Next Article in Journal
Differential Plasma Expression Profiles of Long Non-Coding RNAs Reveal Potential Biomarkers for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Previous Article in Journal
Adsorption and Diffusion of Cisplatin Molecules in Nanoporous Materials: A Molecular Dynamics Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 9
Issue 6
10.3390/biom9060205
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Effects of the Natural Peptide Crotamine from a South American Rattlesnake on Candida auris, an Emergent Multidrug Antifungal Resistant Human Pathogen

by
Caroline Dal Mas
1,
Luana Rossato
2,
Thaís Shimizu
1,
Eduardo B. Oliveira
3,
Pedro I. da Silva Junior
4,
Jacques F. Meis
5,
Arnaldo Lopes Colombo
2,* and
Mirian A. F. Hayashi
1,*
1
Departamento de Farmacologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo SP 04038-032, Brazil
2
Departamento de Medicina, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo SP 04038-032, Brazil
3
Departamento de Bioquímica e Imunologia, Universidade de São Paulo (USP-RP), Ribeirão Preto SP 14049-900, Brazil
4
Special Laboratory for Applied Toxinology (LETA), Center of Toxins, Immune-Response and Cell Signaling (CeTICS), Butantan Institute, São Paulo SP 05503-900, Brazil
5
Center of Expertise in Mycology Radboudumc/CWZ, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital (CWZ), 6532 Nijmegen, The Netherlands
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2019, 9(6), 205; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9060205
Submission received: 22 February 2019 / Revised: 15 April 2019 / Accepted: 29 April 2019 / Published: 28 May 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Invasive Candida infections are an important growing medical concern and treatment options are limited to a few antifungal drug classes, with limited efficacies depending on the infecting organism. In this scenario, invasive infections caused by multiresistant Candida auris are emerging in several places around the world as important healthcare-associated infections. As antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) exert their activities primarily through mechanisms involving membrane disruption, they have a lower chance of inducing drug resistance than general chemical antimicrobials. Interestingly, we previously described the potent candicidal effect of a rattlesnake AMP, crotamine, against standard and treatment-resistant clinical isolates, with no hemolytic activity. We evaluated the antifungal susceptibility of several Candida spp. strains cultured from different patients by using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) microdilution assay, and the antifungal activity of native crotamine was evaluated by a microbial growth inhibition microdilution assay. Although all Candida isolates evaluated here showed resistance to amphotericin B and fluconazole, crotamine (40–80 µM) exhibited in vitro activity against most isolates tested. We suggest that this native polypeptide from the South American rattlesnake Crotalus durissus terrificus has potential as a structural model for the generation of a new class of antimicrobial compounds with the power to fight against multiresistant Candida spp.

1. Introduction

Infections caused by Candida spp. have progressively increased over the last decades, and this phenomenon is mainly associated with the increasing number of critically ill patients exposed to invasive medical procedures, extensive use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and treatment with immunosuppressants, which notably increase the risk in patients with neoplastic and/or degenerative diseases [1]. All this had contributed to the promotion of Candida spp. infections as a public health concern in Europe, the Americas, and Asia [2,3,4]. In this context, Candida auris infection has emerged as a serious problem in intensive care units (ICUs) of many countries, due to its reported emerging antifungal resistance, its easy transmission among patients in ICUs, because it is not easily identified by the most widely used phenotypic identification procedures employed in most clinical laboratories, and because it causes severe infection [3,4,5]. Crude mortality rates range from 32% to 66%, depending on the general clinical conditions and age of the patients, geographic region of the incidence, and clinical management of the infection [5,6]. Unfortunately, antifungal therapy against invasive infections caused by this emerging pathogen may be limited. Up to 90% of isolates are resistant to fluconazole (FLC), and 50% have reduced susceptibility to voriconazole, as demonstrated by elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) [7]. Currently, echinocandins are recommended for the treatment of C. auris infections [3]. However, elevated MICs secondary to hot-spot regions in the FKS genes (FKS1 and FKS2) have been reported in some C. auris isolates [7], raising the possibility of pan-drug resistance [4]. Consequently, there is a clear need for identifying new therapeutic candidates and novel treatment strategies to combat infections caused by this emerging pathogen. Identification of natural products with antimicrobial activity against these pan-resistant isolates is one important strategy to be considered. In fact, the value of searching for novel antimicrobial compounds from natural sources has been widely discussed [8].
The native polypeptide crotamine from the venom of the South American rattlesnake Crotalus durissus terrificus was originally isolated in the late 1950s [9,10]. However, its real contribution to the envenoming process remains largely unknown, in contrast to the well-exploited molecular pathways underlying its assigned roles in skeletal muscles [11] and as a theranostic agent against cancer [12,13]. The peculiar (three-dimensional) structural similarity of crotamine with the human antimicrobial peptide (AMP) beta defensins [14] stimulated us to study and demonstrate the candicidal effect of crotamine against non-resistant reference strains and against the treatment-resistant clinical isolates, and more importantly, with no hemolytic activity [15].
Defensins are members of a class of multifaceted AMPs that are efficient in killing most microbes, and for which the development of resistance is rare, mainly due to their characteristic mechanism(s) of action based on the interaction of defensins with the lipid bilayer of cell membranes [16,17,18], as also demonstrated by us for crotamine [19]. Interestingly, recent reports have identified human beta defensins as a new type of potassium ion channel inhibitors [20,21], as it was also proposed for crotamine [11,22,23], confirming the striking degree of structural and phylogenetic congruence with functional reciprocity between these antimicrobial polypeptides. The perspective of using host defense AMPs for treating infections caused by bacteria, viruses, or fungi is seriously considered lately by many, mainly due to the emergence of drug-resistance mechanisms, which threaten the efficacy of all current antimicrobial agents [24].
Therefore, in the present work, we evaluated the antimicrobial efficacy of several natural peptides from different sources (including animals and plants), with a special focus on a native AMP from a South American rattlesnake venom, against clinical multidrug-resistant C. auris and related emergent species exhibiting phenotypes of multidrug-resistance isolated from different geographic regions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Crotamine

The native crotamine was extracted and purified from the crude venom of rattlesnakes C. durissus terrificus by Dr. Eduardo Oliveira from the Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo University-Ribeirão Preto (USP-RP) (authorization: No. 010426/2010 COAPG/DABS/CNPq; term of concession No. 20100104268), essentially as previously described [9]. The other natural peptides evaluated here were isolated and characterized (sequence determination) essentially as previously described [25], and they were all produced by custom chemical synthesis (China Peptides Co., Shanghai, China). Peptide 1 (WRNWE-NH2, MW 788.35 Da) and peptide 2 (WRNWE, MW 789.35 Da) were initially identified in the hemolymph of centipedes, Scolopendra subspinipes (centipede/Chilopoda), while cheliferin (GAVLDIR, MW 742.4 Da) was from the pseudoscorpion Chelifer cancroides. Oligoventin (QPFSLERW, MW 1062 Da) was from the eggs of the Brazilian armed spider Phoneutria nigriventer (Ctenidae, Araneomorphae) [25], and comosusin (ITKVFGDEAS, MW 1066.19 Da) was from the peels of pineapple.

2.2. Microorganisms

We selected for this study three clinical isolates cultured along the first outbreak of C. auris fungemia documented in South America (470/2015, 484/2015, 467/2015), one isolate from the Middle East (CBS 14916), and two Candida haemulonii isolates (9873/2014 and 1112/2016) recovered from patients with fungemia admitted at Hospital São Paulo, Brazil [26,27]. In addition, the reference strain C. auris CBS 10913 was included in all experiments [28].

2.3. Identification of Candida spp. by Sequencing of the ITS Region of rDNA

All isolates were identified at the species level by sequencing of rDNA ITS as previously described [29]. Total genomic DNA was extracted from the Candida isolates using PrepMan® Ultra Sample Preparation Reagent (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR for the amplification of the ITS region was performed using the forward primer V9G (5′-TTACGTCCCTGCCCTTTGTA-3′) and the reverse primer LS266 (5′-GCATTCCCAAACAACTCGACTC-3′) [30].

2.4. Assays for Checking In Vitro Susceptibility of Candida spp. against Antifungal Drugs

The antifungal susceptibility tests were performed using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) microdilution assay [31]. In brief, susceptibility tests were performed in a 96-well plastic microplate containing RPMI 1640 (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO, USA) buffered at pH 7.0 with 0.165 M morpholinopropanesulfonic acid (Sigma-Aldrich Corp.), as outlined in the CLSI-M60 document [31]. Plates were incubated at 35 °C for 24 and 48 h. The following antifungal drugs were tested: Fluconazole (FLC) and amphotericin B (AMB) (from Sigma-Aldrich Corp.) and micafungin (MICA, provided by Astellas Pharma Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The final concentrations tested ranged from 0.03 to 16 µg/mL for AMB and MICA and from 0.5 to 64 µg/mL for FLC. The final inoculum density ranged from 0.5 to 2.5 × 103 cells mL−1. The MIC results for each agent were determined visually. In the absence of international clinical breakpoint values for AMB and FLC against both species tested, we adapted the reference values for antifungal resistance recently suggested by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [32] for C. auris: FLC ≥ 32 µg/mL and AMB ≥ 2 µg/mL, tested by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) microdilution assay.

2.5. Assays for Checking In Vitro Susceptibility of Candida spp. for Natural Peptides Including Crotamine

For the antifungal susceptibility assay, the yeast Candida spp. was sown with disposable handles in Petri dishes (90 × 15 mm) containing 65 g/L of Sabouraud dextrose agar (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), and the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. Candida spp. isolates were cultured in 5 mL of 25 g/L of PDB medium (Potato Dextrose Broth, Becton, Dickinson and Company), at 37 °C for 18 h in a shaker model New Brunswick™ Innova® 43 (VWR International LLC, Radnor, PA, USA). The in vitro antifungal activity of crotamine and other native peptides was evaluated essentially as described in Yamane et al. [15]. Crotamine was tested in the concentrations of 10, 20, 40, 80, and 160 µM, while other natural peptides were tested in a single concentration (1 mM each), as also described in the Figure 1 legend. These native peptides were added in a 96-well plate containing the isolates of Candida spp. (about 2.5–5.0 × 103 cells/100 µL) in PDB medium, before incubation at 37 °C for 24 h. The Candida growth rate was determined by measurements at 595 nm using a plate reader SpectraMax (Molecular Devices LLC, San Jose, CA, USA). Briefly, the inhibition of growth was calculated by subtracting the density of the strain in the presence of the peptides studied from the maximum density value of this strain growth in the absence of peptides.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the two-way ANOVA test. GraphPad Prism Software (La Jolla, CA, USA) was employed for data analyses. The significance threshold was considered at p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

Susceptibility Tests

Table 1 summarizes the in vitro susceptibilities of all isolates selected for the present study, after evaluation by the CLSI microbroth assay using FLC, AMB, and MICA. The South American and Middle East clinical isolates were resistant to at least two different classes of antifungal drugs. The Asian C. auris CBS 10913 reference strain was susceptible to all three antifungal drugs tested here.
The antifungal activity of crotamine and other natural peptides was monitored by a microbial growth inhibition assay in a liquid medium essentially as described earlier [15], as it is the most commonly employed assay to evaluate and express the antifungal activity of native compounds [33], and also to allow direct comparison to previous data [15,25].
The activity of several natural peptides from invertebrate or vertebrate animals and plants were evaluated using fixed concentrations of about 1 mM of each peptide, and they did not show any important or significant inhibition of the growth of resistant C. auris clinical isolates from the South America or Middle East outbreaks [26,27], although the Asian C. auris CBS 10913 reference was more susceptible to these peptides, with the highest activity observed for cheliferin from the pseudoscorpion C. cancroides (Figure 1).
Although crotamine was also more effective in inhibiting the Asian C. auris CBS 10913 reference compared to the resistant C. auris clinical isolates from South America or the Middle East outbreaks at low concentration, the activity of native crotamine against these resistant C. auris strains was demonstrated with an inhibition of about 50% of the yeast growth for most strains at concentrations of about 80–160 µM (which corresponds to approximately 0.4–0.8 mg/mL of crotamine). At these higher concentrations of crotamine (namely above 80–160 µM), a more pronounced effect of crotamine against the multiresistant C. auris 467/2015 and CBS 14916 strains could be observed (Figure 2). Moreover, a trend for a more effective inhibition of resistant C. auris 470/2015 and 484/2015 strains compared to the CBS 10913 reference strain could be noticed at 80 µM of crotamine, while at the highest concentration used here (namely 160 µM) the differences were statistically significant for the C. auris 484/2015 multiresistant strain also (Figure 2). Although not different among the reference and clinical multiresistant strains, at 40 µM of crotamine close to 40% of inhibition of growth was observed for all evaluated strains, and therefore, we considered as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values ranging from 40 to 80 µM, which correspond to about 0.2–0.4 mg/mL of crotamine. The in vitro fungicidal activity of crotamine against all these clinical multiresistant C. auris strains was demonstrated here.
In addition, the closely related resistant C. haemulonii clinical isolates (9873/2014 and 1112/2016) were also evaluated with crotamine, but inhibition by less than 40% for concentrations up to 80 µM of crotamine was observed. In addition, no significant differences in inhibition efficiency with increasing concentrations of crotamine could be observed (Figure 3).

4. Discussion

C. auris is an emergent multiresistant Candida species able to disseminate in the hospital environment [3]. Antifungal susceptibility data published so far point out that some C. auris strains exhibit elevated minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for the three major classes of antifungal drugs, i.e., azoles, polyenes, and echinocandins [7]. C. haemulonii complex isolates are considered to be emergent species related to C. auris that may also exhibit a multiresistant phenotype to antifungal drugs [2]. So far, several authors have tried to explore different strategies of drug combinations to find new tools to combat this new emerging multiresistant pathogen [34,35,36].
The value of screening natural compounds for searching for new compounds with antimicrobial activity against multiresistant strains is well recognized. However, the several different peptides from invertebrate and plants, with already demonstrated antimicrobial activity, showed important activity only against the Asian C. auris CBS 10913 reference strain, with no significant effect against the multiresistant C. auris clinical isolates from South America or the Middle East. On the other hand, the effective antifungal activity of crotamine against these multiresistant clinical C. auris strains from different patients with fungemia points out the potential of crotamine as a structural model for the development of a new generation of antimicrobial drugs against multidrug-resistant clinical strains. At this point, it is also worth considering that although few clinical strains were evaluated, all those strains were from independent emergences of different clonal populations on different continents [26,27,28].
In the present study, we also decided to evaluate the antifungal activity of crotamine against clinical multiresistant C. haemulonii, which is often misidentified by commercial identification methods and presents a multidrug-resistant profile as confirmed here (Table 1) and as described by others [2], but with no important effect in concentrations up to 80 µM of crotamine.
Crotamine is a well-characterized polypeptide with multiple biological activities [37], including the in vitro activity against a selected panel of Candida species [23]. Crotamine is also a recognized member of the antimicrobial peptide (AMPs) class whose members are efficient in killing most microbes, and for which the development of resistance is rare, mainly due to the characteristic mechanism(s) of action based on the rapid interaction with and disruption of lipid cell membranes [15,19,38]. AMPs represent therefore a powerful drug candidate with reduced risk of resistance development and potential reduction in the duration of treatment [38].
The action of crotamine on mitochondria was also previously demonstrated by us [13], and phenolic compounds such as flavonoids, when combined with FLC, were demonstrated to show activity against Candida tropicalis strains resistant to FLC, by promoting mitochondrial depolarization, apoptosis, and exposure of phosphatidylserine in the plasma membrane [39]. Interestingly, crotamine is also able to promote mitochondrial depolarization and apoptosis [12,13], besides having an affinity for negatively charged lipids such as phosphatidylserine [19,38]. Furthermore, although the lipid-membrane-disrupting activity of crotamine and its shorter derived peptides was previously demonstrated by us [19,38], at this point we cannot simply come to the conclusion that the negative charges in the cell membrane of FLC-resistant strains could be playing a role in the candicidal effect against the C. auris resistant strains. In addition, the low ability of native crotamine in inhibiting the closely related C. haemulonii resistant clinical isolates also deserves special attention, and further studies are planned to clarify this selective activity of native crotamine only against the C. auris clinical strains.

5. Conclusions

Based on our present experiments, we suggest that this native polypeptide from the South American rattlesnake has potential as a structural model compound for the generation of a new class of antimicrobial compound with power against multiresistant nosocomial Candida strains, representing a possible new road to overcome the microbial resistance challenge against emerging opportunistic human fungal pathogens. At this point, it remains unclear if the concentrations of crotamine required to inhibit C. auris and C. haemulonii strains could be safely administrated for treating human infections. However, we may certainly suggest that these data encourage further studies to explore the possible use of crotamine as topical antifungal agents or to study the structural aspects of crotamine as a molecular template for modeling and designing of new molecules with higher efficacy against multiresistant clinical strains.
However, further studies are still necessary to determine the molecular mechanism of action underlying the crotamine activity against the multidrug-resistant strains of C. auris and its relative inefficiency against the C. haemulonii clinical strains, and this may certainly be the next target of our future studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.L.C. and M.A.F.H.; methodology, A.L.C., M.A.F.H., P.I.d.S.J., C.D.M., and L.R.; formal analysis, C.D.M., L.R., T.S., A.L.C., and M.A.F.H.; resources, A.L.C. and M.A.F.H.; Writing—original draft preparation, C.D.M., L.R., A.L.C., P.I.d.S.J., and M.A.F.; writing-review and editing, C.D.M., L.R., E.B.O., P.I.S.J., J.F.M., A.L.C., and M.A.F.; supervision, E.B.O., A.L.C., and M.A.F.; project administration, A.L.C. and M.A.F.H.; funding acquisition, A.L.C. and M.A.F.H; purification and characterization of natural peptides from invertebrates and plants, P.I.d.S.J.; clinical isolates, J.F.M., and A.L.C.

Funding

This research was funded by the São Paulo Research Foundation (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo-FAPESP grant number FAPESP No. 2013/13392-4 and 2017/02413-1) and by the National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico-CNPq No. 311815/2012-0, 475739/2013-2 and 39337/2016-0). This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-Brasil (CAPES)-Finance Code 001.

Acknowledgments

We thank Executive Secretary Rosemary Alves de Oliveira for the great administrative support and Marcela B. Nering for the technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

Colombo A. L. received educational grants from Biotoscana, Pfizer, Gilead Sciences–United Medical (Brazil), MSD, and research grants from Astellas and Pfizer; other authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Colombo, A.L.; de Almeida Junior, J.N., Jr.; Slavin, M.A.; Chen, S.C.; Sorrell, T.C. Candida and invasive mould diseases in non-neutropenic critically ill patients and patients with haematological cancer. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, e344–e356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Colombo, A.L.; Junior, J.N.A.; Guinea, J. Emerging multidrug-resistant Candida species. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 30, 528–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chowdhary, A.; Sharma, C.; Meis, J.F. Candida auris: A rapidly emerging cause of hospital-acquired multidrug-resistant fungal infections globally. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Saris, K.; Meis, J.F.; Voss, A. Candida auris. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 31, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rossato, L.; Colombo, A.L. Candida auris: What have we learned about its mechanisms of pathogenicity? Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 3081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lockhart, S.R.; Etienne, K.A.; Vallabhaneni, S.; Farooqi, J.; Chowdhary, A.; Govender, N.P.; Colombo, A.L.; Calvo, B.; Cuomo, C.A.; Desjardins, C.A.; et al. Simultaneous emergence of multidrug-resistant Candida auris on 3 continents confirmed by whole-genome sequencing and epidemiological analyses. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 64, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kordalewska, M.; Lee, A.; Park, S.; Berrio, I.; Chowdhary, A.; Zhao, Y.; Perlin, D.S. Understanding echinocandin resistance in the emerging pathogen Candida auris. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00238-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hayashi, M.A.; Bizerra, F.C.; Da Silva, P.I., Jr. Antimicrobial compounds from natural sources. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hayashi, M.A.; Oliveira, E.B.; Kerkis, I.; Karpel, R.L. Crotamine: A novel cell-penetrating polypeptide nanocarrier with potential anti-cancer and biotechnological applications. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 906, 337–352. [Google Scholar]
  10. Schenberg, S. Geographical pattern of crotamine distribution in the same rattlesnake subspecies. Science 1959, 129, 1361–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lima, S.C.; Porta, L.C.; Lima, Á.D.C.; Campeiro, J.D.; Meurer, Y.; Teixeira, N.B.; Duarte, T.; Oliveira, E.B.; Picolo, G.; Godinho, R.O.; et al. Pharmacological characterization of crotamine effects on mice hind limb paralysis employing both ex vivo and in vivo assays: Insights into the involvement of voltage-gated ion channels in the crotamine action on skeletal muscles. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nascimento, F.D.; Hayashi, M.A.; Kerkis, A.; Oliveira, V.; Oliveira, E.B.; Rádis-Baptista, G.; Nader, H.B.; Yamane, T.; Tersariol, I.L.; Kerkis, I. Crotamine mediates gene delivery into cells through the binding to heparan sulfate proteoglycans. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 21349–21360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nascimento, F.D.; Sancey, L.; Pereira, A.; Rome, C.; Oliveira, V.; Oliveira, E.B.; Nader, H.B.; Yamane, T.; Kerkis, I.; Tersariol, I.L.; et al. The natural cell-penetrating peptide crotamine targets tumor tissue in vivo and triggers a lethal calcium-dependent pathway in cultured cells. Mol. Pharm. 2012, 9, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kim, J.; Yang, Y.L.; Jang, S.H.; Jang, Y.S. Human β-defensin 2 plays a regulatory role in innate antiviral immunity and is capable of potentiating the induction of antigen-specific immunity. Virol. J. 2018, 15, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yamane, E.S.; Bizerra, F.C.; Oliveira, E.B.; Moreira, J.T.; Rajabi, M.; Nunes, G.L.; de Souza, A.O.; da Silva, I.D.; Yamane, T.; Karpel, R.L.; et al. Unraveling the antifungal activity of a South American rattlesnake toxin crotamine. Biochimie 2013, 95, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Jung, S.W.; Lee, J.; Cho, A.E. Elucidating the bacterial membrane disruption mechanism of human α-defensin 5: A theoretical study. J. Phys. Chem. B 2017, 121, 741–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mathew, B.; Nagaraj, R. Variations in the interaction of human defensins with Escherichia coli: Possible implications in bacterial killing. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0175858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Awang, T.; Pongprayoon, P. The adsorption of human defensin 5 on bacterial membranes: Simulation studies. J. Mol. Model. 2018, 24, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Costa, B.A.; Sanches, L.; Gomide, A.B.; Bizerra, F.; Dal Mas, C.; Oliveira, E.B.; Perez, K.R.; Itri, R.; Oguiura, N.; Hayashi, M.A. Interaction of the rattlesnake toxin crotamine with model membranes. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 5471–5479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Feng, J.; Xie, Z.; Yang, W.; Zhao, Y.; Xiang, F.; Cao, Z.; Li, W.; Chen, Z.; Wu, Y. Human beta-defensin 1, a new animal toxin-like blocker of potassium channel. Toxicon 2016, 113, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, Y.; Xie, Z.; Feng, J.; Li, W.; Cao, Z.; Wu, Y. Pharmacological characterization of human beta-defensins 3 and 4 on potassium channels: Evidence of diversity in beta-defensin-potassium channel interactions. Peptides 2018, 108, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yount, N.Y.; Kupferwasser, D.; Spisni, A.; Dutz, S.M.; Ramjan, Z.H.; Sharma, S.; Waring, A.J.; Yeaman, M.R. Selective reciprocity in antimicrobial activity versus cytotoxicity of hBD-2 and crotamine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 14972–14977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Peigneur, S.; Orts, D.J.; Prieto da Silva, A.R.; Oguiura, N.; Boni-Mitake, M.; de Oliveira, E.B.; Zaharenko, A.J.; de Freitas, J.C.; Tytgat, J. Crotamine pharmacology revisited: Novel insights based on the inhibition of KV channels. Mol. Pharmacol. 2012, 82, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pachón-Ibáñez, M.E.; Smani, Y.; Pachón, J.; Sánchez-Céspedes, J. Perspectives for clinical use of engineered human host defense antimicrobial peptides. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 41, 323–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Candido-Ferreira, I.L.; Kronenberger, T.; Sayegh, R.S.; Batista, I.F.; da Silva Junior, P.I. Evidence of an antimicrobial peptide signature encrypted in HECT E3 ubiquitin ligases. Front. Immunol. 2017, 7, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Calvo, B.; Melo, A.S.; Perozo-Mena, A.; Hernandez, M.; Francisco, E.C.; Hagen, F.; Meisand, J.F.; Colombo, A.L. First report of Candida auris in America: Clinical and microbiological aspects of 18 episodes of candidemia. J. Infect. 2016, 73, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mohsin, J.; Hagen, F.; Al-Balushi, Z.A.M.; de Hoog, G.S.; Chowdhary, A.; Meis, J.F.; Al-Hatmi, A.M.S. The first cases of Candida auris candidaemia in Oman. Mycoses 2017, 60, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Satoh, K.; Makimura, K.; Hasumi, Y.; Nishiyama, Y.; Uchida, K.; Yamaguchi, H. Candida auris sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital. Microbiol. Immunol. 2009, 53, 41–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Merseguel, K.B.; Nishikaku, A.S.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Padovan, A.C.; e Ferreira, R.C.; de Azevedo Melo, A.S.; da Silva Briones, M.R.; Colombo, A.L. Genetic diversity of medically important and emerging Candida species causing invasive infection. BMC Infect. Dis. 2015, 15, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Prakash, A.; Sharma, C.; Singh, A.; Singh, P.K.; Kumar, A.; Hagen, F.; Govender, N.P.; Colombo, A.L.; Meis, J.F.; Chowdhary, A. Evidence of genotypic diversity among Candida auris isolates by multilocus sequence typing, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization timeof-flight mass spectrometry and amplified fragment length polymorphism. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2016, 22, 277.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts; approved standard. In CLSI Document M60, 1st ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ehret-Sabatier, L.; Loew, D.; Goyffon, M.; Fehlbaum, P.; Hoffmann, J.A.; van Dorsselaer, A.; Bulet, P. Characterization of novel cysteine-rich antimicrobial peptides from scorpion blood. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 29537–29544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing and Interpretation. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/candida-auris/c-auris-antifungal.html (accessed on 10 January 2019).
  34. Fakhim, H.; Chowdhary, A.; Prakash, A.; Vaezi, A.; Dannaoui, E.; Meis, J.F.; Badali, H. In vitro interactions of echinocandins with triazoles against multidrug-resistant Candida auris. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e01056-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Eldesouky, H.E.; Li, X.; Abutaleb, N.S.; Mohammad, H.; Seleem, M.N. Synergistic interactions of sulfamethoxazole and azole antifungal drugs against emerging multidrug-resistant Candida auris. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2018, 52, 754–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wall, G.; Chaturvedi, A.K.; Wormley, F.L., Jr.; Wiederhold, N.P.; Patterson, H.P.; Patterson, T.F.; Lopez-Ribot, J.L. Screening a repurposing library for inhibitors of multidrug-resistant Candida auris identifies ebselen as a repositionable candidate for antifungal drug development. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e01084-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Marinovic, M.P.; Dal Mas, C.; Monte, G.G.; Felix, D.; Campeiro, J.D.; Hayashi, M.A.F. Crotamine: Function diversity and potential applications. In Snake Venoms; Gopalakrishnakone, P., Inagaki, H., Vogel, C.W., Mukherjee, A., Rahmy, T., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 265–293. [Google Scholar]
  38. Dal Mas, C.; Pinheiro, D.A.; Campeiro, J.D.; Mattei, B.; Oliveira, V.; Oliveira, E.B.; Miranda, A.; Perez, K.R.; Hayashi, M.A. Biophysical and biological properties of small linear peptides derived from crotamine, a cationic antimicrobial/antitumoral toxin with cell penetrating and cargo delivery abilities. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2017, 1859, 2340–2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. da Silva, C.R.; de Andrade Neto, J.B.; de Sousa Campos, R.; Figueiredo, N.S.; Sampaio, L.S.; Magalhães, H.I.; Cavalcanti, B.C.; Gaspar, D.M.; de Andrade, G.M.; Lima, I.S.; et al. Synergistic effect of the flavonoid catechin, quercetin, or epigallocatechin gallate with fluconazole induces apoptosis in Candida tropicalis resistant to fluconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 1468–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomolecules 09 00205 g001 550
Figure 1. Antifungal activity of several natural peptides against Candida auris. C. auris (CBS 10913) reference strain (white empty columns), and the clinical multiresistant isolates C. auris 470/2015 (white hatched columns) and 484/2015 (light gray columns), C. auris 467/2015 (solid black columns), and C. auris CBS 14916 (hatched dark gray columns). Peptides 1 and 2 are from the centipede Scolopendra subspinipes, cheliferin is from pseudoscorpion Chelifer cancroides, oligoventin is from the eggs of the Brazilian armed spider Phoneutria nigriventer, and comosusin is from pineapple peels. The percentage of inhibition determined by each peptide (about 1 mM each) was calculated by the ratio between the growth of the microorganisms in the presence/absence (which corresponds to 100% growth) of the peptides. The dashed line indicates approximately 50% inhibition of growth. Differences were considered statistically significant for values of p ≤ 0.05 for two-way ANOVA, for the multiple comparisons post-hoc Bonferroni, N = 4, and they are indicated by the bars.
Figure 1. Antifungal activity of several natural peptides against Candida auris. C. auris (CBS 10913) reference strain (white empty columns), and the clinical multiresistant isolates C. auris 470/2015 (white hatched columns) and 484/2015 (light gray columns), C. auris 467/2015 (solid black columns), and C. auris CBS 14916 (hatched dark gray columns). Peptides 1 and 2 are from the centipede Scolopendra subspinipes, cheliferin is from pseudoscorpion Chelifer cancroides, oligoventin is from the eggs of the Brazilian armed spider Phoneutria nigriventer, and comosusin is from pineapple peels. The percentage of inhibition determined by each peptide (about 1 mM each) was calculated by the ratio between the growth of the microorganisms in the presence/absence (which corresponds to 100% growth) of the peptides. The dashed line indicates approximately 50% inhibition of growth. Differences were considered statistically significant for values of p ≤ 0.05 for two-way ANOVA, for the multiple comparisons post-hoc Bonferroni, N = 4, and they are indicated by the bars.
Biomolecules 09 00205 g001
Biomolecules 09 00205 g002 550
Figure 2. Antifungal activity of native crotamine (10–160 µM) against C. auris. C. auris (CBS 10913) reference strain (white empty columns), and the clinical multiresistant isolates C. auris 470/2015 (white hatched columns) and 484/2015 (light gray columns), C. auris 467/2015 (solid black columns), and C. auris CBS 14916 (hatched dark gray columns). The percentage of inhibition determined by crotamine was calculated by the ratio between the growth of the microorganisms in the presence/absence (which corresponds to 100% growth) of the peptide. The dashed line indicates approximately 50% inhibition of growth. The bars represent comparison to C. auris CBS 10913. Differences were considered statistically significant for values of p ≤ 0.05 for two-way ANOVA, for the multiple comparisons post-hoc Bonferroni, N = 6, and they are indicated by the bars.
Figure 2. Antifungal activity of native crotamine (10–160 µM) against C. auris. C. auris (CBS 10913) reference strain (white empty columns), and the clinical multiresistant isolates C. auris 470/2015 (white hatched columns) and 484/2015 (light gray columns), C. auris 467/2015 (solid black columns), and C. auris CBS 14916 (hatched dark gray columns). The percentage of inhibition determined by crotamine was calculated by the ratio between the growth of the microorganisms in the presence/absence (which corresponds to 100% growth) of the peptide. The dashed line indicates approximately 50% inhibition of growth. The bars represent comparison to C. auris CBS 10913. Differences were considered statistically significant for values of p ≤ 0.05 for two-way ANOVA, for the multiple comparisons post-hoc Bonferroni, N = 6, and they are indicated by the bars.
Biomolecules 09 00205 g002
Biomolecules 09 00205 g003 550
Figure 3. Antifungal activity of native crotamine against Candida haemulonii. Different concentrations of native crotamine (from 5 to 80 µM) were tested to evaluate the antifungal activity against the C. haemulonii resistant clinical isolates, namely C. haemulonii 1112/2016 (white empty columns) and C. haemulonii 9873/2014 (solid black columns). Differences were considered statistically significant for values of * p ≤ 0.05 for two-way ANOVA (N = 3).
Figure 3. Antifungal activity of native crotamine against Candida haemulonii. Different concentrations of native crotamine (from 5 to 80 µM) were tested to evaluate the antifungal activity against the C. haemulonii resistant clinical isolates, namely C. haemulonii 1112/2016 (white empty columns) and C. haemulonii 9873/2014 (solid black columns). Differences were considered statistically significant for values of * p ≤ 0.05 for two-way ANOVA (N = 3).
Biomolecules 09 00205 g003
Table
Table 1. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) (µg/mL) of fluconazole (FLC), amphotericin B (AMB), and micafungin (MICA) for Candida spp. isolates.
Table 1. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) (µg/mL) of fluconazole (FLC), amphotericin B (AMB), and micafungin (MICA) for Candida spp. isolates.
StrainsAMBFLCMIC
C. auris CBS 10913 0.5/0.5 (S)2/2 (S)0.03/0.06 (S)
C. auris 470/20152/2 (R)>64/>64 (R)0.06/0.12 (S)
C. auris 484/20154/4 (R)>64/>64 (R)0.06/0.12 (S)
C. auris 467/20152/4 (R)>64/>64 (R)0.06/0.12 (S)
C. auris CBS 149162/2 (R)>64/>64 (R)0.12/0.12 (S)
C. haemulonii 9873/20141/>16 (R)8/16 (R)0.03/0.06 (S)
C. haemulonii 1112/20161/>16 (R)8/16 (R)0.03/0.06 (S)
(R) resistant; (S) sensitive; MIC values are presented as µg/mL determined for 24/48 h incubations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dal Mas, C.; Rossato, L.; Shimizu, T.; Oliveira, E.B.; da Silva Junior, P.I.; Meis, J.F.; Colombo, A.L.; Hayashi, M.A.F. Effects of the Natural Peptide Crotamine from a South American Rattlesnake on Candida auris, an Emergent Multidrug Antifungal Resistant Human Pathogen. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9060205

AMA Style

Dal Mas C, Rossato L, Shimizu T, Oliveira EB, da Silva Junior PI, Meis JF, Colombo AL, Hayashi MAF. Effects of the Natural Peptide Crotamine from a South American Rattlesnake on Candida auris, an Emergent Multidrug Antifungal Resistant Human Pathogen. Biomolecules. 2019; 9(6):205. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9060205

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dal Mas, Caroline, Luana Rossato, Thaís Shimizu, Eduardo B. Oliveira, Pedro I. da Silva Junior, Jacques F. Meis, Arnaldo Lopes Colombo, and Mirian A. F. Hayashi. 2019. "Effects of the Natural Peptide Crotamine from a South American Rattlesnake on Candida auris, an Emergent Multidrug Antifungal Resistant Human Pathogen" Biomolecules 9, no. 6: 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9060205

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop