Next Article in Journal
Virtual Light Sensing Technology for Fast Calculation of Daylight Autonomy Metrics
Next Article in Special Issue
High-Performance NiO/TiO2/ZnO Photovoltaic UV Detector
Previous Article in Journal
Non-Contact, Continuous Sampling of Porous Surfaces for the Detection of Particulate and Adsorbed Organic Contaminations by Low-Temperature Plasma Coupled to Ion Mobility Spectrometer
Previous Article in Special Issue
High-Discrimination Circular Polarization Detection Based on Dielectric-Metal-Hybrid Chiral Metamirror Integrated Quantum Well Infrared Photodetectors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

High-Performance Near-Infrared Photodetector Based on PbS Colloidal Quantum Dots/ZnO-Nanowires Hybrid Nanostructures

1
School of Materials and Energy, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
2
Kunming Institute of Physics, Kunming 650223, China
3
Yunnan Key Laboratory of Advanced Photoelectric Materials and Devices, Kunming 650223, China
4
Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Swansea University, Bay Campus, Fabian Way, Swansea SA1 8EN, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2023, 23(4), 2254; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23042254
Submission received: 29 December 2022 / Revised: 19 January 2023 / Accepted: 20 January 2023 / Published: 17 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Optical Sensors Technology in China)

Abstract

:
Quantum dots have found significant applications in photoelectric detectors due to their unique electronic and optical properties, such as tunable bandgap. Recently, colloidal quantum dots (CQDs) have attracted much interest because of the ease of controlling the dot size and low production cost. In this paper, a high-performance ZnO/PbS heterojunction photodetector was fabricated by spin-coating PbS CQDs onto the surface of a hydrothermally grown vertical array of ZnO nanowires (NWs) on an indium tin oxide (ITO) substrate. Under 940 nm near-infrared light illumination, the device demonstrated a responsivity and detectivity of ~3.9 × 104 A/W and ~9.4 × 1013 Jones, respectively. The excellent performances and low cost of this nanocomposite-based photodetector show that it has the potential for widespread applications ranging from medical diagnosis to environmental monitoring.

1. Introduction

Photodetectors have very extensive and important military and civilian applications, such as missile early warning systems [1], medical diagnosis [2,3,4,5] and environmental monitoring [6,7,8,9]. Among the photosensitive materials, PbS CQDs have been widely used in the design and development of photodetectors due to their tunable size, controllable bandgap and low-cost solution processing technique [10,11]. Thanks to these characteristics, a large number of researchers have conducted synthesis and application research on PbS CQDs. At present, the main preparation technologies include hydrothermal and electrochemical deposition, and these materials have been widely used in the fields of solar cells, biosensors and photocatalysis, etc. [12]. In addition, through the exchange and modification of PbS CQD surface ligands, it is easy to obtain good-performance QD hybrid nanostructures [13,14]. However, the carrier mobility of PbS CQDs is relatively low, which is known to limit device performance [15]. A common approach is to combine PbS CQDs with materials having high carrier mobility to improve device performance [15,16].
ZnO is a direct, wide bandgap (3.37 eV) semiconductor with large exciton binding energy (60 meV) [17]. The transparent conductive oxide was previously combined with PbS CQDs in the fabrication of photodetectors [18,19]. However, various trap states are prone to exist at the PbS/ZnO interface, which could lead to the recombination of carriers at the interface, hence limiting the performance of PbS/ZnO heterojunction optoelectronic devices [20]. The use of ZnO nanowires to improve device performance has attracted great interest [21,22]. The one-dimensional nanowires offer rapid electron transport and direct conduction paths, which could reduce the recombination of photogenerated carriers and greatly enhance the photoelectric response of the photodetector [23].
Recently, there are reports on the fabrication of photodetectors based on ZnO NWs/PbS CQDs hybrid nanostructures. For example, Deep Chandra Upadhyay et al. [24] prepared a ZnO nanorod/PCDTBT:PCBM:PbS QDs/MoOx heterojunction using FTO (4.4 eV) as a substrate to grow ZnO nanorods (NRs) by a hydrothermal method. The device exhibited a detectivity of 5.82 × 1011 Jones in the near-infrared band. Nitumoni Deka et al. [25] prepared a ZnO NRs/PbS/RGO heterojunction photodetector by depositing PbS QDs onto ZnO NRs using chemical bath deposition on an FTO substrate, followed by spin-coating a layer of reduced graphene oxide (RGO). The device demonstrated a detectivity of ~104 Jones in the near-infrared band. The relatively poor detectivity of the above devices may be due to the low work function of FTO.
Although the dark current of photodetector hybrids of ZnO NWs and PbS CQDs may be large, the high specific surface area (larger than NRs) [26,27] and good charge transfer characteristics of ZnO NWs make it possible to prepare a high-performance ZnO NWs/PbS CQDs hybrid near-infrared detector. In this work, we made a completely new device structure. An ITO (4.7 eV) [28] substrate was used and investigated in the fabrication of a ZnO NWs/PbS CQDs hybrid nanostructure-based photodetector to enhance device performance. The ZnO NWs were used as the hole transport layer (HTL) and PbS CQDs were used as the infrared absorption layer [29]. The structure and morphology of PbS CQDs and ZnO NWs were characterized, and the photoelectric properties of the infrared detectors were also studied.

2. Experiment

2.1. Chemical Reagents

The chemical reagents used in this experiment were: zinc acetate (Purity: AR, Xi Long Scientific Co., Ltd., Guangdong, China), hexamethylene tetramine (Purity: AR, Xi Long Scientific Co., Ltd.), ethanolamine (Purity: AR, Tianjin Feng Chuan Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China), methanol (Purity: AR, Suzhou Crystal Clear Electronic Material Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China), octane (Purity: AR, Tianjin Zhi Yuan Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China), ammonia solution (Purity: AR, Tianjin Feng Chuan Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.) and 2-methoxyethanol (Purity: AR, China National Medicines Corporation Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). All chemical reagents were used as purchased without further purification.

2.2. Device Fabrication

ITO quartz substrate (30 Ω•sq−1) was cleaned and heated for 30 min in a mixture of methanol, ammoniac and deionized water in a 1:1:2 ratio, and then rinsed several times with deionized (DI) water. A layer of ZnO seed layer was coated onto the ITO substrate. The solution of ZnO seed layer was prepared by mixing 1.5 g zinc acetate, 20 mL 2-methoxyethanol and 450 μL ethanolamine. This was then heated and stirred using a magnetron agitator at 80 °C for 30 min, and the solution was cooled to room temperature prior to use. The ITO substrate coated with ZnO seed layer was then annealed at 320 °C for 1 h. A ZnO NWs array was grown by a hydrothermal method in a mixture consisting of zinc acetate (0.02 M), hexamethylene tetramine (0.02 M) and ammonia solution (28 wt%) mixed with 45 mL DI water at room temperature, similar to a previous approach [30]. This was followed by the addition of the ITO substrate coated with ZnO seed layer into the mixture and heated at 90 °C for 6 h, then rinsed with DI water several times and finally blow-dried with nitrogen. The concentration of the PbS CQDs (Purchased from Huazhong University of Science and Technology) was 30 mg/mL and the solvent was octane.

2.3. Structural and Device Characterization

The morphology and structure of the ZnO NWs were studied using a Nova Nano SEM 450 spectrometer (SEM). The ZnO NWs and PbS CQDs were characterized both by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a Rigaku D/Max-23 diffractometer at room temperature and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a Tecnai G2 F30 S-Twin microscope. A Keithley 2400 source meter was used to measure the current density-voltage (J-V) characteristics of the device.

3. Results

Figure 1a shows a TEM image of the PbS CQDs. The PbS CQDs exhibited uniform size and good dispersion. Figure 1b shows the particle size distribution of the PbS CQDs. The histogram revealed the average size of the PbS CQDs was ~5.5 nm with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 1.3 nm. Figure 1c,d show the XRD pattern and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of the PbS CQDs, respectively. The observed crystal faces of (220), (311) and (200) in Figure 1d were in good agreement with the peaks in the XRD spectrum shown in Figure 1c. The angles between crystal faces (200) and (220), (311) and (220) and (311) and (200) were 54°, 93° and 36°, respectively. Furthermore, lattice fringes can be observed in the HRTEM image, suggesting that the PbS CQDs exhibited good crystal structure. The fast Fourier transform (FFT) spectra of the PbS CQDs also indicated good crystallinity as shown in Figure 1e. Schematic diagrams illustrating the crystal structures of PbS CQDs with (220), (311) and (200) faces are depicted in Figure 1f, g and h, respectively. As shown, the interplanar spacings of the (220), (311) and (200) faces were 0.215, 0.178 and 0.298 nm, respectively. Figure 1i shows the optical absorption spectrum of the PbS CQDs, which revealed an absorption peak at 900 nm, indicating that they are suitable for near-infrared applications.
Figure 2a illustrates the preparation process of the ZnO NWs grown by a hydrothermal method. Figure 2b shows a top-view SEM image of the as-grown ZnO NWs, which exhibited relatively uniform growth. Figure 2c shows a cross-sectional SEM image of the vertical array of the ZnO NWs with a height of 373 nm grown on the ITO substrate. Figure 2d shows the XRD pattern of the ZnO NWs. The diffraction peak of (002) was the largest among the (100), (101), (102), (110) and (103) faces, indicating the preferential growth of the nanowire along the (002) orientation. Figure 2e shows a TEM image of ZnO NWs grown along the direction perpendicular to the (001) crystal plane (i.e., c-axis direction) [30]. The inset shows a schematic diagram of the crystal structure of ZnO NWs grown perpendicular to the (001) crystal plane. Figure 2f shows the HRTEM image of ZnO NWs with the FFT spectrum shown as an inset. The image revealed lattice fringes at the ZnO NWs, indicating that they exhibited good crystallinity. The angles between the (110) and (002), (110) and (103) and (103) and (002) crystal planes were 76°, 35° and 111°, respectively. Figure 2g shows a scanning TEM (STEM) image of ZnO NWs, in which elemental mapping analysis was performed. Figure 2h–j show the STEM-energy dispersive X-ray (STEM-EDX) elemental mapping of Zn and O. The mapping revealed only Zn and O elements, indicating the high purity of the as-grown ZnO NWs. Figure 2k–m show schematic diagrams of the crystal structures of ZnO NWs with (110), (103) and (002) faces, respectively. The interplanar spacings of the (110), (103) and (002) faces were 0.167, 0.142 and 0.265 nm, respectively. The good crystal quality of the as-grown ZnO NWs would be beneficial to the direct conduction of photogenerated carriers.
Figure 3a depicts the fabrication process of the infrared photodetector based on ZnO NWs/PbS CQDs hybrid nanostructures. PbS CQDs (30 mg/mL) were spin-coated onto ZnO NWs, followed by thermal evaporation of Al to form the upper electrode. Finally, a gold wire was connected to the Al electrode using silver conductive glue. Figure 3b is the energy band diagram of the device [16,31]. We choose ZnO NWs as the HTL and PbS CQDs as the infrared light absorption layer. When light irradiated the infrared light absorption layer, electron-hole pairs were separated, electrons flowed from the infrared light absorption layer to the Al electrode, and holes flowed to the ITO through the HLT. Figure 3c is the photocurrent spectrum of the device. At 764 nm and 967 nm, a photogenerated current was found in the device. The photodetector was characterized under an illumination of 940 nm near-infrared light at different power densities (0.01, 0.05 and 0.11 mWcm−2). Figure 3d shows the J-V characteristics of the photodetector at different power densities. There was no significant change in the photocurrent probably due to the relatively large dark current. Figure 3e shows the responsivity (R) and detectivity (D) plots of the device. The maximum responsivity and detectivity were ~3.9 × 104 A/W and ~9.4 × 1013 Jones, respectively. It is worth noting that the R and D decreased with an increase in the power density of the near-infrared light, which suggested that the device was suitable for detecting weak near-infrared signals. The R [32] and D [33] of the device were calculated using the following formula:
R = I p h / P S
D = R / ( 2 q J d ) 1 / 2
where Iph = IlightIdark, P is the incident power density, S is the effective device area, Jd is the dark current density and q is the coulomb charge of an electron. Table 1 provides a list of the performances of other photodetectors based on PbS CQDs heterojunctions. This shows that the device fabricated in this work exhibits a higher responsivity and detectivity than other devices. Due to the large specific surface and one-dimensional carrier transmission channel of ZnO NWs, the photosensitive area was increased and the mobility of photogenerated carriers was also improved, which greatly improved device performance.

4. Conclusions

A vertical array of ZnO NWs was grown using a hydrothermal method on an ITO substrate. An infrared photodetector based on ZnO NWs/PbS CQDs hybrid nanostructures was fabricated. The ZnO NWs served as the ETL and the PbS CQDs as the infrared absorption layer. ITO and Al were used as the lower and upper electrodes, respectively. Under 940 nm near-infrared light illumination, the R and D of the device were ~ 3.9 × 104 A/W and ~9.4 × 1013 Jones, respectively. The photodetector demonstrated excellent performance suitable for a wide range of applications, such as object identification, optical communication, weak-light detection, etc.

Author Contributions

H.Z. carried out experiments, analyzed data, wrote the paper; L.T. designed experiments, supervised the study, revised the paper; P.T. participated in device preparation and discussion; L.Y. and W.Z. participated in discussion and revised the paper; K.S.T. jointly supervised the study and revised the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Yunnan Province Innovation Team Project (2018HC020) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFB2203404).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tidrow, M.Z.; Dyer, W.R. Infrared sensors for ballistic missile defense. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2001, 42, 333–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Larush, L.; Magdassi, S. Formation of near-infrared fluorescent nanoparticles for medical imaging. Nanomedicine 2011, 6, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kateb, B.; Yamamoto, V.; Yu, C.; Grundfest, W.; Gruen, J.P. Infrared thermal imaging: A review of the literature and case report. Neuroimage 2009, 47, T154–T162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Murthy, J.N.; van Jaarsveld, J.; Fei, J.; Pavlidis, I.; Harrykissoon, R.; Lucke, J.F.; Faiz, S.; Castriotta, R.J. Thermal Infrared Imaging: A Novel Method to Monitor Airflow During Poly-somnography. Sleep 2009, 32, 1521–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Jones, B. A reappraisal of the use of infrared thermal image analysis in medicine. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 1998, 17, 1019–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Martin, P.A. Near-infrared diode laser spectroscopy in chemical process and environmental air monitoring. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002, 31, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Watson, W.M.; Kohler, C.F. Continuous Environmental Monitoring of Nickel Carbonyl by Fourier Transform Infrared Spec-trometry and Plasma Chromatography. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1979, 13, 1241–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Funk, C.; Peterson, P.; Landsfeld, M.; Pedreros, D.; Verdin, J.; Shukla, S.; Husak, G.; Rowland, J.; Harrison, L.; Hoell, A.; et al. The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations—A new environmental record for monitoring extremes. Sci. Data 2015, 2, 150066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Seward, A.; Ashraf, S.; Reeves, R.; Bromley, C. Improved environmental monitoring of surface geothermal features through com-parisons of thermal infrared, satellite remote sensing and terrestrial calorimetry. Geothermics 2018, 73, 60–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Marino, E.; Sciortino, A.; Berkhout, A.; Marino, E.; Sciortino, A.; Berkhout, A.; MacArthur, K.E.; Heggen, M.; Gregorkiewicz, T.; Kodger, T.E.; et al. Simultaneous Photonic and Excitonic Coupling in Spherical Quantum Dot Supercrystals. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 13806−13815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zheng, S.; Chen, J.; Johansson, E.M.; Zhang, X. PbS Colloidal Quantum Dot Inks for Infrared Solar Cells. Iscience 2020, 23, 101753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mamiyev, Z.; Balayeva, N. PbS nanostructures: A review of recent advances. Mater. Today Sustain. 2023, 21, 100305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, Y.F.; Egap, E. PET-RAFT polymerization catalyzed by cadmium selenide quantum dots (QDs): Grafting-from QDs pho-tocatalysts to make polymer nanocomposites. Polym. Chem. 2020, 11, 1018–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. McClelland, K.P.; Clemons, T.D.; Stupp, S.I.; Weiss, E.A. Semiconductor Quantum Dots Are Efficient and Recyclable Photocatalysts for Aqueous PET-RAFT Polymerization. ACS Macro Lett. 2019, 9, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, X.; Xu, K.; Yan, X.; Xiao, X.; Aruta, C.; Foglietti, V.; Ning, Z.; Yang, N. Amorphous ZnO/PbS Quantum Dots Heterojunction for Efficient Responsivity Broadband Photodetectors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 8403–8410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sliz, R.; Lejay, M.; Fan, J.Z.; Choi, M.-J.; Kinge, S.; Hoogland, S.; Fabritius, T.; de Arquer, F.P.G.; Sargent, E.H. Stable Colloidal Quantum Dot Inks Enable Inkjet-Printed High-Sensitivity Infrared Photo-detectors. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 11988–11995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yu, Y.; Hao, W.; Du, Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, T. Growth mechanism for ZnO nanorod array in a metastable supersaturation solution. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2009, 9, 909–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, B.J.; Park, S.; Kim, T.Y.; Jung, E.Y.; Hong, J.-A.; Kim, B.-S.; Jeon, W.; Park, Y.; Kang, S.J. Improving the photoresponsivity and reducing the persistent photocurrent effect of visi-ble-light ZnO/quantum-dot phototransistors via a TiO2 layer. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 16384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shao, J.F.; Perera, A.G.U.; Jayaweera, P.V.V.; He, D. Low-Cost UV-IR Dual Band Detector Using Nonporous ZnO Film Sensi-tized by PbS Quantum Dots. Chin. Phys. Lett. 2010, 27, 027302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kushnir, K.; Chen, K.F.; Zhou, L.T.; Giri, B.; Grimm, R.L.; Rao, P.M.; Titova, L.V. Dynamics of Photoexcited Carriers in Polycrystalline PbS and at PbS/ZnO Hetero-junctions: Influence of Grain Boundaries and Interfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 11682–11688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kumar, D.; Bai, R.; Chaudhary, S.; Pandya, D.K. Enhanced photoelectrochemical response for hydrogen generation in self-assembled aligned ZnO/PbS core/shell nanorod arrays grown by chemical bath deposition. Mater. Today Energy 2017, 6, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rekemeyer, P.; Chang, S.; Chuang, C.-H.M.; Hwang, G.W.; Bawendi, M.G.; Gradečak, S. Enhanced Photocurrent in PbS Quantum Dot Photovoltaics via ZnO Nanowires and Band Alignment Engineering. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, M.; Li, D.; Zhou, J.; Chen, W.; Ruan, S. Ultraviolet detector based on TiO2 nanowire array–polymer hybrids with low dark cur-rent. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 618, 233–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Upadhyay, D.C.; Upadhyay, R.K.; Singh, A.P.; Jit, S. High-Performance Inverted Structure Broadband Photodetector Based on ZnO Nanorods/PCDTBT:PCBM:PbS QDs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2020, 67, 4970–4976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Deka, N.; Chakraborty, P.; Patra, D.C.; Dhar, S.; Mondal, S.P. Self-powered broadband photodetection using PbS decorated ZnO nano-rods/reduced graphene oxide junction. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2020, 118, 105165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lu, J.G.; Chang, P.; Fan, Z. Quasi-one-dimensional metal oxide materials-Synthesis, properties and application. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2006, 52, 49–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, Z.L. ZnO nanowire and nanobelt platform for nanotechnology. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2009, 64, 33–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gu, M.; Wang, Y.; Yang, F.; Lu, K.; Xue, Y.; Wu, T.; Fang, H.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, Y.; Ling, X.; et al. Stable PbS quantum dot ink for efficient solar cells by solution-phase ligand engineering. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 15951–15959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xia, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, K.; Yang, X.; Lian, L.; Zhang, Z.; He, J.; Liang, G.; Wang, S.; Tan, M.; et al. Cation-Exchange Synthesis of Highly Monodisperse PbS Quantum Dots from ZnS Nanorods for Efficient Infrared Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 30, 1907379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, L.; Li, X.; Qu, L.; Gao, C.; Wang, Y.; Teng, F.; Zhang, Z.; Pan, X.; Xie, E. Facile and fast one-pot synthesis of ultra-long porous ZnO nanowire arrays for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 586, 766–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ren, Z.; Sun, J.; Li, H.; Mao, P.; Wei, Y.; Zhong, X.; Hu, J.; Yang, S.; Wang, J. Bilayer PbS Quantum Dots for High-Performance Photodetectors. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1702055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hu, C.; Dong, D.; Yang, X.; Qiao, K.; Yang, D.; Deng, H.; Yuan, S.; Khan, J.; Lan, Y.; Song, H.; et al. Synergistic Effect of Hybrid PbS Quantum Dots/2D-WSe2Toward High Performance and Broadband Phototransistors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 27, 1603605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gong, X.; Tong, M.; Xia, Y.; Cai, W.; Moon, J.S.; Cao, Y.; Yu, G.; Shieh, C.-L.; Nilsson, B.; Heeger, A.J. High-Detectivity Polymer Photodetectors with Spectral Response from 300 nm to 1450 nm. Science 2009, 325, 1665–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sulaman, M.; Yang, S.Y.; Song, T.J.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y.; He, B.; Dong, M.; Tang, Y.; Song, Y.; Zou, B. High performance solution-processed infrared photodiode based on ternary PbSx-Se1-x colloidal quantum dots. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 87730–87737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Manders, J.R.; Lai, T.-H.; An, Y.; Xu, W.; Lee, J.; Kim, D.Y.; Bosman, G.; So, F. Low-Noise Multispectral Photodetectors Made from All Solution-Processed Inorganic Semiconductors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 7205–7210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, Q.; Meng, L.; Sinha, K.; Chowdhury, F.; Hu, J.; Wang, X. Ultrafast Colloidal Quantum Dot Infrared Photodiode. ACS Photon. 2020, 7, 1297–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structural characterization of PbS CQDs. (a) TEM image. (b) Histogram illustrating the particle size distribution. (c) XRD pattern. (d) HRTEM image. (e) FFT spectra. (fh) Crystal structures of PbS CQDs with (220), (311) and (200) faces, respectively. (i) Optical absorption spectrum.
Figure 1. Structural characterization of PbS CQDs. (a) TEM image. (b) Histogram illustrating the particle size distribution. (c) XRD pattern. (d) HRTEM image. (e) FFT spectra. (fh) Crystal structures of PbS CQDs with (220), (311) and (200) faces, respectively. (i) Optical absorption spectrum.
Sensors 23 02254 g001
Figure 2. Preparation and structural characterization of ZnO NWs. (a) Schematic diagram illustrating the preparation process of ZnO NWs grown by hydrothermal method. (b) Top view SEM image. (c) Cross-sectional SEM image. (d) XRD spectrum. (e) TEM image. (f) HRTEM image of individual ZnO NWs (Inset: FFT spectrum of ZnO NWs). (g) STEM image of ZnO NWs. (hj) Elemental mapping of Zn and O. (km) Schematic diagrams illustrating the crystal structures of ZnO NWs with (110), (103) and (002) faces.
Figure 2. Preparation and structural characterization of ZnO NWs. (a) Schematic diagram illustrating the preparation process of ZnO NWs grown by hydrothermal method. (b) Top view SEM image. (c) Cross-sectional SEM image. (d) XRD spectrum. (e) TEM image. (f) HRTEM image of individual ZnO NWs (Inset: FFT spectrum of ZnO NWs). (g) STEM image of ZnO NWs. (hj) Elemental mapping of Zn and O. (km) Schematic diagrams illustrating the crystal structures of ZnO NWs with (110), (103) and (002) faces.
Sensors 23 02254 g002
Figure 3. Fabrication and performance of the photodetector based on ZnO NWs/PbS CQDs hybrid nanostructures. (a) Schematic diagram illustrating the fabrication process of the photodetector. (b)The energy band diagram of the photodetector. (c) The photocurrent spectrum of the photodetector. (d) J-V characteristics of the photodetector at different infrared power densities (λ = 940 nm). (e) Responsivity and detectivity plots of the photodetector.
Figure 3. Fabrication and performance of the photodetector based on ZnO NWs/PbS CQDs hybrid nanostructures. (a) Schematic diagram illustrating the fabrication process of the photodetector. (b)The energy band diagram of the photodetector. (c) The photocurrent spectrum of the photodetector. (d) J-V characteristics of the photodetector at different infrared power densities (λ = 940 nm). (e) Responsivity and detectivity plots of the photodetector.
Sensors 23 02254 g003
Table 1. List of photodetectors based on PbS CQDs heterojunctions and their performances.
Table 1. List of photodetectors based on PbS CQDs heterojunctions and their performances.
DeviceIllumination
(nm)
Responsivity
(A/W)
Detectivity (Jones)Ref.
FTO/ZnO nanorods arrays/PCBM/ PbS CQDs/PCDTBT/MoOx/Ag8607.225.82 × 1011[24]
FTO/ZnO-nanorods/PbS/graphene oxide4000.258.3 × 104[25]
ITO/ZnO/PbS0.4Se0.6/Au98025.81.3 × 1013[34]
ITO/NiO/PbS/ZnO/Al1135/1.1 × 1012[35]
ITO/ZnO/PbS-TBAI/PbS-EDT/Au1125/3.2 × 1011[36]
ITO/ZnO NWs/PbS CQDs/Al9403.9 × 1049.4 × 1013This work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhong, H.; Tang, L.; Tian, P.; Yu, L.; Zuo, W.; Teng, K.S. High-Performance Near-Infrared Photodetector Based on PbS Colloidal Quantum Dots/ZnO-Nanowires Hybrid Nanostructures. Sensors 2023, 23, 2254. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23042254

AMA Style

Zhong H, Tang L, Tian P, Yu L, Zuo W, Teng KS. High-Performance Near-Infrared Photodetector Based on PbS Colloidal Quantum Dots/ZnO-Nanowires Hybrid Nanostructures. Sensors. 2023; 23(4):2254. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23042254

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhong, Hefu, Libin Tang, Pin Tian, Lijing Yu, Wenbin Zuo, and Kar Seng Teng. 2023. "High-Performance Near-Infrared Photodetector Based on PbS Colloidal Quantum Dots/ZnO-Nanowires Hybrid Nanostructures" Sensors 23, no. 4: 2254. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23042254

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop