Linked Records of Children with Traumatic Brain Injury^[*]

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objective: Record linkage may create powerful datasets with which investigators can conduct comparative effectiveness studies evaluating the impact of tests or interventions on health. All linkages of health care data files to date have used protected health information (PHI) in their linkage variables. A technique to link datasets without using PHI would be advantageous both to preserve privacy and to increase the number of potential linkages.

Methods: We applied probabilistic linkage to records of injured children in the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB, N = 156,357) and the Pediatric Health Information Systems (PHIS, N = 104,049) databases from 2007 to 2010. 49 match variables without PHI were used, many of them administrative variables and indicators for procedures recorded as International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification codes. We validated the accuracy of the linkage using identified data from a single center that submits to both databases.

Results: We accurately linked the PHIS and NTDB records for 69% of children with any injury, and 88% of those with severe traumatic brain injury eligible for a study of intervention effectiveness (positive predictive value of 98%, specificity of 99.99%). Accurate linkage was associated with longer lengths of stay, more severe injuries, and multiple injuries.

Conclusion: In populations with substantial illness or injury severity, accurate record linkage may be possible in the absence of PHI. This methodology may enable linkages and, in turn, comparative effectiveness studies that would be unlikely or impossible otherwise.

^* Supplementary material published on our web-site www.methods-online.com

• References

• 1 Weiss NS. The new world of data linkages in clinical epidemiology: are we being brave or foolhardy?. Epidemiology 2011; 22 (03) 292-294.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Herzog TN, Sheuren FJ, Winkler WE. Data quality and record linkage techniques. Springer: 2007
  Google Scholar
• 3 Winkler WE. Overview of Record Linkage and Current Research Directions. Washington, DC: Statistical Research Division, U.S. Census Bureau; 2006
  Google Scholar
• 4 Fellegi IP, Sunter AB. A Theory for Record Linkage. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1969; 64 (328) 1183-1210.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Roos LL, Wajda A. Record linkage strategies. Part I: Estimating information and evaluating approaches. Methods Inf Med 1991; 30 (02) 117-123.
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Newcombe HB, Kennedy JM, Axford SJ, James AP. Automatic linkage of vital records. Science 1959; 130 3381 954-959.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Newcombe HB, and Kennedy JM. Record Linkage: Making Maximum Use of the Discriminating Power of Identifying Information. Communications of the Association of Computing Machinery 1962; 5 (11) 563-566.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 United States Department of Health and Human Services. Understanding Health Information Privacy. 2014. [cited May 16, 2014 ]. Available from http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/index.html.
  Google Scholar
• 9 Navathe AS, Clancy C, Glied S. Advancing research data infrastructure for patient-centered outcomes research. JAMA 2011; 306 (11) 1254-1255.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Cook LJ, Olson LM, Dean JM. Probabilistic record linkage: relationships between file sizes, identifiers and match weights. Methods Inf Med 2001; 40 (03) 196-203.
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Belin TR, Ishwaran H, Duan N, Berry S, Kanouse D. Identifying likely duplicates by record linkage in a survey of prostitutes. In Gelman A, Meng X. editors Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives. Wiley: 2004
  Google Scholar
• 12 Gerber JS, Newland JG, Coffin SE, Hall M, Thurm C, Prasad PA. et al. Variability in antibiotic use at children’s hospitals. Pediatrics 2010; 126 (06) 1067-1073.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Weiss PF, Klink AJ, Hexem K, Burnham JM, Leonard MB, Keren R. et al. Variation in inpatient therapy and diagnostic evaluation of children with Henoch Schoenlein purpura. J Pediatr 2009; 155 (06) 812-8. e1.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Slonim AD, Khandelwal S, He J, Hall M, Stockwell DC, Turenne WM. et al. Characteristics associated with pediatric inpatient death. Pediatrics 2010; 125 (06) 1208-1216.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Conway PH, Keren R. Factors associated with variability in outcomes for children hospitalized with urinary tract infection. J Pediatr 2009; 154 (06) 789-796.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. National Trauma Data Bank Research Data Set User Manual, Admission Year 2009. Chicago, IL: December 2010
  Google Scholar
• 17 Langlois JA, Rutland-Brown W, Thomas KE. Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths. Division of Injury Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2006
  Google Scholar
• 18 Tri-Analytics Inc. and The Johns Hopkins University. ICDMAP-90 Software User’s Guide. 1997
  Google Scholar
• 19 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommended framework for presenting injury mortality data. MMWR 1997; 46: RR-14.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Barell V, Aharonson-Daniel L, Fingerhut LA, Mackenzie EJ, Ziv A, Boyko V. et al. An introduction to the Barell body region by nature of injury diagnosis matrix. Inj Prev 2002; 8 (02) 91-96.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 McGlincy MH. A Bayesian Record Linkage Methodology for Multiple Imputation of Missing Links. Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association 2004; 4001-4008.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. Bayesian Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2004
  Google Scholar
• 23 McGlincy MH. Using Test Databases to Evaluate Record Linkage Models and Train Linkage Practitioners. Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association 2006; 3404-3410.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Shannon CE. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 1948; 27 (03) 379-423. 623–656.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Schneider TD. Information Theory Primer. 2013. [May 16, 2014]. Available from http://schneider. ncifcrf.gov/papers/primer/.
  Google Scholar
• 26 Mason CA, Tu S. Data linkage using probabilistic decision rules: a primer. Birth defects research, Part A: Clinical and molecular teratology 2008; 82 (11) 812-821.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Winkler WE. Advanced Methods for Record Linkage. Washington, DC: Statistical Division, United States Bureau of the Census; 1994
  Google Scholar
• 28 Winkler WE. Improved Decision Rules in the Fellegi-Sunter Model of Record Linkage. Washington, DC: Statistical Division, United States Bureau of the Census; 1993
  Google Scholar
• 29 Schnell R, Bachteler T, Reiher J. Privacy-preserving record linkage using Bloom filters. BMC medical informatics and decision making 2009; 9: 41.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Randall SM, Ferrante AM, Boyd JH, Bauer JK, Semmens JB. Privacy-preserving record linkage on large real world datasets. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2013
  Google Scholar
• 31 Quantin C, Bouzelat H, Allaert FA, Benhamiche AM, Faivre J, Dusserre L. Automatic record hash coding and linkage for epidemiological follow-up data confidentiality. Methods Inf Med 1998; 37 (03) 271-277.
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Kuzu M, Kantarcioglu M, Durham EA, Toth C, Malin B. A practical approach to achieve private medical record linkage in light of public resources. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20 (02) 285-292.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Weber SC, Lowe H, Das A, Ferris T. A simple heuristic for blindfolded record linkage. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19 e (01) e157-161.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Deans KJ, Cooper JN, Rangel SJ, Raval MV, Minneci PC, Moss RL. Enhancing NSQIP-Pediatric through integration with the Pediatric Health Information System. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49 (01) 207-212. discussion 12.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Hammill BG, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Fonarow GC, Schulman KA, Curtis LH. Linking inpatient clinical registry data to Medicare claims data using indirect identifiers. Am Heart J 2009; 157 (06) 995-1000.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Pasquali SK, Jacobs JP, Shook GJ, O’Brien SM, Hall M, Jacobs ML. et al. Linking clinical registry data with administrative data using indirect identifiers: implementation and validation in the congenital heart surgery population. Am Heart J 2010; 160 (06) 1099-1104.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Saatman KE, Duhaime AC, Bullock R, Maas AI, Valadka A, Manley GT. Classification of traumatic brain injury for targeted therapies. J Neurotrauma 2008; 25 (07) 719-738.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Larsen MD. Comments on hierarchical Bayesian record linkage. Joint Statistical Meeting, Proceedings of the Survey Methods Section. 2002: 1995-2000.
  Google Scholar
• 39 Jaro MA. Probabilistic linkage of large public health data files. Stat Med 1995; 14 5–7 491-498.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

• Supplementary Material