Next Article in Journal
Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Evaluation and Chemical Investigation of Rosa gallica var. aegyptiaca Leaf Extracts
Previous Article in Journal
Coherent Surface Plasmon Hole Burning via Spontaneously Generated Coherence
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 21
10.3390/molecules26216490
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Harmirins, Novel Harmine–Coumarin Hybrids as Potential Anticancer Agents

by
Kristina Pavić
1,
Maja Beus
1,
Goran Poje
1,
Lidija Uzelac
2,
Marijeta Kralj
2 and
Zrinka Rajić
1,*
1
Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia
2
Laboratory of Experimental Therapy, Division of Molecular Medicine, Ruđer Bošković Institute, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(21), 6490; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216490
Submission received: 1 October 2021 / Revised: 24 October 2021 / Accepted: 25 October 2021 / Published: 27 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Medicinal Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
As cancer remains one of the major health burdens worldwide, novel agents, due to the development of resistance, are needed. In this work, we designed and synthesized harmirins, which are hybrid compounds comprising harmine and coumarin scaffolds, evaluated their antiproliferative activity, and conducted cell localization and cell cycle analysis experiments. Harmirins were prepared from the corresponding alkynes and azides under mild reaction conditions using Cu(I) catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition, leading to the formation of the 1H-1,2,3-triazole ring. Antiproliferative activity of harmirins was evaluated in vitro against four human cancer cell lines (MCF-7, HCT116, SW620, and HepG2) and one human non-cancer cell line (HEK293T). The most pronounced activities were exerted against MCF-7 and HCT116 cell lines (IC50 in the single-digit micromolar range), while the most selective harmirins were 5b and 12b, substituted at C-3 and O-7 of the β-carboline core and bearing methyl substituent at position 6 of the coumarin ring (SIs > 7.2). Further experiments demonstrated that harmirin 12b is localized exclusively in the cytoplasm. In addition, it induced a strong G1 arrest and reduced the percentage of cells in the S phase, suggesting that it might exert its antiproliferative activity through inhibition of DNA synthesis, rather than DNA damage. In conclusion, harmirin 12b is a novel harmine and coumarin hybrid with significant antiproliferative activity and warrants further evaluation as a potential anticancer agent.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cancer remains one of the greatest global health burdens, affecting an estimated 19.3 million new patients and causing nearly 10 million deaths in 2020. The most commonly diagnosed cancers are breast, lung, colorectal, prostate, and stomach, with lung cancer being the leading cause of cancer death [1]. In 2020/2021, the diagnosis and treatment of cancer were negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. This may have led to a false decline in cancer incidence, but the true impact of delays in diagnosis and treatment will only become apparent in subsequent years [2]. At the same time, the silent pandemic of anticancer drug resistance is developing in the background, leading to cancer recurrence and treatment failures [3]. Therefore, there is still a constant need for new effective anticancer agents.
There are many approaches in drug discovery and development (e.g., follow-on and analog-based drug discovery, product-based research, drug repositioning, and repurposing) [4]. The molecular hybridization approach, a strategy in which two molecules/pharmacophores are combined to form a new hybrid compound, is a useful tool for drug development targeting multifactorial diseases, including cancer. Due to the possible involvement of different or dual/multiple modes of action, the “combined chemotherapy-like” effect of anticancer hybrids is achieved, while overcoming the drawbacks of conventional chemotherapeutic agents [5,6,7,8,9].
β-carbolines and coumarins are two important classes of pharmacologically active natural products used extensively in medicinal chemistry. Harmine, the best-known representative of the β-carboline alkaloids, is found in the seeds and roots of Peganum harmala, Nitrariaceae. In general, β-carbolines possess a wide range of biological activities, such as anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, antiparasitic, hallucinogenic, etc. [3,5,10,11,12,13]. Today, the abundance of research in this field focuses on their anticancer properties. They have been shown to interact with various anticancer drug targets, such as DNA (intercalation [3,14,15], groove binding [3,16]), topoisomerase [3,17], kinases [3,18,19], and α-tubulin [3,20]. Several series of β-carboline–triazole hybrids have been synthesized and evaluated for their antiproliferative activity [5]: C3-linked β-carboline–triazole conjugates (an example is shown in Figure 1a) [16], C1-linked β-carboline–triazoles with an aryl-alkyl ether spacer [21], and tetrahydro-β-carboline–chalcone hybrids [22].
Coumarins are phytochemicals that belong to a family of benzopyran-2-ones [24] and have outstanding therapeutic potential (anticoagulant, antimicrobial, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, etc.) [9]. They have been shown to inhibit kinases, aromatase, heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90), telomerase, angiogenesis and can cause cell cycle arrest [8,25]. Novobiocin, an aminocoumarin antibiotic, and its analogs inhibit Hsp90 via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway [26]. Clausarin, another naturally occurring coumarin, showed superior antiproliferative activity compared to cisplatin against HepG2, HCT116, and SK-LU-1 cancer cell lines [27]. Samundeeswari et al. reported the synthesis and antimitotic activity of a series of coumarin–β-carboline hybrids in which the coumarin moiety was directly linked to the β-carboline core at the C-1 position. Hybrids with fully aromatized β-carboline ring and C-6 substituted coumarin moiety showed better activity against several cancer cell lines than the corresponding tetrahydro analogs (the most active is shown in Figure 1b) [23].
We have employed the concept of molecular hybridization to develop harmirins—novel compounds combining harmine and coumarin pharmacophores in hybrid molecules linked by a 1H-1,2,3-triazole spacer (Figure 2). In this paper, we report their synthesis, antiproliferative activity, cell localization, and influence on the cell cycle.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

Harmirins, harmine–coumarin hybrids, were obtained by applying the standard Cu(I) catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC), leading to the formation of a 1H-1,2,3-triazole ring (Scheme 1 and Scheme 2). Triazole was selected as a suitable linker between two bioactive moieties due to its chemical inertness to oxidation, reduction, and hydrolysis under acidic or basic conditions. Moreover, triazole is an excellent bioisostere of the amide bond [28]. The structural diversity of the title compounds was achieved by the following measures: (1) five series of harmirins were synthesized (4a–d, 5a–d, 11a–d, 12a–d, and 13a–d), which differ by the position of the coumarin-based substituents on the β-carboline core, viz., 1, 3, 6, 7, and 9; (2) in each series, four different substituents at position 6 of the coumarin ring (-H, -CH3, -Cl, -F) were varied; (3) the harmirins 4 and 5 bear a methyleneoxy spacer between the triazole and coumarin heterocycles; and (4) the triazole ring is directly attached to the coumarin moiety in derivatives 11–13.
The required starting compounds for CuAAC were harmine- and coumarin-based azides, 2, 3, and 7a–d, as well as coumarin- and harmine-based terminal alkynes, 1a–d and 8–10. The treatment of 4-hydroxycoumarins with propargyl bromide in the presence of cesium carbonate as a base gave O-alkylated coumarins 1a–d in a one-step reaction. Coumarin-based azides 7a–d were prepared from 4-hydroxycoumarins in a two-step procedure [29]. The first step involved the chlorination of 4-hydroxycoumarins with phosphorous(V) oxychloride. The obtained 4-chlorocoumarins 6a–d were then converted to azides 7a–d using sodium azide. The harmine-based azides 2 and 3 and the harmine-based terminal alkynes 8–10 were prepared according to our previously published procedure [30,31,32].
In the next step, harmirins were efficiently prepared by CuAAC under mild reaction conditions and in relatively good yields (26–69%). Two general methods were employed for the generation of an active catalyst, Cu(I) cations. Most of the harmirins were prepared using Cu(II) acetate precatalyst in methanol as a reducing agent. On the other hand, sodium ascorbate was the reducing agent of choice for the generation of Cu(I) from CuSO4 × 5H2O in the synthesis of harmirins 4a–d due to the lower number of by-products and easier purification. Almost all reactions proceeded at room temperature. However, in some cases, the reactions were slow, the yields were poor or did not proceed at all. The use of microwave-assisted synthesis significantly shortened reaction times, reduced the formation of by-products, and increased yields in the synthesis of several 6- and 9-substituted harmirins (11b,d and 13d, respectively). On the contrary, harmirin 11c was obtained by a classical synthetic procedure at 50 °C due to the formation of by-products during the microwave-assisted synthesis. The reaction conditions and obtained yields are summarized in Table 1.
In total, we prepared 20 harmirins, which were characterized by the standard spectroscopic/spectrometric methods (IR, MS, 1H and 13C-APT NMR). The spectral data were in agreement with the proposed structures and are presented briefly in the Materials and Methods section and in detail in the Supporting Information. The formation of the triazole ring was confirmed by the presence of a characteristic singlet in 1H NMR in the region of 8.46–9.02 ppm due to triazolyl proton. The corresponding carbon atom appeared at 124.67–126.54 ppm in 13C-APT NMR, while the quaternary carbon of the triazole ring was in the region of 137.93–144.75 ppm. The purity of the prepared compounds was evaluated by the elemental analysis, with the values for carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen within 0.4% of those calculated for the proposed molecular formula.
All synthesized harmirins are in almost complete agreement with Lipinski’s rule of five and Gelovani’s rules for the prospective small molecular drugs (MW ≤ 500, log P ≤ 5, number of H-bond donors ≤ 5, number of H-bond acceptors ≤ 10, polar surface area (PSA) < 140 Å2, molar refractivity (MR) in the range of 40 and 130 cm3/mol). Minimal aberrations of the rules are present only for the MR. The parameters were calculated using the Chemicalize.org program and are shown in Table S13 [33].

2.2. Biological Evaluations

2.2.1. Antiproliferative Activity

We selected four different cancer cell lines for antiproliferative screening in vitro, which we believed would provide sufficient data on the anticancer potential of the prepared harmirins (hepatocellular carcinoma—HepG2, colorectal adenocarcinoma, Dukes’ type C—SW620, colorectal carcinoma—HCT116, and breast adenocarcinoma—MCF-7). Additionally, we included one non-cancer cell line (embryonic kidney—HEK293T) to evaluate harmirins’ selectivity. The results obtained are shown in Table 2. The commonly used anticancer drug 5-FU and harmine were used as positive controls. Pre-screening was performed using 50 µM of the tested compound. Only compounds that led to more than 50% reduction in mitochondrial metabolic activity at 50 µM concentration were selected for further analysis. The selectivity index (SI) for each harmirin was calculated as a fractional ratio between the IC50 values for HEK293T and the cancer cell line MCF-7 or HCT116 since these two cell lines were the most susceptible to harmirins.
The most active harmirins exhibited stronger activity against MCF-7 and HCT116 compared to HepG2 and SW620 (the least sensitive cancer cell line). Since the difference in the activity of harmirins was greater against MCF-7 than HCT116 when compared to the activity of the parent compound harmine and 5-FU, further structure–activity relationship (SAR) analyses were performed for MCF-7 (although some interesting results were also obtained for HCT116 and will be discussed later in the text).
The activity of harmirins against MCF-7 decreased according to the pattern: 11 (O-6) > 12 (O-7) > 13 (N-9) > 5 (C-3) > 4 (C-1). Within the series, the compounds differed by the substituents at position 6 of the coumarin ring. The most active compounds 11a,d and 13d, bearing the smallest substituents, hydrogen or fluorine, showed the highest cytotoxicity at low micromolar concentrations (IC50 = 1.9–2.7 μM), which were ~5–7-fold higher than harmine (marked in red in Table 2). Remarkably, their activity against MCF-7 was also ~9–13-fold stronger than the activity of 5-FU. Harmirins 11, as well as compound 13d, exerted strong activity against all tested cell lines, including HEK293T. Thus, these compounds exerted low SI. Interestingly, compounds 5 showed stronger activity against HEK293T than against cancer cell lines.
In contrast, the most active compound against MCF-7 within the series of O-7 substituted harmirins, 12b, bears a methyl substituent (IC50 = 6.9 ± 0.7 μM, marked in green in Table 2). Although it is only involved in weak London dispersion interactions, the methyl group has stereoelectronic effects on biomacromolecules that could subsequently lead to increased receptor selectivity, efficacy, and metabolic stability [34]. Moreover, compound 12b exerted the most selective activity towards MCF-7 (SI > 7.2) compared to HEK293T. Interestingly, the most selective and active compounds against HCT116 were 7- and 3-substituted harmirins with a methyl substituent at position 6 of the coumarin core: 12b (IC50 = 4.7 ± 0.6 µM, SI > 10.6) and 5b (IC50 = 3.2 ± 0.5 µM, SI = 8.6), respectively (marked in green in Table 2).
Compound 12b and MCF-7 were selected for further investigation due to the following reasons: (1) compound 12b is among the most active harmirins against MCF-7 and also the most selective one, and (2) the cytotoxicity of 12b against MCF-7 is twofold higher than harmine and 3.4-fold higher than 5-FU.

2.2.2. Cell Localization

We further examined the intracellular distribution of the compound 12b in MCF-7 cells, based on its fluorescence properties. Therefore, we incubated MCF-7 cells for 30 min with the tested compound 12b and analyzed its localization by fluorescence microscopy (Figure 3). No autofluorescence was detected by examining untreated cells under typical imaging conditions. The tested compound showed punctate staining, pointing to the localization within the cytoplasm, but not within the nucleus. The results confirm that 12b does not bind to the nuclear DNA, i.e., it does not target it, as a potential mechanism of action.

2.2.3. Cell Cycle Analysis

To gain further insight into the potential mechanism of activity of 12b, and to examine whether and how the cell growth inhibition was associated with cell cycle regulation, we assessed its influence on the cell cycle of MCF-7 cells, 24 and 48 h after the treatment and compared it with the influence of the reference compound harmine (Figure 4). Both compounds were tested at the ≈ 1.5 × IC50 concentration (10 µM and 20 µM, respectively, obtained in the MTT assay, after 72 h).
As discussed earlier, harmine shows anticancer activity in multiple types of cancer, through various mechanisms, whereby the IC50 concentrations differed between the cell lines [35,36]. It is interesting to note that, in our hands, treatment of MCF-7 cells with harmine resulted in an order of magnitude lower IC50 value than reported earlier [37]. Harmine also demonstrated antiangiogenic and antitumor effects via the p53 signaling pathway in endothelial cells. These studies clearly demonstrated that in the presence of harmine (10–50 µM), pancreatic cancer cells, as well as human umbilical vein endothelial (HUVEC) cells, were arrested in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle, accompanied by an induction of apoptosis.
Our results show that the treatment with 12b significantly influenced the cell cycle of MCF-7 cells, already after 24 h. It induced a strong G1 arrest, accompanied by a drastic reduction in the percentage of cells in the S phase, which also persisted after 48 h. The influence of harmine on the cell cycle was much less significant, although a G1 delay, along with the reduction in cells in the S phase, is obvious after 24 h, while after 48 h of treatment, an additional accumulation of cells in the G2/M phase is demonstrated, which is in accordance with the published data. The 48-hour treatment with both compounds resulted in an induction of the accumulation of cells in the subG1 phase (apoptotic cells), up to 10% and 15%, respectively (data not shown).
It could be concluded that 12b demonstrates a more pronounced influence on the proliferation of breast cancer cell line MCF-7 compared to harmine. However, the mechanism of activity (molecular target) is likely different and should be determined in future studies.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemistry

3.1.1. General Information

Melting points were measured on a Stuart Melting Point (SMP3) apparatus (Barloworld Scientific, U.K.) in open capillaries with uncorrected values. FTIR-ATR spectra were recorded using a Fourier-Transform Infrared Attenuated Total Reflection UATR Two spectrometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) in the range 450–4000 cm−1. 1H and 13C-APT NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance III HD operating at 300 or 400 MHz for the 1H and 75, 101, or 151 MHz for the 13C nuclei (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). Samples were measured in DMSO-d6 solutions at 20 °C in 5 mm NMR tubes. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in parts per million (ppm) relative to tetramethylsilane in the 1H and the dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) residual peak as a reference in the 13C spectra (39.51 ppm). Coupling constants (J) are reported in Hertz (Hz). Mass spectra were collected on an HPLC-MS/MS instrument (HPLC, Agilent Technologies 1200 Series; MS, Agilent Technologies 6410 Triple Quad, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Mass determination was performed using electrospray ionization (ESI) in a positive mode. Elemental analyses were performed on a CHNS LECO analyzer (LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, MI, USA). Analyses indicated by the symbols of the elements were within ± 0.4% of their theoretical values. Microwave-assisted reactions were performed in a microwave reactor CEM Discover (CEM, Charlotte, NC, USA) in a glass reaction vessel. All compounds were routinely checked by TLC with Merck silica gel 60F-254 glass plates (Merck, Germany) using cyclohexane/ethyl acetate/methanol 3:1:0.75, cyclohexane/ethyl acetate/methanol 3:1:0.5, cyclohexane/ethyl acetate/methanol 1:1:0.5, cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:1, dichloromethane/methanol 9.5:0.5, dichloromethane/methanol 9:1, dichloromethane/methanol 7.5:2.5, or dichloromethane/methanol 1:0.1 as solvent systems. Spots were visualized by short-wave (λ = 254 nm) and long-wave UV light (λ = 366 nm) and iodine vapor. Column chromatography was performed on silica gel 0.063–0.200 mm (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) with the same eluents used for TLC. To eliminate the presence of Cu(I) in the target compounds, a layer of aluminum oxide (90 activated, neutral; 0.063–0.200 mm; Merck, Germany) was applied over silica gel.
All chemicals and solvents were of analytical grade and purchased from commercial sources. Harmine, acetic acid, hydrochloric acid, 4-hydroxycoumarin, acetaldehyde dimethyl acetal, Pd/C (10%), and phosphorus(V) oxychloride were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). 4-Hydroxy-6-methylcoumarin, 6-chloro-4-hydroxycoumarin, 6-fluoro-4-hydroxycoumarin, cesium carbonate, dimethylformamide (DMF), and trifluoroacetic acid were purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry (Tokyo, Japan). Hydrobromic acid (47%) and sodium azide were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), dichloromethane from Fischer Scientific (Loughborough, U.K.), diethyl ether from ITW Reagents (Darmstadt, Germany), and anhydrous sodium sulfate from Gram-Mol (Zagreb, Croatia). Azides 2 and 3, as well as alkynes compounds 8–10, were synthesized according to the previously published procedures [30,31,32]. 4-Chlorocoumarins 6a–d and 4-azidocoumarins 7a–d were synthesized according to the slightly modified previously published procedure [29].

3.1.2. General Procedure for the Synthesis of O-alkylated Coumarins 1a–d

A corresponding 4-hydroxycoumarin (1 mmol) was dissolved in dry DMF (3 mL). Under an argon atmosphere, cesium carbonate (0.456 g, 1.4 mmol) was added, followed by dropwise addition of 80% solution of propargyl bromide in toluene (0.134 mL, 1.2 mmol). The reaction was stirred at r.t. and under argon atmosphere overnight. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was poured into 50 mL water. The product was extracted with dichloromethane (4 × 30 mL). Organic layers were collected and washed with water, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and evaporated under reduced pressure. After trituration with diethyl ether, O-alkylated coumarins 1a–d were obtained. Compounds 1a–c were previously described and their analytical data were in accordance with available data [38].
(1)
4-(Prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (1a).
4-Hydroxycoumarin (0.162 g); yield: 0.060 g (30%) of 1a (white solid).
(2)
6-Methyl-4-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (1b).
4-Hydroxy-6-methylcoumarin (0.176 g); yield: 0.062 g (29%) of 1b (white solid).
(3)
6-Chloro-4-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (1c).
6-Chloro-4-hydroxycoumarin (0.197 g); yield: 0.150 g (64%) of 1c (white solid).
(4)
6-Fluoro-4-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (1d).
6-Fluoro-4-hydroxycoumarin (0.180 g); yield: 0.092 g (42%) of 1d (white solid); IR (ATR): νmax 3274, 3237, 3074, 2135, 1702, 1625, 1575, 1492, 1452, 1392, 1360, 1322, 1263, 1221, 1180, 1120, 1083, 993, 932, 884, 818, 743, 712, 662, 593, 521 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.60–7.48 (m, 3H), 6.04 (s, 1H), 5.12 (s, 1H), 3.85 (t, 1H, J = 2.39 Hz); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 162.81, 161.08, 158.05 (d, J = 242.14 Hz), 149.11, 120.32 (d, J = 29.28 Hz), 118.76 (d, J = 8.36 Hz), 115.98 (d, J = 8.37 Hz), 108.37 (d, J = 25.1 Hz), 92.49, 80.33, 57.66; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C12H7FO3: 218.0, found 219.0 (M + 1)+, 241.0 (M + 23)+.

3.1.3. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Harmirins 4a–d

To a solution of compound 2 (0.039 g, 0.176 mmol) and the corresponding O-alkylated coumarin 1a–d (0.160 mmol) in t-butanol (4 mL), a solution of sodium ascorbate (10 mg/mL) and CuSO4 × 5 H2O (20 µL, c = 1 M) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 0.5–2 h at r.t. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography.
(1)
4-((1-((9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indol-1-yl)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (4a).
From the reaction of 1a (0.032 g) and after purification by column chromatography (mobile phase dichloromethane/methanol 9.5:0.5) and recrystallization from ethanol, 0.035 g (51%) of an off-white solid 4a was obtained; reaction time 1 h; mp 260.5–264.0 °C (decomp.); IR (ATR): νmax 3283, 1707, 1623, 1609, 1564, 1454, 1434, 1380, 1327, 1273, 1244, 1191, 1141, 1106, 1051, 938, 884, 824, 745, 728, 620 cm–1; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.99 (s, 1H), 8.51 (s, 1H), 8.31 (d, 1H, J = 5.17 Hz), 8.27 (d, 1H, J = 7.85 Hz), 8.14 (d, 1H, J = 5.14 Hz), 7.73 (dd, 1H, J = 1.64, 7.89 Hz), 7.69 (d, 1H, J = 8.22 Hz), 7.66-7.64 (ddd, 1H, J = 1.65, 7.22, 8.63 Hz), 7.62–7.59 (ddd, 1H, J = 1.21, 6.97, 8.22 Hz), 7.41 (dd, 1H, J = 1.03, 8.38 Hz), 7.34–7.28 (m, 2H), 6.18, 6.15 (2s, 3H), 5.44 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.37, 161.55, 152.76, 140.87, 140.71, 137.94, 137.88, 133.82, 132.80, 128.74, 128.58, 126.27, 124.21, 122.86, 121.93, 120.74, 119.67, 116.46, 115.08, 114.88, 112.07, 91.34, 62.76, 51.29; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C24H17N5O3: 423.1, found 424.1 (M + 1)+; Anal. Calcd. for C24H17N5O3: C, 68.08; H, 4.05; N, 16.54. Found: C, 68.18; H, 4.06; N, 16.56.
(2)
4-((1-((9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indol-1-yl)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl) methoxy)-6-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (4b).
From the reaction of 1b (0.034 g) and after purification by column chromatography (mobile phase dichloromethane/methanol 9.5:0.5) and recrystallization from ethanol, 0.032 g (45%) of a white solid 4b was obtained; reaction time 0.5 h; mp 246.5–251.0 °C (decomp.); IR (ATR): νmax 3337, 3151, 3106, 3059, 1786, 1697, 1626, 1574, 1504, 1430, 1398, 1369, 1330, 1274, 1236, 1212, 1193, 1166, 1126, 1102, 1050, 969, 947, 839, 817, 762, 746, 724, 607, 585, 543, 510 cm–1; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.99 (s, 1H), 8.50 (s, 1H), 8.31 (d, 1H, J = 5.14 Hz), 8.27 (d, 1H, J = 7.80 Hz), 8.14 (d, 1H, J = 5.16 Hz), 7.68 (d, 1H, J = 0.92, 8.24 Hz), 7.62–7.59 (ddd, 1H, J = 1.21, 7.03, 8.21 Hz), 7.50 (s, 1H), 7.45 (dd, 1H, J = 2.65, 8.82 Hz), 7.30–7.28 (m, 2H), 6.15, 6.14 (2s, 3H), 5.42 (s, 2H), 2.33 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.36, 161.69, 150.92, 140.85, 140.70, 137.93, 137.87, 133.82, 133.62, 133.56, 128.74, 128.58, 126.32, 122.27, 121.93, 120.74, 119.67, 116.28, 114.88, 114.76, 112.07, 91.27, 62.67, 51.28, 20.28; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C25H19N5O3: 437.2, found 438.1 (M + 1)+; Anal. Calcd. for C25H19N5O3: C, 68.64; H, 4.38; N, 16.01. Found: C, 68.74; H, 4.37; N, 16.03.
(3)
4-((1-((9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indol-1-yl) methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl) methoxy)-6-chloro-2H-chromen-2-one (4c).
From the reaction of 1c (0.038 g) and after purification by column chromatography (mobile phase dichloromethane/methanol 9.5:0.5) and recrystallization from ethanol, 0.051 g (69%) of a white solid 4c was obtained; reaction time 1 h; mp 263.5–265.0 °C (decomp.); IR (ATR): νmax 3253, 3159, 1684, 1616, 1603, 1561, 1485, 1458, 1431, 1359, 1325, 1265, 1229, 1194, 1146, 1112, 1058, 939, 895, 818, 738, 596, 532 cm–1; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.98 (s, 1H), 8.52 (s, 1H), 8.31 (d, 1H, J = 5.18 Hz), 8.27 (d, 1H, J = 7.85 Hz), 8.13 (d, 1H, J = 5.14 Hz), 7.70–7.65 (m, 3H), 7.60 (t, 1H, J = 7.60 Hz), 7.46 (d, 1H, J = 8.83 Hz), 7.29 (t, 1H, J = 7.45 Hz), 6.25 (s, 1H), 6.15 (s, 2H), 5.44 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 163.19, 161.09, 151.41, 140.74, 140.71, 137.93, 137.87, 133.81, 132.51, 128.74, 128.58, 128.27, 126.33, 121.93, 120.74, 119.67, 118.67, 116.56, 114.88, 112.07, 92.24, 63.06, 51.32; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C24H16ClN5O3: 457.1, found 458.0 (M + 1)+; Anal. Calcd. for C24H16ClN5O3: C, 62.96; H, 3.52; N, 15.30. Found: C, 63.12; H, 3.54; N, 15.34.
(4)
4-((1-((9H-Pyrido[3,4-b] indol-1-yl) methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl) methoxy)-6-fluoro-2H-chromen-2-one (4d).
From the reaction of 1d (0.035 g) and after purification by column chromatography (mobile phase dichloromethane/methanol 9.5:0.5) and recrystallization from ethanol, 0.040 g (56%) of a white solid 4d was obtained; reaction time 2 h; mp 239.5–241.0 °C (decomp.); IR (ATR): νmax 3334, 3059, 1732, 1718, 1626, 1572, 1492, 1453, 1432, 1371, 1323, 1255, 1215, 1183, 1130, 1082, 1051, 977, 950, 937, 878, 827, 796, 746, 723, 622, 542 cm–1; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.98 (s, 1H), 8.53 (s, 1H), 8.30 (d, 1H, J = 5.18 Hz), 8.27 (d, 1H, J = 7.84 Hz), 8.13 (d, 1H, J = 5.13 Hz), 7.68 (d, 1H, J = 8.20 Hz), 7.61–7.59 (ddd, 1H, J = 1.23, 7.03, 8.23 Hz), 7.56–7.52 (td, 1H, J = 3.07, 8.60 Hz), 7.49–7.44 (m, 2H), 7.29 (t, 1H, J = 7.40 Hz), 6.25 (s, 1H), 6.15 (s, 2H), 5.45 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 163.51, 161.32, 157.99 (d, J = 222.56 Hz), 149.11, 140.80, 140.70, 137.93, 137.86, 133.80, 128.73, 128.57, 126.25, 121.92, 120.73, 120.30 (d, J = 20.69 Hz), 119.66, 118.68 (d, J = 7.88 Hz), 116.17 (d, J = 11.83 Hz), 114.87, 112.06, 108.42 (d, J = 29.57 Hz), 92.17, 63.05, 51.29; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C24H16FN5O3: 441.1, found 442.1 (M + 1)+; Anal. Calcd. for C24H16FN5O3: C, 65.30; H, 3.65; N, 15.87. Found: C, 65.40; H, 3.64; N, 15.88.

3.1.4. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Harmirins 5a–d

To a solution of compound 3 (0.042 g, 0.176 mmol) and the corresponding O-alkylated coumarin 1a–d (0.160 mmol) in methanol (3.5 mL), Cu(OAc)2 (0.01 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight at r.t. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography.
(1)
4-((1-((1-Methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indol-3-yl)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (5a).
From the reaction of 1a (0.032 g) and after purification by column chromatography (mobile phase dichloromethane/methanol 9.5:0.5) and trituration with diethyl ether, 0.045 g (64%) of a white solid 5a was obtained; mp 149.5–153.5 °C (decomp.); IR (ATR): νmax 3292, 1686, 1621, 1566, 1493, 1455, 1357, 1274, 1234, 1191, 1141, 1109, 1051, 937, 881, 812, 767, 731, 647, 588 cm–1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.67 (s, 1H), 8.46 (s, 1H), 8.17 (d, 1H, J = 7.85 Hz), 8.00 (s, 1H), 7.73 (dd, 1H, J = 1.30, 7.90 Hz), 7.67–7.59 (m, 2H), 7.54 (t, 1H, J = 7.60 Hz), 7.40 (d, 1H, J = 8.23 Hz), 7.32 (t, 1H, J = 7.56 Hz), 7.24 (t, 1H, J = 7.38 Hz), 6.17 (s, 1H), 5.81 (s, 2H), 5.43 (s, 2H), 2.75 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.34, 161.53, 152.76, 142.43, 142.18, 140.96, 140.77, 134.00, 132.79, 128.10, 127.60, 125.64, 124.20, 122.87, 121.69, 120.91, 119.46, 116.45, 115.08, 112.09, 112.00, 91.32, 62.78, 55.28, 20.38; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C25H19N5O3: 437.2, found 438.4 (M + 1)+; Anal. Calcd. for C25H19N5O3: C, 68.64; H, 4.38; N, 16.01. Found: C, 68.80; H, 4.38; N, 16.03.
(2)
6-Methyl-4-((1-((1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b] indol-3-yl) methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl) methoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (5b).
From the reaction of 1b (0.034 g) and after purification by column chromatography (mobile phase dichloromethane/methanol 9.5:0.5) and trituration with diethyl ether, 0.033 g (45%) of a white solid 5b was obtained; mp 263.0–267.5 °C (decomp.); IR (ATR): νmax 3149, 3092, 1721, 1629, 1576, 1499, 1431, 1384, 1355, 1323, 1281, 1250, 1208, 1132, 1102, 1059, 936, 902, 857, 821, 795, 737, 584, 533 cm–1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.67 (s, 1H), 8.45 (s, 1H), 8.13 (d, 1H, J = 7.87 Hz), 8.00 (s, 1H), 7.61–7.52 (m, 2H), 7.50 (br. s, 1H), 7.45 (dd, 1H, J = 1.81, 8.46 Hz), 7.29 (d, 1H, J = 8.41 Hz), 7.26–7.22 (m, 1H), 6.14 (s, 1H), 5.81 (s, 2H), 5.41 (s, 2H), 2.75 (s, 3H), 2.33 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.34, 161.68, 150.92, 142.47, 142.18, 140.94, 140.77, 134.00, 133.61, 133.55, 128.10, 127.60, 125.71, 122.29, 121.68, 120.91, 119.45, 116.26, 114.76, 120.09, 111.98, 91.25, 62.70, 55.27, 20.38, 20.26; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C26H21N5O3: 451.2, found 452.1 (M + 1)+; Anal. Calcd. for C26H21N5O3: C, 69.17; H, 4.69; N, 15.51. Found: C, 69.29; H, 4.70; N, 15.54.
(3)
6-Chloro-4-((1-((1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indol-3-yl)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl) methoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (5c).
From the reaction of 1c (0.038 g) and after purification by column chromatography (mobile phase dichloromethane/methanol 9.5:0.5) and trituration with diethyl ether, 0.045 g (59%) of an off-white solid 5c was obtained; mp 254.0–257.5 °C (decomp.); IR (ATR): νmax 3259, 3149, 3091, 1720, 1623, 1563, 1500, 1427, 1355, 1310, 1245, 1186, 1149, 1117, 1058, 931, 857, 825, 795, 735, 705, 677, 584, 532 cm–1; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.67 (s, 1H), 8.48 (s, 1H), 8.17 (d, 1H, J = 7.88 Hz), 7.99 (s, 1H), 7.69 (dd, 1H, J = 2.63, 8.84 Hz), 7.66 (d, 1H, J = 2.53 Hz), 7.60 (d, 1H, J = 8.18 Hz), 7.55–7.53 (ddd, 1H, J = 1.19, 6.97, 8.21 Hz), 7.45 (d, 1H, J = 8.87 Hz), 7.25–7.22 (ddd, 1H, J = 1.05, 6.98, 7.98 Hz), 6.24 (s, 1H), 5.81 (s, 2H), 5.44 (s, 2H), 2.75 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 163.17, 161.09, 151.41, 142.48, 142.17, 140.84, 140.78, 134.00, 132.49, 128.26, 128.09, 127.60, 125.73, 121.94, 121.69, 120.91, 119.45, 118.65, 116.57, 112.09, 111.93, 92.22, 63.10, 55.28, 20.39; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C25H18ClN5O3: 471.1, found 472.0 (M + 1)+; Anal. Calcd. for C25H18ClN5O3: C, 63.63; H, 3.84; N, 14.84. Found: C, 63.53; H, 3.85; N, 15.56.
(4)
6-Fluoro-4-((1-((1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indol-3-yl)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (5d).
From the reaction of 1d (0.035 g) and after purification by column chromatography (mobile phase dichloromethane/methanol 9.5:0.5) and trituration with diethyl ether, 0.027 g (37%) of a white solid 5d was obtained; mp 259.0–261.5 °C (decomp.); IR (ATR): νmax 3151, 3095, 1715, 1630, 1575, 1499, 1453, 1366, 1320, 1254, 1216, 1176, 1131, 1081, 1055, 968, 922, 877, 827, 737, 704, 678, 588, 563 cm–1; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.67 (s, 1H), 8.48 (s, 1H), 8.17 (d, 1H, J = 8.27 Hz), 7.99 (s, 1H), 7.60 (d, 1H, J = 8.18 Hz), 7.56–7.51 (m, 2H), 7.48–7.45 (m, 2H), 7.25–7.22 (ddd, 1H, J = 1.04, 6.99, 8.02 Hz), 6.24 (s, 1H), 5.81 (s, 2H), 5.44 (s, 2H), 2.75 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 163.50, 161.32, 157.99 (d, J = 236.63 Hz), 149.10, 142.49, 142.17, 140.91, 140.78, 134.00, 128.10, 127.60, 125.65, 121.69, 120.91, 120.17 (d, J = 26.32 Hz), 119.45, 118.67 (d, J = 9.06 Hz), 116.18 (d, J = 8.15 Hz), 112.10, 111.94, 108.44 (d, J = 24.70 Hz), 92.16, 63.09, 55.28, 20.38; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C25H18FN5O3: 455.1, found 456.1 (M + 1)+; Anal. Calcd. for C25H18FN5O3: C, 65.93; H, 3.98; N, 15.38. Found: C, 65.87; H, 3.98; N, 15.39.

3.1.5. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Harmirins 11a–d

Method A: To a solution of compound 8 (0.038 g, 0.16 mmol) and the corresponding 4-azidocoumarin 7a–d (0.176 mmol) in methanol (3.5 mL), Cu(OAc)2 (0.01 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at r.t for 48 h. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography.
Method B: A mixture of compound 8 (0.038 g, 0.16 mmol), corresponding 4-azidocoumarin 7a–d (0.176 mmol) and Cu(OAc)2 (0.01 mmol) in methanol (1.5 mL) was heated at 70 °C in microwave reactor for 25 min (P = 75 W). The solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography.
Method C: To a solution of compound 8 (0.038 g, 0.16 mmol) and the corresponding 4-azidocoumarin 7a–d (0.176 mmol) in methanol (3.5 mL), Cu(OAc)2 (0.02 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at 50 °C for four days. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography.
(1)
4-(4-(((1-Methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indol-6-yl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)-2H-chromen-2-one (11a).
Method A, from the reaction of 7a (0.033 g) and after purification by column chromatography (mobile phase dichloromethane/methanol 9:1) and trituration with diethyl ether, 0.043 g (63%) of a yellow solid 11a was obtained; mp 235.5–238.0 °C (decomp.); IR (ATR): νmax 3349, 3035, 1726, 1606, 1572, 1499, 1443, 1391, 1360, 1291, 1256, 1202, 1133, 1106, 1037, 1003, 944, 862, 808, 765, 701, 650, 616, 524 cm–1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.43 (s, 1H), 8.99 (s, 1H), 8.19 (d, 1H, J = 5.33 Hz), 7.98 (s, 1H), 7.93 (d, 1H, J = 5.32 Hz), 7.84–7.76 (m, 2H), 7.60–7.53 (m, 2H), 7.42 (t, 1H, J = 7.69 Hz), 7.30 (dd, 1H, J = 2.45, 8.85 Hz), 7.00 (s, 1H), 5.40 (s, 2H), 2.75 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 159.47, 153.66, 151.87, 145.91, 143.89, 142.23, 136.91, 135.60, 135.10, 133.47, 126.75, 126.37, 125.47, 124.98, 121.37, 118.46, 117.19, 114.36, 112.85, 110.66, 105.33, 61.62, 20.36; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C24H17N5O3: 423.1, found 424.1 (M + 1)+; Anal. Calcd. for C24H17N5O3: C, 68.08; H, 4.05; N, 16.54. Found: C, 67.88; H, 4.04; N, 16.48.
(2)
6-Methyl-4-(4-(((1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indol-6-yl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)-2H-chromen-2-one (11b).
Method B, from the reaction of 7b (0.035 g) and after purification by column chromatography (mobile phase dichloromethane/methanol 9.5:0.5) and recrystallization from ethanol, 0.018 g (26%) of a yellow solid 11a was obtained; mp 235.0–242.0 °C (decomp.); IR (ATR): νmax 3340, 3036, 1725, 1623, 1572, 1499, 1465, 1405, 1378, 1282, 1256, 1199, 1132, 1105, 1040, 1009, 945, 864, 807, 701, 610, 528 cm–1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.42 (s, 1H), 8.97 (s, 1H), 8.18 (d, 1H, J = 5.28 Hz), 7.98 (s, 1H), 7.93 (d, 1H, J = 5.31 Hz), 7.60–7.48 (m, 4H), 7.30 (dd, 1H, J = 2.45, 8.84 Hz), 6.95 (s, 1H), 5.40 (s, 1H), 2.75 (s, 3H), 2.34 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 159.57, 151.85, 145.91, 143.87, 142.23, 136.94, 135.58, 135.11, 134.41, 134.35, 126.74, 126.38, 124.80, 121.38, 118.42, 117.00, 114.08, 112.85, 112.72, 110.71, 105.29, 61.60, 20.41, 20.37; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C25H19N5O3: 437.2, found 438.1 (M + 1)+; Anal. Calcd. for C25H19N5O3: C, 68.64; H, 4.38; N, 16.01. Found: C, 68.90; H, 4.40; N, 16.07.
(3)
6-Chloro-4-(4-(((1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indol-6-yl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)-2H-chromen-2-one (11c).
Method C, from the reaction of 7c (0.039 g) and after purification by column chromatography (mobile phase cyclohexane/ethyl acetate/methanol 3:1:0.75) and trituration with diethyl ether, 0.019 g (26%) of a yellow solid 11c was obtained; mp 220.0–225.0 °C (decomp.); IR (ATR): νmax 3245, 3165, 1731, 1620, 1558, 1500, 1479, 1452, 1401, 1344, 1284, 1261, 1230, 1213, 1185, 1111, 1052, 1013, 947, 827, 810, 682, 619, 558 cm–1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.43 (s, 1H), 9.01 (s, 1H), 8.18 (d, 1H, J = 5.33 Hz), 7.97 (s, 1H), 7.92–7.91 (m, 2H), 7.83 (d, 1H, J = 8.90 Hz), 7.64 (d, 1H, J = 8.89 Hz), 7.55 (d, 1H, J = 8.77 Hz), 7.29 (d, 1H, J = 8.83 Hz), 7.09 (s, 1H), 5.40 (s, 2H), 2.74 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 159.05, 152.34, 151.81, 144.58, 144.04, 142.22, 136.96, 135.55, 135.08, 133.00, 128.78, 126.67, 126.24, 124.78, 121.36, 119.23, 118.32, 115.61, 112.81, 112.67, 111.26, 105.27, 61.59, 20.36; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C24H16ClN5O3: 457.1, found 458.0 (M + 1)+; Anal. Calcd. for C24H16ClN5O3: C, 62.96; H, 3.52; N, 15.30. Found: C, 63.15; H, 3.53; N, 15.36.
(4)
6-Fluoro-4-(4-(((1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indol-6-yl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)-2H-chromen-2-one (11d).
Method B, from the reaction of 7d (0.036 g) and after purification by column chromatography (mobile phase dichloromethane/methanol 9.5:0.5) and recrystallization from ethanol, 0.024 g (34%) of a yellow solid 11d was obtained; mp 224.5–225.5 °C (decomp.); IR (ATR): νmax 3357, 3028, 1730, 1527, 1512, 1488, 1464, 1416, 1353, 1291, 1261, 1238, 1202, 1159, 1074, 1035, 989, 942, 871, 808, 719, 700, 610, 523 cm–1; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.41 (s, 1H), 9.02 (s, 1H), 8.18 (d, 1H, J = 5.29 Hz), 7.97 (s, 1H), 7.92 (d, 1H, J = 5.26 Hz), 7.73–7.66 (m, 3H), 7.54 (d, 1H, J = 8.80 Hz), 7.29 (dd, 1H, J = 2.53, 8.82 Hz), 7.09 (s, 1H), 5.40 (s, 2H), 2.74 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 159.30, 158.05 (d, J = 241.22 Hz), 151.86. 150.11, 144.93 (d, J = 2.52 Hz), 144.05, 142.25, 137.00, 135.56, 135.11, 126.69, 126.23, 121.39, 120.82 (d, J = 25.77 Hz), 119.33 (d, J = 8.37 Hz), 118.35, 115.20 (d, J = 7.36 Hz), 112.83, 111.44 (d, J = 25.53 Hz), 111.16, 105.26, 61.62, 20.40; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C24H16FN5O3: 441.1, found 442.1 (M + 1)+; Anal. Calcd. for C24H16FN5O3: C, 65.30; H, 3.65; N, 15.87. Found: C, 65.05; H, 3.52; N, 15.81.

3.1.6. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Harmirins 12a–d

To a solution of compound 9 (0.038 g, 0.16 mmol) and the corresponding 4-azidocoumarin 7a–d (0.176 mmol) in methanol (3.5 mL), Cu(OAc)2 (0.01 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at r.t overnight (12a,b), for two (12c) or five (12d) days. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography.
(1)
4-(4-(((1-Methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indol-7-yl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)-2H-chromen-2-one (12a).
From the reaction of 7a (0.033 g) and after purification by column chromatography (mobile phase dichloromethane/methanol 9:1) and trituration with diethyl ether, 0.036 g (53%) of a pale yellow solid 12a was obtained; mp 223.5–225.5 °C (decomp.); IR (ATR): νmax 3287, 3177, 3136, 3090, 3025, 2864, 1697, 1608, 1558, 1484, 1439, 1382, 1351, 1275, 1233, 1177, 1138, 1106, 1056, 1003, 964, 872, 820, 738, 651, 615, 572, 488 cm–1; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.52 (s, 1H), 8.99 (s, 1H), 8.17 (d, 1H, J = 5.27 Hz), 8.11 (d, 1H, J = 8.62 Hz), 7.85–7.82 (m, 2H), 7.79 (t, 1H, J = 8.00 Hz), 7.60 (d, 1H, J = 8.34 Hz), 7.45 (t, 1H, J = 7.66 Hz), 7.25 (s, 1H), 7.00–6.97 (m, 2H), 5.44 (s, 2H), 2.74 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 159.45, 158.71, 153.65, 145.90, 143.64, 141.84, 141.30, 137.57, 134.61, 133.48, 127.23, 126.51, 125.45, 125.00, 122.77, 117.19, 115.31, 114.36, 112.04, 110.72, 109.46, 96.02, 61.14, 20.23; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C24H17N5O3: 423.1, found 424.1 (M + 1)+; Anal. Calcd. for C24H17N5O3: C, 68.08; H, 4.05; N, 16.54. Found: C, 68.35; H, 4.06; N, 16.60.
(2)
6-Methyl-4-(4-(((1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indol-7-yl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)-2H-chromen-2-one (12b).
From the reaction of 7b (0.035 g) and after purification by column chromatography (mobile phase dichloromethane/methanol 9:1) and trituration with diethyl ether, 0.040 g (57%) of a white solid 12b was obtained; mp 225.5–229.5 °C (decomp.); IR (ATR): νmax 3286, 3149, 3113, 3067, 3013, 2926, 2861, 1723, 1630, 1570, 1483, 1452, 1357, 1323, 1276, 1233, 1181, 1137, 1105, 1048, 1012, 946, 890, 801, 733, 610, 568, 519 cm–1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.51 (s, 1H), 8.97 (s, 1H), 8.16 (s, 1H), 8.11 (d, 1H, J = 8.52 Hz), 7.84 (d, 1H, J = 4.60 Hz), 7.60–7.48 (m, 3H), 7.24 (s, 1H, 12), 6.99–6.96 (m, 2H), 5.45 (s, 2H), 2.74 (s, 3H), 2.35 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 159.56, 158.68, 151.85, 145.90, 143.61, 141.83, 141.31, 137.61, 134.61, 134.42, 134.36, 127.21, 126.54, 124.77, 122.78, 117.01, 115.32, 114.08, 112.04, 110.78, 96.02, 61.14, 20.43, 20.25; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C25H19N5O3: 437.2, found 438.1 (M + 1)+; Anal. Calcd. for C25H19N5O3: C, 68.64; H, 4.38; N, 16.01. Found: C, 68.37; H, 4.37; N, 15.95.
(3)
6-Chloro-4-(4-(((1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indol-7-yl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)-2H-chromen-2-one (12c).
From the reaction of 7c (0.039 g) and after purification by column chromatography (mobile phase dichloromethane/methanol 9:1) and trituration with diethyl ether, 0.029 g (40%) of a pale yellow solid 12c was obtained; mp 244.0–247.0 °C (decomp.); IR (ATR): νmax 3149, 3090, 3030, 2991, 1619, 1601, 1569, 1484, 1447, 1369, 1322, 1217, 1137, 1097, 1058, 1021, 910, 859, 805, 734, 669, 590, 540, 481 cm–1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.51 (s, 1H), 9.01 (s, 1H), 8.17 (d, 1H, J = 5.30 Hz), 8.11 (d, 1H, J = 8.65 Hz), 7.91 (s, 1H), 7.85–7.82 (m, 2H), 7.64 (d, 1H, J = 8.88 Hz), 7.24 (s, 1H), 7.10 (s, 1H), 6.98 (dd, 1H, J = 2.13, 8.65 Hz), 5.45 (s, 2H), 2.74 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 159.07, 158.68, 152.37, 144.60, 143.79, 141.83, 141.30, 137.59, 134.61, 133.05, 128.82, 127.22, 126.44, 124.78, 122.78, 119.28, 115.65, 115.33, 112.04, 111.38, 109.41, 96.02, 61.13, 20.24; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C24H16ClN5O3: 457.1, found 458.0 (M + 1)+; Anal. Calcd. for C24H16ClN5O3: C, 62.96; H, 3.52; N, 15.30. Found: C, 62.71; H, 3.51; N, 15.24.
(4)
6-Fluoro-4-(4-(((1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indol-7-yl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)-2H-chromen-2-one (12d).
From the reaction of 7d (0.036 g) and after purification by column chromatography (mobile phase dichloromethane/methanol 9.5:0.5) and trituration with diethyl ether, 0.028 g (39%) of a pale yellow solid 12d was obtained; mp 249.0–251.0 °C (decomp.); IR (ATR): νmax 3275, 3175, 3141, 3095, 3067, 3012, 1718, 1626, 1566, 1483, 1456, 1415, 1382, 1345, 1275, 1231, 1169, 1103, 1056, 1006, 966, 869, 806, 735, 614, 569, 528, 491 cm–1; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.48 (s, 1H), 9.02 (s, 1H), 8.16 (d, 1H, J = 5.24 Hz), 8.10 (d, 1H, J = 8.61 Hz), 7.83 (d, 1H, J = 5.28 Hz), 7.72–7.67 (m, 3H), 7.24 (s, 1H), 7.09 (s, 1H), 6.98 (dd, 1H, J = 2.27, 8.61 Hz), 5.44 (s, 2H), 2.73 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 159.26, 158.55 (d, J = 246.21 Hz), 158.64, 150.10, 144.92 (d, J = 2.92 Hz), 143.78, 141.77, 141.36, 137.72, 134.62, 127.12, 126.38, 122.73, 120.82 (d, J = 31.71 Hz), 119.33 (d, J = 10.57 Hz), 115.34, 115.20 (d, J = 10.57 Hz), 111.99, 111.39 (d, J = 31.70 Hz), 111.27, 111.23, 96.01, 61.14, 20.30; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C24H16FN5O3: 441.1, found 442.1 (M + 1)+; Anal. Calcd. for C24H16FN5O3: C, 65.30; H, 3.65; N, 15.87. Found: C, 65.45; H, 3.65; N, 15.90.

3.1.7. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Harmirins 13a–d

Method A: To a solution of compound 10 (0.040 g, 0.160 mmol) and the corresponding 4-azidocoumarin 7a–d (0.176 mmol) in methanol (3.5 mL), Cu(OAc)2 (0.01 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight at r.t. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography.
Method B: A mixture of compound 10 (0.040 g, 0.160 mmol), corresponding 4-azidocoumarin 7d (0.176 mmol) and Cu(OAc)2 (0.01 mmol) in methanol (1.5 mL) was heated at 70 °C in microwave reactor for 40 min (P = 75 W). The solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography.
(1)
4-(4-((7-Methoxy-1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indol-9-yl)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)-2H-chromen-2-one (13a).
Method A, from the reaction of 7a (0.033 g) and after purification by column chromatography (mobile phase dichloromethane/methanol 9.5:0.5) and trituration with diethyl ether, 0.030 g (43%) of an off-white solid 13a was obtained; mp 239.0–243.5 °C (decomp.); IR (ATR): νmax 3144, 3086, 3062, 2837, 1760, 1717, 1622, 1564, 1494, 1439, 1406, 1349, 1237, 1167, 1104, 1041, 948, 870, 813, 768, 646 cm–1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.78 (s, 1H), 8.21 (br. s, 1H), 8.11 (d, 1H, J = 8.60 Hz), 7.91 (d, 1H, J = 4.71 Hz), 7.76–7.72 (m, 2H), 7.55 (dd, 1H, J = 0.95, 8.70 Hz), 7.41–7.37 (m, 2H), 6.92-6.89 (m, 2H), 6.03 (s, 2H), 3.92 (s, 3H), 3.10 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 160.62, 159.41), 153.57, 145.69, 144.74, 142.72, 141.18, 138.13, 134.87, 133.37, 128.63, 125.40, 124.90, 122.40, 117.13, 114.52, 114.36, 112.34, 110.71, 109.47, 94.16, 55.66, 23.30; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C25H19N5O3: 437.2, found 438.1 (M + 1)+; Anal. Calcd. for C25H19N5O3: C, 68.64; H, 4.38; N, 16.01. Found: C, 68.57; H, 4.37; N, 15.98.
(2)
4-(4-((7-Methoxy-1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indol-9-yl)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)-6-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (13b).
Method A, from the reaction of 7b (0.035 g) and after purification by column chromatography (mobile phase dichloromethane/methanol 9.5:0.5) and trituration with diethyl ether, 0.038 g (53%) of a white solid 13b was obtained; mp 253.0–255.0 °C (decomp.); IR (ATR): νmax 3145, 3096, 3058, 3000, 1728, 1622, 1568, 1496, 1445, 1408, 1367, 1336, 1284, 1243, 1195, 1165, 1137, 1039, 1010, 945, 889, 813, 748, 720, 649, 610, 550 cm–1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.78 (s, 1H), 8.21 (d, 1H, J = 5.16 Hz), 8.11 (d, 1H, J = 8.60 Hz), 7.90 (d, 1H, J = 5.17 Hz), 7.55 (dd, 1H, J = 1.48, 8.55 Hz), 7.45–7.40 (m, 3H), 6.91 (dd, 1H, J = 2.02, 8.60 Hz), 6.86 (s, 1H), 6.03 (s, 2H), 3.91 (s, 3H), 3.11 (s, 3H), 2.31 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 160.63, 159.51, 151.77, 145.67, 144.69, 142.70, 141.16, 138.18, 134.77, 134.30, 134.24, 128.64, 124.95, 124.64, 122.41, 116.96, 114.53, 114.06, 112.30, 110.72, 109.45, 94.16, 55.66, 54.91, 23.30, 20.38; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C26H21N5O3: 451.2, found 452.1 (M + 1)+; Anal. Calcd. for C26H21N5O3: C, 69.17; H, 4.69; N, 15.51. Found: C, 69.31; H, 4.69; N, 15.54.
(3)
6-Chloro-4-(4-((7-methoxy-1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indol-9-yl)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)-2H-chromen-2-one (13c).
Method A, from the reaction of 7c (0.039 g) and after purification by column chromatography (mobile phase dichloromethane/methanol 9.5:0.5) and trituration with diethyl ether, 0.033 g (44%) of an off-white solid 13c was obtained; mp 233.0–239.5 °C (decomp.); IR (ATR): νmax 3136, 3080, 2997, 2961, 1729, 1624, 1562, 1445, 1410, 1344, 1256, 1221, 1169, 1120, 1041, 971, 930, 816, 720, 682, 644, 597, 556, 512 cm–1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.79 (s, 1H), 8.20 (d, 1H, J = 5.19 Hz), 8.11 (d, 1H, J = 8.60 Hz), 7.90 (d, 1H, J = 5.19 Hz), 7.82–7.78 (m, 2H), 7.60 (d, 1H, J = 8.68 Hz), 7.39 (s, 1H), 7.01 (s, 1H), 6.90 (dd, 1H, J = 2.05, 8.60 Hz), 6.03 (s, 2H), 3.91 (s, 3H), 3.09 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 160.64, 159.01, 152.27, 144.95, 144.41, 142.72, 141.12, 138.17, 134.71, 132.93, 128.73, 128.65, 124.79, 124.67, 122.39 119.22, 115.65, 114.50, 112.29, 111.36, 109.48, 94.12, 55.67, 23.25; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C25H18ClN5O3: 471.1, found 472.0 (M + 1)+; Anal. Calcd. for C25H18ClN5O3: C, 63.63; H, 3.84; N, 14.84. Found: C, 63.49; H, 3.85; N, 14.87.
(4)
6-Fluoro-4-(4-((7-methoxy-1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indol-9-yl)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)-2H-chromen-2-one (13d).
Method B, from the reaction of 7d (0.036 g) and after purification by column chromatography (mobile phase dichloromethane/methanol 9.5:0.5) and recrystallization from ethanol, 0.036 g (49%) of an off-white solid 13d was obtained; mp 235.0–237.0 °C (decomp.); IR (ATR): νmax 3441, 3127, 3072, 2955, 2836, 1728, 1628, 1574, 1490, 1461, 1440, 1406, 1348, 1301, 1256, 1235, 1197, 1163, 1041, 1025, 1008, 945, 887, 827, 728, 714, 611, 523 cm–1; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.81 (s, 1H), 8.21 (d, 1H, J = 5.18 Hz), 8.12 (d, 1H, J = 8.60 Hz), 7.92 (d, 1H, J = 5.17 Hz), 7.65–7.61 (m, 3H), 7.39 (s, 1H), 7.01 (s, 1H), 6.91 (dd, 1H, J = 2.17, 8.56 Hz), 6.03 (s, 2H), 3.91 (s, 3H), 3.09 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 160.62, 159.24, 158.49 (d, J = 235.40 Hz), 150.02, 144.92, 144.75, 142.70, 141.15, 138.18, 134.73, 128.63, 124.77, 122.40, 120.72 (d, J = 29.19 Hz), 119.28 (d, J = 8.63 Hz), 115.21 (d, J = 10.88 Hz), 114.52, 112.30, 111.33 (d, J = 24.99 Hz), 111.24, 109.46, 94.14, 55.65, 23.27; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C25H18FN5O3: 455.1, found 456.1 (M + 1)+; Anal. Calcd. for C25H18FN5O3: C, 65.93; H, 3.98; N, 15.38. Found: C, 66.03; H, 3.97; N, 15.39.

3.2. Biological Evaluation

3.2.1. Cytotoxicity Assay in Human Cell Lines

The experiments were carried out on five human cell lines purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, PO BOX 1549, manassas, VA 20108, USA): HepG2 (hepatocellular carcinoma; ATCC® HB-8065™), SW620 (colorectal adenocarcinoma; ATCC® CCL-227™), HCT116 (colorectal carcinoma ATCC® CCL-247™), MCF-7 (breast adenocarcinoma, ATCC® HTB-22™), and HEK293T (embryonic kidney cells; ATCC® CRL-3216™). All cell lines were cultured as monolayers and maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) (Capricorn Scientific, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Capricorn Scientific, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin (Capricorn Scientific, USA) in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates (Corning, Durham, NC, USA) at 5000–7000 cells per well (depending on the cell doubling time of a specific cell line) in 0.1 mL media and cultured for 24 h. The next day, the medium was aspirated, and cells were treated for 72 h. Only the compounds that led to more than a 50% reduction in mitochondrial metabolic activity at a concentration of 50 µM were selected for further analysis. The following concentrations of selected compounds were used: 25, 10, 5, and 1 µM. Working dilutions were freshly prepared on the day of the testing. A fresh growth medium was added to untreated control cells, which were defined as 100% viable. DMSO (0.13%) in DMEM was considered a negative control. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and harmine were used as positive controls. At the end of treatment, media was removed, and cells were incubated for 1 h with 0.5 mg/mL MTT (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) dissolved in serum-deprived DMEM. The absorbance was directly proportional to cell viability. The MTT-containing media was then removed, and 0.1 mL isopropanol was added per well to lyse cells and dissolve formazan. The optical density was measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader (VICTOR3, PerkinElmer). Each test point was performed in triplicate. The IC50 values (concentration required to decrease viability by 50%) were calculated by using nonlinear regression on the sigmoidal dose–response plots and are expressed as mean ± SD.

3.2.2. Cell Localization

The MCF-7 cells were seeded on round microscopic coverslips placed in 24-well-plates (5 × 104 cells per well) and grown at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 24 h in DMEM supplemented with FBS, penicillin, and streptomycin, as described above. Cells were then incubated with compound 12b (10 µM) for 30 min. Afterward, the medium was discharged, coverslips rinsed twice with PBS, placed on the microscopic slides, and immediately analyzed. The uptake and intracellular distribution of the tested derivative were analyzed under a fluorescence microscope (Olympus BX51) at 400 × magnification, using a DAPI filter. Images were captured with an Olympus DP70 Digital Camera.

3.2.3. Cell Cycle Analysis

MCF-7 cells were seeded onto 6-well plates (3 × 105 cells per well). After 24 h, 12b was added at 10 µM concentration and harmine at 20 µM concentration. After 24 h or 48 h, the attached cells were trypsinized, combined with floating cells, washed with phosphate buffer saline (PBS), fixed with 70% ethanol, and stored at −20 °C. Immediately before analysis, the cells were washed with PBS and stained with 50 μg/mL of propidium iodide (PI) with the addition of 0.1 μg/μL of RNAse A. The stained cells were then analyzed by BD FACScalibur flow cytometer (20,000 counts were measured). The percentage of cells in each cell cycle phase was determined using FlowJo software (TreeStar Inc., USA). The tests were performed in duplicate and repeated in three separate experiments.

4. Conclusions

Twenty novel hybrid compounds comprising two distinct pharmacophores—harmine/β-carboline and coumarin, connected via triazole linker—were synthesized using CuAAC from harmine-based azides and coumarin alkynes (4 and 5) and coumarin azides and harmine-based alkynes (11–13), respectively. The evaluation of their antiproliferative activity in vitro against a panel of human cell lines revealed that seven harmirins display activities in the single-digit micromolar range against MCF-7 and HCT116. Among them, harmirin 12b, substituted at O-7 of the β-carboline core and bearing the methyl group at position 6 of the coumarin ring, showed the highest selectivity towards cancer cells, in comparison to HEK293T (SIs > 7.2). According to cell localization experiments, harmirin 12b is localized exclusively in the cytoplasm. Furthermore, cell cycle analysis showed that the treatment of MCF-7 cells with harmirin 12b induced a strong G1 arrest, accompanied by a drastic reduction in the percentage of cells in the S phase. Taken together, these results might suggest that harmirin 12b exerts its antiproliferative activity through inhibition of DNA synthesis, rather than DNA damage. Our future work will focus on the elucidation of molecular mechanisms involved in the anticancer activities of harmirins. In summary, our findings indicate that harmirins, harmine–coumarin hybrids, might serve as an important basis for the design and synthesis of new anticancer agents with significant antitumor activity and low toxicity.

Supplementary Materials

Tables S1–S6: Analytical data for coumarin 1d, harmirins 4a–d, 5a–d, 11a–d, 12a–d, 13a–d; Tables S7–S12: 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data for coumarin 1d, harmirins 4a–d, 5a–d, 11a–d, 12a–d, 13a–d; Table S13: Properties of the harmirins calculated with Chemicalize.org program. The Lipinski and Gelovani parameters.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.R.; methodology, K.P., G.P., M.B., L.U. and M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.R., K.P. and M.K.; writing—review and editing, Z.R.; funding acquisition, Z.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Croatian Science Foundation (grant number UIP-2017-05-5160).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in this article and the Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by Croatian Science Foundation, grant number UIP-2017-05-5160. The work of Maja Beus has been fully supported by the Young researcher’s career development project—training of doctoral students of the Croatian Science Foundation founded by the European Union from the European Social Fund.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Fuchs, H.E.; Jemal, A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 7–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Aaghaz, S.; Sharma, K.; Jain, R.; Kamal, A. β-Carbolines as Potential Anticancer Agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 216, 113321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhao, H.; Guo, Z. Medicinal Chemistry Strategies in Follow-on Drug Discovery. Drug Discov. Today 2009, 14, 516–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Soni, J.P.; Yeole, Y.; Shankaraiah, N. β-Carboline-Based Molecular Hybrids as Anticancer Agents: A Brief Sketch. RSC Med. Chem. 2021, 12, 730–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Viegas-Junior, C.; Barreiro, E.J.; Manssour Fraga, C.A. Molecular Hybridization: A Useful Tool in the Design of New Drug Prototypes. Curr. Med. Chem. 2007, 14, 1829–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ivasiv, V.; Albertini, C.; Gonçalves, A.E.; Rossi, M.; Bolognesi, M.L. Molecular Hybridization as a Tool for Designing Multitarget Drug Candidates for Complex Diseases. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2019, 19, 1694–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Thakur, A.; Singla, R.; Jaitak, V. Coumarins as Anticancer Agents: A Review on Synthetic Strategies, Mechanism of Action and SAR Studies. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 101, 476–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wei, H.; Ruan, J.; Zhang, X. Coumarin-Chalcone Hybrids: Promising Agents with Diverse Pharmacological Properties. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 10846–10860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ayoob, I.; Hazari, Y.M.; Lone, S.H.; Shakeel-u-Rehman; Khuroo, M.A.; Fazili, K.M.; Bhat, K.A. Phytochemical and Cytotoxic Evaluation of Peganum Harmala: Structure Activity Relationship Studies of Harmine. ChemistrySelect 2017, 2, 2965–2968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ling, Y.; Guo, J.; Yang, Q.; Zhu, P.; Miao, J.; Gao, W.; Peng, Y.; Yang, J.; Xu, K.; Xiong, B.; et al. Development of Novel β-Carboline-Based Hydroxamate Derivatives as HDAC Inhibitors with Antiproliferative and Antimetastatic Activities in Human Cancer Cells. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 144, 398–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Filali, I.; Belkacem, M.A.; Ben Nejma, A.; Souchard, J.P.; Ben Jannet, H.; Bouajila, J. Synthesis, Cytotoxic, Anti-Lipoxygenase and Anti-Acetylcholinesterase Capacities of Novel Derivatives from Harmine. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2016, 31, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Zhang, X.F.; Sun, R.Q.; Jia, Y.F.; Chen, Q.; Tu, R.F.; Li, K.K.; Zhang, X.D.; Du, R.L.; Cao, R.H. Synthesis and Mechanisms of Action of Novel Harmine Derivatives as Potential Antitumor Agents. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Shankaraiah, N.; Sharma, P.; Pedapati, S.; Nekkanti, S.; Srinivasulu, V.; Praveen Kumar, N.; Kamal, A. Synthesis of Novel C3-Linked beta-Carboline-Pyridine Derivatives Employing Khronke Reaction: DNA-Binding Ability and Molecular Modeling Studies. Lett. Drug Des. Discov. 2016, 13, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mota, N.S.R.S.; Kviecinski, M.R.; Felipe, K.B.; Grinevicius, V.M.A.S.; Siminski, T.; Almeida, G.M.; Zeferino, R.C.; Pich, C.T.; Filho, D.W.; Pedrosa, R.C. β-Carboline Alkaloid Harmine Induces DNA Damage and Triggers Apoptosis by a Mitochondrial Pathway: Study in Silico, in Vitro and in Vivo. Int. J. Funct. Nutr. 2020, 1, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shankaraiah, N.; Jadala, C.; Nekkanti, S.; Senwar, K.R.; Nagesh, N.; Shrivastava, S.; Naidu, V.G.M.; Sathish, M.; Kamal, A. Design and Synthesis of C3-Tethered 1,2,3-Triazolo-β-Carboline Derivatives: Anticancer Activity, DNA-Binding Ability, Viscosity and Molecular Modeling Studies. Bioorganic Chem. 2016, 64, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sathish, M.; Kavitha, B.; Nayak, V.L.; Tangella, Y.; Ajitha, A.; Nekkanti, S.; Alarifi, A.; Shankaraiah, N.; Nagesh, N.; Kamal, A. Synthesis of Podophyllotoxin Linked β-Carboline Congeners as Potential Anticancer Agents and DNA Topoisomerase II Inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 144, 557–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Huber, K.; Brault, L.; Fedorov, O.; Gasser, C.; Filippakopoulos, P.; Bullock, A.N.; Fabbro, D.; Trappe, J.; Schwaller, J.; Knapp, S.; et al. 7,8-Dichloro-1-Oxo-β-Carbolines as a Versatile Scaffold for the Development of Potent and Selective Kinase Inhibitors with Unusual Binding Modes. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xin, B.; Tang, W.; Wang, Y.; Lin, G.; Liu, H.; Jiao, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Yuan, H.; Chen, Y.; Lu, T. Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of β-Carboline Derivatives as Novel Inhibitors Targeting B-Raf Kinase. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 4783–4786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ikeda, R.; Kurosawa, M.; Okabayashi, T.; Takei, A.; Yoshiwara, M.; Kumakura, T.; Sakai, N.; Funatsu, O.; Morita, A.; Ikekita, M.; et al. 3-(3-Phenoxybenzyl)Amino-β-Carboline: A Novel Antitumor Drug Targeting α-Tubulin. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 4784–4787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Salehi, P.; Babanezhad-Harikandei, K.; Bararjanian, M.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Esmaeili, M.A.; Aliahmadi, A. Synthesis of Novel 1,2,3-Triazole Tethered 1,3-Disubstituted β-Carboline Derivatives and Their Cytotoxic and Antibacterial Activities. Med. Chem. Res. 2016, 25, 1895–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sharma, B.; Gu, L.; Pillay, R.P.; Cele, N.; Awolade, P.; Singh, P.; Kaur, M.; Kumar, V. Design, Synthesis, and Anti-Proliferative Evaluation of 1: H -1,2,3-Triazole Grafted Tetrahydro-β-Carboline-Chalcone/Ferrocenylchalcone Conjugates in Estrogen Responsive and Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 11137–11147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Samundeeswari, S.; Kulkarni, M.V.; Joshi, S.D.; Dixit, S.R.; Jayakumar, S.; Ezhilarasi, R.M. Synthesis and Human Anticancer Cell Line Studies on Coumarin-β-carboline Hybrids as Possible Antimitotic Agents. ChemistrySelect 2016, 1, 5019–5024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Matos, M.J.; Santana, L.; Uriarte, E.; Abreu, O.A.; Molina, E.; Yordi, E.G. Coumarins—An Important Class of Phytochemicals. In Phytochemicals—Isolation, Characterisation and Role in Human Health; Rao, A.V., Rao, L.G., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2015; pp. 113–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Akkol, E.K.; Genç, Y.; Bü¸sra Karpuz, B.; Sobarzo-Sánchez, E.; Capasso, R. Cancers Coumarins and Coumarin-Related Compounds in Pharmacotherapy of Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Garg, G.; Khandelwal, A.; Blagg, B.S.J. Anticancer Inhibitors of Hsp90 Function: Beyond the Usual Suspects. Adv. Cancer Res. 2016, 129, 51–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Jantamat, P.; Weerapreeyakul, N.; Puthongking, P. Cytotoxicity and Apoptosis Induction of Coumarins and Carbazole Alkaloids from Clausena Harmandiana. Molecules 2019, 24, 3385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Haldón, E.; Nicasio, M.C.; Pérez, P.J. Copper-Catalysed Azide-Alkyne Cycloadditions (CuAAC): An Update. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 9528–9550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, W.; Li, Z.; Zhou, M.; Wu, F.; Hou, X.; Luo, H.; Liu, H.; Han, X.; Yan, G.; Ding, Z.; et al. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 4-(1,2,3-Triazol-1-Yl)Coumarin Derivatives as Potential Antitumor Agents. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 24, 799–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Perković, I.; Raić-Malić, S.; Fontinha, D.; Prudêncio, M.; Pessanha de Carvalho, L.; Held, J.; Tandarić, T.; Vianello, R.; Zorc, B.; Rajić, Z. Harmicines—Harmine and Cinnamic Acid Hybrids as Novel Antiplasmodial Hits. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 187, 111927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Marinović, M.; Poje, G.; Perković, I.; Fontinha, D.; Prudêncio, M.; Held, J.; Pessanha de Carvalho, L.; Tandarić, T.; Vianello, R.; Rajić, Z. Further investigation of harmicines as novel antiplasmodial agents: Synthesis, structure-activity relationship and insight into the mechanism of action. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 224, 113687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Marinović, M.; Perković, I.; Fontinha, D.; Prudêncio, M.; Held, J.; Pessanha de Carvalho, L.; Tandarić, T.; Vianello, R.; Zorc, B.; Rajić, Z. Novel harmicines with improved potency against Plasmodium. Molecules 2020, 25, 4376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chemicalize ChemAxon. Available online: https://chemicalize.com/ (accessed on 24 May 2021).
  34. De Miranda, A.S. The Methylation Effect in Medicinal Chemistry. Rev. Virtual De Quim. 2011, 3, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wu, L.-W.; Zhang, J.-K.; Rao, M.; Zhang, Z.-Y.; Zhu, H.-J.; Zhang, C. Harmine suppresses the proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells and sensitizes pancreatic cancer to gemcitabine treatment. OncoTargets Ther. 2019, 12, 4585–4593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Dai, F.; Chen, Y.; Song, Y.; Huang, L.; Zhai, D.; Dong, Y.; Lai, L.; Zhang, T.; Li, D.; Pang, X.; et al. A natural small molecule harmine inhibits angiogenesis and suppresses tumour growth through activation of p53 in endothelial cells. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e52162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ding, Y.; He, J.; Huang, J.; Yu, T.; Shi, X.; Zhang, T.; Yan, G.; Chen, S.; Peng, C. Harmine induces anticancer activity in breast cancer cells via targeting TAZ. Int. J. Oncol. 2019, 54, 1995–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Rao, C.P.; Srimannarayana, G. Claisen Rearrangement of 4- Propargloxycoumarins: Formation of 2H,5HPyrano[3,2-c][1]benzopyran-5-ones. Synth. Commun. 1990, 20, 535–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 26 06490 g001 550
Figure 1. β-carboline hybrids with anticancer activity: (a) β-carboline–triazole hybrid (IC50 = 3.67 and 5.44 µM against HT-29 and HGC-27) [16], (b) coumarin–β-carboline hybrid (GI50 = 67.5 µM against HeLa) [23].
Figure 1. β-carboline hybrids with anticancer activity: (a) β-carboline–triazole hybrid (IC50 = 3.67 and 5.44 µM against HT-29 and HGC-27) [16], (b) coumarin–β-carboline hybrid (GI50 = 67.5 µM against HeLa) [23].
Molecules 26 06490 g001
Molecules 26 06490 g002 550
Figure 2. Novel harmirins—harmine–coumarin hybrids.
Figure 2. Novel harmirins—harmine–coumarin hybrids.
Molecules 26 06490 g002
Molecules 26 06490 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of harmirins 4 and 5.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of harmirins 4 and 5.
Molecules 26 06490 sch001
Molecules 26 06490 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Synthesis of harmirins 11–13.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of harmirins 11–13.
Molecules 26 06490 sch002
Molecules 26 06490 g003 550
Figure 3. Fluorescent microscopy image of MCF-7 incubated with 10 µM concentration of compound 12b. The cells were treated for 30 min, rinsed, and analyzed by fluorescent microscope at 400× magnification. Compound 12b shows predominantly cytoplasmic distribution. The scale bar is 50 µm.
Figure 3. Fluorescent microscopy image of MCF-7 incubated with 10 µM concentration of compound 12b. The cells were treated for 30 min, rinsed, and analyzed by fluorescent microscope at 400× magnification. Compound 12b shows predominantly cytoplasmic distribution. The scale bar is 50 µm.
Molecules 26 06490 g003
Molecules 26 06490 g004 550
Figure 4. The effect of 12b and harmine on the cell cycle distribution of MCF-7 cells. Cells were treated with 10 µM of 12b and 20 µM of harmine for 24 h (A) and 48 h (B), and then the cell cycle was analyzed by flow cytometry. The histograms represent the percentage of cells in the respective cell cycle phase (G1, S, and G2/M). Average values from three individual experiments ± SD are presented.
Figure 4. The effect of 12b and harmine on the cell cycle distribution of MCF-7 cells. Cells were treated with 10 µM of 12b and 20 µM of harmine for 24 h (A) and 48 h (B), and then the cell cycle was analyzed by flow cytometry. The histograms represent the percentage of cells in the respective cell cycle phase (G1, S, and G2/M). Average values from three individual experiments ± SD are presented.
Molecules 26 06490 g004
Table
Table 1. The reaction conditions for the synthesis of harmirins and obtained yields.
Table 1. The reaction conditions for the synthesis of harmirins and obtained yields.
Compd.General StructureRPrecatalystReducing AgentSolventTemp.TimeYield (%)
4a Molecules 26 06490 i001HCuSO4 × 5 H2ONa-ascorbatet-butanol/waterr.t.1 h51
4bCH330 min45
4cCl1 h69
4dF2 h56
5a Molecules 26 06490 i002HCu(OAc)2methanolmethanolr.t.overnight64
5bCH345
5cCl59
5dF37
11a Molecules 26 06490 i003HCu(OAc)2methanolmethanolr.t.48 h63
11bCH370 °C a25 min26
11cCl50 °C96 h26
11dF70 °C a25 min34
12a Molecules 26 06490 i004HCu(OAc)2methanolmethanolr.t.overnight53
12bCH357
12cCl48 h40
12dF120 h39
13a Molecules 26 06490 i005HCu(OAc)2methanolmethanolr.t.overnight43
13bCH353
13cCl44
13dF70 °C a40 min49
a microwave-assisted synthesis.
Table
Table 2. In vitro cytostatic activity of harmirins 4, 5, and 11–13 against human cell lines and calculated selectivity indices.
Table 2. In vitro cytostatic activity of harmirins 4, 5, and 11–13 against human cell lines and calculated selectivity indices.
Compd.IC50 a (µM) SI b (HCT116)SI b (MCF-7)
HepG2SW620HCT116MCF-7Hek293T
4a29.5 ± 3.5>50>50>50>50>1>1
4b27.3 ± 1.2>50>5035.7 ± 1.026.0 ± 1.0<0.50.7
4c>50>50>5039.1 ± 3.6>50>1>1.3
4d>50>5033.1 ± 7.7>5045.8 ± 0.21.4<0.9
5a17.8 ± 1.8>50>50>506.5 ± 1.6<0.1<0.1
5b16.8 ± 1.4>503.2 ± 0.5>5027.3 ± 2.18.6<0.6
5c18.5 ± 2.3>507.1 ± 0.715.0 ± 1.38.5 ± 0.31.20.6
5d>50>50>50>5 07.0 ± 1.6<0.1<0.1
11a6.4 ± 0.28.4 ± 0.33.3 ± 0.42.2 ± 0.26.4 ± 0.223
11b13.6 ± 0.8>50>5010.4 ± 0.821.3 ± 4.1<0.42
11c14.0 ± 1.230.3 ± 3.915.5 ± 4.413.3 ± 1.512.2 ± 1.00.80.9
11d14.2 ± 0.412.7 ± 1.82.7 ± 0.41.9 ± 0.26.9 ± 0.63.73.7
12a19.8 ± 1.130.0 ± 3.510.0 ± 3.421.6 ± 3.714.7 ± 0.81.50.7
12b19.5 ± 1.520.8 ± 0.44.7 ± 0.66.9 ± 0.7>50>10.6>7.2
12c>50>5037.6 ± 6.938.2 ± 2.546.2 ± 4.71.21.2
12d>50>50>50>50>50>1>1
13a19.6 ± 1.3>503.4 ± 0.634.0 ± 2.112.4 ± 1.13.60.4
13b>50>50>50>50>50>1>1
13c>50>5034.4 ± 3.332.0 ± 1.9>50>1.5>1.6
13d3.1 ± 0.53.3 ± 0.412.7 ± 0.62.7 ± 0.53.9 ± 0.30.31.5
HAR c18.7 ± 0.84.7 ± 0.64.0 ± 0.813.5 ± 1.112.6 ± 0.83.20.9
5-FU d5.5 ± 0.69.4 ± 0.35.2 ± 2.823.9 ± 5.78.1 ± 0.81.60.3
a IC50, the concentration that causes 50 % growth inhibition; b SI, selectivity index; c HAR, harmine; d 5-FU; 5-fluorouracil.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pavić, K.; Beus, M.; Poje, G.; Uzelac, L.; Kralj, M.; Rajić, Z. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Harmirins, Novel Harmine–Coumarin Hybrids as Potential Anticancer Agents. Molecules 2021, 26, 6490. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216490

AMA Style

Pavić K, Beus M, Poje G, Uzelac L, Kralj M, Rajić Z. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Harmirins, Novel Harmine–Coumarin Hybrids as Potential Anticancer Agents. Molecules. 2021; 26(21):6490. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216490

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pavić, Kristina, Maja Beus, Goran Poje, Lidija Uzelac, Marijeta Kralj, and Zrinka Rajić. 2021. "Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Harmirins, Novel Harmine–Coumarin Hybrids as Potential Anticancer Agents" Molecules 26, no. 21: 6490. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216490

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop