Next Article in Journal
MiR-26a-5p as a Reference to Normalize MicroRNA qRT-PCR Levels in Plasma Exosomes of Pediatric Hematological Malignancies
Next Article in Special Issue
Cytokine-Coding Oncolytic Adenovirus TILT-123 Is Safe, Selective, and Effective as a Single Agent and in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti-PD-1
Previous Article in Journal
Estrogen and Glycemic Homeostasis: The Fundamental Role of Nuclear Estrogen Receptors ESR1/ESR2 in Glucose Transporter GLUT4 Regulation
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Tumor-Targeted Replicating Oncolytic Adenovirus Ad-TD-nsIL12 as a Promising Therapeutic Agent for Human Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 10
Issue 1
10.3390/cells10010100
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Inflammatory Cytokines in Cancer: Comprehensive Understanding and Clinical Progress in Gene Therapy

by
Tianxia Lan
1,2,
Li Chen
1,2 and
Xiawei Wei
1,2,*
1
Laboratory of Aging Research and Cancer Drug Target, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 17, Block 3, Southern Renmin Road, Chengdu 610041, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 17, Block 3, Southern Renmin Road, Chengdu 610041, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2021, 10(1), 100; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10010100
Submission received: 8 December 2020 / Revised: 30 December 2020 / Accepted: 5 January 2021 / Published: 8 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cell and Gene Therapy of Cancer)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The relationship between chronic inflammation and neoplastic diseases is not fully understood. The inflammatory microenvironment of a tumor is an intricate network that consists of numerous types of cells, cytokines, enzymes and signaling pathways. Recent evidence shows that the crucial components of cancer-related inflammation are involved in a coordinated system to influence the development of cancer, which may shed light on the development of potential anticancer therapies. Since the last century, considerable effort has been devoted to developing gene therapies for life-threatening diseases. When it comes to modulating the inflammatory microenvironment for cancer therapy, inflammatory cytokines are the most efficient targets. In this manuscript, we provide a comprehensive review of the relationship between inflammation and cancer development, especially focusing on inflammatory cytokines. We also summarize the clinical trials for gene therapy targeting inflammatory cytokines for cancer treatment. Future perspectives concerned with new gene-editing technology and novel gene delivery systems are finally provided.

1. Introduction

Inflammation is a complicated process that functions as a biological response to harmful stimuli and may trigger common symptoms such as fever, swelling and pain [1]. It has been reported that inflammation is associated with the development of many diseases such as metabolic disorders, obesity, autoimmune diseases and neoplastic diseases [2,3]. Among them, cancer is the deadliest disease for human beings. According to data provided by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, about 9.5 million people died from cancer in 2018 [4]. Therefore, a deeper insight into the links between inflammation and cancer is important, and it is worthwhile to comprehensively evaluate the mediators of cancer-related inflammation that could potentially be implemented into anticancer therapy. Interestingly, inflammation possesses both pro- and anti-tumor features. As part of the immune response, inflammation can activate immune cells and induce the production of inflammatory proteins such as cytokines and enzymes to inhibit the growth of tumors. Thus, multiple biotherapies have been designed to potentiate such antitumor effects for the treatment of cancer. However, inflammation may contribute to the initiation, promotion and metastasis of cancer [5]. It has been revealed that around 25% of cancer cases are related to chronic inflammation [6]. Importantly, previous clinical experiences have demonstrated that nonspecific anti-inflammatory drugs such as aspirin have manifested anticancer potencies [7]. Thus, properly manipulating anti-cancer inflammation or pro-cancer inflammation has been considered as a promising strategy for the treatment of cancer. Notably, in clinical or preclinical settings, many researchers are currently trying to achieve the modulation of cancer-related inflammation using gene therapies. Hence, it is important to comprehensively analyze clinical progress in such gene therapies to evaluate their therapeutic prospects.
The concept of gene therapy is developed under the theory that the correction of cancer-related mutations can control or inhibit the growth of cancer cells and improve patients’ outcomes. The field of gene therapy is underpinned by the development of pathology, immunology as well as material science and nanotechnology. The gene delivery system, including viral and nonviral vectors, also determines its clinical safety and efficiency. Armed by the deeper understanding of mechanisms and pathways underlying the development of cancer, the concept has been further extended to treatments that inhibit or produce mediators of cancer.
In this review, we introduce the critical inflammatory mediators in cancer development and highlight the clinical trials of gene therapy targeting the inflammatory microenvironment in cancer treatment through the years.

2. Inflammation and Cancer

2.1. Inflammation and Cancer Development

For a long time, inflammation has been thought to be a double-edged sword. Although the appropriate stimulation of inflammation can induce the elevation of immune response against cancer, studies have also suggested that inflammatory factors are involved in tumorigenic processes [8].
Inflammatory processes participate in the initiation, promotion and metastasis of cancer through various mechanisms [8]. The initiation of a tumor requires a series of genetic mutations and epigenetic modifications that lead to the activation of the tumorigenic pathway as well as the loss of tumor suppression. In an inflammatory microenvironment, macrophages and neutrophils are active producers of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as well as reactive nitrogen (RNS), both of which can cause DNA damage, which is closely associated with the initiation of the tumorigenesis process [9]. Furthermore, DNA damage can be induced by cytokines. For example, Gronke et al. have shown that IL-22 can activate DNA damage response by regulating the expression of a series of genes [10]. Moreover, epigenetic modifications that upregulate the expression of oncogenes or downregulate the expression of tumor-suppressor genes are found to be orchestrated by inflammatory cytokines [11]. Thus, the components of cancer-related inflammation provide a friendly environment for cancer initiation.
Inflammation partakes in the promotion of cancer. Many studies have demonstrated that various inflammatory factors are involved in the cellular or molecular processes that facilitate tumor growth and progression [8]. In particular, NF-κB plays an important role in the manipulation of the tumor microenvironment (TME). It controls the expression of cytokines that regulate cell growth and migration [12,13]. By collaborating with cytokines, transcription factors such as NF-κB establish an intricate system that allows the substantial expansion of tumors. Mediators such as cells and other functional proteins contribute to angiogenesis, the inhibition of immune response, the regulation of metabolism and other supportive activities for cancer promotion [14,15,16]. It would be valuable to further explore the prospects of targeting these pathways for cancer therapies. In addition, inflammation is an important contributor to the metastasis of tumors. Tumor metastasis requires the migration and seeding of cancer cells, survival of the early metastatic colony and establishment of new TME [17]. Cellular programs such as epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) also have a positive effect on the mobility of cancer cells, thereby facilitating invasion and metastasis [18]. Considering the inefficiency of metastatic processes [19], every supportive factor for the accomplishment of metastasis needs to be deeply understood, as blocking them may be an effective strategy to improve the life expectancy of patients with metastatic diseases. Particularly, inflammatory cytokines are important orchestrators of cancer–inflammation interactions, influence multiple aspects of cancer metastasis. For instance, it has been shown that IL-11 could enhance the growth of the most invasive subset of breast cancer cells [20]. Additionally, TNFs are capable of activating the expression of the transcription factor that can induce EMT [21].
Together, inflammation and the cancer microenvironment modulated by inflammatory response influence initiation, promotion and metastasis through an intricate network. A wide range of inflammatory factors, including cytokines, transcriptional factors, immune cells and stromal cells, are fundamental components of this system.

2.2. Cytokines in Cancer-Related Inflammation

Cytokines are a group of functional proteins secreted from the immune system. They were initially described as modulators of immune response and inflammation [22]. However, an increasing number of studies found that the elevations of some types of cytokines are associated with the induction and progression of tumors [23]. Hence, the roles of these cancer-related cytokines have gained considerable attention [24]. These cytokines that promote or enhance cancer development are involved in a coordinated system (Figure 1).
Although the mechanisms governing some pathways have been illustrated by in vitro studies or animal studies, many cytokines were found to be elevated in patients with cancer or tumor microenvironments [25,26]. Thus, it is of vital importance to fully explore how these cytokines interact with tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment, as a deep understanding of the underlying mechanisms and pathways could shed substantial light on the development of potential anticancer therapies.

2.2.1. Interleukins

Interleukin 6 (IL-6), mainly secreted by monocytes, conducts its functions by binding to IL-6 receptors [27]. In the context of inflammation, the production of IL-6 by immune cells is usually a result of infections and tissue injuries [28]. The pro-oncogenesis effects of IL-6 have been demonstrated in various cancer types, including lung cancer, breast cancer and colorectal cancer, among others [29,30,31]. IL-6 can act with proteins in the STAT family to assist tumorigenic processes [32,33]. Moreover, the cytokine is associated with the inhibition of apoptotic programs as well as the release of ROS and RNS [26,34]. Although targeting IL-6 is considered to be a promising anticancer treatment, it has yet to be integrated into anticancer strategies as a gene therapy. However, gene therapy modulating Il-6 has been studied in noncancer diseases such as hepatic failure and infections [35]. The prospect of targeting IL-6 in cancer settings still needs to be explored by more future studies.
On the contrary, some other inflammatory interleukins such as interleukin 2 (IL-2) and interleukin 12 (IL-12) possess anticancer effects. The clinical efficacy of gene-edited lymphocyte transfer has been verified in lung cancer patients. The overall response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in the group treated with IL-2 gene therapy. Moreover, a substantial decrease in tumor size was also observed in the cell therapy group. The reported toxicity of this treatment was minimal. Hence, the clinical results indicate that this method of cancer gene therapy is safe and possibly efficacious against pleural effusions caused by lung cancer [36]. Furthermore, IL-12 is capable of activating cytotoxic immune cells [37], thus making it a useful substance for the induction of immune response against cancer [38].

2.2.2. Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is an inflammatory cytokine that participates in the regulation of a variety of signaling processes [39]. By attaching to TNF-α R-1 and TNF-α R-2 [26], the cytokine impacts tumor development via multiple mechanisms, such as contributing to EMT, boosting the cell proliferation rate and accelerating angiogenesis, among others [40,41,42]. The aberrant expression of TNF-α was found in a variety of neoplastic diseases, including prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, liver cancer and breast cancer [43,44,45,46]. The antitumor activities of TNF-α have been leveraged in cancer treatments [47]. Interestingly, the cytokine has also been found to exert cancer-promoting roles [48]. A recent study revealed that TNF-α may contribute to the migration of tumor cells by regulating prion protein levels [49].

2.2.3. Transforming Growth Factor Beta

Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) is also a well-documented pleiotropic cytokine that has been found in many oncogenic pathways [34,50]. TGF-β produced by inflammatory cells, including neutrophils and macrophages, plays a substantial role in tumor initiation and progression [51], and studies have shown that blockage of TGF-β significantly increased the effects of anticancer treatments [52,53]. Similar to IL-6 and TNF-α, TGF-β is associated with a wide range of tumor-inductive or cancer-supportive mechanisms, such as EMT, immune escape, the formation of blood vessels, as well as the suppression of apoptotic pathways [52,54]. In breast cancer, TGF-β enhances the vasculature within TME by regulating the expression of VEGF and MCP-1 [55]. Furthermore, The elevated expression level of TGF-β has been found in epithelial ovarian cancer cells and prostate cancer TME [56,57].

2.2.4. Chemokines

Chemokines (CKs) regulate the activation and migration of multiple types of cells. In the context of inflammation, the migration of leukocytes to inflammatory sites is mediated by CKs [58]. This type of cytokine is also closely associated with cancer progression, and metastasis as well as angiogenesis mediated by chemokines have been broadly studied [59,60]. Many anticancer approaches have been designed to target chemokines for inhibiting metastasis and angiogenesis [61,62,63,64]. The gene of C-C motif chemokine ligand 21 (CCL-21) has been introduced into dendritic cells with adenovirus, and these genetically edited dendritic cells could be injected into patients as an antitumor vaccine. In a phase I trial (NCT01574222), patients with non-small-cell lung cancer received such a vaccine to enhance the immune response against tumors. The results show that this strategy successfully evoked the antigen-specific immune response and substantial infiltration of CD8+ T cells [65].

2.2.5. Interferons

Interferons (IFNs) are a group of cytokines crucial for inflammatory processes. IFNs regulate the molecular, cellular and physiological processes that govern inflammatory responses. So far, three types of IFNs (type I, type II, type III) have been uncovered, classified based on their structural characteristics and the specific receptors to which they bind [66]. In cancer, IFNs can affect metabolism and the proliferation of cancer cells via a wide spectrum of molecular pathways. They are also inducers of apoptosis [67]. Type I interferons, for example, possess strong tumor inhibitory ability. It has been recently reported that IFN-I induces the activation of signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 (STAT-3) and activates a series of downstream signals to achieve the inhibition of tumor progression [68]. Equipped with the accumulating understanding of the antitumor functions of IFNs, some type I and type II IFNs have already been directly or indirectly applied to the development of anticancer therapies. Type I interferons such as IFN-α have been developed into Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs for the treatment of cancer or hepatitis C (e.g., Intron® A and Roferon® A). The gene encoding IFN-α has also been inserted into viral vectors for developing antitumor gene therapies.

3. Clinical Studies of Gene Therapies Targeting Inflammatory Cytokines in Cancer

In the context of cancer treatment, the manipulation of cancer-related inflammation is capable of improving patient outcomes [7]. While anti-inflammation drugs such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduce pain, decrease fever and suppress cancer progression when administered in a high dose, proinflammation drugs such as interleukins are also being considered as effective cancer immunotherapies. However, with respect to the gene therapy, previous or current clinical studies are largely focused on utilizing the antitumor effects of proinflammatory proteins, more specifically, inflammatory cytokines (Figure 2).
At present, the biological roles of many inflammatory cytokines have been deeply explored. Some of these cytokines have been considered ideal targets for antitumor therapies, and others are thought to be potent immunomodulatory factors that can be used for treating cancer. Considerable effort has gone into investigating the efficacy and safety of antibodies that inhibit the tumor-promoting pathways regulated by inflammatory functional proteins [69,70,71,72]. However, the therapeutic value of targeted gene therapies that modulate cancer-related inflammation has yet to be comprehensively evaluated. Important previous or ongoing clinical trials with critical inflammatory cytokine gene therapies are summarized in Table 1.

3.1. Gene Therapies Based on TNF-α

As an important inflammatory cytokine, TNF-α has been used in cancer therapies for decades. Many strategies, including antibody–drug conjugates, cell therapy and fusion proteins, have been investigated in preclinical models or patients with different types of cancers [84,85,86,87]. Gene therapies have also been assessed in preclinical and clinical settings [88,89]. Although off-target effects are a major concern for gene therapies, the local administration of drugs and recently more advanced gene-editing tools significantly increased the convenience and specificity of gene editing.
Although it is clear that TNF-α has both pro- and anticancer effects, clinical studies of gene therapies have mainly focused on exploiting the anticancer side of the cytokine. In a phase II study (NCT00051480), in combination with chemoradiotherapy, the TNF-α gene was intratumorally delivered to patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer with adenovirus vectors. Although the clinical outcome of the phase II trial was not published, the results from a phase I study of the drug showed a good safety profile and the prolonged survival of patients. In all 24 enrolled patients, the median overall survival (mOS) was 48.7 months, and the five-year survival rate was 41% [90]. The same drug has also been evaluated in patients with prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, rectal cancer, head and neck cancer and melanoma (NCT01048151; NCT00496535; NCT00051467; NCT00137878; NCT00261404). Among them, the clinical study for locally advanced pancreatic cancer reached phase III. However, the therapy failed to effectively prolong the length of patients’ survival. According to the published data, no significant difference was found between the patients who received gene therapy and standard of care (SOC) and the patients who only received SOC (10.0 months vs. 10.0 months). The patients in the SOC-only group showed longer progression-free survival than the gene therapy group [89]. As a consequence, the therapy was not approved for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.
In addition, one ongoing clinical trial was registered to assess the safety of the adenovirus containing genes encoding TNF-α and IL-2 proteins. The phase I study of the drug was initiated in February 2020 (NCT04217473). The trial is expected to be completed in 2021, and the sponsor recently announced that two patients had already passed the primary safety endpoint.

3.2. Gene Therapies Based on IL-12

IL-12 is not only an important immunomodulating cytokine but also a strong mediator of cancer development. It exerts proinflammatory functions by activating cytotoxic immune cells [91], thus making it an important cytokine in the antitumor response of the immune system [92]. Gene therapies designed to leverage the functions of IL-12 have been evaluated in clinical trials. In a phase I study (NCT02026271), during the surgical resection process, a human IL-12 gene was delivered into patients with glioblastoma multiforme or anaplastic oligoastrocytoma. For the management of toxicity, the production of IL-12 was controlled by the oral activator (veledimex), which was administered before and after the operation to regulate the expression of human IL-12. The safety profile was acceptable, and median overall survival (mOS) of 12.7 months was observed. Notably, in a subgroup of the trial where patients additionally received more than 20 mg of dexamethasone in 14 days, mOS was 16.7 months [36]. The 16.7 months of survival is a very encouraging number for the treatment of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma because the disease is generally considered hard to treat. The significant effects of adding dexamethasone to the therapy are worth further exploring.
IL-12 gene therapy has also been used in combination with chemotherapy and pembrolizumab for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. In a phase II study (NCT04095689), docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, pan-nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine and pembrolizumab plus IL-12 gene therapy were administered to patients with early triple-negative breast cancer, as the phase I trial of the trial showed the safety of the strategy. The trial is estimated to commence in December 2020 and is still recruiting participants. The design of this combination of drugs is theoretically effective for the treatment of breast cancer, as adding pembrolizumab to the chemotherapy regimen has been shown to increase the efficacy of treatment, and IL-12 gene therapy is supposed to facilitate the antitumor immune response.

3.3. Gene Therapies Based on IL-2

IL-2 is also a strong proinflammatory cytokine [37]. Importantly, it is described as the “first effective immunotherapy” against tumors [93]. The IL-2 gene has also been integrated into the virus for the delivery of cytokines in order to strengthen the antitumor immune response. Previously, Colombo, et al. described that patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) were intratumorally injected with a retroviral vector carrying the IL-2 gene and the thymidine kinase gene of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-TK). HSV-TK is considered a “suicide” gene as it regulates the programs that induce cell death. The IL-2 gene was added to enhance the antitumor effects mediated by HSV-TK. In the clinical study, four patients were administered the virus. Two patients died from tumor growth 5 and 12 months after the treatment, and the remaining two developed stabilized diseases. Apparent tumor shrinkage was observed in one of the patients who died from pulmonary embolism [94]. These results show that combining the IL-2 and HSV-TK genes in the virus has antitumor effects, but the safety and the efficacy still need to be validated in larger clinical studies.
In a more recent clinical trial, a plasmid was used as the vector of the IL-2 gene, and the nonviral gene therapy was designed for the treatment of head and neck cancer. In the phase I study, patients were intratumorally injected with the drug in escalating doses. The results suggest that the gene therapy was well tolerated [73]. A similar strategy has also been used in treating prostate cancer. In another phase I study, a plasmid carrying the IL-2 gene was contained in a DNA/lipid complex for therapeutic delivery. The patients were intraprostatically injected with the drug weekly for two weeks. After the treatment, no grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported, indicating that the drug was well tolerated by the patients. Furthermore, evidence for a stronger antitumor immune response such as the increased infiltration of T cells and accelerated proliferation of lymphocytes was observed [75], suggesting the considerable immunomodulatory effect of the drug.
Later, data from another similar phase I clinical study of IL-2 gene therapy were published. In this study, the IL-2 gene was carried by an adenovirus vector for treating localized prostate cancer. A total of 12 patients were intraprostatically injected with the virus, and a grade 3 adverse event was only observed in one patient. No grade 4 adverse event was reported [74]. The antitumor response induced by the treatment was comparable to that induced by the previous clinical trial using plasmid-mediated IL-2 delivery (T cells and lymphocytes infiltration).
Lastly, IL-2 based gene therapy has also been used for treating renal cancer. The drug is basically composed of a plasmid containing the gene for IL-2. For each patient, the drug was injected into multiple sites of the tumor. After four cycles of the administration, no grade 3 or 4 treatment related adverse events were observed in all 31 patients. The ORR was 10%, and 23% of patients achieved stable disease. The mOS was 11 months. The additional evaluation of CD8+ lymphocyte infiltration demonstrated the induction of a strengthened immune response [76].

3.4. Gene Therapies Based on IFN-α

While it has been reported that IFN-α partakes in the activation of inflammasomes by promoting the expression of caspase-11 [95], it is considered a group of effective regulators of an antitumor immune response. Genetically edited viruses that express interferons have been developed into drugs for the treatment of cancer. Recombinant adenoviruses that lost the ability to replicate were modified to express interferon α2b (IFN-α2b). In a phase II study (NCT01687244), 43 patients with bladder cancer received the virus, formulated by a supportive polyamide surfactant. The drug was administered intravesically. The results showed that 35% of the patients achieved recurrence-free survival, with no observations of treatment-related adverse events of grade 4–5 in any of the patients [77]. The outcomes of this phase II study indicate that it will be a promising replacement for patients unable or unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy.
In an earlier phase I study (NCT01119664), the IFN-α2b-expressing adenovirus was administered along with celecoxib in patients with malignant mesothelioma, followed by chemotherapy. In a pilot clinical study, 40 patients received the IFN-α2b-expressing adenovirus, celecoxib, in combination with first- or second-line chemotherapies. After the treatment, the ORR of all patients was 25%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 88% and the two-year survival rate 32%. The results suggest that the treatment is safe in patients and also prolongs the survival rate compared to historical control [78].

3.5. Gene Therapies Based on IFN-β

Interferon β (IFN-β) has been shown to manifest both pro- and anti-inflammatory features [96]. It is currently being used as an immunomodulator for the treatment of cancers. Gene therapy based on interferon β (IFN-β) has also been evaluated in clinical studies to access the effects of the overexpression of IFN-β on neoplastic diseases. In a phase I study, IFN-β genes carried by a cationic liposome were injected into patients with high-grade glioma. The clinical outcomes indicate that the administration of the drug substantially improves the antitumor response of the immune system by inducing necrosis as well as the infiltrations of macrophages and CD8+ lymphocytes [79]. Moreover, the IFN-β gene has been introduced into adenovirus for the treatment of pleural malignancies and mesothelioma (NCT00299962; NCT01119664), and both trials have been completed.

3.6. Gene Therapies Based on GM-CSF

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) enhances the inflammatory response by promoting the activation of immune cells [97]. Furthermore, GM-CSF is being used as an immunostimulant in cancer therapies [98]. In 1998, Michael, et al. reported that they had used a GM-CSF-encoding virus as a gene therapy to treat patients with melanoma. Over the course of the six-week treatment, the virus carrying a passenger gene was intratumorally injected into patients every two weeks. The treatment was safe, and only limited and mild adverse events were observed. The transcribed mRNA of virally encoded GM-CSF was observed in all patients. Although the concentrations of blood cells or immune cells in patients’ blood were not found to be influenced by the treatment, in all seven patients who received the treatment, three had a mixed response and one patient had a partial response, indicating the considerable efficacy of the therapeutic virus [80].
More recently, the oncolytic virus was genetically modified to express GM-CSF for the treatment of cancer, and the efficacy and safety were evaluated by clinical trials. In the phase I study, patients with head and neck cancer, breast cancer, melanoma and gastrointestinal cancer were intratumorally injected with the therapeutic oncolytic virus as a subsequent-line treatment. The drug was well tolerated, the oncolytic virus successfully induced the enhancing of antitumoral immune response in patients and tumor necrosis was observed in more than half of the patients [81]. In the following phase II study, fifty patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma were recruited. They were intratumorally injected with the genetically edited oncolytic virus, and the safety and efficacy of the treatment were further evaluated. According to the published data, the virus was safely tolerated in patients, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 26%. Fifty-eight percent of the patients survived for one year after the treatment, and the two-year survival rate was 52% [82]. These results stress the prospect of this biological drug for the effective management of melanoma, which was successfully granted for the phase III study. A total of 436 patients were enrolled in the phase III trial. Two-thirds of them were assigned to the oncolytic virus group, and one-third were injected with the GM-CSF protein. ORR and median overall survival (mOS) were assessed for the ultimate evaluation of the therapy. The results show that patients in the oncolytic virus group had better ORR (26.4% vs. 5.7%) and mOS (23.3 months vs. 18.9 months). Furthermore, grade 3 or 4 adverse events were only found in 2% of patients in the oncolytic virus group [83], suggesting that the GM-CSF-based gene therapy is an ideal approach for improving the outcome of melanoma treatment. In October 2015, the genetically manipulated oncolytic virus product was approved by the FDA for melanoma gene therapy, namely T-VEC [99].

4. Future Perspectives and Ongoing Preclinical Studies

In recent years, the dawn of gene therapy has come due to the thriving development of gene-editing technologies and biomedical material science. Boosted by the considerable progress made in gene-editing technologies such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and gene editor techniques, gene therapies can be conducted in a more convenient and precise manner [100]. Although there is substantial concern surrounding the possible side effects, including off-target effects and the introduction of new mutations, the advantages of gene therapy such as one-time dosage and high plasticity make it one of the most promising new medical developments of this century [101]. Moreover, in the fields of material science and nanotechnology, the first nanoparticle gene therapeutic, which is a lipid complex containing small interfering RNA (siRNA), was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of a rare disease in 2018. [102] Thus, here, we summarize some representative studies of gene therapy targeting the cancer inflammatory environment using either CRISPR or novel nonviral vectors, which might be promising to move into a clinical trial in the future.

4.1. CRISPR Targeting Cancer Inflammatory Environment

The CRISPR/Cas9 system is a potent tool for gene editing. CRISPR/Cas9 could potentially be used in the treatment of a wide range of disorders caused by DNA mutations. Many CRISPR-based cancer therapies aim to modify the gene in tumor cells to inhibit growth and proliferation or reduce the immune-escaping capacity. Nanoparticles containing the CRISPR/Cas9 system were recently delivered into mice with glioblastoma (GBM) to disrupt the expression of the polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) gene. The protein encoded by the PLK1 gene is currently believed to be a potent target for cancer therapy [103]. In the study, the in vivo tumor model was established by injecting GBM cells to the hippocampus of mice, and the nanoparticles containing the CRISPR/Cas9 system were intratumorally injected into mice. As a result, the treatment significantly inhibited tumor growth and increased the survival rate of mice [104]. This study has consequently shed light on the encouraging prospects of CRISPR-based gene therapy.
It has been reported that a research group achieved the in vivo gene-editing of macrophages in mice. Their results show that the guide RNA successfully bound to the target gene, Cas9 expression was induced by a macrophage-specific promoter and the knockout of Nnt1 was validated by the reduced expression of proteins encoded by the target gene. In addition, the Cas9 expressions of other cells such as T cells, B cells and neutrophils were negligible, suggesting that the CRISPR/Ca9-mediated gene editing in this study is specific to macrophages [105]. In another study, the CRISPR/Cas9 system was used to block the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome of macrophages in mice, and the delivery of guide RNA and Cas9 was assisted by cationic lipid-assisted nanoparticles. The Cas9 gene was specifically expressed in microphages and disrupted the expression of the NLRP3 inflammasome, leading to the meditation of inflammatory consequences such as peritonitis and septic shock in mice [106].
The success of the precise and efficient gene editing of inflammatory factors mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 in animal models reveals the substantial promise of achieving more optimistic outcomes in clinical trials. Future studies may focus on combining such advanced gene-editing tools with well-established anticancer therapies to bring new hopes for patients.

4.2. Novel Nonviral Vectors

In the past, viral vectors were most frequently used for the delivery of gene therapies. However, in clinical practices, there is much concern with respect to the safety surrounding viral vectors. The capacity of viral vectors to contain therapeutic genes is limited. Such disadvantages elicit the quick development of nonviral vectors such as hydrogels and nanoparticles. If properly made, such vectors could theoretically contain the gene of any length. Furthermore, the manufacturing of nonviral vectors is cost-effective [107,108].
In the context of gene therapy, nonviral vectors have been used in clinical or preclinical studies for the delivery of therapeutic genes. Cationic copolymers have been used as vectors for genes encoding cytokines (e.g., GM-CSF, IL-2) [76,109]. In preclinical settings, the polyethylenimine-polyethylene glycol copolymer has been broadly studied. For example, Irina et al. complexed the cDNA of GM-CSF and HSVtk with a cationic copolymer for the delivery of gene therapy. Data suggest that therapeutic genes were expressed in mice, confirmed by the detection of the active GM-CSF and HSVtk protein. The in vivo experiments showed that the treatment significantly reduced the tumor volume of mice. Notably, the similar “cytokine gene + suicide gene” combination has been evaluated in a previously described clinical study [94] where adenovirus was used as a vector. Thus, future clinical studies assessing the clinical value of gene therapy carried out by the polyethylenimine-polyethylene glycol copolymer would provide important data for the comparison of viral and nonviral vectors.
Additionally, nonviral vectors are widely used for gene therapies mediated by CRISPR/Cas9. Ling et al. complexed the CRISPR/Cas9 system with a fluorinated polymer to knock out the gene encoding human mutT homolog 1 (MTH1) in vivo. The gene was to be overexpressed in a broad range of cancers [110]. Recent evidence suggests that the upregulation of MTH1 expression is correlated with cancer-related inflammation [111]. In the in vivo study targeting MTH1 in ovarian cancer, the efficiency of fluorinated polymer delivery was found to be superior to traditional nonviral systems such as Lipofectamine 2000 and Lipofectamine 3000, and the growth of tumors was effectively inhibited in mice [112].
Although nonviral vectors are also associated with disadvantages such as relatively low transfection efficiency and a short duration of time of the therapeutic gene expression, they still hold the promise to become effective gene-transfer systems with more affordable prices.

5. Conclusions

With increasing evidence linking inflammation with cancer development, more critical mediators within cancer-related inflammation can be revealed. The mechanism underlying the pathways regulated by these mediators also needs to be further explored. Inflammatory cytokines are involved in multiple cancer development processes, which makes them ideal antitumor agents or targets. Given that much research has been conducted evaluating the safety and efficacy of different therapies regarding inflammatory cytokines, no significant progress has been demonstrated in terms of clinical values. Armed with the rise of new technologies such as CRISPR/Cas9 and nonviral vectors in the 21st century, it is hopeful that gene therapies based on inflammatory cytokines could provide miracles in the fight against cancer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.L. and X.W.; data curation, T.L. and L.C.; writing—original draft preparation, T.L.; writing—review and editing, X.W. and T.L.; visualization, T.L.; supervision, X.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation Regional Innovation and Development (No. U19A2003), National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for “Significant New Drugs Development” (No. 2018ZX09733001), Excellent Youth Foundation of the Sichuan Scientific Committee Grant in China (No. 2019JDJQ008) and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFA0201402).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to members of the State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Sichuan University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ferrero-Miliani, L.; Nielsen, O.H.; Andersen, P.S.; Girardin, S.E. Chronic inflammation: Importance of NOD2 and NALP3 in interleukin-1beta generation. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2007, 147, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fleit, H.B. Chronic Inflammation. In Pathobiology of Human Disease; McManus, L.M., Mitchell, R.N., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. King, T.C. Inflammation, Inflammatory Mediators, and Immune-Mediated Disease-ScienceDirect. Elsevier’s Integrated Pathology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 21–57. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Salem, M.L.; Attia, Z.I.; Galal, S.M. Acute inflammation induces immunomodulatory effects on myeloid cells associated with anti-tumor responses in a tumor mouse model. J. Adv. Res. 2016, 7, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Balkwill, F.R.; Mantovani, A. Cancer-related inflammation: Common themes and therapeutic opportunities. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2012, 22, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chan, A.T.; Detering, E. An emerging role for anti-inflammatory agents for chemoprevention. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2013, 191, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Greten, F.R.; Grivennikov, S.I. Inflammation and Cancer: Triggers, Mechanisms, and Consequences. Immunity 2019, 51, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hussain, S.P.; Hofseth, L.J.; Harris, C.C. Radical causes of cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gronke, K.; Hernández, P.P.; Zimmermann, J.; Klose, C.S.N.; Kofoed-Branzk, M.; Guendel, F.; Witkowski, M.; Tizian, C.; Amann, L.; Schumacher, F.; et al. Interleukin-22 protects intestinal stem cells against genotoxic stress. Nature 2019, 566, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Grivennikov, S.I. Inflammation and colorectal cancer: Colitis-associated neoplasia. Semin. Immunopathol. 2013, 35, 229–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Geismann, C.; Schäfer, H.; Gundlach, J.P.; Hauser, C.; Egberts, J.H.; Schneider, G.; Arlt, A. NF-κB Dependent Chemokine Signaling in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Putoczki, T.L.; Thiem, S.; Loving, A.; Busuttil, R.A.; Wilson, N.J.; Ziegler, P.K.; Nguyen, P.M.; Preaudet, A.; Farid, R.; Edwards, K.M.; et al. Interleukin-11 is the dominant IL-6 family cytokine during gastrointestinal tumorigenesis and can be targeted therapeutically. Cancer Cell 2013, 24, 257–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Galdiero, M.R.; Marone, G.; Mantovani, A. Cancer Inflammation and Cytokines. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2018, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Grivennikov, S.I.; Greten, F.R.; Karin, M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell 2010, 140, 883–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Zaalberg, A.; Moradi Tuchayi, S.; Ameri, A.H.; Ngo, K.H.; Cunningham, T.J.; Eliane, J.P.; Livneh, M.; Horn, T.D.; Rosman, I.S.; Musiek, A.; et al. Chronic Inflammation Promotes Skin Carcinogenesis in Cancer-Prone Discoid Lupus Erythematosus. J. Investig. Derm. 2019, 139, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Alizadeh, A.M.; Shiri, S.; Farsinejad, S. Metastasis review: From bench to bedside. Tumor Biol. 2014, 35, 8483–8523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mittal, V. Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition in Tumor Metastasis. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2018, 13, 395–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Luzzi, K.J.; MacDonald, I.C.; Schmidt, E.E.; Kerkvliet, N.; Morris, V.L.; Chambers, A.F.; Groom, A.C. Multistep nature of metastatic inefficiency: Dormancy of solitary cells after successful extravasation and limited survival of early micrometastases. Am. J. Pathol. 1998, 153, 865–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Marusyk, A.; Tabassum, D.P.; Altrock, P.M.; Almendro, V.; Michor, F.; Polyak, K. Non-cell-autonomous driving of tumour growth supports sub-clonal heterogeneity. Nature 2014, 514, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Suarez-Carmona, M.; Lesage, J.; Cataldo, D.; Gilles, C. EMT and inflammation: Inseparable actors of cancer progression. Mol. Oncol. 2017, 11, 805–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. O’Shea, J.J.; Gadina, M.; Siegel, R. 9-Cytokines and cytokine receptors. In Clinical Immunology, 4th ed.; Rich, R.R., Fleisher, T.A., Shearer, W.T., Schroeder, H.W., Frew, A.J., Weyand, C.M., Eds.; Elsevier: London, UK, 2013; pp. 108–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zamarron, B.F.; Chen, W. Dual roles of immune cells and their factors in cancer development and progression. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2011, 7, 651–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Amin, M.N.; Siddiqui, S.A.; Ibrahim, M.; Hakim, M.L.; Ahammed, M.S.; Kabir, A.; Sultana, F. Inflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and cancer. SAGE Open Med. 2020, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Landskron, G.; De la Fuente, M.; Thuwajit, P.; Thuwajit, C.; Hermoso, M.A. Chronic Inflammation and Cytokines in the Tumor Microenvironment. J. Immunol. Res. 2014, 2014, 149185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Moulton, V.R. Chapter 17-Cytokines. In Systemic Lupus Erythematosus; Tsokos, G.C., Ed.; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tanaka, T.; Narazaki, M.; Kishimoto, T. IL-6 in inflammation, immunity, and disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014, 6, a016295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Heichler, C.; Scheibe, K.; Schmied, A.; Geppert, C.I.; Schmid, B.; Wirtz, S.; Thoma, O.M.; Kramer, V.; Waldner, M.J.; Büttner, C.; et al. STAT3 activation through IL-6/IL-11 in cancer-associated fibroblasts promotes colorectal tumour development and correlates with poor prognosis. Gut 2020, 69, 1269–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ke, W.; Zhang, L.; Dai, Y. The role of IL-6 in immunotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Thorac. Cancer 2020, 11, 835–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sun, X.; Qu, Q.; Lao, Y.; Zhang, M.; Yin, X.; Zhu, H.; Wang, Y.; Yang, J.; Yi, J.; Hao, M. Tumor suppressor HIC1 is synergistically compromised by cancer-associated fibroblasts and tumor cells through the IL-6/pSTAT3 axis in breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bromberg, J.F.; Wrzeszczynska, M.H.; Devgan, G.; Zhao, Y.; Pestell, R.G.; Albanese, C.; Darnell, J.E. Stat3 as an oncogene. Cell 1999, 98, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Rose-John, S.; Schooltink, H. Cytokines are a therapeutic target for the prevention of inflammation-induced cancers. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2007, 174, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Marson, A.; Levine, S.S.; Cole, M.F.; Frampton, G.M.; Brambrink, T.; Johnstone, S.; Guenther, M.G.; Johnston, W.K.; Wernig, M.; Newman, J.; et al. Connecting microRNA genes to the core transcriptional regulatory circuitry of embryonic stem cells. Cell 2008, 134, 521–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Hecht, N.; Pappo, O.; Shouval, D.; Rose-John, S.; Galun, E.; Axelrod, J.H. Hyper-IL-6 gene therapy reverses fulminant hepatic failure. Mol. Ther. 2001, 3, 683–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tan, Y.; Xu, M.; Wang, W.; Zhang, F.; Li, D.; Xu, X.; Gu, J.; Hoffman, R.M. IL-2 gene therapy of advanced lung cancer patients. Anticancer Res. 1996, 16, 1993–1998. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Chiocca, E.A.; Yu, J.S.; Lukas, R.V.; Solomon, I.H.; Ligon, K.L.; Nakashima, H.; Triggs, D.A.; Reardon, D.A.; Wen, P.; Stopa, B.M.; et al. Regulatable interleukin-12 gene therapy in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma: Results of a phase 1 trial. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. de Rham, C.; Ferrari-Lacraz, S.; Jendly, S.; Schneiter, G.; Dayer, J.M.; Villard, J. The proinflammatory cytokines IL-2, IL-15 and IL-21 modulate the repertoire of mature human natural killer cell receptors. Arthritis Res. 2007, 9, R125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Atzeni, F.; Sarzi-Puttini, P. Tumor Necrosis Factor. In Brenner’s Encyclopedia of Genetics, 2nd ed.; Maloy, S., Hughes, K., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, MA, USA, 2013; pp. 229–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cao, Y. Tumor angiogenesis and therapy. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2005, 59 (Suppl. 2), S340–S343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kumar, M.; Allison, D.F.; Baranova, N.N.; Wamsley, J.J.; Katz, A.J.; Bekiranov, S.; Jones, D.R.; Mayo, M.W. NF-κB regulates mesenchymal transition for the induction of non-small cell lung cancer initiating cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Li, B.; Vincent, A.; Cates, J.; Brantley-Sieders, D.M.; Polk, D.B.; Young, P.P. Low levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha increase tumor growth by inducing an endothelial phenotype of monocytes recruited to the tumor site. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 338–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Cruceriu, D.; Baldasici, O.; Balacescu, O.; Berindan-Neagoe, I. The dual role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) in breast cancer: Molecular insights and therapeutic approaches. Cell. Oncol. 2020, 43, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jo, E.; Jang, H.J.; Yang, K.E.; Jang, M.S.; Huh, Y.H.; Yoo, H.S.; Park, J.S.; Jang, I.S.; Park, S.J. Cordyceps militaris induces apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells through TNF-α/TNFR1-mediated inhibition of NF-κB phosphorylation. BMC Complementary Med. 2020, 20, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Schröder, S.K.; Asimakopoulou, A.; Tillmann, S.; Koschmieder, S.; Weiskirchen, R. TNF-α controls Lipocalin-2 expression in PC-3 prostate cancer cells. Cytokine 2020, 135, 155214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, G.P.; Yue, X.; Li, S.Q. Cathepsin C Interacts with TNF-α/p38 MAPK Signaling Pathway to Promote Proliferation and Metastasis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Res. Treat. 2020, 52, 10–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. van Horssen, R.; ten Hagen, T.L.M.; Eggermont, A.M.M. TNF-α in Cancer Treatment: Molecular Insights, Antitumor Effects, and Clinical Utility. Oncology 2006, 11, 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Balkwill, F. TNF-alpha in promotion and progression of cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006, 25, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Li, H.; Wang, R.; Yu, Z.; Shi, R.; Zhang, J.; Gao, S.; Shao, M.; Cui, S.; Gao, Z.; Xu, J.; et al. Tumor Necrosis Factor α Reduces SNAP29 Dependent Autolysosome Formation to Increase Prion Protein Level and Promote Tumor Cell Migration. Virol. Sin. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Santibañez, J.F.; Quintanilla, M.; Bernabeu, C. TGF-β/TGF-β receptor system and its role in physiological and pathological conditions. Clin. Sci. 2011, 121, 233–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Batlle, E.; Massagué, J. Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling in Immunity and Cancer. Immunity 2019, 50, 924–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Fabregat, I.; Fernando, J.; Mainez, J.; Sancho, P. TGF-beta signaling in cancer treatment. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2014, 20, 2934–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mariathasan, S.; Turley, S.J.; Nickles, D.; Castiglioni, A.; Yuen, K.; Wang, Y.; Kadel, E.E., III; Koeppen, H.; Astarita, J.L.; Cubas, R.; et al. TGFβ attenuates tumour response to PD-L1 blockade by contributing to exclusion of T cells. Nature 2018, 554, 544–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Xu, J.; Lamouille, S.; Derynck, R. TGF-beta-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Cell Res. 2009, 19, 156–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Esquivel-Velázquez, M.; Ostoa-Saloma, P.; Palacios-Arreola, M.I.; Nava-Castro, K.E.; Castro, J.I.; Morales-Montor, J. The role of cytokines in breast cancer development and progression. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2015, 35, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Archer, M.; Dogra, N.; Kyprianou, N. Inflammation as a Driver of Prostate Cancer Metastasis and Therapeutic Resistance. Cancers 2020, 12, 2984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Liao, S.; Liu, J.; Lin, P.; Shi, T.; Jain, R.K.; Xu, L. TGF-beta blockade controls ascites by preventing abnormalization of lymphatic vessels in orthotopic human ovarian carcinoma models. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 1415–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Singh, U.P.; Singh, N.P.; Murphy, E.A.; Price, R.L.; Fayad, R.; Nagarkatti, M.; Nagarkatti, P.S. Chemokine and cytokine levels in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Cytokine 2016, 77, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Kundu, J.K.; Surh, Y.-J. Inflammation: Gearing the journey to cancer. Mutat. Res. 2008, 659, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Sirotkovic-Skerlev, M.; Kulić, A.; Bradić, L.; Cacev, T. Protumor effects of proinflammatory mediators in breast cancer. Period. Biol. 2012, 114, 489. [Google Scholar]
  61. Germano, G.; Frapolli, R.; Belgiovine, C.; Anselmo, A.; Pesce, S.; Liguori, M.; Erba, E.; Uboldi, S.; Zucchetti, M.; Pasqualini, F.; et al. Role of Macrophage Targeting in the Antitumor Activity of Trabectedin. Cancer Cell 2013, 23, 249–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Germano, G.; Mantovani, A.; Allavena, P. Targeting of the innate immunity/inflammation as complementary anti-tumor therapies. Ann. Med. 2011, 43, 581–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Onuffer, J.J.; Horuk, R. Chemokines, chemokine receptors and small-molecule antagonists: Recent developments. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2002, 23, 459–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ryan, C.W.; Desai, J. The past, present, and future of cytotoxic chemotherapy and pathway-directed targeted agents for soft tissue sarcoma. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lee, J.M.; Lee, M.H.; Garon, E.; Goldman, J.W.; Salehi-Rad, R.; Baratelli, F.E.; Schaue, D.; Wang, G.; Rosen, F.; Yanagawa, J.; et al. Phase I Trial of Intratumoral Injection of CCL21 Gene-Modified Dendritic Cells in Lung Cancer Elicits Tumor-Specific Immune Responses and CD8(+) T-cell Infiltration. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 4556–4568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. McNab, F.; Mayer-Barber, K.; Sher, A.; Wack, A.; O’Garra, A. Type I interferons in infectious disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 15, 87–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Chawla-Sarkar, M.; Lindner, D.J.; Liu, Y.F.; Williams, B.R.; Sen, G.C.; Silverman, R.H.; Borden, E.C. Apoptosis and interferons: Role of interferon-stimulated genes as mediators of apoptosis. Apoptosis 2003, 8, 237–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Lu, C.; Klement, J.D.; Ibrahim, M.L.; Xiao, W.; Redd, P.S.; Nayak-Kapoor, A.; Zhou, G.; Liu, K. Type I interferon suppresses tumor growth through activating the STAT3-granzyme B pathway in tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J. Immunother. Cancer 2019, 7, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Cai, W.; Kerner, Z.J.; Hong, H.; Sun, J. Targeted Cancer Therapy with Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha. Biochem. Insights 2008, 2008, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Guo, Y.; Xu, F.; Lu, T.; Duan, Z.; Zhang, Z. Interleukin-6 signaling pathway in targeted therapy for cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2012, 38, 904–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Neuzillet, C.; Tijeras-Raballand, A.; Cohen, R.; Cros, J.; Faivre, S.; Raymond, E.; de Gramont, A. Targeting the TGFβ pathway for cancer therapy. Pharmacol. Ther. 2015, 147, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Wei, J.; Ma, L.; Lai, Y.-H.; Zhang, R.; Li, H.; Li, C.; Lin, J. Bazedoxifene as a novel GP130 inhibitor for Colon Cancer therapy. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. O’Malley, B.W., Jr.; Li, D.; McQuone, S.J.; Ralston, R. Combination Nonviral Interleukin-2 Gene Immunotherapy For Head and Neck Cancer: From Bench Top to Bedside. Laryngoscope 2005, 115, 391–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Trudel, S.; Trachtenberg, J.; Toi, A.; Sweet, J.; Hua Li, Z.; Jewett, M.; Tshilias, J.; Zhuang, L.H.; Hitt, M.; Wan, Y.; et al. A phase I trial of adenovector-mediated delivery of interleukin-2 (AdIL-2) in high-risk localized prostate cancer. Cancer Gene Ther. 2003, 10, 755–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Pantuck, A.J.; Belldegrun, A.S. Phase I clinical trial of interleukin 2 (IL-2) gene therapy for prostate cancer. Curr. Urol. Rep. 2001, 2, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Galanis, E.; Burch, P.A.; Richardson, R.L.; Lewis, B.; Pitot, H.C.; Frytak, S.; Spier, C.; Akporiaye, E.T.; Peethambaram, P.P.; Kaur, J.S.; et al. Intratumoral administration of a 1,2-dimyristyloxypropyl-3- dimethylhydroxyethyl ammonium bromide/dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine formulation of the human interleukin-2 gene in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 2004, 101, 2557–2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Shore, N.D.; Boorjian, S.A.; Canter, D.J.; Ogan, K.; Karsh, L.I.; Downs, T.M.; Gomella, L.G.; Kamat, A.M.; Lotan, Y.; Svatek, R.S.; et al. Intravesical rAd-IFN alpha/Syn3 for Patients With High-Grade, Bacillus Calmette-Guerin-Refractory or Relapsed Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Phase II Randomized Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Sterman, D.H.; Alley, E.; Stevenson, J.P.; Friedberg, J.; Metzger, S.; Recio, A.; Moon, E.K.; Haas, A.R.; Vachani, A.; Katz, S.I.; et al. Pilot and Feasibility Trial Evaluating Immuno-Gene Therapy of Malignant Mesothelioma Using Intrapleural Delivery of Adenovirus-IFNα Combined with Chemotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 3791–3800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Wakabayashi, T.; Natsume, A.; Hashizume, Y.; Fujii, M.; Mizuno, M.; Yoshida, J. A phase I clinical trial of interferon-beta gene therapy for high-grade glioma: Novel findings from gene expression profiling and autopsy. J. Gene Med. 2008, 10, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Mastrangelo, M.J.; Maguire, H.C.; Eisenlohr, L.C.; Laughlin, C.E.; Monken, C.E.; McCue, P.A.; Kovatich, A.J.; Lattime, E.C. Intratumoral recombinant GM-CSF-encoding virus as gene therapy in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Cancer Gene Ther. 1999, 6, 409–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Hu, J.C.; Coffin, R.S.; Davis, C.J.; Graham, N.J.; Groves, N.; Guest, P.J.; Harrington, K.J.; James, N.D.; Love, C.A.; McNeish, I.; et al. A phase I study of OncoVEXGM-CSF, a second-generation oncolytic herpes simplex virus expressing granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 6737–6747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Senzer, N.N.; Kaufman, H.L.; Amatruda, T.; Nemunaitis, M.; Reid, T.; Daniels, G.; Gonzalez, R.; Glaspy, J.; Whitman, E.; Harrington, K.; et al. Phase II clinical trial of a granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-encoding, second-generation oncolytic herpesvirus in patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27, 5763–5771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Andtbacka, R.H.; Kaufman, H.L.; Collichio, F.; Amatruda, T.; Senzer, N.; Chesney, J.; Delman, K.A.; Spitler, L.E.; Puzanov, I.; Agarwala, S.S.; et al. Talimogene Laherparepvec Improves Durable Response Rate in Patients with Advanced Melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 33, 2780–2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Fazle Akbar, S.M.; Abe, M.; Yoshida, O.; Murakami, H.; Onji, M. Dendritic cell-based therapy as a multidisciplinary approach to cancer treatment: Present limitations and future scopes. Curr. Med. Chem. 2006, 13, 3113–3119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Gao, J.Q.; Eto, Y.; Yoshioka, Y.; Sekiguchi, F.; Kurachi, S.; Morishige, T.; Yao, X.; Watanabe, H.; Asavatanabodee, R.; Sakurai, F.; et al. Effective tumor targeted gene transfer using PEGylated adenovirus vector via systemic administration. J. Control. Release 2007, 122, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wright, P.; Zheng, C.; Moyana, T.; Xiang, J. Intratumoral vaccination of adenoviruses expressing fusion protein RM4/tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha induces significant tumor regression. Cancer Gene Ther. 1998, 5, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  87. Wu, A.M.; Senter, P.D. Arming antibodies: Prospects and challenges for immunoconjugates. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 1137–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Chai, L.-P.; Wang, Z.-F.; Liang, W.-Y.; Chen, L.; Chen, D.; Wang, A.-X.; Zhang, Z.-Q. In vitro and in vivo effect of 5-FC combined gene therapy with TNF-α and CD suicide gene on human laryngeal carcinoma cell line Hep-2. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Herman, J.M.; Wild, A.T.; Wang, H.; Tran, P.T.; Chang, K.J.; Taylor, G.E.; Donehower, R.C.; Pawlik, T.M.; Ziegler, M.A.; Cai, H.; et al. Randomized phase III multi-institutional study of TNFerade biologic with fluorouracil and radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Final results. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 886–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Chang, K.J.; Reid, T.; Senzer, N.; Swisher, S.; Pinto, H.; Hanna, N.; Chak, A.; Soetikno, R. Phase I evaluation of TNFerade biologic plus chemoradiotherapy before esophagectomy for locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2012, 75, 1139–1146.e1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Balasubbramanian, D.; Goodlett, B.L.; Mitchell, B.M. Is IL-12 pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory? Depends on the blood pressure. Cardiovasc. Res. 2019, 115, 998–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Xinjie, L. Impact of IL-12 in Cancer. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2017, 17, 682–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Rosenberg, S.A. IL-2: The first effective immunotherapy for human cancer. J. Immunol. 2014, 192, 5451–5458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Palù, G.; Cavaggioni, A.; Calvi, P.; Franchin, E.; Pizzato, M.; Boschetto, R.; Parolin, C.; Chilosi, M.; Ferrini, S.; Zanusso, A.; et al. Gene therapy of glioblastoma multiforme via combined expression of suicide and cytokine genes: A pilot study in humans. Gene Ther. 1999, 6, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Broz, P.; Monack, D.M. Noncanonical Inflammasomes: Caspase-11 Activation and Effector Mechanisms. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Bolívar, S.; Anfossi, R.; Humeres, C.; Vivar, R.; Boza, P.; Muñoz, C.; Pardo-Jimenez, V.; Olivares-Silva, F.; Díaz-Araya, G. IFN-β Plays Both Pro- and Anti-inflammatory Roles in the Rat Cardiac Fibroblast Through Differential STAT Protein Activation. Front. Pharm. 2018, 9, 1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Hirota, K.; Hashimoto, M.; Ito, Y.; Matsuura, M.; Ito, H.; Tanaka, M.; Watanabe, H.; Kondoh, G.; Tanaka, A.; Yasuda, K.; et al. Autoimmune Th17 Cells Induced Synovial Stromal and Innate Lymphoid Cell Secretion of the Cytokine GM-CSF to Initiate and Augment Autoimmune Arthritis. Immunity 2018, 48, 1220–1232.e1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Yan, W.L.; Shen, K.Y.; Tien, C.Y.; Chen, Y.A.; Liu, S.J. Recent progress in GM-CSF-based cancer immunotherapy. Immunotherapy 2017, 9, 347–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Pol, J.; Kroemer, G.; Galluzzi, L. First oncolytic virus approved for melanoma immunotherapy. OncoImmunology 2016, 5, e1115641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Zhang, M.; Eshraghian, E.A.; Jammal, O.A.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, X. CRISPR technology: The engine that drives cancer therapy. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 133, 111007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Keeler, A.; ElMallah, M.; Flotte, T. Gene Therapy 2017: Progress and Future Directions. Clin. Transl. Sci. 2017, 10, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Wei, X.; Wei, Y. Opportunities and challenges in the nanoparticles for nucleic acid therapeutics: The first approval of an RNAi nanoparticle for treatment of a rare disease. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2019, 6, 1105–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Liu, Z.; Sun, Q.; Wang, X. PLK1, A Potential Target for Cancer Therapy. Transl. Oncol. 2017, 10, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Rosenblum, D.; Gutkin, A.; Kedmi, R.; Ramishetti, S.; Veiga, N.; Jacobi, A.M.; Schubert, M.S.; Friedmann-Morvinski, D.; Cohen, Z.R.; Behlke, M.A.; et al. CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing using targeted lipid nanoparticles for cancer therapy. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eabc9450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Luo, Y.-L.; Xu, C.-F.; Li, H.-J.; Cao, Z.-T.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.-L.; Du, X.-J.; Yang, X.-Z.; Gu, Z.; Wang, J. Macrophage-Specific in Vivo Gene Editing Using Cationic Lipid-Assisted Polymeric Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 994–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Xu, C.; Lu, Z.; Luo, Y.; Liu, Y.; Cao, Z.; Shen, S.; Li, H.; Liu, J.; Chen, K.; Chen, Z.; et al. Targeting of NLRP3 inflammasome with gene editing for the amelioration of inflammatory diseases. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Cai, L.; Gu, Z.; Zhong, J.; Wen, D.; Chen, G.; He, L.; Wu, J.; Gu, Z. Advances in glycosylation-mediated cancer-targeted drug delivery. Drug Discov. Today 2018, 23, 1126–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Fan, D.Y.; Tian, Y.; Liu, Z.J. Injectable Hydrogels for Localized Cancer Therapy. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Alekseenko, I.V.; Snezhkov, E.V.; Chernov, I.P.; Pleshkan, V.V.; Potapov, V.K.; Sass, A.V.; Monastyrskaya, G.S.; Kopantzev, E.P.; Vinogradova, T.V.; Khramtsov, Y.V.; et al. Therapeutic properties of a vector carrying the HSV thymidine kinase and GM-CSF genes and delivered as a complex with a cationic copolymer. J. Transl. Med. 2015, 13, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Li, F.; Wu, Y.; Chen, L.; Hu, L.; Zhu, F.; He, Q. High iodine induces DNA damage in autoimmune thyroiditis partially by inhibiting the DNA repair protein MTH1. Cell Immunol. 2019, 344, 103948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Kumagae, Y.; Hirahashi, M.; Takizawa, K.; Yamamoto, H.; Gushima, M.; Esaki, M.; Matsumoto, T.; Nakamura, M.; Kitazono, T.; Oda, Y. Overexpression of MTH1 and OGG1 proteins in ulcerative colitis-associated carcinogenesis. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 16, 1765–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Li, L.; Song, L.; Liu, X.; Yang, X.; Li, X.; He, T.; Wang, N.; Yang, S.; Yu, C.; Yin, T.; et al. Artificial Virus Delivers CRISPR-Cas9 System for Genome Editing of Cells in Mice. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cells 10 00100 g001 550
Figure 1. Critical inflammatory mediators in the tumor microenvironment.
Figure 1. Critical inflammatory mediators in the tumor microenvironment.
Cells 10 00100 g001
Cells 10 00100 g002 550
Figure 2. Clinical progress on inflammatory cytokine gene therapies.
Figure 2. Clinical progress on inflammatory cytokine gene therapies.
Cells 10 00100 g002
Table
Table 1. Important previous or ongoing clinical trials with inflammatory cytokine gene therapies.
Table 1. Important previous or ongoing clinical trials with inflammatory cytokine gene therapies.
Cytokine GenesTransfer VectorCancer ApplicationsPhaseKey Publication or clinicaltrials.gov No.
TNFTNF-αAdenovirusProstate cancerIINCT01048151
TNF-αAdenovirusPancreatic cancerIIINCT00051467
TNF-αAdenovirusEsophagus cancerIINCT00051480
TNF-αAdenovirusHead and neck cancerI/IINCT00496535
TNF-αAdenovirusRectal cancerIINCT00137878
TNF-αAdenovirusMelanomaIINCT00261404
TNF-α and IL-2Adenovirus MelanomaINCT04217473
ILIL-12AdenovirusGliomaINCT02026271 [36]
IL-12AdenovirusBreast cancerIINCT04095689
IL-2PlasmidHead and neck cancerI[73]
IL-2AdenovirusProstate cancerI[74]
IL-2PlasmidProstate cancerI[75]
IL-2Cationic lipidRenal cancerI/II[76]
IFNIFN-α2bAdenovirusBladder cancerII[77]
NCT01687244
IFN-α2bAdenovirusMesotheliomaI[78]
NCT01119664
IFN-βAdenovirusGliomaI[79]
IFN-βAdenovirusPleural malignanciesINCT00299962
GM-CSFGM-CSFVaccinia virusMelanomaNot reported[80]
GM-CSFOncolytic virusHead and neck cancer; breast cancer; melanoma; gastrointestinal cancerI[81]
GM-CSFOncolytic virusMelanomaII[82]
GM-CSFOncolytic virusMelanomaIII[83]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lan, T.; Chen, L.; Wei, X. Inflammatory Cytokines in Cancer: Comprehensive Understanding and Clinical Progress in Gene Therapy. Cells 2021, 10, 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10010100

AMA Style

Lan T, Chen L, Wei X. Inflammatory Cytokines in Cancer: Comprehensive Understanding and Clinical Progress in Gene Therapy. Cells. 2021; 10(1):100. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10010100

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lan, Tianxia, Li Chen, and Xiawei Wei. 2021. "Inflammatory Cytokines in Cancer: Comprehensive Understanding and Clinical Progress in Gene Therapy" Cells 10, no. 1: 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10010100

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop