Next Article in Journal
Preparation of ZnO Nanorods/Graphene Composite Anodes for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrochemical Adsorption on Pt Nanoparticles in Alkaline Solution Observed Using In Situ High Energy Resolution X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of the Effects of Polymer Dispersants on Dispersion of GO Nanosheets in Cement Composites and Relative Microstructures/Performances
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Study of the ORR Activity and Stability of Pt and PtM (M = Ni, Co, Cr, Pd) Supported on Polyaniline/Carbon Nanotubes in a PEM Fuel Cell
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 8
Issue 12
10.3390/nano8120965
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structure of Active Sites of Fe-N-C Nano-Catalysts for Alkaline Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells

by
Hirofumi Kishi
1,
Tomokazu Sakamoto
1,
Koichiro Asazawa
1,*,
Susumu Yamaguchi
1,
Takeshi Kato
1,
Barr Zulevi
2,
Alexey Serov
2,
Kateryna Artyushkova
3,
Plamen Atanassov
3,
Daiju Matsumura
4,
Kazuhisa Tamura
4,
Yasuo Nishihata
4 and
Hirohisa Tanaka
5
1
Advanced R&D Department, Daihatsu Motor Co. Ltd., 3000 Yamanoue, Ryuo, Gamo, Shiga 520-2593, Japan
2
Pajarito Powder Limited Liability Company (LLC), 3600 Osuna Rd NE, Suite 309, Albuquerque, NM 87102, USA
3
Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Center for Micro-Engineered Materials (CMEM), University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
4
Quantum Beam Science Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, 1-1-1, Koto, Sayo, Hyogo 679-5148, Japan
5
Department of Nanotechnology for Sustainable Energy, School of Science and Technology, Kwansei Gakuin University, 2-1 Gakuen, Sanda, Hyogo 669-1337, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2018, 8(12), 965; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8120965
Submission received: 19 October 2018 / Revised: 12 November 2018 / Accepted: 16 November 2018 / Published: 22 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials in Environmental Friendly Fuel Cell)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Platinum group metal-free (PGM-free) catalysts based on transition metal-nitrogen-carbon nanomaterials have been studied by a combination of ex situ and in situ synchrotron X-ray spectroscopy techniques; high-resolution Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM); Mößbauer spectroscopy combined with electrochemical methods and Density Functional Theory (DFT) modeling/theoretical approaches. The main objective of this study was to correlate the HO2− generation with the chemical nature and surface availability of active sites in iron-nitrogen-carbon (Fe-N-C) catalysts derived by sacrificial support method (SSM). These nanomaterials present a carbonaceous matrix with nitrogen-doped sites and atomically dispersed and; in some cases; iron and nanoparticles embedded in the carbonaceous matrix. Fe-N-C oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysts were synthesized by varying several synthetic parameters to obtain nanomaterials with different composition and morphology. Combining spectroscopy, microscopy and electrochemical reactivity allowed the building of structure-to-properties correlations which demonstrate the contributions of these moieties to the catalyst activity, and mechanistically assign the active sites to individual reaction steps. Associated with Fe-Nx motive and the presence of Fe metallic particles in the electrocatalysts showed the clear differences in the variation of composition; processing and treatment conditions of SSM. From the results of material characterization; catalytic activity and theoretical studies; Fe metallic particles (coated with carbon) are main contributors into the HO2− generation.

1. Introduction

Platinum has a limited availability on Earth, and its substitution with a platinum group metal-free (PGM-free) electrocatalyst is needed in order for the fuel cell to become feasible and widely spread technology [1,2,3].
Among several classes of PGM-free catalysts, transition metal-nitrogen-carbon (M-N-C) nanomaterials, where the transition metal (M) is usually Fe, Ni, Co (or few others) are most often studied and discussed. M-N-C nanomaterials are highly active electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). An iron-nitrogen-carbon electrocatalyst (Fe-N-C) has attracted attention due to its highest ORR activity among the other M-N-C electrocatalysts and demonstrated multiple synthesis protocols to yield desired nanomaterial. Fe-N-C have been employed in experimental proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC) and have demonstrated promise, while still being much inferior to PGM catalysts [4]. In contrast, in alkaline media M-N-C demonstrate performance at par with PGM, as such find applications as cathode materials in Anion Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (AEMFCs) [5].
In general, Fe-N-Cs are synthesized through pyrolysis of an N-containing organic precursor, serving as a source of the carbonaceous matrix and a transition metal salt as a source of the metal-containing moieties in the final nanomaterial [6]. Often, the metal is present in the precursor compound, as in metal organic frameworks (MOF) or is introduced in a specific stage of the catalyst preparation [7,8,9]. Substantial efforts have been made towards identifying the structure of the active sites in M-N-C nanomaterials. Current understanding of the M-N-C (and specifically Fe-N-C) catalyst structure involves two central hypotheses: (i) transition metal is atomically dispersed and is built into N-containing carbonaceous matrix and is the site on which di-oxygen binds prior to electro-reduction steps [10,11], and (ii) transition metal form nano-particles of ether reduced metal or metal carbide, which are immersed in carbonaceous matrix and induce ORR catalytic properties onto that matrix, without directly participating in the reaction [12]. Explicit understanding of the chemical structure of the active sites in M-N-C nanomaterials is additionally obscured by the fact that several Fe-containing and N-containing moieties are catalytically active in various individual steps of ORR [13]. This interplay between multiplicity of the chemical structure of the individual active sites and their participation in reaction mechanism, especially in the generation of intermediate HO2−, have yet to be revealed in full.
Under alkaline conditions, the kinetics of the Oxygen Reduction Reaction (ORR) on the cathode is enhanced leading to improved overall fuel cell efficiency. Anion exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFCs) with an alkaline liquid electrolyte such as KOH (aq) are the best performing of all known conventional hydrogen oxygen fuel cell types. The application of alkaline conditions at the electrodes opens the potential to use a range of low-cost PGM-free catalysts. In order to enable liquid electrolyte-free AEMFCs, a number of groups have begun research efforts devoted to fabrication and engineering of anion-exchange membranes and ionomer solutions [14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Also, there are incentives to develop novel materials for AEMFC systems that have the potential to alleviate or eliminate the technical issues associated with liquid electrolyte systems. This may include the use of a much more diverse selection of potential fuels that are thermodynamically favorable in alkaline media.
As one of the most promising ORR electrocatalysts for AEMFC, transition metal-nitrogen-carbon catalysts (M-N-C) have been intensively studied [21]. The performance of these catalysts is remarkably better in a direct hydrazine fuel (DHFC) cell in comparison with a polymer electrolyte fuel cell reaching a power density of 500 mW/cm2 [1,21,22]. Jasinski was the first to show the potential of utilizing a transition metal macrocycle compounds for alkaline oxygen electroreduction [23]. In order for the M-N-C catalysts to achieve their highest overall performance, they must have a well-developed morphology and high density of active sites [24,25,26].
For over a decade, the University of New Mexico has been developing an original synthetic method for M-N-C catalysts preparation called the Sacrificial Support Method (SSM) [4,27]. An industrial application for the SSM was successfully brought onto the catalyst market by Pajarito Powder under the trademarked name VariPore™ [28]. The SSM synthesis produces material with multiple controlled surface defects within a carbonaceous network and an internal network of connected pores with adjustable pore size distribution (PSD). The key chemical features of these electrocatalysts result in high activity and excellent stability. Additionally, it is significant that the formulations, processing and treatment conditions of SSM can be optimized for the best ORR performance at AEMFCs conditions.
To rationally design active and durable electrocatalysts for AEMFCs, the mechanism and the nature active site of ORR in alkaline conditions need to be identified. Especially, it is crucially required to reveal the mechanism of HO2− species generation because HO2− is a source of OH radical [29] which decreases the longevity of anion-exchange membranes and ionomer dispersions.
To reveal the mechanism of HO2− generation, Fe-N-C ORR electrocatalysts synthesized with variation of several parameters were analyzed by synchrotron X-ray radiation to build structure-to-properties correlations on the basis of our previous works [30,31,32,33]. The structure of electrocatalysts, which is associated with Fe-Nx motive and the presence of Fe metallic particle showed the clear difference in the variation of composition, processing and treatment conditions of SSM. From the results of material characterization X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS), Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope (STEM), catalytic activity test (Rotating Ring Disk Electrode, RRDE) and theoretical studies (DFT calculation), it was indisputably shown that Fe metallic particle (coated with carbon) are main contributors to the HO2− generation.
In parallel to the analysis of the mechanism of HO2− generation, we performed Mößbauer spectroscopy measurements and in situ XAFS analysis of the iron species to derive a guideline for the design of highly active ORR catalysts.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Catalyst Preparation

The catalysts were synthesized by modified SSM [30,31]. Iron nitrate (2.5 g, Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, Sigma Aldrich) was mechanically mixed with 25 g of the nitrogen-rich organic precursors (Nicarbazin and Pipemidic acid) and 10 g of LM-150 fumed silica (Cabot Cab-O-sil®, surface area ~150 m2/g). The pre-mixed material was loaded into a 100 mL agate ball-mill jar with 16 agate balls (diameter 1 cm). The mixture was subjected to ball-milling at 450 rpm for 1 h. The homogeneous powder was pyrolyzed at T = 950 °C, t = 30 min in the flow of Ultra High Purity (UHP) Nitrogen, 100 ccm. After heat treatment, silica was removed by 20 wt. % HF (1st acid treatment), followed by washing with DI water until neutral pH was reached. The obtained powder was dried overnight at T = 85 °C. In order to remove Fe metallic particles, the catalysts were acid treated with 1 M HNO3 (2nd acid treatment). The abbreviations of each catalyst sample are shown in Table 1 together with the precursor and acid treatment history.

2.2. XAFS Data Collection and Analysis

X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) measurements were carried out at line BL14B2 line of SPring-8 as in our previous work [32,33]. During in-situ XAFS analysis, potential was set at 0.25 V, 0 V, −0.20 V, −0.40 V, −0.60 V, −0.75 V and −0.90 V vs. Hg/HgO (1.174 V, 0.924 V, 0.724 V, 0.524 V, 0.324 V, 0.174 V and 0.024 V vs. RHE). XAFS data processing was done using EXAFS analysis software (Ifeffit; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA) for fitting.

2.3. Rotating Ring-Disk Electrode (RRDE) Preparation and Testing

The catalyst layer setup to the disk electrode and electrochemical measurement has been done as our previous work [32]. The ratio of HO2− generation was calculated using Equation (1).
P(HO2−) (%) = 2 × Ir/(N × Id + Ir) × 100
(N = 0.38 in this work)

2.4. STEM Analysis

Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope (STEM) and STEM-EDS (JEM-ARM200F, Japan Electron Optics Laboratory Company Limited; Tokyo, Japan) with the voltage acceleration of 200 kV were performed to analyze catalyst morphology and composition.

2.5. HAXPES Analysis

Hard X-ray Photo Electron Spectroscopy (HAXPES) measurements were carried out at BL46XU and BL47XU of SPring-8; Hyogo, Japan. The source X-ray energy was 7940 eV. Fe2p spectra were acquired. Spectra were charge calibrated to the binding energy for Au standard plate of 84 eV (Au4f).

2.6. 57Fe Mößbauer Spectroscopy

Mößbauer measurements were made to characterize the iron compounds within each catalyst. The spectra were recorded at room temperature with a CMCA-550 (WissEl; Starnberg, Germany) equipped with a constant electronic drive system with a triangular reference waveform (Halder Electronics). A 57Co source was used, and the velocity scale and isomer shift δiso were calibrated with natural iron (α-Fe-foil, 25 mm thick, 99.99% purity). An assignment of the iron species was made by a comparison of the Mößbauer parameters to literature data [34,35].

2.7. Computational Study

Calculations were done by using the spin-polarized DFT under Kohn–Sham formalism, implemented in Quantum Espresso [36]. Projector augmented wave (PAW) was used to represent core electrons [36]. Exchange-correlation energy functional was expressed by using generalized gradient approximation by Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhoff (GGA-PBE) [37]. Plane-wave basis sets were used with energy cut-off of 400 eV. The integration on Brillouin zone is done in 4 × 4 × 1 grid. 2 type surfaces are modeled to evaluate HO2− generating process. Two type surfaces were (a) Fe coated with carbon using graphene on 4 layers of Fe(001) and (b) graphene as a reference. Adsorption molecule, graphene and upper half layers of Fe(001) were relaxed and lower half layers of Fe(001) were fixed to evaluate the most stable structure of the adsorbed molecules. For calculations of O22− adsorption as an initial state [38], the total charge in the unit cell was −2 (two additional electrons).

3. Results

Figure 1 shows Fourier-transforms of the Fe K-edge extended X-ray absorption fine structure (ex-situ EXAFS) spectra for three samples of electrocatalysts. Synthesized Fe-N-C electrocatalysts have two peaks. The first nearest neighbor peak around 1.6 Å is assigned to the Fe-Nx structure [39]. The second peak around 2.2 Å is assigned to Fe-Fe originating from Fe metallic particles. NCB represents the peak of Fe-Fe higher than NCB-N and PPM-N, indicating that acid treatment with HNO3 facilitates removal of Fe metallic particles. PPM-N represents the lowest peak of Fe-Fe and a higher peak of Fe-Nx rather than the others, indicating that using PIPEM as precursor reduces the amount of Fe metallic particles and increases the amount of Fe-Nx structures. To reveal the relationship between the structure of Fe-N-C electrocatalysts and ORR activity (Equations (2) and (3)), RRDE analysis were done.
Dual ORR reactions consist of the following two reactions:
O2 + H2O + 2e− → HO2− + OH− (Ε0 = +0.761 V vs. RHE, pH = 14)
HO2− + H2O +2e− → 3OH− (Ε0 = +1.693 V vs. RHE, pH = 14)
Figure 2 and Table 2 show a comparison of RRDE results. NCB produces high amounts of HO2− and results in low kinetic currents and onset/half wave potential. It suggests that the process to generate HO2− via Equation (2) is enhanced and HO2− reduction via Equation (3) does not progress. On the other hands, PPM-N produces low amounts of HO2− and results in high kinetic currents and onset/half wave potential because some of the remaining Fe particles are removed by the second leach of HNO3. This suggests that the reduction of HO2− via Equation (3) is more active for PPM-N than for NCB. NCB-N is in between NCB and PPM-C. To discuss the effect of Fe-N-C structures (from Figure 1 and Table 3) to HO2− generation, the relationship between P(HO2−) and the ratio of Fe metallic particles/Fe-Nx is plotted in Figure 3. Figure 3 represents that P(HO2−) is in proportion to the ratio of Fe metallic particles/Fe-Nx. From this result, it is hypothesized that Fe metallic particles enhance HO2− generation represented by Equation (2). To confirm this hypothesis, it is necessary to discuss ORR mechanism on the surface of Fe metallic particles. STEM analysis has been done to investigate surface structure of Fe metallic particles.
Figure 4 shows HAADF-STEM images and EDS mapping images of Fe for NCB, which represents the high amount of Fe metallic particles, and PPM-C as a reference. The results presented on Figure 4 represent good agreement with the results of EXAFS in Figure 1. Aggregated Fe metallic particles from 10 to 100 nm were observed in NCB (Figure 4a). Atomically distributed Fe, which was assigned as Fe-Nx, was observed in PPM-N (Figure 4b).
In Figure 5, HAXPES shows the difference in amount of Fe metallic particles between NCB and PPM-N. These results also represent good agreement with the results of EXAFS in Figure 1 and HAADF-STEM in Figure 4.
Additionally, Figure 4a shows that Fe metallic particles were coated with a carbon layer. It is well known that carbon in alkaline condition is a strong HO2− generator [40]. Therefore, it is assumed that HO2− generation by carbon is enhanced by Fe metallic particle substrate. To investigate the interaction between Fe metallic particle substrate and carbon overlay, theoretical studies (DFT calculation) were done. Figure 6 presents the energy diagrams for the reaction on carbon (graphene) with Fe substrate (Fe(001) slab [41]) and on only carbon as a reference. It is well known that the edge structure of carbon enhances HO2− generation rather than terrace structure [42]. We assumed that the effect of Fe substrate would be present on the terrace but not on the edge. Hence DFT calculations were done based on graphene (as terrace carbon) on Fe(001) slab.
In this computational part, we focused on the calculation of the energy diagrams of the following reactions [32,39]:
O2 + H2O + 2e− → *O22− + H2O: O2 adsorption
*O22− +H2O → *(O2 + H2O)2−: H2O adsorption
*(O2 + H2O)2− → *HO2− + OH−: HO2− formation
*HO2− +OH− → *O− + 2OH−: HO2− reduction
*HO2− +OH− → HO2− + OH−: HO2− dissociation
* represents the adsorbed X molecule on the surfaces. We compared the energy diagram on graphene with Fe(001) and graphene. By making such comparisons, we could observe the possible rate-limiting step for HO2− generation on each surface.
In the case of graphene, the step of O2 adsorption (Equation (4)) required high energy as shown in Figure 6. This indicates that graphene without Fe metallic particle substrate was not so active for HO2− or OH− generation.
On the other hand, there is no energy barrier in case of graphene with Fe(001), just requiring endothermic energy to generate HO2−: +1.78 eV/OH−: +2.86 eV. Moreover, O2 and H2O adsorption energy: −2.18 eV is available on graphene with Fe(001). This indicates that endothermic energy required for the process from O2 to HO2− is given by another O2 and H2O adsorption. From these results, it is confirmed that Fe metallic particle substrate enhanced HO2− generation. To reveal this mechanism, the investigations of the density of state (DOS) of graphene without/with Fe(001) were done. The comparison of DOS is shown in Figure 7.
Figure 7a shows that graphene without Fe(001) had a band gap around Fermi energy, indicating semiconductive character. On the other hands, Figure 7b shows that graphene with Fe(001) had an electric state around Fermi energy, indicating conductive character. Therefore, charge transfer from graphene to adsorbed O2 was more favorable on graphene with Fe(001) rather than graphene without Fe(001). We conclude that this difference of DOS affected required energy for O2 adsorption (energy barrier for HO2− generation).
From the ex-situ XAFS, RRDE, STEM, HAXPES and theoretical studies, we confirmed that Fe metallic particles enhance HO2− generation. To design reactive Fe-N-C catalysts, the role and active site of the other type of Fe structure present: Fe-Nx should be investigated. To identify the detail of Fe-Nx structures and reveal the relationship between Fe-Nx structure and catalytic activity, Mößbauer measurements were done. Figure 8 and Table 4 show the results.
The results of Mößbauer measurements represented good agreement with the results of EXAFS in Figure 1 and HAADF-STEM in Figure 4. The high amount of Fe metallic particles assigned γ-Fe, FeC and α-Fe were detected in NCB and high amount of Fe-Nx structure assigned D1, D2 and D3 sites were detected in PPM-N as shown in Table 4. Here, D1 was assigned to FeIIN4/C (low spin), D2 was assigned to FeIIN4 (like Fe-Phthalocyanine) and D3 was assigned to N-FeIIN2+2/C (high spin) sites, respectively [34,35]. The amount of D2 is in proportion to the catalytic activity (confirmed by kinetic currents, half-wave potential and onset potential in Table 2). From these results, it is hypothesized that D2 enhances ORR occur-ring through Equations (2) and (3). To confirm this hypothesis, in-situ XAFS analysis was done to investigate the change of adsorption structure in ORR.
Figure 9 shows the results of in-situ analysis of EXAFS on NCB and PPM-N, respectively. To discuss the change of coordination number of Fe-Nx, peak shift at first nearest neighbor peak of Fe around 1.6 Å is plotted in Figure 9. Figure 9 represents that the peak of PPM-N is decreased by the potential shift from 0.25 V to −0.9 V (vs. Hg/HgO). This suggests that adsorbed O2 at the initial state (0.25 V vs. Hg/HgO) on the surface of PPM-N is dissociated and reduced to OH−.
From the results of Mößbauer measurements and in-situ XAFS, we assumed that D2 enhances ORR process. However, in-situ XAFS does not directly suggest a change in the structure of D2 (including D1 and D3). For certification of this assumption, more studies (e.g., DFT calculation for ORR on D1, D2 and D3) are required in future work.

4. Conclusions

To reveal the mechanism of HO2− generation from Fe-N-C catalysts, three different Fe-N-C catalysts were analyzed with ex-situ XAFS, STEM, RRDE and DFT calculations. It was revealed that carbon overlay on Fe metallic particles changes the material from a semiconductor to a conductor and enhanced HO2− generation.
Additionally, Mößbauer measurements and in-situ XAFS analysis were performed to better understand the structure of active sites. They suggested that a D2, assigned to FeIIN4 (like Fe-Phthalocyanine), structure enhances catalytic activity. It is expected that the research will contribute to the further development of PGM-free electrocatalysts as nanomaterials, leading to widespread popularization of environmentally friendly fuel cells.

Author Contributions

Data curation, K.A. and D.M.; Investigation, T.S., B.H., A.S. and K.T.; Project administration, S.Y. and T.K.; Supervision, P.A., Y.N. and H.T.; Writing—original draft, H.K.; Writing—review & editing, K.A.

Funding

This work was supported by the CREST, JST (26289254) and DE-EE0000459.

Acknowledgments

The synchrotron radiation experiments were performed at the BL14B2 in the SPring-8 with the approval of the Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI) (Proposal No. 2014B1881, 2015A1953, 2015B1889 at BL14B2, 2014B1886 at BL46XU). The Mößbauer measurements were performed with the approval of Nanotechnology Platform project supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Support for operation and analysis of Mößbauer measurements from K. Mibu (Nagoya Institute of Technology) are gratefully acknowledged. The computation was mainly carried out using the computer facilities at Research Institute for Information Technology, Kyushu University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bashyam, R.; Zelenay, P. A class of non-precious metal composite catalysts for fuel cells. Nature 2006, 443, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lefèvre, M.; Proietti, E.; Jaouen, F.; Dodelet, J.P. Iron-Based Catalysts with Improved Oxygen Reduction Activity in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells. Science 2009, 324, 71–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Proietti, E.; Jaouen, F.; Lefèvre, M.; Larouche, N.; Tian, J.; Herranz, J.; Dodelet, J.P. Iron-based cathode catalyst with enhanced power density in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Serov, A.; Arthyushkova, K.; Niangar, E.; Wang, C.; Dale, N.; Jaouen, F.; Sougrati, M.T.; Jia, Q.; Mukerjee, S.; Atanassov, P. Nano-structured non-platinum catalysts for automotive fuel cell application. Nano Energy 2015, 16, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Hossen, M.M.; Arthyushkova, K.; Atanassov, P.; Serov, A. Synthesis and characterization of high performing Fe-N-C catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in Alkaline Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. J. Power Sources 2018, 375, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tammeveski, K.; Zagal, J.H. Electrocatalytic oxygen reduction on transition metal macrocyclic complexes for anion exchange membrane fuel cell application. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2018, 9, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, H.; Yin, F.X.; Chen, B.H.; He, X.B.; Lv, P.L.; Ye, C.Y.; Liu, D.J. ZIF-67 incorporated with carbon derived from pomelo peels: A highly efficient bifunctional catalyst for oxygen reduction/evolution reactions. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 205, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, J.; Jaouen, F. Structure and activity of metal-centered coordination sites in pyrolyzed metal–nitrogen–carbon catalysts for the electrochemical reduction of O2. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2018, 9, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, X.X.; Hwang, S.; Pan, Y.T.; Chen, K.; He, Y.; Karakalos, S.; Zhang, H.; Spendelow, J.S.; Su, D.; Wu, G. Ordered Pt3Co Intermetallic Nanoparticles Derived from Metal–Organic Frameworks for Oxygen Reduction. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 4163–4171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Jia, Q.; Ramaswamy, N.; Tylus, U.; Strickland, K.; Li, J.; Serov, A.; Artyushkova, K.; Atanassov, P.; Anibal, J.; Gumeci, C.; et al. Spectroscopic insights into the nature of active sites in iron–nitrogen–carbon electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction in acid. Nano Energy 2016, 29, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chung, H.T.; Cullen, D.A.; Higgins, D.; Sneed, B.T.; Holby, E.F.; More, K.L.; Zelenay, P. Direct atomic-level insight into the active sites of a high-performance PGM-free ORR catalyst. Science 2017, 357, 479–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Strickland, K.; Miner, E.; Jia, Q.; Tylus, U.; Ramaswamy, N.; Liang, W.; Sougrati, M.T.; Jaouen, F.; Mukerjee, S. Highly active oxygen reduction non-platinum group metal electrocatalyst without direct metal–nitrogen coordination. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Artyushkova, K.; Serov, A.; Carbonell, S.R.; Atanassov, P. Chemistry of Multitudinous Active Sites for Oxygen Reduction Reaction in Transition Metal–Nitrogen–Carbon Electrocatalysts. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 25917–25928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chempath, S.; Einsla, B.; Pratt, L.R.; Macomber, C.S.; Boncella, J.M.; Rau, J.A.; Pivovar, B.S. Mechanism of Tetraalkylammonium Headgroup Degradation in Alkaline Fuel Cell Membranes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 3179–3182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Macomber, C.S.; Boncella, J.M.; Pivovar, B.S.; Rau, J.A. Decomposition pathways of an alkaline fuel cell membrane material component via evolved gas analysis. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2008, 93, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Varcoe, J.R.; Slade, R.C.T. Prospects for Alkaline Anion-Exchange Membranes in Low Temperature Fuel Cells. Fuel Cells 2005, 5, 187–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Varcoe, J.R.; Slade, R.C.T. An electron-beam-grafted ETFE alkaline anion-exchange membrane in metal-cation-free solid-state alkaline fuel cells. Electrochem. Commun. 2006, 8, 839–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Varcoe, J.R.; Slade, R.C.T.; Yee, E.L.H.; Poynton, S.D.; Driscoll, D.J.; Apperley, D.C. Poly(ethylene-co-tetrafluoroethylene)-Derived Radiation-Grafted Anion-Exchange Membrane with Properties Specifically Tailored for Application in Metal-Cation-Free Alkaline Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 2686–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Danks, T.N.; Slade, R.C.T.; Varcoe, J.R. Comparison of PVDF- and FEP-based radiation-grafted alkaline anion-exchange membranes for use in low temperature portable DMFCs. J. Mater. Chem. 2002, 12, 3371–3373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Danks, T.N.; Slade, R.C.T.; Varcoe, J.R. Alkaline anion-exchange radiation-grafted membranes for possible electrochemical application in fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. 2003, 13, 712–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Yamada, K.; Asazawa, K.; Yasuda, K.; Ioroi, T.; Tanaka, H.; Miyazaki, Y.; Kobayashi, T. Investigation of PEM type direct hydrazine fuel cell. J. Power Sources 2003, 115, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Asazawa, K.; Yamada, K.; Tanaka, H.; Oka, A.; Taniguchi, M.; Kobayashi, T. A platinum-free zero-carbon-emission easy fuelling direct hydrazine fuel cell for vehicles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8024–8027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jasinski, R.A. New Fuel Cell Cathode Catalyst. Nature 1964, 201, 1212–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Serov, A.; Min, M.; Chai, G.; Han, S.; Seo, S.J.; Park, Y.; Kim, H.; Kwak, C. Electroreduction of oxygen over iron macrocyclic catalysts for DMFC applications. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2009, 39, 1509–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sebastian, D.; Serov, A.; Artyushkova, K.; Atanassov, P.; Arico, A.S.; Baglio, V. Performance, methanol tolerance and stability of Fe-aminobenzimidazole derived catalyst for direct methanol fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2016, 319, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Janarthanana, R.; Serov, A.; Kishore Pilli, S.; Gamarra, D.A.; Atanassov, P.; Hibbs, M.R.; Herring, A.M. Direct Methanol Anion Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell with a Non-Platinum Group Metal Cathode based on Iron-Aminoantipyrine Catalyst. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 175, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Serov, A.; Atryushkova, K.; Andersen, N.I.; Stariha, S.; Atanassov, P. Original Mechanochemical Synthesis of Non-Platinum Group Metals Oxygen Reduction Reaction Catalysts Assisted by Sacrificial Support Method. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 179, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Serov, A.; Zulevi, B.; Artyushkova, K.; Atanassov, P.; Zhang, G.; Chenitz, R.; Lefèvree, M.; Dodelet, J.-P.; Sun, S.; Pann, S.; et al. Platinum Group Metal-Free Oxygen Reduction Reaction Electrocatalysts from Fe-N-C Family: Activity, Durability and Manufacturability. In ECS Meetting Abstract; MA2017-02 1498; The Electrochemical Society: National Harbor, MD, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  29. Stone, D.; Whalley, L.K.; Heard, D.E. Tropospheric OH and HO2 radicals: Field measurements and model comparisons. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 6348–6404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Serov, A.; Workman, M.J.; Arthyushkova, K.; Atanassov, P.; McCool, G.; McKinney, S.; Romero, H.; Halevi, B.; Stephenson, T. Highly stable precious metal-free cathode catalyst for fuel cell application. J. Power Sources 2016, 327, 557–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stariha, S.; Atryushkova, K.; Workman, M.J.; Serov, A.; Mckinney, S.; Halevi, B.; Atanassov, P. PGM-free Fe-N-C catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction: Catalyst layer design. J. Power Sources 2016, 326, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Asazawa, K.; Kishi, H.; Tanaka, H.; Matsumura, D.; Tamura, K.; Nishihata, Y.; Saputro, A.G.; Nakanishi, H.; Kasai, H.; Atryushkova, K.; et al. In Situ XAFS and HAXPES Analysis and Theoretical Study of Cobalt Polypyrrole Incorporated on Carbon (CoPPyC) Oxygen Reduction Reaction Catalysts for Anion-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 25480–25486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sakamoto, T.; Kishi, H.; Yamaguchi, S.; Matsumura, D.; Tamura, K.; Hori, A.; Horiuchi, Y.; Serov, A.; Atryushkova, K.; Atanassov, P.; et al. Mechanism Study of Hydrazine Electrooxidation Reaction on Nickel Oxide Surface in Alkaline Electrolyte by In Situ XAFS. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 10, H951–H957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kramm, U.I.; Lefèvre, M.; Larouche, N.; Schmeisser, D.; Dodelet, J.P. Correlations between Mass Activity and Physicochemical Properties of Fe/N/C Catalysts for the ORR in PEM Fuel Cell via 57Fe Mössbauer Spectroscopy and Other Techniques. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 978–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kramm, U.I.; Herranz, J.; Larouche, N.; Arruda, T.M.; Lefèvre, M.; Jaouen, F.; Bogdanoff, P.; Fiechter, S.; Wurmbach, I.A.; Mukerjee, S.; et al. Structure of the catalytic sites in Fe/N/C-catalysts for O2-reduction in PEM fuel cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 11673–11688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Shi, Z.; Liu, H.; Lee, K.; Dy, E.; Chlistunoff, J.; Blair, M.; Zelenay, P.; Zhang, J.; Liu, J.S. Theoretical Study of Possible Active Site Structures in Cobalt-Polypyrrole Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 16672–16680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Saputro, A.G.; Kasai, H. Comparative Study on the Catalytic Activity of the TM–N2 Active Sites (TM = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni) in the Oxygen Reduction Reaction: Density Functional Theory Study. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2013, 82, 114704–114715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stephens, P.J.; Devlin, F.J.; Chabalowski, C.F.; Frisch, M.J. Ab Initio Calculation of Vibrational Absorption and Circular Dichroism Spectra Using Density Functional Force Fields. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 11623–11627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Suntivich, J.; Gasteiger, H.A.; Yabuuchi, N.; Nakanishi, H.; Goodenough, J.B.; Horn, Y.S. Design principles for oxygen-reduction activity on perovskite oxide catalysts for fuel cells and metal–air batteries. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 546–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Geniès, L.; Faure, R.; Durand, R. Electrochemical reduction of oxygen on platinum nanoparticles in alkaline media. Electrochim. Acta 1998, 44, 1317–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Escano, M.C.S.; Nakanishi, H.; Kasai, H. Spin-polarized density functional theory study of reactivity of diatomic molecule on bimetallic system: The case of O2 dissociative adsorption on Pt monolayer on Fe(001). J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 14302–14307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhang, J. PEM Fuel Cell. Electrocatalysts and Catalyst Layers; Springer Nature Switzerland AG: Basel, Switzerland, 2008; ISBN 978-1-84800-935-6. [Google Scholar]
Nanomaterials 08 00965 g001 550
Figure 1. Radial structure function around Fe, calculated from the Fourier-transforms of the Fe K-edge extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectra of NCB, NCB-N, and PPM-N.
Figure 1. Radial structure function around Fe, calculated from the Fourier-transforms of the Fe K-edge extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectra of NCB, NCB-N, and PPM-N.
Nanomaterials 08 00965 g001
Nanomaterials 08 00965 g002 550
Figure 2. Voltammograms on NCB, NCB-N, and PPM-N of oxygen reduction reaction with rotating ring-disk electrode in 1.0 M KOH at room temperature.
Figure 2. Voltammograms on NCB, NCB-N, and PPM-N of oxygen reduction reaction with rotating ring-disk electrode in 1.0 M KOH at room temperature.
Nanomaterials 08 00965 g002
Nanomaterials 08 00965 g003 550
Figure 3. Voltammograms on NCB, NCB-N, and PPM-N of oxygen reduction reaction with rotating ring-disk electrode in 1.0 M KOH at room temperature.
Figure 3. Voltammograms on NCB, NCB-N, and PPM-N of oxygen reduction reaction with rotating ring-disk electrode in 1.0 M KOH at room temperature.
Nanomaterials 08 00965 g003
Nanomaterials 08 00965 g004 550
Figure 4. HAADF-STEM images and EDS mapping images of Fe, (a) NCB and (b) PPM-N.
Figure 4. HAADF-STEM images and EDS mapping images of Fe, (a) NCB and (b) PPM-N.
Nanomaterials 08 00965 g004
Nanomaterials 08 00965 g005 550
Figure 5. Fe2p HAXPES spectra of NCB and PPM-N. The dot line represents binding energy of metallic Fe: 707 eV.
Figure 5. Fe2p HAXPES spectra of NCB and PPM-N. The dot line represents binding energy of metallic Fe: 707 eV.
Nanomaterials 08 00965 g005
Nanomaterials 08 00965 g006 550
Figure 6. The energy diagrams for the reactions from O2 adsorption to generate HO2− or OH−.
Figure 6. The energy diagrams for the reactions from O2 adsorption to generate HO2− or OH−.
Nanomaterials 08 00965 g006
Nanomaterials 08 00965 g007 550
Figure 7. DOS of (a) graphene, and (b) graphene with Fe(001).
Figure 7. DOS of (a) graphene, and (b) graphene with Fe(001).
Nanomaterials 08 00965 g007
Nanomaterials 08 00965 g008 550
Figure 8. Deconvoluted Mößbauer spectra of (a) NCB and (b) PPM-N.
Figure 8. Deconvoluted Mößbauer spectra of (a) NCB and (b) PPM-N.
Nanomaterials 08 00965 g008
Nanomaterials 08 00965 g009 550
Figure 9. FT peak shift vs initial calculated from in-situ EXAFS data for NCB and PPM-N.
Figure 9. FT peak shift vs initial calculated from in-situ EXAFS data for NCB and PPM-N.
Nanomaterials 08 00965 g009
Table
Table 1. Synthesized Fe-N-C electrocatalysts.
Table 1. Synthesized Fe-N-C electrocatalysts.
Catalyst (Abbreviation)Precursor1st Acid Treatment2nd Acid Treatment
NCBNicarbazin20 wt. % HF-
NCB-NNicarbazin20 wt. % HF1 M HNO3
PPM-NPipemidic acid20 wt. % HF1 M HNO3
Table
Table 2. Electrochemical performance of NCB, NCB-N, and PPM-N using RRDE.
Table 2. Electrochemical performance of NCB, NCB-N, and PPM-N using RRDE.
CatalystP(HO2−)
N = 0.38		Id (mA) @ 0.2 V
vs. RHE		Onset Potential (V)
vs. RHE		Half Wave Potential (V)
vs. RHE
NCB44.6−0.351.010.57
NCB-N28.6−0.441.040.74
PPM-N8.4−0.671.040.78
Table
Table 3. Ratio of Fe-Fe/Fe-Nx which is calculated from EXAFS fitting.
Table 3. Ratio of Fe-Fe/Fe-Nx which is calculated from EXAFS fitting.
CatalystFe-Nx (Area)Fe-Fe (Area)Fe-Fe/Fe-Nx (ratio)
NCB0.680.530.78
NCB-N0.650.240.37
PPM-N0.810.090.11
Table
Table 4. Difference of components of the Fe-N-C electrocatalysts by Mößbauer spectroscopy.
Table 4. Difference of components of the Fe-N-C electrocatalysts by Mößbauer spectroscopy.
CatalystS1 (γ-Fe)Se1 (FeC)Se2 (α-Fe)D1D2D3
NCB10.815.32.936.921.812.3
NCB-N10.00.00.736.137.016.2
PPM-N1.10.00.539.845.712.9

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kishi, H.; Sakamoto, T.; Asazawa, K.; Yamaguchi, S.; Kato, T.; Zulevi, B.; Serov, A.; Artyushkova, K.; Atanassov, P.; Matsumura, D.; et al. Structure of Active Sites of Fe-N-C Nano-Catalysts for Alkaline Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 965. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8120965

AMA Style

Kishi H, Sakamoto T, Asazawa K, Yamaguchi S, Kato T, Zulevi B, Serov A, Artyushkova K, Atanassov P, Matsumura D, et al. Structure of Active Sites of Fe-N-C Nano-Catalysts for Alkaline Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. Nanomaterials. 2018; 8(12):965. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8120965

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kishi, Hirofumi, Tomokazu Sakamoto, Koichiro Asazawa, Susumu Yamaguchi, Takeshi Kato, Barr Zulevi, Alexey Serov, Kateryna Artyushkova, Plamen Atanassov, Daiju Matsumura, and et al. 2018. "Structure of Active Sites of Fe-N-C Nano-Catalysts for Alkaline Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells" Nanomaterials 8, no. 12: 965. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8120965

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop