Next Article in Journal
Neural Network Aided Detection of Huntington Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Is the Use of Intraoperative 3D Navigation for Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery a Risk Factor for Post-Operative Infection?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/jcm11082109
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Risk of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus Associated with Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Nationwide Population Study

by
So Hye Nam
1,2,
Minju Kim
3,
Ye-Jee Kim
3,
Soo Min Ahn
2,
Seockchan Hong
2,
Chang-Keun Lee
2,
Bin Yoo
2,
Ji-Seon Oh
4,* and
Yong-Gil Kim
2,*
1
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu 11759, Korea
2
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
3
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, Seoul 05505, Korea
4
Department of Information Medicine, Big Data Research Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul 05505, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(8), 2109; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082109
Submission received: 9 March 2022 / Revised: 29 March 2022 / Accepted: 8 April 2022 / Published: 10 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Immunology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: This study aimed to investigate the effect of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on diabetes mellitus (DM) development in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: This nested case–control study with a cohort of 69,779 DM-naïve adult patients with RA was conducted from 2011 to 2019 in South Korea. Cases with incident DM were identified and individually matched to randomly selected controls (1:4). DMARDs use was measured for 1 year before the index date and stratified by exposure duration. The association of each DMARD use with DM risk was estimated using conditional logistic regression adjusted for comorbidities and concomitant drug use. Results: Of the patients, 5.4% were newly diagnosed with DM. The use of statins and a higher cumulative dose of corticosteroids were associated with an increased DM risk. In a multivariable-adjusted analysis, cumulative duration of exposure (CDE) >270 days/year, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.76) and methotrexate (MTX; aOR, 0.81) were associated with a significant decrease in DM risk, and tacrolimus (TAC; aOR, 1.27) was associated with an increased risk. Conclusions: Long-term use of HCQ and MTX (>270 days/year) was associated with a reduction in DM incidence as opposed to TAC.

1. Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic inflammatory disease that mainly affects the joints, resulting in loss of function and lowering quality of life. Aside from the loss of joint function, RA patients suffer from combined comorbidities, specifically cardiovascular disease (CVD), which is the most common cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with RA [1,2,3,4,5]. As is well known, diabetes mellitus (DM) is a traditional risk factor for CVD, and a higher cardiovascular risk is observed in RA patients with DM [6,7,8]. The prevalence of DM is reported to be 6–20% in patients with RA, and a recent study revealed that RA is associated with a 23% increased DM risk [9,10]. The reasons for this high prevalence of DM in RA suggests that several predisposing factors including obesity, dyslipidemia, and corticosteroids can contribute to the development of DM [11,12]. In addition, systemic inflammation in RA induced by proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-6 is also known to be linked with insulin resistance by blocking the function of insulin at the receptor level [13,14]. Thus, several studies exist on the association between RA treatment and DM, attempting to find a treatment regimen that can reduce DM incidence [11,15,16,17,18,19]. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has shown favorable incident DM outcomes in large epidemiological studies [15,18]. However, inconsistent data exist on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), except for HCQ [11,15,16,17,18]. Furthermore, assessing the effects of DMARDs on incident DM is difficult because most studies are heterogeneous in design.
Therefore, the association of individual DMARDs with incident DM was investigated here, and whether the sustainability of DMARDs affects DM development in patients with RA was examined.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Source

Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) claims data from 2011 to 2019 were used. HIRA includes all health-related information from around 50,000,000 individuals across the entire Korean population covered by the National Health Insurance program [20]. This information includes patient demographics, medical diagnoses, hospital referrals, and drug prescriptions. Disease diagnoses in the data were performed using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10).

2.2. Study Population

A nested case–control study of a nationwide RA population was conducted with the HIRA data. Patients with newly diagnosed RA (ICD-10 code, M05) from 1 October 2011 to 30 September 2019 were selected for the RA cohort. For diagnostic validation, we included RA patients who visited the outpatient clinic at least twice, had a prescription of DMARDs, and who were listed in the Korean rare and intractable diseases (RID) system. In the Korean RID system, RA is diagnosed based on the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatology classification criteria for RA and on a positive test for rheumatoid factor or anticitrullinated peptide antibodies [21]. The selection of the study population is outlined in Figure 1. Patients who received a diagnosis of DM or were prescribed any antidiabetic medication the year before base-cohort entry were excluded. Patients were also excluded if they had any of the following characteristics during the 1 year prior to the baseline, because the treatment of underlying comorbidities was expected to make it more difficult to assess the impacts of RA treatment: a diagnosis of (1) other rheumatic diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus and mixed connective tissue disease, (2) interstitial lung disease, (3) transplantation, (4) cancer, (5) human immunodeficiency virus infection, and/or (6) end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis (as detailed in Supplementary Table S1).

2.3. Case and Control Definition

Cases were defined as having their first diagnosis of diabetes from October 2012 to September 2019. The definition of diabetes was a newly recorded diagnosis of DM (ICD-10, disease code E10-14) combined with a prescription for antidiabetic medication (all insulin preparations as well as oral hypoglycemic agents). Each case was matched to four controls by sex (male/female), age at RA diagnosis (±1 year), and year of RA diagnosis (duration of the disease until DM diagnosis). The controls were defined among the current cohort population. The index date was defined as the first date of diabetes diagnosis, and the index date for controls was their matched case’s index date.

2.4. Exposure Measurement

Exposure to antirheumatic agents was identified via the prescription records. HCQ, methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide (LEF), sulfasalazine (SSZ), and tacrolimus (TAC) were classified into conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs). The use of cDMARDs was defined as having filled at least two prescriptions for the drugs within 365 days before the index date, and non-user was defined as having no record using DMARDs. The association between cDMARD exposure level and the risk of diabetes incidence was investigated by the cumulative duration of exposure (CDE). Moreover, the CDE was defined as the sum of the exposure duration for each drug and classified as 0 (nonusers), 1–90, 91–180, 181–270, and 271–365 days.

2.5. Confounding Variables

All covariates which are important diabetes determinants were assessed using data from the 365 days before the index date. Data including age, gender, comorbid medical conditions (e.g., asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], CVD, and chronic kidney disease), and use of medications were collected for each patient (Supplementary Table S1). The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was calculated to assess underlying comorbidities except for connective tissue disease [22]. In addition, prescriptions of statins, corticosteroids, and other DMARDs (e.g., biologic DMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) were examined and also included as covariables. Glucocorticoid exposure was categorized following the cumulative equivalent dosage of oral prednisolone, considering the well-known association between corticosteroid use and diabetes development [23].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Categorical and continuous variables were presented as numbers with percentages and median with interquartile range, respectively. The balance in the distribution of baseline characteristics between DM patients and matched controls was quantified using the standardized difference of the mean (SMD). A SMD < 0.1 was regarded as a fair balance of confounders between the matched group. The impact of each DMARD individually on DM risk compared with its non-user using conditional logistic regression models was determined. The risk of new-onset DM with adjustment for CCI, cumulative steroid use, statin use, and use of other DMARDs was also assessed.
Results were reported using adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS Enterprise Guide software version 7.1 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

Among the 69,779 RA patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 3772 (5.4%) cases newly diagnosed with DM and 14,830 controls matched by gender, age at RA diagnosis, and year of RA diagnosis were identified (Figure 1). The cases had a mean age of 62.3 ± 10.9 years at the index date, and 77.6% of them were women (Table 1). The mean duration from RA diagnosis to DM incidence was 2.6 ± 2.1 (median, 2.1; range, 0.0–8.0) years. The cases showed a higher prevalence of comorbidities and comedications, including essential hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, ischemic heart disease, asthma, COPD, CCI, use of statins, corticosteroids, and cDMARDs (Table 1).
Table 2 shows the ORs of incident DM for the comedications within a year of indexing. Concurrent use of statins significantly increased the odds of incident DM (unadjusted OR = 2.37, 95% CI = 2.19–2.56; adjusted OR [aOR] = 2.17, 95% CI = 2.00–2.35). Corticosteroid use showed higher odds with increasing cumulative doses, with an aOR of 3.20 (2.82–3.62) in the highest quintile (335.5–6681.8 mg) compared with the lowest quintile (0–7 mg). Based on these results, analysis of the association between cDMARDs and DM incidence was performed by adjusting for co-medications such as statins and corticosteroids.
Table 3 shows the association between the use of cDMARDs more than twice within a year and the risk of incident DM. The use of HCQ and MTX were associated with decreased aOR of incident DM; otherwise, LEF and TAC were associated with increased aOR. To investigate the potential impact of past exposure and exposure duration of DMARDs, the dose–response relationship for the risk of developing DM according to the CDE for each cDMARD was evaluated. Figure 2 shows that CDE ≤ 90 days/year was associated with an increased risk of developing DM compared with non-exposure for all individual cDMARDs. In contrast, aORs tended to significantly decrease with increasing CDE for all cDMARDs, and HCQ (aOR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.69–0.84) and MTX (aOR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.74–0.89) were associated with a significant reduction in DM risk at CDE >270 days/year. However, TAC still showed a significantly increased DM risk even at CDE >270 days/year (Figure 2; Supplementary Table S2).

4. Discussion

The present study showed the dose–response relationship between cDMARDs and incident DM by CDE. The use of MTX and HCQ more than 270 days/year was associated with a lower incidence of new-onset DM in multivariable analyses adjusted for comorbidities and concomitant medications.
DM can be developed with high inflammatory status and controlling the disease activity of RA while simultaneously minimizing the use of corticosteroids is important. In a previous cohort study on the association of corticosteroid use and incident DM in RA patients, DM risk was increased with higher dosage and longer exposure, and current use of low-dose corticosteroids (prednisolone 5 mg/day) was also associated with DM [23]. The data from the current study consistently showed that DM risk increased as much as the cumulative dose of corticosteroids, despite the possibility that the results were underestimated because we did not include intramuscular or intravenous corticosteroid injections. Several studies have documented the relationship between statin use and incident DM [18,24]. However, as presented in Table 1, the proportion of patients with dyslipidemia was higher in the case group. Considering that DM is associated with metabolic syndrome, which includes obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, it is important to manage these factors to prevent DM development [25]. Consequently, multivariable analyses were conducted by adjusting for various risk factors including comorbidities, corticosteroids, statins, and other DMARDs to evaluate the effect of individual DMARDs on DM. Among the DMARDs, HCQ is known as a representative DMARD that has a protective effect on DM by improving insulin sensitivity and pancreatic β-cell function [26]. In the US cohort study, HCQ and abatacept were associated with decreased risk of incident DM, and, in particular, the longer HCQ was treated (>4 years), the greater the reduction in DM risk was observed compared with non-HCQ users [18]. MTX, as a key RA treatment, has been focused on reducing atherosclerosis and incident DM by controlling inflammation. Although studies on MTX’s effect on atherosclerosis have been inconclusive, most DM studies have shown a decreased risk of incident DM [15,16,27,28,29]. Other cDMARDs (e.g., SSZ and LEF) have been suggested to have antihyperglycemic effects. However, clinical data to support this are lacking [30,31].
In present study, among cDMARDs, HCQ and MTX in particular showed significantly reduced DM risk at CDE > 270 days/year. Moreover, SSZ and LEF were associated with an increase in DM risk at CDE ≤ 90 days/year, but no longer showed a significant increase in DM risk at CDE > 270 days/year. These findings may suggest that the inadequate treatment of RA or a high disease activity status requiring corticosteroids use, rather than cDMARD use itself, was associated with an increased DM risk, and that continued cDMARD use was associated with a reduced DM risk. In addition, a recent study reported that an increased risk of incident DM was associated with higher disease activity and elevated inflammatory cytokine/chemokine levels (IL-6, IL-1, macrophage-derived cytokine/chemokines) in RA patients [14]. Therefore, efforts to achieve low disease activity in RA and improve patient compliance are needed in clinical practice to reduce the prevalence of incident DM in patients with RA. However, TAC was associated with an increase in DM risk at CDE ≤ 90 and CDE > 270 days/year, consistent with the well-known TAC diabetogenicity [32]. Although TAC is not commonly used for RA treatment, there are patients who have an inadequate response to csDMARDs but are difficult to treat with biologic or tsDMARDs owing to socioeconomic status or underlying comorbidities [33,34,35]. In this case, physicians are recommended to monitor their blood glucose index (e.g., hemoglobin A1c) during treatment.
The present study has some limitations. First, a restriction of access to individuals’ information (e.g., family history of DM, body mass index, smoking, disease activity, and exact compliance to drugs) and the absence of laboratory results including actual blood glucose values were noted because the study design was retrospective and performed with claims data. Second, cumulative drug exposure only 1 year before DM diagnosis was calculated, which may be insufficient to assess the impact on DM. However, considering that the median duration between RA diagnosis and incident DM was about 2 years, the observation period was not too short to assess the effect of treatment sustainability on incident DM. Third, biologic and tsDMARDs were not evaluated because of the small population. As increased TNF-α and IL-6 are associated with the pathogenesis of insulin resistance, biologic DMARDs (e.g., TNF inhibitors and tocilizumab) were expected to decrease DM risk by increasing insulin sensitivity [15,19]. In meta-analyses, TNF inhibitors use was associated with a significant decrease in diabetes risk [36]. However, the data on other biologic DMARDs including tocilizumab, abatacept, and tsDMARDs is still lacking [11,18,36]. Thus, further studies are needed as the use of biologic and tsDMARDs expands.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrated a decreased risk of incident DM in RA patients treated with HCQ and MTX as opposed to TAC and corticosteroids, which increased the risk of incident DM. This protective effect of cDMARDs on the development of incident DM was more apparent with a longer treatment duration (>270 days/year). Although further studies are required to identify the effect of biologic and tsDMARDs, the findings of the current study emphasized that the use of HCQ and MTX are associated with a reduced risk of incident DM.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm11082109/s1, Table S1: Operational definition of the exclusion criteria, comorbidities, and individual drug of comedications. Table S2: Association between cumulative use of DMARDs and incident diabetes in patients with RA.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-G.K. and J.-S.O.; methodology, S.H.N. and J.-S.O.; software, Y.-J.K.; validation, S.H.N., J.-S.O. and Y.-G.K.; formal analysis, M.K. and Y.-J.K.; investigation, S.H.N. and J.-S.O.; resources, S.H.N.; data curation, M.K. and Y.-J.K.; writing—original draft prepa Commasration, S.H.N., J.-S.O. and Y.-G.K.; writing—review and editing, J.-S.O., S.M.A., S.H., C.-K.L., B.Y. and Y.-G.K.; visualization, S.H.N., M.K. and Y.-J.K.; supervision, J.-S.O. and Y.-G.K.; project administration, J.-S.O. and Y.-G.K.; funding acquisition, J.-S.O. and Y.-G.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Y.-G. Kim received a grant from the Asan Institute for Life Science (2021IP0070) and this research was supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HR21C0198). This work was also supported by The Technology Innovation Program (20004927, Upgrade of CDM-based Distributed Biohealth Data Platform and Development of Verification Technology) funded By the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was performed following the Declaration of Helsinki, and the requirement for informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) because of the retrospective nature of the study. The waiver from IRB was certified by of Asan Medical Center (no. 20200604).

Informed Consent Statement

The requirement for informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board because of the retrospective nature of the study using a database.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to Data Protection Laws and Regulations in Korea, but the final analyzed results are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gabriel, S.E. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis. Am. J. Med. 2008, 121, S9–S14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Solomon, D.H.; Karlson, E.W.; Rimm, E.B.; Cannuscio, C.C.; Mandl, L.A.; Manson, J.E.; Stampfer, M.J.; Curhan, G.C. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in women diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis. Circulation 2003, 107, 1303–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Avina-Zubieta, J.A.; Thomas, J.; Sadatsafavi, M.; Lehman, A.J.; Lacaille, D. Risk of incident cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2012, 71, 1524–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Harding, J.L.; Pavkov, M.E.; Magliano, D.J.; Shaw, J.E.; Gregg, E.W. Global trends in diabetes complications: A review of current evidence. Diabetologia 2019, 62, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Lee, Y.H.; Song, G.G. Causal Association between Rheumatoid Arthritis with the Increased Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis. J. Rheum. Dis. 2019, 26, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Dal Canto, E.; Ceriello, A.; Ryden, L.; Ferrini, M.; Hansen, T.B.; Schnell, O.; Standl, E.; Beulens, J.W. Diabetes as a cardiovascular risk factor: An overview of global trends of macro and micro vascular complications. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2019, 26, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ozen, G.; Pedro, S.; Michaud, K. The Risk of Cardiovascular Events Associated With Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 2021, 48, 648–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peters, M.J.; van Halm, V.P.; Voskuyl, A.E.; Smulders, Y.M.; Boers, M.; Lems, W.F.; Visser, M.; Stehouwer, C.D.; Dekker, J.M.; Nijpels, G.; et al. Does rheumatoid arthritis equal diabetes mellitus as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease? A prospective study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2009, 61, 1571–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Albrecht, K.; Luque Ramos, A.; Hoffmann, F.; Redeker, I.; Zink, A. High prevalence of diabetes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from a questionnaire survey linked to claims data. Rheumatology 2018, 57, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Tian, Z.; McLaughlin, J.; Verma, A.; Chinoy, H.; Heald, A.H. The relationship between rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 10, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lillegraven, S.; Greenberg, J.D.; Reed, G.W.; Saunders, K.; Curtis, J.R.; Harrold, L.; Hochberg, M.C.; Pappas, D.A.; Kremer, J.M.; Solomon, D.H. Immunosuppressive treatment and the risk of diabetes in rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Dubreuil, M.; Rho, Y.H.; Man, A.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Love, T.J.; Ogdie, A.; Gelfand, J.M.; Choi, H.K. Diabetes incidence in psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis: A UK population-based cohort study. Rheumatology 2014, 53, 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Wasko, M.C.; Kay, J.; Hsia, E.C.; Rahman, M.U. Diabetes mellitus and insulin resistance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Risk reduction in a chronic inflammatory disease. Arthritis Care Res. 2011, 63, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Baker, J.F.; England, B.R.; George, M.; Cannon, G.; Sauer, B.; Ogdie, A.; Hamilton, B.C.; Hunter, C.; Duryee, M.J.; Thiele, G.; et al. Disease activity, cytokines, chemokines and the risk of incident diabetes in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2021, 80, 566–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Solomon, D.H.; Massarotti, E.; Garg, R.; Liu, J.; Canning, C.; Schneeweiss, S. Association between disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and diabetes risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis. JAMA 2011, 305, 2525–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Xie, W.; Yang, X.; Ji, L.; Zhang, Z. Incident diabetes associated with hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate, biologics and glucocorticoids in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2020, 50, 598–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rekedal, L.R.; Massarotti, E.; Garg, R.; Bhatia, R.; Gleeson, T.; Lu, B.; Solomon, D.H. Changes in glycosylated hemoglobin after initiation of hydroxychloroquine or methotrexate treatment in diabetes patients with rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheum. 2010, 62, 3569–3573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ozen, G.; Pedro, S.; Holmqvist, M.E.; Avery, M.; Wolfe, F.; Michaud, K. Risk of diabetes mellitus associated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and statins in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum Dis. 2017, 76, 848–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Antohe, J.L.; Bili, A.; Sartorius, J.A.; Kirchner, H.L.; Morris, S.J.; Dancea, S.; Wasko, M.C. Diabetes mellitus risk in rheumatoid arthritis: Reduced incidence with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy. Arthritis Care Res. 2012, 64, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, J.A.; Yoon, S.; Kim, L.Y.; Kim, D.S. Towards Actualizing the Value Potential of Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) Data as a Resource for Health Research: Strengths, Limitations, Applications, and Strategies for Optimal Use of HIRA Data. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2017, 32, 718–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Villeneuve, E.; Nam, J.; Emery, P. 2010 ACR-EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Rev. Bras. Reumatol. 2010, 50, 481–483. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Charlson, M.E.; Pompei, P.; Ales, K.L.; MacKenzie, C.R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J. Chronic. Dis. 1987, 40, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Movahedi, M.; Beauchamp, M.E.; Abrahamowicz, M.; Ray, D.W.; Michaud, K.; Pedro, S.; Dixon, W.G. Risk of Incident Diabetes Mellitus Associated With the Dosage and Duration of Oral Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016, 68, 1089–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, K.L.; Liu, C.J.; Chao, T.F.; Huang, C.M.; Wu, C.H.; Chen, S.J.; Chen, T.J.; Lin, S.J.; Chiang, C.E. Statins, risk of diabetes, and implications on outcomes in the general population. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012, 60, 1231–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Banerjee, Y. Is prolong use of statins associated with increase in the risk of diabetes? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013, 61, 989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Wasko, M.C.; McClure, C.K.; Kelsey, S.F.; Huber, K.; Orchard, T.; Toledo, F.G. Antidiabetogenic effects of hydroxychloroquine on insulin sensitivity and beta cell function: A randomised trial. Diabetologia 2015, 58, 2336–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. van Halm, V.P.; Nurmohamed, M.T.; Twisk, J.W.; Dijkmans, B.A.; Voskuyl, A.E. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs are associated with a reduced risk for cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A case control study. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2006, 8, R151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ridker, P.M.; Everett, B.M.; Pradhan, A.; MacFadyen, J.G.; Solomon, D.H.; Zaharris, E.; Mam, V.; Hasan, A.; Rosenberg, Y.; Iturriaga, E.; et al. Low-Dose Methotrexate for the Prevention of Atherosclerotic Events. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 752–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Baghdadi, L.R. Effect of methotrexate use on the development of type 2 diabetes in rheumatoid arthritis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0235637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Haas, R.M.; Li, P.; Chu, J.W. Glucose-lowering effects of sulfasalazine in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005, 28, 2238–2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Chen, J.; Sun, J.; Doscas, M.E.; Ye, J.; Williamson, A.J.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Prinz, R.A.; Xu, X. Control of hyperglycemia in male mice by leflunomide: Mechanisms of action. J. Endocrinol. 2018, 237, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Montero, N.; Pascual, J. Immunosuppression and Post-transplant Hyperglycemia. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2015, 11, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kawai, S.; Hashimoto, H.; Kondo, H.; Murayama, T.; Kiuchi, T.; Abe, T. Comparison of tacrolimus and mizoribine in a randomized, double-blind controlled study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 2006, 33, 2153–2161. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Dutta, S.; Ahmad, Y. The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in rheumatoid arthritis. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2011, 3, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Lee, W.S.; Lee, S.I.; Lee, M.S.; Kim, S.I.; Lee, S.S.; Yoo, W.H. Efficacy and safety of low-dose tacrolimus for active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2016, 31, 779–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Lin, C.; Ji, H.; Cai, X.; Yang, W.; Lv, F.; Ji, L. The association between the biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and the incidence of diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 161, 105216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jcm 11 02109 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow diagram showing the selection illustration. RA: rheumatoid arthritis, DM: diabetes mellitus, HIV: human immunodeficiency virus * Other rheumatic disease were systemic lupus erythematosus and mixed connective tissue disease, Sjogren’s syndrome, and inflammatory myositis.
Figure 1. Flow diagram showing the selection illustration. RA: rheumatoid arthritis, DM: diabetes mellitus, HIV: human immunodeficiency virus * Other rheumatic disease were systemic lupus erythematosus and mixed connective tissue disease, Sjogren’s syndrome, and inflammatory myositis.
Jcm 11 02109 g001
Jcm 11 02109 g002 550
Figure 2. Risk of incident DM according to CDE (days/year) of each cDMARDs. DM: diabetes mellitus, CDE: cumulative duration of exposure, cDMARDs: conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, OR: odds ratio, aOR: adjusted odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, CCI: Charlson Comorbidity Index. a Adjusted for CCI (ordinal), use of steroid (cumulative prescribed dose quintiles), use of statin (yes/no), and use of other DMARDs.
Figure 2. Risk of incident DM according to CDE (days/year) of each cDMARDs. DM: diabetes mellitus, CDE: cumulative duration of exposure, cDMARDs: conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, OR: odds ratio, aOR: adjusted odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, CCI: Charlson Comorbidity Index. a Adjusted for CCI (ordinal), use of steroid (cumulative prescribed dose quintiles), use of statin (yes/no), and use of other DMARDs.
Jcm 11 02109 g002
Table
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of cases and controls.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of cases and controls.
CharacteristicCase a
(n = 3772)		Control a
(n = 14,830)		SMDp Value
Sex, female no. (%)2928 (77.6)11,526 (77.7)0.00NE
Age at RA diagnosis, mean ± SD, years60.2 ± 11.059.9 ± 10.90.02NE
Age at index b mean ± SD, years62.3 ± 10.962.1 ± 10.90.02NE
Comorbidities, no. (%)
Essential hypertension2012 (53.3)5027 (33.9)0.40<0.001
Hypercholesterolemia479 (12.7)1210 (8.2)0.15<0.001
Ischemic heart disease347 (9.2)619 (4.2)0.20<0.001
Carotid stenosis28 (0.7)63 (0.4)0.040.014
Asthma508 (13.5)1198 (8.1)0.17<0.001
COPD121 (3.2)253 (1.7)0.10<0.001
Ischemic stroke166 (4.4)414 (2.8)0.09<0.001
Chronic kidney disease42 (1.1)88 (0.6)0.060.001
CCI score c, mean ± SD1.0 ± 1.10.7 ± 0.90.34<0.001
01425 (37.8)7740 (52.2)
1–21983 (52.6)6443 (43.4)
3–4325 (8.6)591 (4.0)
≥539 (1.0)56 (0.4)
Medications (ever use within a year), n (%)
Statins1466 (38.9)3224 (21.7)0.379<0.001
Corticosteroids1461 (38.7)3211 (21.6)0.379<0.001
cDMARDs d3515 (93.2)13,401 (90.4)0.103<0.001
Any TNFi199 (5.3)971 (6.5)0.0540.004
Non-TNFi59 (1.6)203 (1.4)0.0160.406
tsDMARDs13 (0.3)25 (0.2)0.0350.052
SMD: standardized mean difference, RA: Rheumatoid arthritis, SD: standard deviation, COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, CCI: Charlson comorbidity index, cDMARDs: conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, TNFi: tumor necrosis factor inhibitor, tsDMARDs: targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. a Data are given as number (percentage). b Age at index was defined as first date of diagnosis of diabetes, and the index date for controls was their matched case’s index date. c Charlson Comorbidity Index was calculated for each patient, excluding connective tissue disease. d cDMARDs included hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate, leflunomide, sulfasalazine, and tacrolimus.
Table
Table 2. Risk of incident DM according to statins and corticosteroids.
Table 2. Risk of incident DM according to statins and corticosteroids.
Case a
(n = 3772)		Control a
(n = 14,830)		Unadjusted OR (95% CI)p ValueAdjusted b OR (95% CI)p Value
Use of statins within a year1466 (38.9)3224 (21.7)2.37
(2.19–2.56)		<0.0012.17
(2.00–2.35)		<0.001
Cumulative corticosteroids dose within a year
0–7 mg
(1st quintile)		454 (12.0)3283 (22.1)1.00 1.00
7.5–78.3 mg
(2nd quintile)		604 (16.0)3098 (20.9)1.44
(1.26–1.64)		<0.0011.32
(1.16–1.51)		<0.001
78.5–192 mg
(3rd quintile)		716 (19.0)3014 (20.3)1.78
(1.56–2.02)		<0.0011.62
(1.42–1.85)		<0.001
192.3–335 mg
(4th quintile)		814 (21.6)2901 (19.6)2.09
(1.84–2.37)		<0.0011.92
(1.69–2.18)		<0.001
335.5–6681.8 mg
(5th quintile) 		1184 (31.4)2534 (17.1)3.55
(3.14–4.02)		<0.0013.20
(2.82–3.62)		<0.001
DM: diabetes mellitus, OR: odds ratio, CI: confidential interval, CCI: Charlson comorbidity index. a Data are given as number (percentage). b adjusted for CCI.
Table
Table 3. Risk of incident DM according to conventional DMARDs use (≥2 prescriptions within a year).
Table 3. Risk of incident DM according to conventional DMARDs use (≥2 prescriptions within a year).
Case a
(n = 3772)		Control a
(n = 14,830)		Unadjusted OR (95% CI)p ValueAdjusted b OR (95% CI)p Value
Hydroxychloroquine1497 (39.7)6370 (43.0)0.87
(0.80–0.93)		<0.0010.87
(0.81–0.94)		0.001
Methotrexate 2577 (68.3)10,210 (68.8)0.98
(0.90–1.06)		0.5940.84
(0.78–0.92)		<0.001
Leflunomide1230 (32.6)3881 (26.2)1.38
(1.28–1.50)		<0.0011.10
(1.02–1.20)		0.020
Sulfasalazine 695 (18.4)2616 (17.6)1.05
(0.96–1.16)		0.2701.03
(0.93–1.13)		0.608
Tacrolimus416 (11.0)986 (6.6)1.76
(1.56–1.99)		<0.0011.51
(1.33–1.71)		<0.001
DM: diabetes mellitus, DMARDs: disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, OR: odds ratio, CCI: Charlson comorbidity index. a Data are given as number (percentage). b Adjusted for CCI, use of steroid (cumulative prescribed dose quintiles), use of statin (yes/no).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nam, S.H.; Kim, M.; Kim, Y.-J.; Ahn, S.M.; Hong, S.; Lee, C.-K.; Yoo, B.; Oh, J.-S.; Kim, Y.-G. Risk of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus Associated with Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Nationwide Population Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2109. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082109

AMA Style

Nam SH, Kim M, Kim Y-J, Ahn SM, Hong S, Lee C-K, Yoo B, Oh J-S, Kim Y-G. Risk of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus Associated with Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Nationwide Population Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(8):2109. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082109

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nam, So Hye, Minju Kim, Ye-Jee Kim, Soo Min Ahn, Seockchan Hong, Chang-Keun Lee, Bin Yoo, Ji-Seon Oh, and Yong-Gil Kim. 2022. "Risk of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus Associated with Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Nationwide Population Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 8: 2109. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082109

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop