Rapid Matching Antibodies Pair and Fast Detecting Melioidosis with Fluorescent Immunochromatographic Test Strips

: The high infectivity, difﬁculty to diagnose, and high drug resistance of melioidosis limited the timeliness of treatment. Lateral ﬂow assay (LFA) was operated in this research to provide an instant diagnosis method, and a fast antibody rapid matching test strategy based on LFA was developed to select the most sensitive and speciﬁc pair of antibodies. Compared to the traditional ELISA method, the new matching strategy limits the pairing time to 3 h without any complex instruments. The rapid pairing test strategy is a universal strategy that is suitable for various sandwich immune antigen pairings. To fasten the test of the test strips, dry ﬂuorescence immunoassay analyzer (DFIA) was designed and applied. The equipment also simpliﬁes the process of data acquisition. Finally, the concentration gradient test was operated, and the detection lines and limits were presented.


Introduction
Melioidosis is a zoonosis disease caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei (Bacillus Melioides) which belongs to facultative intracellular Gram-negative bacterium [1]. About 89,000 people are killed by this disease annually [2]. People and animals can be infected by skin abrasion, inhalation, or ingestion [3]. It is highly infectious, difficult to diagnose, and highly drug resistant, and there is no corresponding vaccine [4]. It has been listed as a Class B bioterrorism agent by WHO. As reported, hemolysin coregulated protein 1 is the virulence factor of melioidosis which can stimulate the body to produce specific antibodies. It has potential application value in serological identification, screening of vaccine candidate antigens, and lateral flow assay.
Several assays have been developed to diagnose melioidosis aside from bacteria culture. PCR has been developed but is not in routine practice because of its low sensitivity which most likely stemmed from the low concentration of Burkholderia pseudomallei in blood and the co-purification of PCR inhibitors with target DNA [5]. The indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA) is a rapid and cheap method [6] used to detect antibodies produced by human beings during infection that are specific to Burkholderia pseudomallei [7,8]. However, the test is unreliable because in areas where Burkholderia pseudomallei are widely prevalent, most people have the target antibodies in their blood, which results in a false-positive test result but no infection. This drawback makes this detection method completely unsuitable for detecting viruses and bacteria that have been around in an area for a long time, such as melioidosis. Antigen detection by immunofluorescence assay (IFA) is highly sensitive and specific [9]. However, this assay requires a fluorescent microscope and a medical practitioner with requisite expertise that will not be available in most endemic settings. This method can only be applied to epidemiological investigations before an outbreak, and its application is limited to some extent. tional groups on the surface. To avoid the difficulties of purification/extraction of CDs and surface modification of CDs during formation of CDs fluorescent spheres, the in situ synthesis of CDs inside the pre-synthesized silica spheres is an excellent strategy and can simplify the synthesis of CDs fluorescent spheres.
A diagnostic LFA for melioidosis has been developed, which is named Active Melioidosis Detect (AMD) [41]. The assay targets the Burkholderia pseudomallei capsular polysaccharide (CPS) using a CPS-specific monoclonal antibody. Compared to previous described methods, AMD is a convenient and fast detection method. Many researchers focus on the development of AMD, so that its reliability continues to improve. The major benefit is that AMD enables its test results to be obtained in less than an hour after the clinical sample being collected. Although the sensitivity of AMD is lower than culture results, the gold standard for diagnosis of melioidosis, the culture results are rarely available within 24 h or take even several days. The sensitivity of AMD is still enough that a positive result enables the clinician to institute therapy targeting Burkholderia pseudomallei and to operate further additional cultures and imaging to make a definite diagnosis.
Due to the complexity of protein structure, there may be non-specific binding sites between antibodies of the same antigen. This leads to non-specific adsorption between antibodies. At the same time, the binding ability of different antibodies to the same antigen is also strong or weak. Therefore, for sandwich immunobiological detection methods, antibody screening and pairing are extremely necessary. To match antibody pairs in all kinds of LFA research, the ELISA method is widely used by all researchers [42]. ELISA is also named an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, which is currently the most widely used immunoenzyme technology for qualitative or quantitative detection of antibodies or antigens. The ELISA test is a sensitive and specific method, but the requirement of devices limits its convenience in all laboratories in universities and hospitals when it is applied in antibodies matching. The increased testing time has increased the necessity of preserving freshly purified antibodies and increased the requirements for antibody preservation. At the same time, the materials prepared during the pairing process cannot be applied to subsequent LFA research, resulting in a large amount of antibody waste, as well as increased material and time costs for research, which undoubtedly lead to delays in research progress.
This article shows that CDs-based silica spheres (CSS) can be synthesized by growing CDs in situ inside the (aminoethyl)-γ-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (AEAPTMS)-grafted silica nanospheres by a one-step hydrothermal method. The CSS is chosen by its high QY (near 90%) and excellent dispersion, solubility, and stability in aqueous solution. Its bright blue fluorescence enhances the sensitivity of Hemolysin-Coregulated Protein 1 (Hcp-1) of melioidosis and helps us develop the CSS-LFA technology for melioidosis. To select an appropriate pairing of antibodies, a rapid pairing test strategy is applied. Compared to the traditional ELISA method, it only takes about 3 h to elect the appropriate pairing. A new type of equipment called dry fluorescence immunoassay analyzer (DFIA) was developed and applied to detect blue fluorescent LFA test strips. The equipment speeds up the test and simplifies the process of data acquisition. With the application of ImageJ and DFIA, the test lines and detection limits were obtained in the end.

Fabrication of the CSS-Based LFA Test Strip
The sample pad was divided into strips measuring 12 mm in length, dipped into a PBS solution (pH 7.4, 0.01 M) containing 2% NaCl (w/v), 0.1% Tween-20 (v/v), 1% saccharose (w/v) and 1% polyvinylpyrrolidone 55 K (w/v), and then removed to dry and set aside. The test (T) line was created by uniformly distributing 2 mg/mL of coated capture Hcp-1 antibody on the NC membrane, while the control (C) line was created by evenly distributing 2 mg/mL of diluted IgG on the NC membrane. It was then dried for subsequent use in a 37 • C oven for two hours. The PVC substrate, NC membrane, pretreatment sample pad, and absorbent pad were then put together. The sample pad and the absorbent pad were then adhered to the ends of the PVC substrate, respectively, after the NC membrane had been pasted in the center. There is a 1-2 mm overlap between the NC membrane, sample pad, and absorbent pad, respectively. The completed PVC substrate was sliced into 3 mm wide strips by the cutting machine, which then stored them at 4 • C for subsequent use.

Expression and Purification of Hemolysin-Coregulated Protein 1
The DNA sequence from Burkholderia pseudomallei BPC006 encoding Hcp-1 was cloned into pET-28a with an N-terminal His6-tag. Production of Hcp-1 protein was induced in BL21 (DE3) cells (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany) by addition of 0.1 mM isopropyl-b-Dthiogalactoside (IPTG) at 37 • C in LB broth. Bacterial cells were harvested at 6 h post induction at 25 • C by centrifugation at 6000 g for 10 min, and His-tagged protein was purified by HisTrapTM affinity column (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). All elution fractions were collected and detected by SDS-PAGE. The Hcp-1 protein was concentrated with 10 kDa MWCO (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). The proteins were dialyzed extensively against PBS and stored at −80 • C.

Development of Anti-Hcp-1 mAb
The anti-Hcp-1 mAb was generated as previously described [43]. Briefly, BALB/c mice (SLAC Laboratory Animal Company, Shanghai, China) were subcutaneously injected with 50 µg purified Hcp-1 protein and Freund's complete adjuvant. Spleen cells were fused with SP2/0 by PEG to develop hybridomas cells in HAT selective medium (Gibco, Billings, MT, USA). Positive hybridoma cells selected by ELISA were intraperitoneally injected into BALB/c mice, and ascites were collected after 7 days. Anti-Hcp-1 mAb was purified by using our previously published protocol and confirmed by WB [43].

Synthesis of Dendritic SiO 2 Spheres
Dendritic SiO 2 was synthesized by traditional Stöber method. TEA (68 mg) was added into H 2 O (25 mg) and stirred at 80 • C for 30 min. Then, CTAB (380 mg) and sodium salicylate (168 mg) were added into the solution and stirred for 1 h. TEOS (4 mg) was injected into the solution and the mixture was stirred gently at 80 • C for 2 h. The mixture was then diluted with ethanol and sedimentation was separated by centrifugation. The precipitates were washed with ethanol for several times and finally dispersed in HCl/ethanol mixture and stirred at 60 • C for 24 h to extract the residue organic templates. The dendritic SiO 2 spheres (dSiO 2 ) were washed with ethanol and H 2 O and finally dispersed in ethanol.

In Situ Synthesis of CDs Dendritic SiO 2 Spheres (CSS)
The synthesis strategy was learned from Xu L.D [21]. AEAPTMS (360 µL) was added into ethanol (100 mL) which disperses dSiO 2 nanospheres (100 mg). When the dispersion Chemosensors 2023, 11, 351 5 of 11 was uniform, ammonia (2 mL) was added into the mixture and stirred for 12 h. After that, the precipitate was separated by centrifugation and purified to obtain AEAPTMS-grafted dSiO 2 nanospheres. To practice in situ synthesis of CDs into foresaid nanospheres, 2 mL of aqueous solution containing sodium citrate (0.0037 g) was added into 7 mL DMF dispersing AEAPTMS-grafted dSiO 2 nanospheres (10 mg). After the mixture was uniform, it was reacted in an oven at 220 • C for 30 min in the inner pot of the autoclave. After cooled to natural temperature, CSS synthesized in the reaction was washed to obtain CSS.

Preparation of CSS-Labeled Antibody Conjugate
APTES (20 µL) and ammonia (5 mL) were added into ethanol (5 mL) dispersing CSS (5 mg). After stirring for 6 h, it was washed and separated and dispersed in 5 mL of DMF, and then succinic anhydride (50 mg) was added. After stirring for 6 h, washing was performed to obtain carboxy-terminated CSS. Subsequently, 0.5 mL of aqueous solution containing 1 mg of CSS, 20 µL of EDC aqueous solution (10 mg/mL), and 0.5 mL of PBS (pH 7.4, 0.01 M) buffer containing 80 µg of labeled antigen against Hcp-1 were sequentially mixed. After shaking at room temperature for 2 h, the solution was centrifuged under 10,000 RPM for 3 min and the product was dispersed in 1 mL of PBS (pH 7.4, 0.01 M) buffer containing 1% BSA (w/v) to prepare CSS-labeled antibody conjugate.

Results and Discussion
The in situ growth of CDs in dendritic SiO 2 spheres is an easy method of synthesis of carbon quantum dots. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) characterization was used to analyze the dendritic SiO 2 spheres (dSiO 2 ) and the CDs inside the groove of the spheres. As shown in Figure 1b, the size of dSiO 2 is around 180 nm and the microsphere contains an enormous superficial area to accommodate the CDs to aggregation of luminescent clusters inducing the enhancement of fluorescence, as shown in Figure 1a,c. The synthesis is a one-step method under solvothermal conditions in the presence of AEAPTMS. The carbon dots grow inside the dendritic SiO 2 spheres because AEAPTMS provides anchor points for raw materials on dendritic silica. The amino group combines with the carboxyl group in the reaction material in solution, thereby enabling the connection of the core of carbon dots to the dendritic SiO 2 spheres. However, the combination method limits the type of raw materials. As shown in Figure 2a, the 3D fluorescence plots of CSS show that the emission peak is 455 nm under the excitation wavelength of 354 nm. The fluorescence emission spectrum under 354 nm excitation light is shown in Figure 2b. Under the common 365 nm excitation light source, its maximum emission intensity is still 93.7% of the aforementioned maximum emission intensity with similar emission wavelengths of 460 nm. The quantum yield (QY) of CSS aqueous solutions is 89.3%, respectively. The method for measuring fluorescence quantum yield is the reference method, which uses the fluorescence signal of the reference substance to compare the fluorescence signal of the measured substance and calculate the fluorescence quantum yield of the measured substance. In the experiment, we used quinine sulfate solution (QY = 54% under 360 nm excitation light) as a reference fluorescence standard. The equation is Φu = ΦsFuAs/FsAu (Φu and Φs means fluorescence quantum yield of the substance to be tested and the reference substance; Fu and Fs means integrated fluorescence intensity of the substance to be tested and the reference substance; Au and As means the absorbance of the substance to be tested and the reference substance). measured substance. In the experiment, we used quinine sulfate solution (QY = 54% under 360 nm excitation light) as a reference fluorescence standard. The equation is Φu = ΦsFuAs/FsAu (Φu and Φs means fluorescence quantum yield of the substance to be tested and the reference substance; Fu and Fs means integrated fluorescence intensity of the substance to be tested and the reference substance; Au and As means the absorbance of the substance to be tested and the reference substance).  For the well binding and fluorescence properties, we designed a rapid antibody matching test strategy in about 3 h. In this experiment, four different antibodies of Hcp-1, named 1A201, 2D113, 2B101, and 3B1, were matched with this strategy. To pick out the lengths of 460 nm. The quantum yield (QY) of CSS aqueous solutions is 89.3%, respectively. The method for measuring fluorescence quantum yield is the reference method, which uses the fluorescence signal of the reference substance to compare the fluorescence signal of the measured substance and calculate the fluorescence quantum yield of the measured substance. In the experiment, we used quinine sulfate solution (QY = 54% under 360 nm excitation light) as a reference fluorescence standard. The equation is Φu = ΦsFuAs/FsAu (Φu and Φs means fluorescence quantum yield of the substance to be tested and the reference substance; Fu and Fs means integrated fluorescence intensity of the substance to be tested and the reference substance; Au and As means the absorbance of the substance to be tested and the reference substance).  For the well binding and fluorescence properties, we designed a rapid antibody matching test strategy in about 3 h. In this experiment, four different antibodies of Hcp-1, named 1A201, 2D113, 2B101, and 3B1, were matched with this strategy. To pick out the For the well binding and fluorescence properties, we designed a rapid antibody matching test strategy in about 3 h. In this experiment, four different antibodies of Hcp-1, named 1A201, 2D113, 2B101, and 3B1, were matched with this strategy. To pick out the minimum non-specific adsorption and most sensitive pair of antibodies, four different CSS-antibody conjugate and four different LFA test strips with four different test lines with antibodies above were prepared as shown in Figure 3a and zeta potential proved they were successfully synthesized as shown in Figure 3b. In Figure 3a, the Hcp-1 Ab1, named the detection antibody, was fixed on the CSS to combine with the antigens (Ag) in the sample. The Hcp-1 Ab2, named the capture antibody, applies to the surface of the NC membrane to capture Ab1-Ag conjugates in the liquid. This method is called sandwich immunity. After that, a cross-pair experiment was operated, in which 12 pairs of different antibodies matching tests and corresponding blank control strips were applied to the test as shown in Figure 4a. The pair of 1A201 as detection antibody and 2D113 or 2B101 as capture antibody are shown in Figure 4a. From the analysis by ImageJ, we select 2D113 as capture antibody to perform further research for its higher T/C. Other pairs exhibit varying degrees of non-specific adsorption which makes the limit of detection be much higher than the pairs of no non-specific adsorption. At the same time, the brightness of the line is lower compared to the chosen pair. By applying this matching strategy, the matching time can be limited to 3 h, which rapidly diminishes the time of matching antibody pairs and provides a good foundation for large-scale screening of sandwich immune antibody pairs. The CSS-antibody conjugate and prepared test strips can immediately apply to subsequent concentration gradient testing to cut down the use of valuable and precious antibodies and save a significant amount of time for preparing experimental materials. capture antibody to perform further research for its higher T/C. Other pairs exhibit varying degrees of non-specific adsorption which makes the limit of detection be much higher than the pairs of no non-specific adsorption. At the same time, the brightness of the line is lower compared to the chosen pair. By applying this matching strategy, the matching time can be limited to 3 h, which rapidly diminishes the time of matching antibody pairs and provides a good foundation for large-scale screening of sandwich immune antibody pairs. The CSS-antibody conjugate and prepared test strips can immediately apply to subsequent concentration gradient testing to cut down the use of valuable and precious antibodies and save a significant amount of time for preparing experimental materials.
At the same time, to eliminate background fluorescence, the sample pad was preprocessed. The comparison of them is similar to Figure 4c. The background fluorescence of the test strips was strongly affected by the composition of chromatographic solution. In order to add components other than antigen and marker conjugates, the pre-treatment sample pad is the most convenient method. When the sample solution to be tested is dripped onto the sample pad, the substance pre-treated on the sample pad will quickly dissolve in the test solution. This eliminates the step of adding these treatment solutions to the sample, thus simplifying the testing steps. From Figure 4c, it is obvious that the background fluorescence is eliminated to an acceptable level.    Applying the above pairing, the concentration gradient test was carried out. The initial test concentration gradient and the initial gradient is 10 μg/mL. As shown in Figure  4b, the naked eye detection limit is approximately 1 μg/mL. In past research, active melioidosis detect (AMD) LFA with colloidal gold nanoparticles was widely developed [44][45][46][47]. However, most of the research was focused on qualitative research in which sensitivity was reflected in positive accuracy rather than accurate concentration. The assay targets the Burkholderia pseudomallei capsular polysaccharide (CPS) using a CPS-specific monoclonal antibody. Compared to Hcp-1 of Burkholderia pseudomallei, its antigen specificity is lower, resulting in a lower positive reference value and susceptibility to interference from similar bacteria. With the processing of ImageJ, the test line is shown in Figure 5a and the accurate limit is down to 25.6 ng/mL. The application of the test line can help clinicians to determine and monitor the stage of the disease and increase the accuracy and effectiveness of treatment so as to reduce the side effects of treatment and help patients recover faster.
To increase the speed of interpretation of the LFA test strips, dry fluorescence immunoassay analyzer (DFIA) was developed and applied to detect blue fluorescent LFA test strips, as shown in Figure 5c. The analyzer is composed of an optical unit, mechanical unit, control unit, output display unit, and detection system component card. When the sample At the same time, to eliminate background fluorescence, the sample pad was preprocessed. The comparison of them is similar to Figure 4c. The background fluorescence of the test strips was strongly affected by the composition of chromatographic solution. In order to add components other than antigen and marker conjugates, the pre-treatment sample pad is the most convenient method. When the sample solution to be tested is dripped onto the sample pad, the substance pre-treated on the sample pad will quickly dissolve in the test solution. This eliminates the step of adding these treatment solutions to the sample, thus simplifying the testing steps. From Figure 4c, it is obvious that the background fluorescence is eliminated to an acceptable level.
Applying the above pairing, the concentration gradient test was carried out. The initial test concentration gradient and the initial gradient is 10 µg/mL. As shown in Figure 4b, the naked eye detection limit is approximately 1 µg/mL. In past research, active melioidosis detect (AMD) LFA with colloidal gold nanoparticles was widely developed [44][45][46][47].
However, most of the research was focused on qualitative research in which sensitivity was reflected in positive accuracy rather than accurate concentration. The assay targets the Burkholderia pseudomallei capsular polysaccharide (CPS) using a CPS-specific monoclonal antibody. Compared to Hcp-1 of Burkholderia pseudomallei, its antigen specificity is lower, resulting in a lower positive reference value and susceptibility to interference from similar bacteria. With the processing of ImageJ, the test line is shown in Figure 5a and the accurate limit is down to 25.6 ng/mL. The application of the test line can help clinicians to determine and monitor the stage of the disease and increase the accuracy and effectiveness of treatment so as to reduce the side effects of treatment and help patients recover faster.

Conclusions
In this article, to detect melioidosis, we structured a fast antibody rapid matching test method and selected a characteristic protein of melioidosis to operate an LFA fluorescent immunochromatographic test strips testing method. In the testing, an extremely high quantum yield in situ growth of CDs in dendritic SiO2 spheres was applied as the fluorescent labels to offer a bright fluorescent signal for further analysis. Compared to the traditional antibody matching method, ELISA, our new method uses no expensive devices and saves time. In subsequent research of Hcp-1, the detection lines by ImageJ and dry fluorescence immunoassay analyzer are shown.

Data Availability Statement:
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to the requirement of collaborator (Huadong Medical Institute of Biotechniques) that all experimental data should not be disclosed.

Conflicts of Interest:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. To increase the speed of interpretation of the LFA test strips, dry fluorescence immunoassay analyzer (DFIA) was developed and applied to detect blue fluorescent LFA test strips, as shown in Figure 5c. The analyzer is composed of an optical unit, mechanical unit, control unit, output display unit, and detection system component card. When the sample detection card is inserted into the dry fluorescence immunoquantitative analyzer, the processor controls the mechanical transmission device to transmit the detection card to the laser detection area. The excitation light (365 nm) source illuminates the detection card, and then the emission luminescence signal is collected and converted into an electrical signal. The control unit collects signals, calculates the content of analytes in the test samples automatically according to the software, and outputs them to the display screen or prints them out by its thermal printer. From the screen, the numerical value of fluorescence intensities including test line and control line and the value of T/C can be seen. In Figure 5a,b, it is obvious that the sensitivity of DFIA is lower than ImageJ (the accurate limit is about 41.1 ng/mL), but it is much easier to use.

Conclusions
In this article, to detect melioidosis, we structured a fast antibody rapid matching test method and selected a characteristic protein of melioidosis to operate an LFA fluorescent immunochromatographic test strips testing method. In the testing, an extremely high quantum yield in situ growth of CDs in dendritic SiO 2 spheres was applied as the fluorescent labels to offer a bright fluorescent signal for further analysis. Compared to the traditional antibody matching method, ELISA, our new method uses no expensive devices and saves time. In subsequent research of Hcp-1, the detection lines by ImageJ and dry fluorescence immunoassay analyzer are shown.