New Euthemistid Damsel–Dragonfly from the Middle Jurassic of Northern China (Odonata, Isophlebioidea, Euthemistidae)

: A new genus and new species of the euthemistid, Kidaneuthemis ningchengensis gen. et sp. nov., is described from the Middle Jurassic of Inner Mongolia, China. It can be assigned to the Euthemistidae by the several long intercalary veins between RP1 and IR1, IR1 and RP2, as well as between RP2 and IR2 and between IR2 and RP3/4. Kidaneuthemis ningchengensis gen. et sp. nov. dis‑ tinguishes from the other two genera of this family by the presence of not less than eight intercalary veins between MP and wing margin; about three rows of cells in the distal part between MA and MP; the base of IR2 is two cells distal to that of RP3/4. In addition, a revision of the family Euthemistidae has been proposed.

Herein, we describe a new genus and species, Kidaneuthemis ningchengensis gen.et sp.nov., from the Middle Jurassic Jiulongshan Formation.This well-preserved fossil shows some important characteristics of the Euthemistidae, such as the several long intercalary veins between RP1 and IR1, IR1 and RP2, as well as between RP2 and IR2, and between IR2 and RP3/4; an extremely narrow post-discoidal area; numerous secondary antenodal crossveins between the anterior wing margin and ScP distal of Ax2; and discoidal cells opened in the forewing and closed in the hind wing.As the second genus of the Euthemistidae found in China during the Mesozoic, K. ningchengensis gen.et sp.nov.has well preserved head, thorax, legs, wings, and abdomen, especially the female ovipositor, which can contribute to the further understanding of the morphology and taxonomy of Euthemistidae.In addition, a revision of the family Euthemistidae has been proposed.

Materials
This study is based on one specimen from the Middle Jurassic Jiulongshan Formation in Daohugou Village, Wuhua Township, Ningcheng County, Inner Mongolia, China.The specimens (holotype No. NCG012-1, No. NCG012-2) described herein is deposited in the Ningcheng Geological Park, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia.Based on the exploration of the stratigraphy, the age of the Jiulongshan Formation is approximately 164-165 Ma [5][6][7][8].The specimens were observed and photographed using a stereoscopic Nikon SMZ25 microscope with an attached Nikon DS-Ri2 digital camera system.Line drawings were prepared with Affinity Designer 1.10 and Adobe Photoshop 2024.

Systematic Paleontology
Other characteristics as in the diagnosis of Pritykina [3] and Li et al. [2]: several long intercalary veins between RP1 and IR1, IR1 and RP2, as well as between RP2 and IR2, and between IR2 and RP3/4 (intercalaries parallel to main longitudinal veins without apparent origin on them but originating in cross-venation); extremely narrow postdiscoidal area; not petiolate; numerous secondary antenodal crossveins between anterior wing margin and ScP distal of Ax2; discoidal cells opened in forewing and closed in hind wing; hind wing subdiscoidal area transverse, posteriorly closed, short and broad, with vein CuAb making a strong angle with AA; hind wing gaff not very long; RP2 aligned with subnodus; crossveins in hind wing postdiscoidal space are not very long and not oblique.

Description
Holotype.Female (hind wing anal margin rounded, preserved with ovipositor).Imprint of a relatively complete specimen.The insect carapace retains the head, thorax, two forelegs, one midleg and one hindleg, the abdomen, the female ovipositor, and the cerci attached to the most terminal abdominal segment.Fore-and hind wings preserved almost intact, with wing bases slightly overlapped.
Forewing (left and right wings combined).Wing without petiolates.117.2 mm long and 24.3 mm wide; ratio of width to length: 0.21; nodus invisible; from pterostigma to apex 14.9 mm; pterostigma 7.0 mm long, 1.8 mm wide.Discoidal space basally opened.Antenodal cross-veins out of sight, while not less than 20 posterior cross-veins before pterostigma.Pt shorter, covering four cells.IR1 long, originating from RP1, zigzagged at base, smooth distally, more or less parallel to RP1; RP2 originating at subnodus; RP2 and IR2 gently curved and parallel in basal part, with only one row of intervening cells, about seven or eight rows of cells in distal part.Area between RP2 and IR2 somewhat widened distally near posterior wing margin; area between RP3/4 and MA separated by only one row of cells at base and then broadened distally, with 14 rows of cells near posterior wing margin; zigzagged intercalary veins present in area between IRl and RP1, IR1 and RP2, RP2 and IR2, IR2 and RP3/4, as well as RP3/4 and MA; post-discoidal area with one row of cells in basal, becoming two rows of cells distally; MA fluctuates slightly at the origin of IR1, causing area between MA and MP to contract near wing margins.MAb 2.2 mm long and partially aligned with basal part of 'gaff'.MP straight area between MP and CuA with 2-3 rows of cells; and area between MP and wing margin wide, with the widest space not less than seven rows of cells and about 10 intercalary veins originating from MP. CuA divided into CuAa and CuAb.CuAb points towards the posterior margin of the wing and short, CuAa runs almost parallel to the wing margin for some distance, forming a short and narrow cubito-anal area; CuAa branches towards the posterior end, with more than three posterior branches and two rows of cells at its broadest part.Area between MP and posterior wing margin broad, with about eight rows of cells at the widest part, and 10 almost parallel intercalary veins in this area.
Hind wing (left and right wings combined).Wing without short petiole; preserved length 114.2 mm, width 26.2 mm; ratio of width to length 0.23.Distance from base to nodus 46.5 mm, distance from wing base to arculus 10.3 mm, from arculus to nodus 37.3 mm, from nodus to apex 67.8 mm, from nodus to pterostigma 39.0 mm, from pterostigma to apex 21.2 mm, from nodus to arculus 36.2 mm.Pterostigma 9.2 mm long, 1.7 mm wide.Primary antenodal cross-veins strong; Ax0 not preserved; Ax1 2.9 mm basal of arculus, disposed obliquely to ScP and R + MA; and Ax2 5.3 mm distal of arculus, with inverted obliquity.R + MA nearly straight; RP and MA parallel at base, separated at a slightly obtuse angle from RA in arculus; 14/12 secondary antenodal cross-veins present between C and ScP (left/right hind wing, respectively); thirteen secondary antenodal cross-veins present between ScP and RA distal of Ax2; and 19 antesubnodal cross-veins present between RA and RP, extending from Arc to Sn. Arculus, distinctly angled.Discoidal cells basally closed and free of cross-veins.MP nearly straight, slightly curved upwards two cells away from Ax2, and spaced two-three rows of cells away from CuAa.CuAa short and zigzagged, retaining only three branches and basally somewhat parallel to the posterior wing margin, with three or four rows of cells between.Area between the first and second branches of the left hind wing, CuAa wider than that of the right hind wing.The stem of the second branch of left hind wing, CuAa more curved, while part of right hind wing straight.Nodal well preserved; Sn fluctuates in the middle of the vein and aligns with the slightly tilted Cr. 16 postnodal cross-veins present between C and RA, not aligned with 21 cross-veins between RA and RP1 before Pterostigma.Area between RA and RP1 with one row of cells, two rows of cells exist after Pt.Pterostigma more elongated than the forewing and with a weak Pt-brace.IR1 long, smooth, and slightly zigzagged, originating at RP1 at a distance of six cells from Sn and more or less parallel to RP1.Area between RP1 and IR1, RP2 and IR2, and IR2 and RP3/4 strongly expanded in distal part, and more intercalary veins are present in these areas.RP2 aligned with subnodus; RP2 and IR2 smoothly curved, with only one row of intervening cells in basal part and about eight rows of cells in distal part.IR2 with an apparent origin in RP3/4; base of IR2 with two cells and 3.1 mm distal of base of RP3/4 in right hind wing.Area between RP3/4 and MA, separated by one row of cells basally and distally, strongly widened and presented with five subparallel intercalary veins of different lengths.MA slightly undulated in the middle of N and Pt.Post -discoidal area narrow distally, with one row of cells at the base between MA and MP and three rows of cells at the distal.Area between MP and wing margin board with approximately nine rows of cells spaced apart at the widest point, and about nine or 10 near-parallel intercalary veins in this area.
Body (part and counterpart combined).Total body length (from head to end of abdomen, including anal appendages) 172.0 mm.Head 17.1 mm long and 22.3 mm wide, with compound eyes large, preserved clypeus, post clypeus, and frons.Thorax 24.2 mm long and 20.2 mm wide, relatively well preserved, showing ventral view.Legs elongated, retaining four in part.Forelegs relatively well preserved, femur about 16.3 mm long, tibia 17.4 mm long, preserving two rows of tibial comb; tarsus retain only two-segmented, 1.8 mm long, in which basitarsus 0.84 mm long in counterpart; meso-leg partly preserved, femur about 16.9 mm long, tibia 16.2 mm long; meta-leg party preserved as well, femur more complete, about 18.4 mm, while tibia partially preserved (Figure 1D,E).The abdomen long and cylindrical, with 122.9 mm long, 18.0 mm at the widest, and 10.4 mm at the narrowest.The first, eighth, ninth, and tenth abdominal segments are shorter than the others.The second abdominal segment is 13.2 mm long, the third 15.5 mm long, and the third to seventh abdominal segments approximately the same length, decreasing in width.The eighth abdominal segment 8.2 mm long, the ninth 9.2 mm long, and the tenth 3.9 mm long.The presence of gonapophyses in the counterpart (valvulae of the cone-shaped ovipositor) between the eighth and ninth abdominal segments 22.7 mm long.The gonapophyses strongly sclerotized, only weakly curved, and extremely elongated, with the ovipositor extending far beyond the end of the abdomen.In addition, on the ventral margin of the last abdominal segment, one tiny structure visible, maybe the cercus (Figure 1F-H).

Discussion
The Isophlebioptera Bechly [12] is divided into four subgroups: Euthemistidae, Parazygoptera, Selenothemistidae and Isophlebiida [1,2].As a result of the following characters: RP3/4 is slightly curved, more or less parallel to RP2 for some distance, and the space between RP3/4 and MA is significantly enlarged at the distal near posterior wing margin; the area between MA and MP is very narrow, with only one row of cells in between; and the distal space between MP and CuAa is strongly expanded [11].Kidaneuthemis gen.nov.can be easily classified into the Isophlebioptera.
According to the diagnosis of Euthemistidae [2,3], there are several long intercalary veins parallel to the main longitudinal veins, with no apparent origin on them, but in crossvenation, between IR1 and RP1 and between IR1 and RP2, as well as between RP3/4 and IR2 and between IR2 and RP2.Additionally, there is an extremely narrow post-discoidal area without petiolate; numerous secondary antenodal cross-veins between the anterior wing margin and ScP distal of Ax2; discoidal cells opened in the forewing and closed in the hind wing; RP2 aligned with the subnodus; and cross-veins in the hind wing post-discoidal space that are not very long and not oblique.Kidaneuthemis gen.nov. is undoubtedly a member of this family.
The Euthemistidae comprises two Mesozoic genera: Euthemis Pritykina [3] and Sinoeuthemis Li et al. [2].Kidaneuthemis gen.nov. is distinguished from the two genera by the presence of numerous (not less than nine) near-parallel intercalary veins in the area between the MP and the wing margin.Furthermore, compared to Euthemis, there is one row of cells at the base between MA and MP and three rows of cells at the distal in Kidaneuthemis gen.nov., instead of only one row.The difference with Sinoeuthemis is that Kidaneuthemis gen.nov.has two cells based on IR2 and RP3/4 instead of Sinoeuthemis with five cells.
This specimen has a relatively well-preserved, sclerotized, and slightly curved ovipositor tube attached to the eighth abdominal segment.Its structure looks very similar to that of extant dragonfly ovipositors [13], such as being overall sclerotized and curved and having the same oblique position in the cranial direction.
The ovipositor of female dragonflies falls into two main categories: ovipositor openended vulvar lamina and tubes with a saw-like or conical shape.The former is present in several anisopteran families, while the latter is present in all Zygoptera, Epiophlebiidae, and basal Anisoptera, especially in Petaluridae, Austropetaliidae, and Aeshnidae [14].Depending on the morphology of the ovipositor, the spawning pattern varies greatly.The vulvar lamina is used to lay eggs by dipping the tip of the abdomen into the water during flight.The other type of ovipositor is used to insert a substrate, such as plant tissue.Kidaneuthemis ningchengensis gen.et sp.nov.possesses a long and strongly dependent saw-like ovipositor.Usually, this type of ovipositor is used to insert their eggs into the mud at the stream's edge, called endophytic oviposition, which allows the eggs to be effectively protected, increasing the survival rate of the offspring [15].So, K. ningchengensis gen.et sp.nov.maybe lived in a warm, humid climate and was close to streams or lakes.

Conclusions
A new euthemistid dragonfly, Kidaneuthemis ningchengensis gen.et sp.nov., is described from the Middle Jurassic Jiulongshan Formation of northern China.This is the second genus of the Euthemistidae discovered in China, which is rarely preserved with a complete female ovipositor in the fossil.This discovery enriches the diversity of the Euthemistidae and presents more complete morphological information about this family for further study.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Holotype of Kidaneuthemis ningchengensis gen.et sp.nov., (A,B), photograph and line drawing of left hind wing; (C,D), photograph and line drawing of left forewing; (E,F), photograph and line drawing of right hind wing; (G,H), photograph and line drawing of right forewing.Scale bars = 20 mm.