Next Article in Journal
Effect of Omega-3 Microcapsules Addition on the Profile of Volatile Compounds in Enriched Dry-Cured and Cooked Sausages
Next Article in Special Issue
The Relationship between Glucosinolates and the Sensory Characteristics of Steamed-Pureed Turnip (Brassica Rapa subsp. Rapa L.)
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of In Vitro Digestion on Antioxidant Activity of Enriched Apple Snacks with Grape Juice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Low pH Enhances the Glucosinolate-Mediated Yellowing of Takuan-zuke under Low Salt Conditions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 9
Issue 11
10.3390/foods9111682
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seasonal Variation of Glucosinolate Hydrolysis Products in Commercial White and Red Cabbages (Brassica oleracea var. capitata)

by
Nicole S. Wermter
1,2,
Sascha Rohn
2,3 and
Franziska S. Hanschen
1,*
1
Plant Quality and Food Security, Leibniz-Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (IGZ), Theodor-Echtermeyer-Weg 1, 14979 Grossbeeren, Germany
2
Hamburg School of Food Science, Institute of Food Chemistry, University of Hamburg, Grindelallee 117, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
3
Department of Food Chemistry and Analysis, Institute of Food Technology and Food Chemistry, Technische Universität Berlin, TIB 4/3-1, Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, 13355 Berlin, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2020, 9(11), 1682; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111682
Submission received: 26 October 2020 / Revised: 9 November 2020 / Accepted: 12 November 2020 / Published: 17 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research on Glucosinolates in Food Products)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Brassica vegetables contain glucosinolates, which are well-known for their potential to form health-promoting isothiocyanates. Among those crucifers, white and red cabbage are commonly consumed vegetables, exhibiting different glucosinolate and hydrolysis profiles thereof. Regarding the health beneficial effects from these vegetables, more information, especially concerning the seasonal variation of glucosinolate profiles and the formation of their bioactive hydrolysis products in commercial cabbages, is needed. In this study, glucosinolates and glucosinolate hydrolysis product profiles in red and white cabbages from three different food retailers were monitored over six different sampling dates across the selling season in autumn. For the first time, it was shown that, while glucosinolate profiles were similar in each cabbage variety, glucosinolate hydrolysis product profiles and hydrolysis behavior varied considerably over the season. The highest total isothiocyanate concentrations were observed in conventional red (1.66 μmol/g FW) and organic white (0.93 μmol/g FW) cabbages purchased at the first sampling date in September. Here, red cabbage was with up to 1.06 μmol/g FW of 4-(methylsulfinyl)butyl isothiocyanate (sulforaphane), an excellent source for this health-promoting isothiocyanate. Cabbages purchased 11 weeks later in autumn released lower levels of isothiocyanates, but mainly nitriles and epithionitriles. The results indicate that commercial cabbages purchased in early autumn could be healthier options than those purchased later in the year.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

With a consumption of 5.2 kg/person and year in 2017/2018, red cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. rubra) and white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. alba) are the most consumed Brassicaceae vegetables in Germany, contributing to 5% of total vegetable intake [1]. These vegetables are rich in glucosinolates (GLSs), secondary, sulfurous plant constituents, which are particularly present in vacuoles of plant cells of the Brassicaceae family. The chemical GLS structure is determined by the nature of the side chain, depending on the amino acid inserted during biosynthesis [2,3] and GLSs typically contain a glucose unit, bound with a central carbon atom with nitrogen grouping via a thioether bridge. The carbon atom, in turn, is linked to a sulfate group and an organic aglycone residue, possessing an alkyl, alkenyl, aryl, or indole group [2]. This organic residue is inherent to the GLS, its chemical properties and its flavor, respectively [4,5]. Upon attack by herbivores or due to cutting or chopping of vegetables rich in GLSs, GLSs, which were previously present in spatially separated cell vacuoles, are hydrolyzed by myrosinase to various herbivore-toxic degradation products [6,7]. Hydrolysis by myrosinase occurs due to enzymatic cleavage of the thioglycoside bond, first resulting in an unstable aglucone (thiohydroximate-O-sulfate). The aglucone can then undergo a lossen-like rearrangement to form isothiocyanates (ITCs) or decompose into nitriles and molecular sulfur. Moreover, in the presence of certain proteins such as the epithiospecifier protein (ESP), an aglycone with a terminal double bond favors epithionitrile (ETN) formation [7].
Consumption of ITCs can positively affect human health as they have antimicrobial, antidiabetogenic, chemopreventive, and anticarcinogenic properties [8,9]. Previous studies have shown a positive correlation between ITC uptake and cancer prevention [8,10,11], and especially 4-(methylsulfinyl)butyl ITC (sulforaphane; 4MSOB-ITC) is valued for its anticarcinogenic potential [8]. Simple nitriles and ETNs on the other hand, seem to have less health beneficial effects [12,13]. Studies have elucidated that Brassica vegetables, not only ITCs, but also nitriles and ETNs can be the most predominant degradation products [14,15]. Consequently, in order to estimate the health beneficial potential of Brassica vegetables, it is of great importance to not only analyze intact GLSs, but also their behavior during hydrolysis.
The natural GLS content in vegetables varies in accordance with genotype, plant developmental step, soil and cultivation conditions, and other ecophysiological influences, but it is also affected by storage [14,16,17]. Moreover, GLS levels vary over the growth season and several studies reported higher GLS levels in B. oleracea plants grown in spring compared to plants grown in autumn [17], while in broccoli (B. oleracea var. italica), GLS levels were higher when grown in the summer season compared to the spring season [18]. Similarly, Nuñez-Gómez et al. (2020) recently reported higher GLS levels in broccoli grown in autumn compared to broccoli grown in the spring season. Moreover, when comparing two spring seasons, the one with less rainy days and higher temperature resulted in higher GLS levels [19]. Experiments performed under controlled conditions indicate that temperature, as well as day length affect GLS biosynthesis in B. oleracea in a structure-dependent way [20,21,22].
In order to predict GLS-based health beneficial properties, more information especially concerning GLS profiles and especially on their hydrolysis behavior in Brassica foods available for the consumer, is needed. Possessing a long harvesting period—typically ranging from June to November—red and white cabbages are facing seasonal changes and different ecophysiological influences, which can have a great impact on the GLS profile [16,20] and might also affect the potential to form health-preventive ITC. To date, little is known about how GLS hydrolysis products are affected by different cultivation conditions. No revealing insight has been given on how GLS, and even more importantly, the formation behavior of their hydrolysis products varies in commercial cabbages across the whole season. Therefore, the objective of this study was to monitor the variation of GLS levels and the formation of their bioactive hydrolysis products in commercial red and white cabbage heads obtained from three local retailers in Germany and to link the data with the cultivation practices and post-harvest storage conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Allyl GLS (Allyl; ≥99%, reference compound), 4-hydroxybenzyl GLS (4OHbenzyl; purity ≥99%, internal standard), and methylene chloride (GC Ultra Grade, solvent) were purchased from Carl Roth GmbH and Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany). Allyl ITC (Allyl-ITC; ≥99%, reference compound), benzonitrile (≥99.9%, internal standard), DEAE-Sephadex A-25 (anion exchanger), and the reference compounds 3-butenenitrile (Allyl-CN; ≥98%), 4-pentenenitrile (3But-CN; ≥97%), 3-phenylpropanenitrile (≥99%), were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH (Steinheim, Germany). The reference compounds 3-butenyl ITC (3But-ITC; ≥95%) and 4-pentenyl ITC (≥95%) were purchased from TCI Deutschland GmbH (Eschborn, Germany). 3-(Methylsulfinyl)propyl ITC (3MSOP-ITC) and 4-(methylsulfanyl)butyl ITC (4MTB-ITC; ≥98%) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Heidelberg, Germany). 4-(Methylsulfinyl)butyl ITC (4MSOB-ITC) was purchased from Enzo Life Sciences GmbH (Lörrach, Germany). The ETN 1-cyano-2,3-epithiopropane (CETP; ≥95%) was synthesized by Taros Chemicals GmbH and Co. KG (Dortmund, Germany) and 1-cyano-3,4-epithiobutane (CETB; ≥95%) was synthetized by ASCA GmbH Angewandte Synthesechemie Adlershof (Berlin, Germany). 5-(Methylsulfanyl)pentanenitrile (4MTB-CN) and 5-(methylsulfinyl)pentanenitrile (4MSOB-CN) were purchased from Enamine (SIA Enamine, Latvia, Riga). 3-Butenyl GLS (3But; ≥95%), 2(R)-hydroxy-3-butenyl GLS (2OH3But; ≥98%), 4-(methylsulfanyl)butyl GLS (4MTB; ≥98%), 4-(methylsulfinyl)butyl GLS (4MSOB; ≥98%), 3-(methylsulfinyl)propyl GLS (3MSOP; ≥98%), and 2-phenylethyl GLS (2PE; ≥98%) were acquired from Phytolab GmbH and Co. KG, Vestenbergsgreuth, Germany. The solvents methanol (≥99.95%), acetonitrile (LC-MS grade), and arylsulfatase (enzyme) were purchased from Th. Geyer GmbH and Co. KG (Renningen, Germany).

2.2. Plant Material

Three red cabbages (Brassica oleracea convar. capitata var. rubra L.) and three white cabbages (Brassica oleracea convar. capitata var. alba) were purchased at regular intervals from the same two local conventional supermarkets (CON1, CON2) and from the same organic supermarket (ORG1) in Brandenburg, Germany over a period of 3 months (September–November 2019). The supermarkets were selected with regard to different German food trading companies. The two conventional supermarkets selected belong to the two biggest food trading companies in Germany and the organic supermarket also belongs to a big organic food supermarket chain. The exact sampling dates (S1–S6) are given in Table 1. Additionally, red and white cabbage heads, grown in the field at the Leibniz-Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (IGZ) in Grossbeeren, Germany, were harvested freshly in order to compare GLSs and their hydrolysis products with commercial cabbages. Therefore, red (cultivar ‘Redma RZ F1′) and white (cultivar ‘Dottenfelder Dauer’) cabbage seeds were sown (13.06.2019 and 20.06.2019) on loamy soil (pH 7.3) and then grown for 3 months at the IGZ (52°20′59.0″ N 13°18′57.5″ E). The red cabbage was cultivated with 100% of the required nitrogen level and fertilized using calcium ammonium nitrate and Patentkali® (419 kg N/ha). Before cultivation, the field was fertilized once with calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and Patentkali® and later fertilized a second time, with CAN only during the cultivation period. In total, 377.78 kg CAN/ha and 40.74 kg Patentkali® were applied for fertilization.
For white cabbage, Aminofert® Vinasse fertilizer (BayWa AG, Munich, Germany) was applied (60 kg N/ha) with 30% of the required nitrogen level. Here, fertilization occurred before the sowing of the seeds on 06 June 2019 and a second time on 25 June 2019 for head formation. The origin and cultivation background of commercial cabbages were investigated by interrogating service staff at supermarkets and by contacting growers. Cabbages sold at CON1 and ORG1 were procured from different farming areas in northern Germany (CON1: Neuenkirchen and Helse (Schleswig-Holstein), Germany; ORG1: Blankensee (Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania), Hedwigenkoog (Schleswig-Holstein), Vierlinden and Seeblick (Brandenburg, Germany), whereas cabbages purchased from CON2 could continuously be procured from the same farming area, but on different fields within a 30 km perimeter in Neuenkirchen, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany) (Table 2). With regard to the cultivars, mainly white cabbage varieties such as “Storema”, “Lennox”, “Marcello”, and “Impala” and red cabbage varieties, especially “Futurima”, “Rodima”, “Bandolero”, and “Klimaro” were cultivated in the Dithmarschen region (Helse, Neuenkirchen) for CON1 and CON2. Cultivars “Rodynda”(red cabbage) and “Dowinda” (white cabbage) were mainly cultivated in Hohennauen, Germany for ORG1. Early cabbage cultivars (“Marcello”, “Bandolero”) were likely purchased between 04 and 05 September 2019, whereas later cabbage cultivars (“Storema”, “Lennox”, “Impala”, “Futurima”, “Klimaro”, “Rodynda”, “Dowinda”) could be purchased between 09 September 2019 and 06 November 2019.
Long-term stored white cabbages (‘Storema”, “Lennox”, “Impala”, “Dowinda”) were purchased as of 18 November 2019 and stored at 0.1–0.3 °C in warehouses at the wholesaler. Cabbages from CON1 and CON2 were fertilized using a combination of urea, calcium ammonium nitrate, phosphate and potassium, whilst organically cultivated cabbage ORG1 was fertilized using hair-meal pellets (200 kg N/ha) or compost (Table 2). According to growers in Blankensee, Neuenkirchen, Vierlinden, and Helse, only hybrid cultivars such as “Storema”, “Impala”, “Lennox”, and “Bandolero” were grown, harvested, and later sold as ripe cabbages to CON1 and CON2, whereas non-hybrid cultivars such as “Rodynda” and “Dowinda” (grown for ORG1) were generally grown in Hedwigenkoog and Hohennauen. According to growers in Helse, seeds were sown from the 16th to the 20th calendar week of 2019, and cabbages were harvested from the 23rd to the 46th calendar week on heavy, sea marsh soil. Similar sowing and harvesting dates also applied for cabbages cultivated in Neuenkirchen, which were harvested between weeks 23 to 45 and also grown on heavy, sea marsh soil. According to growers in Helse, which supplied CON1 with cabbage, cabbage heads grown for the conventional market generally grew slower in the Dithmarschen region and were grown for 150 d in Helse on sea marsh soil (late cabbage). The growth of early cultivars (S1 sampling of CON1 and CON2) was accelerated with non-woven fibre barriers. The alleged storage conditions, according to all growers before the selling period and conditions in the supermarket during selling time, according to salespersons in CON1, CON2, and ORG1 are listed in Table 2, while in Supplemental Table S1 all information collected during this study on the analyzed cabbages are given for each cabbage separately and in more detail.
In order to give a better understanding of how GLSs and their hydrolysis products can differ in commercial cabbages and how they might change within the season, GLSs and their hydrolysis products were additionally monitored by comparing cabbage heads from an organic and two conventional supermarkets (ORG1, CON1, CON2) with cabbage heads grown at the Leibniz-Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (IGZ), Grossbeeren, Germany. A further aim of this work was to link the results with the common cultivation practices and the alleged storage conditions (Table 2).

2.3. Sample Preparation

Fresh cabbage heads were chopped in half. Of the two obtained halves, one of the halves was halved again, and two quarters were obtained. Afterwards, one of the obtained quarters was divided into 2–3 strips (weight: 70–180 g, width: 1–1.5 cm) along the middle, and the strips were frozen at −20 °C overnight before lyophilization (11 d) and were later ground. The remaining plant material of the same quarter, from which the strips were obtained, was then cut into small pieces of 1 cm width. The chopped plant material was thoroughly mixed by hand, and 15–20 g fresh cabbage was then given into a round bottom glass vessel for homogenization. Afterwards, 15–20 mL of distilled water was added, in order to obtain a 1:1 ratio of plant material and water. Then, samples were homogenized for 1 min at a rate of 20,000 rpm using a mixer (H04, Edmund Bühler GmbH, Tübingen, Germany) and incubated for 1 h at room temperature (22 °C).

2.4. Analysis of Glucosinolates

To determine the profiles and concentrations of GLS in red and white cabbages, 10 mg of lyophilized powder was extracted and GLS was analyzed as their desulfo-form [23]. Briefly, 10 mg of dry plant powder was extracted thrice using 70% of hot methanol in the presence of 0.025 μmol 4-hydroxybenzyl GLS as an internal standard. The extracts were combined and desulfated on a DEAE-Sephadex A-25 ion-exchanger column using aryl sulfatase. Afterwards, desulfo-GLSs were eluted with 1 mL of water and analyzed using an Agilent UHPLC-DAD-ToF-MS system equipped with a Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm, 2.7 μm; Agilent Technologies), a gradient of water, and 40% acetonitrile, as described previously [23]. Desulfo-GLSs were quantified at 229 nm via the internal standard and the calibration factor reported in the DIN EN ISO 9167-1 and calculated on this basis for 4-hydroxybenzyl GLS.

2.5. Determination of Glucosinolate Breakdown Products

For the analysis of GLS hydrolysis products released from red and white cabbage tissue, the protocol described by Hanschen and Schreiner (2017) was followed with small modifications [14]: Briefly, 500 mg of the homogenized fresh samples (containing 50% of water) were weighed into solvent resistant centrifuge tubes. During the first two samplings, 1 g of sample homogenate was used, which might have led to reduced recoveries for nitriles and epithionitriles, due to higher water to solvent ratio. Then, the internal standard benzonitrile (0.2 µmol) was added and GLS hydrolysis products were extracted 3 times using methylene chloride: 2 mL during the first extraction and 1.5 mL of methylene chloride in the second and third extraction. Then, samples were analyzed as described previously [14], except that in the present study an Agilent J&W VF-5ms GC-MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm) coupled to a 10 m EZ-Guard P/N:CP9013 column was used for analyte separation.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

To investigate differences between different sampling dates (S1–S6), means were compared using ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test and STATISTICA version 13.5.0.17 software (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) with a significance level of p ≤ 0.05. All analyses were carried out in triplicate by analyzing three biological replicates.

3. Results

Samples (three cabbage heads) from each of the three retailers (conventional supermarkets CON1, CON2, and organic supermarket ORG1) were collected between September and November 2019 every 2 to 3 weeks, summing up to a total of six sampling dates (S1–S6). GLS-profiles and the corresponding GLS hydrolysis products were monitored over the six sampling periods and additionally compared to fresh samples (four red and white cabbage heads) harvested from a field at the IGZ in Grossbeeren, Germany. Most analyzed cabbage heads differed in their regional origin and harvest time (Table 2). The dates of the purchased or harvested cabbages over the six sampling periods (S1–S6) are listed in Table 1.

3.1. Glucosinolates in White and Red Cabbage from Local Food Retailers

The GLS profile of the most abundant GLS of white cabbage purchased from the different food retailers over the 3-month period is given in Figure 1A–C, whilst the GLS profile for red cabbage is displayed in Figure 1D–F. Table 3 shows the chemical structures of the most abundant cabbage GLS, as well as their GLS hydrolysis product names including the abbreviations. In the heads of the analyzed white and red cabbage cultivars, a total of 12 chemically different GLSs were detected (Table S2). The main GLSs were allyl GLS (Allyl), 3-butenyl GLS (3But), 2-hydroxy-3-butenyl GLS (2OH3But), 3-(methylsulfinyl)propyl GLS (3MSOP), 4-(methylsulfinyl)butyl GLS (4MSOB), and indol-3-ylmethyl GLS (I3M) (Figure 1). The GLS profile in white and red cabbage cultivars between different supermarkets was often found to be similar within the same cabbage variety. In that way, Allyl, 3MSOP, and I3M were found to be most dominant in white cabbage, with maximum Allyl concentrations reaching 0.71 ± 0.02 μmol/g FW in S5 (Figure 1A), up to 0.64 ± 0.17 μmol/g FW 3MSOP in S1 of ORG1, and up to 0.49 ± 0.12 µmol/g FW I3M in S4 of ORG1 (Figure 1C). Red cabbage was often the richest in 2OH3But and 4MSOB (Figure 1D–F), with up to 0.99 ± 0.19 μmol/g FW 2OH3But in S1 of CON1 (Figure 1D) and 0.93 ± 0.05 μmol/g FW 4MSOB in S1 of CON1 (Figure 1D), respectively. However, Allyl, 3But, 3MSOP, and I3M were also formed in considerable amounts in red cabbage (Figure 1D–F).
In general, red cabbage heads produced higher levels of GLSs (Figure 1D–F) compared to white cabbage heads (Figure 1A–C). The highest total GLS levels in red cabbage heads were detected in S1 from CON1 (3.12 ± 0.27 μmol/g FW) (Figure 1D), whereas the highest total GLS content for white cabbage was observed in S5 from CON1 (1.61 ± 0.11 μmol/g FW) (Figure 1A).
Whilst general increases in total GLS concentration were found from sampling S1 to S6 (especially due to Allyl) in white cabbages from CON2 (Figure 1B), a general decreasing trend in total GLS concentration was detected in white cabbages procured from ORG1 (Figure 1C). In red cabbage, total GLSs varied for the individual samples from the same food retailers in all purchased red cabbage heads (Figure 1D–F), and no specific trend was noted between purchase dates from the different retailers. With regard to individual GLSs, many GLSs in cabbages from the three supermarkets did not significantly change over the different sampling dates, such as GLSs in red cabbage from CON2 (Figure 1E), while others were affected (Figure 1).
The two major GLSs detected in white cabbage heads were 3MSOP and Allyl. In white cabbages procured from CON1 (S1-S6, Figure 1A), Allyl increased by 2.1-fold from S1 to S5 and then decreased in S6 to levels similar to S1. In white cabbages, which were purchased from CON2, a general increase in Allyl content was observed from S1 to S6 (0.17 ± 0.03 to 0.61 ± 0.07 μmol/g FW) (Figure 1B), while in white cabbages purchased from ORG1 (Figure 1C), Allyl did not significantly change over time. In red cabbage, no significant changes were observable for Allyl (Figure 1D–F). 3MSOP as the other main GLS of white cabbage stayed the same over the sampling period in cabbages from CON2 and ORG1, but displayed increased levels in S4 and S5 of cabbages from CON1 compared to the S1-S3 samples (Figure 1A). In red cabbage, 3MSOP did not change across the consecutive sampling dates (Figure 1D–F). 4MSOB as a major GLS in red cabbage displayed reduced content in S2-S4 compared to S1 in CON1-cabbage (Figure 1D), but did not change in cabbages from CON2 and ORG1. Likewise, in white cabbage of ORG1, 4MSOB was not affected. In white cabbage from CON1, 4MSOB slightly decreased from S1 to S5 but was highest in S6 (Figure 1A), and in CON2-cabbages, this GLS generally displayed similar levels over the sampling dates (Figure 1B). Similarly, 2OH3But varied significantly only in white and red cabbage procured from CON1 (Figure 1A,D), but not in cabbages from the other supermarkets. In CON1-cabbages, 2OH3But was highest in S1 (red cabbage) or S2 (white cabbage) samples, then decreased until S4 (red cabbage) or S5 (white cabbage) and then again increased in the last samples (by tendency in red cabbage; significantly in white cabbage). The indole GLS I3M generally had similar levels over the different sampling dates in white and red cabbages, as well (Figure 1).

3.2. Glucosinolate Hydrolysis Product Formation in White and Red Cabbages from Local Food Retailers

Resulting from the homogenization of the fresh cabbage material, GLSs in cabbages from the different food retailers were degraded. The most pronounced GLS hydrolysis products released from white and red cabbages included the ITCs (or follow-up products from ITC) 3-(methylsulfinyl)propyl ITC (3MSOP-ITC), 4-(methylsulfinyl)butyl ITC (4MSOB-ITC), 3-butenyl ITC (3But-ITC), and 5-vinyloxazolidine-2-thione (OZT), the nitriles 5-(methylsulfinyl)pentanenitrile (4MSOB-CN) and 4-(methylsulfinyl)butanenitrile (3MSOP-CN) and the ETNs 1-cyano-2,3-epthiopropane (CETP), 1-cyano-3,4-epithiobutane (CETB), and isomers of 1-cyano-2-hydroxy-3,4-epithiobutane (CHETB A, CHETB B) (Table S3). Overall, the main GLS hydrolysis products in white cabbages were 3-MSOP-CN and 3MSOP-ITC, which were formed from 3MSOP and CETP, originating from the GLS Allyl (Figure 2A–C).
Red cabbages released mainly 4MSOB-CN and 4MSOB-ITC, originating from 4MSOB and CETP, but also 3MSOP-products and CETB and CHETB were often released in higher amounts (Figure 2D–F). Usually, homogenized red cabbages released more GLS-hydrolysis products compared to white cabbages (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The formation of the cancer-preventive ITC 4MSOB-ITC was highest in red cabbages procured from CON1 in the S1 sample (1.06 ± 0.25 μmol/g FW), where it was also the main GLS-hydrolysis product. Although still being the main GLS-hydrolysis product in some samples, less 4MSOB-ITC was released in CON2- and ORG1- cabbages (up to 0.33 ± 0.18 μmol/g FW in S3 from CON2 and up to 0.44 ± 0.16 μmol/g FW in S2 from ORG1) (Figure 2D–F). The formation of GLS hydrolysis products in cabbages purchased from the three different supermarkets generally varied over the course of the sampling period (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Overall, the S5 sample of red cabbages with 2.68 ± 0.57 µmol/g FW displayed the highest total level of released GLS-hydrolysis products.
Regarding white cabbages, total ITC concentrations were highest with up to 0.50 ± 0.19 µmol/g FW in the later samples S4 and S5 from CON1, where they were also the main GLS hydrolysis product type. In addition, total nitrile levels were higher in these later samples. Total ETN levels were also highest in S5 (Figure 3A). In white cabbages from CON2, total ITC levels did not change during the sampling season, while ETN levels increased in later samples (S3–S6) and nitriles only displayed increased levels in S4 (Figure 3B). In organic white cabbages from ORG1, cabbages from the first sampling date (S1) released with up to 0.96 ± 0.14 µmol/g FW mainly ITCs, which was generally the highest observed ITC level in white cabbages. On the other hand, samples S3, S5, and S6 only showed low levels of ITC formation (0.02–0.06 µmol/g FW) with nitriles and ETNs as the most dominant GLS-hydrolysis products (Figure 3C).
Red cabbages from the first samples (S1–S3) usually mainly released ITCs, while later samples (S3–S6) mainly released nitriles or ETNs (Figure 3D–F). More specifically, the total ITC formation was highest in the first samples and peaked in cabbages from S1 (CON1 and CON2) or S2 (ORG1), while later samples released much lower total ITCs (Figure 3D–E). In red cabbages from CON1, ETNs and nitriles displayed increased levels in S5 and S6 cabbages compared to S1–S4 (Figure 3D). Comparably, in CON2, the red cabbages total ETN formation was also higher in S5, but nitriles were not affected (Figure 3E). In organic red cabbages from ORG1, total nitriles were also highest in S5, while ETN-formation fluctuated and displayed increased levels in S2 and S5 compared to S3 and S6 (Figure 3F).
Regarding the ratios (%) of total EPTs, nitriles, and ITCs relative to the total amount of formed GLS hydrolysis products, usually the relative ITC formation was higher in the first samples of cabbages, where they were often the main GLS hydrolysis products, but ITC formation decreased towards later sampling dates. Relative nitrile formation often behaved the other way around and was higher in later samples compared to early samples (Figure 4). More specifically, in white cabbages from CON1, the % of ITCs more than halved, while relative nitrile levels more than tripled from S1 to S6 and relative ETN formation was slightly increased in S2 compared to the other samples (Figure 4A). In white cabbages from CON2, the relative ITC formation was highest in S2 with 63 ± 11% and then decreased to S5 by 56% to 28 ± 9% of ITC formation. While relative nitrile formation was hardly affected, relative ETN formation increased from S1 to S5 to 46 ± 10% of ETN formation in S5 (Figure 4B). In organic white cabbages from ORG1, GLSs also mainly released ITCs with 75 ± 3% in S1, while cabbages from later samples (S3, S5, and S6) mainly released nitriles with up to 65 ± 7% (in S5) (Figure 4C). Red cabbages showed a very similar GLS hydrolysis behavior: With up to 75 ± 7% of ITC formation (S1 from CON1) the first samples (S1-S3) released mainly ITCs and the formation decreased towards later sampling dates, while nitrile formation increased in reverse with later samples to up to 64 ± 8% (S5 from ORG1).
The relative ETN release was not affected in red cabbages from CON2 and ORG1, but increased with later samples in CON1 up to 45 ± 9% of all GLS products (in S5) (Figure 4D–F). As an indicator of ESP-activity, the relative formation of CETP, Allyl-ITC, and Allyl-CN were monitored, as well. In red cabbages from CON1 and ORG1, the relative release of CEPT increased from first to last samples, while in white cabbages, an increase from S1 to S2–S5 was found (Supplemental Figure S1). The relative CETP formation was unaffected in red cabbages from CON2 and conventional white cabbages.

3.3. Glucosinolates and Glucosinolate Hydrolysis Products Formation in Freshly Harvested White and Red Cabbages

The GLS profile of freshly harvested white and red cabbages was similar to the commercial ones, and 3MSOP and Allyl were most dominant in white cabbage (Figure 5A), whilst 2OH3But and 4MSOB contributed the most towards the total GLS content of freshly harvested red cabbage (Figure 5D). The total GLS and GLS-hydrolysis product level of red cabbages was higher compared to the freshly harvested white cabbages. With regard to individual GLS hydrolysis product formation, the main GLS hydrolysis products released from homogenized freshly harvested white cabbages were CETP and 3MSOP-CN (Figure 5B) and from freshly harvested red cabbages 4MSOB-CN and 4MSOB-ITC (Figure 5E). Of the detected GLS hydrolysis products from freshly harvested white cabbages, 36 ± 13% were nitriles (mainly 3MSOP-CN), 34 ± 7% were ETNs, and 30 ± 9% were ITCs (Figure 5C), while in red cabbages GLSs were degraded to 52 ± 3% nitriles (mainly 4MSOB-CN), 28 ± 2% ETNs, and 20 ± 4% ITCs (Figure 5F).

4. Discussion

In this study, the GLS content and formation of GLS hydrolysis products was evaluated in commercial white and red cabbages purchased from two conventional and one organic supermarket in Germany over a period of 3 months and compared to freshly harvested cabbages. In general, the composition of individual GLSs in red and white cabbages among different food retailers displayed only slight fluctuations and the GLS profile and levels were similar over the six sampling periods (Figure 1). With Allyl and 3MSOP being the main GLS in commercial and freshly harvested white cabbages and red cabbages being rich in 4MSOB and 2OH3But, (but also of Allyl, 3But, 3MSOP, and I3M), the GLS profiles and levels were in accordance to previous reports [14,24]. The small variability in GLS levels is an unexpected observation, as the analyzed white and red cabbages differed in genotype, came from different regions, were cultivated on different soil types using different fertilizers and storage practices, and were also purchased from different food retailers that belonged to different food trading companies (Table 2, Supplemental Table S1). Previous studies showed that GLS levels in Brassica oleracea vegetables are affected by cultivar (genotype) [14,25], nutrient supply [26,27], climatic conditions [17,20,28], as well as storage conditions [29,30]. As the variability of the GLSs was relatively low, it is suspected that genotypes were similar in their initial GLS concentrations and that also cultivation practices and storage conditions had no major effect on the GLS content of the cabbages, when they were finally sold in the supermarket. On the other hand, long-term storage (2 °C, 95% of relative humidity, up to 100 days) was shown to decrease the GLS content in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. spp. pekinensis), with GLSs being more stable in cabbages stored under a controlled atmosphere (CA) (2% O2 and 2% CO2) [31]. Accordingly, Osher et al. (2018) even reported an increase for aliphatic ITC-formation in cabbage (B. oleracea) stored at 1 °C under CA for 60 days (CA: 2% O2, 5% CO2), while ITC formation declined when stored under normal atmosphere (up to 45 and 72% decline in Allyl-ITC after 60 and 90 days, respectively) [32]. In the present study, I3M levels of organic white and red cabbages from ORG1 were often higher, compared to the cabbages from the conventional food retailers CON1 and CON2 (Figure 1C). Likewise, using NMR spectroscopy, Lucarini et al. (2020) recently also found nearly 3 times as much I3M in organic broccoli compared to conventionally grown ones [33]. In that study, the main difference in both farming practices was the fertilization practice, as no pesticides were used. While the same amount of nitrogen was supplied to the soil, for conventional broccoli with 0.2 t/ha urea and 15 t/ha bovine manure were applied, while organic grown broccoli was fertilized with 28 t/ha [33]. Nevertheless, increased I3M biosynthesis could be also explained due to the absence of chemical pesticides in organic cultivation practices, resulting in the stimulation of indole GLS biosynthesis upon herbivory damage via the methyl jasmonate signalling pathway [34].
Upon homogenization, GLSs were hydrolyzed in cabbages, yielding nitriles, ITC (or breakdown product thereof), and ETNs. Usually, the recovery of aliphatic GLS hydrolysis products was good with recoveries in a range of 60–130%. However, in some samples, low recoveries of aliphatic GLS hydrolysis samples were also observed (for example, S3 and S6 white cabbage samples and the S3 red cabbage sample from ORG1) (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Regarding this observation, myrosinase activity in these samples was probably low, therefore, resulting in a low recovery of hydrolysis products. In pre-experiments performed for the current study, the recovery of GLS hydrolysis products did not benefit from longer incubation times. Probably due to chemical instabilities of the products [35,36], it is likely that the myrosinase activity decreases with incubation time and that the initial myrosinase activity might be a major factor for the recovery of products. This hypothesis is further supported by the observation that sulfate, which is released during GLS hydrolysis, is a competitive inhibitor of myrosinase activity [37].
With regard to the differences in GLS hydrolysis products in the different samples, in contrast to GLS, the formation of GLS hydrolysis products varied strongly between the purchase dates (S1–S6; Figure 2). Especially during the first samples (S1–S3) mainly ITCs were released from red cabbages, while in later samples nitriles were preferentially formed (S5, S6) (Figure 3). Likewise, the relative ITC formation in white and red cabbages generally decreased until the last sample, while nitriles were usually the major hydrolysis products (Figure 4). These results show that in contrast to some previous reports [14,38], ITCs can be the main hydrolysis products in cabbages, as this was the case for cabbages purchased in early autumn. Here, red cabbage could be an excellent source for cancer-preventive 4MSOB-ITC (sulforaphane) (up to 1.06 μmol/g FW in red cabbage from CON1 at S1), releasing levels, which were 6-times higher compared to mature broccoli and comparable to the 4MSOB-ITC release from broccoli sprouts [14].
With regard to the high nitrile and ETN formation at later purchase dates, the ESP protein activity is made responsible for ETN-release from alkenyl GLS and for increased formation in simple nitriles from non-alkenyl GLS [39,40]. Therefore, it was suspected that the ESP-activity increased towards later samples, while it remained low in the first samples. When regarding the relative formation of Allyl hydrolysis products, as an indicator of ESP activity, it can be further supported that the ESP activity increased with later purchase dates in red cabbage from CON1 and organic cabbage, while it was not considerably affected in conventional white cabbage (Figure S1). As the relative nitrile formation significantly increased in white cabbage from CON1 in later samples (Figure 4A) (but relative CETP release not, Figure S1), it is suspected, that next to the ESP activity, also other factors influence GLS hydrolysis, which could have resulted in changes in hydrolysis product behavior from S1 to S6 due to their variation. As especially nitriles increased (Figure 4A), it is suspected that white cabbage contains nitrile specifier proteins, which are involved in nitrile formation in Arabidopsis thaliana [41]. This suspicion is strengthened by the observation that Brassica oleracea contains a gene with a homology of 80% compared to the nitrile specifier protein 1 of A. thaliana [42]. Further, this hypothesis is supported by a recent study, which could neither prove the nitrile specifier protein activity for three B. oleracea ESP isoforms in vitro nor in vivo, but nitrile formation from alkyl GLS was observed [43].
To date, there is little data how pre- and postharvest factors affect glucosinolate hydrolysis. Freshly harvested white and red cabbages showed a similar GLS hydrolysis behavior compared to the supermarket cabbages purchased during similar dates (S5 white cabbage, S4 red cabbage) (Figure 5; Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). Due to this finding and due to the different storage conditions of growers and retailers, in the present study storage does not seem to be the factor that caused a reduced ITC release in cabbages purchased in later autumn. With regard to preharvest factors, nitrogen and sulfur supply affected the release of GLS hydrolysis products in the ETN-producer Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis) and ITCs were reduced in response to the increasing N and decreasing S supply [44]. In pak choi (B. rapa subsp. chinensis (L.) Hanelt), which also mainly released ETN, the ITC/CN and ITC/ETN ratio increased with the increasing sulfur supply [45]. With regard to the present study, it is unlikely that differences in fertilization were responsible for the observed changes in the GLS hydrolysis behavior as also the red cabbage from CON2 which originated from the same grower (Table 2, Table S1) showed reduced % ITC release at later purchase dates (Figure 4E). Moreover, herbivore feeding can affect the GLS hydrolysis behavior, and simple nitrile formation was shown to increase in response to the specialist insect feeding (Pieris rapae) in Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 [46], while ITC-emitting plants appear to be better defended against generalist herbivores [47]. However, as organic and conventional cabbages displayed a similar hydrolysis behavior (Figure 4D–F), it is suspected that climatic conditions such as reduced radiation or decreasing temperatures across the autumn season might be responsible for the observed shifts. Moreover, all of the conventional cabbages originated from the Dithmarschen region (Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Table S1), which is characterized by a coastal climate and marsh soil (being ideal conditions for growing cabbages). It is the largest coherent cabbage-growing area in Europe. In Table S4, the climatic data of the presumable growing season in 2019 is presented. Consequently, it is likely that temperature and radiation interact with regard to the GLS hydrolysis behavior. Recently, Jasper et al. (2020) showed that at higher temperatures during growth, more GLS hydrolysis products were formed from rocket (Eruca sativa), while GLS levels were less affected [48]. Likewise, Ku et al. (2013) reported different ITC conversion rates in broccoli grown in 2 different years and linked this to different climatic conditions. Unfortunately, in that study, nitriles were not analyzed and therefore, conversion rates could have been also affected by changes of the myrosinase activity [49]. As organic cabbages which originated from different regions in Germany (Brandenburg, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Schleswig-Holstein; Table 2 and Table S1) also showed similar changes in the GLS hydrolysis behavior compared to the conventional cabbages originating from the Dithmarschen region, it can be assumed that the results obtained in this study might be also valid for other countries and regions with similar climatic conditions. The specific role of climatic growth conditions on GLS hydrolysis in B. oleracea vegetables will need to be evaluated in future studies.

5. Conclusions

Current findings in this study have highlighted the great diversity, particularly of the GLS hydrolysis behavior in white and red cabbages between the different supermarkets over the six sampling periods: Whilst the GLS composition and content remained similar between the different food retailers, the composition and content of the individual hydrolysis products formed varied across the season and high ITC levels were generally noted in early sampling periods (early September) and decreased, particularly in red cabbages over time. Here, the increased specifier protein activity is made responsible for the reduced ITC-release.
In conclusion, with regard to their potential to release more ITCs, consumption of commercial cabbages purchased in early autumn could be healthier options than those purchased in later autumn months. The fact that ITCs can be preferentially formed in earlier autumn months, but hardly towards the end of autumn, underlines the need to unravel the factors that affect the GLS-hydrolysis outcome. The results of this study might also help growers and food companies produce cabbages and products with more pungency due to a higher ITC formation. Due to the potential of red cabbage to form high rates of health-promoting 4MSOB-ITC in cabbages purchased in early autumn, red cabbage consumption could be an alternative for people who dislike broccoli.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/9/11/1682/s1, Figure S1: Allyl glucosinolate hydrolysis product ratios [percentage of allyl isothiocyanate (Allyl-ITC), 3-butenenitrile (Allyl-CN) and 1-cyano-2,3-epithiopropane (CETP)] from white (A–C) and red cabbages (D–F) from conventional (A, B, D, E) and organic supermarkets (C, F) on different sampling dates (S1–S6). Table S1: Overview of white and red cabbages purchased from three different food retailers or harvested freshly from the field (Großbeeren, D). Table S2: Glucosinolates (GLSs) content in commercial and cabbages harvested freshly from the field in µmol/g fresh weight. Table S3: Glucosinolate (GLS) hydrolysis product formation in commercial and cabbages harvested freshly from the field in µmol/g fresh weight. Table S4: Climatic data of the Dithmarschen region in northern Germany in 2019.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.S.W., F.S.H., and S.R.; methodology, N.S.W. and F.S.H.; validation, F.S.H.; investigation, N.S.W. and F.S.H.; resources, F.S.H.; writing—original draft preparation, N.S.W. and F.S.H.; writing—review and editing, F.S.H. and S.R.; visualization, N.S.W. and F.S.H.; supervision, F.S.H. and S.R.; project administration, F.S.H.; funding acquisition, F.S.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Franziska Hanschen and this research study are part of the Leibniz-Junior Research Group OPTIGLUP, funded by the Leibniz-Association (J16/2017).

Acknowledgments

The excellent technical assistance of Andrea Jankowsky, Andrea Maikath, and Jessica Eichhorn is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. BMEL-Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft. Available online: https://www.bmel-statistik.de/fileadmin/daten/GBT-0070004-2018.pdf (accessed on 15 July 2020).
  2. Blažević, I.; Montaut, S.; Burčul, F.; Olsen, C.E.; Burow, M.; Rollin, P.; Agerbirk, N. Glucosinolate structural diversity, identification, chemical synthesis and metabolism in plants. Phytochemistry 2020, 169, 112100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Katsarou, D.; Omirou, M.; Liadaki, K.; Tsikou, D.; Delis, C.; Garagounis, C.; Krokida, A.; Zambounis, A.; Papadopoulou, K.K. Glucosinolate biosynthesis in Eruca sativa. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 109, 452–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hanschen, F.S.; Lamy, E.; Schreiner, M.; Rohn, S. Reactivity and stability of glucosinolates and their breakdown products in foods. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 11430–11450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bell, L.; Oloyede, O.O.; Lignou, S.; Wagstaff, C.; Methven, L. Taste and flavor perceptions of glucosinolates, isothiocyanates, and related compounds. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2018, 62, e1700990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Koroleva, O.A.; Cramer, R. Single-cell proteomic analysis of glucosinolate-rich S-cells in Arabidopsis thaliana. Methods 2011, 54, 413–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wittstock, U.; Burow, M. Glucosinolate breakdown in Arabidopsis: Mechanism, regulation and biological significance. Arab. Book 2010, 8, e0134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Palliyaguru, D.L.; Yuan, J.-M.; Kensler, T.W.; Fahey, J.W. Isothiocyanates: Translating the power of plants to people. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2018, 62, e1700965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Romeo, L.; Iori, R.; Rollin, P.; Bramanti, P.; Mazzon, E. Isothiocyanates: An overview of their antimicrobial activity against human infections. Molecules 2018, 23, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Chou, Y.-C.; Chang, M.-Y.; Lee, H.-T.; Shen, C.-C.; Harnod, T.; Liang, Y.-J.; Wu, R.S.-C.; Lai, K.; Hsu, F.; Chung, J.-G. Phenethyl isothiocyanate inhibits in vivo growth of xenograft tumors of human glioblastoma cells. Molecules 2018, 23, 2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Veeranki, O.L.; Bhattacharya, A.; Tang, L.; Marshall, J.R.; Zhang, Y. Cruciferous vegetables, isothiocyanates, and prevention of bladder cancer. Curr. Pharmacol. Rep. 2015, 1, 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Hanschen, F.S.; Herz, C.; Schlotz, N.; Kupke, F.; Rodríguez, M.M.B.; Schreiner, M.; Rohn, S.; Lamy, E. The Brassica epithionitrile 1-cyano-2,3-epithiopropane triggers cell death in human liver cancer cells in vitro. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2015, 59, 2178–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Matusheski, N.V.; Jeffery, E. Comparison of the bioactivity of two glucoraphanin hydrolysis products found in broccoli, sulforaphane and sulforaphane nitrile. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 5743–5749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hanschen, F.S.; Schreiner, M. Isothiocyanates, nitriles, and epithionitriles from glucosinolates are affected by genotype and developmental stage in Brassica oleracea varieties. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Klopsch, R.; Witzel, K.; Börner, A.; Schreiner, M.; Hanschen, F.S. Metabolic profiling of glucosinolates and their hydrolysis products in a germplasm collection of Brassica rapa turnips. Food Res. Int. 2017, 100, 392–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Verkerk, R.; Schreiner, M.; Krumbein, A.; Ciska, E.; Holst, B.; Rowland, I.; De Schrijver, R.; Hansen, M.; Gerhäuser, C.; Mithen, R.; et al. Glucosinolates in Brassica vegetables: The influence of the food supply chain on intake, bioavailability and human health. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2008, 53, S219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cartea, M.E.; Velasco, P.; Obregón, S.; Padilla, G.; De Haro, A. Seasonal variation in glucosinolate content in Brassica oleracea crops grown in northwestern Spain. Phytochemistry 2008, 69, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rosa, E.A.; Rodrigues, A.S. Total and individual glucosinolate content in 11 broccoli cultivars grown in early and late seasons. HortScience 2001, 36, 56–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nuñez-Gómez, V.; Baenas, N.; Navarro-González, I.; García-Alonso, F.J.; Moreno, D.A.; González-Barrio, R.; Periago, M.J. Seasonal variation of health-promoting bioactives in broccoli and methyl-jasmonate pre-harvest treatments to enhance their contents. Foods 2020, 9, 1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Charron, C.S.; Sams, C.E. Glucosinolate content and myrosinase activity in rapid-cycling Brassica oleracea grown in a controlled environment. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2004, 129, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Mølmann, J.A.; Steindal, A.L.; Bengtsson, G.B.; Seljåsen, R.; Lea, P.; Skaret, J.; Johansen, T.J. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on sensory quality and contents of glucosinolates, flavonols and vitamin C in broccoli florets. Food Chem. 2015, 172, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pereira, F.M.V.; Rosa, E.; Fahey, J.W.; Stephenson, K.K.; Carvalho, R.; Aires, A. Influence of temperature and ontogeny on the levels of glucosinolates in nroccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) sprouts and their effect on the induction of mammalian phase 2 enzymes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 6239–6244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hanschen, F.S. Domestic boiling and salad preparation habits affect glucosinolate degradation in red cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. rubra). Food Chem. 2020, 321, 126694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ciska, E.; Martyniak-Przybyszewska, B.; Kozlowska, H. Content of glucosinolates in cruciferous vegetables grown at the same site for two years under different climatic conditions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 2862–2867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Brown, A.F.; Yousef, G.G.; Jeffery, E.H.; Klein, B.P.; Wallig, M.A.; Kushad, M.M.; Juvik, J.A. Glucosinolate profiles in broccoli: Variation in levels and implications in breeding for cancer chemoprotection. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2002, 127, 807–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Schonhof, I.; Blankenburg, D.; Müller, S.; Krumbein, A. Sulfur and nitrogen supply influence growth, product appearance, and glucosinolate concentration of broccoli. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2007, 170, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Omirou, M.D.; Papadopoulou, K.K.; Papastylianou, I.; Constantinou, M.; Karpouzas, D.G.; Asimakopoulos, I.; Ehaliotis, C. Impact of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization on the composition of glucosinolates in relation to sulfur assimilation in different plant organs of broccoli. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 9408–9417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Charron, C.S.; Saxton, A.M.; Sams, C.E. Relationship of climate and genotype to seasonal variation in the glucosinolate-myrosinase system. I. Glucosinolate content in ten cultivars of Brassica oleracea grown in fall and spring seasons. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2005, 85, 671–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vallejo, F.; Tomás-Barberán, F.; García-Viguera, C. Health-promoting compounds in broccoli as influenced by refrigerated transport and retail sale period. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 3029–3034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rodrigues, A.S.; Rosa, E.A.S. Effect of post-harvest treatments on the level of glucosinolates in broccoli. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1999, 79, 1028–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kang, J.-H.; Woo, H.-J.; Park, J.-B.; Chun, H.H.; Park, C.W.; Bin Song, K. Effect of storage in pallet-unit controlled atmosphere on the quality of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. spp. pekinensis) used in kimchi manufacturing. LWT 2019, 111, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Osher, Y.; Chalupowicz, D.; Maurer, D.; Ovadia-Sadeh, A.; Lurie, S.; Fallik, E.; Kenigsbuch, D. Summer storage of cabbage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2018, 145, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lucarini, M.; Di Cocco, M.E.; Raguso, V.; Milanetti, F.; Durazzo, A.; Lombardi-Boccia, G.; Santini, A.; Delfini, M.; Sciubba, F. NMR-based metabolomic comparison of Brassica oleracea (var. italica): Organic and conventional farming. Foods 2020, 9, 945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Textor, S.; Gershenzon, J. Herbivore induction of the glucosinolate–myrosinase defense system: Major trends, biochemical bases and ecological significance. Phytochem. Rev. 2008, 8, 149–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Hanschen, F.S.; Kaufmann, M.; Kupke, F.; Hackl, T.; Kroh, L.W.; Rohn, S.; Schreiner, M. Brassica vegetables as sources of epithionitriles: Novel secondary products formed during cooking. Food Chem. 2018, 245, 564–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Fechner, J.; Kaufmann, M.; Herz, C.; Eisenschmidt, D.; Lamy, E.; Kroh, L.W.; Hanschen, F.S. The major glucosinolate hydrolysis product in rocket (Eruca sativa L.), sativin, is 1,3-thiazepane-2-thione: Elucidation of structure, bioactivity, and stability compared to other rocket isothiocyanates. Food Chem. 2018, 261, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Shikita, M.; Fahey, J.W.; Golden, T.R.; Holtzclaw, W.D.; Talalay, P. An unusual case of ‘uncompetitive activation’ by ascorbic acid: Purification and kinetic properties of a myrosinase from Raphanus sativus seedlings. Biochem. J. 1999, 341, 725–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kyung, K.; Fleming, H.; Young, C.; Haney, C. 1-Cyano-2,3-epithiopropane as the primary sinigrin hydrolysis product of fresh cabbage. J. Food Sci. 1995, 60, 157–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Matusheski, N.V.; Swarup, R.; Juvik, J.A.; Mithen, R.; Bennett, M.; Jeffery, E. Epithiospecifier protein from broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. ssp. italica) inhibits formation of the anticancer agent sulforaphane. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 2069–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Burow, M.; Markert, J.; Gershenzon, J.; Wittstock, U. Comparative biochemical characterization of nitrile-forming proteins from plants and insects that alter myrosinase-catalysed hydrolysis of glucosinolates. FEBS J. 2006, 273, 2432–2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wittstock, U.; Meier, K.; Dörr, F.; Ravindran, B.M. NSP-dependent simple nitrile formation dominates upon breakdown of major aliphatic glucosinolates in roots, seeds, and seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana Columbia-0. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Román, J.; González, D.; Inostroza-Ponta, M.; Mahn, A. Molecular modeling of epithiospecifier and nitrile-specifier proteins of broccoli and their interaction with aglycones. Molecules 2020, 25, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Witzel, K.; Abu Risha, M.; Albers, P.; Börnke, F.; Hanschen, F.S. Identification and characterization of three epithiospecifier protein isoforms in Brassica oleracea. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Geilfus, C.-M.; Hasler, K.; Witzel, K.; Gerendás, J.; Mühling, K.H. Interactive effects of genotype and N/S-supply on glucosinolates and glucosinolate breakdown products in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2016, 89, 279–286. [Google Scholar]
  45. Meschede, C.A.C.; Abdalla, M.A.; Mühling, K.H. Sulfur but not nitrogen supply increases the ITC/nitrile ratio in pak choi (Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis (L.) Hanelt). J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2020, 93, 95–104. [Google Scholar]
  46. Burow, M.; Losansky, A.; Müller, R.; Plock, A.; Kliebenstein, D.J.; Wittstock, U. The genetic basis of constitutive and herbivore-induced ESP-independent nitrile formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2008, 149, 561–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Mumm, R.; Burow, M.; Bukovinszkine’Kiss, G.; Kazantzidou, E.; Wittstock, U.; Dicke, M.; Gershenzon, J. Formation of simple nitriles upon glucosinolate hydrolysis affects direct and indirect defense against the specialist herbivore, Pieris rapae. J. Chem. Ecol. 2008, 34, 1311–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Jasper, J.; Wagstaff, C.; Bell, L. Growth temperature influences postharvest glucosinolate concentrations and hydrolysis product formation in first and second cuts of rocket salad. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2020, 163, 111157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ku, K.-M.; Jeffery, E.; Juvik, J.A. Influence of seasonal variation and methyl jasmonate mediated induction of glucosinolate biosynthesis on quinone reductase activity in broccoli florets. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 9623–9631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Foods 09 01682 g001 550
Figure 1. Glucosinolate (GLS) profile in white (A–C) and red cabbages (D–F) from conventional (A,B,D,E) and organic supermarkets (C,F) on different sampling dates (S1–S6). Exact sampling dates can be found in Table 1. A) and D) Represent conventional supermarket 1 (CON1), B) and E) stand for conventional supermarket 2 (CON2), and C) and F) show results from organic supermarket 1 (ORG1). Each color in the bar of the given bar chart represents the mean plus standard deviation (SD) of the GLSs from three cabbage heads from the same supermarket (n = 3). Lower case letters indicate significant differences in means between the levels of a GLS on different sampling dates, as tested by ANOVA and Tukey HSD test at the p ≤ 0.05 level. Abbreviations: FW: Fresh weight; abbreviations of compounds as listed in Table 3.
Figure 1. Glucosinolate (GLS) profile in white (A–C) and red cabbages (D–F) from conventional (A,B,D,E) and organic supermarkets (C,F) on different sampling dates (S1–S6). Exact sampling dates can be found in Table 1. A) and D) Represent conventional supermarket 1 (CON1), B) and E) stand for conventional supermarket 2 (CON2), and C) and F) show results from organic supermarket 1 (ORG1). Each color in the bar of the given bar chart represents the mean plus standard deviation (SD) of the GLSs from three cabbage heads from the same supermarket (n = 3). Lower case letters indicate significant differences in means between the levels of a GLS on different sampling dates, as tested by ANOVA and Tukey HSD test at the p ≤ 0.05 level. Abbreviations: FW: Fresh weight; abbreviations of compounds as listed in Table 3.
Foods 09 01682 g001
Foods 09 01682 g002 550
Figure 2. Main glucosinolate (GLS) hydrolysis products released from white (A–C) and red cabbages (D–F) from conventional (A,B,D,E) and organic supermarkets (C,F) on different sampling dates (S1–S6). Exact sampling dates can be found in Table 1. (A,D) Represent conventional supermarket 1 (CON1), (B,E) stand for conventional supermarket 2 (CON2), and (C,F) show results from organic supermarket 1 (ORG1). Each color in the bar of the given bar chart represents the mean plus standard deviation (SD) of the GLS hydrolysis products from three cabbage heads from the same supermarket (n = 3). Abbreviations: FW: Fresh weight; abbreviations of compounds are listed in Table 3. * Samples were analyzed from 1 g of sample homogenate (instead of 0.5 g).
Figure 2. Main glucosinolate (GLS) hydrolysis products released from white (A–C) and red cabbages (D–F) from conventional (A,B,D,E) and organic supermarkets (C,F) on different sampling dates (S1–S6). Exact sampling dates can be found in Table 1. (A,D) Represent conventional supermarket 1 (CON1), (B,E) stand for conventional supermarket 2 (CON2), and (C,F) show results from organic supermarket 1 (ORG1). Each color in the bar of the given bar chart represents the mean plus standard deviation (SD) of the GLS hydrolysis products from three cabbage heads from the same supermarket (n = 3). Abbreviations: FW: Fresh weight; abbreviations of compounds are listed in Table 3. * Samples were analyzed from 1 g of sample homogenate (instead of 0.5 g).
Foods 09 01682 g002
Foods 09 01682 g003 550
Figure 3. Formation of total isothiocyanates (ITCs), nitriles (CNs), and epithionitriles (ETNs) from white (A–C) and red cabbages (D–F) from conventional (A,B,D,E) and organic supermarkets (C,F) on different sampling dates (S1–S6). Exact sampling dates can be found in Table 1. (A,D) Represent conventional supermarket 1 (CON1), (B,E) stand for conventional supermarket 2 (CON2), and (C,F) show results from organic supermarket 1 (ORG1). Each color in the bar of the given bar chart represents the mean minus standard deviation (SD) of the total ITC, CN, or ETN levels from three cabbage heads from the same supermarket (n = 3). Different lower case letters indicate significant differences in means between total ITCs, CNs, and ETNs levels in different samples, as tested by ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test at the p ≤ 0.05 level. FW: Fresh weight. * Samples were analyzed from 1 g of sample homogenate (instead of 0.5 g).
Figure 3. Formation of total isothiocyanates (ITCs), nitriles (CNs), and epithionitriles (ETNs) from white (A–C) and red cabbages (D–F) from conventional (A,B,D,E) and organic supermarkets (C,F) on different sampling dates (S1–S6). Exact sampling dates can be found in Table 1. (A,D) Represent conventional supermarket 1 (CON1), (B,E) stand for conventional supermarket 2 (CON2), and (C,F) show results from organic supermarket 1 (ORG1). Each color in the bar of the given bar chart represents the mean minus standard deviation (SD) of the total ITC, CN, or ETN levels from three cabbage heads from the same supermarket (n = 3). Different lower case letters indicate significant differences in means between total ITCs, CNs, and ETNs levels in different samples, as tested by ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test at the p ≤ 0.05 level. FW: Fresh weight. * Samples were analyzed from 1 g of sample homogenate (instead of 0.5 g).
Foods 09 01682 g003
Foods 09 01682 g004 550
Figure 4. Total glucosinolate (GLS) hydrolysis product ratios (percentage of total isothiocyanates (ITCs), nitriles (CNs), and epithionitriles (ETNs)) from white (A–C) and red cabbages (D–F) from conventional (A,B,D,E) and organic supermarkets (C,F) on different sampling dates (S1–S6). Exact sampling dates can be found in Table 1. (A,D) Represent conventional supermarket 1 (CON1), (B,E) stand for conventional supermarket 2 (CON2), and (C,F) show results from organic supermarket 1 (ORG1). Each color in the bar of the given bar chart represents the mean minus standard deviation (SD) of the GLS hydrolysis products from three cabbage heads from the same supermarket (n = 3). Different lower case letters indicate significant differences in means between the ratios of total ITCs, CNs, and ETNs in different samples, as tested by ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test at the p ≤ 0.05 level. FW: Fresh weight. * Samples were analyzed from 1 g of sample homogenate (instead of 0.5 g).
Figure 4. Total glucosinolate (GLS) hydrolysis product ratios (percentage of total isothiocyanates (ITCs), nitriles (CNs), and epithionitriles (ETNs)) from white (A–C) and red cabbages (D–F) from conventional (A,B,D,E) and organic supermarkets (C,F) on different sampling dates (S1–S6). Exact sampling dates can be found in Table 1. (A,D) Represent conventional supermarket 1 (CON1), (B,E) stand for conventional supermarket 2 (CON2), and (C,F) show results from organic supermarket 1 (ORG1). Each color in the bar of the given bar chart represents the mean minus standard deviation (SD) of the GLS hydrolysis products from three cabbage heads from the same supermarket (n = 3). Different lower case letters indicate significant differences in means between the ratios of total ITCs, CNs, and ETNs in different samples, as tested by ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test at the p ≤ 0.05 level. FW: Fresh weight. * Samples were analyzed from 1 g of sample homogenate (instead of 0.5 g).
Foods 09 01682 g004
Foods 09 01682 g005 550
Figure 5. Glucosinolate (GLS) (A,D) and their absolute (B,E) and relative (C,F) hydrolysis product formation in white (A–C) and red cabbages (D–F) harvested freshly from the field. Each color in the bar of the given bar chart represents the mean plus standard deviation (SD) of the GLS (A,D), their respective hydrolysis products (B,E), or the ratio of relative isothiocyanates (ITCs), nitriles (CNs), and epithionitriles (ETNs) (C,F) from three cabbage heads freshly harvested from the field (n = 3). Abbreviations: FW: Fresh weight; abbreviations of compounds are listed in Table 3.
Figure 5. Glucosinolate (GLS) (A,D) and their absolute (B,E) and relative (C,F) hydrolysis product formation in white (A–C) and red cabbages (D–F) harvested freshly from the field. Each color in the bar of the given bar chart represents the mean plus standard deviation (SD) of the GLS (A,D), their respective hydrolysis products (B,E), or the ratio of relative isothiocyanates (ITCs), nitriles (CNs), and epithionitriles (ETNs) (C,F) from three cabbage heads freshly harvested from the field (n = 3). Abbreviations: FW: Fresh weight; abbreviations of compounds are listed in Table 3.
Foods 09 01682 g005
Table
Table 1. Overview of the dates of the purchased and harvested red and white cabbage heads.
Table 1. Overview of the dates of the purchased and harvested red and white cabbage heads.
Date of Purchase
SupplierAbbreviationWhite CabbageRed Cabbage
CON1S104.09.201904.09.2019
S216.09.201916.09.2019
S330.09.201930.09.2019
S421.10.201921.10.2019
S504.11.201904.11.2019
S618.11.201918.11.2019
CON2S105.09.201905.09.2019
S216.09.201916.09.2019
S330.09.201930.09.2019/01.10.2019
S421.10.201921.10.2019/23.10.2019
S504.11.20194.11.2019/06.11.2019
S618.11.201918.11.2019
ORG1S109.09.201909.09.2019
S219.09.201919.09.2019
S301.10.201901.10.2019
S423.10.201923.10.2019
S506.11.201906.11.2019
S620.11.201920.11.2019
Fresh harvest from field (IGZ)Date of harvest
White CabbageRed Cabbage
29.10.201910.10.2019
Table
Table 2. Total overview of the German origin, cultivation, and storage conditions of commercial red and white cabbages and red and white cabbages from the field experiment. Purchase dates of S1–S6 can be found in Table 1.
Table 2. Total overview of the German origin, cultivation, and storage conditions of commercial red and white cabbages and red and white cabbages from the field experiment. Purchase dates of S1–S6 can be found in Table 1.
SupplierOrigin of CultivationSamples/Date of Harvest (IGZ)Harvest SeasonCabbage TypeCabbage GenotypeSoil Type and FieldFertilizerCertifica-Tion MarkStorage Conditions *1Storage Conditions *2
CON125792, Neuenkirchen
Schleswig-Holstein		S1–S3Summer, autumn(1), (2)White cabbage hybridsSea marshUrea, CAN, phosphate and potashQS(i)20 °C day/night
S1–S4Red cabbage hybrids
CON125709, Helse
Schleswig-Holstein		S4–S6Autumn, winter(2), (3)White cabbage hybridsSea marsh, pH-value 7.0–7.4PKS fertilizer (blends), ammonium nitrate and urea, calcium cyanamideQS(ii)20 °C day/night
S5, S6Red cabbage hybrids
CON225792, Neuenkirchen
Schleswig-Holstein		S1–S6Summer, autumn, winter(1), (2), (3)Red and white cabbage hybridsSea marshUrea, CAN, phosphate and potashQS(iii)7–10 °C day/night in cooling counter, max. 1 week
ORG117237, Blankensee
Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania		S1, S4, S5Autumn(2)White cabbage hybridsSandy loamHair-meal pelletsBioland(iv)10 °C day/night in cooling counter, max. 1 week
S1Red cabbage hybrids
ORG125761, Hedwigenkoog
Schleswig-Holstein		S2, S3Autumn(2)White cabbage, non-hybridSea MarshCompostDemeter(iv)Day/night in cooling counter, max. 1 week
S2, S3, S4, S5Red cabbage, non-hybrid
ORG115306, Vierlinden
Brandenburg		S6Autumn(2)White cabbage hybridsSandy loamHair-meal pelletsBioland(v)Day/night in cooling counter, max. 1 week
ORG114715, Seeblick
Brandenburg		S6Autumn(2)Red cabbage, non-hybridsSandy loamCompostDemeter(iv)Day/night in cooling counter, max. 1 week
IGZ14979, Großbeeren
Brandenburg		10 October 2019Autumn(2)Red cabbage (Redma RZ F1), hybridSilty loamCAN, patentkali-No storageNo storage
IGZ14979, Großbeeren
Brandenburg		29 October 2019Autumn(2)White cabbage (Dottenfelder Dauer), non-hybridSilty loamVinasse-No storageNo storage
*1 Before selling, *2 during selling; CAN-calcium ammonium nitrate. (i) 6–8 °C for 1–2 days after harvest, storage for 1–2 days (intermediate trade), then storage at 6–8 °C (cold storage warehouse). (1) Early cabbage (fresh harvest). (ii) 6–7 °C for 1–2 days in central warehouse. (2) Late cabbage (fresh harvest). (iii) 6–8 °C for 1–2 days after harvest, then storage at 6–8 °C in cold storage warehouse. (3) Long-term stored (stored). (iv) 2–6 °C for 1–2 days after harvest, then storage at 4–7 °C for 1–3 days in cold storage warehouse (max 48 h). (v) 0.1–0.3 °C cold storage warehouse.
Table
Table 3. Structures of main cabbage glucosinolates, their abbreviations, and their hydrolysis products analyzed in the present study. N.d.: Not detected.
Table 3. Structures of main cabbage glucosinolates, their abbreviations, and their hydrolysis products analyzed in the present study. N.d.: Not detected.
Glucosinolates (GLSs)Corresponding Breakdown Products
Isothiocyanate (ITC)NitrileEpithionitrile (ETN)
StructureAbbreviationName (trivial name)AbbreviationNameAbbreviationNameAbbreviationName
Foods 09 01682 i001
Foods 09 01682 i002Allylallyl GLS (sinigrin)Allyl-ITC2-propenyl ITCAllyl-CN3-butenenitrileCETP1-cyano-2,3-epithiopropane
Foods 09 01682 i0033But3-butenyl GLS (gluconapin)3But-ITC3-butenyl ITC3But-CN4-pentenenitrileCETB1-cyano-3,4-epithiobutane
Foods 09 01682 i0042OH3But 2-(R)-2-hydroxy-3-butenyl GLS (progoitrin)OZT5-vinyl-1,3-oxazolidine-2-thione 3-hydroxy-pentenenitrileCHETB A
CHETB B		1-cyano-2-hydroxy-3,4-epithiobutane
Foods 09 01682 i0053MSOP3-(methylsulfinyl)propyl GLS (glucoiberin)3MSOP-ITC3-(methylsulfinyl)-propyl ITC3MSOP-CN4-(methylsulfinyl)-butanenitrile--
Foods 09 01682 i0064MSOB4-(methylsulfinyl)butyl GLS (glucoraphanin)4MSOB-ITC4-(methylsulfinyl)butyl ITC4MSOB-CN5-(methylsulfinyl)-pentanenitrile--
Foods 09 01682 i007I3Mindol-3-ylmethyl GLS (glucobrassicin) n.d. indole-3-acetonitrile--
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wermter, N.S.; Rohn, S.; Hanschen, F.S. Seasonal Variation of Glucosinolate Hydrolysis Products in Commercial White and Red Cabbages (Brassica oleracea var. capitata). Foods 2020, 9, 1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111682

AMA Style

Wermter NS, Rohn S, Hanschen FS. Seasonal Variation of Glucosinolate Hydrolysis Products in Commercial White and Red Cabbages (Brassica oleracea var. capitata). Foods. 2020; 9(11):1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111682

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wermter, Nicole S., Sascha Rohn, and Franziska S. Hanschen. 2020. "Seasonal Variation of Glucosinolate Hydrolysis Products in Commercial White and Red Cabbages (Brassica oleracea var. capitata)" Foods 9, no. 11: 1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111682

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop