PhI(OAc)2-Promoted 1,2-Transfer Reaction between 1,1-Disubstituted Allylic Alcohols and Thiophenols

The PhI(OAc)2-promoted 1,2-transfer reaction between allylic alcohols and thiophenols, conducted in an argon atmosphere, has proven to be effective in producing β-carbonyl sulfides from 1,1-disubstituted allylic alcohols in high yields. This method offers a fast and efficient way to synthesize β-carbonyl sulfides, which are valuable intermediates in organic synthesis. This discussion focuses on the effects of the oxidizer, temperature, and solvent on the reaction. A proposed tentative mechanism for this reaction is also discussed.


Results
Initially, we chose 1,1-diphenylprop-2-en-1-ol (1a) and 4-methylthiophenol (2a) as the model substrates to optimize the reaction conditions, as shown in Table 1.We found that when the reaction was carried out in the presence of PhI(OAc)2 at room temperature in an argon atmosphere for 24 h in CH3CN, the β-carbonyl sulfide 3aa was obtained in an 89% yield (see Table 1, entry 1).No desired product was detected when the reaction was conducted without an oxidant (Table 1, entry 2).Furthermore, nearly no product was afforded when the other oxidants were employed (Table 1, entries 3-5).Adjusting the amount of PhI(OAc)2 to 1.0 equiv.yielded the desired product 3aa in a yield of 9% (Table 1, entry 6), while using 3.0 equiv.resulted in a 52% yield (Table 1, entry 7).We also evaluated the reaction temperature, finding that deviating from room temperature led to decreased yields (Table 1, entries 8-10).Additionally, we found that CH3CN was the optimal solvent compared to others (Table 1, entries [11][12][13][14].Finally, the yield of β-carbonyl sulfide 3aa dropped to 75% when the reaction was performed in an air atmosphere (Table 1, entry 15).

Results
Initially, we chose 1,1-diphenylprop-2-en-1-ol (1a) and 4-methylthiophenol (2a) as the model substrates to optimize the reaction conditions, as shown in Table 1.We found that when the reaction was carried out in the presence of PhI(OAc) 2 at room temperature in an argon atmosphere for 24 h in CH 3 CN, the β-carbonyl sulfide 3aa was obtained in an 89% yield (see Table 1, entry 1).No desired product was detected when the reaction was conducted without an oxidant (Table 1, entry 2).Furthermore, nearly no product was afforded when the other oxidants were employed (Table 1, entries 3-5).Adjusting the amount of PhI(OAc) 2 to 1.0 equiv.yielded the desired product 3aa in a yield of 9% (Table 1, entry 6), while using 3.0 equiv.resulted in a 52% yield (Table 1, entry 7).We also evaluated the reaction temperature, finding that deviating from room temperature led to decreased yields (Table 1, entries 8-10).Additionally, we found that CH 3 CN was the optimal solvent compared to others (Table 1, entries 11-14).Finally, the yield of β-carbonyl sulfide 3aa dropped to 75% when the reaction was performed in an air atmosphere (Table 1, entry 15).DTBP-catalyzed alkylation of 1, 1-diaryl allylic alcohols, which involves a 1,2-aryl migration process.Previously, our group reported [40] that K2S2O8 promoted dehydrative crosscoupling between 1,1-disubstituted allylic alcohols and thiophenols/thiols, and allyl sulfides were obtained.Herein, we report a study on the PhI(OAc)2-promoted 1,2-transfer reaction between allylic alcohols and thiophenols, which provided atom-economic and metal catalyst-free conditions for the synthesis of β-carbonyl sulfides.

Results
Initially, we chose 1,1-diphenylprop-2-en-1-ol (1a) and 4-methylthiophenol (2a) as the model substrates to optimize the reaction conditions, as shown in Table 1.We found that when the reaction was carried out in the presence of PhI(OAc)2 at room temperature in an argon atmosphere for 24 h in CH3CN, the β-carbonyl sulfide 3aa was obtained in an 89% yield (see Table 1, entry 1).No desired product was detected when the reaction was conducted without an oxidant (Table 1, entry 2).Furthermore, nearly no product was afforded when the other oxidants were employed (Table 1, entries 3-5).Adjusting the amount of PhI(OAc)2 to 1.0 equiv.yielded the desired product 3aa in a yield of 9% (Table 1, entry 6), while using 3.0 equiv.resulted in a 52% yield (Table 1, entry 7).We also evaluated the reaction temperature, finding that deviating from room temperature led to decreased yields (Table 1, entries 8-10).Additionally, we found that CH3CN was the optimal solvent compared to others (Table 1, entries 11-14).Finally, the yield of β-carbonyl sulfide 3aa dropped to 75% when the reaction was performed in an air atmosphere (Table 1, entry 15).With the above optimal conditions in hand, we investigated the scope for introducing thiophenols to the PhI(OAc) 2 -promoted 1,2-transfer reaction.As shown in Figure 1, all thiophenol derivatives, 2a-2j, reacted smoothly with 1a to obtain the β-carbonyl sulfides 3aa-3ai in good to excellent yields.First, thiophenols bearing electron-neutral functional groups including methyl, ethyl, isopropyl, and tert-butyl were effectively reacted with 1,1-diphenylprop-2-en-1-ol, yielding corresponding β-carbonyl sulfides in 67-89% yields (Figure 1, 3aa-3ah).Moreover, methoxy-substituted thiophenol can also deliver this desired transformation, giving the corresponding β-carbonyl sulfide in a yield of 73% (3ai).Next, a range of allyl alcohols were capable of participating in the 1,2-transfer reaction with high yields (3ba-3ga, 52-65%) in Figure 2. First, a series of symmetrical diaryl allylic alcohols were investigated.Delightfully, halogen-substituted allylic alcohols were successfully converted into the corresponding β-carbonyl sulfides 3ba-3ca.In addition, allylic alcohols with two varying types of substituents on the phenyl ring were all compatible reaction partners (Figure 2, 3da-3ga and 3da'-3ga').A variety of allylic alcohols with different electronwithdrawing or electron-donating substituents reacted nicely with 4-methylthiophenol in good yields to obtain β-carbonyl sulfides 3da-3ga and their isomers 3da'-3ga'.
Moreover, the applicability of the PhI(OAc) 2 -promoted 1,2-transfer reaction was further demonstrated by a gram-scale reaction (Scheme 2).When the reaction was conducted with a metal-free approach, the expected β-carbonyl sulfide 3aa could be obtained in a high isolated yield (81%).
Moreover, the applicability of the PhI(OAc)2-promoted 1,2-transfer reaction was further demonstrated by a gram-scale reaction (Scheme 2).When the reaction was conducted with a metal-free approach, the expected β-carbonyl sulfide 3aa could be obtained in a high isolated yield (81%).To shed light on the mechanism of the 1,2-transfer reaction between 1,1-disubstituted allylic alcohols and thiophenols, a variety of control experiments were performed (Scheme 3).Running the model reaction in the presence of 2.0 equiv. of 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4methylphenol (BHT) or 1,4-cyclohexadiene did not have much effect on the reaction, and β-carbonyl sulfide 3aa was still the major product.These results indicated that the reaction involves the cationic mechanism pathway rather than the free radical process.To shed light on the mechanism of the 1,2-transfer reaction between 1,1-disubstituted allylic alcohols and thiophenols, a variety of control experiments were performed (Scheme 3).Running the model reaction in the presence of 2.0 equiv. of 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT) or 1,4-cyclohexadiene did not have much effect on the reaction, and β-carbonyl sulfide 3aa was still the major product.These results indicated that the reaction involves the cationic mechanism pathway rather than the free radical process.
Moreover, the applicability of the PhI(OAc)2-promoted 1,2-transfer reaction was further demonstrated by a gram-scale reaction (Scheme 2).When the reaction was conducted with a metal-free approach, the expected β-carbonyl sulfide 3aa could be obtained in a high isolated yield (81%).To shed light on the mechanism of the 1,2-transfer reaction between 1,1-disubstituted allylic alcohols and thiophenols, a variety of control experiments were performed (Scheme 3).Running the model reaction in the presence of 2.0 equiv. of 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4methylphenol (BHT) or 1,4-cyclohexadiene did not have much effect on the reaction, and β-carbonyl sulfide 3aa was still the major product.These results indicated that the reaction involves the cationic mechanism pathway rather than the free radical process.

General Information
All materials, reagents, and solvents were purchased from commercial suppliers and

General Information
All materials, reagents, and solvents were purchased from commercial suppliers and were used without further purification.Analytical TLC was performed with silica gel GF254 plates, and the products were visualized by UV detection.Flash chromatography was carried out using silica gel 200-300.The 1 H NMR (400 or 600 MHz) and 13 C NMR (151 MHz) spectra were measured using CDCl 3 as solvent (Supplementary Materials Figures S1-S30).All chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm and coupling constants (J) in Hz.High-resolution mass spectra (HR-MS) were recorded under electrospray ionization (ESI) conditions.

General Procedure for the 1,2-Transfer Reaction of 1,1-Diphenylprop-2-en-1-ol with Various Thiophenols
To a dried reaction tube (10 mL) with a magnetic bar, PhI(OAc) 2 (0.4 mmol) was added, and the tube was then sealed.The tube was then charged with nitrogen.Then, α,αdiphenyl allylic alcohols (1a, 0.2 mmol), thiophenols (2, 0.4 mmol), and CH 3 CN (2 mL) were injected into the tube using a syringe.The reaction was performed at room temperature for 24 h.The reaction's progress was monitored by TLC.After the reactions were completed, the reaction mixture was diluted with water (10 mL) and washed with EA (3 × 10 mL).The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na 2 SO 4 and concentrated under reduced pressure.The products were isolated by silica gel column chromatography (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1:50 to 1:200).

General Procedure for the 1,2-Transfer Reaction of Various Allyl Alcohols with 4-Methylthiophenol
To a dried reaction tube (10 mL) with a magnetic bar, PhI(OAc) 2 (0.4 mmol) was added, and the tube was then sealed.The tube was then charged with nitrogen.Then, α,α-diaryl allylic alcohols (1, 0.2 mmol), 4-methylthiophenol (2a, 0.4 mmol), and CH 3 CN (2 mL) were injected into the tube using a syringe.The reaction was performed at room temperature for 24 h.The reaction's progress was monitored by TLC.After the reactions were completed, the reaction mixture was diluted with water (10 mL) and washed with EA (3 × 10 mL).The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na 2 SO 4 and concentrated under reduced pressure.The products were isolated by silica gel column chromatography (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1:100 to 1:200).

Scale-Up Experiment
To a dried reaction tube (10 mL) with a magnetic bar PhI(OAc) 2 (10 mmol) was added, and the tube was then sealed.The tube was then charged with nitrogen.Then, α,α-diaryl allylic alcohols (1a, 5 mmol), 4-methylthiophenol (2a, 10 mmol), and CH 3 CN (25 mL) were injected into the tube using a syringe.The reaction was performed at room temperature for 24 h.The reaction's progress was monitored by TLC.After the reactions were completed, the reaction mixture was diluted with water (20 mL) and washed with EA (3 × 20 mL).The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na 2 SO 4 and concentrated under reduce pressure.The product 3aa was isolated by silica gel column chromatography (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1:100).

Conclusions
In summary, we have described a PhI(OAc) 2 -promoted 1,2-transfer reaction between allylic alcohols and thiophenols in high yields.This reaction method represents a powerful tool for synthesizing β-carbonyl sulfides, providing both high yields and rapid reaction times.Additionally, a tentative mechanism has been proposed.Further studies of the detailed reaction mechanism and its application are underway in our laboratory.

Scheme 3 .
Scheme 3. Control experiments.Scheme 3. Control experiments.Based on the above experimental results and literature reports [41,42], a tentative mechanism for the PhI(OAc) 2 -promoted 1,2-transfer reaction is illustrated in Scheme 4. In the first place, PhI(OAc) 2 attacks the 1,1-diaryl allyl alcohol double bond to form cation A. Then, the aryl group migrates to form intermediate B, and the acetate ion leaves to form iodide cation C. Finally, thiophenol attacks intermediate C and leaves a molecule of PhI to obtain the target product.

Table 1 . Screening of reaction conditions a . Entry Deviation from Standard Conditions 3aa Yield (%) b
Scheme 1. Synthesis of β-carbonyl sulfides.

Table 1 .
Screening of reaction conditions a .

Table 1 .
Screening of reaction conditions a .