Next Article in Journal
The Minimal Residual Disease Using Liquid Biopsies in Hematological Malignancies
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of an Ultrasensitive NGS-Based Blood Test for the Diagnosis of Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Sensitivity, a Hurdle Still Difficult to Overcome
Previous Article in Journal
Activation of Investigator-Initiated Clinical Trials with a Pharmaceutical for Cancer Patients before and after Post-Millennial Changes of Regulations in Germany and Europe
Previous Article in Special Issue
Detection of Cancer Mutations by Urine Liquid Biopsy as a Potential Tool in the Clinical Management of Bladder Cancer Patients
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 14
Issue 5
10.3390/cancers14051309
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Transcending Blood—Opportunities for Alternate Liquid Biopsies in Oncology

by
Bonnita Werner
,
Kristina Warton
and
Caroline E. Ford
*
Gynaecological Cancer Research Group, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2022, 14(5), 1309; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051309
Submission received: 8 February 2022 / Revised: 28 February 2022 / Accepted: 1 March 2022 / Published: 3 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cell-Free DNA as Prognostic and Predictive Biomarker in Solid Cancers)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Cell-free DNA—DNA that has been expelled from cells and can be isolated from blood plasma and other body fluids—is a useful tool in medicine, with applications as a biomarker in diagnosis, prognosis, disease profiling, and treatment selection. In oncology, the ease of access to the tumour genome is a major advantage of cell-free DNA, but while this has led to significant research in blood, other body fluids have not received equal attention. This review article summarises the current research into cell-free DNA in non-blood body fluids, highlighting its values and limitations, and suggesting the direction of future studies. We conclude that cell-free DNA from non-blood body fluids may provide additional information to supplement traditional biopsies, allowing informative and improved patient care across many cancer types.

Abstract

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a useful molecular biomarker in oncology research and treatment, but while research into its properties in blood has flourished, there remains much to be discovered about cfDNA in other body fluids. The cfDNA from saliva, sputum, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, faeces, pleural effusions, and ascites has unique advantages over blood, and has potential as an alternative ‘liquid biopsy’ template. This review summarises the state of current knowledge and identifies the gaps in our understanding of non-blood liquid biopsies; where their advantages lie, where caution is needed, where they might fit clinically, and where research should focus in order to accelerate clinical implementation. An emphasis is placed on ascites and pleural effusions, being pathological fluids directly associated with cancer. We conclude that non-blood fluids are viable sources of cfDNA in situations where solid tissue biopsies are inaccessible, or only accessible from dated archived specimens. In addition, we show that due to the abundance of cfDNA in non-blood fluids, they can outperform blood in many circumstances. We demonstrate multiple instances in which DNA from various sources can provide additional information, and thus we advocate for analysing non-blood sources as a complement to blood and/or tissue. Further research into these fluids will highlight opportunities to improve patient outcomes across cancer types.

1. Introduction

The field of oncology has benefitted from the advancements in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) research since its discovery in the mid-20th century [1]. With the ongoing progress in molecular biology, the potential of cfDNA as a clinical tool is compelling. Though cfDNA that circulates in the blood (cirDNA) has proven clinical value—with multiple applications already in clinical practice [2]—it has substantial limitations, including low concentrations and limited release of cell-free tumour DNA (ctDNA) into the blood stream by cancers in certain anatomical locations, such as the brain. While other body fluids have not received the same research attention as blood, early studies indicate that cfDNA isolated from non-blood sources may have a unique clinical utility, especially in situations where blood and tissue specimens are inaccessible or dated [3].
Traditional tissue biopsies can provide insights to inform clinical management. However, they come with crucial limitations; tissue biopsies are site-restricted, invasive and can misrepresent the heterogeneity of a cancer [4]. They can also yield insufficient material for genetic analysis in up to 25% of cases [5]. The discovery that body fluids contain disease-related constituents gave rise to the concept of an informative and minimally invasive ‘liquid biopsy’. Sampling fluid allows a non-biased, random selection of tumour-derived factors, capturing tumour heterogeneity in a way that cannot be achieved from a single tissue biopsy (Figure 1) [6]. This has obvious benefits in oncology and has been investigated, and in some cases implemented, for cancer diagnosis, patient monitoring, and tumour molecular analysis in a range of cancer types [7,8].
cirDNA has been of interest as an analyte in liquid biopsies since 1977, when it was first found to contain ctDNA [9]. In healthy individuals, cirDNA is present at low levels (10–15 ng/mL blood), though it does increase during tissue stress instigated by exercise, inflammation, or injury [10]. In cancer patients it can be up to 10-fold higher, especially with metastatic disease, partially due to ctDNA contribution [9]. Multiple commercial cirDNA-based oncology assays have been approved for early detection (for example, Epi proColon® for colorectal cancer) [11], disease monitoring (for example, COLVERA™ for monitoring the recurrence of colorectal cancer) [12], and precision medicine (for example, Cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2, for the prediction of non-small cell lung cancer responses to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors) [13,14].
Although other body fluids can be arguably more accessible and less invasive to collect than blood, they have not been afforded equal attention, with ctDNA not discovered in urine until 1995 [15]. ctDNA has since been found in saliva [16], sputum [17], semen [18], faeces [19], and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [20]. With respective proximity to cancers of the bladder, head and neck, lungs, prostate and testes, gastro-intestinal tract, and central nervous system (CNS), these fluids may have unique advantages (Figure 2) [21]. Additionally, pathological fluids, such as pleural effusions and ascites (which arise only in a diseased state), are known ctDNA sources [22,23]. These fluids are drained therapeutically and may present more direct insight into their associated cancers than blood; however, they too have received limited research attention [24].
Several advantages of non-blood sourced cfDNA have been described in the literature, including the tendency to be a richer and more diverse source of ctDNA, carrying additional information not detected in samples from blood or tissue [19,20,25]. Though promising, further research is needed to establish the full scope of the applications and limitations of non-blood sourced cfDNA. In this review, we evaluate the evidence for non-blood cfDNA as a liquid biopsy substrate and identify areas for future research to focus on in order to facilitate progress towards clinical implementation.

2. Reliable Molecular Profiling of Disease

2.1. Does Non-Blood Sourced cfDNA Recapitulate Tumour Tissue Profile?

The most critical requirement for liquid biopsies is a demonstrated ability to recapitulate information from the solid tumour, and there is evidence that non-blood-sourced cfDNA can do this very effectively. Table 1 condenses the findings of sequencing reports comparing cfDNA from various body fluids versus tissue. We indicate the percentage of cases in which any additional mutations were discovered in a tissue or fluid sample within an individual (or, where indicated, within total mutations across a cohort), and cases where there was concordance between the two sources. A report from 2021 examined the concordance between the cfDNA from non-blood fluids and matched tissue biopsies, in variant alleles and their frequencies [26]. Pleural fluid, peritoneal fluid, pericardial fluid, and fine needle aspirate was collected for diagnostic cytology from 23 people with various cancer types, and the results were compared to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues [26]. The average tumour proportion, estimated by variant allele frequency (VAF), was similar between the two DNA sources (24% in fluid compared to 26% in cell blocks) [26]. Ninety percent of the variants detected in cell blocks were concordant with the fluid samples, and identical variant profiles were identified in 74% of sample pairs [26]. Discordant variants may represent the less dominant clones; where reported, VAF was lower than average in discordant values (3% and 8%) [26]. Another study, also comparing multiple serous fluids, similarly found concordance between matched tumour and liquid biopsies, with additional information from the latter in 30% of cases [27]. These studies were not able to discern an advantage of certain fluids or tumour locations over others, due to low cohort numbers.
Studies that focus on individual fluids support the additional information present, with cfDNA shown to harbour unique mutations in CSF [28], urine [29], ascites, and pleural effusions [22]. In a cohort of patients with glioblastoma (GBM), all GBM-related coding mutations detected in tumour tissue were similarly detected in CSF, but additional GBM-related changes were seen in the CSF cfDNA of 5/9 patients [28]. In two case studies of recurrent medulloblastoma, where driver mutations were found to differ between the initial and recurrent disease, cfDNA from CSF was found to accurately detect the changes [30]. Similarly, cfDNA from pleural effusions has been found to correspond to matched tumour tissue [31,32]. Among 29 patients with lung cancer, 93% of the driver mutations identified in tumour tissue were similarly detected in the cfDNA from pleural effusions [33]. In ascites fluid from a cohort of mixed KRAS-positive and wild-type tumours, KRAS mutations were detected in 100% of the KRAS-positive cohort, and in an additional 19% of tumours deemed wild-type by tissue biopsy [34]. Sputum and saliva, however, though similarly representative of tumour tissue, are less sensitive sources for cfDNA analysis [17,35].
The heightened mutation detection in non-blood fluids may indicate their capacity to capture intra-tumour heterogeneity. However, tumour heterogeneity may not be the only source of the additional mutations in cfDNA. Alternative explanations include a higher vulnerability to artefactual DNA changes in the extracellular space, technical errors in sequencing caused by the unique characteristics of cfDNA, or the inheritance of unfavourable mutations preceding cell death. These avenues should be explored to reach confidence in cfDNA profiling in the clinical setting.
Table
Table 1. Concordance in variants detected in tumour tissue and cfDNA from body fluids.
Table 1. Concordance in variants detected in tumour tissue and cfDNA from body fluids.
FluidConcordance between SourcesAdditional Variants in TissueAdditional Variants in FluidSource
Ascites80% (n = 5)20% (n = 1)0% (n = 0)Perrone, M.E. et al., 2021 [26]
100% (n = 2)0% (n = 0)0% (n = 0)Yang, S.R. et al., 2019 [27]
10% (n = 1)60% (n = 6)70% (n = 7)Han, M.R. et al., 2020 [25]
88% (n = 23)0% (n = 0)12% (n = 3)Leick, K.M. et al., 2020 [34]
CSF44% (n = 4)0% (n = 0)56% (n = 5)Duan, H. et al., 2020 [28]
Pleural
effusions		75% (n = 12)19% (n = 3)6% (n = 1)Perrone, M.E. et al., 2021 [26]
75% (n = 6)0% (n = 0)25% (n = 2)Yang, S.R. et al., 2019 [27]
100% (n = 6)0% (n = 0)0% (n = 0)Mokanszki, A. et al., 2021 [32]
58% (mutations = 96)18% (mutations = 29)24% (mutations = 40)Tong, L. et al., 2019 [33]
50% (n = 7)36% (n = 5)21% (n = 3)Guo, Z. et al., 2019 [36]
n—number of people, CSF—cerebrospinal fluid.

2.2. What Are the Distinctive Features of Non-Blood Sourced Cell-Free DNA Compared to cirDNA?

2.2.1. Is There an Explanation for the Different ctDNA Concentrations in Blood and Non-Blood Fluids?

One of the major limitations of working with cirDNA is the high ctDNA dilution with white blood cell cfDNA, which may contain sequence variants arising from clonal haematopoiesis. For example, in an investigation that used high intensity sequencing to compare somatic mutations in cfDNA, white blood cells, and tumour biopsies, over 50% of the mutations detected in cirDNA from cancer patients were due to normal clonal haematopoiesis [37]. A key advantage of cfDNA in non-blood body fluids is the characteristically high ctDNA fraction, which makes tumour DNA easier to sequence and detect.
Improved ctDNA detection rates have been observed in cfDNA from non-blood sources compared to blood [29], with the exception of saliva [35] and sputum [17,38]. This has been repeatedly demonstrated in pleural effusions secondary to lung cancer, with an increased sensitivity to EGFR mutations in malignant pleural effusions over plasma, as well as over cell pellets from the effusions [31,32,33,36]. Furthermore, in two independent cohorts of lung adenocarcinoma patients, higher ctDNA abundance was seen in other body fluids, including ascites, pericardial effusions, and CSF, compared to blood plasma [39,40]. The clinical implications of this are clear and have been demonstrated in a multi-cancer study of precision medicine; 36% of participants, despite having no detectable driver mutations in blood, possessed driver mutations detected in the cfDNA from serous body fluids—which had a higher total cfDNA concentration and a higher VAF—allowing the guidance of personalised treatment [41].
An explanation for the high ctDNA abundance may be the proximity of these fluids to the tumour. Ascites—common in cancers of the abdomen and pelvis, including ovarian, gastro-intestinal, pancreatic, and uterine cancers [42,43]—is generally in immediate proximity to tumours, and often contains suspended cancer cells. In fact, in ovarian cancers, suspended cancer cells are the predominant mode of metastasis, which is mainly localised to the peritoneum [44]. The encapsulation of disease in the peritoneum may limit ctDNA access to the circulation [45]; in a cohort of patients with confirmed KRAS-positive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, KRAS mutations were detected in the cirDNA of 18 of 19 patients with metastases outside of the peritoneum (for example in the lungs or liver), but in only 5 of 26 patients with disease confined to the peritoneum [46]; in another study of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, next-generation sequencing of cirDNA detected tumour fractions in the cirDNA of only 31 of 80 patients (the presence or absence of extraperitoneal lesions in this cohort was not reported) [47]. In an investigation of colorectal cancer, KRAS/BRAF mutations were detected in cirDNA by digital droplet PCR in only 20% of mutation-carrying patients with peritoneal confined disease, compared to 93% of patients with liver metastases, but when ascites was similarly tested, mutations were detected in 100% of cases (n = 20) [48].
Other contexts in which fluid proximity appears to be important in ctDNA dissemination and detection include CSF in cancers of the CNS [49] and urine in renal cell carcinoma [50]. cirDNA dissemination is hypothesised to be restricted by the blood-brain barrier, hampering the access of CNS-derived ctDNA into the bloodstream [51]. In a 2014 analysis of 640 cancer patients with various primary tumours, ctDNA detection in cirDNA was significantly lower in patients with medulloblastomas and gliomas, compared to patients with local or advanced carcinomas external to the CNS (40% and 10%, respectively, compared to 50% to >75%, depending on disease stage) [52]. Where detected, the ctDNA concentration was lower in patients with primary CNS tumours [52]. This was backed by a more recent report in which ctDNA was detected in only 1 of 13 medulloblastoma patients’ plasma samples, and 10 out of 13 CSF samples [30]. Another group similarly found ctDNA to be present in the CSF of almost 75% of patients with primary CNS cancer [49]. In renal cell carcinoma, where there is similar proximity to both urine and blood, increased detection of ctDNA has been found in urine compared to plasma, [50]. In contrast, the detection of ctDNA was lower in urine than in blood in lung cancer patients, where the urine proximity to the tumour site is clearly less [38].
An alternative explanation for the high ctDNA concentrations in pleural effusions and ascites may be the presence of different clearance pathways compared to cirDNA. In healthy individuals, low levels of cirDNA can be attributed to efficient clearance via the liver, by phagocytosis, or by enzymatic cleavage [53,54,55,56]. In conditions where cirDNA levels are elevated, such as cancer, clearance is less efficient and cirDNA accumulates; however, the half-life remains less than two hours [53]. As the filtration mechanism of other body fluids differs to blood, clearance may be exceeded by accumulation, explaining the high concentration.
cfDNA clearance from ascites and pleural effusion may be negatively impacted by compromised lymphatic drainage. In healthy individuals, there is an equilibrium in fluid movement into and out of the peritoneal cavity, with the total volume settling at approximately 50 mL [57]. However, with malignant ascites and pleural effusion, increased fluid production and leaky blood vessels, largely due to VEGF upregulation, pair with a decreased lymphatic drainage, due to the ectopic cell obstruction of lymphatic stomata, resulting in fluid accumulation [24,58,59]. A similar process is observed in pleural effusions [60,61]. As jeopardised lymphatic drainage is a prerequisite feature of these pathological fluids, the passage of cfDNA to the liver for clearance may be reduced [58].
Since a major source of cfDNA in circulation is apoptotic and necrotic cells, the prolonged half-life in non-blood body fluids holds clinical implications [62]. The cfDNA pool may over-represent DNA from clonal sources that are no longer prevalent, and the cfDNA may have significant exposure to elements causing molecular damage. Thus, it is possible that cfDNA from non-blood body fluids contains irrelevant or artefactual DNA changes.
The DNA half-life in these body fluids should be investigated. cfDNA in saliva, in which low total ctDNA concentration has been reported, has a half-life of 3 h; however, cfDNA in urine, in which a higher ctDNA concentration has been reported, has a half-life too short to be reliably measured [63]. It is therefore difficult to estimate the effect of cfDNA degradation on ctDNA abundance. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have investigated the half-life of cfDNA in ascites fluid or pleural effusions. Further research is required to delineate the mechanism and effect of cfDNA clearance in non-blood body fluids.

2.2.2. Is There Concordance between ctDNA in Blood and Non-Blood Fluids?

cirDNA is utilised clinically in various contexts, though ctDNA from blood can have a low concordance with the primary tumour in mutation profile [64,65]. Additional DNA changes have been detected in the ctDNA from body fluids compared to blood, indicating that cfDNA from non-blood sources may provide information to supplement traditional or blood-based biopsies.
cfDNA from non-blood sources often holds more tumour-derived mutations than cirDNA (Table 2) [41,66,67]. This is inconsistent with one report, where NRAS mutations were detected in an additional 25% of the cohort’s cirDNA compared to pleural effusion cfDNA (n = 8); however, this cohort was of patients with blood cancers, with findings therefore supportive of our previous hypothesis on proximity to the tumour [68].
The epigenetic profiles in serous fluids are less widely researched than mutations. However, evidence points towards conserved methylation patterns in ctDNA from non-blood fluids, similar to blood, with a report of a lung cancer-specific methylation panel designed for blood cfDNA also distinguishing benign from malignant pleural effusion and ascites (though matched bloods were not compared for concordance) [69]. The methylation of cfDNA in urine has also been investigated for its diagnostic potential for renal cell carcinoma [70].
The most comprehensive liquid biopsy information will likely be obtained from the complementary analysis of cirDNA, as well as non-blood sourced cfDNA. Han and colleagues collected solid tumour and ascites samples from the debulking surgery of 10 epithelial ovarian cancer patients, along with blood samples from within one week prior to surgery [25]. Compared to the number of mutations found in the cfDNA from ascites, the tumour tissue DNA captured just 32% of total mutations and the cirDNA captured 23% [25]. However, unique mutations were found in ascites cfDNA in 70% of cases, but also in solid tissue in 70% of cases, and in cirDNA in 40% of cases, indicating the value of analysing DNA from multiple sources [25].
Table
Table 2. Concordance in variants detected in cfDNA from blood plasma and body fluids.
Table 2. Concordance in variants detected in cfDNA from blood plasma and body fluids.
FluidConcordance between SourcesAdditional Variants in cirDNA (Blood)Additional Variants in
cfDNA (Non-Blood)		Source
Ascites100% (n = 7)0% (n = 0)0% (n = 0)Villatoro, S. et al., 2019 [41]
86%
(mutations = 6)		0%
(mutations = 0)		14%
(mutations = 1)		Zhou, S. et al., 2018 [71]
10% (n = 1)40% (n = 4)80% (n = 8)Han, M.R. et al., 2020 [25]
CSF25% (n = 4)0% (n = 0)75% (n = 8)Villatoro, S. et al., 2019 [41]
53% (n = 10)0% (n = 0)47% (n = 9)Suryavanshi, M. et al., 2020 [67]
15% (n = 2)8% (n = 1)77% (n = 10)Escudero, L. et al., 2020 [30]
Pleural effusions75% (n = 6)25% (n = 2)0% (n = 0)Ozeki, M. et al., 2019 [68]
100% (n = 4)0% (n = 0)0% (n = 0)Villatoro, S. et al., 2019 [41]
29% (n = 14)36% (n = 5)43% (n = 6)Guo, Z. et al., 2019 [36]
100% (n = 6)0% (n = 0)0% (n = 0)Zhou, S. et al., 2018 [71]
n—number of people, CSF—cerebrospinal fluid.

2.2.3. Is There a Difference in the Biological Origin of ctDNA in Blood and Non-Blood Fluids?

The biological characteristics of cirDNA, such as its origin, have been extensively studied [53,72]. However, with far less data on non-blood cfDNA, it is unclear how transferable our knowledge of cirDNA is.
cirDNA exists as extracellular double-stranded DNA freely suspended in blood. A range of mechanisms for cirDNA release have been proposed, including apoptosis, necrosis, active release, oncosis, pyroptosis, phagocytosis, and neutrophil extracellular trap release [53,73,74]. The release process generally results in a distinctive, ladder-like fragmentation pattern that reflects cleavage between nucleosomes, with the nucleosomes protecting the DNA from further degradation [75]. The size profile of cirDNA gives an insight into its origin: cirDNA fragments of ~167 base pairs are associated with apoptosis where they arise from caspase-dependent cleavage [53]; longer cirDNA fragments may originate from necrotic cells or extracellular vesicles released actively by live cells [73,74]; tumour derived cirDNA is enriched in smaller, mono-nucleosomal fragments of 90–150 base pairs [76,77,78].
There is some debate as to whether similar conclusions based on size analysis can be drawn regarding non-blood cfDNA. cfDNA with a similar size profile to blood has been reported in various fluids [22,32,79,80], and tumour enrichment in short cfDNA fragments has been demonstrated in CSF and urine [81,82]. However, distinct size profiles have also been observed. Trans-renal cirDNA is known to cross the kidney barrier more efficiently in fragments of approximately 100 base pairs or less, perhaps naturally enriching for ctDNA [83]. cfDNA samples with fragment sizes over 1000 base pairs are more common in semen from prostate cancer patients than in healthy controls or benign prostate hyperplasia patients [18,84]. In 2021, Yu et al. identified high levels of long cfDNA fragments in malignant pleural effusions from 11 of 30 patients with non-small cell lung cancer [85]. After isolating the high molecular weight cfDNA and comparing it to the more fragmented DNA, they identified a significant increase in cancer-unrelated (likely artefactual) mutations in the high molecular weight fraction, potentially giving false estimates of the tumour mutational burden [85]. High molecular weight DNA, albeit of a different size, was observed in a similar proportion of malignant ascites from ovarian cancer patients, though sequencing was not performed [23]. Further characterisation of the size of ctDNA from non-blood fluids is necessary to clarify the technical and biological implications.

2.2.4. Is Non-Blood cfDNA Similarly Affected by Protocol Technical Parameters?

Technical factors, including extraction kits, quantitation techniques, and storage methods have been extensively studied in cirDNA, with significant impacts on assay outcomes reported [86,87]. Given the physiological distinctions between blood and non-blood sourced cfDNA, it is unclear whether similar technical outcomes are maintained.
DNA extraction kits have varying efficiency in recovering cirDNA, thus poor kit selection can lead to inaccurate results and poor performance in downstream assays [86,88]. Yield variations have been shown to be largely influenced by biased fragment size selection, with a reduced recovery of short (50–100 bp), potentially tumour-enriched fragments [89]. Furthermore, the storage of plasma before cirDNA extraction can lead to a 25% decrease in cfDNA yield per year (Yuwono, N.L., et al. in press, CCLM.2021.1152.R1).
Without insight into the effect of these technical parameters on cfDNA from body fluids, the impact on cfDNA quantitation is unclear. Commercial circulating DNA extraction kit performance should be evaluated for use with different fluid types. Adapted protocols, specific to non-blood body fluids, should be developed, ideally allowing higher input volumes to account for the large volumes of ascites and pleural effusion that can be drained. Furthermore, the long-term stability and storage requirements of non-blood fluid cfDNA should be ascertained. We have shown cell-free DNA from ovarian cancer-related ascites to be stable in terms of size profile and concentration over three days at 4 °C [23]. However, this should be further explored in a long-term time-course, comparing yield over time in different storage conditions to facilitate the inclusion of these sample types in clinical trials.
This may have a translational impact, as cirDNA concentration has been linked to tumour burden: cirDNA concentration has been suggested as a biomarker of tumour burden in childhood neuroblastoma (n = 79) [90]; as a prognostic indicator for overall survival in metastatic melanoma (n = 43) [91]; and as an indicator of response to first and second-line taxanes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (n = 571) [92]. To the best of our knowledge, the cfDNA concentration in body fluids has not been linked to prognosis; however, cfDNA in pleural effusion has been found to be significantly more concentrated than matched cirDNA [33]. Thus, factors affecting the yield and stability of cfDNA from non-blood fluid should be further investigated, particularly for confidence in considering total cfDNA concentration as a biomarker of disease burden.
Another technical consideration is non-blood cfDNA performance in existing sequencing platforms. Several commercial next-generation sequencing methods have been optimised for use with cirDNA, accommodating a small fragment size, low total concentration, and low tumour DNA content. However, the comparison of these methods with tissue-specific protocols has revealed a low concordance within patients [64]. In one study comparing the 65 genes common to both assays, an average of 4.82 genes were altered in the tissue and 2.96 were altered in the cirDNA [65]. This may be due to the dilution of ctDNA with genomic cirDNA, decreasing the sensitivity of cirDNA-specific assays relative to tissue-specific assays; discordance between outputs was significantly more likely with VAFs of <1% [64]. In similar studies where participants had a verified level of >10% ctDNA, the concordance in somatic mutations and copy number variations was 88% and 80%, respectively [93]. The increased ctDNA concentration in non-blood body fluids may, therefore, improve performance in established sequencing platforms.

3. Where Are Non-Blood Liquid Biopsies Clinically Applicable?

The analysis of traditional tissue biopsies is a common clinical practice, particularly for diagnosis and disease profiling. However, the invasiveness and expense of tissue biopsies can limit the situations in which they are applicable. The major advantage of a liquid biopsy over a standard tissue biopsy is the reduction in the risks and costs associated with the latter. Furthermore, increased accessibility allows sampling when biopsies or surgery may not typically be undertaken, such as at disease progression and the acquisition of resistance [6].
cirDNA is an attractive substrate for widescale clinical testing for multiple reasons, but largely due to the ease of access to blood: blood tests are generally acceptable at routine medical appointments [94], blood sampling is convenient and can be safely done in most circumstances, and DNA changes in blood can be traced to cancers of many primary sites [95]. Though non-blood body fluid biopsies may not always share these traits, their additional perspective may provide important supplementary information, aiding in diagnosis, disease monitoring, and precision medicine.
Due to the prior mentioned benefits of blood tests, cirDNA-based liquid biopsies are particularly well placed as screening tools for early cancer detection. Passively collected non-blood based liquid biopsies, such as urine, stool, and saliva are similarly appropriate for this purpose. Population-wide colorectal cancer self-screening tests, involving personal faecal collection, demonstrate evidence of the utility of easily collected samples, having reduced colorectal cancer mortality by up to 62% [96]. However, not all body fluids are appropriate for this purpose. In the case of pleural effusion and ascites, which are indicative of advanced disease, the objectives of early diagnosis or recurrence detection are redundant, though they may facilitate diagnosis. CSF sampling, being more invasive and involved than blood sampling, is also not appropriate for early disease screening, but may aid in confirming diagnosis where suspicions are high.
Non-blood fluids may serve better in other circumstances, such as disease monitoring. A key exclusion of the utility of cirDNA in oncological testing is in cancers of the CNS, where ctDNA presence in blood is restricted, possibly due to the blood-brain barrier [51]. ctDNA from CSF has been shown to recapitulate genomic alterations in solid paediatric medulloblastoma and to correctly stratify molecular features, facilitating clinical management, and disease monitoring [30]. Tissue biopsies of CNS tumours can be particularly challenging or impossible, so a sensitive CSF liquid biopsy is a desirable alternative for diagnosing and monitoring localised CNS tumours. Furthermore, there are instances where blood draws are detrimental to the patient. Advanced cancer is frequently coupled with anaemia and there are concerns over excessive blood draws in critically ill patients [97,98]. Here, less invasive specimens, such as urine, may be a more appropriate analyte for disease monitoring [3]. As well as containing local ctDNA contributions in the case of urothelial and prostate cancers [99,100], urine has been shown to contain ctDNA derived from the circulation, representative of cancers throughout the body [101,102,103]. Ascites and pleural effusions, being therapeutically drained as part of patient care, are another avenue of access to ctDNA that avoids imposing additional procedures on unwell patients. As these fluids typically reaccumulate, they also present an opportunity for serial disease monitoring.
Non-blood fluids are also excellent templates to enable precision medicine and informed disease management, particularly when tissue is inaccessible or out-dated and blood can be outperformed. A case study involving a patient with stage IV gastric cancer, with no tumour tissue available for sequencing, compared cirDNA from plasma with cfDNA from ascites and pleural effusion as templates for personalised medicine selection [71]. A high concordance in the mutational spectra was found between sample types, but ascites contained the highest mutant allele frequencies in all common aberrations detected [71]. The findings enabled the prescription of a targeted therapy, demonstrating an instance where non-blood body fluid could provide the most clinically pertinent information in lieu of a tissue biopsy [71].

4. Conclusions

We have found growing evidence to support the strength of the use of cfDNA from non-blood sources as liquid biopsy templates, providing clinically actionable information across various solid cancers. Body fluids, particularly pleural effusions, ascites, CSF and urine, can provide accessible additional information to supplement or substitute for tissue biopsies and blood liquid biopsies, where they are inappropriate or insufficient. Further research into the technical concerns highlighted in this review, including potential artefacts, stability, and performance with non-specific extraction kits, will facilitate a swift transition into clinical practice, supported by the existing platforms already developed for liquid biopsies of blood. The described advantages of non-blood cfDNA, including high tumour content and comprehensive disease profiling, may lead to a more precise understanding of an individual’s disease, being of growing importance in the era of precision medicine.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.W., K.W. and C.E.F.; writing—original draft preparation, B.W.; writing—review and editing, B.W., K.W. and C.E.F.; supervision, K.W. and C.E.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

B. Werner would like to acknowledge the funding support from the Australian Research Training Program and the Translational Cancer Research Network Ph.D. top-up scheme, supported by the Cancer Institute, NSW.

Conflicts of Interest

K. Warton declares potential financial conflicts of interest due to stock ownership in the following companies which are developing cell-free DNA based clinical assays: Guardant Health; Exact Sciences; EpiGenomics AG.

Abbreviations

cfDNAcell-free DNA
cirDNAcirculating cell-free DNA, referring specifically to cell-free DNA in blood plasma
ctDNAtumour-derived cell-free DNA

References

  1. Mandel, P.; Metais, P. Nuclear Acids in Human Blood Plasma. C. R. Seances Soc. Biol. Fil. 1948, 142, 241–243. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Ignatiadis, M.; Sledge, G.W.; Jeffrey, S.S. Liquid biopsy enters the clinic—Implementation issues and future challenges. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 18, 297–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Peng, M.; Chen, C.; Hulbert, A.; Brock, M.V.; Yu, F. Non-blood circulating tumor DNA detection in cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 69162–69173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pectasides, E.; Stachler, M.D.; Derks, S.; Liu, Y.; Maron, S.; Islam, M.; Alpert, L.; Kwak, H.; Kindler, H.; Polite, B.; et al. Genomic Heterogeneity as a Barrier to Precision Medicine in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2018, 8, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Corcoran, R.B.; Chabner, B.A. Application of Cell-free DNA Analysis to Cancer Treatment. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 1754–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Parikh, A.R.; Leshchiner, I.; Elagina, L.; Goyal, L.; Levovitz, C.; Siravegna, G.; Livitz, D.; Rhrissorrakrai, K.; Martin, E.E.; van Seventer, E.E.; et al. Liquid versus tissue biopsy for detecting acquired resistance and tumor heterogeneity in gastrointestinal cancers. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1415–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Poulet, G.; Massias, J.; Taly, V. Liquid Biopsy: General Concepts. Acta Cytol 2019, 63, 449–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. De Rubis, G.; Rajeev Krishnan, S.; Bebawy, M. Liquid Biopsies in Cancer Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Prognosis. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 40, 172–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leon, S.A.; Shapiro, B.; Sklaroff, D.M.; Yaros, M.J. Free DNA in the serum of cancer patients and the effect of therapy. Cancer Res. 1977, 37, 646–650. [Google Scholar]
  10. Yuwono, N.L.; Warton, K.; Ford, C.E. The influence of biological and lifestyle factors on circulating cell-free DNA in blood plasma. eLife 2021, 10, e69679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lin, K.W. mSEPT9 (Epi proColon) Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Am. Fam. Physician 2019, 100, 10–11. [Google Scholar]
  12. Murray, D.H.; Baker, R.T.; Gaur, S.; Young, G.P.; Pedersen, S.K. Validation of a Circulating Tumor-Derived DNA Blood Test for Detection of Methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 DNA. J. Appl. Lab. Med. 2017, 2, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Locke, W.J.; Guanzon, D.; Ma, C.; Liew, Y.J.; Duesing, K.R.; Fung, K.Y.C.; Ross, J.P. DNA Methylation Cancer Biomarkers: Translation to the Clinic. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Heeke, S.; Benzaquen, J.; Hofman, V.; Ilie, M.; Allegra, M.; Long-Mira, E.; Lassalle, S.; Tanga, V.; Salacroup, C.; Bonnetaud, C.; et al. Critical Assessment in Routine Clinical Practice of Liquid Biopsy for EGFR Status Testing in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Laboratory Experience (LPCE, Nice, France). Clin. Lung Cancer 2020, 21, 56–65.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Fitzgerald, J.M.; Ramchurren, N.; Rieger, K.; Levesque, P.; Silverman, M.; Libertino, J.A.; Summerhayes, I.C. Identification of H-ras mutations in urine sediments complements cytology in the detection of bladder tumors. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1995, 87, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Y.; Springer, S.; Mulvey, C.L.; Silliman, N.; Schaefer, J.; Sausen, M.; James, N.; Rettig, E.M.; Guo, T.; Pickering, C.R.; et al. Detection of somatic mutations and HPV in the saliva and plasma of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015, 7, 293ra104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Li, L.; Li, X.; Xu, Y.; Wang, M.; Liang, L.; Jiao, P.; Li, Y.; He, S.; et al. Sputum Cell-Free DNA: Valued Surrogate Sample for Detection of EGFR Mutation in Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma. J. Mol. Diagn. 2020, 22, 934–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ponti, G.; Maccaferri, M.; Mandrioli, M.; Manfredini, M.; Micali, S.; Cotugno, M.; Bianchi, G.; Ozben, T.; Pellacani, G.; Del Prete, C.; et al. Seminal Cell-Free DNA Assessment as a Novel Prostate Cancer Biomarker. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2018, 24, 941–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ahlquist, D.A.; Taylor, W.R.; Mahoney, D.W.; Zou, H.; Domanico, M.; Thibodeau, S.N.; Boardman, L.A.; Berger, B.M.; Lidgard, G.P. The stool DNA test is more accurate than the plasma septin 9 test in detecting colorectal neoplasia. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012, 10, 272–277.e271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. De Mattos-Arruda, L.; Mayor, R.; Ng, C.K.Y.; Weigelt, B.; Martinez-Ricarte, F.; Torrejon, D.; Oliveira, M.; Arias, A.; Raventos, C.; Tang, J.; et al. Cerebrospinal fluid-derived circulating tumour DNA better represents the genomic alterations of brain tumours than plasma. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ponti, G.; Manfredini, M.; Tomasi, A. Non-blood sources of cell-free DNA for cancer molecular profiling in clinical pathology and oncology. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2019, 141, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Husain, H.; Nykin, D.; Bui, N.; Quan, D.; Gomez, G.; Woodward, B.; Venkatapathy, S.; Duttagupta, R.; Fung, E.; Lippman, S.M.; et al. Cell-Free DNA from Ascites and Pleural Effusions: Molecular Insights into Genomic Aberrations and Disease Biology. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2017, 16, 948–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Werner, B.; Yuwono, N.; Duggan, J.; Liu, D.; David, C.; Srirangan, S.; Provan, P.; Investigators, I.N.; DeFazio, A.; Arora, V.; et al. Cell-free DNA is abundant in ascites and represents a liquid biopsy of ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2021, 162, 720–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ford, C.E.; Werner, B.; Hacker, N.F.; Warton, K. The untapped potential of ascites in ovarian cancer research and treatment. Br. J. Cancer 2020, 123, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Han, M.R.; Lee, S.H.; Park, J.Y.; Hong, H.; Ho, J.Y.; Hur, S.Y.; Choi, Y.J. Clinical Implications of Circulating Tumor DNA from Ascites and Serial Plasma in Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Res. Treat. 2020, 52, 779–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Perrone, M.E.; Alvarez, R.; Vo, T.T.; Chung, M.W.; Chhieng, D.C.; Paulson, V.A.; Colbert, B.G.; Konnick, E.Q.; Huang, E.C. Validating cell-free DNA from supernatant for molecular diagnostics on cytology specimens. Cancer Cytopathol. 2021, 125, 544–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, S.R.; Mooney, K.L.; Libiran, P.; Jones, C.D.; Joshi, R.; Lau, H.D.; Stehr, H.; Berry, G.J.; Zehnder, J.L.; Long, S.R.; et al. Targeted deep sequencing of cell-free DNA in serous body cavity fluids with malignant, suspicious, and benign cytology. Cancer Cytopathol. 2020, 128, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Duan, H.; Hu, J.L.; Chen, Z.H.; Li, J.H.; He, Z.Q.; Wang, Z.N.; Zhang, G.H.; Guo, X.Y.; Liang, L.; Mou, Y.G. Assessment of circulating tumor DNA in cerebrospinal fluid by whole exome sequencing to detect genomic alterations of glioblastoma. Chin. Med. J. 2020, 133, 1415–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ou, Z.; Li, K.; Yang, T.; Dai, Y.; Chandra, M.; Ning, J.; Wang, Y.; Xu, R.; Gao, T.; Xie, Y.; et al. Detection of bladder cancer using urinary cell-free DNA and cellular DNA. Clin. Transl. Med. 2020, 9, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Escudero, L.; Llort, A.; Arias, A.; Diaz-Navarro, A.; Martinez-Ricarte, F.; Rubio-Perez, C.; Mayor, R.; Caratu, G.; Martinez-Saez, E.; Vazquez-Mendez, E.; et al. Circulating tumour DNA from the cerebrospinal fluid allows the characterisation and monitoring of medulloblastoma. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Son, S.M.; Woo, C.G.; Han, H.S.; Lee, K.H.; Lim, Y.H.; Lee, O.J. Analysis of EGFR mutation status in malignant pleural effusion and plasma from patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2020, 58, 1547–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mokanszki, A.; Badon, E.S.; Monus, A.; Toth, L.; Bittner, N.; Mehes, G. Cell-free DNA From Pleural Effusion Samples: Is It Right for Molecular Testing in Lung Adenocarcinoma? Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2021, 27, 613071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tong, L.; Ding, N.; Tong, X.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Xu, X.; Ye, M.; Li, C.; Wu, X.; et al. Tumor-derived DNA from pleural effusion supernatant as a promising alternative to tumor tissue in genomic profiling of advanced lung cancer. Theranostics 2019, 9, 5532–5541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Leick, K.M.; Kazarian, A.G.; Rajput, M.; Tomanek-Chalkley, A.; Miller, A.; Shrader, H.R.; McCarthy, A.; Coleman, K.L.; Kasi, P.M.; Chan, C.H.F. Peritoneal Cell-Free Tumor DNA as Biomarker for Peritoneal Surface Malignancies. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2020, 27, 5065–5071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ding, S.; Song, X.; Geng, X.; Liu, L.; Ma, H.; Wang, X.; Wei, L.; Xie, L.; Song, X. Saliva-derived cfDNA is applicable for EGFR mutation detection but not for quantitation analysis in non-small cell lung cancer. Thorac. Cancer 2019, 10, 1973–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guo, Z.; Xie, Z.; Shi, H.; Du, W.; Peng, L.; Han, W.; Duan, F.; Zhang, X.; Chen, M.; Duan, J.; et al. Malignant pleural effusion supernatant is an alternative liquid biopsy specimen for comprehensive mutational profiling. Thorac. Cancer 2019, 10, 823–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Razavi, P.; Li, B.T.; Brown, D.N.; Jung, B.; Hubbell, E.; Shen, R.; Abida, W.; Juluru, K.; De Bruijn, I.; Hou, C.; et al. High-intensity sequencing reveals the sources of plasma circulating cell-free DNA variants. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1928–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wu, Z.; Yang, Z.; Li, C.S.; Zhao, W.; Liang, Z.X.; Dai, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Miao, K.L.; Cui, D.H.; Chen, L.A. Differences in the genomic profiles of cell-free DNA between plasma, sputum, urine, and tumor tissue in advanced NSCLC. Cancer Med. 2019, 8, 910–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, P.; Wu, X.; Tang, M.; Nie, X.; Li, L. Detection of EGFR gene mutation status from pleural effusions and other body fluid specimens in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Thorac. Cancer 2019, 10, 2218–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Perez-Barrios, C.; Sanchez-Herrero, E.; Garcia-Simon, N.; Barquin, M.; Clemente, M.B.; Provencio, M.; Romero, A. ctDNA from body fluids is an adequate source for EGFR biomarker testing in advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2021, 59, 1221–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Villatoro, S.; Mayo-de-Las-Casas, C.; Jordana-Ariza, N.; Viteri-Ramirez, S.; Garzon-Ibanez, M.; Moya-Horno, I.; Garcia-Pelaez, B.; Gonzalez-Cao, M.; Malapelle, U.; Balada-Bel, A.; et al. Prospective detection of mutations in cerebrospinal fluid, pleural effusion, and ascites of advanced cancer patients to guide treatment decisions. Mol. Oncol. 2019, 13, 2633–2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Oey, R.C.; van Buuren, H.R.; de Man, R.A. The diagnostic work-up in patients with ascites: Current guidelines and future prospects. Neth. J. Med. 2016, 74, 330–335. [Google Scholar]
  43. Hodge, C.; Badgwell, B.D. Palliation of malignant ascites. J. Surg. Oncol. 2019, 120, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Worzfeld, T.; Pogge von Strandmann, E.; Huber, M.; Adhikary, T.; Wagner, U.; Reinartz, S.; Muller, R. The Unique Molecular and Cellular Microenvironment of Ovarian Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2017, 7, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Chan, C.H.F. ASO Author Reflections: Potential Values of Peritoneal Cell-Free Tumor DNA Testing. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2020, 27, 5072–5073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sugimori, M.; Sugimori, K.; Tsuchiya, H.; Suzuki, Y.; Tsuyuki, S.; Kaneta, Y.; Hirotani, A.; Sanga, K.; Tozuka, Y.; Komiyama, S.; et al. Quantitative monitoring of circulating tumor DNA in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Cancer Sci. 2020, 111, 266–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Baumgartner, J.M.; Raymond, V.M.; Lanman, R.B.; Tran, L.; Kelly, K.J.; Lowy, A.M.; Kurzrock, R. Preoperative Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis is an Independent Predictor of Progression-Free Survival. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2018, 25, 2400–2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Van’t Erve, I.; Rovers, K.P.; Constantinides, A.; Bolhuis, K.; Wassenaar, E.C.; Lurvink, R.J.; Huysentruyt, C.J.; Snaebjornsson, P.; Boerma, D.; van den Broek, D.; et al. Detection of tumor-derived cell-free DNA from colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases in plasma and peritoneal fluid. J. Pathol. Clin. Res. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, Y.; Springer, S.; Zhang, M.; McMahon, K.W.; Kinde, I.; Dobbyn, L.; Ptak, J.; Brem, H.; Chaichana, K.; Gallia, G.L.; et al. Detection of tumor-derived DNA in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with primary tumors of the brain and spinal cord. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 9704–9709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Smith, C.G.; Moser, T.; Mouliere, F.; Field-Rayner, J.; Eldridge, M.; Riediger, A.L.; Chandrananda, D.; Heider, K.; Wan, J.C.M.; Warren, A.Y.; et al. Comprehensive characterization of cell-free tumor DNA in plasma and urine of patients with renal tumors. Genome Med. 2020, 12, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. McEwen, A.E.; Leary, S.E.S.; Lockwood, C.M. Beyond the Blood: CSF-Derived cfDNA for Diagnosis and Characterization of CNS Tumors. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Bettegowda, C.; Sausen, M.; Leary, R.J.; Kinde, I.; Wang, Y.; Agrawal, N.; Bartlett, B.R.; Wang, H.; Luber, B.; Alani, R.M.; et al. Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6, 224ra24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Kustanovich, A.; Schwartz, R.; Peretz, T.; Grinshpun, A. Life and death of circulating cell-free DNA. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2019, 20, 1057–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Leung, F.; Kulasingam, V.; Diamandis, E.P.; Hoon, D.S.; Kinzler, K.; Pantel, K.; Alix-Panabieres, C. Circulating Tumor DNA as a Cancer Biomarker: Fact or Fiction? Clin. Chem. 2016, 62, 1054–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Gauthier, V.J.; Tyler, L.N.; Mannik, M. Blood clearance kinetics and liver uptake of mononucleosomes in mice. J. Immunol. 1996, 156, 1151–1156. [Google Scholar]
  56. Martin, M.; Leffler, J.; Smolag, K.I.; Mytych, J.; Bjork, A.; Chaves, L.D.; Alexander, J.J.; Quigg, R.J.; Blom, A.M. Factor H uptake regulates intracellular C3 activation during apoptosis and decreases the inflammatory potential of nucleosomes. Cell Death Differ. 2016, 23, 903–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hirabayashi, K.; Graham, J. Genesis of ascites in ovarian cancer. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1970, 106, 492–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cavazzoni, E.; Bugiantella, W.; Graziosi, L.; Franceschini, M.S.; Donini, A. Malignant ascites: Pathophysiology and treatment. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 18, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zebrowski, B.K.; Liu, W.; Ramirez, K.; Akagi, Y.; Mills, G.B.; Ellis, L.M. Markedly elevated levels of vascular endothelial growth factor in malignant ascites. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 1999, 6, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Krishna, R.; Rudrappa, M. Pleural Effusion; StatPearls: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  61. Bradshaw, M.; Mansfield, A.; Peikert, T. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural effusion. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2013, 15, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Thierry, A.R.; El Messaoudi, S.; Gahan, P.B.; Anker, P.; Stroun, M. Origins, structures, and functions of circulating DNA in oncology. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016, 35, 347–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Yao, W.; Mei, C.; Nan, X.; Hui, L. Evaluation and comparison of in vitro degradation kinetics of DNA in serum, urine and saliva: A qualitative study. Gene 2016, 590, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kuderer, N.M.; Burton, K.A.; Blau, S.; Rose, A.L.; Parker, S.; Lyman, G.H.; Blau, C.A. Comparison of 2 Commercially Available Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms in Oncology. JAMA Oncol. 2017, 3, 996–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chae, Y.K.; Davis, A.A.; Carneiro, B.A.; Chandra, S.; Mohindra, N.; Kalyan, A.; Kaplan, J.; Matsangou, M.; Pai, S.; Costa, R.; et al. Concordance between genomic alterations assessed by next-generation sequencing in tumor tissue or circulating cell-free DNA. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 65364–65373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Yu, H.; Han, L.; Yuan, J.; Sun, Y. Circulating tumor cell free DNA from plasma and urine in the clinical management of colorectal cancer. Cancer Biomark. 2020, 27, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Suryavanshi, M.; Jaipuria, J.; Panigrahi, M.K.; Goyal, N.; Singal, R.; Mehta, A.; Batra, U.; Doval, D.C.; Talwar, V. CSF cell-free DNA EGFR testing using DdPCR holds promise over conventional modalities for diagnosing leptomeningeal involvement in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2020, 148, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ozeki, M.; Aoki, Y.; Nozawa, A.; Yasue, S.; Endo, S.; Hori, Y.; Matsuoka, K.; Niihori, T.; Funayama, R.; Shirota, M.; et al. Detection of NRAS mutation in cell-free DNA biological fluids from patients with kaposiform lymphangiomatosis. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2019, 14, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ooki, A.; Maleki, Z.; Tsay, J.J.; Goparaju, C.; Brait, M.; Turaga, N.; Nam, H.S.; Rom, W.N.; Pass, H.I.; Sidransky, D.; et al. A Panel of Novel Detection and Prognostic Methylated DNA Markers in Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Serum DNA. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 7141–7152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Nuzzo, P.V.; Berchuck, J.E.; Korthauer, K.; Spisak, S.; Nassar, A.H.; Abou Alaiwi, S.; Chakravarthy, A.; Shen, S.Y.; Bakouny, Z.; Boccardo, F.; et al. Detection of renal cell carcinoma using plasma and urine cell-free DNA methylomes. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 1041–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhou, S.; Xu, B.; Qi, L.; Zhu, D.; Liu, B.; Wei, J. Next-generation sequencing reveals mutational accordance between cell-free DNA from plasma, malignant pleural effusion and ascites and directs targeted therapy in a gastric cancer patient. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2019, 20, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jahr, S.; Hentze, H.; Englisch, S.; Hardt, D.; Fackelmayer, F.O.; Hesch, R.D.; Knippers, R. DNA fragments in the blood plasma of cancer patients: Quantitations and evidence for their origin from apoptotic and necrotic cells. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 1659–1665. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  73. Muhanna, N.; Di Grappa, M.A.; Chan, H.H.L.; Khan, T.; Jin, C.S.; Zheng, Y.; Irish, J.C.; Bratman, S.V. Cell-Free DNA Kinetics in a Pre-Clinical Model of Head and Neck Cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Bronkhorst, A.J.; Wentzel, J.F.; Aucamp, J.; van Dyk, E.; du Plessis, L.; Pretorius, P.J. Characterization of the cell-free DNA released by cultured cancer cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1863, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Snyder, M.W.; Kircher, M.; Hill, A.J.; Daza, R.M.; Shendure, J. Cell-free DNA Comprises an In Vivo Nucleosome Footprint that Informs Its Tissues-Of-Origin. Cell 2016, 164, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Cristiano, S.; Leal, A.; Phallen, J.; Fiksel, J.; Adleff, V.; Bruhm, D.C.; Jensen, S.O.; Medina, J.E.; Hruban, C.; White, J.R.; et al. Genome-wide cell-free DNA fragmentation in patients with cancer. Nature 2019, 570, 385–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Liu, X.; Liu, L.; Ji, Y.; Li, C.; Wei, T.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, X.; Gao, Y.; Xu, W.; et al. Enrichment of short mutant cell-free DNA fragments enhanced detection of pancreatic cancer. EBioMedicine 2019, 41, 345–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Yao, W.; Song, Y.; Liu, B.; Chen, W.; Santarpia, M.; Rossi, E.; et al. Increased detection of circulating tumor DNA by short fragment enrichment. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2021, 10, 1501–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Li, H.G.; Huang, S.Y.; Zhou, H.; Liao, A.H.; Xiong, C.L. Quick recovery and characterization of cell-free DNA in seminal plasma of normozoospermia and azoospermia: Implications for non-invasive genetic utilities. Asian J. Androl. 2009, 11, 703–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Sun, Y.; Li, M.; Ren, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Gao, W.; Gong, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; et al. Exploring genetic alterations in circulating tumor DNA from cerebrospinal fluid of pediatric medulloblastoma. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 5638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mouliere, F.; Mair, R.; Chandrananda, D.; Marass, F.; Smith, C.G.; Su, J.; Morris, J.; Watts, C.; Brindle, K.M.; Rosenfeld, N. Detection of cell-free DNA fragmentation and copy number alterations in cerebrospinal fluid from glioma patients. EMBO Mol. Med. 2018, 10, e9323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Mouliere, F.; Smith, C.G.; Heider, K.; Su, J.; van der Pol, Y.; Thompson, M.; Morris, J.; Wan, J.C.M.; Chandrananda, D.; Hadfield, J.; et al. Fragmentation patterns and personalized sequencing of cell-free DNA in urine and plasma of glioma patients. EMBO Mol. Med. 2021, 13, e12881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sharma, V.K.; Vouros, P.; Glick, J. Mass spectrometric based analysis, characterization and applications of circulating cell free DNA isolated from human body fluids. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2011, 304, 172–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Ponti, G.; Maccaferri, M.; Manfredini, M.; Micali, S.; Torricelli, F.; Milandri, R.; Del Prete, C.; Ciarrocchi, A.; Ruini, C.; Benassi, L.; et al. Quick assessment of cell-free DNA in seminal fluid and fragment size for early non-invasive prostate cancer diagnosis. Clin. Chim. Acta 2019, 497, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Yu, Y.; Qian, J.; Shen, L.; Ji, W.; Lu, S. Distinct profile of cell-free DNA in malignant pleural effusion of non-small cell lung cancer and its impact on clinical genetic testing. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 18, 1510–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Warton, K.; Graham, L.J.; Yuwono, N.; Samimi, G. Comparison of 4 commercial kits for the extraction of circulating DNA from plasma. Cancer Genet. 2018, 228–229, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Warton, K.; Yuwono, N.L.; Cowley, M.J.; McCabe, M.J.; So, A.; Ford, C.E. Evaluation of Streck BCT and PAXgene Stabilised Blood Collection Tubes for Cell-Free Circulating DNA Studies in Plasma. Mol. Diagn. Ther. 2017, 21, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sorber, L.; Zwaenepoel, K.; Deschoolmeester, V.; Roeyen, G.; Lardon, F.; Rolfo, C.; Pauwels, P. A Comparison of Cell-Free DNA Isolation Kits: Isolation and Quantification of Cell-Free DNA in Plasma. J. Mol. Diagn. 2017, 19, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Cook, L.; Starr, K.; Boonyaratanakornkit, J.; Hayden, R.; Sam, S.S.; Caliendo, A.M. Does Size Matter? Comparison of Extraction Yields for Different-Sized DNA Fragments by Seven Different Routine and Four New Circulating Cell-Free Extraction Methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018, 56, e01061-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Wang, X.; Wang, L.; Su, Y.; Yue, Z.; Xing, T.; Zhao, W.; Zhao, Q.; Duan, C.; Huang, C.; Zhang, D.; et al. Plasma cell-free DNA quantification is highly correlated to tumor burden in children with neuroblastoma. Cancer Med. 2018, 7, 3022–3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Valpione, S.; Gremel, G.; Mundra, P.; Middlehurst, P.; Galvani, E.; Girotti, M.R.; Lee, R.J.; Garner, G.; Dhomen, N.; Lorigan, P.C.; et al. Plasma total cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a surrogate biomarker for tumour burden and a prognostic biomarker for survival in metastatic melanoma patients. Eur. J. Cancer 2018, 88, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Mehra, N.; Dolling, D.; Sumanasuriya, S.; Christova, R.; Pope, L.; Carreira, S.; Seed, G.; Yuan, W.; Goodall, J.; Hall, E.; et al. Plasma Cell-free DNA Concentration and Outcomes from Taxane Therapy in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer from Two Phase III Trials (FIRSTANA and PROSELICA). Eur. Urol. 2018, 74, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Adalsteinsson, V.A.; Ha, G.; Freeman, S.S.; Choudhury, A.D.; Stover, D.G.; Parsons, H.A.; Gydush, G.; Reed, S.C.; Rotem, D.; Rhoades, J.; et al. Scalable whole-exome sequencing of cell-free DNA reveals high concordance with metastatic tumors. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Young, B.; Fogarty, A.W.; Skelly, R.; Shaw, D.; Thurley, P.; Sturrock, N.; Norwood, M.; Langley, T.; Lewis, S.; Cranwell, J. Patients’ attitudes towards cost feedback to doctors to prevent unnecessary testing: A qualitative focus group study. Public Health 2020, 185, 338–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Moss, J.; Magenheim, J.; Neiman, D.; Zemmour, H.; Loyfer, N.; Korach, A.; Samet, Y.; Maoz, M.; Druid, H.; Arner, P.; et al. Comprehensive human cell-type methylation atlas reveals origins of circulating cell-free DNA in health and disease. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Ladabaum, U.; Dominitz, J.A.; Kahi, C.; Schoen, R.E. Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Gastroenterology 2020, 158, 418–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Baron, R.M.; Christman, J.W.; Liu, K.D.; Matthay, M.A.; Self, W.H.; McVerry, B.J.; Hite, R.D.; Paine, R., 3rd; Wurfel, M.M.; Shapiro, N.I.; et al. Monitoring Research Blood Sampling in Critically Ill Patients: Avoiding Iatrogenic Anemia. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 202, 885–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Schwartz, R.N. Anemia in patients with cancer: Incidence, causes, impact, management, and use of treatment guidelines and protocols. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 2007, 64, S5–S13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Xia, Y.; Huang, C.C.; Dittmar, R.; Du, M.; Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; Shenoy, N.; Wang, L.; Kohli, M. Copy number variations in urine cell free DNA as biomarkers in advanced prostate cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 35818–35831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Ward, D.G.; Gordon, N.S.; Boucher, R.H.; Pirrie, S.J.; Baxter, L.; Ott, S.; Silcock, L.; Whalley, C.M.; Stockton, J.D.; Beggs, A.D.; et al. Targeted deep sequencing of urothelial bladder cancers and associated urinary DNA: A 23-gene panel with utility for non-invasive diagnosis and risk stratification. BJU Int. 2019, 124, 532–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Lin, S.Y.; Dhillon, V.; Jain, S.; Chang, T.T.; Hu, C.T.; Lin, Y.J.; Chen, S.H.; Chang, K.C.; Song, W.; Yu, L.; et al. A locked nucleic acid clamp-mediated PCR assay for detection of a p53 codon 249 hotspot mutation in urine. J. Mol. Diagn. 2011, 13, 474–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Chen, S.; Zhao, J.; Cui, L.; Liu, Y. Urinary circulating DNA detection for dynamic tracking of EGFR mutations for NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2017, 19, 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Umansky, S.R.; Tomei, L.D. Transrenal DNA testing: Progress and perspectives. Expert. Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2006, 6, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cancers 14 01309 g001 550
Figure 1. Tumour clonal representation in traditional tissue biopsies and liquid biopsies. Traditional tissue biopsies are rich in tumour DNA but can be naïve to tumour heterogeneity. Liquid biopsies of circulating cell-free DNA (cirDNA) in blood are diluted with DNA from normal tissue. Liquid biopsies of cell-free DNA from non-blood sources can capture disease heterogeneity better than tissue biopsies with far less dilution with healthy DNA than cirDNA.
Figure 1. Tumour clonal representation in traditional tissue biopsies and liquid biopsies. Traditional tissue biopsies are rich in tumour DNA but can be naïve to tumour heterogeneity. Liquid biopsies of circulating cell-free DNA (cirDNA) in blood are diluted with DNA from normal tissue. Liquid biopsies of cell-free DNA from non-blood sources can capture disease heterogeneity better than tissue biopsies with far less dilution with healthy DNA than cirDNA.
Cancers 14 01309 g001
Cancers 14 01309 g002 550
Figure 2. Major sources of cell-free tumour DNA. ctDNA can be sourced from many body fluids, including blood, ascites, cerebrospinal fluid, pleural effusions, and urine. These fluids, though often also containing ctDNA from non-local tumours, are particularly advantageous due to their contact with tumours in the anatomical locations indicated. All fluids are collected by minimally invasive or non-invasive methods, and pleural effusions, ascites, and sometimes cerebrospinal fluid are incidentally collected as symptom management. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 8 February 2022). CNS, central nervous system.
Figure 2. Major sources of cell-free tumour DNA. ctDNA can be sourced from many body fluids, including blood, ascites, cerebrospinal fluid, pleural effusions, and urine. These fluids, though often also containing ctDNA from non-local tumours, are particularly advantageous due to their contact with tumours in the anatomical locations indicated. All fluids are collected by minimally invasive or non-invasive methods, and pleural effusions, ascites, and sometimes cerebrospinal fluid are incidentally collected as symptom management. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 8 February 2022). CNS, central nervous system.
Cancers 14 01309 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Werner, B.; Warton, K.; Ford, C.E. Transcending Blood—Opportunities for Alternate Liquid Biopsies in Oncology. Cancers 2022, 14, 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051309

AMA Style

Werner B, Warton K, Ford CE. Transcending Blood—Opportunities for Alternate Liquid Biopsies in Oncology. Cancers. 2022; 14(5):1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051309

Chicago/Turabian Style

Werner, Bonnita, Kristina Warton, and Caroline E. Ford. 2022. "Transcending Blood—Opportunities for Alternate Liquid Biopsies in Oncology" Cancers 14, no. 5: 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051309

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop