Diisoamyl (1 R , 4 S )-7-oxabicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-ene-2,3-dicarboxylate

: Diisoamyl (1 R ,4 S )-7-oxabicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-ene-2,3-dicarboxylate ( 2 ) was prepared by reacting exo -7-oxabicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-ene-2,3-dicarboxylic anhydride ( 1 ) with isoamyl alcohol in the presence of a sulfuric acid catalyst under sonication conditions. Compound 2 was characterized by 1 H, 13 C NMR, DEPT-135, infrared, and UV-vis spectroscopy. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, elemental analysis, and melting point determination were used to assess purity. The structure of compound 2 was also determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. It crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2 1 /c (14) with cell values of a = 15.5647(3) Å, b = 12.8969(2) Å, c = 9.0873(2) Å; β = 99.3920(10) ◦ .


Results and Discussion
Compound 2 was prepared from a modified procedure (Figure 2) that called for the reaction of exo-7-oxabicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-ene-2,3-dicarboxylic (1) with methanol under HCl catalysis and refluxing for two hours [13].The reaction times were too excessive to accommodate the time allotted for laboratory classes [14].Indeed, the Fisher Esterification reaction is hampered by its small equilibrium constant (keq = ~4); thus, several strategies have historically been employed to improve the yield of the ester product, which include increased reaction temperatures, use of a catalyst, conducting the reaction in excess alcohol, and the removal of water using a Dean-Stark apparatus or desiccants [15].Notably the condensation reaction rate retards with increasing steric bulk of the alcohol or carboxylic acid; therefore, forming compound 2 using this method would prove difficult.To overcome these deficiencies, we adopted sonication techniques [16] to exploit the properties of cavitation chemistry that have been theorized to produce microscopic zones of extreme temperatures and pressures [17].In concert with sonication, super absorbent polymer beads (sodium polyacrylate beads, Jelly Marbles ® ) were used as a desiccant to drive the reaction to product formation.To our knowledge, this is the first use of these conditions in the Fisher Esterification reaction.Compound 2 was successfully prepared by reacting isoamyl alcohol with compound 1 and a catalytic amount of sulfuric acid in the presence of gel beads under sonication at 49 °C for 30 minutes (Figure 2).After workup compound 2 was isolated as colorless thin crystals in ~20% yield.It should be noted that conducting the reaction under thermal conditions (no sonication) promoted the retro-Diels-Alder reaction to produce diisoamyl maleate and its hydrolyzed product, maleic acid.This decomposition becomes more problematic with temperatures above 50 °C.It should also be noted that methyl, ethyl, and isopropyl analogs of the 7-oxanorbornene diesters can be prepared using these standard conditions.

Results and Discussion
Compound 2 was prepared from a modified procedure (Figure 2) that called for the reaction of exo-7-oxabicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-ene-2,3-dicarboxylic (1) with methanol under HCl catalysis and refluxing for two hours [13].The reaction times were too excessive to accommodate the time allotted for laboratory classes [14].Indeed, the Fisher Esterification reaction is hampered by its small equilibrium constant (k eq = ~4); thus, several strategies have historically been employed to improve the yield of the ester product, which include increased reaction temperatures, use of a catalyst, conducting the reaction in excess alcohol, and the removal of water using a Dean-Stark apparatus or desiccants [15].Notably, the condensation reaction rate retards with increasing steric bulk of the alcohol or carboxylic acid; therefore, forming compound 2 using this method would prove difficult.To overcome these deficiencies, we adopted sonication techniques [16] to exploit the properties of cavitation chemistry that have been theorized to produce microscopic zones of extreme temperatures and pressures [17].In concert with sonication, super absorbent polymer beads (sodium polyacrylate beads, Jelly Marbles ® ) were used as a desiccant to drive the reaction to product formation.To our knowledge, this is the first use of these conditions in the Fisher Esterification reaction.Compound 2 was successfully prepared by reacting isoamyl alcohol with compound 1 and a catalytic amount of sulfuric acid in the presence of gel beads under sonication at 49 • C for 30 min (Figure 2).After workup, compound 2 was isolated as colorless thin crystals in ~20% yield.It should be noted that conducting the reaction under thermal conditions (no sonication) promoted the retro-Diels-Alder reaction to produce diisoamyl maleate and its hydrolyzed product, maleic acid.This decomposition becomes more problematic with temperatures above 50 • C. It should also be noted that methyl, ethyl, and isopropyl analogs of the 7-oxanorbornene diesters can be prepared using these standard conditions.

Results and Discussion
Compound 2 was prepared from a modified procedure (Figure 2) that called for the reaction of exo-7-oxabicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-ene-2,3-dicarboxylic (1) with methanol under HCl catalysis and refluxing for two hours [13].The reaction times were too excessive to accommodate the time allotted for laboratory classes [14].Indeed, the Fisher Esterification reaction is hampered by its small equilibrium constant (keq = ~4); thus, several strategies have historically been employed to improve the yield of the ester product, which include increased reaction temperatures, use of a catalyst, conducting the reaction in excess alco hol, and the removal of water using a Dean-Stark apparatus or desiccants [15].Notably the condensation reaction rate retards with increasing steric bulk of the alcohol or carbox ylic acid; therefore, forming compound 2 using this method would prove difficult.To overcome these deficiencies, we adopted sonication techniques [16] to exploit the proper ties of cavitation chemistry that have been theorized to produce microscopic zones of ex treme temperatures and pressures [17].In concert with sonication, super absorbent poly mer beads (sodium polyacrylate beads, Jelly Marbles ® ) were used as a desiccant to drive the reaction to product formation.To our knowledge, this is the first use of these condi tions in the Fisher Esterification reaction.Compound 2 was successfully prepared by re acting isoamyl alcohol with compound 1 and a catalytic amount of sulfuric acid in the presence of gel beads under sonication at 49 °C for 30 minutes (Figure 2).After workup compound 2 was isolated as colorless thin crystals in ~20% yield.It should be noted tha conducting the reaction under thermal conditions (no sonication) promoted the retro Diels-Alder reaction to produce diisoamyl maleate and its hydrolyzed product, maleic acid.This decomposition becomes more problematic with temperatures above 50 °C.I should also be noted that methyl, ethyl, and isopropyl analogs of the 7-oxanorbornene diesters can be prepared using these standard conditions.

X-ray Diffraction Studies
Compound 2 was examined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (Figure 3).

X-ray Diffraction Studies
Compound 2 was examined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (Figure 3).), to 3363 unique (R int = 0.0487, R sigma = 0.0262), which were used in all calculations.The final R 1 was 0.0494 (I > 2σ(I)) and wR 2 was 0.1441 (all data).Despite the numerous reports of 7-oxanorbornene diesters, a perusal of the literature reveals a paucity of their structural reports [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].More surprisingly, only the methyl version has been reported [18][19][20][21].Thus, this structural report of compound 2 joins the somewhat rare cohort of structurally characterized compounds.The structure of compound 2 displays a bicyclic 7-oxanorbornene unit with protruding isoamyl groups that dominate the structure.The carbonyl groups are tilted in the same direction, causing the carbonyl oxygen atom (O3) to have close intramolecular contact (2.986 Å) with the O2 atom of the adjacent ester moiety.The tilting of the carbonyls is likely an artifact to lessen the intramolecular electronic interactions between the adjacent diesters' oxygen atoms (O1•••O3 = 3.416 Å and O2•••O4 = 3.257 Å).This was also observed with the previously reported dimethyl 7-oxanorbornene diester [18][19][20][21]; however, the carbonyl oxygen atoms were a bit closer (O•••O = 3.345 Å) as compared to compound 2.Moreover, the intramolecular contact between the carbonyl oxygen atom of one ester is farther away from the ester oxygen atom of the adjacent ester (3.133 Å) in the dimethyl version as compared to compound 2. Canonically, compound 2 would be expected to be a meso compound with C s symmetry; however, the titling carbonyl groups and the different rotational conformations of the isoamyl groups in the single-crystal X-ray structure of compound 2 cause the molecule to be asymmetric.The bond distances and angles of compound 2 are typical and similar to previously known 7-oxanorbornene diesters and diacids [18][19][20][21].A list of structural data is shown in Table 1.
surprisingly, only the methyl version has been reported [18][19][20][21].Thus, this structural report of compound 2 joins the somewhat rare cohort of structurally characterized compounds.The structure of compound 2 displays a bicyclic 7-oxanorbornene unit with protruding isoamyl groups that dominate the structure.The carbonyl groups are tilted in the same direction, causing the carbonyl oxygen atom (O3) to have close intramolecular contact (2.986 Å) with the O2 atom of the adjacent ester moiety.The tilting of the carbonyls is likely an artifact to lessen the intramolecular electronic interactions between the adjacent diesters' oxygen atoms (O1‧‧‧O3 = 3.416 Å and O2‧‧‧O4 = 3.257 Å).This was also observed with the previously reported dimethyl 7-oxanorbornene diester [18][19][20][21]; however, the carbonyl oxygen atoms were a bit closer (O‧‧‧O = 3.345 Å) as compared to compound 2.Moreover, the intramolecular contact between the carbonyl oxygen atom of one ester is farther away from the ester oxygen atom of the adjacent ester (3.133 Å) in the dimethyl version as compared to compound 2. Canonically, compound 2 would be expected to be a meso compound with Cs symmetry; however, the titling carbonyl groups and the different rotational conformations of the isoamyl groups in the single-crystal X-ray structure of compound 2 cause the molecule to be asymmetric.The bond distances and angles of compound 2 are typical and similar to previously known 7-oxanorbornene diesters and diacids [18][19][20][21].A list of structural data is shown in Table 1.The packing of compound 2 (Figure 4) shows the molecules forming head-to-tail sheets in the a-b plane, which in turn form layers in the c-direction that are stitched together with short contacts between O3…H5-C5 and O1…H2-C2 of neighboring molecules.The intermolecular interactions of compound 2 were further investigated through a quantitative analysis of the Hirshfeld surface, visualized using the Crystal Explorer 21  The packing of compound 2 (Figure 4) shows the molecules forming head-to-tail sheets in the a-b plane, which in turn form layers in the c-direction that are stitched together with short contacts between O3. ..H5-C5 and O1. ..H2-C2 of neighboring molecules.The intermolecular interactions of compound 2 were further investigated through a quantitative analysis of the Hirshfeld surface, visualized using the Crystal Explorer 21 software package [22].The Hirshfeld surfaces of the molecules were mapped with the function d norm (Figure 5).This figure color codes the contacts, with red being shorter than the sums of vdW radii, blue longer than the sums of vdW radii, and white areas approximately equal to vdW.For compound 2, the most intense red spots correspond to the intermolecular contacts between O1 and H2 [2.3029 (11) Å], and between O3 and H5 [2.4384 (11) Å].Analysis of the two-dimensional fingerprint plot [23] indicates that H. ..H contacts are the most common in this structure, representing 75.2% of the intermolecular contacts.O. ..H contacts make the second-highest contribution, representing 21.7% of the contacts.The other types of contacts combined represent less than 10% of the contacts.
software package [22].The Hirshfeld surfaces of the molecules were mapped with the function dnorm (Figure 5).This figure color codes the contacts, with red being shorter than the sums of vdW radii, blue longer than the sums of vdW radii, and white areas approximately equal to vdW.For compound 2, the most intense red spots correspond to the intermolecular contacts between O1 and H2 [2.3029 (11) Å], and between O3 and H5 [2.4384 (11) Å].Analysis of the two-dimensional fingerprint plot [23] indicates that H…H contacts are the most common in this structure, representing 75.2% of the intermolecular contacts.O…H contacts make the second-highest contribution, representing 21.7% of the contacts.The other types of contacts combined represent less than 10% of the contacts.

Spectroscopy and Characterization
The 1 H and 13 C nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of compound 2 correlate well with its structure.The protons on the bicyclic, 7-oxanorbornene scaffold all appear as singlets software package [22].The Hirshfeld surfaces of the molecules were mapped with the function dnorm (Figure 5).This figure color codes the contacts, with red being shorter than the sums of vdW radii, blue longer than the sums of vdW radii, and white areas approximately equal to vdW.For compound 2, the most intense red spots correspond to the intermolecular contacts between O1 and H2 [2.3029 (11) Å], and between O3 and H5 [2.4384 (11) Å].Analysis of the two-dimensional fingerprint plot [23] indicates that H…H contacts are the most common in this structure, representing 75.2% of the intermolecular contacts.O…H contacts make the second-highest contribution, representing 21.7% of the contacts.The other types of contacts combined represent less than 10% of the contacts.

Spectroscopy and Characterization
The 1 H and 13 C nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of compound 2 correlate well with its structure.The protons on the bicyclic, 7-oxanorbornene scaffold all appear as singlets

Spectroscopy and Characterization
The 1 H and 13 C nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of compound 2 correlate well with its structure.The protons on the bicyclic, 7-oxanorbornene scaffold all appear as singlets at 6.49, 5.24, and 2.78 ppm owing to a lack of magnetic spin information exchange from neighboring protons.This is due to improper 3 J(H-C-C-H) dihedral angles (ϕ) required for coupling.The Karplus equation states that strong 3 J coupling is observed when the ϕ of the H-C-C-H orbitals are parallel (synperiplanar (0-30 • )or antiperiplanar (150-180 • )).Weak coupling occurs when the ϕ of the H-C-C-H bonds is between 60 and 120 • [24].The protons for the methylene groups (OCH 2 ) attached to the ester oxygen atom are diastereotopic and appear as a complicated multiplet with second-order spin couplings representing the behavior of an ABXY system (4.10 ppm).Though diastereotopic, the other methylene group appears as a simple quartet (1.51 ppm), despite the differing chemical environments of its neighboring protons.The resonances for the remaining protons of the isopropyl fragment are as expected (nonet and doublet, CH(CH 3 ) 2 ).The 13 C NMR of compound 2 (see Supplementary Materials) shows the expected eight resonance signals with the carbonyl and alkene carbons appearing far downfield (171.62 and 136.72 ppm, respectively).It would be expected that the tertiary methine carbon would be more downfield that of a methylene group; however, a DEPT-135 experiment revealed the methylene group of the CH 2 CH(CH 3 ) 2 fragment is more downfield (37.33 ppm) than the methine carbon (25.18 ppm).The infrared spectrum of compound 2 shows strong stretches at 2958 (sp 2 ) and 2932 (sp 3 ) cm -1 indicative of alkyl groups.The diagnostic carbonyl stretch occurs at 1737 cm −1 .The alkene displays a strong stretch at 1463 cm −1 .The stretch at 1189 cm −1 correlates to the C-O stretch of the ester, while the stretch at 1149 cm −1 represents the C-O stretch of the bridging ether unit of the 7-oxanorbornene.The UV-vis spectrum of compound 2 shows a λ max of 240 nm (log ε = 1.84) due to the π-π* transition of the carbonyl and another absorption at 278 nm (log ε = 1.43) due to its n-π* transition.Analysis of compound 2 using GC-MS with electron impact ionization does not show the molecular ion, which is common for long-chain esters due to McLafferty rearrangements and other cleavages [25].The base peak at m/z = 71 is the isoamyl group fragment.Another prominent fragment at m/z = 117 matches that of a maleic acid unit as a result of a retro-Diels-Alder rearrangement and cleavage of the isoamyl groups.A less prominent fragment with m/z = 187 is likely the intact doubly protonated 7-oxabicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-ene-2,3dicarboxylic acid.Compound 2 has a melting point of 76-78.2• C, which is lower than that reported for its dimethyl congener (dimethyl (1R,4S)-7-oxabicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-ene-2,3dicarboxylate) (120 • C) [14].The comparatively lower melting point of compound 2 results from the branched isoamyl group, which lessens intermolecular interactions.

General
All chemicals were purchased from commercial sources and used as received unless otherwise noted.Exo-7-oxabicyclo[2.2.1] hept-5-ene-2,3-dicarboxylic anhydride (1) was prepared by literature methods [11].Ultrasonic reactions were conducted in a Fisher Scientific Fisherbrand ® sonicator (Model FUB20LD) ( Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) at a frequency of 40 KHz with a power rating of 400 W. All NMR spectra were recorded on a JEOL ECS300 FT 300 MHz spectrometer(JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).All 1 H and 13 C {1H} NMR spectra were referenced against residual signals of the deuterated solvent and chemical shifts were recorded in ppm (δ).Coupling constants (J HH values) were reported in Hz.All UV-vis spectra were recorded on a Cary 100 UV-vis double-beam instrument (Agilent Technologies, Inc. Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a multicellchanger.Stock solutions of the complexes were diluted (10 mg of compound 2 in 3 mL solvent) in chloroform and scanned from 200-350 nm at room temperature.Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) samples were recorded on a Shimadzu GC-2010 gas chromometer with a quadrupole mass spectrometer (QP2010SE) (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) using an Agilent 191015-44 column (Agilent Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA).All GC-MS samples were introduced via split injection with a two-min hold time at 50 • C and a temperature ramp of 15 • C/min over a range of 50-250 • C. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction measurements were performed on a Rigaku XtaLab Synergy-i diffractometer (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Cu micro-focused source at 1.5418 Å and a HyPix Bantam detector (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).Infrared spectra were recorded on a PerkinElmer Spectrum-100 FTIR (PerkinElmer, Shelton, MA, USA) using ATR methods.Melting point determinations were recorded on a Reach Device RD-MP digital melting point apparatus (Reach Devices, LLC., Boulder, CO, USA).Elemental analyses were performed at Atlantic Microlab, Inc., Norcross, GA, USA.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Line reaction for the formation of compound 2.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Line reaction for the formation of compound 2.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Line reaction for the formation of compound 2.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Packing of compound 2, viewed down the c-axis.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Packing of compound 2, viewed down the c-axis.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Packing of compound 2, viewed down the c-axis.