Next Article in Journal
The Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy Is an Independent Factor for the Progression of Diabetic Nephropathy
Previous Article in Journal
Reduced Kidney Function and Relative Hypocalciuria—Observational, Cross-Sectional, Population-Based Data
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prognostic Value of Fibrinogen among COVID-19 Patients Admitted to an Emergency Department: An Italian Cohort Study

by
Pierpaolo Di Micco
1,*,
Vincenzo Russo
2,
Novella Carannante
3,
Michele Imparato
1,
Giuseppe Cardillo
4 and
Corrado Lodigiani
5
1
UOC Medicina, Fatebenefratelli Hospital of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”—Monaldi Hospital, Piazzale Ettore Ruggeri, 80131 Naples, Italy
3
Emergenza Infettivologica—Pronto Soccorso Ospedale Cotugno, AO dei Colli, 80131 Naples, Italy
4
Medylab, Biochimica Avanzata Laboratory, 80131 Napoli, Italy
5
Thrombosis and Hemorrhagic Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(12), 4134; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124134
Submission received: 6 November 2020 / Revised: 12 December 2020 / Accepted: 15 December 2020 / Published: 21 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Diseases)

Abstract

:
Introduction: A highly pathogenic human coronavirus able to induce severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) has been recently recognized as the cause of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); the disease became pandemic after a few months. Little is still known about the laboratory prognostic markers in COVID-19 patients. The aim of our study was to describe the prognostic value of clotting parameters for the prediction of severe form of COVID-19 characterized by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) at hospital admission. Material and Methods: From a large cohort of 152 patients consecutively admitted from February to March 2020 for fever and dyspnea to the emergency departments (ED) of three Italian hospitals, we evaluated 85 patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and 67 patients with acute illness. All patients underwent medical history checks, physical examination, and laboratory evaluation. Prothrombin time (PT), activated thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen and D-dimer tests were performed and compared, first, between COVID-19 and control groups, and then between COVID-19 patients with or without ARDS. Results: COVID-19 patients were more likely to show abnormal baseline levels of PT, aPTT, D-dimer, and fibrinogen at admission compared to the control group. COVID-19 patients with ARDS showed a statistically significant increase in levels of fibrinogen compared to those without ARDS (720 (621–833) vs. 490 (397.5–601.5); p= 1.8653 × 10−9 (0.0765). A cut-off value of 617 mg/dL had a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 79% in identifying COVID-19 patients with ARDS. Conclusion: A serum level of fibrinogen of 617 mg/dL in COVID-19 patients admitted to emergency department may help to identify early those with ARDS.

1. Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak became pandemic because of the easy transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome human coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) [1]. COVID-19 is associated with relevant morbidity and mortality, in particular if complicated by SARS, rapidly evolving toward acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or venous thromboembolism (VTE) [2,3,4,5]. Italy is among the countries majorly hit by COVID-19, with more than 229,000 laboratory-confirmed cases [6]. From early worldwide reports to the present, SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with early laboratory alterations [7,8]; moreover, clotting abnormalities have been associated with COVID-19 complications and prognosis [9,10,11,12,13,14]. There is a growing interest in the role of biomarkers in the screening and early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection at emergency departments. The aim of our study was to describe the prognostic value of clotting parameters for the prediction of severe form of COVID-19 characterized by ARDS at hospital admission.

2. Materials and Methods

From a large cohort of 152 patients consecutively admitted from February to March 2020 for fever and dyspnea to the emergency departments (ED) of three Italian hospitals (Humanitas Clinical and Research Center of Milan, Cotugno Hospital of Naples, Fatebenefratelli Hospital of Naples), we selected 85 patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19; 67 consecutive patients with acute illness admitted to ED were used as a control group. All patients underwent medical history checks, physical examination, and laboratory evaluation. Laboratory tests included prothrombin time (PT) expressed as seconds and international normalized ratio (INR), activated thromboplastin time (aPTT), and fibrinogen and D-dimer tests. The selection methods were similar to those used in our previous reports [13].
Clotting tests were performed according to standard methods and commercial kits [14]; in particular, the values of D-dimer and fibrinogen were measured in human citrated plasma on IL CoagulationSystem® (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA, USA). D-dimer was measured bymeans of an immunoturbidimetric latex-particle assay, and fibrinogen by means of the functional clotting assay according to Clauss. Fibrinogen and D-dimer levels higher than 400 mg/dL and 500 μg/dL, respectively, were considered pathological.
The detection of SARS-CoV-2 by real-time quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay on nose/throat swab or sputum samples has been used to achieve the laboratory confirmation of COVID-19 [15]. ARDS diagnosis was defined according to the Berlin definition [16]. The COVID-19 population was divided into two groups according to the diagnosis of isolated pneumonia (No ARDS Group) or pneumonia with ARDS (ARDS Group). The clotting factor values were also compared between the two groups in order to describe their prognostic value in identifying COVID-19 patients with ARDS at ED admission. The institutional ethics committee of the Fatebenefratelli Hospital of Naples approved the protocol (FBGID-90320). Verbal and written informed consent for participation was provided for all patients.

Statistical Analysis

The Anderson–Darling test was used to analyze data normality. Continuous variables were reported using median and interquartile intervals (IQR). Categorical variables were indicated as frequency counts and percentages. Differences between groups were evaluated using the 2-tailed Fligner–Policello and Fligner–Killeen test for continuous data, and Barnard’s or Fisher’s test for categorical variables. A receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve was constructed to identify the parameter and its cut-off points that can best predict ARDS diagnosis at admission. In all statistical tests, the alpha value was set to 5%. Statistical comparisons were performed using the statistical software package MatLab R2018a (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA).

3. Results

There were no statistically significant differences in demographic characteristics between the COVID-19 and control group (Table 1); however, COVID-19 patients showed a statistically significant increase in values of PT, aPTT, D-dimer, and fibrinogen compared to controls (Table 2). In the COVID-19 group, patients with ARDS (n: 34) did not show differences in demographic characteristics, sex distribution, PT, aPTT, or D-dimer values compared to those without ARDS (n: 54) (Table 3); however, an increased fibrinogen median value has been shown in COVID-19 patients with ARDS (Table 4). ROC curve analysis revealed that fibrinogen was an independent predictor of ARDS at admission (area under curve (AUC) = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.71–0.93, p = 5.2421 × 10−9) (Table 5); a cut-off value of 617 mg/dL had a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 79% (Figure 1).
During hospitalization with a median follow-up of 26 (IQR: 11–43) days, eight deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and three pulmonary embolism (PE) events occurred among the study population. Eight patients died, among them two following PE. The numbers and rates of DVT, PE, death following PE, and overall death among the groups are summarized in Table 6.

4. Discussion

From early reports to the present, alterations of hemostasis with a trend toward hypercoagulable state have been reported in COVID-19 patients [7,8]; in particular, increased levels of D-dimer and fibrinogen have been associated with poor prognosis among hospitalized patients [9,10,11,12,13], mainly due to pulmonary embolism or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) [17]. However, the blood samples were usually collected during hospitalization, and little is still known about the role of clotting parameters in identifying, at ED admission patients, with more severe form of COVID-19, characterized by ARDS, and their relationship with thromboembolic events [18]. Our study confirms significant differences in clotting parameter levels between COVID-19 patients and control group at ED admission (13) and supports the hypothesis that the hypercoagulable state is present since the early stage of the disease and may lead to venous thrombosis complications and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) [19]. Among COVID-19 patients, fibrinogen levels higher than 617 mg/dL are more likely associated with those presenting with severe clinical form of the disease characterized by ARDS at admission and at increased risk of venous thromboembolism events during hospitalization, in particular pulmonary embolism and PE-related death. Our findings suggest a possible role for fibrinogen-level testing to identify early the clinically severe form of COVID-19 at admission to the emergency department; in particular, a cut-off of 617 mg/dL might be used to early identify those with ARDS, with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 79%. According to these findings, routine testing of clotting factors should be integrated with current triage strategies for patients with suspected COVID-19 [20] in order to collect more detailed information for their clinical management. The potential association between antithrombotic therapy and the clinical presentation of COVID-19 is still debated [21], and further studies are necessary to evaluate the possible role of clotting factors, in particular fibrinogen, in guiding the use of antiviral and antithrombotic therapies [22,23,24] as part of routine medical therapy during hospitalization.

5. Conclusions

A serum level of fibrinogen of 617 mg/dL in COVID-19 patients admitted to an emergency department may help to identify early, with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 79%, those with ARDS.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.D.M. and V.R.; methodology, G.C.; software, G.C.; validation, P.D.M., V.R. and C.L.; formal analysis, G.C.; investigation, N.C., M.I., V.R., P.D.M.; resources, P.D.M.; data curation, N.C., M.I., V.R., P.D.M.; writing—original draft preparation, V.R.; writing—review and editing, V.R., P.D.M.; visualization, C.L.; supervision, P.D.M., V.R.; project administration, P.D.M.; funding acquisition, P.D.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. McCloskey, B.; Heymann, D.L. SARS to novel coronavirus: Old lessons and new lessons. Epidemiol. Infect. 2020, 148, e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Guan, W.J.; Ni, Z.Y.; Hu, Y.; Liang, W.H.; Ou, C.Q.; He, J.X.; Liu, L.; Shan, H.; Lei, C.L.; Hui, D.S.C.; et al. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1708–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Russo, V.; Rago, A.; Carbone, A.; Bottino, R.; Ammendola, E.; Della Cioppa, N.; Galante, D.; Golino, P.; Nigro, G. Atrial Fibrillation in COVID-19: From epidemiologicalassociation to pharmacologicalimplications. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2020, 76, 138–145. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lodigiani, C.; Iapichino, G.; Carenzo, L.; Cecconi, M.; Ferrazzi, P.; Sebastian, T.; Kucher, N.; Studt, J.-D.; Sacco, C.; Bertuzzi, A.; et al. Venous and arterial thromboembolic complications in COVID-19 patients admitted to an academic hospital in Milan, Italy. Thromb. Res. 2020, 191, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Russo, V.; Bottino, R.; Carbone, A.; Rago, A.; Papa, A.A.; Golino, P.; Nigro, G. COVID-19 and Heart: From Clinical Features to Pharmacological Implications. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Covid-19—Situazione in Italia. Available online: http://www.salute.gov.it/portale/nuovocoronavirus/dettaglioContenutiNuovoCoronavirus.jsp?lingua=italiano&id=5351&area=nuovoCoronavirus&menu=vuoto (accessed on 6 November 2020).
  7. Zhou, F.; Yu, T.; Du, R.; Fan, G.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Xiang, J.; Wang, Y.; Song, B.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020, 395, 1054–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Huang, F.; Wang, F.; Yuan, J.; Wang, Z.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Feng, C.; et al. Clinical and biochemical indexes from 2019-nCoV infected patients linked to viral loads and lung injury. Sci. China Life Sci. 2020, 63, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Tang, N.; Li, D.; Wang, X.; Sun, Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 844–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Ranucci, M.; Ballotta, A.; Di Dedda, U.; Bayshnikova, E.; Poli, M.D.; Resta, M.; Falco, M.; Albano, G.; Menicanti, L. The procoagulant pattern of patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 1747–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Fogarty, H.; Townsend, L.; Ni Cheallaigh, C.; Bergin, C.; Martin-Loeches, I.; Browne, P.; Bacon, C.L.; Gaule, R.; Gillett, A.; Byrne, M.; et al. COVID19 coagulopathy in Caucasian patients. Br. J. Haematol. 2020, 189, 1044–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Long, H.; Nie, L.; Xiang, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.; Fu, X.; Ren, H.; Liu, W.; Wang, Q.; Wu, Q.-M. D-Dimer and Prothrombin Time Are the Significant Indicators of Severe COVID-19 and Poor Prognosis. Biomed. Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 6159720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Di Micco, P.; Russo, V.; Carannante, N.; Imparato, M.; Rodolfi, S.; Cardillo, G.; Lodigiani, C. Clotting Factors in COVID-19: Epidemiological Association and Prognostic Values in Different Clinical Presentations in an Italian Cohort. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Christensen, B.; Favaloro, E.J.; Lippi, G.; Van Cott, E.M. Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2020, 46, 845–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Caruana, G.; Croxatto, A.; Coste, A.T.; Opota, O.; Lamoth, F.; Jaton, K.; Greub, G. Diagnostic strategies for SARS-CoV-2 infection and interpretation of microbiological results. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020, 26, 1178–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ranieri, V.M.; Rubenfeld, G.D.; Thompson, B.T. ARDS definition task force. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: The Berlin definition. JAMA 2012, 307, 2526–2533. [Google Scholar]
  17. Scudiero, F.; Silverio, A.; Di Maio, M.; Russo, V.; Citro, R.; Personeni, D.; Cafro, A.; D’Andrea, A.; Attena, E.; Pezzullo, S.; et al. Pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients: Prevalence, predictors and clinical outcome. Thromb. Res. 2020, 198, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Di Micco, P.; Russo, V.; Lodigiani, C. Venous Thromboembolism and Its Association with COVID-19: Still an Open Debate. Medicina (Kaunas) 2020, 56, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Iba, T.; Levi, M.; Levy, J.H. Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2020, 46, 89–95. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, J.; Zhou, L.; Yang, Y.; Peng, W.; Wang, W.; Chen, X. Therapeutic and triage strategies for 2019 novel coronavirus disease in fever clinics. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, e11–e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Russo, V.; Carbone, A.; Mottola, F.F.; Mocerino, R.; Verde, R.; Attena, E.; Verde, N.; Di Micco, P.; Nunziata, L.; Santelli, F.; et al. Effect of Triple Combination Therapy with Lopinavir-Ritonavir, Azithromycin, and Hydroxychloroquine on QT Interval and Arrhythmic Risk in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 582348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Russo, V.; Di Maio, M.; Attena, E.; Silverio, A.; Scudiero, F.; Celentani, D.; Lodigiani, C.; Di Micco, P. Clinical impact of pre-admission antithrombotic therapy in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A multicenter observational study. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 159, 104965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Russo, V.; Cardillo, G.; Viggiano, G.V.; Mangiacapra, S.; Cavalli, A.; Fontanella, A.; Agrusta, F.; Bellizzi, A.; Amitrano, M.; Iannuzzo, M.; et al. Fondaparinux Use in Patients With COVID-19: A Preliminary Multicenter Real-World Experience. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2020, 76, 369–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Russo, V.; Cardillo, G.; Viggiano, G.V.; Mangiacapra, S.; Cavalli, A.; Fontanella, A.; Agrusta, F.; Bellizzi, A.; Amitrano, M.; Iannuzzo, M.; et al. Thromboprofilaxys with Fondaparinux vs. Enoxaparin in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A MulticenterItalianObservational Study. Front. Med. 2020, 7, 569567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. ROC curves of fibrinogen as a predictor of COVID-19 ARDS. On the left, the green area is the gain above the chance, represented by a red area of 0.5; on the right, sensitivity (red full line), specificity (green full line), and efficiency (blue full line) are functions of fibrinogen concentration (mg/dL). Dashed lines show cut-offs where parameters are maximized: at 349 mg/dL, sensitivity is max (in red); at 604 mg/dL, sensitivity and specificity are equal (in yellow); at 617 mg/dL, efficiency is max (in blue); at 796 mg/dL, positive likelihood ratio is max (in magenta); at 920 mg/dL, specificity is max (in green); at 1021 mg/dL, negative likelihood ratio is max (in black).ROC: receiver-operating characteristics; AUC: area under curve; PLR: Positive Likelihood Ratio; NLR: Negative Likelihood Ratio.
Figure 1. ROC curves of fibrinogen as a predictor of COVID-19 ARDS. On the left, the green area is the gain above the chance, represented by a red area of 0.5; on the right, sensitivity (red full line), specificity (green full line), and efficiency (blue full line) are functions of fibrinogen concentration (mg/dL). Dashed lines show cut-offs where parameters are maximized: at 349 mg/dL, sensitivity is max (in red); at 604 mg/dL, sensitivity and specificity are equal (in yellow); at 617 mg/dL, efficiency is max (in blue); at 796 mg/dL, positive likelihood ratio is max (in magenta); at 920 mg/dL, specificity is max (in green); at 1021 mg/dL, negative likelihood ratio is max (in black).ROC: receiver-operating characteristics; AUC: area under curve; PLR: Positive Likelihood Ratio; NLR: Negative Likelihood Ratio.
Jcm 09 04134 g001
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the study population.
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the study population.
Patients’ CharacteristicsControls n: 67COVID-19 n: 85p-Value
Males, n (%)47 (70%)58 (68%)0.83715
Age <40 years, n (%)2 (3%)4 (5%)0.77552
Age 40–60 years, n (%)19 (28%)26 (31%)
Age >60 years, n (%)46 (68%)55 (65%)
For sex, we used a 2-tailed Barnard’s exact test; for age, a 2-tailed Fisher’s exact test.
Table 2. Comparisons of laboratory parameters between Control and COVID-19 groups.
Table 2. Comparisons of laboratory parameters between Control and COVID-19 groups.
ParametersControls n: 67COVID-19 n: 85FP Test
p-Value
FK Test
p-Value
PT INR, median (IQR)1.11(1.01–1.16)1.13(1.07–1.21)0.01980.1149
aPTT ratio, median (IQR)0.96(0.88–1.02)0.99(0.90–1.11)0.02900.0159
D-dimerμg/dL, median (IQR)505(276–650)637(412–964)0.01120.1049
Fibrinogen mg/dL, median (IQR)450(356–591)589(461–721)0.00010.1922
All tests are 1-tailed. FP: Fligner–Policello; FK: Fligner–Killeen. PT: Prothrombin time. INR: international normalized ratio; aPTT: Activated partial thromboplastin time.
Table 3. Demographic characteristics of the study population according to the presence or not of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Table 3. Demographic characteristics of the study population according to the presence or not of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Patients’ CharacteristicsOverall
n: 85
No ARDS Group
n: 54
ARDS Group
n: 31
p-Value
Males, n (%)58 (68%)37 (68%)21 (68%)1.0000
Age <40 years, n (%)4 (5%)3 (6%)1 (3%)0.9645
Age 40–60 years, n (%)26 (31%)16 (31%)10 (32%)
Age >60 years, n (%)55 (65%)35 (65%)20 (65%)
For sex, we used a 2-tailed Barnard’s exact test; for age, a 2-tailed Fisher’s exact test.
Table 4. Comparisons of laboratory parameters between COVID-19 patients without and with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Table 4. Comparisons of laboratory parameters between COVID-19 patients without and with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
ParametersOverall
n: 85
No ARDS Group
n: 54
ARDS Group
n: 31
FP Test
p-Value
FK Test
p-Value
PT INR, median (IQR)1.13
(1.07–1.21)
1.13
(1.07–1.19)
1.14
(1.09–1.25)
0.13120.6040
aPTT ratio, median (IQR)0.99
(0.90–1.11)
0.975
(0.900–1.095)
0.99
(0.89–1.115)
0.31280.4395
D-dimer μg/dL, median (IQR)637
(412–964)
569.5
(341.75–954.75)
698
(508.75–1255)
0.06700.5034
Fibrinogen mg/dL, median (IQR)589
(461–721)
490
(397.5–601.5)
720
(621–833)
1.8653 × 10−90.0765
All tests are 1-tailed. FP: Fligner–Policello; FK: Fligner–Killeen. PT: Prothrombin time. INR: international normalized ratio; aPTT: Activated partial thromboplastin time.
Table 5. Area under the fibrinogen receiver-operating characteristics curve estimation.
Table 5. Area under the fibrinogen receiver-operating characteristics curve estimation.
AUCStandard ErrorConfidence IntervalCommentStandard AUCp Value
0.824880.056770.713610.93615Good test5.72275.2421 × 10−9
Maximized ParameterCut-off (mg/dL)
Sensitivity349
Cost-Effective604
Efficiency617
Positive Likelihood Ratio796
Specificity920
Negative Likelihood Ratio1021
ROC: receiver-operating characteristics; AUC: area under curve.
Table 6. Numbers and rates of clinical outcome events in the study population.
Table 6. Numbers and rates of clinical outcome events in the study population.
Clinical Outcome EventsOverall
n: 85
No ARDS Group
n: 54
ARDS Group
n: 31
p-Value
DVT, n (%)8 (9.4)4 (7.4)4 (12.9)0.41
PE, n (%)3 (3.5)0 (0)3 (9.7)0.02
Death for PE, n (%)2 (2.4)0 (0)2 (6.4)0.06
Overall death, n (%)6 (7.1)1 (1.8)5 (16.1)0.01
DVT: deep venous thrombosis; PE: pulmonary embolism.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Micco, P.; Russo, V.; Carannante, N.; Imparato, M.; Cardillo, G.; Lodigiani, C. Prognostic Value of Fibrinogen among COVID-19 Patients Admitted to an Emergency Department: An Italian Cohort Study. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 4134. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124134

AMA Style

Di Micco P, Russo V, Carannante N, Imparato M, Cardillo G, Lodigiani C. Prognostic Value of Fibrinogen among COVID-19 Patients Admitted to an Emergency Department: An Italian Cohort Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(12):4134. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124134

Chicago/Turabian Style

Di Micco, Pierpaolo, Vincenzo Russo, Novella Carannante, Michele Imparato, Giuseppe Cardillo, and Corrado Lodigiani. 2020. "Prognostic Value of Fibrinogen among COVID-19 Patients Admitted to an Emergency Department: An Italian Cohort Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 12: 4134. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124134

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop