Next Article in Journal
Proteomic Analysis of Maternal Urine for the Early Detection of Preeclampsia and Fetal Growth Restriction
Previous Article in Journal
More than 50% of Persistent Myocardial Scarring at One Year in “Infarct-like” Acute Myocarditis Evaluated by CMR
 
 
jcm-logo
Article Menu

Article Menu

Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Real-Life Impact of Glucocorticoid Treatment in COVID-19 Mortality: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

by
Ana Muñoz-Gómez
1,
Ana Fernández-Cruz
2,*,
Cristina Lavilla-Olleros
3,
Vicente Giner-Galvañ
4,
Cristina Ausín-García
3,
Philip Wikman
4,
Alejandro D. Bendala-Estrada
3,
Juan A. Vargas
5,
Manuel Rubio-Rivas
6,
Jaime Laureiro
7,
Daniel Fernández-Bermúdez
8,
Verónica A. Buonaiuto
9,
Antonio P. Arenas de Larriva
10,11,
María de los Reyes Pascual-Pérez
12,
José N. Alcalá-Pedrajas
13,
Ane Labirua-Iturburu Ruiz
14,
Almudena Hernández-Milián
15,
Marta Gómez del Mazo
16,
Beatriz Antequera
17,
Carmen Mella-Pérez
18,
María de la Sierra Navas-Alcántara
19,
Juan F. Soto-Delgado
20,
Rosa M. Gámez-Mancera
21,
Cristina Sardiña-González
22,
Héctor Meijide-Míguez
23,
José M. Ramos-Rincón
24,
Ricardo Gómez-Huelgas
9 and
on behalf of the SEMI-COVID-19 Network
add Show full author list remove Hide full author list
1
Internal Medicine Department, Hospital de Parla, 28981 Madrid, Spain
2
Infectious Diseases Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Puerta de Hierro—Segovia de Arana, 28222 Madrid, Spain
3
Internal Medicine Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 28007 Madrid, Spain
4
Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Sant Joan d’Alacant, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica en la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO), 03550 Alicante, Spain
5
Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Puerta de Hierro—Segovia de Arana, 28222 Madrid, Spain
6
Department of Internal Medicine, Bellvitge University Hospital, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain
7
Doce de Octubre University Hospital, 28041 Madrid, Spain
8
Internal Medicine Department, Costa del Sol Hospital, 29603 Marbella, Spain
9
Internal Medicine Department, Regional University Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Málaga (IBIMA), University of Málaga (UMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain
10
Lipids and Atherosclerosis Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba (IMIBIC), Reina Sofia University Hospital, University of Córdoba, Av. Menendez Pidal s/n, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
11
CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), 28222 Madrid, Spain
12
Internal Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Elda, 03600 Alicante, Spain
13
Internal Medicine Department, Pozoblanco Regional Hospital, 14400 Córdoba, Spain
14
Santa Marina Hospital, 48004 Bilbao, Spain
15
Internal Medicine Department, Son Llàtzer University Hospital, 07198 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
16
Internal Medicine Department, San Pedro Hospital, 26006 Logroño, Spain
17
Internal Medicine Department, Sagunto Hospital, 46520 Valencia, Spain
18
Universitary Hospital Complex of Ferrol, 15405 A Coruña, Spain
19
Internal Medicine Department, Infanta Margarita Hospital, Cabra, 14940 Córdoba, Spain
20
Internal Medicine Department, University Hospital of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
21
Internal Medicine Department, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
22
Internal Medicine Department, Monforte de Lemos Public Hospital, 27400 Lugo, Spain
23
Internal Medicine Department, Quironsalud Hospital, 15009 A Coruña, Spain
24
Department of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche, 03203 Alicante, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
A complete list of the SEMI-COVID-19 Network members is provided in the supplementary materials.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(20), 4678; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204678
Submission received: 2 September 2021 / Revised: 6 October 2021 / Accepted: 8 October 2021 / Published: 13 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Diseases)

Abstract

:
We aimed to determine the impact of steroid use in COVID-19 in-hospital mortality, in a retrospective cohort study of the SEMICOVID19 database of admitted patients with SARS-CoV-2 laboratory-confirmed pneumonia from 131 Spanish hospitals. Patients treated with corticosteroids were compared to patients not treated with corticosteroids; and adjusted using a propensity-score for steroid treatment. From March–July 2020, 5.262 (35.26%) were treated with corticosteroids and 9.659 (64.73%) were not. In-hospital mortality overall was 20.50%; it was higher in patients treated with corticosteroids than in controls (28.5% versus 16.2%, OR 2.068 [95% confidence interval; 1.908 to 2.242]; p = 0.0001); however, when adjusting by occurrence of ARDS, mortality was significantly lower in the steroid group (43.4% versus 57.6%; OR 0.564 [95% confidence interval; 0.503 to 0.633]; p = 0.0001). Moreover, the greater the respiratory failure, the greater the impact on mortality of the steroid treatment. When adjusting these results including the propensity score as a covariate, in-hospital mortality remained significantly lower in the steroid group (OR 0.774 [0.660 to 0.907], p = 0.002). Steroid treatment reduced mortality by 24% relative to no steroid treatment (RRR 0.24). These results support the use of glucocorticoids in COVID-19 in this subgroup of patients.

1. Introduction

As of July 1st, there had been 249,659 SARS-CoV-2 infections diagnosed in Spain, causing at least 28,363 deaths during the same period [1], and no effective therapy available. During the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the use of corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID-19 was controversial, based on data from influenza pneumonia and SARS-CoV-1 infection [2]. However, they were used in many cases, due to the lack of effective therapy for this entity. There was not enough knowledge about the different phases of the illness nor had there been time to generate scientific evidence on the safety and effectiveness of different potential treatments [3].
Initially, drugs with presumed antiviral properties, such as hydroxychloroquine or lopinavir/ritonavir, were widely administered, but failed to demonstrate benefits [4]. Progressively, it became clear that elevation of inflammatory biomarkers and certain clinical features such as fever, pointed towards a hyper-inflammatory state. Based on this rationale, despite controversies, and in the absence of a better option, steroid treatment was considered to treat patients with COVID19 in many cases.
The first studies that analyzed the role of steroid treatment in COVID-19 did not support their use, in some cases for fear of delayed viral clearance based on the previous scarce evidence with SARS and MERS [5,6]. However, when viral clearance of SARS-CoV-2 was analyzed in patients who received corticosteroid treatment, there was no evidence of delayed viral clearance [7,8]. Furthermore, other single center studies suggested a positive impact of corticosteroids in mortality of patients with COVID-19 who needed supplementary oxygen [9,10].
The results of the RECOVERY trial [11] suggest that treatment with dexamethasone is beneficial for patients with COVID-19 that present with hypoxemia, which motivated the change in the World Health Organization recommendations [12]. In the present study, we analyze real-world data with the aim of confirming the consistency of these findings in a large Spanish multicenter cohort.

2. Material/Patients and Methods

2.1. Setting and Study Design

The present observational study is based on the SEMI (Spanish Society of Internal Medicine)-COVID-19 Registry. This is an ongoing, nationwide multicenter anonymized online database of consecutive adult patients admitted with SARS-CoV-2 laboratory-confirmed pneumonia from 131 different Spanish hospitals.
As described elsewhere [13], inclusion criteria for the registry were age ≥ 18 years and first hospital discharge with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. Exclusion criteria were subsequent admissions of the same patient and denial or withdrawal of informed consent. Patients were cared for at their attending physician’s discretion, according to local protocols and clinical judgment.
A retrospective cohort study was designed to compare the differences in all-cause mortality between patients who received corticosteroids as part of the treatment for COVID-19 (independently of the dose, duration of the treatment and moment of initiation) and those who did not.

2.2. Data Collection

The registry includes epidemiological, clinical, laboratory and radiologic data extracted from electronic medical records. More in-depth information on the registry is available in previously published works [13].

2.3. Definitions

We considered SARS-CoV-2 infected patients those with a microbiological confirmation by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing of a respiratory sample. Exposure to corticosteroids was defined as the use of systemic corticosteroids at any time during the hospital admission. Different types of corticosteroids were considered (dexamethasone, methylprednisolone, prednisone). The effect of different doses or different corticosteroids is analyzed elsewhere (Lavilla-Olleros C. et al. in press).
The main outcome variable was in-hospital mortality.
The diagnosis and grading of ARDS was determined according to modified Berlin criteria [14] (in non-ventilated patients, the PEEP value in the modified criteria was not taken into consideration): mild: PaO2/FiO2 200–300 mmHg (PEEP or CPAP ≥ 5 cmH2O, or non-ventilated); moderate: PaO2/FiO2 100–200 (PEEP ≥ 5 cmH2O, or non-ventilated); severe: PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 100 mmHg (PEEP ≥ 5 cmH2O, or non-ventilated).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Quantitative variables were expressed as means and standard deviations (SD) and/or medians and interquartile ranges, and qualitative variables as frequencies and percentages. The association of baseline characteristics among the steroid and control cohorts with mortality was assessed through univariable conditional logistic regression to compute crude odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
To compare differences between survivors and non-survivors, the Mann–Whitney U test, X2 test, Fisher’s exact test or Student t test were used where appropriate. To explore risk factors associated with in-hospital death, univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression models were used. Variables with a p < 0.05 in univariable analysis were selected into the multivariable.
To reduce the effect of corticosteroid treatment selection bias and potential confounding, we adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics by a propensity score, which predicts the patient’s probability of being treated with corticosteroids regardless of confounding factors, using multivariable logistic regression. Potential confounders considered in propensity score matching analysis were those variables included in the final model by means of stepwise backward elimination procedures. The effect of steroid treatment on clinical outcome was analyzed by a multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for major variables associated with mortality; the individual propensity score was incorporated into the model as a covariate, to calculate the propensity adjusted odds ratio (OR), as described elsewhere [10].
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS system (version 26.0 for Windows, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The statistical significance level was set at a two-sided p value of <0.05. An odds ratio (OR) was reported along with 95% confidence interval (CI).

3. Results

As of July 2020, 14,921 patients were included in the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry. Among them, 5262 (35.26%) patients were treated with corticosteroids and 9659 (64.73%) patients were not (from now on, control cohort). Median time to corticosteroid treatment from symptoms onset was 10 days (IQR 7 to 14 days).

3.1. Clinical Characteristics

The clinical characteristics of the steroid and control cohorts are shown in Table 1. There were significant differences between the group of patients who received steroid treatment and those who did not in all the baseline characteristics and laboratory findings considered relevant (including known poor prognosis risk factors such as hypertension, obesity, diabetes, D-dimer or C-RP which were more prevalent or presented higher levels among those who received steroids), except for the total lymphocyte count, which showed no significant differences.

3.2. In-Hospital Mortality of Patients Treated with Corticosteroids Compared to Patients Not Treated with Corticosteroids

Overall, in-hospital mortality was 20.5%. Characteristics of survivors and non-survivors are shown in Table 2.
Notably, whereas in the univariable analysis, in-hospital mortality was higher in patients treated with corticosteroids than in controls (16.2% versus 28.5%; OR 2.068 (95% confidence interval, 1.908 to 2.242); p = 0.0001), when adjusting by occurrence of established ARDS (all severities included), mortality was significantly lower in the steroid treatment group (43.4% versus 57.6%; OR 0.564 (95% confidence interval, 0.503 to 0.633); p = 0.0001). Furthermore, we could see a greater benefit of steroid treatment in mortality as the severity of the lung damage increased (6% vs. 10.1% in mild ARDS, 26% vs. 51.2% in moderate ARDS, and 66.6% vs. 84.3% in severe ARDS). Mortality was higher in the subgroup of patients without ARDS who received steroid treatment (5% vs. 9.9%).
Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (OR 1.481 (1.440–1.524), p = 0.000), low SpO2/FiO2 ratio at admission (OR 0.997 (0.996–0.998), p = 0.000), established ARDS at any point during the course of the disease 4.233 (3.958 to 4.527), p = 0.000), high values of LDH (OR 1.001 (1.000–1.001), p = 0.000) and high values of C-reactive protein (OR 1.002 (1.001 to 1.003), p = 0.000) were independent risk factors for mortality, whereas steroid treatment (OR 0.793 (0.7682–0.923), p = 0.003), Tocilizumab treatment (OR 0.458 (0.371 to 0.564), p = 0.001), Hydroxychloroquine treatment (OR 0.342( 0.281 to 0.416), p = 0.000) and Lopinavir/Ritonavir treatment (OR 0.620 (0.533 to 0.723), p = 0.000) were independent protective factors.
A propensity score for steroid treatment was developed to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. The propensity score for steroid treatment included the following variables: hypertension, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, diabetes, onco-hematologic underlying disease, acute coronary syndrome, COPD, obesity, moderate-severe chronic kidney disease, SpO2/FiO2, lymphocyte, LDH and C-RP at admission. The propensity-score-matched cohort is displayed in Table 1.
Table 3 shows the risk factors for mortality in both univariable and multivariable analyses, including those adjusted by the propensity score for steroid treatment. When adjusting these results including the propensity score as a covariate, the overall in-hospital mortality remained significantly lower in the steroid treatment group (OR 0.774 (0.660 to 0.907), p = 0.002). Steroid treatment reduced mortality by 24% relative to no steroid treatment (RRR 0.24).

4. Discussion

In the present study, we observed that patients with SARS-COV-2 pneumonia with established acute respiratory distress syndrome who received corticosteroids as part of their treatment had 24% inferior in-hospital mortality than those who did not.
Although retrospective studies on steroid effect on COVID-19 mortality are discordant, our results are consistent with those reported in the RECOVERY trial. Other retrospective studies support these results [9,10].
Interestingly, as reported in the RECOVERY trial, steroid treatment did not show a beneficial effect on patients who did not require oxygen, on the contrary, mortality in this subset was higher than in the non-steroid treatment group [11]. This can be at least partly explained by the characteristics of the patients who received steroids, who presented a higher prevalence of dismal prognostic factors such as hypertension, obesity or diabetes among others and higher levels of biomarkers associated with poor outcome in COVID-19 (D-dimer, C-RP). Nevertheless, we cannot exclude that in some cases steroid could have been administered too early, during the viral phase of the disease, which has been associated with worse outcomes [15,16]. In addition, corticosteroids are not exempt of adverse effects, in particular when given at high-dose, and in patients without severe involvement the risk-benefit ratio may not be favorable.
Furthermore, our results suggest that the greater the respiratory failure, the larger the impact on mortality of the steroid treatment. These results are in accordance with the physiopathology of ARDS in COVID-19 which is based in the exuberant inflammatory response in the lungs [17].
The only corticosteroid tested in the RECOVERY trial was dexamethasone, at 6 mg per day [11]. In the present study, different corticosteroids at different dosage regimens were used. This real-life use of diverse corticosteroids in COVID-19 was associated with a decrease in mortality in patients with COVID-19 that fulfilled ARDS criteria. Dexamethasone doses in the RECOVERY trial are equivalent to medium prednisone doses. It is a matter of controversy whether higher doses or even pulses would present better results in COVID-19 (Lavilla-Olleros C et al. in press) [18]. However, some authors believe that viral clearance could be affected by high dose corticosteroids, but not by low-dose [19]; consequently, this must be taken into consideration when analyzing different doses of steroid treatment for COVID-19.
The major strength of the present study was the great number of patients included, and being a multicenter registry with a highly heterogeneous population (as there were no exclusion criteria), which we believe provides real-life results, generalizable to other populations.
Limitations of the present study are those typical of retrospective studies, including the occasional missing data. Unfortunately, the precise moment of developing ARDS criteria relative to symptoms onset or corticosteroid administration was not appropriately registered, as was neither the exact corticosteroid used in each case, limiting the subgroup analysis. To overcome selection bias, we developed a propensity score for steroid treatment from the baseline characteristics of patients, and performed an adjusted analysis.
Our real-life results support evidence from clinical trials in favor of the use of steroid treatment in patients with SARS-COV-2 pneumonia and established ARDS. The ideal dosage and the optimal moment in the course of the disease require further investigation. Future studies should address as well whether steroid treatment has a class effect in COVID-19 or is specific for some drugs, and determine if synergies with other anti-inflammatory or antiviral drugs exist.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm10204678/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.F.-C., J.A.V., J.M.R.-R. and R.G.-H.; data curation, A.M.-G., C.L.-O., V.G.-G., P.W., A.D.B.-E., M.R.-R., J.L., D.F.-B., V.A.B., A.P.A.d.L., M.d.l.R.P.-P., J.N.A.-P., A.L.-I.R., A.H.-M., M.G.d.M., B.A., C.M.-P., M.d.l.S.N.-A., J.F.S.-D., R.M.G.-M., C.S.-G. and H.M.-M.; formal analysis, A.M.-G., A.F.-C. and C.A.-G.; methodology, A.F.-C.; project administration, J.A.V., J.M.R.-R. and R.G.-H.; supervision, A.F.-C.; writing—original draft, A.M.-G.; writing—review and editing, A.F.-C., C.L-O., V.G.-G., C.A.-G., P.W., A.D.B.-E., J.A.V., M.R.-R., J.L., D.F.-B., V.A.B., A.P.A.d.L., M.d.l.R.P.-P., J.N.A.-P., A.L.-I.R., A.H.-M., M.G.d.M., B.A., C.M.-P., M.d.l.S.N.-A., J.F.S.-D., R.M.G.-M., C.S.-G., H.M.-M., J.M.R.-R. and R.G.-H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

There was no funding granted for this article.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of Málaga on 27 March 2020 (Ethics Committee code: SEMI-COVID-19 27-03-20), as per the guidelines of the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Products.

Informed Consent Statement

Only patients who had previously given consent for their medical records to be used for medical research were included in this registry. Data confidentiality and patient anonymity were always maintained, in accordance with Spanish regulations on observational studies.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge all the investigators who participate in the SEMI-COVID-19 registry. This study was presented at the “31st ECCMID 2021” as a ePoster (Session name: 12e. Drug development and treatment modalities (incl. clinical trials).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare they no conflicts of interest related to this article.

Abbreviations

SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus -2; COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; corticosteroids: glucocorticoids or corticoids; OR: odds ratio; PaO2/FiO2: arterial oxygen tension/inspiratory oxygen fraction; SpO2/FiO2: plasma oxygen saturation/inspiratory oxygen fraction; ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome; CRP: C-reactive protein; PEEP: positive end expiratory pressure; SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence interval; RRR: relative risk reduction; IQR: interquartile range; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; SpO2: plasma oxygen saturation; ICU: intensive care unit.

References

  1. COVID-19: Casos Confirmados, Muertes y Recuperados Por día en España 2021. Available online: https://es.statista.com/estadisticas/1107506/covid-19-casos-confirmados-muertes-y-recuperados-por-dia-espana/ (accessed on 1 October 2021).
  2. Russell, C.D.; Millar, J.E.; Baillie, J.K. Clinical evidence does not support corticosteroid treatment for 2019-nCoV lung injury. Lancet 2020, 395, 473–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Dagens, A.; Sigfrid, L.; Cai, E.; Lipworth, S.; Cheung, V.; Harris, E.; Bannister, P.; Rigby, I.; Horby, P. Scope, quality, and inclusivity of clinical guidelines produced early in the covid-19 pandemic: Rapid review. BMJ 2020, 369, m1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. WHO; Pan, H.; Peto, R.; Henao-Restrepo, A.M.; Preziosi, M.P.; Sathiyamoorthy, V.; Abdool Karim, Q.; Alejandria, M.M.; Hernandez Garcia, C.; Kieny, M.P.; et al. Solidarity Trial Consortium repurposed antiviral drugs for COVID-19—Interim WHO solidarity trial results. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 497–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Arabi, Y.M.; Mandourah, Y.; Al-Hameed, F.; Sindi, A.A.; Almekhlafi, G.; Hussein, M.A.; Jose, J.; Pinto, R.; Al-Omari, A.; Kharaba, A.; et al. Corticosteroid therapy for critically Ill patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 197, 757–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lee, N.; Chan, K.A.; Hui, D.; Ng, E.K.; Wu, A.; Chiu, R.W.; Wong, V.W.; Chan, P.; Wong, K.; Wong, E.; et al. Effects of early corticosteroid treatment on plasma SARS-associated Coronavirus RNA concentrations in adult patients. J. Clin. Virol. 2004, 31, 304–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Fang, X.; Mei, Q.; Yang, T.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Tong, F.; Geng, S.; Pan, A. Low-dose corticosteroid therapy does not delay viral clearance in patients with COVID-19. J. Infect. 2020, 81, 147–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zha, L.; Li, S.; Pan, L.; Tefsen, B.; Li, Y.; French, N.; Chen, L.; Yang, G.; Villanueva, E.V. Corticosteroid treatment of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Med. J. Aust. 2020, 212, 416–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Fadel, R.; Morrison, A.R.; Vahia, A.; Smith, Z.R.; Chaudhry, Z.; Bhargava, P.; Miller, J.; Kenney, R.M.; Alangaden, G.; Ramesh, M.S.; et al. Early short-course corticosteroids in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Fernandez-Cruz, A.; Ruiz-Antoran, B.; Munoz-Gomez, A.; Sancho-Lopez, A.; Mills-Sanchez, P.; Centeno-Soto, G.A.; Blanco-Alonso, S.; Javaloyes-Garachana, L.; Galan-Gomez, A.; Valencia-Alijo, A.; et al. A retrospective controlled cohort study of the impact of glucocorticoid treatment in SARS-COV-2 infection mortality. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. The RECOVERY Collaborative Group Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 693–704. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rochwerg, B.; Agarwal, A.; Siemieniuk, R.A.; Agoritsas, T.; Lamontagne, F.; Askie, L.; Lytvyn, L.; Leo, Y.-S.; Macdonald, H.; Zeng, L.; et al. A living WHO guideline on drugs for covid-19. BMJ 2020, 370, m3379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Casas-Rojo, J.; Antón-Santos, J.; Millán-Núñez-Cortés, J.; Lumbreras, C.; Rincón, J.M.R.; Roy-Vallejo, E.; Artero-Mora, A.; Arnalich-Fernández, F.; García-Bruñén, J.; Vargas-Núñez, J.; et al. Características clínicas de los pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19 en España: Resultados del Registro SEMI-COVID-19. Rev. Clín. Esp. 2020, 220, 480–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Force, A.D.T.; Ranieri, V.M.; Rubenfeld, G.D.; Thompson, B.T.; Ferguson, N.; Caldwell, E.; Fan, E.; Camporota, L.; Slutsky, A.S. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: The Berlin Definition. JAMA 2012, 307, 2526–2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shionoya, Y.; Taniguchi, T.; Kasai, H.; Sakuma, N.; Imai, S.; Shikano, K.; Takayanagi, S.; Yahaba, M.; Nakada, T.-A.; Igari, H.; et al. Possibility of deterioration of respiratory status when steroids precede antiviral drugs in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: A retrospective study. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0256977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fernández-Cruz, A.; Ruiz-Antorán, B.; Múñez-Rubio, E.; Sancho-López, A.; Callejas-Díaz, A.; Avendaño-Solá, C.; Ramos-Martinez, A. The right time for steroids in COVID-19. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 72, 1486–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Osuchowski, M.F.; Winkler, M.S.; Skirecki, T.; Cajander, S.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Lachmann, G.; Monneret, G.; Venet, F.; Bauer, M.; Brunkhorst, F.M.; et al. The COVID-19 puzzle: Deciphering pathophysiology and phenotypes of a new disease entity. Lancet Respir. Med. 2021, 9, 622–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ruiz-Irastorza, G.; Pijoan, J.-I.; Bereciartua, E.; Dunder, S.; Dominguez, J.; Garcia-Escudero, P.; Rodrigo, A.; Gomez-Carballo, C.; Varona, J.; Guio, L.; et al. Second week methyl-prednisolone pulses improve prognosis in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia: An observational comparative study using routine care data. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0239401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Li, S.; Hu, Z.; Song, X. High-dose but not low-dose corticosteroids potentially delay viral shedding of patients with COVID-19. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 72, 1297–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients in the steroid and non-steroid complete cohort and in the propensity-matched cohort.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients in the steroid and non-steroid complete cohort and in the propensity-matched cohort.
Complete CohortPropensity Score Matched Cohort
Non-Steroid TreatmentSteroid Treatmentp ValueNon-Steroid TreatmentSteroid Treatmentp Value
Baseline Characteristics and Underlying Medical Conditions
Sex (Men, %)5208 (54.0%)3323 (63.2%)0.0001269 (55.1%)1011 (65.4%)0.000
Age (mean, SD)65700.00067.870.50.000
Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (mean)3.44.00.0003.74.20.000
High blood pressure4590 (47.6%)2983 (56.8%)0.0001242 (53.9%)953 (61.5%)0.000
Diabetes1724 (17.9%)1140 (21.7%)0.000471 (20.4%)370 (23.9%)0.011
Acute coronary syndrome703 (7.3%)485 (9.2%)0.000193 (8.4%)162 (10.5%)0.028
Moderate to severe chronic kidney disease516 (5.4%)388 (7.4%)0.000154 (6.7%)123 (7.9%)0.137
Dyslipidemia3630 (37.7%)2272 (43.3%)0.000964 (41.8%)711 (45.9%)0.012
COPD505 (5.2%)516 (9.8%)0.000170 (7.4%)199 (12.8%)0.000
Stroke664 (6.9%)417 (7.9%)0.01968 (3.0%)43 (2.8%)0.750
Obesity1657 (18.8%)1209 (25.3%)0.000543 (23.5%)464 (30.0%)0.000
Leukemia93 (1.0%)86 (1.6%)0.00024 (1.0%)24 (1.5%)0.163
Lymphoma120 (1.2%)92 (1.7)0.01332 (1.4%)27 (1.7%)0.378
Hematologic disease211 (2.2%)175 (3.3%)0.00055 (2.4%)50 (3.2%)0.116
Solid tumor with metastases218 (2.3%)105 (2.0%)0.29160 (2.6%)34 (2.2%)0.421
Solid tumor without metastases581 (6.0%)351 (6.6%)0.119150 (6.5%)104 (6.7%)0.797
Malignancy787 (8.2%)454 (8.6%)0.323208 (9%)137 (8.8%)0.848
Moderate to severe liver disease90 (0.9%)58 (1.1%)0.31524 (1%)21 (1.4%)0.372
Laboratory findings at admission
Urea (mg/dL)45.553.40.00049.155.70.000
LDH (U/L)3544030.000385.58437.40.000
C-reactive protein (mg/L)52.170.50.00094.1130.90.000
Lymphocytes (per 106/L)1437.31169.40.0001150.61047.40.090
D-Dimer (ng/mL)1607.32430.90.0001881.82563.40.076
Interleukin-6 (pg/mL)47.0695.70.00053.8103.50.003
Ferritin (mcg/L)750.51209.20.000801.41281.40.000
Respiratory parameters
SpO2/FiO2 at admission273.0203.80.000405.4375.60.000
ARDS1082 (11.2%)1549 (29.6%)0.000597 (26.0%)928 (60.1%)0.000
Table 2. Baseline characteristics of patients in the survivor and non-survivor cohort.
Table 2. Baseline characteristics of patients in the survivor and non-survivor cohort.
Survivors (n = 11,862)Non—Survivors (n = 3059)p Value
Baseline Characteristics and Underlying Medical Conditions
Sex (Men, %)6619 (55.9%)1912 (62.6%)0.000
Age (mean, SD)64.18 (15.9%)79.67 (10.6%)0.000
Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (mean)3.08 (2.5%)5.70 (2.41%)0.000
High blood pressure5423 (45.8%)2150 (70.4%)0.000
Diabetes1993 (16.9%)871 (28.6%)0.000
Ischemic heart disease751 (6.3%)437 (14.3%)0.000
Moderate to severe chronic kidney disease517 (4.4%)387 (12.7%)0.000
Dyslipidemia4360 (36.8%)1542 (50.6%)0.000
COPD645 (5.4%)376 (12.3%)0.000
CVA657 (5.6%)424 (13.9%)0.000
Obesity2253 (20.7%)613 (21.4%)0.045
Onco-hematologic1050 (8.9%)524 (17.2%)0.000
Hematologic disease231 (2%)155 (5.1%)0.000
Leukemia106 (0.9%)73 (2.4%)0.000
Lymphoma126 (1.1%)86 (2.8%)0.000
Solid tumor with metastases226 (1.9%)97 (3.2%)0.000
Solid tumor without metastases633 (5.3%)299 (9.8%)0.000
Moderate to severe liver disease105 (0.9%)43 (1.4%)0.009
Laboratory findings at admission
Urea (mg/dL)41.65 (29.7)74.46 (51.35)0.000
Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L)347.06 (193.9)476.80 (299.77)0.000
C-reactive protein (mg/L)77.04 (81.5)127.24 (104.14)0.000
Lymphocyte count (per 106/L)1174.68 (1773.5)1139.90 (3317.10)0.578
D-Dimer (ng/mL)1623.36074.500.000
Interleukin-6 (pg/mL)60.50 (173.8)126.45 (183.48)0.000
Ferritin (mcg/L)892.35 (1039.4)1235.03 (1375.82)0.000
Respiratory parameters
SatO2/FiO2 (SD)423.73 (63.6)356.01 (106.1)0.000
ARDS2483 (21.0%)2413 (79.8%)0.00
Treatments received
Steroid treatment3763 (31.7%)1499 (49.0%)0.000
Hydroxychloroquine10,487 (88.5%)2285 (74.7%)0.000
Lopinavir/Ritonavir7549 (63.7%)1599 (52.4%)0.000
Interferon1125 (9.5%)536 (17.6%)0.000
Tocilizumab948 (8.0%)309 (10.1%)0.000
Anakinra64 (0.5%)26 (0.9%)0.046
Table 3. Risk factors for mortality in both univariable and multivariable analyses (including a multivariable analysis including the propensity score for steroid treatment as a covariate).
Table 3. Risk factors for mortality in both univariable and multivariable analyses (including a multivariable analysis including the propensity score for steroid treatment as a covariate).
Univariable AnalysisMultivariable AnalysisMultivariable Adjusted with Propensity Score
N = 14.921OR (95% CI)p ValueOR (95% CI)p ValueOR (95% CI)p Value
Basal characteristics and underlying medical conditions
Sex (Women)0.756 (0.697–0.821)0.000
Age1.088 (1.084–1.092)0.000
Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index1.445 (1.420–1.470)0.0001.481 (1.440–1.524)0.0001.440 (1.397–1.485)0.000
High blood pressure2.824 (2.592–3.076)0.000
Diabetes1.972 (1.799–2.163)0.000
Ischemic heart disease2.470 (2.179–2.800)0.000
Moderate to severe chronic kidney disease3.184 (2.772–3.656)0.000
Dyslipidemia1758 (1.623–1.905)0.000
COPD2.441 (2.135–2.791)0.000
Ictus2.754 (2.420–3.315)0.000
Obesity1.133 (1.024–1.254)0.016
Onco-hematologic2.128 (1.900–2.384)0.000
Hematologic disease2.687 (2.183–3.306)0.000
Leukemia2.713 (2.008–3.665)0.000
Lymphoma2.693 (2.042–3.553)0.000
Solid tumor with metastases1.688 (1.326–2.148)0.000
Solid tumor without metastases1.922 (1.664–2.219)0.000
Moderate to severe liver disease1.596 (1.117–2.282)0.010
Laboratory findings at admission
Urea (mg/dL)1.022 (1.021–1.023)0.000
LDH (U/L)1.003 (1.0020–1.003)0.0001.001 (1.000–1.001)0.0001.000 (1.000–1.001)0.005
C-reactive protein (mg/L)1.006 (1.005–1.006)0.0001.002 (1.001–1.003)0.0001.000 (0.999–1.002)0.526
Lymphocytes (per 106/L)1.00 (1.00–1.00)0.436
D-Dimer (ng/mL)1.00 (1.00–1.00)0.000
Interleukin-6 (pg/mL)1.001 (1.001–1.002)0.000
Ferritin (mcg/L)1.000 (1.000–1.000)0.000
Respiratory parameters
SatO2/FiO2 (SD)0.991 (0.991–0.992)0.0000.997 (0.996–0.998)0.0000.998 (0.997–0.999)0.000
ARDS14.845 (13.444–16.393)0.0004.233 (3.958–4.527)0.0004.299 (3.393–4.540)0.000
Treatments administered
Steroid treatment2.068 (1.908–2.242)0.0000.793 (0.682–0.923)0.0030.774 (0.660–0.907)0.002
Hydroxychloroquine0.386 (0.349–0.426)0.0000.342 (0.281–0.416)0.000
Lopinavir/Ritonavir0.626 (0.578–0.679)0.0000.620 (0.533–0.723)0.0000.636 (0.542–0.747)0.000
Interferon2.031 (1.816–2.271)0.000
Tocilizumab1.294 (1.130–1.481)0.0000.458 (0.371–0.564)0.0010.476 (0.383–0.592)0.000
Anakinra1.587 (1.004–2.507)0.048
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Muñoz-Gómez, A.; Fernández-Cruz, A.; Lavilla-Olleros, C.; Giner-Galvañ, V.; Ausín-García, C.; Wikman, P.; Bendala-Estrada, A.D.; Vargas, J.A.; Rubio-Rivas, M.; Laureiro, J.; et al. Real-Life Impact of Glucocorticoid Treatment in COVID-19 Mortality: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4678. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204678

AMA Style

Muñoz-Gómez A, Fernández-Cruz A, Lavilla-Olleros C, Giner-Galvañ V, Ausín-García C, Wikman P, Bendala-Estrada AD, Vargas JA, Rubio-Rivas M, Laureiro J, et al. Real-Life Impact of Glucocorticoid Treatment in COVID-19 Mortality: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(20):4678. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204678

Chicago/Turabian Style

Muñoz-Gómez, Ana, Ana Fernández-Cruz, Cristina Lavilla-Olleros, Vicente Giner-Galvañ, Cristina Ausín-García, Philip Wikman, Alejandro D. Bendala-Estrada, Juan A. Vargas, Manuel Rubio-Rivas, Jaime Laureiro, and et al. 2021. "Real-Life Impact of Glucocorticoid Treatment in COVID-19 Mortality: A Multicenter Retrospective Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 20: 4678. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204678

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop