Next Article in Journal
Sleep–Wake Cycle and EEG-Based Biomarkers during Neonate to Adult Transition in C57BL/6 Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Polymer Nanocomposites for Lowering Heating and Cooling Loads in Buildings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Revising the Chromosome-Specific Probes of White Hawk (Leucopternis albicollis) †

by
Ivanete Furo
1,*,
Rafael Kretschmer
2,
Jorge Pereira
3,
Darren Griffin
4,
Rebecca O’Connor
4,
Patricia C. M. O’Brien
5,
Malcolm Ferguson-Smith
5 and
Edivaldo H. C. de Oliveira
6,7
1
Laboratório de Reprodução Animal, LABRAC, Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, UFRA, Parauapebas PA 68515-000, Brazil
2
Programa de Pós-graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, PPGBM, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre RS 91509-900, Brazil
3
Animal and Veterinary Research Centre (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal
4
School of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NJ, UK
5
Cambridge Resource Centre for Comparative Genomics, University of Cambridge Department of Veterinary Medicine, Cambridge CB03 0ES, UK
6
Laboratório de Cultura de Tecidos e Citogenética, SAMAM, Instituto Evandro Chagas, Ananindeua PA 67030-000, Brazil
7
Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Naturais, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém PA 66075-110, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the First International Electronic Conference on Genes: Theoretical and Applied Genomics, 2–30 November 2020; Available online: https://iecge.sciforum.net/.
Proceedings 2021, 76(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECGE-07152
Published: 2 November 2020

Abstract

:
Leucopternis albicollis is a diurnal bird of prey with extensive karyotype reorganization. Chromosome-specific probes from this species have been used successfully to detect intrachromosomal rearrangements in different species of bird since 2010. However, some gaps were detected in this first set of probes. Here, we have obtained a new set of whole chromosome probes in order to improve the previous one; also, we have performed experiments using bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) from chicken microchromosomes. Our results demonstrated that the microchromosomes were involved in fusion events. In addition, a new nomenclature has been proposed for the new set of probes and some inaccurate data were corrected.

1. Introduction

Whole chromosome probes have provided the opportunity to analyze the chromosome homology, organization and evolution of different taxa with more accuracy than methods based on conventional banding techniques. The first avian set of chromosome paints was obtained from Gallus gallus (chicken—GGA) and has become a powerful tool to detect chromosome rearrangements and chromosome signatures between different species, facilitating the proposal of phylogenetic inferences [1,2]. However, considering that most species of birds have retained karyotypes similar to G. gallus, with maintenance of most syntenic groups, the application of GGA paints is not able to detect intrachromosomal rearrangements, such as inversions, apart the few cases in which chromosome fusions occurred previously to the inversion events, such as in some Psitaciformes [3].
An alternative approach to the limitations of G. gallus probes was the use of whole chromosome paints obtained from a species in which syntenic groups have been fissioned or reshuffled, such as the white hawk (Leucopternis albicollis) [4]. Despite having a diploid number of 2n = 66, the ancestral macrochromosomes 1–3 (GGA1-3) and 5 (GGA5) have been fissioned in L. albicollis [4]. For instance, from the sorted chromosomes of L. albicollis, five different pairs were assigned to GGA1. Hence, the use of these paintings allowed the detection of intrachromosomal rearrangements in species with the ancestral chromosome 1 conserved as an entire chromosome, such as in Columbiformes [5], or in species with fissions in this chromosome, such as in Passeriformes [6]. However, the fact that the five previously chromosomes of L. albicollis identified as homologous to GGA1 did not cover the entire chromosome 1 of Columbiformes species raised the suspicions that at least one more chromosome of L. albicollis should be assigned to GGA1 [5]. Similar results were observed in Opisthocomiformes and Cuculiformes [7,8]. Hence, the aim of this study was to generate a new set of chromosome paints of L. albicollis in order to obtain a better coverage of GGA chromosomes. In addition, we performed fluorescence in situ hybridization (ISH) using bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) of G. gallus microchromosomes in order to demonstrate which microchromosome pairs were involved in fusions, which played an important role in the karyotype evolution of L. albicollis.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Flow Sorting

Flow sorting was performed according to Nie et al. [9]. Chromosome preparations were obtained from a fibroblast cell line of a female Leucopternis albicollis. Chromosomes were stained with chromomycin A3 (40 µg/mL) and Hoechst 33,258 (2 µg/mL) (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Sorting was carried out using a dual-laser cell sorter (MoFlo, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). The primary sorted chromosome material was amplified by degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction (DOP-PCR) [10] and then resulting products were labeled with biotin-16-dUTP during secondary DOP-PCR amplification. The identity of probes was validated by same-species chromosome painting.

2.2. Chicken BAC Clones and Hybridization In Situ

Generation, labeling and experiments using bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) followed O’Connor et al. [11]. BACs were selected from the genome library of Gallus gallus (GGA). The slides were analyzed with an Olympus BX-61 epifluorescence microscope equipped with a cooled charge coupled device (CCD) camera and appropriate filters. Images were captured using SmartCapture3 (Digital Scientific, Cambridgeshire, UK).

3. Results

3.1. Flow Karyotype

The 66 chromosomes of L. albicollis were resolved into 33 peaks by flow cytometry (Figure 1). The chromosomes in each peak of the flow karyotype were identified on L. albicollis metaphases using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with labeled peak-specific DNA (Figure 2).

3.2. BAC-FISH Mapped onto L. albicollis Chromosomes

BAC probes corresponding to GGA chromosome pairs 17–28, except pair 20 (which did not produce reproducible results) demonstrated that all the microchromosomes were involved in fusion events on karyotype of L. albicollis.

3.3. Chromosome Painting between L. albicollis and Gallus gallus

Reciprocal chromosome painting between L. albicollis and G. gallus established chromosome homologies between these species, which are summarized in the Figure 3. The GGA1 was formally represented by five different pairs of L. albicollis (Figure 3A) [4]; however, in our analysis we found two extra small pairs, summing seven chromosomes of white hawk covering GGA1 (Figure 3B).

4. Discussion

In this study we provided a new set of whole chromosome probes from L. albicollis obtained by flow cytometry, which contributed to the improving the previously set one [4]. Specifically, we provided here the isolation and identification of some chromosomes which were missing in the first set. For instance, it has been proposed that five chromosomes of L. albicollis were homologous to chromosome 1 of Gallus gallus [1]; however, here we confirmed that are seven pairs of L. albicollis homologous to GGA1. These two small chromosomes, identified as pairs 22 and 26 (Figure 3), were not sorted as individual paints in the previous description, making it difficult to assign them in the homology map.
L. albicollis probes have been used in cytogenetics studies of birds since 2010, and intrachromosomal rearrangements were proposed in the chromosome homologous to GGA1 in some species, especially in Passeriformes and Columbiformes [5,6]. Although these studies have applied only five whole chromosome pairs of L. albicollis as homologous to GGA1, the occurrence of intrachromosomal rearrangements is still valid; however, the use of the two additional chromosomes identified herein as homologous to GGA1 (LAL 22 and LAL 25) (Figure 2 and Figure 3) are involved in the rearrangements proposed or are conserved as an entire segments in species of Passeriformes and Columbiformes. Hence, intrachromosomal rearrangements proposed in Passeriformes and Columbiformes [5,6], may represent an even more complex series of inversions than initially proposed.
Considering that L. albicollis has 66 chromosomes, despite the occurrence of innumerous fission events in macrochromosomes, and a few pairs of microchromosomes, raised the idea that fusions involving these small elements were important in the karyotypical evolution of this species [4]. Hence, we confirmed this assumption and identified chromosome fusions involving GGA microchromosomes 17–28 (except 20—see materials and methods). Chromosome fusions involving microchromosomes have been previously detect only in Falconiformes and Psitaciformes [11].
As a conclusion, our results have improved the set of L. albicollis probes for comparative chromosome painting in birds and identified the homologous to GGA microchromosomes involved in fusions in the karyotype of the L. albicollis, by the use of BAC-derived probes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization I.F. and E.H.C.d.O.; methodology, I.F. and J.P.; validation, I.F. and E.H.C.d.O.; formal analysis, I.F., investigation, I.F., J.P.; resources, E.H.C.d.O.; M.F.-S., D.G. and R.O.; data curation, I.F., R.K. and E.H.C.d.O.; writing—original draft preparation, I.F., R.K. and E.H.C.d.O.; writing—review and editing, I.F., R.K., E.H.C.d.O.; P.C.M.O., M.F.-S., D.G. and R.O.; supervision and project administration, E.H.C.d.O.; M.F.-S.; funding acquisition, M.F.-S. and E.H.C.d.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by a grant to EHCO from CNPq (307382/2019-2) and to MAFS from the Wellcome Trust in support of the Cambridge Resource Centre for Comparative Genomics and by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/K008161/1) to the University of Kent, and by the project UIDB/CVT/00772/2020 funded by the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The experiments were performed followed ethical protocols approved by the ethics committee (CEUA- Federal University of Para) no. 170/2013.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to CNPq (309699/2015-0) and CAPES for technical and financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Griffin, D.K.; Robertson, L.B.W.; Tempest, H.G.; Skinner, B.M. The evolution of the avian genome as revealed by comparative molecular cytogenetic. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2007, 117, 64–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kretschmer, R.; Ferguson-Smith, M.A.; de Oliveira, E.H.C. Karyotype evolution in birds: From conventional staining to chromosome painting. Genes 2018, 9, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Nanda, I.; Karl, E.; Griffin, D.K.; Schartl, M.; Schmid, M. Chromosome repatterning in three representative parrots (Psittaciformes) inferred from comparative chromosome painting. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2007, 117, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. De Oliveira, E.H.C.; Tagliarini, M.M.; Rissino, J.D.; Pieczarka, J.C.; Nagamachi, C.Y.; O’Brien, P.C.M.; Ferguson-Smith, M.A. Reciprocal chromosome painting between white hawk (Leucopternis albicollis) and chicken reveals extensive fusions and fissions during karyotype evolution of Accipitridae (Aves, Falconiformes). Chromosome Res. 2010, 18, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kretschmer, R.; Furo, I.O.; Gunski, R.J.; Garnero, A.D.V.; Pereira, J.C.; O’Brien, P.C.M.; Ferguson-Smith, M.A.; de Oliveira, E.H.C.; de Freitas, T.R.O. Comparative chromosome painting in Columbidae (Columbiformes) reinforces divergence in Passerea and Columbea. Chromosome Res. 2018, 26, 211–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kretschmer, R.; Gunski, R.J.; Garnero, A.D.V.; Furo, I.D.O.; O’Brien, P.C.M.; Ferguson-Smith, M.A.; De Oliveira, E. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of multiple intrachromosomal rearrangements in two representatives of the genus Turdus (Turdidae, Passeriformes). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e103338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dos Santos, M.S.; Furo, I.O.; Tagliarini, M.M.; Kretschmer, R.; O’Brien, P.C.M.; Ferguson-Smith, M.A.; de Oliveira, E.H.C. The Karyotype of the Hoatzin (Opisthocomus hoazin)—A Phylogenetic Enigma of the Neornithes. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2018, 156, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Santos, M.D.S.D.; Kretschmer, R.; Furo, I.D.O.; Gunski, R.J.; Garnero, A.D.V.; Valeri, M.P.; O’Brien, P.C.M.; Ferguson-Smith, M.A.; De Oliveira, E.H.C. Chromosomal evolution and phylogenetic considerations in cuckoos (Aves, Cuculiformes, Cuculidae). PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0232509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Nie, W.; O’Brien, P.C.M.; Fu, B.; Wang, J.; Su, W.; He, K.; Bed’Hom, B.; Volobouev, V.; Ferguson-Smith, M.A.; Dobigny, G.; et al. Multidirectional chromosome painting substantiates the occurrence of extensive genomic reshuffling within Accipitriformes. BMC Evol. Biol. 2015, 15, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Telenius, H.; Ponder, B.A.J.; Tunnacliffe, A.; Pelmear, A.H.; Carter, N.P.; Ferguson-Smith, M.A.; Behmel, A.; Nordenskjöld, M.; Pfragner, R. Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1992, 4, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. O’Connor, R.E.; Kiazim, L.; Skinner, B.; Fonseka, G.; Joseph, S.; Jennings, R.; Larkin, D.M.; Griffin, D.K. Patterns of microchromosome organization remain highly conserved throughout avian evolution. Chromosoma 2019, 128, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. New flow karyotype of L. albicollis. Legend: M = Microchromosomes.
Figure 1. New flow karyotype of L. albicollis. Legend: M = Microchromosomes.
Proceedings 76 00001 g001
Figure 2. Representative same-species FISH experiments using L. albicollis (LAL) probes: LAL 4 (A), LAL8 (B) and cross-species LAL probes on G.gallus metaphases (C and D).
Figure 2. Representative same-species FISH experiments using L. albicollis (LAL) probes: LAL 4 (A), LAL8 (B) and cross-species LAL probes on G.gallus metaphases (C and D).
Proceedings 76 00001 g002
Figure 3. Homology map between chicken macrochromosomes and white hawk paints. (A) The homology described by de Oliveira et al. [4] (B) The new nomenclature has been proposed for the new set of probes from white hawk.
Figure 3. Homology map between chicken macrochromosomes and white hawk paints. (A) The homology described by de Oliveira et al. [4] (B) The new nomenclature has been proposed for the new set of probes from white hawk.
Proceedings 76 00001 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Furo, I.; Kretschmer, R.; Pereira, J.; Griffin, D.; O’Connor, R.; O’Brien, P.C.M.; Ferguson-Smith, M.; Oliveira, E.H.C.d. Revising the Chromosome-Specific Probes of White Hawk (Leucopternis albicollis). Proceedings 2021, 76, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECGE-07152

AMA Style

Furo I, Kretschmer R, Pereira J, Griffin D, O’Connor R, O’Brien PCM, Ferguson-Smith M, Oliveira EHCd. Revising the Chromosome-Specific Probes of White Hawk (Leucopternis albicollis). Proceedings. 2021; 76(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECGE-07152

Chicago/Turabian Style

Furo, Ivanete, Rafael Kretschmer, Jorge Pereira, Darren Griffin, Rebecca O’Connor, Patricia C. M. O’Brien, Malcolm Ferguson-Smith, and Edivaldo H. C. de Oliveira. 2021. "Revising the Chromosome-Specific Probes of White Hawk (Leucopternis albicollis)" Proceedings 76, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECGE-07152

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop