Next Article in Journal
The Role of Vitamin E in Slowing Down Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
Relationships between Gait Regularity and Cognitive Function, including Cognitive Domains and Mild Cognitive Impairment, in Community-Dwelling Older People
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Healthcare
Volume 9
Issue 11
10.3390/healthcare9111572
healthcare-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Perinatal Mental Health; The Role and the Effect of the Partner: A Systematic Review

by
Evangelia Antoniou
*,
Pinelopi Stamoulou
,
Maria-Dalida Tzanoulinou
and
Eirini Orovou
Department of Midwifery, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2021, 9(11), 1572; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111572
Submission received: 10 October 2021 / Revised: 10 November 2021 / Accepted: 17 November 2021 / Published: 18 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Women's Health Care)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pregnancy is a transitional period involving the most complex experiences in a woman’s life, during which the woman’s psychological status can be affected by a wide range of psychosocial variables. However, positive interpersonal relationships appear to constitute a supportive network that significantly influences perinatal mental health. Therefore, the presence of a supportive partner works psycho-protectively against the difficulties and pressures created by the transition to maternity. The aim of this study was to review systematically the influence of the partner on the woman’s psychology during the perinatal period. Fourteen research articles from PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar and PsycINFO were included in the review from a total of 1846 articles. Most studies have shown a correlation between the support from the partner and prenatal depression and anxiety. Support from the spouse during childbirth is related to the extent to which women feel safe during labor as well as the stress during childbirth. The role of the partner is very important in the occurrence of perinatal mental disorders in women. Of course, more research needs to be done in the field of perinatal mental health. The risk factors that lead to mental disorders need to be clarified and the role of the partner in the perinatal period requires reinforcement and needs to be given the necessary importance.

1. Introduction

It is already known that pregnancy and the transition to parenthood include significant biological and psychosocial changes that have been associated with increased anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms and discomfort. Approximately 20 to 50% of women in developing countries will be confronted with issues related to mental health during the perinatal period [1]. Perinatal mental illness is a major complication of pregnancy and the postpartum period. These disorders include depression, anxiety disorders and postpartum psychosis, which usually manifests as bipolar disorder [2], maternal obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) [3] and postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [4]. Perinatal mental illness has been recognized since the time of Hippocrates and commented on through the centuries. The International Marce Society for Perinatal Mental Health, devoted to the study of perinatal mental disorders, has published a significant number of case studies of women suffering from various forms of perinatal mental disorders, 150 years ago [5]. Nowadays, research in this field on the prevalence and risk factors of mental illness has increased dramatically; as a result, many government agencies and specialist teams have developed guidelines for the diagnosis and management of these diseases [6,7,8].
Depression and anxiety symptoms have been found to be the most frequent mental health issues that are manifested by women during the perinatal period from the beginning of pregnancy until one year later [9], while proposals have been made to ensure the provision of perinatal mental health services to women two years after childbirth [10]. Depression and anxiety have been found to affect both potential mothers and fathers [11,12]. The manifestation of mental health issues during the perinatal period can be attributed to the drastic psychological and psychosocial changes that the future parents face during the perinatal period [10].
The data presented above suggest that the mental health of both women and men faces many challenges during the perinatal period. However, data deriving from relevant studies regarding the prevalence rates of depression and anxiety symptoms among women and men during the perinatal period is controversial, since the prevalence rates range from 4.8 to 86.5% for depression and from 10.1 to 75.6% for anxiety [13]. Moreover, depression and anxiety symptoms manifested during the perinatal period have been found to have a significantly negative effect on the infant’s mental and physical health, since the manifestation of mental health issues has been found to be positively associated with preterm birth, lower birth weight [14], perinatal effects and cesarean section [15]. Thus, depression and anxiety symptoms during the perinatal period have been found to be both of high prevalence and a significant risk factor for the infant’s health. The symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress that women may experience from conception to one year after giving birth are described as perinatal distress [16]. Although perinatal distress can be connected to physiological processes, the literature shows that the social support [17] and the quality of social relationships are responsible for much of the variability in depressive symptoms among young mothers [18].
The term social support refers mainly to any kind of help received from various sources, with an emphasis on how the support is perceived by the recipient [19]. The term “partner support” means the process of responding with supportive actions (behavioral as well as psychological) to a difficulty or problem experienced by the partner in a couple relationship [20]. However, the most significant support source for the reduction of mental health issues during the perinatal period is the relationship with the partner. Many studies indicate that a future mother not only has a wide and effective social support network to deal with the risk of developing mental health problems during the perinatal period [21], but also the future mother’s relationship with her partner has been found to be one of the most effective and important protective factors during the perinatal period [22,23,24,25]. It is a fact that effective supportive behavior from the partner enhances relationship satisfaction and promotes mental and physical health. Satisfaction through a quality relationship, and the intimacy that results from it, has proven to be a strong prognostic factor of adequate mental health in the perinatal period for women [26]. Even in the case of women suffering from depression in pregnancy, the supportive role of the husband managed to minimize these depressive symptoms in the postnatal period [18].
Based upon the information provided above, it is evident that the manifestation of depression and anxiety symptoms is of high prevalence during the perinatal period, affecting both women and men. Moreover, the manifestation of mental health issues during the perinatal period is a significant risk factor negatively affecting the infant’s health [27]. Thus, it is significant to investigate potential protective factors that may lower the risk of manifesting mental health issues during this period. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate systematically the effect of partner relationship and partner support on the woman’s mental health status during the perinatal period.

2. Materials and Methods

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of partner relationship and partner support on the mental health status of women during the perinatal period. In particular, we investigated the extent to which parameters such as the couple’s marital status, the quality of their relationship and/or partner support during and after the woman’s pregnancy have an impact on the woman’s mental health status during the perinatal period. In order for this aim to be met, a systematic review of relevant studies was conducted. The research was carried out based on PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar and PsycINFO.
The keywords used were as follows: Perinatal mental health OR Perinatal distress AND support from spouse OR partner; Perinatal mental health OR Perinatal distress AND the role of partner OR spouse; Perinatal mental health OR Perinatal distress AND partner support OR spouse support; Perinatal mental health OR Perinatal distress AND prenatal depression; Perinatal mental health OR Perinatal distress AND prenatal anxiety; Perinatal mental health OR Perinatal distress AND couple relationship.
The timeline was set from 2010 to 2021 and out of 1846 articles only 14 were included in the review. More specifically, the research articles identified through the initial review were first screened by title and abstract. The full texts of the research papers were examined against the inclusion and exclusion criteria and from a total of 146 studies, a total of 112 reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were rejected as well as 19 articles in languages other than English (Figure 1). The study analyzed the women’s exposure to low partner support during the perinatal period, as well as domestic violence, infidelity and dissatisfaction with their marriage. As a perinatal outcome, we analyzed the perinatal distress (depression or anxiety or stress) that was documented with specific psychometric tools.
Regarding the methodological quality of the articles, nine criteria were used to rate them. The first group of criteria (selection) consists of 4 criteria concerning the exposure of the sample. The first criterion, concerning the representative exposure sample, was met by all studies except three. The second criterion concerned the choice of non-exposure, i.e., we did not know before which women were exposed to low support from the partner, was met in all studies. All studies met the third criterion (concerns whether there were exposure findings), because the exposure was identified by the specific psychometric tools. In all studies the outcome did not precede the study (the perinatal distress was the final result of each study), so the fourth criterion was met. The second group of criteria (comparability) consists of 2 criteria concerning adjustment for confusing factors. Therefore, the fifth criterion, which was the adaptation for the educational level, was met in all articles except two. In all studies apart from three, an adaptation for an additional confounding factor had been used. The third group of criteria (results) consists of 3 criteria, evaluating the quality of the results of each study. All studies met the seventh criterion for evaluating the effects of low partner support with psychometric tools and also, in all cohorts and prospective studies there was sufficient follow-up time, thus the cross-sectional studies did not fulfill the eighth criterion. Finally, all articles met non-bias of wear, the ninth criterion. The score of studies varied between 6 and 9 (Table 1).

3. Results

The 14 studies included in this review were carried out in various countries. Of the total research, 7 studies were cross-sectional and 7 were prospective or cohort studies (Table 2). Regarding the methodological evaluation of the studies, 6 studies were very good and 7 were of moderate methodological quality (Table 1). More specifically, in the study of Bernard et al. (2018) [28], which was carried out in Jamaica, all available data support a connection link between the low partner support and prenatal depression, with an additional factor of financial difficulties. The mental states of 3517 pregnant women were diagnosed by psychometric tools and the results showed that one in five women had a high likelihood of prenatal depression. The Cheng et al. (2016) [21] cohort study, which analyzed 2 projects, Project Viva and Project ACCESS (the first between 1999 and 2002 and the second between August 2002 and December 2009), highlights higher levels of prenatal anxiety and depression among pregnant women who reported low partner support. Additionally, the women from Project Viva were more likely to smoke, but gained less weight as support from their partners increased. The cohort of Jonsdottir (2017) [29] aimed to investigate the association between the partner relationship and social support when pregnant women are dealing with perinatal distress. However, the results show that pregnant women who were dissatisfied in their partner relationship, mainly with the division of household tasks and child care, were four times more likely to experience perinatal distress, according to the specific psychometric tools. Some other vulnerable factors were lower educational level and unemployment. In addition, the 1062 cases of pregnant women studied by Hartley et al. (2011) [30] were evaluated on the prenatal depressed mood, and the results showed that 39% of women were suffering during pregnancy. The research also shows that low partner support and intimate partner violence constitute the strongest predictors of a depressed mood during pregnancy. Furthermore, two other factors (lower income and younger maternal age) were identified as contributing factors to prenatal distress.
The cross-sectional study of Nasreen et al. (2011) [31] investigated the prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms and explored the associated partner involvement. However, the results of this study show that 18% of the sample suffered from depressive symptoms and 29% from anxiety symptoms during pregnancy, associated with physical partner violence and forced sex, as well as the interaction between poor household economy and poor partner relationship. Furthermore, the history of previous depression was an additional factor for prenatal distress. In the cross-sectional study of Yanikkerem et al. (2013) [32], data on 651 pregnant women were collected from a Turkish hospital. In the cases of depressive and anxiety symptoms, the dissatisfaction of women with their marriage is obvious. More specifically, a percentage of 14.5% of pregnant women were more likely to be depressed than women who were satisfied with their marriage. The low educational level of those women and the unplanned pregnancies were additional factors.
The cohort study of Bayrampour et al. (2015) [33] investigated the relationship between prenatal transient and persistent anxiety and risk factors during pregnancy. The results showed that the poor quality of the marital relationship and partner tension were exclusive predictors of anxiety and depressive symptoms in women, in addition to their past psychiatric history.
A recent cross-sectional study of Kazemi et al. (2021) [34] investigated the partner’s emotional reaction to pregnancy. The researchers concluded that the partner’s low emotional reaction to pregnancy was adversely related to prenatal depression and anxiety. Furthermore, the results show that a desirable emotional reaction from the partner decreases anxiety and depression levels that result from an unplanned pregnancy. Another cross-sectional study of Salehi et al. (2017) [35] showed the association between women’s marital satisfaction and anxiety during pregnancy. According to this study, marital satisfaction could predict state anxiety (21%) and trait anxiety (17%) of the pregnant women.
There were 5 studies in our review describing the results of partner support in the postnatal period. The prospective study of Sapkota et al. (2012) [36] examined the impact of prenatal support during labor on maternal anxiety and depressive symptoms in women. The study observations show that continuous support from the spouse during a woman’s labor was associated with a higher degree of postpartum support than for a woman who was not supported by her husband during labor. In the prospective cohort study of Xie et al. (2010) [37], the effect of perinatal family support on postpartum depression was investigated. The results show that low prenatal support from all family members was not associated with increased risk of depression, while low prenatal support from partner and parents was associated with an increased risk. In addition, low postnatal support from all family members was associated with a high risk of depression, suggesting that the support from a partner during the postnatal period was much stronger than the effect of family support before delivery. In the Iles et al. (2011) [38] prospective cohort study, 372 couples were examined for postpartum traumatic stress and depression. The examination took place the first days, six weeks and three months postpartum and the results show that symptoms were significantly related within couples. Moreover, the men’s traumatic symptoms predicted women’s traumatic stress and the women’s dissatisfaction with partner support was associated with greater levels of postnatal depression. In the Stapleton et al. (2012) [39] prospective study, which investigated women’s perceived partner support in pregnancy, a supportive partner may contribute to improved maternal and child well-being after childbirth. In addition, the results show that stronger antenatal partner support predicted lower maternal distress in the postpartum period.
A cross-sectional study on women’s intentions of formal and informal help-seeking in the perinatal period by Fonseca et al. (2017) [40] identified the role of the partner in women’s professional help-seeking and the effect on her mental health problems. More specifically, a significant indirect outcome on the relationship between women’s intention to seek informal and professional help take place through the women’s perceived encouragement from the partner to ask for professional help.

4. Discussion

The aim of our systematic review was to describe the effect of partner relationship and partner support on the woman’s mental health status during the perinatal period. The present study provides a strong link between low support from the partner and perinatal distress in women. The findings, according to the included articles, show that the partner’s role is a very important role in the mother’s perinatal period [50]. Actually, for many women, their partner is key in the identification of their perinatal distress and significantly supports the woman in seeking professional help [40,51].
Severe mental health problems during the antenatal period were a more frequent sign in women with low partner support. More specifically, there is a strong correlation between prenatal depression [28,30], prenatal anxiety [33,35] or prenatal distress [21,29,31,32,34], which constitutes an umbrella term to describe anxiety and depressive symptoms during the perinatal period [52], with low partner support. Of course, domestic violence during pregnancy [28,30,31], partner infidelity [28,30] or partner tension [33] are considered factors of low satisfaction in a partner relationship [53]. However, the probabilities that increase the levels of woman’s dissatisfaction in the partner are explained by the positive or negative support provided to her by her partner and financial difficulties. In fact, prosperity in the relationship can be disrupted through financial problems [28,29,30,54], while lower educational levels [29,32], younger age [30] and a history of mental illness [31,33] can be contributing factors to prenatal distress [30]. Furthermore, the fact that women with unplanned and unwanted pregnancies have a significantly higher rate of depression symptoms than women with planned pregnancies [32,34] suggests that they may need more partner and social support.
Certainly, a non-supportive partner during pregnancy will not be able to offer support to the mother during labor and also will not be able to offer her support during the postpartum period [36,55]. This can be explained by the opportunity provided to the partner by his wife to become part of the experience of childbirth and to participate directly in the care of the woman and the infant. At this point, it should be mentioned that a postpartum woman needs more support from her family than in pregnancy, especially from her husband [37]. A possible explanation for this phenomenon could be that some women may be more vulnerable to partner and family postpartum support, due to the need for infant care and the hormonal variability that makes her more sensitive [56].
The high quality and quantity of prenatal support of the partner can contribute not only to the improvement of the health of the mother, but also of the infant during the postpartum period [39]. One possible indirect mechanism is that effective partner support and lower maternal emotional distress could both enable mothers to adopt more sensitive and committed behaviors.
Finally, partner support was a major predictor for maternal distress. A poor-quality couple relationship, particularly in conjunction with other stressors such as financial difficulties, partner infidelity, partner tension and domestic violence, is a strong predictor for perinatal distress. The World Health Organization has advised health policies on mental health problems [57] and especially on maternal mental health [58], emphasizing the importance of early detection and screening for perinatal distress, perinatal care and implications for training.

5. Conclusions

Pregnancy is a period of hormonal and emotional changes in a woman’s life. During this period the woman has more access to the health system and therefore, it is a reasonable period to apply screening for prenatal distress. Given the high prevalence of perinatal distress, early midwifery interventions may have important maternal and child outcomes. The role of the partner should be strengthened and included in prenatal care as it seems it is very helpful. The partner’s own mental health should be evaluated at the same time, since it is expected to contribute substantially to the improvement of the mother’s mental health. Furthermore, midwives and other perinatal health care professionals should work together to provide support and empowerment to women and couples throughout the perinatal period. In addition, through the Mental Health Liaison Team, suspicious cases will be detected, evaluated and treated individually.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.S. and M.-D.T.; methodology, E.A., P.S. and M.-D.T.; validation, E.A.; investigation, P.S. and M.-D.T.; resources, P.S. and M.-D.T.; data curation, E.A., P.S., M.-D.T. and E.O.; writing—original draft preparation, P.S. and M.-D.T.; writing—review and editing, E.A., P.S., M.-D.T. and E.O.; visualization, E.A.; supervision, E.A.; project administration, P.S. and M.-D.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Biaggi, A.; Conroy, S.; Pawlby, S.; Pariante, C.M. Identifying the Women at Risk of Antenatal Anxiety and Depression: A Systematic Review. J. Affect. Disord. 2016, 191, 62–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. O’Hara, M.W.; Wisner, K.L. Perinatal Mental Illness: Definition, Description and Aetiology. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2014, 28, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Trust, N.; National, C. What is Perinatal OCD and What are the Treatments? Available online: https://www.nct.org.uk/life-parent/how-you-might-be-feeling/what-perinatal-ocd-and-what-are-treatments (accessed on 10 November 2021).
  4. Dekel, S.; Stuebe, C.; Dishy, G. Childbirth Induced Posttraumatic Stress Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Risk Factors. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. The International Marce Society for Perinatal Mental Health. Available online: https://marcesociety.com/ (accessed on 2 October 2021).
  6. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Management of Perinatal Mood Disorders: A National Clinical Guideline; Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network: Edinburgh, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  7. 1 Recommendations Antenatal and Postnatal Mental Health: Clinical Management and Service Guidance Guidance NICE. Available online: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg192/chapter/1-Recommendations (accessed on 10 June 2020).
  8. Yonkers, K.A.; Wisner, K.L.; Stowe, Z.; Leibenluft, E.; Cohen, L.; Miller, L.; Manber, R.; Viguera, A.; Suppes, T.; Altshuler, L. Management of Bipolar Disorder during Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period. Am. J. Psychiatry 2004, 161, 608–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. What Does Perinatal Mean?: Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust. Available online: https://www.sabp.nhs.uk/our-services/mental-health/perinatal/what-does-perinatal-mean (accessed on 10 November 2021).
  10. Howard, L.M.; Khalifeh, H. Perinatal Mental Health: A Review of Progress and Challenges. World Psychiatry 2020, 19, 313–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gavin, N.I.; Gaynes, B.N.; Lohr, K.N.; Meltzer-Brody, S.; Gartlehner, G.; Swinson, T. Perinatal Depression: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Incidence. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 106, 1071–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Paulson, J.F.; Bazemore, S.D. Prenatal and Postpartum Depression in Fathers and Its Association with Maternal Depression: A Meta-Analysis. JAMA 2010, 303, 1961–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gourounti, K.; Lykeridou, K.; Taskou, C.; Kafetsios, K.; Sandall, J. A Survey of Worries of Pregnant Women: Reliability and Validity of the Greek Version of the Cambridge Worry Scale. Midwifery 2012, 28, 746–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Littleton, H.L.; Bye, K.; Buck, K.; Amacker, A. Psychosocial Stress during Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2010, 31, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Andersson, L.; Sundström-Poromaa, I.; Wulff, M.; Aström, M.; Bixo, M. Implications of Antenatal Depression and Anxiety for Obstetric Outcome. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004, 104, 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Perinatal Distress: Early Screening and Management CESPHN. Available online: https://www.cesphn.org.au/news/latest-updates/57-enews/2425-perinatal-distress-early-screening-and-management (accessed on 7 October 2021).
  17. Ginja, S.; Coad, J.; Bailey, E.; Kendall, S.; Goodenough, T.; Nightingale, S.; Smiddy, J.; Day, C.; Deave, T.; Lingam, R. Associations between Social Support, Mental Wellbeing, Self-Efficacy and Technology Use in First-Time Antenatal Women: Data from the BaBBLeS Cohort Study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018, 18, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Edwards, R.C.; Thullen, M.J.; Isarowong, N.; Shiu, C.-S.; Henson, L.; Hans, S.L. Supportive Relationships and the Trajectory of Depressive Symptoms among Young, African American Mothers. J. Fam. Psychol. 2012, 26, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Haber, M.G.; Cohen, J.L.; Lucas, T.; Baltes, B.B. The Relationship between Self-Reported Received and Perceived Social Support: A Meta-Analytic Review. Am. J. Community Psychol. 2007, 39, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Iafrate, R.; Donato, S.; Bertoni, A. Partner Support. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research; Michalos, A.C., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 4640–4644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cheng, E.R.; Rifas-Shiman, S.L.; Perkins, M.E.; Rich-Edwards, J.W.; Gillman, M.W.; Wright, R.; Taveras, E.M. The Influence of Antenatal Partner Support on Pregnancy Outcomes. J. Womens Health (Larchmt) 2016, 25, 672–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Dennis, C.-L.; Chung-Lee, L. Postpartum Depression Help-Seeking Barriers and Maternal Treatment Preferences: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Birth 2006, 33, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Highet, N.J.; Gemmill, A.W.; Milgrom, J. Depression in the Perinatal Period: Awareness, Attitudes and Knowledge in the Australian Population. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 2011, 45, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hopkins, J.; Campbell, S.B. Development and Validation of a Scale to Assess Social Support in the Postpartum Period. Arch. Womens Ment. Health 2008, 11, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Rowe, H.J.; Fisher, J.R. Development of a Universal Psycho-Educational Intervention to Prevent Common Postpartum Mental Disorders in Primiparous Women: A Multiple Method Approach. BMC Public Health 2010, 10, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Beck, C.T. Predictors of Postpartum Depression: An Update. Nurs. Res. 2001, 50, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Leight, K.L.; Fitelson, E.M.; Weston, C.A.; Wisner, K.L. Childbirth and Mental Disorders. Int. Rev. Psychiatry 2010, 22, 453–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bernard, O.; Gibson, R.C.; McCaw-Binns, A.; Reece, J.; Coore-Desai, C.; Shakespeare-Pellington, S.; Samms-Vaughan, M. Antenatal Depressive Symptoms in Jamaica Associated with Limited Perceived Partner and Other Social Support: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jonsdottir, S.S.; Thome, M.; Steingrimsdottir, T.; Lydsdottir, L.B.; Sigurdsson, J.F.; Olafsdottir, H.; Swahnberg, K. Partner Relationship, Social Support and Perinatal Distress among Pregnant Icelandic Women. Women Birth 2017, 30, e46–e55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Hartley, M.; Tomlinson, M.; Greco, E.; Comulada, W.S.; Stewart, J.; le Roux, I.; Mbewu, N.; Rotheram-Borus, M.J. Depressed Mood in Pregnancy: Prevalence and Correlates in Two Cape Town Peri-Urban Settlements. Reprod. Health 2011, 8, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Nasreen, H.E.; Kabir, Z.N.; Forsell, Y.; Edhborg, M. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms during Pregnancy: A Population Based Study in Rural Bangladesh. BMC Women’s Health 2011, 11, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Yanikkerem, E.; Ay, S.; Mutlu, S.; Goker, A. Antenatal Depression: Prevalence and Risk Factors in a Hospital Based Turkish Sample. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2013, 63, 472–477. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bayrampour, H.; McDonald, S.; Tough, S. Risk Factors of Transient and Persistent Anxiety during Pregnancy. Midwifery 2015, 31, 582–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kazemi, A.; Ghaedrahmati, M.; Kheirabadi, G. Partner’s Emotional Reaction to Pregnancy Mediates the Relationship between Pregnancy Planning and Prenatal Mental Health. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021, 21, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Salehi, F.; Shahhosseini, Z. Association between Women’s Marital Satisfaction and Anxiety during Pregnancy. Iran. J. Psychiatry Behav. Sci. 2017, 11, e7937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sapkota, S.; Kobayashi, T.; Takase, M. Impact on Perceived Postnatal Support, Maternal Anxiety and Symptoms of Depression in New Mothers in Nepal When Their Husbands Provide Continuous Support during Labour. Midwifery 2013, 29, 1264–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xie, R.-H.; Yang, J.; Liao, S.; Xie, H.; Walker, M.; Wen, S.W. Prenatal Family Support, Postnatal Family Support and Postpartum Depression. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2010, 50, 340–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Iles, J.; Slade, P.; Spiby, H. Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms and Postpartum Depression in Couples after Childbirth: The Role of Partner Support and Attachment. J. Anxiety Disord. 2011, 25, 520–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Stapleton, L.R.T.; Schetter, C.D.; Westling, E.; Rini, C.; Glynn, L.M.; Hobel, C.J.; Sandman, C.A. Perceived Partner Support in Pregnancy Predicts Lower Maternal and Infant Distress. J. Fam. Psychol. 2012, 26, 453–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Fonseca, A.; Canavarro, M.C. Women’s Intentions of Informal and Formal Help-Seeking for Mental Health Problems during the Perinatal Period: The Role of Perceived Encouragement from the Partner. Midwifery 2017, 50, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Cox, J.L.; Holden, J.M.; Sagovsky, R. Detection of Postnatal Depression. Development of the 10-Item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br. J. Psychiatry 1987, 150, 782–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Available online: https://www.apa.org/pi/about/publications/caregivers/practice-settings/assessment/tools/beck-depression (accessed on 10 October 2021).
  43. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Available online: https://www.apa.org/pi/about/publications/caregivers/practice-settings/assessment/tools/trait-state (accessed on 10 October 2021).
  44. Rini, C.; Schetter, C.D.; Hobel, C.J.; Glynn, L.M.; Sandman, C.A. Effective Social Support: Antecedents and Consequences of Partner Support during Pregnancy. Pers. Relatsh. 2006, 13, 207–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Power, M.J.; Champion, L.A.; Aris, S.J. The Development of a Measure of Social Support: The Significant Others (SOS) Scale. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 1988, 27, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pais-Ribeiro, J.; Silva, I.; Ferreira, T.; Martins, A.; Meneses, R.; Baltar, M. Validation Study of a Portuguese Version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Psychol. Health Med. 2007, 12, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Collins, S.; Long, A. Working with the Psychological Effects of Trauma: Consequences for Mental Health-Care Workers—A Literature Review. J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs. 2003, 10, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Locke, H.J.; Wallace, K.M. Short Marital-Adjustment and Prediction Tests: Their Reliability and Validity. Marriage Fam. Living 1959, 21, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Logsdon, M.C.; Usui, W.M. The Postpartum Support Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties in Adolescents. J. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatr. Nurs. 2006, 19, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Atkinson, J.; Smith, V.; Carroll, M.; Sheaf, G.; Higgins, A. Perspectives of Partners of Mothers Who Experience Mental Distress in the Postnatal Period: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Evidence Synthesis. Midwifery 2021, 93, 102868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Higgins, A. Perinatal Mental Health: An. Exploration of Practices, Policies, Processes and Education Needs of Midwives and Nurses within Maternity and Primary Care Services in Ireland; Health Service Executive: Dublin, Ireland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  52. Premji, S. Perinatal Distress in Women in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Allostatic Load as a Framework to Examine the Effect of Perinatal Distress on Preterm Birth and Infant Health. Matern. Child. Health J. 2014, 18, 2393–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Domestic and Family Violence in Pregnancy and Early Parenthood. Available online: https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/publications/domestic-and-family-violence-pregnancy-and-early-parenthood (accessed on 9 October 2021).
  54. Stress during Pregnancy Due to Financial Challenges. In International Forum for Wellbeing in Pregnancy; Available online: https://www.ifwip.org/pregnancy-financial-strain-money-worries-stress-work/ (accessed on 10 October 2021).
  55. Gjerdingen, D.K.; Froberg, D.G.; Fontaine, P. The Effects of Social Support on Women’s Health during Pregnancy, Labor and Delivery, and the Postpartum Period. Fam Med. 1991, 23, 370–375. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Buckley, S.J. Hormonal Physiology of Childbearing: Evidence and Implications for Women, Babies, and Maternity Care; The National Partnership for Women & Families: Suite, WA, USA, 2015; p. 248. [Google Scholar]
  57. Mental Health and Development: Targeting People with Mental Health Conditions as A Vulnerable Group. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789241563949 (accessed on 9 October 2021).
  58. Perinatal Mental Health: Bridging the Gaps in Policy and Practice. 2. Available online: https://www.euro.who.int/Perinatal-mental-health-bridging-gaps- (accessed on 12 October 2021).
Healthcare 09 01572 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow chart: structure search strategy.
Figure 1. Flow chart: structure search strategy.
Healthcare 09 01572 g001
Table
Table 1. Methodological quality of the studies.
Table 1. Methodological quality of the studies.
Author/YearSelectionComparabilityResult Total
1. Bernard (2018) [28]* * * *- * * - *7
2. Cheng (2016) [21]* * * ** ** * *9
3. Jonsdottir (2017) [29]* * * ** ** * *9
4. Hartley (2011) [30]* * * ** * * - *8
5. Nasreen (2011) [31]* * * ** -* - *7
6. Yanikkerem (2013) [32]* * * ** -* - *7
7. Bayrampour (2015) [33]* * * ** ** * * 9
8. Kazemi (2021) [34]* * * * * -* - *7
9. Salehi (2017) [35]- * * *- - * - *5
10. Sapkota (2012) [36]- * * ** -* * *7
11. Xie (2010) [37]* * * * * ** * *9
12. Iles (2011) [38]* * * * * ** * * 9
13. Stapleton (2012) [39]* * * * * * * * *9
14. Fonseca (2017) [40]- * * ** ** - *7
Notes: All 9 criteria were 1. Representative exposure sample, 2. selection of non-exposed, 3. exposure finding, 4. outcome did not precede the study, 5. adaptation for educational level, 6. adaptation for additional confounding factor, 7. outcome evaluation, 8. adequate monitoring time, 9. non-bias of wear. The symbol (*) means that the study met the specific criterion and the symbol; (-) means that the study did not meet it. Selection has 4 criteria 1. 2. 3. 4. Comparability has 2 criteria 5. 6. Results has 3 criteria 7. 8. 9.
Table
Table 2. Studies included in the review.
Table 2. Studies included in the review.
Author/YearDesignStart/ExpiryNDataCountryExposurePerinatal Outcomes
1. Bernard, (2018) [28]Cross-sectional study1 July–30 September 20113517
women		JA-Kids Birth CohortJamaicaLow partner support, violence,
partner infidelity		Prenatal
depression
2. Cheng (2016) [21]Cohort study1999–20092641
women		Projects Viva and ACCESSUSALow partner supportPrenatal anxiety and depressive symptoms
3. Jonsdottir (2017) [29]Cohort study2006–2012562
women		The Icelandic study of perinatal mental healthIcelandDissatisfaction in partner relationshipPrenatal
distress
4. Hartley (2011) [30]Cross-sectional study20091062
women		Philani Mentor Mothers ProjectSouth AfricaLow partner support, intimate partner violencePrenatal
depressed mood
5. Nasreen (2011) [31]Cross-sectional studyJuly 2008 to August 2009720
women		BRAC health programBangladeshPhysical partner violence, violence during pregnancy, forced sex, interaction between poor household economy and poor partner relationship.Prenatal
depressive and anxiety symptoms
6.Yanikkerem (2013) [32]Cross-sectional studyApril–September 2011651
women		HospitalTurkeyDissatisfaction with marriagePrenatal
depressive and anxiety symptoms
7. Bayrampour (2015) [33]Cohort study2008–20103021
women		All Our Babies cohortCanadaPoor quality of marital
relationship, partner
tension		Prenatal anxiety
8. Kazemi (2021) [34]Cross-sectional studyAugust 2017–April 2018303
women		HospitalsIranLow partner reaction to pregnancyPrenatal anxiety and depression
9. Salehi (2017) [35]Cross-sectional studyMarch–July 2015147
women		Health care centersIranLow marital satisfactionPrenatal anxiety
10. Sapkota (2012) [36]Prospective studyFebruary–April
2011		231
women		HospitalNepalLack of support from a husband during laborPostnatal depression
11.Xie (2010) [37]Prospective cohort studyFebruary–September 2007534
women		Maternal and Infant HospitalChinaLow support from partnerPostnatal
depression
12. Iles (2011) [38]Prospective cohort studyBetween
2005–2006		372
couples		HospitalUKDissatisfaction with partner supportPostnatal
depression
13. Stapleton (2012) [39]Prospective study2012
A part from a large survey		272
women		2 large urban medical centersUSALow quantity and quality of partner
support		Postnatal emotional distress
(anxiety and depression
14. Fonseca (2017) [40]Cross-sectional studyNovember 2014–March 2015231
women		Internet surveyPortugalLess encouragement from partnerPerinatal distress
Notes: The psychometric tools used were as follows: the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) [41], the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) [42], the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) [43], the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), the Social Support Effectiveness (SSE) [44], the Significant Others Scale, (SOS) [45], the Enrich marital satisfaction questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS [46], the Adult Attachment Scale (AAS) [47], the Marital Adjustment Test (MAT) [48], the Postpartum Support Questionnaire (PSQ) [49].
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Antoniou, E.; Stamoulou, P.; Tzanoulinou, M.-D.; Orovou, E. Perinatal Mental Health; The Role and the Effect of the Partner: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2021, 9, 1572. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111572

AMA Style

Antoniou E, Stamoulou P, Tzanoulinou M-D, Orovou E. Perinatal Mental Health; The Role and the Effect of the Partner: A Systematic Review. Healthcare. 2021; 9(11):1572. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111572

Chicago/Turabian Style

Antoniou, Evangelia, Pinelopi Stamoulou, Maria-Dalida Tzanoulinou, and Eirini Orovou. 2021. "Perinatal Mental Health; The Role and the Effect of the Partner: A Systematic Review" Healthcare 9, no. 11: 1572. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111572

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop