Next Article in Journal
Performance of Conventional and Innovative Single U-Tube Pipe Configuration in Vertical Ground Heat Exchanger (VGHE)
Next Article in Special Issue
Evidence-Based Public Policy Decision-Making in Smart Cities: Does Extant Theory Support Achievement of City Sustainability Objectives?
Previous Article in Journal
Nature-Based Solutions Tools for Planning Urban Climate Adaptation: State of the Art
Previous Article in Special Issue
Public Administration and Governance for the SDGs: Navigating between Change and Stability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Sustainable Public Administration

Institute for Public Sustainability Governance, Faculty of Sustainability, Leuphana University Lüneburg 1, 21335 Lüneburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(11), 6382; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116382
Submission received: 31 May 2021 / Accepted: 2 June 2021 / Published: 4 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Sustainable Public Administration)
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, with its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), was agreed upon by 193 member states of the United Nations in September 2015. Given the size of the ongoing challenge to redirect unsustainable pathways toward sustainable development, state and non-state actors alike are strongly encouraged by the agreement to contribute. The private sector, for example, is expected to introduce sustainable management practices and develop sustainable business models; sciences should contribute through the analysis and development of solutions; civil society is invited to participate inter alia in searching and testing new and more sustainable practices; and citizens are invited to support the endeavor through sustainable consumption. Despite the undisputable importance of non-state actors for achieving the SDGs, state institutions have a special role to play. On the one hand, policy making for sustainable development is required at the international, national, and subnational level to shape the political setting in which societal actors can develop and realize more sustainable actions. On the other hand, public administrations are challenged to lead by example and develop capabilities to administer transformation processes toward sustainable development professionally. Even though thirty years of social science research on (un)sustainable development as well as on governance of sustainable development have generated a vast body of knowledge, the focus has rarely been on the quest for sustainability in public administration.
With this background, this anthology presents eleven articles from different world regions with varying political, socioeconomic, and cultural contexts addressing a broad range of key challenges and topics of sustainable development such as the circular economy, climate change, technological innovation, aviation, and sustainable business models. Looking at these issues from the perspective of sustainable public administration, the articles can be clustered into three research and development areas: (1) sustainable public administration and human capacity, (2) sustainable public administration and organizational dimensions, and (3) sustainable public administration and governance. The article “Icebergs of Expertise-Based Leadership: The Role of Expert Leaders in Public Administration” by Sadia Hanif, Ali Ahsan, and Graham Wise and the contribution “Change from Within: Exploring Transformative Literacy in Public Administrations to Foster Sustainability Transitions” highlight the importance of individual capacities, especially of leadership personnel, in developing and routinizing a transformative sustainable public administration. This human resources perspective is closely linked with the second cluster of articles: The publications of Hinrika Droege, Andreas Raggi, and Tomás B. Ramos (“Overcoming Current Challenges for Circular Economy Assessment Implementation in Public Sector Organisations”), Miguel Soberón, Teresa Sánchez-Chaparro, Julia Urquijo, and David Pereira (“Introducing an Organization Perspective in SDG Implementation in the Public Sector in Spain: The Case of the Former Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Food and Environment”), and Friederike Behr, Gero Oertzen, and Manuel Dienst (“Managing Sustainability and Carbon-Neutrality in the Public Administration—Case Report of a German State Institution”) discuss essential organizational challenges and possibilities for the institutionalization of sustainability in public administrations, and Louis Meuleman proposes an integrative approach for public administration and governance capable of driving the implementation of the global Sustainable Development Goals (“Public Administration and Governance for the SDGs: Navigating between Change and Stability”). The majority of articles, however, look at (potential) roles of public administrations in sustainability governance, building a third cluster. The spectrum ranges from reflections on citizen participation vis a vis public administration by Maria V. Pevnaya, Anna A. Drozdova, and Mariana Cernicova-Buca (“Making Room for Volunteer Participation in Managing Public Affairs: A Russian Experience”), conceptualizing public administration within multistakeholder climate policy contexts by Winfried Osthorst (“Tensions in Urban Transitions. Conceptualizing Conflicts in Local Climate Policy”), a proposal to enable the expansion of sustainable business models (“A Step-by-Step Process towards an Evolutionary Policy Encouraging the Adoption of Sustainable Business Models”) by Angelo Paletta, Eleonora Foschi, Genc Alimehmeti, and Alessandra Bonoli, the particular role of public administration for fostering sustainability in air freight transportation highlighted through the COVID-19 pandemic (“Sustainability and Air Freight Transportation: Lessons from the Global Pandemic”), as well as the capacity of public administration to shape conditions for sustainable technology and innovation by Fu-Hsuan Chen and Hao-Ren Liu (“Evaluation of Sustainable Development in Six Transformation Fields of the Central Taiwan Science Park”).
In sum, the articles compiled in this anthology provide a conceptually, empirically, and practically diverse insight into important issues of sustainable public administrations around the globe. Encouraging perspectives are presented, and a significant need to act is identified. Based on the insights of this publication, the perspective of sustainable public administration can be considered a promising field of work for researchers, consultants, and practitioners alike.

List of Contributions

  • Meuleman, L. Public Administration and Governance for the SDGs: Navigating between Change and Stability. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5914, doi:10.3390/su13115914.
  • Jacob, K.; Paulick-Thiel, C.; Teebken, J.; Veit, S.; Singer-Brodowski, M. Change from Within: Exploring Transformative Literacy in Public Administrations to Foster Sustainability Transitions. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4698, doi:10.3390/su13094698.
  • Chen, F.-H.; Liu, H.-R. Evaluation of Sustainable Development in Six Transformation Fields of the Central Taiwan Science Park. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4336, doi:10.3390/su13084336.
  • Bartle, J.R.; Lutte, R.K.; Leuenberger, D.Z. Sustainability and Air Freight Transportation: Lessons from the Global Pandemic. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3738, doi:10.3390/su13073738.
  • Droege, H.; Raggi, A.; Ramos, T.B. Overcoming Current Challenges for Circular Economy Assessment Implementation in Public Sector Organisations. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1182, doi:10.3390/su13031182.
  • Paletta, A.; Foschi, E.; Alimehmeti, G.; Bonoli, A. A Step-by-Step Process towards an Evolutionary Policy Encouraging the Adoption of Sustainable Business Models. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1176, doi:10.3390/su13031176.
  • Osthorst, W. Tensions in Urban Transitions. Conceptualizing Conflicts in Local Climate Policy Arrangements. Sustainability 2021, 13, 78, doi:10.3390/su13010078.
  • Pevnaya, M.V.; Drozdova, A.A.; Cernicova-Buca, M. Making Room for Volunteer Participation in Managing Public Affairs: A Russian Experience. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10229, doi:10.3390/su122410229.
  • Soberón, M.; Sánchez-Chaparro, T.; Urquijo, J.; Pereira, D. Introducing an Organizational Perspective in SDG Implementation in the Public Sector in Spain: The Case of the Former Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Food and Environment. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9959, doi:10.3390/su12239959.
  • Hanif, S.; Ahsan, A.; Wise, G. Icebergs of Expertise-Based Leadership: The Role of Expert Leaders in Public Administration. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4544, doi:10.3390/su12114544.
  • Behr, F.; Oertzen, G.; Dienst, M. Managing Sustainability and Carbon-Neutrality in the Public Administration—Case Report of a German State Institution. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4146, doi:10.3390/su13084146.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Heinrichs, H.; Laws, N. Sustainable Public Administration. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6382. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116382

AMA Style

Heinrichs H, Laws N. Sustainable Public Administration. Sustainability. 2021; 13(11):6382. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116382

Chicago/Turabian Style

Heinrichs, Harald, and Norman Laws. 2021. "Sustainable Public Administration" Sustainability 13, no. 11: 6382. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116382

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop