Next Article in Journal
Carrot Pomace Polysaccharide (CPP) Improves Influenza Vaccine Efficacy in Immunosuppressed Mice via Dendritic Cell Activation
Previous Article in Journal
Current State of Evidence: Influence of Nutritional and Nutrigenetic Factors on Immunity in the COVID-19 Pandemic Framework
Previous Article in Special Issue
Food Addiction Mediates the Relationship between Perceived Stress and Body Mass Index in Taiwan Young Adults
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/nu12092739
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dietary Soy Protein Isolate Attenuates Intestinal Immunoglobulin and Mucin Expression in Young Mice Compared with Casein

by
Bin Zeng
,
Dongyang Wang
,
Hailong Wang
,
Ting Chen
,
Junyi Luo
,
Qianyun Xi
,
Jiajie Sun
and
Yongliang Zhang
*
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2020, 12(9), 2739; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092739
Submission received: 4 August 2020 / Revised: 4 September 2020 / Accepted: 5 September 2020 / Published: 8 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Topics in Public Health Nutrition)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Dietary protein sources have profound effects on children and young animals, and are important for the gut barrier function and immune resilience. Milk and soy are the main sources of protein for children and young animals after weaning. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of dairy and soy proteins on the intestinal barrier in early development. Weanling C57BL/6 mice were fed AIN-93G diets prepared with casein or soy protein isolate (SPI) for 21 days. Compared with those fed with the casein diet, mice fed with the SPI diet did not change their body weight and organ coefficients, but increased their feed intake and ratio of feed to gain. SPI lowered the level of luminal secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA) and downregulated the levels of IL-4, IL-13, polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (Pigr), Janus kinase 1 (Jak1), signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (Stat6), and transforming growth factor-β (Tgfb) in the mouse ileum. Western blotting of ileal proteins confirmed that SPI suppressed the activation of the JAK1/STAT6 signaling pathway. Furthermore, SPI attenuated intestinal mucin production, as demonstrated by the decreased numbers of intestinal goblet cells and the reduced relative expression levels of mucin 1 (Muc1), mucin 2 (Muc2), trefoil factor 3 (Tff3), glucose-regulated protein 94 (Grp94), and anterior gradient homolog 2 (Agr2). The results indicated that the SPI diet could attenuate mouse intestinal immunity, as demonstrated by decreased SIgA and mucin production in the intestine. Therefore, we suggest that our findings should be of consideration when SPI or casein are used as dietary protein sources.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The diets consumed after weaning can have long-term effects on the development and health of infants. Infant formulas (IFs) can be defined as substitutes for breast milk after weaning. Bovine milk protein (with casein as the main ingredient) is the source of protein in most IFs. According to the applicable European regulation (EU, 2016), soy protein isolate (SPI) is allowed as a source of protein in IFs [1]. Although the use of soy protein-based formula is recommended only for infants who cannot receive milk-based products because of cow milk allergy, lactose intolerance or cultural/religious reasons [2], soy protein-based formulas in the United States account for nearly 25% of the formula market [3]. The main reasons for this are likely to be the rising global incidence of obesity and metabolic syndrome in both adults and children [4], for which soy foods are posited as irresistible health diets, and are described as being high in protein, but low in saturated fat and cholesterol [5]. Additional health benefits have been suggested to include anti-diabetic effects and protection against coronary heart disease, based on reductions in plasma cholesterol and triglycerides [6]. However, the potential health effects of soy foods in children and young animals remain highly controversial [7,8].
The gut is the core organ that comes into contact with food. Besides its central function in the digestion and absorption of nutrients, the intestine provides a robust mucosal barrier that exerts a protective function in the body [9]. The intestinal structure and function of children or young animals is incomplete. Importantly, during weaning, the sudden transition from breast milk to solid feed causes weaning stress that damages the intestinal mucosal barrier and results in an intestinal imbalance [10]. Intestinal diseases in childhood can lead to anemia, malnutrition, and impaired mental skills, which are hazardous to long-term life quality [11,12]. In livestock production, intestinal damage in young animals results in decreased growth rates and increased morbidity and mortality [13].
The gut is a multilayer system mainly consisting of a mucus layer produced by the goblet cells, followed by a monolayer of epithelial cells forming the epithelial tight junction [14]. The secretion of highly glycosylated mucins into the intestinal lumen by goblet cells creates the first line of defense against microbial encroachment. The most abundant one of these mucins, mucin 2 (MUC2), plays an essential part in the organization of intestinal mucous layers at the epithelial surface [15]. Mucosal-acquired immunity is an indispensable line of defense against the gut bacteria of the mucosa and is an essential component of the gut barrier function. Secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA) is a primary protective factor for gut-acquired immunity and is transported from the basolateral surface to the mucosal surface by binding to the polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (pIgR) [16]. Dietary protein provides nutritional and functional components to the body, which may possess diverse properties and result in health effects in the intestinal tract. It has been reported that different dietary protein sources have different effects on regional gut growth and luminal growth factor bioactivity [17]. Rats fed with different protein diets showed a rapidly altered intestinal microbial composition [18]. The long-term supply of a particular diet of proteins leads to specific metabolic activities of the intestinal microbiota [19]. However, there is still a lack of sufficient and rigorous animal experiments to compare the effects of dairy and soy proteins on the intestinal barrier from weaning to puberty.
Based on current knowledge, we hypothesized that dietary supplementation with milk or soy source preparations have different effects on the host intestinal mucosal barrier during early development. Therefore, a casein-based diet and a soy protein isolate (SPI)-based diet were supplied as the sole dietary protein source for weanling C57BL/6 mice. The host growth, feed intake, and the intestinal mucosal barrier function were then examined. The results provided evidence that milk and soy proteins have different effects on intestinal health, and also provided important insights for the applications of milk and soy protein sources in children or young animal diets.

2. Materials and Method

2.1. Diets

The diets were custom-made by Guangdong Medical Laboratory Animal Center (Guangdong, China). The casein diet was formulated according to the AIN-93G formulation [20]. The SPI diet was made by replacement of casein with SPI (food grade, YUWANG GROUP products, Shandong, China, execution standard: GB/T20371-2016), and essential amino acids (Tagn Rusii products, US) were added to match the casein diet. The contents of crude protein and dry matter of SPI were adjusted to be consistent with those of the casein diet. Table 1 shows the measured amino acid content of casein and SPI. Table 2 shows the overall composition of the diets.

2.2. Animal Experiments

Sixteen male C57BL/6 weanling mice at 3 weeks of age were obtained from the Animal Experiment Center of Guangdong Province (permission number: SYXK [Yue] 2016-0136). The animals were randomly divided into two groups of eight mice each. Mice in the casein group and SPI group were fed with the casein diet and SPI diet, respectively. Mice were caged individually, housed in a room maintained under a photoperiod of 12/12 h (day/night), a temperature of 24 ± 2 °C, and a relative humidity of 60 ± 10% throughout the experimental period. In the following 21 days, all mice had free access to food and drinking water. During the experiment, the feed intake was measured every 3 days. Body weight was recorded each week. On day 22, the mice were sacrificed to obtain their organ weights and intestinal samples. The small intestine was excised and segmented. The luminal contents (mucosal scrapping) of the ileum were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for use in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)–SIgA analyses. Mice ileum tissues (0.5 cm ×3) were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for use in ELISA-interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), and Western blotting analyses. Another ileum tissue sample (1 cm) was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) staining and immunofluorescence analysis. The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of South China Agricultural University, China. All animal experimentation complied with the laboratory animal management and welfare regulations approved by the Standing Committee of Guangdong People’s Congress (Guangzhou), China. Ethical code number: SCAU-AEC-2010-0416.

2.3. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

For SIgA quantification, the frozen ileal luminal contents were diluted with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) (1 mM) at a ratio of 1:10 (w/v), homogenized, and centrifuged (12,000× g, 5 min, 4 °C). The resulting supernatant was collected to detect the levels of SIgA using an ELISA kit. For IL-4 and IL-13 quantification, intestinal proteins were lysed by grinding the ileal tissues in lysis buffer containing PMSF (1 mM), and centrifuged (12,000× g, 5 min, 4 °C). The resulting supernatant was collected to detect the protein concentration using bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assays (Thermo Scientific Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). The protein concentrations were adjusted to the same level and the samples were applied to analyze the intestinal IL-4 and IL-13 levels using the corresponding ELISA kits. All assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocols.

2.4. Gene Expression Analysis Using qRT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from ileum tissue using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and cDNA was synthesized using a reverse transcription kit (PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser; Takara, Dalian, China) using 1 μg of total RNA, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA was diluted with 5-fold nuclease-free H2O, and the qRT-PCR was performed using a CFX96 Touch™ Optics Module instrument (BIO-RAD, Hercules, CA, USA) in a 20 μL reaction containing 2 μL of cDNA, 5 mM of each primer, and 10 μL of 2× SYBR Green Real-time qPCR Master Mix reagents (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The relative expression of mRNAs was normalized to Actb (β-actin) levels, using the 2−ΔΔCt method. The primers used for qRT-PCR are shown in Table 3.

2.5. Western Blotting Analysis

Total protein was extracted from 100 mg of ileum tissue using 300 μL of radio immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer that contained 1 mM PMSF and protein phosphatase inhibitor complex (Biosino Bio-Technology and Science Inc., Beijing, China). The sample was then centrifuged at 12,000× g at 4 °C for 5 min, and the supernatant was used for further analysis. The total protein concentration was determined using BCA protein assays (Thermo Scientific Technologies). Protein samples (25 μg) were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, then transferred to 0.45 mm polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). After blocking with 5% skim milk for 2 h, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with specific antibodies. The following antibodies were used: anti-Janus kinase-1 (JAK1) (bs-1439R, Bioss, Beijing, China), anti-phospho (p)-JAK1 (Tyr1034 + Tyr1035, bs-3238R, Bioss, China), anti- signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6) (380957, ZEN BIO, China), anti-p-STAT6 (Tyr641, ab263947, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-pIgR (AF2800-SP, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), anti-TGFβ1 (bs-4538R, Bioss, China), and anti-β-actin (AP0060, Bioworld Technology Inc., Bloomington, MN, USA). They were then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated corresponding secondary antibodies. The immunoreactive protein bands were visualized using FluorChem M (ProteinSimple, San Jose, CA, USA). ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used for gray scan analysis.

2.6. Periodic Acid-Schiff Staining

Fixed ileum tissues were embedded in paraffin and 5-μm sections were prepared. Sections were stained with PAS/Hematoxylin blue. Images were acquired under a light microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) at a magnification of 40×. Positively stained cells were counted in all villi for each tissue section.

2.7. Immunofluorescence

Fixed ileum tissues were embedded in paraffin and 5-μm sections were prepared. The sections were incubated overnight in rabbit anti-MUC2 (NBP1-31231, Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA) at 4 °C. Then, the sections were washed with PBS three times and incubated in fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated secondary antibodies (bs-0295G, Bioss) for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. For visualization of cell nuclei, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (H-1200, Vector Laboratories) was added. Images were captured under a fluorescent microscope (Nikon) at a magnification of 200×. Positively stained cells were counted in all villi for each tissue section.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

All data are expressed as means ± the standard error of the mean (SEM). Data were analyzed using t-tests (SPSS 17.0, IMB Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Body Weight and Feed Intake

First, we investigated whether the two protein diets had different effects on the body weight and feed intake of the mice. The results showed that body weights of the mice were not different between the casein and SPI groups throughout the experiment (p > 0.05, Figure 1A). However, compared with the casein diet, feeding mice with the SPI diet increased the daily feed intake and the ratio of feed to gain (p < 0.05, Figure 1B,C). We also measured the organ weights of all mice at the end of the feeding study, and the results showed that there was no significant difference in the organ coefficients between the casein and SPI groups (p > 0.05, Figure 1D).

3.2. SPI Reduces Intestinal Secretory IgA (SIgA) and Th2 Cytokine Levels

As mentioned above, little is known about the effects of the two protein diets on intestinal barrier function in mice. SIgA plays an important role in the homeostatic regulation of intestinal mucosal immunity that protects the internal body from external enteric toxins and pathogenic microorganisms. Here, we examined SIgA levels in the ileum via ELISA. We observed significantly decreased SIgA levels in mice receiving the SPI diet compared with those in mice receiving the casein diet (p < 0.05, Figure 2A). Previous studies reported that Th2 cytokines are inducers of intestinal SIgA production [21]. Hence, we quantified the abundance of IL-4 and IL-13 proteins in the ileum using ELISA. The results showed that mice fed with SPI diets had lower IL-4 and IL-13 proteins levels than the casein-fed mice (p < 0.05, Figure 2B,C). We also investigated the expression levels of the mRNAs encoding J-chain (Jchain), polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (Pigr, the core components of SIgA), and related cytokines using qRT-PCR. The mRNA expression levels of Jchain, Il1b and Il5 in the ileum were not significantly different between the casein and SPI groups (p > 0.05, Figure 2D). Interestingly, the mRNA expression levels of Pigr, Il4 and Il13 in the ileum were downregulated in the SPI group (p < 0.05, Figure 2D). These data suggested that compared with casein, SPI reduces SIgA production in the mouse ileum, which is associated with decreased levels of pIgR, IL-4, and IL-13.

3.3. SPI Suppresses the Intestinal JAK1/STAT6 Signaling Pathway

Previous work has demonstrated that pIgR is regulated by the JAK-STAT pathway, and cytokines IL-4 and IL-13 are associated with increased JAK1 and STAT6 phosphorylation [22]. Thus, we analyzed the expression levels of Jak1 and Stat6 in the ileum. The results showed that the mRNA expression levels of Jak1 and Stat6 were decreased in the SPI group mice compared with those in the casein group (p < 0.05, Figure 3A). Western blotting analysis revealed that the levels of pIgR, p-JAK1, and p-STAT6 proteins in the ileal tissues of mice from the SPI group were significantly lower than those in the casein group (p < 0.05, Figure 3B,C). Moreover, Tgfb mRNA levels were reduced in the SPI group mice relative to those in the casein group (p < 0.05, Figure 3A), which was further confirmed using Western blotting (p < 0.05, Figure 3B,C). These results indicated that, compared with the casein diet, the SPI diet reduces SIgA levels in the mouse ileum by suppressing the JAK1/STAT6-pIgR signaling pathway.

3.4. SPI Reduces Intestinal Mucin Production

We also compared the effect of casein and SPI on intestinal mucin production. The ileal mRNA levels of mucin 1 (Muc1), mucin 2 (Muc2), trefoil factor 3 (Tff3), glucose-regulated protein 94 (Grp94), and anterior gradient homolog 2 (Agr2), as measured using qRT-PCR, were significantly decreased in SPI diet-fed mice compared with those in the casein diet-fed mice (p < 0.05, Figure 4A). PAS staining analysis revealed that the number of goblet cells per villus of the ileum was significantly reduced in the SPI diet group compared with that in the casein diet group (p < 0.05, Figure 4B,C). Similarly, immunofluorescence analysis revealed that the number of MUC2-positive cells per villus was decreased in the SPI group relative to that in the casein diet group (p < 0.05, Figure 4D,E). These data suggested that the SPI diet also reduces intestinal mucin production compared with that of the casein diet.

4. Discussion

Dairy and soy products are the main sources of protein for children and young animals after weaning. In this study, we compared the differences in intestinal immunoglobulin and mucin between mice fed casein and SPI diets. From a nutritional perspective, casein is a high-quality protein, and it is therefore used as a protein source in the well-balanced semisynthetic AIN-93G diet [20]. In addition, the original source of casein is cow’s milk, which is considered to be mostly consistent with infant formula. We used weaned C57BL/6 mice as an animal model, and the casein-based semisynthetic diet (AIN-93G) was used as the reference diet. The AIN-93 diet is the global standard for a purified rodent diet proposed by the American Institute of Nutrition (AIN) and is considered as the “gold standard” in nutrition research [23]. Moreover, to remove potential confounding factors, careful measures were taken to ensure the same protein intake in the two groups. The concentrations of dry matter, crude protein, and essential amino acids in two protein sources were adjusted to be consistent in the present study. Infant formula (soy protein-based or milk protein-based) is usually used as a sole-source food for infants and is consumed by infants for long periods of time [24]. The content of essential amino acids in soy protein-based infant formula is usually consistent with that in milk protein-based infant formula and meets the standard of infant formula [25]. Therefore, we believe the findings in our study will also be relevant to human nutrition research.
Our results showed that compared with feeding casein protein, feeding mice with the SPI protein diet significantly increased the feed intake and ratio of feed to gain of the mice, but did not change their body weight and organ coefficients. This indicated that SPI inhibited the feed conversion rate. Similar results were observed in previous studies [23,26], in which growing rats were fed casein or SPI AIN-93G diets. In those studies, however, the decline in feed conversion efficiency in the SPI rats was not caused by the increased feed intake, but by the decreased weight gain. They believed that the weight gain inhibition effects of dietary SPI on the young rats were attributed to essential amino acid limitation (methionine) in the SPI source, a fact that we have also found in the methionine concentration in SPI (0.73%), which is much lower than that in casein (2.29%), as shown in Table 1. Their results also showed that the total plasma amino acid concentrations in the young rats fed the SPI diet were significantly reduced (by 28.3%), among which the essential amino acid concentrations were especially reduced (by 37.7%) [23]. In the present study, we did not observe a decrease in body weight in the SPI diet-fed mice, which might have resulted from the concentrations of essential amino acids in two protein sources having been adjusted to be consistent. Wróblewska et al. [27] and Song et al. [23] reported that SPI decreases the protein efficiency ratio and increases the concentration of N in urine and plasma. Moreover, soy proteins led to a lower level of gastrointestinal digestion than dairy proteins during in vitro infant digestion [28], which may trigger a reduction in the feed conversion rate.
In this work, we focused on the effects of casein and soy protein isolate on the intestinal barrier in mice. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to demonstrate that feeding SPI results in the suppression of SIgA and mucin in mouse intestines compared with feeding casein. We observed that the SPI diet decreased SIgA levels in the mouse ileum. SIgA has the capacity to directly quench bacterial virulence factors and to promote the clearance of ls, which would provide opportunities for pathogens to access epithelial receptors and pass through antigens and pathogenic microorganisms from the intestinal lumen [29]. Reduced intestinal SIgA levels in the intestinal epithelia lead to intestinal and other diseases. The production and secretion of intestinal IgA are complex and regulated by many factors [21]. Mice fed with the SPI diet had lower IL-4, IL-13, p-JAK1, p-STAT6, and pIgR levels than the casein-fed mice. Cytokines IL-4 and IL-13 are stimulators of intestinal SIgA production [21,30]. A previous study demonstrated that IL-4 and IL-13 induce tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of STAT-6 [31]. The secretion of SIgA across the intestinal epithelia via pIgR is regulated by the JAK1-STAT6 pathway [22]. We found that SPI significantly reduced the levels of the Th2-associated cytokines, IL-4 and IL-13, in intestinal tissues, further resulting in reduced levels of phosphorylated JAK1 and STAT6, which ultimately inhibited the expression of the IgA transport protein pIgR and lowered the luminal SIgA level. The TGFβ level in the mouse ileum decreased in response to the SPI diet, which also contributed to suppressing intestinal SIgA secretion. TGFβ is arguably the most important factor in directing B cells toward IgA differentiation [32]. TGFβ can be produced by various cell types, including epithelial cells, dendritic cells, and T cells [21]. IgA production levels decreased remarkably in TGFβ1 knockout mice [33]. Compared with the mice fed the casein diet, the lack of corresponding cytokines in the SPI-fed mice might be responsible for this effect [34]. Our study also found that, compared with casein, SPI significantly reduced the numbers of goblet cells and MUC2-positive cells, and the expression levels of Muc2, Tff3, Grp94, and Agr2 in the ileum. These results were consistent with a previous report [35], in which a soy protein diet decreased Mucin and TFF3 levels in the colon of dextran sodium sulfate-treated C57BL/6 mice. Goblet cells produce mucins, which constitute the mucus layer overlying the gut surface epithelium, and play an essential role in the protection of the intestinal tract from injury [36]. MUC2 and TFF3 are the principal components in the small intestine responsible for construction of the mucus barrier [37]. GRP94 is the most abundant protein within the endoplasmic reticulum lumen, and has a critical link to goblet cell and gut barrier function [38]. AGR2 is present within the endoplasmic reticulum of intestinal secretory epithelial cells and is essential for in vivo production of intestinal MUC2 [39]. This series of reduction altogether could lead to damage in the intestinal barrier.
SPI is a food stuff comprising a complex mixture, i.e., proteins, peptides, and over 100 phytochemicals, all of which might have biological activities [40]. It remains unclear which component(s) of SPI are responsible for the observed effects on the intestinal barrier in weaned mice. Thus, further studies of the potential mechanisms and bioactive components are warranted. It has been reported that branched chain amino acids (BCAA) play an important role in the intestinal barrier and immune function in animals [41]. Soy protein contains less BCAA than dairy protein [42]. This may also be one of the reasons for the results in this study. Recent evidence suggests that microRNAs in food can be absorbed into the circulatory system and organs of the host, where they regulate gene expressions and biological processes [43,44]. Plant (maize) miRNA-156 inhibits intestine cell proliferation by targeting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [45]. Soybean-derived miRNA-159a specifically inhibits proliferation and stimulates apoptosis of Caco-2 cells [46]. Interestingly, highly abundant miRNAs in bovine milk, including miR-148a and the let7 family [47], have been reported to play an important regulatory role in intestinal mucosal immunity [48]. Therefore, it is important to analyze the content and biological effects of microRNAs in SPI and casein on animal intestines in future research. Food-derived bioactive peptides play an important role in intestinal barrier function [49]. It would be meaningful to explore the differences in peptide composition in the intestines and even in the fecal samples. In addition, the composition and metabolic activity of the gut microbiota could be modulated by dietary proteins. These changes of microbiota could affect the gut barrier and the immune system by regulating the secretion of metabolites and gene expression in relevant signaling pathways [10]. Further studies to determine the importance of gut bacteria in these animals could include explorations into intestinal microbial species and short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), or the use of germ-free animals. There were still some limitations in this study. The sex of mice could affect some parts of the responses to dietary proteins. Since we did not include female mice in this study, it is difficult to tell the effects of these proteins on the female mice. As we examined ileum tissues, we cannot determine the changes occurring in the whole gut tract. Therefore, more studies are needed to comprehensively understand the changes in the intestinal barrier caused by milk and soy protein.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study has demonstrated that, compared with casein, SPI reduces intestinal SIgA and mucin production, and induces negative effects on the feed conversion rate in young mice. Our findings provide new data that should be taken into account when soy protein is considered to replace dairy protein in the diets of children or young animals.

Author Contributions

B.Z., J.S. and Y.Z. conceived and designed the experiments; B.Z., D.W. and H.W. performed the experiments; B.Z., T.C. and J.L. analyzed the data and wrote the paper; Q.X. and J.S. contributed to the reagents/materials/analysis tools. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0500503), Natural Science Foundation of China program (31802156), and the Key Project of Guangdong Provincial Nature Science Foundation (2018B030311015). The funders had no role in study design, sample collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Abbreviations

PASPeriodic Acid–Schiff
SPISoy protein isolate
SIgASecretory immunoglobulin A
IL-1βInterleukin-1β
IL-4Interleukin-4
IL-5Interleukin-5
IL-13Interleukin-13
pIgRPolymeric immunoglobulin receptor
Jak1Janus kinase 1
Stat6Signal transducer and activator of transcription 6
TGFβTransforming growth factor-β
Muc1Mucin 1
Muc2Mucin 2
Tff3Trefoil factor 3
Grp94Glucose-regulated protein 94
Agr2Anterior gradient homolog 2

References

  1. Roux, L.L.; Mejean, S.; Chacon, R.; Lopez, C.; Dupont, D.; Deglaire, A.; Nau, F.; Jeantet, R. Plant proteins partially replacing dairy proteins greatly influence infant formula functionalities. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 120, 108891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, H.; Zhu, K.; Zhou, H.; Peng, W.; Guo, X. Comparative Study about Some Physical Properties, In vitro Digestibility and Immunoreactivity of Soybean Protein Isolate for Infant Formula. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2013, 68, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bhatia, J.; Greer, F.R. Use of Soy Protein-Based Formulas in Infant Feeding. Pediatrics 2008, 121, 1062–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Flynn, M.A.T.; Mcneil, D.A.; Maloff, B.; Mutasingwa, D.; Wu, M.; Ford, C.; Tough, S. Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: A synthesis of evidence with ‘best practice’ recommendations. Obes. Rev. 2006, 7, 7–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Uddin, M.N.; KanikaMitra, D.; Rahman, M.M.; Abdullah, A.; Haque, D.M.Z. Evaluation of proximate, determination of minerals and chromatographic quantification of water soluble vitamin in newly developed soy protein isolate. J. Biosci. 2016, 4, 604–608. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ronis, M.J.; Chen, Y.; Badeaux, J.; Badger, T.M. Dietary soy protein isolate attenuates metabolic syndrome in rats via effects on PPAR, LXR, and SREBP signaling. J. Nutr. 2009, 139, 1431–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Clarkson, T.B. Soy, soy phytoestrogens and cardiovascular disease. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 566S–569S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Badger, T.M.; Ronis, M.J.J.; Hakkak, R.; Rowlands, J.C.; Korourian, S. The Health Consequences of Early Soy Consumption. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Damiano, S.; Sasso, A.; De Felice, B.; Di Gregorio, I.; La Rosa, G.; Lupoli, G.A.; Belfiore, A.; Mondola, P.; Santillo, M. Quercetin increases MUC2 and MUC5AC gene expression and secretion in intestinal goblet cell-like LS174T via PLC/PKCα/ERK1-2 pathway. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Ma, N.; Tian, Y.; Wu, Y.; Ma, X. Contributions of the interaction between dietary protein and gut microbiota to intestinal health. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2017, 18, 795–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hukkinen, M.; Merrassalmio, L.; Pakarinen, M.P. Health-related quality of life and neurodevelopmental outcomes among children with intestinal failure. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 2018, 27, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Elsayed, N.M.; Ramadan, M.E. The Impact of Intestinal Parasitic Infections on the Health Status of Children: An Overview. J. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 2017, 12, 209–213. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ji, F.J.; Wang, L.X.; Yang, H.; Hu, A.; Yin, Y. Review: The roles and functions of glutamine on intestinal health and performance of weaning pigs. Animal 2019, 13, 2727–2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Turner, J.R. Intestinal mucosal barrier function in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 9, 799–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Peterson, L.W.; Artis, D. Intestinal epithelial cells: Regulators of barrier function and immune homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014, 14, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sun, H.; Bi, J.; Lei, Q.; Wan, X.; Jiang, T.; Wu, C.; Wang, X. Partial enteral nutrition increases intestinal sIgA levels in mice undergoing parenteral nutrition in a dose-dependent manner. Int. J. Surg. 2018, 49, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Marchbank, T.; Mandir, N.; Calnan, D.; Goodlad, R.A.; Podas, T.; Playford, R.J. Specific protein supplementation using soya, casein or whey differentially affects regional gut growth and luminal growth factor bioactivity in rats; implications for the treatment of gut injury and stimulating repair. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhao, F.; Huang, Z.; Zhou, G.; Li, H.; Xu, X.; Li, C. Dietary proteins rapidly altered the microbial composition in rat caecum. Curr. Microbiol. 2017, 74, 1447–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Graf, D.; Di Cagno, R.; Fåk, F.; Flint, H.J.; Nyman, M.; Saarela, M.; Watzl, B. Contribution of diet to the composition of the human gut microbiota. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 2015, 26, 26164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Reeves, P.G.; Nielsen, F.H.; Fahey, G.C., Jr. AIN-93 Purified Diets for Laboratory Rodents: Final Report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad Hoc Writing Committee on the Reformulation of the AIN-76A Rodent Diet. J. Nutr. 1993, 123, 1939–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pabst, O. New concepts in the generation and functions of IgA. Nat. Reviews Immunol. 2012, 12, 821–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Heneghan, A.F.; Pierre, J.F.; Kudsk, K.A. JAK-STAT and intestinal mucosal immunology. Jak Stat 2013, 2, e25530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Song, S.; Hua, C.; Zhao, F.; Li, M.; Fu, Q.; Hooiveld, G.J.; Muller, M.; Li, C.; Zhou, G. Purified dietary red and white meat proteins show beneficial effects on growth and metabolism of young rats compared to casein and soy protein. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 9942–9951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. FAQ Expert Consultation. Dietary protein quality evaluation in human nutrition. FAO Food Nutr. Pap. 2013, 92, 1–66. [Google Scholar]
  25. Agostoni, C.; Agostoni, C.; Axelsson, I.; Goulet, O.; Koletzko, B.; Michaelsen, K.F.; Puntis, J.; Rieu, D.; Rigo, J.; Shamir, R.; et al. Soy protein infant formulae and follow-on formulae: A commentary by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2006, 42, 352–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Song, S.; Hooiveld, G.J.; Li, M.; Zhao, F.; Zhang, W.; Xu, X.; Muller, M.; Li, C.; Zhou, G. Dietary soy and meat proteins induce distinct physiological and gene expression changes in rats. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wróblewska, B.; Juśkiewicz, J.; Kroplewski, B.; Jurgoński, A.; Wasilewska, E.; Złotkowska, D.; Markiewicz, L. The effects of whey and soy proteins on growth performance, gastrointestinal digestion, and selected physiological responses in rats. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 1500–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Nguyen, T.T.P.; Bhandari, B.; Cichero, J.; Prakash, S. Gastrointestinal digestion of dairy and soy proteins in infant formulas: An in vitro study. Food Res. Int. 2015, 76, 348–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Mantis, N.J.; Rol, N.; Corthésy, B. Secretory IgA’s complex roles in immunity and mucosal homeostasis in the gut. Mucosal Immunol. 2011, 4, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, M.; Xiao, H.; Liu, G.; Chen, S.; Tan, B.; Ren, W.; Bazer, F.W.; Wu, G.; Yin, Y. Glutamine promotes intestinal SIgA secretion through intestinal microbiota and IL-13. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2016, 60, 1637–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Heneghan, A.F.; Pierre, J.F.; Kudsk, K.A. IL-25 improves IgA levels during parenteral nutrition through the JAK-STAT pathway. Ann. Surg. 2013, 258, 1065–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Stavnezer, J.; Kang, J. The surprising discovery that TGFβ specifically induces the IgA class switch. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 5–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Van Ginkel, F.W.; Wahl, S.M.; Kearney, J.F.; Kweon, M.N.; Fujihashi, K.; Burrows, P.D.; Kiyono, H.; Mcghee, J.R. Partial IgA-deficiency with increased Th2-type cytokines in TGF-beta 1 knockout mice. J. Immunol. 1999, 163, 1951. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Konstantinou, G.N.; Bencharitiwong, R.; Grishin, A.; Caubet, J.C.; Bardina, L.; Sicherer, S.H.; Sampson, H.A.; Nowak-Węgrzyn, A. The role of casein-specific IgA and TGF-β in children with food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome to milk. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2014, 25, 651–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jiang, H.; Przybyszewski, J.; Mitra, D.; Becker, C.; Brehm-Stecher, B.; Tentinger, A.; MacDonald, R.S. Soy protein diet, but not Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, decreases mucin-1, trefoil factor-3, and tumor necrosis factor-α in colon of dextran sodium sulfate-treated C57BL/6 mice. J. Nutr. 2011, 141, 1239–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Johansson, M.E.; Sjövall, H.; Hansson, G.C. The gastrointestinal mucus system in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 10, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Matsuo, K.; Ota, H.; Akamatsu, T.; Sugiyama, A.; Katsuyama, T. Histochemistry of the surface mucous gel layer of the human colon. Gut 1997, 40, 782–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Liu, B.; Staron, M.; Hong, F.; Wu, B.X.; Sun, S.; Morales, C.; Crosson, C.E.; Tomlinson, S.; Kim, I.; Wu, D. Essential roles of grp94 in gut homeostasis via chaperoning canonical Wnt pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 6877–6882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Park, S.-W.; Zhen, G.; Verhaeghe, C.; Nakagami, Y.; Nguyenvu, L.T.; Barczak, A.J.; Killeen, N.; Erle, D.J. The protein disulfide isomerase AGR2 is essential for production of intestinal mucus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 6950–6955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ronis, M.J.; Gomez-Acevedo, H.; Shankar, K.; Sharma, N.; Blackburn, M.; Singhal, R.; Mercer, K.E.; Badger, T.M. Soy protein isolate feeding does not result in reproductive toxicity in the pre-pubertal rat testis. Exp. Biol. Med. 2018, 243, 695–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, S.; Zeng, X.; Ren, M.; Mao, X.; Qiao, S. Novel metabolic and physiological functions of branched chain amino acids: A review. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 8, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Kalman, D.S. Amino Acid Composition of an Organic Brown Rice Protein Concentrate and Isolate Compared to Soy and Whey Concentrates and Isolates. Foods 2014, 3, 394–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhang, L.; Chen, T.; Yin, Y.; Zhang, C.-Y.; Zhang, Y.-L. Dietary microRNA-A Novel Functional Component of Food. Adv. Nutr. 2019, 10, 711–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Li, J.; Lei, L.; Ye, F.; Zhou, Y.; Chang, H.; Zhao, G. Nutritive implications of dietary microRNAs: Facts, controversies, and perspectives. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 3044–3056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Li, M.; Chen, T.; Wang, R.; Luo, J.-Y.; He, J.-J.; Ye, R.-S.; Xie, M.-Y.; Xi, Q.-Y.; Jiang, Q.-Y.; Sun, J.-J.; et al. Plant MIR156 regulates intestinal growth in mammals by targeting the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2019, 317, C434–C448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, J.; Wang, F.; Weng, Z.; Sui, X.; Fang, Y.; Tang, X.; Shen, X. Soybean-derived miRNAs specifically inhibit proliferation and stimulate apoptosis of human colonic Caco-2 cancer cells but not normal mucosal cells in culture. Genomics 2020, 112, 2949–2958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Izumi, H.; Kosaka, N.; Shimizu, T.; Sekine, K.; Ochiya, T.; Takase, M. Bovine milk contains microRNA and messenger RNA that are stable under degradative conditions. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95, 4831–4841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Park, E.J.; Shimaoka, M.; Kiyono, H. MicroRNA-mediated dynamic control of mucosal immunity. Int. Immunol. 2017, 29, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Martinez-Augustin, O.; Rivero-Gutierrez, B.; Mascaraque, C.; Sanchez de Medina, F. Food Derived Bioactive Peptides and Intestinal Barrier Function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 22857–22873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Nutrients 12 02739 g001 550
Figure 1. Growth performance of mice fed casein or soy protein isolate (SPI) diets. (A) Body weight. (B) Feed intake. (C) Ratio of feed to gain. (D) Organ index. All data are presented as means ± SEM, n = 8. * p < 0.05. Statistical significance was calculated using t-tests.
Figure 1. Growth performance of mice fed casein or soy protein isolate (SPI) diets. (A) Body weight. (B) Feed intake. (C) Ratio of feed to gain. (D) Organ index. All data are presented as means ± SEM, n = 8. * p < 0.05. Statistical significance was calculated using t-tests.
Nutrients 12 02739 g001
Nutrients 12 02739 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of SPI on SIgA, IL-4, IL-13 and SIgA-associated mRNA levels in mouse ileum tissue. (A–C) ELISA analysis of SIgA, IL-4, and IL-13 levels in mouse ileum tissue, respectively (n = 7). (D) qRT-PCR analysis of Pigr, Jchain, Il1β, Il4, Il5 and Il13 mRNA expression in mouse ileum tissue (normalized against Actb (β-actin); n = 8). All data are presented as means ± SEM. NS, not significant (p > 0.05); * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. Statistical significance was calculated using t-tests.
Figure 2. Effect of SPI on SIgA, IL-4, IL-13 and SIgA-associated mRNA levels in mouse ileum tissue. (A–C) ELISA analysis of SIgA, IL-4, and IL-13 levels in mouse ileum tissue, respectively (n = 7). (D) qRT-PCR analysis of Pigr, Jchain, Il1β, Il4, Il5 and Il13 mRNA expression in mouse ileum tissue (normalized against Actb (β-actin); n = 8). All data are presented as means ± SEM. NS, not significant (p > 0.05); * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. Statistical significance was calculated using t-tests.
Nutrients 12 02739 g002
Nutrients 12 02739 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of SPI on JAK1-STAT6 signaling and TGFβ levels in mouse ileum tissue. (A) qRT-PCR analysis of Jak1, Stat6, Tgfb1, and Tgfb2 mRNA expression levels in mouse ileum tissue (normalized against Actb (β-actin); n = 8). (B) Western blotting analysis of JAK1, p-JAK1, STAT6, p-STAT6, pIgR, and TGFβ1 protein levels in mouse ileum tissue (n = 6). (C) The statistical analyses of the Western blotting results. Results are normalized to β-actin (n = 6). All data are presented as means ± SEM. NS, not significant (p > 0.05); * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. Statistical significance was calculated using t-tests.
Figure 3. Effect of SPI on JAK1-STAT6 signaling and TGFβ levels in mouse ileum tissue. (A) qRT-PCR analysis of Jak1, Stat6, Tgfb1, and Tgfb2 mRNA expression levels in mouse ileum tissue (normalized against Actb (β-actin); n = 8). (B) Western blotting analysis of JAK1, p-JAK1, STAT6, p-STAT6, pIgR, and TGFβ1 protein levels in mouse ileum tissue (n = 6). (C) The statistical analyses of the Western blotting results. Results are normalized to β-actin (n = 6). All data are presented as means ± SEM. NS, not significant (p > 0.05); * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. Statistical significance was calculated using t-tests.
Nutrients 12 02739 g003
Nutrients 12 02739 g004 550
Figure 4. Effect of SPI on mucin production in mouse ileum tissue. (A) qRT-PCR analysis of Muc1, Muc2, Tff3, Grp94, and Agr2 mRNA expression levels in mouse ileum tissue (normalized against Actb (β-actin); n = 8). (B,C) Representative PAS-stained histomicrographs and corresponding quantification of goblets cell per villus in the ileum tissue (n = 6). (D,E) Representative micrographs for MUC2 staining and corresponding quantification of MUC2+ goblet cells per villus in the ileum tissue (n = 6). All data are presented as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. Statistical significance was calculated using t-tests.
Figure 4. Effect of SPI on mucin production in mouse ileum tissue. (A) qRT-PCR analysis of Muc1, Muc2, Tff3, Grp94, and Agr2 mRNA expression levels in mouse ileum tissue (normalized against Actb (β-actin); n = 8). (B,C) Representative PAS-stained histomicrographs and corresponding quantification of goblets cell per villus in the ileum tissue (n = 6). (D,E) Representative micrographs for MUC2 staining and corresponding quantification of MUC2+ goblet cells per villus in the ileum tissue (n = 6). All data are presented as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. Statistical significance was calculated using t-tests.
Nutrients 12 02739 g004
Table
Table 1. Amino acid composition of casein and soy protein isolate (SPI), on a dry matter basis.
Table 1. Amino acid composition of casein and soy protein isolate (SPI), on a dry matter basis.
Item (%)CaseinSPI
Asp6.7110.30
Thr3.763.37
Ser4.384.19
Glu18.7816.60
Gly1.743.73
Ala2.903.88
Val5.654.31
Met2.290.73
Ile4.534.14
Leu8.507.02
Tyr4.743.26
Phe4.594.64
Lys6.775.66
His2.372.29
Arg3.016.68
Pro8.904.57
Trp1.101.12
Table
Table 2. Composition of AIN-93G-based casein and soy protein isolate (SPI) diets.
Table 2. Composition of AIN-93G-based casein and soy protein isolate (SPI) diets.
Ingredient (g/kg)Casein DietSPI Diet
Cornstarch397.468397.468
Casein (≥85% protein)200.0000
Soy protein isolate *0200.000
Dextrinized cornstarch132.000132.000
Sucrose100.000100.000
Soybean oil (no additives)70.00070.000
Fiber50.00050.000
Mineral mix (AIN-93G-MX)35.00035.000
Vitamin mix (AIN-93-VX)10.00010.000
L-Cystine3.0003.000
Choline bitartrate (41.1% choline)2.5002.500
Tert-butylhydroquinone0.0140.014
* The essential amino acids were added to match the casein levels.
Table
Table 3. Primers for qRT-PCR.
Table 3. Primers for qRT-PCR.
NameForward (5′-3′)Reverse (5′-3′)
β-actinTGCTGTCCCTGTATGCCTCTCTTTGATGTCACGCACGATTT
J-chainGAACTTTGTATACCATTTGTCAGACGCTGGGTGGCAGTAACAACCT
pIgRAGTAACCGAGGCCTGTCCTTGTCACTCGGCAACTCAGGA
TGFβ1ATTCCTGGCGTTACCTTGGAGCCCTGTATTCCGTCTCCT
TGFβ2ACATCCACACGCACACTCATAAGGGACGAGACGAGAAGGT
JAK1AGTGCAGTATCTCTCCTCTCTGGATTCGGTTCGGAGCGTACC
STAT6ATCTTCAACGACAACAGCCTCAGGAGAAGGCTAGTGACATATTG
IL-1βTTGAAGTTGACGGACCCCACCACAGCCACAATGAGTGATAC
IL-4AACGAGGTCACAGGAGAAGGTGGAAGCCCTACAGACAAGC
IL-5CCCTCATCCTCTTCGTTGCATCCTCCTGCGTCCATCTG
IL-13CTTGCTTGCCTTGGTGGTCGGGAGTCTGGTCTTGTGTGA
MUC1CCTTCAGTGCCAAGTCAATACTCCCCAGAAAATCTCCGTT
MUC2ATGCCCACCTCCTCAAAGACGTAGTTTCCGTTGGAACAGTGAA
TFF3GCTAATGCTGTTGGTGGTCCGGTTGTTACACTGCTCCGATG
GRP94GGTGTTGTGGATTCCGATGGAAGTTTAGCAAGCCGTGTT
AGR2CTGTTGCTTGTCTTGGATCTGTGGAGCCAAAAAGGACCCAAAG

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeng, B.; Wang, D.; Wang, H.; Chen, T.; Luo, J.; Xi, Q.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Y. Dietary Soy Protein Isolate Attenuates Intestinal Immunoglobulin and Mucin Expression in Young Mice Compared with Casein. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2739. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092739

AMA Style

Zeng B, Wang D, Wang H, Chen T, Luo J, Xi Q, Sun J, Zhang Y. Dietary Soy Protein Isolate Attenuates Intestinal Immunoglobulin and Mucin Expression in Young Mice Compared with Casein. Nutrients. 2020; 12(9):2739. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092739

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zeng, Bin, Dongyang Wang, Hailong Wang, Ting Chen, Junyi Luo, Qianyun Xi, Jiajie Sun, and Yongliang Zhang. 2020. "Dietary Soy Protein Isolate Attenuates Intestinal Immunoglobulin and Mucin Expression in Young Mice Compared with Casein" Nutrients 12, no. 9: 2739. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092739

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop