Next Article in Journal
Combating Bacterial Biofilm Formation in Urinary Catheter by Green Silver Nanoparticle
Next Article in Special Issue
Characteristics of tet(X4)−Producing Escherichia coli in Chicken and Pig Farms in Hunan Province, China
Previous Article in Journal
Temocillin: Applications in Antimicrobial Stewardship as a Potential Carbapenem-Sparing Antibiotic
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rational Use of Danofloxacin for Treatment of Mycoplasma gallisepticum in Chickens Based on the Clinical Breakpoint and Lung Microbiota Shift
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Mutations in DNA Gyrase and Topoisomerase IV in Field Strains and In Vitro Selected Quinolone-Resistant Mycoplasma hyorhinis Mutants

1
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety-State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base of Ministry of Science and Technology, Institute of Food Safety and Nutrition, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210040, China
2
Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
3
College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210014, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(4), 494; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11040494
Submission received: 7 March 2022 / Revised: 6 April 2022 / Accepted: 6 April 2022 / Published: 7 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Food Animals)

Abstract

:
Mycoplasma hyorhinis is ubiquitous in swine, and it is a common pathogen of swine that causes polyserositis, arthritis, and maybe pneumonia. Fluoroquinolones are effective antimicrobials used for the treatment of mycoplasmal infection. However, a decrease in fluoroquinolones susceptibility in mycoplasma was observed. The molecular mechanisms have been studied in many mycoplasma species, while the mechanism in M. hyorhinis is still unknown. This study aimed to illustrate the in vitro development of fluoroquinolone resistance in M. hyorhinis and unveil the resistance mechanisms in both in vitro selected mutants and field strains. Seven ciprofloxacin-sensitive M. hyorhinis isolates were chosen to induce the fluoroquinolone resistance in vitro, and the point mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) were characterized. The substitutions first occurred in ParC, resulting in a 2- to 8-fold increase in resistance, followed by additional mutations in GyrA and/or ParE to achieve a 32-fold increase. The mutations occurred in hot spots of QRDRs, and they were diverse and variable, including five in ParC (Ser80Phe, Ser80Tyr, Phe80Tyr, Glu84Gly, and Glu84Lys), four in GyrA (Ala83Val, Ser84Pro, Asp87Tyr, and Asp87Asn) and one in ParE (Glu470Lys). Target mutations in field strains were observed in the ParC (Ser80Phe, Ser81Pro, and Glu84Gln) of isolates with MICCIP = 2 μg/mL. This study characterized the point mutations in the QRDRs of M. hyorhinis and could be useful for the rapid detection of fluoroquinolone resistance in M. hyorhinis field isolates.

1. Introduction

Mycoplasma hyorhinis (M. hyorhinis) is a small, pleomorphic, and cell wall-less bacterium which was first isolated in 1953 [1,2]. M. hyorhinis is ubiquitous in swine and commonly inhabits the ciliated upper respiratory tract [3,4]. Most colonized pigs show no visible clinical symptoms. Under certain conditions, M. hyorhinis can cause systemic infections, including polyserositis, arthritis, abortion, otitis, conjunctivitis, and maybe pneumonia [5,6]. Additionally, M. hyorhinis has also been reported to be linked with human cancer, such as gastric, esophageal, lung, breast, glioma, and colon cancers [7]. In addition, M. hyorhinis is one of the most common mycoplasmal contaminants in cultured cell lines [8].
Fluoroquinolones (enrofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and marbofloxacin), macrolides (tylosin, tilmicosin, and tiamulin), and tetracyclines (oxytetracycline and doxycycline) are effective antimicrobials against Mycoplasma spp. [9]. These antimicrobials are frequently applied in animal husbandry for treating bacterial infections as well as mycoplasmal infections. Additionally, they are used to prevent and eliminate the contamination of mycoplasma in the cell cultures [10]. However, several studies have reported a decrease in fluoroquinolones susceptibility of mycoplasma species when comparing old with recent strains [9,11]. Fluoroquinolones inhibit bacterial/mycoplasmal replication by acting at DNA gyrase (coding by gyrA and gyrB) and topoisomerase IV (coding by parC and parE) [12]. Mutations in these genes have been proven to be related to the acquirement of quinolone resistance in Mycoplasma spp. [9].
The quinolone resistance mechanisms have been illustrated in many Mycoplasma spp., such as M. agalactiae [13], M. gallisepticum [14], M. synoviae [15], M. hyopneumoniae [16] and M. bovis [17]. However, the quinolone resistance mechanism in M. hyorhinis was still unknown. Hence, this study aimed to illustrate the in vitro developing process of fluoroquinolone resistance in M. hyorhinis and unveil the molecular mechanisms by using both in vitro selected mutants and field strains, especially the occurrence and contributions of specific mutations in the QRDRs.

2. Results

2.1. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of M. hyorhinis Field Strains

In the present study, the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of reference strain BTS-7 were similar with previous studies [9,11,18], with MICs of ciprofloxacin at 0.25 μg/mL, doxycycline at 0.125 μg/mL, florfenicol at 1 μg/mL, lincomycin at 0.25 μg/mL, oxytetracycline at 0.25 μg/mL, tiamulin at 0.015 μg/mL, tilmicosin at 0.5 μg/mL, tylosin at 0.03 μg/mL and tylvalosin at 0.015 μg/mL, indicating good reproducibility of the test in our laboratory conditions.
MIC distributions of the 25 field strains of M. hyorhinis to 9 antimicrobial agents are shown in Figure 1. All the isolates had low MIC values to ciprofloxacin (≤2 μg/mL), doxycycline (≤2 μg/mL), oxytetracycline (≤4 μg/mL), tiamulin (≤0.5 μg/mL), and tylvalosin (≤4 μg/mL). Of these antimicrobials, tiamulin and tylvalosin showed the best antimicrobial activity, with the lowest MIC50 at 0.12 μg/mL and MIC90 at 0.25 μg/mL. In the cases of lincomycin, tilmicosin, and tylosin, there were several strains showing high MIC values (≥32 μg/mL), which might be resistant isolates. For tylvalosin, the MIC distribution divided into two populations (<0.5 µg/mL and >2 µg/mL). The field isolates with MICTVN = 4 μg/mL were less susceptible to tylvalosin, which might be a sign of resistance. In total, the MIC distributions of ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, florfenicol, oxytetracycline, and tiamulin were clustered, while the MIC distributions of lincomycin and tilmicosin were relatively scattered.

2.2. In Vitro Selection of Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Mutants of M. hyorhinis

Seven strains of ciprofloxacin-sensitive M. hyorhinis (Mhr-JS-2016-47, Mhr-JS-2010-36, Mhr-JS-2010-37, Mhr-JS-2011-40, Mhr-JS-2018-53, Mhr-JS-2014-43, Mhr-JS-2015-44; MICCIP = 0.5 μg/mL), which presented different antimicrobial-susceptible phenotypes, were chosen to induce the resistance to fluoroquinolone in this study (Table 1). Although 5 passages were performed for all the parental strains, the results of selection showed marked differences between the strains. Finally, the highest ciprofloxacin MIC for the mutants derived from Mhr-JS-2016-47, Mhr-JS-2014-43, Mhr-JS-2015-44, Mhr-JS-2010-37, and Mhr-JS-2011-40 was 16 μg/mL, compared with 8 μg/mL for the mutants derived from Mhr-JS-2010-36 and Mhr-JS-2018-53. In summary, fluoroquinolone-resistant mutants were successfully selected from all 7 isolates of ciprofloxacin-sensitive M. hyorhinis, and the MIC increased 16–32 folds in comparison with the corresponding parental strains.

2.3. Characterization of Mutations in QRDRs in Both In Vitro Selected Mutants and Field Strains

The MIC results and DNA changes related to in vitro selected fluoroquinolone resistance are shown in Table 2. The mutations in QRDRs occurred in the sequence of parC, parE, and gyrA (except gyrB). When the MIC of the mutants increased by 2-fold, the mutations first occurred at the amino acid position 80 (Ser80Phe, Ser80Tyr, and Phe80Tyr) or 84 of ParC (Glu84Gly and Glu84Lys). Both mutations of Ser80Tyr (Mhr-JS-2014-43 and Mhr-JS-2018-53) and Glu84Lys (Mhr-JS-2010-37 and Mhr-JS-2011-40) occurred in two isolates, while other mutations were just found in one strain. The mutation in ParE was rare; it just appeared at the point of amino acid position 470 (Glu470Lys) and only occurred in two isolates (Mhr-JS-2016-47 and Mhr-JS-2018-53).
Multiple mutations in different QRDRs were needed for the fluoroquinolone-resistant mutants to achieve higher resistant levels. The mutations in gyrA were found in the resistant mutants with higher MIC values (≥2 μg/mL). The mutations in GyrA mainly occurred in 3 hot points, including amino acid positions of 83 (Ala83Val), 84 (Ser84Pro), and 87 (Asp87Tyr and Asp87Asn). Ala83Val was the most common mutation point, which was found in three isolates (Mhr-JS-2010-36, Mhr-JS-2015-44, and Mhr-JS-2011-40), followed by Asp87Asn, which was found in the isolates of Mhr-JS-2014-43 and Mhr-JS-2010-37.
The target mutations in QRDRs were also determined for all the field isolates of M. hyorhinis. The genome sequence (NZ_KB911485.1) of ciprofloxacin-sensitive BTS-7 was used as a reference to compare with the field isolates. The results showed that point mutations were only observed in the ParC of M. hyorhinis isolates, with the highest MICCIP at 2 μg/mL. Specifically, Ser80Tyr was detected in Mhr-JS-2016-46, Ser81Pro was observed in Mhr-JS-2011-39, and Glu84Gln was found in Mhr-JS-2010-35 and Mhr-JS-2018-53.

3. Discussion

The infection of M. hyorhinis is ubiquitous in swine; however, no effective vaccine is commercially available against M. hyorhinis infection at present. Antimicrobial is the main intervention used to minimize the infection. However, because the antimicrobial susceptibility testing of mycoplasmas is difficult and time-consuming, the relevant MIC data concerning M. hyorhinis are scarce. In the present study, we found that the field M. hyorhinis isolates were most sensitive to tiamulin and tylvalosin. Ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, florfenicol, and oxytetracycline showed moderate antimicrobial activities. There were several isolates showing resistance to lincomycin, tilmicosin, and tylosin, with MICs above 32 μg/mL.
The in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility data from this study was consistent with previous studies. The MIC values of various antimicrobials against Mycoplasma hyorhinis in these years have been comprehensively reviewed by Gautier-Bouchardon, A.V. [9]. In 2020, Ruben S. Rosales et al. reported that 48 strains of M. hyorhinis collected from southern Europe showed the highest sensitivity to tylvalosin (MIC50 = 0.016 μg/mL; MIC90 = 0.125 μg/mL), valnemulin (MIC50 = 0.016 μg/mL; MIC90 = 0.03 μg/mL), and tiamulin (MIC50 = 0.125 μg/mL; MIC90 = 0.5 μg/mL) [19]. There were also isolates showing decreased susceptibility to lincomycin with MICs > 64 μg/mL. Another recent study from central Europe reported the antibiotic susceptibility profiles of 38 Hungarian M. hyorhinis strains isolated between 2014 and 2017 [11]. Low MIC values for tetracyclines (MIC50 0.078 μg/mL for doxycycline and ≤0.25 μg/mL for oxytetracycline) and pleuromutilins (MIC50 0.156 μg/mL for tiamulin and ≤0.039 μg/mL for valnemulin) were observed. There were also numerous isolates showing decreased susceptibility to macrolides and lincomycin (MIC90 > 64 μg/mL for tylosin, tilmicosin, tulathromycin, gamithromycin, and lincomycin, 8 μg/mL for tylvalosin). Twelve field isolates of M. hyorhinis from Korea were most sensitive to tylvalosin (MIC50 0.06 μg/mL and MIC90 0.12 μg/mL) and tiamulin (MIC50 0.12 μg/mL and MIC90 0.25 μg/mL). Some strains exhibited higher MIC value to chlortetracycline (MIC > 64 μg/mL) [20]. For the antimicrobial susceptibility data of M. hyorhinis before 2000, tetracyclines and macrolides were the most effective antibiotic classes [21].
Based on our antimicrobial susceptibility results, seven strains of ciprofloxacin-sensitive M. hyorhinis, which presented different antimicrobial-susceptible phenotypes, were chosen to induce the resistance to fluoroquinolone and unveil its mechanisms. The molecular mechanisms of fluoroquinolones resistance of Mycoplasma spp. have been reported in M. agalactiae [13], M. gallisepticum [14], M. synoviae [15], M. hyopneumoniae [16], M. bovis [17], which mainly involve the target mutations in the QRDRs. However, the molecular mechanisms of M. hyorhinis resistance against fluoroquinolones have not been reported before. In this study, we were able to select quinolone-resistant M. hyorhinis mutants after serial passages in stepwise increased concentrations of ciprofloxacin. We first characterized the point mutations in the QRDRs of M. hyorhinis mutants with elevated MIC values to fluoroquinolones, and the results showed that the molecular mechanisms involved separate sequential mutations in topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase. The substitutions included 5 in ParC [3 in codon 80 (Ser80Phe, Ser80Tyr, and Phe80Tyr), 2 in codon 84 (Glu84Gly and Glu84Lys)], 4 in GyrA [2 in codon 87 (Asp87Tyr and Asp87Asn), 1 in codon 83 (Ala83Val), 1 in codon 84 (Ser84Pro)], and 1 in ParE (Glu470Lys).
In this study, the primacy of ParC mutations over those in GyrA strongly suggested that topoisomerase IV might be the primary target of fluoroquinolones in M. hyorhinis, which was consistent with the reports of other Mycoplasma species, such as M. agalactiae [13], M. hominis [22], and M. bovis [23]. When selected with ciprofloxacin, the amino acid substitution at position 80 or 84 of ParC was the first change that appeared, leading to the increment of MIC values at 2-4 folds. However, when the amino acid position 84 of Glu was replaced with Gly for the isolate of Mhr-JS-2010-36, the MIC increased to 8 μg/mL (8-fold). The substitutions of Ser80Phe and Ser80Tyr have been previously described in fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae [24], while the point mutations at amino-acid position 84 (Glu84Gly and Glu84Lys) were reported in Mycoplasma gallisepticum [25].
In order to survive under a higher concentration of ciprofloxacin, the QRDRs in the M. hyorhinis underwent second-, even third-step mutations, mainly in the GyrA subunit and less in the ParE. The point mutation of Glu470Lys in ParE only occurred in 2 lineages (Mhr-JS-2016-47 and Mhr-JS-2018-53), leading to the increase of MICCIP by 4-fold. This novel mutation is described for the first time for Mycoplasma spp. in the present study. All the in vitro selected quinolone-resistant M. hyorhinis mutants had both mutations in the ParC and GyrA subunits. Double/triple mutations increased the ciprofloxacin MICs of in vitro selected mutants by 16-32 fold compared to the parental strain, which indicated the cumulative effects of the mutations on the MICs. In addition, the gyrA-mediated resistance was only detectable in the parC mutants. The GyrA mutations were found at positions of hot spots, such as amino acid positions of 83 (Ala83Val), 84 (Ser84Pro), and 87 (Asp87Tyr and Asp87Asn), leading to a 2- to 16-fold increase in the MICs. Of all the substitutions, only the Ala83Val mutation was previously reported by another swine mycoplasmas of M. hyopneumoniae [16].
The comparison of several independent lineages indicates that these mutations accumulate following a similar trajectory: first in ParC, resulting in a 2- to 8-fold increase in resistance, followed by additional mutations in GyrA and/or ParE to reach up to a 32-fold increase. The mutations occurred in hot spots of QRDRs; moreover, the mutated amino acids were variable and diverse. To validate the contributions of in vitro selected target mutations in the fluoroquinolone resistance of M. hyorhinis, point mutations in the QRDRs of field isolates were also determined. The point mutations were only observed in the ParC subunit (Ser80Tyr, Ser81Pro, and Glu84Gln) of field isolates with the highest MICCIP (2 μg/mL), which may be due to the relative low MIC level (2 μg/mL) of field strains compared to the in vitro selected mutants (16 μg/mL). The amino-acid substitution of Ser80Tyr was found in both the laboratory-derived resistant mutants of Mhr-JS-2018-53 and Mhr-JS-2014-43 and the field isolate of Mhr-JS-2015-45. Other mutations such as Ser81Pro were previously reported in M. gallisepticum [25] and M. synoviae [15], while Glu84Gln has been described in M. gallisepticum [25]. The in vitro study of mutations of QRDRs could be useful for the establishment of methods for rapid detection of fluoroquinolone resistance in M. hyorhinis field isolates.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Mycoplasma Isolates and Growth Conditions

A total of 25 M. hyorhinis field isolates were included in this study. They originated from different pig farms in the Jiangsu province of China from July 2010 to October 2018. The M. hyorhinis isolates were confirmed by nested PCR assay of the p37 gene and cultured at 37 °C in KM2 broth medium or on KM2 agar [26]. The growth of M. hyorhinis was evaluated by the number of color-changing units (CCU) (red to yellow shift), which was calculated by the microplate dilution method [27]. Type stain of BTS-7 (ATCC 17981, NZ_KB911485.1) was used as control. For determination of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and in vitro selection of fluoroquinolone-resistant mutants, thallium acetate and penicillin were excluded from the KM2 broth culture medium.

4.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

The antimicrobial susceptibility of M. hyorhinis to ciprofloxacin, tylosin, tiamulin, doxycycline, tylvalosin, lincomycin, oxytetracycline, tilmicosin, and florfenicol were determined using the broth microdilution method, according to the recommendation of Hannan [27]. All the tested antimicrobials were purchased from Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China), and were of ≥98% purity. For the antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 2-fold dilutions of each antimicrobial at the range of 0.015 μg/mL to 128 μg/mL were freshly prepared in KM2 broth medium. Then the antimicrobials were mixed with an equal volume (100 μL) of M. hyorhinis cultures at 106 CCU/mL in a sterilized 96-well microtiter plate. The final concentrations of tested antimicrobials ranged from 0.0075 μg/mL to 64 μg/mL. The final MIC value for each test was defined as the lowest concentration of antimicrobials with no visible growth in the KM2 broth (no red to yellow color change). The reference strain of BTS-7 was used as the quality control in the MIC determination. Each MIC testing was performed with three independent repeats.

4.3. Selection of Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Mutants

A total of 7 strains of ciprofloxacin-sensitive M. hyorhinis were chosen to induce resistance to fluoroquinolone in this study (Table 1). The in vitro selection of fluoroquinolone-resistant mutants process was conducted according to previously described methods with minor modifications [13,14]. M. hyorhinis from a 1 mL of mid-exponential culture (106 CCU) were centrifuged for 15 min at 8000 g at room temperature and resuspended in 1 mL of KM2 medium containing ciprofloxacin at the concentration of 1/2 MIC. After the medium’s color changed from red to yellow, the culture was centrifuged for 15 min at 8000 g at room temperature. Then, the sediment was resuspended in 100 μL of KM2 broth medium and plated onto KM2 agar plates supplemented with an equivalent concentration of ciprofloxacin (1/2 MIC). Then, a single colony was picked and propagated in 2 mL of KM2 broth medium. After the culture medium showed a red to yellow shift, one aliquot of the M. hyorhinis was preserved and stored at −80 °C for further analysis, while the other aliquot was tested for its CCU and adjusted to 106 CCU, then centrifuged and resuspended in 1 mL of KM2 medium added with ciprofloxacin at the concentration of 1 MIC. The selection step was repeated as described above. At each selection step, the supplemented concentration of ciprofloxacin was increased twofold. The selection process was ended when the culture medium color showed no change (red to yellow) after three independent attempts. The MICs of parental M. hyorhinis and its developed FQs-resistant mutants selected at each step were determined using the broth microdilution method.

4.4. Analysis of Quinolone Resistance Determining Region

In order to analyze the mutations that occurred in the QRDRs, genomic DNAs of in vitro selected fluoroquinolone-resistant mutants of M. hyorhinis, and also the field isolates, were extracted from 20 mL logarithmic-phase broth cultures by using the Bacterial DNA kit (Omega). Gene fragments of QRDRs were amplified using specific primers (Table 3), which were designed according to the genomes of two M. hyorhinis strains: BTS-7 (NZ_KB911485.1) and HUB-1 (NC_014448.1). The PCR components of DNA templates (3 μL), pair of primers (2 μL, 10 μM), 2 × Phanta® Max Master Mix (Dye Plus) (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) (25 μL), and ddH2O (18 μL) were mixed to a total volume of 50 μL system. The PCR reactions were performed with an i-Cycler (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA) thermal cycler. The PCR conditions were conducted as follows. After 3 min at 95 °C, amplification was performed over 32 cycles, with 15 s at 95 °C, 15 s at 56 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C, with a final extension step of 5 min at 72 °C. PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis in 1% agarose gels containing 0.01% of TS-GelRed (Tsingke, Beijing, China). DNA bands were visualized under UV light. Subsequently, PCR products were purified using FastPure Gel DNA Extraction Mini Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) and sequenced using an ABI 3730XI sequencer (ABI, Foster City, CA, USA). For convenience, the amino acid numbering refers to the Escherichia coli numbering and is based on the E. coli K12 sequences for GyrA (AAC7529.1), GyrB (AAT48201.1), ParC (AAC76055.1), and ParE (AAA69198.1).

5. Conclusions

Consistent with other reports, 25 strains of field M. hyorhinis isolates collected in Jiangsu, China, were most sensitive to tiamulin and tylvalosin. The in vitro developing process of fluoroquinolone resistance in M. hyorhinis was illustrated using stepwise increased concentrations of ciprofloxacin. The underlying molecular mechanisms included diverse and variable point mutations in the hot spots of GyrA, ParC, and ParE. The ParC subunit of topoisomerase IV might be the primary target of fluoroquinolones in M. hyorhinis. Revealing point mutations in the QRDRs could be useful for rapid detection of fluoroquinolone resistance in M. hyorhinis field isolates.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L., G.S. and Q.X.; Data curation, J.L., Y.W. and Y.L.; Formal analysis, Y.W.; Funding acquisition, J.L.; Investigation, Y.W., J.W. and Y.L.; Methodology, J.W.; Supervision, G.S. and Z.F.; Writing—original draft, J.L.; Writing—review & editing, Z.F. and Q.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20190261), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32102728, 32102675), Exploration and Disruptive Innovation Projects of Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences [ZX(21)1224]. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Carter, C.R.; McKay, K.A. A Pleuropneumonia-like Organism Associated with Infectious Atrophic Rhinitis of Swine. Can. J. Comp. Med. Vet. Sci. 1953, 17, 413–416. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Li, J.; Wang, J.; Shao, J.; Li, Y.; Yu, Y.; Shao, G.; Feng, Z.; Xiong, Q. The variable lipoprotein family participates in the interaction of Mycoplasma hyorhinis with host extracellular matrix and plasminogen. Vet. Microbiol. 2022, 265, 109310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Friis, N.F.; Feenstra, A.A. Mycoplasma-Hyorhinis in the Etiology of Serositis among Piglets. Acta Vet. Scand. 1994, 35, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Clavijo, M.J.; Murray, D.; Oliveira, S.; Rovira, A. Infection dynamics of Mycoplasma hyorhinis in three commercial pig populations. Vet. Rec. 2017, 181, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gimenez-Lirola, L.G.; Meiroz-De-Souza-Almeida, H.; Magtoto, R.L.; McDaniel, A.J.; Merodio, M.M.; Matias Ferreyra, F.S.; Poonsuk, K.; Gatto, I.R.H.; Baum, D.H.; Ross, R.F.; et al. Early detection and differential serodiagnosis of Mycoplasma hyorhinis and Mycoplasma hyosynoviae infections under experimental conditions. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0223459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Pan, L.; Li, J.; Yu, Y.; Liu, B.; Zubair, M.; Wei, Y.; Pillay, B.; Olaniran, A.O.; et al. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) moonlights as an adhesin in Mycoplasma hyorhinis adhesion to epithelial cells as well as a plasminogen receptor mediating extracellular matrix degradation. Vet Res. 2021, 52, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Vande Voorde, J.; Balzarini, J.; Liekens, S. Mycoplasmas and cancer: Focus on nucleoside metabolism. EXCLI J. 2014, 13, 300–322. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Uphoff, C.C.; Drexler, H.G. Detection of Mycoplasma contamination in cell cultures. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2014, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gautier-Bouchardon, A.V. Antimicrobial Resistance in Mycoplasma spp. Microbiol. Spectr. 2018, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Nikfarjam, L.; Farzaneh, P. Prevention and detection of Mycoplasma contamination in cell culture. Cell J. 2012, 13, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Beko, K.; Felde, O.; Sulyok, K.M.; Kreizinger, Z.; Hrivnak, V.; Kiss, K.; Biksi, I.; Jerzsele, A.; Gyuranecz, M. Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of Mycoplasma hyorhinis strains isolated from swine in Hungary. Vet. Microbiol. 2019, 228, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Drlica, K.; Malik, M. Fluoroquinolones: Action and resistance. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2003, 3, 249–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tatay-Dualde, J.; Prats-van der Ham, M.; de la Fe, C.; Paterna, A.; Sanchez, A.; Corrales, J.C.; Contreras, A.; Gomez-Martin, A. Mutations in the quinolone resistance determining region conferring resistance to fluoroquinolones in Mycoplasma agalactiae. Vet. Microbiol. 2017, 207, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Reinhardt, A.K.; Bebear, C.M.; Kobisch, M.; Kempf, I.; Gautier-Bouchardon, A.V. Characterization of mutations in DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV involved in quinolone resistance of Mycoplasma gallisepticum mutants obtained in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 590–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Lysnyansky, I.; Gerchman, I.; Mikula, I.; Gobbo, F.; Catania, S.; Levisohn, S. Molecular characterization of acquired enrofloxacin resistance in Mycoplasma synoviae field isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 3072–3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Vicca, J.; Maes, D.; Stakenborg, T.; Butaye, P.; Minion, F.; Peeters, J.; de Kruif, A.; Decostere, A.; Haesebrouck, F. Resistance mechanism against fluoroquinolones in Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae field isolates. Microb. Drug Resist. 2007, 13, 166–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Sato, T.; Okubo, T.; Usui, M.; Higuchi, H.; Tamura, Y. Amino acid substitutions in GyrA and ParC are associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycoplasma bovis isolates from Japanese dairy calves. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2013, 75, 1063–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ter Laak, E.A.; Pijpers, A.; Noordergraaf, J.H.; Schoevers, E.C.; Verheijden, J.H. Comparison of methods for in vitro testing of susceptibility of porcine Mycoplasma species to antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1991, 35, 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Rosales, R.S.; Ramirez, A.S.; Tavio, M.M.; Poveda, C.; Poveda, J.B. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of porcine mycoplasmas isolated from samples collected in southern Europe. BMC Vet. Res. 2020, 16, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Jang, J.; Kim, K.; Park, S.; Park, B.; Um, H.; Coulier, M.; Hahn, T.W. In vitro antibiotic susceptibility of field isolates of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Mycoplasma hyorhinis from Korea. Korean J. Vet. Res. 2016, 56, 109–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wu, C.C.; Shryock, T.R.; Lin, T.L.; Faderan, M.; Veenhuizen, M.F. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Mycoplasma hyorhinis. Vet. Microbiol. 2000, 76, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bebear, C.M.; Renaudin, H.; Charron, A.; Bove, J.M.; Bebear, C.; Renaudin, J. Alterations in topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase in quinolone-resistant mutants of Mycoplasma hominis obtained in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998, 42, 2304–2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Khalil, D.; Becker, C.A.M.; Tardy, F. Alterations in the Quinolone Resistance-Determining Regions and Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Clinical Isolates and Laboratory-Derived Mutants of Mycoplasma bovis: Not All Genotypes May Be Equal. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 82, 1060–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Le Carrou, J.; Laurentie, M.; Kobisch, M.; Gautier-Bouchardon, A.V. Persistence of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in experimentally infected pigs after marbofloxacin treatment and detection of mutations in the parC gene. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 1959–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Reinhardt, A.K.; Kempf, I.; Kobisch, M.; Gautier-Bouchardon, A.V. Fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycoplasma gallisepticum: DNA gyrase as primary target of enrofloxacin and impact of mutations in topoisomerases on resistance level. J. Antimicrob. Chemoth. 2002, 50, 589–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Liu, W.; Xiao, S.; Li, M.; Guo, S.; Li, S.; Luo, R.; Feng, Z.; Li, B.; Zhou, Z.; Shao, G.; et al. Comparative genomic analyses of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae pathogenic 168 strain and its high-passaged attenuated strain. BMC Genomics. 2013, 14, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Hannan, P.C. Guidelines and recommendations for antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing against veterinary mycoplasma species. Vet. Res. 2000, 31, 373–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The MIC distributions of 25 strains of M. hyorhinis field isolates. MIC50 for the lowest concentrations that inhibit 50% of bacterial isolates. MIC90 for the lowest concentrations that inhibit 90% of bacterial isolates.
Figure 1. The MIC distributions of 25 strains of M. hyorhinis field isolates. MIC50 for the lowest concentrations that inhibit 50% of bacterial isolates. MIC90 for the lowest concentrations that inhibit 90% of bacterial isolates.
Antibiotics 11 00494 g001
Table 1. The background information and MIC data of the seven ciprofloxacin-sensitive M. hyorhinis isolates used for in vitro selection.
Table 1. The background information and MIC data of the seven ciprofloxacin-sensitive M. hyorhinis isolates used for in vitro selection.
StrainOriginYearMIC (μg/mL)
CIPTIATYLDOXTVNLINOTCTILFFC
Mhr-JS-2010-36Nanjing, China20100.50.120.510.060.5222
Mhr-JS-2010-37Nanjing, China20100.50.120.510.120.5422
Mhr-JS-2011-40Nanjing, China20110.50.0150.250.250.030.120.50.50.5
Mhr-JS-2014-43Lishui, China20140.50.2510.120.1210.2541
Mhr-JS-2015-44Nanjing, China20150.50.120.50.50.120.5222
Mhr-JS-2016-47Liuhe, China20160.50.250.510.061248
Mhr-JS-2018-53Taixing, China20180.50.06110.250.5282
Note: CIP, ciprofloxacin; TIA, tiamulin; TYL, tylosin; DOX, doxycycline; TVN, tylvalosin; LIN, lincomycin; OTC, oxytetracycline; TIL, tilmicosin; FFC, florfenicol.
Table 2. The point mutations in the QRDRs of fluoroquinolones-resistant mutants collected at each selection step.
Table 2. The point mutations in the QRDRs of fluoroquinolones-resistant mutants collected at each selection step.
StainsInitial
MIC
QRDRsConcentration of Ciprofloxacin for Selection (μg/mL)
0.5124816
Mhr-JS-2016-470.5ParCSer80PheSer80PheSer80PheSer80PheSer80PheSer80Phe
ParE Glu470LysGlu470LysGlu470LysGlu470LysGlu470Lys
GyrA Asp87TyrAsp87TyrAsp87Tyr
Mhr-JS-2018-530.5ParC Ser80TyrSer80TyrSer80TyrSer80Tyr
ParE Glu470LysGlu470LysGlu470Lys
GyrA Ser84Pro
Mhr-JS-2014-430.5ParC Ser80TyrSer80TyrSer80TyrSer80TyrSer80Tyr
GyrA Asp87AsnAsp87AsnAsp87Asn
Mhr-JS-2015-440.5ParC Phe80TyrPhe80TyrPhe80TyrPhe80Tyr
GyrA Ala83ValAla83ValAla83Val
Mhr-JS-2010-360.5ParC Glu84GlyGlu84GlyGlu84GlyGlu84Gly
GyrA Ala83Val
Mhr-JS-2010-370.5ParC Glu84LysGlu84LysGlu84LysGlu84LysGlu84Lys
GyrA Asp87AsnAsp87AsnAsp87AsnAsp87Asn
Mhr-JS-2011-400.5ParC Glu84LysGlu84LysGlu84LysGlu84LysGlu84Lys
GyrA Ala83ValAla83ValAla83ValAla83Val
Table 3. Primers and sequences of the genes coding for QRDRs.
Table 3. Primers and sequences of the genes coding for QRDRs.
Primer TargetPrimer SequenceProduct Size (bp)
gyrA-FACTTCTTTTAAATTATGAGGG621
gyrA-RTGAAGCAGAACTAGAACAA
gyrB-FCACAGATAGTTATTCTGATTC831
gyrB-RGGTTGAGCTATGTAAACAT
parC-FATGAAGAAACTAGATAATAATATG609
parC-RTTCTATACAAGCATCAATTA
parE-FAATTAAACATTCAAATCCAATT670
parE-RTGAATATGCATAAACAACTT
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.; Wei, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Shao, G.; Feng, Z.; Xiong, Q. Characterization of Mutations in DNA Gyrase and Topoisomerase IV in Field Strains and In Vitro Selected Quinolone-Resistant Mycoplasma hyorhinis Mutants. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 494. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11040494

AMA Style

Li J, Wei Y, Wang J, Li Y, Shao G, Feng Z, Xiong Q. Characterization of Mutations in DNA Gyrase and Topoisomerase IV in Field Strains and In Vitro Selected Quinolone-Resistant Mycoplasma hyorhinis Mutants. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(4):494. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11040494

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Jun, Yanna Wei, Jia Wang, Yao Li, Guoqing Shao, Zhixin Feng, and Qiyan Xiong. 2022. "Characterization of Mutations in DNA Gyrase and Topoisomerase IV in Field Strains and In Vitro Selected Quinolone-Resistant Mycoplasma hyorhinis Mutants" Antibiotics 11, no. 4: 494. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11040494

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop