Next Article in Journal
High Pressure Crystal Structure and Electrical Properties of a Single Component Molecular Crystal [Ni(dddt)2] (dddt = 5,6-dihydro-1,4-dithiin-2,3-dithiolate)
Next Article in Special Issue
Metal-Organic Frameworks of MIL-100(Fe, Cr) and MIL-101(Cr) for Aromatic Amines Adsorption from Aqueous Solutions
Previous Article in Journal
1H-NMR Metabolomics Analysis of the Effects of Sulfated Polysaccharides from Masson Pine Pollen in RAW264.7 Macrophage Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Copper(II) Coordination Compounds Assembled from Multifunctional Pyridine-Carboxylate Blocks: Synthesis, Structures, and Catalytic Activity in Cycloalkane Oxidation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 24
Issue 9
10.3390/molecules24091840
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structural Transformations in the Thermal Dehydration of [Cu2(bpa)(btec)(H2O)4]n Coordination Polymer

by
Laura Bravo-García
1,
Edurne S. Larrea
1,
Beñat Artetxe
2,
Luis Lezama
2,3,
Juan M. Gutiérrez-Zorrilla
2,3,* and
María I. Arriortua
1,3,*
1
Departamento de Mineralogía y Petrología, Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad del País Vasco, UPV/EHU, Sarriena s/n, 48940 Leioa, Spain
2
Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad del País Vasco, UPV/EHU, Sarriena s/n, 48940 Leioa, Spain
3
BCMaterials, Basque Center for Materials, Applications and Nanostructures, Edf. Martina Casiano, UPV/EHU Science Park, 48940 Leioa, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(9), 1840; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24091840
Submission received: 17 April 2019 / Revised: 3 May 2019 / Accepted: 11 May 2019 / Published: 13 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Metal-Organic Framework Based Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Reactions between pyridinic ligands such as 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane (bpa) and transition metal cations are a very widespread technique to produce extended coordination polymers such as Metal-Organic Frameworks. In combination with a second ligand these systems could present different topologies and behaviors. In this context, the use of 1,2,4,5-benzenetetracarboxylic acid (H4btec) gave us a novel 2D compound, [Cu2(bpa)(btec)(H2O)4]n (1), which was prepared by microwave-assisted synthesis and structurally characterized by means of single crystal X-ray diffraction. Its thermal behavior was analyzed through thermogravimetric analysis and variable temperature powder X-ray diffraction, concluding that thermal stability is influenced by the coordination water molecules, allowing two sequential thermochromic phase transformations to take place. These transformations were monitored by electronic paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy and magnetic susceptibility measurements. In addition, the crystal structure of the anhydrous compound [Cu2(bpa)(btec)]n (1.ah) was determined. Finally, a topological study was carried out for the bpa ligand considering all the structures deposited in the Cambridge Structural Databased. More than 1000 structures were analyzed and classified into 17 different topologies, according to the role of the ligand.

1. Introduction

Materials consisting of metal ions or clusters that are linked by polyfunctional organic ligands can lead to extended open frameworks with permanent porosity, well known as Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs) [1,2]. Their structural features, including large cavities and large surface areas, have opened a wide range of applications [3,4,5,6] such as gas storage [7,8,9,10], gas separation [11,12,13], drug delivery [14,15,16], chemical sensing [17,18], heterogeneous catalysis [19,20,21] and biomedical imaging [22,23]. In this context, there is a general interest among the scientific community in making the synthesis of these materials cleaner and more effective. Thus, synthesis by non-conventional methods such as mechanochemical, solvent-free heating, microwave-assisted synthesis or sonochemistry [24] is an increasingly widespread strategy nowadays.
Among the different combinations of metal/organic ligand, the simultaneous use of aromatic polycarboxylates and N,N′-donor spacers seems to be an effective strategy to obtain these type of materials [25,26,27], because it increases the topological variability, increasing the possible applications. Furthermore, this broad range of topologies boosts the possibilities of a positive response to external stimuli [28]. Solid-state transformations triggered by a given external stimulus applied on a responsive material have long been identified as a focus of attention because: (i) they might follow a different pathway from that in solution due to the constrains imposed by the structural architecture, affording different products in comparison to those achievable by following alternative routes; and (ii) they allow for tuning the functionality of such responsive materials by controlling the applied stimulus. This feature makes them suitable candidates for a wide range of applications, including switches, memories, storage devices and sensors.
Concerning coordination polymers, these materials can be classified into two groups according to their structural response. Robust frameworks do not present important structural changes as a result of the applied stimulus. Conversely, dynamic transformations are those in which the external stimulus (e.g., light, heat, mechanical force, removal or exchange of chemical guests) involves the rupture/formation of coordinative bonds, and occasionally, modifications in the oxidation state of the metal centers. These modifications usually imply the extensive rearrangement of the network of weak intermolecular interactions that stabilize the crystal packing, and hence they often result in remarkable changes of physical properties such as color, magnetism, luminescence, or porosity [29,30]. Among these phase transitions, those in which single crystal behavior is retained throughout the process (i.e., single-crystal-to-single-crystal transformations, SCSC) are the most popular, because they offer an incomparable tool for monitoring how the location of atoms varies within the crystal packing upon the application of the external stimulus, and for assessing how a given property of interest can be modified and tuned as a consequence [31,32,33,34,35].
Thermally triggered solid-state transformations represent the most frequent group. Usually the thermal stimulus promotes the removal of guest solvent molecules located in the pores of robust frameworks, leaving them accessible and operative for gas sorption/separation, catalysis or sensing. However, dynamic transformations promoted by the release of hydration and/or coordination water molecules have recently been reviewed [36]. Examples include (i) drastic changes in magnetic properties of the antiferromagnetic CoCl2(1,4-dioxane)(H2O)2, which exhibits ferromagnetic coupling in its anhydrous form [37]; and (ii) reversible rupture of the stable [Cu(5-bromonicotinate)2(H2O)2]n paddle-wheel with associated solvatochromism [38].
In recent years, we have explored non-conventional synthetic methods for the preparation of supramolecular coordination networks that display interesting thermostructural behavior. Previous research indicated the correlation between the synthetic procedures (microwaved-assisted synthesis vs. sonochemistry) employed and the final dimensionality of the network in copper(II) coordination frameworks containing 1,3-benzenedicarboxylic acid and 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane (bpa) ligands [39]. Additional studies on the reversible thermal dehydration of the 1,2,4,5-benzenetetracarboxylic acid (H4btec) in the ionic [Cu(H2dpmd)2][H2btec] (H2dpmd = dipyridilmethanediol) framework afforded drastic structural changes with associated solvatochromism. This process implied a considerable decrease on the crystallinity of the sample that could be reverted with the addition of water. The nearly amorphous nature of the dehydrated phase avoided further structural elucidation [40]. To extend these studies, we combined the pyridinic bpa ligand of the former work with the thermoresponsive H4btec.
Herein, we report on the thermostructural behavior of the [Cu2(bpa)(btec)(H2O)4]n (1) coordination polymer, which undergoes two sequential solvatochromic phase transformations upon gradual removal of coordination water molecules. The structure of the anhydrous [Cu2(bpa)(btec)]n (1.ah) was determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction and phase transformations analyzed by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy and magnetic susceptibility measurements. The reversibility of such transitions has also been addressed. In addition, all the structures containing the bpa ligand that have been deposited in the Cambridge Structural Database have been analyzed and classified.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis and Preliminary Characterization

In a previous publication [39], some of us explored the effect of selecting different non-conventional synthetic methods for the reaction between bpa and benzenedicarboxylate (m-bdc). In the course of these studies, microwave-assisted synthesis was found to be the most efficient method for the prepration of frameworks with higher dimensionality. Therefore, the same synthetic method employed for [Cu4(m-bdc)4(bpa)2dmf]·dmf was used, but with btec as the polycarboxylic ligand instead. In this case, microwave-assisted synthesis provides a mixture of both blue crystals of the predominant phase 1 and a few green crystals of 1.ah. The same result was obtained for different crystal batches. Crystals were separated manually under a polarized light microscope.
Compound 1 and 1.ah were firstly identified by infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). The FT-IR spectra, together with the list of the most intense bands and their assignations, are shown in Figure S1 and Table S1. Both spectra display the characteristic bands of both the bpa and btec ligands, as exemplified by the presence of the N=C stretching vibration band at 1300 cm−1 and a set of different overlapped signals around 1630 cm−1 related to asymmetrical and symmetrical stretching of C=O bonds from carboxylate groups, which could indicate the presence of btec ligands in different coordination modes (monodentate, chelating, bridging) [41]. However, the wide band centered at ca. 3082 cm−1, which corresponds to the stretching O–H vibrations from water molecules, is narrowed significantly when going from 1 to 1.ah. Although the O–H band can still be observed in the spectrum of 1.ah because of the humidity absorbed by the KBr matrix, it could suggest a lower water content in this compound in comparison to 1.

2.2. Crystal Structures

Compound 1 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P-1 and its asymmetric unit contains one Cu(II) ion, one half of the bpa and one half of the btec ligand and two coordination water molecules (Figure S2). Both bpa and btec are located at an inversion center. The coordination environment of the metal center in a distorted octahedral geometry is CuNO5, with three oxygen atoms of carboxylate groups belonging to two different ligands, one in a monodentate mode and the other one in a chelating mode, one nitrogen atom from the pyridinic ligand and two coordination water molecules. Bond lengths and angles, together with the values for continuous shape measurements (CSM) [42] are summarized in Table 1. Each carboxylate ligand acts as a four-connected node between four metal centers forming metal-carboxylate chains running along the [100] direction, whereas the bpa ligand connects these chains to form covalent layers in the (01–2) plane.
Thus, the crystal packing of compound 1 exhibits a bidimensional character (Figure 1a) where the π-π interactions between the aromatic rings of different pyridinic ligands (N1···N1) contribute to reinforce these layers. As shown in Figure 1b, the staking of these layers is antiparallel along the z-axes, and proceeds through i) T-type π-π interactions between C1A and N1 rings from btec and bpa ligands, respectively; and ii) hydrogen bonds established between the coordination water molecules and O atoms from carboxylate groups (O1W-H1WA···O1A, O1W-H1WB···O4A and O2W-H2WA···O2A). Distances and angles of these supramolecular interactions are summarized in Table 2.
The anhydrous 1.ah shows great differences with respect to the coordination environment of the metal centers in 1 and the arrangement of the ligands. Compound 1.ah crystallizes in the triclinic space group P−1 and its asymmetric unit contains one Cu(II) ion, and half a ligand of each type (Figure S3). The loss of coordination water molecules promotes the formation of a centrosymmetric copper (II) dimer, where each metal center displays a CuNO4 environment with two bridging carboxylate ligands in a μ2-η1:η1 coordination mode, a third bridging carboxylate ligand in a μ2-η2 fashion and N atoms from bpa ligands completing the distorted pentacoordinated geometry. Bond lengths and angles together with the values for CSM are summarized in Table 3.
In addition, this structure results in an increase of the dimensionality of the framework in comparison with 1, because Cu(II) dimers in 1.ah can be visualized as being constituted by linking different metal centers located in adjacent layers in 1. In 1.ah, the btec ligand acts as a tetra-connector node forming layers parallel to the (001) plane (Figure 2a). These layers are stacked along the z-axis, where bpa ligands play the role of covalent bridge between dimers resulting in a three-dimensional structure (Figure 2b). The interactions between the aromatic rings of different types of ligands (N1···C1A) contribute to reinforce the network (Table 4).

2.3. Thermal Behavior

The thermal stability of 1 was studied by thermogravimetric analyses (TGA/DTA) carried out under synthetic air atmosphere in the temperature range of 25–500 °C at a heating rate of 5 °C/min. As observed in Figure 3a, thermal decomposition proceeds via three different stages. The first mass loss below 100 °C corresponds to a dehydration process and it implies the release of one water molecule [%mass, calc. (found): 5.6 (5.3)]. The loss of the second coordination water molecule at ca. 160 °C [%mass, calc. (found): 5.6 (4.8)] results in the anhydrous phase, which is stable up to 220 °C. Above this temperature, an exothermic process takes place, which is associated with the combustion of the organic ligands and leads to the final residue at ca. 300 °C [% mass calc. (found) for CuO: 25.0 (28.0)]. The fact that the release of the two coordination water molecules takes place in two well-differentiated stages could be easily explained based on the crystal structure of 1. The first step implies the release of the axial water molecule (OW2), because it exhibits a much longer Cu–O bond length (2.304 Å) in comparison with that shown by the second water molecule (Cu–OW1: 1.975 Å). Furthermore, the latter species establishes two O–H···O type hydrogen bonds, as well as an additional C–H···O type interaction with adjacent carboxylate groups, whereas the former only forms one O–H···O bond (Table 2).
Variable-temperature powder X-ray diffraction (termodiffractometry, TXRD) experiments were carried out from 30 to 500 °C at steps of 15 °C (Figure 3b) to determine the potential phase transformations in 1 upon thermal dehydration and the subsequent range of thermal stability. These results revealed a dynamic thermostructural behavior for 1. The parent hydrated compound transforms into a second partially dehydrated phase (1.dh) upon release of the first coordination water molecule above 75 °C, as indicated by the clear modifications in either the positions and relative intensity of most of the diffraction maxima in the 2θ = 5–30° angle range (Figure 3c). More specifically, instead of the most intense diffraction maxima at 10.6 and 18.0° for 1, those at 10.0, 21.2 and 23.0° became predominant in the spectrum of the partially dehydrated phase. It is also worth noting the presence of two maxima of mid-to-low intensity at low 2θ values (7.4 and 8.7°) for the latter phase. A totally anhydrous crystalline phase is completely formed at 150 °C and keeps stable up to 250 °C, above which the diffraction maxima lose intensity until full amorphization is reached at 285 °C. This temperature is in good agreement with the results obtained from the TGA analyses, which show that the thermally stable anhydrous phase starts decomposing at 250 °C. The intensity of the diffraction maximum located at 8.8° increases significantly when going from the partially dehydrated phase to the anhydrous form, whereas those at 10.4, 12.9, 19.3 and 23.6° became the most intense. The final residue at 330 °C was identified as monoclinic C2/c CuO, also known as tenorite [43].
Taking into account the structural similarities between 1 and 1.ah, we hypothesized whether the latter compound could be prepared by thermal dehydration of the former. Thus, a crystalline sample of 1 was heated in the oven at 200 °C for 1 h, and immediately afterwards it was analyzed by powder XRD. There was a good agreement in the profile fitting procedure carried out between the experimental spectrum and the cell unit parameters obtained in the single crystal XRD studies (Figure S4), revealing that 1.ah can be directly obtained by total thermal dehydration of 1. Cell parameters, the displacement of the sample, the shape of the diffraction maxima, as well as the angular evolution of the half-height width were refined using FULLPROF [44]. Agreement factors of the fitting are summarized in Table S2. Similarly, we tried to elucidate the crystal structure of the partially dehydrated phase by heating single crystals of 1 at 90 °C for 1 h. Unfortunately, despite our efforts, crystals did not preserve their integrity, and we were not able to perform a full single-crystal XRD data acquisition. Figure S5 shows the experimental powder X-Ray diffraction patterns in comparison to those simulated from single crystal data for both compounds 1 and 1.ah. The good agreement between experimental and simulated patterns indicate the presence of pure crystalline phases in bulk samples.

2.4. Reversibility of Thermally Triggered Phase Transformation and EPR Espectroscopy

The reversibility of thermally triggered structural transformations that 1 undergoes and the associated solvatochromism (thermochromism) was studied by XRD (Figure 4). A powdered light blue sample of 1 was heated at 90 °C in an oven and a clear color change to dark blue was observed as a result of modifications in the coordination environment of the Cu(II) center promoted by the thermal evacuation of the first coordination water molecule. When the partially dehydrated phase is exposed to ambient moisture, it reverts to the parent phase 1 upon re-hydration, as evidenced by its color change and the registered powder XRD pattern. As mentioned above, a second sample of 1 was heated to 200 °C, and the anhydrous 1.ah was obtained. The color change from blue to green arises not only from the removal of coordination water molecules, but also from modifications in the coordination modes of btec ligands. In this case, the dehydration is not reversible because no rehydration is observed neither when the solid is exposed to ambient moisture, nor when it is soaked in water.
These phase transformations and their reversibility were monitored by electron paramagnetc resonance spectroscopy (EPR). X and Q band EPR measurements were carried out at several temperatures in the 4.2–298 K range. The X-band EPR spectra of 1 and the corresponding dehydrated phases exhibit nearly axial symmetries for the g tensor in the ΔMs = ± 1 region, but an appreciable extent of rhombicity can be detected operating at Q-band (Figure 5). The spin Hamiltonian parameters were estimated by comparison of the experimental spectra with those obtained by a computer simulation program working at the second order of the perturbation theory. The best-fit results are represented as dashed lines in Figure 5.
The main components of the g tensor for 1 are g1 = 2.338, g2 = 2.091 and g3 = 2.051 (gII = 2.338, g⊥ = 2.071, <g> = 2.160). These values are typical of Cu(II) ions in distorted octahedral environment in good agreement with the structural characteristics of the CuNO5 chromophore. In addition, the lowest g value deviates appreciably from the free electron value (ge = 2.0023), indicating a dx2-y2 ground state which corresponds to that expected for an axially elongated octahedral Cu(II) ion [45].
After heating a sample of 1 at 90 °C, the spectrum continues displaying a single and well-defined signal, with rhombic g values of g1 = 2.287, g2 = 2.090 and g3 = 2.058 (gII = 2.287, g⊥ = 2.074, <g> = 2.145). The reduction of gII is in good agreement with the loss of the water molecule in apical position. As the axial field is removed, the copper ion attracts the equatorial ligands more strongly, the dx2-y2 orbital becomes more antibonding and the gII value decreases [46]. It must be taken into account that, for systems with similar covalence degree, the g values depend mainly on the energy of the d-d transitions, following these Equations:
g II = g e − 8 K II 2 λ 0 Δ 1
g ⊥ = g e − 2 K ⊥ 2 λ 0 Δ 2
where λ0 is the free ion spin-orbit coupling constant (λ0 = −830 cm−1 for Cu2+), KII and K⊥ are the covalence factors, and Δ1 and Δ2 are the energies of the dxy→dx2-y2 and dxz,yz→dx2-y2 transitions, respectively [47]. Diffuse reflectance UV-Vis spectra (Figure S6) showed that the center of gravity of the d-d transitions shift to higher energies when the first water molecule is removed. This effect can be visually observed in its color change (from a lighter to a darker blue) and it is in good agreement with the decrease of the <g> value.
When the sample is heated at 200 °C, 1.ah is obtained, and thus, a new EPR signal is registered showing different g values: g1 = 2.327, g2 = 2.075 and g3 = 2.069 (gII = 2.327, g⊥ = 2.072, <g> = 2.157). The relative increase of the gII component implies that the loss of the second water molecule is accompanied by changes in the coordination of the Cu(II) ions, which results in a slight increase of the equatorial distances [46]. This is in good agreement with the crystallographic data. In addition, it is worth noting that the Cu(II) hyperfine lines could not be resolved in any of these compounds and therefore extensive magnetic exchange is present in all of them. However, the G parameters, which are in the range 3.8–4.8, indicate that the local tetragonal axes of the molecules are aligned parallel or only slightly misaligned [45]. Therefore, it can be assumed that the calculated g values correspond to the molecular tensors and adequately reflect the characteristics of the environment of the Cu2+ ions in each compound. Moreover, the EPR spectra of compound 1 and the dehydrated phase at 90 °C remain practically unchanged over the temperature range 4.2–298 K, so the magnetic interactions should be of small magnitude in both compounds. On the contrary, the intensity of the EPR signal of compound 1.ah decrease below 90 K, indicating that moderate antiferromagnetic exchange is operative between the copper(II) ions of the dimeric entity. Thus, temperature dependent magnetic measurements were carried out.
The magnetic susceptibility (χm) of 1 reveals a Curie-Weiss behavior for the whole temperature range analyzed and the fit of the data to the corresponding expression leads to Cm and θ values of 0.44 cm3K/mol and −0.2 K, respectively (Figure S7). Conversely, temperature-dependent susceptibility data registered for 1.ah displays a maximum at ca. 90 K and decreases to 15 K upon cooling. Below this temperature, there is a drastic increase in magnetic susceptibility as the temperature decreases. The room temperature magnetic moment (χmT = 0.73 cm3K/mol, μeff = 3.42 BM) is considerably lower than that expected for two magnetically isolated copper (II) ions with g=2.16 (χmT = 0.87 cm3K/mol, μeff = 3.74 MB). The χmT curve continuously decreases when cooling, until it almost vanishes at very low temperatures. These features are consistent with moderately strong antiferromagnetic exchange between the Cu(II) ions within the dimer. The behavior below 15 K could be explained by the presence of a small amount of monomeric Cu(II) species. According to these observations, the experimental data can be well fitted to the Bleaney and Bowers equation for a dinuclear Cu(II) complex [48] modified with an additional term to take into account the presence of non-coupled Cu(II) impurities following a simple Curie law with the same g factor:
χ m = ( 1 − ρ ) N g 2 β 2 k T ( 3 + 3 exp ( − J / k T ) + ρ N g 2 β 2 4 k T
where the singlet-triplet energy gap (2J) is defined by the Hamiltonian H = −2J·S1·S2 (S1 = S2 = 1/2), ρ is the percent of non-coupled component and other symbols have their usual meanings. A good fit to the data (solid lines in Figure 6) was obtained when g = 2.16, J = −52.4 cm−1, and ρ = 0.013, with an error R =2.4 × 10−4. According to the topology of the Cu···Cu dimeric entities in 1.ah, different exchange pathways must be taken into account: i) two axial-equatorial monoatomic carboxylate oxygen bridges, ii) two carboxylate bridges in syn-syn mode. It is well known that axial–equatorial bridging modes between Cu2+ ions provide weak spin communication between magnetic dx2−y2 orbitals, thus the observed J value can be mainly assigned to the syn-syn bridges [49].

2.5. Topological Study of the bpa Ligand

Although it exhibits limited coordination modes (monodentate or ambidentate), the bpa ligand usually acts as linker of metal centers leading to extended structures with very different topologies. An exhaustive bibliographic search in the Cambridge Crystallographic Database (CSD) [50] of structures containing transition metal ions, lanthanides and actinides provided us with a set of 1197 structures in which the bpa ligand plays a bridging role between metal centers. Figure 7 shows the general distribution of these structures according to their dimensionality (Figure 7a), the coordination number of the metal centers (Figure 7b), and the conformation of the ligand (Figure 7c). It must be highlighted that most of the structures found in the database are combinations of the bpa ligand with first raw transition metals in a hexacoordinated environment, and only a few examples belong to the families of 4d and 4f/5f metals. In all cases, the anti conformation of the bpa is clearly predominant over the gauche form (for representations of the extreme conformations see Figure S8).
Close inspection of the crystal structures showed four different ways in which the bpa ligand could contribute to the final dimensionality of the network. Beginning from the most frequent forms, these are: (i) zero connector or bridge (B); (ii) mono-dimensional connector or linear chain (C); (iii) bi-dimensional connector or layers (L); and (iv) three-dimensional network (T). These modes were classified according to their topology as displayed in Figure 8. Additionally, Table 5 compiles the number of structures of each possible topology, together with a brief description and a representative example for each case. The bpa ligand in both compounds 1 and 1.ah reported in this work acts as a B1 linker, which increases the dimensionality of Cu(II)-btec systems from 1D to 2D for 1 and from 2D to 3D for 1.ah.

3. Experimental

3.1. Materials and Methods

All solvents and chemicals were used as received from reliable commercial sources without further purification. The reactants 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane (bpa), 1,2,4,5-benzenetetracarboxylc acid (H4btec) and copper(II) nitrate 2.5 hydrate 99%, and the solvent N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) 99.8% were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, (Madrid, Spain) whereas nitric acid 65% (HNO3) was purchased from Panreac (Barcelona, Spain).
The FT-IR spectra were collected as KBr pellets (1%w of sample) on a Shimadzu FTIR-8400S spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) at room temperature in the 400–4000 cm−1 range. The thermogravimetric analysis (TG/DTA) was performed from room temperature to 600 °C at a rate of 5 °C min−1 on a SDT 2960 DSC-TGA NETZSCH STA 449F3 instrument (Netzsch-Geräte GmbH, Barcelona, Spain). The carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen contents were determined on a Euro EA 3000 CHN Elemental Analyzer (EuroVector, Milan, Italy). Thermodiffractometric (TDX) analysis was carried out in a Bruker D8 Advanced Theta-Theta diffractometer (Bruker, Madison, WI, USA) equipped with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) and HTK2000 Chamber with a Pt sample holder. The patterns were recorded from room temperature to 500 °C at steps of 15 °C every 10 min. Diffuse Reflectance studies were performed on a UV-Vis-NIR Varian Cary 500 spectrophotometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). X-band EPR measurements were registered on a Bruker ELEXSYS 500 spectrometer equipped with a super-high-Q resonator ER-4123-SHQ (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) and standard Oxford low-temperature devices. For Q-band studies, EPR spectra were recorded on a Bruker EMX system equipped with an ER-510-QT resonator (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany). The magnetic field was calibrated by a NMR probe and the frequency inside the cavity was determined with a Hewlett Packard 5352B microwave frequency counter (Palo Alto, CA, USA). Computer simulation: WINEPR-Simfonia, version 1.5, Bruker Analytische Messtechnik GmbH (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany). Temperature-dependent magnetic measurements were performed between 3 and 300 K with an applied field of 0.1T using a commercial MPMS3 SQUID magnetometer (Quantum Design, San Diego, CA, USA). The experimental susceptibilities were corrected for the diamagnetism of the constituent atoms by using Pascal tables [70].

3.2. Synthesis of [Cu2(bpa)(btec)(H2O)4]n (1) and [Cu2(bpa)(btec)]n (1.ah)

Solid 1,2,4,5-benzenetetracarboxylc acid (0.25 mmol) dissolved in DMF (10 mL) was added to a blue aqueous solution (10 mL) of Cu(NO3)2·2.5H2O (0.40 mmol) and 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane (0.20 mmol). The resulting mixture was transferred to a 100 mL CEM MARS5 XP-1500 plus microwave vessel and heated at 140 °C (800 W) for 1 h under autogenous pressure. After cooling down to room temperature, a mixture of blue prismatic crystals of [Cu2(bpa)(btec)(H2O)4]n (1) and a few green prismatic crystals of [Cu2(bpa)(btec)4]n (1.ah) were obtained. Crystals were separated manually under optical microscope. Yield for 1: 100 mg, 79.25% based on Cu. Elemental analysis calc. for C22H22Cu2N2O12 (1): C, 41.06; H, 5.01; N, 4.35. Found: C, 41.60; H, 4.53; N, 4.94. FT-IR (cm−1): 3430 (m), 3082(m), 1620(s), 1600(s) 1580(s), 1490(m), 1410 (m), 1360(s), 890(m), 800(m), 770(m), 650(m). Compound 1.ah can be obtained as a pure phase by heating 1 in an oven at 200 °C for 1h. Elemental analysis calc. for C11H7CuNO4 (1.ah): C, 47.06; H, 2.51; N, 4.99. Found: C, 46.90; H, 2.22; N, 5.11. FT-IR (cm−1): 3371(m), 1625(s), 1605(s), 1584(m), 1505 (w), 1462(m), 1359(s), 857(m), 836(m), 754(m), 672(m).

3.3. Single-Crystal X-Ray Diffraction

Single crystals of 1 and 1.ah with dimensions given in Table 6 were selected under polarizing microscope and mounted on a MicroMountsTM (MiTeGen, LLC, Ithaca, NY, USA). Intensity data were collected at 150 K on an Agilent Technologies Supernova single source diffractometer equipped with Cu-Kα (1.54184 Å) radiation and Atlas CCD detector (Agilent, Santa Clara, California, USA). Data frames were processed (unit cell determination, multi-scan absorption correction, intensity data integration and correction for Lorentz and polarization effects) using the CrysAlis Pro software package [71]. The structures were solved using OLEX2 [72] and refined by full–matrix least–squares based on F2 with SHELXL–2014/6 [73] as integrated in WinGX [74]. Thermal vibrations were treated anisotropically for heavy atoms. Hydrogen atoms of the organic ligands were placed in calculated positions and refined using a riding model with standard SHELXL parameters, except for those belonging to water molecules, which were located in the Fourier maps and O–H bond lengths manually restrained to 0.84(2)Å (DFIX). Details of crystal data and some features of the structural refinements are reported in Table 6. CCDC 1910260 (1) and 1910261 (1.ah) contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

4. Conclusions

The thermally triggered phase transition of the coordination polymer [Cu2(bpa)(btec)(H2O)4]n (1) (bpa = 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane, btec = 1,2,4,5-benzenetetracarboxylate) was analyzed in this work. The title compound, which involves the combination of a pyridinic and a polycarboxylic ligand, was prepared by microwave-assisted synthesis and presents a bidimensional covalent structure formed by isolated Cu(II) centers linked through organic ligands, as demonstrated by single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies. Variable-temperature powder X-ray diffraction revealed that 1 undergoes two sequential phase transformations upon gradual removal of coordination water molecules. These transformations involve thermochromism (from blue to green) as a result of modifications in the coordination sphere of Cu(II) centers. The loss of the first water molecule was found to be reversible, whereas the anhydrous form cannot revert to any of its parent phases by rehydration. Full dehydration leads to the anhydrous structure [Cu2(bpa)(btec)]n (1.ah), which displays copper(II) dimers produced by changes in the coordination modes of the btec ligands and increases the dimensionality, from 2D to 3D, in comparison with the parent hydrated 1. Variable temperature electronic paramagnetic resonance spectra are in good agreement with these transformations and magnetic susceptibility measurements conclude that there is a moderately strong antiferromagnetic exchange between the two Cu(II) ions within the dimeric entities in 1.ah. Finally, making use of the Cambridge Structural Database, all the structures containing the bpa ligand (>1000 entries) were analyzed and classified into 17 different topologies according to the role of the ligand.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/24/9/1840/s1, infrared spectra (IR), ORTEP views of asymmetric units of 1 and 1.ah, XRD profile fitting for 1 heated at 200 °C, comparison between experimental and calculated PXRD patterns for 1 and 1ah, diffuse reflectance spectra, magnetic susceptibility of 1.

Author Contributions

E.S.L synthesized the title compound and performed its physicochemical characterization in close collaboration with L.B.-G.; J.M.G.-Z. solved the single-crystal X-ray diffraction structures; L.L. was in charge of EPR and magnetic susceptibility studies; L.B.-G. and B.A. prepared the manuscript; J.M.G.-Z. and M.I.A. conceived the work and acted as scientific coordinators.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (award No. MAT2016–76739-R, AEI/FEDER, UE), Gobierno Vasco (PIBA 2018–59) and UPV/EHU (GIU 17/050). L.B.G. thanks the UPV/EHU for her PhD grant.

Acknowledgments

Technical and human support provided by SGIker (UPV/EHU) is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zheng, Y.; Zheng, S.; Xue, H.; Pang, H. Metal-Organic Frameworks/Graphene-Based Materials: Preparations and Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1804950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wu, J.; Xu, F.; Li, S.; Ma, P.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Q.; Fu, R.; Wu, D. Porous Polymers as Multifunctional Material Platforms toward Task-Specific Applications. Adv. Mater. 2018, 31, 1802922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Farha, O.K.; Hupp, J.T. Rational Design, Synthesis, Purification, and Activation of Metal-Organic Framework Materials. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 1166–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, D.; Zou, D.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, J. Mesoporous Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthetic Strategies and Emerging Applications. Small 2018, 14, e1801454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ma, L.; Abney, C.; Lin, W. Enantioselective catalysis with homochiral metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1248–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, B.; Wen, H.-M.; Chen, B.; Cui, Y.; Qian, G.; Zhou, W. Emerging Multifunctional Metal-Organic Framework Materials. Adv Mater 2016, 28, 8819–8860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bhanja, P.; Modak, A.; Bhaumik, A. Porous Organic Polymers for CO2 Storage and Conversion Reactions. ChemCatChem 2018, 11, 244–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sosa, J.; Bennett, T.; Nelms, K.; Liu, B.; Tovar, R.; Liu, Y. Metal-organic framework hybrid materials and their applications. Crystals 2018, 8, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, H.; Eddaoudi, M.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, M. Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal-organic framework. Nature 1999, 402, 276–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Farha, O.K.; Oezguer Yazaydin, A.; Eryazici, I.; Malliakas, C.D.; Hauser, B.G.; Kanatzidis, M.G.; Nguyen, S.B.T.; Snurr, R.Q.; Hupp, J.T. De novo synthesis of a metal-organic framework material featuring ultrahigh surface area and gas storage capacities. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 944–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hillman, F.; Brito, J.; Jeong, H.K. Rapid One-Pot Microwave Synthesis of Mixed-Linker Hybrid Zeolitic-Imidazolate Framework Membranes for Tunable Gas Separations. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 5586–5593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Adatoz, E.; Avci, A.K.; Keskin, S. Opportunities and challenges of MOF-based membranes in gas separations. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 152, 207–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, B.; Liang, C.; Yang, J.; Contreras, D.S.; Clancy, Y.L.; Lobkovsky, E.B.; Yaghi, O.M.; Dai, S. A microporous metal-organic framework for gas-chromatographic separation of alkanes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1390–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gao, X.; Zhai, M.; Guan, W.; Liu, J.; Liu, Z.; Damirin, A. Controllable Synthesis of a Smart Multifunctional Nanoscale Metal-Organic Framework for Magnetic Resonance/Optical Imaging and Targeted Drug Delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 3455–3462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Luo, Z.; Wang, R.; Gu, C.; Li, F.; Han, Y.; Li, B.; Liu, J. A metal-organic framework with unusual nanocages: Drug delivery. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2017, 76, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Horcajada, P.; Chalati, T.; Serre, C.; Gillet, B.; Sebrie, C.; Baati, T.; Eubank, J.F.; Heurtaux, D.; Clayette, P.; Kreuz, C.; et al. Porous metal-organic-framework nanoscale carriers as a potential platform for drug delivery and imaging. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kreno, L.E.; Leong, K.; Farha, O.K.; Allendorf, M.; Van Duyne, R.P.; Hupp, J.T. Metal-Organic Framework Materials as Chemical Sensors. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1105–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Chen, B.; Wang, L.; Xiao, Y.; Fronczek, F.R.; Xue, M.; Cui, Y.; Qian, G. A luminescent metal-organic framework with Lewis basic pyridyl sites for the sensing of metal ions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 500–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, J.; Chen, L.; Cui, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, L.; Su, C.-Y. Applications of metal-organic frameworks in heterogeneous supramolecular catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 6011–6061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, Y.-Y.; Leus, K.; Sun, Z.; Li, X.; Depauw, H.; Wang, A.; Zhang, J.; Van Der Voort, P. Catalytic oxidative desulfurization of model and real diesel over a molybdenum anchored metal-organic framework. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2019, 277, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, C.-L.; Lu, B.-R.; Cao, F.-H.; Wu, Z.-Y.; Zhang, W.; Cong, H.-P.; Yu, S.-H. Electrospun metal-organic framework nanoparticle fibers and their derived electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Nano Energy 2019, 55, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fu, C.; Zhou, H.; Tan, L.; Huang, Z.; Wu, Q.; Ren, X.; Ren, J.; Meng, X. Microwave-Activated Mn-Doped Zirconium Metal-Organic Framework Nanocubes for Highly Effective Combination of Microwave Dynamic and Thermal Therapies Against Cancer. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 2201–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rieter, W.J.; Pott, K.M.; Taylor, K.M.L.; Lin, W. Nanoscale Coordination Polymers for Platinum-Based Anticancer Drug Delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 11584–11585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Stock, N.; Biswas, S. Synthesis of Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs): Routes to Various MOF Topologies, Morphologies, and Composites. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 933–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Maity, D.K.; Bhattacharya, B.; Mondal, R.; Ghoshal, D. Five diverse bivalent metal coordination polymers based on benzene dicarboxylate and bent dipyridyl ligands: syntheses, structures, and photoluminescent properties. CrystEngComm 2014, 16, 8896–8909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Haneda, T.; Kawano, M.; Kojima, T.; Fujita, M. Thermo-to-photo-switching of the chromic behavior of salicylideneanilines by inclusion in a porous coordination network. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6643–6645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sun, Q.-Z.; Liu, N.-W.; Pan, J.-Q.; Zhang, B.-G.; Liu, H. Synthesis, structures and magnetic properties of two 2D → 3D entangled Cobalt(II) coordination polymers. Transit. Met. Chem. 2017, 42, 517–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kitagawa, S.; Kondo, M. Functional micropore chemistry of crystalline metal complex-assembled compounds. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1998, 71, 1739–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Humby, J.D.; Benson, O.; Smith, G.L.; Argent, S.P.; da Silva, I.; Cheng, Y.; Rudic, S.; Manuel, P.; Frogley, M.D.; Cinque, G.; et al. Host-guest selectivity in a series of isoreticular metal-organic frameworks: Observation of acetylene-to-alkyne and carbon dioxide-to-amide interactions. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 1098–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Southon, P.D.; Liu, L.; Fellows, E.A.; Price, D.J.; Halder, G.J.; Chapman, K.W.; Moubaraki, B.; Murray, K.S.; Letard, J.-F.; Kepert, C.J. Dynamic Interplay between Spin-Crossover and Host-Guest Function in a Nanoporous Metal-Organic Framework Material. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10998–11009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Manna, B.; Desai, A.V.; Ghosh, S.K. Neutral N-donor ligand based flexible metal-organic frameworks. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 4060–4072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Abdollahi, N.; Masoomi, M.Y.; Morsali, A.; Junk, P.C.; Wang, J. Sonochemical synthesis and structural characterization of a new Zn(II) nanoplate metal-organic framework with removal efficiency of Sudan red and Congo red. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2018, 45, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chaudhary, A.; Mohammad, A.; Mobin, S.M. Recent Advances in Single-Crystal-to-Single-Crystal Transformation at the Discrete Molecular Level. Cryst. Growth Des. 2017, 17, 2893–2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Neogi, S.; Sen, S.; Bharadwaj, P.K. Single-crystal to single-crystal transformations in metal-organic frameworks. Met.-Org. Framework Mater 2014, 473–522. [Google Scholar]
  35. Chen, L.; Chen, Q.; Wu, M.; Jiang, F.; Hong, M. Controllable Coordination-Driven Self-Assembly: From Discrete Metallocages to Infinite Cage-Based Frameworks. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ke, S.-Y.; Wang, C.-C. Water-induced reversible SCSC or solid-state structural transformation in coordination polymers. CrystEngComm 2015, 17, 8776–8785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Duan, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Zhu, D. Crystal-to-Crystal Transformation from Antiferromagnetic Chains into a Ferromagnetic Diamondoid Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6934–6935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Du, M.; Li, C.-P.; Wu, J.-M.; Guo, J.-H.; Wang, G.-C. Destruction and reconstruction of the robust [Cu2(OOCR)4] unit duringcrystal structure transformations between two coordination polymers. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 8088–8090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bravo-Garcia, L.; Barandika, G.; Fidalgo-Marijuan, A.; Bazan, B.; Urtiaga, M.K.; Lezama, L.; Arriortua, M.I. Thermal and Magnetic Diversity in the Behaviour of the CuII-bdc-bpa System: 1D, 2D and Interpenetrated 3D Frameworks. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 2016, 4783–4791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bravo-Garcia, L.; Barandika, G.; Bazan, B.; Urtiaga, M.K.; Arriortua, M.I. Thermal stability of ionic nets with CuII ions coordinated to di-2-pyridyl ketone: Reversible crystal-to-crystal phase transformation. Polyhedron 2015, 92, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lu, Y.; Miller, J.D. Carboxyl Stretching Vibrations of Spontaneously Adsorbed and LB-Transferred Calcium Carboxylates as Determined by FTIR Internal Reflection Spectroscopy. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 256, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pinsky, M.; Avnir, D. Continuous Symmetry Measures. 5. The Classical Polyhedra. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 5575–5582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Calos, N.J.; Forrester, J.S.; Schaffer, G.B. A Crystallographic Contribution to the Mechanism of a Mechanically Induced Solid State Reaction. J. Solid State Chem. 1996, 122, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rodríguez-Carvajal, J. FULLPROF: Program for Rietveld Refinement and Pattern Matching Analysis. In Abstracts of the Satellite Meeting on Powder Diffraction of the XV; Congress of the IUCr: Toulouse, France, 1990; p. 127. [Google Scholar]
  45. Hathaway, B.J.; Billing, D.E. Electronic properties and stereochemistry of mononuclear complexes of the copper(II) ion. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1970, 5, 143–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hathaway, B.J. Correlation of the electronic properties and stereochemistry of mononuclear [CuN4–6] chromophores. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1972, 1196–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. McGarvey, B.R. Electron spin resonance of transition-metal complexes. Transit. Met. Chem. (N.Y.) 1966, 3, 89–201. [Google Scholar]
  48. Bleaney, B.; Bowers, K.D. Anomalous paramagnetism of copper acetate. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1952, 214, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rodríguez-Fortea, A.; Alemany, P.; Alvarez, S.; Ruiz, E. Exchange Coupling in Carboxylato-Bridged Dinuclear Copper(ii) Compounds: A Density Functional Study. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 627–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Groom, C.R.; Bruno, I.J.; Lightfoot, M.P.; Ward, S.C. The Cambridge Structural Database. Acta Cryst. 2016, B72, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lin, R.; Fu, Y.; Brock, C.P.; Guarr, T.F. Structural, spectroscopic, and electrochemical investigation of luminescent bimetallic complexes of rhenium(I). Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 4346–4353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Malaestean, I.L.; Kravtsov, V.C.; Speldrich, M.; Dulcevscaia, G.; Simonov, Y.A.; Lipkowski, J.; Ellern, A.; Baca, S.G.; Kogerler, P. One-Dimensional Coordination Polymers from Hexanuclear Manganese Carboxylate Clusters Featuring a {MnII4MnIII2(μ4-O)2}.Core and Spacer Linkers. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 7764–7772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Fujita, M.; Nagao, S.; Iida, M.; Ogata, K.; Ogura, K. Palladium(II)-directed assembly of macrocyclic dinuclear complexes composed of (en)Pd2+ and bis(4-pyridyl)-substituted bidentate ligands. Remarkable ability for molecular recognition of electron-rich aromatic guests. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 1574–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tudor, V.; Marin, G.; Lloret, F.; Kravtsov, V.C.; Simonov, Y.A.; Julve, M.; Andruh, M. New alkoxo-bridged mixed-valence cobalt clusters: Synthesis, crystal structures and magnetic properties. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2008, 361, 3446–3452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, S.; Xing, H.; Li, Y.; Bai, J.; Pan, Y.; Scheer, M.; You, X. 2D and 3D cadmium(II) coordination polymers from a flexible tripodal ligand of 1,3,5-tris(carboxymethoxy)benzene and bidentate pyridyl-containing ligands with three-, eight- and ten-connected topologies. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 3041–3053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ferbinteanu, M.; Marinescu, G.; Roesky, H.W.; Noltemeyer, M.; Schmidt, H.-G.; Andruh, M. {[Co(μ-bpe)(bpe)2(H2O)2](0.5bpe)(H2O)(ClO4)2}n: a transition metal-organo network with a novel supramolecular architecture (bpe = 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane). Polyhedron 1998, 18, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dalai, S.; Sarathi Mukherjee, P.; Zangrando, E.; Ray Chaudhuri, N. Synthesis, crystal structure and magnetic properties of two new dicyanamide bridged 2D and 1D complexes of Mn(II). New J. Chem. 2002, 26, 1185–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gunes, B.; Soylu, H.; Ozbey, S.; Tufan, Y.; Karacan, N. Bis(1,2-di-4-pyridylethane-N:N’)cadmium(II) tetracyanonickelate(II) m-xylene solvate. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C Cryst. Struct. Commun. 1996, C52, 2425–2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, C.-C.; Lin, H.-W.; Yang, C.-H.; Liao, C.-H.; Lan, I.-T.; Lee, G.-H. Synthesis and structure of a novel two-dimensional bilayer framework of a [M(C5O5)(dpe)] coordination polymer. New J. Chem. 2004, 28, 180–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, Q.-M.; Guo, G.-C.; Mak, T.C.W. A coordination polymer based on twofold interpenetrating three-dimensional four-connected nets of 42638 topology, [CuSCN(bpa)] [bpa = 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane]. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1849–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fujita, M.; Kwon, Y.J.; Miyazawa, M.; Ogura, K. One-dimensional coordinate polymer involving heptacoordinate cadmium(II) ions. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1994, 1977–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hennigar, T.L.; MacQuarrie, D.C.; Losier, P.; Rogers, R.D.; Zaworotko, M.J. Supramolecular isomerism in coordination polymers: conformational freedom of ligands in [Co(NO3)2(1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane)1.5]n. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 972–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sun, C.-Y.; Zheng, X.-J.; Li, W.-J.; Wang, M.-W.; Fang, C.-Y. Assembly of supramolecular networks with the inclusion of water chains, cyclic hepta and octa water clusters. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2008, 634, 2663–2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kim, S.H.; Park, B.K.; Song, Y.J.; Yu, S.M.; Koo, H.G.; Kim, E.Y.; Poong, J.I.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, C.; Kim, S.-J.; et al. Construction of crystal structures of metal(II)-benzoates (M = Mn, Ni, Co, Cu, Zn, and Cd) and 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane: Effects of metal coordination modes and their catalytic activities. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2009, 362, 4119–4126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Dias de Souza, N.L.G.; Garcia, H.C.; de Souza, M.C.; Fernandes, A.L.d.A.; Pereira, G.C.; Diniz, R.; de Oliveira, L.F.C. Crystal architectures of copper and zinc metal complexes containing 2-thiophenepropionate and 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane building blocks. J. Mol. Struct. 2015, 1085, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. May, L.J.; Shimizu, G.K.H. Mutual structure-directing effects of a non-interpenetrated square grid coordination polymer and its complementary complex anion net. Chem. Commun. 2005, 1270–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Plater, M.J.; Foreman, M.R.S.J.; Skakle, J.M.S. Synthesis of co-ordination networks from flexible bis-(4-pyridyl) ligands and cadmium salts. Cryst. Eng. 2001, 4, 293–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lin, H.; Wu, X.; Maggard, P.A. Ligand-Based Modification of the Structures and Optical Properties of New Silver(I)-Rhenate(VII) Oxide/Organic Hybrid Solids. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 11265–11276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Dannenbauer, N.; Matthes, P.R.; Mueller-Buschbaum, K. Luminescent coordination polymers for the VIS and NIR range constituting LnCl3 and 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 6529–6540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pascal, P. Magnetochemical researches. Ann. Chim. Phys. 1910, 19, 5–70. [Google Scholar]
  71. CrysAlis Pro CCD V38.2 and RED; Oxford Diffraction, Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2009.
  72. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: a complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Crystallogr. 2015, C71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Farrugia, L.J. WinGX suite for small-molecule single-crystal crystallography. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1999, 32, 837–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 1 and 1.ah are available from the authors.
Molecules 24 01840 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) View of the hybrid layers in 1 parallel to the (01–2) plane. The π-π interactions are depicted as red dotted lines; (b) View of the staking of the layers along the x axis. Hydrogen bonds are represented as red dotted lines, whereas the interactions between aromatic rings are depicted as yellow dotted lines. CgN1: N1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6; CgC1A: C1A, C2A, C3A, C1A_d, C2A_d, C3A_d.
Figure 1. (a) View of the hybrid layers in 1 parallel to the (01–2) plane. The π-π interactions are depicted as red dotted lines; (b) View of the staking of the layers along the x axis. Hydrogen bonds are represented as red dotted lines, whereas the interactions between aromatic rings are depicted as yellow dotted lines. CgN1: N1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6; CgC1A: C1A, C2A, C3A, C1A_d, C2A_d, C3A_d.
Molecules 24 01840 g001
Molecules 24 01840 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) View of the hybrid layers in 1.ah parallel to the (001) plane; (b) View of the staking of the layers along the x axis. Interactions between aromatic rings are represented as dotted red lines. CgN1: N1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6; CgC1A: C1A, C2A, C3A, C1A_c, C2A_c, C3A_c.
Figure 2. (a) View of the hybrid layers in 1.ah parallel to the (001) plane; (b) View of the staking of the layers along the x axis. Interactions between aromatic rings are represented as dotted red lines. CgN1: N1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6; CgC1A: C1A, C2A, C3A, C1A_c, C2A_c, C3A_c.
Molecules 24 01840 g002
Molecules 24 01840 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) TGA/DTA curves for 1 (exo down). Variable temperature PXRD analysis for 1 from 30 °C to 315 °C (b) top 2D view and (c) 3D view.
Figure 3. (a) TGA/DTA curves for 1 (exo down). Variable temperature PXRD analysis for 1 from 30 °C to 315 °C (b) top 2D view and (c) 3D view.
Molecules 24 01840 g003
Molecules 24 01840 g004 550
Figure 4. Powder X-ray diffraction patterns and photographs displaying the color of powdered samples of 1 (a) at room temperature, (b) after being heated at 90 °C, (c) after being heated at 90 °C and rehydrated in open air conditions, (d) after being heated at 200 °C. The reversibility of such transformations is also indicated.
Figure 4. Powder X-ray diffraction patterns and photographs displaying the color of powdered samples of 1 (a) at room temperature, (b) after being heated at 90 °C, (c) after being heated at 90 °C and rehydrated in open air conditions, (d) after being heated at 200 °C. The reversibility of such transformations is also indicated.
Molecules 24 01840 g004
Molecules 24 01840 g005 550
Figure 5. Q-band EPR spectra recorded at room temperature on polycrystalline samples of (a) compound 1, (b) heated at 90 °C and (c) heated at 200 °C.
Figure 5. Q-band EPR spectra recorded at room temperature on polycrystalline samples of (a) compound 1, (b) heated at 90 °C and (c) heated at 200 °C.
Molecules 24 01840 g005
Molecules 24 01840 g006 550
Figure 6. Thermal evolution of χm (blue triangles) and χmT product (red circles) for 1.ah. The solid line corresponds to the best theoretical fit (see text for the details).
Figure 6. Thermal evolution of χm (blue triangles) and χmT product (red circles) for 1.ah. The solid line corresponds to the best theoretical fit (see text for the details).
Molecules 24 01840 g006
Molecules 24 01840 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Graphical representation of the number of structures with different dimensionalities (0D, 1D, 2D and 3D) containing bpa as a bridge between the different metal centers; (b) Graphical representation of the number of structures with different coordination environments (NC < 4, NC4, NC5, NC6, NC > 6) containing bpa as a bridge between the different metal centers; (c) Graphical representation of the number of structures with different conformational states (anti and gauche) containing bpa as a bridge between the different metal centers.
Figure 7. (a) Graphical representation of the number of structures with different dimensionalities (0D, 1D, 2D and 3D) containing bpa as a bridge between the different metal centers; (b) Graphical representation of the number of structures with different coordination environments (NC < 4, NC4, NC5, NC6, NC > 6) containing bpa as a bridge between the different metal centers; (c) Graphical representation of the number of structures with different conformational states (anti and gauche) containing bpa as a bridge between the different metal centers.
Molecules 24 01840 g007
Molecules 24 01840 g008 550
Figure 8. Schematic representation of the different topologies found in the CSD database for all the coordination compounds based on the bpa ligand.
Figure 8. Schematic representation of the different topologies found in the CSD database for all the coordination compounds based on the bpa ligand.
Molecules 24 01840 g008
Table
Table 1. Bond lengths and angles for Cu(II) centers in 1, together with the values for CSM.
Table 1. Bond lengths and angles for Cu(II) centers in 1, together with the values for CSM.
Bond Lengths (Å) Bond Angles (°)
Cu1-N12.003(4)N1-Cu1-O2Aii89.4(2)O1Aii-Cu1-O1W108.7(1)
Cu1-O3A1.970(3)N1-Cu1-O1W 90.6(2)O1Aii-Cu1-N191.6(1)
Cu1-O1W1.975(4)O3A-Cu1-O2Aii86.0(2)O2W-Cu1-N1 98.5(2)
Cu1-O2Ai2.023(3)O3A-Cu1-O1W 93.2(2)O2W-Cu1-O1Aii155.3(1)
Cu1-O2W2.304(4)O1Aii-Cu1-O2Aii55.9(2)O2W-Cu1-O3A 84.4(1)
Cu1-O1A2.508(4)O1Aii-Cu1-O3A84.2(2)O2W-Cu1-O1W 93.7(1)
CSM DistortionOC-6TPR-6
Cu13.81414.855
Symmetry codes: (i) x − 1, y, z; (ii) −1 + x, y, z. Ideal reference shapes: OC-6 = octahedron and TPR-6 = trigonal prism.
Table
Table 2. Distances (Å) and angles (°) of supramolecular hydrogen bonding and π-π interactions in 1.
Table 2. Distances (Å) and angles (°) of supramolecular hydrogen bonding and π-π interactions in 1.
D-H···AD···A<D-H···AD-H···AD···A<D-H···A
O1W-H1WA···O1Ai2.655(5)170(5)C2 -H2···O2Aii3.318(7)174
O1W-H1WB···O4A 2.590(6)156(6)C6 -H6···O1Ai3.266(7)145
O2W-H2WA···O2Aii2.755(5)172(6)C7 -H7B···O1Wiii3.298(7)132
Cgi-CgjDCANGDZDZ’DXY
CgN1-CgN1iii3.843(3)0.0(3)3.605(2)3.605(2)1.331
CgC1A-CgN1iv5.308(3)88.3(3)0.357(2)4.914(2)
Symmetry codes: (i) 1 − x, 1 − y,1 − z; (ii) 1 − x,1 − y,2 − z (iii) −x,2 − y,2 − z, (iv) 1 + x, −1 + y, z.
Table
Table 3. Bond lengths and angles for Cu(II) centers in 1.ah, together with the values for CSM.
Table 3. Bond lengths and angles for Cu(II) centers in 1.ah, together with the values for CSM.
Bond Length (Å) Bond Angles (°)
Cu1—O1A1.930 (6)N1-Cu1-O4A92.7 (3)O1Ai-Cu1-N196.4 (3)
Cu1—O3Aii1.970 (6)O4A-Cu1-O1A88.2 (3)O1Ai-Cu1-O1A 100.3 (3)
Cu1—O4Aiii1.985 (6)O1A-Cu1-O3A 88.9 (3)O1Ai-Cu1-O3A 82.7 (3)
Cu1—N11.978 (8)O3A-Cu1-N1 95.1 (3)O1Ai-Cu1-O4A 80.2 (3)
Cu1—O1Ai2.442 (9)
CSM distortionvOC-5TBPY-5SPY-5
Cu12.5842.4052.755
Symmetry codes: (i) –x + 1, −y + 1, −z; (ii) −x, −y + 1, −z; (iii) x + 1, y, z. Ideal reference shapes: vOC-5 = vacant octahedron; TBPY-5 = trigonal bipyramid; SPY-5 = square pyramid.
Table
Table 4. Distances (Å) and angles (°) of supramolecular hydrogen bonding and π-π interactions in 1.ah.
Table 4. Distances (Å) and angles (°) of supramolecular hydrogen bonding and π-π interactions in 1.ah.
D-H···AD···A<D-H···AD-H···AD···A<D-H···A
C2-H2···O4Ai2.979(11) 111C6-H6···O3Aii2.998(12) 118
Cgi-CgjDCANGDZDZ’DXY
CgN1-CgC1Aiii4.291(6)19.7(5)2.707(4)3.604(4)2.329
Symmetry codes: (i) 1 + x, y, z; (ii) -x, 1 − y, −z; (iii) −1 + x, −1 + y, z.
Table
Table 5. Number of structures (No.) belonging to each kind of topology found in the CSD database for all the coordination compounds based on the bpa ligand, together with a short description and a representative example for each one.
Table 5. Number of structures (No.) belonging to each kind of topology found in the CSD database for all the coordination compounds based on the bpa ligand, together with a short description and a representative example for each one.
TopologyNo.DescriptionCSD Refcode
B2340D
B1205Bpa bridge (anti) between 2 metal centersJUMPUC [51]
B26Bpa bridge (gauche) between 2 metal centersUKIBIA [52]
B311Double bpa bridge (gauche)WAFTEC [53]
B41Triple bpa bridge (gauche)AGACER [54]
Bn(X)11Bpa bridge (anti o gauche) between X metal centersLELMUL [55]
C4501D
C1251Bpa chain (anti)LADQOW [56]
C225Zig-zag de bpa chain (gauche)WUJLUI [57]
C325Double bpa bridge chain (gauche)TEJYUC [58]
C411Alternated zig-zag bpa chain (gauche and anti) ISIKIE [59]
C5118Zig-zag bpa chain (anti)DAQFAC [60]
C65Bpa chain (anti) and double bpa bridge (gauche)POGLEC [61]
C715Stairs bpa (anti)NAMTOK [62]
L222D
L11Brick bpa layer (anti)XOLCOR [63]
L26Herringbone bpa layer (anti)NUHLOS [64]
L31Corrugated hexagonal bpa layer (anti)TUBBAV [65]
L411Square bpa layer (anti)PAKSOK [66]
L56Linear bpa layer (anti) connected by bpa bridge (anti or gauche)NAMSEZ [62]
T123D
T16Cubic bpa structure (anti)IDAJUS [67]
T23Diamond like bpa structure (anti)HUWDEJ [68]
T34Complex structure of bpa layers (anti) connected by bpa (gauche)VAKDIX [69]
Table
Table 6. Parameters of the crystal data, structural resolution and refinement procedure for 1 and 1.ah.
Table 6. Parameters of the crystal data, structural resolution and refinement procedure for 1 and 1.ah.
11.ah
FormulaC22H22Cu2N2O12C22H12Cu2N2O8
FW (gmol−1)633.49280.72
Crystal System.TriclinicTriclinic
Space Group (n°)P−1, (2)P−1, (2)
a (Å)7.2481(11)5.6282(5)
b (Å)9.2514(11)8.6560(5)
c (Å)9.8569(14)10.0512(8)
α (°)115.68(1)95.739(6)
β (°)97.80(1)97.168(7)
γ (°)96.80(1)96.154(6)
V(Å3)578.4(1)479.84(6)
Z11
F (000)322282
μ (mm−1)2.9263.273
ρcalc (gcm−3)1.8191.943
Crystal Size, mm0.05 × 0.04 × 0.030.12 × 0.07 × 0.06
Limiting Indices−8 ≤ h ≤ 8−6≤ h ≤ 6
−10 ≤ k ≤10−10 ≤ k ≤6
−11 ≤ l ≤7−11 ≤ l ≤11
Reflections Collected3163, 3185
Unique (Rint)1831 (0.042)1693 (0.049)
Observed [I > 2σ(I)] a15601527
Parameters/Restraints188/4154/0
R(F)/wR(F2) [I > 2σ(I)] a0.062/0.1590.083/0.238
R(F)/wR(F2) (all data) a0.071/0.1680.088/0.241
Goodness of Fit on F21.0641.230
L. Diff. Peak and Hole (e Å−3)1.194, −1.2001.656, −1.082
a     R 1 = ∑ | F 0 | | | F 0 | −   | F c | | / ∑ | F 0 | , w R 2 =   ∑ w ( | F 0 | − | F c | ) 2 / ∑ w | F 0 | 2

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bravo-García, L.; Larrea, E.S.; Artetxe, B.; Lezama, L.; Gutiérrez-Zorrilla, J.M.; Arriortua, M.I. Structural Transformations in the Thermal Dehydration of [Cu2(bpa)(btec)(H2O)4]n Coordination Polymer. Molecules 2019, 24, 1840. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24091840

AMA Style

Bravo-García L, Larrea ES, Artetxe B, Lezama L, Gutiérrez-Zorrilla JM, Arriortua MI. Structural Transformations in the Thermal Dehydration of [Cu2(bpa)(btec)(H2O)4]n Coordination Polymer. Molecules. 2019; 24(9):1840. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24091840

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bravo-García, Laura, Edurne S. Larrea, Beñat Artetxe, Luis Lezama, Juan M. Gutiérrez-Zorrilla, and María I. Arriortua. 2019. "Structural Transformations in the Thermal Dehydration of [Cu2(bpa)(btec)(H2O)4]n Coordination Polymer" Molecules 24, no. 9: 1840. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24091840

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop