Next Article in Journal
Does the Winner Take All in E-Commerce of Agricultural Products under the Background of Platform Monopoly?
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Biostimulatory Activity of Commercial Formulations on Three Varieties of Chickpea
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agriculture
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/agriculture13020475
agriculture-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Exploring Plant Tissue Culture and Steviol Glycosides Production in Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.) Bertoni: A Review

by
Shilpa Sharma
1,
Swati Gupta
2,
Deepa Kumari
1,
Shanker Lal Kothari
3,
Rohit Jain
2 and
Sumita Kachhwaha
1,*
1
Department of Botany, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur 302004, India
2
Department of Biosciences, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur 303007, India
3
Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Rajasthan, Jaipur 303002, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2023, 13(2), 475; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020475
Submission received: 19 January 2023 / Revised: 6 February 2023 / Accepted: 9 February 2023 / Published: 16 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Production)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.) Bertoni, commonly called “sweet leaf” is a medicinally and industrially important plant known to be rich in zero-calorie natural sweetening compound(s) known as “steviol glycosides”. However, due to its poor seed germination and slow vegetative propagation, it has become rather difficult to meet the increasing global demand for Stevia-based products. Different biotechnological approaches have been developed over the past few decades to overcome these limitations and allow for mass propagation of the plant. Several protocols for in vitro organogenesis, callogenesis, and cell suspension cultures have been developed during the past few years. Apart from this, attempts have also been made to improve the production of steviol glycosides through nutrient manipulation, the use of elicitors, hairy root cultures, genetic transformation, and metabolic pathway engineering. Therefore, this review provides an up-to-date report on the applications of various biotechnological tools for mass propagation and enhanced steviol glycoside production, along with a detailed bibliometrics analysis. This review also highlights research gaps and future considerations that could be fruitful for the scientific community to delve deeper into the various unexplored aspects of the architecture and functionality of this natural sweetening plant.

1. Introduction

Stevia (family Asteraceae) is a perennial herb native to northern Paraguay. It was discovered by Moises Santiago Bertoni in 1877. Its leaves have traditionally been used by South American Guarani Indians due to their sweet taste and effectiveness in treating diabetes. Leaves of Stevia produce tetracyclic diterpene Steviol Glycosides (SGs), which are 200–300 times sweeter than table sugar [1]. Steviol glycosides, due to their complex structure, are not metabolised in the human body and are thus non-caloric [2]. Other bioactive compounds found in leaves include terpenoids (amyrin, limonene, kaurenoic acid, carvacrol), phenols (catechin, apigenin, chlorogenic acid, quercetin, trans-ferulic acid, cinnamic acid, leteolin-7-O-rutinoside), carbohydrates (L-arabinose, D-mannose, D-xylose, L-rhamnose), lipids (palmitic acid, stearic acid, linoleic acid), protein (serine), vitamins (ascorbic acid, niacin, riboflavin, thiamine) and minerals (calcium, magnesium, manganese, sodium, selenium, cobalt, phosphorus, zinc and potassium) [3,4,5]. Stevia extracts have hypotensive, hypoglycaemic, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties [6]. Studies have demonstrated that Stevia leaf extracts are hypoglycaemic [7], antimicrobial [8], antioxidant [9], antiviral [10], and anti-inflammatory [11]. With increasing rates of diabetes and obesity globally and the risks associated with artificial sweeteners, people are turning to natural sweeteners. As a result, Stevia-based sweeteners and medications are now available on the market and are in high demand.
The conventional agronomic practises are not enough to meet the increasing demand for Stevia plantations, as seed propagation is inefficient and produces a non-homogenous population with varied concentrations of SGs in the plants, affecting the taste profile. Additionally, poor seed germination also hinders the large-scale production of Stevia plants. Therefore, to overcome the above-mentioned problem, rapid clonal propagation methods have been developed [12]. This review presents a comprehensive study on the tissue culture of Stevia rebaudiana, methods employed to enhance the production of SGs and in vitro studies.

2. Bibliometrics Analysis

A bibliometric study was carried out to analyse research articles, book chapters, proceedings, editorial materials, letters, meeting abstracts, news items, notes, and reviews (papers, book chapters, and early access) published on Stevia rebaudiana during the period 1938 to 2022. A comprehensive search was done on SCOPUS database and Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection for bibliometric analysis of Stevia literature. A bibliometric analysis of the retrieved data was done using the Biblioshiny tool, as reported in [13]. The following keywords were used for collecting information from both databases on Stevia publications: 1. Stevia; 2. Stevia rebaudiana; 3. Steviol Glycosides; 4. Steviosides; and 5. Rebaudioside A.
The data mined from WOS (1989–2022) returned 2503 documents from 803 sources. Stevia publications have an annual growth rate of 8.66% with 16.87 average citations per document (Table 1). There was a marked increase in publications on Stevia, from only 8 papers published in 1989 to a maximum of 281 papers in 2021. Stevia publications have risen continuously from 2006 to date with a slight dip in 2015.
Most relevant sources on Stevia research were (i) Food Chemistry (ii) Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry (iii) Phytochemistry (iv) Molecules (v) Food and Chemical Toxicology. Figure 1 shows the clustering of sources through Bradford’s Law using the Biblioshiny tool. It is evident that Food Chemistry is the preferred journal among researchers. Further, in terms of scientific production, China, the USA, and India were identified as the top three countries.
Analysis of the most searched, cited, and worked-upon topics was identified based on the keywords using different tools available on the Biblioshiny, and the same have been represented in the form of a word tree map (Figure 2a), a thematic map (Figure 2b), and a topic dendrogram (Figure 2c). SCOPUS (1955–2021)-Annual Growth Rate−7.84%, 1955 (1 document), 2021-(391 documents), average citations per year-max (2003-3.8), most relevant sources-Food Chemistry (72), Phytochemistry (69), Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry (55), Sugar Tech (37) and Food and Chemical Toxicology (35).

3. Botanical Description and Cultivation of Stevia rebaudiana

Stevia is a new world genus of Eupatorieae tribes of the Asteraceae family that is native to northeastern Paraguay [14]. The genus comprises herbs and shrubs, growing at altitudes of 500–300 m and distributed from the southern United States to Argentina and the Brazilian highlands, through Mexico, the Central American States, and the South American Andes [15,16].
Among the 230/261 [17] species of the genus Stevia, sweet ent-kaurene diterpene glycosides are found in S. phlebophylla and S. rebaudiana, but the highest level of sweetness is exhibited by S. rebaudiana, thus imparting its industrial importance [15,18,19]. Stevia is cultivated in Japan, India, China, Thailand, Taiwan, Korea, Brazil, Malaysia, Hawaii, California, Canada, and other parts of Asia and Europe [20,21,22]. Stevia is a short-day plant that usually shows flowering from January to March and September to December in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, respectively [16]. Day length sensitivity is extremely variable, which led to the classification of three photoperiod classes in Stevia populations [23,24]. It is cultivated in semi-humid and sub-tropical climates with an average temperature of 24 °C [25]. Stevia grows well in sandy soil with a pH of 6.5–7.5 [26]. A detailed description of the phenotypic characteristics along with the taxonomic classification of S. rebaudiana has been summarized in Table 2 and Table 3 [14,16,27,28].

4. Applications/Properties of SGs

4.1. Therapeutic

4.1.1. Antidiabetic Effect

Stevia is well known for its antidiabetic potential. Several reports have demonstrated the antihyperglycaemic effects of Stevia leaf extracts (aqueous, ether, ethanolic, and methanolic), purified steviol, stevioside, and rebaudioside A, in in vitro and in vivo models including human subjects [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Further, steviol glucuronide, isolated from human urine, showed dose and glucose-dependent stimulation of insulin secretion on mouse islets [35]. A number of studies have been carried out to understand the underlying mechanism of SG antidiabetic activity, and the following modes of action have been proposed: (i) enhancement of insulin secretion and sensitivity [29,30,31,36,38,39], (ii) glucose transport modulation [40] (iii) inhibition of glucagon secretion [29,38], (iv) upregulation of gene expression (PPAR-γ, GLUT4, GLUT 2, Gcgr) [31,32,33,35]. In a study proposed by Chen, Jeppesen, Nordentoft and Hermansen [31] and Bugliani, Tavarini, Grano, Tondi, Lacerenza, Giusti, Ronci, Maidecchi, Marchetti and Tesi [37], SGs protected mouse pancreatic beta cells from lipotoxicity and from the amelioration of glyburide-induced desensitization.
Stevioside, rebaudioside A, and steviol can potentially aid in the treatment of type 2 diabetes by increasing insulin production, lowering postprandial blood glucose, and protecting beta cells from damage.

4.1.2. Antihypertensive Effect

Many studies have revealed the effectiveness of stevioside in combating hypertension. Stevioside has been reported to reduce blood pressure (BP) in animals (rats and dogs) and humans [41,42,43,44,45,46]. When stevioside (95% purity) was administered intravenously to hypertensive rats, a marked reduction in BP was observed. Stevioside had a dose-dependent effect, with the maximum hypotensive activity at 200 mg/kg stevioside content [41]. Early reports have indicated that the hypotensive activity of stevioside is through a calcium antagonist mechanism (like verapamil) [47] and that its effect is prostaglandin activity-dependent [48], while other studies have shown the vasorelaxation activity of stevioside [41,49]. Further, studies on human patients have shown discrepancies in the effectiveness of stevioside [42,43,44]. Oral intake of capsules (500 mg stevioside) for two years showed a decrease in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in mildly hypertensive patients as compared to placebo [43]. Other studies have reported that stevioside has no effect or a lower effect than other hypotensive drugs in human subjects [42,44]. GlucoMedix®, a suspension prepared from 15% volume/volume (v/v) of Uncaria bark extract and 11.67% weight/volume (w/v) of Stevia leaf extract powder (8.18% w/v SGs content), has been demonstrated to be safe and effective against hyperglycaemia, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension in rats [46]. Further, the safety and tolerability of stevioside allow it to be used as an alternative or supplementary therapy for hypertension [42,44].

4.1.3. Anticancer and Antitumor Effect

Many studies have been done to understand the activity and mechanisms mediating the anticancerous effects of SGs in both in vivo and in vitro models. Various SGs and their derivatives, like steviol, stevioside, rebaudioside A, steviolbioside, and isosteviol, have been explored to study their effect on cancer cell lines [50,51,52,53,54]. SGs are effective against cell lines and models of leukaemia, gastrointestinal cancer, lung cancer, cervical cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer [50,51,52,53,55]. Ref. [56] investigated the effects of Stevia extracts in a variety of solvents, including chloroform, acetone, water, ethanol, petroleum ether, and methanol, and assessed their potential cytotoxicity towards MCF-7 cell lines. All the extracts were effective, but petroleum ether produced the best results. In another in vitro study, Stevia leaf extracts in ethyl acetate and acetone exhibited more cytotoxicity on human laryngeal epithelioma cells in vitro [57]. Mechanistically, Stevia and its derivatives increase cytotoxicity, decrease cell viability, inhibit cell proliferation, arrest cells in the G1/G2 phase, and induce reactive oxygen-mediated apoptosis in different cell lines [50,51,52,53,55].To sum up, SGs are ideal candidates for cancer therapy or prevention since they exhibit anticancer activity and are less toxic to non-cancerous cells [58].

4.1.4. Antimicrobial Activity

Stevia extracts have been traditionally used in treating bacterial and fungal infections [49]. The antimicrobial activity of leaf extracts (aqueous, ethanol, ethyl acetate, acetone, methanol, chloroform, hexane, and acetone) has been investigated in several studies [3,57,59,60,61,62]. Bibi, Sarwar, Sabir, Nisa and Khan [59] evaluated the antimicrobial activity of Stevia leaf extracts (water and ethanol) against microorganisms including Aspergillus flavus (fungi), Staphylococcus aureus, Lactobacillus acidophilus (gram-positive bacteria), Salmonella typhi, and Escherichia coli (gram-negative bacteria). Ethanolic extract showed better antibacterial activity, while no antifungal activity was detected. In another study, antibacterial, antifungal, antiyeast, and antitumour activities were detected in leaf extracts (ethyl acetate, acetone, chloroform, and water) of Stevia [57]. These extracts can also be used against tooth decaying bacteria because they effectively inhibit the growth of cariogenic bacteria (16 strains of Streptococcus and Lactobacillus) [60].

4.2. Food/Other

Many sweeteners are available on the market, like aspartame, saccharin, and cyclamate [63]. But these sweeteners produce toxic substances inside the body that are often associated with many health risks [64,65]. Stevia has emerged as an alternative sweetener as it is reported to be safe for consumption [64,66]. Stevioside and rebaudioside A are the main sweetening substances in Stevia and account for 90% w/w of SGs in leaves [67]. Additionally, SGs are heat resistant, pH stable, and non-fermentative, with high solubility and stability in aqueous solutions [5].
Therefore, Stevia has become an indispensable part of food products and dietary supplements such as beverages, dairy products, bakery products, medicines, and many more [3,57,64,67,68,69,70]. A high-purity rebaudioside A sweetener, Rebiana, has been jointly commercialised by Cargill, Incorporation and The Coca-Cola Company; it has been successfully used in the preparation of food, beverages, confectionaries, nutraceuticals, and pharmaceuticals [71]. Some of the Stevia-based beverages with brand names such as Sprite Green, Zevia, Virgil Diet Soda, Virgil Zero, Virgil Coca, and Thomas Kemper Natural Diet Soda are also available on the market [72].

5. Toxicological Studies

The safety of steviol glycosides for human consumption has been controversial as steviol glycosides have been associated with various acute, subacute, reproductive, and genotoxicities [73]. The contradictory reviews on the safety of SG consumption published by Geuns [74] and Huxtable [75] led to clinical studies on the risk assessment of these natural sweeteners, which confirmed their non-genotoxic and non-carcinogenic nature [69,76]. Studies conducted in the early 1900s demonstrated that SGs pose no reproductive or developmental hazards to animal subjects [77,78]. In the investigation of plasma profiles, metabolism, and excretion characteristics of intact and bile duct-cannulated rats, administered with radiolabelled rebaudioside A (reb-A), stevioside (stv), and steviol were determined. Many in vitro and in vivo studies have confirmed that SGs are neither digested nor absorbed by the upper gastrointestinal tract, thus making them safe for human consumption [1]. The United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) designated Stevia as generally recognised as safe (GRAS) in December 2008 [79], following which the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) also lifted the ban on Stevia in 2015. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) recommended high-purity leaf extracts of Stevia to be safe with an acceptable daily intake dose of 4 mg “steviol equivalents” per kilogramme of body weight per day [80,81].

6. Steviol Glycosides

Steviol glycosides (SGs) are tetracyclic diterpenes that share a common precursor (kaurenoid) with that of the gibberellic acid (GA) biosynthetic pathway [19,64], it has been reported that the biosynthesis of SGs primarily occurs in leaves and that they are transported to other parts of the plant, such that they are found mainly in the following order: Leaves > flowers > stems > seeds > roots [82].

6.1. Types of SGs

More than 60 SGs have been identified in Stevia to date, among which stevioside was the first glycoside to be isolated from Stevia leaves, followed by the isolation of reb-A, dulcoside A, reb-B, C, D, E, F, I, M, and steviolbioside [83,84,85,86]. It has been reported that SGs account for 25% of the dry weight of Stevia leaves, whereas stevioside, reb-A, reb-C, dulcoside, reb-D, E, F, and steviolbioside account for 0.1%–10% [84]. SGs contain a common backbone of 13-hydroxy-ent-kaur-16-en-19-oic acid, known as steviol. Differences in the amount and type of carbohydrates (glucose, rhamnose, xylose, fructose, and deoxyglucose) linked to the C13 and C19 positions of the aglycone steviol via 1, 2-: 1, 3-: 1, 4 or 1, 6-α or β-glycosidic linkages, result in colossal diversity of SGs [79]. Based on the type of glycosidic residues, Purkayastha, Markosyan, Prakash, Bhusari, Pugh Jr, Lynch, Roberts and Pharmacology [79], classified SGs into five groups, namely (i) Glycosyl steviol family (SvGn), (ii) Rhamnosyl steviol family (SvR1Gn), (iii) Xylosyl steviol family (SvX1Gn), (iv) Fructosyl steviol family (SvF1Gn) and (v) Deoxyglucose steviol family (SvdG1Gn). The sweetness and bitterness of SGs are perceived by the G protein-coupled taste receptors present on the human tongue [87].

6.2. Biosynthetic Pathway and Its Associated Genes

Many studies have been carried out to unravel the biosynthetic pathway of steviol glycosides. The biosynthesis of SGs occurs in different cellular compartments; it begins in plastids, continues in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and finally terminates in the cytoplasm, leading to the formation of various SGs [19] (Figure 4).

6.2.1. Kaurene (Precursor) Synthesis in Plastids

Ent-kaurene, the precursor of steviol, is synthesised in plastids. Totté, et al. [88] demonstrated that the plastid-localised MEP (methyl-erythrol-4-phosphate) pathway is responsible for the synthesis of steviol precursors. Early steps of SGs biosynthesis are common with the MEP pathway, which involves the synthesis of IPP (isopentenyl diphosphate) and DMAPP (dimethylallyl diphosphate) [89]. The steps involving the synthesis of kaurenoic acids are similar to those of the gibberellic acid pathway. GGDP (geranylgeranyl-di-phosphate) (15 carbons) is synthesised from IPP and DMAPP, via three condensation reactions catalysed by GGDP synthase (plastidic prenyltransferase), which in turn is converted to copalyl diphosphate (CDP) by CDP synthase (CPS) through cyclisation, and finally, CDP is converted to ent-kaurene by kaurene synthase (KS) [19,90].

6.2.2. Oxidation Reaction (Endoplasmic Reticulum)

From plastids, kaurene is transported to the ER and oxidised to kaurenoic acid by the kaurenoic oxidase (P450 monooxygenase) enzyme; this is then hydroxylated by kaurenoic acid-13-hydroxylase to “steviol” [91]. This step is rendered as the first committed step in SG biosynthesis, and it is also the point from which the biosynthetic pathways of SG and GA diverge [19,92].

6.2.3. Formation of Major SGs in Cytosol

Steviol is an aglycone with two hydroxyl groups, one on C-19 of the C-4 carboxyl group and the other on C-13 [19]. All subsequent steps of the pathway are carried out in the cytosol by a divergent group of enzymes called UDP-glycosyltransferases (UGTs), which transfer sugar from the donor molecule to the acceptor molecule [19]. UGT85C2 glycosylates the steviol backbone at the C13 hydroxyl position and forms steviolmonoside; UGT91D2 catalyses glycosylation at C-2 of the 13-O-glucose and results in the formation of steviolbioside; and glycosylation at the C-19 (UGT74G1) and C-13 (UGT76G1) positions forms stevioside and reb-A, respectively [93,94]. According to Wang and Hou [95], hydroxylated molecules are common acceptors of sugar. UGT76G1 is a “chameleon enzyme,” as it catalyses eight different reactions and leads to the formation of different types of SGs, including reb-D, reb-M, reb-I, reb-Q, 1, 3-bioside, etc., in minute quantities [94].
Finally, after the completion of SG biosynthesis in the cytosol of the green parts of the plant, they are transported via MFS, MATE, and ABC transporter-like proteins to the vacuoles and trichomes [19,96,97].

7. Biotechnological Interventions

Conventionally, Stevia is propagated by shoot cuttings and seeds; however, propagation by shoot cuttings is a time-consuming and labour-intensive process with a low success rate, while seed propagation is not a common method due to low production and germination efficiency [16,98]. It was recently discovered that the poor yield of germinating seeds (1%) is due to a lack of pollen tube formation owing to unsuitable levels of gibberellins during the generative phase [99].
Because the plant is self-incompatible, the chances of heterozygosity are higher, which may result in the loss of desired traits. With the increase in demand and shortage of high-yielding varieties, tissue culture has emerged as an alternative method for large-scale production of homogenous and disease-free populations of Stevia with quality traits irrespective of the season and climatic conditions [100,101]. In addition to this, tissue culture also provides a platform for enhancing the production of desired SGs through various elicitors [100,102,103].

7.1. Strategies for In Vitro Morphogenesis/Multiplication of Stevia

Plant tissue culture is a technique that exploits the totipotent nature of the plant cells, thus allowing the induction of desired organs or plantlets from explants under artificially optimised conditions [104]. This technique has greatly aided plant propagation, which was previously difficult to achieve using traditional breeding techniques. Aside from facilitating the rapid multiplication of plants, tissue culture has also provided a platform for the manipulation of various factors, resulting in increased biomass production and improved traits.
In vitro cultures have fairly contributed to the production of pharmaceutically and industrially important secondary metabolites. Thus, tissue culture ensures a yearlong supply of plant material to meet the commercial demand. In vitro propagation of Stevia, like other plants, involves the establishment of in vitro cultures, shoot induction and regeneration, rooting of in vitro shoots, and acclimatisation of regenerated plants.
Various modes of regeneration have been explored for establishing Stevia cultures, which include direct and indirect organogenesis, suspension cultures, root cultures, anther cultures, and somatic embryogenesis. Mostly, organogenesis has been the method of choice for the regeneration of Stevia plants. Some studies regarding the tissue culture studies of Stevia have been reviewed in the subsequent sections.

7.1.1. Multiple Shoot Proliferation

Shoot proliferation is a method mostly employed for rapid multiplication in tissue culture studies. In this method, the ontogenic route and pre-existing meristems of explants are exploited, resulting in the multiplication of shoot primordia in a shorter period of time. For successful plant regeneration in artificial conditions, various factors need to be considered, which include the source and type of explants, basal media composition, growth regulators, chemical factors, growth conditions, and other factors. In the case of Stevia, various types of explants, such as shoot tips [105,106], nodal segments [107,108,109], internodal segments [110], leaf [111,112,113,114,115], axillary bud [116], flower [117], root [118] and anther [119,120] have been extensively used for the development of in vitro regeneration and multiplication protocols. Among the various explants, shoot tips and nodal segments have been widely used to establish in vitro cultures of Stevia, while the use of anther cultures is still in its infancy.
According to the literature, shoot tips have been more responsive in multiple shoot regeneration [106,121]. For in vitro multiplication of Stevia, a higher number of shoots was obtained with shoot tips than with nodal segments and leaves [107,122,123]. Contrary to most reports where shoot tip was observed to be more efficient, Ahmed, Salahin, Karim, Razvy, Hannan, Sultana, Hossain and Islam [108], Laribi, et al. [124], Yadav, et al. [125], Singh, et al. [126], advocated for a better response with nodal segments in terms of shoot proliferation. Plant growth regulators (PGRs) play an important role in deciding the route of morphogenesis in tissue culture systems (Table 4). Explant growth and development can be easily manipulated by incorporating different concentrations and combinations of PGRs in a basal medium [107]. The type or combination of exogenous PGRs should be adjusted according to the explant type to achieve the appropriate response [121]. For shoot organogenesis in Stevia, a few reports have advocated the use of a PGR-free basal medium, while others mostly supported the use of PGRs such as cytokinins and auxins [107,127,128,129,130].

7.1.2. Callus and Cell Suspension Cultures

Callus is a mass of unorganised cells that, when provided with appropriate culture conditions, can be differentiated into adventitious shoots or roots [153]. Further callus cultures can be used to induce somatic embryos and cell suspension cultures. Early reports of callus culture studies date to the 20th century, with the pioneering works of Yamazaki, et al. [154] and Swanson, et al. [155]. The development of callus cultures is determined by various factors, which include explant type and in vitro growth conditions. The establishment of callus cultures in Stevia has been reported from numerous explants, including leaves [110,113,115,135,155,156], nodal segments [115], shoot buds [157], internodal segments [111,135] and flowers [117]. For successful plant regeneration, the selection of appropriate explants is important. Only a few studies have found nodal segments to be responsive in Stevia, while the majority of studies have found leaves to be superior to nodal explants [112,135]. Khalil, et al. [158] reported the synergistic effect of PGRs and polyamines (spermidine and putrescine) on callogenesis and shoot morphogenesis in Stevia.
Callus culture has been widely exploited for the establishment of cell suspension culture. Cell suspension cultures are composed of single cells and cellular aggregates, which are generally initiated by a friable callus on an agitated liquid medium and are used as a tool for analysing physiological processes and producing highly valued biochemicals in plants [159]. For successful establishment and maintenance of suspension cultures, various factors like growth regulators, inoculum density, and concentrations of other nutrients need to be optimised [160].
Suspension cultures have been used for the regeneration of Stevia in vitro as well as for steviol glycoside production. Various studies reported on the callus induction and/or suspension culture of Stevia have been summarised in Table 5.

7.1.3. Rhizogenesis

Various medium compositions and growth regulators have been exploited for root generation. In Stevia, IBA (Indole Butyric Acid) or NAA (Naphthalene Acetic Acid) with full- or half-strength MS (Murashige and Skoog) media have been reported effective for root initiation and growth [168]. Dheeranupattana, et al. [169] reported the highest root formation (11 roots/ explant) on MS medium supplemented with 2 mg/L NAA. Similar results have also been noticed by Bespalhok-Filho, et al. [170] on half-strength medium. Other researchers also supported NAA as the best hormone for rooting Stevia [171,172]. Few studies have supported the claim that IBA is more efficient in root formation [115,129,173]. While Ahmed, Salahin, Karim, Razvy, Hannan, Sultana, Hossain and Islam [108] observed better results with IAA and callus induction with IBA at a concentration of 0.1 mg/L. Moreover, a decrease in root length was observed at higher concentrations of NAA. Treatment with polyamines and auxins enhanced root initiation, with 86% rooting on medium with spermidine and NAA, and maximum root length was obtained on medium with putrescine and NAA [158]. A detailed account of root induction in Stevia is given in Table 6.

7.1.4. Somatic Embryogenesis

Somatic embryogenesis (SE) has emerged as a powerful biotechnological method for clonal regeneration, germplasm conservation, genetic improvement, and the production of synthetic seeds in plants [174]. SE involves the induction of embryos from somatic cells; both direct and indirect methods have been employed in Stevia for somatic embryo production [175,176,177,178]. Multiple factors govern the formation of somatic embryos, such as genotype, phytohormones, explant source, and type [174,178,179].
The pioneering work by Bespalhok-Filho, Hashimoto and Vieira [170] reported somatic embryogenesis from Stevia leaves. Though several studies have examined different stages of SE through histological studies, more studies need to be carried out for regeneration, ontogeny, and the origin of somatic embryos in Stevia [178,179].

7.1.5. Nutrient Manipulation

Although plant tissue culture medium (MS, B5, WPM) contains various macro- and micronutrients, studies have shown that, apart from hormonal ratios, nutrient contents and types require optimization for better morphogenesis and growth [180,181]. Copper is one such micronutrient that is required for the normal growth and development of the plant. According to Jain, Kachhwaha and Kothari [12], high copper in the basal medium has a stimulatory effect on multiplication in Stevia, with the maximum number of shoots formed with 10 times the amount of CuSO4 (copper sulphate) in the proliferation medium (BA + KIN). TEM (Transmission Electron Microscopy) studies revealed changes in the morphology and thylakoid ultrastructure of chloroplasts in explants grown on elevated CuSO4 levels (0.5 µM). Thus, indicating the potential application of copper in SGs biosynthesis [72].
Similarly, Stevia explants grown on modified MS medium with major and minor elements at definite concentrations have also been reported to maximise growth and development of the in vitro multiplying plants [182].

7.2. Secondary Metabolite Production—Need and Methods

Previous studies have shown that the regenerated plants have a lower content and composition of steviol glycosides than in field-grown plants [103,183]. Therefore, various strategies have been employed to produce a homogenous population of Stevia plants with a higher content of SGs through tissue culture methods. These strategies include manipulation of tissue and organ cultures by various factors, including the type of explant [110], type and concentration of basal medium, PGRs [128,166,184], carbon source, and nutrients [101,115,116,185]. Further, the use of biotic and abiotic elicitors, hairy root cultures, and nanoparticles [103,118,129,186,187,188,189,190,191] has also emerged as an effective method for enhanced in vitro production of SGs.

7.2.1. Effect of PGRs and Medium on SG Content

In plant tissue culture studies, PGRs are known to govern secondary metabolite production; therefore, many studies on Stevia have focused on studying the effect of PGRs on SG production [128,166,192]. Combinations of cytokinins (BA + Kin) have been reported to be effective for the biosynthesis of major SGs (dulcoside A and stevioside). It has also been reported that accumulation of dulcoside A was favourably affected by lower concentrations of agar as compared to stevioside and reb A [166].
Apart from PGRs, MS medium strength also influences the amount of SGs, as it is the source of nutrients available for plant growth in in vitro conditions. Furthermore, dilution of MS medium results in a decrease in SGs and the expression of its biosynthetic genes [101]. Contrary to this, Mehrafarin, Etminan, Delkhosh and Golrokhan [185] concluded an inverse relation between medium strength and SGs accumulation, which was explained by the promotion of primary metabolism in full-strength nutrient medium.

7.2.2. Effects of Nutrients

Usually in in vitro studies, MS medium is fortified with essential nutrients, but the effective quantity of nutrients is specific to plants; thus, studies have been carried out to determine the precise amount of these nutrients for optimal plant growth. Additional supply of nutrients effects physiological and morphological characteristics of in vitro grown plants, such as the addition of nitrogen sources like ammonium nitrate and potassium nitrate (NH4NO3 and KNO3) to MS medium has been reported to enhance growth rate, number of leaves, and plantlet length [116].

7.2.3. Effects of Elicitors (Biotic and Abiotic)

To enhance the production of steviol glycosides, biotechnological techniques can be used as an alternative method [188]. In this context, elicitation studies have emerged as an important method to enhance growth as well as SG accumulation in Stevia [103,186,187]. Table 7 and Figure 4 summarise the effects of various elicitors on Stevia growth, SG production in vitro, and the expression of genes associated with the stevioside biosynthesis pathway, while Table 8 summarises the HPLC methods used for quantification of SGs.

7.2.4. Mutagenic Effects

For the improvement of qualitative and quantitative traits, mutations have emerged as an alternative method. Induced mutations have been investigated for the purpose of developing better varieties with higher SG contents. One such mutagenic agent is gamma radiation, which, when applied at proper doses and exposure times, has been demonstrated to have a positive effect on SG content in in vitro studies [202]. Similarly, chemical mutagens like EMS (Ethyl Methane Sulfonate) significantly influenced the physiological and morphological traits of regenerated Stevia plants [204].

7.2.5. Physical Factors

Light

Light is an important factor that favours the development of chloroplast membranes, which is related to stevioside production [205]. The role of light was demonstrated in a study in which the synthesis of steviosides was increased in calli grown in light as compared to dark. In accordance with this, Yoneda, et al. [206] studied the impact of blue, red, and far-red light treatment and suggested that light quality can possibly influence SG accumulation and regulate its biosynthetic pathway. Blue light produced more concentrated SG content in leaves. Likewise, Calli cells exposed to blue, white, red, and red/blue light significantly affected the stevioside content [188].

Abiotic Stress (Drought and Salinity)

To enhance the production of SGs, drought and salinity stress have been used in several reports, some of which have been subsequently discussed in this section. Sodium salts sodium chloride and sodium carbonate (NaCl and Na2CO3) have been reported to have a positive impact on SG (ST and reb-A) production in callus and cell suspension culture; reb-A content was enhanced 1.6 and 3.4 times more than control on application of 0.10% NaCl and 0.025% Na2CO3, respectively [186]. Similarly, NaCl and proline have also been reported to increase stevioside and reb-A levels by up to 3.3 fold over control levels when supplemented in the medium for a period of four weeks [195]. Ghaheri, et al. [207] reported that stress reduces growth in Stevia, but recently a positive influence of stress-producing chemicals has been shown on SG content in in vitro cultures along with up-regulation of genes involved in its biosynthesis. Along with it, under salinity and drought conditions, up-regulation of a few genes (CMS, CMK, HDR, and UGT76G1) of the SG biosynthetic pathway has also been seen [208] (Figure 4).

7.2.6. Hairy Root Culture for Secondary Metabolite Production

Recently, hairy root (HR) cultures have gained immense attention for their ability to produce novel secondary metabolites in in vitro conditions due to their genetic stability, rapid growth, and easy maintenance [209,210,211]. Various protocols have been established for the initiation of hairy root cultures by inducing infection of Agrobacterium rhizogenes on leaf, stem, and internodal explants in Stevia [189,190]. Early reports, examining the production of SGs in hairy root cultures of Stevia, showed no production of metabolites in both light and dark conditions. The authors proposed that leaves, rather than roots, are the primary site for SG production, indicating the importance of plastids in SG production [154]. Further studies revealed that the presence of chlorophyll and light are not the sole factors regulating stevioside production in green hairy root cultures, but plastid and cytosolic pathway crosstalk and the cytosolic gene (UGT85C2) also play an important role [190]. Contrary to the prior report [154], few studies have revealed the presence of SG in hairy root cultures of Stevia [211]. On application of light or different osmotic stresses during HR cultures, redirection of the metabolic route to SG biosynthesis was observed along with the up-regulation of some UGT genes (UGT85C2, UGT74G1, and UGT76G1) and SG content depending on culture conditions [211].

7.3. Nanoparticles (NPs) Application for Secondary Metabolite Production

Owing to their small size, nanomaterials (NMs) possess dynamic chemical, physical, and mechanical properties, which make them more readily available to interact at the cellular level in plants even when given at very low concentrations. Many reports have indicated an increase in seed germination, biomass, chlorophyll content, secondary metabolite content, yield, productivity, and gene expression with the application of NPs [212,213]. There is increasing research on the use of NMs as elicitors for the enhancement of growth and important metabolites [212,213,214,215].
Several nanomaterial treatments have been used in Stevia to enhance biomass production and secondary metabolite production. Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have been reported to affect regeneration, total chlorophyll content, and secondary metabolites in Stevia. Bioaccumulation of AgNPs has been reported, and silver ion (Ag+) accumulation was observed in foliar tissues at high concentrations [216]. Stevia seedlings treated with commercially and naturally synthesised AgNPs (spray solution) showed an increase in the amount of glycosides. Synthesised AgNPs treatment enhanced stevioside and reb-A content more than commercial AgNPs, which was attributed to the size and morphology of NPs [129,191]. Javed, Zia, Yücesan and Gürel [129] suggested the use of capped and uncapped NPs for the production of metabolites on a large scale in shoot cultures of Stevia; the highest SG content was reported with Zinc Oxide-Polyethylene Glycol NPs (ZnO-PEG). The findings of Ghazal, Saif, Farid, Khan, Rehman, Reshma, Fazal, Ali, Ahmad and Rahman [118] showed an increase in biomass and secondary metabolite content in adventitious root cultures of Stevia on application of gold (Au) and copper (Cu) NPs. Golkar, Moradi and Garousi [114] studied the effect of salicylic acid (SA) and AgNPs on callus growth and SG content in MS medium. Titanium oxide (TiO2) NPs have also been found to positively affect stevioside production and photocatalytic properties when applied as a spray to potted plants [217].

7.4. Genetic Transformation Studies

Genetic transformation studies are carried out to yield transgenic plants with improved traits such as disease resistance, herbicide tolerance, improved tolerance to climatic conditions, and the production of phyochemicals via direct and indirect regeneration methods [218,219]. Although genetic transformation studies have proven to be a successful crop improvement method, in Stevia this method is still in its infancy [219].

7.4.1. Trait Improvement

In a report, two types of explants (nodal sections and callus) were used for the optimization of Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of the herbicide-resistant bar gene in Stevia. Nodal sections showed a higher regeneration response than callus explants. Further, various parameters like acetosyringone concentration, agrobacterium cell density, duration, co-cultivation medium, and shoot and root induction medium were also optimized. Higher transformation efficiency was achieved with nodal explants, but no significant difference was obtained in stevioside and reb-A content in transgenic plants with respect to mother plants [220,221]. The biolistic gene gun method has also been used to produce transgenic Stevia plants carrying bar genes [222]. Further, more studies need to be carried out for the optimization of genetic transformation and the molecular characterization of transformants in Stevia.

7.4.2. Characterization of SG Biosynthetic Genes and Elucidation of SG Biosynthetic Pathway Genes

Recently, an efficient Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation strategy was developed to elucidate the function of UGTs in the SG biosynthetic pathway. To understand the genetic regulation of SG biosynthesis, a gene silencing approach has been adopted in which Agrobacterium tumefaciens is used as a molecular vehicle to transform Stevia plants [223]. Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene silencing was also used for this purpose, and the results revealed the regulatory roles of the SrKA13H, SrUGT85C2, and SrUGT76G1 genes in the SG biosynthetic route [223].
For functional characterization of UGTs involved in SG production, agroinfiltration-based transient gene expression of UGT76G1 was done in Nicotiana benthamiana. The functionality of plant UGTs was evaluated directly from crude or plants expressing the protein [83].

7.4.3. Manipulation of SGs via Genetic Transformation

Transgenic Stevia plants were generated via direct regeneration through an Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transfer method. The successful insertion of T-DNA was confirmed by the GUS reporter gene. Due to random insertion of T-DNA, transgenic plant showed higher content of steviol while stevioside and reb-A content was lower than mother plant [218]. Further, an efficient Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation method was developed, which stated that prolonged dark incubation is critical for shoot regeneration [224]. The leading area in Stevia research is the development of plants with desirable taste profiles (higher reb-A content); therefore, various transformation studies have been carried out, including the overexpression of SG biosynthetic pathway genes [225,226]. Overexpression of 1-deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase 1 (SrDXS1) and kaurenoic acid hydroxylase (SrKAH) enhanced total content of SGs in transgenic plants by 42–54% and 67–88%, respectively [226]. Further, transgenic plants overexpressing UDP-glycosyltransferase 76G1 (SrUGT76G1) were generated. Transgenic plants showed a drastic increase in the reb-A to stevioside ratio (5.16 higher than control) without significant changes in the total SG content [226].
Table
Table 8. Techniques used for the extraction of steviol glycosides from Stevia rebaudiana.
Table 8. Techniques used for the extraction of steviol glycosides from Stevia rebaudiana.
TechniquePlant PartExtraction SolventAnalyserColumn/TLC PlateMobile PhaseElution/
Developer		Reference
ultrasonic-assistedleaves (dried)NADES 50 (lactic acid: glycerol: malic acid: glucose, 1:1:1:1) UHPLC-PDA [227]
OH-AWEleaves (dried)waterHPLC (Shimadzu® SPD-M20A)C18 columnacetone nitrite and deionized waterisocratic (50:50)[228]
ultrasonic-assistedleaves
(oven dried)		ethanol (60%)HPLC Eurosphere C-18water-methanol (90:10), acetonitrile and trifluoroacetic acid (65:35:0.01)isocratic[198]
sonicationleaves and stems (dried)methanolUHPLC (LC–MS Shimadzu, 2020 system, Kyoto, Japan)reverse phase C18 columnacetonitrile and waterisocratic (1:1)[197]
ultrasound with deep eutectic solventsleaves (dried)TEAC:EG with 10% waterHPTLC (Camag, Muttenz, Switzerland)silica gel glass Plate 60 Å F254ethyl acetate/methanol/acetic acid
(3:1:1)		acetic acid/sulfuric acid/absolute ethanol (1:1:10)[229]
heating and centrifugationdried callusethanol (70%)HPLCC18 columnmethanol and waterisocratic (70:30)[114]
pressurized hot waterleaves (dried)water (extraction cells)HPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA)C18 columnA (potassium dihydrogen phosphate), B (acetonitrile)gradient linear gradient (10–35% B-10 min),
constant ratio (65% A: 35% B-15 min)
linear gradient (35% to 75% B-10 min)
constant ratio (25% A: 75% B-15 min)
90% A: 10% B-2 min		[230]
heating and centrifugationlyophilized samplesethanol (70%)RP-HPLCC-18 reversed-phase columnacetonitrile and phosphateisocratic (32:68)[100]
RSLDEleaves (sun dried)waterHPLC-DAD (Waters, Milford, MA, USA)C18 columnwater (A) and 99acetonitrile (B)gradient
95–60% A, 0–20 min; 60% A, 20–25 min; 60–5% A, 25–30 min		[231]
sonicationleavesmethanolPlus HPLC (Thermo Scientific, Bremen,
Germany)		RP C18 columnwater (A) and acetonitrile (B)gradient
65A/35B-0 to 1 min
63A/27B-4 min
60A/40B-2.5 min
5A/95B-0.5 min and for 3 min
65A/35B-1 min		[103]
ultrasonic-assistedleaves (dried)ethanol (80%)HPLCsilica based aminopropyl bonded sorbent columnacetonitrile and waterisocratic (80:20 v/v)[232]
Abbreviations: NADES: Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents; UHPLC-PDA: Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography-PhotoDiode Array; OH-AWE: Ohmic Heating-Assisted Water Extraction; RSLDE: Rapid Solid-Liquid Dynamic Extraction; HPLC-DAD: High Performance Liquid Chromatography-PhotoDiode Array Detection; TEAC: tetraethylammonium chloride; EG: Ethylene glycol; HPTLC: High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography; RP: Reverse Phase.

7.5. Omics

Despite extensive research on the SG biosynthetic pathway, the characterization of genes involved in the underlying molecular mechanism is still in its infancy [233]. Various techniques, like microarrays and RNA-sequencing, have been deployed to understand transcriptome profiling in Stevia [233,234,235]. Using Illumina RNA-Seq technology, three different Stevia genotypes with varying reb and stv content were used to identify genes associated with SG biosynthesis. In total, 191,590,282 reads were generated, along with the procurement of 80,160 unigenes with an average length of 969 bp. Among them, 143 UDP-glucosyltransferase (UGT) unigenes were also identified [233].
A GC-MS profile of terpenoids in four types of tissue extracts from Stevia—leaves, flowers, roots, and stems—led to the identification of 60 volatile organic compounds in varied tissue-specific concentrations. Diterpenoids were found mainly in leaves and flowers, while sesquiterpenoids dominated the stems and roots. Further, with transcriptomics studies, four sesqui-terpene synthases (TPSs) and one mono-TSP were characterised that are involved in the production of major terpenoids. The genes showed tissue-specific occurrence; labdane-type diterpenoids, such as copalic acid, and copaiferic acid, and 8(17), 12-labda-diene-15,16-dial were found in flowers; copalic acid and copaiferic acid were produced in leaves; and more than 80% of total VOCs were detected in stems and roots [234].
In a recent study, the effect of nitrogen on Stevia growth and SG synthesis was determined through transcriptome analysis. Due to nitrogen deficiency, transcriptome reprogramming occurred in Stevia, which resulted in inhibition of plant growth and photosynthesis while increases in reb-A (49.97%), stevioside (46.64%), and reb-C (84.80%) content were observed. With the help of gene ontology and the Kyoto encyclopaedia, 535 differentially expressed genes were identified [236,237].
Not only nitrogen (N) but also its form affects terpenoid synthesis. In keep with this, the effects of two forms of N, ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3+−) were investigated to study their relationship with SG metabolism in Stevia leaves. The total SG content was higher in NO3+ fertilised plants as compared to NH4+ fertilised plants. Furthermore, NO3+− enhanced the content of reb-A bin pot and field conditions by 50.79% and 15.14%, respectively. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that NO3− up-regulated the terpenoid synthesis pathway, mediated by induction of transcription factors (TFs) that belonged to MYB and/or WRKY families. These TFs regulated the expression of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase (GGPPS) and ent-copalylpyrophosphate synthase (CPS) genes involved in terpene biosynthesis, thus enhancing SG content. As disclosed by MapMan analysis, expression of methylerythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway genes was enhanced in NO3+-fed Stevia plants [236,237].
Reb-D and Reb-M are second-generation sweeteners that are less bitter as compared to other SGs [84,87,238,239]. But are present in low concentration in Stevia leaves as compared to stevioside and reb-A [240]. Therefore, a study was conducted to explore the underlying mechanisms of reb-D and reb-M at the transcription level. Five Stevia varieties with different reb-D and reb-M contents were used for the de novo RNA-seq transcriptome. Out of the 131,655 assembled unigenes, 2186 DEGs were found to be potentially related to reb-D and reb-M biosynthesis. From these 2186 common DEGs pool, 106 putative transcription factors (TFs) were identified. Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) revealed 76 TFs that were closely related to reb-D and reb-M synthesis in Stevia leaves, with SCL14 and SCL33 in the centre of the network. Further, SCL14 and SCL33 TFs were well co–expressed with UGT76G2 and may contribute to reb-D and reb-M biosynthesis in Stevia leaves [238].
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play an important role in development and metabolism in plants. With the aid of deep sequencing and transcriptomics, small RNA (sRNA) libraries were constructed in Stevia. From this library, 30,472,534 reads representing 2,509,190 distinct sequences were obtained. Further, through sequence similarity and solexa sequencing of sRNAs, 34 conserved families of miRNA and 12 novel potential miRNAs were identified using previously discovered Stevia-expressed sequence tags [241]. Target prediction of these identified novel miRNAs was done using two target prediction web servers, psRNATarget and TAPIR. Using the Stevia transcript library, multiple targets were predicted for only eight novel miRNAs, which included mRNA encoding enzymes involved in the regulation of vital metabolic and signalling pathways [242]. Similarly, a potential miRNA belonging to the miR168 family was identified by assembling transcriptomic data from the Sequence Retrieval Archive (SRA) and assembling it into transcripts. As reported earlier, miRNA targeted mRNA involved in plant growth and metabolism [243].
NGS (next-generation sequencing) is mostly employed to determine genes associated with SG biosynthesis, but recently the role of flowering genes was elucidated using sequencing techniques. Transcriptomic libraries of two leaf samples of S. rebaudiana (MS007), BF (before flowering sample), and AF (after flowering sample) were generated and analysed. For functional gene annotation of Stevia, databases such as GeneOntology (GO), UniProt, GenBank, and Pfam were used. From transcriptome analysis, the involvement of pheophorbide A oxygenase (PAO), eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit E (TIF3E1), and jasmonate ZIM domain-containing protein 1 (JAZ1) was found to be associated with flowering development [244].

8. Conclusions

A comprehensive overview of the biotechnological interventions used in Stevia research pertaining to mass propagation, therapeutic properties, secondary metabolic pathway elucidation, and engineering has been presented in the current review. Despite extensive research on propagation and secondary metabolite elicitation in Stevia under both in vitro and in vivo conditions, studies pertaining to enhancement of its active component (steviol glycosides) through less invasive methods, including hairy root and suspension cultures, along with clonal regeneration through somatic embryogenesis, are comparatively scarce. Furthermore, bioreactor studies for steviol glycosides mass production and downstream processing methods for maximum recovery are biotechnological domains that have not been fully explored, which is a pre-requisite for the establishment of industrial scale reactor systems for bulk biosynthesis of plant based important bioactive compounds. A wide range of elicitation studies have been carried out for enhancing steviol glycoside content, yet the knowledge of the interaction of elicitors with plants is still evolving, and thus studies using an integrated omics approach need to be done. Further, studies directed towards elucidating molecular mechanisms associated with various physiological and metabolic processes could not only pave the way for molecular transformation and Crispr Cas 9-based gene manipulations but will also open some novel gateways for producing high-yielding varieties of Stevia.

Author Contributions

S.S., S.G. and R.J. contributed to the writing and editing of the paper. Illustrations and tables were created by S.S., S.G. and D.K. The manuscript has been proof-read by S.L.K. and S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This review work was supported by the Government of Rajasthan, Department of Science and Technology (DST) Project No. DST/BTR and D/ EAC 2018.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

S.S. and S.K. would like to acknowledge the University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, for providing basic infrastructure facilities. S.S., D.K. and S.K. (Sumita Kachhwaha) would also like to thank the Government of Rajasthan, DST and Ministry of human resource development, Department of higher education, Government of India for the RUSA 2.0 programme (Thematic Project III). S.S. acknowledges the University Grants Commission, New Delhi for senior research fellowship. All individuals included in this section have consented to the acknowledgements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Geuns, J.M.J.P. Stevioside. Phytochemistry 2003, 64, 913–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Strauss, S.J.T.R. The perfect sweetener. Technol. Rev. 1995, 98, 18–20. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tadhani, M.B.; Subhash, R. In vitro antimicrobial activity of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni leaves. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2006, 5, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Hossain, M.; Islam, M.; Islam, M.; Akhtar, S. Cultivation and uses of stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni): A review. Afr. J. Food Agric. Nutr. Dev. 2017, 17, 12745–12757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schiatti-Sisó, I.P.; Quintana, S.E.; García-Zapateiro, L.A. Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana) as a common sugar substitute and its application in food matrices: An updated review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Marcinek, K.; Krejpcio, Z. Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni: Health promoting properties and therapeutic applications. J. Consum. Prot. Food Saf. 2016, 11, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Anton, S.D.; Martin, C.K.; Han, H.; Coulon, S.; Cefalu, W.T.; Geiselman, P.; Williamson, D.A. Effects of stevia, aspartame, and sucrose on food intake, satiety, and postprandial glucose and insulin levels. Appetite 2010, 55, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Sunitha, V.; Wilsy, J.; Reginold, M. Antibacterial activity in medicinal plant (Stevia rebaudiana) using two solvents. Int. J. Rec. Scien. Res. 2015, 6, 5070–5071. [Google Scholar]
  9. Shukla, S.; Mehta, A.; Mehta, P.; Bajpai, V. Antioxidant ability and total phenolic content of aqueous leaf extract of Stevia rebaudiana Bert. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2012, 64, 807–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kedik, S.; Yartsev, E.; Stanishevskaya, I. Antiviral activity of dried extract of Stevia. Pharm. Chem. J. 2009, 43, 198–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, T.; Guo, M.; Song, X.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, H.; Wang, W.; Fu, Y.; Cao, Y.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, N. Stevioside plays an anti-inflammatory role by regulating the NF-κB and MAPK pathways in S. aureus-infected mouse mammary glands. Inflammation 2014, 37, 1837–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jain, P.; Kachhwaha, S.; Kothari, S. Improved micropropagation protocol and enhancement in biomass and chlorophyll content in Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.) Bertoni by using high copper levels in the culture medium. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 119, 315–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Aria, M.; Cuccurullo, C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr. 2017, 11, 959–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Soejarto, D.D. Botany of Stevia and Stevia rebaudiana. In Stevia: The Genus Stevia, 1st ed.; Kinghorn, A.D., Ed.; Taylor & Francis Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 18–39. ISBN 978-0-4292-1748-7. [Google Scholar]
  15. Soejarto, D.D.; Kinghorn, A.D.; Farnsworth, N.R. Potential sweetening agents of plant origin. III. Organoleptic evaluation of Stevia leaf herbarium samples for sweetness. J. Nat. Prod. 1982, 45, 590–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yadav, A.K.; Singh, S.; Dhyani, D.; Ahuja, P.S. A review on the improvement of stevia [Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni)]. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2011, 91, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tropicos.org Missouri Botanical Garden. Available online: https://tropicos.org (accessed on 18 December 2022).
  18. Robinson, B. Observations on the genus Stevia. Contrib. Gray Herb. Harv. Univ. 1930, 36–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Brandle, J.; Telmer, P.J.P. Steviol glycoside biosynthesis. Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 1855–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hossain, M.A.; Siddique, A.; Rahman, S.M.; Hossain, M.J. Chemical composition of the essential oils of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni leaves. Arab. J. Chem. 2010, 5, 56–61. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gardana, C.; Simonetti, P.; Canzi, E.; Zanchi, R.; Pietta, P. etabolism of stevioside and rebaudioside A from Stevia rebaudiana extracts by human microflora. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 6618–6622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Singh, D.; Kumari, M.; Prakash, H.; Rao, G.; Solomon, S. Phytochemical and pharmacological importance of stevia: A calorie-free natural sweetener. Sugar Tech 2019, 21, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Valio, I.; Rocha, R. Effect of photoperiod and growth regulator on growth and flowering of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Jpn. J. Crop. Sci. 1977, 46, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Chalapathi, M.; Thimmegowda, S.; Sridhara, S.; Ramakrishna Parama, V.; Prasad, T. Natural non-calorie sweetener stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni)-A future crop of India. Crop. Res. Hisar 1997, 14, 347–350. [Google Scholar]
  25. Huxley, A.; Griffiths, M.; Levy, M. The new RHS dictionary of gardening. In Royal Horticultural Society; MacMillan Press: London, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  26. Singh, S.; Rao, G. Stevia: The herbal sugar of 21st century. Sugar Tech. 2005, 7, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dwivedi, R. Unnurtured and untapped super sweet nonsacchariferous plant species in India. Curr. Sci. 1999, 76, 1454–1461. [Google Scholar]
  28. Marsolais, A.A.; Brandle, J.; Sys, E.A. Stevia Plant NamedRSIT 94-751. U.S. Patent Application 08/657,463, 18 August 1998. [Google Scholar]
  29. Jeppesen, P.B.; Gregersen, S.; Alstrup, K.; Hermansen, K.J.P. Stevioside induces antihyperglycaemic, insulinotropic and glucagonostatic effects in vivo: Studies in the diabetic Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rats. Phytomedicine 2002, 9, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Abudula, R.; Jeppesen, P.B.; Rolfsen, S.E.D.; Xiao, J.; Hermansen, K. Rebaudioside A potently stimulates insulin secretion from isolated mouse islets: Studies on the dose-, glucose-, and calcium-dependency. Metabolism 2004, 53, 1378–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, J.; Jeppesen, P.B.; Nordentoft, I.; Hermansen, K.J.M. Stevioside counteracts the glyburide-induced desensitization of the pancreatic beta-cell function in mice: Studies in vitro. Metabolism 2006, 55, 1674–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Assaei, R.; Mokarram, P.; Dastghaib, S.; Darbandi, S.; Darbandi, M.; Zal, F.; Akmali, M.; Omrani, G. Hypoglycemic effect of aquatic extract of Stevia in pancreas of diabetic rats: PPARγ-dependent regulation or antioxidant potential. Avicenna J. Med. Biotechnol. 2016, 8, 65. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bhasker, S.; Madhav, H.; Chinnamma, M.J.P. Molecular evidence of insulinomimetic property exhibited by steviol and stevioside in diabetes induced L6 and 3T3L1 cells. Phytomedicine 2015, 22, 1037–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ahmad, U.; Ahmad, R. Anti diabetic property of aqueous extract of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni leaves in Streptozotocin-induced diabetes in albino rats. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 18, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Gu, W.; Rebsdorf, A.; Anker, C.; Gregersen, S.; Hermansen, K.; Geuns, J.M.; Jeppesen, P.B. Steviol glucuronide, a metabolite of steviol glycosides, potently stimulates insulin secretion from isolated mouse islets: Studies in vitro. Endocrinol. Diabetes Metab. 2019, 2, e00093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Abdel-Aal, R.A.; Abdel-Rahman, M.S.; Al Bayoumi, S.; Ali, L. Effect of stevia aqueous extract on the antidiabetic activity of saxagliptin in diabetic rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 265, 113188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bugliani, M.; Tavarini, S.; Grano, F.; Tondi, S.; Lacerenza, S.; Giusti, L.; Ronci, M.; Maidecchi, A.; Marchetti, P.; Tesi, M. Protective effects of Stevia rebaudiana extracts on beta cells in lipotoxic conditions. Acta Diabetol. 2022, 59, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Jeppesen, P.; Gregersen, S.; Rolfsen, S.; Jepsen, M.; Colombo, M.; Agger, A.; Xiao, J.; Kruhøffer, M.; Ørntoft, T.; Hermansen, K.J.M. Antihyperglycemic and blood pressure-reducing effects of stevioside in the diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rat. Metabolism 2003, 52, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Gregersen, S.; Jeppesen, P.B.; Holst, J.J.; Hermansen, K.J.M. Antihyperglycemic effects of stevioside in type 2 diabetic subjects. Metabolism 2004, 53, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chowdhury, A.I.; Rahanur Alam, M.; Raihan, M.M.; Rahman, T.; Islam, S.; Halima, O. Effect of stevia leaves (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni) on diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 10, 2868–2878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chan, P.; Xu, D.-Y.; Liu, J.-C.; Chen, Y.-J.; Tomlinson, B.; Huang, W.-P.; Cheng, J.-T. The effect of stevioside on blood pressure and plasma catecholamines in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Life Sci. 1998, 63, 1679–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chan, P.; Tomlinson, B.; Chen, Y.J.; Liu, J.C.; Hsieh, M.H.; Cheng, J.T. A double-blind placebo-controlled study of the effectiveness and tolerability of oral stevioside in human hypertension. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2000, 50, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Hsieh, M.-H.; Chan, P.; Sue, Y.-M.; Liu, J.-C.; Liang, T.H.; Huang, T.-Y.; Tomlinson, B.; Chow, M.S.S.; Kao, P.-F.; Chen, Y.-J. Efficacy and tolerability of oral stevioside in patients with mild essential hypertension: A two-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Clin. Ther. 2003, 25, 2797–2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Ferri, L.J.; Alves-Do-Prado, W.; Yamada, S.S.; Gazola, S.; Batista, M.R.; Bazotte, R.B. Investigation of the antihypertensive effect of oral crude stevioside in patients with mild essential hypertension. Phytother. Res. 2006, 20, 732–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Carrera-Lanestosa, A.; Acevedo-Fernandez, J.J.; Segura-Campos, M.R.; Velazquez-Martinez, R.; Moguel-Ordonez, Y. Antihypertensive, antihyperglycemic, and antioxidant effects of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni (creole variety INIFAP C01) extracts on Wistar rats with induced metabolic syndrome. Nutr. Hosp. 2020, 37, 730–741. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Villegas Vílchez, L.F.; Ascencios, J.H.; Dooley, T.P. GlucoMedix®, an extract of Stevia rebaudiana and Uncaria tomentosa, reduces hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension in rat models without toxicity: A treatment for metabolic syndrome. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2022, 22, 62. [Google Scholar]
  47. Melis, M.; Sainati, A. Effect of calcium and verapamil on renal function of rats during treatment with stevioside. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1991, 33, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Melis, M.; Rocha, S.; Augusto, A. Steviol effect, a glycoside of Stevia rebaudiana, on glucose clearances in rats. Braz. J. Biol. 2009, 69, 371–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Ruiz-Ruiz, J.C.; Moguel-Ordoñez, Y.B.; Segura-Campos, M.R. Biological activity of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni and their relationship to health. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 2680–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Toyoda, K.; Matsui, H.; Shoda, T.; Uneyama, C.; Takada, K.; Takahashi, M.J.F.; Toxicology, C. Assessment of the carcinogenicity of stevioside in F344 rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1997, 35, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Paul, S.; Sengupta, S.; Bandyopadhyay, T.; Bhattacharyya, A.J.N. Stevioside induced ROS-mediated apoptosis through mitochondrial pathway in human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. Nutr. Cancer 2012, 64, 1087–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ukiya, M.; Sawada, S.; Kikuchi, T.; Kushi, Y.; Fukatsu, M.; Akihisa, T. Cytotoxic and apoptosis-inducing activities of steviol and isosteviol derivatives against human cancer cell lines. Chem. Biodivers. 2013, 10, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gupta, E.; Kaushik, S.; Purwar, S.; Sharma, R.; Balapure, A.K.; Sundaram, S.J. Anticancer potential of steviol in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2017, 13, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Chen, J.; Xia, Y.; Sui, X.; Peng, Q.; Zhang, T.; Li, J.; Zhang, J. Steviol, a natural product inhibits proliferation of the gastrointestinal cancer cells intensively. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 26299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. López, V.; Pérez, S.; Vinuesa, A.; Zorzetto, C.; Abian, O. Stevia rebaudiana ethanolic extract exerts better antioxidant properties and antiproliferative effects in tumour cells than its diterpene glycoside stevioside. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 2107–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ibrahem, E.S.; Ragheb, E.M.; Yousef, F.M.; Abdel-Azizand, M.F.; Alghamdi, B.A. Nutritional Value, Cytotoxic and Antimicrobial Activities of Stevia rebaudiana Leaf Extracts. J. Biochem. Technol. 2020, 11, 108–115. [Google Scholar]
  57. Jayaraman, S.; Manoharan, M.S.; Illanchezian, S.J. In-vitro antimicrobial and antitumor activities of Stevia rebaudiana (Asteraceae) leaf extracts. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2008, 7, 1143–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Iatridis, N.; Kougioumtzi, A.; Vlataki, K.; Papadaki, S.; Magklara, A. Anti-Cancer Properties of Stevia rebaudiana; More than a Sweetener. Molecules 2022, 27, 1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Bibi, S.; Sarwar, S.; Sabir, M.; Nisa, S.; Khan, T. Antimicrobial potential of Stevia rebaudiana leaves extract against selected bacterial and fungal strains. J. Adv. Nutr. Sci. Technol. 2021, 1, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gamboa, F.; Chaves, M. Antimicrobial potential of extracts from Stevia rebaudiana leaves against bacteria of importance in dental caries. Acta Odontol Lat. 2012, 25, 171–175. [Google Scholar]
  61. Singh, S.; Garg, V.; Yadav, D.; Beg, M.N.; Sharma, N.; Sciences, P. In vitro antioxidative and antibacterial activities of various parts of Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni). Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 4, 468–473. [Google Scholar]
  62. Lemus-Mondaca, R.; Vega-Gálvez, A.; Rojas, P.; Stucken, K.; Delporte, C.; Valenzuela-Barra, G.; Jagus, R.J.; Agüero, M.V.; Pasten, A.J.; Plants, A. Antioxidant, antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory potential of Stevia rebaudiana leaves: Effect of different drying methods. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2018, 11, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kant, R. Sweet proteins–potential replacement for artificial low calorie sweeteners. Nutr. J. 2005, 4, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Yadav, S.K.; Guleria, P.J. Steviol glycosides from Stevia: Biosynthesis pathway review and their application in foods and medicine. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 52, 988–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ribeiro, M.N.; Rodrigues, D.M.; Rocha, R.A.R.; Silveira, L.R.; Condino, J.P.F.; Júnior, A.C.; de Souza, V.R.; Nunes, C.A.; Pinheiro, A.C. Optimising a stevia mix by mixture design and napping: A case study with high protein plain yoghurt. Int. Dairy J. 2020, 110, 104802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Savita, S.; Sheela, K.; Sunanda, S.; Shankar, A.; Ramakrishna, P. Stevia rebaudiana–A functional component for food industry. J. Hum. Ecol. 2004, 15, 261–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gasmalla, M.A.A.; Yang, R.; Amadou, I.; Hua, X. Nutritional composition of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni leaf: Effect of drying method. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2014, 13, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Goyal, S.K.; Samsher, N.; Goyal, R.K. Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana) a bio-sweetener: A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2010, 61, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  69. Koyama, E.; Kitazawa, K.; Ohori, Y.; Izawa, O.; Kakegawa, K.; Fujino, A.; Ui, M. In vitro metabolism of the glycosidic sweeteners, stevia mixture and enzymatically modified stevia in human intestinal microflora. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2003, 41, 359–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Putnik, P.; Bezuk, I.; Barba, F.J.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Polunić, I.; Bursać, D.K. Sugar reduction: Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni as a natural sweetener. In Agri-Food Industry Strategies for Healthy Diets and Sustainability; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2020; pp. 123–152. [Google Scholar]
  71. Prakash, I.; DuBois, G.; Clos, J.; Wilkens, K.; Fosdick, L.J.F.; Toxicology, C. Development of rebiana, a natural, non-caloric sweetener. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, S75–S82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jain, P.; Kachhwaha, S.; Kothari, S.; Research, P. Biotechnology and metabolic engineering of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.) Bertoni: Perspective and possibilities. Int. J. Life Sci. Biotechnol. Pharma Res. 2014, 3, 15. [Google Scholar]
  73. Geuns, J.M. Safety evaluation of Stevia and stevioside. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 2002, 27, 299–319. [Google Scholar]
  74. Geuns, J.M. Safety of stevia and stevioside. Recent Res. Dev. Phytochem. 2000, 4, 75–88. [Google Scholar]
  75. Huxtable, R. Pharmacology and Toxicology of Stevioside, Rebaudioside A, and Steviol. Stevia: The Genus Stevia; Taylor and Francis: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  76. Rajab, R.; Mohankumar, C.; Murugan, K.; Harish, M.; Mohanan, P. Purification and toxicity studies of stevioside from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Toxicol. Int. 2009, 16, 49. [Google Scholar]
  77. Yodyingyuad, V.; Bunyawong, S. Effect of stevioside on growth and reproduction. Hum. Reprod. 1991, 6, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Mori, N.; Sakanoue, M.; Takeuchi, M.; Shimpo, K.; Tanabe, T. Effect of stevioside on fertility in rats [a sweet principle of Stevia rebaudiana bertoni, diet]. Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi. J. Food Hyg. Soc. Jpn. 1981, 22, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Purkayastha, S.; Markosyan, A.; Prakash, I.; Bhusari, S.; Pugh, G., Jr.; Lynch, B.; Roberts, A. Steviol glycosides in purified stevia leaf extract sharing the same metabolic fate. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2016, 77, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Additives, E.; Journal, N. Scientific opinion on the safety of steviol glycosides for the proposed uses as a food additive. EFSA J. 2010, 8, 1537. [Google Scholar]
  81. FAO; WHO. Evaluation of Certain Food Additives Eighty-Seventh Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 1020. [Google Scholar]
  82. Bondarev, N.; Sukhanova, M.; Reshetnyak, O.; Nosov, A. Steviol glycoside content in different organs of Stevia rebaudiana and its dynamics during ontogeny. Biol. Plant. 2003, 47, 261–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Petit, E.; Berger, M.; Camborde, L.; Vallejo, V.; Daydé, J.; Jacques, A. Development of screening methods for functional characterization of UGTs from Stevia rebaudiana. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ceunen, S.; Geuns, J. Spatio-temporal variation of the diterpene steviol in Stevia rebaudiana grown under different photoperiods. Phytochemistry 2013, 89, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kinghorn, A.D.; Soejarto, D.; Nanayakkara, N.; Compadre, C.; Makapugay, H.; Hovanec-Brown, J.; Medon, P.; Kamath, S. A phytochemical screening procedure for sweet ent-kaurene glycosides in the genus Stevia. J. Nat. Prod. 1984, 47, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhou, X.; Gong, M.; Lv, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Du, G.; Liu, L. Metabolic engineering for the synthesis of steviol glycosides: Current status and future prospects. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 5367–5381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hellfritsch, C.; Brockhoff, A.; Stähler, F.; Meyerhof, W.; Hofmann, T. Human psychometric and taste receptor responses to steviol glycosides. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 6782–6793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Totté, N.; Charon, L.; Rohmer, M.; Compernolle, F.; Baboeuf, I.; Geuns, J. Biosynthesis of the diterpenoid steviol, an ent-kaurene derivative from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni, via the methylerythritol phosphate pathway (vol 41, pg 6407, 2000). Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 7595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wanke, M.; Skorupinska-Tudek, K.; Swiezewska, E. Isoprenoid biosynthesis via 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate/2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate (DOXP/MEP) pathway. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2001, 48, 663–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. McGarvey, D.J.; Croteau, R.J. Terpenoid metabolism. Plant Cell. 1995, 7, 1015. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Humphrey, T.V.; Richman, A.S.; Menassa, R.; Brandle, J.E. Spatial organisation of four enzymes from Stevia rebaudiana that are involved in steviol glycoside synthesis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 61, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kim, K.K.; Sawa, Y.; Shibata, H. Hydroxylation ofent-Kaurenoic Acid to Steviol in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni—Purification and Partial Characterization of the Enzyme. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1996, 332, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Richman, A.; Swanson, A.; Humphrey, T.; Chapman, R.; McGarvey, B.; Pocs, R.; Brandle, J. Functional genomics uncovers three glucosyltransferases involved in the synthesis of the major sweet glucosides of Stevia rebaudiana. Plant J. 2005, 41, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Olsson, K.; Carlsen, S.; Semmler, A.; Simón, E.; Mikkelsen, M.D.; Møller, B.L. Microbial production of next-generation stevia sweeteners. Microb. Cell. Factories 2016, 15, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Wang, J.; Hou, B. Glycosyltransferases: Key players involved in the modification of plant secondary metabolites. Front. Biol. China 2009, 4, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Brandle, J.; Rosa, N. Heritability for yield, leaf: Stem ratio and stevioside content estimated from a landrace cultivar of Stevia rebaudiana. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1992, 72, 1263–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Oviedo-Pereira, D.G.; López-Meyer, M.; Evangelista-Lozano, S.; Sarmiento-López, L.G.; Sepúlveda-Jiménez, G.; Rodríguez-Monroy, M.J. Enhanced specialized metabolite, trichome density, and biosynthetic gene expression in Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) Bertoni plants inoculated with endophytic bacteria Enterobacter hormaechei. PeerJ 2022, 10, e13675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Chalapathi, M.; Thimmegowda, S.; Devakumar, N.; Chandraprakash, J.; Eswar Rao, G. Vegetative propagation of stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni) under field conditions. J. Trop. Agric. 1999, 18, 319–320. [Google Scholar]
  99. Tuleja, M.; Santocki, M.; Dziurka, M.; Musiał, K.; Capecka, E.; Libik-Konieczny, M. The search towards cyto-embryological and physiological obstacles in sexual reproduction of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 288, 110342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lucho, S.R.; do Amaral, M.N.; Milech, C.; Ferrer, M.Á.; Calderón, A.A.; Bianchi, V.J.; Braga, E.J. Elicitor-induced transcriptional changes of genes of the steviol glycoside biosynthesis pathway in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 37, 971–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kahrizi, D.; Ghaheri, M.; Yari, Z.; Yari, K.; Bahraminejad, S.J.C.; Biology, M. Investigation of different concentrations of MS media effects on gene expression and steviol glycosides accumulation in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2018, 64, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Álvarez-Robles, M.J.; López-Orenes, A.; Ferrer, M.A.; Calderón, A.A. Methanol elicits the accumulation of bioactive steviol glycosides and phenolics in Stevia rebaudiana shoot cultures. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2016, 87, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Bayraktar, M.; Naziri, E.; Akgun, I.H.; Karabey, F.; Ilhan, E.; Akyol, B.; Bedir, E.; Gurel, A. Elicitor induced stevioside production, in vitro shoot growth, and biomass accumulation in micropropagated Stevia rebaudiana. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2016, 127, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Teixeira da Silva, J.A.; Zeng, S.; Godoy-Hernández, G.; Rivera-Madrid, R.; Dobránszki, J. Bixa orellana L.(achiote) tissue culture: A review. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2019, 55, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Tamura, Y.; Nakamura, S.; Fukui, H.; Tabata, M. Comparison of Stevia plants grown from seeds, cuttings and stem-tip cultures for growth and sweet diterpene glucosides. Plant Cell Rep. 1984, 3, 180–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hassanen, S.A.; Khalil, R.M. Biotechnological studies for improving of stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni) in vitro plantlets. Middle East J. Sci. Res. 2013, 14, 93–106. [Google Scholar]
  107. Hwang, S. Rapidin Vitro propagation and enhanced stevioside accumulation in Stevia rebaudiana Bert. J. Plant Biol. 2006, 49, 267–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ahmed, M.; Salahin, M.; Karim, R.; Razvy, M.; Hannan, M.; Sultana, R.; Hossain, M.; Islam, R. An efficient method for in vitro clonal propagation of a newly introduced sweetener plant (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni.) in Bangladesh. Am.-Eurasian J. Sci. Res. 2007, 2, 121–125. [Google Scholar]
  109. Modi, A.R.; Patil, G.; Kumar, N.; Singh, A.S.; Subhash, N. A simple and efficient in vitro mass multiplication procedure for Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni and analysis of genetic fidelity of in vitro raised plants through RAPD. Sugar Tech. 2012, 14, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Blinstrubienė, A.; Burbulis, N.; Juškevičiūtė, N.; Žūkienė, R. Factors affecting organogenesis of Stevia rebaudiana and in vitro accumulation of steviol glycosides. Zemdirb.-Agric. 2020, 107, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Uddin, M.S.; Chowdhury, M.S.; Khan, M.M.; Uddin, M.B.; Ahmed, R.; Baten, M.J. In vitro propagation of Stevia rebaudiana Bert in Bangladesh. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 5, 1238–1240. [Google Scholar]
  112. Patel, R.; Shah, R. Regeneration of Stevia plant through callus culture. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 71, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Gupta, P.; Sharma, S.; Saxena, S.; Sciences, B. Callusing in Stevia rebaudiana (natural sweetener) for steviol glycoside production. Int. J. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010, 1, 30–34. [Google Scholar]
  114. Golkar, P.; Moradi, M.; Garousi, G. Elicitation of stevia glycosides using salicylic acid and silver nanoparticles under callus culture. Sugar Tech. 2019, 21, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kumari, M.; Chandra, S. Stevioside glycosides from in vitro cultures of Stevia rebaudiana and antimicrobial assay. Braz. J. Bot. 2015, 38, 761–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Akbari, F.; Arminian, A.; Kahrizi, D.; Fazeli, A.; Biology, M. Effect of nitrogen sources on some morphological characteristics of in vitro Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2017, 63, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Ahmad, N.; Fazal, H.; Zamir, R.; Khalil, S.A.; Abbasi, B.H. Callogenesis and shoot organogenesis from flowers of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.). Sugar Tech. 2011, 13, 174–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ghazal, B.; Saif, S.; Farid, K.; Khan, A.; Rehman, S.; Reshma, A.; Fazal, H.; Ali, M.; Ahmad, A.; Rahman, L. Stimulation of secondary metabolites by copper and gold nanoparticles in submerge adventitious root cultures of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.). IET Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 12, 569–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Flachsland, E.; Mroginski, L.; Davina, J. Regeneration of plants from anthers of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni (Compositae) cultivated in vitro. Biocell 1996, 20, 87–90. [Google Scholar]
  120. Uskutoğlu, T.; Uskutoğlu, D.; Turgut, K. Effects on pre-treatment and different tissue culture media for androgenesis in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Sugar Tech. 2019, 21, 1016–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Giridhar, P.; Sowmya, K.S.; Ramakrishna, A.; Ravishankar, G. Rapid clonal propagation and stevioside profiles of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Int. J. Plant Dev. Biol. 2010, 4, 47–52. [Google Scholar]
  122. Sivaram, L.; Mukundan, U.; Biology-Plant, D. In vitro culture studies on Stevia rebaudiana. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2003, 39, 520–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Anbazhagan, M.; Kalpana, M.; Rajendran, R.; Natarajan, V.; Dhanavel, D. In vitro production of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2010, 22, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Laribi, B.; Rouatbi, N.; Kouki, K.; Bettaieb, T. In vitro propagation of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.)-A non caloric sweetener and antidiabetic medicinal plant. Int. J. Med. Aromat. Plants 2012, 2, 333–339. [Google Scholar]
  125. Yadav, A.; Poonia, A.K.; Kajla, S. Rapid regeneration and molecular assessment of genetic stability using RAPD markers in stevia. Indian J. Hortic. 2016, 73, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Singh, P.; Dwivedi, P.; Atri, N. In vitro shoot multiplication of Stevia and assessment of stevioside content and genetic fidelity of the regenerants. Sugar Tech. 2014, 16, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Yücesan, B.; Mohammed, A.; Büyükgöçmen, R.; Altuğ, C.; Kavas, Ö.; Gürel, S.; Gürel, E. In vitro and ex vitro propagation of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni with high Rebaudioside-A content—A commercial scale application. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 203, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Röck-Okuyucu, B.; Bayraktar, M.; Akgun, I.H.; Gurel, A. Plant growth regulator effects on in vitro propagation and stevioside production in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Hortscience 2016, 51, 1573–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Javed, R.; Zia, M.; Yücesan, B.; Gürel, E. Abiotic stress of ZnO-PEG, ZnO-PVP, CuO-PEG and CuO-PVP nanoparticles enhance growth, sweetener compounds and antioxidant activities in shoots of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2017, 11, 898–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kaplan, B.; Turgut, K. Improvement of rebaudioside A diterpene glycoside content in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni using clone selection. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2019, 43, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Ashrafi, K.; Iqrar, S.; Saifi, M.; Khan, S.; Qamar, F.; Quadri, S.N.; Mishra, A.; Abdin, M.Z. Influence of Plant Growth Regulators on Glandular Trichome Density and Steviol Glycosides Accumulation in Stevia rebaudiana. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 30967–30977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Sichanova, M.; Geneva, M.; Petrova, M.; Miladinova-Georgieva, K.; Kirova, E.; Nedev, T.; Tsekova, D.; Iwanov, I.; Dochev, K.; Ivanova, V.; et al. Improvement of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni In Vitro Propagation and Steviol Glycoside Content Using Aminoacid Silver Nanofibers. Plants 2022, 11, 2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Shulgina, A.A.; Kalashnikova, E.A.; Tarakanov, I.G.; Kirakosyan, R.N.; Cherednichenko, M.Y.; Polivanova, O.B.; Baranova, E.N.; Khaliluev, M.R. Influence of light conditions and medium composition on morphophysiological characteristics of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni in vitro and in vivo. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. TANG, C.; Lamasudin, D.U.; Abdullah, W.; Moo, C.-L. Enhanced in vitro Shoot Regeneration and Biochemical Properties of Stevia rebaudiana using Chitosan. Sains Malays. 2021, 50, 667–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Asmono, S.L. In Vitro Regeneration of Stevia Rebaudiana Bertoni from internode and leaf explants using different concentrations of BAP (6-Benzyl Amino Purine). In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Bali, Indonesia, 2–3 November 2019; p. 012004. [Google Scholar]
  136. Hilo, B.R.; Hussain, N.H.; Khaleel, S.A.; Hullo, B. Effect of some growth regulators on glycosides leaf content of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni in vitro. Plant Arch. 2020, 20, 1715–1720. [Google Scholar]
  137. Javed, M.A.; Habib, I.; Jamil, M.W.; Anwer, M.J.; Nazir, S.; Iqbal, M.Z. Protocol optimization for efficient in vitro micro-propagation of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Adv. Life Sci. 2019, 6, 100–105. [Google Scholar]
  138. Kaplan, B.; Duraklioglu, S.; Turgut, K. Sustainable micropropagation of selected Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni genotypes. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2019, 18, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Khan, A.; Jayanthi, M.; Gantasala, N.P.; Bhooshan, N.; Uma, R. A rapid and efficient protocol for in vitro multiplication of genetically uniform Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni). Experiment 2016, 54, 477–481. [Google Scholar]
  140. Modi, A.R.; Sharma, V.; Patil, G.; Singh, A.S.; Subhash, N.; Kumar, N. Micropropagation and biomass production of true-to-type Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. In Protocols for In Vitro Cultures and Secondary Metabolite Analysis of Aromatic and Medicinal Plants, 2nd ed.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 113–123. ISBN 9781-1-4939-3332-7. [Google Scholar]
  141. Pradhan, N.; Dwivedi, P. In vitro shoot multiplication of Stevia rebaudiana, an important plant with high economic and medicinal values. Vegetos 2016, 102, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Yücesan, B.; Büyükgöçmen, R.; Mohammed, A.; Sameeullah, M.; Altuğ, C.; Gürel, S.; Gürel, E. An efficient regeneration system and steviol glycoside analysis of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni, a source of natural high-intensity sweetener. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2016, 52, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Peixe, A.; Calado, J.; Carlos, R. A one-step procedure for in vitro micropropagation of Stevia (Stevia Rebaudiana Bertoni). In Proceedings of the VIII International Symposium on In Vitro Culture and Horticultural Breeding, Coimbra, Portugal, 2–7 June 2013; Volume 1083, pp. 295–301. [Google Scholar]
  144. Kundu, S.; Dey, A.; Bandyopadhyay, A. Stimulation of in vitro morphogenesis, antioxidant activity and over expression of kaurenoic acid 13-hydroxylase gene in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni by chlorocholine chloride. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2014, 36, 2683–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Soliman, H.I.A.; Metwali, E.M.R.; Almaghrabi, O.A.-H. Micropropagation of Stevia rebaudiana Betroni and assessment of genetic stability of in vitro regenerated plants using inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) marker. Plant Biotechnol. 2014, 31, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Thiyagarajan, M.; Venkatachalam, P. Large scale in vitro propagation of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert) for commercial application: Pharmaceutically important and antidiabetic medicinal herb. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2012, 37, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Shatnawi, M.; Shibli, R.; Abu-Romman, S.; Al-Mazra, M.; Al Ajlouni, Z.; Shatanawi, A.; Odeh, W. Clonal propagation and cryogenic storage of the medicinal plant Stevia rebaudiana. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 9, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Pratibha, G.; Satyawati, S.; Sanjay, S. Micropropagation of Stevia rebaudiana (natural sweetener) using kinetin for Steviol glycoside production. Res. J. Biotech. 2010, 5, 63–67. [Google Scholar]
  149. Jena, A.K.; Panda, M.K.; Nayak, S.J. Effect of phytoregulators on in vitro mass propagation of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Int. J. Integr. Biol. 2009, 8, 56–59. [Google Scholar]
  150. Sairkar, P.; Chandravanshi, M.; Shukla, N.; Mehrotra, N. Mass production of an economically important medicinal plant Stevia rebaudiana using in vitro propagation techniques. J. Med. Plants Res. 2009, 3, 266–270. [Google Scholar]
  151. Sreedhar, R.; Venkatachalam, L.; Thimmaraju, R.; Bhagyalakshmi, N.; Narayan, M.; Ravishankar, G. Direct organogenesis from leaf explants of Stevia rebaudiana and cultivation in bioreactor. Biol. Plant. 2008, 52, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Mitra, A.; Pal, A. In vitro regeneration of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert) from the nodal explant. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2007, 16, 59–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Gantait, S.; Das, A.; Mandal, N. Stevia: A comprehensive review on ethnopharmacological properties and in vitro regeneration. Sugar Tech. 2015, 17, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Yamazaki, T.; Flores, H.E.; Shimomura, K.; Yoshihira, K. Examination of steviol glucosides production by hairy root and shoot cultures of Stevia rebaudiana. J. Nat. Prod. 1991, 54, 986–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Swanson, S.M.; Mahady, G.B.; Beecher, C.W. Stevioside biosynthesis by callus, root, shoot and rooted-shoot cultures in vitro. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 1992, 28, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Javad, S.; Naz, S.; Ilyas, S.; Aftab, A.; Sciences, P. Production of stevioside from callus and cell suspension cultures of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.). JAPS J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2016, 26, 1374–1382. [Google Scholar]
  157. Smitha, P.; Nazeem, P.; Thomas, J.; Keshavachandran, R.; Girija, D. Micropropagation for mass multiplication of the important medicinal sweet herb-Stevia rebaudiana. J. of Medi. and Aromt. Plant Sci. 2005, 27, 247–252. [Google Scholar]
  158. Khalil, S.A.; Kamal, N.; Sajid, M.; Ahmad, N.; Zamir, R.; Ahmad, N.; Ali, S. Synergism of polyamines and plant growth regulators enhanced morphogenesis, stevioside content, and production of commercially important natural antioxidants in Stevia rebaudiana Bert. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2016, 52, 174–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Moscatiello, R.; Baldan, B.; Navazio, L. Plant cell suspension cultures. In Plant Mineral Nutrients; Maathius, F., Ed.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 77–93. ISBN 978-1-62703-152-3. [Google Scholar]
  160. Mathur, S.; Shekhawat, G. Establishment and characterization of Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) cell suspension culture: An in vitro approach for production of stevioside. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 931–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Ghose, A.K.; Abdullah, S.N.A.; Md Hatta, M.A.; Megat Wahab, P.E. In Vitro Regeneration of Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni) and Evaluation of the Impacts of Growth Media Nutrients on the Biosynthesis of Steviol Glycosides (SGs). Agronomy 2022, 12, 1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Kaur, R.; Manchanda, P.; Sidhu, G.S. Optimization of extraction of bioactive phenolics and their antioxidant potential from callus and leaf extracts of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2022, 16, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Zayova, E.; Nedev, T.; Stancheva, I. Callus via Shoot Organogenesis and Plant Regeneration of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. In Proceedings of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria, 2 May 2022; pp. 620–628. [Google Scholar]
  164. Al-Zubaidy, N.A.; Ibrahim, M.M.; Musstta, M.A. The effect of growth regulators and different concentrations of sucrose in callus induction of sugar leaf plant Stevia rebaudiana and its content of stevoiside. Plant Arch. 2020, 20, 4492–4496. [Google Scholar]
  165. Abd El-Motaleb, M.; Abd El-Hameid, A.R.; Elnaggar, H.M.; Abdel-Hady, M.J. Callus induction and regeneration of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Int. J. Chem. Tech. Res. 2015, 8, 868–877. [Google Scholar]
  166. Aman, N.; Hadi, F.; Khalil, S.A.; Zamir, R.; Ahmad, N. Efficient regeneration for enhanced steviol glycosides production in Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni). Comptes Rendus Biol. 2013, 336, 486–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Janarthanam, B.; Gopalakrishnan, M.; Sai, G.L.; Sekar, T. Plant regeneration from leaf derived callus of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Plant Tissue Cult. Biotechnol. 2009, 19, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Khan, S.A.; Verma, P.; Rahman, L.U.; Parasharami, V.A. Exploration of biotechnological studies in low-calorie sweetener Stevia rebaudiana: Present and future prospects. In Medicinal and Aromatic Plants; Aftab, T., Hakeem, K.R., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 289–324. ISBN 978-0-1281-9590-1. [Google Scholar]
  169. Dheeranupattana, S.; Wangprapa, M.; Jatisatienr, A. Effect of sodium acetate on stevioside production of Stevia rebaudiana. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 786, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 15–18 January 2007; pp. 269–272. [Google Scholar]
  170. Bespalhok-Filho, J.C.; Hashimoto, J.M.; Vieira, L.G. Induction of somatic embryogenesis from leaf explants of Stevia rebaudiana. Rev. Bras. De Fisiol. Veg. 1993, 5, 51–53. [Google Scholar]
  171. Ali, A.; Gull, I.; Naz, S.; Afghan, S. Biochemical investigation during different stages of in vitro propagation of Stevia rebaudiana. Pak. J. Bot. 2010, 42, 2827–2837. [Google Scholar]
  172. Tiwari, S.; Arnold, R.; Saxena, A.; Mishra, R.; Singh Tiwari, A.; Rajak, A.; Singh, P.; Sciences, L. Studies on rapid micropropagation of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni: A natural sweetener. Int. J. Pharm. Life Sci. 2013, 4, 2667–2671. [Google Scholar]
  173. Mousumi, D. Clonal propagation and antimicrobial activity of an endemic medicinal plant Stevia rebaudiana. J. Med. Plants Res. 2008, 2, 45–51. [Google Scholar]
  174. Keshvari, T.; Najaphy, A.; Kahrizi, D.; Zebarjadi, A.J.C.; Biology, M. Callus induction and somatic embryogenesis in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni as a medicinal plant. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2018, 64, 46–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Meenakshi, B.; Priyanka, S. Somatic embryogenesis in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni using different concentration of growth hormones. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2010, 5, 284–289. [Google Scholar]
  176. Das, A.; Mandal, N. Enhanced development of embryogenic callus in Stevia rebaudiana Bert. by additive and amino acids. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 368–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. Pande, S.; Khetmalas, M. Effect of concentration of sucrose on callus induction and somatic embryogenesis of anti-diabetic plant: Stevia rebaudiana. Asian J. Biochem. Pharm. Res. 2012, 1, 27–31. [Google Scholar]
  178. Naranjo, E.J.; Fernandez Betin, O.; Urrea Trujillo, A.I.; Callejas Posada, R.; Atehortua Garces, L. Effect of genotype on the in vitro regeneration of Stevia rebaudiana via somatic embryogenesis. Acta Biológica Colomb. 2016, 21, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Nazneen, H.; Sridhar, S.; Reddy, S. Studies on somatic embryogenesis of stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) by scanning electron microscope (SEM). World J. Pharmac. Res. 2015, 4, 918–924. [Google Scholar]
  180. Niedz, R.P.; Evens, T.J. Regulating plant tissue growth by mineral nutrition. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2007, 43, 370–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Ramage, C.M.; Williams, R.R. Mineral nutrition and plant morphogenesis. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2002, 38, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Ibrahim, I.A.; Nasr, M.I.; Mohammed, B.R.; El-Zefzafi, M.M. Plant growth regulators affecting in vitro cultivation of Stevia rebaudiana. Sugar Tech. 2008, 10, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Bondarev, N.; Reshetnyak, O.; Nosov, A. Peculiarities of diterpenoid steviol glycoside production in in vitro cultures of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Plant Sci. 2001, 161, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Dey, A.; Paul, S.; Kundu, S.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Bhattacharjee, A. Elevated antioxidant potential of chlorocholine chloride-treated in vitro grown Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 1775–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Mehrafarin, A.; Etminan, A.; Delkhosh, B.; Golrokhan, M. Assessment of Stevioside content, shoot proliferation, and root induction of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni under in vitro conditions. J. Med. Plants 2016, 15, 98–110. [Google Scholar]
  186. Gupta, P.; Sharma, S.; Saxena, S. Effect of salts (NaCl and Na2CO3) on callus and suspension culture of Stevia rebaudiana for steviol glycoside production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014, 172, 2894–2906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Rasouli, D.; Werbrouck, S.; Maleki, B.; Jafary, H.; Schurdi-Levraud, V. Elicitor-induced in vitro shoot multiplication and steviol glycosides production in Stevia rebaudiana. South Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 137, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Mejía-Espejel, L.; Robledo-Paz, A.; Lozoya-Gloria, E.; Peña-Valdivia, C.B.; Carrillo-Salazar, J.A. Elicitors on steviosides production in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni calli. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 242, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Michalec-Warzecha, Ż.; Pistelli, L.; D’Angiolillo, F.; Libik-Konieczny, M. Establishment of highly efficient agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation for Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni explants. Acta Biol. Cracoviensia Ser. Bot. 2016, 58, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Pandey, H.; Pandey, P.; Pandey, S.S.; Singh, S.; Banerjee, S. Meeting the challenge of stevioside production in the hairy roots of Stevia rebaudiana by probing the underlying process. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2016, 126, 511–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Ramezani, M.; Gerami, M.; Research, B. Investigation on some main glycosides content of Stevia rebaudian B. under different concentrations of commercial and synthesized silver nanoparticles. Pharm. Biomed. Res. 2018, 4, 8–14. [Google Scholar]
  192. Jamwal, K.; Bhattacharya, S.; Puri, S. Plant growth regulator mediated consequences of secondary metabolites in medicinal plants. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2018, 9, 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Bayraktar, M.; Naziri, E.; Karabey, F.; Akgun, I.H.; Bedir, E.; Bärbel, R.-O.; Gürel, A. Enhancement of stevioside production by using biotechnological approach in in vitro culture of Stevia rebaudiana. Int. J. Second. Metab. 2018, 5, 362–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  194. Esmaeili, F.; Ghaheri, M.; Kahrizi, D.; Mansouri, M.; Safavi, S.M.; Ghorbani, T.; Muhammadi, S.; Rahmanian, E.; Vaziri, S.; Biology, M. Effects of various glutamine concentrations on gene expression and steviol glycosides accumulation in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2018, 64, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Gupta, P.; Sharma, S.; Saxena, S.; Plants, A. Effect of abiotic stress on growth parameters and steviol glycoside content in Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) raised in vitro. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2016, 3, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Alvarado-Orea, I.; Paniagua-Vega, D.; Capataz-Tafur, J.; Torres-López, A.; Vera-Reyes, I.; García-López, E.; Huerta-Heredia, A. Photoperiod and elicitors increase steviol glycosides, phenolics, and flavonoid contents in root cultures of Stevia rebaudiana. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2020, 56, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Thakur, K.; Sood, A.; Kumar, P.; Kumar, D.; Warghat, A. Steviol glycoside accumulation and expression profiling of biosynthetic pathway genes in elicited in vitro cultures of Stevia rebaudiana. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2021, 57, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Saptari, R.T.; Esyanti, R.R.; Putranto, R.A. Daminozide enhances the vigor and steviol glycoside yield of stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bert.) propagated in temporary immersion bioreactors. Plant Cell. Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2022, 149, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Tahmasi, S.; Garoosi, G.; Ahmadi, J. Cadmium Chloride and Silver Nitrate Affect the Gene Expression, Stevioside, and Rebaudioside: A Production in Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.). Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 83, 663–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Ahmad, M.A.; Javed, R.; Adeel, M.; Rizwan, M.; Ao, Q.; Yang, Y. Engineered ZnO and CuO nanoparticles ameliorate morphological and biochemical response in tissue culture regenerants of candyleaf (Stevia rebaudiana). Molecules 2020, 25, 1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. Khalil, S.A.; Ahmad, N.; Zamir, R. Gamma radiation induced variation in growth characteristics and production of bioactive compounds during callogenesis in Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.). New Negatives Plant Sci. 2015, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. Chiew, M.; Lai, K.; Hussein, S.; Abdullah, J. Acute gamma irradiated Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni enhanced particular types of steviol glycosides. Asia Pac. J. Mol. Biol. Biotechnol. 2019, 27, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Melviana, A.C.; Esyanti, R.R.; Setyobudi, R.H.; Mel, M.; Adinurani, P.G.; Burlakovs, J. Gene expression related to steviol glycoside synthesis produced in Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.) shoot culture induced with high far-red LED light in TIS RITA® bioreactor system. Sarhad J. Agric. 2021, 37, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Gerami, M.; Abbaspour, H.; Ghasemiomran, V.; Pirdashti, H.; Research, E. Effects of ethyl methanesulfonate on morphological and physiological traits of plants regenerated from stevia (stevia rebaudiana bertoni) calli. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2017, 15, 373–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Ladygin, V.; Bondarev, N.; Semenova, G.; Smolov, A.; Reshetnyak, O.; Nosov, A. Chloroplast ultrastructure, photosynthetic apparatus activities and production of steviol glycosides in Stevia rebaudiana in vivo and in vitro. Biol. Plant. 2008, 52, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Yoneda, Y.; Nakashima, H.; Miyasaka, J.; Ohdoi, K.; Shimizu, H. Impact of blue, red, and far-red light treatments on gene expression and steviol glycoside accumulation in Stevia rebaudiana. Phytochemistry 2017, 137, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Ghaheri, M.; Kahrizi, D.; Bahrami, G.; Mohammadi-Motlagh, H.-R. Study of gene expression and steviol glycosides accumulation in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni under various mannitol concentrations. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019, 46, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Lucho, S.R.; do Amaral, M.N.; Auler, P.A.; Bianchi, V.J.; Ferrer, M.Á.; Calderón, A.A.; Braga, E.J.B. Salt stress-induced changes in in vitro cultured Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni: Effect on metabolite contents, antioxidant capacity and expression of steviol glycosides-related biosynthetic genes. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 38, 1341–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Halder, M.; Roychowdhury, D.; Jha, S. A critical review on biotechnological interventions for production and yield enhancement of secondary metabolites in hairy root cultures. Hairy Roots Eff. Tool Plant Biotechnol. 2018, 21–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Kazmi, A.; Khan, M.A.; Mohammad, S.; Ali, A.; Kamil, A.; Arif, M.; Ali, H. Elicitation directed growth and production of steviol glycosides in the adventitious roots of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2019, 139, 111530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Libik-Konieczny, M.; Michalec-Warzecha, Ż.; Dziurka, M.; Zastawny, O.; Konieczny, R.; Rozpądek, P.; Pistelli, L. Steviol glycosides profile in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni hairy roots cultured under oxidative stress-inducing conditions. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 5929–5941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Khodakovskaya, M.V.; Kim, B.S.; Kim, J.N.; Alimohammadi, M.; Dervishi, E.; Mustafa, T.; Cernigla, C.E. Carbon nanotubes as plant growth regulators: Effects on tomato growth, reproductive system, and soil microbial community. Small 2013, 9, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Ghanati, F.; Bakhtiarian, S. Effect of methyl jasmonate and silver nanoparticles on production of secondary metabolites by Calendula officinalis L (Asteraceae). Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2014, 13, 1783–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  214. Jasim, B.; Thomas, R.; Mathew, J.; Radhakrishnan, E. Plant growth and diosgenin enhancement effect of silver nanoparticles in Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.). Saudi Pharm. J. 2017, 25, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Ghorbanpour, M.; Hadian, J. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes stimulate callus induction, secondary metabolites biosynthesis and antioxidant capacity in medicinal plant Satureja khuzestanica grown in vitro. Carbon 2015, 94, 749–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Castro-González, C.G.; Sánchez-Segura, L.; Gómez-Merino, F.C.; Bello-Bello, J.J. Exposure of stevia (Stevia rebaudiana B.) to silver nanoparticles in vitro: Transport and accumulation. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  217. Rezaizad, M.; Hashemi-Moghaddam, H.; Abbaspour, H.; Gerami, M.; Mueller, A. Photocatalytic effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on morphological and photochemical properties of stevia plant (Stevia rebaudiana B.). Sugar Tech. 2019, 21, 1024–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Khan, S.A.; Ur Rahman, L.; Shanker, K.; Singh, M. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transgenic plant and somaclone production through direct and indirect regeneration from leaves in Stevia rebaudiana with their glycoside profile. Protoplasma 2014, 251, 661–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Pandey, D.K.; Konjengbam, M.; Dwivedi, P.; Kaur, P.; Kumar, V.; Ray, D.; Ray, P.; Nazir, R.; Kaur, H.; Parida, S.; et al. Biotechnological interventions of in vitro propagation and production of valuable secondary metabolites in Stevia rebaudiana. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 8593–8614. [Google Scholar]
  220. Taak, P.; Koul, B.; Chopra, M.; Sharma, K. Comparative assessment of mulching and herbicide treatments for weed management in Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) cultivation. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 140, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Taak, P.; Tiwari, S.; Koul, B.J.S.r. Optimization of regeneration and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni): A commercially important natural sweetener plant. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Mubarac, M. Genetic Transformation in Stevia rebaudiana. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Biotechnology Applications In Agriculture, Benha University (ICBAA), Hurghada, Egypt, 18–21 February 2012; pp. 8–12. [Google Scholar]
  223. Guleria, P.; Yadav, S. Agrobacterium mediated transient gene silencing (AMTS) in Stevia rebaudiana: Insights into steviol glycoside biosynthesis pathway. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e74731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  224. Wu, Q.; La Hovary, C.; Chen, H.-Y.; Li, X.; Eng, H.; Vallejo, V.; Qu, R.; Dewey, R. An efficient Stevia rebaudiana transformation system and in vitro enzyme assays reveal novel insights into UGT76G1 function. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  225. Zheng, J.; Zhuang, Y.; Mao, H.-Z.; Jang, I.-C. Overexpression of SrDXS1 and SrKAH enhances steviol glycosides content in transgenic Stevia plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Kim, M.J.; Zheng, J.; Liao, M.H.; Jang, I.C. Overexpression of Sr UGT 76G1 in Stevia alters major steviol glycosides composition towards improved quality. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 1037–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Suresh, P.S.; Singh, P.P.; Sharma, M.; Sharma, U. Multicomponent natural deep eutectic solvents: Super solvents for the efficient extraction of steviol glycosides (rebaudioside A) from Stevia rebaudiana. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 385, 135639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Moongngarm, A.; Sriharboot, N.; Loypimai, P.; Moontree, T. Ohmic heating-assisted water extraction of steviol glycosides and phytochemicals from Stevia rebaudiana leaves. Lwt 2022, 154, 112798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Milani, G.; Vian, M.; Cavalluzzi, M.M.; Franchini, C.; Corbo, F.; Lentini, G.; Chemat, F. Ultrasound and deep eutectic solvents: An efficient combination to tune the mechanism of steviol glycosides extraction. Sonochemistry 2020, 69, 105255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Kovačević, D.B.; Barba, F.J.; Granato, D.; Galanakis, C.M.; Herceg, Z.; Dragović-Uzelac, V.; Putnik, P. Pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE) for the green recovery of bioactive compounds and steviol glycosides from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni leaves. Food Chem. 2018, 254, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Gallo, M.; Vitulano, M.; Andolfi, A.; DellaGreca, M.; Conte, E.; Ciaravolo, M.; Naviglio, D. Rapid Solid-Liquid Dynamic Extraction (RSLDE): A new rapid and greener method for extracting two steviol glycosides (stevioside and rebaudioside A) from stevia leaves. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2017, 72, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Yang, Y.; Huang, S.; Han, Y.; Yuan, H.; Gu, C.; Wang, Z. Environmental cues induce changes of steviol glycosides contents and transcription of corresponding biosynthetic genes in Stevia rebaudiana. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 86, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Chen, J.; Hou, K.; Qin, P.; Liu, H.; Yi, B.; Yang, W.; Wu, W. RNA-Seq for gene identification and transcript profiling of three Stevia rebaudiana genotypes. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  234. Dhandapani, S.; Kim, M.J.; Chin, H.J.; Leong, S.H.; Jang, I.-C. Identification and functional characterization of tissue-specific terpene synthases in Stevia rebaudiana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Xiang, Z.-X.; Tang, X.-L.; Liu, W.-H.; Song, C.-N. A comparative morphological and transcriptomic study on autotetraploid Stevia rebaudiana (bertoni) and its diploid. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 143, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Sun, Y.; Xu, X.; Zhang, T.; Yang, Y.; Tong, H.; Yuan, H. Comparative transcriptome analysis provides insights into steviol glycoside synthesis in stevia (Stevia rebaudiana B.) leaves under nitrogen deficiency. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 1709–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Sun, Y.; Zhang, T.; Xu, X.; Yang, Y.; Tong, H.; Mur, L.; Yuan, H. Transcriptomic Characterization of Nitrate-Enhanced Stevioside Glycoside Synthesis in Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana) Bertoni. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Wang, Y.; Sun, X.; Jia, X.; Zhu, L.; Yin, H. Comparative transcriptomic of Stevia rebaudiana provides insight into rebaudioside D and rebaudioside M biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 167, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Tao, R.; Cho, S. Consumer-based sensory characterization of steviol glycosides (rebaudioside A, D, and M). Foods 2020, 9, 1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. Evans, J.M.; Vallejo, V.A.; Beaudry, R.M.; Warner, R.M. Daily light integral influences steviol glycoside biosynthesis and relative abundance of specific glycosides in stevia. Hortscience 2015, 50, 1479–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  241. Mandhan, V.; Kaur, J.; Singh, K. smRNAome profiling to identify conserved and novel microRNAs in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  242. Mandhan, V.; Singh, K. DIdentification of Novel MicroRNAs and their Target Prediction in Stevia rebaudiana. Transcriptomics 2015, 2, 2. [Google Scholar]
  243. Mehta, A.; Gupta, H.; Rawal, R.; Mankad, A.; Tiwari, T.; Patel, M.; Ghosh, A. In silico microRNA identification from stevia rebaudiana transcriptome assembly. Eur. J. Med. Plants 2016, 15, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Samsulrizal, N.H.; Khadzran, K.S.; Shaarani, S.H.; Noh, A.L.; Sundram, T.C.; Naim, M.A.; Zainuddin, Z.J. De novo transcriptome dataset of Stevia rebaudiana accession MS007. Data Brief. 2020, 28, 104811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agriculture 13 00475 g001 550
Figure 1. Most relevant sources on Stevia research based on Bradford’s Law (Source: Biblioshiny).
Figure 1. Most relevant sources on Stevia research based on Bradford’s Law (Source: Biblioshiny).
Agriculture 13 00475 g001
Agriculture 13 00475 g002 550
Figure 2. The (a) world tree map, (b) thematic map, and (c) topic dendrogram represent the most cited, searched, and researched topics on Stevia (Source: Biblioshniny).
Figure 2. The (a) world tree map, (b) thematic map, and (c) topic dendrogram represent the most cited, searched, and researched topics on Stevia (Source: Biblioshniny).
Agriculture 13 00475 g002
Agriculture 13 00475 g003 550
Figure 3. Stevia rebaudiana flower (a) inflorescence, (b) flowering buds and (c–e) different components of the flower.
Figure 3. Stevia rebaudiana flower (a) inflorescence, (b) flowering buds and (c–e) different components of the flower.
Agriculture 13 00475 g003
Agriculture 13 00475 g004 550
Figure 4. Effect of different elicitors on the expression profiles of different genes involved in the biosynthesis pathway of steviol glycoside. DXS deoxyxyulose-5-phosphate synthase; DXR deoxyxyulose-5-phosphate reductase; CMS 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-d-erythritol synthase; CMK 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-d-erythritol kinase; MCS 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-d-erythritol 2,4-cyclodiphosphate synthase; HDS 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2(E)-butenyl-4-diphosphate synthase; HDR 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2(E)-butenyl-4-diphosphate reductase; GGDPS geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase; CDPS copalyl diphosphate synthase; KS kaurene synthase; KO kaurene oxidase; KAH kaurenoic acid hydroxylase; UGT85C2 UDP glucosyltransferase-85C2; UGT74G1 UDP glucosyltransferase-74G; UGT76G2 UDP glucosyltransferase-76G. Upward (↑) and Downward (↓) arrow indicate increased and decreased expression, respectively.
Figure 4. Effect of different elicitors on the expression profiles of different genes involved in the biosynthesis pathway of steviol glycoside. DXS deoxyxyulose-5-phosphate synthase; DXR deoxyxyulose-5-phosphate reductase; CMS 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-d-erythritol synthase; CMK 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-d-erythritol kinase; MCS 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-d-erythritol 2,4-cyclodiphosphate synthase; HDS 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2(E)-butenyl-4-diphosphate synthase; HDR 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2(E)-butenyl-4-diphosphate reductase; GGDPS geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase; CDPS copalyl diphosphate synthase; KS kaurene synthase; KO kaurene oxidase; KAH kaurenoic acid hydroxylase; UGT85C2 UDP glucosyltransferase-85C2; UGT74G1 UDP glucosyltransferase-74G; UGT76G2 UDP glucosyltransferase-76G. Upward (↑) and Downward (↓) arrow indicate increased and decreased expression, respectively.
Agriculture 13 00475 g004
Table
Table 1. Bibliometric descriptions of the publications on Stevia from 1989–2022 as retrieved from the WoS Core Collection.
Table 1. Bibliometric descriptions of the publications on Stevia from 1989–2022 as retrieved from the WoS Core Collection.
DescriptionResults
Main Information About Data
Timespan1989:2022
Sources (Journals, Books, etc.)802
Documents2503
Annual Growth Rate %8.66
Document Average Age7.43
Average citations per doc16.87
References58,839
Document Contents
Keywords Plus (ID)4291
Author’s Keywords (DE)5127
AUTHORS
Authors7797
Authors of single-authored docs95
Authors Collaboration
Single-authored docs153
Co-Authors per Doc4.83
International co-authorships %17.78
Document Types
Article2065
article; book chapter1
article; early access22
article; proceedings paper22
Correction11
editorial material32
Letter12
meeting abstract120
news item51
Note13
Review145
review; book chapter2
review; early access7
Table
Table 2. Taxonomical classification of S. rebaudiana.
Table 2. Taxonomical classification of S. rebaudiana.
KingdomPlantae
DivisionMagnoliophyta
ClassMagnoliopsida
GroupMonochlamydae
OrderAsterales
FamilyAsteraceae
TribeEupatorieae
GenusStevia
SpeciesS. rebaudiana
Table
Table 3. Phenotypic characteristics of S. rebaudiana.
Table 3. Phenotypic characteristics of S. rebaudiana.
CharacteristicDescription
HabitPerennial herb
HabitatTropical and sub-tropical regions
Synonym(s)Eupatorium rebaudianum Bertoni
First published in Revista Agron. Asunción 2: 35 (1899) [17]
Stevia rebaudiana Hemsl.
First published in Hooker’s Icon. Pl. 29: t. 2816 (1906) [17]
Common namesSweet leaf, Honey yerba, Honey leaf, Sweet chrysanthemum, Candy leaf
Local nameMeethi tulsi
StemErect and slender stem, branched, pubescent, produces secondary shoots (suckers) from its base
RootTap roots, perennial
LeafSimple, opposite, subsessile leaf, usually 2–3 cm long and 0.6–1 cm wide, narrowly elliptic to oblanceolate or spatulate-oblanceolate to linear-oblong or ovate, toothed on upper half, entire on lower half, secondary reticulate venation, blades in dry state olive green to brownish green, usually dark on the upper side, both surfaces subscrabous
InflorescenceCapitula arranged into loose, paniculate–corymbose inflorescence, each capitulum enveloped by involucre and made up of five disk florets
FlowerHermaphrodite, complete, white flowers with pale purple throat corollas (Figure 3)
CalyxSepals persistent and hairy (Figure 3)
CorollaActinomorphic, five, white, gamopetalous, corolla tube slender, greenish below whitish to purplish above, covered with fine hairs on the inside to glabrous on the outside
AndroeciumStamens 5, anthers syngenesious with distal appendages, light green, dehiscence longitudinal (Figure 3)
GynoeciumBicarpellary, syncarpous, unilocular with inferior ovary, ovule single, basal, and anatropous, stigma is bilobed from the middle style surrounded by anthers (Figure 3)
PollinationSelf-incompatible, insect pollination
Fruit/seedSingle seeded achenes (3 mm in length), with persistent bristles, with pale or tan seeds (Figure 3)
FloweringJanuary to March (southern hemisphere)
September to December (northern hemisphere)
Table
Table 4. Summary of different studies conducted on the direct organogenesis of Stevia rebaudiana.
Table 4. Summary of different studies conducted on the direct organogenesis of Stevia rebaudiana.
ReferenceExplant SourceExplantType of MediumBasal MediumPGR Type and Conc. (mg/L)AdditiveResponse
[131]Ex Vitronodes and leafSIMMS1.5-4.68 shoots
0.5
SMMMS110.14 shoots
1.5
[132]In Vitro Grown Seedlingsnodal explantSOMMS0.5NF-2% Ag (10)3.35 shoots
[133]In Vitronodes with axillary buds-MS0.1coherent light irradiation (weekly)multiplication coefficient doubled
Epin 0.5
[134]In Vitro Grown Seedlingsnodal segmentSIMMS1low mol wt chitosan (60 mg/L)25 leaves/explant
[135]Plants Grown In Greenhouseinternodal segment-MS0.25-8.7 shoots
[136]-nodal explantsSMMMS1-3.1 shoots
0.3-
[137]Ex Vitronodal segmentsSIMMS0.5-highest shoot no
1.5
[138]Greenhouse Grown Plantnodal segmentsSIMMS1-3.18 shoots
0.25
SMMMS0.5-13.38 shoots
0.5
[125]-nodal segments, shoot tipSIMMS2-98% shoot induction (nodal seg)
SMMMS0.3-40.5 shoots
0.3
0.1
PEG (15)
[139]Greenhouse Grown Plantnodal segments with axillary bud-MS2urea (5 mg/L)44.56 shoots
1
[140]Nursery Grown Plantaxillary nodes-MS *--7.2 nodes/shoot
[128]-nodal segments and shoot tips-WPM0.5-10.2 shoots/shoot tip
0.5
[141]Nursery Grown Plantnodal segments-1/2 MS0.2-3 shoots
[142]In Vitro Grown Seedlingsnodal segments-MS1-max shoot length (3.1 cm)
[143]In Vitrosingle nodesSIM, RIMDKW0.5FeEDDHAone step plantlet development
paclobutrazol 0.5
[144]In Vitrocotyledonary leavesSMMMS1CCC (0.5)24 shoots
0.5
[145]Ex Vitronodal segmentsSIMMS1-9.48 shoots
0.05
SMMMS2-
[126]Ex Vitronodal segments, shoot tip, internodal segmentsSIMMS2-3 shoots
[124]Ex Vitronodal segmentsSIM/SBIMS1-
0.5
SMM/SBPMS1-4.25 shoots
0.25
[146]In Vitronodal segmentsSBIMS1-2 shoots
SBPMS1-15.69 shoots
[147]Ex Vitroshoot tips MS1.5-8.9 shoots
0.2
[121]In Vitroshoot tip and nodal segmentsSIMB51-28 (shoot tip)
0.14
[148]In Vitronodal explants with auxillary buds MS4-35 shoots
[123]Ex Vitroshoot tipSIMMS1-16.2 shoots
0.5
[149]Pot Grown Plantnodal segments MS3-7.2 shoots
[150]Pot Grown Plantnodal segmentSIMMS0.1-1.55 shoots
SMMMS3.5-83.2 plantlets
[12]Field Grown Plantleaf and nodesSIMMS0.5copper sulphate pentahydrate (1 μM)9.5 (nodal segment)
0.5
SMMMS0.817–18 (nodal segment)
0.4
[151]In VitroleafSIMMS2-4.33 shoots
1
[152]Ex Vitronodal explants-MS1.0adenine sulphate
(30 mg/L)		10 shoots
10
[107]In Vitronodal explants -MS0.523.4
2
[122]Greenhouse Grown PlantShoot apex, nodal, and leafSIMMS2 11.2 (shoot apex)
1
Color Key
BAPKinIAAIBANAATDZ2,4-DGA3
Abbreviations: MS *: modified Murashige and Skoog medium; SIM: shoot induction medium; SOM: shoot organogenesis medium; SMM: shoot multiplication medium; SBI: shoot bud induction medium; SBP: shoot bud proliferation medium; RIM: root induction medium; MS: Murashige and Skoog medium; WPM: woody plant medium; B5: Gamborg medium; DKW: Driver and Kuniyaki Walnut medium; CCC: chlorocholine chloride; FeEDDHA: iron ethylene diamine-N, N’-bis (hydroxy phenyl acetic acid); PEG: polyethylene glycol.
Table
Table 5. Summary of different studies conducted on the indirect organogenesis of Stevia rebaudiana.
Table 5. Summary of different studies conducted on the indirect organogenesis of Stevia rebaudiana.
ReferenceExplant SourceExplantType of MediumBasal MediumPGR Type and Conc. (mg/L)AdditiveResponse
[161]In Vitro Grown SeedlingsleafCIMMSZeatin (0.10)-76.67% (callus production)
1.50
[162]--CIMMS4-best response
0.5
SOMMS10-5.8 shoots
[163]In VitroleafCIMMS2-80% CI (leaf)
0.5
0.5
SOMMS0.5-2.3 shoots/callus (leaf)
2
0.5
SMMMS2-8.2 shoots
[164]In Vitro Grown SeedlingsleafCIMMS2-100% callus induction,
0.5-highest average wet weight (0.963 g/L)
[165]Ex Vitroleaf, nodal segmentsCIMMS2-
SIMMS0.5-13.2 shoots
1
[144]In Vitrocotyledonary leavesCIMMS3CCC (1)highest callusing efficiency
1
1/2 MS0.5-max growth index (secondary callus)
[166]In VitroleavesCIMMS2agar (3.5 mg/L)
SOMMS2agar (7 mg/L)28 shoots
[117]Greenhouse Grown Plantflower CIMMS2-93.6% callus induction
2
SOMMS2-21.6 shoots
[112]-nodal segmentsCIMMS1.0-100% callusing
2.0
SOMMS2-3 (nodal segment)
0.2
[167]Greenhouse Plantleaf, nodal explantsCIMMS2.45-max callus
0.5
SOMMS1-14 shoots
0.25
Color Key
BAPKinIAAIBANAATDZ2,4-DGA3
Abbreviation: CIM: callus induction medium.
Table
Table 6. Summary of different methods reported for in vitro rhizogenesis in Stevia rebaudiana.
Table 6. Summary of different methods reported for in vitro rhizogenesis in Stevia rebaudiana.
ReferenceExplant SourceExplantBasal MediumPGR(s) Conc. (mg/L)Additive(s)Response
[131]ex vitronodes and leaf1/2 MS1 8.02 roots/shoot
[132]In vitro grown seedlingsnodal explantMS0.5NF-1% Ag (50)42.92% rooting
[161]In vitro grown seedlingsLeaf1/2 MS 2.86 roots/shoot
[163]in vitroleaf and nodal segment1/2 MS0.1 4.5 roots/shoot
[133]in vitronodes with axillary budsMShydroxycinnamic acid (0.5) 85% rooting
[136] nodal explantsMS0.5 27 roots/shoot
[125] nodal segments, shoot tip1/2 MS0.5 21.2 roots
[139]greenhouse grown plantnodal segments with axillary budMS4 100% (rooting)
[140]nursery grown plantaxillary nodes1/2 MS Charcoal
(0.1 mg/L)		25 roots/shoot
[128] nodal segments and shoot tips
[141]nursery grown plantnodal segments1/2 MS2 10 roots
0.5
[142]In vitro grown seedlingsnodal segmentsMS0.25 8.1 roots
[145]ex vitronodal segmentsMS0.5 9.46 roots
[166]in vitroleavesMS2Agar (7 mg/L)100% rooting
[124]ex vitronodal segmentsMS0.5 8.9 roots
[146]in vitronodal segments1/2 MS0.4 14.4 roots
[121]in vitroshoot tip and nodal segmentsMS 11.5
[123]ex vitroshoot tip, nodal segment and leaf1/2 N61 11.80 roots
[112] nodal segments and leaves1/4 MS0.1 9.47 roots per plantlet
[149]pot grown plantnodal segments1/2 MS0.5 max root length
Color Key
BAPKinIAAIBANAA
Table
Table 7. Summary of different in vitro elicitation studies in Stevia.
Table 7. Summary of different in vitro elicitation studies in Stevia.
Elicitation Studies in Stevia (In Vitro)
ReferenceName of Elicitor (Conc.)Fold Increase as Compared to Control
[103]Alginate (0.5 mg/L)9.4
0.55
[193]MeJA (100 µm)17.4
[188]Salicylic acid (100 mM)9.8
Salicylic acid (10 mM)34.6
[102]Methanol (0.1% v/v)2
(Reb A, F, C, Stv, Dul A)
[169]Sodium acetate (0.01)0.0039
[194]Glutamine (3%)1.4
Glutamine (2%)1.4
[161]MS (0.75)1.67
MS (0.25)1.2
[195]Na2CO3 (0.05%)2.3
4.9
[156]BAP (1) + NAA (1) + 2,4-D (2.5)33.87 mg/g
[158]Spd (2) + BA (2) + Kn (2)3.38
[185]1/2 MS + IBA (0.2) + active carbon (2)2.29
[196]Hydrogen Peroxide (3 days)2.4 (SGs-stev + reb A)
[187]MeJA0.59
[197]ALG5
7
[198]Daminozide (10 ppm)1.9
1.9
BAP (1) + 2,4-D (0.5)1.6
1.9
[199]cadmium chloride (20 mg/L, 96 h)1.19
silver nitrate (60 mg/L, 24 h)1.2
[200]Zinc Oxide NP (2 mg/L)1.2
1.5
Copper oxide NP (10)2.8
2.01
[188]Temperature (28 °C)9.8
[201]Gamma radiation (15 Gy)1.08
[202]Gamma radiation (23 Gy)4
3.4
3.76
[203]Light (High far-red LED RITA)0.37
0.23
Color Key
SteviosideReb AReb DSGs
Abbreviations: MeJA: Methyl Jasmonate; Spd: Spermidine; LED RITA: Light-Emitting Diodes- Recipient for Automated Temporary Immersion System.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sharma, S.; Gupta, S.; Kumari, D.; Kothari, S.L.; Jain, R.; Kachhwaha, S. Exploring Plant Tissue Culture and Steviol Glycosides Production in Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.) Bertoni: A Review. Agriculture 2023, 13, 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020475

AMA Style

Sharma S, Gupta S, Kumari D, Kothari SL, Jain R, Kachhwaha S. Exploring Plant Tissue Culture and Steviol Glycosides Production in Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.) Bertoni: A Review. Agriculture. 2023; 13(2):475. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020475

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sharma, Shilpa, Swati Gupta, Deepa Kumari, Shanker Lal Kothari, Rohit Jain, and Sumita Kachhwaha. 2023. "Exploring Plant Tissue Culture and Steviol Glycosides Production in Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.) Bertoni: A Review" Agriculture 13, no. 2: 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020475

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop