Next Article in Journal
Potential of Straw for Energy Purposes in Poland—Forecasts Based on Trend and Causal Models
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamic-Model-Based AGC Frequency Control Simulation Method for Korean Power System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thermodynamic Study on Reduction of Iron Oxides by H2 + CO + CH4 + N2 Mixture at 900 °C

1
School of Metallurgical and Ecological Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
2
Beijing Key Laboratory of Special Melting and Preparation of High-End Metal Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
3
College of Metallurgical Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2020, 13(19), 5053; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13195053
Submission received: 23 July 2020 / Revised: 11 September 2020 / Accepted: 22 September 2020 / Published: 25 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Section I: Energy Fundamentals and Conversion)

Abstract

:
The reduction gas used in the gas-based direct reduction iron-making process contains CH4 in different concentrations, which has an important effect on the gas and heat needed for the reduction of iron oxide. To investigate the influence of CH4 on gas utilization rate and heat needed at 900 °C, the initial conditions are set as H2% + CO% = 90, CH4% + N2% = 10, gas pressure 1–9 atm, and 0.5 mol Fe2O3, and the equilibrium state composition is calculated using the minimum free energy method. The utilization rate of total gas can be improved, and gas demand can be decreased by increasing CH4 concentration or H2 concentration or reducing gas pressure. For the production of per ton of Fe from 25 °C to 900 °C, 6.08–7.29 m3 of reduction gas, and 7.338–8.952 MJ of gas sensible heat can be saved by increasing 1 m3 CH4, while 10.959–11.189 MJ of reaction heat is increased. Compared with 3390.828–3865.760 MJ of the total heat of per ton of Fe for the reduction by H2 + CO, 2.174–3.703 MJ of total heat is increased by increasing 1 m3 CH4, and the increase ratio is 0.065–0.096%. This study is helpful to improve the gas efficiency and lower the pursuit of higher concentration of H2 + CO in reduction gas.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The gas-based direct reduction iron-making process is a kind of non-blast furnace iron-making process which does not use coke and produces solid iron through gas–solid reaction. It is a rapidly developing iron-making process due to its short technological process, high cleanliness, and low CO2 emission [1]. The basic composition of a gas-based direct reduction iron-making process can be divided into two parts: the gasification process and reduction process [2,3,4,5,6]. The gasification process provides available and clean reduction gas, which requires the concentration ratio of H2 + CO greater than 85%, the concentration ratio of CO2 + H2O less than 5%, the concentration ratio of CH4 less than 3%, the concentration ratio of H2S less than 0.1%, and the residual is N2.
H2 and CO are highly efficient in reducing gases. The gas utilization rates of H2 and CO in the reduction of Fe2O3 at 900 °C are 37.575% and 31.460%, respectively, which is the upper limit of the utilization rates of these two gases at 900 °C. Therefore, the reduction utilization rate of the H2 + CO mixture is between 31.460% and 37.575% [7]. In the presence of CO2 and H2O, the reduction utilization rate of the H2 + CO + CO2 + H2O mixture is further lower. N2 is often recognized as a heat carrier and does not participate in the reduction reaction in a reduction atmosphere [8]. CO2 can be removed by pressure swing adsorption or polyamine adsorption, and H2O can be removed by low temperature or desiccants, while CH4 + N2 will stay in the reduction gas [9].
The reduction gas generated from CH4 conversion and coal gasification contain CH4 in different concentrations, as shown in Table 1 [9,10,11,12,13]. The difference in the concentration of CH4 between input and output is used to calculate reduction gas demand [11]. In addition, 1 mol CH4 is often considered to be equivalent to 4 mol H2 + CO, according to CH4 conversion Formulas (9) and (10). The chemical reactions in which CH4 participates in the reduction of Fe2O3 are complex and reversible, as shown in Table 2. The main reactions between Fe2O3 and H2 + CO + CH4 + N2 include reduction reactions by H2 or CO or CH4, CH4 conversion reactions, carburizing reactions, carbon deposition reaction, water gas shift reaction, gasification reaction, etc. The determination of the equilibrium state containing 11 components requires detailed calculation. It is not reliable to calculate gas demand by only these two chemical equations. Therefore, a specific thermodynamic analysis of the influence of CH4 on the reduction reaction of Fe2O3 is required.
The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of CH4 concentration, gas pressure, H2 or CO concentration on reduction gas needed, and reaction enthalpy at 900 °C with CH4 concentration less than 10%. This study is helpful to understand the relationship between H2 + CO and CH4 in the process of reducing Fe2O3 and even to improve the utilization rate of reducing gas by increasing the concentration of CH4.

2. Methods

2.1. Parameters Settings

The initial state and the equilibrium state are shown in Figure 1. The reaction system is composed of solid and gas. The initial solid is 0.5 mol Fe2O3, and other gangue in the iron ore are not considered in the reaction system. The initial gas volume fraction is as shown in Table 3. The volume fraction of H2 + CO is fixed at 90%; namely, CO% + H2% = 90, which is a common gas composition requirement. For comparison, CO2 gas and H2O gas in initial states are neglected in the mixed gas. The volume fraction of CH4 gas increase from 0% to 10%, and the N2 is residual.
The reaction temperature is 900 °C, which is used in the MIDREX process and HYL/Energiron process [9,13]. The total gas pressure p total increases from 1 atm 9 atm, and 1 atm (atmosphere) or 1 p is 101,325 Pa. The total pressure of the reaction system is set to remain unchanged before and after reactions. In fact, the gas pressure decreases from bottom to top of the shaft furnace due to the solid bulk layer.
The amount of the initial gas is 10 mol, which exceeds the amount of gas required for reduction. For the reduction of 0.5 mol Fe2O3, the demand for reduction gas, composed of different concentrations of H2 + CO, are 4.0–4.7 mol, which has been calculated by the minimum Gibbs free energy method [7]. For the H2 + CO + CH4 + N2 gas mixture, the gas demand needs to be calculated under different conditions by the minimum Gibbs free energy method.

2.2. The Minimum Gibbs Free Energy Method

The minimum Gibbs free energy method can be used to calculate the amount of the components in the equilibrium state [7,14,15], which can be obtained from the initial state conditions (amount, temperature, and pressure). Based on the principle of minimum free energy; that is, the sum of Gibbs free energy of each component in the equilibrium state is the smallest, and a calculation model is established, as shown in Formulas (22) and (23). By solving the non-linear equations with constraints, the amount of each component in the equilibrium state could be received.
min . G all = i = 1 N n i G i = i = 1 N n i ( G i + R T ln a i )
s . t .   i = 1 N α i e n i = n e ( e = 1 , 2 , , M )
In this two formulas, i, e, represent the components and elements in the equilibrium state, respectively; N, M, represent the number of components and the number of elements in the equilibrium state, respectively; ni, ne, are the amounts of the components i and elements e in the equilibrium state, respectively, mol; G i , G i , represent the Gibbs free energy and the standard Gibbs free energy of the components i, respectively, J/mol; p i , p total , p , represent the partial pressure of the components i, the total pressure of all gas, and the standard atmospheric pressure, respectively, Pa, and p = 1 atm = 101,325 Pa; α i e represents the number of element e in the component i; T, represents the thermodynamic temperature of the system, K; R, is the ideal gas constant, which is equal to 8.314, J/(mol·K); a i represents the activity, when i is a gaseous state a i = p i p = n i n i · p total p , when i is a solid-state a i = 1 . The software LINGO is used in the mathematics calculation of minimum values for nonlinear equations.

2.3. Reaction Enthalpy and Sensible Heat

For reaction enthalpy of chemical reactions and sensible heat of substance with temperature changing, these calculation formulas are the same, which are the difference between the final state and the initial state, as shown in Formula (24).
Δ H = i = 1 N n i H i ,   T i j = 1 M n j H j ,   T j
where ΔH represents the enthalpy change, kJ/mol, and a negative value is exothermic, a positive value is endothermic; i, j, signify the components after and before the state change, respectively; N and M represent the number of components after and before the state change, respectively; ni and nj represent the number of components after and before the state change, respectively, mol; Ti and Tj represent the thermodynamic temperature of components after and before the state change, respectively, K; H i ,   T i and H j ,   T j , represent the standard molar enthalpy of component i at the thermodynamic temperature Ti and the component j at the thermodynamic temperature Tj, respectively, kJ/mol. The standard molar enthalpy and standard molar Gibbs energy of pure matter are derived from the specific heat capacity data provided by previous literatures [16].

2.4. Related Definitions

All equilibrium compositions are calculated by the minimum Gibbs free energy method based on the initial conditions. According to the amount of each component in the initial and equilibrium state, some definitions are made out to search the thermodynamic law in the reduction of iron oxide by reduction gas within CH4 at 900 °C.
CO2/(CO + CO2) and H2O/(H2O + H2) are used to show the equilibrium gas ratio and the utilization rate of CO and H2 in the reduction of iron oxide, which is shown in Formulas (25) and (26), respectively.
equilibrium   gas   ratio   of   CO 2 = n CO 2 , equilibrium n CO , equilibrium + n CO 2 , equilibrium
equilibrium   gas   ratio   of   H 2 O = n H 2 O , equilibrium n H 2 , equilibrium + n H 2 O , equilibrium
where in the n expresses the amount of the component, and the subscript equilibrium and initial express the equilibrium state and the initial state, respectively.
However, when CH4 is in the reduction gas, Formulas (25) and (26) are meaningless. According to the mass balance of gas–solid reactions, the lost oxygen in iron oxide is the same as the increased oxygen in gas. The deoxygenation rate of Fe2O3 and the utilization rate of total gas are defined as Formulas (27) and (28), respectively. Furthermore, the gas demand can be got by Formula (29). The amount of O in iron oxide is 1.5 mol for 0.5 mol Fe2O3, and 600 m3 for Fe2O3 including 1 t Fe. CH4 can save the volume of reduction gas and increase the reaction enthalpy, compared with the reduction gas H2 + CO, the saving volume of total gas per mol CH4 and increased reaction enthalpy per mol are defined in Formulas (30) and (31), respectively.
deoxygenation   rate   of   Fe 2 O 3 = the   amount   of   lost   oxygen   in   Fe 2 O 3   the   amount   of   oxygen   in   Fe 2 O 3 × 100 %
utilization   rate   of   total   gas = the   amount   of   lost   oxygen   in   Fe 2 O 3   the   amount   of   the   initial   gas × 100 %
the   amount   of   gas   needed = the   amount   of   O   in   iron   oxide the   utilization   rate   of   total   gas
saving   volume   of   total   gas   per   mol   CH 4 = the   amount   of   saving   volume   the   amount   of   CH 4
increased   reaction   enthalpy   per   mol   CH 4 = ( Δ H CO + H 2 + CH 4 Δ H CO + H 2 ) T , P the   amount   of   CH 4
CH4 conversion is defined as shown in Formula (32). According to the element balance, the possible product from CH4 are C, Fe3C, H2, CO, CO2, and H2O. Other hydrocarbons, carbon hydroxide, and carbonates are not considered. CH4 conversion reflects the utilization rate of CH4 under specific conditions.
CH 4   conversion   rate = ( 1 n CH 4 , equilibrium n CH 4 , initial ) × 100 %

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Equilibrium Composition

The collection of settings are taken as an example to display the law of reduction of Fe2O3 by H2 + CO + CH4 + N2 mixtures: the initial gas concentration is H2% = 45, CO% = 45, CH4% = 3.0, N2% = 7, the total pressure is 4 atm, and the reaction temperature is 900 °C. Figure 2 shows some rules, such as equilibrium products, equilibrium gas ratio, deoxygenation rate of iron oxide, gas utilization rate, and CH4 conversion.
Figure 2a shows the amount and kinds of equilibrium products with increasing the amount of initial reduction gas at the current setting, which demonstrates that the composition of equilibrium products is significantly affected by the quantity of reduction gas. With the increase of reduction gas, the iron oxide follows the law of gradual reduction, that is, Fe2O3→Fe3O4→Fe0.95O→Fe. When the initial amount of reduction gas is 1.5–2.5 mol and the initial iron oxide is 0.5 mol Fe2O3, the equilibrium state is Fe0.95O→Fe stage. Also, any two stages cannot exist at the same time in thermodynamics. Under the current initial conditions, Fe3C and C have not been generated. The complete reduction of iron oxide is shown in Figure 2a that product Fe0.95O gradually decreases to 0, and the corresponding amount of product Fe gradually increases to a maximum of 1mol and then remains unchanged. There is a certain amount of reduction gas that is just enough for the iron oxide to be completely reduced, and the more amount of reduction gas is not needed. Besides, attention should be paid to the fact that the content of CH4 in Figure 2a is close to 0.
Figure 2b shows the equilibrium gas ratio with increasing the amount of initial reduction gas in the current setting. In the reduction stage of Fe0.95O→Fe stage at 900 °C, the equilibrium concentration ratios of H2O/(H2 + H2O) and CO2/(CO + CO2) are 37.581% and 31.450%, respectively, which are the same as that of the reduction of iron oxide by pure H2 and pure CO. The two equilibrium concentration ratios are a function of temperature, regardless of whether CH4 exists or not, or how much CH4 exists.
Figure 2c shows the deoxygenation rate of Fe2O3 and the utilization rate of total gas with increasing the amount of initial reduction gas at the current setting. In the presence of CH4, the equilibrium concentrations of H2O/(H2 + H2O) and CO2/(CO + CO2) cannot represent the utilization rate of the gas. The ratio of the amount of oxygen loss to the amount of reduction gas should be adopted to display the utilization rate of reduction gas. In the reduction stage of Fe0.95O→Fe, the utilization rate does not change with the increase of the deoxygenation rate of Fe2O3. Therefore, this rule can be used to calculate the reduction gas utilization rate under different settings, such as gas concentration, gas pressure, etc.
Figure 2d shows the CH4 conversion rate with increasing the amount of initial reduction gas at the current setting. In the reduction stage of Fe0.95O→Fe, the CH4 conversion rate remains unchanged with the increase of the reduction gas. The increased CH4 has reacted with the increased H2O and CO2 obtained from the reduction of Fe0.95O, which is shown in Figure 2a. At any reduction stage of iron oxide, CH4 is almost completely decomposed, and the conversion rate of CH4 is ≥99.982%. When the amount of reduction gas is more than needed, the CH4 conversion rate decreases rapidly, and the reason is that the amount of CO2 and H2O generated from the reduction of iron oxide do not increase.

3.2. The Utilization Rate of Reduction Gas

The utilization rate of reduction gas for the full reduction of iron oxide is the same as that of the partial reduction stage of Fe0.95O→Fe. Therefore, the initial amount of reduction gas is set as 2 mol. The initial gas concentration is H2% + CO% = 90, CH4% = 0–10, the residual is N2, and these given initial gas concentration (volume fraction) are listed in Table 3. The total pressure is 1–9 atm and the reaction temperature is 900 °C.
The Figure 3a,b show the relationship between the utilization rate of total gas and the total gas pressure, and the former fixes the initial concentrations of both H2 and CO at 45%, the latter fixed the initial concentration of CH4 at 2%. As can be seen from these two figures, no matter what the initial gas concentration is, the gas utilization rate decreases with the increase of the total gas pressure, expect for single gas reduction. However, the influence of pressure on the gas utilization rate is not significant. The change of gas utilization rate from 1 atm to 9 atm is less than 1.70%, as shown in Figure 4. Also, when initial H2% = 60, the pressure has the greatest effect on gas utilization, which is close to 1.70%.
Figure 3c shows the relationship between the utilization rate of total gas and the initial CH4 volume fraction. It can be seen from these two figures, no matter what the initial gas concentration is, the gas utilization rate decreases with the increase of the total gas pressure. In other words, increasing the concentration of CH4 can greatly improve the gas utilization rate. Besides, the lines under different pressures are nearly parallel. According to the calculation of the slope, for every 1% increase in CH4 concentration, the gas utilization rate can be improved by 2.03–2.07%.
Figure 3d shows the relationship between the utilization rate of total gas and the initial H2 volume fraction. As can be seen from the figure, the gas utilization rate increases as the initial H2 concentration increases also decreases as the initial CO concentration increases. Also, the two ends of all curves are approximately coincident, that is, when the gas concentration is (H2% = 90, CH4% = 2) and (CO% = 90, CH4% = 2), the pressure has little effect on the gas utilization. For other H2 concentrations, the higher the pressure is, the lower the utilization of the gas is. Based on the slope calculation, every 1% increase in H2 concentration can improve the gas utilization rate by about 0.06%.
Table 4 lists the utilization rate of total gas of the selected nine groups of gas concentrations under different pressure. For single reduction gas (CO% = 90, N2% = 10) and (H2% = 90, N2% = 10), the utilization rate of total gas at 900 °C is 28.305% and 33.823%, respectively. Increasing CH4 concentration and decreasing the pressure can improve the gas utilization rate. At the same temperature and pressure, pure H2 has the highest gas utilization rate, while pure CO has the lowest gas utilization rate.

3.3. The Saving Volume of Reduction Gas per m3 CH4

The reduction gas needed for the full reduction of iron oxide to produce 1 ton of metallic Fe can be calculated by the utilization rate of reduction gas. For H2% = 45, CO% = 45, CH4% = 0–10, gas pressure is 1–9 atm, the reduction gas required for a ton of iron is shown in Figure 5. As can be seen from Figure 5, the amount of reduction gas required per ton of iron decreases with the increase of CH4 content. For example, when the initial CH4% is 0, the reduction gas (H2% = 45, CO%45, N2% = 10, gas pressure 4 atm) needed is 1937.319 m3; when the initial CH4% is 5, that is 1453.959 m3, the reduction gas required decreases by 483.36 m3.
The reduction gas demand can be saved by increasing CH4 into the mixture, and the specific effect can be calculated by Formula (30), which is shown in Figure 6. As can be seen from the figure, the saving effect decreases with the increase of the initial CH4 concentration, and the decreasing trend is obvious with the increase of the pressure. However, the range of these savings due to pressure and CH4 concentration is small, with a maximum of just 0.008 m3/m3. Therefore, it can be considered that for reduction gas (H2% = 45, CO% = 45, N2% = 10, and the pressure is 1–9 atm), 1 m3 CH4 can save 6.64–6.65 m3 total reduction gas.
Figure 7 shows the relationship between saving volume of total gas per m3 CH4 and the initial H2 concentration. It can be seen from Figure 7 that the saving volume per m3 CH4 decreases linearly with the increase of the initial H2 concentration. Since CH4 concentration has little influence on the savings effect of CH4, the points in Figure 7 are coincide, and the coordinate values of the main nodes have been marked in the figure. For gas concentration from (H2% = 0, CO% = 90) to (H2% = 90, CO% = 0), the saving effect of CH4 is decreased from 7.29 m3/m3 to 6.08 m3/m3. Compared with pressure and CH4 concentration, H2 concentration has a more significant effect on the savings effect of CH4.
It is important to note that the volume saving per m3 CH4 cannot be calculated according to Formula (9) and (10). According to Formula (9), the reaction between CH4 and H2O can produce 3 m3 H2 + 1 m3 CO by 1 m3 CH4. According to Formula (10), the reaction between CH4 and CO2 can get 2 m3 H2 + 2 m3 CO by 1 m3 CH4. In other words, the reaction of CH4 with deoxidized products H2O and CO2 results in a mixture of 4 m3 H2 + CO. However, this algorithm for saving effect without the iron oxide reduction system is not correct, due to the gas utilization rate for reduction is neglected. In the gas system composed of CH4 + H2O + H2 + CO2 + CO, five kinds of gases. H2O + H2, and CO2 + CO are also in equilibrium.

3.4. The Reaction Enthalpy

The reaction enthalpy of reduction of iron oxide can be calculated by Formula (24). Figure 8 shows the relationship between the reaction enthalpy and the initial gas amount, and the oblique line shows the full reduction of iron oxide. The curve that demonstrates the reduction by gas without CH4 is at the bottom of all curves and reaches a maximum value of 8.3 kJ/mol when the iron oxide is completely reduced; due to reverse reaction of Formulas (9) and (10), the curve starts to go down. For the reduction by gas included CH4, the reaction enthalpy increases with the increase of the amount of reduction gas.
Figure 9 shows the relationship between the reaction enthalpy and the initial CH4 concentration. As shown in the figure, reaction enthalpy is linearly correlated with the initial CH4 concentration. The initial reduction gas volume is set as 1.5 mol, 2.0 mol, and 2.5 mol, respectively, so the equilibrium state is in the stage of Fe0.95O→Fe. According to the calculation by Formula (33), the change of reaction enthalpy brought by 1 mol CH4 is the same at the same pressure. Increasing the pressure can reduce the change value of reaction enthalpy. The change of reaction enthalpy caused by 1 mol CH4 at 4 atm, 5 atm, and 6 atm is 249.79 kJ/mol, 249.31 kJ/mol, and 248.72 kJ/mol, respectively.
Δ H 1173 K = slope   of   reaction   enthalpy   increment   of   the   initial   amount   of   CH 4  

3.5. The Increased Reaction Enthalpy Per m3 CH4

Comparing the reduction of iron oxide by gas within CH4 and by gas without CH4, the reaction enthalpy increases under the same initial concentration of H2 and CO and pressure.
Figure 10 shows the relationship between the increased reaction enthalpy per m3 CH4 and the total gas pressure and the initial H2 concentration. As shown in the figure, the increased reaction enthalpy decreases with the increase of the total gas pressure, or with the increase of the initial H2 concentration. For the gas (H2% = 0, CO% = 90, the pressure is 1atm), the increased reaction enthalpy per m3 CH4 is the maximum of 11.189 MJ/m3. For the gas (H2% = 90, CO% = 0, the pressure is 9atm) the increased reaction enthalpy per m3 CH4 is the smallest of 10.959 MJ/m3.
For the gas (H2% = 0, CO% = 90, N2% = 10), the reaction enthalpy for producing a ton of iron is −330.280 MJ. For the gas (H2% = 90, CO% = 0, N2% = 10), and the reaction enthalpy for the production of a ton of iron is 568.471 MJ. The addition of 30 m3 CH4 in the gas phase can make the reaction enthalpy of the former gas system zero, and the latter gas system more heat supply needed.
According to the reduction reaction and methane conversion reaction, the reaction between CH4 and iron oxide is obtained by coupling, as shown in Formulas (34) and (35). The released heat of chemical reaction in the production of 1 mol of Fe with CO is 18.445 kJ, the absorption heat of chemical reaction in the production of 1 mol of Fe with H2 is 31.747 kJ, and the absorption heat of chemical reaction in the production of 1 mol of Fe with CH4 is 373.061 kJ.
Fe 2 O 3 + 3 CO = 2 Fe + 3 CO 2 Δ H 1173 K = 36.890   kJ / mol +   3 × ( CH 4 + CO 2 = 2 H 2 + 2 CO ) _ Δ H 1173 K = 261.004   kJ / mol Fe 2 O 3 + 3 CH 4 = 2 Fe + 6 H 2 + 3 CO Δ H 1173 K = 746.121   kJ / mol
Fe 2 O 3 + 3 H 2 = 2 Fe + 3 H 2 O Δ H 1173 K = 63.495   kJ / mol + 3 × ( CH 4 + H 2 O = 3 H 2 + CO ) _ Δ H 1173 K = 227.542   kJ / mol Fe 2 O 3 + 3 CH 4 = 2 Fe + 6 H 2 + 3 CO Δ H 1173 K = 746.121   kJ / mol
When the initial CH4 concentration is set to be 10% at most, the amount of CO2 and H2O in the system are excessive relative to that of CH4; that is, the conversion reaction of CH4 is relatively sufficient, as shown in Figure 2d. When the initial concentration of CO and H2 in the gas phase changes, the concentration of CO2 and H2O generated by the reduction reaction also changes along with it, thus making the reaction enthalpy of CH4 conversion different. The reduction utilization rate of H2 is higher than that of CO at 900 °C. Increasing the initial H2 concentration can increase the overall gas utilization rate and the concentration of H2O in the gas phase. In addition, the reaction enthalpy of H2O + CH4 is lower than that of CO2 + CH4, which reduces the increased reaction enthalpy of the system.
The transformation reaction of CH4 are reactions in which the amount of substance increases. Increasing the gas pressure can decrease the amount of forwarding reaction and the gas utilization rate, which lowers the increased reaction enthalpy of the system.

3.6. The Heat Needed per Ton Fe

The total heat needed of reduction of iron oxide by gas at 900 °C consists of three parts: reaction heat, the sensible heat of solid Fe2O3 from 25 °C to 900 °C, and sensible heat of gas mixture from 25 °C to 900 °C. MJ/tFe represents heat unit per ton Fe.
Figure 11 shows the relationship between reduced sensible heat of reduction gas and CH4 concentration, gas pressure, and H2 concentration, which is compared with the reduction without CH4. As can be seen from Figure 11a, the reduced sensible heat of reduction gas increases with the increase of CH4 concentration and has little been influenced by the gas pressure in the range of 1–9 atm. As can be seen from Figure 11b, under the same gas pressure and CH4 concentration, the reduced sensible heat of reduction gas decreases with the increase of H2 concentration.
In addition, according to the sensible heat calculation Formula (24) and gas composition, it can be obtained that the saved sensible heat of gas per m3 CH4 is 7.338–8.952 MJ. The former corresponds to gas mixture H2% = 90, CO% = 00, CH4% + N2% = 10, and gas pressure = 9atm. The latter corresponds to gas mixture H2% = 0, CO% = 90, CH4% + N2% = 10, and gas pressure = 1atm.
Figure 12 shows the relationship between increased reaction heat and CH4 concentration, gas pressure, and H2 concentration, which is compared with the reduction without CH4. As can be seen from Figure 12a, the increased reaction heat goes up with the increase of CH4 concentration and has been little influenced by the gas pressure in the range of 1–9atm. As can be seen from Figure 12b, under the same gas pressure and CH4 concentration, the increased reaction heat decreases with the increase of H2 concentration.
The sensible heat of the solid Fe2O3 is 1123.381 MJ/tFe, which is a constant under certain temperature change conditions. Therefore, increased total heat can be defined by the difference of gas sensible heat and reaction heat, as shown in Formula (36).
increased total heat = increased reaction heat reduced gas sensible heat
The relationship between increased total heat with CH4 concentration, gas pressure, and H2 concentration is shown in Figure 13. It can be seen that the increased total heat increases with the increase of CH4 concentration, and has been little influenced by the gas pressure in the range of 1–9 atm. As can be seen from Figure 13b, under the same gas pressure and CH4 concentration, the increased reaction heat increases with the increase of H2 concentration.
According to Formula (36), increasing 1 m3 CH4 can increase the total heat by 2.174–3.703 MJ. The former corresponds to gas mixture H2% = 0, CO% = 90, CH4% = 1, N2% = 9, and gas pressure = 9 atm. The latter corresponds to gas mixture H2% = 90, CO% = 0, CH4% = 1, N2% = 9, and gas pressure = 1 atm.
Figure 14 shows the relationship between the total heat and CH4 concentration, gas pressure, and H2 concentration, and its variation trend is the same as that of the increased total heat. Taking the reduction by H2% = 45, CO% = 45, CH4% = 0, N2% = 10 gas mixture as an example, as shown in Figure 14a, the total heat needed is 3649.223 MJ/tFe (gas pressure = 1 atm) and 3636.249 MJ/tFe (gas pressure = 9 atm), and the slight difference is due to the lower reaction heat caused by the increase in pressure. When the gas pressure = 4 atm, as shown in Figure 14b, the total heat needed is 3865.76 MJ/tFe for the reduction by H2% = 0, CO% = 90, CH4% = 0, N2% = 10 gas mixture and 3390.828 MJ/tFe for the reduction by H2% = 90, CO% = 0, CH4% = 0, N2% = 10 gas mixture, and the huge difference is due to the exothermic reaction of CO + Fe2O3.
The maximum increase rate in total heat caused by the presence of CH4 is 10.582% (H2% = 90, CH4% =10, gas pressure = 1 atm) compared to the reducing gas without CH4. An appropriate increase in total heat is acceptable since it saves the amount of H2 + CO and reduces the purity limit of H2 + CO. However, the addition of CH4 requires more heat supply for gas reduction and may increase the carbon content.

4. Conclusions

The minimum free energy method was used to calculate the equilibrium state composition of the reduction of iron oxide by gas with H2% + CO% = 90 and CH4% + N2% = 10 at 900 °C under 1–9 atm, and the following conclusions were obtained:
(1)
Increasing CH4 concentration, increasing H2 concentration, or reducing gas pressure can improve the utilization rate of total gas, reduce the reduction gas demand, and increase the total heat needed.
(2)
Under the condition of 900 °C and 1–9 atm, increasing 1 m3 CH4 can reduce the gas demand of 6.08–7.29 m3, the gas sensible heat needed to be 7.338–8.952 MJ, and the increase in the reaction heat needed to be 10.959–11.189 MJ.
(3)
Compared with 3390.828–3865.760 MJ of the total heat of per ton Fe for the reduction by H2 + CO, increasing 1 m3 CH4 can increase the total heat by 2.174–3.703 MJ, and increase ratio is 0.065–0.096%.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.G. and J.G.; Methodology, B.L. and W.Y.; Software, B.L. and S.L.; Data curation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, G.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 51274031) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number U1560203).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bhaskar, A.; Assadi, M.; Nikpey Somehsaraei, H. Decarbonization of the Iron and Steel Industry with Direct Reduction of Iron Ore with Green Hydrogen. Energies 2020, 13, 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Lu, W.; Cao, Q.; Xu, B.; Adidharma, H.; Gasem, K.; Argyle, M.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, M. A new approach of reduction of carbon dioxide emission and optimal use of carbon and hydrogen content for the desired syngas production from coal. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Miura, K.; Yan, J.; Ohgaki, H.; Ashida, R.; Ichikawa, K. Reduction and gasification characteristics of a unique iron ore/carbon composite prepared from robe river and a coal tar vacuum residue. ISIJ Int. 2019, 59, 2182–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Patisson, F.; Mirgaux, O. Hydrogen Ironmaking: How It Works. Metals 2020, 10, 922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, W.; Fu, G.; Chu, M.; Zhu, M. Non-isothermal reduction behavior and mechanism of hongge vanadium titanomagnetite pellet with simulated shaft furnace gases. ISIJ Int. 2018, 58, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Wei, R.; Feng, S.; Long, H.; Li, J.; Yuan, Z.; Cang, D.; Xu, C.C. Coupled biomass (lignin) gasification and iron ore reduction: A novel approach for biomass conversion and application. Energy 2017, 140, 406–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sun, G.; Li, B.; Yang, W.; Guo, J.; Guo, H. Analysis of energy consumption of the reduction of Fe2O3 by hydrogen and carbon monoxide mixtures. Energies 2020, 13, 1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Battle, T.; Srivastava, U.; Kopfle, J.; Hunter, R.; McClelland, J. Chapter 1.2—The Direct Reduction of Iron. In Treatise on Process Metallurgy; Seetharaman, S., Ed.; Elsevier: Boston, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 89–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hu, J.; Gao, Z. Development of DRI production technology by coal gasified shaft furnace. Res. Iron Steel 2010, 38, 50–53. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, F.; Cao, C.; Xu, H. Current status and prospects of gas-based shaft furnace direct reduction technology. Iron Steel 2014, 49, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Tang, J.; Chu, M.; Xue, X. Analysis of Gas Thermodynamic Utilization and Reaction Kinetic Mechanism in Shaft Furnace. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2014, 21, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Qi, Y.; Qian, H.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, H. Present status and trend of direct reduction technology development in China. China Metall. 2013, 23, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yi, L.; Huang, Z.; Peng, H.; Jiang, T. Action rules of H_2 and CO in gas-based direct reduction of iron ore pellets. J. Cent. S. Univ. 2012, 19, 2291–2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, B.; Guo, H.; Guo, J.; Sun, G. Thermodynamics of iron oxide gas-solid reduction based on the minimized Gibbs free energy principle. Chin. J. Eng. 2017, 39, 1653–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, W.; Hsu, C.; Du, S. Thermodynamic analysis of the partial oxidation of coke oven gas for indirect reduction of iron oxides in a blast furnace. Energy 2015, 86, 758–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Barin, I.; Knacke, O.; Kubaschewski, O. Thermochemical Properties of Inorganic Substances; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The initial and equilibrium state of the reaction system.
Figure 1. The initial and equilibrium state of the reaction system.
Energies 13 05053 g001
Figure 2. The initial gas concentration is H2% = 45, CO% = 45, CH4% = 3, N2% = 7, the total pressure is 4 atm, and the temperature is 900°C. (a) the amount of equilibrium products; (b) equilibrium gas ratio; (c) deoxygenation rate of Fe2O3 and utilization rate of total gas; (d) CH4 conversion rate.
Figure 2. The initial gas concentration is H2% = 45, CO% = 45, CH4% = 3, N2% = 7, the total pressure is 4 atm, and the temperature is 900°C. (a) the amount of equilibrium products; (b) equilibrium gas ratio; (c) deoxygenation rate of Fe2O3 and utilization rate of total gas; (d) CH4 conversion rate.
Energies 13 05053 g002
Figure 3. The relationship between the utilization rate of total gas and other initial conditions at 900 °C. (a) the x-axis is the total gas pressure, and initial H2% = 45, CO% = 45, CH4% = 0–10; (b) x-axis is the total gas pressure, and initial H2% + CO% = 90, CH4% = 2; (c) x-axis is the initial CH4 volume fraction, and initial H2% = 45, CO% = 45; (d) x-axis is the total gas pressure, and initial H2% + CO% = 90, CH4% = 2.
Figure 3. The relationship between the utilization rate of total gas and other initial conditions at 900 °C. (a) the x-axis is the total gas pressure, and initial H2% = 45, CO% = 45, CH4% = 0–10; (b) x-axis is the total gas pressure, and initial H2% + CO% = 90, CH4% = 2; (c) x-axis is the initial CH4 volume fraction, and initial H2% = 45, CO% = 45; (d) x-axis is the total gas pressure, and initial H2% + CO% = 90, CH4% = 2.
Energies 13 05053 g003
Figure 4. The relationship between the rangeability of the utilization rate of total gas at 900 °C and the initial H2 volume fraction.
Figure 4. The relationship between the rangeability of the utilization rate of total gas at 900 °C and the initial H2 volume fraction.
Energies 13 05053 g004
Figure 5. The relationship between the volume for total gas needed for per ton Fe and initial CH4 volume fraction at 900 °C with the initial H2% = 45 and CO% = 45 under 1–9 atm.
Figure 5. The relationship between the volume for total gas needed for per ton Fe and initial CH4 volume fraction at 900 °C with the initial H2% = 45 and CO% = 45 under 1–9 atm.
Energies 13 05053 g005
Figure 6. The relationship between the saving volume per m3 CH4 and initial CH4 volume fraction at 900 °C with the initial H2% = 45 and CO% = 45 under 1–9 atm.
Figure 6. The relationship between the saving volume per m3 CH4 and initial CH4 volume fraction at 900 °C with the initial H2% = 45 and CO% = 45 under 1–9 atm.
Energies 13 05053 g006
Figure 7. The relationship between the saving volume per m3 CH4 and initial H2 volume fraction at 900 °C under 4 atm.
Figure 7. The relationship between the saving volume per m3 CH4 and initial H2 volume fraction at 900 °C under 4 atm.
Energies 13 05053 g007
Figure 8. The relationship between the reaction enthalpy and the initial gas amount at 900 °C under 4 atm with H2% = 45, CO% = 45, CH4% = 0–10.
Figure 8. The relationship between the reaction enthalpy and the initial gas amount at 900 °C under 4 atm with H2% = 45, CO% = 45, CH4% = 0–10.
Energies 13 05053 g008
Figure 9. The relationship between the reaction enthalpy and the initial CH4 volume fraction at 900 °C with H2% = 45, CO% = 45. (a) the total pressure is 4 atm; (b) total pressure is 5 atm; (c) total pressure is 6 atm.
Figure 9. The relationship between the reaction enthalpy and the initial CH4 volume fraction at 900 °C with H2% = 45, CO% = 45. (a) the total pressure is 4 atm; (b) total pressure is 5 atm; (c) total pressure is 6 atm.
Energies 13 05053 g009aEnergies 13 05053 g009b
Figure 10. The increased reaction enthalpy per m3 CH4 at 900 with H2% + CO% = 90. (a) the x-axis is the total gas pressure; (b) x-axis is the initial H2 volume fraction.
Figure 10. The increased reaction enthalpy per m3 CH4 at 900 with H2% + CO% = 90. (a) the x-axis is the total gas pressure; (b) x-axis is the initial H2 volume fraction.
Energies 13 05053 g010
Figure 11. The relationship between the reduced sensible heat of total gas and the initial CH4 volume fraction at 900 °C. (a) H2% = 45, CO% = 45, total pressure is 1–9 atm; (b) H2% + CO% = 90, total pressure is 4 atm.
Figure 11. The relationship between the reduced sensible heat of total gas and the initial CH4 volume fraction at 900 °C. (a) H2% = 45, CO% = 45, total pressure is 1–9 atm; (b) H2% + CO% = 90, total pressure is 4 atm.
Energies 13 05053 g011
Figure 12. The relationship between the increased reaction heat and the initial CH4 volume fraction at 900 °C. (a) H2% = 45, CO% = 45, total pressure is 1–9 atm; (b) H2% + CO% = 90, total pressure is 4 atm.
Figure 12. The relationship between the increased reaction heat and the initial CH4 volume fraction at 900 °C. (a) H2% = 45, CO% = 45, total pressure is 1–9 atm; (b) H2% + CO% = 90, total pressure is 4 atm.
Energies 13 05053 g012
Figure 13. The relationship between the increased total heat and the initial CH4 volume fraction at 900 °C. (a) H2% = 45, CO% = 45, total pressure is 1–9 atm; (b) H2% + CO% = 90, total pressure is 4 atm.
Figure 13. The relationship between the increased total heat and the initial CH4 volume fraction at 900 °C. (a) H2% = 45, CO% = 45, total pressure is 1–9 atm; (b) H2% + CO% = 90, total pressure is 4 atm.
Energies 13 05053 g013
Figure 14. The relationship between the total heat and the initial CH4 volume fraction at 900 °C. (a) H2% = 45, CO% = 45, total pressure is 1–9 atm; (b) H2% + CO% = 90, total pressure is 4 atm.
Figure 14. The relationship between the total heat and the initial CH4 volume fraction at 900 °C. (a) H2% = 45, CO% = 45, total pressure is 1–9 atm; (b) H2% + CO% = 90, total pressure is 4 atm.
Energies 13 05053 g014
Table 1. The gas composition used for the reduction of iron oxide (volume fraction, %).
Table 1. The gas composition used for the reduction of iron oxide (volume fraction, %).
SpeciesCH4 ConversionCoal Gasification
HYL IIIMIDREXBG/LTexacoShellHT-LTwo-Stage
H2/%61.855–5827.930.7825.63029.36
CO/%23.534–3758.9339.3565.16062.38
H2O/%0.63–4-16.43--1.5
CO2/%3.01.5–2.53.0311.430.83.52.76
CH4/%4.00.5–36.130.040.01<10.26
N2/%7.10.5–13.350.498.036.24.87
H2S(COS)/%---0.880.070.020.37
Table 2. The main reactions between Fe2O3 and H2 + CO + CH4 mixture.
Table 2. The main reactions between Fe2O3 and H2 + CO + CH4 mixture.
Reaction TypeChemical Reaction Equation
CO Reduction reaction 3 Fe 2 O 3 + CO = 2 Fe 3 O 4 + CO 2   Δ H 298 K = 43.221   kJ / mol (1)
Fe 3 O 4 + CO = 3 FeO + CO 2   Δ H 298 K = 19.288   kJ / mol (2)
FeO + CO = Fe + CO 2   Δ H 298 K = 10.920   kJ / mol (3)
Fe 2 O 3 + 3 CO = 2 Fe + 3 CO 2   Δ H 298 K = 23.389   kJ / mol (4)
H2 Reduction reaction 3 Fe 2 O 3 + H 2 = 2 Fe 3 O 4 + H 2 O   Δ H 298 K = 2.071   kJ / mol (5)
Fe 3 O 4 + H 2 = 3 FeO + H 2 O   Δ H 298 K = 60.438   kJ / mol (6)
FeO + H 2 = Fe + H 2 O   Δ H 298 K = 30.229   kJ / mol (7)
Fe 2 O 3 + 3 H 2 = 2 Fe + 3 H 2 O   Δ H 298 K = 100.060   kJ / mol (8)
CH4 conversion reaction CH 4 + H 2 O = 3 H 2 + CO   Δ H 298 K = 206.083   kJ / mol (9)
CH 4 + CO 2 = 2 H 2 + 2 CO   Δ H 298 K = 247.233   kJ / mol (10)
CH4 cracking reaction CH 4 = C + 2 H 2   Δ H 298 K = 74.810   kJ / mol (11)
CH4 reduction reaction CH 4 + FeO = Fe + 2 H 2 + CO   Δ H 298 K = 236.312   kJ / mol (12)
Fe 2 O 3 + 3 CH 4 = 2 Fe + 6 H 2 + 3 CO   Δ H 298 K = 718.309   kJ / mol (13)
Carburizing reaction 3 Fe + 2 CO + = Fe 3 C + C O 2   Δ H 298 K = 149.829   kJ / mol (14)
3 Fe + CO + H 2 = Fe 3 C + H 2 O   Δ H 298 K = 108.679   kJ / mol (15)
3 Fe + C H 4 = Fe 3 C + 2 H 2   Δ H 298 K = 97.404   kJ / mol (16)
3 FeO + 5 CO = Fe 3 C + 4 CO 2   Δ H 298 K = 182.590   kJ / mol (17)
3 Fe + C = Fe 3 C   Δ H 298 K = 22.594   kJ / mol (18)
Carbon deposition reaction 2 CO = C + CO 2   Δ H 298 K = 172.423   kJ / mol (19)
Water-gas shift reaction CO + H 2 O = H 2 + CO 2   Δ H 298 K = 41.150   kJ / mol (20)
Gasification reaction C + H 2 O = H 2 + CO   Δ H 298 K = 131.273   kJ / mol (21)
Table 3. The given volume fraction of each component of initial gas.
Table 3. The given volume fraction of each component of initial gas.
H2/%CO/%CH4/%N2/%Σ/%
0900–10, increment 1Residual100
1575
3060
4545
6030
7515
900
Table 4. The utilization rate of total gas of the selected nine groups of gas concentration under different pressure.
Table 4. The utilization rate of total gas of the selected nine groups of gas concentration under different pressure.
Initial Gas Concentration/%Total Gas Pressure/Atm
H2COCH4123456789
090028.30528.30528.30528.30528.30528.30528.30528.30528.305
090232.43832.43732.43632.43532.43532.43432.43332.43132.430
090538.63538.63338.63138.62738.62338.61738.61138.60338.595
4545031.05831.04031.01130.97130.91930.85530.7830.69530.598
4545235.18935.16935.13635.08935.03034.95734.87234.77434.663
4545541.38641.36241.32241.26741.19541.10841.00640.88940.757
900033.82333.82333.82333.82333.82333.82333.82333.82333.823
900237.95437.95137.94637.93837.92937.91837.90437.88937.872
900544.15144.14344.13044.11144.08844.05944.02543.98743.943

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, G.; Li, B.; Guo, H.; Yang, W.; Li, S.; Guo, J. Thermodynamic Study on Reduction of Iron Oxides by H2 + CO + CH4 + N2 Mixture at 900 °C. Energies 2020, 13, 5053. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13195053

AMA Style

Sun G, Li B, Guo H, Yang W, Li S, Guo J. Thermodynamic Study on Reduction of Iron Oxides by H2 + CO + CH4 + N2 Mixture at 900 °C. Energies. 2020; 13(19):5053. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13195053

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Guanyong, Bin Li, Hanjie Guo, Wensheng Yang, Shaoying Li, and Jing Guo. 2020. "Thermodynamic Study on Reduction of Iron Oxides by H2 + CO + CH4 + N2 Mixture at 900 °C" Energies 13, no. 19: 5053. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13195053

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop