Next Article in Journal
Progressive Failure Analysis of Thin-Walled Composite Structures Verified Experimentally
Previous Article in Journal
In Situ Electrochemical Study of the Growth Kinetics of Passive Film on TC11 Alloy in Sulfate Solution at 300 °C/10 MPa
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 13
Issue 5
10.3390/ma13051136
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Developing Conductive Highly Ordered Zinc Oxide Nanorods by Acetylacetonate-Assisted Growth

by
Siti Shafura A Karim
1,
Yuzuru Takamura
2,
Phan Trong Tue
3,
Nguyen Thanh Tung
4,
Jamal Kazmi
1,
Chang Fu Dee
1,
Burhanuddin Yeop Majlis
1 and
Mohd Ambri Mohamed
1,*
1
Institute of Microengineering and Nanoelectronics (IMEN), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
2
School of Materials Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (JAIST), 1-1 Asahidai, Nomi City, Ishikawa 923-1292, Japan
3
Laboratory for Materials and Structures, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology (TITech), Yokohama 226-8503, Japan
4
Department of Finemechanics, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, 6-6, Aramaki Aza Aoba, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8579, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(5), 1136; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13051136
Submission received: 23 January 2020 / Revised: 13 February 2020 / Accepted: 21 February 2020 / Published: 4 March 2020
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Highly ordered vertically grown zinc oxide nanorods (ZnO NRs) were synthesized on ZnO-coated SiO2/Si substrate using zinc acetylacetonate hydrate as a precursor via a simple hydrothermal method at 85 °C. We used 0.05 M of ZnO solution to facilitate the growth of ZnO NRs and the immersion time was varied from 0.5 to 4 h. The atomic force microscopy revealed the surface roughness of ZnO seed layer used to grow the ZnO NRs. The morphology of vertically grown ZnO NRs was observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy. X-ray diffraction examination and transmission electron microscopy confirmed that the structure of highly ordered ZnO NRs was crystalline with a strong (002) peak corresponded to ZnO hexagonal wurtzite structure. The growth of highly ordered ZnO NRs was favorable due to the continuous supply of Zn2+ ions and chelating agents properties obtained from the acetylacetonate-derived precursor during the synthesis. Two-point probe current–voltage measurement and UV–vis spectroscopy of the ZnO NRs indicated a resistivity and optical bandgap value of 0.44 Ω.cm and 3.35 eV, respectively. The photoluminescence spectrum showed a broad peak centered at 623 nm in the visible region corresponded to the oxygen vacancies from the ZnO NRs. This study demonstrates that acetylacetonate-derived precursors can be used for the production of ZnO NRs-based devices with a potential application in biosensors.

1. Introduction

Zinc oxide (ZnO) is a versatile n-type semiconducting material owing to the direct bandgap (3.37 eV) with a large exciton binding energy (60 meV) at room temperature, bio-safe, functional biocompatible, and high isoelectric point (~9.5) [1,2]. Among all diverse morphologies of ZnO nanostructures such as nanosheets, nanoflakes, nanoplates, nanoflowers, and nanocombs [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10], nanorods (NRs) have higher surface area and catalytic properties, and for that reason, they can be utilized in many potential applications such as sensors, field-effect transistors, piezoelectric generators, and biosensors [5,7,11,12]. Highly ordered ZnO NRs with excellent electrical conductivity give higher surface reaction activity for a bio-interfacing platform for immobilization, which could lead to greater signal transductions during the detection, hence, promise better sensing performance. For instance, N.S. Ridhuan et al. reported that the highly oriented ZnO NRs with an aspect ratio of ~6 showed a good matrix for glucose oxidase immobilization and obtained a high sensitivity of 48.75 µA/mM·cm2 towards glucose detection [13]. Therefore, ZnO NRs have been explores as a promising biomaterial for biosensor development. Several methods have been developed to synthesize ZnO nanostructures, such as pulsed laser deposition (PLD), physical vapor deposition (PVD), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), carbothermal reduction method, and hydrothermal method [14,15,16,17,18,19]. However, these methods (such as PLD, PVD and CVD) require a high vacuum chamber and more complex set up to deposit ZnO thin film. The hydrothermal method offers simplest preparation set-up with less energy consumption, and low production cost, where the ZnO nanostructures can be grown under mild synthesis conditions (such as normal pressure and low growth temperature), simple facility, good repeatability and high reliability [20,21]. In hydrothermal method, precursor has a role as a Zn2+ ions source. There are many reports on the preparation of ZnO NRs using nitrate and acetate-derived precursor, however, they only able to obtain low aspect ratio nanorods and very time consuming [2,13,22,23,24,25]. Few works have demonstrated the development of precipitated ZnO prepared by acetylacetonate-derived precursor via a chemical method, such as hydrolysis method [26,27], and solvothermal method [28]. However, no works reported on the growth of ZnO NRs directly on a seeded substrate using the acetylacetonate-derived precursor. ZnO NRs that grown directly on the substrate provides good adherence and stability for enhanced device performance [11,13].
Therefore, we developed a simple hydrothermal process to synthesize ZnO NRs using zinc acetylacetonate hydrate as a precursor. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the synthesis of ZnO NRs using acetylacetonate-assisted hydrothermal method on ZnO-coated SiO2/Si substrate. The selection of acetylacetonate-derived as an alternative precursor for ZnO growth because they are inexpensive, non-toxic, and commercially available. Furthermore, the precursor is less susceptible to hydrolysis as compared to halide-derived or acetate-derived; which is due to their chelating agent properties [29,30]. The chelating agent properties provide stable multidentate ligand to the non-polar facets of ZnO crystal, hence favor the growth in the single polar (001) facets. These properties are believed can influence the growth of ZnO. The quality of ZnO NRs synthesized using this approach has been systematically studied in terms of their morphological, structural, optical, and electrical properties. In addition, a possible growth mechanism of the ZnO NRs has been proposed.

2. Materials and Methods

Zinc acetate dehydrate, 2-methoxyethanol and monoethanolamine were used as a starting material to prepare a ZnO seed layer solution. The 0.2 M of ZnO solution was stirred at 110 °C for 30 min. A clear and homogeneous solution was obtained, and spin-coated onto cleaned SiO2/Si substrate (2 × 2 cm2) at 2000 rpm for 30 s. Then, the ZnO-coated SiO2/Si substrate was annealed at 350 °C for 30 min. For ZnO NRs preparation, equimolar 0.05 M ZnO solution was prepared by dissolving 0.198 g of zinc acetylacetonate hydrate (Zn(AcAc)2, Zn(C5H7O2)2·xH2O), and 0.084 g of hexamethylenetetramine (HMTA, (CH2)6N4)) in 15 mL of deionized water. Next, the solution was sonicated at 50 °C for 30 min, and then stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The solution was poured into a capped bottle, and the ZnO-coated SiO2/Si substrate was immersed in the solution. The immersion process was carried out at 85 °C with the immersion time varied between 0.5 to 4 h. Next, the sample was rinsed with deionized water and dried in an oven at 150 °C for 30 min. Finally, the sample was annealed at 350 °C for 30 min in N2 ambient.
The surface roughness of the ZnO seed layer was measured using atomic force microscopy (Hitachi, AFM5000II). The morphological and cross-sectional view of the ZnO NRs were observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Zeiss Merlin), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Thermo Scientific, Talos L120C, 120 kV). Meanwhile, the structural properties of the ZnO NRs were characterized using thin-film X-ray diffraction (XRD, PANalytical, X’Pert Pro, CuKα). The optical properties of ZnO NRs were characterized by a diffuse reflectance method over the range of 300–800 nm using a Hitachi U39000-H spectrophotometry system. In addition, the photoluminescence properties of ZnO NRs were characterized using the 325 nm line of a He–Cd UV laser (Renishaw InVia) as the excitation source at room temperature with laser power of 5 mW. For electrical characterization purposes, metal contact electrodes consisting of Au (40 nm)/Cr (10 nm) were deposited by thermal evaporator and electron beam evaporator, respectively. The distance between the two electrodes was approximately 20 µm. The electrical properties of ZnO NRs were measured using the current-voltage (I–V) semiconductor characterization system (Keithley 4200-SCS).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphological Properties of Zinc Oxide Nanorods (ZnO NRs)

Figure 1 shows the morphological and cross-sectional FESEM images of ZnO NRs obtained at different immersion time between 0.5 h to 4 h. All samples were observed to have high uniformity and well-distribution of ZnO NRs on the surface of the substrate. Interestingly, the increment of immersion time resulted in a higher density of grown ZnO NRs, thus developed more interconnection between them. The diameter of ZnO NRs for 0.5 h is distributed in the range of 15–30 nm with an average value of 25 nm. As the immersion time was increased to 2 h, the diameter of ZnO NRs increased to the range of 30–60 nm with an average value of 40 nm. Apparently, a similar diameter range of ZnO NRs was obtained after further increment of immersion time to 4 h. From the cross-sectional FESEM images (Figure 1), it was observed that the growth of ZnO NRs is most likely vertical to the substrate with uniform length. The FESEM image of 0.5 h sample (Figure 1a) showed the length of the ZnO NRs were approximately 0.9 µm. As the immersion time increased to 2 h, the length of the ZnO NRs were approximately 1.6 µm which is almost twice longer than 0.5 h sample, which is an improvement with respect to other hydrothermal method that used acetates and nitrates-derived precursor to grow nanorods (the minimal immersion time captured from several works to grow nanorods are presented in Table 1). However, a further increment in the immersion time to 4 h showed insignificant differences in terms of the morphologies and dimensionality of the ZnO NRs, which can be ascribed to the insufficient amount of Zn2+ ions supplied to the system, hence abrupted the growth of ZnO NRs [31]. These showed that in a hydrothermal, precursor plays a role in supplying Zn2+ ions to the system in order to completely form ZnO. Table 2 shows the list of diameter and length of ZnO NRs obtained at different immersion time.
The morphologies of grown ZnO NRs are mainly attributed to the surface roughness of the seed layer. Figure 2 shows the AFM topographic images of the ZnO seed layer that provides nucleation sites for the growth of the ZnO NRs. The ZnO seed layer is uniformly distributed at the entire surface as shown in 3D AFM images (Figure 2a) with the roughness value of 0.84 nm (Figure 2b). This uniform distribution of nucleation sites contributed to the alignment and density of the grown ZnO NRs.

3.2. Structural Properties of ZnO NRs

The crystal structure of ZnO NRs prepared for 2 h was confirmed using XRD analysis. All peaks were observed at 34.38°, 36.18° and 47.46° of 2θ in the ZnO NRs as shown in Figure 3, which corresponds to the (002), (101) and (012) diffraction peaks of hexagonal wurtzite for ZnO crystal family (PDF code no: 01-079-0207), respectively. The sharp and strong peak (002) indicates the growth of ZnO NRs were dominantly along the c-axis direction without any impurities. The wurtzite lattice parameters, such as the values of d and the distances between adjacent crystal planes (hkl), were calculated using the Bragg formula,
λ = 2d sin θ.
The (002), (101) and (012) planes exhibited d-spacing of 0.2606, 0.2481 and 0.1914 nm, respectively. Values obtained were found to be consistent as reported in the literature [32]. Meanwhile, the well-known Scherrer formula [33],
D = (kλ/β cos θ),
was used to determine the crystallite size of the ZnO NRs where D is the crystallite size in nanometers (nm), λ is the wavelength of the radiation (1.54056 Å for CuKα radiation), k is the constant that equal to 0.94, β is the full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of peak intensity, and θ is the peak position. The (002) peak was chosen as the preferred peak to calculate the crystallite size. The crystallite size of ZnO NRs was calculated to be approximately 20 nm. The XRD results indicate our acetylacetonate-assisted growth produced crystalline ZnO NRs with preferential growth along c-axis.
The crystal structure of ZnO NRs synthesized in 2 h was further characterized using a 120 kV TEM. The sharp nano-grass structure was observed as presented in Figure 4a. The length and diameter of the nanorod were measured to be approximately 1.6 µm and 40 nm, respectively, which is consistent with the FESEM results in terms of their morphologies and dimensionality. Meanwhile, the high magnification TEM image (Figure 4b) reveals the distance between two parallel fringes, which is approximately 0.26 nm, and it is fully consistent with the XRD result in terms of the d-spacing of the (002) planes of the wurtzite hexagonal of ZnO crystal. It confirms that the obtained ZnO NRs are crystalline with the wurtzite hexagonal structure, and are grown along the c-axis orientation, which is further affirmed by the selected area of electron diffraction (SAED) pattern, as shown in Figure 4c.

3.3. Growth Mechanism of ZnO NRs

The ZnO NRs were grown by heating up the mixture of Zn(AcAc)2, HMTA, and deionized water at 85 °C. HMTA reacts with deionized water and decomposed to formaldehyde and ammonia as intermediate, as shown in Equation (3). Then the ammonia will further react with deionized water to produce ammonium ions (NH4+) and hydroxyl ions (OH−) as shown in Equation (4). This process is known as the hydrolyzation process.
(CH2)6N4 + 6H2O ↔ 6HCHO + 4NH3
NH3 + H2O ↔ NH4+ + OH−.
Concurrently, the hydrolyzation process and Equation (5) also occurred [34]. As a result, Zn2+ ions and acetylacetonate ions are continuously supplied to the system.
Zn(CH3COCHCOCH3)2.H2O → Zn2+ + (CH3COCHCOCH3) + H2O−.
As the concentration of Zn2+ and OH− ions achieve a stable state at minimum energy level, the ZnO starts to grow rapidly to form rod-like structures. The formation of crystalline ZnO from Zn(OH)2 can be explained by these simple chemical Equations:
Zn2+ + 2OH + 2H2O → Zn(OH)2 + 2H2O ↔ ZnO + H2O.
The growth of ZnO NRs is involved by the energetic and kinetic factor. After reaching the critical value, the ZnO starts to grow rapidly to form sharp nano-grass structures as can be seen in FESEM and TEM results. Acetylacetonate-derived precursor is soluble in HMTA, and both exhibit non-polar chelating agent properties [29,35,36,37]. They form stable multidentate ligand with the (101) non-polar facets of ZnO crystal, therefore, encouraging the growth in the single polar (001) facets. The velocity in the (0001) direction or c-axis is the fastest [38], hence ZnO NRs growth occurs mostly along the c-axis. The XRD and TEM results confirmed that the grown ZnO NRs have crystalline wurtzite structure along c-axis as the preferred orientation. From literatures, B. Ruqia et al. demonstrated that the growth of ZnO NRs along the (0001) direction by a direct solvothermal treatment was affected by controlling the concentration of the precursor and capping agents [28]. At lower concentrations of the precursor, they obtained an inhomogeneous low aspect ratio of nanorods, however, the aspect ratio of nanorods was increased with the use of octylamine as a capping agent. Meanwhile, Y. Chen et al. reported the high sputtering pressure was found to disturb the growth of the columnar structure of the ZnO deposited by radio frequency magnetron sputtering [39]. The illustration of the possible growth mechanism for the highly ordered ZnO NRs synthesized on the ZnO-coated SiO2/Si substrate using the acetylacetonate-assisted hydrothermal method are presented in Figure 5.

3.4. Electrical Properties of ZnO NRs

For electrical conductivity studies, the ZnO NRs were deposited on a fabricated channel with a distance of 20 µm, as showed in Figure 6a. The bending curve indicated a semiconducting behavior of the ZnO NRs, as can be seen from Figure 6b. As the voltage was swept from 0 to 10 V, 2 h sample shows higher current flow compared to 0.5 h sample. Higher density of ZnO NRs produced more interconnection between the nanorods, hence, induced more electron pathway, as illustrated in inset Figure 6b. The resistivity of the ZnO NRs can be calculated using this formula (7) [40], resistivity;
ρ = (V/I)(wt/l),
where V is the applied voltage, I is the measured current, w is the length of metal contact, t is the thickness of the sample, and l is the length of the channel. It shows that the 2 h sample exhibited a lower resistivity value of 0.44 Ω.cm, compared to a 0.5 h sample (7.16 Ω.cm). From literature, the electrical resistivity of ZnO was reported to be in the range of 10−2 to 10 Ω.cm [41,42].

3.5. Optical Properties of ZnO NRs

The room temperature UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectrum of ZnO NRs obtained after 2 h of immersion time is shown in Figure 7. The spectrum reveals a rapid change in the diffuse reflectance of the ZnO NRs at a wavelength of 370 nm which can be explained to the reflection of the intrinsic bandgap of ZnO due to the electron transitions from the valence band to the conduction band (O2p→Zn3d) [43]. Tauc’s plot was used to determine the optical bandgap energy of the ZnO NRs by drawing the tangent line at the lower energy sides. The Tauc’s plot of the diffuse reflectance of the ZnO NRs is presented in the inset of Figure 7, and it exhibits a bandgap of 3.35 eV. These electrical and optical properties of ZnO NRs prove its applicability in biosensor applications [13,44]. This is due to the fact that ZnO NRs could provide higher surface reaction activity for biomolecules immobilization, and their good electrical conductivity could enhance signal transductions during the detection, hence resulting in greater device performances.
The room temperature photoluminescence (PL) properties of ZnO NRs obtained after 2 h of immersion time in the range of 350–800 nm are shown in Figure 8. The PL spectrum of the ZnO NRs shows two peaks centered at 383 nm and 623 nm, which corresponded to the ultraviolet emission peak and the green emission peak, respectively. The ultraviolet emission is also known as near band edge emission (NBE), attributed by the free excitons recombination through excitons collision process [28,45]. The visible emission of ZnO NRs appeared as a broad peak centered at 623 nm with a bandwidth of 250 nm. This emission peak is related to the presence of oxygen vacancies in the ZnO crystals [46]. These defect structures in ZnO crystal will enhance the surface defect activities, thus allowing them to provide strong binding sites for the absorption of various organic and inorganic molecules [47,48]. Consequently, this may improve the biomolecules immobilization for future biosensing devices.

4. Conclusions

Highly ordered vertically grown ZnO NRs have been successfully synthesized using a zinc acetylacetonate-assisted hydrothermal method on a ZnO-coated SiO2/Si substrate. A uniform, dense, and interconnected ZnO NRs were obtained after 2 h of immersion time. The synthesized ZnO NRs have an average length of 1.6 µm and an average diameter of 40 nm. XRD examination confirms the ZnO NRs are hexagonally crystalline with strong preferential growth at c-axis. TEM analysis further reveals the distance between two parallel fringes of ZnO NRs measured to be approximately 0.26 nm, which reflected the d-spacing of (002) plane. Chelating agent properties of acetylacetonate ions have influenced the growth of ZnO NRs. Furthermore, the electrical resistivity and optical bandgap energy of ZnO NRs were measured to be around 0.44 Ω.cm and 3.35 eV, respectively. A broad peak centered at 623 nm in the visible region was observed in photoluminiscense spectrum that corresponded to the oxygen vacancies from the ZnO NRs. With a good crystallinity, a highly ordered growth, a high active surface area, and a low electrical resistivity, it could be suggested that the synthesized ZnO NRs by this method is suitable to be used as a transducing element in biosensor applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.T. and P.T.T.; methodology, S.S.A.K.; investigation, S.S.A.K. and N.T.T.; data curation, S.S.A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S.A.K.; validation, J.K. and C.F.D.; writing—review and editing, M.A.M. and B.Y.M.; resources, M.A.M. and B.Y.M.; supervision, M.A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was performed under the support of the Ministry of Education Malaysia (AKU254:HICoE (Fasa II) “MEMS for Biomedical Devices (artificial kidney)”), TRGS/1/2019/UKM/02/1/1, and the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia under research grant DIP-2019-018.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tripathy, N.; Kim, D.-H. Metal oxide modified ZnO nanomaterials for biosensor applications. Nano Converg. 2018, 5, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sofiane, S.; Mounir, S. Surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) investigation and sensitive detection of zinc oxide nanorods (ZnO Nrds) deposited on silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) substrate. Mater. Lett. 2019, 254, 112–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yue, H.Y.; Wu, P.F.; Huang, S.; Gao, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, W.Q.; Guo, X.R. Electrochemical determination of levodopa in the presence of uric acid using ZnO nanoflowers-reduced graphene oxide. J. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 3984–3993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Saranya, P.E.; Selladurai, S. Facile Synthesis of Self-Assembled Flower-Like Mesoporous Zinc Oxide Nanoflakes for Energy Applications. Int. J. Nanosci. 2017, 17, 1760002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Feng, Z.; Ma, Y.; Natarajan, V.; Zhao, Q.; Ma, X.; Zhan, J. In-situ generation of highly dispersed Au nanoparticles on porous ZnO nanoplates via ion exchange from hydrozincite for VOCs gas sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 255, 884–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ahmad, R.; Tripathy, N.; Jang, N.K.; Khang, G.; Hahn, Y.-B. Fabrication of highly sensitive uric acid biosensor based on directly grown ZnO nanosheets on electrode surface. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 206, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mohammed, A.J.; Hassan, T.A.A. A New Piezo-Amperometric Sensing Method Based on Comb-like Nanostructured Zinc Oxide Thin Films for the Efficient Detection of Na2SO4. Energy Procedia 2019, 157, 1191–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dedova, T.; Acik, I.O.; Polivtseva, S.; Krunks, M.; Gromyko, I.; Tõnsuaadu, K.; Mere, A. Influence of solution composition on sprayed ZnO nanorods properties and formation process: Thermoanalytical study of the precursors. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 2887–2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tiong, T.Y.; Dee, C.F.; Hamzah, A.A.; Majlis, B.Y.; Rahman, S.A. Enhancement of CuO and ZnO nanowires methanol sensing properties with diode-based structure. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 202, 1322–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shibayama, N.; Kanda, H.; Yusa, S.I.; Fukumoto, S.; Baranwal, A.K.; Segawa, H.; Ito, S. All-inorganic inverse perovskite solar cells using zinc oxide nanocolloids on spin coated perovskite layer. Nano Converg. 2017, 4, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Karim, S.S.A.; Dee, C.-F.; Majlis, B.Y.; Mohamed, M.A. Recent Progress on Fabrication of Zinc Oxide Nanorod-Based Field Effect Transistor Biosensors. Sains Malays. 2019, 48, 1301–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Picca, R.A.; Manoli, K.; Luciano, A.; Sportelli, M.C.; Palazzo, G.; Torsi, L.; Cioffi, N. Enhanced stability of Organic Field-Effect Transistor biosensors bearing electrosynthesized ZnO Nanoparticles. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 274, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ridhuan, N.S.; Abdul, K.; Razak, Z. Lockman Fabrication and Characterization of Glucose Biosensors by Using Hydrothermally Grown ZnO Nanorods. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Karnati, P.; Haque, A.; Taufique, M.; Ghosh, K. A systematic study on the structural and optical properties of vertically aligned zinc oxide nanorods grown by high pressure assisted pulsed laser deposition technique. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Alameri, D.; Ocola, L.E.; Kuljanishvili, I. Mask-free fabrication and chemical vapor deposition synthesis of ultrathin zinc oxide microribbons on Si/SiO2 and 2D substrates. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Films 2018, 36, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, D.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chang, F. Facile synthesis of three-dimensional ZnO hierarchical microspheres composed of well-ordered nanorods by hydrothermal method. Results Phys. 2019, 12, 953–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Reddy, I.N.; Reddy, C.V.; Sreedhar, M.; Cho, M.; Shim, J.; Reddy, V.R.; Kim, D. Effect of seed layers (Al, Ti) on optical and morphology of Fe-doped ZnO thin film nanowires grown on Si substrate via electron beam evaporation. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc. 2017, 71, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tiong, T.Y.; Dee, C.F.; Hamzah, A.A.; Goh, B.T.; Wong, Y.Y.; Ooi, L.; Ahmad, I. A rapid responding ultraviolet sensor based on multi-parallel aligned ZnO nanowires field effect transistor. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2017, 260, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tee, T.S.; Hui, T.C.; Yi, C.W.; Chin, Y.C.; Umar, A.A.; Titian, G.R.; Salleh, M.M. Microwave-assisted hydrolysis preparation of highly crystalline ZnO nanorod array for room temperature photoluminescence-based CO gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 227, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ismail, A.S.; Mamat, M.H.; Sin, N.M.; Malek, M.F.; Zoolfakar, A.S.; Suriani, A.B.; Rusop, M. Fabrication of hierarchical Sn-doped ZnO nanorod arrays through sonicated sol−gel immersion for room temperature, resistive-type humidity sensor applications. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 9785–9795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Iwantono, I.; Nurwidya, W.; Lestari, L.R.; Naumar, F.Y.; Nafisah, S.; Umar, A.A.; Salleh, M.M. Effect of growth temperature and time on the ZnO film properties and the performance of dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC). J. Solid State Electrochem. 2015, 19, 1217–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Feng, Y.; Shen, T.; Li, X.; Wei, X. ZnO-nanorod–fiber UV sensor based on evanescent field principle. Optik 2020, 202, 163672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yan, Z.; Yang, J.; Ge, X.; Yu, J.; Wei, L.; Yang, T.; Liu, L. Manganese oxide catalysts supported on zinc oxide nanorod arrays: A new composite for selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 at low temperature. Appl. Surface Sci. 2019, 491, 579–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhou, Z.; Xiu, F.; Jiang, T.; Xu, J.; Chen, J.; Liu, J.; Huang, W. Solution-processable zinc oxide nanorods and a reduced graphene oxide hybrid nanostructure for highly flexible and stable memristor. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 35, 10764–10768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Patil, V.L.; Patil, A.A.; Patil, S.V.; Khairnar, N.A.; Tarwal, N.L.; Vanalakar, S.A.; Dongale, T.D. Bipolar resistive switching, synaptic plasticity and non-volatile memory effects in the solution-processed zinc oxide thin film. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc. 2020, 106, 104769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Petrović, Ž.; Ristić, M.S. Musić Development of ZnO microstructures produced by rapid hydrolysis of zinc acetylacetonate. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 10953–10959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ambrožič, G.; Škapin, S.D.; Žigon, M.; Orel, Z.C. The synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles from zinc acetylacetonate hydrate and 1-butanol or isobutanol. J. Coll. Interface Sci. 2010, 346, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ruqia, B.; Nam, K.M.; Lee, H.; Lee, G.; Choi, S.-I. Facile synthesis of highly crystalline ZnO nanorods with controlled aspect ratios and their optical properties. CrystEngComm 2017, 19, 1454–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yathindranath, V.; Worden, M.; Sun, Z.; Miller, D.W.; Hegmann, T. A general synthesis of metal (Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn) oxide and silica nanoparticles based on a low temperature reduction/hydrolysis pathway. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 23722–23729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sodhi, R.K.; Paul, S. An overview of metal acetylacetonates: Developing areas/routes to new materials and applications in organic syntheses. Catal. Surv. Asia 2018, 22, 31–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bidier, S.A.; Hashim, M.R.; Al-Diabat, A.M.; Bououdina, M. Effect of growth time on Ti-doped ZnO nanorods prepared by low-temperature chemical bath deposition. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2017, 88, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Allen, J.A.; Murugesan, D.; Viswanathan, C. Circumferential growth of zinc oxide nanostructure anchored over carbon fabric and its photocatalytic performance towards p-nitrophenol. Superlattices Microstruct. 2019, 125, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wong, E.W.; Maynor, B.W.; Burns, L.D.; Lieber, C.M. Growth of metal carbide nanotubes and nanorods. Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 2041–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rudolph, G.; Henry, M.C. The thermal decomposition of zinc acetylacetonate hydrate. Inorg. Chem. 1964, 3, 1317–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sunandan, B.; Joydeep, D. Hydrothermal growth of ZnO nanostructures. Sci. Technol. Adv.Mater. 2009, 10, 013001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Laudise, R.; Ballman, A. Hydrothermal synthesis of zinc oxide and zinc sulfide1. J. Phys. Chem. 1960, 64, 688–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shigematsu, T.; Tabushi, M. Extraction Behavior of Metal Acetylacetonates. Bull. Inst. Chem. Res. 1961, 39, 35–42. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/75786 (accessed on 1 September 2019).
  38. Qiu, J.; Li, X.; He, W.; Park, S.J.; Kim, H.-K.; Hwang, Y.-H.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, Y.D. The growth mechanism and optical properties of ultralong ZnO nanorod arrays with a high aspect ratio by a preheating hydrothermal method. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 155603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, Y.; Sun, P.; Gao, C.; Yang, T.; Huang, Q. Growth and characterization of c-axis titled ZnO thin film by radio frequency magnetron sputtering. Mater. Exp. 2020, 10, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dahnoun, M.; Attaf, A.; Saidi, H.; Yahia, A.; Khelifi, C. Structural, optical and electrical properties of zinc oxide thin films deposited by sol-gel spin coating technique. Optik 2017, 134, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Muchuweni, E.; Sathiaraj, T.S.; Nyakotyo, H. Effect of annealing on the microstructural, optical and electrical properties of ZnO nanowires by hydrothermal synthesis for transparent electrode fabrication. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2018, 227, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sannakashappanavar, B.S.; Byrareddy, C.R.; Kumar, P.S.; Yadav, A.B. Seed layer effect on different properties and UV detection capability of hydrothermally grown ZnO nanorods over SiO2/p-Si substrate. Superlattices Microstruct. 2018, 117, 503–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mamat, M.H.; Khusaimi, Z.; Musa, M.Z.; Sahdan, M.Z.; Rusop, M. Novel synthesis of aligned Zinc oxide nanorods on a glass substrate by sonicated sol–gel immersion. Mater. Lett. 2010, 64, 1211–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jagadale, S.B.; Patil, V.L.; Vanalakar, S.A.; Patil, P.S.; Deshmukh, H.P. Preparation, characterization of 1D ZnO nanorods and their gas sensing properties. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 3333–3340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ahsanulhaq, Q.; Umar, A.; Hahn, Y.B. Growth of aligned ZnO nanorods and nanopencils on ZnO/Si in aqueous solution: Growth mechanism and structural and optical properties. Nanotechnology 2007, 18, 115603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, Y.; Dai, Y. Controlled Growth and Optical Properties of Zinc Oxide Nanostructures. In Nanowires and Nanobelts: Materials, Properties and Devices Volume 2: Nanowires and Nanobelts of Functional Materials; Wang, Z.L., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2003; pp. 139–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Do, T.A.T.; Giang, H.T.; Ngan, P.Q.; Thai, G.H.; Lam, T.D. Correlation between photoluminescence spectra with gas sensing and photocatalytic activities in hierarchical ZnO nanostructures. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 9826–9832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jung, M.H.; .Lee, H. Selective patterning of ZnO nanorods on silicon substrates using nanoimprint lithography. Nanosc. Lett. 2011, 6, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Materials 13 01136 g001 550
Figure 1. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images of the ZnO NRs after immersion time of (a) 0.5 h, (b) 2 h, and (c) 4 h with different magnification in between their morphological and cross-sectional images.
Figure 1. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images of the ZnO NRs after immersion time of (a) 0.5 h, (b) 2 h, and (c) 4 h with different magnification in between their morphological and cross-sectional images.
Materials 13 01136 g001
Materials 13 01136 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) 3D atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of ZnO-coated SiO2/Si substrate deposited using the spin coating technique, and (b) the surface roughness.
Figure 2. (a) 3D atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of ZnO-coated SiO2/Si substrate deposited using the spin coating technique, and (b) the surface roughness.
Materials 13 01136 g002
Materials 13 01136 g003 550
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of ZnO NRs and ZnO seed layer.
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of ZnO NRs and ZnO seed layer.
Materials 13 01136 g003
Materials 13 01136 g004 550
Figure 4. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of ZnO NRs synthesized for 2 h at (a) low magnification TEM image, (b) high magnification TEM image, and (c) the selected area of electron diffraction (SAED) pattern, obtained at 120 kV.
Figure 4. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of ZnO NRs synthesized for 2 h at (a) low magnification TEM image, (b) high magnification TEM image, and (c) the selected area of electron diffraction (SAED) pattern, obtained at 120 kV.
Materials 13 01136 g004
Materials 13 01136 g005 550
Figure 5. Schematic illustration of the possible growth mechanism of the ZnO NRs synthesized using the acetylacetonates-assisted hydrothermal method.
Figure 5. Schematic illustration of the possible growth mechanism of the ZnO NRs synthesized using the acetylacetonates-assisted hydrothermal method.
Materials 13 01136 g005
Materials 13 01136 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Metal-semiconductor-metal structure used to measure electrical properties of the ZnO NRs, with its morphological FESEM image. (b) I–V curve of the ZnO NRs at different immersion time of 0.5 h and 2 h. Inset shows an illustration of electron movement in ZnO NRs.
Figure 6. (a) Metal-semiconductor-metal structure used to measure electrical properties of the ZnO NRs, with its morphological FESEM image. (b) I–V curve of the ZnO NRs at different immersion time of 0.5 h and 2 h. Inset shows an illustration of electron movement in ZnO NRs.
Materials 13 01136 g006
Materials 13 01136 g007 550
Figure 7. The UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectrum of ZnO NRs obtained at an immersion time of 2 h. Inset shows the Tauc plot of the spectrum.
Figure 7. The UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectrum of ZnO NRs obtained at an immersion time of 2 h. Inset shows the Tauc plot of the spectrum.
Materials 13 01136 g007
Materials 13 01136 g008 550
Figure 8. The PL spectrum of ZnO NRs obtained at an immersion time of 2 h.
Figure 8. The PL spectrum of ZnO NRs obtained at an immersion time of 2 h.
Materials 13 01136 g008
Table
Table 1. Minimal immersion time to grow ZnO nanorods (NRs) on a seeded substrate using various types of precursors with their dimensionality of obtained nanorods.
Table 1. Minimal immersion time to grow ZnO nanorods (NRs) on a seeded substrate using various types of precursors with their dimensionality of obtained nanorods.
No.PrecursorImmersion Time (h)Length of Nanorods (µm)Diameter of Nanorods (nm)Aspect Ratio (Length/Diameter)Ref.
1Nitrate40.645109.96[13]
2NitrateN/A 11.2~2305[22]
3Nitrate42~15014[23]
4Nitrate34~150 27[24]
5Acetate40.15–0.4050-608[2]
6Acetate64N/A 1-[25]
7Acetylacetonate21.6~4040this work
1 not reported.
Table
Table 2. The summary of length and diameter of prepared ZnO NRs at different immersion time.
Table 2. The summary of length and diameter of prepared ZnO NRs at different immersion time.
Immersion Time (h)Length (µm)Diameter (nm)Aspect Ratio (Length/Diameter)
0.50.9~2536
21.6~4040
41.6~4040

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

A Karim, S.S.; Takamura, Y.; Tue, P.T.; Tung, N.T.; Kazmi, J.; Dee, C.F.; Yeop Majlis, B.; Mohamed, M.A. Developing Conductive Highly Ordered Zinc Oxide Nanorods by Acetylacetonate-Assisted Growth. Materials 2020, 13, 1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13051136

AMA Style

A Karim SS, Takamura Y, Tue PT, Tung NT, Kazmi J, Dee CF, Yeop Majlis B, Mohamed MA. Developing Conductive Highly Ordered Zinc Oxide Nanorods by Acetylacetonate-Assisted Growth. Materials. 2020; 13(5):1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13051136

Chicago/Turabian Style

A Karim, Siti Shafura, Yuzuru Takamura, Phan Trong Tue, Nguyen Thanh Tung, Jamal Kazmi, Chang Fu Dee, Burhanuddin Yeop Majlis, and Mohd Ambri Mohamed. 2020. "Developing Conductive Highly Ordered Zinc Oxide Nanorods by Acetylacetonate-Assisted Growth" Materials 13, no. 5: 1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13051136

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop