Next Article in Journal
High Throughput Screening of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Gram-Negative Seafood Bacteria
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Droplet Digital PCR Assay for Detection of Seed-Borne Burkholderia glumae and B. gladioli Causing Bacterial Panicle Blight Disease of Rice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia Species in Ticks Removed from Humans in the Republic of Korea

Division of Vectors and Parasitic Diseases, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, 187 Osongsaenmyeong 2-ro, Osong-eup, Heungdeok-gu, Cheongju 28159, Chungbuk, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(6), 1224; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061224
Submission received: 12 May 2022 / Revised: 9 June 2022 / Accepted: 12 June 2022 / Published: 15 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Parasitology)

Abstract

:
Human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA) and human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME) are zoonotic tick-borne diseases transmitted via tick bites. To determine the state of human Anaplasma and Ehrlichia infections caused by tick bites in the Republic of Korea (ROK), we conducted a nationwide investigation of human cases of tick bites in 2020. A total of 180 ticks were obtained, comprising Haemaphysalis longicornis (70.0%), Amblyomma testudinarium (17.8%), Ixodes nipponensis (6.1%), H. flava (4.4%), and I. persulcatus (1.7%). In three cases (1.7%; 95% CI: 0.3–4.9), A. phagocytophilum was detected in Ixodes ticks using primers for Anaplasma-specific genes (16s rRNA, ankA, and msp4). Conversely, Ehrlichia sp. was only detected in H. longicornis, in two cases (1.1%; 95% CI: 0.1–4.0). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first record of Ehrlichia sp. in ticks parasitizing humans in the ROK. As concerns remain about the possibility of HGA and HME transmission, continuous monitoring and management of the pathogens and vectors are necessary.

1. Introduction

Ticks are major arthropod vectors of various pathogens, such as protozoa, bacteria, viruses, and parasites, which cause diseases in humans and livestock [1]. Under natural conditions, numerous tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) circulate between animals and ticks [2]. When acquiring a blood meal, ticks can transmit pathogenic organisms [3], such as Anaplasma, Ehrlichia [4], Rickettsia [5], Bartonella, Borrelia, Babesia [6], and severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus [7], to the host.
Human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA) and human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME) are emerging zoonotic diseases caused by A. phagocytophilum and E. chaffeensis, respectively, which belong to the family Anaplasmataceae. The major clinical signs and symptoms of HGA and HME are nonspecific, such as fever, myalgia, headache, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and elevated levels of hepatic enzymes [8,9].
Patients with HGA and HME were first reported in the US in 1994 and 1987, respectively [10,11], and the number of patients has increased every year since, according to data reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [12]. Additionally, cases have also been reported in Europe and Asia [13,14,15,16]. In the Republic of Korea (ROK), A. phagocytophilum and E. chaffeensis were first identified in 2002 in the sera of patients with acute febrile disease [17], and the first patients were reported in 2014 and 2000 [18,19], respectively. Since the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) initiated its investigation into the incidence of HGA in 2015, the number of patients has increased gradually, with 4 cases reported in 2016, 13 in 2017, 32 in 2018, 38 in 2019, and 31 in 2020 [20]. However, no case of HME has been reported since the first suspected case in 2000 [19].
HGA and HME are transmitted by Ixodes sp. (I. scapularis, I. ricinus, and I. pacificus) and Amblyomma americanum in the US and Europe [6,21]. In the ROK, Haemaphysalis longicornis, I. nipponensis, and I. persulcatus have been identified as the main vectors for these pathogens [4,22], and domestic and wild mammals are considered as reservoirs [23,24,25]. However, few studies on TBPs in ticks isolated from humans bitten by ticks have been reported in the ROK. Recently, 16 ticks collected between 2014 and 2017 from residents of the southwestern region of the ROK tested positive for A. phagocytophilum (three ticks), Babesia gibsoni (one tick), B. microti (two ticks), and Rickettsia spp. (12 ticks) [26], with A. phagocytophilum infection detected in both ticks and patients [27]. However, no research has been conducted based on nationwide surveys.
The emergence and spread of TBPs are increasing due to global warming and other factors, such as increased human travel, animal transport, and urban development [28]. Therefore, continuous surveillance is necessary for monitoring the emergence of human diseases caused by TBPs [29,30]. As a public service, KDCA conducts annual pathogen investigations on ticks that bite humans. In this study, the presence of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia was investigated in cases of human tick bites across the ROK in 2020.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Tick Collection and Identification

Ticks were collected from local public health centers in the ROK from March to October 2020 as part of a service provided by the KDCA for the diagnosis of TBP infections in humans with tick bites from whom ticks were removed. The tick species and developmental stages were classified based on morphological classification keys [31]. Individual ticks were then placed in 2.0 mL cryovials according to the species, date, and stage of development, and were stored at −80 °C until DNA extraction.

2.2. DNA Extraction

Each identified tick was individually homogenized mechanically using a Precellys Evolution homogenizer (Bertin Technologies, Bretonneux, France) with phosphate-buffered saline and 2.8 mm beads (30 frequencies/s for 2 min), and then centrifuged at 12,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. Following centrifugation, genomic DNA was harvested with the MagMAX™ DNA Multi-Sample Ultra 2.0 Kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) using the KingFisher Flex system (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C until use.

2.3. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Amplification

Conventional PCR was performed using primers targeting the 16S rRNA gene sequence for each Anaplasma sp. and Ehrlichia sp., and nested PCR was performed using genospecies-specific primers against ankA, msp4, and groEL, as described in previous studies (Table 1). Total genomic DNA of laboratory strains of A. phagocytophilum and E. chaffeensis, provided by the Division of Zoonotic and Vector Borne Disease Research, and the Division of Bacterial Diseases, KDCA, respectively, served as the positive control. Conventional and nested PCRs were performed in a total reaction volume of 20 µL. Each PCR mixture contained AccuPower® PCR PreMix (Bioneer, Seoul, Korea), 10 pmol of each primer, 5 µL of DNA extracted from the ticks for the primary PCR, and 1 µL of the first-step PCR product used as a template for nested PCR. Each reaction was conducted in a C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA), as described in Table 1. The PCR products were visualized using gel electrophoresis in 1.2% agarose gel containing 10,000× Safe-Pinky DNA Gel Staining Solution (GenDEPOT, Barker, TX, USA). To avoid cross contamination, DNA extraction, amplification, and agarose gel electrophoresis were performed in separate rooms.

2.4. Nucleotide Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis

The PCR products that exhibited positive bands were subjected to sequencing at BIOFACT (Daejeon, Korea). To typify the isolates, the obtained sequences were matched against the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nucleotide collection using the BLAST service, and aligned using CLUSTAL Omega (v.1.2.1). A phylogenetic tree was generated using the neighbor-joining method and the Kimura 2-parameter distance model in the MEGA 5.2 program. For assessing the bootstrap values of the obtained tree, 1000 bootstrap replicates were obtained.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of Ticks

A total of 180 ticks, including five tick species belonging to three genera, were collected from local public health centers in 2020. Among them, H. longicornis was the most abundant species (n = 126, 70%), followed by A. testudinarium (n = 32, 17.8%), I. nipponensis (n = 11, 6.1%), H. flava (n = 8, 4.4%), and I. persulcatus (n = 3, 1.7%) (Table 2 and Table 3). Based on the developmental stage, the 180 ticks comprised 110 adults (61.1%, 103 females and 7 males), 69 nymphs (38.3%), and one larva (0.6%) (Table 2 and Table 3). The collected ticks showed the highest prevalence between May and August (82.8%) (Table 2). The greatest number of ticks was collected from Gyeongsangbuk-do (n = 38, 21.1%), followed by Gyeongsangnam-do (n = 37, 20.6%), Gyeonggi-do (n = 33, 18.3%), and Chungcheongnam-do (n = 23, 12.8%) (Table 3).

3.2. Detection of Anaplasma sp. and Ehrlichia sp.

Based on the 16S rRNA gene analysis, out of 180 ticks, 3 ticks tested positive for Anaplasma sp. (1.7%; 95% CI: 0.3–4.9) and 2 ticks tested positive for Ehrlichia sp. (1.1%; 95% CI: 0.1–4.0). No coinfection was observed between the target pathogens. Based on the results of genospecies-specific nested PCR, three ticks tested positive for ankA and msp4 gene fragments (381 and 664 bp, respectively) of A. phagocytophilum, and two ticks tested positive for the groEL gene fragment (365 bp) of Ehrlichia sp. Two I. nipponensis ticks and one I. persulcatus tick tested positive for A. phagocytophilum, whereas only one H. longicornis tick tested positive for Ehrlichia sp. All ticks that tested positive for the pathogens were matured females. The 16S rRNA gene and genospecies sequences detected in this study have been submitted to GenBank (accession numbers: OM681329-OM681333 and OM294660-OM294667).

3.3. Molecular and Phylogenetic Analysis

The Anaplasma sp.- and Ehrlichia sp.-positive sequences were obtained in partial and aligned with the homologous sequences from the NCBI GenBank nucleotide sequence database. The 16S rRNA gene analysis revealed that among the three Anaplasma-positive ticks, samples nos. 7 (OM681329) and 54 (OM681330) were identical to each other, and the sequence obtained exhibited 100% identity with that of A. phagocytophilum isolated from a raccoon dog in the ROK (KY458570). Additionally, the sequence from sample no. 67 (OM681331) shared 99.78% identity with that of A. phagocytophilum detected in a tick in the ROK (GU064898) (Figure 1a). Sequence alignment of ankA indicated that sample nos. 7, 67, and 54 shared 100% and 98.29% identity with A. phagocytophilum isolated from I. nipponensis in the ROK (MW481246) and I. persulcatus in Russia (AY502606), respectively (Figure 1b). The partial ankA sequences were grouped with those of A. phagocytophilum strains isolated from ticks and humans in the ROK. Sequence alignment of msp4 indicated that sample nos. 7, 67, and 54 shared 100% identity with A. phagocytophilum isolated from sheep in China (GQ412346) and a tick in Russia (KF745732) (Figure 1c).
In the phylogenetic analysis of Ehrlichia species, the partial 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained in this study showed high identity (99.7%) with the sequences of E. chaffeensis isolated from the USA (AF416764) (Figure 2a). However, the partial groEL sequences obtained from the two Ehrlichia-positive ticks showed 99.7% identity (99% coverage) with that of Ehrlichia sp. detected in H. longicornis in Japan (LC385854) and confirmed cluster formation with sequences of Ehrlichia sp. in ticks collected in Asia (Figure 2b).

4. Discussion

In this study, a total of 180 tick specimens were collected from humans during a nationwide investigation in the ROK, and molecular detection and phylogenetic analysis of three A. phagocytophilum and two Ehrlichia sp. pathogens were performed. Studies have been published on the molecular detection of TBPs in ticks that bite humans. Jahfari et al. [38] reported that several TBPs, including Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, A. phagocytophilum, Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis, two Rickettsia species, and several Babesia species, in 314 ticks (removed from people with tick bites) and 626 blood samples (of people with tick bites or erythema migrans), were identified using PCR-based methods. Moreover, Xu et al. [39] investigated the infection prevalence of B. burgdorferi sensu lato, B. miyamotoi, and A. phagocytophilum in human-biting ticks collected over a 10-year period in three western states of the US [39]. However, studies on TBPs in the ROK have primarily been conducted on wild or domesticated animals, such as goats [23], deer [24], and cattle [25], and several sporadic cases have been reported in patients with tick bites or in individuals visiting local hospitals [26,27]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a nationwide survey to test ticks removed from humans in the ROK.
H. longicornis is most dominant tick species and is considered an important vector for tick-borne diseases in the ROK [5,40]. The present study showed that H. longicornis (70.0%) is the most common species detected in cases of human tick bites, followed by A. testudinarium (17.8%), I. nipponensis (6.1%), H. flava (4.4%), and I. persulcatus (1.7%). These findings are consistent with the results of a previous study in the ROK, which identified H. longicornis as the dominant questing tick species collected from various habitats [40,41]. In addition, previous studies have shown that A. testudinarium has a relatively low population density collected by dragging, flagging, and dry ice-baited trapping [7,42]. This species is known to use a host-seeking strategy, unlike the other ticks collected in this study that have a passive ambushing strategy [43]. Interestingly, in this study, the population density of A. testudinarium appeared to be relatively high compared to that reported in several other studies [42,44]. Recent studies conducted in the ROK have reported peaks in adult, nymph, and larval tick density from June to August, May to June, and August to September, respectively [41,45]. In this study, the monthly density of ticks at each developmental stage was similar to the results obtained from previous studies, except for tick larva (n = 1) in October. However, despite the epidemiological importance, the data did not provide estimates of the species composition and seasonal abundance of ixodid species removed from humans in the ROK. Nonetheless, the results can be useful in providing the basis for vector-borne risk assessments of tick bites.
A. phagocytophilum is the most frequently reported TBP in the ROK since the first reported case in 2002 [5,22]. In accordance with findings from previous studies, A. phagocytophilum has been detected in ticks feeding on livestock and wild animals, including cattle (31/566 tick pools (5.5%)) [46], Korean water deer (89/266 tick pools (33.5%)) [47], horses (5/1409 tick pools (0.4%)) [48], and migratory birds (1/108 tick pools (0.9%)) [49]. In a study, 1467 ticks were collected from nine provinces of the ROK, and 35 H. longicornis ticks and 1 I. persulcatus tick were found to test positive for A. phagocytophilum [4]. Various TBPs were found in 33 ticks isolated from humans in the southwestern region of the ROK between 2014 and 2017 [26]. Among them, 9.1% tested positive for A. phagocytophilum (two I. nipponensis ticks and one A. testudinarium tick). In this study, we surveyed TBPs in ticks removed from humans bitten by ticks throughout the country, and A. phagocytophilum was detected in two I. nipponensis ticks and one I. persulcatus tick. Each 16S rRNA, ankA, and msp4 gene fragment obtained from A. phagocytophilum-positive ticks formed a cluster with the corresponding sequences of A. phagocytophilum identified in ticks or in animals and Korean patients.
E. chaffeensis is the etiological agent of HME [50] and has been primarily detected in Ixodes sp. in the US and Europe [6,21]. In the ROK, E. chaffeensis is most frequently detected in H. longicornis ticks collected from the Gyeonggi province (4.3%, 26/611 ticks) [36], the Korean Demilitarized Zone (15.0%, 63/420 tick pools) [51], and Jeju Island (12.1%, 56/463 salivary glands) [52]. In this study, E. chaffeensis was not detected; instead, two H. longicornis ticks from Gyeonggi and Gyeongsangnam provinces tested positive for Ehrlichia sp., with unknown pathogenicity to humans. According to Kim et al. [4], Anaplasma and Ehrlichia sp. are extensively distributed across the ROK [4]. Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA and groEL gene sequences of Ehrlichia species revealed different results. In general, 16S rRNA gene amplification has been used for the identification of bacterial pathogens [53]. However, evident sequence comparison is limited owing to high conservation. groEL sequences are more divergent than the corresponding 16S rRNA gene sequences, and are considered a valuable tool for phylogenetic analysis [54]. For this reason, analysis based on groEL gene sequencing is more reliable. In this study, two samples belonging to the genus Ehrlichia were found to be more closely related to Ehrlichia sp. with unclear characteristics for pathogenicity as isolated from H. longicornis in Japan [55] than E. chaffeensis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the presence of Ehrlichia sp. in ticks removed from humans in the ROK.
Climate patterns are changing rapidly owing to global warming, and the range of tick habitats is spreading widely; hence, various tick-borne diseases are expected to emerge and re-emerge [56,57]. In addition, as outdoor activities such as climbing and camping increase, the probability of human contact with ticks increases, which is expected to pose a threat to public health. Therefore, the continuous monitoring of various tick species and hosts and corresponding preventive measures are necessary.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Y.K. and H.I.L.; formal analysis, Y.-J.K. and J.Y.S.; investigation, Y.-J.K. and J.Y.S.; resources, J.Y.S.; data curation, Y.-J.K.; writing–original draft preparation, Y.-J.K.; writing–review and editing, S.Y.K. and H.I.L.; funding acquisition, H.I.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, grant number 2020-NI-032-00.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article. The newly generated sequences were submitted to the GenBank database under the accession numbers OM681329-OM681333 and OM294660-OM294667. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We are sincerely grateful to the members of the Division of Bacterial Diseases and the Division of Zoonotic and Vector Borne Disease Research, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) for providing the positive control samples used in this study. We also thank Young-Ran Ha from Honam Regional Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Jeju Office) for her sampling work and thoughtful contributions to this project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sharifah, N.; Heo, C.C.; Ehlers, J.; Houssaini, J.; Tappe, D. Ticks and tick-borne pathogens in animals and humans in the island nations of Southeast Asia: A review. Acta Trop. 2020, 209, 105527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Baneth, G. Tick-borne infections of animals and humans: A common ground. Int. J. Parasitol. 2014, 44, 591–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Süss, J.; Klaus, C.; Gerstengarbe, F.W.; Werner, P.C. What makes ticks tick? Climate change, ticks, and tick-borne diseases. J. Travel Med. 2008, 15, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Kim, C.M.; Kim, M.S.; Park, M.S.; Park, J.H.; Chae, J.S. Identification of Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and A. bovis in Haemaphysalis longicornis and Ixodes persulcatus ticks from Korea. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2003, 3, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kim, C.M.; Yi, Y.H.; Yu, D.H.; Lee, M.J.; Cho, M.R.; Desai, A.R.; Shringi, S.; Klein, T.A.; Kim, H.C.; Song, J.W.; et al. Tick-borne rickettsial pathogens in ticks and small mammals in Korea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 5766–5776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Adelson, M.E.; Rao, R.V.S.; Tilton, R.C.; Cabets, K.; Eskow, E.; Fein, L.; Occi, J.L.; Mordechai, E. Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi, Bartonella spp., Babesia microti, and Anaplasma phagocytophila in Ixodes scapularis ticks collected in Northern New Jersey. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 2799–2801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Seo, M.G.; Noh, B.E.; Lee, H.S.; Kim, T.K.; Song, B.G.; Lee, H.I. Nationwide temporal and geographical distribution of tick populations and phylogenetic analysis of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus in ticks in Korea, 2020. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dumler, J.S.; Madigan, J.E.; Pusterla, N.; Bakken, J.S. Ehrlichioses in humans: Epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 45, S45–S51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ismail, N.; Walker, D.H. Balancing protective immunity and immunopathology: A unifying model of monocytotropic ehrlichiosis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2005, 1063, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, S.M.; Dumler, J.S.; Bakken, J.S.; Walker, D.H. Identification of a granulocytotropic Ehrlichia species as the etiologic agent of human disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1994, 32, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Maeda, K.; Markowitz, N.; Hawley, R.C.; Ristic, M.; Cox, D.; McDade, J.E. Human infection with Ehrlichia canis, a leukocytic rickettsia. N. Engl. J. Med. 1987, 316, 853–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Centers of Disease Control and Prevention. Epidemiology and Statistics. Number of Reported Cases of Anaplasmosis and Ehrlichiosis in US. 2000–2019. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov (accessed on 4 August 2021).
  13. Petrovec, M.; Lotric Furlan, S.; Zupanc, T.A.; Strle, F.; Brouqui, P.; Roux, V.; Dumler, J.S. Human disease in Europe caused by a granulocytic Ehrlichia species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35, 1556–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Zhang, L.; Liu, H.; Xu, B.; Zhang, Z.; Jin, Y.; Li, W.; Lu, Q.; Li, L.; Chang, L.; Zhang, X.; et al. Rural residents in China are at increased risk of exposure to tick-borne pathogens Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia chaffeensis. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 313867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Takano, A.; Ando, S.; Kishimoto, T.; Fujita, H.; Kadosaka, T.; Nitta, Y.; Kawabata, H.; Watanabe, H. Presence of a novel Ehrlichia sp. in Ixodes granulatus found in Okinawa, Japan. Microbiol. Immunol. 2009, 53, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yoshimoto, K.; Matsuyama, Y.; Matsuda, H.; Sakamoto, L.; Matsumoto, K.; Yokoyama, N.; Inokuma, H. Detection of Anaplasma bovis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum DNA from Haemaphysalis megaspinosa in Hokkaido, Japan. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 168, 170–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Heo, E.J.; Park, J.H.; Koo, J.R.; Park, M.S.; Park, M.Y.; Dumler, J.S.; Chae, J.S. Serologic and molecular detection of Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Anaplasma phagocytophila (human granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent) in Korean patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 3082–3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kim, K.H.; Yi, J.; Oh, W.S.; Kim, N.H.; Choi, S.J.; Choe, P.G.; Kim, N.J.; Lee, J.K.; Oh, M.D. Human granulocytic anaplasmosis, South Korea, 2013. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 1708–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sachar, D.S. Ehrlichia chaffeensis infection in an active duty soldier stationed in Korea. Med. Surveill. Mon. Rep. 2000, 6, 9–11. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee, S.J.; Kim, H.H.; Kim, J.Y.; Yoo, J.E.; Gill, B.C. Laboratory-based diagnostic test results for human granulocytic anaplasmosis in 2020. Public Health Wkly. Rep. PHWR 2021, 14, 2773–2780. [Google Scholar]
  21. Schouls, L.M.; Van De Pol, I.; Rijpkema, S.G.T.; Schot, C.S. Detection and identification of Ehrlichia, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, and Bartonella species in Dutch Ixodes ricinus ticks. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37, 2215–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Im, J.H.; Baek, J.; Durey, A.; Kwon, H.Y.; Chung, M.H.; Lee, J.S. Current status of tick-borne diseases in South Korea. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2019, 19, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Seo, H.J.; Jin, B.C.; Kim, K.H.; Yoo, M.S.; Seong, K.W.; Jeong, S.J.; Hyun, B.H.; Cho, Y.S. Molecular detection and phylogenetic analysis of Anaplasma spp. in Korean native goats from Ulsan Metropolitan City, Korea. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2019, 19, 773–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shin, S.U.; Park, Y.J.; Ryu, J.H.; Jang, D.H.; Hwang, S.; Cho, H.C.; Park, J.; Han, J.I.; Choi, K.S. Identification of zoonotic tick-borne pathogens from Korean water deer (Hydropotes inermis argyropus). Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2020, 20, 745–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Park, J.; Han, D.G.; Ryu, J.H.; Chae, J.B.; Chae, J.S.; Yu, D.H.; Park, B.K.; Kim, H.C.; Choi, K.S. Molecular detection of Anaplasma bovis in Holstein cattle in the Republic of Korea. Acta Vet. Scand. 2018, 60, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bang, M.S.; Kim, C.M.; Pyun, S.H.; Kim, D.M.; Yun, N.R. Molecular investigation of tick-borne pathogens in ticks removed from tick-bitten humans in the southwestern region of the Republic of Korea. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0252992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lee, S.H.; Shin, N.R.; Kim, C.M.; Park, S.; Yun, N.R.; Kim, D.M.; Jung, D.S. First identification of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in both a biting tick Ixodes nipponensis and a patient in Korea: A case report. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Medlock, J.M.; Leach, S.A. Effect of climate change on vector-borne disease risk in the UK. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2015, 15, 721–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Diuk-Wasser, M.A.; Liu, Y.; Steeves, T.K.; Folsom-O’Keefe, C.; Dardick, K.R.; Lepore, T.; Bent, S.J.; Usmani-Brown, S.; Telford, S.R., 3rd; Fish, D.; et al. Monitoring human babesiosis emergence through vector surveillance New England, USA. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hai, V.V.; Almeras, L.; Socolovschi, C.; Raoult, D.; Parola, P.; Pagès, F. Monitoring human tick-borne disease risk and tick bite exposure in Europe: Available tools and promising future methods. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014, 5, 607–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yamaguti, N.; Tipton, V.J.; Keegan, H.L.; Toshioka, S. Ticks of Japan, Korea, and the Ryukyu Islands. Brigh. Young Univ. Sci. Bull. Biol. Ser. 1971, 15, 1. [Google Scholar]
  32. Barlough, J.E.; Madigan, J.E.; Derock, E.; Bigornia, L. Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction for Detection of Ehrlichia equi Genomic DNA in Horses and Ticks (Ixodes pacificus). Vet. Parasitol. 1996, 63, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Massung, R.F.; Levin, M.L.; Munderloh, U.G.; Silverman, D.J.; Lynch, M.J.; Gaywee, J.K.; Kurtti, T.J. Isolation and Propagation of the Ap-Variant 1 Strain of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in a Tick Cell Line. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 2138–2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Yang, J.; Liu, Z.; Niu, Q.; Liu, J.; Xie, J.; Chen, Q.; Chen, Z.; Guan, G.; Liu, G.; Luo, J.; et al. Evaluation of Different Nested PCRs for Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Ruminants and Ticks. BMC Vet. Res. 2016, 12, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Oh, J.Y.; Moon, B.C.; Bae, B.K.; Shin, E.-H.; Ko, Y.H.; Kim, Y.-J.; Park, Y.H.; Chae, J.-S. Genetic identification and phylogenetic analysis for Anaplasma and Ehrlichia spiecies in Haemaphysalis longicornis collected from Jeju Island, Korea. J. Bacteriol. Virol. 2009, 39, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Lee, S.O.; Na, D.K.; Kim, C.M.; Li, Y.H.; Cho, Y.H.; Park, J.H.; Lee, J.H.; Eo, S.K.; Klein, T.A.; Chae, J.S. Identification and Prevalence of Ehrlichia chaffeensis Infection in Haemaphysalis longicornis Ticks from Korea by PCR, Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis Based on 16S RRNA Gene. J. Vet. Sci. 2005, 6, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pritt, B.S.; Sloan, L.M.; Johnson, D.K.; Munderloh, U.G.; Paskewitz, S.M.; McElroy, K.M.; McFadden, J.D.; Binnicker, M.J.; Neitzel, D.F.; Liu, G.; et al. Emergence of a New Pathogenic Ehrlichia species, Wisconsin and Minnesota. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 422–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Jahfari, S.; Hofhuis, A.; Fonville, M.; van der Giessen, J.; van Pelt, W.; Sprong, H. Molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in humans with tick bites and erythema migrans, in the Netherlands. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0005042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Xu, G.; Pearson, P.; Dykstra, E.; Andrews, E.S.; Rich, S.M. Human-biting Ixodes ticks and pathogen prevalence from California, Oregon, and Washington. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2019, 19, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Lee, J.; Moon, K.; Kim, M.; Lee, W.G.; Lee, H.I.; Park, J.K.; Kim, Y.H. Seasonal distribution of Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) and detection of SFTS virus in Gyeongbuk Province, Republic of Korea, 2018. Acta Trop. 2021, 221, 106012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim-Jeon, M.D.; Jegal, S.; Jun, H.; Jung, H.; Park, S.H.; Ahn, S.K.; Lee, J.; Gong, Y.W.; Joo, K.; Kwon, M.J.; et al. Four year surveillance of the vector hard ticks for SFTS, Ganghwa-do, Republic of Korea. Korean J. Parasitol. 2019, 57, 691–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Park, J.W.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, G.S.; Seo, J.J.; Chung, J.K. Epidemiological characteristics of field tick-borne pathogens in Gwang-ju metropolitan area, South Korea, from 2014 to 2018. Osong Public Health Res. Perspect. 2020, 11, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chae, J.B.; Kang, J.G.; Kim, H.C.; Chong, S.T.; Lee, I.Y.; Shin, N.S.; Chae, J.S. Identification of tick species collected from wild boars and habitats of wild boars and domestic pigs in the Republic of Korea. Korean J. Parasitol. 2017, 55, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jo, Y.S.; Kang, J.G.; Chae, J.B.; Cho, Y.K.; Shin, J.H.; Jheong, W.H.; Chae, J.S. Prevalence of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus in ticks collected from national parks in Korea. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2019, 19, 284–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Han, S.Y.; Sung, S.H.; Seo, J.W.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, S.J.; Lee, S.J.; Yoo, S.S. Isolation and Identification of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Hard Ticks Collected in Daejeon. Korean J. Vet. Serv. 2021, 44, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kang, S.W.; Doan, H.T.; Choe, S.E.; Noh, J.H.; Yoo, M.S.; Reddy, K.E.; Kim, Y.H.; Kweon, C.H.; Jung, S.C.; Chang, K.Y. Molecular investigation of tick-borne pathogens in ticks from grazing cattle in Korea. Parasitol. Int. 2013, 62, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kang, J.G.; Ko, S.; Kim, H.C.; Chong, S.T.; Klein, T.A.; Chae, J.B.; Jo, Y.S.; Choi, K.S.; Yu, D.H.; Park, B.K.; et al. Prevalence of Anaplasma and Bartonella spp. in ticks collected from Korean water deer (Hydropotes inermis argyropus). Korean J. Parasitol. 2016, 54, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Seo, H.J.; Truong, A.T.; Kim, K.H.; Lim, J.Y.; Min, S.; Kim, H.C.; Yoo, M.S.; Yoon, S.S.; Klein, T.A.; Cho, Y.S. Molecular detection and phylogenetic analysis of tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected from horses in the Republic of Korea. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kang, J.G.; Kim, H.C.; Choi, C.Y.; Nam, H.Y.; Chae, H.Y.; Chong, S.T.; Klein, T.A.; Ko, S.; Chae, J.S. Molecular detection of Anaplasma, Bartonella, and Borrelia species in ticks collected from migratory birds from Hong-do Island, Republic of Korea. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2013, 13, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Paddock, C.D.; Childs, J.E. Ehrlichia chaffeensis: A prototypical emerging pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 16, 37–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Chae, J.S.; Yu, D.H.; Shringi, S.; Klein, T.A.; Kim, H.C.; Chong, S.T.; Lee, I.Y.; Foley, J. Microbial pathogens in ticks, rodents and a shrew in Northern Gyeonggi-do near the DMZ, Korea. J. Vet. Sci. 2008, 9, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Lee, M.J.; Chae, J.S. Molecular detection of Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Anaplasma bovis in the salivary glands from Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010, 10, 411–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Patel, J.B. 16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial pathogen identification in the clinical laboratory. Mol. Diagn. 2001, 6, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sumner, J.W.; Nicholson, W.L.; Massung, R.F. PCR amplification and comparison of nucleotide sequences from the groESL heat shock operon of Ehrlichia species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35, 2087–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Taira, M.; Ando, S.; Kawabata, H.; Fujita, H.; Kadosaka, T.; Sato, H.; Monma, N.; Ohashi, N.; Saijo, M. Isolation and molecular detection of Ehrlichia species from ticks in western, central, and eastern Japan. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2019, 10, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Bouchard, C.; Dibernardo, A.; Koffi, J.; Wood, H.; Leighton, P.A.; Lindsay, L.R. Increased risk of tick-borne diseases with climate and environmental changes. Can. Commun. Dis. Rep. 2019, 45, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. El-Sayed, A.; Kamel, M. Climatic changes and their role in emergence and re-emergence of diseases. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2020, 27, 22336–22352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships for Anaplasma phagocytophilum, based on the partial nucleotide sequence of (a) Anaplasma 16S rRNA, (b) ankA, and (c) msp4 gene. The neighbor-joining method was used for constructing a phylogenetic tree. The numbers at the nodes represent the proportion of bootstrap values for the branch point. The three A. phagocytophilum-positive sequences identified in this study are indicated in bold. Reference strains of Anaplasma with the host, country of detection, and the National Center for Biotechnology Information accession numbers are also shown. Scale bars indicate sequence distances.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships for Anaplasma phagocytophilum, based on the partial nucleotide sequence of (a) Anaplasma 16S rRNA, (b) ankA, and (c) msp4 gene. The neighbor-joining method was used for constructing a phylogenetic tree. The numbers at the nodes represent the proportion of bootstrap values for the branch point. The three A. phagocytophilum-positive sequences identified in this study are indicated in bold. Reference strains of Anaplasma with the host, country of detection, and the National Center for Biotechnology Information accession numbers are also shown. Scale bars indicate sequence distances.
Microorganisms 10 01224 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships for Ehrlichia sp., based on the partial nucleotide sequence of (a) Ehrlichia 16S rRNA and (b) groEL gene. The neighbor-joining method was used for constructing a phylogenetic tree. The numbers at the nodes represent the proportions of bootstrap values for the branch point. The two Ehrlichia sp.-positive sequences identified in this study are indicated in bold. Reference strains of Ehrlichia with the host, country of detection, and the National Center for Biotechnology Information accession numbers are also shown. Scale bars indicate sequence distances.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships for Ehrlichia sp., based on the partial nucleotide sequence of (a) Ehrlichia 16S rRNA and (b) groEL gene. The neighbor-joining method was used for constructing a phylogenetic tree. The numbers at the nodes represent the proportions of bootstrap values for the branch point. The two Ehrlichia sp.-positive sequences identified in this study are indicated in bold. Reference strains of Ehrlichia with the host, country of detection, and the National Center for Biotechnology Information accession numbers are also shown. Scale bars indicate sequence distances.
Microorganisms 10 01224 g002
Table 1. Primers used for the detection of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia in ticks.
Table 1. Primers used for the detection of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia in ticks.
Target GenePrimers Sequence (5′ to 3′)Amplicon
Size (bp)
PCR ConditionsReferences
Anaplasma
16s rRNA
EE11stTCCTGGCTCAGAACGAACGCTGGCGGC143394 °C/5 min; 35 cycles: 94 °C/60 s,
50 °C/30 s, 72 °C/1.5 min; 72 °C/10 min
[32]
EE2AGTCACTGACCCAACCTTAAATGGCTG
EE32ndGTCGAACGGATTATTCTTTATAGCTTGC92694 °C/5 min; 35 cycles: 94 °C/30 s,
50 °C/30 s, 72 °C/60 s; 72 °C/10 min
EE4CCCTTCCGTTAAGAAGGATCTAATCTCC
Anaplasma ankAANK-F11stGAAGAAATTACAACTCCTGAAG70594 ℃/2 min; 40 cycles: 94 °C/30 s,
55 °C/30 s, 72 ℃/60 s; 72 °C/5 min
[33]
ANK-R1CAGCCAGATGCAGTAACGTG
ANK-F22ndTTGACCGCTGAAGCACTAAC66494 °C/2 min; 30 cycles: 94 °C/30 s,
55 °C/30 s, 72 °C/60 s; 72 °C/5 min
ANK-R2ACCATTTGCTTCTTGAGGAG
Anaplasma
msp4
MSP4AP51stATGAATTACAGAGAATTGCTTGTAGG84994 °C/5 min; 35 cycles: 94 °C/60 s,
54 °C/60 s, 72 °C/60 s; 72 °C/10 min
[34]
MSP4AP3TTAATTGAAAGCAAATCTTGCTCCTATG
MSP4f2ndCTATTGGYGGNGCYAGAGT38194 °C/5 min; 30 cycles: 94 °C/30 s,
55 °C/30 s, 72 °C/30 s; 72 °C/10 min
MSP4rGTTCATCGAAAATTCCGTGGTA
Ehrlichia
16s rRNA
AE1-F1stAAGCTTAACACATGCAAGTCGAA140694 °C/5 min; 40 cycles: 94 °C/60 s,
59 °C/60 s, 72 °C/1.5 min; 72 °C/10 min
[35]
AE1-RAGTCACTGACCCAACCTTAAATG
HE12ndCAATTGCTTATAACCTTTTGGTTATAAAT39094 °C/3 min; 3 cycles: 94 °C/60 s, 55 °C/2 min, 72 °C/1.5 min; 92 °C/60 s; 37 cycles: 92 °C/60 s, 55 °C/2 min, 72 °C/60 s; 72 °C/10 min[36]
HE3TATAGGTACCGTCATTATCTTCCCTAT
Ehrlichia
groEL
GR0607F1stGAAGATGCWGTWGGWTGTACKGC66495 °C/5 min; 35 cycles: 95 °C/30 s,
54 °C/30 s, 72 °C/60 s; 72 °C/10 min
[37]
GR01294RAGMGCTTCWCCTTCWACRTCYTC
GR0677F2ndATTACTCAGAGTGCTTCTCARTG31595 °C/5 min; 30 cycles: 94 °C/30 s,
57 °C/30 s, 72 °C/60 s; 72 °C/10 min
GR01121RTGCATACCRTCAGTYTTTTCAAC
Table 2. Seasonal distribution of human-biting ticks and pathogen prevalence in the Republic of Korea, March–October, 2020.
Table 2. Seasonal distribution of human-biting ticks and pathogen prevalence in the Republic of Korea, March–October, 2020.
SpeciesStageNo. of Collected TicksAnaplasma
phagocytophilum
Ehrlichia sp.
MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberTotal
(%)
Positive
(%)
95% CIPositive
(%)
95% CI
Amblyomma
testudinarium
Female--15112111 (6.1)0000
Larva-------11 (0.6)0000
Male--11---13 (1.7)0000
Nymph-23461-117 (9.4)0000
Haemaphysalis
flava
Female-------22 (1.1)0000
Male--1----12 (1.1)0000
Nymph-22-----4 (2.2)0000
H. longicornisFemale1-762134 (2 )8-77 (42.8)002 (2.6)0.3–9.3
Male---1-1--2 (1.1)0000
Nymph-31781134147 (26.1)0000
Ixodes
nipponensis
Female-1 (1 )44 (1 )1---10 (5.6)2 (20.0)2.4–72.300
Nymph--1-----1 (0.6)0000
I. persulcatusFemale--3 (1 )-----3 (1.7)1 (33.3)0.8–185.700
TotalFemale1115152335103103 (57.2)3 (2.9)0.6–8.52 (1.9)0.2–7.0
Larva-------11 (0.6)0000
Male--22-1-27 (3.9)0000
Nymph-723121744269 (38.3)0000
Total1840294040148180 (100.0)3 (1.7)0.3–4.92 (1.1)0.1–4.0
: positive for A. phagocytophilum, : positive for Ehrlichia sp.
Table 3. Geographical distribution of human-biting ticks and pathogen prevalence as recorded in 2020 across the 14 administrative units of the Republic of Korea.
Table 3. Geographical distribution of human-biting ticks and pathogen prevalence as recorded in 2020 across the 14 administrative units of the Republic of Korea.
RegionSpeciesTotal (%)
Amblyomma
testudinarium
Haemaphysalis
flava
Haemaphysalis
longicornis
Ixodes
nipponensis
Ixodes
persulcatus
Seoul Special City1 1 2 (1.1)
Gyeonggi-do Province02292 33 (18.3)
Gwangwon-do Province0 5 27 (3.9)
Chungcheongbuk-do Province0 91111 (6.1)
Chungcheongnam-do Province2 165 23 (12.8)
Jeollanam-do Province2 4 6 (3.3)
Gyeongsangbuk-do Province51311 38 (21.1)
Gyeongsangnam-do Province18316 37 (20.6)
Jeju special self-governing Province0 2 2 (1.1)
Metropolitan area *42122 20 (11.1)
Unknown 1 1 (0.6)
Total328126113180 (100)
* Metropolitan area includes Busan, Daejeon, Incheon, Sejong, and Ulsan.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, Y.-J.; Seo, J.Y.; Kim, S.Y.; Lee, H.I. Molecular Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia Species in Ticks Removed from Humans in the Republic of Korea. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061224

AMA Style

Kim Y-J, Seo JY, Kim SY, Lee HI. Molecular Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia Species in Ticks Removed from Humans in the Republic of Korea. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(6):1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061224

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Yu-Jung, Ji Ye Seo, Seong Yoon Kim, and Hee Il Lee. 2022. "Molecular Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia Species in Ticks Removed from Humans in the Republic of Korea" Microorganisms 10, no. 6: 1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061224

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop