Next Article in Journal
Evolutionary Models of the Cenozoic Basins of Central-Western Mediterranean Area: A Review of Methodological Approaches
Next Article in Special Issue
The Usefulness of Seismic Surveys for Geotechnical Engineering in Karst: Some Practical Examples
Previous Article in Journal
Application of ‘Estimation Procedures’ in Unsaturated Soil Mechanics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prospecting and Evaluation of Underground Massive Ice by Ground-Penetrating Radar
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Quantitative Analysis of Pore Space Structure in Dry and Wet Soil by Integral Geometry Methods

1
Faculty of Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 1-2 Leninskie Gory, 119991 Moscow, Russia
2
Soil Science Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 1-12 Leninskie Gory, 119991 Moscow, Russia
3
Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute, per. Pyzhevskii 7, 119017 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Geosciences 2020, 10(9), 365; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10090365
Submission received: 29 July 2020 / Revised: 10 September 2020 / Accepted: 11 September 2020 / Published: 14 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modern Surveying and Geophysical Methods for Soil and Rock)

Abstract

:
We present a methodology for a numerical analysis of three-dimensional tomographic images in this paper. The methodology is based on integral geometry, topology, and morphological analysis methods. It involves calculating cumulative and non-cumulative pore size distributions of Minkowski functionals and Betti numbers. We investigated 13 samples in dry and wet (saturated beyond the field capacity) conditions within different horizons of the Phaeozem albic. For samples of the arable horizon, an increase in the Euler characteristic was observed in the process of wetting. For samples from the A2, AB and B2 horizons, the Euler-Poincare characteristic decreased during wetting. It has been proven that both Betti numbers (number of isolated pores and number of “tunnels”) decrease with swelling of the AB and B2 horizons at a depth of 20–90 cm. For samples from the arable horizon, another dependence was observed: A Betti number of zero increased first but decreased during wetting. Based on the change in topological characteristics, two methods of changing the topology of the void space of the soil were demonstrated. The above-described quantitative changes of proposed parameters of pore space tomographic images prove the possibility and progressiveness of their usage for the pore space transformation estimate.

1. Introduction

Soil porosity is a three-dimensional structure with complicated internal surface geometry. The mechanical and hydrological soil characteristics are mainly determined by the three-dimensional pore space structure and by a form of phase boundary “pore-solid skeleton” [1,2,3]. X-ray computed tomography allows us to obtain information about pore space structure with a high degree of extension without sample destruction. However, different methods for three-dimensional images quantitative analysis are needed to obtain quantitative information about the pore structure.
There are numerous examples of two-dimensional [4] and three-dimensional [5,6] soil image analysis using statistical, morphological, and other methods. All methods have both advantages and disadvantages, while few have been validated. Methods which have their fundamental basis in statistical physics, integral geometry, and topology are examined in the present paper. These methods are based on Minkowski functionals, i.e., four basic geometric and topological characteristics that are associated with three-dimensional objects with the purpose of structure description.
Investigations have been devoted to the application of methods based on integral geometry and morphological analysis. These methods are used for analysis media with complex internal structures at different scales [7] including soils, sedimentary rocks, foams [8], ceramics [9], and composite materials [10]. Early studies focused on artificial media [11,12] and 2-dimensional rock samples cuts [13]. In later works, 3-dimensional X-ray computed tomographic [14,15,16] and FIB-SEM [17] images were examined. The effect of the resolution of 3-dimensional images on pore-size distribution and Minkowski functional values were discussed in [18].
Specifically, in [16], intrinsic geometry quantitative analysis was examined. The samples were managed in several ways based on Minkowski functionals evolution during the process of dilatation either of the solid phase or voids analysis. This method is applicable to objects at all scales—the integral geometry and topological methods can quantitatively describe the geometry of voids in soil aggregates [19] or voids between aggregates or macroscopic pores [20].
We would like to distinguish several papers where the connection between Minkowski functionals and some functional characteristics of natural environs or liquid motion in them is demonstrated [21,22,23,24,25]. For example, in [25], Minkowski functionals were used to show that structure and water distribution impacts fungal colonization in soil. Another study investigated the intrinsic geometry change of oil reservoir voids during acid handling using topological methods and persistent homology theory [26].
The process of soil saturation with liquid leads to significant changes in soil properties. This process was discussed in the works [27,28,29]. In particular, [27] investigated the influence of the cycles of wetting and drying on the dynamics of the pore structure of three different soil types. In this study, the methodology for sample void intrinsic geometry analysis [30,31,32,33] was used to quantitatively describe soil changes in samples in dry conditions upon wetting. With this issue, the tomographic images of several samples from different horizons in dry conditions were obtained. Then, all samples were moistened and tomographed for the second time.
In the present investigation, a morphological “opening” operation was used to obtain a cumulative and non-cumulative pore size distribution of Minkowski functionals [24,33]. This method was chosen because it is necessary to obtain three-dimensional images of pores of various sizes to calculate the distributions of topological characteristics. Additionally, in this paper it is proposed to analyze voids Betti numbers in addition to Minkowski functionals due to the visible interpretation: zero Betti number is associated with the number of individual pores and the first Betti number is associated with number of tunnels in soil sample.

2. Materials and Methods

The Phaeozem albic (WRB 2014, version of 2015) from Vladimirskoe Opolie was the object of investigation. Vladimirskoe Opolie is situated in Russian valley northwest of Vladimir, on the west high bank of river Kliaz’ma, to the southeast of the Moscow glaciation boundary. The average long-term precipitations total is 575 mm and the evaporation capacity is more than 400 mm per year. Some physical properties of these soils are represented in Table A1. The size of investigated objects was determined by the laser diffraction method, in which the laser particle analyzer Analysette 22 Comfort (FRITCH, Germany) was used. The bulk density was determined with sample rings, the filed capacity was determined in the field [34].
In Phaeozem albic the subsoil compaction appears at 20–30 cm depth in terms of consolidation at 20–40 cm depth. The consolidation graduates into horizons compacted by evolutionary soil processes in deeper layers. The compaction does not go beyond the critical values of bulk density for loamy cultivated soil (>1.4 g/cm3) [35]. However, the differences are essential compared to arable layers which have bulk density on optimum level. This occurrence stands to be mentioned as a characteristic one for clay-loam intensively used ploughing soils.

2.1. Sample Preparation and Wetting Process

The mold for monoliths was constructed using a medicine syringe with 20 mL volume. The syringe hub was taken out and the syringe was cut down to a height of 40 mm. For sample collection, soil was cut until it formed a rail of 10 cm depth around the monolithic sample. Thus, a “pocket” of soil was made in the form of truncated cone, where the upper base diameter was congruent to the syringe diameter and the lower base diameter was 2–3 cm wider than the syringe diameter. The form of the truncated cone provided stability and reduced the risk of monolithic cracking or breaking. After preparation procedures, the syringe was pushed on the monolith by undercutting the truncated cone to the cylindrical form every 5–10 cm of syringe moving. After the monolith was fully immersed into the syringe, the sample was cut in and evened from the bottom on the periphery of the syringe and was sealed with a sticky tape.
Thirteen monolithic samples were collected for laboratory investigation with X-ray computed tomography. Samples were collected from different horizons of Phaeozem albic soil. A visualization of voids from all samples in dry conditions can be found in Figure 1.
X-ray computed tomography was carried out under two different saturation conditions: air-dried and saturated beyond the field capacity. After the first air-dry tomography scanning, the sample was moistened by supplying excess water through the base standing on several filter papers. The imbibition continued for 7 full days with permanent watering until the water table rose up to the top base of the specimen. Then, the sample was free drained on a sandy base reaching the constant weight without evaporation. Then, a 3D image of the specimen was acquired through microtomography, with a time acquisition of 2–3 h. Soil humidity was constant during imaging.

2.2. X-ray Computed Tomography and Image Analysis

The tomographic investigation of pore space structure was carried out with a SkyScan 1172 (Belgium) microtomographer with different energy settings for dry (100 kV, 100 μA, Al + Cu filter) and wet (70 kV, 129 μA, Al filter) samples. The X-ray source was a Hamamatsu 100/250 with 10 W output. The imaging parameters were chosen so as to minimize costs (the running time of X-ray tunnel and CMOS device) of the microtomographer, but to obtain sufficient final image quality. Soil samples consisted of several vertical sections which were acquired in one hour.
The projections were reconstructed onto a 3D image with the Feldkamp algorithm [36] implemented in NReckon software. Voids visualization of each sample in dry and moisture-saturated conditions are provided in Supplementary Materials (Figures S1–S11). We obtained 3D sample images with 16-bit arrays and a resolution of 8 micrometers in each direction. After median filtering with a 3 by 3 kernel, pores were identified via Fiji [37] implementation of minimum cross entropy thresholding method [38], which showed the most consistent results. We will only consider the visible porosity because the pores smaller than several voxels in size are not resolved.
Two-dimensional tomographic images of one soil sample are presented in Figure 2. The sample was acquired in dry and moisture-saturated conditions. The changes in void structure are visible—some flat cracks are closed, and cylindrical shaped channels have narrowed.

3. Minkowski Functionals and Betti Numbers

3.1. Theory

Let X be an object which is bounded by the smooth surface δ X in Euclidean d-dimensional space. To describe the geometric and topological properties of this object, the integral geometry enables us to determine d + 1 topological invariants that are named Minkowski functionals [39,40]. Here, consideration is given to three-dimensional tomographic images of soil samples. Thus, only 3-dimensional space will be reviewed. The object of investigation was the pore space because its structure mainly determines the soil properties. In this case, the Minkowski functionals correspond to pores volume, surface area of pores, and integral mean curvature of pore–soil interface and Euler-Poincare characteristic of pore space:
M 0 ( X ) = V ( X ) ,
M 1 ( X ) = δ X d S = S ( X ) ,
M 2 ( X ) = δ X ( 1 r 1 + 1 r 2 ) d S = C ( X ) ,
M 3 ( X ) = δ X 1 r 1 r 2 d S = 2 π χ ( δ X ) = 4 π χ ( X ) ,
where r 1 and r 2 are the main radii of surface curvature d S , while χ ( δ X ) and χ ( X ) are the Euler-Poincare characteristics for the surface and convex body, respectively. To compare values of Minkowski functionals obtained from different samples, we used normalization. For example, if the size of the 3-dimensional image was 1000 × 1000 × 1000 voxels, then the values of functionals were divided by 109.
The Euler-Poincare characteristic for the convex body is an integral estimate of topological complexity, and can be determined as an alternative summary of Betti numbers:
χ ( X ) = b 0 ( X ) b 1 ( X ) + b 2 ( X ) ,
where Betti numbers can be interpreted in the context of soil pore space in the following way [31,41]: b 0 is the number of connected components (individual pores), b 1 is the number of “tunnels” (or redundant connections, loops, torus—all types of pores that cannot be compacted into a dot), and b 2 is the number of solid clusters that are completely surrounded by pores (supposed to be equivalent to 1).
Only two phases (pores and solid skeleton) are rationalized in the investigated sample, so, according to [42,43], Minkowski functionals and Betti numbers were calculated for the pore space. The water inside the specimens in moisture-saturated condition was not considered. Values for the solid phase can be determined using an analytic approach.

3.2. Algorithms

The 3-dimensional image of voids can be represented in terms of cubical complexes [44,45]. The additivity of Minkowski functionals affords the use of combinatorial algorithms to calculate them. There are several algorithms which enable the calculation of Minkowski functional values [40,46,47]. In [46], an algorithm based on calculating the number of different local configurations of 2 × 2 × 2 voxel was proposed, while in [40] an algorithm based on calculating the number of vertices, edges, faces and voxels in cubical complex was presented:
V ( X ) = n c ,
S ( X ) = 6 n c + 2 n f ,
2 C ( X ) = 3 n c 2 n f + n e ,
χ ( X ) = n c + n f n e + n ν ,
where n c is the number of cubes, n f is the number of faces, n e is the number of edges and n ν is the number of vertices in the cubical complex which is associated with sample voids.
In this study, we used [47] software to compute Minkowski functionals. Zero and second Betti numbers (numbers of connected clusters of pore space and solid matrix) were calculated using basic functions of MATLAB [48] and ImageJ [49]. The first Betty number was calculated using the following equation:
b 1 ( X ) = b 0 ( X ) + b 2 ( X ) χ ( X ) .

3.3. Mathematical Morphology: Erosion, Dilatation, and Opening Operations

The morphological opening operation used in this study relates to the type of methods which is called the mathematical morphology. Classical mathematical morphology was proposed in [50], where the main morphological operations of erosion and dilatation were introduced. Mathematical morphology was used for tomographic soil images [20,33,51] analysis. A detailed mathematical morphology methods review describing their applicability for investigations of 2D and 3D images of natural structures is provided in [52].
The erosion operation leads to object boundaries expansion. Conversely, the dilatation leads to boundaries narrowing (Figure A1 and Figure A2). An opening operation was obtained by successive usage of erosion and dilatation operations with structural unit identical form and size for objects:
X B d = ( X B d ) B d ,
where B d is the structural spherical shaped unit with diameter d , and symbols   a n d   define erosion and dilatation operations, respectively. As a result of the opening operation usage, objects which are smaller than the size of structural unit disappear. Thus, the dependences M i ( d ) and b i ( d ) represents the cumulative distribution of M i and b i over pore sizes. Non-cumulative distributions of Minkowski functionals and Betti numbers can be carried out as a derivative of the cumulative distributions.
In Figure 3 demonstrates the results of the morphology opening operation with increasing structural discus-shaped unit appliance to the sample pore space image. The generation of similar functionals distributions for the pore space of samples in dry and wet conditions enabled the quantitative description of change in pore space structure due to soil wetting. The advantage of this approach is that there is no need to separate the pore space into individual pore objects [5].

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Topological Analysis of All Samples

The topological invariants (Euler-Poincare characteristic and Betti number) of all samples in our investigation are reported in Table 1. For samples from the arable horizon, an increase in the Euler-Poincare characteristic is observed during the wetting process. On the other hand, for samples from the A2, AB, and B2 horizons, the Euler-Poincare characteristic decreased during wetting (except for sample 6). All samples were divided into two groups based on mechanism of topological change of pore space during wetting:
  • Samples with a “normal” topology change (samples from 20–90 cm depth, horizons A2, AB, and B2). Both Betti numbers (number of connected clusters and number of tunnels) decreased during swelling. The Euler-Poincare characteristic change was determined by the correlation between closed pores and closed tunnels: In the samples from the above-mentioned horizons the number of closed pores was bigger than the number of closed tunnels: ( b 0 dry b 0 wet > b 1 dry b 1 wet ), so the Euler-Poincare value decreased. These samples were taken from the horizons which had not been agriculturally exploited, so a denser (>1.3 g/cm3) and more stable structure was preserved. Upon wetting, some tunnels are closed, or at least partly closed, allowing them to be subsumed to the category of individual pores. In one of the samples taken from 20–30 cm depth from the A2 horizon (sample 6), the number of closed pores was smaller than the number of closed tunnels and the Euler-Poincare value increased. The correlation can be explained by the individual structural features of the samples, particularly by the large number of small tunnels which closed during wetting (Figure S17).
  • Samples with an “irregular” changing topology (0–20 cm, arable horizon). In these samples, the b 1 (number of tunnels) decreased, but the b 0 (number of connected clusters) increased during the wetting process. In this case, an increase in the number of small pores was observed (this was also proved by the increasing integral mean curvature in that range). Apparently, during the swelling, some pores become smaller but not enough to close. Another explanation can be a mechanism whereby small pores do not close up because they are filled with an X-ray transparent substance, for example, clamped pendular water [53]. In samples from the arable horizon at a depth of 10–20 cm, a number of tunnels narrowed slightly, which can be explained by the presence of plant roots in most tunnels. For the majority of agricultural crops in a mild climate, about 50% of all plant roots are accumulated at a depth of 8–20 cm [54]. These roots can keep tunnels open during soil wetting. It should be noted that in one of the samples from the arable horizon at a depth of 0–10 cm (sample 2), the change in the topology of the pore space occurred in agreement with the “normal” change (Figure S13).

4.2. The Detailed Analysis of the Sample from the B2 Horizon

Here, we discuss the pore size distribution of Minkowski functionals and Betti numbers in the sample from the B2 horizon. The sample was taken from a depth of 80–90 cm and its pore space image is presented in Figure 4. The dependence graphs for all samples are shown in Supplementary Materials (Figures S12–S22). The dependencies analysis from Figure 5 suggests that, during soil wetting, the total sample porosity narrowed across the entire range of pore sizes; furthermore, the specific surface area of pores narrowed too. The integral mean curvature of pore spaces narrowed by less than 0.4 mm, which can be explained by the small number of pores closing. These small pores have a large specific surface curvature. The large pores and tunnels reduced slightly in size and did not change their form, so their curvature changed minimally.
More detailed changes which take place in the void’s structure are illustrated by the distribution of the Euler-Poincare characteristic and Betti numbers. The larger the Euler-Poincare value is, the stronger individual pores dominate over tunnels in a void’s structure. The structures where tunnels prevail over individual pores have negative values of the Euler-Poincare characteristic.
In a case sample from B2 horizon, a Euler-Poincare characteristic of voids narrows during soil swelling across the entire range of pore sizes. This means the voids become more bound together topologically. This can be proved by Betti numbers analysis, which enables visual interpretation. A zero Betti number is associated with the void’s connected clusters, whereas the first Betti number is associated with numbers of tunnels in the solid phase. The individual pore spaces ( b 0 ) are interstices that do not have exits past the sample boundaries. These pores are closed. The tunnels ( b 1 ) are open pores with more than one exit past the sample boundaries (perforated pore). It can also be a closed pore with a form topologically identical to torus.
The distribution analysis suggests that the dry sample contains more individual pores or tunnels than the wet sample, with a difference in the range of 0–0.4 mm. Nevertheless, pores are more likely to become closed than tunnels: b 0 dry b 0 wet > b 1 dry b 1 wet . It is worth noting that the aforementioned correlation is not universe for all samples. The second Betti number equals 1 (it is associated with the connected clusters of soils phase which are surrounded by voids) and is not represented in graphs.

5. Conclusions

Here we presented the methodological base of the void structure quantitative description. The methodology is based on the methods from integral geometry, topology, and mathematical morphology. Methodology can be applied to media with complex internal structures at different scales, including but not limited to soils, sedimentary rocks, foams, ceramics, and composite materials.
The void structure’s evolution of 13 monolithic samples during soil wetting was quantitatively illustrated. To quantitatively demonstrate the changes in the structure of the pore space, an analysis of the evolution of the Minkowski functionals and Betti numbers was carried out. The results suggest that quantitative topological analysis can be used to describe either the void structure or the changes in internal structure of voids which are initiated by some external effect or process. We found that the topology of the void space in the process of soil saturation can change in two ways. A “normal” change in topology implies a decrease in the zero and first Betty numbers of the pore space, and is observed in soils from the A2, AB, and B2 horizons at a depth of 20–90 cm. An “irregular” change in the pore space was found for soils from the arable horizon at a depth of 0–20 cm. The zero Betty number of the pore space for these samples increased and then decreased during wetting.
Eventually, we plan to transition from quantitative characteristics of pore space to the functional characteristics of hydro-physical properties of soil. The future target of research is the degraded soils. The possibility of association of Minkowski functionals and Betti numbers with physical properties such as field capacity, wilting moisture content, bubbling pressure, hydraulic conductivity, and other physical pedological characteristics will be investigated.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/10/9/365/s1, Figures S1–11: Void visualization of samples taken from different depths and horizons in dry and moisture-saturated conditions; Figures S12–S22: Distribution of specific pore volumes, surface areas and integral mean curvature of pore surfaces, Euler-Poincare characteristics and Betti numbers as a function of pore sizes for a samples at different depths and horizons in dry and moisture-saturated conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.S., D.I.; methodology, T.K., E.S., D.I.; software, D.I.; validation, E.S., E.G.; formal analysis, T.K.; investigation, T.K.; resources, T.K., E.S.; data curation, D.I., E.S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.I.; writing—review and editing, D.I., T.K., E.S.; visualization, D.I.; supervision, E.S., E.G.; project administration, E.S.; funding acquisition, E.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was partly supported by the RFBR, project 19-29-05112_mk, “Digital physics and soil hydrology: the basics of spatial-dynamic analysis, prediction of risks of critical situations and optimal control”.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to K.N. Abrosimov for help with obtaining tomographic images of soils. The tomographic work was carried out with the involvement of the equipment from the Center for the Collective Use of Scientific Equipment “Functions and properties of soils and soil cover” of V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute. The authors also thank the three anonymous reviewers, whose insightful comments helped improve the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Physical and chemical properties of silty loam Phaeozem albic.
Table A1. Physical and chemical properties of silty loam Phaeozem albic.
Depth, cmHorizonsSoil Texture Diameter, mmDensity, g/cm3FC, % vol.Sat. Hydraulic Conductivity, cm/Days
<0.0020.002–0.05>0.05
0–5Arable17.3980.661.951.137.360
0–1017.3580.212.441.1637.258
10–2017.21802.791.213752
20–30A217.0381.621.751.3338.626
30–401682.431.571.3638.232
40–50AB17.3581.760.891.3337.435
50–6017.3282.090.591.3935.335
80–100B218.481.10.51.437.628.5
Figure A1. An example of morphological erosion operation applied with structural units of different sizes for images of samples from the arable soil horizon. Voids are white and solid phase is black.
Figure A1. An example of morphological erosion operation applied with structural units of different sizes for images of samples from the arable soil horizon. Voids are white and solid phase is black.
Geosciences 10 00365 g0a1
Figure A2. An example of morphological dilatation operation applied with structural units of different sizes for images of samples from the arable soil horizon. Voids are white and solid phase is black.
Figure A2. An example of morphological dilatation operation applied with structural units of different sizes for images of samples from the arable soil horizon. Voids are white and solid phase is black.
Geosciences 10 00365 g0a2

References

  1. Zhao, S.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, J. Quantitative analysis of soil pores under natural vegetation successions on the Loess Plateau. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2010, 53, 617–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Costanza-Robinson, M.S.; Estabrook, B.D.; Fouhey, D.F. Representative elementary volume estimation for porosity, moisture saturation, and air-water interfacial areas in unsaturated porous media: Data quality implications. Water Resour. Res. 2011, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rigby, S.P.; Chigada, P.I.; Wang, J.; Wilkinson, S.K.; Bateman, H.; Al-Duri, B.; Wood, J.; Bakalis, S.; Miri, T. Improving the interpretation of mercury porosimetry data using computerised X-ray tomography and mean-field DFT. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 66, 2328–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Karsanina, M.V.; Gerke, K.M.; Skvortsova, E.B.; Ivanov, A.L.; Mallants, D. Enhancing image resolution of soils by stochastic multiscale image fusion. Geoderma 2018, 314, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Houston, A.N.; Otten, W.; Falconer, R.; Monga, O.; Baveye, P.C.; Hapca, S.M. Quantification of the pore size distribution of soils: Assessment of existing software using tomographic and synthetic 3D images. Geoderma 2017, 299, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Leue, M.; Uteau-Puschmann, D.; Peth, S.; Nellesen, J.; Kodešová, R.; Gerke, H.H. Separation of Soil Macropore Types in Three-Dimensional X-Ray Computed Tomography Images Based on Pore Geometry Characteristics. Vadose Zone J. 2019, 18, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Armstrong, R.T.; McClure, J.E.; Robins, V.; Liu, Z.; Arns, C.H.; Schlüter, S.; Berg, S. Porous Media Characterization Using Minkowski Functionals: Theories, Applications and Future Directions. Transp. Porous Media 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gregorová, E.; Uhlířová, T.; Pabst, W.; Diblíková, P.; Sedlářová, I. Microstructure characterization of mullite foam by image analysis, mercury porosimetry and X-ray computed microtomography. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 12315–12328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pabst, W.; Uhlířová, T.; Gregorová, E. Microstructure Characterization of Porous Ceramics Via Minkowski Functionals. In Ceramic Transactions Series; Singh, D., Fukushima, M., Kim, Y.-W., Shimamura, K., Imanaka, N., Ohji, T., Amoroso, J., Lanagan, M., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 53–64. ISBN 978-1-119-49409-6. [Google Scholar]
  10. Tsukanov, A.; Ivonin, D.; Gotman, I.; Gutmanas, E.Y.; Grachev, E.; Pervikov, A.; Lerner, M. Lerner Effect of Cold-Sintering Parameters on Structure, Density, and Topology of Fe–Cu Nanocomposites. Materials 2020, 13, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Mecke, K.R.; Wagner, H. Euler characteristic and related measures for random geometric sets. J Stat. Phys. 1991, 64, 843–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Arns, C.H.; Knackstedt, M.A.; Mecke, K.R. Characterisation of irregular spatial structures by parallel sets and integral geometric measures. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2004, 241, 351–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Arns, C.; Knackstedt, M.; Martys, N. Cross-property correlations and permeability estimation in sandstone. Phys. Rev. E 2005, 72, 046304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Feng, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, T.; Bai, Z.; Reading, L. Using computed tomography images to characterize the effects of soil compaction resulting from large machinery on three-dimensional pore characteristics in an opencast coal mine dump. J. Soils Sediments 2019, 19, 1467–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. San José Martínez, F.; Martín, L.; García-Gutiérrez, C. Minkowski Functionals of Connected Soil Porosity as Indicators of Soil Tillage and Depth. Front. Environ. Sci. 2018, 6, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. San José Martínez, F.; Muñoz Ortega, F.J.; Caniego Monreal, F.J.; Kravchenko, A.N.; Wang, W. Soil aggregate geometry: Measurements and morphology. Geoderma 2015, 237–238, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Çeçen, A.; Wargo, E.A.; Hanna, A.C.; Turner, D.M.; Kalidindi, S.R.; Kumbur, E.C. 3-D Microstructure Analysis of Fuel Cell Materials: Spatial Distributions of Tortuosity, Void Size and Diffusivity. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2012, 159, B299–B307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wyss, P.; Flisch, A.; Lehmann, E.; Vontobel, P.; Krafczyk, M.; Kaestner, A.; Beckmann, F.; Gygi, A.; Flühler, H. Tomographical Imaging and Mathematical Description of Porous Media Used for the Prediction of Fluid Distribution. Vadose Zone J. 2006, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wang, W.; Kravchenko, A.N.; Smucker, A.J.M.; Liang, W.; Rivers, M.L. Intra-aggregate Pore Characteristics: X-ray Computed Microtomography Analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2012, 76, 1159–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. San José Martínez, F.; Muñoz-Ortega, F.; Caniego, J.; Peregrina, F. Morphological Functions to Quantify Three-Dimensional Tomograms of Macropore Structure in a Vineyard Soil with Two Different Management Regimes. Vadose Zone J. 2013, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Berg, C.F. Permeability Description by Characteristic Length, Tortuosity, Constriction and Porosity. Transp. Porous Media 2014, 103, 381–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Akai, T.; Lin, Q.; Alhosani, A.; Bijeljic, B.; Blunt, M. Quantification of Uncertainty and Best Practice in Computing Interfacial Curvature from Complex Pore Space Images. Materials 2019, 12, 2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. McClure, J.E.; Armstrong, R.T.; Berrill, M.A.; Schlüter, S.; Berg, S.; Gray, W.G.; Miller, C.T. A geometric state function for two-fluid flow in porous media. Phys. Rev. Fluids 2018, 3, 084306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vogel, H.-J. Topological Characterization of Porous Media. In Morphology of Condensed Matter; Mecke, K., Stoyan, D., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2002; Volume 600, pp. 75–92. ISBN 978-3-540-44203-5. [Google Scholar]
  25. Falconer, R.E.; Houston, A.N.; Otten, W.; Baveye, P.C. Emergent Behavior of Soil Fungal Dynamics: Influence of Soil Architecture and Water Distribution. Soil Sci. 2012, 177, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Khachkova, T.S.; Bazaikin, Y.V.; Lisitsa, V.V. Use of the computational topology to analyze the pore space changes during chemical dissolution. Numer. Methods Program. 2020, 21, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Diel, J.; Vogel, H.-J.; Schlüter, S. Impact of wetting and drying cycles on soil structure dynamics. Geoderma 2019, 345, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Weller, U.; Leuther, F.; Schlüter, S.; Vogel, H.-J. Quantitative Analysis of Water Infiltration in Soil Cores Using X-Ray. Vadose Zone J. 2018, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Pires, L.F.; Auler, A.C.; Roque, W.L.; Mooney, S.J. X-ray microtomography analysis of soil pore structure dynamics under wetting and drying cycles. Geoderma 2020, 362, 114103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Vogel, H.-J.; Roth, K. Quantitative morphology and network representation of soil pore structure. Adv. Water Resour. 2001, 24, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vogel, H.J. Morphological determination of pore connectivity as a function of pore size using serial sections. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 1997, 48, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Vogel, H.J.; Kretzschmar, A. Topological characterization of pore space in soil—Sample preparation and digital image-processing. Geoderma 1996, 73, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vogel, H.-J.; Weller, U.; Schlüter, S. Quantification of soil structure based on Minkowski functions. Comput. Geosci. 2010, 36, 1236–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shein, E.V.; Troshina, O.A. Physical properties of soils and the simulation of the hydrothermal regime for the complex soil cover of the Vladimir Opol’e region. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2012, 45, 968–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shein, E.V.; Kiryushin, V.I.; Korchagin, A.A.; Mazirov, M.A.; Dembovetskii, A.V.; Il’in, L.I. Assessment of agronomic homogeneity and compatibility of soils in the Vladimir Opolie region. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2017, 50, 1166–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Feldkamp, L.A.; Davis, L.C.; Kress, J.W. Practical cone-beam algorithm. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1984, 1, 612–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Frise, E.; Kaynig, V.; Longair, M.; Pietzsch, T.; Preibisch, S.; Rueden, C.; Saalfeld, S.; Schmid, B.; et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Li, C.H.; Lee, C.K. Minimum cross entropy thresholding. Pattern Recognit. 1993, 26, 617–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hadwiger, H. Vorlesungen Über Inhalt, Oberfläche und Isoperimetrie; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1957. [Google Scholar]
  40. Michielsen, K.; De Raedt, H. Integral-geometry morphological image analysis. Phys. Rep. 2001, 347, 461–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Bazaikin, Y.; Gurevich, B.; Iglauer, S.; Khachkova, T.; Kolyukhin, D.; Lebedev, M.; Lisitsa, V.; Reshetova, G. Effect of CT image size and resolution on the accuracy of rock property estimates: EFFECT OF CT IMAGE SCALE. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2017, 122, 3635–3647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rabot, E.; Wiesmeier, M.; Schlüter, S.; Vogel, H.-J. Soil structure as an indicator of soil functions: A review. Geoderma 2018, 314, 122–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Baveye, P.C.; Otten, W.; Kravchenko, A.; Balseiro-Romero, M.; Beckers, É.; Chalhoub, M.; Darnault, C.; Eickhorst, T.; Garnier, P.; Hapca, S.; et al. Emergent Properties of Microbial Activity in Heterogeneous Soil Microenvironments: Different Research Approaches Are Slowly Converging, Yet Major Challenges Remain. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Werman, M.; Wright, M.L. Intrinsic Volumes of Random Cubical Complexes. Discret. Comput. Geom. 2016, 56, 93–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Kaczynski, T.; Mischaikow, K.; Mrozek, M. Computational Homology; Applied Mathematical Sciences; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 2004; ISBN 978-0-387-40853-8. [Google Scholar]
  46. Schladitz, K.; Ohser, J.; Nagel, W. Measuring Intrinsic Volumes in Digital 3d Images. In Discrete Geometry for Computer Imagery; Kuba, A., Nyúl, L.G., Palágyi, K., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; Volume 4245, pp. 247–258. ISBN 978-3-540-47651-1. [Google Scholar]
  47. Legland, D.; Kiêu, K.; Devaux, M.-F. Computation of Minkowski measures on 2D and 3D binary images. Image Anal. Stereol. 2011, 26, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. 3-D Volumetric Image Processing—MATLAB & Simulink. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/help/images/3d-volumetric-image-processing.html?s_tid=CRUX_lftnav (accessed on 18 August 2020).
  49. Schindelin, J.; Rueden, C.T.; Hiner, M.C.; Eliceiri, K.W. The ImageJ ecosystem: An open platform for biomedical image analysis. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2015, 82, 518–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Serra, J. Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology; Academic Press, Inc.: Orlando, FL, USA, 1983; ISBN 978-0-12-637240-3. [Google Scholar]
  51. San José Martínez, F.; Muñoz-Ortega, F.; Caniego, J.; Peregrina, F. Morphological Functions with Parallel Sets for the Pore Space of X-ray CT Images of Soil Columns. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ohser, J.; Schladitz, K. 3D Images of Materials Structures: Processing and Analysis; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2009; ISBN 978-3-527-62830-8. [Google Scholar]
  53. Faybishenko, B.A. Hydraulic Behavior of Quasi-Saturated Soils in the Presence of Entrapped Air: Laboratory Experiments. Water Resour. Res. 1995, 31, 2421–2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fan, J.; McConkey, B.; Wang, H.; Janzen, H. Root distribution by depth for temperate agricultural crops. Field Crop. Res. 2016, 189, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Void visualization of all samples in dry conditions.
Figure 1. Void visualization of all samples in dry conditions.
Geosciences 10 00365 g001
Figure 2. Two-dimensional slices of tomographic images of one of the studied samples (a) in a dry condition and (b) moisture-saturated condition. In the two images, the cross sections corresponding to the same height of the specimen are shown.
Figure 2. Two-dimensional slices of tomographic images of one of the studied samples (a) in a dry condition and (b) moisture-saturated condition. In the two images, the cross sections corresponding to the same height of the specimen are shown.
Geosciences 10 00365 g002
Figure 3. An example of morphological opening operation applied with structural units of different sizes for images of samples from the arable soil horizon. Voids are white and solid phase is black. Each image shows only the pores that are larger than the structural unit size used for the morphological opening.
Figure 3. An example of morphological opening operation applied with structural units of different sizes for images of samples from the arable soil horizon. Voids are white and solid phase is black. Each image shows only the pores that are larger than the structural unit size used for the morphological opening.
Geosciences 10 00365 g003
Figure 4. Void visualization of a sample which was taken from 80–90 cm depth from the B2 horizon (a) in a dry condition and (b) in a moisture-saturated condition. The Euclidean distance to the solid phase is illustrated in color. It can be observed that some small pores and channels present in the dry sample image on the left are absent from the wet sample image on the right. Large pores and channels were narrowed but present in the image of the wet sample.
Figure 4. Void visualization of a sample which was taken from 80–90 cm depth from the B2 horizon (a) in a dry condition and (b) in a moisture-saturated condition. The Euclidean distance to the solid phase is illustrated in color. It can be observed that some small pores and channels present in the dry sample image on the left are absent from the wet sample image on the right. Large pores and channels were narrowed but present in the image of the wet sample.
Geosciences 10 00365 g004
Figure 5. Distribution of pore characteristics as a function of pore sizes for a sample from horizon B2 at a depth of 80–90 cm in a dry condition (blue color) and wet condition (red color). The values V , S , C are represented by non-cumulative pores sizes distribution, whereas χ , b 0 , b 1 values are presented versus the minimum pore diameter. The minimum pore diameter corresponds to the diameter of the spherical structural unit used for morphological opening.
Figure 5. Distribution of pore characteristics as a function of pore sizes for a sample from horizon B2 at a depth of 80–90 cm in a dry condition (blue color) and wet condition (red color). The values V , S , C are represented by non-cumulative pores sizes distribution, whereas χ , b 0 , b 1 values are presented versus the minimum pore diameter. The minimum pore diameter corresponds to the diameter of the spherical structural unit used for morphological opening.
Geosciences 10 00365 g005
Table 1. Soil samples used in this study, indicating the occurrence depths and horizons. The three columns on the right represent the relationship between the Euler-Poincare characteristic and Betti numbers of the pore space under dry and wet conditions.
Table 1. Soil samples used in this study, indicating the occurrence depths and horizons. The three columns on the right represent the relationship between the Euler-Poincare characteristic and Betti numbers of the pore space under dry and wet conditions.
SampleDepth, cmHorizonTopology χ w e t   v s .   χ d r y b 0 w e t   v s .   b 0 d r y b 1 w e t   v s .   b 1 d r y
10–10ArableIrregular> > <
20–10ArableNormal> < <
30–10ArableIrregular> > <
410–20ArableIrregular> > <
510–20ArableIrregular> > <
620–30A2Normal> < <
720–30A2Normal< < <
830–40A2Normal< < <
930–40A2Normal< < <
1040–50ABNormal< < <
1140–50ABNormal---
1280–90B2Normal< < <
1380–90B2Normal< < <

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ivonin, D.; Kalnin, T.; Grachev, E.; Shein, E. Quantitative Analysis of Pore Space Structure in Dry and Wet Soil by Integral Geometry Methods. Geosciences 2020, 10, 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10090365

AMA Style

Ivonin D, Kalnin T, Grachev E, Shein E. Quantitative Analysis of Pore Space Structure in Dry and Wet Soil by Integral Geometry Methods. Geosciences. 2020; 10(9):365. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10090365

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ivonin, Dmitriy, Timofey Kalnin, Eugene Grachev, and Evgeny Shein. 2020. "Quantitative Analysis of Pore Space Structure in Dry and Wet Soil by Integral Geometry Methods" Geosciences 10, no. 9: 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10090365

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop