Next Article in Journal
Coverage and k-Coverage Optimization in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Computational Intelligence Methods: A Comparative Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Millimeter Wave Propagation in Long Corridors and Tunnels—Theoretical Model and Experimental Verification
Previous Article in Journal
Capacitive Coupling Wireless Power Transfer with Quasi-LLC Resonant Converter Using Electric Vehicles’ Windows
Previous Article in Special Issue
Highly Integrated Resonant Tunneling Diode with Rectangular Waveguide Output for W-Band Communication System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Inexpensive Millimeter-Wave Communication Channel Using Glow Discharge Detector and Satellite Dish Antenna

1
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel
2
Department of Electro-Optical and Photonics Engineering, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 8410501, Israel
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2020, 9(4), 677; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9040677
Submission received: 17 March 2020 / Revised: 16 April 2020 / Accepted: 18 April 2020 / Published: 21 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Millimeter and Terahertz Wireless Communications)

Abstract

:
A full proof of concept for low-cost millimeter wave (MMW) communication link is demonstrated in this study. The suggested MMW channel is based on a very inexpensive commercially available off-axis dish antenna usually used for TV satellites, two Arduino Uno micro controller boards, and glow discharge detectors (GDD). The GDD is a robust and inexpensive room-temperature plasma device which was found to be a sensitive MMW radiation detector. The Arduino micro controllers are used to encode a text message into serial bits and also decode it. Those serial bits were used to modulate the MMW radiation in On-Off keying. The detection of MMW radiation was performed using a simple and inexpensive GDD. The suggested MMW channel can be used as point to point backhaul wireless communication for the 5th generation of cellular communication.

1. Introduction

In order to satisfy the demand for huge data rates, the carrier frequency must be increased to the X band, K band, and/or millimeter-wave (MMW) (30–300 GHz) portion of the electromagnetic spectrum [1,2]. The millimeter-wave (MMW) and terahertz (THz) bands (30 GHz to 300 GHz) are good solutions for providing high data communication rates [2,3]. Thus, the use of millimeter wave (MMW) and THz radiation for wireless communication has increased significantly. More and more applications in wireless communication, autonomic vehicles, and space technology are based on MMW and THz radiation bands [3,4]. Furthermore, inexpensive quasi optical components such as reflectors and mirrors, are necessary for the implementation of such MMW and THz communication channels [5,6]. In order to fulfill requirements for massive data traffic to core cellular network in the 5th generation of wireless communication, a fast backhaul network is required [7]. Optic fiber backhaul cannot be used in some regions due to infrastructure issues and the current microwave solution cannot fulfill the growing demands for high speed traffic channels [8].
Miniature neon indicator lamps, also known as glow discharge detectors (GDDs), were found to be very sensitive and inexpensive detectors (0.3$ each) for MMW and THz radiation [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. The GDD is a room temperature detector, capable of direct and heterodyne detection [14,15,19]. In previous studies, The NEP and responsivity of the GDD were calculated for the electronic detection system at 100 GHz and resulted in 10 nW/√Hz and 31 V/W respectively [9]. MMW Focal plane arrays (FPA) based on GDD pixels were constructed and experimentally demonstrated [13]. In those demonstrations, the detection mechanism of the GDD was based on slight change of the GDD electrical current as a function of the incident MMW/THz radiation [16,17,18]. Furthermore, upconversion of MMW power into visual light range using the GDD was demonstrated as well [9]. Operation of GDDs in upconversion mode for MMW coherent detection was also experimentally demonstrated in [23]. Many GDD neon lamps from different vendors were tested and the Gilway N523 was found to be the most responsive of them for electrical detection.
In this study we present a very inexpensive MMW wireless point to point (PTP) communication channel concept (see Figure 1). The quasi-optical set up of the MMW channel was composed of two inexpensive and commercially available satellite TV dish antennae. Those satellite TV dishes were coated with metal stickers in order to ensure that the metal surface is smooth enough for use in the MMW band as shown in Figure 3a–c. The Arduino micro controller board in the transmitter side is used to encode a text message into serial bits and transfer those bits to a serial port also known as a UART (TX pin). Those serial bits were used to modulate a 100 GHz carrier wave with On-Off keying (OOK) modulation. The modulated MMW beam is then coupled out to free space using a horn antenna. The horn antenna was placed in the focal plane of an off-axis dish that collimates the MMW radiation and reflects it to a second off-axis dish that focuses the radiation on the GDD cross section.
The GDD is an MMW envelope detector and it was used to detect the modulated On-OFF keying. The detected signal generated from the GDD was connected to a comparator circuit that was used to generate the proper On-OFF voltage levels that are required for detection using a second Arduino microcontroller placed on the receiver side. A computer code was used to control the Arduino microcontroller and to decode the received serial bits and present the received message. The bit rate of the transmission was set to 57,600 bps. The constructed MMW communication channel distance, z, was 15 m. However, larger distances can also be achieved using the same considerations. Design considerations and calculations required for realization of a very inexpensive point-to-point (PTP) MMW communication channel, in general, will be given in this study.

2. Quasi-optical Design of the MMW Channel, Calculations and Alignment

The whole quasi optical design for the realization of MMW communication PTP link is shown in Figure 1. This unique design is composed of two standard TV satellite dishes, 100 GHz MMW source, 2 Arduino Uno microcontroler, GDD detector circuit shown in Figure 2 and an oscilloscope. The 100 GHz source (TX272 VDI) used here was manufactured by Virginia Diodes Inc (VDI). This MMW source in the W band is based on three GaAs frequencies and has a multiplication Factor of 8 to its local oscillator frequency range of 12.625–13.625 GHz [24]. The maximum output power of that source is 600 mW at 100 GHz. The encoded message bits were generated by the user and were transmitted from the Arduino microcontroller Tx pin to the TTL modulation input of the MMW source (0 to 5 V). The maximum TTL modulation rate of this MMW source is 100 MHz.
The GDD circuit contains an amplifier with voltage gain of 5, a dc block capacitor and a resistor RL. The modulated radiation generated by the MMW source is coupled out to free space using a Virginia Diodes Conical horn antenna and a satellite dish antenna coated with aluminum. The horn antenna specifications are as follows: horn length LGh = 35.5 mm and aperture diameter Dh = 16.3 mm. The total cost of the two dish antennae and the aluminum tape is less than 50 $. Figure 3 shows photos of those coated antennas.
The receiver side of the MMW channel is based on a similar dish antenna. Calculations of the expected beam spot on the transmitter dish, receiver dish, and the GDD is shown next. In those calculations only the fundamental Gaussian mode (TEM00) is being considered. This is since, according to VDI specifications for typical conical horn antenna that was used in this demonstration, 87% of total power is transmitted to free space in the fundamental Gaussian mode [25,26,27,28,29]. The initial alignment of the quasi-optical set up shown in Figure 3 was carried out using a laser source that was placed instead of the MMW source. The laser beam is assumed to be Gaussian with an irradiance profile that follows an ideal Gaussian distribution. Further alignments were performed by adjusting the position of quasi-optical dishes and the GDD in order to receive a stronger MMW signal. The MMW source horn antenna was located at the focal point of the transmitted dish (Fdish = 600 mm). The Gaussian beam approximation was used to calculate the beam waist (Equation (1)), and the total power collected by the receiving dish is calculated in Equation (2).
ω ( z ) = ω 0 1 + ( z z R ) ,   z R = π ω 0 λ
  P = P 0 ( 1 e D 2 2 ω ( z ) 2 )
where ω ( z ) is beam waist, z is the distance of propagation, λ is the MMW wavelength, ZR is the Rayleigh range of a Gaussian beam, P 0 is the total beam power emitted from the MMW source, and D is the diameter of the receiving element. The diameter of the transmitting and receiving dishes is 800 mm. Equation (2) can be used to calculate the power collected by the transmitting and receiving dishes and also by the detector (assuming a circular detecting aperture). To use Equation (2), the MMW beam waist has to be calculated in those positions.
According to VDI’s nominal horn specifications the MMW beam waist radius refers to the input of the conical horn antenna and is fixed by that geometry to ω 0 = 6.2   mm [25,26,27,28,29]. The MMW source was placed in the focal point of the transmitter dish and the GDD was placed at the focal point of the receiving dish (see Figure 1). The focal lengths of both dishes are also fixed and can’t be altered and are equal to Fdish = 600 mm. The approximate beam waist can be calculated for a given position in the quasi optical setup shown in Figure 1, using the transformation of the complex beam parameter q1 at the output of the MMW source (W = 6.2 mm and R = ) by the ABCD transfer matrix for paraxial rays. The complex beam parameter q2 can then be calculated at that given position using Equation (4). Knowing the complex beam parameter q2 can allow the calculation of the beam waist W and the beam radius of curvature R at that given position using Equation (5). The parameters in Equation (3) are as follows:
[ A B C D ] = [ 1 d 3 0 1 ] [ 1 0 1 / F d i s h 1 ] [ 1 d 2 0 1 ] [ 1 0 1 / F d i s h 1 ] [ 1 d 1 0 1 ]
q 2 = Aq 1 + B Cq 1 + D
1 q 2 = 1 R i λ π W 2
d 1 is the distance between the transmitter and the projecting dish, F d i s h is the focal length of both of the dishes, d 2 is the distance between the projecting and receiving dishes and d3 is the distance between the receiving dish and the detector plane which is identical to the focal length of the receiving dish and equal to (600 mm). The MMW losses that are shown in Table 1 were calculated using Equation (2) with the aperture diameter D of 800 mm for the transmitting and receiving dishes and a diameter of 1mm for the effective detector aperture. To generate the final ABCD matrix shown in Equation (3), the individual matrices representing each section of the system shown in Figure 1 have to be multiplied together. The beam waist at a given point can be calculated by using the individual matrices representing each section up to that point to produce the total ABCD matrix, and then Equations (4) and (5) can be used to calculate the beam waist at that point.
From Table 1 it can be noticed that for up to 50 m, the suggested concept can produce a strong signal. For larger distance communication the MMW source needs to be relocated slightly further from the focal point of the dish antenna, in order to obtain greater spot size at the transmitting dish and consequently a smaller spot size at the receiving dish. In the set-up of Figure 1, the emitted MMW radiation was collimated using a dish antenna and directed to the second dish antenna that focused the beam on the effective detection area of the GDD. The current MMW technology can produce MMW power of more than 600 mW and also detect signals lower than 1 µW. Under such conditions it will be theoretically possible to transmit MMW power with the quasi-optical shown in Figure 1 for distances longer than 10 km. The dishes used here have a diameter of 800 mm. Better results can be achieved with dishes that have larger diameters, which increase the power collected by the receiving dish.

3. Results

Figure 4 top shows the Arduino Uno microcontroller transmitted bits. Figure 4 bottom show the GDD detected bits. A comparator circuit is used as a decision circuit that decides whether an incoming binary signal is at the logical 0 level or at the logical 1. The output voltage of this comparator is shown in the middle of Figure 4. The VDI MMW source used for the transmission of serial bits from the Arduino microcontroller had an MMW frequency of 100 GHz. The incoming binary signal was encoded using the Arduino Uno microcontroller and the message was shown using the Arduino software (serial monitor option). The SNR of the proposed system for distance between transmitter and receiver dishes of up to 20 m, depends mainly on the detector noise. The NEP and responsivity of the GDD were calculated for the electronic detection system at 100 GHz and resulted in 10 nW/√Hz and 31 V/W respectively [9]. The MMW source transmission power was about 600 mW, and the measured beam waist was about 10 mm. Therefore the total power collected by the GDD effective cross section is about 3.8 mW and, because of the On-Off modulation, the average power is approximately 1.9 mW. The GDD circuit of Figure 2 was connected to an amplifier with gain of 5, therefore the response of the GDD can be calculated by multiplying the received power of 1.5 mW by the responsivity of 31 V/W and by the amplifier gain of 5. The calculated response is therefore approximately 295 mV. The noise voltage is approximately 310 nv/√Hz and the bandwidth was about 1MHz, therefore the noise voltage can be calculated to be about 0.31 mV RMS or 6.2 mV RMS after amplification. The signal shown in Figure 4 is about 270 mV peak to peak voltage as was expected (95 mV RMS). The SNR is therefore equals to about 24 dB. Thus, the performance of the communication link or (Pout/Pin) is 0.91, which means that 91 percent of the transmitted signal is received at the GDD plane. The Arduino Uno microcontroller was programmed to send the same message in loops. Based on typical chart for bit error rate of different modulation method [30] including On-Off keying shown in Figure 5 the bit error rate can be estimate at about 10−12 for a signal to noise ratio of 24 dB.
The experimental results shown in this study prove that the proposed MMW channel can be used as a MMW point to point backhaul network. Following this proof of concept, we can now realize high data rates and a very inexpensive MMW communication channel. MMW communication channel distances of hundreds of meters can be designed and constructed based on the proposed MMW channel.

4. Conclusions

The experimental results of this paper show that the proposed system can serve as a very inexpensive, commercially available and easy to calibrate and operate point to point backhaul MMW wireless communication link for indoor and outdoor application. The suggested quasi-optical system can produce a strong signal with low losses depending on the distance between the transmitter and receiver, and the diameters of the dishes. The system can increase the product signal by improving the alignment of the dishes and improving the coating of the aluminum tapes to form a smoother surface. The proposed system can also be used as an inexpensive alternative for in-space satellite communications.

5. Patents

The GDD was patented under the title: “Upconversion system for imaging and communication”, priority: US/17.07.16/ USP20166263269.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.K., A.A. and D.R.; Methodology, L.K. and A.A.; software, D.R. and L.K.; validation, L.K., M.G. and D.R.; investigation, L.K.; resources, A.A. and N.K.; data curation, L.K. Writing—original draft preparation, L.K., D.R. and A.A.; Writing—review and editing, L.K., N.K., Y.Y.; supervision, A.A., N.K. and Y.Y.; project administration, A.A., N.K. and Y.Y.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Ariel university internal funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rappaport, T.S.; Xing, Y.; Kanhere, O.; Ju, S.; Madanayake, A.; Mandal, S.; Alkhateeb, A.; Trichopoulos, G.C. Wireless Communications and Applications above 100 GHz: Opportunities and Challenges for 6G and Beyond. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 78729–78757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Niu, Y.; Li, Y.; Jin, D.; Su, L.; Vasilakos, A.V. A survey of millimeter wave communications (mmWave) for 5G: Opportunities and challenges. Wirel. Netw. 2015, 21, 2657–2676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rappaport, T.S.; Xing, Y.; MacCartney, G.R.; Molisch, A.F.; Mellios, E.; Zhang, J. Overview of Millimeter Wave Communications for Fifth-Generation (5G) Wireless Networks—With a Focus on Propagation Models. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2017, 65, 6213–6230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kong, L.; Khan, M.; Wu, F.; Chen, G. Millimeter-Wave Wireless Communications for IoT-Cloud Supported Autonomous Vehicles. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2017, 55, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rogalski, A.; Sizov, F. Terahertz detectors and focal plane arrays. Opto-Electron. Rev. 2011, 19, 346–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sizov, F.F. Terahertz radiation detectors: the state-of-the-art. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2018, 33, 123001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ahamed, M.M.; Faruque, S. 5G backhaul: requirements, challenges, and emerging technologies. In Broadband Communications Networks—Recent Advances and Lessons from Practice; Haidine, A., Aqqal, A., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; pp. 43–58. [Google Scholar]
  8. Jaber, M.; Imran, M.A.; Tafazolli, R.; Tukmanov, A. 5G Backhaul Challenges and Emerging Research Directions: A Survey. IEEE Access 2016, 4, 1743–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Akram, A.A.; Rozban, D.; Klein, A.; Abramovich, A.; Yitzhaky, Y.; Kopeika, N.S. Detection and upconversion of three-dimensional MMW/THz images to the visible. Photon. Res. 2016, 4, 306. [Google Scholar]
  10. Abramovich, A.; Kopeika, N.S.; Rozban, D.; Farber, E. Inexpensive detector for terahertz imaging. Appl. Opt. 2007, 46, 7207–7211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rozban, D.; Abramovich, A.; Kopeika, N.S.; Farber, E. Terahertz detection mechanism of inexpensive sensitive glow discharge detector. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 093306-1–093306-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Abramovich, A.; Kopeika, N.S.; Rozban, D. THz Polarization Effects on Detection Responsivity of Glow Discharge Detectors (GDDs). IEEE Sens. J. 2009, 9, 1181–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rozban, D.; Levanon, A.; Joseph, H.; Akram, A.; Abramovich, A.; Kopeika, N.S.; Yitzhaky, Y.; Belenky, A.; Yadid-Pecht, O. Inexpensive THz Focal Plane Array Imaging Using Miniature Neon Indicator Lamps as Detectors. IEEE Sens. J. 2011, 11, 1962–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rozban, D.; Akram, A.A.; Levanon, A.; Abramovich, A.; Kopeika, N.S. W-Band Chirp Radar Mock-Up Using a Glow Discharge Detector. IEEE Sens. J. 2013, 13, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Akram, A.A.; Rozban, D.; Kopeika, N.S.; Abramovich, A. Heterodyne detection at 300 GHz using neon indicator lamp glow discharge detector. Appl. Opt. 2013, 52, 4077–4082. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kopeika, N.S. Glow Discharge Detection of Long Wavelength Electromagnetic Radiation: Cascade Ionization Process Internal Signal Gain and Temporal and Spectral Response Properties. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 1978, 6, 139–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kopeika, N.S. On the mechanism of glow discharge detection of microwave and millimeter wave radiation. Proc. IEEE 1975, 63, 981–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kopeika, N.; Farhat, N. Video detection of millimeter waves with glow discharge tubes: Part I—Physical description; part II—Experimental results. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 1975, 22, 534–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Akram, A.A.; Rozban, D.; Abramovich, A.; Yitzhaky, Y.; Kopeika, N.S. Terahertz Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave Radar using Glow Discharge Detector. IEEE Sens. J. 2016, 16, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Levanon, A.; Kopeika, N.S.; Yitzhaky, Y.; Rozban, D.; Abramovich, A. Calibration Method for MMW Imaging Using Inexpensive Miniature Neon Indicator Lamp Detectors. IEEE Sens. J. 2014, 14, 1677–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shilemay, M.; Rozban, D.; Levanon, A.; Yitzhaky, Y.; Kopeika, N.S.; Yadid-Pecht, O.; Abramovich, A. Performance quantification of a millimeter-wavelength imaging system based on inexpensive glow-discharge-detector focal-plane array. Appl. Opt. 2013, 52, C43–C49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abramovich, A.; Kopeika, N.S.; Rozban, D. Design of inexpensive diffraction limited Focal Plane Arrays for mm wavelength and THz using glow discharge detector pixels. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 104, 033302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ben-Laish, M.; Rozban, D.; Aharon, A.; Abramovich, A.; Yitzhaky, Y.; Kopeika, N. QPSK detection using glow discharge detector and a photodiode for millimeter-wave and terahertz communication. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Custom VDI Transmitters: TX272. Available online: https://vadiodes.com/en/products/custom-transmitters (accessed on 31 October 2017).
  25. Goldsmith, P. Quasioptical Systems: Gaussian Beam Quasioptical Propagation and Applications; Wiley-IEEE Press: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  26. Rudge, A.W.; Milne, K. (Eds.) The Handbook of Antenna Design; Peter Peregrinus Ltd.: London, UK, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  27. Olver, A.D.; Clarricoats, P.J.B.; Shafai, L.; Kishk, A.A. Microwave Horns and Feeds; IEE Electromagnetic Waves Series; The Institution of Electrical Engineers: London, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gandhi Om, P. Microwave Engineering & Applications; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  29. Johansson, J.; Whyborn, N. The diagonal horn as a sub-millimeter wave antenna. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 1992, 40, 795–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Elganimi, T.Y. Studying the BER performance, power- and bandwidth- efficiency for FSO communication systems under various modulation schemes. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Jordan Conference on Applied Electrical Engineering and Computing Technologies (AEECT), Amman, Jordan, 3–5 December 2013. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Block diagram of the experimental setup of MMW projection system.
Figure 1. Block diagram of the experimental setup of MMW projection system.
Electronics 09 00677 g001
Figure 2. The glow discharge detectors (GDD) electrical circuit.
Figure 2. The glow discharge detectors (GDD) electrical circuit.
Electronics 09 00677 g002
Figure 3. The dish antennas setup for the receiver (a) and transmission side (b) in the experiment. (c) Demonstration of the alignment process.
Figure 3. The dish antennas setup for the receiver (a) and transmission side (b) in the experiment. (c) Demonstration of the alignment process.
Electronics 09 00677 g003
Figure 4. The voltage values of the Arduino transmitted bits in TTL levels (top, yellow signal), the raw detected signal received at the GDD detector of size 295 mV pick to pick’ (bottom, blue signal) and the reconstructed signal of the transmitted bits in the receiver side at the comparator output in TTL levels (middle, green signal).
Figure 4. The voltage values of the Arduino transmitted bits in TTL levels (top, yellow signal), the raw detected signal received at the GDD detector of size 295 mV pick to pick’ (bottom, blue signal) and the reconstructed signal of the transmitted bits in the receiver side at the comparator output in TTL levels (middle, green signal).
Electronics 09 00677 g004
Figure 5. The bit error rate performance for free space communication systems under various modulation method as a function of single to noise ration.
Figure 5. The bit error rate performance for free space communication systems under various modulation method as a function of single to noise ration.
Electronics 09 00677 g005
Table 1. Approximated beam diameter and approximated percentage of total power collected by the receiving dishes are given for transmitter to receiver distances of z = 15 m, z = 20 m, z = 50 m and z = 500 m.
Table 1. Approximated beam diameter and approximated percentage of total power collected by the receiving dishes are given for transmitter to receiver distances of z = 15 m, z = 20 m, z = 50 m and z = 500 m.
Distance between transmitter and receiver [m]15 20 50 100 500
Beam waist on the Transmitting dish [mm]9292929292
Beam waist on the receiving dish [mm]17522051810315161
Percentage of total power collected by the receiving dish.100%99.86%69%26%1.2%
Percentage of total power collected by the GDD detector (effective aperture diameter of 1 mm).1.64%1.62%1.13%0.42%0.019%

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kahana, L.; Rozban, D.; Gihasi, M.; Abramovich, A.; Yitzhaky, Y.; Kopeika, N. Inexpensive Millimeter-Wave Communication Channel Using Glow Discharge Detector and Satellite Dish Antenna. Electronics 2020, 9, 677. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9040677

AMA Style

Kahana L, Rozban D, Gihasi M, Abramovich A, Yitzhaky Y, Kopeika N. Inexpensive Millimeter-Wave Communication Channel Using Glow Discharge Detector and Satellite Dish Antenna. Electronics. 2020; 9(4):677. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9040677

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kahana, Lidor, Daniel Rozban, Moshe Gihasi, Amir Abramovich, Yitzhak Yitzhaky, and Natan Kopeika. 2020. "Inexpensive Millimeter-Wave Communication Channel Using Glow Discharge Detector and Satellite Dish Antenna" Electronics 9, no. 4: 677. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9040677

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop