Next Article in Journal
m-Carborane as a Novel Core for Periphery-Decorated Macromolecules
Next Article in Special Issue
Azeotropes as Powerful Tool for Waste Minimization in Industry and Chemical Processes
Previous Article in Journal
Cultivation of Mushrooms and Their Lignocellulolytic Enzyme Production Through the Utilization of Agro-Industrial Waste
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Fruit and Vegetable Peels: Utilization of High Value Horticultural Waste in Novel Industrial Applications

1
School of Bioengineering & Food Technology, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Solan-173229, India
2
School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Solan-173229, India
3
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Kralove, 50003 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
4
School of Biotechnology and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara-144411, Punjab, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors share the first authorship.
Molecules 2020, 25(12), 2812; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122812
Submission received: 23 May 2020 / Revised: 13 June 2020 / Accepted: 16 June 2020 / Published: 18 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Sustainable Synthesis)

Abstract

:
Fruits and vegetables are the highly used food products amongst the horticultural crops. These items are consumed uncooked, nominally cooked or fully cooked, according to their nature and cooking process. With the change in diet habits and rising population, the production, as well as the processing of horticultural crops, has exponentially improved to meet its increasing demand. A large amount of peel waste is generated from fruit and vegetable-based industries and household kitchen and has led to a big nutritional and economic loss and environmental problems. Processing of fruits and vegetables alone generates a significant waste, which amounts to 25–30% of the total product. Most common wastes include pomace, peels, rind and seeds, which are highly rich in valuable bioactive compounds such as carotenoids, enzymes, polyphenols, oils, vitamins and many other compounds. These bioactive compounds show their application in various industries such as food to develop edible films, food industries for probiotics and other industries for valuable products. The utilization of these low-cost waste horticultural wastes for producing the value-added product is a novel step in its sustainable utilization. The present review intends to summarize the different types of waste originating from fruits as well as vegetables peels and highlight their potential in developing edible films, probiotics, nanoparticles, carbon dots, microbial media, biochar and biosorbents.

1. Introduction

In the European Union, approximately 89 million tons of food waste is generated, and this value is expected to increase by 40-fold in coming years. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimated that around 40% of the food produced in India is wasted [1,2]. Moreover, the Food Corporation of India reported this loss ranging between 10 to 15 percent of the total production. The Ministry of Food Processing Industries (MFPI) India estimated fruit and vegetable losses to be 12 and 21 million tons, respectively, amounting to an approximate value of about 4.4 billion USD, with a total food value loss and waste produce of 10.6 billion USD [2]. A broader term is “fruit and vegetable waste” (FVW), which refers to indigestible parts that are thrown away at different stages such as collection, handling, shipping and processing [3]. In accordance with the above definition, FVW can be considered as fruit and vegetable loss instead of waste. FVW can be produced at different steps from farm to consumer, involving both pre- and post-consumer stages of the food supply chain [4].
There are high amounts of phytochemical constituents present in FVW and studied for dietary fibers, phenolic compounds and other bioactive compounds extraction [5]. Studies revealed that essential nutrients and phytochemicals are abundantly found in the peels, seeds and other constituent of vegetables and fruits in common use [6]. For instance, the skin of avocados, grapes, lemons, seeds of jackfruits and mangoes contains 15% higher phenolic concentrations as compared to fruit pulp [7,8]. The FVWs can be utilized to extract as well as obtain bioactive compounds that can be used in cosmetics, food, textile and pharmaceutical industries as shown in Figure 1. Some of the FVWs waste originates from horticultural supplies, which is not considered important at present. Their proper use will not only solve the environmental issues, but will act as a sustainable approach to improve health via enriched food containing health-enhancing substances [9]. The current review summarizes the scientific inventions and reviews the recent advances in the exploitation of waste fruits and vegetables peel as a valuable commodity of the future.

2. Fruit and Vegetable Peel Based Edible Coatings/Films

Edible coatings are made up of thin layers applied on the surface of the food to make its shelf life longer, maintain the properties, characteristics and functionality of foods at minimum cost [17]. This application can increase its functionality by extending the shelf life, preventing the microbial spoilage and acting as a carrier matrix for antimicrobial agents [18,19]. Coating can be considered as an effective method of preservation during transport of fruits and vegetables easily affected by microorganisms, insects, pre- and post-harvesting conditions [20]. Coatings also help in developing a modified atmosphere to induce varied alterations in minimally processed and fresh foodstuff in various areas such as sensory quality, antioxidant properties, color, firmness, ethylene production, microbial growth inhibition and organic compounds under anaerobic processes [21]. Recently, essential oils (EOs) and their main components have received substantial attention due to the presence of effective antimicrobial properties in them. The main EO component of lemongrass citral (3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadienal) has been reported for its antimicrobial activity against a variety of foodborne pathogens and is also explored as an antimicrobial agent in edible coatings [22]. The EOs are commonly considered as safe, as they impart maximum effects with the minimum change in the organoleptic properties of the food [23]. Of late, in the development of edible coatings applications of this emerging technology included a variety of nanosystems, consisting of nanoemulsions, polymeric nanoparticles and nanocomposites to release antioxidants, and showing antibacterial activities on the surface of the food. Because of the many phenolic substances with excellent antioxidant capacity, fruits and vegetable peel are considered as suitable materials for inclusion into films and coatings.
Fish gelatin is believed to be a valuable biopolymer source for fabricating biofilms because of its biodegradable nature and high myofibrillar protein content [24]. Additionally, because of the variations in the sequence of amino acid, fruit and vegetable peel-based films show less water permeability in contrast to mammalian gelatin-based film. Enriching pomegranate peel powder in gelatin films considerably increased their water vapor permeability (WVP) as incomplete dissolution of pomegranate peel in the film matrix resulted in more heterogeneous microstructure [25]. Both hydrophobic and hydrophilic components present in the peel of pomegranate balances the hygroscopic properties and do not alter the moisture content of the films (Table 1).
The peel of potato contains adequate quantities of cellulose, fermentable sugars, hemicellulose, and starch [33]. The films with low concentration peel of potato after comparison with high concentrations peel in the biopolymer film resulted in a higher WVP due to bigger pore size of film matrix despite its denser structure [33]. Potato peel biopolymer film-coating proved helpful for designing biodegradable food packaging with more-value commercial use. Generally, fish gelatin/polyethylene bilayer films solubility was lowered by enriching with different fruit peels [34].

3. Fruit and Vegetable Peel Fortified Probiotics

Over the past two centuries, fruits have been used as a remedy for dry cough, severe thirst and sore throat in medicine. In the last few years, the demand for novel functional foods has increased and probiotics are commonly consumed all over the world and considered as one of the main functional food products [35]. Additionally, the fruits and peels are of great value and high source of bioactive compounds. In pomegranate, citrus, mango and Opuntia ficus-indica (barbary fig) peel, the functional ingredients present in abundance are antioxidants, fiber and oligosaccharides (as prebiotics) [36,37,38,39]. Probiotics and dietary fiber both have been reported to reduce the incidence of colon cancer and relieve constipation [40]. Additionally, some dietetic fibers obtained from fruits have shown considerable effect on the viability of these bacteria and are recommended as an ingredient in probiotic dairy foods [11]. Various attempts have been made to increase the biological activities of probiotics, including supplementation with fruit peel.
Probiotic yogurt prepared with pineapple peel powder improved the anticancer, antioxidant and antibacterial activities against Escherichia coli, but no significant effect was observed on Staphylococcus aureus [41]. The addition of apple, banana and passion fruit peel powder in probiotic yogurt improved the rheological properties and enhanced the growth of Lactobacillus casei, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus paracasei [11]. The effect of milk supplementation with mango peels on the kefir microorganism’s growth rates and antioxidant properties were also estimated in fermented products [42]. Composite fruit peel powder (orange, passion fruit and pineapple) was used in different proportions i.e., 1%, 0.5% and 0.7% (w/v), respectively, to develop fat and sugar-free probiotic set yogurt [43]. Increase in firmness and consumer acceptability, decrease in syneresis and high lactic acid bacteria counts were observed in yogurt incorporated with 0.5% peel mixtures.

4. Fruit and Vegetable Peel-Derived Metallic Nanoparticles

Beneficial bioactive molecules such as alkaloids, amino acids, enzymes, phenolics, proteins, polysaccharides, tannins, saponins, vitamins and terpenoids and other compounds present in fruits and vegetable waste generally act as reducing agents in metal nanoparticles (NPs) synthesis [44,45]. Some biomolecules play the role of modeling agents directing particle growth in a specific direction, while other biomolecules function as capping agents, preventing nanoparticle from getting agglomerated [46,47]. Nanoparticles biosynthesized by using FVW have also emerged as a reliable, sustainable and eco-friendly technology with lower risk to human health and environmental as compared with chemicals and toxic solvents based conventional manufacturing protocol [48]. A significant interest in use of NPs was reported due to their distinctive physicochemical properties and applications in various fields of biomedicine and pharmaceuticals. The biogenic NPs are synthesized by following the bottom-up approach, in which atoms as well as compounds act as the building block and self-assembled themselves to form the final product [49,50].
Various noble metal/metal oxide NPs have been synthesized from fruits and vegetables peel extracts as shown in Table 2.
Gold (Au) NPs have been synthesized using dried onion peels (OP) aqueous extract, which reduces Au3+ to OP-AuNPs by forming a colloidal solution [64]. The phytoconstituents, mainly the cysteine derivatives, found in the onion bulb, might be responsible for the synthesis of OP-AuNPs. Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles were synthesized with domestic waste potato peel after 24 h of incubation using starch present in the potato peel to reduce the metal ion [63]. Banana, pomegranate, lemon and orange peel extracts have also been found to possess the ability to reduce silver (Ag+) ions in aqueous solutions to synthesize silver (Ag) nanoparticles [54,55,56,57]. Likewise, ZnO-NPs have been synthesized using tomato, grapefruit, lemon and orange peel [61].

5. Fruit and Vegetable Peel Derived Carbon Dots

Carbon dots (CDs) are a very small (<10 nm) photoluminescent material synthesized by two approaches, i.e., top-down and bottom-up synthetic routes [67,68]. In the top-down synthetic route, a large carbon structure breaks down by involving acid assisted chemical oxidation, electro-oxidation or laser ablation in the synthesis process [69]. However, this approach requires a complex and extreme synthetic condition, which is considered as one of the disadvantages of this method. On the other hand, the bottom-up approach using plants and their byproducts without using chemicals was found advantageous over the top-down approach. Food waste is a matter of serious concern worldwide, and this waste needs to be given proper attention. The use of food as waste offer economic benefits and is one of the most interesting starting materials as carbon sources for the synthesis of CDs [67]. Presence of functional components such as carotenoids, dietary fiber, gallic acid, polyphenols, flavonoids and mangiferin in mango peel and pineapple peel makes these suitable for the development of CDs [70,71]. The increasing number of publications shows that the fruit and vegetable by-products are source of antibacterial, antioxidant and nutritional dietary fiber [72]. Additionally, because of their biocompatibility, innocuousness, low toxicity, low cost and photostability properties, they are suitable starting materials for CDs [73,74]. The appropriate properties, i.e., pyrolyzation at high temperature and oxygenolysis with concentrated acid, carbonization, oxidation, polymerization and nucleation are needed during peels treatment to synthesize CDs [14]. CDs have shown a promising potential for applications in biomedical to energy storage devices, determination of pathogens, environmental studies, detection of heavy metals and additives in the food and water purification processes (Table 3) [75,76].

6. Fruit and Vegetable Peel Based Microbiological Media

In microbiological studies, microorganisms are grown by adding suitable culture media with favorable environment under laboratory conditions [89]. In most of the cases, commercially available media such as Cetrimide agar, Nutrient agar and MacConkey agar are used, but these are generally considered high cost media [89]. The growth and isolation of organisms have been reported using different substrates and media [90]. Some fruits and vegetables, such as cabbage, carrot, gooseberry, tomato, pumpkin etc., have been used as a substitute for nutrient agar to culture both bacteria and fungi, [91]. Other reports have used black gram, cowpea and green gram as starch and protein substitutes to ease the microbial media cost [92]. Fruits and vegetable bio-waste contain simple and complex sugars that are metabolized by microorganisms and have received much attention for their use in animal feed, bio-ethanol and biogas production [93,94].
Different type of agriculture waste is now used for the production of low-cost growth media for microorganisms (Table 4) [95,96].
Agar of Dragon fruit peel (DFP) was also used as a microbial growth media [92]. Grapefruit, banana and melon peels contain a high amount of carbohydrates, which act as a good substrate for the production of amylase [10]. Banana peel was found to be an economically low and effective medium for the growth of fungi [98]. The watermelon peel extract is found rich in macronutrients such as lipids, reducing sugars and total proteins [99]. The study reported that watermelon peel waste (WPW) was best for the growth of Aspergillus niger, Fusarium oxysporum, Lichtheimia corymbifera, Penicillium expansium and Rhizopus oryzae, respectively. The study also revealed that formulated watermelon peel waste dextrose agar (WPWDA) (watermelon peel waste dextrose agar) medium was found as an alternative way for some commonly used media such as Czapek’s Dox agar (CzDA) and Potato dextrose agar (PDA); in addition, this medium was very cheap and eco-friendly. Orange peel waste (OPW) was used as a liquid medium in producing biodiesel used oleaginous yeasts and found that and Cryptococcus laurentii UCD 68–201 and Rhodosporidium toruloides NRRL 1091 strains yielded 31.9% and 36.9% of biodiesel, respectively [100]. Pea peel waste was used as a growth medium at 30 °C with Trichoderma reesei to produce cellulase enzyme [102].

7. Fruit and Vegetable Peel Derived Biochar

Biochar is a stable carbon-rich solid generated by pyrolysis as a result of the thermochemical decomposition of organic feedstock material at high temperatures under oxygen-free conditions [104]. Different types of food waste have been used for the production of biochar and its yield and physicochemical properties have been reported in detail [105,106]. Biochar is generally used to remove different types of pollutant containing heavy metals from contaminated water bodies [107,108,109]. It also serves as an intermediate for producing bioethanol from biological waste collected from food processing industries as well as different agricultural plant residues like husk, bran etc. [110,111]. Different studies have shown the production of biochar from different types of fruits and vegetables peel wastes (Table 5).
Potato peel waste (PPW) was used to produce biochar by fast pyrolysis using the fluidized bed system to remove H2S [122]. Biochar produced from pineapple peel showed that H-bonding interacts with oxytetracycline (OTC) for its sorption. However, thermodynamic parameters showed that the OTC sorption onto the biochar was endothermic and is a spontaneous process [115]. Biochar derived from pineapple, sweet lime and pomelo peel was developed to remove hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution [114,117,121]. In another report, biochar was prepared from rambutan and pomegranate peel for the removal of copper (II) ions from aqueous and soil system, respectively [118,119]. Biochar derived from pomelo and litchi peels were used to remove congo red, methyl orange and malachite green from wastewater [113,118].

8. Fruit and Vegetable Peel Derived Biosorbents

Biosorption can be explained as a mechanism when a sorbate (i.e., an atom, ion or compound) reacts with the biomass or biomaterial (stated as biosorbent), which causes the acclimatization of sorbate ions over the surface of biosorbents, which subsequently reduces the sorbate concentration in the solution [123]. This mechanism has attained significant attention due to its ability to immobilize the heavy metal contaminated from the water (especially contaminated with the discharge of electroplating and mining industries) or metal processing industries. Numerous biosorbents have been developed with the help of different biomasses such as algae, fungi (e.g., Mucorrouxii), yeasts and bacteria (e.g., Bacillus thuringiensis) [124,125]. The natural biomass complex compendium signifies the contribution of different processes that describe the mechanism of how biosorbents works in eliminating the various contaminants; however, these processes are still being explored. Several functional groups are attached to these biosorbents to attract and sequester the contaminants, which relies on the type of biosorbent and functional groups (amine, amides carboxyl, hydroxyl, carbonyl, sulfhydryl, phenolic, sulfonate and phosphate groups) attached to it [126,127].
Many studies were done to produce biosorbents from fruits peel, i.e., apple, pineapple and dragon fruit and vegetables peel such as garlic, and cucumber to remove methylene blue dye from the aqueous solution (Table 6) [16,128,129,130,131].
Sponge gourd peel was considered as an inexpensive natural biosorbent to remove malachite green (MG), a cationic dye, in batch mode [140]. Banana peel was used as an efficient biosorbent for removing rhodamine-B, a cationic water-soluble dye of basic nature [138]. The contact time selected for the adsorption of rhodamine-B on banana peel powder was 60 min. In another study, a bisorbent was developed by using natural banana peel (NBP), methylated banana peel (MBP) and banana peel activated carbon (BPAC), respectively, and used in the treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) [136].

9. Conclusions

Development of the sustainable solution for managing fruit and vegetable waste has become extremely important in present scenario. Therefore, it demands the development of solution that could utilize the full potential of these waste material and support in attaining the social, environmental and economic benefits from these wastes. Furthermore, utilization of the fruit as well as vegetable waste especially peels in developing value-added products such as edible films, probiotics, nanoparticles, carbon dots, biochar and biosorbents will be an eco-friendly and sustainable way to create novel business opportunities and also functionalizing this waste for a useful purpose. Most of these interventions are in its infancy stage and lacks the technological advances and findings. Hence, there is high need to develop consortia of researcher and industrialist to improve the economic potential of these valuable horticultural wastes with a support of initial investment. Moreover, it will aid in promoting the usage of horticultural waste for synthesizing value-added commodities.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.N., K.K. and D.K.; Manuscript writing, H.K., K.B. and R.S.; Manuscript editing, E.N., D.S.D., R.V. and P.B.; Critical revising, K.K., S.S. and D.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Excellence project, UHK.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the University of Hradec Kralove (Faculty of Science, VT2019-2021) for financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Plazzotta, S.; Manzocco, L.; Nicoli, M.C. Fruit and vegetable waste management and the challenge of fresh-cut salad. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 63, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. National Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Saving the Harvest: Reducing the Food Loss and Waste; Policy Brief No. 5.; National Academy of Agricultural Sciences: New Delhi, India, 2019. Available online: http://naasindia.org/documents/Saving%20the%20Harvest.pdf (accessed on 8 October 2019).
  3. Chang, J.I.; Tsai, J.J.; Wu, K.H. Composting of vegetable waste. Waste Manag. Res. 2006, 24, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Panda, S.K.; Mishra, S.S.; Kayitesi, E.; Ray, R.C. Microbial-processing of fruit and vegetable wastes for production of vital enzymes and organic acids: Biotechnology and scopes. Environ. Res. 2016, 146, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Galanakis, C.M. Recovery of high added-value components from food wastes: Conventional, emerging technologies and commercialized applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 26, 68–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rudra, S.G.; Nishad, J.; Jakhar, N.; Kaur, C. Food industry waste: Mine of nutraceuticals. Int. J. Sci. Environ. 2015, 4, 205–229. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gorinstein, S.; Martín-Belloso, O.; Park, Y.-S.; Haruenkit, R.; Lojek, A.; Ĉíž, M.; Caspi, A.; Libman, I.; Trakhtenberg, S. Comparison of some biochemical characteristics of different citrus fruits. Food Chem. 2001, 74, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Soong, Y.-Y.; Barlow, P.J. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of selected fruit seeds. Food Chem. 2004, 88, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sagar, N.A.; Pareek, S.; Sharma, S.; Yahia, E.M.; Lobo, M.G. Fruit and Vegetable Waste: Bioactive Compounds, Their Extraction, and Possible Utilization. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018, 17, 512–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Siddiqui, A.; Salahuddin, T.; Riaz, A.; Zohra, R.R.; Naheed, S. Production of amylase from Bacillus sp. AY3 using fruit peels as substrate. FUUAST J. Biol. 2014, 4, 213–215. [Google Scholar]
  11. Santo, A.P.D.E.; Cartolano, N.S.; Silva, T.F.; Soares, F.A.S.D.M.; Gioielli, L.; Perego, P.; Converti, A.; De Oliveira, M.N. Fibers from fruit by-products enhance probiotic viability and fatty acid profile and increase CLA content in yoghurts. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 154, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shanmugavadivu, M.; Kuppusamy, S.; Ranjithkumar, R. Synthesis of pomegranate peel extract mediated silver nanoparticles and its antibacterial activity. Am. J. Adv. Drug. Deliv. 2014, 2, 174–182. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nasirifar, S.Z.; Maghsoudlou, A.; Oliyaei, N. Effect of active lipid-based coating incorporated with nanoclay and orange peel essential oil on physicochemical properties of Citrus sinensis. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 1508–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Jiao, X.-Y.; Li, L.-S.; Qin, S.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, K.; Xu, L. The synthesis of fluorescent carbon dots from mango peel and their multiple applications. Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 577, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhou, N.; Chen, H.; Xi, J.; Yao, D.; Zhou, Z.; Tian, Y.; Lu, X. Biochars with excellent Pb(II) adsorption property produced from fresh and dehydrated banana peels via hydrothermal carbonization. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 232, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Enniya, I.; Jourani, A. Study of Methylene Blue Removal by a biosorbent prepared with Apple peels. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2017, 8, 4573–4581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zaragoza, M.D.L.L.Z.; González-Reza, R.M.; Mendoza-Munoz, N.; Miranda-Linares, V.; Bernal-Couoh, T.F.; Mendoza-Elvira, S.; Quintanar-Guerrero, D. Nanosystems in Edible Coatings: A Novel Strategy for Food Preservation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Wu, Y.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Q. Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of essential oils encapsulated in zein nanoparticles prepared by liquid–liquid dispersion method. LWT 2012, 48, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Prakash, A.; Baskaran, R.; Vadivel, V. Citral nanoemulsion incorporated edible coating to extend the shelf life of fresh cut pineapples. LWT 2020, 118, 108851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Raghav, P.K.; Agarwal, N.; Saini, M. Edible coating of fruits and vegetables: A review. Int. J. Sci. Res. Mod. Edu. 2016, 1, 188–204. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ullah, A.; Abbasi, N.; Shafique, M.; Qureshi, A.A. Influence of Edible Coatings on Biochemical Fruit Quality and Storage Life of Bell Pepper cv. “Yolo Wonder.”. J. Food Qual. 2017, 2017, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Adukwu, E.; Allen, S.C.; Phillips, C.A. The anti-biofilm activity of lemongrass (Cymbopogon flexuosus) and grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) essential oils against five strains of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 113, 1217–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Alparslan, Y.; Metin, C.; Yapıcı, H.H.; Baygar, T.; Günlü, A.; Baygar, T. Combined effect of orange peel essential oil and gelatin coating on the quality and shelf life of shrimps. J. Food Saf. Food Qual. 2017, 68, 69–78. [Google Scholar]
  24. Etxabide, A.; Urdanpilleta, M.; Gómez-Arriaran, I.; De La Caba, K.; Guerrero, P. Effect of pH and lactose on cross-linking extension and structure of fish gelatin films. React. Funct. Polym. 2017, 117, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hanani, Z.A.N.; Yee, F.C.; Nor-Khaizura, M. Effect of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel powder on the antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of fish gelatin films as active packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 89, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shin, S.-H.; Chang, Y.; Lacroix, M.; Han, J. Control of microbial growth and lipid oxidation on beef product using an apple peel-based edible coating treatment. LWT 2017, 84, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Al-Anbari, I.H.; Dakhel, A.M.; Adnan, A. The effect of adding local orange peel powder to microbial inhibition and oxidative reaction within edible film component. Plant Arc. 2019, 19, 1006–1012. [Google Scholar]
  28. Moghadam, M.; Salami, M.; Mohammadian, M.; Khodadadi, M.; Emam-Djomeh, Z. Development of antioxidant edible films based on mung bean protein enriched with pomegranate peel. Food Hydrocoll. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tammineni, N.; Ünlü, G.; Min, S.C. Development of antimicrobial potato peel waste-based edible films with oregano essential oil to inhibit Listeria monocytogenes on cold-smoked salmon. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech. 2013, 48, 211–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alparslan, Y.; Baygar, T. Effect of Chitosan Film Coating Combined with Orange Peel Essential Oil on the Shelf Life of Deepwater Pink Shrimp. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2017, 10, 842–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rahmawati, D.; Chandra, M.; Santoso, S.; Puteri, M.G. Application of lemon peel essential oil with edible coating agent to prolong shelf life of tofu and strawberry. In AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing LLC: Melville, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Radi, M.; Akhavan, H.-R.; Amiri, S.; Akhavan-Darabi, S. The use of orange peel essential oil microemulsion and nanoemulsion in pectin-based coating to extend the shelf life of fresh-cut orange. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Borah, P.P.; Das, P.; Badwaik, L.S. Ultrasound treated potato peel and sweet lime pomace based biopolymer film development. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2017, 36, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hanani, Z.A.N.; Husna, A.A.; Syahida, S.N.; Khaizura, M.N.; Jamilah, B. Effect of different fruit peels on the functional properties of gelatin/polyethylene bilayer films for active packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2018, 18, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Abdel-Hamid, M.; Romeih, E.; Huang, Z.; Enomoto, T.; Huang, L.; Li, L. Bioactive properties of probiotic set-yogurt supplemented with Siraitia grosvenorii fruit extract. Food Chem. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cerezal, P.; Duarte, G. Use of skin in the elaboration of concentrated products of cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller). J. Prof. Assoc. Cactus. 2005, 7, 61–83. [Google Scholar]
  37. Crizel, T.D.M.; Jablonski, A.; Rios, A.D.O.; Rech, R.; Flôres, S.H. Dietary fiber from orange byproducts as a potential fat replacer. LWT 2013, 53, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chan, C.-L.; Gan, R.-Y.; Shah, N.P.; Corke, H. Enhancing antioxidant capacity of Lactobacillus acidophilus-fermented milk fortified with pomegranate peel extracts. Food Biosci. 2018, 26, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Coelho, E.M.; Souza, M.E.; Corrêa, L.C.; Viana, A.C.; De Azevêdo, L.C.; Lima, M.D.S. Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Mango Peel Liqueurs (Mangifera indica L.) Produced by Different Methods of Maceration. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Drago, L. Probiotics and Colon Cancer. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Sah, B.N.P.; Vasiljevic, T.; McKechnie, S.; Donkor, O. Effect of pineapple waste powder on probiotic growth, antioxidant and antimutagenic activities of yogurt. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 53, 1698–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vicenssuto, G.M.; De Castro, R.J.S. Development of a novel probiotic milk product with enhanced antioxidant properties using mango peel as a fermentation substrate. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 24, 101564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pgi, D.; Jwa, S.; Rmusk, R. Formulation and development of composite fruit peel powder incorporated fat and sugar-free probiotic set yogurt. GSC Boil. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 11, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Akhtar, M.S.; Panwar, J.; Yun, Y.-S. Biogenic Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles by Plant Extracts. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2013, 1, 591–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ghosh, P.R.; Fawcett, D.; Sharma, S.B.; Poinern, G.E.J. Production of High-Value Nanoparticles via Biogenic Processes Using Aquacultural and Horticultural Food Waste. Materials 2017, 10, 852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Shah, M.; Fawcett, D.; Sharma, S.; Tripathy, S.K.; Poinern, G.E.J. Green Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles via Biological Entities. Materials 2015, 8, 7278–7308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Fawcett, D.; Verduin, J.; Shah, M.; Sharma, S.B.; Poinern, G.E.J. A Review of Current Research into the Biogenic Synthesis of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles via Marine Algae and Seagrasses. J. Nanosci. 2017, 2017, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Anastas, P.T.; Warner, J.C. Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  49. Thakkar, K.; Mhatre, S.S.; Parikh, R.Y. Biological synthesis of metallic nanoparticles. Nanomed. Nanotech. Boil. Med. 2010, 6, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kumar, H.; Bhardwaj, K.; Kuca, K.; Kalia, A.; Nepovimova, E.; Verma, R.; Kumar, D. Flower-Based Green Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles: Applications beyond Fragrance. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Naganathan, K.; Thirunavukkarasu, S. Green way genesis of silver nanoparticles using multiple fruit peels waste and its antimicrobial, anti-oxidant and anti-tumor cell line studies. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2017; Volume 191, p. 12009. [Google Scholar]
  52. Shet, A.R.; Tantri, S.; Bennal, A. Economical biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using fruit waste. J. Chem. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 9, 2306–2311. [Google Scholar]
  53. Reenaa, M.; Menon, A.S. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Different Citrus Fruit Peel Extracts and a Comparative Analysis on its Antibacterial Activity. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2017, 6, 2358–2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Skiba, M.I.; Vorobyova, V.I. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Orange Peel Extract Prepared by Plasmochemical Extraction Method and Degradation of Methylene Blue under Solar Irradiation. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 2019, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Samreen, F.G.; Muzaffar, R.; Nawaz, M.; Gul, S.; Basra, M.A.R. Synthesis, Characterization and Anti-Microbial Activity of Citrus limon Mediated Nanoparticles. Preprints 2018, 2018110417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Ibrahim, H.M.M. Green synthesis and characterization of silvernanoparticles using banana peel extract and their antimicrobial activity against representative microorganisms. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2015, 8, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Devanesan, S.; AlSalhi, M.; Balaji, R.V.; A Ranjitsingh, A.J.; Ahamed, A.; Alfuraydi, A.; Alqahtani, F.Y.; Aleanizy, F.S.; Othman, A.H. Antimicrobial and Cytotoxicity Effects of Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles from Punica granatum Peel Extract. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Ajmal, N.; Saraswat, K.; Sharma, V.; Zafar, M.E. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles from Prunus armeniaca (Apricot) fruit peel extract. Bull. Environ. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 2016, 5, 91–94. [Google Scholar]
  59. Kokila, T.; Ramesh, P.S.; Geetha, D. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles from Cavendish banana peel extract and its antibacterial and free radical scavenging assay: A novel biological approach. Appl. Nanosci. 2015, 5, 911–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Barros, C.H.N.; Cruz, G.C.F.; Mayrink, W.; Tasic, L. Bio-based synthesis of silver nanoparticles from orange waste: Effects of distinct biomolecule coatings on size, morphology, and antimicrobial activity. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 2018, 11, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Nava, O.; Soto-Robles, C.; Gómez-Gutiérrez, C.; Vilchis-Nestor, A.; Castro-Beltrán, A.; Olivas, A.; Morales, P.L. Fruit peel extract mediated green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles. J. Mol. Struct. 2017, 1147, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Das, G.; Patra, J.K.; Basavegowda, N.; Vishnuprasad, C.N.; Shin, H.-S. Comparative study on antidiabetic, cytotoxicity, antioxidant and antibacterial properties of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles using outer peels of two varieties of Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 4741–4754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Bhuvaneswari, S.; Subashini, G.; Subramaniyam, S. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using potato peel and degradation of textile mill effluent by photocatalytic activity. World J. Pharm. Res. 2017, 6, 774–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Patra, J.K.; Kwon, Y.; Baek, K.-H. Green biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles by onion peel extract: Synthesis, characterization and biological activities. Adv. Powder Technol. 2016, 27, 2204–2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kumar, V.; Verma, S.; Choudhury, S.; Tyagi, M.; Chatterjee, S.; Variyar, P.S. Biocompatible silver nanoparticles from vegetable waste: Its characterization and bio-efficacy. Int. J. Nanomater. Sci. 2015, 4, 70–86. [Google Scholar]
  66. Tamileswari, R.; Nisha, M.H.; Jesurani, S.; Kanagesan, S.; Hashim, M.; Catherine, S.; Alexander, P. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using the vegetable extract of Raphanus sativus (radish) and assessment of their antibacterial activity. Int. J. Adv. Technol. Eng. Sci. 2015, 3, 207–212. [Google Scholar]
  67. Fan, H.; Zhang, M.; Bhandari, B.; Yang, C.-H. Food waste as a carbon source in carbon quantum dots technology and their applications in food safety detection. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 95, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kumar, H.; Kuča, K.; Bhatia, S.K.; Saini, K.; Kaushal, A.; Verma, R.; Bhalla, T.C.; Kumar, D. Applications of Nanotechnology in Sensor-Based Detection of Foodborne Pathogens. Sensors 2020, 20, 1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Wang, Y.; Hu, A. Carbon quantum dots: Synthesis, properties and applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 6921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Ajila, C.; Bhat, S.; Rao, U.P. Valuable components of raw and ripe peels from two Indian mango varieties. Food Chem. 2007, 102, 1006–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rattanapoltee, P.; Kaewkannetra, P. Utilization of Agricultural Residues of Pineapple Peels and Sugarcane Bagasse as Cost-Saving Raw Materials in Scenedesmus acutus for Lipid Accumulation and Biodiesel Production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014, 173, 1495–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Pérez-Jiménez, J.; Saura-Calixto, F. Fruit peels as sources of non-extractable polyphenols or macromolecular antioxidants: Analysis and nutritional implications. Food Res. Int. 2018, 111, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Cao, L.; Meziani, M.J.; Sahu, S.; Sun, Y.-P. Photoluminescence Properties of Graphene versus Other Carbon Nanomaterials. Accounts Chem. Res. 2012, 46, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Iravani, S.; Varma, R.S. Green synthesis, biomedical and biotechnological applications of carbon and graphene quantum dots. A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020, 18, 703–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Tyagi, A.; Tripathi, K.M.; Choudhary, S.; Singh, N.; Gupta, R.K. Green synthesis of carbon quantum dots from lemon peel waste: Applications in sensing and photocatalysis. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 72423–72432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Huang, C.-C.; Hung, Y.-S.; Weng, Y.-M.; Chen, W.; Lai, Y.-S. Sustainable development of carbon nanodots technology: Natural products as a carbon source and applications to food safety. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 86, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Vandarkuzhali, S.A.A.; Natarajan, S.; Jeyabalan, S.; Sivaraman, G.; Singaravadivel, S.; Muthusubramanian, S.; Viswanathan, B. Pineapple Peel-Derived Carbon Dots: Applications as Sensor, Molecular Keypad Lock, and Memory Device. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 12584–12592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Ghosh, S.; Ghosal, K.; Mohammad, S.A.; Sarkar, K. Dendrimer functionalized carbon quantum dot for selective detection of breast cancer and gene therapy. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 373, 468–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Huang, Q.; Lin, X.; Zhu, J.J.; Tong, Q.X. Pd-Au@ carbon dots nanocomposite: Facile synthesis and application as an ultrasensitive electrochemical biosensor for determination of colitoxin DNA in human serum. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 94, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lu, W.; Qin, X.; Liu, S.; Chang, G.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, Y.; Asiri, A.M.; Al-Youbi, A.O.; Sun, X. Economical, Green Synthesis of Fluorescent Carbon Nanoparticles and Their Use as Probes for Sensitive and Selective Detection of Mercury(II) Ions. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 5351–5357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Xiao, P.; Ke, Y.; Lu, J.; Huang, Z.; Zhu, X.; Wei, B.; Huang, L. Photoluminescence immunoassay based on grapefruit peel-extracted carbon quantum dots encapsulated into silica nanospheres for p53 protein. Biochem. Eng. J. 2018, 139, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bankoti, K.; Rameshbabu, A.P.; Datta, S.; Das, B.; Mitra, A.; Dhara, S. Onion derived carbon nanodots for live cell imaging and accelerated skin wound healing. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 6579–6592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhou, J.; Sheng, Z.; Han, H.-Y.; Zhou, M.; Li, C. Facile synthesis of fluorescent carbon dots using watermelon peel as a carbon source. Mater. Lett. 2012, 66, 222–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Chatzimitakos, T.; Kasouni, A.; Sygellou, L.; Avgeropoulos, A.; Troganis, A.; Stalikas, C. Two of a kind but different: Luminescent carbon quantum dots from Citrus peels for iron and tartrazine sensing and cell imaging. Talanta 2017, 175, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Prasannan, A.; Imae, T. One-Pot Synthesis of Fluorescent Carbon Dots from Orange Waste Peels. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 15673–15678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Aji, M.P.; Susanto; Wiguna, P.A. Sulhadi Facile synthesis of luminescent carbon dots from mangosteen peel by pyrolysis method. J. Theor. Appl. Phys. 2017, 22, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Yadav, H.A.; Eraiah, B.; Basavaraj, R.; Nagabhushana, H.; Darshan, G.; Sharma, S.; Prasad, B.D.; Nithya, R.; Shanthi, S. Rapid synthesis of C-dot@TiO2 core-shell composite labeling agent: Probing of complex fingerprints recovery in fresh water. J. Alloy Compd. 2018, 742, 1006–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Vikneswaran, R.; Ramesh, S.; Yahya, R. Green synthesized carbon nanodots as a fluorescent probe for selective and sensitive detection of iron(III) ions. Mater. Lett. 2014, 136, 179–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Jadhav, P.; Sonne, M.; Kadam, A.; Patil, S.; Dahigaonkar, K.; Oberoi, J.K. Formulation of cost effective alternative bacterial culture media using fruit and vegetables waste. Int. J. Curr. Res. Rev. 2018, 10, 6–15. [Google Scholar]
  90. Basu, S.; Bose, C.; Ojha, N.; Das, N.; Das, J.; Pal, M.; Khurana, S. Evolution of bacterial and fungal growth media. Bioinformation 2015, 11, 182–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Deivanayaki, M.; Iruthayaraj, A.P. Alternative vegetable nutrient source for microbial growth. Inter. J. Biosci. 2012, 2, 47–51. [Google Scholar]
  92. Wasas, A.D.; Huebner, R.E.; Klugman, K.P. Use of dorset egg medium for maintenance and transport of Neisseria meningitides and Haemophilus influenzae Type b. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37, 2045–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Tijani, I.D.R.; Jamal, P.; Alam, M.; Mirghani, M. Optimization of cassava peel medium to an enriched animal feed by the white rot fungi Panus tigrinus M609RQY. Int. Food Res. J. 2012, 19, 427–432. [Google Scholar]
  94. Jamal, P.; Saheed, O.K.; Kari, M.I.A.; Alam, Z.; Muyibi, S.A. Cellulolytic Fruits Wastes: A Potential Support for Enzyme Assisted Protein Production. J. Boil. Sci. 2013, 13, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Kahraman, S.; Gurdal, I.H. Effect of synthetic and natural culture media on laccase production by white rot fungi. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 82, 215–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Milala, M.; Shugaba, A.; Gidado, A.; Ene, A.; Wafar, J. Studies on the use of agricultural wastes for cellulase enzyme production by Aspergillus niger. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2005, 1, 325–328. [Google Scholar]
  97. Putri, C.H.; Janica, L.; Jannah, M.; Ariana, P.P. Utilization of dragon fruit peel waste as microbial growth media. In Proceedings of the 10th CISAK, Daejeon, Korea, July 2017; pp. 91–95. [Google Scholar]
  98. Kindo, A.; Tupaki-Sreepurna, A.; Yuvaraj, M. Banana peel culture as an indigenous medium for easy identification of late-sporulation human fungal pathogens. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2016, 34, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Hasanin, M.; Hashem, A.H. Eco-friendly, economic fungal universal medium from watermelon peel waste. J. Microbiol. Methods 2020, 168, 105802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Carota, E.; Petruccioli, M.; D’Annibale, A.; Gallo, A.M.; Crognale, S. Orange peel waste–based liquid medium for biodiesel production by oleaginous yeasts. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 4617–4628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Verma, N.; Kumar, V.; Bansal, M. Utility of Luffa cylindrica and Litchi chinensis peel, an agricultural waste biomass in cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei under solid state cultivation. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 16, 483–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Verma, N.; Bansal, M.C.; Kumar, V. Pea peel waste: A lignocellulosic waste and its utility in cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei under solid state cultivation. Bioresources 2011, 6, 1505–1519. [Google Scholar]
  103. Kadam, A.; Patil, S.; Sonne, M.; Dahigaonkar, K.; Oberoi, J.K.; Jadhav, P. Cost effective alternative fungal culture media formulation using fruit and vegetables waste. Int. J. Curr. Res. 2017, 9, 56887–56893. [Google Scholar]
  104. Bruno, G.; Mike, P.; Christelle, B.; Goodspeed, K. Biochar is carbon negative. Nature Geosci. 2009, 2, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Oh, J.-I.; Lee, J.; Lee, T.; Ok, Y.S.; Lee, S.-R.; Kwon, E.E. Strategic CO 2 utilization for shifting carbon distribution from pyrolytic oil to syngas in pyrolysis of food waste. J. CO2 Util. 2017, 20, 150–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Carmona-Cabello, M.; Garcia, I.L.; Leiva-Candia, D.; Dorado, M.P. Valorization of food waste based on its composition through the concept of biorefinery. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2018, 14, 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Liu, Z.; Zhang, F.-S. Removal of lead from water using biochars prepared from hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass. J. Hazard Mater. 2009, 167, 933–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Inyang, M.; Gao, B.; Yao, Y.; Xue, Y.; Zimmerman, A.R.; Pullammanappallil, P.; Cao, X. Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution by biochars derived from anaerobically digested biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 110, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Xu, X.; Cao, X.; Zhao, L. Comparison of rice husk- and dairy manure-derived biochars for simultaneously removing heavy metals from aqueous solutions: Role of mineral components in biochars. Chemosphere 2013, 92, 955–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Cao, X.; Ma, L.; Gao, B.; Harris, W. Dairy-manure derived biochar effectively sorbs lead and atrazine. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 3285–3291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Yao, Y.; Gao, B.; Inyang, M.; Zimmerman, A.R.; Cao, X.; Pullammanappallil, P.; Yang, L. Biochar derived from anaerobically digested sugar beet tailings: Characterization and phosphate removal potential. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 6273–6278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Lam, S.S.; Liew, R.K.; Cheng, C.-K.; Rasit, N.; Ooi, C.K.; Ma, N.L.; Ng, J.-H.; Lam, W.H.; Chong, C.T.; Chase, H.A. Pyrolysis production of fruit peel biochar for potential use in treatment of palm oil mill effluent. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 213, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Zhang, B.; Wu, Y.; Cha, L. Removal of methyl orange dye using activated biochar derived from pomelo peel wastes: Performance, isotherm, and kinetic studies. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2019, 41, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wang, C.; Gu, L.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Cao, L.; Hu, X. Sorption behavior of Cr(VI) on pineapple-peel-derived biochar and the influence of coexisting pyrene. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 2016, 111, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Fu, B.; Ge, C.; Yue, L.; Luo, J.; Feng, D.; Deng, H.; Yu, H. Characterization of Biochar Derived from Pineapple Peel Waste and Its Application for Sorption of Oxytetracycline from Aqueous Solution. Bioresouces 2016, 11, 9017–9035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Hu, X.; Zhang, X.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W.; Wen, H.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, C. Comparison study on the ammonium adsorption of the biochars derived from different kinds of fruit peel. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 707, 135544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Wu, Y.; Cha, L.; Fane, Y.; Fang, P.; Ming, Z.; Sha, H. Activated Biochar Prepared by Pomelo Peel Using H3PO4 for the Adsorption of Hexavalent Chromium: Performance and Mechanism. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2017, 228, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Wu, J.; Yang, J.; Feng, P.; Huang, G.; Xu, C.; Lin, B. High-efficiency removal of dyes from wastewater by fully recycling litchi peel biochar. Chemosphere 2020, 246, 125734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Selvanathan, M.; Yann, K.T.; Chung, C.H.; Selvarajoo, A.; Arumugasamy, S.K.; Sethu, V. Adsorption of copper(II) ion from aqueous solution using biochar derived from rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum) peel: Feedforward neural network modelling study. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Cao, Q.; Huang, Z.; Liu, S.; Wu, Y. Potential of Punica granatum biochar to adsorb Cu(II) in soil. Sci. Rep. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Shakya, A.; Núñez-Delgado, A.; Agarwal, T. Biochar synthesis from sweet lime peel for hexavalent chromium remediation from aqueous solution. J. Environ. Manag. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Sun, Y.; Yang, G.; Zhang, L.; Sun, Z. Preparation of high performance H 2 S removal biochar by direct fluidized bed carbonization using potato peel waste. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2017, 107, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Niazi, N.K.; Murtaza, B.; Bibi, I.; Shahid, M.; White, J.; Nawaz, M.; Bashir, S.; Shakoor, M.; Choppala, G.; Murtaza, G.; et al. Removal and Recovery of Metals by Biosorbents and Biochars Derived From Biowastes. In Environmental Materials and Waste; Elsevier BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 149–177. [Google Scholar]
  124. Vijayaraghavan, K.; Yun, Y.-S. Bacterial biosorbents and biosorption. Biotechnol. Adv. 2008, 26, 266–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wang, J.; Chen, C. Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 195–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Park, N.; Yun, Y.-S.; Park, J.M. The past, present, and future trends of biosorption. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2010, 15, 86–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Abdi, O.; Kazemi, M. A review study of biosorption of heavy metals and comparison between different biosorbents. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2015, 6, 1386–1399. [Google Scholar]
  128. Hameed, B.; Ahmad, A. Batch adsorption of methylene blue from aqueous solution by garlic peel, an agricultural waste biomass. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 870–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Krishni, R.; Foo, K.Y.; Hameed, B. Food cannery effluent, pineapple peel as an effective low-cost biosorbent for removing cationic dye from aqueous solutions. Desalination Water Treat. 2013, 52, 6096–6103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Shakoor, S.; Nasar, A. Adsorptive treatment of hazardous methylene blue dye from artificially contaminated water using cucumis sativus peel waste as a low-cost adsorbent. Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 2017, 5, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Jawad, A.H.; Kadhum, A.M.; Ngoh, Y.S. Applicability of dragon fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) peels as low-cost biosorbent for adsorption of methylene blue from aqueous solution: Kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamics studies. DESALINATION Water Treat. 2018, 109, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Romero-Cano, L.A.; González-Gutiérrez, L.V.; A Baldenegro-Pérez, L.; Carrasco-Marin, F. Grapefruit peels as biosorbent: Characterization and use in batch and fixed bed column for Cu(II) uptake from wastewater. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2017, 92, 1650–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ibisi, N.E.; Asoluka, C.A. Use of agro-waste (Musa paradisiaca peels) as a sustainable biosorbent for toxic metal ions removal from contaminated water. Chem. Int. 2018, 4, 52–59. [Google Scholar]
  134. Lam, Y.F.; Lee, L.Y.; Chua, S.J.; Lim, S.S.; Gan, S. Insights into the equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamics of nickel removal by environmental friendly Lansium domesticum peel biosorbent. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 127, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Pavan, F.A.; Mazzocato, A.C.; Jacques, R.A.; Dias, S.L.P. Ponkan peel: A potential biosorbent for removal of Pb(II) ions from aqueous solution. Biochem. Eng. J. 2008, 40, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Mohammed, R.; Chong, M.F. Treatment and decolorization of biologically treated Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) using banana peel as novel biosorbent. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 132, 237–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Pavan, F.A.; Lima, I.S.; Lima, E.C.; Airoldi, C.; Gushikem, Y. Use of Ponkan mandarin peels as biosorbent for toxic metals uptake from aqueous solutions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 137, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Singh, S.; Parveen, N.; Gupta, H. Adsorptive decontamination of rhodamine-B from water using banana peel powder: A biosorbent. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2018, 12, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ahmed, D.; Abid, H.; Riaz, A. Lagenaria siceraria peel biomass as a potential biosorbent for the removal of toxic metals from industrial wastewaters. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 2018, 75, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Ng, H.W.; Lee, L.Y.; Chan, W.L.; Gan, S.; Chemmangattuvalappil, N.G. Luffa acutangula peel as an effective natural biosorbent for malachite green removal in aqueous media: Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic investigations. DESALINATION Water Treat. 2015, 57, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Gill, R.; Mahmood, A.; Nazir, R. Biosorption potential and kinetic studies of vegetable waste mixture for the removal of Nickel(II). J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2013, 15, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Utilization of fruits and vegetable peel-based waste into novel industrial products [10,11,12,13,14,15,16].
Figure 1. Utilization of fruits and vegetable peel-based waste into novel industrial products [10,11,12,13,14,15,16].
Molecules 25 02812 g001
Table 1. Fruits and vegetables peel based edible films/coating with their applications.
Table 1. Fruits and vegetables peel based edible films/coating with their applications.
Fruit/Vegetable Common NameScientific NameMatrixApplied on Food ItemsTechnique UsedBeneficial EffectsRef
AppleMalus domesticaCarboxy methylcelluloseFresh beef pattiesMicrofluidizationA complete inhibition of lipid oxidation, and efficient suppression of the growth of microbes on raw beef patties. No effect on the sensory characteristics of raw and cooked beef patties [26]
OrangeCitrus sinensisGelatinCupcakeNDIncrease in peroxide value by 3.60–4.80 (mL.eq./kg fat) in refrigerated storage for 1 week and decrease in microbial growth[27]
PomegranatePunica granatumMung bean proteinNSNDThe films enriched with pomegranate peel also showed higher total phenolic content; antioxidant activity, antibacterial capacity compared to the control mung bean protein film. These films found their use in food industry to develop bio-functional edible films intended for packaging of food products[28]
PotatoSolanum tuberosumOregano essential oil (OEO)Cold-smoked salmonNDWhen samples were coated with Potato processing waste-based-oregano oil-incorporating film (PPW-OO), the Listeria population decreased from 6.7 to 4.7 log CFU/g by the end of storage. Incorporation of oil into the films reduced the film strength and increased their water vapor permeability. The PPW-OO film reduced the growth of Listeria monocytogenes on cold-smoked salmon during storage under vacuum conditions at 4 °C for 28 days[29]
OrangeCitrus sinensis (L.) OsbeckChitosan filmDeepwater pink shrimpCastingThe combination of chitosan film with 2% orange peel essential oil concentration was effective in prolonging the shelf life of fresh shrimps to 15 days[30]
OrangeCitrus sinensis (L.) OsbeckGelatinShrimpsNDGelatin coating combined with orange peel essential oil preserved shrimp quality during cold storage with a shelf-life extension of about 6 days[23]
LemonCitrus limonCassava starch and sodium alginateTofu, StrawberryNDThe addition of 0.6% lemon peel essential oil (LPEO) to tofu and 1% LPEO to strawberry with each of edible coating agents was significantly able to reduce their degradation[31]
OrangeCitrus sinensisCarnauba wax, montmorillonite nanoclayBlood orangeNDBlood orange coated by carnauba wax with montmorillonite nanoclay (MMT) had the least deformation and dissolved solid and the highest acidity compared to other treatments. Fruits coating with MMT showed better brightness[13]
OrangeCitrus sinensisPectin-coatingFresh-cut orangeNDThe results showed that the nanoemulsion-based edible coatings containing orange peel essential oil can extend the shelf life of orange slices without any undesirable impacts on sensory attributes[32]
NS: not specified; ND: not defined.
Table 2. Fruits and vegetables peel derived metallic nanoparticles with their application.
Table 2. Fruits and vegetables peel derived metallic nanoparticles with their application.
Fruit/Vegetable Common NameScientific NameTypes of Nanoparticles SynthesizedReaction TimeMorphologySizeApplicationsRef
Pomegranate; Orange; Banana and ApplePunica granatum; Citrus sinensis; Musa; Malus domesticaSilver2 minSphere25 nmAntibacterial activity against Salmonella sp., Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas sp., Aeromonas hydrophila; Antifungal activity against Fuarium sp.; Antioxidant activity using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH); Cytotoxicity against human breast cancer cells MCF-7[51]
Orange; BananaCitrus sinensis; MusaSilver1 hSphereNDAntibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Proteus vulgaris[52]
Orange; Lemon; Sweet lemonCitrus sinensis; Citrus limon; Citrus limettaSilver24 hNDNDAntibacterial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium[53]
OrangeCitrus sinensisSilver10 minSphere47–53 nmPhotocatalytic against methylene blue[54]
LemonCitrus limonSilver30 minSphere2–5 nmAntibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa, E. coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, Streptococcus mutans, Proteus mirabilis; Antifungal activity against Candida albicans[55]
PomegranatePunica granatumSilver24 hND5–50 nmAntibacterial activity against S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, E. coli[12]
BananaMusa paradisiacaSilver1 hSphere23.7 nmAntibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa, E. coli, S. aureus, Bacillus subtilis; Antifungal activity against C. albicans[56]
PomegranatePunica granatumSilver24 hSphere20–40 nmAntibacterial activity against E. coli, P. vulgaris, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, S. aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Klebsiella pneumonia; Cytotoxicity against human colon cancer cell line RKO: ATCC® CRL-2577™[57]
ApricotPrunusa rmeniacaSilverNSRod50 nmAntibacterial activity against E. coli, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, B. subtilis[58]
Cavendish bananaMusa acuminataSilver30 minSphere55 nmAntibacterial activity against S. aureus, B. subtilis, E. coli, K. pneumonia; Antioxidant activity (DPPH), 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS)[59]
OrangeCitrus sinensisSilver5 hND48.1 nmAntibacterial activity against Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri (Xac)[60]
Tomato; Orange; Grapefruit; LemonLycopersicon esculentum; Citrus sinensis; Citrus
Paradise; Citrus aurantifolia
Zinc Oxide1 hHexagonal9.01 nm; 12.55 nm; 19.66 nm; 11.39 nmPhotocatalytic against methylene blue[61]
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatas (L.) Lam.(Ib)Silver1–12 hAgglomeratedNDAntibacterial activity against Enterococcus feacium, Salmonella enteritica, Listeria monocytogenes, B. cereus, S. aureus; Antidiabetic; Antioxidant activity (DPPH, ABTS, nitrite/nitrate oxide (NOx)); Cytotoxicity against HepG2 cancer cells[62]
PotatoSolanum tuberosumZinc Oxide24 hHexagonal30–150 nmPhotocatalytic against methylene blue and azo dyes[63]
OnionAllium cepaGold24 hSphere and Triangle45.42 nmSynergistic antimicrobial potential against B. cereus, E. coli, L. monocytogenes, S. aureus, S. typhimurium; Antifungal activity against C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. glochares; Antioxidant activity (DPPH, ABTS, NOx)[64]
Bottle gourdLagenaria sicerariaSilver20 hSphere5–40 nmCytotoxicity against A431, (skin carcinoma, p53 mutant) and A549, (lung carcinoma, p53 wild type); Antibacterial activity against S. typhi[65]
RadishRaphanus sativusSilver15 minPolygonal30–60 nmAntibacterial activity against S. aureus, B. subtilis, E. coli, K. pneumonia[66]
NS: not specified; ND: not defined.
Table 3. Fruits and vegetables peel as a carbon source for preparing carbon dots.
Table 3. Fruits and vegetables peel as a carbon source for preparing carbon dots.
Fruits/Vegetable Common NameScientific NameProduction ConditionsDetection Limit of Heavy MetalsApplicationsRef
MangoMangifera indicaHydrothermal/300 °C/2 h1.2 µMCellular labeling ferrous ion (Fe2+) detection[14]
PineappleAnanas comosusHydrothermal/200 °C/3 h4.5 nMElectronic security devices mercury ion (Hg2+) quantification[77]
LemonCitrus limon (L.)Hydrothermal/200 °C/8 h73 nMCr6+ sensing; Photocatalysis effect[75]
Sweet lemonCitrus limettaHydrothermal/180 °C/3 hNABreast cancer detection gene therapy[78]
BananaMusa acuminataMicrowave-assisted/500 W/20 minNADetermination of colitoxin DNA[79]
PomeloCitrus maximaHydrothermal/200 °C/3 h0.23 nMHg2+ sensing[80]
GrapefruitCitrus paradisiHydrothermal/190 °C/12 hNAPhotoluminescence immunoassay[81]
OnionAllium cepaMicrowave-assisted/1000 W/a specific time intervalsNASkin wound healing; Living cells imaging[82]
WatermelonCitrullus lanatusHydrothermal/220 °C/2 hNAImaging probe[83]
CitrusCitrus sinensis, Citrus limonHydrothermal/180 °C/2 h0.01 µMFerric ion (Fe3+) and tartrazine sensing; Cell imaging[84]
OrangeCitrus sinensisHydrothermal/150 °C/10 hNAPhotocatalytic activity[85]
MangosteenGarcinia mangostanaHydrothermal/200 °C/30 minNACells imaging[86]
PomegranatePunica granatumHydrothermal/180 °C/36 hNARecovery of latent prints[87]
BananaMusa acuminataHydrothermal/200 °C/2 h211 nMSelective and sensitive detection of Fe3+ ions[88]
NA-not applicable.
Table 4. Fruits and vegetables peel based microbiological media.
Table 4. Fruits and vegetables peel based microbiological media.
Fruit/Vegetable Common NameScientific NameMedium CompositionPurpose/UtilizationRef
Dragon fruitHylocereus undatusDragon fruit peel powder (33.3 g/L), peptone (20 mg/mL) and agar (1.5%)Viability analysis of Escherichia coli[97]
Orange; Potato; Drum stickCitrus sinensis; Solanum tuberosum; Moringa oleiferaPeel powder of orange (0.20 g/100 mL), potato (0.25 g/100 mL), drum stick (1 g/100mL) and agar (2%)Growth and pigment production analysis of E. coli, Serratia sp., Pseudomonas sp.[89]
Banana; Melon; GrapefruitMusa; Cucumis melo; Citrus paradiseLuria-Bertani medium contained 1% (w/v) starch, banana, grape fruit and melon peel powderAmylase production from Bacillus sp. AY3[10]
BananaMusaAutoclave banana peel directly inoculated with fungiGrowth of human fungal pathogens viz. Lasiodiplodia theobromae, Macrophomina phaseolina, Nigrospora sphaerica, Chaetomium murorum, Nattrassia mangiferae and Schizophyllum commune[98]
WatermelonCitrullus lanatusWatermelon peel waste extract (500 g/L) and dextrose (20 g/L)Evaluation of fungal growth such as Rhizopus oryzae, Lichtheimia corymbifera, Aspergillus niger, Penicillium Expansium and Fusarium oxysporum[99]
OrangeCitrus sinensisOrange peel extract (19.8 g/L), (NH4)2SO4 (0.6 g/L)Biodiesel production using oleaginous yeasts[100]
Sponge gourd; LycheeLuffa cylindrica; Litchi chinensisSponge gourd peel bed soaked with urea (0.3 g/L), (NH4)2SO4 (1.4 g/L), KH2PO4 (2.0 g/L), MgSO4 7H2O (0.3 g/L), peptone (1 g/L), tween 80 (0.2 g/L), FeSO4 7H2O (0.005 g/L), MnSO4.7H2O (0.0016 g/L), ZnSO4. 7H2O (0.0014 g/L) CaCl2 2H2O (0.4 g/L), CoCl2 6H2O (0.02 g/L); same composition with lychee peelCellulase production using Trichoderma reesei[101]
PeaPisum sativumPea peel powder soaked with urea (0.3 g/L), (NH4)2SO4 (1.4 g/L), KH2PO4 (2.0 g/L), MgSO4.7H2O (0.3g/L), peptone (1g/L), tween 80 (0.2 g/L), FeSO4 7H2O (0.005 g/L), MnSO4.7H2O (0.0016g/L), ZnSO4. 7H2O (0.0014 g/L) CaCl2.2H2O (0.2 g/L), CoCl2. 6H2O (0.2 g/L)Cellulase production using Trichoderma reesei[102]
Orange; Potato; Drum stickCitrus sinensis; Solanum tuberosum; Moringa oleiferaPeel powder of orange (0.20 g/100 mL), potato (0.25 g/100 mL), drum stick (1 g/100 mL) and agar (2.5%)Growth analysis of Trichoderma sp., Aspergillus sp.[103]
Table 5. Fruits and vegetables peel derived biochar and its applications.
Table 5. Fruits and vegetables peel derived biochar and its applications.
Fruit/Vegetable Common NameScientific NameProcess conditions Required for Biochar FormationApplicationsRef
Orange; BananaCitrus sinensis; MusaPyrolysis at 500 °C for 10 minShowed good performance in reducing the concentration of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended solid (TSS) and oil and grease of Palm oil Mil effluent (POME) to an acceptable level below the discharge[112]
BananaMusaHydrothermal carbonization at 230 °C for 2 hShowed excellent lead clarification capability of 359 mg/g and 193 mg/g, respectively[15]
PomeloCitrus maximaPyrolysis at 450 °C for 1 hOne gram of biochar adsorb 150 mg/L methyl orange dye[113]
PineappleAnanas comosusPyrolysis at 750 °C for 2 hSorption capacity for hexavalent chromium: Cr (VI) was 7.44 mg/g[114]
PineappleAnanas comosusPyrolysis at 200 °C for 2 h and then heated at 650 °C for 3 hSorption of oxytetracycline[115]
Orange; Pineapple; Dragon fruitCitrus sinensis; Ananas comosus; Hylocereus undatusPyrolysis at 300 °C for 2 hMaximum ammonium cation (NH4+) adsorption capacities were associated with biochars of orange peel (4.71 mg/g) and pineapple peel (5.60 mg/g) produced at 300 °C for 2 h. The maximum NH4+ adsorption capacity of the dragon fruit (pitaya) peel biochar produced at 400 °C for 2 h was 2.65 mg/g[116]
PomeloCitrus maximaPyrolysis at 450 °C for 1 hA 0.05 g of biochar adsorbed 57.637 mg/g of Cr (VI)[117]
LitchiLitchi chinensisHydrothermal carbonization at 180 °C for 12 hAdsorption capacity for congored and malachite green was 404.4 and 2468 mg/g[118]
RambutanNephelium lappaceumPyrolysis at 600 °C for 3 hAdsorption for removal of copper ion: Cu(II) from aqueous solutions of 50 and 100 mg/L at 0.2 and 0.4 g/L adsorbent dosages, respectively[119]
PomegranatePunica granatumPyrolysis at 300 °C for 2 hAdsorption of Cu(II) was 52 mg/g[120]
Sweet limeCitrus limettaPyrolysis at 450 °C for 1 hMaximum removal efficiency was found to be 95% with 120 mg/L of initial Cr(VI) concentration with 3 g/L of biochar dose[121]
PotatoSolanum tuberosumPyrolysis at 500 °C for 5 minHydrogen sulfide (H2S) was achieved 53 mg/g at 500 °C, under space velocity (8000 L min–1kg–1)[122]
Table 6. Fruits and vegetables peel derived biosorbents and their applications.
Table 6. Fruits and vegetables peel derived biosorbents and their applications.
Fruit/Vegetable Common NameScientific NameDrying Temperature/TimeApplicationsRef
AppleMalus domestica60 °C/24 hAdsorbed 107.52 mg/g of
methylene blue
[16]
Dragon fruitHylocereus undatus105 °C/24 hA dosage of 0.06 g adsorbed 192.31 mg/g of methylene blue[131]
PineappleAnanas comosus70 °C/48 hAdsorbed 97.09 mg/g of
methylene blue
[129]
GrapefruitCitrus paradisi105 °C/24 hAdsorbed 52.48 mg/g copper ion: Cu(II)[132]
BananaMusa paradisiaca60 °C/5 hRemoved 90% lead (II) and cadmium (II) ions[133]
LangastLansium domesticum60 °C/24 hAdsorbed 10.1 mg/g of nickel[134]
Ponkan fruits/Mandarin orangeCitrus reticulataRT/daysAdsorbed 112.1 mg/g of lead (II) ions[135]
BananaMusa80 °C/48 hAdsorbed 97 mg/g color, 25 mg/g TSS, and 90.5 mg/g COD removed from Palm oil mill effluent (Natural banana peel); Adsorbed 137.5 mg/g, 28.5 mg/g and 93 mg/g for color, TSS and COD removed (Methylated banana peel)[136]
Ponkan fruits/Mandarin orangeCitrus reticulata60 °C/24 hAdsorbed 1.92, 1.37 and 1.31 mmol/g of nickel (II), cobalt (II) and copper (II) ions[137]
BananaMusaRT/4 daysA dosage of 0.3 g adsorbed 81.07% of rhodamine-B[138]
Bottle gourdLagenaria siceraria80 °C/24 hAdsorbed 99% copper, 95% silver and iron[139]
Sponge gourdLuffa acutangula60 °C/24 hA dosage of 8 g/L adsorbed 69.64 mg/g of malachite green[140]
Potato; CarrotSolanum tuberosum/ Daucus carota subsp. sativus60 °C/48 hA dosage of 3.0 g adsorbed 79.32% of nickel[141]
CucumberCucumis sativus95 °C/24 h A dosage of 4 g/L adsorbed 81.4% methylene blue[130]
GarlicAllium sativum60 °C/24 hAdsorbed 142.86 mg/g of methylene blue[128]
RT-room temperature.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumar, H.; Bhardwaj, K.; Sharma, R.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuča, K.; Dhanjal, D.S.; Verma, R.; Bhardwaj, P.; Sharma, S.; Kumar, D. Fruit and Vegetable Peels: Utilization of High Value Horticultural Waste in Novel Industrial Applications. Molecules 2020, 25, 2812. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122812

AMA Style

Kumar H, Bhardwaj K, Sharma R, Nepovimova E, Kuča K, Dhanjal DS, Verma R, Bhardwaj P, Sharma S, Kumar D. Fruit and Vegetable Peels: Utilization of High Value Horticultural Waste in Novel Industrial Applications. Molecules. 2020; 25(12):2812. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122812

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kumar, Harsh, Kanchan Bhardwaj, Ruchi Sharma, Eugenie Nepovimova, Kamil Kuča, Daljeet Singh Dhanjal, Rachna Verma, Prerna Bhardwaj, Somesh Sharma, and Dinesh Kumar. 2020. "Fruit and Vegetable Peels: Utilization of High Value Horticultural Waste in Novel Industrial Applications" Molecules 25, no. 12: 2812. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122812

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop