Electrocatalytic Properties of Quasi-2D Oxides LaSrMn0.5M0.5O4 (M = Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn) for Hydrogen and Oxygen Evolution Reactions

Designing cost-effective and highly efficient electrocatalysts for water splitting is a significant challenge. We have systematically investigated a series of quasi-2D oxides, LaSrMn0.5M0.5O4 (M = Co, Ni, Cu, Zn), to enhance the electrocatalytic properties of the two half-reactions of water-splitting, namely oxygen and hydrogen evolution reactions (OER and HER). The four materials are isostructural, as confirmed by Rietveld refinements with X-ray diffraction. The oxygen contents and metal valence states were determined by iodometric titrations and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Electrical conductivity measurements in a wide range of temperatures revealed semiconducting behavior for all four materials. Electrocatalytic properties were studied for both half-reactions of water-splitting, namely, oxygen-evolution and hydrogen-evolution reactions (OER and HER). For the four materials, the trends in both OER and HER were the same, which also matched the trend in electrical conductivities. Among them, LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4 showed the best bifunctional electrocatalytic activity for both OER and HER, which may be attributed to its higher electrical conductivity and favorable electron configuration.


Introduction
The development of green and sustainable energy solutions is crucial to addressing the energy challenges of the future.The persistent use of carbon-rich fossil fuels leads to carbon dioxide emissions, worsening the greenhouse effect.Additionally, the harmful gases produced during the burning of those fuels cause environmental problems.These challenges have inspired the scientific community to explore renewable and sustainable energy sources.Hydrogen is widely considered an attractive alternative to conventional fuels due to its high energy density and absence of carbon emissions when used as a fuel.Among different methods of hydrogen production, electrochemical water splitting is highly promising.It is an excellent approach for converting and storing renewable energy if cost-effective and efficient catalysts are used to facilitate large-scale hydrogen production.Electrochemical water splitting involves two half-cell reactions, the hydrogen-evolution reaction (HER) and the oxygen-evolution reaction (OER).The OER also occurs in other energy storage and conversion devices, including rechargeable metal-air batteries (M x O 2 → M x + O 2 ) [1].The OER in water electrolysis involves a four-electron-transfer mechanism (H 2 O → O 2 + 4H + + 4e − ) with a more complex reaction pathway and slower kinetics compared to the HER, which follows a two-electron-transfer mechanism (2H + + 2e − → H 2 ).There are efficiency challenges associated with water electrolysis due to the sluggish kinetics of the two half-reactions, particularly the OER.This leads to substantial overpotentials beyond the theoretical thermodynamic potential of 1.23 V versus the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) [2].Although catalysts based on noble metals, such as Pt, Ru, and Ir, often exhibit very high performance for water-splitting, their high cost and scarcity limit their wide-scale application, making it necessary to explore cost-effective and earth-abundant alternatives [3,4].
Perovskite oxides have received growing interest as non-precious metal-based catalysts due to their versatility in composition, tunable electronic structures, affordability, and strong inherent catalytic performance [5][6][7][8].Partial replacement or doping with different metal cations leads to changes in their performance for different applications driven by the resulting modifications to their physical, chemical, and electronic properties [9,10].Several perovskite oxides, such as the benchmark catalyst Ba 0.5 Sr 0.5 Co 0.8 Fe 0.2 O 3−δ (BSCF), have demonstrated efficient OER catalysis, gaining prominence for their OER performance in alkaline environments, on par with IrO 2 [5].Studies have also explored the HER characteristics of perovskite oxides such as Pr 0.5 (Ba 0.5 Sr 0.5 ) 0.5 Co 0.8 Fe 0.2 O 3-δ [11] and SrNb 0.1 Co 0.7 Fe 0.2 O 3-δ [12].A variety of other structural arrangements are derived from perovskites, such as double perovskite, brownmillerite, Ruddlesden-popper, and the so-called K 2 NiF 4 -type [13] structure.The latter is the topic of the present work and has a quasi-2D structure (Figure 1) with the general formula A 2 BO 4 , where A is usually a rare-earth or alkaline-earth metal, and B is frequently a transition metal.Some materials with this structure type have been reported to show electrocatalytic activity for OER or HER, such as SrLaFeO 4 , SrLaCo 0.5 Fe 0.5 O 4 , and SrLaCoO 4-δ [13].Nevertheless, oxide catalysts that demonstrate efficient catalytic activity for both OER and HER are not commonly found.

Crystal Structure
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) was employed to assess the crystal structures of LaSrMn0.5M0.5O4(M = Co, Ni, Cu, Zn) using Rietveld refinements (Figure 1).Table 1 shows a representative example of refined structural parameters for LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4.The structural parameters for the other three materials are listed in Tables S1-S3.The data revealed that all samples consisted of a single phase, indicating the absence of impurities.The space In the present work, we investigated a series of quasi-2D oxides LaSrMn 0.5 M 0.5 O 4 (M = Co, Ni, Cu, Zn), with the aim of improving their electrocatalytic performance for HER and OER through the incorporation of different transition metals.Previous reports on these materials have been limited to their synthesis and some structural characterizations [14][15][16][17][18]. Their electrocatalytic properties have not been previously studied.Our comprehensive studies involved the investigation of their electrical and electrocatalytic properties, as well as detailed X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) studies.Our findings showed semiconducting behavior in all four compounds, with electrical conductivity increasing as a function of temperature.The trend in electrical conductivity correlated with that of the electrocatalytic activity for both HER and OER.Importantly, the bifunctional electrocatalytic properties found in these materials are remarkable, particularly for LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 , which exhibited the highest electrical charge-transport and superior electrocatalytic performance.

Crystal Structure
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) was employed to assess the crystal structures of LaSrMn 0.5 M 0.5 O 4 (M = Co, Ni, Cu, Zn) using Rietveld refinements (Figure 1).Table 1 shows a representative example of refined structural parameters for LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 .The structural parameters for the other three materials are listed in Tables S1-S3.The data revealed that all samples consisted of a single phase, indicating the absence of impurities.The space group and structures of these materials were consistent with previous reports [14][15][16][17][18].All four materials are isostructural with a body-centered tetragonal space group I4/mmm.The crystal structure is shown in Figure 2. All four materials can be described by the general formula A 2 BO 4 , where the A-site is occupied by a mix of La and Sr, while the B-site contains a mix of Mn with Co, Ni, Cu, or Zn.Their structures comprise BO 6 octahedra that share corners to form a 2D layer.The layers are separated from each other, and the gap between them is where the A-site cations reside.The A-site cations have 9 oxygens in their coordination environment.The morphologies of sintered pellets were probed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the results are shown in Figure 3, indicating similar microstructures for the four samples.The EDS mapping showed the surface elemental compositions, as shown in Figure S1, which illustrates representative data for LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 , matching the expected atomic percentages.

Oxidation State and Oxygen Content
The synthesis conditions and elevated temperatures necessary for synthesizing these compounds can result in different valence states, which can affect the oxygen contents [19,20].The oxygen contents of these materials were determined by iodometric titrations, which were repeated at least three times with excellent reproducibility, giving oxygen stoichiometries of 4.0173 ± 0.0016 for LaSrMn 0. We also investigated all four materials by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to determine the oxidation states of transition metals.Given the close overlap of binding energies of Mn 3+ and Mn 4+ peaks, we also conducted additional measurements of standard Mn 2 O 3 and MnO 2 samples (Figure 4).The manganese spectra for three materials, LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 , LaSrMn 0.5 Ni 0.5 O 4, and LaSrMn 0.5 Cu 0.5 O 4-δ , are very similar to each other and encompass binding energies corresponding to both trivalent and tetravalent manganese, as evident from comparison to Mn 2 O 3 and MnO 2 standards in Figure 4 and previously reported manganese binding energies in other oxide materials [21][22][23].Therefore, these three materials contain manganese in a mixed +3/+4 state.On the other hand, the manganese spectrum of LaSrMn 0.5 Zn 0.5 O 4 shows peaks at a higher binding energy compared to the other three compounds, indicating a significantly greater tetravalent character.This observation is consistent with iodometric titration results that indicated four oxygens per formula unit.This oxygen content requires manganese in a tetravalent state, given the divalent state of zinc in LaSrMn 0.5 Zn 0.5 O 4 .
We also investigated all four materials by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to determine the oxidation states of transition metals.Given the close overlap of binding energies of Mn 3+ and Mn 4+ peaks, we also conducted additional measurements of standard Mn2O3 and MnO2 samples (Figure 4).The manganese spectra for three materials, LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4,LaSrMn0.5Ni0.5O4,and LaSrMn0.5Cu0.5O4-δ,are very similar to each other and encompass binding energies corresponding to both trivalent and tetravalent manganese, as evident from comparison to Mn2O3 and MnO2 standards in Figure 4 and previously reported manganese binding energies in other oxide materials [21][22][23].Therefore, these three materials contain manganese in a mixed +3/+4 state.On the other hand, the manganese spectrum of LaSrMn0.5Zn0.5O4shows peaks at a higher binding energy compared to the other three compounds, indicating a significantly greater tetravalent character.This observation is consistent with iodometric titration results that indicated four oxygens per formula unit.This oxygen content requires manganese in a tetravalent state, given the divalent state of zinc in LaSrMn0.5Zn0.5O4.For LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4, the cobalt spectrum was obtained (Figure 5a) and showed binding energies consistent with a mix of +2/+3 oxidation states.Divalent cobalt is expected to give a 2p3/2 peak just below 780 eV [24], while the peak for trivalent cobalt is expected to For LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 , the cobalt spectrum was obtained (Figure 5a) and showed binding energies consistent with a mix of +2/+3 oxidation states.Divalent cobalt is expected to give a 2p 3/2 peak just below 780 eV [24], while the peak for trivalent cobalt is expected to be just above 780 eV [24].The Co 2p 3/2 peak for our material is centered around 780 eV, with a satellite peak at about 786 eV, indicative of Co 2+ [25], and a satellite at about 789 eV, indicative of Co 3+ [24].We ruled out the presence of tetravalent cobalt, as we did not observe any pronounced peak at ~281.5 eV [24].These analyses are consistent with iodometric titration results, indicating four oxygens per formula unit for LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 , and the manganese XPS spectrum, indicating manganese in mixed +3/+4 state, which would require cobalt to be in mixed +2/+3 state for the charge neutrality of the material.
spectrum, the first peak, just above 850 eV, corresponds to La 3+ 3d3/2 [26].The 2p3/2 peak for Ni 2+ is expected to appear close to 854 eV [26][27][28], but higher binding energies, such as ~855 eV, have also been reported for divalent nickel [29].On the other hand, the Ni 3+ 2p3/2 peak is expected to be close to 856-857 eV [26,27,29].In our nickel spectra, the 2p3/2 peak is centered around ~254.6 eV, consistent with the predominant presence of Ni 2+ , and a small high-energy shoulder at ~856.5 eV, which may indicate the presence of some Ni 3+ .For LaSrMn0.5Cu0.5O4-δ, the copper spectrum was obtained, as illustrated in Figure 5c.The Cu 2+ 2p3/2 peak is expected to appear at ~933.5-934.6 eV [26,[30][31][32], while the peak for Cu 1+ should be close to ~932.4 eV [30][31][32].In our copper spectra, the 2p3/2 peak is centered around ~933.7 eV, with strong satellite peaks at about 7-10 eV higher than the 2p3/2 peak, which is considered the signature of Cu 2+ [31,33].These observations are consistent with the presence of copper in a predominantly divalent state.They also match the observation of a Mn 3+ /Mn 4+ mixture in the manganese spectrum and the oxygen vacancies determined by iodometric titrations, which will be required for charge neutrality.
For LaSrMn0.5Zn0.5O4, the zinc spectrum was obtained, as illustrated in Figure 5d.As expected, zinc is in divalent state, evident from the 2p3/2 peak at ~1021.3 eV [26,34].As stated in the discussion of the manganese spectrum, the presence of Zn 2+ and Mn 4+ are consistent with iodometric titration results indicating four oxygens per formula unit.For LaSrMn 0.5 Cu 0.5 O 4-δ , the copper spectrum was obtained, as illustrated in Figure 5c.The Cu 2+ 2p 3/2 peak is expected to appear at ~933.5-934.6 eV [26,[30][31][32], while the peak for Cu 1+ should be close to ~932.4 eV [30][31][32].In our copper spectra, the 2p 3/2 peak is centered around ~933.7 eV, with strong satellite peaks at about 7-10 eV higher than the 2p 3/2 peak, which is considered the signature of Cu 2+ [31,33].These observations are consistent with the presence of copper in a predominantly divalent state.They also match the observation of a Mn 3+ /Mn 4+ mixture in the manganese spectrum and the oxygen vacancies determined by iodometric titrations, which will be required for charge neutrality.
For LaSrMn 0.5 Zn 0.5 O 4 , the zinc spectrum was obtained, as illustrated in Figure 5d.As expected, zinc is in divalent state, evident from the 2p3/2 peak at ~1021.3 eV [26,34].As stated in the discussion of the manganese spectrum, the presence of Zn 2+ and Mn 4+ are consistent with iodometric titration results indicating four oxygens per formula unit.

Electrical Conductivity
We conducted a study on the electrical conductivity of all four compounds over a range of temperatures, from 25 to 800 • C (298 to 1073 K).The resistance is determined by applying Ohm's law to the current response obtained from DC measurements, and this resistance value is subsequently converted into electrical conductivity, denoted by σ (Equation ( 1)) [35].
In this equation, l indicates the thickness of the measured pellet, and A represents the cross-sectional area of the pellet through which the current is applied.Table 2 lists the conductivity values at room temperature, and Figure 6a shows the plot of conductivity at different temperatures.

Hydrogen Evolution Reaction
The hydrogen evolution reaction is the cathodic half-reaction of water electrolysis and involves a two-electron transfer process [6,40].To overcome the sluggish reaction kinetics and accelerate the rate of the HER, it is necessary to apply an overpotential.Designing efficient and stable electrocatalysts is essential to improving the reaction kinetics and minimizing the overpotential.The mechanism of the HER involves a series of steps in both acidic and alkaline media [41].Each condition has advantages and disadvantages.The efficiency of HER in acidic media is expected to be better than that of alkaline environments due to faster kinetics [42].The source of the hydrogen adsorbed on the catalyst in acidic media is a proton, whereas in alkaline HER, the adsorbed hydrogen comes from breaking the bond in the H2O molecule [43], as shown below.
In this equation, σ represents electrical conductivity, n denotes the concentration of charge carriers, e stands for charge of an electron, and µ represents the mobility of charge carriers [36,37].LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 shows higher conductivity than the other three materials in the whole temperature range.The electrical conductivity in oxides typically occurs by electron/hole hopping through metal-oxygen-metal (M-O-M) bonds [38].For this process to happen, metals with more than one stable oxidation state, such as Mn 3+ /Mn 4+ or Co 3+ /Co 4+ , are preferred.The transition metal 3d orbitals overlap with oxygen 2p orbitals, allowing the electron hopping through the M-O-M pathway.The activation energy (E a ) for the temperature-dependent increase in the conductivity of these materials can be calculated using the Arrhenius equation (Equation ( 3)) [35,39].
The activation energy (E a ) for the change in conductivity with temperature can be determined by analyzing the slope of the line of best fit in the log σT versus the 1000/T plot.In this equation, σ • is a pre-exponential factor, while E a , k, and T represent activation energy, the Boltzmann constant, and absolute temperature, respectively.Figure 6b shows the Arrhenius plots for the four materials.The activation energies, determined from the slopes, are presented in Table 2.It is important to emphasize that the activation energy signifies the energy barrier associated with the temperature-dependent increase in conductivity.The E a values are consistent with the electrical conductivity trend, where LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 , which exhibits higher conductivity, also has a lower activation energy.

Hydrogen Evolution Reaction
The hydrogen evolution reaction is the cathodic half-reaction of water electrolysis and involves a two-electron transfer process [6,40].To overcome the sluggish reaction kinetics and accelerate the rate of the HER, it is necessary to apply an overpotential.Designing efficient and stable electrocatalysts is essential to improving the reaction kinetics and minimizing the overpotential.The mechanism of the HER involves a series of steps in both acidic and alkaline media [41].Each condition has advantages and disadvantages.The efficiency of HER in acidic media is expected to be better than that of alkaline environments due to faster kinetics [42].The source of the hydrogen adsorbed on the catalyst in acidic media is a proton, whereas in alkaline HER, the adsorbed hydrogen comes from breaking the bond in the H 2 O molecule [43], as shown below.
To explore the reaction kinetics for the four materials, the Tafel equation was used (Equation ( 4)) [50,51].
where η is the overpotential and j is the current density.The slope of η vs. logj is indicative of the reaction kinetics.A smaller slope suggests a faster reaction, as it indicates that a small change in overpotential is associated with a large change in current density [51,52].As shown in Figure 7b, the Tafel slopes of the four materials show the same trend as their overpotentials.LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 shows the smallest Tafel slope among the four compounds, indicating faster reaction kinetics and consistent with its greater electrocatalytic activity.Chronopotentiometry experiments performed on the most active material, LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 , exhibit a stable response for over 12 h, as shown in the inset of Figure 7a.Furthermore, X-ray diffraction data, before and after 100 cycles of HER (Figure 7c), indicates little change, confirming that the material's structural integrity remains unaltered.We also calculated the mass activity to evaluate the catalysts' inherent qualities.In Figure 7d, we have compared the mass activities of the four compounds at various overpotentials, showing that LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 has a consistently higher mass activity.To explore the reaction kinetics for the four materials, the Tafel equation was used (Equation ( 4)) [50,51].
where η is the overpotential and j is the current density.The slope of η vs. logj is indicative of the reaction kinetics.A smaller slope suggests a faster reaction, as it indicates that a small change in overpotential is associated with a large change in current density [51,52].As shown in Figure 7b, the Tafel slopes of the four materials show the same trend as their overpotentials.LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4shows the smallest Tafel slope among the four compounds, indicating faster reaction kinetics and consistent with its greater electrocatalytic activity.Chronopotentiometry experiments performed on the most active material, LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4,exhibit a stable response for over 12 h, as shown in the inset of Figure 7a.Furthermore, X-ray diffraction data, before and after 100 cycles of HER (Figure 7c), indicates little change, confirming that the material's structural integrity remains unaltered.We also calculated the mass activity to evaluate the catalysts' inherent qualities.In Figure 7d, we have compared the mass activities of the four compounds at various overpotentials, showing that LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4has a consistently higher mass activity.We also determined the double-layer capacitance, Cdl, (Figure 8) by analyzing the average current densities (javg) at various scan rates (υ), as obtained from cyclic We also determined the double-layer capacitance, C dl , (Figure 8) by analyzing the average current densities (j avg ) at various scan rates (υ), as obtained from cyclic voltammograms in a non-faradaic region (Figure S2) [53].The importance of C dl is that it is proportional to the electrochemically active surface area [54].The slope of the plot depicting j avg against ν provides the double-layer capacitance, calculated according to Equation ( 5) [6].
Notably, the C dl values align with the trend observed in electrocatalytic activity, with the most active catalyst, LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 , also displaying the highest C dl value.
The HER activities of the four materials in basic conditions, 1 M KOH, show a similar trend to that in acidic conditions, where LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 has the best activity, followed by LaSrMn 0.5 Cu 0.5 O 4-δ , LaSrMn 0.5 Ni 0.5 O 4 , and LaSrMn0 .5 Zn 0.5 O 4 (Figure 9a).The overpotential values (η 10 ) at 10 mA/cm 2 are 0.482 V, 0.680 V, 0.740 V, and 0.805 V, respectively.Similarly, the same trend is observed for the HER kinetics, as evident from the Tafel slopes shown in Figure 9b.XRD data, before and after 100 HER cycles (Figure 9c), indicate that the structure remains unchanged, confirming the stability.In addition, the comparison of mass activity at various overpotentials in the basic medium again shows consistently higher mass activity for LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 (Figure 9d). is proportional to the electrochemically active surface area [54].The slope of the plot de-picting javg against ν provides the double-layer capacitance, calculated according to Equation ( 5) [6].
Notably, the Cdl values align with the trend observed in electrocatalytic activity, with the most active catalyst, LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4,also displaying the highest Cdl value.The HER activities of the four materials in basic conditions, 1 M KOH, show a similar trend to that in acidic conditions, where LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4has the best activity, followed by LaSrMn0.5Cu0.5O4-δ,LaSrMn0.5Ni0.5O4,and LaSrMn0.5Zn0.5O4(Figure 9a).The overpotential values (η10) at 10 mA/cm 2 are 0.482 V, 0.680 V, 0.740 V, and 0.805 V, respectively.Similarly, the same trend is observed for the HER kinetics, as evident from the Tafel slopes shown in Figure 9b.XRD data, before and after 100 HER cycles (Figure 9c), indicate that the structure remains unchanged, confirming the stability.In addition, the comparison of mass activity at various overpotentials in the basic medium again shows consistently higher mass activity for LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4(Figure 9d).We also determined the double-layer capacitance (Cdl) in 1 M KOH (Figure 10) using cyclic voltammograms in the non-faradaic region (Figure S2).Among the four materials, LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4displays the highest Cdl, followed by LaSrMn0.5Cu0.5O4-δ,LaSrMn0.5Ni0.5O4,and LaSrMn0.5Zn0.5O4, the same trend as the electrocatalytic activity.We also determined the double-layer capacitance (C dl ) in 1 M KOH (Figure 10) using cyclic voltammograms in the non-faradaic region (Figure S2).Among the four materials, LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 displays the highest C dl , followed by LaSrMn 0.5 Cu 0.5 O 4-δ , LaSrMn 0.5 Ni 0.5 O 4 , and LaSrMn0 .5 Zn 0.5 O 4 , the same trend as the electrocatalytic activity.
The kinetics of the OER were analyzed using Tafel plots (Figure 11b), indicating a smaller Tafel slope, i.e., faster reaction kinetics, for LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4compared to the other three materials and the same trend as the OER activity.The stability of the best catalyst in the series, LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4,was evaluated by chronopotentiometry, showing a steady response for at least 12 h, as shown in the inset of Figure 11a.Also, X-ray diffraction data after 100 cycles of OER confirmed the material's structural integrity was preserved (Figure 11c).The mass activities for OER at various overpotentials are shown in Figure 11d, highlighting the significantly higher activity of LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4. Figure 12 shows the TEM images before and after the chronopotentiometry experiment under OER conditions for LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4.Some comments on the observed electrocatalytic properties are in order.The trend in electrocatalytic activity matches the trend in electrical conductivity.It is important to note that both OER and HER involve the transfer of electrons and are affected by the conductivity of catalysts.Some previous studies have shown that perovskite oxides with better electronic conductivity exhibit improved electrocatalytic performance [6,36].

Oxygen Evolution Reaction
The OER electrocatalytic activities of the four materials were studied in both acidic and alkaline media.These materials showed little OER activity in acidic conditions, but the alkaline OER activity, especially for two of the materials, was substantial.Therefore, alkaline OER is discussed here.As demonstrated by the polarization curves in Figure 11a, the electrocatalytic performance for OER follows a similar trend to that observed in the HER.Among the four compounds, LaSrMn 0.5 Ni 0.5 O 4 , and LaSrMn0 .5 Zn 0.5 O 4 did not produce sufficient current to reach 10 mA cm −2 within the experimental potential range.On the other hand, LaSrMn 0.5 Cu 0.5 O 4-δ shows an overpotential of η 10 = 550 mV, beyond the thermodynamic potential of 1.23 V at 10 mA cm −2 , while LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 exhibits a lower overpotential of η 10 = 450 mV.The OER overpotential of LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 (η 10 = 450) is not as low as those observed for some oxides such as IrO 2 (400 mV) and RuO 2 (η 10 ≈ 420 mV) [49].Nevertheless, LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 shows a better activity than several previously reported oxides, including well-known catalyst BSCF (η 10 ≈ 500 mV) [5], La 0.5 Sr 0.5 Co 0.8 Fe 0.2 O 3 (η 10 = 600 mV) [55], and La 0.6 Sr 0.4 CoO 3−δ (η 10 = 590 mV) [56].
The kinetics of the OER were analyzed using Tafel plots (Figure 11b), indicating a smaller Tafel slope, i.e., faster reaction kinetics, for LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 compared to the other three materials and the same trend as the OER activity.The stability of the best catalyst in the series, LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 , was evaluated by chronopotentiometry, showing a steady response for at least 12 h, as shown in the inset of Figure 11a.Also, X-ray diffraction data after 100 cycles of OER confirmed the material's structural integrity was preserved (Figure 11c).The mass activities for OER at various overpotentials are shown in Figure 11d, highlighting the significantly higher activity of LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 .Figure 12 shows the TEM images before and after the chronopotentiometry experiment under OER conditions for LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 .There are also other parameters to consider.Some researchers have suggested that the filling of eg-level orbitals can be a descriptor for the OER activity [5].They proposed that high OER activity is expected for oxides, containing metal cations that have eg occupancy close to one, due to the optimum binding with reaction intermediates.In the best catalyst in our series, LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4, a mixture of Co 2+ and Co 3+ oxidation states, is observed.Previous studies have indicated that the intermediate spin state is prominent for Co 3+ in some perovskite oxides [5,57].This intermediate spin state would give an electron configuration of t2g 5 eg 1 for Co 3+ .Also, the mixed oxidation states of transition metals can accelerate OER activity [1,43], an advantage offered by the presence of cobalt.Regarding the next best material in the series, LaSrMn0.5Cu0.5O4-δ, it is possible that the observed activity is influenced by the presence of oxygen vacancies in this material, as confirmed by iodometric titrations and XPS, which might facilitate the adsorption of reaction intermediates [6,47,58].In addition, some studies on HER catalysts containing both copper and nickel have shown the better activity of copper compared to nickel.For example, a study of NiCu showed that surface Cu exhibits a d-band center closer to that of the highly active catalyst Pt [59].The Ni site of NiCu was found to play a less substantial role in HER, primarily due to its d-band being too high, while Cu emerged as the more active catalytic site [59,60].Finally, the least active material in the series, LaSrMn0.5Zn0.5O4,has the lowest electrical conductivity and contains zinc, which is only in a divalent state.Some comments on the observed electrocatalytic properties are in order.The trend in electrocatalytic activity matches the trend in electrical conductivity.It is important to note that both OER and HER involve the transfer of electrons and are affected by the conductivity of catalysts.Some previous studies have shown that perovskite oxides with better electronic conductivity exhibit improved electrocatalytic performance [6,36].
There are also other parameters to consider.Some researchers have suggested that the filling of e g -level orbitals can be a descriptor for the OER activity [5].They proposed that high OER activity is expected for oxides, containing metal cations that have e g occupancy close to one, due to the optimum binding with reaction intermediates.In the best catalyst in our series, LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 , a mixture of Co 2+ and Co 3+ oxidation states, is observed.Previous studies have indicated that the intermediate spin state is prominent for Co 3+ in some perovskite oxides [5,57].This intermediate spin state would give an electron configuration of t 2 g 5 e g 1 for Co 3+ .Also, the mixed oxidation states of transition metals can accelerate OER activity [1,43], an advantage offered by the presence of cobalt.Regarding the next best material in the series, LaSrMn 0.5 Cu 0.5 O 4-δ , it is possible that the observed activity is influenced by the presence of oxygen vacancies in this material, as confirmed by iodometric titrations and XPS, which might facilitate the adsorption of reaction intermediates [6,47,58].In addition, some studies on HER catalysts containing both copper and nickel have shown the better activity of copper compared to nickel.For example, a study of NiCu showed that surface Cu exhibits a d-band center closer to that of the highly active catalyst Pt [59].The Ni site of NiCu was found to play a less substantial role in HER, primarily due to its d-band being too high, while Cu emerged as the more active catalytic site [59,60].Finally, the least active material in the series, LaSrMn0 .5 Zn 0.5 O 4 , has the lowest electrical conductivity and contains zinc, which is only in a divalent state.

Experimental Methods
Synthesis and Characterization.Polycrystalline samples of LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4,LaSrMn0.5Ni0.5O4,LaSrMn0.5Cu0.5O4-δ,and LaSrMn0.5Zn0.5O4were synthesized under an argon atmosphere by solid-state synthesis method.The stoichiometric proportions of precursors La2O3, SrCO3, MnO4, CoO, NiO, CuO, and ZnO were thoroughly mixed in agate mortar and pestle.For example, for the synthesis of LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4, a mixture of La2O3 (0.1500 g), SrCO3 (0.1359 g), CoO (0.0343 g), and MnO2 (0.0400 g) was used.The powder mixtures were pressed into pellets and were heated at 1200 °C for 24 h followed by slow cooling.The heating and cooling rates of the furnace for all samples were set at 100 °C/h.The phase purity and structure of polycrystalline samples were determined by powder Xray diffraction (XRD) at room temperature using Cu Kα1 radiation (λ = 1.54056Å) on an X-ray diffractometer equipped with a monochromator.Rietveld refinements were carried out using GSAS [61] program and EXPIGU interface [62].The oxygen content was determined using iodometric titrations [63], where excess potassium iodide (2 g) and 50 mg of the sample were dissolved in 100 mL of argon-purged 1 M HCl, allowing the mixture to react overnight.Then, 5 mL of the reacted mixture, containing the generated iodine, was titrated against 0.025 M Na2S2O3 (I2 + 2S2O3 2− → 2I − + S4O6 2− ) using starch indicator (0.6 mL), which was added near the titration endpoint.Excess KI reduced the oxide samples to form oxides with the lowest stable oxidation states of transition metals.The amount of Na2S2O3 needed for titration indicated the amount of oxygen lost during metal ion reduction.Measurements were repeated three times for error analysis.The morphologies of the samples were studied by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) on sintered pellets using a Thermo Fisher Apreo C LoVac Field Emission SEM at a magnification of 5000×, accompanied by an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) detector.X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed using a ThermoFisher Scientific K-Alpha instrument.The instrument employed an aluminum monochromatic X-ray source with an energy of hν = 1486.69eV and incorporated an electron flood gun for effective charge neutralization.Wide survey scans were carried out at a pass energy of 160 eV, while high-resolution scans were performed with a pass energy of 20 eV.
Electrical Conductivity.Electrical conductivity measurements were conducted at variable temperatures from 25 °C to 800 °C.These measurements were performed using a two-probe direct current (DC) method [64] on pellets that had been sintered at 1250 °C.Prior to conducting the measurements, a layer of gold paste was applied to both sides of  (0.1500 g), SrCO 3 (0.1359 g), CoO (0.0343 g), and MnO 2 (0.0400 g) was used.The powder mixtures were pressed into pellets and were heated at 1200 • C for 24 h followed by slow cooling.The heating and cooling rates of the furnace for all samples were set at 100 • C/h.The phase purity and structure of polycrystalline samples were determined by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) at room temperature using Cu Kα1 radiation (λ = 1.54056Å) on an X-ray diffractometer equipped with a monochromator.Rietveld refinements were carried out using GSAS [61] program and EXPIGU interface [62].The oxygen content was determined using iodometric titrations [63], where excess potassium iodide (2 g) and 50 mg of the sample were dissolved in 100 mL of argon-purged 1 M HCl, allowing the mixture to react overnight.Then, 5 mL of the reacted mixture, containing the generated iodine, was titrated against 0.025 M Na 2 S 2 O 3 (I 2 + 2S 2 O 3 2− → 2I − + S 4 O 6 2− ) using starch indicator (0.6 mL), which was added near the titration endpoint.Excess KI reduced the oxide samples to form oxides with the lowest stable oxidation states of transition metals.The amount of Na 2 S 2 O 3 needed for titration indicated the amount of oxygen lost during metal ion reduction.Measurements were repeated three times for error analysis.The morphologies of the samples were studied by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) on sintered pellets using a Thermo Fisher Apreo C LoVac Field Emission SEM at a magnification of 5000×, accompanied by an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) detector.X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed using a ThermoFisher Scientific K-Alpha instrument.The instrument employed an aluminum monochromatic X-ray source with an energy of hν = 1486.69eV and incorporated an electron flood gun for effective charge neutralization.Wide survey scans were carried out at a pass energy of 160 eV, while high-resolution scans were performed with a pass energy of 20 eV.Electrical Conductivity.Electrical conductivity measurements were conducted at variable temperatures from 25 • C to 800 • C.These measurements were performed using a two-probe direct current (DC) method [64] on pellets that had been sintered at 1250 • C. Prior to conducting the measurements, a layer of gold paste was applied to both sides of the pellet and then dried by heating for 3 h at 800 • C. Gold wires were attached to gold foils and used as electrodes, ensuring contact with the two gold-painted surfaces on each side of the pellet.A voltage of 0.01 V was applied for the measurements, which were conducted at approximately 100 • C intervals.Equilibrium conductivity was achieved at each measurement temperature after about 30 min, as indicated by a stable plateau in the DC conductivity data.Heating and cooling rates during the conductivity measurements were maintained at 3 • C/min.Electrochemical Measurements.The catalyst ink for electrochemical measurements was prepared using 35 mg of the catalyst material, 7 mg of carbon black powder, 40 µL of Nafion D-521 solution (5% w/w in water and 1-propanol), and 7 mL of Tetrahydrofuran (THF).The mixture was ultrasonically dispersed in water for 30 min.The drop-casting was carried out by placing two coats of 10 µL of the mixture onto the surface of a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) with a diameter of 5 mm and an area of 0.196 cm 2 , with a mass loading of 1.02 mg/cm 2 , followed by overnight air-drying.This catalyst-loaded electrode was used as the working electrode.Electrochemical measurements were conducted using a standard three-electrode electrochemical cell connected to a rotating disk electrode at 1600 rpm.The OER and HER experiments were carried out in 1 M KOH solution by using a Hg/HgO reference electrode (1 M NaOH).The HER experiments were also conducted in 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 solution using Ag/AgCl (4 M KCl) as the reference electrode.A carbon electrode was used as the counter electrode for all experiments.All potentials were iR-corrected and converted to potential vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) using the Nernst equation E vsRHE = E vs Reference electrode + 0.059 pH + E 0 Reference electrode , where E 0 Ag/AgCl = 0.197 V for 4 M KCl and E 0 Hg/HgO = 0.098 for 1 M NaOH [36,65].For each material, the electrocatalytic measurements were repeated at least three times, using at least two different batches synthesized independently.Chronopotentiometry was utilized to investigate the catalyst stability under both HER and OER conditions, employing the same three-electrode setup and a constant current of 10 mA/cm 2 .

Conclusions
A range of parameters can influence electrocatalytic properties, such as electrical conductivity, the presence of metals with more than one stable oxidation state, oxygenvacancies, and electron configuration.These parameters were studied in this work through the investigation of a series of quasi-2D oxides to reveal their structural and electrocatalytic properties.X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, iodometric titrations, electrical conductivity studies, and OER and HER experiments were used for the investigation of the four materials LaSrMn 0.5 M 0.5 O 4 (M = Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn).The electrical conductivity measurements, as well as electrocatalytic HER and OER, all showed the same trend, LaSrMn 0.5 Zn 0.5 O 4 < LaSrMn 0.5 Ni 0.5 O 4 < LaSrMn 0.5 Cu 0.5 O 4-δ < LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 .The best-performing compound in this series, LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 , can act as a bifunctional catalytic material, facilitating both OER and HER.Its lower overpotential, faster kinetics, and greater mass activity were demonstrated and correlated with several descriptors that can be responsible for its higher electrocatalytic performance.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. XPS data showing the manganese spectra for all four materials.The purple dashed line is drawn to show that the binding energy for the 2p3/2 peak of LaSrMn0.5Zn0.5O4 is shifted to higher energy compared to those of the other three materials.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. XPS data showing the manganese spectra for all four materials.The purple dashed line is drawn to show that the binding energy for the 2p 3/2 peak of LaSrMn 0.5 Zn 0.5 O 4 is shifted to higher energy compared to those of the other three materials.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.(a) Electrical conductivities as a function of temperature.(b) Arrhenius plots to determine the activation energies (Ea) for the temperature-activated increase in conductivity.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.(a) Electrical conductivities as a function of temperature.(b) Arrhenius plots to determine the activation energies (E a ) for the temperature-activated increase in conductivity.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. (a) Polarization curves for HER in 0.5 M H2SO4.The inset shows chronopotentiometry data for the best-performing material, LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4.(b) Tafel plots and slopes.(c) X-ray diffraction data for LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4before and after 100 cycles of HER in 0.5 M H2SO4.(d) HER mass activities at different overpotentials in 0.5 M H2SO4.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. (a) Polarization curves for HER in 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 .The inset shows chronopotentiometry data for the best-performing material, LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 .(b) Tafel plots and slopes.(c) X-ray diffraction data for LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 before and after 100 cycles of HER in 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 .(d) HER mass activities at different overpotentials in 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 .

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. (a) HER polarization curves in 1 M KOH.The inset shows chronopotentiometry data for the best-performing material LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 .(b) Tafel plots and slopes.(c) X-ray diffraction data for LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 before and after 100 cycles of HER in 1 M KOH.(d) HER mass activities at different overpotentials in 1 M KOH.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Plots of j avg against ν in 1 M KOH.The slopes indicate double-layer capacitance, C dl .

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.(a) Polarization curves for OER in 1 M KOH.The inset shows chronopotentiometry data for the best-performing material, LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4.(b) Tafel plots and slopes.(c) X-ray diffraction data for LaSrMn0.5Co0.5O4before and after 100 cycles of OER in 1 M KOH.(d) OER mass activities at different overpotentials in 1 M KOH.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.(a) Polarization curves for OER in 1 M KOH.The inset shows chronopotentiometry data for the best-performing material, LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 .(b) Tafel plots and slopes.(c) X-ray diffraction data for LaSrMn 0.5 Co 0.5 O 4 before and after 100 cycles of OER in 1 M KOH.(d) OER mass activities at different overpotentials in 1 M KOH.

Figure 12 .
Figure 12.The TEM data (a) before and (b) after chronopotentiometry experiment under OER conditions.

Figure 12 .
Figure 12.The TEM data (a) before and (b) after chronopotentiometry experiment under OER conditions.

Table 2 .
Room temperature electrical conductivity and activation energies.