Next Article in Journal
Validation of a Saliency Map for Assessing Image Quality in Nuclear Medicine: Experimental Study Outcomes
Previous Article in Journal
Spermidine Binding to the Acetinobacter baumannii Efflux Protein AceI Observed by Near-UV Synchrotron Radiation Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Investigation on Rare Nuclear Processes in Hf Nuclides

1
Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy
2
INFN, Sezione di Roma “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy
3
INFN, Sezione Roma “La Sapienza”, 00185 Rome, Italy
4
Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, 00185 Rome, Italy
5
INFN, Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Assergi, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
6
Arthur B. McDonald Canadian Astroparticle Physics Research Institute, Department of Physics, Engineering Physics and Astronomy, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
7
Department of Physics, Engineering Physics and Astronomy, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
8
Department of Chemistry, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Radiation 2022, 2(2), 234-247; https://doi.org/10.3390/radiation2020017
Submission received: 27 April 2022 / Revised: 23 May 2022 / Accepted: 26 May 2022 / Published: 31 May 2022

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Nuclear instability is an interesting topic which plays an important role in nuclear models, electroweak interaction e conservation laws. Herein, investigations on rare nuclear processes in Hf isotopes, using HP-Ge spectrometry and Hf-based crystal scintillators, are described. This type of investigation can be crucial in developing models in nuclear and astroparticle physics. In addition to the already-observed alpha decay of 174Hf, some other rare nuclear processes, such as the alpha decay of 176Hf in 172Yb and 177Hf in 173Yb are near the theoretical expectations, giving hope to their first observation in the near future. In addition, a short emphasis on several types of Hf-based crystal scintillators is reported.

Abstract

In this work, a review of recent studies concerning rare nuclear processes in Hf isotopes is presented. In particular, the investigations using HP-Ge spectrometry and Hf-based crystal scintillators are focused; the potentiality and the results of the “source = detector” approach are underlined. In addition, a short introduction concerning the impact of such kind of research in the context of astroparticle and nuclear physics is pointed out. In particular, the study of α decay and double beta decay of 174 Hf, 176 Hf, 177 Hf, 178 Hf, 179 Hf, 180 Hf isotopes either to the ground state or to the lower bounded levels have been discussed. The observation of α decay of 174 Hf isotope to the ground state with a T 1 / 2 = 7.0 ( 1.2 ) × 10 16 y is reported and discussed. No decay was detected for α decay of 174 Hf isotope at the first excited level of daughter and of 176 Hf, 177 Hf, 178 Hf, 179 Hf, 180 Hf isotopes either to the ground state or to the lower bounded levels. The T 1 / 2 lower limits for these decays are at the level of 10 16 10 20 y. Nevertheless, the T 1 / 2 lower limits for the transitions of 176 Hf 172 Yb ( 0 + 0 + ) and 177 Hf 173 Yb ( 7 / 2 5 / 2 ) are near to the theoretical predictions, giving hope to their observation in the near future. All the other experimental limits ( 10 16 –10 20 y) are absolutely far from the theoretical expectations. The experiments investigating the 2 ϵ and ϵ β + processes in 174 Hf are also reported; the obtained half-life limits are set at the level of 10 16 10 18 y. Moreover, we estimate the T 1 / 2 of 2 ν 2 ϵ of 174 Hf decay at the level of (0.3–6) × 10 21 y (at now the related measured lower limit is 7.1 × 10 16 y).

1. Introduction

A fascinating topic of nuclear physics is the nuclear instability, which plays an important role in nuclear models, electroweak interaction, and conservation laws. Here, the current status of the experimental searches for rare α and double beta decay (DBD) in Hf-isotopes is reviewed.
The DBD is a significant nuclear decay for neutrino physics, to test, e.g., the calculations of different nuclear shapes and the decay modes that involve the vector and axial-vector weak effective coupling constants ( g A ), etc. The DBD with neutrinos is a higher-order effect with respect to the β -decay: the expected half-lives are longer than those of the β -decay, and roughly of the order of 10 20 y. Therefore, special experimental care has to be taken to study this process. The DBD without neutrinos emission is a process requiring lepton-number violation, in addition to a non-vanishing neutrino mass that requires a Majorana mass component. Therefore, it could be often regarded as the golden-standard process for probing the fundamental nature of neutrinos. Thus, the 0 ν DBD is of great interest because it could open a new window beyond the Standard Model. The number of candidate isotopes to this study are 69, in particular, 35 via the emission of two e and 34 in positive channels: either two positron emission (2 β + ) or a positron emission with an electron capture ( ϵ β + ) or a double electron capture (2 ϵ ) [1,2]. The simultaneous study of positive and negative DBD can constrain the theoretical parameters with very high confidence, giving mutual information. Additionally, the nuclear matrix elements for the 2 ν transition and 0 ν transition can be connected through significant parameters: in the free nucleon interaction, the g A value is 1.2701, but, considering a nuclear decay, the phenomenological axial-vector coupling value seams reduced to g A < 1 , more precisely: g A 1.269 A 0.12 or g A 1.269 A 0.18 , depending on the adopted nuclear model [1]. Moreover, the “quenched” g A observed is shown to encode the emergence of chiral-scale symmetry hidden in QCD in the vacuum; the g A value could impact the in-medium modified nucleon weak and electromagnetic form factors on the neutrino mean free path in dense matter; the g A role in the values of the cross sections of neutrino scattering from astrophysical sources on nuclei; and many other issues. Thus, DBD investigation considering different nuclei would help to constrain these and other significant model-dependent parameters. In addition, in case of the 0 ν 2 ϵ transition, it is possible to study also the so-called “resonant effect” [1,2].
Besides these, various nuclear models are continuously extended or improved, inspired, for example, by studying long-lived or stable superheavy isotopes and the predictions of their half-lives. Thus, the study of rare alpha decay plays a crucial role in developing nuclear physics. It can offer details about the nuclear structure, its levels and properties. Furthermore, the phenomenon of α decay can provide information about the fusion-fission reactions since the α decay process involves sub-barrier penetration due to the interaction between the nucleus and the α particle [3]. Moreover, understanding the nuclear properties is essential also for nuclear and particle astrophysics studies, for example, α –capture reactions (equivalent to the inverse α –decay process) are important for nucleosynthesis and β –delayed fission, together with other fission modes, determine the so-called “fission recycling” in the r-process nucleosynthesis [4]. In addition, as a byproduct, such researches contribute to develop new detectors and perform news protocols to purify materials containing DBD or rare α emitters from radio-impurities [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. In this work, main aspects on status of the investigations on rare nuclear processes in Hf isotopes are reported.

2. Searching for Double Beta Decay in Hafnium Isotopes

The 174 Hf isotope is a potentially DBD emitter via ϵ β + and 2 ϵ modes with the energy decay Q 2 β = 1100.0 ( 23 ) keV [26] and an isotopic abundance δ = 0.156 ( 6 ) % [27]. A simplified ϵ β + and 2 ϵ decay scheme of 174 Hf is shown in Figure 1. Theoretical half-life estimations of the ϵ β + and 2 ϵ of 174 Hf are not present in literature (to our knowledge) but the values of the phase space factor involved are (0.001–7.5) × 10 30 y 1 and (0.003–1) × 10 17 y 1 respectively for the 2 ν ϵ β + and 0 ν ϵ β + transitions [28] and ( 1.6 3.5 ) × 10 21 y 1 for the 2 ν 2 ϵ transition [28]. Considering that typically the magnitude of the nuclear matrix element of the 2 ν DBD is of the order of 1–10, the half-life estimations are roughly 10 28 10 33 y and (0.3–6) × 10 21 y respectively for the 2 ν ϵ β + and 2 ν 2 ϵ transitions.
In 2020 and 2021 two independent experiments [29,30] (they are the first searches ever realized for 2 ϵ and ϵ β + decay of 174 Hf and for the work in Ref. [29] also by using a high-pure sample of hafnium), the first one performed at HADES laboratory of the Joint Research Centre of European Commission (Geel, Belgium) and the second one at the underground National Laboratory of Gran Sasso (LNGS) in Italy, searched for the 2 ϵ and ϵ β + decay of 174 Hf. In both cases, a passive approach (the source of the event searched for is outside the detector), using gamma-ray spectrometry technique, has been adopted. Both the experiments have adopted two different geometrical arrangements to increase the detection efficiency and to decrease as much as possible the energy threshold.
The experiment at HADES in Ref. [29] used a sample of metallic hafnium with sizes 59.0 mm × 5.0 mm (total mass of 179.8 g that contained ∼0.29 g of the isotope 174 Hf). The experimental set-up was arranged using two different couples of HP-Ge detectors, and the Hf-sample was installed between the end-cap of two HP-Ge detectors arranged back-to-back (see Figure 2-left). The total exposure of the experiment was 42 g × d for the isotope 174 Hf.
The experiment at LNGS on Ref. [30] used a foil of metallic hafnium of 55.379(1) g and the HP-Ge ( 70 mm × 70 mm) was covered by this hafnium foil (see Figure 2-right). In particular, the foil thickness (0.25(1) mm) was optimized to minimize the self-absorption of low-energy γ and X-rays within the sample itself and improve the overall detection efficiency; infact, the metallic foils were coupled to the Ge crystal (under its end-cap). The data were collected over 310 d.
The total exposures of those experiments were 26.9 kg × d and 16.5 kg × d for Ref. [29] and Ref. [30] respectively. In the Table 1 the detection efficiencies of both the experiments are compared (when possible); typically the experiment at Ref. [30] has higher values with respect to the other experiment.
Considering the 2 ϵ transitions, in case of a 2 K o K L capture in 174 Hf, a cascade of X-rays (and Auger electrons) of 174 Yb atom with energies in the range of (50.8–61.3) keV is expected, while energies of the 2 L capture X-ray quanta are ≃(7–10) keV. These latter were below the detectors’ energy thresholds of both the experiments. Thank to these X-rays, the decay modes 2 K and K L to the ground state (g.s.) of the 170 Yb have been studied by both experiments, besides the transition to the first excited level of the daughter nucleus. In both the investigations, the energy spectrum in the region of interest for the 2 ν 2K and 2 ν KL was dominated by the background due to the electron capture of 175 Hf (T 1 / 2 = 70(2) d; Q E C = 683.9 ( 20 ) keV), but also from events related to U/Th chains, as clearly shown in the Figure 3a,b. In Refs. [29,30] no peculiarity have been observed concerning the DBD of 174 Hf; thus, in Table 2, the half-life limits are reported.

3. Searching for Alpha Decays in Hafnium Isotopes

Natural hafnium consists of six isotopes: 174 Hf, 176 Hf, 177 Hf, 178 Hf, 179 Hf, 180 Hf; all of them are theoretically unstable concerning the α decay with a Q α value in the range of 1.3–2.5 MeV. The Hf isotopes with natural abundance and with Q α > 0 are listed in the Table 3. All of them can decay to g.s. or to excited levels of daughter nuclei. Figure 4 shows simplified decay schemes of the α decay of the naturally occurring Hf isotopes.
Table 3. Main potential α decay of Hf nuclides. Isotopes with natural abundance ( δ ) greater than zero (i.e., naturally present in nature) and with Q α > 0 for transitions between g.s. or between g.s. and lowest bounded level (with spin/parity J π ) are listed. Theoretical predictions and experimental measurements (if exist) on the T 1 / 2 ’s are reported in the latest columns.
Table 3. Main potential α decay of Hf nuclides. Isotopes with natural abundance ( δ ) greater than zero (i.e., naturally present in nature) and with Q α > 0 for transitions between g.s. or between g.s. and lowest bounded level (with spin/parity J π ) are listed. Theoretical predictions and experimental measurements (if exist) on the T 1 / 2 ’s are reported in the latest columns.
Nuclide Transition J π δ Q α T 1 / 2 (y)
Parent(%)(keV) Theoretical 
Daughter Nuclei[31][26]Experimental
and Its Level (keV) [32][33][34]
174 Hf 170 Yb 0 + 0 + , g.s.0.156(6) [27]2494.5(2.3) 7.0 ( 1.2 ) × 10 16 [27] 3.5 × 10 16 7.4 × 10 16 3.5 × 10 16
0 + 2 + , 84.2 2.8 × 10 16 [30] 1.3 × 10 18 3.0 × 10 18 6.6 × 10 17
176 Hf 172 Yb 0 + 0 + , g.s.5.26(70)2254.2(1.5) 9.3 × 10 19 [27] 2.5 × 10 20 6.6 × 10 20 2.0 × 10 20
0 + 2 + , 78.7 3.0 × 10 17 [35] 1.3 × 10 22 3.5 × 10 22 4.9 × 10 21
177 Hf 173 Yb 7 / 2 5 / 2 , g.s.18.60(16)2245.7(1.4) 3.2 × 10 20 [27] 4.5 × 10 20 5.2 × 10 22 4.4 × 10 22
7 / 2 7 / 2 , 78.6 1.3 × 10 18 [35] 9.1 × 10 21 1.2 × 10 24 3.6 × 10 23
178 Hf 174 Yb 0 + 0 + , g.s.27.28(28)2084.4(1.4) 5.8 × 10 19 [27] 3.4 × 10 23 1.1 × 10 24 2.2 × 10 23
0 + 2 + , 76.5 1.3 × 10 18 [30] 2.4 × 10 25 8.1 × 10 25 7.1 × 10 24
179 Hf 175 Yb 9 / 2 + 7 / 2 + , g.s.13.62(11)1807.7(1.4) 2.5 × 10 20 [27] 4.5 × 10 29 4.0 × 10 32 4.7 × 10 31
9 / 2 + 9 / 2 + , 104.5 2.7 × 10 18 [30] 2.0 × 10 32 2.5 × 10 35 2.2 × 10 34
180 Hf 176 Yb 0 + 0 + , g.s.35.08(33)1287.1(1.4) 6.4 × 10 45 5.7 × 10 46 9.2 × 10 44
0 + 2 + , 82.1 1.0 × 10 18 [35] 4.0 × 10 49 4.1 × 10 50 2.1 × 10 48
Figure 4. Simplified decay schemes of potential α decay of Hf isotopes considering the first two energy levels of the daughter nuclei. The corresponding gamma transitions and the probability related for a single energy level are also shown. The 175 Yb isotope is unstable via β decay with T 1 / 2 = 4.185 ( 1 ) d [36], all the other Yb nuclei are stable.
Figure 4. Simplified decay schemes of potential α decay of Hf isotopes considering the first two energy levels of the daughter nuclei. The corresponding gamma transitions and the probability related for a single energy level are also shown. The 175 Yb isotope is unstable via β decay with T 1 / 2 = 4.185 ( 1 ) d [36], all the other Yb nuclei are stable.
Radiation 02 00017 g004
In the decays of such Hf isotopes to excited levels, γ quanta are emitted. In this case, a search by using low-background γ spectrometry can be implemented. Moreover, because the 175 Yb is unstable via β decay with T 1 / 2 = 4.185 ( 1 ) d [36], the 179 Hf to the g.s. of daughter 175 Yb can be evaluated using the mentioned passive technique.
Besides, the nuclide 178 m 2 Hf, the excited state of 178 Hf with energy 2446.1 keV, has a long half-life T 1 / 2 = 31 ( 1 ) y [37]. Ordinarily, its de-excitation happens through 178 m 2 Hf ⟶ 178 Hf transition. However, the α decay of 178 m 2 Hf ⟶ 174 Yb is energetically possible with Q α = 4530 keV. In addition, the β decay to 178 Ta (Q β = 606 keV), the electron capture to 178 Lu (Q ϵ = 349 keV) and the spontaneous fission (Q S F 100 MeV) are also possible [38].
Considering that approach and using HP-Ge detectors, two experimental set-ups were realized (see Refs. [30,35]). Such setups are the same as those described in Section 2; they are the first experiments performed to study the α decay of 176 Hf, 177 Hf, 178 Hf, 179 Hf and 180 Hf, but considering only the transitions emitting gamma quanta. Thus, in Refs. [30,35], the decays, at the first excited level of the daughter nucleus, have been studied, as well as the 179 Hf to the g.s. of the daughter 175 Yb, thanks to its β instability (see Figure 4). The α decay of 174 Hf to the g.s. of 170 Yb was studied for the first time in Ref. [39]. In that case, a large cylindrical ionization counter has been used for measurements of natural alpha radioactivity. The heavy element samples were deposited uniformly over the internal surface of the cylindrical chamber, directly on the copper or the steel of the chamber (total active surface of 1200 cm 2 ). The gas mixture used was 94% argon, 5% ethylene, and 1% nitrogen. The measurements on the Hf sample were performed in two stages. In the first one a sample of HfO 2 enriched in 174 Hf was deposited with an average thickness of 0.10 mg × cm 2 and a weak 210 Po standard was added. A small peak was observed at 2.50 MeV. In the second stage, the HfO 2 sample was mixed with a small amount of Sm 2 O 3 , to try to improve the energy calibration of the data considering the peak position of 147 Sm, claiming that the T 1 / 2 = ( 4.0 ± 0.2 ) × 10 15 y. However, the theoretical expectation (see Table 3) was in strong tension with the observation claimed.
Recently, an interesting experiment, using an active approach, was performed in Ref. [27] to study some potentially α decay of Hf isotopes to g.s. or exited levels of daughter nuclei and in particular the α decay of 174 Hf to the g.s. of 170 Yb. The best obtained results are reported in Table 3 with the theoretical estimations. In particular, Ref. [27] reports a direct study of the α decay of naturally occurring Hf isotopes by exploiting the “source = detector” approach with a Cs 2 HfCl 6 (CHC) crystal scintillator. There, after 2848 h of data taking, the α decay of 174 Hf was observed with T 1 / 2 = 7.0 ( 1.2 ) × 10 16 y. The experiment was carried out at the STELLA facility of the LNGS. The CHC crystal scintillator with mass 6.90(1) g was coupled with a 3-inch low radioactivity photomultiplier (PMT, Hamamatsu R6233MOD), and placed above the end-cap of the ultra-low background HP-Ge γ spectrometer GeCris (465 cm 3 ). A schematic cross-sectional view of the experimental set-up is shown in Ref. [27].
The crystal surface was wrapped by diffusive Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape to enhance the light collection. The CHC and HP-Ge detectors were installed inside a passive shield, all in a plexiglas box continuously flushed by high purity nitrogen gas.
A CAEN DT5720B digitizer, as an event-by-event system, acquired the pulse profiles from the PMT and HP-Ge. In this way, it was possible to implement a coincidence logic between the events in the CHC and HP-Ge to study the α decay of Hf isotopes to the first excited level of the daughter nucleus when a γ –ray of such a decay is emitted and can reach the HP-Ge detector.
The pulse-shape discrimination (PSD) between β / γ and α particles, the time–amplitude analysis of fast correlated α decays, and the so-called Bi–Po events analysis were adopted to estimate the radioactive contamination of the CHC crystal. In particular, to build the background model, the data of the radioactive contamination of the CHC crystal was considered.
The time shape of each event was utilised to determine its “mean time” ( t ) according to:
t = f ( t k ) t k f ( t k )
where the sum is over the time channels, k, starting from the origin of the pulse up to 8 μ s. Moreover, f ( t ) is the digitized amplitude (at the time t) of a given signal. Figure 5 shows the scatter plot of the t versus the energy for the acquired data. It confirms the good pulse-shape discrimination ability of the CHC detector [40]. The distribution of the t for the events with energies—using the γ scale—in the interval (0.4–3.0) MeV is reported in the inset of Figure 5. In Figure 6, the spectrum of α events according to the PSD analysis is given.
The Q.F.’s of the α particles at the energies of 224 Ra, 220 Rn and 216 Po α decays were measured to be 0.39(4), 0.40(3), 0.40(3), respectively, and shown in Figure 7 of Ref. [27] with the fit following the prescription of Ref. [41].
The α energy spectrum, above 4 MeV, was fitted (see Figure 6) using a model which includes the α peaks (see Ref. [27] for details) of 232 Th, 238 U and their daughters in order to study such contaminants (taking in account the measured Q.F.’s of the α particles). Considering all the α events, the total internal α activity in the CHC crystal is at the level of 7.8(3) mBq/kg. However, adopting the declared T 1 / 2 of the 174 Hf α decay in Ref. [39] (see before), the event numbers in 2848 h of data taking with this CHC crystal (see Ref. [27] for details) would be 1100 counts. Nevertheless, all the measured α events was 553(23), even ascribing all of them to 174 Hf α decay (although considering the information reported above); thus, the result given in Ref. [39] is safely refused; in fact, even in such an unlike hypothesis, the T 1 / 2 value derived in Ref. [27] would be 4.01 ( 17 ) × 10 15 y, about 4.5 σ far from T 1 / 2 = 2.0 ( 4 ) × 10 15 in Ref. [39]. Therefore, the half-life given in Ref. [39] was safely rejected. Let us now report the improved determination of the half-life of the 174 Hf α decay thanks to the analysis in Ref. [27].
The background model in the range (1.1–3.9) MeV, where the 174 Hf α decay is expected too, was made by an exponential function (to take into account the residual β / γ events), some degraded alpha particles and suitable asymmetric Gaussian to shaping the α decay of 174 Hf (Q α = 2494.5 ( 2.3 ) keV), 147 Sm (Q α = 2311.2 ( 10 ) keV) and the data in the energy interval (3.0–3.9) MeV (see Ref. [27] for details). The fit, in the range (1.1–3.9) MeV, gives a χ 2 / n . d . f . = 0.87 ( χ 2 probability = 38.7%) and 31.7 ( 5.6 ) events for the signal searched for (see Figure 7-left). The peak near 2.3 MeV is ascribed to the α decay of 147 Sm and the estimated number of counts is 29.5(5.4) in very good agreement with that expected for 147 Sm reported in Table 7 of Ref. [27]: 36(6) counts. The statistical impact of the other eligible radionuclides is negligible, as demonstrated in Ref. [27]. The Q α values of 147 Sm and 174 Hf determined by the fit procedure show a slight shift in the same direction of the mean value (∼5%) consistent with the uncertainty of the adopted Q.F. model discussed in Ref. [27].
To exclude that the data in the range (2–3) MeV could be due to one single peak, the previous fit was performed considering one single peak (see Figure 7-right). The fit result gives a p-value of 1.7%.
Thus, according to all the detailed analysis in Ref. [27] (2848 h of data taking with a CHC crystal of 6.09(1) g), the half-life for the 174 Hf α decay, is:
T 1 / 2 = ( 7.0 ± 1.2 ) × 10 16 y .

4. Perspectives and Conclusions

In this work, the experimental studies and few T 1 / 2 predictions concerning the rare decay of naturally occurring isotopes have been briefly reported. In particular, in Table 2 the half-life limits of 2 ϵ and ϵ β + processes in 174 Hf are shown. The half-life limits are at the level of 10 16 10 18 y. These values have to be compared to the values of the phase space factor predicted for such transition considering a nuclear matrix element of the order of 1–10 as typical for that calculations (see Section 2). In this case, it is interest to notice, that the 2 ν 2 ϵ of 174 Hf decay has a T 1 / 2 estimation of (0.3–6) × 10 21 y (at now the related measured lower limit is 7.1 × 10 16 y). This encourages progress in such research, especially using the “detector = source” approach to profit a better detection efficiency with respect to the passive one.
In Table 3 the main potential α transition of Hf isotopes and the related experimental measurements and theoretical predictions of half-lives are reported. In particular, an experiment to investigate the α decay of naturally occurring hafnium isotopes to the first excited state and the ground state using a CHC crystal scintillator in coincidence with a HP-Ge detector was completed after 2848 h of live time (see Ref. [27]). The analysis performed ruled out the T 1 / 2 value of α decay of 174 Hf isotope given in Ref. [39]. Furthermore, Ref. [27] stated that the α decay of 174 Hf isotope to the ground state was observed with a T 1 / 2 = 7.0 ( 1.2 ) × 10 16 y. This value is in good agreement with the theoretical predictions reported in Table 3.
Besides this result, no decay was detected for α and DBD of 174 Hf, 176 Hf, 177 Hf, 178 Hf, 179 Hf, 180 Hf isotopes either to the ground state or to the lower bounded levels considering the data in Refs. [27,30,35]. The determined T 1 / 2 lower limits for these decays are reported in Table 3. In particular, the T 1 / 2 lower limits for the transitions of 176 Hf 172 Yb ( 0 + 0 + ) and 177 Hf 173 Yb ( 7 / 2 5 / 2 ) are near to the theoretical predictions (see Table 3); all the other limits ( 10 16 10 20 y) are absolutely far from the theoretical expectations.
In Ref. [27], it has also been evaluated the average quenching factor for alpha particles modelled according to the prescription of Ref. [41] and reported in Figure 7 of Ref. [27]; it varies in the range 0.3–0.4. In addition, the CHC crystal scintillator of Ref. [27] exhibits a powerful PSD between β / γ and α events as proved in Figure 5.
For the future, the development and the use of scintillation detectors, containing the isotope of interest (as a “source= detector” approach), are a very reasonable way to improve the experimental sensitivity. One of the more promising scintillator is the mentioned Cs 2 HfCl 6 . In particular, such detector meets high detection efficiency, good particle discrimination capability, large amount of the isotope of interest, dedicated protocol of material selection and growing procedure, a low background, and a good energy resolution. Indeed, nowadays there is significant interest in the development of scintillating crystals from the metal hexachlorides Cs 2 MCl 6 (M = Hf or other nuclei) family thanks to their outstanding scintillating properties—a high light yield (up to 50,000 photons/MeV), perfect linearity of the energy response, excellent energy resolution (<3.5% at 662 keV in the best configuration), a quenching factor for alpha particles around QF = 0.3–0.5, and excellent statistical pulse shape discrimination ability. For example, in Figure 8 we show the diagram T 1 / 2 vs the inverse of the square root of alpha energy in MeV. The black symbols are the results in Ref. [27]. The blue band is the extrapolation of the predictions on T 1 / 2 for all the Hf isotopes using the Geiger-Nuttall scaling law considering the data point observed in Ref. [27]. The red symbols represent the sensitivity that the measurement can reach using a CHC crystal scintillator with 43.83 kg × day of exposure. As evident, there is a good perspective to observe the α decay of 176 Hf and 176 Hf (see also Table 3). In addition, to further increase the sensitivity for the study of the rare α and 2 β decays of naturally occurred hafnium isotopes with the active source approach, it is also relevant to improve the radiopurity of Cs 2 HfCl 6 crystal scintillators, in particular for what concerns the Sm component in traces.
Besides this, some potential crystal scintillator containing Hf isotopes are the transparent optical ceramics based on cerium doped alkaline earth hafnates: BaHfO 3 (Ce) and SrHfO 3 (Ce) [42]; but also crystal scintillators as CaHfO 3 [43], HfF 4 [44], HfO 2 [45], La 2 Hf 2 O 7 (Ti) [46], Tl 2 HfCl 6 [47,48]. The main scintillation properties of such crystals are listed in Table 4. In general, an other promising approach is also a crystal that can work as scintillating bolometers to study the decays to the ground state of daughter nuclei [49]. HP-Ge, instead, is a promising choice for the investigations of decay to excited levels of daughter nuclei thanks the excellent energy resolution. Finally, an important issue is to use a crystal scintillator with high percentage in weight of Hf isotopes (see Table 4) or the implementation of isotopically enriched materials in the isotope of interest. However, in the our knowledge, no suitable technology existed that could guarantee a high concentration of a specific hafnium isotope, and the expensive enrichment process is mainly achieved by using the electromagnetic separation method.

Author Contributions

All the authors of this paper have been significantly contributing to the presented review of experimental results. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Caracciolo, V. Status and Perspectives of 2ϵ, ϵβ+ and 2β+ Decays. Particles 2021, 4, 241–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Cappella, F.; Caracciolo, V.; Cerulli, R.; Incicchitti, A.; Merlo, V. Double Beta Decay to Excited States of Daughter Nuclei. Universe 2020, 6, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Danevich, F.A.; Incicchitti, A.; Tretyak, V.I. Experimental searches for rare alpha and beta decays. Eur. Phys. J. A 2019, 55, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Van Duppen, P.; Andreyev, A.N. Alpha Decay and Beta-Delayed Fission: Tools for Nuclear Physics Studies. The Euroschool on Exotic Beams. Lect. Notes Phys. 2018, 948, 65–116. [Google Scholar]
  5. Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Cappella, F.; Caracciolo, V.; Cerulli, R.; Danevich, F.A.; Di Marco, A.; Incicchitti, A.; Poda, D.V.; Polischuk, O.G.; et al. Investigation of rare nuclear decays with BaF2 crystal scintillator contaminated by radium. Eur. Phys. J. A 2014, 50, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Barabash, A.S.; Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Borovlev, Y.A.; Cappella, F.; Caracciolo, V.; Cerulli, R.; Danevich, F.A.; Incicchitti, A.; Kobychev, V.V.; et al. Improvement of radiopurity level of enriched 116CdWO4 and ZnWO4 crystal scintillators by recrystallization. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 2016, 833, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Danevich, F.A.; Barabash, A.S.; Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Boiko, R.S.; Brudanin, V.B.; Cappella, F.; Caracciolo, V.; Cerulli, R.; Incicchitti, A.; et al. Development of radiopure cadmium tungstate crystal scintillators from enriched 106Cd and 116Cd to search for double beta decay. AIP Conf. Proc. 2013, 1549, 201–204. [Google Scholar]
  8. Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Brudanin, V.B.; Cappella, F.; Caracciolo, V.; Cerulli, R.; Danevich, F.A.; Incicchitti, A.; Kasperovich, D.V.; Klavdiienko, V.R.; et al. Search for Double Beta Decay of 106Cd with an Enriched 106CdWO4 Crystal Scintillator in Coincidence with CdWO4 Scintillation Counters. Universe 2020, 6, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leoncini, A.; Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Cappella, F.; Caracciolo, V.; Cerulli, R.; Danevich, F.A.; Incicchitti, A.; Kasperovich, D.V.; Klavdiienko, V.; et al. New results on search for 2β decay processes in 106Cd using 106CdWO4 scintillator. Phys. Scr. 2022, 97, 064006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Borovlev, Y.A.; Cappella, F.; Caracciolo, V.; Cerulli, R.; Danevich, F.A.; Degoda, V.Y.; Incicchitti, A.; Kasperovych, D.V.; et al. Optical, luminescence, and scintillation properties of advanced ZnWO4 crystal scintillators. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 2022, 1029, 166400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Barabash, A.S.; Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Cappella, F.; Caracciolo, V.; Cerulli, R.; Chernyak, D.M.; Danevich, F.A.; d’Angelo, S.; Incicchitti, A.; et al. Final results of the Aurora experiment to study 2β decay of 116Cd with enriched 116CdWO4 crystal scintillators. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 98, 092007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Boiko, R.S.; Brudanin, V.B.; Cappella, F.; Caracciolo, V.; Cerulli, R.; Chernyak, D.M.; Danevich, F.A.; d’Angelo, S.; et al. Search for double-β decay processes in 106Cd with the help of 106CdWO4 crystal scintillator. Phys. Rev. C 2012, 85, 044610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Borovlev, Y.A.; Cappella, F.; Caracciolo, V.; Cerulli, R.; Danevich, F.A.; Incicchitti, A.; Kasperovych, D.V.; Polischuk, O.G.; et al. New development of radiopure ZnWO4 crystal scintillators. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 2019, 935, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bernabei, R.; Belli, P.; Cappella, F.; Caracciolo, V.; Castellano, S.; Cerulli, R.; Boiko, R.S.; Chernyak, D.M.; Danevich, F.A.; Incicchitti, A.; et al. Crystal scintillators for low background measurements. AIP Conf. Proc. 2013, 1549, 189–196. [Google Scholar]
  15. Barucci, M.; Beeman, J.W.; Caracciolo, V.; Pagnanini, L.; Pattavina, L.; Pessina, G.; Pirro, S.; Rusconi, C.; Schäffnerfc, K. Cryogenic light detectors with enhanced performance for rare event physics. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 2019, 935, 150–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Boiko, R.S.; Cappella, F.; Caracciolo, V.; Cerulli, R.; Chernyak, D.M.; Danevich, F.A.; di Vacri, M.L.; Incicchitti, A.; et al. First search for 2ϵ and ϵβ+ processes in 168Yb. Nucl. Phys. A 2019, 990, 64–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Barabash, A.S.; Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Boiko, R.S.; Cappella, F.; Caracciolo, V.; Cerulli, R.; Danevich, F.A.; Di Marco, A.; Incicchitti, A.; et al. Double beta decay of 150Nd to the first excited 0+ level of 150Sm: Preliminary results. Nucl. Phys. Atom. Energy 2018, 19, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Boiko, R.S.; Cappella, F.; Caracciolo, V.; Cerulli, R.; Danevich, F.A.; Incicchitti, A.; Kropivyansky, B.N.; Laubenstein, M.; et al. First search for 2ϵ and ϵβ+ decay of 162Er and new limit on 2β- decay of 170Er to the first excited level of 170Yb. J. Phys. G 2018, 45, 095101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Barabash, A.S.; Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Cappella, F.; Caracciolo, V.; Cerulli, R.; Danevich, F.A.; Di Marco, A.; Incicchitti, A.; Kasperovych, D.V.; et al. Low background scintillators to investigate rare processes. J. Instrum. 2020, 15, C07037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Boiko, R.S.; Cappella, F.; Caracciolo, V.; Cerulli, R.; Danevich, F.A.; Di Marco, A.; Incicchitti, A.; Kropivyansky, B.N.; et al. First direct search for 2ϵ and ϵβ+ decay of 144Sm and 2β- decay of 154Sm. Eur. Phys. J. A 2019, 55, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Cappella, F.; Caracciolo, V.; Cerulli, R.; Danevich, F.A.; Incicchitti, A.; Kasperovych, D.V.; Kobychev, V.; Kovtun, G.P.; et al. Search for α decay of naturally occurring osmium nuclides accompanied by γ quanta. Phys. Rev. C 2020, 102, 024605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Caracciolo, V.; Cappella, F.; Cerulli, R.; Di Marco, A.; Laubenstein, M.; Nagorny, S.S.; Safonova, O.E.; Shlegelh, N.G. Limits and performances of a BaWO4 single crystal. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 2019, 901, 150–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Azzolin, O.; Beeman, J.W.; Bellini, F.; Beretta, M.; Biassoni, M.; Brofferio, C.; Bucci, C.; Capelli, S.; Cardani, L.; Carniti, P.; et al. Measurement of 216Po half-life with the CUPID-0 experiment. Phys. Lett. B 2021, 822, 136642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Boiko, R.S.; Danevich, F.A.; Di Marco, A.; Incicchitti, A.; Kasperovych, D.V.; Cappella, F.; Caracciolo, V.; Kobychev, V.V.; et al. Half-life measurements of 212Po with thorium-loaded liquid scintillator. Nucl. Phys. Atom. Energy 2018, 19, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Cappella, F.; Caracciolo, V.; Cerulli, R.; Danevich, F.A.; Incicchitti, A.; Kasperovych, D.V.; Kobychev, V.; Kovtun, G.P.; et al. New experimental limits on double-beta decay of osmium. J. Phys. G 2021, 48, 085104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, M.; Huang, W.J.; Kondev, F.G.; Audi, G.; Naimi, S. The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references. Chin. Phys. C 2021, 41, 030003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Caracciolo, V.; Nagorny, S.S.; Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Cappella, F.; Cerulli, R.; Inchicchitti, A.; Laubenstein, M.; Merlo, V.; Nisi, S.; et al. Search for α decay of naturally occurring Hf-nuclides using a Cs2HfCl6 scintillator. Nucl. Phys. A 2020, 1002, 121941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mirea, M.; Pahomi, T.; Stoica, S. Values of the phase space factors involved in double beta decay. Rom. Rep. Phys. 2015, 67, 872–889. [Google Scholar]
  29. Danevich, F.A.; Hult, M.; Kasperovych, D.V.; Kovtunc, G.P.; Kovtun, K.W.; Lutter, G.; Marissens, G.; Polischuk, O.G.; Stetsenko, S.P.; Tretyak, V.I. First search for 2ϵ and ϵβ+ decay of 174Hf. Nucl. Phys. A 2020, 996, 121703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Broerman, B.; Laubenstein, M.; Nagorny, S.; Songac, N.; Vincent, A.C. A search for rare and induced nuclear decays in hafnium. Nucl. Phys. A 2021, 1012, 122212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Meija, J.; Coplen, T.B.; Berglund, M.; Brand, W.A.; De Bièvre, P.; Gröning, M.; Holden, N.E.; Irrgeher, J.; Loss, R.D.; Walczyk, T.; et al. Atomic weights of the elements 2013. Pure Appl. Chem. 2016, 88, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Buck, B.; Merchant, A.C.; Perez, S.M. Ground state to ground state alpha decays of heavy even-even nuclei. Physica G 1991, 17, 1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Poenaru, D.N.; Ivascu, M. Estimation of the alpha decay half-lives. J. Phys. 1983, 44, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Denisov, V.Y.; Khudenko, A.A. α-decay half-lives: Empirical relations. Rhys. Rev. C 2015, 92, 014602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Danevich, F.A.; Hult, M.; Kasperovych, D.V.; Kovtunc, G.P.; Kovtun, K.W.; Lutter, G.; Marissens, G.; Polischuk, O.G.; Stetsenko, S.P.; Tretyak, V.I. First search for α decays of naturally occurring Hf nuclides with emission of γ quanta. Eur. Phys. J. A 2020, 56, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Abzouzi, A.; Antony, M.S.; Ndocko Ndongué, V.B. Precision measurements of the half-lives of nuclides. J. Rad. Nucl. Chem. Lett. 1998, 135, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Achterberg, E.; Capurro, O.A.; Marti, G.V. Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 178. Nucl. Data Sheets 2009, 110, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Van Klinken, J.; Venema, V.Z.; Janssens, R.V.F.; Emery, G.T. K-forbidden decays in 178Hf; M4 decay of an Yrast state. Nucl. Phys. A 1980, 339, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Macfarlane, R.D.; Kohman, T.P. Natural alpha radioactivity in medium-heavy elements. Phys. Rev. 1961, 121, 1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cardenas, C.; Burger, A.; Goodwin, B.; Groza, M.; Laubenstein, M.; Nagorny, S.; Rowe, E. Pulse-shape discrimination with Cs2HfCl6 crystal scintillator. Nucl. Inst. Met. A 2017, 869, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tretyak, V.I. Semi-empirical calculation of quenching factors for ions in scintillators. Astropart. Phys. 2010, 33, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. van Loef, E.V.; Higgins, W.M.; Glodo, J.; Brecher, C.; Lempicki, A.; Venkataramani, V.; Moses, W.W.; Derenzo, E.S.; Shah, K.S. Scintillation Properties of SrHfO3(Ce) and BaHfO3(Ce) Ceramics. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2007, 54, 741–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Derenzo, S.; Bizarri, G.; Borade, R.; Bourret-Courchesne, E.; Boutchko, R.; Canning, A.; Chaudhry, A.; Eagleman, Y.; Gundiah, G.; Hanrahan, S.; et al. New scintillators discovered by high-throughput screening. Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 2011, 652, 247–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Derenzo, S.E.; Moses, W.W.; Cahoon, J.L.; Perera, R.C.C.; Litton, J.E. Prospects for New Inorganic Scintillators. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 1990, 37, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. LeLuyer, C.; Villanueva-Ibanez, M.; Pillonnet, A.; Dujardin, C. HfO2:X (X = Eu3+, Ce3+, Y3+) Sol Gel Powders for Ultradense Scintillating Materials. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 10152–10155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ji, Y.M.; Jiang, D.Y.; Shi, J.L. La2Hf2O7:Ti4+ ceramic scintillator for x-ray imaging. J. Mater. Rese. 2005, 20, 567–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fujimoto, Y.; Saeki, K.; Nakauchi, D.; Yanagida, T.; Koshimizu, M.; Asai, K. New Intrinsic Scintillator with Large Effective Atomic Number: Tl2HfCl6 and Tl2ZrCl6 Crystals for X-ray and Gamma-ray Detections. Sens. Mater. 2018, 30, 1577–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vuong, P.Q.; Tyagi, M.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, H.J. Crystal growth of a novel and efficient Tl2HfCl6 scintillator with improved scintillation characteristics. Cryst. Eng. Comm. 2019, 21, 5898–5904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dumoulin, L.; Giuliani, A.; Kandel, R.; Khalife, H.; Kuznetsov, S.V.; Nagorny, S.S.; Nahorna, V.V.; Nishchev, K.N.; Nones, C.; Olivieri, E.; et al. Assessment of Cs2HfCl6 crystal applicability as low-temperature scintillating bolometers by their thermodynamic characteristics. J. Mater. Chem. C 2022, 10, 5218–5229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Simplified ϵ β + and 2 ϵ decay scheme of 174 Hf.
Figure 1. Simplified ϵ β + and 2 ϵ decay scheme of 174 Hf.
Radiation 02 00017 g001
Figure 2. Simplified schematic representation of the experimental setups (not in scale) detailed in Refs. [29] (for the left scheme) and [30] (for the right scheme).
Figure 2. Simplified schematic representation of the experimental setups (not in scale) detailed in Refs. [29] (for the left scheme) and [30] (for the right scheme).
Radiation 02 00017 g002
Figure 3. (a) Energy spectrum acquired with the experiment at HADES [29] in the region of interest for the 2 ν 2K and 2 ν KL of 174 Hf (solid histogram, online red). The dots (online blue) is the background data without the Hf sample and normalized to the time of acquisition. Solid line (online black) is the fit of the background model, and the dashed line is the excluded effect. (Taken from Ref. [29] with permission). (b) Energy spectrum acquired with the experiment at LNGS [30], in the region of interest for the α decay of 174 Hf (see next section). However, the low energy range of the panel shows the energy region of interest for the case of 2 ν 2K and 2 ν KL of 174 Hf decay, where the dominant background is due to the Hf X-rays. The solid line (online red) is the background model for the α decay of 174 Hf and the dashed line is the excluded effect. (Taken from Ref. [30] with permission).
Figure 3. (a) Energy spectrum acquired with the experiment at HADES [29] in the region of interest for the 2 ν 2K and 2 ν KL of 174 Hf (solid histogram, online red). The dots (online blue) is the background data without the Hf sample and normalized to the time of acquisition. Solid line (online black) is the fit of the background model, and the dashed line is the excluded effect. (Taken from Ref. [29] with permission). (b) Energy spectrum acquired with the experiment at LNGS [30], in the region of interest for the α decay of 174 Hf (see next section). However, the low energy range of the panel shows the energy region of interest for the case of 2 ν 2K and 2 ν KL of 174 Hf decay, where the dominant background is due to the Hf X-rays. The solid line (online red) is the background model for the α decay of 174 Hf and the dashed line is the excluded effect. (Taken from Ref. [30] with permission).
Radiation 02 00017 g003
Figure 5. Mean time ( t ) versus energy for the data accumulated over 2848 h using a CHC crystal scintillator (see text). The lines corresponding to sigma intervals (at the 99% of events) for the t values of β / γ and α particles are painted (on-line: red solid lines and blue dashed lines, respectively). (Inset) Distribution of the t for the data in the energy range of (0.4–3.0) MeV (taken from Ref. [27] with permission).
Figure 5. Mean time ( t ) versus energy for the data accumulated over 2848 h using a CHC crystal scintillator (see text). The lines corresponding to sigma intervals (at the 99% of events) for the t values of β / γ and α particles are painted (on-line: red solid lines and blue dashed lines, respectively). (Inset) Distribution of the t for the data in the energy range of (0.4–3.0) MeV (taken from Ref. [27] with permission).
Radiation 02 00017 g005
Figure 6. α energy spectrum picked out using the PSD from the data accumulated with the CHC crystal scintillator over 2848 h. The fit model built from α decays of 238 U and 232 Th with daughters is highlighted by blue solid line, and some individual fit contributions are also presented. The energy scale is in α energy having considered the Q.F. studied in Ref. [27] (taken from Ref. [27] with permission).
Figure 6. α energy spectrum picked out using the PSD from the data accumulated with the CHC crystal scintillator over 2848 h. The fit model built from α decays of 238 U and 232 Th with daughters is highlighted by blue solid line, and some individual fit contributions are also presented. The energy scale is in α energy having considered the Q.F. studied in Ref. [27] (taken from Ref. [27] with permission).
Radiation 02 00017 g006
Figure 7. Using the PSD, the energy spectrum of α events from the acquired data with a CHC scintillator over 2848 h is shown. For the energy scale, the authors have considered the Q.F. of α particles (see text or Ref. [27] for details). (left) The fit of the data, in the energy region of interest, for the 174 Hf α decay. The fit model is built considering the α decays of 147 Sm, 174 Hf (red line) and taking into account some degraded alpha particles (online solid blue line). The yellow band is the background model. (right) The fit of the data by a modified model similar to the previous one but considering one peak (instead of two) in the energy (2.2–2.6) MeV (taken from Ref. [27] with permission).
Figure 7. Using the PSD, the energy spectrum of α events from the acquired data with a CHC scintillator over 2848 h is shown. For the energy scale, the authors have considered the Q.F. of α particles (see text or Ref. [27] for details). (left) The fit of the data, in the energy region of interest, for the 174 Hf α decay. The fit model is built considering the α decays of 147 Sm, 174 Hf (red line) and taking into account some degraded alpha particles (online solid blue line). The yellow band is the background model. (right) The fit of the data by a modified model similar to the previous one but considering one peak (instead of two) in the energy (2.2–2.6) MeV (taken from Ref. [27] with permission).
Radiation 02 00017 g007
Figure 8. Diagram T 1 / 2 vs the inverse of the square root of alpha energy in MeV. The black symbols are the results in Refs. [1,27]. The α decay of 174 Hf has been observed [27], while only lower limits at 90% C.L. are reported for the other three Hf isotopes naturally present. The blue band is the extrapolation of the predictions for all the Hf isotopes using the Geiger-Nuttall scaling law and the observed data point [27]. The red symbols represent the sensitivity that the measurement can reach using a CHC crystal scintillator with 43.83 kg × day of exposure. As evident, there is a good perspective to observe the α decay of 176 Hf and 176 Hf (see also Table 3).
Figure 8. Diagram T 1 / 2 vs the inverse of the square root of alpha energy in MeV. The black symbols are the results in Refs. [1,27]. The α decay of 174 Hf has been observed [27], while only lower limits at 90% C.L. are reported for the other three Hf isotopes naturally present. The blue band is the extrapolation of the predictions for all the Hf isotopes using the Geiger-Nuttall scaling law and the observed data point [27]. The red symbols represent the sensitivity that the measurement can reach using a CHC crystal scintillator with 43.83 kg × day of exposure. As evident, there is a good perspective to observe the α decay of 176 Hf and 176 Hf (see also Table 3).
Radiation 02 00017 g008
Table 1. The detection efficiency of some 2 ϵ and ϵ β + processes in 174 Hf as performed in Refs. [29,30] if comparable. E γ is the γ quanta used in both the experiments to study the half-life of the related transition.
Table 1. The detection efficiency of some 2 ϵ and ϵ β + processes in 174 Hf as performed in Refs. [29,30] if comparable. E γ is the γ quanta used in both the experiments to study the half-life of the related transition.
Channel of the DecayDecay ModeLevel of Daughter NucleusE γ (keV)Detection Efficiency (%)
J π , Energy (keV) [29][30]
2 L 2 ν 2 + , 76.576.5 0.39 3.15
2 K 0 ν g.s.977.4 4.53 7.59
K L 0 ν g.s.1028.9 4.46 7.32
2 L 0 ν g.s.1080.4 4.39 7.09
2 K 0 ν 2 + , 76.5900.9 4.67 8.01
K L 0 ν 2 + , 76.5952.4 4.59 7.72
2 L 0 ν 2 + , 76.51003.9 4.51 7.45
K β + 2 ν + 0 ν g.s.511 10.6 11.8
L β + 2 ν + 0 ν g.s.511 10.7 11.8
Table 2. The half-life limits of 2 ϵ and ϵ β + processes in 174 Hf as performed in Refs. [29,30].
Table 2. The half-life limits of 2 ϵ and ϵ β + processes in 174 Hf as performed in Refs. [29,30].
Channel of the DecayDecay ModeLevel of Daughter NucleusExperimental Limit of
T 1 / 2 (90% C.L. (y))
J π , Energy (keV)[29][30]
2 K 2 ν g.s. 7.1 × 10 16 1.4 × 10 16
K L 2 ν g.s. 4.2 × 10 16 1.4 × 10 16
2 K 2 ν 2 + , 76.5 5.9 × 10 16 7.9 × 10 16
K L 2 ν 2 + , 76.5 3.5 × 10 16 7.9 × 10 16
2 L 2 ν 2 + , 76.5 3.9 × 10 16 7.9 × 10 16
2 K 0 ν g.s. 5.8 × 10 17 2.7 × 10 18
K L 0 ν g.s. 1.9 × 10 18 4.2 × 10 17
2 L 0 ν g.s. 7.8 × 10 17 3.6 × 10 17
2 K 0 ν 2 + , 76.5 7.1 × 10 17 2.4 × 10 18
K L 0 ν 2 + , 76.5 6.2 × 10 17 3.1 × 10 17
2 L 0 ν 2 + , 76.5 7.2 × 10 17 9.4 × 10 17
K β + 2 ν + 0 ν g.s. 1.4 × 10 17 5.6 × 10 16
L β + 2 ν + 0 ν g.s. 1.4 × 10 17 5.6 × 10 16
Table 4. Main properties of Hf-based crystal scintillators (See text).
Table 4. Main properties of Hf-based crystal scintillators (See text).
ScintillatorPercentage of Hf in Weight (%)Density (g/cm 3 )L.Y. (phe/MeV)Main Decay Time (ns)Main Emission Peak (nm)
BaHfO 3 (Ce)498.3∼40,000∼25∼400
CaHfO 3 676.9∼10,000∼33∼439
Cs 2 HfCl 6 313.8∼50,000∼10,000∼400
HfF 4 707.1∼300∼29∼350
HfO 2 859.7∼30,000∼9500∼480
La 2 Hf 2 O 7 (Ti)237.9∼13,000∼10,000∼475
SrHfO 3 (Ce)576.7∼40,000∼42∼410
∼36 (89%);
Tl 2 HfCl 6 225.3∼25,000∼217 (6%);∼380
∼1500 (11%)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Caracciolo, V.; Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Cappella, F.; Cerulli, R.; Incicchitti, A.; Laubenstein, M.; Leoncini, A.; Merlo, V.; Nagorny, S.; et al. Investigation on Rare Nuclear Processes in Hf Nuclides. Radiation 2022, 2, 234-247. https://doi.org/10.3390/radiation2020017

AMA Style

Caracciolo V, Belli P, Bernabei R, Cappella F, Cerulli R, Incicchitti A, Laubenstein M, Leoncini A, Merlo V, Nagorny S, et al. Investigation on Rare Nuclear Processes in Hf Nuclides. Radiation. 2022; 2(2):234-247. https://doi.org/10.3390/radiation2020017

Chicago/Turabian Style

Caracciolo, Vincenzo, Pierluigi Belli, Rita Bernabei, Fabio Cappella, Riccardo Cerulli, Antonella Incicchitti, Matthias Laubenstein, Alice Leoncini, Vittorio Merlo, Serge Nagorny, and et al. 2022. "Investigation on Rare Nuclear Processes in Hf Nuclides" Radiation 2, no. 2: 234-247. https://doi.org/10.3390/radiation2020017

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop