Next Article in Journal
Chicken Skin Decontamination of Thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. and Hygiene Indicator Escherichia coli Assessed by Viability Real-Time PCR
Next Article in Special Issue
Seroprevalence of Tick-Borne Encephalitis (TBE) Virus Antibodies in Wild Rodents from Two Natural TBE Foci in Bavaria, Germany
Previous Article in Journal
Powdery Mildew Resistance Genes in Vines: An Opportunity to Achieve a More Sustainable Viticulture
Previous Article in Special Issue
Outbreak of Alimentary Tick-Borne Encephalitis in Eastern Slovakia: An Analysis of Affected Patients and Long-Term Outcomes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/pathogens11060704
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Epidemiological Trends of Trans-Boundary Tick-Borne Encephalitis in Europe, 2000–2019

by
Mulugeta A. Wondim
*,
Piotr Czupryna
,
Sławomir Pancewicz
,
Ewelina Kruszewska
,
Monika Groth
and
Anna Moniuszko-Malinowska
Department of Infectious Diseases and Neuroinfections, Medical University of Bialystok, Żurawia 14 Block E, 15-540 Białystok, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2022, 11(6), 704; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11060704
Submission received: 11 April 2022 / Revised: 1 June 2022 / Accepted: 14 June 2022 / Published: 18 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Tick-borne encephalitis is a neuroinfection widely distributed in the Euro–Asia region. Primarily, the virus is transmitted by the bite of infected ticks. From 2000–2019, the total number of confirmed cases in Europe reported to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control was 51,519. The number of cases decreased in 2014 and 2015; however, since 2015, a growing number of cases have been observed, with the involvement of countries in which TBE has not been previously reported. The determinant factors for the spread of TBE are host population size, weather conditions, movement of hosts, and local regulations on the socioeconomic dynamics of the local and travelling people around the foci areas. The mean incidence rate of tick-borne encephalitis from 2000–2019 in Europe was 3.27, while the age-adjusted mean incidence rate was 2.19 per 100,000 population size. This review used several articles and data sources from the European Centre for Diseases Prevention and Control.

1. Introduction

Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is a viral infectious disease caused by tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) that affects the central nervous system. It appears in mild, moderate, or severe forms, with the possibility of long-lasting neurologic sequelae development. It is mainly transmitted by an infected tick bite and rarely through the ingestion of raw milk [1]. A report has also revealed that three solid organ transplant recipients were infected with TBEV during transplantation [2].
The transmission of the virus occurs between ticks, animals, and humans. Humans are the dead-end host of TBEV [3]. In Europe, the Ixodes ricinus (IR) tick is the main vector for the transmission of TBEV [4]. IR ticks are prevalent throughout Europe, from Ireland in the west to the Urals in the east, and from northern Sweden to north Africa [5]. Birds, sheep, goats, horses, rodents, dogs, and other animals can also host the virus, as well as humans [6]. Animals considered to be suitable hosts remain infected with sufficient amounts of the virus in their blood stream to infect naïve ticks while they are feeding. Co-feeding is the other way that ticks get infected. Simultaneous feeding by both infected and non-infected ticks in proximity leads the uninfected ticks to acquire the virus [7,8]. Besides transmission from host to vector or vice versa, the transovarian transmission of TBEV from parent to offspring and transstadial transmission helps the virus to pass through all developmental stages [7,9]. Even though ticks have their own preference for feeding on animals during a particular developmental stage, small mammals such as rodents and insectivores are believed to be their main hosts. Small- and medium-sized mammals and birds are the targets of larvae and nymphs, while adults stick to infesting larger animals [7,9,10].
There are three common subtypes of TBEV, known as European (TBEV-Eu), Siberian (TBEV-Sib), and Far-Eastern (TBEV-FE). IR (TBEV-Eu) and Ixodes persulcatus ticks carry these three antigenically closely related subtypes [3]. Recently, two more subtypes, Baikalian (TBEV-Blk) and Himalayan (TBEV-Him), have been discovered [11,12]. TBEV-Eu causes neurological sequelae in up to 10% of cases, with a mortality rate of < 2% [13,14,15]. TBEV-Sib causes prolonged infection compared to other sub-types, while TBEV-FE patients show high rates of neurological sequelae [13].
TBE was discovered in 1930 by scientists from the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). The first subtype discovered was the Far-Eastern subtype. There was confusion between TBE and Japanese encephalitis until scientists confirmed that they were different and that the route of the transmission of TBE was not airborne [16]. The Western subtype was reported as seasonal meningitis from Austria [17].
Ticks have a long life cycle, and TBEV can survive throughout their developmental stages. Ixodid ticks ingest blood once in a developmental stage, and they have no chance of transmitting TBEV until they feed again [18,19]. The life cycle of ticks is affected by the microclimate, host factors, and seasonal variation. During colder seasons, the activity and development of the two common species of ticks are limited [4]. Ticks become active during vegetation seasons, with adequate levels of humidity and elevated temperatures. Access to increased moisture help ticks ascend to the upper part of grasses, thereby increasing their opportunities to attach to hosts. During molting time, the size of ticks shrinks with the release of water and the hardening of the skin. At this time, ticks prepare for the winter season until the following spring [20].
Globally, TBE covers the geographical areas of Japan, China, Russia, Southern Europe, Central Europe, and Northern Europe. In Europe, the most strongly affected countries are southern Germany, Switzerland, the Czech Republic, Austria, Slovakia, Hungary, the Baltic countries, Slovenia, Poland, parts of Scandinavia, and European Russia [3]. The recent presence of TBEV in Northern Europe is evidence for the emergence of new TBE foci [21].

2. Factors Affecting TBEV Transmission

The risk of TBE in humans is influenced by, e.g., socioeconomic changes, climate change, seasonal variations, and individual predispositions. An extended and warmer summer and the increased population size of hosts favor the survival of ticks and microbes outside of their known habitats [22,23,24]. After an extended and warmer summer, the dynamics of the other seasons change in a way that is favorable for ticks’ survival [24]. Mild and shorter winters are followed by rainy summers, which help grass grow effectively so that ticks can climb and infest humans and other hosts. It has been observed that ticks remain active between March and December because of climate change, which causes shorter winters. The duration of the convenient season for tick activity extended after the year 2000 [25]. Climate change affects the survival, reproduction, interaction with hosts and the environment, and movement of ticks. Cases have been reported from new areas because of activities related to increased human need and the possibility of accessing places that were hard to reach in the past [26].
During winter, ticks hide in the leaf litter or soil and digest the blood ingested during their questing time. Ticks require warm temperatures and humidity to become active (exiting from the soil and ascending into the vegetation) [26,27]. Ticks can be active in dry seasons, looking for hosts and food; however, such conditions limit their longevity [28]. Weather conditions with temperatures of around 8°C and humidity levels of 70–80% are ideal for tick movement and feeding. The European subtype (adult IR tick) is most active in the periods of May–June and September–October [21].
Although climate change is a major factor in the increased spread of several infectious diseases, including TBE, in humans, socioeconomic changes play a comparable role. The end of the Soviet era caused a surge in the number of TBE cases in humans within countries that had been influenced by the planned economy. This was related to the decreased pesticide use, the expansion of subsistence farming and land use, and increased leisure time [29]. Reduced pesticide use favors the survival of ticks and rodents, seemingly promoting TBEV transmission. Small-farm owners tend to fail at following safety protocols, and so people consume dairy products which could be infected with TBEV. In Lithuania, the incidence rate in a joinpoint model rose by 195.2% after 1991 [30]. Estonia also saw a sharp rise in TBE cases in the 1990s. From 1976 to 1992, the yearly incidence rate per 100,000 was 3, while 12, 28, and 27 cases were reported in 1996, 1997, and 1998, respectively [31]. In the Czech Republic, an increase in the incidence rate of TBE was observed in the years 1990–2008 compared to 1970-1989 (p < 0.05) [32].
The number of human cases reported to the ECDC shows seasonal variation and a bimodal distribution, with the peak number of cases reported between June and August, followed by the second peak in October. The majority (95%) of cases are reported from May to November [33]. The recent increased incidence rate is also associated with the advancement of diagnosis tools and the establishment of mandatory reporting and surveillance systems; in the past, a considerable proportion of cases remained either undetected or unreported [34]. However, the irregular geographical distribution with patchy foci and the low prevalence of TBEV in both hosts and vectors make controlling TBE difficult [35,36].
The population of ticks depends on the density of hosts, though not all hosts are able to transmit the virus. The composition of hosts in a specific area determines the impact of hosts on tick survival. The higher proportion of non-competent hosts reduces the transmission of TBEV by minimizing the number of tick bites [37]. Changing the land use and cover also increases the accessibility of landscapes for humans. Access to tick-populated areas by humans eventually leads to an increased chance of acquiring tick bites [37]. Converting agricultural fields to forests creates a convenient environment for hosts’ and ticks’ survival [38].
The exposure to ticks is also increased with the movement of people [25]. Human mobility in tick-populated areas is a potential factor for the enhanced spread of both ticks and TBE. People travel to forest areas for activities such as hiking and mushroom or berry picking. In 2007 alone, 78 million people travelled to TBE endemic areas in Europe without knowledge of the disease [39].

3. Migration of TBE Subtypes

In recent decades, the European strain of TBEV has spread into non-endemic areas. A phylogenetic analysis conducted in Hungary (2011–2016) revealed that Hungarian strains formed a unique cluster that showed similarities to TBEV strains from Finland, Germany, and Russia. Trans-boundary migratory birds were supposedly responsible for the movement of other countries’ strains [40]. The Siberian subtype was found in the northernmost part of Europe, including Finland [41] and Estonia, and three of the subtypes were found in the Crimean Peninsula [42].
Evidence has emerged showing either the appearance of TBEV in new areas or the re-emergence of TBE. In the United Kingdom, the first occurrence of TBEV was reported in May 2019, when the virus was found in ticks collected from deer. The Netherlands saw its first human case in 2016 [12]. Denmark has reported cases in its Baltic regions [43]. In northern Germany, ticks tested positive for TBEV after 15 years of its absence from the area, either due to long-term persistence at low levels of activity or virus reappearance due to bird migrations [44]. The first autochthonous cases of TBE were reported in Moscow in 2016, along with the detection of TBEV in ticks and small mammals [45].
The altitude convenient for ticks in the past was limited to the lower part of Europe. However, other conditions impact tick population density regardless of the altitude level, such as proximity to the ocean, humidity level, and vegetation. In Europe, ticks are reported to survive at altitudes between 600 and 2000 m above sea level with other elements required for their survival (Table 1) [29,46]. Multiple combined factors contribute to an increase in the risk of TBE incidence. Recently, the popularity of mountain climbing as a recreational activity has increased, and ticks have adapted to new foci at higher altitudes because of climate-change-induced warmer weather [29,39,46].
Predictions show that the foci are spreading to the northern part of Europe, while the number of cases is decreasing in central Europe. The spread is expected to be limited to Poland and the Baltic area in 2050 and the southern part of Scandinavia by 2080. The predicted global land temperature and precipitation will not be favorable for the spread of TBEV in its human and enzootic hosts. The temperature change in the land will be higher than that in the sea, leading to less rainfall. Eventually, it is believed that the moisture level in central Europe will be insufficient for ticks [47,48].
Table
Table 1. Tick survival with altitude change over time, from 1950 to 2013.
Table 1. Tick survival with altitude change over time, from 1950 to 2013.
YearCountry Altitude (Meters above Sea Level)Conditions
1950Bosnia Herzegovina<800[49]
1957 Scotland 700[49]
1960Bosnia Herzegovina900[48,49]
1980 Czech Republic700–750Krkonose mountainous area [50]
1997Italy <1300Presence of limestone and vegetation cover with thermophile deciduous forests and high densities of roe deer [51]
1990s Scotland ≥700[49,52]
2001 Scotland 1100[49,52]
2002Czech Republic 1180Krkonose mountainous area [50]
2006Czech Republic 1250Krkonose mountainous area [50]
2008Austria>1500Alpine pasture [53]
2008Greece >600Arid parts of Europe typical of the Mediterranean
2010Bosnia Herzegovina1190[49]
2013Spain 2000Atlantic influence (i.e., greater humidity) [49]
Switzerland 1450Mountainside [49]
Controlling TBEV is extremely difficult because of its unique life cycle, which spans arthropod vectors and reservoir hosts without involving humans [54]. TBE has no definitive treatment other than supportive treatment [55]. Therefore, vaccination plays an irreplaceable role [55,56]. In Austria, from 2000 to 2011, the overall field effectiveness in regularly vaccinated people was 96–99%. This reduced the number of TBE cases by over 4000 within the period 2000–2011 [54]. Two main TBE vaccines (Encepur and FSME-IMMUN) are available in Western Europe [57]. The first vaccine used in Europe was FSME-IMMUN® (Pfizer, New York, NY, USA) in 1976, followed by Encepur® (Bavarian Nordic) from Germany in 1991. Vaccines offer the best protection against TBEV. Vaccination is highly recommended for travellers who plan to stay in risky areas [56]. Post-exposure prophylaxis with specific anti-TBEV immunoglobulins is recommended in Russia and Kazakhstan; however, in Europe, its use has been discontinued because of concerns regarding antibody-mediated disease enhancement in naïve individuals [15].

4. Epidemiological Trends of TBE, 2000–2019

This review draws data from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) collected from European Union/European Economic Area member countries. The number of countries reporting TBE cases to the ECDC increased from 12 in 2000 to 25 in 2019. The data were gathered by ECDC surveillance (Table 2) and are used as per the data-use protocol of the ECDC. The database is classified into two parts: 2000-2010 and 2012–2019. The 2000–2010 section includes the total number of reported cases, total number of confirmed cases, and classification per sex per country. The 2012–2019 report includes the total number of cases, confirmed cases, confirmed cases per 100,000 population, and confirmed cases adjusted for age per 100,000 population. To show the historical background of TBE, several pieces of literature from diverse sources were included.
Over the past nineteen years among the European Union/European Economic Area member countries listed in Table 3, a total number of 51,519 confirmed TBE cases were reported to the ECDC. The mean incidence rate per year within the region was 3.26, and the mean age-adjusted incidence rate was 2.19 per 100,000 population per year. The number of countries included in the report has increased over the years. Lithuania, Latvia, and the Czech Republic had the highest incidence rate per year (13.66, 9.95, and 6.14 cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year, respectively). This, however, does not mean that there are no areas with a greater incidence rate (Figure 1). These countries are at the top since the report only considered their respective national figures.
However, in areas such as the eastern and northeastern regions of Poland, the incidence rate is closer to the national incidence rate of Lithuania. The number of cases between 2000 and 2013 was variable, increasing in some years and decreasing in others; however, the number of confirmed cases steadily increased from 2015 to 2019. Therefore, greater attention should be paid to foci areas, since the national reports of a particular country do not represent the uniform distribution of TBE cases across its regions.
The number of cases reported shows seasonal variation. The number rises in March, peaks in August, and declines in October (Figure 2).
TBE seems to be more prevalent among older adults in both sexes. Older people are more vulnerable to symptomatic infection and severe forms of the disease due to a decreased immune response. Vaccine failure is also more often observed among elderly people, as antibody response to TBEV vaccine declines with increased age (Figure 3) [58]. Furthermore, people aged >50 years are more likely than other age groups to travel across Europe without enough awareness about TBE and without protecting themselves against it. People in this age group are thus at a higher risk of TBE [39].

5. Conclusions

TBE is believed to be under-reported. The under-identification of cases could be related to a lack of clear-cut and specific diagnostic methods and the training of professionals. The dynamic identification of foci areas should be carried out to monitor the continuously changing expansion of TBE. An integrated public health intervention plan is also important to deter TBE expansion within Europe, including vaccination and disease detection, considering that TBE is an important disease affecting travellers and the general public.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.W., P.C., S.P., E.K., M.G. and A.M.-M.; methodology, M.A.W., P.C., S.P., E.K., M.G. and A.M.-M.; software, M.A.W.; validation, M.A.W., P.C., S.P., E.K., M.G. and A.M.-M.; formal analysis, M.A.W. and A.M.-M.; resources, A.M.-M.; data curation, M.A.W. and A.M.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.W. and A.M.-M.; writing—review and editing, P.C., S.P., E.K., M.G. and A.M.-M.; visualization, M.G. and A.M.-M.; supervision, A.M.-M.; project administration, M.A.W. and A.M.-M.; funding acquisition, M.A.W. and A.M.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Pathogens 11 00704 i001 This study was conducted as part of a project that received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 754432, and the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education, from financial resources for science in 2018–2023 granted for the implementation of an international co-financed project. The study was also partially financed by the National Science Centre, Poland, 2017/26/E/NZ6/00277.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical approval is not needed.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Consent for Publication

No consent for publication is needed.

References

  1. Deviatkin, A.A.; Kholodilov, I.S.; Vakulenko, Y.A.; Karganova, G.G.; Lukashev, A.N. Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus: An Emerging Ancient Zoonosis? Viruses 2020, 12, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Lipowski, D.; Popiel, M.; Perlejewski, K.; Nakamura, S.; Bukowska-Osko, I.; Rzadkiewicz, E.; Dzieciatkowski, T.; Milecka, A.; Wenski, W.; Ciszek, M.; et al. A Cluster of Fatal Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Infection in Organ Transplant Setting. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 215, 896–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Lindquist, L.; Vapalahti, O. Tick-Borne Encephalitis. Lancet 2008, 371, 1861–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Estrada-Peña, A.; de la Fuente, J. The Ecology of Ticks and Epidemiology of Tick-Borne Viral Diseases. Antivir. Res. 2014, 108, 104–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Estrada-Peña, A.; Farkas, R.; Jaenson, T.G.T.; Koenen, F.; Madder, M.; Pascucci, I.; Salman, M.; Tarrés-Call, J.; Jongejan, F. Association of Environmental Traits with the Geographic Ranges of Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) of Medical and Veterinary Importance in the Western Palearctic. A Digital Data Set. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2013, 59, 351–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Epidemiological Situation of Tick-Borne Encephalitis in the European Union and European Free Trade Association Countries; ECDC: Stockholm, Sweden, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  7. Michelitsch, A.; Wernike, K.; Klaus, C.; Dobler, G.; Beer, M. Exploring the Reservoir Hosts of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus. Viruses 2019, 11, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Bakhvalova, V.N.; Potapova, O.F.; Panov, V.V.; Morozova, O.V. Vertical Transmission of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus between Generations of Adapted Reservoir Small Rodents. Virus Res. 2009, 140, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Karbowiak, G.; Biernat, B. The Role of Particular Tick Developmental Stages in the Circulation of Tick-Borne Pathogens Affecting Humans in Central Europe. 2. Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus. Ann. Parasitol. 2016, 62, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Klaus, C.; Gethmann, J.; Hoffmann, B.; Ziegler, U.; Heller, M.; Beer, M. Tick Infestation in Birds and Prevalence of Pathogens in Ticks Collected from Different Places in Germany. Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 2729–2740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Dai, X.; Shang, G.; Lu, S.; Yang, J.; Xu, J. A New Subtype of Eastern Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Discovered in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2018, 7, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Holding, M.; Dowall, S.D.; Medlock, J.M.; Carter, D.P.; McGinley, L.; Curran-French, M.; Pullan, S.T.; Chamberlain, J.; Hansford, K.M.; Baylis, M.; et al. Detection of New Endemic Focus of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus (TBEV), Hampshire/Dorset Border, England, September 2019. Eurosurveillance 2019, 24, 1900658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Bogovic, P. Tick-Borne Encephalitis: A Review of Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics, and Management. WJCC 2015, 3, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pulkkinen, L.; Butcher, S.; Anastasina, M. Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus: A Structural View. Viruses 2018, 10, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Ruzek, D.; Avšič Županc, T.; Borde, J.; Chrdle, A.; Eyer, L.; Karganova, G.; Kholodilov, I.; Knap, N.; Kozlovskaya, L.; Matveev, A.; et al. Tick-Borne Encephalitis in Europe and Russia: Review of Pathogenesis, Clinical Features, Therapy, and Vaccines. Antivir. Res. 2019, 164, 23–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zlobin, V.I.; Pogodina, V.V.; Kahl, O. A Brief History of the Discovery of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus in the Late 1930s (Based on Reminiscences of Members of the Expeditions, Their Colleagues, and Relatives). Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2017, 8, 813–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Barrett, P.N.; Schober-Bendixen, S.; Ehrlich, H.J. History of TBE Vaccines. Vaccine 2003, 21, S41–S49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Randolph, S.E. Ticks Are Not Insects: Consequences of Contrasting Vector Biology for Transmission Potential. Parasitol. Today 1998, 14, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hartemink, N.A.; Randolph, S.E.; Davis, S.A.; Heesterbeek, J.A.P. The Basic Reproduction Number for Complex Disease Systems: Defining R0 for Tick-Borne Infections. Am. Nat. 2008, 171, 743–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kahl, O.; Alidousti, I. Bodies of Liquid Water as a Source of Water Gain for Ixodes Ricinus Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1997, 21, 731–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hrnjaković Cvjetković, I.; Cvjetković, D.; Patić, A.; Radovanov, J.; Kovacević, G.; Milosević, V. TICK-BORNE ENCEPHALITIS VIRUS INFECTION IN HUMANS. Med. Pregl. 2016, 69, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. A Clear and Present Danger: Tick-Borne Diseases in Europe. Available online: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/717730 (accessed on 29 July 2020).
  23. Randolph, S.E. Ticks and Tick-Borne Disease Systems in Space and from Space. In Advances in Parasitology; Remote Sensing and Geographical Information Systems in Epidemiology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2000; Volume 47, pp. 217–243. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gray, J.S.; Dautel, H.; Estrada-Peña, A.; Kahl, O.; Lindgren, E. Effects of Climate Change on Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases in Europe. Interdiscip. Perspect. Infect. Dis. 2009, 2009, 593232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jaenson, T.G.; Hjertqvist, M.; Bergström, T.; Lundkvist, Å. Why Is Tick-Borne Encephalitis Increasing? A Review of the Key Factors Causing the Increasing Incidence of Human TBE in Sweden. Parasites Vectors 2012, 5, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Ostfeld, R.S.; Brunner, J.L. Climate Change and Ixodes Tick-Borne Diseases of Humans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 370, 20140051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Ogden, N.H.; Lindsay, L.R.; Beauchamp, G.; Charron, D.; Maarouf, A.; O’Callaghan, C.J.; Waltner-Toews, D.; Barker, I.K. Investigation of Relationships Between Temperature and Developmental Rates of Tick Ixodes Scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) in the Laboratory and Field. J. Med. Entomol. 2004, 41, 622–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Nieto, N.C.; Holmes, E.A.; Foley, J.E. Survival Rates of Immature Ixodes Pacificus (Acari: Ixodidae) Ticks Estimated Using Field-Placed Enclosures. J. Vector Ecol. 2010, 35, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Randolph, S.E. To What Extent Has Climate Change Contributed to the Recent Epidemiology of Tick-Borne Diseases? Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 167, 92–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Radzišauskienė, D.; Žagminas, K.; Ašoklienė, L.; Jasionis, A.; Mameniškienė, R.; Ambrozaitis, A.; Jančorienė, L.; Jatužis, D.; Petraitytė, I.; Mockienė, E. Epidemiological Patterns of Tick-borne Encephalitis in Lithuania and Clinical Features in Adults in the Light of the High Incidence in Recent Years: A Retrospective Study. Eur. J. Neurol. 2018, 25, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kerbo, N.; Donchenko, I.; Kutsar, K.; Vasilenko, V. Tickborne Encephalitis Epidemiology in Estonia, 1950–2004. Wkly. Releases 2005, 10, 2740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kriz, B.; Maly, M.; Benes, C.; Daniel, M. Epidemiology of Tick-Borne Encephalitis in the Czech Republic 1970–2008. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012, 12, 994–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Tick-Borne Encephalitis—Annual Epidemiological Report for 2018. Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/tick-borne-encephalitis-annual-epidemiological-report-2018 (accessed on 30 December 2020).
  34. Amicizia, D.; Domnich, A.; Panatto, D.; Lai, P.L.; Cristina, M.L.; Avio, U.; Gasparini, R. Epidemiology of Tick-Borne Encephalitis (TBE) in Europe and Its Prevention by Available Vaccines. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2013, 9, 1163–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Blomqvist, G.; Näslund, K.; Svensson, L.; Beck, C.; Valarcher, J.F. Mapping Geographical Areas at Risk for Tick-Borne Encephalitis (TBE) by Analysing Bulk Tank Milk from Swedish Dairy Cattle Herds for the Presence of TBE Virus–Specific Antibodies. Acta Vet. Scand. 2021, 63, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Pettersson, J.H.-O.; Golovljova, I.; Vene, S.; Jaenson, T.G.T. Prevalence of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus in Ixodes Ricinus Ticks in Northern Europe with Particular Reference to Southern Sweden. Parasites Vectors 2014, 7, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Hartemink, N.; Takken, W. Trends in Tick Population Dynamics and Pathogen Transmission in Emerging Tick-Borne Pathogens in Europe: An Introduction. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2016, 68, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Knap, N.; Avšič-Županc, T. Factors Affecting the Ecology of Tick-Borne Encephalitis in Slovenia. Epidemiol. Infect. 2015, 143, 2059–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Süss, J.; Kahl, O.; Aspöck, H.; Hartelt, K.; Vaheri, A.; Oehme, R.; Hasle, G.; Dautel, H.; Kunz, C.; Kupreviciene, N.; et al. Tick-Borne Encephalitis in the Age of General Mobility; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 94–100. [Google Scholar]
  40. Egyed, L.; Rónai, Z.; Dán, Á. Hungarian Tick-Borne Encephalitis Viruses Isolated from a 0.5-Ha Focus Are Closely Related to Finnish Strains. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2018, 9, 1064–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jääskeläinen, A.E.; Sironen, T.; Murueva, G.B.; Subbotina, N.; Alekseev, A.N.; Castrén, J.; Alitalo, I.; Vaheri, A.; Vapalahti, O. Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus in Ticks in Finland, Russian Karelia and Buryatia. J. Gen. Virol. 2010, 91, 2706–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yurchenko, O.O.; Dubina, D.O.; Vynograd, N.O.; Gonzalez, J.-P. Partial Characterization of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Isolates from Ticks of Southern Ukraine. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017, 17, 550–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Agergaard, C.N.; Rosenstierne, M.W.; Bødker, R.; Rasmussen, M.; Andersen, P.H.S.; Fomsgaard, A. New Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Hot Spot in Northern Zealand, Denmark, October 2019. Eurosurveillance 2019, 24, 1900639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Frimmel, S.; Krienke, A.; Riebold, D.; Loebermann, M.; Littmann, M.; Fiedler, K.; Klaus, C.; Süss, J.; Reisinger, E.C. Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Habitats in North East Germany: Reemergence of TBEV in Ticks after 15 Years of Inactivity. Available online: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2014/308371/ (accessed on 8 January 2021).
  45. Makenov, M.; Karan, L.; Shashina, N.; Akhmetshina, M.; Zhurenkova, O.; Kholodilov, I.; Karganova, G.; Smirnova, N.; Grigoreva, Y.; Yankovskaya, Y.; et al. First Detection of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus in Ixodes Ricinus Ticks and Their Rodent Hosts in Moscow, Russia. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2019, 10, 101265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Randolph, S.E. Dynamics of Tick-Borne Disease Systems: Minor Role of Recent Climate Change. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2008, 27, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Randolph, S. Predicting the Risk of Tick-Borne Diseases. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2002, 291, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Randolph, S.E.; Rogers, D.J. Fragile Transmission Cycles of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus May Be Disrupted by Predicted Climate Change. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2000, 267, 1741–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Daniel, M.; Danielová, V.; Kříž, B.; Jirsa, A.; Nožička, J. Shift of the Tick Ixodes Ricinus and Tick-Borne Encephalitis to Higher Altitudes in Central Europe. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2003, 22, 327–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Expansion to Higher Altitudes Correlated with Climate Warming—ScienceDirect. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1438422108000398 (accessed on 15 January 2021).
  51. Rizzoli, A.; Merler, S.; Furlanello, C.; Genchi, C. Geographical Information Systems and Bootstrap Aggregation (Bagging) of Tree-Based Classifiers for Lyme Disease Risk Prediction in Trentino, Italian Alps. J. Med. Entomol. 2002, 39, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Medlock, J.M.; Hansford, K.M.; Bormane, A.; Derdakova, M.; Estrada-Peña, A.; George, J.-C.; Golovljova, I.; Jaenson, T.G.; Jensen, J.-K.; Jensen, P.M.; et al. Driving Forces for Changes in Geographical Distribution of Ixodes Ricinus Ticks in Europe. Parasites Vectors 2013, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Cagnacci, F.; Focardi, S.; Heurich, M.; Stache, A.; Hewison, A.J.M.; Morellet, N.; Kjellander, P.; Linnell, J.D.C.; Mysterud, A.; Neteler, M.; et al. Partial Migration in Roe Deer: Migratory and Resident Tactics Are End Points of a Behavioural Gradient Determined by Ecological Factors. Oikos 2011, 120, 1790–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kaaijk, P.; Luytjes, W. Are We Prepared for Emerging Flaviviruses in Europe? Challenges for Vaccination. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2018, 14, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Riccardi, N.; Antonello, R.M.; Luzzati, R.; Zajkowska, J.; Bella, S.D.; Giacobbe, D.R. Tick-Borne Encephalitis in Europe: A Brief Update on Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2019, 62, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Taba, P.; Schmutzhard, E.; Forsberg, P.; Lutsar, I.; Ljøstad, U.; Mygland, Å.; Levchenko, I.; Strle, F.; Steiner, I. EAN Consensus Review on Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of Tick-Borne Encephalitis. Eur. J. Neurol. 2017, 24, 1214-e61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kollaritsch, H.; Paulke-Korinek, M.; Holzmann, H.; Hombach, J.; Bjorvatn, B.; Barrett, A. Vaccines and Vaccination against Tick-Borne Encephalitis. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2012, 11, 1103–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lindblom, P.; Wilhelmsson, P.; Fryland, L.; Matussek, A.; Haglund, M.; Sjöwall, J.; Vene, S.; Nyman, D.; Forsberg, P.; Lindgren, P.-E. Factors Determining Immunological Response to Vaccination against Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus in Older Individuals. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pathogens 11 00704 g001 550
Figure 1. Change in the annual incidence rate of TBE in most affected countries (2000–2019).
Figure 1. Change in the annual incidence rate of TBE in most affected countries (2000–2019).
Pathogens 11 00704 g001
Pathogens 11 00704 g002 550
Figure 2. Number of TBE cases by month of onset reported in nine EU/EFTA countries (2000–2010; n = 7083). Source: data from the ECDC (https://register.ecdc.europa.eu/) (accessed on 19 January 2021).
Figure 2. Number of TBE cases by month of onset reported in nine EU/EFTA countries (2000–2010; n = 7083). Source: data from the ECDC (https://register.ecdc.europa.eu/) (accessed on 19 January 2021).
Pathogens 11 00704 g002
Pathogens 11 00704 g003 550
Figure 3. TBE Key risk groups: number of TBE cases by age group and gender reported in 16 EU/EFTA countries (2000–2010, n = 22,378). Source: data from the ECDC (https://register.ecdc.europa.eu/) (accessed on 19 January 2021).
Figure 3. TBE Key risk groups: number of TBE cases by age group and gender reported in 16 EU/EFTA countries (2000–2010, n = 22,378). Source: data from the ECDC (https://register.ecdc.europa.eu/) (accessed on 19 January 2021).
Pathogens 11 00704 g003
Table
Table 2. The number of confirmed cases reported to the ECDC and number of countries involved each year (2000–2019).
Table 2. The number of confirmed cases reported to the ECDC and number of countries involved each year (2000–2019).
YearNumber of CountriesNumber of Confirmed CasesNumber of Confirmed Cases/100,000 Population
20001226297.02
20011424975.07
20021419523.19
20031432256.15
20041424814.33
20051526513.71
20061537564.94
20071522673.27
20081625133.15
20091635135.07
20101631555.06
20122121492.34
20132229043.03
20142419851.75
20152419081.75
20162526802.14
20172529162.22
20182630922.07
20192532462.57
Total 51519
Source: data from ECDC (https://register.ecdc.europa.eu/); (accessed on 16 January 2021).
Table
Table 3. Number of TBE cases, number of years the country has reported, and mean incidence rate (2000–2019).
Table 3. Number of TBE cases, number of years the country has reported, and mean incidence rate (2000–2019).
CountryNumber of YearsConfirmed Cases IR/100,000Age-Adjusted IR/100,000 (2012–2019)
Czechia19120556.145.50
Lithuania19817813.6615.64
Germany1960890.410.43
Latvia1941849.956.60
Poland1939330.540.41
Slovenia19387710.126.34
Sweden1933452.482.85
Estonia19276110.867.73
Slovakia1917341.692.15
Austria1915620.971.10
Switzerland111302..
Hungary198780.460.24
Finland197870.771.07
Italy183120.030.03
Croatia81890.560.53
Norway191860.200.30
France8670.010.01
Romania19260.010.01
Netherlands416..
Belgium8 140.020.02
United Kingdom890.000.00
Denmark140.070.07
Bulgaria640.010.01
Greece840.000.01
Luxembourg610.030.03
Ireland810.000.00
Spain810.000.00
Total 515193.26 **2.19 **
Source: data from the ECDC (https://register.ecdc.europa.eu/) (accessed on 16 January 2021) ** mean incidence rate. IR: incidence rate.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wondim, M.A.; Czupryna, P.; Pancewicz, S.; Kruszewska, E.; Groth, M.; Moniuszko-Malinowska, A. Epidemiological Trends of Trans-Boundary Tick-Borne Encephalitis in Europe, 2000–2019. Pathogens 2022, 11, 704. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11060704

AMA Style

Wondim MA, Czupryna P, Pancewicz S, Kruszewska E, Groth M, Moniuszko-Malinowska A. Epidemiological Trends of Trans-Boundary Tick-Borne Encephalitis in Europe, 2000–2019. Pathogens. 2022; 11(6):704. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11060704

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wondim, Mulugeta A., Piotr Czupryna, Sławomir Pancewicz, Ewelina Kruszewska, Monika Groth, and Anna Moniuszko-Malinowska. 2022. "Epidemiological Trends of Trans-Boundary Tick-Borne Encephalitis in Europe, 2000–2019" Pathogens 11, no. 6: 704. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11060704

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop