Routes of Soil Uses and Conversions with the Main Crops in Brazilian Cerrado: A Scenario from 2000 to 2020

: The Brazilian Savannah, also known as Cerrado Biome, is a hotspot for Brazilian biodiversity. The hypothesis tested in this study is that there are diverse routes of soil uses for agriculture production in Cerrado, derived mainly from areas with pasture (natural and planted) due to the decrease in Cerrado deforestation in the last 20 years (from 2000 to 2020). The aim of this study was (i) to determine the proﬁle of crop production in Brazilian Cerrado; (ii) to demonstrate the routes of soil uses during the last 20 years; (iii) to demonstrate the increase of soybean and corn production in Cerrado. The design of the study was based on data of (i) the accumulation of biomass and carbon in Cerrado; (ii) production area and yield of corn, soybean, coffee, sugarcane, cotton, and pasture (natu-ral and planted); (iii) Cerrado deforestation. Results showed that the vegetation of Cerrado promotes a higher accumulation of biomass and carbon on the subsurface, followed by accumulation in the surface, deadwood, and litter. In the last 20 years, there has been a reduction of 75% in deforestation and an increase of 66% in crop areas and 78% in crop yield. However, there was no clear reduction in deforestation speciﬁcally in the Matopiba region. In Minas Gerais/MG, Goi á s/GO, and Mato Grosso/MT, there were higher productions of coffee/MG, soybean/MT, corn/MT, sugarcane/MG-GO, and cotton/MT. Planted pasture (and not natural pasture) covered the larger areas, representing 75% of the total area with pasture. The low routes of soil uses from deforestation to (i) planted pasture and (ii) crop production explained the decrease in deforestation. The increases in yield and crop areas are explained by the routes from pasture (planted and natural) to agriculture. Our results provided clear insights that programs of Cerrado preservation should continue the decrease of deforestation with the sustainable development in agriculture, mainly in the Matopiba region where there was no clear decrease in deforestation in the last 20 years.


Introduction
The exploitation and conservation of natural resources are frequently discussed globally, mainly in developing countries (like Brazil), due to the pressure of progress and rapid economic development [1]. Between 1990 and 2000, the deforestation rate was 8 million ha yr −1 in tropical forests [2], and 6 million ha yr −1 in humid tropical forests [3,4]. Meyfroidt and Lambin showed that the global rates of tropical deforestation are decreasing (after 2000) with a tendency to transition from deforestation to reforestation. However, between August 2018 and July 2019, the Amazônia and Cerrado lost 16.1 thousand km 2 of forest, both biomes located in Brazil [5].
Cerrado is the Portuguese word that describes central Brazil's plateau with woodlands, savannas, grasslands, galleries, and dry forests [6]. Cerrado occupies about 24% of the Brazilian territory, with approximately 200 million hectares [7]. The vegetation is formed by the combination of different structural forms divided into five main types: (i) campo limpo (Cerrado grassland); (ii) campo sujo (Cerrado shrubland); (iii) campo Cerrado (low tree (natural and planted) and deforestation from 2000 to 2020 ( Figure 1). The profile was focused on production of food (corn, soybean, coffee, and sugarcane) and fiber (cotton), and pasture in Minas Gerais, Goiás, Mato Grosso, Tocantins, Maranhão, Bahia, Mato Grosso do Sul, and Piauí. We did not consider São Paulo and Distrito Federal data due to the low percentage of Brazilian Cerrado area. Figure 1. Design of study with the production profile of food (corn, soybean, sugarcane, and sugarcane) and fiber (cotton), and pasture (natural and planted) in Brazilian Cerrado from 2000 to 2020.

Cerrado Deforestation
Cerrado characterization was based on the technical report developed by the Brazilian Ministry of the Environment [21]. Data of biomass and carbon were collected to demonstrate the accumulation in the surface, subsurface, deadwood, litter, and total (sum). The biomass ratio in the surface, subsurface, deadwood, and litter was calculated using Equation (1). Where AB is the accumulated biomass (Mg dry matter ha −1 ); CB is the accumulated carbon in biomass (Mg C ha −1 ).
Ratio biomass C (Mg C −1 ) = AB⁄CB (1) The annual deforestation of Cerrado was monitored from 2000 to 2020. The data from 2000 and 2020 were collected from the PRODES program for monitoring vegetation suppression (PRODES-Cerrado), developed by the INPE (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais), and available in Terrabrasilis [22]. PRODES-Cerrado presents accurate and reliable data [9,23]. We calculated the total deforestation of Cerrado by summing of data from 2000 to 2020 in all states. Deforestation was considered when there was a conversion of natural areas with forest formations into other land use categories using Landsat-5 satellite data images with a spatial resolution of about 30 m by 30 m. The forests were characterized as an area with a predominance of tree species with canopy formation.

Agriculture Characterization
The data of area and yield were collected from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, IBGE [24], and National Supply Company, CONAB [25]. Data of area and yield of sugarcane (stalk yield) and cotton were monitored in the Sidra platform of the IBGE, while the data of area and yield of soybean, corn, and coffee (all grains) were monitored in the historic series in the CONAB. The corn data were separated into corn produced in summer (1 st crop) and corn produced in winter (2nd crop).

Cerrado Deforestation
Cerrado characterization was based on the technical report developed by the Brazilian Ministry of the Environment [21]. Data of biomass and carbon were collected to demonstrate the accumulation in the surface, subsurface, deadwood, litter, and total (sum). The biomass ratio in the surface, subsurface, deadwood, and litter was calculated using Equation (1). Where AB is the accumulated biomass (Mg dry matter ha −1 ); CB is the accumulated carbon in biomass (Mg C ha −1 ).

Ratio biomass C (Mg C
The annual deforestation of Cerrado was monitored from 2000 to 2020. The data from 2000 and 2020 were collected from the PRODES program for monitoring vegetation suppression (PRODES-Cerrado), developed by the INPE (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais), and available in Terrabrasilis [22]. PRODES-Cerrado presents accurate and reliable data [9,23]. We calculated the total deforestation of Cerrado by summing of data from 2000 to 2020 in all states. Deforestation was considered when there was a conversion of natural areas with forest formations into other land use categories using Landsat-5 satellite data images with a spatial resolution of about 30 m by 30 m. The forests were characterized as an area with a predominance of tree species with canopy formation.

Agriculture Characterization
The data of area and yield were collected from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, IBGE [24], and National Supply Company, CONAB [25]. Data of area and yield of sugarcane (stalk yield) and cotton were monitored in the Sidra platform of the IBGE, while the data of area and yield of soybean, corn, and coffee (all grains) were monitored in the historic series in the CONAB. The corn data were separated into corn produced in summer (1st crop) and corn produced in winter (2nd crop).
Data of pasture areas were obtained in the agricultural census of IBGE, separated into natural and planted pasture in Cerrado, considered as (i) natural pasture, areas with no Land 2021, 10, 1135 4 of 16 pasture planting, even if it had been cleaned, graded, used, or destined for grazing animals; (ii) planted pasture, corresponding to the planted area or area in preparation for the grazing of animals existing in the establishment. Available data of natural and planted pasture were obtained from 1996, 2006, and 2017, and we used models to demonstrate the reality from 2000 to 2020 (Table S1). Data of pasture separated into natural, no degraded planted pasture, and degraded planted pasture were obtained from 2006 in the IBGE agricultural census in the IBGE Sidra platform. Such monitoring was not performed in other years. No degraded planted pasture included pasture in the process of recovery; degraded pasture included areas with erosion, invasive plants, and termite mounds.

Calculus and Data Analyses
The quality of the dataset was tested using the data normality (Shapiro-Wilk test; p < 0.05) and homogeneity of variance (Bartlett test; p < 0.05). The annual variabilities of deforestation, agriculture soil used, and pasture were tested by the linear and quadratic models. When the determination coefficient (R 2 ) of the models was higher than 70%, the model more parsimonious to explain the annual dynamics was used.
The routes of deforestation, pasture (natural and planted), and crops were monitored using the data of all years and states. The data of deforestation and pasture were used as roots and correlated with crops (Pearson correlation test; p < 0.01), representing the results in the tree grafo (adapted). The routes between crops were linearly correlated and represented by Hamiltonian Cycle (Hamiltonian route), described as a closed grafo where every k-apex is visited exactly once. The k-apexes in both route analyses were represented by a percentual increase from 2000 to 2020.
All statistical analysis was performed in R (version 4.0.0; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and Python (version 3.8.3; Python Software Foundation, Wilmington, DE, USA).

Cerrado Vegetation
In Cerrado, there was a total biomass accumulation of 164.5 Mg dry matter ha −1 with higher biomass accumulation on the subsurface (64.3 Mg dry matter ha −1 ), followed by accumulation in the surface (48.4 Mg dry matter ha −1 ), litter (26.3 Mg dry matter ha −1 ), and deadwood (25.7 Mg dry matter ha −1 ), Figure 2A.
In 20 years, there was total deforestation of 290,631 km 2 , with higher deforestation in MG, GO, and MT with a total of 45,676, 45,957, and 47,225 km 2 , respectively. The lower deforestations were noticed in MS and PI with a total of 20,033 and 16,275 km 2 , respectively ( Figure 3A).
The annual deforestation fitted a quadratic response with a decrease in deforestation from 2000 to 2020, representing a reduction of 75%, from 29,233 km 2 in 2000 to 7038 km 2 in 2020 (R 2 : 89%). The highest deforestation occurred between 2000 and 2004 with a total area of 115,740 km 2 deforested, representing 40% of total deforestation in the last 20 years ( Figure 3B).
In MG, GO, MT, and MS, there was a quadratic reduction in deforestation from 2000 to 2020 with an R 2 higher than 82%, and a respective reduction of 93%, 90%, 77%, and 78% ( Figure 4). However, there was a linear reduction in deforestation in BA from 2288 km 2 in 2000 to 781 km 2 in 2000, representing a reduction of 65%. In contrast, there was constant     In MG, GO, MT, and MS, there was a quadratic reduction in deforestation from 2000 to 2020 with an R 2 higher than 82%, and a respective reduction of 93%, 90%, 77%, and 78% ( Figure 4). However, there was a linear reduction in deforestation in BA from 2288 km 2 in 2000 to 781 km 2 in 2000, representing a reduction of 65%. In contrast, there was constant deforestation in TO, MA, and PI with an annual average of 2217, 2001, and 817 km 2 , respectively ( Figure 4).

Agriculture Characterization
In Cerrado, there was an increase of 66% in agricultural land with soybean, corn, cotton, sugarcane, and coffee from 2000 to 2020, corresponding to 13,630 thousand hectares in 2000 to 40,319 thousand hectares in 2020 ( Figure 5).

Agriculture Characterization
In Cerrado, there was an increase of 66% in agricultural land with soybean, corn, cotton, sugarcane, and coffee from 2000 to 2020, corresponding to 13,630 thousand hectares in 2000 to 40,319 thousand hectares in 2020 ( Figure 5).
Soybean and corn occupied the largest crop production areas in the last 20 years, with a total production area of 22,646 and 11,874 thousand hectares in 2020, corresponding to an annual average of 16,168 and 8025 thousand ha year −1 (Table S2).
MT was the main area responsible for the production of soybean and corn with an annual area of 7275 and 2651 thousand ha year −1 , respectively (Table S2). In MT, there was a linear increase in the annual production area of soybean and corn from 2000 to 2020, representing a respective increase of 70% and 90% ( Figure 5A,B). Soybean and corn occupied the largest crop production areas in the last 20 years, with a total production area of 22,646 and 11,874 thousand hectares in 2020, corresponding to an annual average of 16,168 and 8025 thousand ha year −1 (Table S2).
MT was the main area responsible for the production of soybean and corn with an annual area of 7275 and 2651 thousand ha year −1 , respectively (Table S2). In MT, there was a linear increase in the annual production area of soybean and corn from 2000 to 2020, representing a respective increase of 70% and 90% ( Figure 5A,B).
For coffee, MG had the higher production area with an average of 1004 thousand hectares year −1 (Table S2; Figure 5C). The areas targeted to sugarcane presented an increase after 2008, mainly in MG, GO, and MS, with 35%, 56%, and 65%, respectively, comparing the data from 2008 to 2020 ( Figure 5D).
There were higher areas with cotton in MT and BA with a constant area of 565 and 266 thousand hectares year −1 , respectively ( Figure 5E). In general, agriculture areas in Cerrado were occupied by soybean > corn > sugarcane > coffee > cotton in the last 20 years (Table S2) For coffee, MG had the higher production area with an average of 1004 thousand hectares year −1 (Table S2; Figure 5C). The areas targeted to sugarcane presented an increase after 2008, mainly in MG, GO, and MS, with 35%, 56%, and 65%, respectively, comparing the data from 2008 to 2020 ( Figure 5D).
There were higher areas with cotton in MT and BA with a constant area of 565 and 266 thousand hectares year −1 , respectively ( Figure 5E). In general, agriculture areas in Cerrado were occupied by soybean > corn > sugarcane > coffee > cotton in the last 20 years (Table S2).
In Cerrado, there was also an increase of 78% in yield of soybean, corn, cotton, sugarcane, and coffee from 2000 to 2020 ( Figure 6). Sugarcane led with a total yield of 236,023 thousand tons in 2020 and an annual yield of 154,849 thousand tons year −1 (Table S2). In Cerrado, there was also an increase of 78% in yield of soybean, corn, cotton, sugarcane, and coffee from 2000 to 2020 ( Figure 6). Sugarcane led with a total yield of 236,023 thousand tons in 2020 and an annual yield of 154,849 thousand tons year −1 (Table S2).
Annual yields of soybean, corn, and cotton were similar to the production area with higher yields in MT ( Figure 6A,B; Table S2). Moreover, there was an increase of sugarcane yield after 2008, mainly in MG, GO, and MS, with an increase of 34%, 56%, and 59% comparing the data of 2008 and 2020, respectively ( Figure 6D).

Pasture Characterization
In Cerrado, the area with pasture (planted and natural) represented a reduction of 11% from 2000 to 2020, corresponding to 115,781 thousand hectares in 2000 to 103,102 thousand hectares in 2020 (Figure 7). If we divided the pasture into planted and natural, there was a reduction of 39% in the natural pasture (from 42,954 to 25,984 thousand hectares) and an increase of 6% in the planted pasture (from 72,827 to 77,118 thousand hectares) in the last 20 years. Annual yields of soybean, corn, and cotton were similar to the production area with higher yields in MT ( Figure 6A,B; Table S2). Moreover, there was an increase of sugarcane yield after 2008, mainly in MG, GO, and MS, with an increase of 34%, 56%, and 59% comparing the data of 2008 and 2020, respectively ( Figure 6D).

Pasture Characterization
In Cerrado, the area with pasture (planted and natural) represented a reduction of 11% from 2000 to 2020, corresponding to 115,781 thousand hectares in 2000 to 103,102 thousand hectares in 2020 (Figure 7). If we divided the pasture into planted and natural, there was a reduction of 39% in the natural pasture (from 42,954 to 25,984 thousand hectares) and an increase of 6% in the planted pasture (from 72,827 to 77,118 thousand hectares) in the last 20 years. There were increases in the planted pasture in MT, MG, TO, MA, and PI, with areas ranging from 317 to 2814 thousand hectares between 2000 and 2020, and fitting a linear increment with R 2 higher than 80%. Interestingly, in MS, GO, and BA, there were reductions of 2231 and 1413 thousand hectares in the planted pasture with a linear reduction in MS (R 2 : 97%) and GO (R 2 : 85%), while there was a quadratic reduction in BA with an R 2 of 80% (Figure 7).  Planted pasture covered the larger areas, representing 75% of the total area with pasture in all states, except in PI, where natural pasture was higher than planted pasture (Table S3).
In 20 years, there was a reduction in the area of natural pasture in all states ranging from 676 to 5661 thousand hectares between 2000 and 2020, and fitting linear reductions with R 2 higher than 77% (Figure 7).
The higher reductions of natural pasture were noticed in MG, BA, and TO with a reduction of 5661, 2516, and 2304 thousand hectares, respectively, from 2000 to 2020. At the same time, PI presented the lowest reduction of 676 thousand hectares from 2000 to 2020 (Figure 7).
There were increases in the planted pasture in MT, MG, TO, MA, and PI, with areas ranging from 317 to 2814 thousand hectares between 2000 and 2020, and fitting a linear increment with R 2 higher than 80%. Interestingly, in MS, GO, and BA, there were reductions of 2231 and 1413 thousand hectares in the planted pasture with a linear reduction in MS Land 2021, 10, 1135 10 of 16 (R 2 : 97%) and GO (R 2 : 85%), while there was a quadratic reduction in BA with an R 2 of 80% (Figure 7).
The Hamiltonian routes indicated diverse routes of soil uses in the systems of rotation and succession in the last 20 years. The main routes were between soybean, corn, and cotton, with r-flux higher than 0.71 (p < 0.05), Figure 8.
There was no route between coffee and grain productions, but there was a route between coffee and sugarcane (r-flux: 0.51; p < 0.05). Moreover, there was no route of soil uses between sugarcane and cotton (r-flux: −0.14; p > 0.05). However, there were routes between sugarcane and corn (r-flux: 0.42; p < 0.05), and sugarcane and soybean (r-flux: 0.25; p < 0.05), Figure 8B.

Discussion
Cerrado was characterized by the high biomass accumulation with 164.5 Mg dry matter ha −1 accumulated mainly on the soil subsurface (39% of total accumulation). The Cerrado forest formations explained the high accumulated biomass with a vegetation predominance of the wooded savanna, submontane semideciduous seasonal forest, and forested savanna, which represent around 51% of the forest formations in the Cerrado biome The flux was medium from natural pasture to planted pasture (r-flux: 0.59; p < 0.05). In addition, there was a median flux from natural pasture to sugarcane (r-flux: 0.19; p > 0.05) and coffee (r-flux: 0.19; p > 0.05), and low flux from natural pasture to corn (r-flux: 0.29; p > 0.05), Figure 8A.
The Hamiltonian routes indicated diverse routes of soil uses in the systems of rotation and succession in the last 20 years. The main routes were between soybean, corn, and cotton, with r-flux higher than 0.71 (p < 0.05), Figure 8.
There was no route between coffee and grain productions, but there was a route between coffee and sugarcane (r-flux: 0.51; p < 0.05). Moreover, there was no route of soil uses between sugarcane and cotton (r-flux: −0.14; p > 0.05). However, there were routes between sugarcane and corn (r-flux: 0.42; p < 0.05), and sugarcane and soybean (r-flux: 0.25; p < 0.05), Figure 8B.

Discussion
Cerrado was characterized by the high biomass accumulation with 164.5 Mg dry matter ha −1 accumulated mainly on the soil subsurface (39% of total accumulation). The Cerrado forest formations explained the high accumulated biomass with a vegetation predominance of the wooded savanna, submontane semideciduous seasonal forest, and forested savanna, which represent around 51% of the forest formations in the Cerrado biome [26][27][28]. Roquette also showed that the vegetation wooded savanna (in Portuguese: Cerrado restrito) accumulated a total of 66 Mg dry matter ha −1 with a higher accumulation in the subsurface (40 Mg dry matter ha −1 ) than in the surface (26 Mg dry matter ha −1 ).
The conditions of climate (high irradiance and air temperature, and low relative humidity) and soil (nutrient-poor, acid soils with high levels of exchangeable aluminum) in Cerrado promote the adaption of species (mainly) with the thick and tortuous trunk, grasses, and shrubs [29,30]. These characteristics of Cerrado (climate, soil, and forest phytophysiognomies) promote a lower biomass accumulation on the surface compared with other tropical biomes (i.e., Amazonia and Mata Atlântica) [31]. The increase of soil C stocks is a consequence of biomass accumulation due to deposition and decomposition of residues in soil (surface and subsurface), and C presents in the biomass of plants, directly impacting C sequestration [32].
Forests are important alternatives to the C sequestration and are considered an important and large terrestrial carbon sink [33,34]. Kauppi et al. estimated that woody vegetation promoted annual sequestration of 75-105 Tg C from 1971 to 1990. In our study, the biomass C stock in the subsurface was 30.1 Mg C ha −1 , which was close to the value of soil C stocks found by [ In the last 20 years, there has been an annual decrease in Cerrado deforestation with a reduction of 75% (from 2000 to 2020), and a total deforested area of 290,631 km 2 or 29 million hectares. The decrease in Cerrado deforestation in the last 20 years was also demonstrated by [22,23,41]. Clemente et al. showed that the deforestation of Cerrado (North of Minas Gerais) was higher between 1986 and 1996, with a respective decrease between 1996 and 2009. However, even with the decrease of deforestation in the last 20 years, the total deforested area of Cerrado, considering the original area, represents a loss of approximately 50% (approximately 2 million km 2 or 200 million hectares).
The urban population growth and international demands for agricultural products are the main factors associated with deforestation [42]. Part of this deforested area has been transformed into pasture and agricultural lands to produce food, fiber, and energy [23]. Environment policy with direct action in preserving protected areas, and sustainable agriculture management has been the main act to preserve Cerrado [43].
The continuous reduction of deforestation is essential to preserving Cerrado, which is considered an important hotspot for the Brazilian biodiversity, where 45% of the flora is endemic [9]. The states where there was large deforestation included MG, GO, and MT. These results were expected due to larger crop production in these states in the last 20 years [25]. In contrast, the lower deforestation was noticed in MS and PI, and a constant deforestation in TO, MA, and PI. The states of MA, TO, PI, and BA are part of Matopiba, a new frontier of Brazillian agricultural production. Our data on deforestation in Matopiba are corroborated by Parente et al. [23] and Matricardi et al. [44,45]. Noojipady et al. demonstrated that during 2010-2013, the C emissions from Matopiba contributed 45% of total Cerrado forest C emissions due to high deforestation.
In Cerrado, there was an increase of 66% in agricultural land with soybean, corn, sugarcane, cotton, and coffee from 2000 to 2020. Soybean and corn occupied the largest crop production areas in the last 20 years. Food production is important to growing food demands and advancing global food insecurity [46]. In Cerrado, there is the production of two or three crops during one crop-year in the systems of succession or rotation.
Corn was produced mainly in first crop before 2000, and in 2020 was actually produced mainly in the second crop (Figures 1 and S2). The increase of the second crop is explained by the increase of soybean production in the first crop (occupying the same area), which presents better economic advances [47]. Moreover, adequate technologies have been developed to increase the corn production in the second crop [48,49], demonstrating that the corn production in the second crop will continue to increase in the next years.
In addition, corn and soybean have been planted in succession systems (soybeancorn-soybean) with the planting of soybean in summer (between September and March) and posterior planting of corn (between January and August) [50]. The corn and soybean cropping patterns promoted both crops' yields with a frequent yield of 25% greater than that of monoculture. These positives effects are explained, mainly, by better use of nutrients [51] and water [29], and the accumulation of residues on the soil surface in systems of no tillage [30].
The production areas of sugarcane and cotton also presented a scenario of increase in the last 20 years. Brazil is considered an important producer of sugarcane and cotton [25]. Sugarcane can be used to produce ethanol and sugar, considered the second most used crop for ethanol production [52]. In 2020, Brazil produced 36 billion L yr −1 of ethanol in an area of 8.5 M hectares, considered the world's largest sugarcane producer [25]. There is an expectation to keep growing sugarcane production in the upcoming years due to the increase in ethanol consumption [53]. For cotton, even with an increase in cotton production in Brazil, there was a variation in production in the last 20 years that is explained by the world market variation [54]. In South American, Brazil and Argentina are considered the greater players in cotton production, with exportation to countries of Asia [55].
The most important result of this study is the routes of soil uses in the last 20 years. Low routes of soil uses explain the decrease of deforestation, with low routes from deforestation to (i) planted pasture and (ii) crop production with r-fluxes lower than 0.19 (p < 0.05). These results indicated that the crop production and planted pasture were not directly responsible for the deforestation in the last 20 years.
In contrast, there is an intense route from deforestation to natural pasture that may be occurring mainly in the Matopiba region, which explains the increase of production area and the absence of a decrease in deforestation. Klink and Machado showed that~2 million km 2 of Cerrado had been transformed into pasture, cash crop agriculture, and other uses in the past 35 years.
The exploration of natural pasture is common in Cerrado, which started in the 18th century with cattle ranching activities over natural pastures. The conversion of Cerrado to pastures (even that considered natural) decreases carbon stocks and increases greenhouse gas emissions [8,39]. We can consider the route from deforestation to natural pasture is the first cycle in the soil conversion, followed by the route from natural pasture to planted pasture or agriculture uses.
The route from natural pasture to planted pasture indicates that it is common practice in the region [19]. Dias et al. showed that since 1940, planted pasture had been expanded in Brazil, especially in the Cerrado. Areas of planted pasture request fertilizer and lime due to high aluminum levels and low natural levels of nutrients in the soil [56]. The degradation of soil is a consequence of inadequate management and cattle herds [57,58]. Peron and Evangelista estimated that 80% of grassland grown presented some degradation status due to inadequate management (incorrect decision in soil tillage, forage species, and others) [23]. Parente et al. showed that already there is~104,000 km 2 of abandoned land in Cerrado derived from inadequate soil uses.
Considering that there was a reduction of 75% in deforestation (from 29,233 km 2 in 2000 to 7038 km 2 in 2020) and 40% in natural pasture area, and an increase of 66% in agricultural land with soybean, corn, sugarcane, cotton, and coffee, we can observe with the routes associated with the new open area in Cerrado, mainly, with the conversion of natural pasture area to agriculture land. In addition, there is~104,000 km 2 of abandoned land in Cerrado derived from in adequate soil uses [23], which also might be converted to Land 2021, 10, 1135 13 of 16 agriculture use. This exercise demonstrates the environmental and agronomic benefits of the conversion of area with low uses (monoculture and degraded pasture), optimizing the food production and helping to achieve the principles of a circular economy-efficient use of resources with harmony between the economy, environment, and society [59].

Conclusions
The vegetation of Cerrado promotes a higher accumulation of biomass and carbon on the subsurface, followed by accumulation in the surface, deadwood, and litter. In the last 20 years, there has been a reduction of 75% in deforestation and an increase of 66% in agricultural land and 78% in yield. In Minas Gerais, Goiás, and Mato Grosso, there were higher productions of coffee, soybean, corn, sugarcane, and cotton. Planted pasture (not natural pasture) covered the larger areas, representing 75% of the total area with pasture.
The low routes of soil uses from deforestation to (i) planted pasture and (ii) crop production explain the decrease of deforestation. The increase in yield and agriculture areas is explained by converting pasture (planted and natural) to agricultural lands, and the intense Hamiltonian routes of soybean, corn, and cotton with the double-crop agricultural production year.
The use of Cerrado demonstrates the environmental and agronomic benefits of the conversion of area with low uses (i.e., monoculture, and degraded pasture), optimizing the food production and helping to achieve the principles of a circular economy with harmony between the economy, environment, and society. However, Cerrado preservation programs are requested to continue the decrease of deforestation with the sustainable development in agriculture, mainly in the Matopiba region where there was no clear decrease in deforestation in the last 20 years.