Understanding the Impacts of the October 2017 Portugal Wildfires on Cultural Heritage
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Mapping Burnt Areas
2.2. Geolocating Cultural Heritage Assets
2.3. Identification of Potentially Affected Assets
3. Surveys
3.1. Arganil
3.2. Gouveia
3.3. Oliveira Do Hospital
- -
- Some of the sites were not known to the locals of the contacted parishes, meaning that in those cases the municipality technicians could not make use of oral information. Nevertheless, the team attempted to identify the sites based on the collected geographical coordinates. The sites located within the urban fabric of villages and towns or close to agricultural rural areas were easily identified, mapped and inventoried. On the other hand, in forest areas, two and a half years after the event (which affected 98% of the municipality’s forest territory), different types of vegetation had grown in a disorganised manner, making them inaccessible and/or impenetrable. Since a large part of the potentially affected archaeological sites are high medieval funerary structures (i.e., graves dug in rock), most of them are located in granitic outcrops at the ground level, and are therefore hidden by the vegetation;
- -
- In some of the cases, the original typological classification of the sites in the database was performed without following strict scientific criteria. As a result, some of the sites may belong to different types than those recorded;
- -
- Some of the sites suffered anthropogenic damage prior to the fires, which made it impossible to locate them (such as the Crastos tomb);
- -
- Some of the sites are located on private property which the municipality team was not given permission to access;
- -
- Some of the archaeological sites consist in patches of occupation (i.e., areas where there is a concentration of archaeological materials on the surface belonging to a specific period) which have not yet been intervened (i.e., archaeological excavations have not yet been carried out). However, it may be assumed that these sites are preserved.
3.4. Pampilhosa da Serra
3.5. Tábua
3.6. Vouzela
- -
- Affected (forestry work): damage caused by moving machinery during cutting operations of burnt wood;
- -
- At risk (forestry work): includes risks arising from cutting operations of burnt wood and/or soil mobilisation for reforestation;
- -
- Undetermined: the site in question has not yet been located by municipality services and it is not possible to determine its state of conservation;
- -
- Nonexistent: database errors, possibly due to repeated inventorying of the same site but with different names.
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tedim, F.; Leone, V.; Amraoui, M.; Bouillon, C.; Coughlan, M.; Delogu, G.; Fernandes, P.; Ferreira, C.; McCaffrey, S.; McGee, T.; et al. Defining Extreme Wildfire Events: Difficulties, Challenges, and Impacts. Fire 2018, 1, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moritz, M.A.; Batllori, E.; Bradstock, R.A.; Gill, A.M.; Handmer, J.; Hessburg, P.F.; Leonard, J.; McCaffrey, S.; Odion, D.C.; Schoennagel, T.; et al. Learning to Coexist with Wildfire. Nature 2014, 515, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moritz, M.A.; Parisien, M.-A.; Batllori, E.; Krawchuk, M.A.; Van Dorn, J.; Ganz, D.J.; Hayhoe, K. Climate Change and Disruptions to Global Fire Activity. Ecosphere 2012, 3, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bowman, D.M.J.S.; Williamson, G.J.; Abatzoglou, J.T.; Kolden, C.A.; Cochrane, M.A.; Smith, A.M.S. Human Exposure and Sensitivity to Globally Extreme Wildfire Events. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 1, 0058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mallinis, G.; Mitsopoulos, I.; Beltran, E.; Goldammer, J. Assessing Wildfire Risk in Cultural Heritage Properties Using High Spatial and Temporal Resolution Satellite Imagery and Spatially Explicit Fire Simulations: The Case of Holy Mount Athos, Greece. Forests 2016, 7, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ryan, K.C.; Jones, A.T.; Koerner, C.L.; Lee, K.M. Wildland Fire in Ecosystems: Effects of Fire on Cultural Resources and Archaeology; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: Fort Collins, CO, USA, 2012; Volume 3.
- Ryan, K.C. Effects of Fire on Cultural Resources. In VI International Conference on Forest Fire Research; Viegas, D.X., Ed.; Rocky Mountain Research Station: Coimbra, Portugal, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Poljanšek, K.; Ferrer, M.M.; De Groeve, T.; Clark, I. Science for Disaster Risk Management 2017: Knowing Better and Losing Less; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Romão, X.; Paupério, E.; Figueiredo, R. A Importância Da Informação Sobre Os Impactos Das Catástrofes—Enquadramento No Projeto Europeu LODE. In Estudos Cindínicos—Madeira Região Resiliente. Aprender com o Passado; Lourenço, L., Dias, J., Eds.; Estudos Cindínicos; RISCOS—Associação Portuguesa de Riscos, Prevenção e Segurança: Coimbra, Portugal, 2020; Volume 9, pp. 267–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Groeve, T.; Poljansek, K.; Ehrlich, D.; Corbane, C. Current Status and Best Practices for Disaster Loss Data Recording in EU Member States: A Comprehensive Overview of Current Practice in the EU Member States; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CHCfE Consortium. Cultural Heritage Counts for Europe; International Cultural Centre: Krakow, Poland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Figueiredo, R.; Romão, X.; Paupério, E. Component-Based Flood Vulnerability Modelling for Cultural Heritage Buildings. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021, 61, 102323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNESCO. Strategy for Reducing Risks from Disasters at World Heritage Properties (WHC-07/31.COM/7.2); UNESCO: Paris, France, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1); United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030; United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR): Sendai, Japan, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Drdácký, M.; Binda, L.; Herle, I.; Lanza, L.G.; Maxwell, I.; Pospíšil, S. Protecting the Cultural Heritage from Natural Disasters; European Parliament: Brussels, Belgium, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Cacciotti, R.; Kaiser, A.; Sardella, A.; De Nuntiis, P.; Drdácký, M.; Hanus, C.; Bonazza, A. Climate Change-Induced Disasters and Cultural Heritage: Optimizing Management Strategies in Central Europe. Clim. Risk Manag. 2021, 32, 100301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonazza, A.; Maxwell, I.; Drdácký, M.; Vintzileou, E.; Hanus, C. Safeguarding Cultural Heritage from Natural and Man-Made Disasters—A Comparative Analysis of Risk Management in the EU; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romão, X.; Paupério, E. An Indicator for Post-Disaster Economic Loss Valuation of Impacts on Cultural Heritage. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2021, 15, 678–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romão, X.; Paupério, E.; Monserrat, O.; Rousakis, T.; Montero, P. Assets at Risk and Potential Impacts: 3.6—Cultural Heritage. In Science for Disaster Risk Management 2020: Acting Today, Protecting Tomorrow; Casajus Valles, A., Marin Ferrer, M., Poljanšek, K., Clark, I., Eds.; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2020; pp. 503–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mateus, P.; Fernandes, P.M. Forest Fires in Portugal: Dynamics, Causes and Policies. In Forest Context and Policies in Portugal; Reboredo, F., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 97–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turco, M.; Jerez, S.; Augusto, S.; Tarín-Carrasco, P.; Ratola, N.; Jiménez-Guerrero, P.; Trigo, R.M. Climate Drivers of the 2017 Devastating Fires in Portugal. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Viegas, D.X.; Almeida, M.A.; Ribeiro, L.M.; Raposo, J.; Viegas, M.T.; Oliveira, R.; Alves, D.; Pinto, C.; Rodrigues, A.; Ribeiro, C.; et al. Análise Dos Incêndios Florestais Ocorridos a 15 de Outubro de 2017; University of Coimbra: Coimbra, Portugal, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Bragança, F.; Zambujo, G.; Lourenço, S.; Paiva, B.; Banha, C.; Regala, F.T.; Moura, H.; Bugalhão, J.; Marques, J.; Correia, J.; et al. Salvaguarda de Património Arqueológico Em Operações Florestais: Gestão e Sensibilização. In Arqueologia em Portugal 2020—Estado da Questão; Arnaud, J.M., Neves, C., Martins, A., Eds.; Associação dos Arqueólogos Portugueses e CITCEM: Lisbon, Portugal, 2020; pp. 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chuvieco, E.; Mouillot, F.; van der Werf, G.R.; San Miguel, J.; Tanase, M.; Koutsias, N.; García, M.; Yebra, M.; Padilla, M.; Gitas, I.; et al. Historical Background and Current Developments for Mapping Burned Area from Satellite Earth Observation. Remote Sens. Environ. 2019, 225, 45–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dorati, C.; Kucera, J.; Rivero, I.M.I.; Wania, A. Product User Manual for Copernicus EMS Rapid Mapping; JRC Technical Report JRC111889; European Commission: Ispra, Italy, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Copernicus EMS-Mapping. Portfolio: Rapid Mapping. Available online: https://emergency.copernicus.eu/mapping/ems/rapid-mapping-portfolio (accessed on 12 July 2021).
- European Commission. Copernicus EMS-Mapping. EMSR250: Forest Fire Portugal. Available online: https://emergency.copernicus.eu/mapping/list-of-components/EMSR250 (accessed on 12 July 2021).
- European Commission. Copernicus EMS-Mapping. [EMSR250] Nelas: Delineation Map. Available online: https://emergency.copernicus.eu/mapping/ems-product-component/EMSR250_03NELAS_01DELINEATION_MAP/2 (accessed on 12 July 2021).
- Presidência do Conselho de Ministros. Decreto-Lei n.º 43/2019 - Aprova a orgânica do Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas, I. P. Diário da República n.º 63/2019, Série I de 2019-03-29; Portugal, 2019; pp. 1170–1776. [Google Scholar]
- Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Floresta. Cartografia Nacional de Áreas Ardidas dos Anos 1975 à Data Atual em Conformidade Com o Disposto no n.o 5 Do Art.o 2.o do Decreto-Lei n.o 124/2006, de 28 de Junho, na Redação Dada Pelo Decreto-Lei n.o 17/2009, de 14 de Janeiro. Available online: https://sig.icnf.pt/portal/home/item.html?id=983c4e6c4d5b4666b258a3ad5f3ea5af (accessed on 12 July 2021).
- Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas. Shapefile Área Ardida 2017. Available online: http://www.icnf.pt/portal/florestas/dfci/Resource/doc/cart/2019-08-14-AARDIDA_2017.zip (accessed on 12 July 2021).
- Noé, P. O SIPA—Sistema de Informação Para o Patrimônio Arquitetônico—Em Portugal. Rev. CPC 2016, esp21, 67–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Assembleia da República. Lei n.º 107/2001 - Estabelece as bases da política e do regime de protecção e valorização do património cultural. Diário da República n.o 209/2001, Série I-A de 2001-09-08; Portugal, 2001; pp. 5808–5829. [Google Scholar]
- Figueiredo, R.; Romão, X.; Paupério, E. Flood Risk Assessment of Cultural Heritage at Large Spatial Scales: Framework and Application to Mainland Portugal. J. Cult. Herit. 2020, 43, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DGPC. Endovélico Inventory. Available online: http://www.patrimoniocultural.gov.pt/en/patrimonio/patrimonio-imovel/patrimonio-arqueologico/endovelico-inventario/ (accessed on 12 July 2021).
- DGPC. Archaeologist’s Portal. Available online: http://www.patrimoniocultural.gov.pt/en/patrimonio/patrimonio-imovel/patrimonio-arqueologico/gestao-da-atividade-arqueologica/portal-do-arqueologo/ (accessed on 12 July 2021).
- Divisão de Inventário do Instituto Português de Arqueologia. Endovélico: Sistema de Gestão e Informação Arqueológica. Rev. Port. Arqueol. 2002, 5, 277–283. [Google Scholar]
- Drdácký, M.F. Flood Damage to Historic Buildings and Structures. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 2010, 24, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pozo-Antonio, J.S.; Sanmartín, P.; Serrano, M.; De la Rosa, J.M.; Miller, A.Z.; Sanjurjo-Sánchez, J. Impact of Wildfire on Granite Outcrops in Archaeological Sites Surrounded by Different Types of Vegetation. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 747, 141143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gomez-Heras, M.; McCabe, S.; Smith, B.J.; Fort, R. Impacts of Fire on Stone-Built Heritage. J. Archit. Conserv. 2009, 15, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luís, L. Incêndios Florestais e o Seu Impacto No Património Mundial: O Caso de Foz Côa. In Desafios na Gestão de Riscos em Património Cultural; Ramirez, C.E., Paupério, E., Romão, X., Eds.; Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Instituto da Construção, Junta de Castilla y Leon, Unidad de Gestión de Riesgos y Emergencias de Patrimonio Cultural da Junta de Castilla y Leon: Porto, Portugal, 2017; pp. 62–77. [Google Scholar]
- Real, F. Os Incêndios de 2003 e a Arqueologia Na Política Da Ordenamento Florestal. Al-Madan 2003, II, 202–203. [Google Scholar]
- Delgado, C.; Oosterbeek, L.; Cruz, A. Incêndios 2003: Estratégias e Resultados. Arkeos Perspect. em Diálogo 2006, 16, 77–88. [Google Scholar]
- Caninas, J.; Henriques, F.; Branco, P.C. Contributos Para Uma Caracterização Do Impacte Dos Fogos Florestais de 2003 Sobre o Património Arqueológico e o Património Construído No Distrito de Castelo Branco. Açafa On-line 2008, 1, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
Toponym | Type | Listed Status | Municipal Classification | Visited | Impact |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Igreja Matriz de Vinhó | Religious architecture | Public interest | Relevant built heritage | 1 | |
Igreja Matriz de Folgosinho | Religious architecture | Relevant built heritage | 1 | ||
Capela Sra. do Monte | Religious architecture | Relevant built heritage | 1 | ||
Capela Sta. Eufémia | Religious architecture | Relevant built heritage | 1 | ||
Casa do Judeu | Vernacular architecture | Relevant built heritage | 1 | ||
Capela de Sta. Marta | Religious architecture | Public interest | Relevant built heritage | 1 | |
Casa da Câmara | Civil architecture | Public interest | Relevant built heritage | 1 | |
Pelourinho | Pillory | National monument | Relevant built heritage | 1 | |
Paço de Melo | Civil architecture | Public interest | Relevant built heritage | 1 | |
Castelo de Folgosinho | Castle | Public interest | Relevant built heritage | 1 | |
Outeiro | Undefined | Public interest | Relevant built heritage | 1 | |
Misericórdia | Religious architecture | Relevant built heritage | 1 | ||
Capela S. Faustino | Religious architecture | Relevant built heritage | 1 | ||
Capela S. Pedro | Religious architecture | Relevant built heritage | 1 | ||
Solar Carvalho Cunha | Civil architecture | Relevant built heritage | 1 | ||
Solar Bento de Moura | Civil architecture | Relevant built heritage | 1 | ||
Capela do Santíssimo | Religious architecture | Relevant built heritage | 1 | ||
Capela Sra. do Porto | Religious architecture | Relevant built heritage | 1 | ||
Igreja S. Isidoro | Religious architecture | Relevant built heritage | 1 | ||
Solar | Civil architecture | Relevant built heritage | 1 | ||
Tronco do Ferrador | Ethnographic | Ethnographic heritage | 1 | ||
Galhardos | Pathway | Public interest | Ancient road network | ✓ | 4 |
Ponte das Cantinas | Bridge | Ancient road network | ✓ | 2 | |
Ponte do Aljão | Bridge | Ancient road network | ✓ | 1 | |
Bravoíssa | Inscription | Archaeological site | 1 | ||
Campo Redondo | Village | Archaeological site | ✓ | 1 | |
Quinxozo | Tomb | Archaeological site | 1 | ||
Tapada | Necropolis | Archaeological site | ✓ | 1 | |
Regada/Bacelo | Undefined | Archaeological site | 0 | ||
Chão do Pinto | Tomb | Archaeological site | 1 | ||
Moita do Cume | Tomb | Archaeological site | 1 | ||
Castelo | Walled village | Archaeological site | ✓ | 2 | |
Fraga | Undefined | Archaeological site | 0 | ||
Sítio da Horta | Undefined | Archaeological site | 0 | ||
Pai Moço | Undefined | Archaeological site | 0 | ||
Penedo da Marreca | Inscription | Archaeological site | 1 | ||
Barroca Girabolhos | Inscription | Archaeological site | 1 | ||
Lagar do Clergo | Winepress | Archaeological site | 1 | ||
Monte dos Galhardos | Menhir | Archaeological site | 1 | ||
Regada Grande | Necropolis | Archaeological site | ✓ | 1 | |
Quinta dos Botos | Winepress | Archaeological site | 1 | ||
Cama da Moura | Tomb | Archaeological site | 1 | ||
Penedo dos Mouros | Residential | Archaeological site | 1 | ||
Penedo dos Mouros | Tomb | Archaeological site | ✓ | 2 | |
Quinta da Moira | Tomb | Archaeological site | 1 | ||
Pedras da Forca | Forca | Relevant archaeological site | ✓ | 3 | |
Castelo | Tomb | Relevant archaeological site | ✓ | 2 | |
Casal São Pedro | Tomb | Relevant archaeological site | 1 | ||
Vale do Rossim | Undefined | Relevant archaeological site | 0 | ||
Castro Vedro | Village | Relevant archaeological site | ✓ | 3 | |
Castelejo | Walled village | Relevant archaeological site | ✓ | 2 | |
Risado/Arrasado | Necropolis | Relevant archaeological site | ✓ | 2 | |
Castelo | Undefined | Relevant archaeological site | 1 | ||
Lages Ruivas I | Winepress | Relevant archaeological site | ✓ | 1 | |
Penedo dos Mouros | Roqueiro castle | Relevant archaeological site | ✓ | 2 | |
Penedo dos Mouros | Residential | Relevant archaeological site | ✓ | 2 | |
Quinta da Moira | Rock sanctuary | Relevant archaeological site | ✓ | 1 |
Designation | Type | Impact |
---|---|---|
Aldeia das Dez | Treasure | None, as the moveable heritage was not exposed to the flames. |
Alto Zambujeiro | Tomb | None or minor. |
Ameal | Necropolis | None. |
Anta da Arcaínha | Dolmen | Even though the nearby forest burned, the site was not directly affected. However, during the reforestation process promoted by a local association, the site was partially damaged. |
Anta de Curral dos Mouros | Dolmen | Not directly affected. During the forest clearing process, a charred tree fell onto one of the pillars of the access corridor to the funeral chamber, tilting it. |
Anta da Coitena/Pinheiro dos Abraços | Dolmen | None or minor. |
Avô 3 | Pathway | None or minor. |
Calçada medieval de Vila Pouca da Beira | Pathway | None or minor. |
Casa do Penedo | Tower | None. |
Castelo | Castle | None. |
Castelo de Avô | Castle | None or minor. |
Castelo Verde | Village | None or minor. |
Digueifel e Digueifel 2 | Pebble heap | Minor, as the site was not directly affected. |
Espinhal | Tomb | None, as the site was not affected by the fire. |
Fiais da Beira | Fortified village | Colouring affected by the fire. |
Mata das Forcas | Necropolis | One of the graves is not impacted, whereas the other may in the future be covered by forest remnants. |
Olival dos Pobres | Tomb | The structure was not directly affected. Indirectly and as a consequence of the event, there are forest and agricultural remnants covering a part of the grave. |
Passal 1 | Necropolis | None, as the religious building that this site is part of was also not affected. |
Penedo do Gorgulão | Necropolis | None or minor. |
Pinhal da Fonte do Rei | Tomb | The grave dug in the rock was not directly hit, although some soot is present as a result of the fire. Regarding its surroundings, forest remnants are present, which may affect the visibility of the site in the future. |
Ponte Romana de Bobadela | Bridge | None or minor. |
Quinta de Salgodins | Necropolis | No impacts from the fire, but the site is adjoined by undergrowth. |
Quinta do Boco | Shrine | None. |
Quinta da Moreira de Baixo | Necropolis | None or minor. |
Quinta do Ribeiro Mouro | Necropolis | None, as the site was not affected by the fire. |
Ruínas Romanas de Bobadela | City | None or minor. |
Salgueiral | Necropolis | None. |
Santa Ovaia | Isolated findings | Any possibly existing structures are underground; thus, the impacts were minor. |
São Bartolomeu 1 e 2 | Misc. remains; Necropolis | The necropolis was occasionally affected by the soot present on the outcrops where the structures are inscribed. The uncontrolled growth of vegetation may hide the structures in the future. |
São João | Necropolis | None, although the site is covered by dense vegetation. |
São Pedro de Lourosa | Necropolis | No impact relatable to the event. |
Tapada | Tomb | The grave dug in the rock was not directly hit, although some soot is present as a result of the fire. Regarding its surroundings, the archaeological site is covered by dense vegetation, threatening its identification in the future. |
Tapada 1 | Tomb | The grave dug in the rock was not directly hit. Regarding its surroundings, the archaeological site is covered by dense vegetation, threatening its identification in the future. |
Tapada do Adão | Rock art | None or minor. |
Vale do Coito/Laje da Pereira | Tomb | None or minor. |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Figueiredo, R.; Paupério, E.; Romão, X. Understanding the Impacts of the October 2017 Portugal Wildfires on Cultural Heritage. Heritage 2021, 4, 2580-2598. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4040146
Figueiredo R, Paupério E, Romão X. Understanding the Impacts of the October 2017 Portugal Wildfires on Cultural Heritage. Heritage. 2021; 4(4):2580-2598. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4040146
Chicago/Turabian StyleFigueiredo, Rui, Esmeralda Paupério, and Xavier Romão. 2021. "Understanding the Impacts of the October 2017 Portugal Wildfires on Cultural Heritage" Heritage 4, no. 4: 2580-2598. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4040146