Ecology and Genetic Lineages of Nasal Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA Carriage in Healthy Persons with or without Animal-Related Occupational Risks of Colonization: A Review of Global Reports

In this conceptual review, we thoroughly searched for appropriate English articles on nasal staphylococci carriage among healthy people with no reported risk of colonization (Group A), food handlers (Group B), veterinarians (Group C), and livestock farmers (Group D) published between 2000 and 2021. Random-effects analyses of proportions were performed to determine the pooled prevalence of S. aureus, MRSA, MRSA-CC398, and MSSA-CC398, as well as the prevalence of PVL-positive S. aureus from all eligible studies. A total of 166 eligible papers were evaluated for Groups A/B/C/D (n = 58/31/26/51). The pooled prevalence of S. aureus and MRSA in healthy humans of Groups A to D were 15.9, 7.8, 34.9, and 27.1%, and 0.8, 0.9, 8.6, and 13.5%, respectively. The pooled prevalence of MRSA-CC398 nasal carriage among healthy humans was as follows: Group A/B (<0.05%), Group C (1.4%), Group D (5.4%); and the following among Group D: pig farmers (8.4%) and dairy farmers (4.7%). The pooled prevalence of CC398 lineage among the MSSA and MRSA isolates from studies of the four groups were Group A (2.9 and 6.9%), B (1.5 and 0.0%), C (47.6% in MRSA), and D (11.5 and 58.8%). Moreover, MSSA-CC398 isolates of Groups A and B were mostly of spa-t571 (animal-independent clade), while those of Groups C and D were spa-t011 and t034. The MRSA-CC398 was predominately of t011 and t034 in all the groups (with few other spa-types, livestock-associated clades). The pooled prevalence of MSSA and MRSA isolates carrying the PVL encoding genes were 11.5 and 9.6% (ranges: 0.0–76.9 and 0.0–28.6%), respectively. Moreover, one PVL-positive MSSA-t011-CC398 isolate was detected in Group A. Contact with livestock and veterinary practice seems to increase the risk of carrying MRSA-CC398, but not in food handlers. Thus, this emphasizes the need for integrated molecular epidemiology of zoonotic staphylococci.


Introduction
Many coagulase-positive and negative staphylococci are normal microbiota of the nasal cavity. However, some of them are of great public health importance due to their capacity to produce staphylococcal infections and diseases in humans and animals, and being responsible for zoonosis [1,2].
The main reservoir site for staphylococcal nasal carriage is the anterior nares and vestibules [3]. Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is the most important nasal staphylococci and has been found in about 30% of healthy adults [3]. It was estimated that previous nasal colonization in 30% of the cases of bacteremia was due to S. aureus [4]. Essentially, S. aureus is an important cause of community-acquired (CA) and hospital-acquired (HA) on staphylococcal nasal carriages in healthy humans. This study identified 4702 records; after the elimination of duplicates, 615 remained. After screening titles and abstracts, we retained and assessed 321 full-text articles for eligibility.

Selection of Studies
Studies identified in the literature search were checked by title and abstract. The papers with relevant abstracts were examined in detail. The criteria for the inclusion and exclusion of the studies were established by the investigators before the literature was reviewed. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies that were original articles, short communications, correspondence, or letters that provided sufficient original data about the prevalence of 'Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage', 'MRSA nasal carriage', 'Coagulase-negative staphylococci', 'Coagulase positive staphylococci', 'Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus', 'non-aureus staphylococcal nasal carriage', 'MRSP nasal carriage', 'Nasal staphylococci in veterinarians', 'Nasal staphylococci in veterinary students', 'Nasal staphylococci in livestock farmers', 'Nasal staphylococci in food handlers', and 'Nasal staphylococci in healthy people'; (2) studies in which all MRSA strains were adequately presented; and (3) studies that were published in English. The exclusion criteria were: (1) studies that contained duplicate data or were overlapping articles; (2) reviews and conference abstracts; (3) articles that included fewer than 10 subjects; (4) studies performed on healthy humans working in the hospitals or attending health centers/nursing homes and prison, or prison inmates or human healthcare students, or specific groups of populations that their social or living conditions could affect the nasal staphylococci status (homeless and athletes, among others); (5) articles that were published before the year 2000, (6) longitudinal studies with no specific nasal staphylococci prevalence at the initial sampling, and (7) studies that were solely on staphylococci isolates with no or full information of the number of persons and occupation they were isolated from.

Category of Studied People
The following four groups of healthy individuals were tested in this study: Group A: Healthy people with no known risk of colonization. Group B: Food handlers. Group C: Veterinarians and veterinary students. Group D: Livestock farmers.

Data Extraction
Authors independently ascertained the characteristics of each study, including the first author's surname, year of publication, continent, country, study years, detection method, staphylococci prevalence, antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and genotypes, virulence factors, and molecular typing reports. When there was disagreement, the relevant paper was reviewed, and the differences were resolved by consensus. Finally, 166 full texts were included because they were the only available articles that directly focused on the distribution pattern of the staphylococci community, genetic lineages, antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and genotypes, and/or virulence genes in nasal cavities of healthy humans.

Statistical Analysis
The pooled prevalence of nasal carriage of S. aureus, MRSA or other non-aureus staphylococci was calculated. Medcalc software Version 2019. 19.0.7 (Ostend, Belgium) was used for all statistical analysis. Where possible, an analysis of pooled prevalence was carried out using the random-effects model. Moreover, the pooled rate of nasal carriage by CC398 S. aureus isolates (MRSA or MSSA) was calculated, using the articles in which molecular typing of isolates were performed.

Eligible Study Characteristics
Data were extracted and synthesized from 166 articles after applying exclusion criteria ( Figure 1). There were 58 studies on healthy people without a known risk of S. aureus nasal carriage (Group A), while 31, 26, and 51 were on food handlers, veterinarians/veterinary students, and livestock farmers (Groups B-D), respectively (Table 1, Supplementary Tables  S1-S4). Out of the 58 studies on healthy humans of Group A, 51, 4, and 3 had cross-sectional, prospective, and cohort study designs, respectively. Among the eligible studies on food handlers, only one of them was a retrospective study, whereas five out of the studies on Group C were prospective studies. Five of the studies on livestock farmers had a prospective study design, whereas the others were cross-sectional studies (Supplementary Tables S1-S4). Out of the studies on Group A, 12, 18, 15, 12, and 1 were from Africa, Asia, Europe, America, and Australia, respectively. Out of the studies on Group B, 8, 12, 7, and 4 were from Africa, Asia, Europe, and America, respectively. Of the studies in Group C, 3, 4, 12, 6, and 1 were from Africa, Asia, Europe, America, and Australia, respectively. Additionally, 10, 18, 18, and 5 of the studies in Group D were from Africa, Asia, Europe, and America, respectively (Supplementary Tables S1-S4) [13,20,23,. Among all the studies on Group A (Supplementary Table S1), 53 were solely on S. aureus nasal carriage [20,, 4 were on both CoNS and CoPS [81][82][83][84], whereas one was solely on CoNS [85]. Of all the eligible studies conducted from 2000 to 2021 (Supplementary  Table S1), the calculated pooled prevalence of S. aureus and MRSA nasal carriage among healthy people was 15.9 and 0.8%, respectively, while the prevalence range was 2.3-79.6 and 0.0-17.5%, respectively (Table 1). Figure 2 shows the pooled rates of S. aureus nasal carriage detected in studies performed in countries of different continents. Of which, the highest pooled prevalence of nasal carriage of S. aureus in healthy humans of Group A was obtained from African countries (33.0%, with a range of 10.5-51.5%), followed by countries of the Americas (30.8%, range 30.7-38.5%), countries of Asia (23.7%, range 16.1-40.3%), and the lowest pooled nasal carriage rate by the countries of Europe (10.7%, range 2.3-47.4%) (Figure 2a,b). Different variables could be responsible for the nasal S. aureus carriage variation among the continents and studies (such as the methodologies used, specific characteristics of the countries or of the individuals tested, or a pattern of antimicrobial use, among others). For instance, studies among Dutch children revealed a decreasing carriage rate during the first year of life, remaining stable at 20-30% until it increases again to 40-50% between the age of 6 to 12 years [192,193]. Moreover, in West Africa, these rates might be considerably different due to co-colonization with other pathogens or living conditions, such as large family sizes and lower sanitary standards, which are all associated with higher S. aureus nasal carriage [194,195].
The rate of MRSA carriage in the healthy people of Group A was low (less than 2%) in most of the reviewed studies (n = 30/52, 57.7%) that were performed in 24 countries of all continents (Figure 3). A medium MRSA prevalence (2-5%) was reported in 10 studies (19.2%) performed in Colombia, Spain, Morocco, India, Ukraine, Mexico, Argentina, and Ethiopia. Moreover, a high prevalence (5.1-10.0%) was identified in six studies (11.5%) performed in Spain, Iran, Nigeria, and Brazil. Finally, a very high MRSA prevalence (10.1-20.0%) was identified in six studies (11.5%) performed in Nigeria, Malaysia, Iraq, and Iran (Table 2). It appears that most studies with a very high MRSA prevalence were from developing countries (with few exceptions) and might be due to uncontrolled use or misuse of antimicrobial drugs in most of these countries [196]. Figure 4a,b showed the pooled prevalence of MRSA nasal carriages by countries and continents in healthy people of Group A. Of which, Iraq, Nigeria, Iran, Morocco, and Colombia had the highest pooled prevalence of MRSA. This also reflected on the pooled prevalence of nasal MRSA carriage by continent. Of which, the highest was obtained from Asia (4.0%), followed by Africa (2.6%), America/Australia (1.4%), and least in Europe (0.3%) (Figure 4a). The high prevalence reported in these countries and continents could be due, in part, to differences in the laboratory protocol and media used for the identification of isolation and the identification of MRSA. In most studies from the developing countries, MRSA detection were mainly based on phenotypic detection (Supplementary Table S1).     Table 2).

Prevalence of Nasal S. aureus and MRSA Carriage among Food Handlers (Group B)
The LA-MRSA is widely disseminated as a nasal colonizer of conventionally raised livestock and humans subjected to occupational exposure. Reports on the contamination of raw meat, milk, and other animal products raise the question as to whether occupationally exposed food handlers are at particular risk of nasal colonization by LA-MRSA. Nasal carriage of S. aureus, particularly those producing enterotoxins, constitutes the main risk of contamination in food, followed by possible food poisoning. Therefore, the investigation of S. aureus carriage among food handlers and the analysis of the prevalence of toxin genes in colonizing strains is important to prevent food contamination with toxigenic strains that may be related to food poisoning or other diseases [21]. Very recently, the relevance of the superantigen SEIW (encoded by selw gene) on S. aureus pathogenesis has been postulated [197]. The SEIW has been shown to be highly prevalent among S. aureus isolates, and it could be a unique superantigen expressed by those of the CC398 lineage [197]. Hence, S. aureus acquisition by handling contaminated milk, meat, and meat products should be considered.
According to our analysis, a relatively low pooled rate of nasal MRSA carriage in food handlers among eligible studies was found: 0.9% from 21 eligible studies with a range of 0.0-37.1%, whereas the pooled rate of S. aureus nasal carriage was 7.8% with a range of 1.4-60% (Table 1).
In relation to the pooled nasal S. aureus carriage of healthy humans of Group B by continents, the highest values were detected in the Americas and Africa (26.8 and 24.1%, respectively), with lower values in countries of Europe (7.5%) and Asia (6.6%) (Figure 2a). In African countries, Nigeria had the highest pooled prevalence (49.7%) (Figure 2(bi)) [85][86][87]. Moreover, among European countries, a study in Germany reported the highest S. aureus prevalence of 45.4% among butchers, meat sellers, and cooks [110]; the least prevalence was reported from Bosnia (1.4%) [106].
If we consider the studies included in Table 2 in relation to the MRSA nasal carriage of Group B, 57.1% of them (n = 12) reported a low rate of colonization (<2%), 14.3% of the studies reported a medium rate of colonization (2-5%), 9.5% of the studies reported a high

Healthy people without risk (Group A) Food handlers (Group B) Veterinarians (Group C) Livestock farmers (Group D)
Rate of MRSA nasal carriage  Table 2).

Prevalence of Nasal S. aureus and MRSA Carriage among Food Handlers (Group B)
The LA-MRSA is widely disseminated as a nasal colonizer of conventionally raised livestock and humans subjected to occupational exposure. Reports on the contamination of raw meat, milk, and other animal products raise the question as to whether occupationally exposed food handlers are at particular risk of nasal colonization by LA-MRSA. Nasal carriage of S. aureus, particularly those producing enterotoxins, constitutes the main risk of contamination in food, followed by possible food poisoning. Therefore, the investigation of S. aureus carriage among food handlers and the analysis of the prevalence of toxin genes in colonizing strains is important to prevent food contamination with toxigenic strains that may be related to food poisoning or other diseases [21]. Very recently, the relevance of the superantigen SEIW (encoded by selw gene) on S. aureus pathogenesis has been postulated [197]. The SEIW has been shown to be highly prevalent among S. aureus isolates, and it could be a unique superantigen expressed by those of the CC398 lineage [197]. Hence, S. aureus acquisition by handling contaminated milk, meat, and meat products should be considered.
According to our analysis, a relatively low pooled rate of nasal MRSA carriage in food handlers among eligible studies was found: 0.9% from 21 eligible studies with a range of 0.0-37.1%, whereas the pooled rate of S. aureus nasal carriage was 7.8% with a range of 1.4-60% (Table 1).
In relation to the pooled nasal S. aureus carriage of healthy humans of Group B by continents, the highest values were detected in the Americas and Africa (26.8 and 24.1%, respectively), with lower values in countries of Europe (7.5%) and Asia (6.6%) (Figure 2a). In African countries, Nigeria had the highest pooled prevalence (49.7%) (Figure 2b(i)) [85][86][87]. Moreover, among European countries, a study in Germany reported the highest S. aureus prevalence of 45.4% among butchers, meat sellers, and cooks [110]; the least prevalence was reported from Bosnia (1.4%) [106].
If we consider the studies included in Table 2 in relation to the MRSA nasal carriage of Group B, 57.1% of them (n = 12) reported a low rate of colonization (<2%), 14.3% of the studies reported a medium rate of colonization (2-5%), 9.5% of the studies reported a high rate of colonization (5-10%), while 9.5% of the studies reported a very high rate (10-20%), and 8.5% an extremely high rate (20-40%) (Figure 3).
The overall low prevalence of nasal MRSA carriage from food handlers (0.9%, similar to that from Group A) may be associated with the lack of direct contact with live animals (but with their food products), although it could also be affected by the adoption of preventive measures of personal hygiene and environmental sanitation, such as consistent hand washing, the use of face mask, and consistent hand glove practice. According to our results, the pooled prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage in veterinary personnel (Group C) was 34.9% (range 19.4-50.8%), whereas the corresponding of MRSA was 8.6% (range 0.7-38.4%) ( Table 1). A study carried out by Anueyiagu et al. [20] in Nigeria reported the highest prevalence of MRSA in veterinary students (38.4%) and least in a study from Hong Kong [141] that reported 0.7% from veterinary personnel.
With respect to the S. aureus nasal carriage prevalence by continents, a similar pooled prevalence was obtained in individuals of Group C in countries of Europe, Asia, and Africa (27.9-33.7%). However, a high prevalence was detected in one unique study included in the America continent [131] (Figure 2).
Of the 25 studies in which the prevalence of MRSA among veterinary personnel has been evaluated, 16.0% of them reported a low rate of nasal carriage (<2%), 24.0% of the studies indicated a medium rate (2-5%), 28.0% of the studies a high rate of carriage (5.1-10%), 20.0% a very high rate (10.1-30%), and 12.0% reported an extremely high rate of nasal carriage (30-50%) (Table 2, Figure 3).
The higher prevalence of MRSA carriage in veterinary personnel has been proven by multiple studies all over the world. The rates in Europe vary from 0.7-44.9% [127,128]. Traditionally, high prevalence data come from countries with well-developed livestock production, such as the Netherlands, Denmark, or Germany [124,128,130,198] (Table 2). The type of veterinary practice, frequency of contact with animals, time since exposure, and the study design could be factors that led to international differences in prevalence rates.

Prevalence of Nasal S. aureus and MRSA Carriage among Livestock Farmers (Group D)
According to our results, the pooled prevalence of S. aureus and MRSA nasal carriage among livestock workers was 27.1 and 13.5%, respectively. Moreover, the range of S. aureus and MRSA nasal carriages were 3.1-62.8 and 0.0-85.8%, respectively (Table 1; Supplementary Table S4). This category of the population had the highest pooled MRSA nasal carriage prevalence.
If we consider the studies included in Table 2 in relation to the MRSA nasal carriage of Group D, only 16.3% of the 49 studies of this group reported a low MRSA nasal carriage (<2%), 14.3% of the studies reported a medium rate of colonization (2-5%), 16.3% of the studies reported a high rate (5.1-10%), while 34.7 and 14.3% of the studies reported very high (10.1-30%) and extremely high (30.1->50%) nasal carriage rates, respectively (Figure 3). The calculated pooled prevalence of nasal MRSA carriage among livestock farmers by continent was highest in Europe (20.6%), followed by America/Australia (14.4%), Africa (11.0%), and least in Asia (5.8%) (Figure 4a).
In relation to MRSA in African countries, Madagascar and Ethiopia had the highest pooled MRSA prevalence in livestock farmers (26.5 and 14.2%, respectively) [141,143], while Nigeria and Morocco had the lowest [142,145] (Figure 4b). Moreover, specific studies in Spain and Germany on pig farmers reported a very high MRSA prevalence of 57.9% and 84.7%/85.8%, respectively [128,171,181]; these studies were performed in regions with a very high density of pig farming in both countries. Other European studies reported a lower prevalence of MRSA in pig farmers, and even a study in Switzerland did not detect any pig farmer with LA-MRSA nasal colonization [122].
A pooled global prevalence of MRSA in all livestock farmers was 13.5% ( Figure 5); Nevertheless, differences were observed when the type of livestock animals were taken into account. In this respect, a pooled MRSA prevalence of 16.3% was obtained when only pig farmers were considered ( Figure 6). Of which, the following differences in the prevalence of MRSA in pig farmers by continents were noted: Europe (23.9%), Asia (8.6%) (China, Korea, Thailand, and Taiwan), and the USA/Canada (11.3%) (Figure 7). In dairy farmers, a pooled prevalence of 6.3% MRSA nasal carriage was obtained ( Figure 6). It is important to remark that a single study reported a very high MRSA rate (32.9%) isolated from the Netherlands in dairy workers [180]. This must have affected the net pooled prevalence in this category of farmers. Similarly, a single study in Australia reported a very high prevalence (59.6%) of MRSA in pig farmers [185]. Moreover, a 6.8% pooled prevalence of MRSA was calculated from 10 other studies that comprised of poultry and unspecified/mixed-type farmers ( Figure 6). If we consider the studies included in Table 2 in relation to the MRSA nasal carriage of Group D, only 16.3% of the 49 studies of this group reported a low MRSA nasal carriage (<2%), 14.3% of the studies reported a medium rate of colonization (2-5%), 16.3% of the studies reported a high rate (5.1-10%), while 34.7 and 14.3% of the studies reported very high (10.1-30%) and extremely high (30.1->50%) nasal carriage rates, respectively ( Figure  3). The calculated pooled prevalence of nasal MRSA carriage among livestock farmers by continent was highest in Europe (20.6%), followed by America/Australia (14.4%), Africa (11.0%), and least in Asia (5.8%) (Figure 4a).
In relation to MRSA in African countries, Madagascar and Ethiopia had the highest pooled MRSA prevalence in livestock farmers (26.5 and 14.2%, respectively) [141,143], while Nigeria and Morocco had the lowest [142,145] (Figure 4b). Moreover, specific studies in Spain and Germany on pig farmers reported a very high MRSA prevalence of 57.9% and 84.7%/85.8%, respectively [128,171,181]; these studies were performed in regions with a very high density of pig farming in both countries. Other European studies reported a lower prevalence of MRSA in pig farmers, and even a study in Switzerland did not detect any pig farmer with LA-MRSA nasal colonization [122].
A pooled global prevalence of MRSA in all livestock farmers was 13.5% ( Figure 5); Nevertheless, differences were observed when the type of livestock animals were taken into account. In this respect, a pooled MRSA prevalence of 16.3% was obtained when only pig farmers were considered ( Figure 6). Of which, the following differences in the prevalence of MRSA in pig farmers by continents were noted: Europe (23.9%), Asia (8.6%) (China, Korea, Thailand, and Taiwan), and the USA/Canada (11.3%) (Figure 7). In dairy farmers, a pooled prevalence of 6.3% MRSA nasal carriage was obtained ( Figure 6). It is important to remark that a single study reported a very high MRSA rate (32.9%) isolated from the Netherlands in dairy workers [180]. This must have affected the net pooled prevalence in this category of farmers. Similarly, a single study in Australia reported a very high prevalence (59.6%) of MRSA in pig farmers [185]. Moreover, a 6.8% pooled prevalence of MRSA was calculated from 10 other studies that comprised of poultry and unspecified/mixed-type farmers ( Figure 6).   MRSA-CC398 in healthy people without risk of nasal colonization; e-There were two studies (of 5 eligible) that reported MSSA-CC398 in food handlers.

Antibiotic Resistance Identified in Staphylococci of Nasal Cavities of Healthy Humans
Out of the 58 studies on healthy humans of Group A, only 47 reported antimicrobial resistance phenotypes, while 40 detected the antimicrobial resistance genes profile of the staphylococci isolates (Supplementary Table S1). Some of these studies individually reported the mecA gene from S. aureus isolated from nasal samples (Supplementary Table  S1). The mecA gene was the unique gene associated to methicillin resistance in all eligible studies and none of them found the mecC gene. Aside from S. aureus isolates, mecA was   MRSA-CC398 in healthy people without risk of nasal colonization; e-There were two studies (of 5 eligible) that reported MSSA-CC398 in food handlers.

Antibiotic Resistance Identified in Staphylococci of Nasal Cavities of Healthy Humans
Out of the 58 studies on healthy humans of Group A, only 47 reported antimicrobial resistance phenotypes, while 40 detected the antimicrobial resistance genes profile of the staphylococci isolates (Supplementary Table S1). Some of these studies individually reported the mecA gene from S. aureus isolated from nasal samples (Supplementary Table  S1). The mecA gene was the unique gene associated to methicillin resistance in all eligible studies and none of them found the mecC gene. Aside from S. aureus isolates, mecA was

Antibiotic Resistance Identified in Staphylococci of Nasal Cavities of Healthy Humans
Out of the 58 studies on healthy humans of Group A, only 47 reported antimicrobial resistance phenotypes, while 40 detected the antimicrobial resistance genes profile of the staphylococci isolates (Supplementary Table S1). Some of these studies individually reported the mecA gene from S. aureus isolated from nasal samples (Supplementary Table S1). The mecA gene was the unique gene associated to methicillin resistance in all eligible studies and none of them found the mecC gene. Aside from S. aureus isolates, mecA was identified in some S. epidermidis isolates among healthy veterinary students in Greece [140].
Aside from the gene mecA for methicillin resistance in nasal S. aureus isolates, others such as erm(A), erm(C), msr(A), and erm(T) genes were reported by Lozano et al. [67], while erm(C) and erm(A) were detected by Kock et al. [175]. Furthermore, tet(M), tet(L), aacA, aphD, dfrK, erm(C), and erm(T) were reported by Paterson et al. [136]. The erm(T) gene was detected in MSSA and MRSA of lineage CC398 [67,136]. Other antimicrobial resistance genes were identified in both CoPS and CoNS (Supplementary Tables S1-S4). As the present review focused on the S. aureus-CC398 lineage, it is necessary to remark that the detection of tetracycline and erythromycin resistance genes (tet(M) and erm(T)) are often potential markers of livestock-association such as the MRSA-CC398 and MRSA-CC398/ST9 [17,155]. This suggests that tetracycline resistance may be useful in the determination of the epidemiological source of MRSA isolates.

Prevalence Pattern of Panton Valentine Leukocidin in Nasal Staphylococcus aureus in Healthy Humans
Diverse categories of virulence genes have been detected in nasal staphylococci of healthy humans (Supplementary Tables S1-S4). Staphylococcal virulence factors have been shown to contribute to the increased severity of associated infections. Particularly, the virulence factors that have been described in nasal S. aureus are the Panton-Valentine Leucocidin (PVL), staphylococcal enterotoxins, and toxic shock syndrome toxin [199][200][201][202][203].
Supplementary Table S5 shows the 18 studies (from 13 different countries) in which the genes encoding PVL have been analyzed in nasal S. aureus of healthy humans (most of them of Group A and only three of Groups B/D), indicating the prevalence in each of the studies as well as the associated S. aureus genetic lineages. The pooled prevalence of PVL-MSSA and PVL-MRSA were 11.5 and 9.6%, respectively (with ranges of 0.0-76.9 and 0.0-28.6%, respectively). If we consider the pooled prevalence in each of the countries, the highest prevalence of PVL-MSSA was detected in Ghana, with a pooled prevalence of 67.9% [33,34], whereas, in the case of PVL-MRSA, the highest prevalence of 28.6% was reported in Argentine children [79]. In China, Gong et al. [48] reported a very high prevalence of PVL-MSSA of 76.9% in healthy children, while Yan et al. [49] reported a very low prevalence of 2.3% in healthy adults. However, in the USA, a nasal PVL-MSSA prevalence of <5% was reported by Velasco et al. [69] and Wardyn et al. [66], but 29.0% by Wardyn et al. [73] in humans of Group A. Based on these findings, it can be inferred that PVL was more frequent in MSSA than in MRSA nasal isolates in most of the 18 eligible studies (Supplementary Table S5). Additionally, studies from Sub-Saharan Africa suggest that the region is MSSA-PVL endemic due to the very high prevalence especially reported [33,34].

Genetic Lineages in Nasal S. aureus of Healthy Humans of Groups A-D, with Special Focus on the CC398 Lineage
Fifty-two studies reported the molecular typing (staphylococcal protein-A (spa), sequence types (ST) and/or clonal complexes (CC)) of S. aureus isolated from the nasal cavity of healthy humans of Groups A-D (Supplementary Table S6). In Figure 5, it is shown the pooled prevalence of MRSA in healthy humans of the groups A-D (obtained with data of Supplementary Tables S1-S4), and the pooled prevalence of MRSA-CC398 (in relation to healthy individuals and to typed MRSA isolates) and of MSSA-CC398 (in relation to healthy individuals and to typed MSSA isolates) in the four studied groups (obtained from data presented in Supplementary Table S6). The pooled prevalence of MRSA among humans of group A, B, C, and D was of 0.8%, 0.9%, 8.6%, and 13.5%, respectively.
The CC398 lineage was scarcely detected among healthy humans of Group A, with pooled prevalence of 0.04% (for MRSA-CC398) and 0.82% (for MSSA-CC398). Moreover, the lineage CC398 represented 2.9 and 6.9% of total MSSA and MRSA isolates of Group A, respectively ( Figure 5). The MSSA-CC398 isolates were detected in 3 of the 12 studies in which S. aureus molecular typing was performed [49,67,72], and these studies were carried out in Spain, China, and the USA; the spa-type t571 was found in most of cases, although a few isolates with spa-types t034 and t1451 were also identified. In the studies of China and the USA, the CC398 isolates represented 8-10% of the total MSSA isolates. In relation to MRSA-CC398 in Group A, it was detected in only 3 of the 15 selected studies, performed in China and in different European countries [49,62,63]; these isolates were ascribed to spa-types t034, t011, and t108. The most frequent lineages detected in Group A in MSSA versus MRSA isolates, other than CC398, were as follows: CC15, C30, CC5, CC45, CC152, CC84 versus CC5, CC152, and CC88 (Supplementary Table S6).
The data obtained in the studies of Group B were very similar to the ones of Group A, with a very low pooled prevalence of MSSA-CC398 and MRSA-CC398 nasal carriages among food handlers (≤0.05%) ( Figure 5). In this sense, only two studies performed in Hong Kong and Germany detected MSSA-CC398 (spa, t034, t571, and t1451) [82,88]; on the other hand, no MRSA-CC398 isolates were detected in the six selected studies of this group. Other lineages frequently detected in this group, in MSSA versus MRSA were as follows: CC22, CC15, and CC96 versus CC22 and CC6 (Supplementary Table S6).
The pooled rate of MRSA-CC398 nasal carriage among healthy veterinary personnel (Group C) was of 2.6%, representing 28.4% of total MRSA of this group ( Figure 5). They were detected in 6 of the 11 studies in which molecular typing was performed, and they were carried out in Switzerland, the Czech Republic, and the UK [121][122][123][124]135,136]. Most of the isolates corresponded to the spa type t011, but in a few cases, t034 or t899 were also identified. The other lineages among MRSA isolates detected in Group C were CC22 and ST59 (Supplementary Table S6). However, molecular typing of MSSA was not performed in any of selected studies.
Finally, in Group D (healthy livestock farmers), of the 10 studies in which molecular typing was performed on MSSA, 9 of them detected MSSA-CC398 isolates (spa t034 and t011); these studies were performed in China, Switzerland, Germany, Poland, and the USA. On the other hand, of the 28 studies in which molecular typing was performed on MRSA, CC398 isolates were detected in 17 of them (mostly of spa-types t011 and t034; and to a lesser extent t899, t1451, and t1456) ( Figure 5; Supplementary Table S6). The pooled rates of MRSA-CC398 and MSSA-CC398 nasal carriages among livestock farmers were of 5.4 and 1.8%, respectively ( Figure 5). Moreover, MRSA-CC398 and MSSA-CC398 represented 58.8 and 11.5% of total MRSA and MSSA isolates recovered from livestock farmers ( Figure 5).
The countries in which nasal MRSA-CC398 was most prevalent were Germany, Poland, the USA, Canada, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Australia, Korea, Spain, and Italy. However, in China and Taiwan, three studies detected ST9 in pig farmers, also considered as LA-MRSA, in some cases associated with spa-type t899 (Supplementary Table S6). Interestingly, the pooled prevalence of MSSA-CC398 nasal carriage in livestock farmers (1.8%) was higher than in individuals of Groups A/B (0.82%/0.05%), with associated spa-types t011, t034, and t108; moreover, the rate of CC398 among MSSA isolates was higher in Group D (11.8%) than in groups A/B (<3%) ( Figure 5; Supplementary Table S6). Other lineages, in addition to CC398 detected in studies of Group D among MSSA versus MRSA were as follows: CC7 (China), CC45, CC15, and CC30 versus CC7 and CC9 (China and Thailand) (Supplementary Table S6).
The data of MRSA, MRSA-CC398, and MRSA-CC398/ST9 in relation with the type of livestock is shown in Figure 6. In this sense, pig farmers showed higher rates of MRSA (16.3%) and MRSA-CC398 nasal carriages (8.4%) than dairy farmers (6.3 and 4.7%, respectively). These rates were lower in the studies in which chicken farmers, or unspecified or mixed type of farmers were included (6.8 and 0.07%, respectively). Nevertheless, the lineage CC398 represented a high proportion of MRSA isolates in both pig and dairy farmers (63.3 and 75%, respectively). The rate of MRSA-CC398/ST9 (LA-MRSA) nasal carriage among pig farmers was 9.2% ( Figure 6). The molecular surveillance of the evolution of S. aureus-CC398 lineage should not only be in pig farms but in other livestock farms. For instance, cows' farms are considered the main animal reservoir for the emergence of human epidemic clones of S. aureus, according to a recent study that analyzed the gene exchange as the driver of the ecological success of this multi-host bacterial pathogen [204].
Differences were observed in the data of the pooled rates of MRSA, MRSA-CC398, and MRSA-CC398/ST9 nasal carriages of pig farmers when the different continents were compared (Figure 7). In this sense, the highest rate of MRSA-CC398 nasal rates was obtained in European countries (15.1%), especially in Germany, Switzerland, Italy, and Spain [121,161,172,174,181]; this lineage represented 94.2% of the MRSA isolates recovered from pig farmers. The most prevalent LA-MRSA lineage in Europe is ST398. This ST dominated most of the studies on humans with risk of animal contact due to occupation. Most animal-related MRSA strains belonged to spa-types t011, t034, and t1451, and typically showed resistance to tetracycline, an antibiotic frequently used in animal food production.
The rate of MRSA-CC398 nasal carriage among pig farmers in the studies carried out in the USA/Canada was of 3.8% and represented one/third of the MRSA isolates recovered in this population. Moreover, the rate of nasal carriage found in the studies performed in Asian countries (China, Korea, and Taiwan) was of 1.5%, although it increased to 4.2% when the ST9 lineage was also considered. The ST9 lineage is a relevant LA-MRSA among Asian countries.
The CC398 lineage has been reported from S. aureus isolates from various human populations and geographical locations. Based on the high rate of CC398-S. aureus reported from these studies, measures for the prevention of infections in humans by MRSA CC398 should focus on humans with direct exposure to livestock, especially with pigs. Regimens for screening and admission to hospitals should include farmers raising productive livestock and veterinarians with subsequent precaution measures.
According to the global data analyzed in this study, healthy people of Groups A and B showed very low rates of nasal carriages of MRSA-CC398 (<0.05%) and MSSA-CC398 (<1%); the predominant spa type among MSSA-CC398 isolates was t571, which represent a livestock-independent clade [17,205]. Findings from this analysis suggest that food handlers seem to be at a low risk of nasal colonization by the MRSA-CC398 lineage, as previously indicated [110]. However, a higher rate of MRSA-CC398 nasal carriage was detected in healthy humans of Group C (veterinarians) and especially among those of Group D (livestock farmers), with pooled rates of 2.6 and 5.4%, respectively ( Figure 5), of which spa-types t034 and t011 predominated ( Supplementary Table S6; Figure 8). This prevalence increased when only pig farmers were considered (8.42%) ( Figure 6). Moreover, a moderate prevalence of MSSA-CC398 was also found in farmers of Group D (1.8%), with t034 and t011 as predominant spa types (livestock-related clades), with no detection of t571; MSSA-CC398 represented 11.5% of total MSSA isolates ( Figure 5, Supplementary Table S6). It seems that direct and intensive contact with livestock (especially pigs) is a risk factor for colonization with MRSA-CC398, and at a lower level with MSSA-CC398 (spa t011 or t034, animal-associated).

Non-Aureus Staphylococci Nasal Colonization in Healthy People (Groups A to D)
Aside from S. aureus isolates, 16 different studies recovered and reported non-aureus staphylococci ( Supplementary Table S7). Most of them were S. epidermidis. Perhaps the high proportion of S. epidermidis isolated from the nasal cavity of healthy people was because this CoNS is a major part of the normal microbiota of the skin (including those on the nose). Moreover, S. epidermidis is one of the most abundant colonizers of healthy human mucosa including that in the respiratory tract [206].
Moreover, Abadi et al. [82] and Falomir et al. [83] reported non-aureus CoPS and CoNS from the nasal cavity of healthy humans who did not have animal contact (Supplementary  Table S7). In most of the studies that reported CoNS, S. haemolyticus, S. lugdunensis, and S. saprophyticus were ones of the major isolated species, in addition to S. epidermidis. It could be that humans encountered these isolates through the environment [207] or during the consumption of contaminated animal-derived food, implying these as routes of transmission of non-S. aureus to humans [208].
Besides S. aureus isolated from the nasal cavity of livestock workers, Sinlapasorn et al. [188] reported the identification of S. sciuri, S. haemolyticus, S. arlettae, S. cohnii subsp. urealyticus, S. hominis subsp. hominis, S. chromogenes, and S. epidermidis isolates recovered from Thailand pig farmers (Supplementary Table S7). Interestingly, the rates of MRCoNS among pig-farm workers recorded by Sinlapasorn et al. [188] was high (16.3%). This finding confirmed that both MRSA and various species of MRCoNS can be frequently found in livestock farmers [188].
Veterinary personnel may also be colonized by non-aureus CoPS of animal origin. Aside from the S. aureus nasal colonization in veterinarians, three studies reported the recovery of S. pseudintermedius from veterinarians of Denmark, Czech Republic, and Hong Kong, representing nasal colonization between 0.7-3.9%; interestingly, two of these studies recovered methicillin-resistant S. pseudintermedius (MRSP) isolates [138,139]. Dogs are frequently colonized and occasionally infected by this microorganism that could be transferred to in-contact humans, as is the case of veterinarians [209]. Several studies have isolated S. pseudintermedius from 46-92% of healthy dogs, with the highest prevalence at the perineum, followed by either the nasal or oral mucosa [210,211].

Genetic Studies of Nasal S. pseudintermedius Colonization from Healthy People
The few genomic studies of S. pseudintermedius have offered a glimpse of its diversity, epidemiological characteristics, and antimicrobial resistance gene profile [185,212]. Among them, S. pseudintermedius was reported from studies by Paul et al. [138], Boost et al. [139], and Neradova et al. [135] with a prevalence of 3.9, 0.7, and 1.5%, respectively ( Supplementary Table S7). However, only a study by Boost et al. [139] performed the molecular typing of the S. pseudintermedius isolate. Of which, it was MRSP and belonged to ST71.
Although the three studies reported a low S. pseudintermedius carriage rate (<5%), they may be epidemiologically considered high on the basis that S. pseudintermedius is not a normal human microbiota. Hence, the S. pseudintermedius colonized veterinary personnel may have an increased risk for the acquisition of MRSP because they are regularly exposed to animals (especially dogs and cats) and other small animals with skin and soft tissue infections [213].

Limitation of the Study
Despite the fact that this current article comprehensively synthesized data from published articles to obtain various pooled prevalence, it is necessary to be cautious in the interpretation of some data, as the pooled prevalence of S. aureus and MRSA in some countries were solely from one or two studies (See supplementary files).

Conclusions and Recommendations
These findings, put together, demonstrated that contact with livestock and veterinary practice increases the risk of being an MRSA-CC398 nasal carrier, while food handlers seem to be at a lower risk for MRSA-CC398 carriage. Thus, this emphasizes the need for an integrated molecular epidemiology of zoonotic staphylococci to enhance adequate surveillance and accurate diagnostics. It is very important to implement a long-term surveillance of the genetic lineages of nasal staphylococci. Moreover, there is the crucial need to precisely determine the virulome and resistome of S. pseudintermedius and other non-aureus staphylococci colonizing healthy humans.
Most of the eligible studies used in this current article were performed in European and Asian countries. Hence, it is recommended that more studies should be performed in other continents to have a more and balanced picture of this subject matter. To achieve a formidable control of antimicrobial resistance, country-wise, regional, and global antimicrobial-resistant surveillance are very critical. These will help to detect and measure the extent of the emergence of new resistant lineages with the capacity to spread and switch between healthy animals and humans. Taken together, our findings provide a framework that will provide a critical foundation for future studies on the population structure and dynamics, antimicrobial resistance of nasal staphylococci as well as the occupational risks in food handlers, veterinarians, and livestock farmers.
Supplementary Materials: The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10 .3390/pathogens10081000/s1, Table S1: Study characteristics, species, antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes of Staphylococcal nasal carriages in healthy humans that did not report any risk factor of S. aureus colonization (n = 58), Table S2: Study characteristics, species, antimicrobial resistance pattern and virulence genes detected in staphylococcal nasal isolates recovered from healthy foodhandlers (n = 31), Table S3: Study characteristics, species, antimicrobial resistance, and virulence genes of staphylococcal nasal carriages in veterinary students and practitioners (n = 26), Table S4: Study characteristics, species, antimicrobial resistance pattern, and virulence genes detected in staphylococcal nasal isolates recovered from healthy livestock farmers (n = 51), Table S5: Prevalence pattern and genetic profile of PVL-positive S. aureus isolates in the nasal cavity of healthy people of the Groups A-D, Table S6: Molecular typing of S. aureus isolated from the nasal cavity of healthy humans with or without occupational risks of colonization (Groups A-D), Table S7: Study characteristics, species, and antimicrobial resistance profile of non-aureus staphylococci nasal carriage in healthy people with or without risk of colonization (Groups A-D). Funding: This work was supported by the project PID2019-106158RB-I00 of the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) of Spain and by the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) of the European Union. Additionally, it received funding from the European Union's H2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement N • 801586 for Idris Nasir Abdullahi. Rosa Fernandez-Fernández has a predoctoral contract from the Ministry of Spain (FPU18 /05438).

Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement:
The datasets in excel sheet used for the analyses of the main findings during this study can be accessed through the corresponding author on request.