Hematene Nanoplatelets with Enhanced Visible Light Absorption; the Role of Aromatic Molecules

Hematite has been considered an important candidate for the development of an efficient photoelectrocatalytic water-splitting system. One of the most serious obstacles that limits the efficiency of hematite is low absorption capacity in visible light. Herein, we report the production of hematene nanoplatelets from hematite ore with yields of up to 60%, using a low-cost, sustainable method that is based on the ultrasonic treatment of hematite ore in a water solution of a series of organic aromatic compounds. We show that the chemisorption of molecules with increased aromaticity on the surface of hematene resulted in the significant improvement of its visible light absorptivity, with an increase of up to 200%. As a result, using a water solution of terephthalaldehyde as a liquid medium, hematite ore was exfoliated to hematene nanoplatelets with a yield of 40% and remarkable stability in water. Due to this, hematene was easily drop-casted on glass forming homogenous thin films with strong absorptivity in the visible region.


Introduction
Hematite (α-Fe 2 O 3 ) is the most thermodynamically stable form of iron oxide, found in abundance on Earth and easily prepared in the laboratory.It has been extensively studied as an anodic material for photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting that is considered a great challenge for solar energy conversion [1,2].Hematite has certain significant advantages and among others is a photochemically stable, non-toxic, environmentally friendly semiconductor with an energy bandgap of about 2 eV that suggests a highly promising theoretical maximum solar-to-energy efficiency of 15% [3].However, experimental results have shown much lower values, although an extensive number of ideas have been explored in recent years such as metal doping; size, shape and surface area control; and hybrid or heterostructure fabrication [4][5][6].The four main disadvantages of hematite that limit its efficiency focus on poor conductivity, short lifetime of photoelectrons due to recombination, slow water oxidation reaction, and poor light absorption capacity [1].
The development of nanostructured materials in the last few decades has offered new perspectives on semiconductors that can be used in hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) [7,8], photovoltaics [9,10] and photoelectrocatalytic water splitting [11].Therefore, controlling the size, the shape and the surface morphology of nanostructured hematite could facilitate charge separation, provide short diffusion length for minority carriers and optimize the light absorption and energy bandgap, limiting the disadvantages of the bulk form [3,12].In recent years, following the great success of graphene, a variety of 2D nanostructures have been prepared by the liquid phase exfoliation (LPE) method, from layered materials such as transition metal dichalcogenides and group VA monoelemental solids like black phosphorous and hexagonal boron nitride [13].
Hematite ores belong to the family of non van der Waals materials that, under certain treatments, can be converted to 2D nanostructured analogs, such as hematene, which exhibit interesting optoelectronic properties and introduce novel expectations in various applications [14].Two-dimensional hematene nanoplatelets have up to now been studied as a support in catalysis and in nonlinear optics, photocatalysis and photoelectrocatalytic water splitting [15][16][17][18][19][20][21].
Specularite, a lamellar hematite ore, has been exfoliated under sonication in organic solvents to very thin nanoplatelets that can be used as an alternative low-cost iron oxide nanostructure in catalysis [15].Although polar organic solvents like dimethylformamide or N-methyl pyrrolidone are mainly used in the LPE process, water remains the most abundant, sustainable and environmentally friendly material and therefore the most interesting and desirable solvent [16].In the literature, there are only a few examples of water being used as the solvent of the LPE of iron oxide materials.Specularite ore has been exfoliated to hematene nanosheets by LPE in water with a prolonged sonication of 48 h [20].The sonochemical treatment has also been used for the exfoliation of synthetic hematite nanopowder in the form of flakes, which showed much higher photoelectrochemical efficiency [21].
Recently, we have shown that iron oxide ores, such as hematite and magnetite can be exfoliated in an aqueous solution of melamine under mild sonication.The isolated nanoplatelets of hematene showed interesting nonlinear optical properties [17].
Following this idea, we describe here the formation of hematene nanoplatelets with highly visible light absorption (VLA) resulting from the treatment of hematite ore with mild sonication in aqueous solutions of a variety of organic aromatic compounds.Depending on the organic compound used, the resulting hematene nanoplatelets exhibited high VLA, and excellent fabrication efficiency.The aromatic compounds investigated here have some common characteristics, such as low to mild solubility in water, planar shape, presence of oxygen (O) or nitrogen (N) atoms and aromaticity.The aim of the present work was to study the role of organic molecules in shaping some important characteristics of the hematene nanoplatelets in terms of the photoelectrocatalysis of water splitting, such as stability and homogeneous dispersion in water, VLA and the energy bandgap.

Results and Discussion
Hematite ore is red brown in color and its optical absorption spectrum extends from the near-infrared to the ultraviolet region with maximum absorption in the 400 nm region.The raw material used in this work was natural ferroxide, hematite.It is associated with Fe-skarns and occurs as patches that replace magnetite due to supergene oxidation.A certain amount of hematite ore was dispersed in a solution of the organic compound in water and the mixture was sonicated in a bath for an hour.The non-exfoliated material was removed after precipitation and the dispersed material was isolated by filtration and washed to remove the organics.The organic compounds that were used in this work, as well as the dispersed-in-water hematene products, are shown in Figure 1.
The liquid phase exfoliation (LPE) yield ranged between 30 and 60%.The two aminerich compounds, melamine and caffeine, showed the highest yield close to 60%, the aldehydes, 3,4 DHBA and terephthalaldehyde, showed moderate yields around 40% and the rest, oxygen-rich compounds, showed the lowest but remarkable yields of about 30%.The compounds used in the present work, except for pyranine, have rather low solubility in water.Recently, our group has shown that poorly soluble organic compounds in water favor graphite exfoliation and the production of few-layer graphene nanosheets [22].However, in terms of the ultrasonic treatment of hematite, the solubilities of organic compounds in water, do not have a direct impact on the performance of this treatment.The LPE of hematite in the presence of organics produces very thin nanoplatelets, with a thickness of much less than 5 nm [17] and a lateral size from 0.5 to a few µm (see Figure 2a,b).The dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements (see Table 1 and Figure S1) showed that the prepared hematene nanoplatelets have similar hydrodynamic diameters (except that of H rhod ) ranging between 230 and 360 nm, indicating that the role of organic molecules in terms of the structural characteristics of the nanoplatelets is rather limited.The liquid phase exfoliation (LPE) yield ranged between 30 and 60%.The two aminerich compounds, melamine and caffeine, showed the highest yield close to 60%, the aldehydes, 3,4 DHBA and terephthalaldehyde, showed moderate yields around 40% and the rest, oxygen-rich compounds, showed the lowest but remarkable yields of about 30%.The compounds used in the present work, except for pyranine, have rather low solubility in water.Recently, our group has shown that poorly soluble organic compounds in water favor graphite exfoliation and the production of few-layer graphene nanosheets [22].However, in terms of the ultrasonic treatment of hematite, the solubilities of organic compounds in water, do not have a direct impact on the performance of this treatment.The LPE of hematite in the presence of organics produces very thin nanoplatelets, with a thickness of much less than 5 nm [17] and a lateral size from 0.5 to a few µm (see Figure 2a,b).The dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements (see Table 1 and Figure S1) showed that the prepared hematene nanoplatelets have similar hydrodynamic diameters (except that of Hrhod) ranging between 230 and 360 nm, indicating that the role of organic molecules in terms of the structural characteristics of the nanoplatelets is rather limited.The FTIR spectra of the hematene products and hematite showed similar bands (see Figure 3).The peaks at 874 and 570 cm −1 are characteristic Fe-O vibrations.The remaining two peaks at 1022 and 791 cm −1 are attributed to stretching vibrations associated to goethite impurities of the starting material [23].The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the hematene nanoplatelets include peaks corresponding to the main lattice planes of bulk hematite.However, the peaks of the nanoplatelets are much broader, as expected from the nanoscale dimensions (see Figure S2 and Table S1).The FTIR spectra of the hematene products and hematite showed similar bands (see Figure 3).The peaks at 874 and 570 cm −1 are characteristic Fe-O vibrations.The remaining two peaks at 1022 and 791 cm −1 are attributed to stretching vibrations associated to goethite impurities of the starting material [23].The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the hematene nanoplatelets include peaks corresponding to the main lattice planes of bulk hematite.However, the peaks of the nanoplatelets are much broader, as expected from the nanoscale dimensions (see Figure S2 and Table S1).The main property of hematene is its characteristic absorption in the UV-Vis area, which makes it a very promising semiconductor, suitable for photoelectrochemical water splitting.
UV-Vis spectra comparison.The samples were diluted with water to a final concentration of 0.09 g L −1 .The absorption spectra of the samples are presented in Figure 4a.The absorption of hematene starts in the near-infrared region, continues to increase slightly in the visible and finally forms an intense broad band with λmax at 388-395 nm and a broad shoulder around 530-550 nm attributed to ligand-to-metal charge transfer 3+ The main property of hematene is its characteristic absorption in the UV-Vis area, which makes it a very promising semiconductor, suitable for photoelectrochemical water splitting.
UV-Vis spectra comparison.The samples were diluted with water to a final concentration of 0.09 g L −1 .The absorption spectra of the samples are presented in Figure 4a.The absorption of hematene starts in the near-infrared region, continues to increase slightly in the visible and finally forms an intense broad band with λ max at 388-395 nm and a broad shoulder around 530-550 nm attributed to ligand-to-metal charge transfer transitions and pair excitations of two adjacent Fe 3+ cations occupying adjacent sites, respectively.Based on experimental data, the λ max position depends on the thickness of the nanoplatelets due to quantum confinement.The decrease in the thickness of the hematene nanoplatelets is associated with a blue shift of the λ max [17,23].The almost constant value of λ max , here, suggests that the thickness of the different hematene nanoplatelets is very similar.
The main property of hematene is its characteristic absorption in the UV-Vis area, which makes it a very promising semiconductor, suitable for photoelectrochemical water splitting.
UV-Vis spectra comparison.The samples were diluted with water to a final concentration of 0.09 g L −1 .The absorption spectra of the samples are presented in Figure 4a.The absorption of hematene starts in the near-infrared region, continues to increase slightly in the visible and finally forms an intense broad band with λmax at 388-395 nm and a broad shoulder around 530-550 nm attributed to ligand-to-metal charge transfer transitions and pair excitations of two adjacent Fe 3+ cations occupying adjacent sites, respectively.Based on experimental data, the λmax position depends on the thickness of the nanoplatelets due to quantum confinement.The decrease in the thickness of the hematene nanoplatelets is associated with a blue shift of the λmax [17,23].The almost constant value of λmax, here, suggests that the thickness of the different hematene nanoplatelets is very similar.Considering the concentration of the hematene samples (C = 0.09 g L −1 ) and the absorbance at 380-400 nm, the extinction coefficient of the hematene products was estimated (see Table 2).Based on the Tauc plot method, the main direct bandgaps of the hematene samples were also estimated (see Table 2 and Figure 4b,c).The absorption efficiency of the hematene samples in aqueous dispersion in the visible light region showed the highest values with H pyran , H querc and H phen and the lowest with H mel and H caf .The most effective product, H pyran , has about 4 times higher VLA (α 550 = 0.35) than hematene produced in pure water, H water (α 550 = 0.09).The energy bandgaps of the hematene products showed a similar trend with the absorbance, although the area that ranges is very narrow.
A total of 200 µg of the hematene samples was deposited on glass slides by simple drop-casting of aqueous dispersions and air-dried to form thin films.Most of the samples formed homogenous films.In the H pyran sample, a coffee ring with a high concentration of hematene at the periphery was formed, while in the H querc sample an aggregate was formed in the middle (see Figure 5a).Subsequently, the air-dried hematene films were then studied by UV-Vis spectroscopy (see Figure 5b).VLA was recorded in different regions of the covered surface to examine the homogeneity of the films.
Table 2.The absorbance at the λ max of the dispersion of hematene products in water and the estimated extinction coefficient, ε, and energy bandgap.The last two columns show the mean value of the absorption coefficient, α, of the hematene samples deposited as thin films and the relative standard deviation (RSD).

Samples
Absorbance  The absorption coefficient α was calculated using the equation α = 2.30 × A/thickness.The average thickness of the samples was estimated as 0.17 μm.The absorption coefficients, α, of the hematene films are presented in Table 2.It was noted that the extinction coefficient (measured in water dispersion) and the absorption coefficient The absorption coefficient α was calculated using the equation α = 2.30 × A/thickness.The average thickness of the samples was estimated as 0.17 µm.The absorption coefficients, α, of the hematene films are presented in Table 2.It was noted that the extinction coefficient (measured in water dispersion) and the absorption coefficient (measured in films) showed a similar trend, in terms of increasing absorptivity, except for H pyran and H querc which are probably affected by the inhomogeneity of the films (see Figure 6).The size and shape of hematite nanostructures have been reported among the factors affecting their absorptivity and energy bandgap [12,24,25].However, here, 2D shape is the same for all the hematene nanoplatelets and their size and thickness do not differ significantly, as shown by DLS measurements and the position of λ max .Hphen showed the highest VLA capacity in solution and in film, but it was produced with a medium yield.Hmel was produced with the highest yield, but its absorption capacity was the lowest.The solution of terephthalaldehyde in water was the optimum case to produce hematene, Htere, with a high absorption capacity and a very promising yield.
Here, the role of organic molecules during the formation of hematene nanoplatelets in water is determined by its interaction with the surface of the hematene.Although the nature of those interactions has not yet been studied in detail, cation-π interactions of aromatic compounds with mineral surfaces have been reasonably suggested, as they are often identified in similar natural systems [26,27].The planarity of the aromatic molecules favors these interactions and the position of the molecules parallel to the hematene surface (see Figure 7) is the most energetically stable, taking into consideration the DFT study of the adsorption of benzene on hematite surfaces by Dzade et al. [26].On the other hand, the experimental results showed that the absorptivity of the final hematene nanoplatelets is in accordance with the aromaticity of the molecules interacting with the hematene nanoplatelets during exfoliation.The increased aromaticity of the organic molecules is associated with the red shift of their UV-Vis absorption bands due to the stabilization of π* and the lower energy of π,π* transition.Therefore, the interaction of hematene with pyranine and quercetin, which have a higher aromatic character as indicated by their absorption spectra, is associated with the most absorptive nanoplatelets H pyran and H querc .On the other hand, the less aromatic caffeine and melamine, lead to the formation of the less absorbing H caf and H mel nanoplatelets.Finally, molecules with moderate aromaticity have contributed to the formation of hematene products with medium-to-high absorptivity (see Figure 6).
H phen showed the highest VLA capacity in solution and in film, but it was produced with a medium yield.H mel was produced with the highest yield, but its absorption capacity was the lowest.The solution of terephthalaldehyde in water was the optimum case to produce hematene, H tere , with a high absorption capacity and a very promising yield.
Here, the role of organic molecules during the formation of hematene nanoplatelets in water is determined by its interaction with the surface of the hematene.Although the nature of those interactions has not yet been studied in detail, cation-π interactions of aromatic compounds with mineral surfaces have been reasonably suggested, as they are often identified in similar natural systems [26,27].The planarity of the aromatic molecules favors these interactions and the position of the molecules parallel to the hematene surface (see Figure 7) is the most energetically stable, taking into consideration the DFT study of the adsorption of benzene on hematite surfaces by Dzade et al. [26].
nature of those interactions has not yet been studied in detail, cation-π interactions of aromatic compounds with mineral surfaces have been reasonably suggested, as they are often identified in similar natural systems [26,27].The planarity of the aromatic molecules favors these interactions and the position of the molecules parallel to the hematene surface (see Figure 7) is the most energetically stable, taking into consideration the DFT study of the adsorption of benzene on hematite surfaces by Dzade et al. [26].Εxamining the UV-Vis spectra of the hematene products at shorter wavelengths (e.g.200-400 nm), weak absorption bands were detected, indicating the presence of small Examining the UV-Vis spectra of the hematene products at shorter wavelengths (e.g., 200-400 nm), weak absorption bands were detected, indicating the presence of small amounts of organic molecules on the surface of hematene nanoplatelets after washing (Figure S3).Based on this observation, it is suggested that, here, the cation-π interactions of the hematene surface with aromatic molecules facilitate the transition of the electrons of the semiconductor to the conduction band and significantly increase the VLA of the hematene nanoplatelets, offering a great advantage for their use in photoelectrocatalytic water-splitting systems.The effect on the water-splitting efficiency of organically modified hematene nanoplatelets due to increased absorptivity is likely to be mitigated by the restriction of the catalytic centers on the surface of the hematene, due to the presence of the organic molecules.However, spectroscopic evidence, in particular the lack of significant signals of organic material on the hematene FTIR spectra, suggests that the presence of these molecules on the surface is limited in contrast with their impact.
Preparation method.A total of 20 mg of powder hematite was mixed with a solution of 100 mg of the organic compound (with 50 g pyranine) in 40 mL of deionized water, and the mixture was sonicated for 1 h in bath sonication.The remaining hematite was left to precipitate for 1 h and the supernatant was isolated and centrifuged for 30 min at 10,000 rpm to separate the solid hematene products from the organic material.The product was then redispersed in water, filtered (nylon membrane 0.45 µm), washed with water and dried in air.The thin films were formed by the drop-casting of 200 µg of the hematite samples dispersed in water and air-dried.
Characterization.XRD patterns was conducted with a D8 Advance Bruker diffractometer (Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany) using a CuKa (lD 1.5418) radiation source (40 kV, 40 mA) and a secondary beam graphite monochromator.The laser power was 1.082 mV.The optical spectra were recorded in water dispersion with a Shimadzu UV-1900 (Shimadzu, Duisburg, Germany).FTIR spectra were obtained with an ATR technique on a Fourier transform spectrometer (IRTracer-100, Shimadzu Europa GmbH, Duisburg, Germany).TEM images were obtained by a JEOL (Tokyo, Japan), JEM-2100 instrument operating at 200 kV.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. (a) TEM and (b) SEM images of hematene nanosheets from Hmel product.(c) Hydrodynamic diameter and zeta potential of Hphen measured by DLS.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. (a) TEM and (b) SEM images of hematene nanosheets from H mel product.(c) Hydrodynamic diameter and zeta potential of H phen measured by DLS.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of hematite ore and the product H phen .

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. (a) UV-Vis absorption spectra of hematene samples in water dispersion.(b,c) Tauc plot graph for direct transitions optical band gaps calculated by extrapolation of the linear part of (ahv) 2 versus energy.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. (a) UV-Vis absorption spectra of hematene samples in water dispersion.(b,c) Tauc plot graph for direct transitions optical band gaps calculated by extrapolation of the linear part of (ahv) 2 versus energy.

Molecules 2024 , 11 Figure 6 .
Figure 6.The extinction coefficient ε390, the absorption coefficient α550 and the yield of the preparation procedure of the hematene products are shown.In the gray highlighted areas, the area of the λmax of the absorption spectra of the involved aromatic compounds is shown.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.The extinction coefficient ε 390 , the absorption coefficient α 550 and the yield of the preparation procedure of the hematene products are shown.In the gray highlighted areas, the area of the λ max of the absorption spectra of the involved aromatic compounds is shown.

Table 1 .
The hydrodynamic diameter and zeta potential of the products in water.

Table 1 .
The hydrodynamic diameter and zeta potential of the products in water.