Next Article in Journal
Effects of Energy-Restricted Feeding during Rearing on the Performance, Uniformity, and Development of Rugao Layer Breeders at the Initiation of the Laying Period
Next Article in Special Issue
The Combined Effect of Weaning Stress and Immune Activation during Pig Gestation on Serum Cytokine and Analyte Concentrations
Previous Article in Journal
Meat Quality of the Native Carpathian Goat Breed in Comparison with the Saanen Breed
Previous Article in Special Issue
Late Gestation Maternal Feed Restriction Decreases Microbial Diversity of the Placenta While Mineral Supplementation Improves Richness of the Fetal Gut Microbiome in Cattle
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Narrative Review on the Unexplored Potential of Colostrum as a Preventative Treatment and Therapy for Diarrhea in Neonatal Dairy Calves

by
Havelah S. M. Carter
1,
David L. Renaud
1,*,
Michael A. Steele
2,
Amanda J. Fischer-Tlustos
2 and
Joao H. C. Costa
3
1
Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
2
Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
3
Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(8), 2221; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082221
Submission received: 1 July 2021 / Revised: 21 July 2021 / Accepted: 22 July 2021 / Published: 28 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Maternal Influence on Animal Health and Performance)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The rate of death and disease in young dairy calves is alarmingly high, with diarrhea accounting for over half of all disease incidence. The majority of diarrhea cases are treated with antimicrobials, which may not be warranted. There is increasing concern related to the use of antimicrobials in food animals due to the emanant development of antimicrobial resistance. Bovine colostrum is densely packed with hundreds of nutrients and bioactives specifically tailored to improve calf health and development. As such, colostrum may have potential to be used an alternative to antimicrobials for the treatment of diarrhea. The objective of this review is to outline the causation and implication of diarrhea in young dairy calves and to explore the benefits of colostrum and its potential use as a therapy and preventative for diarrhea in pre-weaned calves.

Abstract

Diarrhea is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in pre-weaned dairy calves and, as such, represents a significant animal health and welfare concern. Furthermore, digestive disease early in life is associated with several long-term consequences such as reduced growth rate and decreased milk yield during the first lactation, thus generating severe economic losses. The majority of diarrheic cases in young calves are treated with antimicrobials; however, it is necessary to develop alternative treatments, as excessive antimicrobial usage can lead to antimicrobial resistance and can negatively impact the gut microflora of a calf. Bovine colostrum is abundant in immune and bioactive factors that improve immune function and development. This rich and natural combination of immunoglobulins, natural antimicrobial factors, growth factors, anti-inflammatories and nutrients may be an attractive alternative to antimicrobials in the treatment of diarrhea in young dairy calves. There is evidence that supports the use of colostrum as an early treatment for diarrhea in young calves. Future research should investigate its therapeutic and economic effectiveness.

1. Introduction

High levels of disease in dairy calves threaten the economic efficiency and sustainability of the global dairy industry. Recent reports state that digestive diseases (i.e., diarrhea) are the leading cause of disease and death in the pre-weaning period [1]. Specifically, digestive disease accounts for 56% and 32% of morbidity and mortality, respectively [1], with the highest incidence in the second week of life [1,2,3]. Diarrhea is a multifactorial disease that results from a combination of exposure to pathogens, the environment and the host’s immune system [4]. The most common diarrheic pathogens include rotavirus and coronavirus, Cryptosporidium parvum (C. parvum), Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (E. coli), Clostridium perfringens and Salmonella spp. [3,5,6], most of which are highly contagious [7]. Exposure to one or more of these pathogens may result in diarrhea, which can be further exacerbated by a compromised immune system that may be a result of other diseases and poor management [8]. It is clear that the high incidence of diarrhea in young calves poses a significant concern from both welfare and health standpoints. Yet, diarrhea in pre-weaned calves can also have long-lasting economic effects [3], including a reduction in average daily gain (ADG) [9,10,11], an increased number of inseminations to achieve first pregnancy and an over 300 kg decrease in milk yield during the first lactation [11]. Consequently, research focusing on diarrhea therapy and prevention in young dairy calves is vital to the profitability of the dairy industry.
The majority of gastrointestinal diseases in calves are treated with antimicrobials [7]. Specifically, a study conducted in the United States found that 33.9% of all dairy calves were administered antimicrobials, with 75% of dairy calves with diarrhea receiving antimicrobial therapy [1]. There are a number of production, societal and health concerns pertaining to the frequent and improper use of antimicrobials in food production animals, including an increased risk of antimicrobial resistance [12]. Furthermore, animals administered antimicrobials, particularly young animals, can be negatively impacted by alterations to the gut microbiota in early life [13]. The diversity and abundance of total commensal gut microbiota can be reduced alongside targeted pathogens, upsetting microbial balance and causing gastrointestinal tract (GIT) dysfunction [14,15]. Due to the potential detrimental effects of high rates of antimicrobial administration, efforts should be made to reduce their use. Thus, the investigation of efficient alternatives to antimicrobials is necessary to improve both calf health and welfare, as well as consumer trust of the dairy industry and its products.
Bovine colostrum is densely packed with bioactive factors (i.e., antibodies, hormones and growth factors) and nutrients, resulting in a composition that differs substantially from mature milk [16]. Colostrum’s beneficial qualities have been used for centuries to provide several species with supplemental nutrition and treatment for numerous illnesses, including diarrhea in humans [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. More recently, the advantages of colostrum as a prophylactic and therapeutic in young calves has been explored [27,28,29,30]. This research exemplifies that beneficial bioactives within bovine colostrum may provide an effective therapeutic alternative to antimicrobials for treatment of diarrhea in calves. Most research in this field involves the use of hyperimmune colostrum which is created by exposing the dam to specific pathogens, thus enriching her colostrum with pathogen specific antibodies [17]. This form of therapy can be expensive and lacks efficiency compared to natural bovine colostrum [17,31]; however, evidence supporting the use of natural colostrum as a therapy for diseases in cattle is lacking. Thus, the objective of this narrative review is to evaluate the physiology and effects of neonatal gastrointestinal diseases in dairy calves and, importantly, explore the potential benefits of colostrum as a prophylactic and therapeutic for neonatal calf diarrhea.

2. Causation of Digestive Disorders in Neonatal Calves

The dairy industry has made tremendous efforts to improve animal housing, hygiene, nutrition and health. However, neonatal calf diarrhea is still a major concern due to its multifactorial nature. As mentioned previously, digestive disorders can be a consequence of the environment, immunosuppression, pathogenic factors or a combination of the three [32,33]. Common diarrhea-causing pathogens include rotavirus and coronavirus (viral), C. parvum (protozoa), E. coli, Clostridium perfringens and Salmonella spp. (bacteria) [3,5,34]. E. coli, C. parvum and rotavirus have been found to cause >70%, >55% and 80% of cases of enteric illnesses in calves, respectively [2,3,5,35]. In addition, recent studies have demonstrated an increased frequency of multi-pathogen illnesses, with rotavirus and C. parvum being the most common pathogen combination [4,34]. An Australian study, which tested approximately 600 calves with diarrhea from 84 dairy and dairy beef farms, found that 96.4% of farms and 71% of samples contained multiple pathogens. In the infected calves, 42.8, 39.5 and 35.5% of samples contained two, three and four pathogens, respectively [5]. While pathogens can have synergistic and antagonistic effects on one another [3], evidence suggests that the difference between single pathogen and multi-pathogen diarrhea could be subclinical and clinical, respectively [4].
Although pathogens are associated with diarrhea, they can also be present in healthy calves. It has been determined that bovine coronavirus and rotavirus, as well as C. parvum, can be present in a calf without causing severe diarrhea [36]. Other factors, including failed transfer of passive immunity, poor nutrition, unhygienic conditions, hostile environmental conditions and poor management, can decrease immune function, allowing pathogens to thrive and ultimately cause neonatal calf diarrhea [5,6,8,35]. Specifically, routine and frequent cleaning of calf and maternity pens significantly decreases the risk of diarrhea [37]. Additionally, limiting other illnesses such as respiratory disease will reduce the risk of diarrhea caused by invasion of opportunistic pathogens [3,37]. Due to the aggressive nature of many diarrhea-causing pathogens, symptoms can be long-lasting and result in long-term consequences.
Diarrhea is a result of decreased absorption and increased secretions of water and electrolytes in the gut. This process generally begins with the ingestion of a single or multiple pathogens, which initiates numerous pathogenic physiological pathways leading to severe dehydration [33,38,39]. Consequently, the loss of fluids can cause a multitude of health and behavioral issues, including aversion to suckling, anorexia, depression, weakness and, in severe cases, death [7,33,38].
Rotavirus, coronavirus and C. parvum similarly cause villous atrophy by targeting small intestinal crypts that house stem cells that stimulate enterocyte renewal, see Figure 1 [38,39,40]. While rotavirus replicates in the cytoplasm of the epithelial cells in the small intestinal villi, coronavirus is released through cell lysis once replication is completed in enterocytes [38]. Rotavirus causes destruction to mature cells in the villi and activates non-structural glycoprotein 4, an enterotoxin that stimulates an influx of calcium ions, resulting in enterocyte destruction [41]. The pathophysiology of coronavirus is similar to rotavirus; however, this enveloped virus uses a spike protein to bind and fuse to the membrane of the host enterocyte, leading to atrophy [38]. C. parvum replicates through sexual and asexual reproduction, which creates autoinfecting thin-walled oocytes. The invasion results in atrophy of columnar epithelial cells and a loss of microvilli [38]. Salmonella destroys enterocytes by invading the intestinal mucosal layer, and continues to multiply in the lymphoid tissues [42]. The bacteria will then circulate through the body from mesenteric lymph nodes, initiating systemic illness [38,43]. Enterotoxigenic E. coli is another bacterium that is a major cause of diarrhea in calves. These bacteria attach to the immature epithelium through fimbria adhesion, mainly in the distal portion of the small intestine due to a favorably low pH. Hypersecretory diarrhea and dehydration results from the release of excess electrolytes and water due to villous atrophy though laminar propria damage and the release of thermo-stable toxins see Figure 1 [38]. Additionally, after enterocyte invasion, Clostridium perfringens may cause changes to the structure of the intestinal cytoskeleton through shortening of the columnar epithelial cells and destruction of microvilli due to necrotizing enteritis [38]. If not monitored and treated promptly, any of these pathogens can cause severe dehydration, malnutrition, reduced growth and death.

Consequences, Concerns and the Economic Loss of Neonatal Calf Diarrhea

Diarrhea in pre-weaned calves can have a direct economic impact on producers through treatment and labor costs. Specifically, Goodell et al. (2012) calculated that a case of diarrhea in a pre-weaned calf costs USD 56, due to the cost of increased labor and medication. Beyond these costs, pre-weaning calf diarrhea carries a 5.1% case fatality rate [44]. Diarrhea in the pre-weaning period can also have long lasting effects, as it negatively impacts ADG by 50 g/day [11,32], and results in almost a 10% reduction in milk yield during first lactation [11,45]. In addition, calves with diarrhea are 2.9 times more likely to achieve first calving after 30 months of life [46]—six months later than optimal calving age [47]. A later age at first calving can lead to decreased lifetime milk production and increased costs to rear replacement animals [45]. Additionally, late calving age is associated with a higher weight at first calving, causing considerable metabolic and production complications during the transition period and throughout lactation [48]. It is clear that the negative impacts of pre-weaning diarrhea can have not only short-term consequences on calf health, but long-term effects on cow physiology and milk production. Thus, it is important to investigate strategies that reduce the high incidence of diarrhea, as well as potential alternatives to antimicrobials when clinical diarrhea occurs.
Aside from its economic impacts, pre-weaning diarrhea poses a major threat to calf welfare. There are myriad negative welfare challenges associated with diarrhea for pre-weaned calves, such as ataxia, dehydration through loss of fluids and weakness [49]. Furthermore, due to its immunosuppressive nature, calves with diarrhea have a higher likelihood of contracting other illnesses, such as respiratory disease [38]. Additionally, several symptoms caused by diarrhea may result in unnecessary stress and pain caused by anorexia and dehydration, which may ultimately result in death [3,50]. Furthermore, certain pathogens associated with calf diarrhea (Cryptosporidium, rotavirus and Salmonella) can be harmful to human health due to their zoonotic potential, as well as their abilities to develop antimicrobial resistance which can be passed on when meat and milk is consumed [6,42,51,52,53,54].

3. Antimicrobial Usage and Its Role in Diarrhea Therapy

Amoxicillin, chlortetracycline, neomycin, oxytetracycline, streptomycin, sulfachloropyridazine, sulfamethazine and tetracycline are all currently labeled in the United States for the treatment of calf diarrhea [7]. According to Urie et al. (2018), the antimicrobials listed above are utilized as a therapy for approximately 75% of calves diagnosed with diarrhea during the pre-weaning period. Due to a heavy reliance on these antimicrobials, pathogens such as E. coli and Salmonella have developed resistance to antimicrobials [55,56]. In addition, antimicrobial exposure can weaken the host’s immune system, increasing the risk for opportunistic pathogens, such as coronavirus, to colonize the gut [3]. Antimicrobial therapy is meant to target specific pathogens; however, this tends to force the gut microbiota into dysbiosis [14,15] through negatively impacting similar indigenous gut microbiota that play an important role in digestion and immunity [13,57]. The modification and deterioration of the composition of the gut microflora can lead to long-lasting negative effects [58], including increased gut permeability that allows for increased invasion of numerous pathogens [59]. Recent research in mice has shown that altered gut microflora composition negatively affects macrophage functions by pushing them into a hyperactive state [55], resulting in T-cell dysfunction and, ultimately, increased susceptibility to disease [55]. The pre-weaning period is a vital stage in gut microbiota establishment [56]. Disruption of gut microbial homeostasis during this period can have detrimental effects on calf health, including increased sensitivity to enteric infection, systemic disease and autoimmune disorders [58]. Due to the negative implications of antimicrobial use on the host immune system and gut microbiome, as well as concerns relating to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, there is a push for producers to reduce heavy reliance on antimicrobials and begin to source alternatives when treating and augmenting the production and growth of their animals in order to ensure social acceptance by the dairy industry [60].

4. The Role of the Gastrointestinal Microbiome in Maintaining Gut Homeostasis

An infant’s gut is sterile in utero, with gut microbiome colonization beginning at parturition and continuing through early life [61]. A similar process is suspected in the calf [61]; however, there is evidence that suggests microbiota development may begin prenatally [62]. Although diversity of the gut microflora is marginal at birth [63], during the first 48 h of life and beyond, the microbiome is highly variable and diversifies significantly [64]. With much of the gut microbiota colonization occurring through environmental interactions at and soon after birth [65], colostrum feeding in early life can also significantly influence and shape a calf’s microbiome due to its ample supply of energy sources which are provided to the gut bacteria [65,66]. Rectal microbiota samples from newborn calves at birth show composition of Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes (phyla) [64]. However, by the first day of life, significant changes occur and only Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes remain, which is mainly a result of the environmental microbiota and colostrum feeding [64]. In the pre-weaning period, the intestinal microbiome is mainly comprised of bacteria [67,68] with Lactobacillus, Corynebacterium, Streptococcus, clostridium, Pepto streptococcus and Bifidobacterium being among the 167 genera identified at one week of life in the intestinal tract [67,68]. The gut microbiome changes significantly and continuously as the calf develops, consumes more solid feed and is weaned off milk [67].
The gut microbiota plays an important role in stimulating the function of the host immune system. This is especially prominent in neonates, where the early interactions of microbial communities can initiate long term immunity through the development of the mucosal layer of the epithelial cell barrier [69,70,71]. The epithelial layer is necessary for many vital immune and digestive functions of the GIT, where it plays a role in nutrient absorption and facilitates microbial cross-talk, as well as acts as a barrier against bacterial invasion [13,71,72]. Bacteria in the gut have a plethora of other functions, including improving immune function, decreasing pH, mucosal gut barrier maintenance and increasing digestive capacity [73]. The gut itself provides a localized immune response by eliminating pathogens with antigen presenting cells, neutrophils and natural killer cells [74]. Additionally, a large proportion of T-cells are present in the GIT, which are critical in the defense against pathogens [74]. The colonization of commensal microbes and their subsequent effects on calf immunity during early life promote a healthy gut environment, which may provide protection against pathogens and the high incidence of diarrhea in young calves.

5. Colostrum

Colostrum, the first milk produced following parturition, functions to aid in promoting growth and development of the neonatal calf, but it also supplies maternal antibodies and cell-mediated immunity to stimulate immune function within the first hours of life See Table 1 [2]. On-farm colostrum management has the greatest association with calf morbidity and mortality [75]; thus, it is vital to monitor the quality, quantity and cleanliness of colostrum and to ensure the calf receives the first colostrum feeding in a timely manner [76,77]. To be characterized as “good-quality”, colostrum should contain > 50 g/L of immunoglobulin G (IgG) to ensure successful transfer of passive immunity [77]. Quality can be altered by many factors, such as breed and age of the dam, season of calving, length of previous lactation and delayed colostrum collection [77]. Additionally, nutrition and health during the periparturient period of the dam such as energy and length of the dry period have shown to affect colostrum IgG levels [78]. In terms of quantity, calves should receive 10–12% of their body weight in colostrum at their first feeding, which over 50% of Canadian producers achieve [77,79], and ensure consumption of at least 150–200 g of IgG during the first 24 h of life [77,80]. Due to gut closure occurring during the first day of life, it is vital that colostrum is fed soon after birth to supply the calf with ample immunoglobulins [76]. Additionally, the cleanliness of colostrum is crucial to calf vitality. The method in which colostrum is collected and stored can influence the calf’s metabolism, endocrine system and nutrition [19,81]. The majority of Canadian dairy farmers reported that they regularly remove calves from the calving pen within 30 min after birth and prohibit suckling from the dam [79]. If contamination with bacteria occurs during the collection process, bacteria can bind to immunoglobulins, inhibiting their transport across the enterocytes and thus reducing transfer of passive immunity [77].
Bovine colostrum is abundant in immunoglobulins, which are more than 100 times greater in colostrum than mature milk, to ensure protection against disease [16]. The common isotopes include immunoglobulin M (IgM), immunoglobulin A (IgA) and IgG, of which IgG is the primary isotope [2] accounting for 85–90% of all bovine colostral immunoglobulins [82]. Immunoglobulins are composed of short and long polypeptide chains, with each class and sub-class differing slightly in chain formation [82].
During the first 24 h of life, maternal immunoglobulins are absorbed through colostrum to provide passive immunity to the calf [76]. After ingestion, immunoglobulins transfer into the neonate’s circulatory system through the lumen of the small intestine [16], where the calf is provided with short-term, immediate immunity [83]. As gut permeability decreases rapidly during the first day of life [84], delaying colostrum intake to as late as 12 h of life will concurrently reduce passive transfer of immunoglobulins [85]. Prior to absorption, immunoglobulins will also defend against disease, binding to pathogens on antigen binding sites of the intestinal mucosal membrane and thus preventing further intrusion or adhesion to the epithelium through the provision of an intestinal barrier [17,86,87]. Colostrum also contains compounds that are responsible for the protection of immunoglobulins, such as trypsin inhibitor, which is 100 times more abundant in colostrum. This prevents degradation of IgG in the GIT, thus increasing the availability of IgG for the calf [77].
In addition to the supply of immunoglobulins in colostrum, the latter contains an abundance of antimicrobial components. Lactoferrin, a bioactive protein in colostrum, has been shown to prevent sepsis in infants and calves, which can occur in calves with diarrhea [88,89]. It exhibits antimicrobial characteristics by creating a localized iron deficiency in bacteria though its binding capabilities, thus minimizing the potential for bacterial growth [16]. Moreover, it inhibits the growth of many microbes, including E. coli and Salmonella [90,91,92,93]. Lactoperoxidase is a similar bioactive compound that exhibits antimicrobial qualities by inhibiting bacterial metabolism through the suppression of oxidation in protein groups [16]. Another bioactive compound, lysozyme, can actively protect the host from Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains of bacteria by hydrolyzing the β 1–4 linkages in the cell wall, thus causing cell lysis [16,94].
Colostrum is also rich in additional bioactive molecules [95,96], such as insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF-II [96]. Following parturition, their concentrations decline rapidly; therefore, early collection of colostrum is vital to ensure that the concentrations of both IgG and bioactive molecules are not diluted by transition milk [96]. Insulin has been shown to improve the oral glucose absorption capabilities of the calf, thus increasing its electrolyte levels [97]. Growth factors have been shown to stimulate the growth and maturation of the intestines, as well as the other mammalian cells [16]. Specifically, epithelial cell growth and development is stimulated by IGF-I and IGF-II [16]. Similarly, colostrum is rich in additional bioactive factors related to the innate and acquired immune system that are useful in the treatment and prevention of certain illnesses [98]. These include neutrophils, macrophages, immune regulators and anti-inflammatory molecules [98]. Neutrophils and macrophages are responsible for eliminating pathogens directly through phagocytosis, as well as through the production of cytokines [98]. Cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α and INF-γ, regulate immune function, infection and stress though immune cell recruitment, meditation of inflammatory processes, enhancing phagocytotic abilities and immunological maturation [18,99]. In addition to factors that provide direct antimicrobial support with endotoxin-neutralizing abilities, colostrum contains several more bioactive molecules such as leptin, casein and α-lactalbumin that can reduce gut inflammation to encourage tissue repair and improve gastrointestinal mucosal integrity [18,100].
Although the concentrations of colostral components can vary, colostrum typically contains less than half the amount of lactose and more than 70% of oligosaccharides found in whole milk [101]. High levels of sialylated oligosaccharides are beneficial, as they have many potential prophylactic functions [101,102]. During a disease state, oligosaccharides provide several benefits through the inhibition of the binding capacity of certain pathogens, including E. coli and rotavirus, to the intestinal epithelium [102,103,104,105,106] and through the reduction in gut permeability by enhancing the expression of lipoproteins that comprise the tight junctional complexes [105,106]. Furthermore, oligosaccharides also decrease intestinal inflammation by reducing the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which modulate proteins in epithelial tight junctions and enhance the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines [105,106]. In addition, certain oligosaccharides may accelerate and improve the development of gut microflora in the calf by acting as an energy source for bacteria [104,105,106,107].
Overall, the fat content of colostrum is higher than that of transition or mature milk [95]. Elevated concentrations of certain fatty acids in colostrum insinuates that lipids may be essential for neonatal calves [108]. Neonatal ruminants are born with low energy stores and a limited ability to thermoregulate [109], as only 3% of a calf’s body weight is made up of lipids at birth [110]. The high levels of fat in colostrum are necessary to provide energy and to improve the calf’s thermoregulatory abilities [109]. Moreover, parturition activates the calf’s metabolic and respiratory processes, exposing it to high levels of oxidative stress [111]. Although the majority of lipids are in the form of triglycerides [112], the increased concentration of polyunsaturated fatty acids in colostrum has been shown to reduce the numbers of oxidants and reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, providing a greater antioxidant capacity and decreasing oxidative stress experienced by the calf [111,113].
Table 1. Benefits to gut immunity and development provided by colostrum components.
Table 1. Benefits to gut immunity and development provided by colostrum components.
Colostrum BioactiveConcentrationBenefit to the Gastrointestinal TractReference
UnitColostrumMature Milk
Immunoglobulin Gg/L81<2Primary immunity contributor through pathogen binding in the intestinal mucosal membrane and passive immunity when absorbed into the circulatory system.[17,77,86,87,96]
Lactoferring/L1.840.1Sepsis prevention in infants. Binds to iron, preventing excess growth of bacteria, such as E. coli and Salmonella.[16,88,89,90,91,92,93,96,114]
Lactoperoxidaseg/L0.011–0.0450.013–0.030Inhibitory effects on bacterial metabolism through suppression of oxidation in proteins.[16,114]
Lysozymeμg/L140–70070–600Cell lysis caused by hydrolysis of β linkages in the cell wall of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.[16,94,114]
Insulinμg/L651Promotes cell growth in the small intestine.[96,115]
Insulin-like growth factor-Iμg/L310<2Stimulates intestinal cell growth and epithelial development.[16,96]
Insulin-like growth factor-IIμg/L1501Stimulates intestinal cell growth and epithelial development.[16,96,116]
Oligosaccharidesg/L1<0.2Reduces gut permeability and promotes gut microflora development.[101,117]
Fatty Acidsg/L6439Improves thermoregulation capabilities. High levels of PUFA decreases oxidative stress by reducing the oxidants and reactive oxygen and nitrogen species.[96,107,109,111]
CytokinesIL-1 β
IL-6
TNF-α
INF-γ
μg/L845
75
925
260
3
<0.2
3
0.2
Anti-inflammatory capabilities through the neutralization of pro-inflammatory molecules. Specifically, INF-γ amplifies the capacity of phagocytic cells.[99,118]

5.1. Hyperimmune Colostrum as a Treatment for Diarrhea

Hyperimmune colostrum has been used as a therapy for gastrointestinal diseases in the dairy industry for many years [17]. It is produced by exposing the dam to a specific pathogen, which will enrich her colostrum with IgG specialized to recognize and protect the neonate against the specific pathogen in question [17,119]. This antibody-enriched colostrum has been used in human infants, children and adults to treat diarrhea caused by coronavirus [21], rotavirus [23] and C. parvum, alleviating symptoms for up to 3 months at a time with a single dose [22,24,25]. Hyperimmune colostrum has also shown to be effective in reducing the concentration C. parvum in the GIT of mice [120] and decreasing calf mortality during a coronavirus challenge [21]. Treating gastrointestinal diseases with hyperimmune colostrum is an attractive alternative to antimicrobials, as there are no effects on the diversity of the gut microflora [121]. Although hyperimmune colostrum poses several benefits, it is not feasible on a mass scale for treatment of calf diarrhea due to cost and production time. The use of hyperimmune colostrum may also pose societal concerns from both cow welfare and health standpoints due to the purposive administration of pathogens to create a product for the animal production industry. Furthermore, as stated previously, calf diarrhea is a multifactorial disease, and a single case of diarrhea can be caused by multiple pathogens. Thus, it would prove increasingly difficult and expensive to expose cows to multiple pathogens to create a hyperimmune colostrum that is effective towards the abundance of pathogens implicated in calf diarrhea. When the inefficiency and potential welfare and health concerns of hyperimmune colostrum are considered, it is clear that natural colostrum may act as a more suitable option to prevent and treat calf diarrhea.

5.2. Natural Colostrum as a Preventative for Calf Disease

Failure to absorb an adequate quantity of high quality immunoglobulins, especially IgG, is termed failed transfer of passive immunity, which results in a deficient immune system and increased risk of disease [76]. A newly recommended scale has been designed to measure transfer of passive immunity in four categories: >20.5, 18.0–24.9, 10–17.9 and <10 IgG/L representing excellent, good, fair and poor, respectively [122]. Achievement of good and excellent rates of passive transfer are used as a metric to indicate a lower risk for, and less susceptibility to, morbidity and mortality [122]. Although correlations between morbidity and mortality and the newly recommended passive transfer categories have been clearly demonstrated, it is necessary to determine correlations between each category and the incidence of specific diseases, including both respiratory and digestive disease.
Recently, there have been several studies highlighting the benefit of prolonged supplementation of colostrum beyond the first day of life. Kargar et al. (2020) determined that the enhancement of five liters of milk replacer with 0.7 kg/day of colostrum for 14 days postnatally improved ADG and decreased the risk of elevated rectal temperatures, diarrhea and pneumonia. Likewise, Berge et al. (2009) concluded that enhancing milk replacer with 70 g of colostrum replacer for 14 days increased grain consumption and ADG while reducing diarrhea incidence and antimicrobial administration. In addition to improved health, transition milk has also been shown to improve the development of the gastrointestinal tract [19]. Feeding colostrum for 72 h postnatally has been shown to improve the development and maturation of the small intestine, as well as improve IgG persistency [123,124]. Similarly, an enhanced nutritional plane in the pre-weaning period results in improved mammary tissue growth and mammogenic stimulation [125]. However, it is difficult to distinguish whether the benefits of the majority of the aforementioned studies are a result of extra nutrients, bioactives or a combination of the two, as energy and protein provisions are rarely balanced between treatments. Yet, this collection of studies suggests that an elevated colostrum allowance following the first day of life improves calf health and development, thus acting as a short- and long-term prophylactic for disease. Specifically, this research, along with the current body of literature highlighting the beneficial effects of colostral bioactive molecules on calf GIT development and health, indicate the great potential for colostrum as a preventative treatment for the current high rates of calf diarrhea.

5.3. Natural Colostrum as a Treatment for Diarrhea

Studies evaluating the use of natural colostrum have also shown positive results when using it as a treatment for different forms of diseases in humans. Bovine colostrum has been shown to improve gut immunity following certain diseases or treatments, such as short term bowel syndrome and chronic pain syndrome [18]. It has been found to minimize the immunosuppressive effects of intense physical activity through enhanced recovery and improved immune response [126]. Moreover, owing to the antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties of bovine colostrum, it can be beneficial in treating many different infections [18].
Few studies have explored the efficacy of bovine colostrum as a treatment for disease in neonatal calves. Cantor et al. (2021) highlighted how the use of colostrum may reduce disease likelihood in calves that had shown early disease symptoms. This research exemplifies that colostrum has an advantageous influence on calves displaying signs of morbidity; however, further research must investigate the effects of colostrum on diarrhea specifically. Bovine colostrum holds the potential to become a sustainable and effective therapy for neonatal calf diarrhea [127]. Colostrum has shown to naturally improve development and microbial colonization and development, as well as minimize inflammation within the GIT [66,77]. Critically high levels of antimicrobial resistance, in addition to the physiological upset antimicrobials pose to a young calves’ GIT, warrant a shift in therapeutics used for the treatment of diarrhea in pre-weaning calves [14,55,56].
Feeding colostrum after gut closure may have residual benefits. Although absorption will have ceased, immunoglobulins can still provide protection against pathogens in the GIT [17]. Moreover, there is an abundance of components that can improve calf diarrhea such as oligosaccharides, lipids, growth factors and hormones antibodies that continue to protect and maintain a healthy GIT [77,128]. Furthermore, several bioactives in colostrum provide immunity through phagocytosis and the prevention of pathogen growth [77]. This abundant combination of nutrients and bioactives could be the resource that is necessary in the treatment of diarrhea in young calves.

6. Future Research Directions

There have been recent studies attempting to find alternative treatments for neonatal calf diarrhea, including essential oil, probiotics and prebiotics, most of which have shown to decrease calf mortality and improve ADG [129,130,131]. However, the current alternatives to antimicrobials consist of either a single treatment or a combination of 2–4 ingredients; contrarily, colostrum is a natural combination of hundreds of bioactives specifically tailored to an individual calf [77,129,130]. Knowledge is still lacking within this field and minimal research has been conducted to evaluate the impact natural bovine colostrum can have as a treatment for neonatal calf diarrhea. It is not known whether colostrum can lead to improved recovery from diarrheic symptoms or what the proper treatment protocol should be (i.e., required dosage and quality level of the colostrum). It is clear that an adequate quantity of colostrum fed quickly after birth will provide the calf with protection against the development of diarrhea. Additional research has highlighted that, even following gut closure, supplementation of colostrum can reduce diarrhea through its bioactive and immune enhancing components [29]. Other research has shown that, by adding colostrum to milk replacers, the probability that antimicrobial treatment would be required decreased by 57.7%, as colostrum acted as a protectant against diarrhea, respiratory disease and navel ill [30].

7. Conclusions

The dairy industry is making tremendous efforts to improve animal welfare and health through improved hygiene, management and environment. However, several diseases in pre-weaning calves still pose a serious issue. With antimicrobial resistance steadily growing, there has been a recent influx in research related to antimicrobial alternatives. Colostrum holds the potential to be used as a natural prophylactic and therapy for diarrhea in young calves. Using future research regarding the development of protocols, this therapy may be a practical and natural method to treat pre-weaning calves with diarrhea while adhering to industry and consumer standards.

Author Contributions

The individual contributions of the authors are as follows. Conceptualization, H.S.M.C., D.L.R., M.A.S., A.J.F.-T. and J.H.C.C.; methodology, H.S.M.C., D.L.R., M.A.S., A.J.F.-T.; validation, H.S.M.C., D.L.R., M.A.S., A.J.F.-T., J.H.C.C.; investigation, H.S.M.C.; resources, H.S.M.C.; data curation, H.S.M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, H.S.M.C.; writing—review and editing, H.S.M.C., D.L.R., M.A.S., A.J.F.-T., J.H.C.C.; visualization, H.S.M.C., D.L.R., M.A.S., A.J.F.-T.; supervision, D.L.R., M.A.S.; project administration, D.L.R., M.A.S.; funding acquisition, D.L.R., M.A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Urie, N.J.; Lombard, J.E.; Shivley, C.B.; Kopral, C.A.; Adams, A.E.; Earleywine, T.J.; Olson, J.D.; Garry, F.B. Preweaned Heifer Management on US Dairy Operations: Part V. Factors Associated with Morbidity and Mortality in Preweaned Dairy Heifer Calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 9229–9244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Cho, Y.I.; Han, J.I.; Wang, C.; Cooper, V.; Schwartz, K.; Engelken, T.; Yoon, K.J. Case-Control Study of Microbiological Etiology Associated with Calf Diarrhea. Vet. Microbiol. 2013, 166, 375–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bartels, C.J.M.; Holzhauer, M.; Jorritsma, R.; Swart, W.A.J.M.; Lam, T.J.G.M. Prevalence, Prediction and Risk Factors of Enteropathogens in Normal and Non-Normal Faeces of Young Dutch Dairy Calves. Prev. Vet. Med. 2010, 93, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. De La Fuente, R.; Garcia, A.; Ruiz-Santa-Quiteria, J.A.; Luzón, M.; Cid, D.; García, S.; Orden, J.A.; Gómez-Bautista, M. Proportional Morbidity Rates of Enteropathogens among Diarrheic Dairy Calves in Central Spain. Prev. Vet. Med. 1998, 36, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Izzo, M.M.; Kirkland, P.D.; Mohler, V.L.; Perkins, N.R.; Gunn, A.A.; House, J.K. Prevalence of Major Enteric Pathogens in Australian Dairy Calves with Diarrhoea. Aust. Vet. J. 2011, 89, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chalmers, R.M.; Smith, R.; Elwin, K.; Clifton-hadley, F.A.; Giles, M. Epidemiology of Anthroponotic and Zoonotic Human Cryptosporidiosis in England and Wales. Epidemiol. Infect. 2011, 139, 700–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Constable, P.D. Antimicrobial Use in the Treatment of Calf Diarrhea. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2008, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Frank, N.A.; Kaneene, J.B. Management Risk Factors Associated with Calf Diarrhea in Michigan Dairy Herds. J. Dairy Sci. 1993, 76, 1313–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Anderson, D.C.; Kress, D.D.; Bernardini, T.M.M.; Davis, K.C.; Boss, D.L.; Doornbos, D.E. The Effect of Scours on Calf Weaning Weight. Prof. Anim. Sci. 2003, 19, 399–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Donovan, G.A.; Dohoo, I.R.; Montgomery, D.M.; Bennett, F.L. Calf and Disease Factors Affecting Growth in Female Holstein Calves in Florida, USA. Prev. Vet. Med. 1998, 33, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abuelo, A.; Cullens, F.; Brester, J.L. Effect of Preweaning Disease on the Reproductive Performance and First-Lactation Milk Production of Heifers in a Large Dairy Herd. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 7008–7017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. World Health Organization. WHO Global Strategy for Containment of Antimicrobial Resistance; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001; Available online: https://www.who.int/drugresistance/WHO_Global_Strategy_English.pdf (accessed on 22 January 2021).
  13. Helander, H.F.; Fändriks, L. Surface Area of the Digestive Tract-Revisited. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 49, 681–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Oultram, J.; Phipps, E.; Teixeira, A.G.V.; Foditsch, C.; Bicalho, M.L.; Machado, V.S.; Bicalho, R.C.; Oikonomou, G. Effects of Antibiotics (Oxytetracycline, Florfenicol or Tulathromycin) on Neonatal Calves’ Faecal Microbial Diversity. Vet. Rec. 2015, 117, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. van Vleck Pereira, R.; Lima, S.; Siler, J.D.; Foditsch, C.; Warnick, L.D.; Bicalho, R.C. Ingestion of Milk Containing Very Low Concentration of Antimicrobials: Longitudinal Effect on Fecal Microbiota Composition in Preweaned Calves. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0147525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Pakkanen, R.; Aalto, J. Growth Factors and Antimicrobial Factors of Bovine Colostrum. Int. Dairy J. 1997, 7, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ulfman, L.H.; Leusen, J.H.W.; Savelkoul, H.F.J.; Warner, J.O.; van Neerven, R.J.J. Effects of Bovine Immunoglobulins on Immune Function, Allergy, and Infection. Front. Nutr. 2018, 5, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Rathe, M.; Müller, K.; Sangild, P.T.; Husby, S. Clinical Applications of Bovine Colostrum Therapy: A Systematic Review. Nutr. Rev. 2014, 72, 237–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Berge, A.C.B.; Besser, T.E.; Moore, D.A.; Sischo, W.M. Evaluation of the Effects of Oral Colostrum Supplementation during the First Fourteen Days on the Health and Performance of Preweaned Calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92, 286–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kim, J.H.; Jung, W.S.; Choi, N.J.; Kim, D.O.; Shin, D.H.; Kim, Y.J. Health-Promoting Effects of Bovine Colostrum in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Can Reduce Blood Glucose, Cholesterol, Triglyceride and Ketones. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2009, 20, 298–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ikemori, Y.; Ohta, M.; Umeda, K.; Icatlo, F.C.; Kuroki, M.; Yokoyama, H.; Kodama, Y. Passive Protection of Neonatal Calves against Bovine Coronavirus-Induced Diarrhea by Administration of Egg Yolk or Colostrum Antibody Powder. Vet. Microbiol. 1997, 58, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ungar, B.L.P.; Ward, D.J.; Fayer, R.; Quinn, C.A. Cessation of Cryptosporidium-Associated Diarrhea in an Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Patient after Treatment with Hyperimmune Bovine Colostrum. Gastroenterology 1990, 98, 486–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Davidson, G.P.; Daniels, E.; Nunan, H.; Moore, A.G.; Whyte, P.B.D.; Franklin, K.; Mccloud, P.I.; Moore, D.J. Passive Immunisation of Children With Bovine Colostrum Containing Antibodies To Human Rotavirus. Lancet 1989, 334, 709–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fayer, R.; Andrews, C.; Ungar, B.L.P.; Blagburn, B. Efficacy of Hyperimmune Bovine Colostrum for Prophylaxis of Cryptosporidiosis in Neonatal Calves. J. Parasitol. 1989, 75, 393–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chapman, C.; Roberton, D. Remission of Diarrhoea Due to Cryptosporidiosis in an Immunodeficient Child Treated with Hyperimmune Bovine Colostrum. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 1986, 293, 1276–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Solomons, N.W. Modulation of the Immune System and the Response against Pathogens with Bovine Colostrum Concentrates. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002, 56, S24–S28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cantor, M.C.; Renaud, D.L.; Costa, J.H.C. Nutraceutical Intervention with Colostrum Replacer: Can We Reduce Disease Hazard, Ameliorate Disease Severity, and Improve Performance in Preweaned Dairy Calves? J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 7168–7176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kargar, S.; Roshan, M.; Ghoreishi, S.M.; Akhlaghi, A.; Kanani, M.; Abedi Shams-Abadi, A.R.; Ghaffari, M.H. Extended Colostrum Feeding for 2 Weeks Improves Growth Performance and Reduces the Susceptibility to Diarrhea and Pneumonia in Neonatal Holstein Dairy Calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 8130–8142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Berge, A.C.B.; Moore, D.A.; Besser, T.E.; Sischo, W.M. Targeting Therapy to Minimize Antimicrobial Use in Preweaned Calves: Effects on Health, Growth, and Treatment Costs. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92, 4707–4714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Chamorro, M.F.; Cernicchiaro, N.; Haines, D.M. Evaluation of the Effects of Colostrum Replacer Supplementation of the Milk Replacer Ration on the Occurrence of Disease, Antibiotic Therapy, and Performance of Pre-Weaned Dairy Calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 1378–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Steele, J.; Sponseller, J.; Schmidt, D.; Cohen, O.; Tzipori, S. Hyperimmune Bovine Colostrum for Treatment of GI Infections. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2013, 9, 1565–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. DeBey, B.M.; Blanchard, P.C.; Durfee, P.T. Abomasal Bloat Associated with Sarcina-like Bacteria in Goat Kids. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1996, 209, 1468–1469. [Google Scholar]
  33. Berchtold, J. Treatment of Calf Diarrhea: Intravenous Fluid Therapy. Vet. Clin. North Am.-Food Anim. Pract. 2009, 25, 73–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. García, A.; Ruiz-Santa-Quiteria, J.A.; Orden, J.A.; Cid, D.; Sanz, R.; Gómez-Bautista, M.; De La Fuente, R. Rotavirus and Concurrent Infections with Other Enteropathogens in Neonatal Diarrheic Dairy Calves in Spain. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2000, 23, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. El-Seedy, F.R.; Abed, A.H.; Yanni, H.A.; Abd El-Rahman, S.A.A. Prevalence of Salmonella and E. Coli in Neonatal Diarrheic Calves. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2016, 5, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Renaud, D.L.; Rot, C.; Marshall, J.; Steele, M.A. The Effect of Cryptosporidium Parvum, Rotavirus, and Coronavirus Infection on the Health and Performance of Male Dairy Calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 2151–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Klein-Jöbstl, D.; Iwersen, M.; Drillich, M. Farm Characteristics and Calf Management Practices on Dairy Farms with and without Diarrhea: A Case-Control Study to Investigate Risk Factors for Calf Diarrhea. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97, 5110–5119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cho, Y.L.; Yoon, K.J. An Overview of Calf Diarrhea—Infectious Etiology, Diagnosis, and Intervention. J. Vet. Sci. 2014, 15, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Foster, D.M.; Smith, G.W. Pathophysiology of Diarrhea in Calves. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2009, 25, 13–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Peek, S.F.; Mcguirk, S.M.; Sweeney, R.W.; Cummings, K.J. Infectious Diseases of the Gastrointestinal Tract. In Rebhun’s Diseases of Dairy Cattle, 3rd ed.; Saunders Elsevierpp: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2018; pp. 249–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ball, J.M.; Mitchell, D.M.; Gibbons, T.F.; Parr, R.D. Rotavirus NSP4: A Multifunctional Viral Enterotoxin. Viral Immunol. 2005, 18, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Holschbach, C.L.; Peek, S.F. Salmonella in Dairy Cattle. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2018, 34, 133–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Giannella, R. Salmonella—Medical Microbiology—NCBI Bookshelf. Med. Microbiol. 1996. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK8435/ (accessed on 2 April 2021).
  44. Windeyer, M.C.; Leslie, K.E.; Godden, S.M.; Hodgins, D.C.; Lissemore, K.D.; LeBlanc, S.J. Factors Associated with Morbidity, Mortality, and Growth of Dairy Heifer Calves up to 3 Months of Age. Prev. Vet. Med. 2014, 113, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Heinrichs, A.J.; Heinrichs, B.S. A Prospective Study of Calf Factors Affecting First-Lactation and Lifetime Milk Production and Age of Cows When Removed from the Herd1. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Waltner-Toews, D.; Martin, S.W.; Meek, A.H. The Effect of Early Calfhood Health Status on Survivorship and Age at First Calving. Can. J. Vet. Res. 1986, 50, 314–317. [Google Scholar]
  47. Gabler, M.T.; Tozer, P.R.; Heinrichs, A.J. Development of a Cost Analysis Spreadsheet for Calculating the Costs to Raise a Replacement Dairy Heifer 1. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 83, 1104–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhao, W.; Chen, X.; Xiao, J.; Chen, X.H.; Zhang, X.F.; Wang, T.; Zhen, Y.G.; Qin, G.X. Prepartum Body Condition Score Affects Milk Yield, Lipid Metabolism, and Oxidation Status of Holstein Cows. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 32, 1889–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Meganck, V.; Hoflack, G.; Opsomer, G. Advances in Prevention and Therapy of Neonatal Dairy Calf Diarrhoea: A Systematical Review with Emphasis on Colostrum Management and Fluid Therapy. Acta Vet. Scand. 2014, 56, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kaneene, J.B.; Scott Hurd, H. The National Animal Health Monitoring System in Michigan. III. Cost Estimates of Selected Dairy Cattle Diseases. Prev. Vet. Med. 1990, 8, 127–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Garofalo, C.; Vignaroli, C.; Zandri, G.; Aquilanti, L.; Bordoni, D.; Osimani, A.; Clementi, F.; Biavasco, F. Direct Detection of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Specimens of Chicken and Pork Meat. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 113, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tóth, A.G.; Csabai, I.; Krikó, E.; Tőzsér, D.; Maróti, G.; Patai Á, V.; Makrai, L.; Szita, G.; Solymosi, N. Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Raw Milk for Human Consumption. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Alaoui Amine, S.; Melloul, M.; El Alaoui, M.A.; Boulahyaoui, H.; Loutfi, C.; Touil, N.; El Fahime, E. Evidence for Zoonotic Transmission of Species A Rotavirus from Goat and Cattle in Nomadic Herds in Morocco, 2012–2014. Virus Genes 2020, 56, 582–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Umpiérrez, A.; Bado, I.; Oliver, M.; Acquistapace, S.; Etcheverría, A.; Padola, N.L.; Vignoli, R.; Zunino, P. Zoonotic Potential and Antibiotic Resistance of Escherichia Coli in Neonatal Calves in Uruguay. Microbes Environ. 2017, 32, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Scott, N.A.; Andrusaite, A.; Andersen, P.; Lawson, M.; Alcon-Giner, C.; Leclaire, C.; Caim, S.; Le Gall, G.; Shaw, T.; Connolly, J.P.; et al. Antibiotics Induce Sustained Dysregulation of Intestinal T Cell Immunity by Perturbing Macrophage Homeostasis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018, 10, eaao4755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Malmuthuge, N.; Griebel, P.J.; Guan, L.L. The Gut Microbiome and Its Potential Role in the Development and Function of Newborn Calf Gastrointestinal Tract. Front. Vet. Sci. 2015, 2, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Zhang, S.; Chen, D.C.; Chen, L.M. Facing a New Challenge: The Adverse Effects of Antibiotics on Gut Microbiota and Host Immunity. Chin. Med J. 2019, 132, 1135–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Becattini, S.; Taur, Y.; Pamer, E.G. Antibiotic-Induced Changes in the Intestinal Microbiota and Disease. Trends Mol. Med. 2016, 22, 458–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Tulstrup, M.V.L.; Christensen, E.G.; Carvalho, V.; Linninge, C.; Ahrné, S.; Højberg, O.; Licht, T.R.; Bahl, M.I. Antibiotic Treatment Affects Intestinal Permeability and Gut Microbial Composition in Wistar Rats Dependent on Antibiotic Class. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Cardoso, C.S.; Hötzel, M.J.; Weary, D.M.; Robbins, J.A.; von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. Imagining the Ideal Dairy Farm. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 1663–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Bäckhed, F.; Roswall, J.; Peng, Y.; Feng, Q.; Jia, H.; Kovatcheva-Datchary, P.; Li, Y.; Xia, Y.; Xie, H.; Zhong, H.; et al. Dynamics and Stabilization of the Human Gut Microbiome during the First Year of Life. Cell Host Microbe 2015, 17, 690–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Alipour, M.J.; Jalanka, J.; Pessa-Morikawa, T.; Kokkonen, T.; Satokari, R.; Hynönen, U.; Iivanainen, A.; Niku, M. The Composition of the Perinatal Intestinal Microbiota in Cattle. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Malmuthuge, N. Role of Commensal Microbiota in Neonatal Calf Gut Development. 2016, pp. 1–290. Available online: https://era.library.ualberta.ca/items/2df7d952-623a-4cae-abb0-53d9a645eecd/view/5fbf0d43-e07f-4042-8194-fa0ae3a10f57/Malmuthuge_Nilusha_S_201607_PhD.pdf (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef]
  64. Klein-Jöbstl, D.; Quijada, N.M.; Dzieciol, M.; Feldbacher, B.; Wagner, M.; Drillich, M.; Schmitz-Esser, S.; Mann, E. Microbiota of Newborn Calves and Their Mothers Reveals Possible Transfer Routes for Newborn Calves’ Gastrointestinal Microbiota. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Yeoman, C.J.; Ishaq, S.L.; Bichi, E.; Olivo, S.K.; Lowe, J.; Aldridge, B.M. Biogeographical Differences in the Influence of Maternal Microbial Sources on the Early Successional Development of the Bovine Neonatal Gastrointestinal Tract. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Belkaid, Y.; Hand, T.W. Role of the Microbiota in Immunity and Inflammation. Cell 2014, 157, 121–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Malmuthuge, N.; Liang, G.; Guan, L.L. Regulation of Rumen Development in Neonatal Ruminants through Microbial Metagenomes and Host Transcriptomes. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Fonty, G.; Gouet, P.; Jouany, J.-P.; Senaud, J. Establishment of the Microflora and Anaerobic Fungi in the Rumen of Lambs Effects Of. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1987, 133, 1835–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Sharma, R.; Schumacher, U.; Ronaasen, V.; Coates, M. Rat Intestinal Mucosal Responses to a Microbial Flora and Different Diets. 1995; Volume 36. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7883219/ (accessed on 22 March 2021).
  70. Petersson, J.; Schreiber, O.; Hansson, G.C.; Gendler, S.J.; Velcich, A.; Lundberg, J.O.; Roos, S.; Holm, L.; Phillipson, M. Importance and Regulation of the Colonic Mucus Barrier in a Mouse Model of Colitis. Am. J. Physiol.-Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2010, 300, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Chung, H.; Pamp, S.J.; Hill, J.A.; Surana, N.K.; Edelman, S.M.; Troy, E.B.; Reading, N.C.; Villablanca, E.J.; Wang, S.; Mora, J.R.; et al. Gut Immune Maturation Depends on Colonization with a Host-Specific Microbiota. Cell 2012, 149, 1578–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Rautava, S.; Walker, W.A. Commensal Bacteria and Epithelial Cross Talk in the Developing Intestine. Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2007, 9, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Uyeno, Y.; Shigemori, S.; Shimosato, T. Effect of Probiotics/Prebiotics on Cattle Health and Productivity. Microbes Environ. 2015, 30, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Wu, H.J.; Wu, E. The Role of Gut Microbiota in Immune Homeostasis and Autoimmunity. Gut Microbes. 2012, 3, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. McGuirk, S.M.; Collins, M. Managing the Production, Storage, and Delivery of Colostrum. Vet. Clin. North Am.-Food Anim. Pract. 2004, 20, 593–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Godden, S. Colostrum Management for Dairy Calves. Vet. Clin. North Am.-Food Anim. Pract. 2008, 24, 19–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Godden, S.M.; Lombard, J.E.; Woolums, A.R. Colostrum Management for Dairy Calves. Vet. Clin. North Am.-Food Anim. Pract. 2019, 35, 535–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Fischer-Tlustos, A.; Lopez, A.; Hare, K.; Wood, K.; Steele, M. Immune and Bioactive Components in Bovine Colostrum and Their Effects on the Neonatal Calf. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Winder, C.B.; Bauman, C.A.; Duffield, T.F.; Barkema, H.W.; Keefe, G.P.; Dubuc, J.; Uehlinger, F.; Kelton, D.F. Canadian National Dairy Study: Heifer Calf Management. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 10565–10579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Weaver, D.M.; Tyler, J.W.; VanMetre, D.C.; Hostetler, D.E.; Barrington, G.M. Passive Transfer of Colostral Immunoglobulins in Calves. J. Vet. Intern. Med./Am. Coll. Vet. Intern. Med. 2000, 14, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hammon, H.M.; Blum, J.W. Metabolic and Endocrine Traits of Neonatal Calves Are Influenced by Feeding Colostrum for Different Durations or Only Milk Replacer. J. Nutr. 1998, 128, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Larson, B.L.; Heary, H.L.; Devery, J.E. Immunoglobulin Production and Transport by the Mammary Gland. J. Dairy Sci. 1980, 63, 665–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. DuBourdieu, D. Colostrum Antibodies, Egg Antibodies and Monoclonal Antibodies Providing Passive Immunity for Animals. Nutraceuticals Vet. Med. 2019, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bush, L.J.; Staley, T.E. Absorption of Colostral Immunoglobulins in Newborn Calves. J. Dairy Sci. 1980, 63, 672–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Fischer, A.J.; Song, Y.; He, Z.; Haines, D.M.; Guan, L.L.; Steele, M.A. Effect of Delaying Colostrum Feeding on Passive Transfer and Intestinal Bacterial Colonization in Neonatal Male Holstein Calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 3099–3109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Hilpert, H.; Briissow, H.; Mietens, C.; Sidoti, J.; Lerner, L.; Werchau, H. Use of Bovine Milk Concentrate Containing Antibody to Rotavirus to Treat Rotavirus Gastroenteritis In Infants. J. Infect. Dis. 1987, 156, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Rump, J.A.; Arndt, R.; Arnold, A.; Bendick, C.; Dichtelmüller, H.; Franke, M.; Helm, E.B.; Jäger, H.; Kampmann, B.; Kolb, P.; et al. Treatment of Diarrhoea in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients with Immunoglobulins from Bovine Colostrum. Clin. Investig. 1992, 70, 588–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Turin, C.G.; Zea-Vera, A.; Pezo, A.; Cruz, K.; Zegarra, J.; Bellomo, S.; Cam, L.; Llanos, R.; Castañeda, A.; Tucto, L.; et al. Lactoferrin for Prevention of Neonatal Sepsis. BioMetals 2014, 27, 1007–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Habing, G.; Harris, K.; Schuenemann, G.M.; Piñeiro, J.M.; Lakritz, J.; Clavijo, X.A. Lactoferrin Reduces Mortality in Preweaned Calves with Diarrhea. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 3940–3948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Saito, H.; Miyakawa, H.; Tamura, Y.; Shimamura, S.; Tomita, M. Potent Bactericidal Activity of Bovine Lactoferrin Hydrolysate Produced by Heat Treatment at Acidic PH. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3724–3730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Batish, V.K.; Chander, H.; Zumdegni, K.C.; Bhatia, K.L.; Singh, R.S. Antibacterial Activity Of Lactoferrin Against Some Common Food-Borne Pathogenic Organisms—ProQuest. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 1988, 43, 16–18. [Google Scholar]
  92. Lassiter, M.O.; Newsome, A.L.; Sams, L.D.; Arnold, R.R. Characterization of Lactoferrin Interaction with Streptococcus Mutans. J. Dent. Res. 1987, 66, 480–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Oram, J.D.; Reiter, B. Inhibition of Bacteria by Lactoferrin and Other Iron-Chelating Agents. BBA-Gen. Subj. 1968, 170, 351–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Shah, N.P. Effects of Milk-Derived Bioactives: An Overview. Br. J. Nutr. 2000, 84, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. O’Callaghan, T.F.; O’Donovan, M.; Murphy, J.P.; Sugrue, K.; Mannion, D.; McCarthy, W.P.; Timlin, M.; Kilcawley, K.N.; Hickey, R.M.; Tobin, J.T. Evolution of the Bovine Milk Fatty Acid Profile–From Colostrum to Milk Five Days Post Parturition. Int. Dairy J. 2020, 104, 104655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Blum, J.W.; Hammon, H. Colostrum Effects on the Gastrointestinal Tract, and on Nutritional, Endocrine and Metabolic Parameters in Neonatal Calves. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2000, 66, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Steinhoff-Wagner, J.; Görs, S.; Junghans, P.; Bruckmaier, R.M.; Kanitz, E.; Metges, C.C.; Hammon, H.M. Intestinal Glucose Absorption but Not Endogenous Glucose Production Differs between Colostrum- and Formula-Fed Neonatal Calves1-3. J. Nutr. 2011, 141, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Stelwagen, K.; Carpenter, E.; Haigh, B.; Hodgkinson, A.; Wheeler, T.T. Immune Components of Bovine Colostrum and Milk. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 87, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Hagiwara, K.; Kataoka, S.; Yamanaka, H.; Kirisawa, R.; Iwai, H. Detection of Cytokines in Bovine Colostrum. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2000, 76, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Playford, R.J.; Weiser, M.J. Bovine Colostrum: Its Constituents and Uses. Nutrients 2021, 13, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Fischer-Tlustos, A.J.; Hertogs, K.; van Niekerk, J.K.; Nagorske, M.; Haines, D.M.; Steele, M.A. Oligosaccharide Concentrations in Colostrum, Transition Milk, and Mature Milk of Primi- and Multiparous Holstein Cows during the First Week of Lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 3683–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Martín-Sosa, S.; Martín, M.J.; Hueso, P. The Sialylated Fraction of Milk Oligosaccharides Is Partially Responsible for Binding to Enterotoxigenic and Uropathogenic Escherichia Coli Human Strains. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 3067–3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ganguli, K.; Meng, D.; Rautava, S.; Lu, L.; Walker, W.A.; Nanthakumar, N. Probiotics Prevent Necrotizing Enterocolitis by Modulating Enterocyte Genes That Regulate Innate Immune-Mediated Inflammation. Am. J. Physiol.-Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2013, 304, 132–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Chichlowski, M.; De Lartigue, G.; Bruce German, J.; Raybould, H.E.; Mills, D.A. Bifidobacteria Isolated from Infants and Cultured on Human Milk Oligosaccharides Affect Intestinal Epithelial Function. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2012, 55, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Ewaschuk, J.B.; Diaz, H.; Meddings, L.; Diederichs, B.; Dmytrash, A.; Backer, J.; Van Langen, M.L.; Madsen, K.L. Secreted Bioactive Factors from Bifidobacterium Infantis Enhance Epithelial Cell Barrier Function. Am. J. Physiol.-Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2008, 295, 1025–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Huang, P.; Xia, M.; Tan, M.; Zhong, W.; Wei, C.; Wang, L.; Morrow, A.; Jiang, X. Spike Protein VP8* of Human Rotavirus Recognizes Histo-Blood Group Antigens in a Type-Specific Manner. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 4833–4843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Yu, Z.T.; Chen, C.; Newburg, D.S. Utilization of Major Fucosylated and Sialylated Human Milk Oligosaccharides by Isolated Human Gut Microbes. Glycobiology 2013, 23, 1281–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Wilms, J.N.; Hare, K.S.; Fischer-Tlustos, A.; Vahmani, P.; Dugan, M.E.R.; Leal, L.N.; Steele, M.A. Fatty Acid Profile in Colostrum, Transition, and Mature Milks of Primi- and Multiparous Cows during the First Week of Lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Quigley, J.D.; Drewry, J.J. Nutrient and Immunity Transfer from Cow to Calf Pre- and Postcalving. J. Dairy Sci. 1998, 81, 2779–2790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Morrill, K.M.; Conrad, E.; Lago, A.; Campbell, J.; Quigley, J.; Tyler, H. Nationwide Evaluation of Quality and Composition of Colostrum on Dairy Farms in the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95, 3997–4005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Opgenorth, J.; Sordillo, L.M.; Lock, A.L.; Gandy, J.C.; VandeHaar, M.J. Colostrum Supplementation with N-3 Fatty Acids Alters Plasma Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Inflammatory Mediators in Newborn Calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 11676–11688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. MacGibbon, A.K.H.; Taylor, M.W. Composition and Structure of Bovine Milk Lipids. Adv. Dairy Chem. 2006, 2, 25–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Opgenorth, J.; Sordillo, L.M.; VandeHaar, M.J. Colostrum Supplementation with N-3 Fatty Acids and α-Tocopherol Alters Plasma Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Profile and Decreases an Indicator of Oxidative Stress in Newborn Calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 3545–3553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Korhonen, H. Antimicrobial Factors in Bovine Colostrum. Agric. Food Sci. 1977, 49, 434–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Shulman, R.J. Oral Insulin Increases Small Intestinal Mass and Disaccharidase Activity in the Newborn Miniature Pig. Pediatr. Res. 1990, 28, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Vega, J.R.; Gibson, C.A.; Skaar, T.C.; Hadsell, D.L.; Baumrucker, C.R. Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF)-I and -II and IGF Binding Proteins in Serum and Mammary Secretions during the Dry Period and Early Lactation in Dairy Cows. J. Anim. Sci. 1991, 69, 2538–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Nakamura, T.; Kawase, H.; Kimura, K.; Watanabe, Y.; Ohtani, M.; Arai, I.; Urashima, T. Concentrations of Sialyloligosaccharides in Bovine Colostrum and Milk during the Prepartum and Early Lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86, 1315–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Bernard, L.; Leroux, C.; Chilliard, Y. Expression of Nutritional Regulation of Lipogenic Genes in the Ruminant Lactating Mammary Gland. In Bioactive Components of Milk; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  119. Kramski, M.; Center, R.J.; Wheatley, A.K.; Jacobson, J.C.; Alexander, M.R.; Rawlin, G.; Purcell, D.F.J. Hyperimmune Bovine Colostrum as a Low-Cost, Large-Scale Source of Antibodies with Broad Neutralizing Activity for HIV-1 Envelope with Potential Use in Microbicides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 4310–4319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Fayer, R.; Perryman, L.E.; Riggs, M.W. Hyperimmune Bovine Colostrum Neutralizes Cryptosporidium Sporozoites and Protects Mice against Oocyst Challenge. J. Parasitol. 1989, 75, 151–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sponseller, J.K.; Steele, J.A.; Schmidt, D.J.; Kim, H.B.; Beamer, G.; Sun, X.; Tzipori, S. Hyperimmune Bovine Colostrum as a Novel Therapy to Combat Clostridium Difficile Infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2015, 211, 1334–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Lombard, J.; Urie, N.; Garry, F.; Godden, S.; Quigley, J.; Earleywine, T.; McGuirk, S.; Moore, D.; Branan, M.; Chamorro, M.; et al. Consensus Recommendations on Calf- and Herd-Level Passive Immunity in Dairy Calves in the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 7611–7624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Hare, K.S.; Pletts, S.; Pyo, J.; Haines, D.; Guan, L.L.; Steele, M. Feeding Colostrum or a 1:1 Colostrum:Whole Milk Mixture for 3 Days after Birth Increases Serum Immunoglobulin G and Apparent Immunoglobulin G Persistency in Holstein Bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 11833–11843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Pyo, J.; Hare, K.; Pletts, S.; Inabu, Y.; Haines, D.; Sugino, T.; Guan, L.L.; Steele, M. Feeding Colostrum or a 1:1 Colostrum:Milk Mixture for 3 Days Postnatal Increases Small Intestinal Development and Minimally Influences Plasma Glucagon-like Peptide-2 and Serum Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 Concentrations in Holstein Bull Calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 4236–4251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Geiger, A.J.; Parsons, C.L.M.; Akers, R.M. Feeding an Enhanced Diet to Holstein Heifers during the Preweaning Period Alters Steroid Receptor Expression and Increases Cellular Proliferation. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 8534–8543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Davison, G.; Diment, B.C. Bovine Colostrum Supplementation Attenuates the Decrease of Salivary Lysozyme and Enhances the Recovery of Neutrophil Function after Prolonged Exercise. Br. J. Nutr. 2010, 103, 1425–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Barakat, S.H.; Meheissen, M.A.; Omar, O.M.; Elbana, D.A. Bovine Colostrum in the Treatment of Acute Diarrhea in Children: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2019, 66, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Snodgrass, D.R.; Stewart, J.; Taylor, J.; Krautil, F.L.; Smith, M.L. Diarrhoea in Dairy Calves Reduced by Feeding Colostrum from Cows Vaccinated with Rotavirus. Res. Vet. Sci. 1982, 32, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Katsoulos, P.D.; Karatzia, M.A.; Dovas, C.I.; Filioussis, G.; Papadopoulos, E.; Kiossis, E.; Arsenopoulos, K.; Papadopoulos, T.; Boscos, C.; Karatzias, H. Evaluation of the In-Field Efficacy of Oregano Essential Oil Administration on the Control of Neonatal Diarrhea Syndrome in Calves. Res. Vet. Sci. 2017, 115, 478–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Renaud, D.L.; Kelton, D.F.; Weese, J.S.; Noble, C.; Duffield, T.F. Evaluation of a Multispecies Probiotic as a Supportive Treatment for Diarrhea in Dairy Calves: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 4498–4505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Timmerman, H.M.; Mulder, L.; Everts, H.; Van Espen, D.C.; Van Der Wal, E.; Klaassen, G.; Rouwers, S.M.G.; Hartemink, R.; Rombouts, F.M.; Beynen, A.C. Health and Growth of Veal Calves Fed Milk Replacers with or without Probiotics. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88, 2154–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Pathophysiology of diarrhea-causing pathogens; rotavirus, coronavirus, C. parvum and E. coli.
Figure 1. Pathophysiology of diarrhea-causing pathogens; rotavirus, coronavirus, C. parvum and E. coli.
Animals 11 02221 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Carter, H.S.M.; Renaud, D.L.; Steele, M.A.; Fischer-Tlustos, A.J.; Costa, J.H.C. A Narrative Review on the Unexplored Potential of Colostrum as a Preventative Treatment and Therapy for Diarrhea in Neonatal Dairy Calves. Animals 2021, 11, 2221. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082221

AMA Style

Carter HSM, Renaud DL, Steele MA, Fischer-Tlustos AJ, Costa JHC. A Narrative Review on the Unexplored Potential of Colostrum as a Preventative Treatment and Therapy for Diarrhea in Neonatal Dairy Calves. Animals. 2021; 11(8):2221. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082221

Chicago/Turabian Style

Carter, Havelah S. M., David L. Renaud, Michael A. Steele, Amanda J. Fischer-Tlustos, and Joao H. C. Costa. 2021. "A Narrative Review on the Unexplored Potential of Colostrum as a Preventative Treatment and Therapy for Diarrhea in Neonatal Dairy Calves" Animals 11, no. 8: 2221. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082221

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop