Factors Affecting Organelle Genome Stability in Physcomitrella patens

Organelle genomes are essential for plants; however, the mechanisms underlying the maintenance of organelle genomes are incompletely understood. Using the basal land plant Physcomitrella patens as a model, nuclear-encoded homologs of bacterial-type homologous recombination repair (HRR) factors have been shown to play an important role in the maintenance of organelle genome stability by suppressing recombination between short dispersed repeats. In this review, I summarize the factors and pathways involved in the maintenance of genome stability, as well as the repeats that cause genomic instability in organelles in P. patens, and compare them with findings in other plant species. I also discuss the relationship between HRR factors and organelle genome structure from the evolutionary standpoint.


Introduction
Physcomitrella patens is a moss (bryophyte) that has been used as a model species for studying cell growth and differentiation [1]. Additionally, P. patens is recognized as a model for land plants because it is located at the base of the land plant lineage [2]. The life cycle of P. patens is simple and mostly haploid. Germinated spores of P. patens produce filamentous protonemal cells comprising chloronemal and caulonemal cells, which subsequently produce gametophores with leafy shoots. Sporophyte, the only diploid phase in the life cycle of P. patens, is developed from zygotes, archegonia, and antheridia, which are formed at the top of gametophores. Nuclear DNA of P. patens shows exceptionally high activity of homologous recombination, which enables its use for gene targeting in combination with polyethylene glycol-mediated protoplast transformation [3]. This feature, together with its haploid vegetative growth phase and recent advances in nuclear genome analysis, has accelerated reverse genetic analyses in P. patens [2,4].
Each P. patens cell harbors ≈50 large spindle-shaped chloroplasts and many rod-or sphere-shaped mitochondria. Chloroplast and mitochondria in P. patens, as in other plant species and algae, possess their own DNA, which associates with proteins to form nucleoids. The mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) of P. patens is 105 kb in size and harbors genes encoding transfer RNAs (tRNAs), ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), and proteins that regulate gene expression and oxidative phosphorylation [5]. The mapped mitochondrial genomes of angiosperms are larger than that of P. patens; however, they are shown to form complicated structures including linear, branched, and circular structures [6]. Moreover, homologous recombination between repeats longer than 1 kb, which are frequently observed in angiosperm mtDNA, makes them a more complicated structure. By contrast, P. patens mtDNA forms a single circular structure because of the absence of repeats longer than 80 bp [5,[7][8][9]. The chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) of P. patens is 123 kb in size and contains genes encoding tRNAs, rRNAs, and proteins including subunits of RNA polymerase-and photosynthesis-related proteins [10]. The cpDNA of P. patens exhibits a typical circular structure with large single-copy (LSC) and small single-copy (SSC) regions separated by a pair of large inverted repeat (IR) regions [10]. Except for the large IR regions (9.6 kb each), the longest dispersed repeat in P. patens cpDNA is 63 bp in size, with a 3 bp mismatch [11]. Notably, neither mtDNA nor cpDNA encode proteins that are involved in DNA replication, recombination, and repair; instead, proteins involved in these processes are encoded by nuclear DNA, similar to a large number of proteins that function in chloroplasts and mitochondria.

Plant Homologs of Bacterial Proteins and Their Localization
Because chloroplasts and mitochondria are derived from bacteria, internal contents of these organelles resemble prokaryotes. Although orthologs of bacterial proteins function in chloroplasts and mitochondria, most of the chloroplast and mitochondrial proteins are encoded by nuclear DNA because of gene transfer during evolution. In bacteria, homologous recombination repair (HRR) proteins repair DNA double-strand breaks and collapsed or stalled replication forks. Homologs of bacterial HRR factors are also found in the nuclear genome of P. patens and that of other plant species. The N-terminus of HRR factors contain signal peptides that target these proteins to chloroplasts and/or mitochondria. Interestingly, such bacterial-type HRR factors have not been found in animal or yeast nuclear genomes [8,[12][13][14], implying the existence of plant-specific mechanisms underlying organelle DNA maintenance by HRR. Table 1 summarizes plant homologs of bacterial HRR factors and MutS homolog 1 (MSH1; involved in organelle genome stabilization) in P. patens and other plant species, including Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Arabidopsis thaliana, which are representative models of green algae and angiosperms, respectively. Nuclear genomes of P. patens and other plant species encode several homologs of bacterial HRR factors, although some homologs have not been identified in the genomes of P. patens and other plant species, on the basis of sequence similarity.  [25] RecA is a key factor in HRR, as it binds to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and identifies homologous sequences to perform strand exchange between them [27]. Nuclear DNA of P. patens encodes two types of RecA homologs, RECA1 and RECA2, which show moderate sequence similarity. Phylogenetic analysis shows that these two RECA proteins cluster with either cyanobacterial RecA or proteobacterial RecA in separate clades, suggesting that these proteins have different origins, that is, RECA1 from α-proteobacteria, and RECA2 from cyanobacteria [13]. Products of RECA1 and RECA2 genes expressed from the nuclear DNA are predominantly localized to mitochondria and chloroplasts, respectively, thus reflecting their predicted origins [13,18]. When full-length RECA1 and RECA2 proteins are transiently produced in protoplasts, they form granular structures that associate with organelle nucleoids [8,18], indicating that these proteins constantly associate with and/or act on nucleoids. Consistent with this hypothesis, chloroplast RecA is shown to associate with the chloroplast nucleoid by nucleoids enriched proteome in maize [28]. Interestingly, although HRR factors are encoded by a single conserved gene in plants, the copy number of RECA varies among plant species. Although A. thaliana and other flowering plants harbor multiple copies of the RECA gene, and the encoded proteins localize to chloroplasts and/or mitochondria, algae, including C. reinhardtii, harbor a single RECA gene copy, and the encoded RecA homolog localizes to chloroplasts [12] (Table 1).
RecG, a DNA helicase/translocase, functions in the rescue of branched DNA structures including stalled replication forks [29]. The nuclear genome of P. patens harbors a single copy of the RECG gene [14]. Phylogenetic analysis shows that plant RecG homologs, including P. patens RECG, are closely related to cyanobacterial RecG, suggesting that these proteins originated from cyanobacteria [23]. The RECG protein of P. patens harbors an ambiguous N-terminal signal peptide but localizes to both chloroplasts and mitochondria, similar to the A. thaliana RecG homolog, RECG1 [14,23]. Moreover, full-length P. patens RECG protein localizes to nucleoids of both organelles [14].
Unlike RecA and RecG, RecX does not act directly on DNA but participates in HRR by directly regulating RecA activity [30]. Although RecX is absent from several bacterial classes including α-proteobacteria and cyanobacteria [31], it is encoded by single copy genes present in the nuclear genomes of diverse plants ranging from green algae to angiosperms [8]. Because of difficulty in analyzing the evolutional origin of plant RecX homologs, it is unclear whether α-proteobacteria and cyanobacteria lost their RecX or plants acquired RecX via horizontal gene transfer. In protoplasts, a fluorescent protein-tagged RecX homolog of P. patens, RECX, localizes to mitochondrial and chloroplast nucleoids, thereby co-localizing with RECA1 and RECA2, respectively [8].
MSH is a eukaryotic homolog of bacterial MutS. Among several types of MSH proteins, MSH1 is the only protein that localizes to organelles [32,33]. MSH1 was originally identified in A. thaliana as a chloroplast mutator (CHM) protein because of the variegated phenotype of the mutant [34,35]. MSH1 is distinct from other MSH proteins and MutS because of the presence of the GIY-YIG endonuclease domain at its C-terminal end [21]. The nuclear genome of P. patens harbors two MSH1 genes, MSH1A and MSH1B, although nuclear genomes of other plants carry only one MSH1 gene copy. Because MSH1A lacks the C-terminal endonuclease domain, P. patens MSH1 genes are thought to be derived by gene duplication or the loss of C-termini endonuclease domains after the duplication event [25]. Both P. patens MSH1 proteins (MSH1A and MSH1B) localize to organelle nucleoids by forming granular structures [25], similar to the MSH1 localization pattern in A. thaliana [26].

Maintenance of Mitochondrial Genome Stability by HRR and MSH1
3.1. RECA P. patens mitochondrial RECA1 knockout (KO) mutants generated by targeted gene disruption show severe defects in protonema cells, with less-developed gametophores and defective mitochondria characterized by an enlarged shape, disorganized cristae, and lower matrix electron density [7], indicating that RECA1 is essential for normal growth. The mitochondrial genome of P. patens RECA1 KO mutant is destabilized by the accumulation of products derived from aberrant recombination between short repeats dispersed throughout the mtDNA [7]. Most of the 24 pairs of repeats (≥30 bp) identified in P. patens mtDNA are involved in recombination in RECA1 KO plants [8], occasionally leading to the generation of subgenomes [7]. Interestingly, because most of the repeats are located in introns of genes in the direct orientation, recombination between them leads to the loss of genes and generation of subgenomes, which may be subsequently lost, as these are not replicated. Thus, copy number variation of loci resulting from the loss of subgenomes is associated with instability of mtDNA in the RECA1 KO mutant [14]. Collectively, these findings show the role of RECA1 in maintaining mtDNA stability by suppressing aberrant recombination between short dispersed repeats (SDRs) in P. patens. Additionally, defects in the recovery of mtDNA damaged by methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) in RECA1 KO plants suggest the involvement of RECA1 in the repair of exogenously damaged mtDNA [13].
In A. thaliana, two RecA homologs, RECA2 and RECA3, localize to mitochondria (Table 1). In comparison with RECA2, RECA3 is more diverged from other RECAs and has truncated C-terminus, which is considered unusual because the C-terminus of RecA is important for its function [21,36]. Consistent with the gene structure, A. thaliana RECA2 mutants are seedling-lethal, thus indicating the importance of RECA2 for normal plant growth; by contrast, RECA3 mutants are almost indistinguishable from the wild type [21]. Both RECA2 and RECA3 mutants accumulate products derived from recombination between intermediate-sized (100-300 bp) repeats in mtDNA, and the number of repeats involving recombination in RECA2 mutants exceed that of RECA3 mutants [36]. Although recombination between shorter repeats (<100 bp) has not been tested in A. thaliana RECA2 and RECA3 mutants, the aforementioned findings suggest a fundamental role of plant mitochondrial RecA homologs in maintaining mitochondrial genome stability by suppressing aberrant recombination between short repeats.

RECG
KO mutation of P. patens RECG gene leads to growth and morphological defects that are similar to but milder than those caused by the KO mutation of RECA1 in plants [14]. The RECG KO mutant plants exhibit abnormal mitochondria, with disorganized cristae and lower matrix density. Moreover, mtDNA of the RECG KO mutant is destabilized by SDR-mediated recombination, similar to the mtDNA of the RECA1 KO mutant, and the length of repeats involved in recombination is also similar between RECA1 and RECG KO mutants [14]. However, these repeats exhibit some differences between RECA1 and RECG KO mutants; for example, at the mitochondrial atp9 locus, recombination between ccmF and atp9 mediated by 47 bp repeats leads to product accumulation in mitochondria of the RECG KO mutant, whereas recombination between nad2 and atp9 mediated by 60 bp repeats, which is a hallmark of recombination induced by the RECA1 KO mutation [7], does not lead to product accumulation in mitochondria of the RECG KO mutant [14]. Furthermore, increase in copy numbers of all tested loci in the RECG KO mutant differed from that in the RECA1 KO mutant. These differences suggest that RECG of P. patens plays a somewhat different role from that of RECA1 in the maintenance of mtDNA stability. Because the amount of mitochondrial recombination products often show a direct correlation with the heterogeneous RECG KO growth defects, recombination between mitochondrial SDRs is considered as the cause of all morphological phenotypes [14]. Because of mtDNA rearrangements induced by the KO mutation of RECG, the level of mitochondrial transcripts is decreased by recombination between repeats located in introns of mitochondrial genes [14]. Although A. thaliana RECG1 mutants are morphologically indistinguishable from wild-type plants under normal growth conditions, they show mtDNA instability because of aberrant recombination between intermediate-sized repeats (100-500 bp in length) [23]. Thus, RECG1 participates in the suppression of recombination between intermediate-sized repeats, and the loss of RECG1 leading to the accumulation of recombination products. Although recombination between shorter repeats has not been analyzed in A. thaliana RECG1 mutants, recombination surveillance indicates that RecG homolog is involved in the suppression of aberrant recombination between short and/or imperfect repeats in plant mitochondria.

RECX
KO mutation of P. patens RECX, which leads to no significant morphological phenotypes, results in a minor but reliable increase in products derived from recombination between several pairs of mitochondrial SDRs [8], suggesting the involvement of RECX in the maintenance of mtDNA stability. Overexpression (OEX) of P. patens RECX in plants leads to mtDNA instability because of the induction of recombination between many pairs of SDRs, sometimes with a comparable level with mtDNA instability in the RECA1 KO mutant [8]. Taking into account the protein-protein interaction between P. patens RECX and RECA1, as revealed by yeast two-hybrid assays, RECX is believed to modulate the function of RECA1 by directly binding to RECA1 to maintain mtDNA stability, rather than inducing mtDNA instability in wild type. The involvement of RECX in the maintenance of mtDNA stability is also supported by the positive correlation between the expression of RECX and other mtDNA stabilizing genes, including RECA1 and RECG, in several tissues of P. patens [8]. Interestingly, the expression of RECX, RECA1, RECG, and MSH1B is highly increased in P. patens spores, thus indicating their roles in mtDNA maintenance during transmission to progenies.

MSH1
Because P. patens unusually possesses two MSH1 genes, single and double KO mutants of MSH1 genes were generated. Although the single and double MSH1 mutants showed no significant phenotypes compared with the wild type, comparison among the mutants show an involvement of MSH1B in the maintenance of mtDNA [25]. In the single MSH1B KO mutant and MSH1A and MSH1B double KO mutants, mtDNA is similarly destabilized by the induction of recombination between mitochondrial repeats (21-69 bp in length) that overlap with those in P. patens RECA1 or RECG KO mitochondria. On the other hand, the accumulation of products derived from recombination between nad2 and atp9, rather than that of products derived from recombination between ccmF and atp9, hallmarks of the mitochondrial atp9 locus in RECA1 KO and RECG KO mutants, respectively, in the MSH1B mutant suggest a similar mechanism of mtDNA stabilization between MSH1B and RECA1, whereas the MSH1 RECA1 double KO mutant is likely lethal [25]. Genetic interaction between P. patens MSH1B and RECG loci, as shown by epistatic analysis of the suppression of recombination, suggests that MSH1B and RECA1 act in distinct pathways that converge at a node in mitochondria [25]. The importance of the GIY-YIG endonuclease domain of MSH1 for the suppression of recombination is indicated by its deletion mutants; on the other hand, no significant phenotypes are observed in the MSH1A KO mutant, which lacks the endonuclease domain [25]. The instability of mtDNA in A. thaliana MSH1 mutants is well characterized; in these mutants, recombination is observed between 50-556 bp repeats, and the length of these repeats overlaps with that of repeats responsible for mtDNA instability in the P. patens MSH1B KO mutant [21,32,37]. Moreover, the difference in mtDNA rearrangements between A. thaliana MSH1 mutants and RECA3 mutants, as well as the highly pronounced phenotypes of the MSH1 RECA3 double KO mutants, suggest that these genes act in distinct but overlapping pathways [21]. Recent biochemical characterization of the GIY-YIG domain of A. thaliana MSH1 shows its binding to a branched DNA structure, proposing a mechanism for the suppression of recombination between repeats [38].

RECA
KO mutation of P. patens RECA2 results in modest growth inhibition under glucose-deficient conditions and increased sensitivity to MMS or ultraviolet (UV) radiation, leading to DNA damage [11]. These phenotypes of the RECA2 KO mutant are in contrast to those of the RECA1 KO mutant of P. patens, which show severe growth defects under normal conditions. However, despite the slight effect of RECA2 KO mutation on the morphology of P. patens, the cpDNA of the RECA2 KO mutant is destabilized by the induction of recombination between SDRs (13-63 bp in length) [11]. This shows that RECA2 is involved in the maintenance of chloroplast genome stability by suppressing recombination between SDRs. Moreover, roles of RECA1 and RECA2 in mitochondria and chloroplasts suggest the common role of RecA homologs in maintaining organelle genome stability by suppressing aberrant recombination between SDRs. Because P. patens cpDNA has fewer relatively long (>35 bp) repeats, the lack of RecA homologs may lead to a slight effect on the stability of cpDNA compared with that of mtDNA. Impaired recovery of damaged cpDNA, but not that of nuclear DNA or mtDNA, in P. patens RECA2 KO mutants suggests another role of RECA2 in the maintenance of cpDNA stability by promoting recovery from DNA damage [11]. In contrast to the modest phenotypes of P. patens lacking chloroplast RECA, the deficiency of chloroplast RECA (RECA1) in A. thaliana plants (Table 1) is lethal [21]. A. thaliana T-DNA insertion RECA1 mutants in which the level of RECA1 transcripts is decreased to 15% of that in the wild type suggest that RECA1 is involved in the maintenance of cpDNA integrity by maintaining the quantity and multimeric structure of cpDNA [39]. A. thaliana RECA1 also maintains cpDNA stability by preventing cpDNA rearrangements in plants carrying a mutation in Whirly genes, which encode a family of ssDNA-binding proteins that suppress cpDNA rearrangements [40,41]. Chloroplast RECA in C. reinhardtii (Table 1) is also involved in the maintenance of chloroplast genome stability by suppressing aberrant recombination between SDRs, and it regulates the dynamics of chloroplast nucleoid including segregation [42].

RECG
Because the morphological defects of RECG KO mutant plants are similar to those of RECA1 KO mutant plants, the defects of RECG KO plants are mainly attributed to defects in mtDNA. However, KO mutation of RECG leads to abnormal chloroplasts that over-accumulate starch and possess less-developed thylakoids, implying defects in chloroplast function [14]. Indeed, cpDNA and mtDNA of the RECG KO mutant are destabilized by the induction of recombination between SDRs. The repeats involved in recombination are almost common between the cpDNA of RECG and RECA2 KO mutants, although the accumulation of recombination products is higher in the RECG KO mutant than in the RECA2 KO mutant [14]. These results suggest that RECG maintains chloroplast genome stability by suppressing recombination between a broad range of repeats in cpDNA. Both synergistic and suppressive relationships are observed between RECG and RECA2, with respect to the suppression of recombination between chloroplast repeats, depending on the type of repeats [25], suggesting a complex relationship between these genes. Thus, RECG and RECA2 may act in distinct pathways or in the same pathway, depending on the repeats, to suppress recombination. A. thaliana RECG1 localizes to chloroplasts; however, evidence indicating the involvement of RECG1 in the maintenance of chloroplast genome stability is lacking [23].

RECX
Although RECX localizes to chloroplast nucleoids, significant phenotypes have not been observed in the chloroplasts of P. patens RECX KO mutants and OEX plants. These KO and OEX plants show a basal level of products derived from recombination between chloroplast SDRs, in contrast to P. patens RECA2 KO plants, which accumulate these recombinant products to high levels [8]. However, yeast two-hybrid assays show protein-protein interaction between P. patens RECX and RECA2, which is stronger than that between RECX and RECA1 [8]. This implies that RECX may interact with RECA2 and modulate its activity to maintain chloroplast genome stability, and the effect of RECX KO mutation or OEX was not evident probably because of the moderate effect of RECA2 inhibition on cpDNA.

MSH1
Similar to the instability of mitochondrial genome in the MSH1 KO mutant, the MSH1B KO mutant shows chloroplast genome instability because of recombination between 28-63 bp SDRs in P. patens [25]. KO mutation of the MSH1A gene does not increase the abundance of recombination products in the wild-type or MSH1B KO mutant, indicating that MSH1B plays a predominant role in the suppression of recombination between SDRs in chloroplasts and mitochondria [25]. Interestingly, the level of recombination products in chloroplasts vary among the P. patens MSH1B, RECA2, and RECG KO mutant plants, depending on the type of repeats. Among these KO mutants, the level of products resulting from recombination between direct repeat-1 (DR-1) is the highest in RECG KO mutants, whereas the level of products resulting from recombination between inverted repeat-1 (IR-1) is the highest in MSH1B KO mutant plants [25]. This suggests a complicated regulation of recombination in chloroplasts. Similar complicated regulation is also observed in the genetic interaction between genes, as shown by synergistic relationships between MSH1B and RECG and between MSH1B and RECA2, although synergistic relationships have been observed for DR-1 but not for IR-1 [25]. Figure 1 summarizes all the factors affecting organelle stability and their relationship in P. patens. In A. thaliana MSH1 mutants, cpDNA rearrangements at a locus containing a number of small repeats (<15 bp) indicate the involvement of MSH1 in maintaining chloroplast genome stability, although the details of these rearrangements remain unclear [26].
Plants 2020, 9,145 7 of 10 between MSH1B and RECA2, although synergistic relationships have been observed for DR-1 but not for IR-1 [25]. Figure 1 summarizes all the factors affecting organelle stability and their relationship in P. patens. In A. thaliana MSH1 mutants, cpDNA rearrangements at a locus containing a number of small repeats (<15 bp) indicate the involvement of MSH1 in maintaining chloroplast genome stability, although the details of these rearrangements remain unclear [26].

Organelle Genome Structure, Repeats, and HRR Proteins
Recent evidence in various plant species suggests the role of HRR factors in chloroplasts and mitochondria exclusively for the maintenance of genome stability by suppressing recombination between ectopic loci containing repeats, as summarized above. Because the phenomena of genome destabilization are common between mutants of organelle HRR factors, these factors likely function in a same suppression pathway. However, epistatic analyses of recombination suppression sometimes show that these factors act in distinct pathways [25]. Plant organelle HRR factors are thought to function in the repair of stalled or collapsed replication forks, which are prone to rearrangements in mutants [7]. Because such stalling and collapse of replication forks are caused by various types of DNA damage, the pathways of suppression in organelles may be regulated in a complicated manner. On the other hand, as shown in Table 1, not all HRR factors are conserved in plants, and some are absent in organelles of certain plant species; for example, mitochondrial RecA homologs are absent in some algae including C. reinhardtii, whereas copy numbers of mitochondrial RecA homologs are increased in various angiosperms including A. thaliana (Table 1) [12,13]. By contrast, chloroplast RecA copy numbers are conserved in plants (Table 1). Interestingly, the size and shape of mitochondrial genomes vary among plant species-C. reinhardtii possesses a 16 kb linear mitochondrial genome, whereas A. thaliana harbors a 368 kb multi-chromosome circular mitochondrial genome (Table 2). Moreover, the number of short repeats, which may lead to organelle genome instability because of the loss of HRR, corresponds to the size of the mitochondrial genome ( Table 2). The presence/absence of RecA homologs may be correlated to the number and characteristics of repeats; RecA homologs are absent in algae because of the lack of significant repeats in mtDNA, whereas those in angiosperms are duplicated and functionally divergent to regulate recombination between increased and divergent repeats, or duplication of mitochondrial RecA homologs enabled increase of number of repeats in angiosperms. Recent advances in genome

Organelle Genome Structure, Repeats, and HRR Proteins
Recent evidence in various plant species suggests the role of HRR factors in chloroplasts and mitochondria exclusively for the maintenance of genome stability by suppressing recombination between ectopic loci containing repeats, as summarized above. Because the phenomena of genome destabilization are common between mutants of organelle HRR factors, these factors likely function in a same suppression pathway. However, epistatic analyses of recombination suppression sometimes show that these factors act in distinct pathways [25]. Plant organelle HRR factors are thought to function in the repair of stalled or collapsed replication forks, which are prone to rearrangements in mutants [7]. Because such stalling and collapse of replication forks are caused by various types of DNA damage, the pathways of suppression in organelles may be regulated in a complicated manner. On the other hand, as shown in Table 1, not all HRR factors are conserved in plants, and some are absent in organelles of certain plant species; for example, mitochondrial RecA homologs are absent in some algae including C. reinhardtii, whereas copy numbers of mitochondrial RecA homologs are increased in various angiosperms including A. thaliana (Table 1) [12,13]. By contrast, chloroplast RecA copy numbers are conserved in plants (Table 1). Interestingly, the size and shape of mitochondrial genomes vary among plant species-C. reinhardtii possesses a 16 kb linear mitochondrial genome, whereas A. thaliana harbors a 368 kb multi-chromosome circular mitochondrial genome (Table 2). Moreover, the number of short repeats, which may lead to organelle genome instability because of the loss of HRR, corresponds to the size of the mitochondrial genome ( Table 2). The presence/absence of RecA homologs may be correlated to the number and characteristics of repeats; RecA homologs are absent in algae because of the lack of significant repeats in mtDNA, whereas those in angiosperms are duplicated and functionally divergent to regulate recombination between increased and divergent repeats, or duplication of mitochondrial RecA homologs enabled increase of number of repeats in angiosperms. Recent advances in genome sequencing of various plant species provide an opportunity for exploring the relationship between HRR factors and organelle genome structure. Repeats identified as ≥20 bp of direct or inverted repeats without mismatch by using REPuter [47].
Funding: This work was funded by SUMITOMO Foundation (170946) and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (19K22405).

Conflicts of Interest:
The author declares no conflict of interest.