Correction: Kim et al. Assessment of Enhancement Kinetics Improves the Specificity of Abbreviated Breast MRI: Performance in an Enriched Cohort. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 136

There were errors in the original publication [...].

There were errors in the original publication [1]. The CAD system version and an inequality sign in the definition should be corrected. A correction has been made to 2. Materials and Methods, 2.4. Kinetic Analysis, 1st paragraph: The sentence "Kinetic information was retrospectively analyzed on a dedicated workstation using a CAD system (CadstreamTM version 4.1.3, Merge Healthcare, Inc., Hartland, WI, USA)." should be replaced with "Kinetic information was retrospectively analyzed on a dedicated workstation using a CAD system (CadstreamTM v6.0, Merge Healthcare, Inc., Hartland, WI, USA).".
Inequality signs and an AUC value should be corrected. A correction has been made to 3. Results, 3.2. Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve Analysis of Parameters for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions, 1st paragraph: The sentence "For the detection of all malignancies including in situ carcinoma, the enhancement degree, enhancement curve type, and size showed significantly better AUC values compared to morphological analysis alone (0.72-0.74 vs. 0.62; p ≤ 0.05 for all parameters)." should be replaced with "For the detection of all malignancies including in situ carcinoma, the enhancement degree, enhancement curve type, and size showed significantly better AUC values compared to morphological analysis alone (0.72-0.74 vs. 0.62; p < 0.05 for all parameters).".
The sentence "For the detection of invasive cancers, enhancement degree and size showed significantly better AUC values compared to morphological analysis alone (0.72 for each vs. 0.6; p ≤ 0.05 for both parameters)." should be replaced with "For the detection of invasive cancers, enhancement degree and size showed significantly better AUC values compared to morphological analysis alone (0.72 for each vs. 0.61; p < 0.05 for both parameters).".
Incorrect dividing lines inside the Tables 1 and 3 and the indentations should be  corrected. The corrected Tables 1 and 3 appear below.  In the fifth line of Figure S1, "circumscribed" should be corrected to "heterogeneous enhancement." The corrected Figure S1 appears below.
Diagnostics 2023, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 4 Figure S1. Interpretation guideline of mass on AB-MRI.

Supplementary Materials:
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https: //www.mdpi.com/xxx/s1, Table S1: Abbreviated protocol of screening breast MRI. Figure S1: Interpretation guideline of mass on AB-MRI. Figure  The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the academic editor. The original publication has also been updated.