Daylight Performance of Classrooms in a Mediterranean School Heritage Building

In school buildings, natural light has considerable physiological benefits, and increases energy efficiency while reducing the operational energy consumption of buildings. It is thus crucial to maximize the amount of daylight, as well as to improve its quality, in educational premises. In Italy and other European countries, many historic buildings are reused as school buildings, changing their original function. This process of adaptive reusing is one method for conserving heritage buildings, however sometimes this process sacrifices the quality of daylight and well being of pupils. It has therefore become apparent that it is difficult to reconcile the cultural value of historic buildings with comfort standards. This study aimed to investigate the natural lighting performance of a school located in an historic building, and proposes different technological solutions to improve the visual comfort in classrooms whilst also respecting the cultural value of built heritage. Daylight performance was carried out in a representative classroom in the ‘Caserma Gaetano Abela’, an historical building located in Siracusa (Italy). A daylight model built in Radiance was first validated against an illuminance measurement campaign, and was then used to run detailed dynamic simulations. Climate Based Daylight Modelling (CBDM) metrics were used to show the achievable improvements in visual comfort conditions by means of proposed retrofit interventions. These interventions may also be used in other areas of southern Europe with similar climatic and constructive/distributive characteristics of architectural heritage.


Introduction
For many years, daylight has been a subject of interest in school buildings because it is closely associated with the improvement of students' performance and health conditions [1,2]. Moreover, daylight contributes considerably to the aesthetics and physical character of a learning space, as well as in limiting potential harmful effects from prolonged artificial light exposure [3][4][5]. In fact, as reported by various researchers, the lack of regular natural light exposure may cause a series of symptoms such as fatigue, stress, circadian dysfunction, phase shifting, and Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD) amongst building occupants [6][7][8]. In addition, the exploitation of natural light is an important factor for energy reduction purposes, as pointed out in a report from the International Energy Agency (IEA) where it is shown that artificial lighting is responsible for around 14% of the electricity consumption in the European Union [9]. Finally, yet importantly, it has been shown that the reduction of energy • Daylight Autonomy (DA), defined as the percentage of the occupied hours of the year when a minimum illuminance threshold is met by daylight only [26]. According to the original study carried out by IESNA, the 300 lux minimum threshold has been adopted [27]. • Useful Daylight Illuminance (UDI), which represents the percentage of time in which daylight levels fall within certain bins. Usually, three bins are identified by setting a lower and an upper illuminance threshold. The upper bin represents the percentage of time when excessive daylight illuminance occurs, which might lead to visual discomfort; on the other hand, the lower bin represents the percentage of time when daylight illuminance alone is too scarce. Finally, the intermediate bin is the percentage of time when appropriate daylight illuminance is attained.
According to the original UDI definition proposed [28], the lower and upper thresholds are set to 100 lx and 2000 lx respectively.
This paper focuses on the assessment of the existing lighting conditions of an historical building in the perspective of defining the suitable retrofit solutions for daylighting systems. In detail, we present the approach adopted to assess daylight availability on a representative classroom in a school heritage building located in Syracuse (Italy) using a CBDM approach.

Materials and Methods
Dynamic metrics, based on local climate data series, have created a new perspective for daylight studies since they capture the particularities of the locale, including daily and seasonal variations of daylight.
As mentioned in the introduction, the metrics used to carry out the assessment of the daylight dynamic performance are the Daylight Autonomy (DA) and the Useful Daylight Illuminance (UDI). In order to calculate these figures, it is necessary to evaluate the time-varying illuminance distribution within the indoor space. In this paper, the calculation was performed for a representative classroom in an historical building. The first step of the study involved a detailed field survey of the geometrical and optical features of the classrooms. To this aim, a Leica 792290 (Leica Camera AG, Wetzlar, Germany) laser distance meter was used for setting up the geometrical model, while a Minolta T-10 lux meter (measurement range of 0.01-300 klx, accuracy ±3%) and a Minolta LS-100 luminance meter (measurement range of 0.01-50 kcd/m 2 , accuracy ±0.2%) were used for defining the optical properties of different opaque surfaces ( Figure 1). daylight for a given building site together with irregular meteorological events [25]. The CBDM metrics employed in this study, which are able to account for variable luminance distributions of the sky throughout a year, are: • Daylight Autonomy (DA), defined as the percentage of the occupied hours of the year when a minimum illuminance threshold is met by daylight only [26]. According to the original study carried out by IESNA, the 300 lux minimum threshold has been adopted [27].

•
Useful Daylight Illuminance (UDI), which represents the percentage of time in which daylight levels fall within certain bins. Usually, three bins are identified by setting a lower and an upper illuminance threshold. The upper bin represents the percentage of time when excessive daylight illuminance occurs, which might lead to visual discomfort; on the other hand, the lower bin represents the percentage of time when daylight illuminance alone is too scarce. Finally, the intermediate bin is the percentage of time when appropriate daylight illuminance is attained.
According to the original UDI definition proposed [28], the lower and upper thresholds are set to 100 lx and 2000 lx respectively.
This paper focuses on the assessment of the existing lighting conditions of an historical building in the perspective of defining the suitable retrofit solutions for daylighting systems. In detail, we present the approach adopted to assess daylight availability on a representative classroom in a school heritage building located in Syracuse (Italy) using a CBDM approach.

Materials and Methods
Dynamic metrics, based on local climate data series, have created a new perspective for daylight studies since they capture the particularities of the locale, including daily and seasonal variations of daylight.
As mentioned in the introduction, the metrics used to carry out the assessment of the daylight dynamic performance are the Daylight Autonomy (DA) and the Useful Daylight Illuminance (UDI). In order to calculate these figures, it is necessary to evaluate the time-varying illuminance distribution within the indoor space. In this paper, the calculation was performed for a representative classroom in an historical building. The first step of the study involved a detailed field survey of the geometrical and optical features of the classrooms. To this aim, a Leica 792290 (Leica Camera AG, Wetzlar, Germany) laser distance meter was used for setting up the geometrical model, while a Minolta T-10 lux meter (measurement range of 0.01-300 klx, accuracy ±3%) and a Minolta LS-100 luminance meter (measurement range of 0.01-50 kcd/m 2 , accuracy ±0.2%) were used for defining the optical properties of different opaque surfaces (   The values of luminance (L) and illuminance (E) measured on the opaque surfaces allowed to define their visible reflectance ρ under the assumption of Lambertian behavior. Indeed, for diffuse reflection, the following relation holds: Equation (1) was used to evaluate the visible reflectance of opaque surrounding materials of the room. The solar normal transmittance of a representative single sheet of glass (6 mm thickness) of the windows was measured using the spectrophotometer VARIAN Cary 2300 (Agilent 5301 Stevens Creek Blvd, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The spectrophotometer was used to estimate its visual transmittance, varying the wavelength in the range of 350 to 2100 nm (UV-Vis-NIR fields) according to the European Standard EN 410 [29].
The employed field measurements of natural lighting levels were used for the validation of software simulations, taking into account suggestions previously provided [30] on methods and techniques for effective, accurate, and repeatable in-situ measurements. The validation process was conducted to obtain simulation results matching the levels and distribution of the in-situ measured illuminance levels. Natural lighting measurements were conducted on-site in a classroom during a representative summer period under overcast conditions using the Minolta T-10 lux meter. Illuminance values were taken on 30 different points in a representative classroom at a height of 0.80 m from the floor according to the national UNI EN 12464-1 Standard [31]. During the monitoring period, the classroom was unoccupied, artificial lighting was not used, and window shades were open.
Simulations were then run using the Groundhog graphical interface for Radiance implemented in Google Sketchup [32][33][34]. Radiance software was employed to perform daylight simulations using the backward ray-tracing technique in order to examine varying lighting regimes with varying sky models [35]. A validation process was conducted to obtain simulation results as close as possible to the measured values by making all the necessary corrections in terms of geometry and internal surfaces' reflectance, as well as fine-tuning of the Radiance parameters. This process was repeated for many days and in different sky conditions until the achievement of a good match between in-situ and simulated illuminance values. Finally, different measures for the improvement of visual comfort in a representative classroom, taking into account the particularities of an historical building were proposed.
In this regard, several strategies are theoretically possible, most of which are mainly aimed at: (i) Improving the daylight uniformity within the classroom (e.g., by using light shelves on the clerestory of windows); (ii) reducing glare risk close to the windows (e.g., by application of a reflective coating on the outer pane of a window, or by using bi-reflective blinds), and (iii) avoiding too low daylight levels at the back of the classroom (e.g., by means of light tubes or optical fibers) [36]. However, not all of these measures are suitable for historic buildings because of several conservation constraints. Only punctual improvements, carefully designed to be congruent with the architectural particularities of the building, are allowed.
Consequently, this study proposes the use of low-invasive measures, such as windows intrados modification, solar reflective glazing application, and highly-reflective false ceilings. In fact, a different shape of the intrados of the windows allows more daylight from the outer walls to spread to the rest of the room when these are very thick, as is the case in many historical buildings. The higher lighting levels thus achieved are, on the one hand, redirected towards the bottom of the room by means of a highly-reflective diffuse ceiling and, on the other hand, mitigated by using a double-glazed reflective window. Such a window is aesthetically very similar to a single-glazed traditional window and, as such, does not conflict with the historical value of the heritage building.

Gaetano Abela Barrack in Siracusa
The case study building was the Gaetano Abela Barrack, located in the island of Ortigia (Siracusa, LAT 37 • 03 N, LON 17 • E). The building was built around 1735, housing a barrack until the early twentieth century. Since 2005, it has been the seat of the Special Teaching Facility for Architecture of the University of Catania. The urban fabric on which it stands, and the presence of architectural emergencies, such as the Maniace castle (1232-1239), demonstrates the military destination of the district during its history [37].
The building originally had only one floor, and was elevated in the 1930s. From a distribution point of view, it is a rectangular building with a large internal courtyard used for military exercises ( Figure 2). Several rooms surround the courtyard, with different dimensions depending on the destination.

Gaetano Abela Barrack in Siracusa
The case study building was the Gaetano Abela Barrack, located in the island of Ortigia (Siracusa, LAT 37°03′ N, LON 17° E). The building was built around 1735, housing a barrack until the early twentieth century. Since 2005, it has been the seat of the Special Teaching Facility for Architecture of the University of Catania. The urban fabric on which it stands, and the presence of architectural emergencies, such as the Maniace castle (1232-1239), demonstrates the military destination of the district during its history [37].
The building originally had only one floor, and was elevated in the 1930s. From a distribution point of view, it is a rectangular building with a large internal courtyard used for military exercises ( Figure 2). Several rooms surround the courtyard, with different dimensions depending on the destination. The building's original designation as a military barrack led to the use of a compact building shape, not permeable with the outside. The windows on the external facades, in fact, are small (1.7 m 2 ) and protected by grilles. The inner windows, facing the courtyard, are larger (almost 2.2 m 2 ) and light the rooms.
The barrack was built with a technological system that varies according to the construction period. The structural system is in bearing masonry made in blocks of tender limestone (thicknesses from 0.86 to 0.65 m from ground to upper floors in order in Figure 3). The horizontal closures (the oldest ones) are vaulted on the ground floor while reinforced concrete floors, built in the Hennebique system, can be found on the upper ones. Pitched roofs covered with a mantle of Spanish tiles rest on wooden trusses that hold a continuous plank. The Gaetano Abela Barrack is highlighted in red in both panels.
The building's original designation as a military barrack led to the use of a compact building shape, not permeable with the outside. The windows on the external facades, in fact, are small (1.7 m 2 ) and protected by grilles. The inner windows, facing the courtyard, are larger (almost 2.2 m 2 ) and light the rooms.
The barrack was built with a technological system that varies according to the construction period. The structural system is in bearing masonry made in blocks of tender limestone (thicknesses from 0.86 to 0.65 m from ground to upper floors in order in Figure 3). The horizontal closures (the oldest ones) are vaulted on the ground floor while reinforced concrete floors, built in the Hennebique system, can be found on the upper ones. Pitched roofs covered with a mantle of Spanish tiles rest on wooden trusses that hold a continuous plank. The classroom, which was the object of study, faces west, is rectangular in shape (6.52 × 12.19 m 2 wide, with a resulting net floor area of about 79.48 m 2 ), and is equipped with three windows of 1.3 × 1.7 m 2 dimension each, located at around one meter from the floor, and provided with a wooden frame. The entrance door has two shutters-one fixed and one mobile-with an aluminum frame and does not contribute to the illuminance of the space. The false ceiling height is approximately 3.50 m and is made of white gypsum panels. Apart from the traditional school furniture composed of desks, chairs, and the blackboard, the classroom is equipped with a video projector with a wall screen used for lecture activities and for presentations from the students.
After the definition of the geometrical characteristics of the classroom, a series of measurements were taken with the aim of characterizing the optical properties of the surfaces enveloping the space (in terms of visible reflectance of the opaque surfaces and visible transmissivity of transparent surfaces respectively, see Table 1), and the illuminance levels on the work plane.
The work plane was defined as an ideal horizontal surface located at 0.80 m from the floor (corresponding to the height of the desks) where the main visual task takes place (UNI EN 12464-1: 2011 standard). [31] Table 1 sums up the optical properties of the materials making up the room; these values are then used as input for the simulations in Radiance. The classroom, which was the object of study, faces west, is rectangular in shape (6.52 × 12.19 m 2 wide, with a resulting net floor area of about 79.48 m 2 ), and is equipped with three windows of 1.3 × 1.7 m 2 dimension each, located at around one meter from the floor, and provided with a wooden frame. The entrance door has two shutters-one fixed and one mobile-with an aluminum frame and does not contribute to the illuminance of the space. The false ceiling height is approximately 3.50 m and is made of white gypsum panels. Apart from the traditional school furniture composed of desks, chairs, and the blackboard, the classroom is equipped with a video projector with a wall screen used for lecture activities and for presentations from the students.
After the definition of the geometrical characteristics of the classroom, a series of measurements were taken with the aim of characterizing the optical properties of the surfaces enveloping the space (in terms of visible reflectance of the opaque surfaces and visible transmissivity of transparent surfaces respectively, see Table 1), and the illuminance levels on the work plane.
The work plane was defined as an ideal horizontal surface located at 0.80 m from the floor (corresponding to the height of the desks) where the main visual task takes place (UNI EN 12464-1: 2011 standard [31]). Table 1 sums up the optical properties of the materials making up the room; these values are then used as input for the simulations in Radiance.

Model Validation
The illuminance values inside the classroom were measured on a horizontal grid of 30 equally distributed points spaced 1.10 × 2.20 m 2 and placed at 0.80 m from the floor at 12:30 a.m. on 14 May under slightly overcast conditions (see in Figure 4). The points adjacent to the perimeter walls were spaced 1.54 m from the south wall, 0.66 m from the west wall, 0.55 m from the north wall, and 0.66 m from the east wall in order.
Groundhog is a type of software that needs local climate data, both to calculate the position of the sun in the sky and to convert the values of the global horizontal radiation in a luminance distribution for the sky, according to Perez's model.
These luminance values were then transformed into illuminance values for each point belonging to the sensor's grid defined by the user following the daylight coefficients approach [5]. The climate data needed for the simulations was retrieved from the EnergyPlus software portal in .epw format (Typical Meteorological Year with hourly distribution of meteorological data) from the nearest weather station of Catania-Fontanarossa. This was done because no climate data was available for the city of Siracusa; however, no significant differences were expected because both cities are on the sea level and are situated just 40 km away from each other.
For the sake of validating the model and adjusting the basic parameters used by Radiance in the simulations (reported in Table 2), several iterations were performed until an average error of less than 7% was achieved between the measured and simulated illumination profiles for each point of the analysis grid. It is important to notice that the simulated results refer to 9 May (and not 14 May) because this was the day from the EnergyPlus weather file that shows sky conditions very close to those of the measurement day while keeping the same solar height. Although not perfectly accurate, this procedure was followed to overcome the limitations deriving from the lack of real-time monitored weather data, and the consequent use of Typical Meteorological weather data was used for validation purposes. Ambient bounces -ab (i.e., the maximum number of bounces of the diffuse indirect component of daylight) was set to 4 to accurately account for diffuse reflection within the room, and accordingly the ambient resolution parameter -ar was set to 512 to have a high density of ambient values used for interpolation. On the other hand, the ambient super-samples -as and ambient divisions -ad parameters were set to quite a low resolution (512 and 2048 respectively) to keep simulation times reasonable. However, these parameters were mainly used for rendering visualization and did not affect the calculation outcomes.
From the comparison shown in Figure 4 and in Table 3 it is possible to see how the gap between measured and simulated illuminance is little, and acceptable for each sensor; in this way the calculation model was considered validated to perform the annual simulations discussed in the following section. From the comparison shown in Figure 4 and in Table 3 it is possible to see how the gap between measured and simulated illuminance is little, and acceptable for each sensor; in this way the calculation model was considered validated to perform the annual simulations discussed in the following section.    1  2400  2250  2  972  1203  3  900  932  4  822  845  5  694  750  6  703  775  7  812  1090  8  744  750  9  699  732  10  670  717  11  2120  2180  12  1057  1273  13  678  765  14  640  724  15  631  704  16  692  767  17 791 1103

Existing Scenario
From the analysis of the illuminance values carried out at 12:30 a.m. on 14 May, it is evident how higher levels (around 2250 lx, see Figure 5) were recorded in correspondence of the areas below the glazed surfaces. For all the other points, the illuminance kept consistently higher than the minimum threshold of 300 lx set by the existing legislation in Italy [31]. The average illuminance was about 850 lx on around 60% of the work plane, while the uniformity ratio (i.e., the ratio between the minimum and the average illuminance) was 0.67. It therefore showed a good distribution of light in conditions of overcast sky without excessive asymmetries between the areas close to the glazed surfaces and the remaining.
If extending the analysis period to an entire year, the UDI (hereafter the 'useful' range will be considered, that is to say the bin of 500 < UDI < 2000) and DA parameters reported in Figure 6 show how the space would keep a good illuminance distribution for most of the useful surface for about 70% of the time. In fact, the areas close to the windows show values higher than 2000 lx for about 40% of the time. However, this may lead to potential glare issues for the users. The back and the remaining areas of the classroom are instead characterized by an insufficient illuminance for at least 5% of the time. DA calculations, on the other hand, show how, for about 90% of the time, the illuminance is over the minimum threshold set at 300 lx almost everywhere.
What is therefore evident from yearly simulations of the existing scenario is that: • In the classroom there was a good availability of natural light, expressed by an average DA value of 90%; • Glare issues may occur near the glazed surfaces also under overcast sky conditions. This is pointed out by the UDI calculation, which highlights illuminance values higher than 2000 lx for about 40% of the time on average for the study points.

Retrofit Scenario
As previously stated in Section 2, the historic value of the building poses several constraints in terms of viable retrofit solutions. It has been therefore decided to take action with improvement proposals that are punctual, non-invasive, and carefully studied to suit the architectural features of the building. In detail, it has been decided to replace the existing clear glass of transmissivity τ = 0.75 with a double-glazed unit of lower resulting transmissivity (τ = 0.60). In this way, the incoming light

Retrofit Scenario
As previously stated in Section 2, the historic value of the building poses several constraints in terms of viable retrofit solutions. It has been therefore decided to take action with improvement proposals that are punctual, non-invasive, and carefully studied to suit the architectural features of the building. In detail, it has been decided to replace the existing clear glass of transmissivity τ = 0.75 with a double-glazed unit of lower resulting transmissivity (τ = 0.60). In this way, the incoming light from the windows is reduced, thus lessening the risk of glare for those occupants sit in close proximity of the windows.
Furthermore, the traditional wooden-framed windows allow for an easy replacement of the existing glass sheets with new ones of greater thickness, by introducing new little wooden frames [38].
In order to avoid the excessive reduction of daylight levels in the areas furthest away from the windows, it is proposed to give a divergent section to the intrados of the windows by cutting the wall obliquely 0.2 m on the right, left, and upper sides. This will have positive effects for natural light to enter and spread in the environment, because of the high thickness of perimeter walls (about 0.8 m). In addition, it has also been hypothesized that the introduction of a double-curved false ceiling with highly-reflective panels (ρ = 0.8) in natural fiber would facilitate a uniform redistribution of daylight in the most remote areas of the classroom. To improve its performance, apart from the curvature, several iterations have been made for the estimation of the optimal tilt angle. The panels have a thickness of 6 mm and can be hooked to a metal support structure made of an aluminum profile, which will be hung in turn on the existing concrete ceiling. Consequently, the false ceiling has a height difference between the external and internal walls, as reported in Figure 7 where the different solutions proposed are of around 0.6 m.
Sustainability 2018, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 15 proposals that are punctual, non-invasive, and carefully studied to suit the architectural features of the building. In detail, it has been decided to replace the existing clear glass of transmissivity τ = 0.75 with a double-glazed unit of lower resulting transmissivity (τ = 0.60). In this way, the incoming light from the windows is reduced, thus lessening the risk of glare for those occupants sit in close proximity of the windows. Furthermore, the traditional wooden-framed windows allow for an easy replacement of the existing glass sheets with new ones of greater thickness, by introducing new little wooden frames [38].
In order to avoid the excessive reduction of daylight levels in the areas furthest away from the windows, it is proposed to give a divergent section to the intrados of the windows by cutting the wall obliquely 0.2 m on the right, left, and upper sides. This will have positive effects for natural light to enter and spread in the environment, because of the high thickness of perimeter walls (about 0.8 m). In addition, it has also been hypothesized that the introduction of a double-curved false ceiling with highly-reflective panels (ρ = 0.8) in natural fiber would facilitate a uniform redistribution of daylight in the most remote areas of the classroom. To improve its performance, apart from the curvature, several iterations have been made for the estimation of the optimal tilt angle. The panels have a thickness of 6 mm and can be hooked to a metal support structure made of an aluminum profile, which will be hung in turn on the existing concrete ceiling. Consequently, the false ceiling has a height difference between the external and internal walls, as reported in Figure 7 where the different solutions proposed are of around 0.6 m. By running the daylight simulations, with the implementation of the above-mentioned retrofit solutions, the classroom showed an average illuminance value under overcast sky conditions of about 350 lx (the time considered is the same discussed for the existing scenario to allow a direct comparison, see Figure 8). By running the daylight simulations, with the implementation of the above-mentioned retrofit solutions, the classroom showed an average illuminance value under overcast sky conditions of about 350 lx (the time considered is the same discussed for the existing scenario to allow a direct comparison, see Figure 8). The desks registered illuminance values ranging between 170 and 320 lx, while the area facing the blackboard reached an illuminance value of around 500 lx. The UDI distribution reported in Figure 9 shows how most of the useful surface had very good levels of illuminance for more than 70% of the time in a year. In particular, only in rare cases (less than 15% of the time) illuminance values higher than 2000 lx were registered near the windows. The DA distribution confirms this result, showing how on average, for 95% of the simulated time, illuminance was higher than the minimum threshold of 300 lx, but with a more uniform distribution in comparison to the base case depicted in Figure 6. The desks registered illuminance values ranging between 170 and 320 lx, while the area facing the blackboard reached an illuminance value of around 500 lx. The UDI distribution reported in Figure 9 shows how most of the useful surface had very good levels of illuminance for more than 70% of the time in a year. In particular, only in rare cases (less than 15% of the time) illuminance values higher than 2000 lx were registered near the windows. The DA distribution confirms this result, showing how on average, for 95% of the simulated time, illuminance was higher than the minimum threshold of 300 lx, but with a more uniform distribution in comparison to the base case depicted in Figure 6. The desks registered illuminance values ranging between 170 and 320 lx, while the area facing the blackboard reached an illuminance value of around 500 lx. The UDI distribution reported in Figure 9 shows how most of the useful surface had very good levels of illuminance for more than 70% of the time in a year. In particular, only in rare cases (less than 15% of the time) illuminance values higher than 2000 lx were registered near the windows. The DA distribution confirms this result, showing how on average, for 95% of the simulated time, illuminance was higher than the minimum threshold of 300 lx, but with a more uniform distribution in comparison to the base case depicted in Figure 6.

Conclusions
This article explored the optimization of natural light within an historic building reused as a university teaching building located in Siracusa (Italy).
If daylighting issues are easy to manage in new buildings through an accurate design phase, then when considering a retrofit intervention on existing buildings-especially on heritage buildings-more accurate and careful evaluations are required.
With the help of an accurate survey of the geometric, technological, and illuminance characteristics of the case study building, a validated daylight model in Radiance was built using the Groundhog plug-in for Google Sketchup. The use of Climate Based Daylight Metrics such as the Useful Daylight Illuminance (UDI) and the Daylight Availability (DA) have made it possible to identify, on an annual basis and under variable sky conditions, the main problems of a sample classroom. The main issues found regard excessive illuminance levels near the windows and too low illuminance values when away from them. In order to reduce the potential glare risks for students sitting near the windows, without negatively affecting the illuminance levels in the remaining areas, the installation of double-glazed windows together with a highly-reflective and diffuse false ceiling was suggested. The study of the new geometric layout given by the flaring of the window frames and the double curvature of the inclined false ceiling allows for a more even distribution of daylight inside the classroom.
All the proposed interventions are compatible with the historic-aesthetic value of the case study building and represent viable solutions to the improvement of natural light conditions inside school buildings. This exercise demonstrates how a careful daylight analysis carried out using state-of-the-art CBDM metrics can inform the design of refurbishment interventions also in heritage buildings, which are typically characterized by several architectural constraints.