CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Methods Inf Med 2017; 56(S 01): e123-e128
DOI: 10.3414/ME16-02-0040
Focus Theme – Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Patient-driven N-of-1 in Parkinson’s Disease

Lessons Learned from a Placebo-controlled Study of the Effect of Nicotine on Dyskinesia
Sara Riggare
1   Health Informatics Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
,
Kenton T. Unruh
2   School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
,
Jasmine Sturr
1   Health Informatics Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
,
Josefa Domingos
3   Clinical Pharmacological Unit, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
,
Jonathan A. Stamford
4   Parkinson’s Movement, The Cure Parkinson’s Trust, London, UK
,
Per Svenningsson
5   Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
,
Maria Hägglund
1   Health Informatics Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
› Author Affiliations
Funding: This work was financially supported by FORTE, the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare [grant number 2014-4238]; and Vinnova, the Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems.
Further Information

Publication History

received: 17 November 2016

accepted: 08 August 2017

Publication Date:
31 January 2018 (online)

Summary

Background: New insights and knowledge in biomedical science often come from observation and experimentation. Methods traditionally used include self-experimentation, case reports, randomised controlled trials, and N-of-1 studies. Technological advances have lead to an increasing number of individuals and patients engaging in self-tracking. We use the term patient-driven N-of-1 for self-tracking performed with the explicit intention to disseminate the results by academic publishing.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to: 1) explore the potential role for patient-driven N-of-1 studies as a tool for improving self-management in Parkinson’s disease (PD) using the example of managing levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) with nicotine, and 2) based on this example; identify some specific challenges of patient-driven N-of-1 studies.

Methods: We used a placebo controlled patient-driven N-of-1 study with nicotine administered via e-cigarette to treat LID. The first author initiated and conducted the experiment on herself and noted her observations. The evaluations of the potential of N-of-1 for improving self-management of PD as well as the effects of nicotine on dyskinesia were based on the perception of the subject. During the planning and undertaking of the experiment, notes were made to identify challenges specific to patient-driven N-of-1 studies.

Results: The subject was able to distinguish a decrease of her LID from nicotine but no effect from placebo. The main challenges of patient-driven N-of-1 studies were identified to be associated with planning of the study, recruiting a suitable research team, making sure the data collection is optimal, analysis of data, and publication of results.

Conclusions: Our study indicates that nicotine administered via e-cigarette may have an effect on levodopa-induced dyskinesia in individual patients with PD. The main contribution is however highlighting the work done by patients on a daily basis for understanding their conditions and conducting self-tracking experiments. More work is needed to further develop methods around patient-driven N-of-1 studies for PD.

 
  • References

  • 1 Dresser R. Personal knowledge and study participation. J Med Ethics 2014; 40 (Suppl. 07) 471-474. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101390.
  • 2 Weisse AB. Self-experimentation and its role in medical research. Texas Hear Inst J 2012; 39 (Suppl. 01) 51-54.
  • 3 Nissen T, Wynn R. The history of the case report: a selective review. JRSM open 2014; 5 (Suppl. 04) 5. doi: 10.1177/2054270414523410.
  • 4 Vandenbroucke JP. In Defense of Case Reports and Case Series. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134: 330-334. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b0c0b8.
  • 5 Vandenbroucke JP. Observational research, randomised trials, and two views of medical science. PLoS Med 2008; 5 (Suppl. 03) e67. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050067.
  • 6 Lillie EO, Patay B, Diamant J, Issell B, Topol EJ, Schork NJ. The N-of-1 Clinical Trial The Ultimate Strategy for Individualizing Medicine?. Per Med 2011; 8 (Suppl. 02) 1-19.
  • 7 Thornquist E, Kirkengen AL. The quantified self: Closing the gap between general knowledge and particular case?. J Eval Clin Pract 2015; 21 (Suppl. 03) 398-403. doi: 10.1111/jep.12239.
  • 8 Larson EB. N-of-1 trials: a new future?. J Gen Intern Med 2010; 25 (Suppl. 09) 891-892. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1440-8.
  • 9 Olsson J, Terris D, Elg M, Lundberg J, Lindblad S. The One-Person Randomized Controlled Trial. Qual Manag Health Care 2005; 14 (Suppl. 04) 206-216.
  • 10 Lees AJ, Hardy J, Revesz T. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 2009; 373 9680 2055-2066. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60492-X.
  • 11 Bloem BR, Munneke M. Revolutionising management of chronic disease: the ParkinsonNet approach. BMJ 2014; 348: g1838. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1838.
  • 12 Connolly BS, Lang AE. Pharmacological Treatment of Parkinson Disease. A Review. J Neurol 2014; 311 (Suppl. 04) 442-449. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12170.
  • 13 Rana AQ, Siddiqui I, Yousuf MS. Challenges in diagnosis of young onset Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci 2012; 323 1-2 113-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2012.08.029.
  • 14 Schrag A, Schott JM. Epidemiological, clinical, and genetic characteristics of early-onset parkin-sonism. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5 (Suppl. 04) 355-363. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70411-2.
  • 15 Dorsey ER, Constantinescu R, Thompson JP. et al. Projected number of people with Parkinson disease in the most populous nations, 2005 through 2030. Neurology 2007; 68 (Suppl. 05) 384-386. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000247740.47667.03.
  • 16 Quik M, Bordia T, Zhang D, Perez XA. Nicotine and Nicotinic Receptor Drugs: Potential for Parkinson’s Disease and Drug-Induced Movement Disorders. Int Rev Neurobiol 2015; 124: 247-271. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2015.07.005.
  • 17 Rothstein MA, Wilbanks JT, Brothers KB. Citizen Science on Your Smartphone: An ELSI Research Agenda. J Law Med Ethics 2015; 43 (Suppl. 04) 897-903. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12327.
  • 18 Wilbanks JT, Topol EJ. Stop the privatization of health data. Nature 2016; 535 7612 345-348. doi: 10.1038/535345a.
  • 19 Arora S, Venkataraman V, Zhan A. et al. Detecting and monitoring the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease using smartphones: A pilot study. Parkin- sonism Relat Disord 2015; 21 (Suppl. 06) 650-653. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.02.026.
  • 20 Stamford J, Schmidt P, Friedl K. What Engineering Technology Could Do for Quality of Life in Parkinson’s Disease: a Review of Current Needs and Opportunities. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2015; 19 (Suppl. 06) 1862-1872. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2464354.
  • 21 Lakshminarayana R, Wang D, Burn D. et al. Smartphone- and internet-assisted self-management and adherence tools to manage Parkinson’s disease (SMART-PD): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. (v7; 15 August 2014) Trials 2014; 15: 374. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-374.
  • 22 Wicks P, Stamford J, Grootenhuis MA, Haverman L, Ahmed S. Innovations in e-health. Qual Life Res 2014; 23 (Suppl. 01) 195-203. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0458-x.
  • 23 Espay AJ, Bonato P, Nahab FB. et al. Technology in Parkinson’s disease: Challenges and opportunities. Mov Disord 2016; 31 (Suppl. 09) 1272-1282. doi: 10.1002/mds.26642.
  • 24 Pasluosta CF, Gassner H, Winkler J, Klucken J, Es-kofier BM. An Emerging Era in the Management of Parkinson’s Disease: Wearable Technologies and the Internet of Things. IEEE J Biomed Heal Informatics 2015; 19 (Suppl. 06) 1873-1881. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2461555.
  • 25 Maetzler W, Klucken J, Horne MK. A clinical view on the development of technology-based tools in managing Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2016; 31 (Suppl. 09) 1263-1271. doi: 10.1002/mds.26673.
  • 26 Gimpel H, Nißen M, Görlitz RA. Quantifying the quantified self: A study on the motivation of pa- tients to track their own health. In: Thirty Fourth International Conference on Information Systems. Milan: 2013. p. 128-133.
  • 27 Wiederhold BK. Self-tracking: better medicine through pattern recognition. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2012; 15 (Suppl. 05) 235-236. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.1545.
  • 28 Sjöklint M. The Measurable Me - the Influence of Self-Tracking on the User Experience. 2015. Available from: http://openarchive.cbs.dk/bitstream/handle/10398/9222/Mimmi_Sj%C3%B6klint.pdf?sequence=1.
  • 29 Paton C, Hansen M, Fernandez-Luque L, Laua YS. Self-Tracking, Social Media and Personal Health Records for Patient Empowered Self-Care. Contribution of the IMIA Social Media Working Group. Yearb Med Inform 2012; 7 (Suppl. 01) 16-24.
  • 30 Roberts S. Self-experimentation as a source of new ideas: ten examples about sleep, mood, health, and weight. Behav Brain Sci 2004; 27 (Suppl. 02) 227-262.
  • 31 Karkar R, Zia J, Vilardaga R. et al. A framework for self-experimentation in personalized health. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (Suppl. 03) 440-448. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv150.
  • 32 Ancker JS, Witteman HO, Hafeez B, Provencher T, Van De Graaf M, Wei E. “You get reminded you’re a sick person”: Personal data tracking and patients with multiple chronic conditions. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 (Suppl. 08) 1-18. doi: 10.2196Ajmir.4209.
  • 33 Almalki M, Gray K, Martin-Sanchez FJ. Refining the Concepts of Self-quantification Needed for Health Self-management. Methods Inf Med 2017; 56 (Suppl. 01) 46-54. doi: 10.3414/ME15-02-0007.
  • 34 Almalki M, Gray K, Martin-Sanchez F. Activity Theory as a Theoretical Framework for Health Self-Quantification: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18 (Suppl. 05) e131. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5000.
  • 35 Fox S, Duggan M. Tracking for Health. 2013. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/28/tracking-for-health/.
  • 36 Lewis D, Leibrand S. Real-World Use of Open Source Artificial Pancreas Systems. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2016; 10 (Suppl. 06) 1411. doi: 10.1177/193229681 6665635.
  • 37 Ahrens S. Opening (and Swallowing) A Can of Worms to Treat My Crohn’s Disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111 (Suppl. 07) 918-920. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.193.
  • 38 Wright A. Self-Tracking: Reflections from the Bo-dyTrack Project. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016. Forthcoming. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9801-2.
  • 39 Swan M. Emerging patient-driven health care models: an examination of health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009; 6 (Suppl. 02) 492-525. doi: 10.3390/ijerph6020492.
  • 40 Stamford J. Smell perception and judgement in pd patients: results of a study designed, conducted, analysed and reported by PD patients. In: Movement Disorders Society Congress, Poster Session. Mov Disord 2016. 31 (suppl 2 1999.
  • 41 Stamford J, Carson J, Aertsen V. Assessment of several simple, low-tech “real-life” smell tests in PD patients and controls: an international, multi-centre study designed, tested and analysed by PD patients. In: Abstracts of the 4th World Parkinson Congress. September 20-23, 2016 Portland, OR, USA: Journal of Parkinson’s Disease 2016: P23.29.
  • 42 Economist.. The Quantified Self. Counting every moment. The Economist; 2012 [cited 2017 Mar 1]. Available from: http://www.economist.com/node/21548493.
  • 43 Rutkin A. Health-hackers: The people building apps to manage their illness. New Scientist; 2015 [cited 2017 Mar 1]. Available from: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22730282-300-health-hackers-the-people-building-apps-to-manage-their-illness/.
  • 44 Quik M, Cox H, Parameswaran N, O’Leary K, Langston JW, Di Monte D. Nicotine reduces levo-dopa-induced dyskinesias in lesioned monkeys. Ann Neurol 2007; 62 (Suppl. 06) 588-596. doi: 10.1002/ana.21203.
  • 45 Cen R, Hussain A, Pak KJ. et al. Do N-of-1 Trials Need IRB Review?. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2016; 11 (Suppl. 03) 250-255. doi: 10.1177/155626461 6662560.
  • 46 Kaisar MA, Prasad S, Liles T, Cuculio L. A decade of e-cigarettes: Limited research & unresolved safety concerns. Toxicology 2016; 365: 67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2016.07.020.
  • 47 Rascol O, Ferreira J, Nègre-Pages L. et al. A proof-of-concept, randomized, placebo-controlled, multiple cross-overs (n-of-1) study of naftazone in Parkinson’s disease. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2012; 26 (Suppl. 04) 557-564. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2011.00951.x.
  • 48 Tison F, Nègre-Pagés L, Meissner WG. et al. Sim-vastatin decreases levodopa-induced dyskinesia in monkeys, But not in a randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multiple cross-over (“n-of-1”) exploratory trial of simvastatin against levodopa-induced dys-kinesia in Parkinson’s disease patients. Park Relat Disord 2013; 19 (Suppl. 04) 416-421. doi: 10.1016/j.park-reldis.2012.12.003.
  • 49 Ferreira JJ, Mestre T, Guedes LC. et al. Espresso coffee for the treatment of somnolence in Parkinson’s disease: Results of n-of-1 trials. Front Neurol 2016; 7 MAR 1-7. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00027.
  • 50 Goetz CG. The History of Parkinson’s Disease: Early Clinical Descriptions and Neurological Therapies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2011; 1 (Suppl. 01) 1-16. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008862.
  • 51 Fox S, Purcell K. Chronic Disease and the Internet. 2010 Available from: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Chronic-Disease.aspx.
  • 52 Ferguson T, Frydman G. The first generation of e-patients. BMJ 2004; 328 7449 1148-1149. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1148.
  • 53 Riggare S, Unruh KT. Patients organise and train doctors to provide better care. BMJ 351: h6318. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6318.
  • 54 Roberts S. The unreasonable effectiveness of my self-experimentation. MedHypotheses 2010; 75 (Suppl. 06) 482-489. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2010.04.030.