THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE TANGKAHAN ECOTOURISM IN NAMO SIALANG VILLAGE, LANGKAT REGENCY

https://doi.org/10.34013/ijscot.v1i02.1015

Authors

  • Gabriele Louise Politeknik Pariwisata NHI Bandung
  • Eka Pramita Marsongko Politeknik Pariwisata NHI Bandung
  • Odang Permana Politeknik Pariwisata NHI Bandung

Keywords:

Sustainable Tourism, Ecotourism, Economic Impact, Socio-Economic, Rural Communities

Abstract

Ecotourism is one of the sustainable alternative tourism developed in Indonesia, one of which is the Tangkahan Ecotourism destination. Namo Sialang Village is one of the villages directly connected to Tangkahan Ecotourism. This ecotourism destination has a history of illegal logging to the thoughts and behavior of the surrounding community for sustainable changes in Tangkahan's nature. The development of Tangkahan Ecotourism certainly has an impact on the people of Namo Sialang Village. According to UNWTO, one aspect of impact is socioeconomic sustainability. This study uses sustainable socioeconomic indicators issued by the Global Sustainable Tourism Council (GSTC) Criteria assessment agency on the consideration of the character of Namo Sialang Village as an area around the Tangkahan Ecotourism conservation area. Indicators of socioeconomic sustainability are used to see the benefits of the local economy and the natural environment. The subjects of this research are the people of Namo Sialang Village, to be precise in Kwala Gemoh and Kwala Buluh Hamlets. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of the development of Tangkahan Ecotourism on the economy of the people of Namo Sialang Village. The research method used is a quantitative approach with quantitative analysis tools using a statistical package for the social science (SPSS) tools. The results of this study indicate the impact of tourism development in Tangkahan which has been carried out following the principles of ecotourism development. Where the percentage of positive responses from the community, which is 70%, feels the benefits of the local economy, is involved in community participation, and receives support from the development of Tangkahan Ecotourism

References

Arida, I Nyoman Sukma. (2017). Ekowisata (Pengembangan, Partisipasi Lokal, dan Tantangan Ekowisata). Denpasar: Cakra Press.

Baware, Fergina; Kiroh, H. J; Wungow, R. H; Kawatu, M. (2016). Dampak Pengembangan Program Ekowisata Berbasis Satwa Endemik di Tangkoko Bitung. doi:10.35792/zot.37.2.2017.16702.

Dinas Pariwisata dan Kebudayaan Kabupaten Langkat bersama Pelaku Wisata. Diakses pada Maret 5, 2021 dari https://rakyatmedia.com/dinas- pariwisata-dan-kebudayaan-kabupaten- langkat-temu-ramah-bersama-pelaku- wisata/

Djaali, Pudji Muljono, dan Ramly. (2000). Pengukuran dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: PPs UNJ.

Fokus Pengembangan pariwisata dan infrstruktur Pemerintah Kabupaten Langkat. Diakses pada Maret 6, 2021 dari https://sumut.antaranews.com/berita/19 8685/pemkab-langkat-fokus- pengembangan-pariwisata-dan- infrastruktur

Hamidi. (2005). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Malang:UMM pressSekaran, Uma. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian untuk Bisnis (Research Methods for Business). Buku 1 Edisi 4. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Harahap, Riana Astuti. (2018), Analisis Peluang Ekonomi Pariwisata Alam Tangkahan Dalam Meningkatkan Pembangunan Ekonomi di Kabupaten Langkat, Sumatera Utara. Repository Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara.

Martina, Sopa. (2014). Dampak Pengelolaan Taman Wisata Alam Kawah Putih Terhadap Kehidupan Sosial dan Ekonomi Masyarakat. Jurnal STP Ars Internasional Pariwisata Vol I. No.2

Ordóñez, C; P. N. Duinker. 2010. Interpreting Sustainability for Urban Forests, Jurnal Canada. Vol. 2 hal 124-127. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2061510

Pariwisata Berkelanjutan dan Mengapa Indonesia membutuhkan ini. Diakses pada Februari 26, 2021 dari https://travel.kompas.com/read/2019/10/ 23/165507727/pariwisata-berkelanjutan-dan-mengapa-indonesia- butuh-ini?page=all

Peraturan Pemerintah No. 50 Tahun 2011 mengenai Rencana Induk Pembangunan Kepariwisataan Nasional

Picard, Michel. (2006). Bali Pariwisata Budaya dan Budaya Pariwisata. terjemahan Jean Couteau dan Warih Wisatsana. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Ringkasan Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Daerah Kabupaten Langkat. Diakses pada Maret 10, 2021 dari https://docplayer.info/32081523- Ringkasan-rpjpd-kabupaten-langkat- tahun.html

Sejarah Tangkahan Ekowisata. Diakses pada Maret 6, 2021 dari Situs resmi Taman Nasional Gunung Leuser https://gunungleuser.or.id/

Setijawan, Arief. (2018). Pembangunan Pariwisata Berkelanjutan Dalam Perspektif Sosial Ekonomi. Jurnal Planoearth Vol. 3 No. 1. https://doi.org/10.31764/jpe.v3i1.213

Simanjuntak, Y. M. (2009). Analisis Nilai Ekonomi dan Sosial Ekowisata Tangkahan (Studi Kasus di Desa Namo Sialang dan Desa Sei Serdang Kecamatan Batang Serangan Kabupaten Langkat Sumatera Utara).

Travel Forever Global Sustainable Tourism Council (GSTC) destination criteria, 2020. https://www.gstcouncil.org

United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO). (2004). Indicators of Sustainable Development for Tourism Destinations : A Guide Book. Madrid, Spain: World Tourism Organization.

Usia produktif. Diakses pada tanggal Maret 15, 2021 dari situs resmi badan pusat statistik https://www.bps.go.id/istilah/index.html? Istilah_page=4

Yulianti, Dini. (2020). Dampak Pengembangan Pariwisata Terhadap Kesejahteraan Masyarakat (Studi Kasus pada Masyarakat Pelaku Usaha di Sekitar Objek Wisata Pantai Tanjung Setia, Pekon Tanjung Setia Kec. Pesisir Selatan Kab. Pesisir Barat).

Wiratno. (2013). “Dari Penebang Liar ke Konservasi Leuser (Tangkahan dan Pengembangan Ekowisata Leuser.”

Published

2022-12-28

How to Cite

Louise, G., Marsongko, E. P., & Odang Permana. (2022). THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE TANGKAHAN ECOTOURISM IN NAMO SIALANG VILLAGE, LANGKAT REGENCY. International Journal of Sustainable Competitiveness on Tourism, 1(02), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.34013/ijscot.v1i02.1015

Issue

Section

Articles