Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Genet., 07 December 2020
Sec. Evolutionary and Population Genetics
This article is part of the Research Topic Stressors Acting on Aquatic Ecosystems: High-Throughput Sequencing Approaches to Shed Light on Human-Nature Interactions View all 6 articles

Population Genetic Structure and Connectivity of the European Lobster Homarus gammarus in the Adriatic and Mediterranean Seas

  • 1Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Split, Croatia
  • 2School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
  • 3Institute for Biological Resources and Marine Biotechnologies (IRBIM), National Research Council (CNR), Ancona, Italy
  • 4UMR CNRS 6134 Sciences Pour l’Environnement, Università di Corsica Pasquale Paoli, Corte, France
  • 5UMS CNRS 3514 STELLA MARE, Università di Corsica Pasquale Paoli, Biguglia, France
  • 6National Institute of Oceanography and Applied Geophysics – OGS, Trieste, Italy

Highly selective fishing has the potential to permanently change the characteristics within a population and could drive the decline of genetic diversity. European lobster is an intensively fished crustacean species in the Adriatic Sea which reaches high market value. Since knowledge of population structure and dynamics is important for effective fisheries management, in this study, we used 14 neutral microsatellites loci and partial mitochondrial COI region sequencing to explore population connectivity and genetic structure by comparing samples from the Adriatic Sea and the adjacent basins of the Mediterranean Sea. The obtained results suggest that neutral genetic diversity has not been significantly affected by decrease in population size due to overfishing, habitat degradation and other anthropogenic activities. Global genetic differentiation across all populations was low (FST = 0.0062). Populations from the Adriatic Sea were panmictic, while genetic differentiation was found among populations from different Mediterranean basins. Observed gene flow for European lobster suggest that populations in the north eastern Adriatic act as a source for surrounding areas, emphasizing the need to protect these populations by establishing interconnected MPAs that will be beneficial for both fisheries and conservation management.

Introduction

Genetic connectivity among marine populations is an important driver for ecological evolutionary processes of species and reflects historical and contemporary demographic events, such as climate shifts, environmental features, oceanographic patterns or particular species behaviors (Avise, 2000; Selkoe et al., 2008). Larval dispersal, juvenile or adult stages migration and recruitment success through marine ecosystems shapes connectivity between populations, influencing fisheries management and establishment of marine reserve networks (Shanks et al., 2003; Fogarty and Botsford, 2007). Spatial connectivity of many marine species is a result of the complex interplay of different life-history traits and their environmental change responses, where transport of planktonic larval stages by sea currents may last for several days to weeks before settlement, followed by a sedentary adult phase (Cowen et al., 2007). However, some species with long larval periods show spatially limited dispersal and self-recruitment patterns to natal habitats, despite oceanic currents (Cowen et al., 2006). Thus, prediction of population connectivity in the marine environment presents a challenging task.

Genetic approaches based on gene flow and diversity estimations are highly recommended for effective conservation decisions, since genetic diversity has been one of the most important biodiversity conservation issues (Laikre et al., 2010). On the other hand, intense fishing pressures can negatively impact the genetic diversity of exploited populations through selection and genetic drift (Marty et al., 2015). Therefore, knowledge of stock composition and population dynamics of exploited species is important for sustainable management of fisheries (Ovenden et al., 2015). Fisheries science successfully applies population genetic approaches for this purpose (Cadrin et al., 2014), including determination of fisheries stock structure, population abundance, genetic diversity and evolutionary response to exploitation (Ovenden et al., 2015; Matić-Skoko et al., 2018). Generally, genetic studies on decapod crustaceans and associated management plans in the Mediterranean are scarce. Although, the European lobster (Homarus gammarus) is a commercially important species for Croatian small-scale fisheries, the knowledge of its genetic diversity, stock structure and population dynamics in the Adriatic Sea is currently lacking.

The species is distributed in the north-eastern Atlantic Ocean from Morocco (though absent in the Baltic Sea) to Arctic Norway, and in the Mediterranean Sea (Triantafyllidis et al., 2005; Supplementary Figure 1). The European lobster inhabits the continental shelf from the low intertidal to 150 m depth, typically not deeper than 50 m, and favors hard substrates like rock or hard mud (Holthuis, 1991). They are territorial and nocturnal animals inhabiting crevices and holes (Skerritt et al., 2015). Females mature sexually between the ages of 5 and 8 with a carapace length of 80 to 85 mm (Holthuis, 1991). Fertilized eggs develop for 10 to 12 months on the female pleopods and the planktonic larvae spend 15 to 35 days drifting where water temperature plays significant role in development (Browne et al., 2009). This is a highly prized marine species targeted by small-scale fishers throughout its range. Over the past decade, the total European annual landings varied between around 4500 and 5600 tons (FAO, 2020), mostly originating from the northern European countries. Landings in Mediterranean countries have never reached those levels (Prodöhl et al., 2007). In the past, intensive fishing in Scandinavia and the Mediterranean led to stock depletions and recovery did not occur or was slow (Ellis et al., 2015b). The European lobster is present in the Adriatic Sea, it is more abundant in its northern part and in Croatia it is fished traditionally with baited traps, trammel nets and gillnets targeting fish.

In the last two decades, genetic studies have been carried out intensively, especially in northern European regions where stock enhancement programs were implemented to supplement fisheries production in heavily depleted areas (Jørstad et al., 2005; Triantafyllidis et al., 2005; Ellis et al., 2015a, 2017; Watson et al., 2016; Jenkins et al., 2019). Several genetic distinct clusters of European lobster have been identified across its range of distribution (Triantafyllidis et al., 2005; Ellis et al., 2017). Genetic division was noticed between European lobster populations from the Atlantic Ocean and from the Mediterranean Sea. In the Mediterranean, population structuring was also evident between the central Mediterranean and the Aegean Sea (Jenkins et al., 2019). However, strong conclusions of additional structuring among Mediterranean populations could not be reached because of the limited number of populations sampled across basins, e.g., populations from central (Ionian and Adriatic Sea) and western Mediterranean (Balearic and Alboran Sea) are lacking. In particular, complete genetic structure analysis of European lobster has not been previously conducted for the Adriatic Sea, except for south Adriatic Sea which was represented with one sampling site (Triantafyllidis et al., 2005).

In the present study, the population genetic variation of European lobster was investigated in the Adriatic Sea and the adjacent basins of the Mediterranean Sea using two classes of genetic markers, i.e., 14 neutral microsatellites and a sequence polymorphism of a mitochondrial DNA COI region. Based on sampling coverage, this study aimed to: (i) provide detailed insights into the genetic structure of European lobster in the Adriatic Sea and assess genetic connectivity between the Adriatic and Mediterranean basins; (ii) detect the possible impacts of intense fishing pressure on species genetic diversity and reconstruct its demographic history based on mtDNA and nuclear markers, and (iii) consider potential management implications of present findings for European lobster in the Adriatic Sea.

Materials and Methods

Tissue Sampling and DNA Extraction

A total of 331 individuals of European lobster were collected from the central and eastern Mediterranean (Figure 1 and Table 1). The Adriatic Sea was intensively sampled at eight different locations of the north and mid Adriatic on both the eastern and western sides of the basin during 2017 and 2018. Sampling was primarily conducted in collaboration with local commercial fishing vessels. For each captured European lobster, a tissue sample (pleopod clip) was taken, and sex and carapace length (mm) measured. Other samples, in the form of extracted DNA from Greece (2001) and preserved tissues from Corsica (2015–2017) were obtained from collaborators, including information of the approximate fishing region and date of capture. Sample sizes ranged from 4 to 48 per location. For samples from the Adriatic Sea of known length, a carapace length of 87 mm was used as a boundary to discriminate adults from juveniles (Phillips, 2013). Total genomic DNA was extracted from individual pleopod tissues by proteinase K digestion and later was applied standard phenol-chloroform extraction protocol. DNA quality and quantity was checked with the help of spectrophotometer (IMPLEN N50, Germany).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Central and eastern Mediterranean Sea bathymetry with sampling locations of European lobster Homarus gammarus where the first two letters of location abbreviations denote the geographic origin of samples (AD, Adriatic Sea; IO, Ionian Sea; AE, Aegean Sea; LG, Ligurian Sea) and the second two letters denote the abbreviations for sampling sites (VE, Venice; UM, Umag; PU, Pula; LO, Lošinj; AN, Ancona; HV, Hvar; VI, Vis; BA, Bari; CO, Corsica; PA, Patras; AL, Alexandroupoli). Information on populations included and regional subdivisions are provided in Table 1. Isobaths indicate depths of 250, 500, 1000, and 1200 m. The colors represent different depths. The figure was prepared in MATLAB 2014a (www.mathworks.com) and GIMP 2.8.16 (www.gimp.org) software.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Sampling information, codes and the number of individuals of European lobster Homarus gammarus genetically tested with 14 putative neutral microsatellites (SSR) and mtDNA COI marker.

Microsatellite Genotyping and Analyses

DNA samples were genotyped with 15 microsatellite markers designed for European lobster, following the protocol outlined in Ellis et al. (2015a) where 12 microsatellites from André and Knutsen (2010) and 3 microsatellites from Ellis et al. (2015a) were combined in three multiplex reactions (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1). On an Eppendorf Mastercycler Nexus Gx2 thermal cycler, microsatellites were amplified in 10 μL reactions with a 10 ng DNA template using the Multiplex PCR kit (Qiagen, Germany). Final concentrations of 0.2 μM were uniformly set for all primers. For all multiplex PCRs, the same protocol was used with the following steps: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 26 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 60°C for 90 s, and elongation at 72°C for 30 s; and the final elongation at 60°C for 30 min. Genotyping was performed on an ABI 3730 (Applied Biosystems) DNA sequencer with an internal size standard 500 LIZ dye Size Standard (Applied Biosystems). Genemapper v.3.5 (Applied Biosystems) was used to call allele sizes.

Genetic Diversity

The presence and frequency of null alleles for each locus was checked by MICROCHECKER v.2.2.3 (Van Oosterhout et al., 2004) and FREENA (Chapuis and Estoup, 2007). The fixation index (FIS), linkage disequilibrium (LD), departures from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE), observed and expected heterozygosity (He, Ho) were assessed using GENEPOP 4.0 (Raymond and Rousset, 1995; Rousset, 2008). The average number of alleles per locus (A) and effective number of alleles across loci (Ae) were estimated in POPGENE 1.32 (Yeh et al., 1999). Allelic richness (Ar) and differences in allelic richness and heterozygosity among populations were calculated and tested in FSTAT 2.9.3 (Goudet, 2002). Whenever needed, the sequential Bonferroni correction was used for multiple testing (Rice, 1989).

The relationship between fitness and heterozygosity can be investigated by measuring genetic diversity. Four heterozygosity measures for each individual with known carapace length and sex were estimated as the proportions of heterozygous genotypes with the function GENHET.R (Coulon, 2010) in R (R Core Team, 2017). To investigate whether sex or fitness components of individuals are correlated with their level of heterozygosity, linear regressions were employed in STATISTICA (see Supplementary Material for details).

Genetic Differentiation and Population Structuring

The level of gene flow among sampling locations was estimated with pair-wise and global FST values over 14 loci in ARLEQUIN v.3.5, using 10,000 permutations for testing statistical significance. The Dest measure based on allele identities (Jost, 2008) was calculated in GENODIVE (Meirmans and Van Tienderen, 2004). To assess the contribution of null alleles in the dataset and its impact on the level of population differentiation, FreeNA was applied to compute the FST statistic, both with exclusion and inclusion of the Excluding Null Alleles correction method. Using 50,000 replicates over loci, the bootstrap 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the global FST values were estimated.

Bayesian-clustering program STRUCTURE 2.3 (Pritchard et al., 2000) and the Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components (DAPC) method implemented in the Adegenet package (Jombart, 2008) for R (R Core Team, 2017) were used for genetic structure analysis of the sampled populations. Set-up parameters for STRUCTURE included usage of the admixture ancestry model with correlated allele frequencies, a burn-in period of 503 iterations and 504 MCMC (Markov chain Monte Carlo) steps. K-value ranged from 1 to the maximal number of sampled groups, including 20 replicates for each value. Using Structure Harvester 0.6.93 (Earl and von Holdt, 2012), the most likely number of clusters was assessed with ln P(D) and delta K-values and visualized using CLUMPP (Jakobsson and Rosenberg, 2007) and DISTRUCT (Rosenberg, 2004). The DAPC was executed by the function dapc with sampling location used as a prior. Retained number of Principal Components (PCs) was optimized executing the function xvalDapc (Jombart, 2008).

Isolation by distance (IBD) analysis was tested with the package Adegenet and the mantel.randtest function in R using 1000 permutations. To explore pattern of IBD, described as a continuous or distant patchy cline of genetic differentiation, two-dimensional kernel density estimation (function kde2d) was applied to measure local densities of distances and function image for plotting in the package MASS (Venables and Ripley, 2002).

Test of Demographic Changes, Effective Population Size and Migration Rate

BOTTLENECK 1.2.02 (Piry et al., 1999) was used in order to detect recent declines in effective population sizes (Ne) over a relatively short period (several Ne generations). With 20,000 replications, two-phase model (TPM) with 90% single-step mutations and 10% variance among multiple steps was tested for populations with a sample size over 20 individuals. The probability of significant heterozygote excess was tested using a one-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test, as recommend by Piry et al. (1999). To further investigate the reduction of population size, the M ratio test was conducted in MPVal and the critical value of Mc was estimated by CriticalM software for each population (Garza and Williamson, 2001). The M ratio depends on the total number of alleles (k) and overall range in allele size (r) at a given locus. In recently reduced populations, M-ratios is expected to be smaller than in populations under mutation-drift equilibrium and, as such, may be persevered for hundreds of generations (Garza and Williamson, 2001) in contrast to the heterozygosity excess outcomes. The M-ratio empirical values were compared to the bottleneck threshold of 0.68 (Garza and Williamson, 2001) and to the simulated equilibrium distribution formed on the two-phase mutation model. With simulation of 10,000 replicates, Mc was calculated engaging the mean size of non-stepwise mutations (Δg) = 3.1, and the proportion of stepwise mutations (ps) = 78% (Peery et al., 2012). Three different values (0.5, 1, 4) were set for theta (Θ = 4Neμ) that correspond to a pre-bottleneck effective population size of 250, 500, and 2000, respectively.

Contemporary gene flow based on few generations (mc) and historical gene flow that covers much longer period of time (∼ 4 Ne generations in the past, mh) were estimated among populations by BayesAss1.3 (Wilson and Rannala, 2003) and Migrate (Beerli and Felsenstein, 2001; Beerli, 2006). For BayesAss, several analyses with different starting seeds were performed and each Markov chain Monte Carlo run involved 3 × 106 iterations and discarding of the first 106 iterations as burn-in. The delta values DA, DF, and DM were set to 0.7, 0.6, and 0.5, respectively. Log-probability of each run was analyzed with TRACER v.171 (Rambaut et al., 2018) and the best model fit was determined based on Bayesian deviance measure (Spiegelhalter et al., 2002). Migrate v 3.7.2 (Beerli, 2008) and application of Bayesian inference was used to estimate gene flow, i.e., mutation-scaled rates of migration (M = mh/μ; mh is the historical migration rate; μ is the mutation rate per generation) and mutation-scaled effective population size (Θ = 4Neμ; Ne is historical effective population size). The Brownian motion mutation model and FST calculations as starting parameter values were used with constant mutation rates for all loci. Uniform prior distribution was applied to estimate Θ (range = 0–50, mean = 25) and M (range = 0–50, mean = 25). A long chain was set to visit 1,000,000 parameter values with a burn-in of 50,000 iterations for each locus and to record 20,000 genealogies with a sampling increment of 50. To improve the MCMC searches, static heating scheme at four temperatures (1, 1.5, 3, and 6) was applied.

NeEstimator V2 (Do et al., 2014) program that implements the single sample linkage disequilibrium method was used to estimate contemporary effective population size for populations with a sample size over 20 individuals. Alleles with frequencies bellow 0.02 were removed from the analysis, balancing between precision and potential bias of highly polymorphic microsatellites loci. In addition, the likelihood method implemented in AgeStructure (Wang et al., 2010) was applied to estimate the generation interval and effective size of European lobster of known length size and sex (Adriatic samples). Sex, age, and multilocus genotype information of 159 males and 107 females were provided for Ne estimation of an age structured lobster population with overlapping generations. Following Uglem et al. (2005), age calculations based on carapace length were performed.

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) Sequencing, Genetic Diversity and Population Expansion

A part of the mtDNA-encoded cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) gene was amplified for the reduced dataset (see Table 1 for population codes) with the LCO and HCO primer pair (Folmer et al., 1994), following the PCR protocol reported in Pavičić et al. (2020). Product purification and sequencing were performed by Macrogen Inc (Amsterdam, Netherlands) on an ABI 3730 automatic sequencer. Difficulties to secure fresh samples were experienced. So, part of the samples that were successfully genotyped for microsatellite markers had to be excluded from mtDNA analysis due to the poor product amplification. Sequence alignment was performed in Mega7 using the ClustalW tool (Kumar et al., 2016). Molecular diversity was measured using Dnasp 5.19 (Librado and Rozas, 2009) calculating the number of haplotypes (H), polymorphic sites (S), haplotype and nucleotide diversity. The median-joining haplotype network was constructed in PopART1.

Demographic history changes were assessed by Tajima’s D (Tajima, 1989) and Fu’s FST (Fu, 1997) tests in Arlequin 3.5.1.2 (Excoffier and Lischer, 2010). Test values indicate a recent population bottleneck or population expansion. The mismatch distribution simulated in Arlequin 3.5.1.2 was analyzed using the sudden expansion model. Model fit was statistically tested using the sum of square deviations (SSD) to reject the hypothesis of demographic expansion. Using Arlequin (Rogers and Harpending, 1992), the time since population expansion (t) was estimated as t = τ/2u, where τ is the mutational time scale. The mutation rate per locus per generation (2u) was calculated by multiplying the length of sequence × mutation rate × generation time. In the absence of the calibrated mutation rate of the mtDNA of European lobster, the mutation rates from 1.66 to 2.33% per million years of Sesarma COI gene were tested (Schubart et al., 1998). The lower CI boundary of 9.81 years was used as the generation time for European lobster.

Results

Genetic Diversity

A total of 331 individuals of European lobster were genotyped at 15 microsatellite loci (Table 1, Figure 1, and Supplementary Table 1). The amount of missing data per locus and population ranged from 0 to 3.5%, with an average of 0.04%. MICROCHECKER detected a high frequency (>10%) of null alleles for the locus HGA8 and accordingly, that locus was removed from further analyses. The loci HGC120 and HGC129 showed the presence of null alleles at low frequencies (<4%) and therefore were kept on. The FST values with and without application of the Excluding Null Alleles correction method were comparable (0.0068 vs. 0.0062, respectively, with overlapping 95% CI). After the removal of locus HGA8, no consistent support for linkage disequilibrium among the pair of loci and no significant deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (Supplementary Table 2) were observed, as revealed by Fisher’s exact test.

Among the 14 loci examined, all were polymorphic with 6 to 12 alleles per locus, with an average of 9 alleles per total dataset (Supplementary Table 2). Expected (He) and observed (Ho) heterozygosity showed moderate variation among populations and ontogenetic stage (adults vs. juveniles), ranging from 0.63 to 0.77 (Table 2). Disregarding the population with the smallest sample size (IO_PA), the highest genetic diversity was observed in populations sampled in the mid Adriatic (AD_VI_A and AD_AN_J) and in the population sampled at the boundary of north-mid Adriatic (AD_LO_A). The effective number of alleles (Ae) and allelic richness (Ar) indices showed similar levels of diversity among populations and stages. Still, the number of alleles per locus was slightly reduced in juvenile stage of populations, likely affected by the limited sample sizes. Low and statistically insignificant values of the inbreeding coefficients, FIS, were recorded in the dataset (Table 2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Summary of genetic variation statistics for 14 microsatellites loci of European lobster Homarus gammarus in the central and eastern Mediterranean.

For several individual heterozygosity estimates, i.e., standardized observed heterozygosity per individual (Hs_exp, HS_obs), internal relatedness (IR) and homozygosity by locus (HL), no statistically significant differences (Mann–Whitney U test, p > 0.05) were detected between female and male individuals sampled in the Adriatic Sea (data not shown). The proportion of heterozygous loci was uncorrelated with carapace length (i.e., lobster age) for both female and male individuals (p > 0.05; Supplementary Figure 2).

Between-Population Genetic Differentiation

Global genetic differentiation estimated with FST and Dest was 0.0062 (p < 0.001) and 0.023, respectively, supporting a relatively limited level of differentiation across all populations. Following Bonferroni correction, both estimators gave congruent results in terms of pairwise comparisons, where 17 of 79 interactions were statistically significant (Table 3). On average, Dest values were 1- to 2-fold higher than the equivalent statistic. High and significant pair-wise interactions were observed among populations from different Mediterranean basins. While the majority of Adriatic populations showed restricted gene flow toward the Aegean and Ligurian Sea populations, only the population from the western middle Adriatic and groups of juveniles from the northern Adriatic had no significant pair-wise differentiation from the population in the Ligurian Sea. Additionally, no breaks in gene flow were found within populations from the Adriatic, except for the populations sampled on the eastern side of the Adriatic, where the Vis Island population (AD_VI) sampled from the outermost point in the middle region showed significant interaction with the Lošinj Island population (AD_LO) from the north region. According to the mean L(K) and delta K statistics, three discrete genetic clusters of European lobster were inferred through Bayesian clustering analysis (Figure 2 and Supplementary Figure 3). All Adriatic populations were grouped into the first cluster with an average assignment score of 71%. The Ligurian Sea population formed a second cluster (82%) while the third cluster was associated with the Aegean Sea population (63%). The Ionian population showed an admixture proportion of membership in each of the three clusters. To explore potentially fine-scale population structure within the Adriatic Sea, a hierarchical STRUCTURE analysis was conducted exclusively on these populations. However, the mean L(K) suggested panmixia since the most likely number of populations was identified as K = 1 (data not shown). Presence of three clusters was also supported by the optimal number of clusters identified using DAPC and successive K-means clustering analyses. When each location was treated as an a priori cluster, the DAPC plot clustered groups similarly to the structure pattern noted in STRUCTURE (Supplementary Figure 4) where the gradual transition of clusters across the Adriatic, Ionian and Aegean Sea directions is seen in the PC space. Moderate isolation by distance was recorded by IBD analysis (r = 0.63, p = 0.01). Scatterplot of local densities of distances showed a patched form of genetic differentiation among populations due to the multiple densities of genetic relatedness with spatial discontinuities (Figure 3). Further analysis performed exclusively on the Adriatic Sea populations failed to detect IBD as a result of cline (r = 0.01, p = 0.78).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Pairwise FST values (below diagonal) and Dest (above diagonal) based on 14 neutral microsatellites loci among 10 populations of European lobster Homarus gammarus including adult and juvenile individuals.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Bayesian clustering of European lobster Homarus gammarus populations in accordance to STRUCTURE assignment scores, where three (K = 3) inferred clusters were assumed. See Table 1 for additional information on sample names.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Isolation by distance plot showing the pairwise relationships of genetic distances in respect to the pairwise geographical distances in European lobster Homarus gammarus populations. Two-dimensional kernel density estimation in the MASS package in R was applied for the plot illustration, where the different colors present different correlation densities of genetic and geographic distances (red, high density; blue, low density).

Demographic Pattern and Gene Flow

No significant heterozygosity excess was observed under the two-phase model (TPM) parameters. In addition, the M ratio test showed no signal of a recent reduction in effective size, considering that the observed mean M-ratio of 0.77 ± 0.02 for the whole dataset was higher than the 0.68, i.e., the generally accepted threshold criterion in conservation genetics (Garza and Williamson, 2001; Hoban et al., 2013). While the majority of sampled populations had estimated M-ratio values (0.77–0.80) above their critical M values, two populations from the Adriatic Sea (AD_PU and AD_VI) showed evidence of a recent size reduction, but exclusively for ancestral theta (θ) values of 0.5 (Supplementary Figure 5).

Estimates of contemporary gene flow with BayesAss showed that populations in the north Adriatic (AD_UM and AD_LO) were the predominant source of exogenous allelic variants, with estimated emigration rates ranging from 0.06 for the most distant Corsica (LG_CO) population from the Ligurian Sea to 0.26 for the neighboring Lošinj (AD_LO) population from the north Adriatic (Figure 4A and Supplementary Table 3). In addition, there were no indications that the Umag population (AD_UM) in the north Adriatic received reproducing immigrants from other populations. Among other locations, little gene flow was detected, suggesting that these act as sink populations since the most of migration estimated values had 95% confidence intervals that overlapped zero.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Gene flow diagrams for European lobster Homarus gammarus populations presenting (A) contemporary gene flow estimates (m) from BayesAss, and (B) historical gene flow estimates (M) from Migrate-n. Grid width represents the total amount of incoming and outgoing gene flow estimated for each population. Arrows indicate the direction of gene flow among the populations while the width of arrows are proportional to the relative amount of gene flow observed among connected populations. The wider arrow is linked with higher gene flow. The threshold for graphical illustration of gene flow was set to 0.01 for BayesAss and 2.0 for Migrate-n estimates. Exact gene flow estimates are presented in Supplementary Table 3. Populations codes are showed in Table 1.

Historical gene flow values using Migrate-n ranged from 0.83 to 11.3 with slightly more complex interactions between and within populations than contemporary gene flow estimates (Figure 4B and Supplementary Table 3). Again, the population from Umag (AD_UM) and less pronounced Pula (AD_PU) population acted as the main source of gene flow, supporting asymmetrical migration from the north toward the southern regions of the Adriatic. Still, migration rate between geographically distant clusters, as was the case for the Aegean Sea (AE_AL) and Ligurian Sea (LG_CO) populations tended to be lower, which is in line with local oceanographic features and relevant barriers. Gene flow among different basins was only evident in the case of the Aegean Sea population (source population) and populations from the eastern middle Adriatic (AD_VI and AD_HV; sink populations). Overall, historical migration rate estimates support more gene flow among all regions.

The contemporary effective population size, Ne, of European lobster ranged from 74 (AD_HV) to 43,751 (AD_UM), but for all estimates the upper confidence limit reached infinity, indicating insufficient sample size to capture the genetic drift signal (Table 4). Ne values with both lower and upper 95% confidence bound were only captured for the Hvar population (AD_HV) in the mid Adriatic and for overall estimates, i.e., pooled Adriatic samples (2094) and the whole dataset (1560). The likelihood method implemented in AgeStructure (Wang et al., 2010) used to estimate the effective size for populations with overlapping generations, gave an Ne of 1651 (95% CI: 656–2051) for the pooled Adriatic populations; this value was slightly lower than the value estimated by the LD method where the 95% confidence intervals (CI) partially overlapped (Table 4). The paternal generation interval (GI) of 11.42 (95% CI: 9.81–12.67) and maternal GI of 12.74 (95% CI: 11.24–12.88) were estimated for the pooled Adriatic populations of known sex and size. Distribution of effective numbers of breeders of each age class varied between the sexes, where on average females had 20% higher values of breeders than males (Supplementary Table 4). Mutation scaled effective population size (Θ) calculated in Migrate-n ranged from 0.7 (AD_HV) to 1.8 (AD_UM), indicating that north Adriatic populations are effectively the largest. Still, these values should be scaled to the mutation rate for interpretation of Ne estimates. To date, there are no published mutation rates for decapod microsatellites. Applying the mutation rate recorded in an orthopteran insect (phylum Arthropoda, Chapuis et al., 2015), the estimated theta values would correspond to Ne values ranging from 791 (AD_HV) to 2087 (AD_UM) (Table 4).

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Contemporary, historical and age-structured effective population size (Ne) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for European lobster Homarus gammarus populations based on 14 putatively neutral microsatellite loci.

mtDNA Haplotype Diversity and Population Expansion

Due to the poorly amplified products and discrepancies between forward and reverse sequences, the study design resulted in an unbalanced number of samples among locations. Thus, locations from the north Adriatic (AD_UM, AD_PU) were pooled into a single population (AD_IS), the Venice location was excluded, and the location near Bari (AD_BA) was introduced in dataset but with a limited number of individuals (Table 1). A 574-bp segment of the mitochondrial COI region was obtained, and 6 haplotypes were identified in 63 individuals (GenBank acc. no. MT983889 – MT983894). The number of haplotypes per population ranged from 1 to 5 (Figure 5). Haplotype diversity (Hd) averaged 0.46 across the five populations, and was higher for the middle Adriatic populations (0.626) than those in the north (0.44). The most common haplotype (Hap_1) was found at all sampling locations (Figure 5). The most distantly related rare haplotype (Hap_4) belonged to populations from the middle Adriatic (AD_HV and AD_VI) and was connected with the most common haplotype by a median vector representing the unsampled ancestral haplotype, most likely due to the limited sample size. Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs test values for overall samples were negative but not significant, where mismatch distribution analysis and SSD test supported the hypothesis of a sudden population expansion (Supplementary Table 5). The non-significant values of neutrality tests probably reflect the limited power of these tests to detect departures from equilibrium, owning to the small sample size. Based on mutation rates ranging from 1.66 to 2.33% per million years, tau values calculated from the mismatch distribution of overall sequences from the Adriatic Sea provided estimates of coalescence in the range of 13.5–18.9 ka BP.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Median-joining network based on COI haplotypes (A) and geographical distribution of haplotypes (B) for European lobster Homarus gammarus. Colored circles represent haplotypes found in sampled populations whose sizes are proportional to the number of individuals. Missing haplotypes are indicated by small yellow dots. The pie charts on the map display the haplotype frequencies found at each location. Populations codes are given in Table 1.

Discussion

Knowledge of species distribution, population structure and size in relation to habitat suitability across local and broad spatial scales are key parameters for sustainable and ecosystem-based fisheries management. This is especially important for the semi-enclosed Mediterranean Sea, where intense fisheries effort has been recognized as one of the main stressors on the marine ecosystem (Coll et al., 2012; Colloca et al., 2013; Corrales et al., 2018). Namely, majority of marine stocks are considered fully exploited or overexploited (Vasilakopoulos et al., 2014; Osio et al., 2015; Tsikliras et al., 2015; FAO, 2018). Nowadays, European lobster stocks are considered depleted due to significant declines in catches in many Mediterranean regions (Lloret and Riera, 2008; Lotze et al., 2011; Pere et al., 2019), although stock assessment has not been performed yet. To support genetically informed European lobster fisheries management in the Adriatic Sea, 14 neutral microsatellites loci and partial mtDNA region were used to explore fine-scale genetic structure of species and migration patterns that affect genetic connectivity, by comparing 331 individuals sampled from the central and eastern regions of the Mediterranean. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of the genetic diversity and population structure of the European lobster H. gammarus, a decapod crustacean species of ecological and economic importance, in the waters of the Adriatic Sea.

Previous studies have explored European lobster population structure at different geographical scales using novel and traditional markers, i.e., RAPDS (Ulrich et al., 2001), allozymes (Jørstad et al., 2005), mtDNA and RFLPs (Triantafyllidis et al., 2005), microsatellites (Huserbråten et al., 2013; Watson et al., 2016; Ellis et al., 2017) and SNPs (Jenkins et al., 2019, 2020). At the broad geographical scale, coherent patterns of gene flow discontinuity were observed where several major distinct groups, i.e., Atlantic, northern Norway, Netherlands and Mediterranean were identified with the presence of an IBD pattern at the European level (for more detail see Triantafyllidis et al., 2005; Ellis et al., 2017). Both authors suggest that populations located toward the distribution limits, as in the case for populations originating from northern Norway and the Aegean Sea, show discrete biological units due to reduced migration rate and consequently increased genetic drift. Additionally, mtDNA analysis also supported sub-regional division within the Mediterranean, confirming differentiation of the Aegean populations from Adriatic and western Mediterranean ones (Triantafyllidis et al., 2005). This pattern was also observed in the present work, where the highest level of genetic differentiation was found among populations from different Mediterranean basins, while populations from the Adriatic Sea proved to be panmictic. Aside from the low level of overall genetic differentiation of European lobster in the present dataset (FST = 0.0062) that overlapped with the level previously documented using the same set of microsatellite loci (FST = 0.007; Ellis et al., 2017) on a wide sample collection throughout Europe, the majority of FST pair-wise comparisons among Adriatic-Aegean and Adriatic-Ligurian populations were significantly different. High gene flow and low values of FST in marine species do not mean an absence of population structure, because exchange of only few individuals per generation among populations can maintain genetic homogeneity (Waples, 1998). High gene flow documented in the Adriatic Sea and reduced flow toward other basins has been verified by both spatial analyses suggesting larval retention and confined dispersal within the Adriatic Sea. Namely, hierarchical Structure and DAPC analysis gave three distinct clusters assigning all the Adriatic populations into the first cluster, populations from the Ligurian and Aegean Seas into the second and third clusters, with the exception of the Ionian population that showed a more heterogeneous origin. It seems that the semi-enclosed Adriatic Sea presents one of defined phylogeographic regions within the Mediterranean. Namely, reduced gene flow has been documented for several other marine species (Ruditapes decussatus, Cordero et al., 2014; Sepia officinalis, Pérez-Losada et al., 2007; Solea solea, Sabatini et al., 2018; Paracentrotus lividus, Maltagliati et al., 2010) between the Adriatic Sea and the rest of Mediterranean.

Still, a diffuse barrier between the Adriatic and Ionian coast was observed in the present study although due to the limited sample size of the Ionian group, no strong conclusions can be drawn regarding population connectivity. The Ionian population showed a north-to-south transition pattern of differentiation characterized with low and non-significant FST pair-wise comparisons with all other sampled groups. Furthermore, all individuals in that group were partially assigned to all three clusters identified by Bayesian analysis. The Ionian Sea presents no phylogeographic barriers and is linked with the Adriatic Sea via oceanographic processes (Villamor et al., 2014), primarily coastal marine currents. Therefore, larval exchange and contemporary gene flow greatly depends on the dispersal capacity of the species (Rossi et al., 2014).

The most divergent individuals characterized by high membership coefficients of its assigning cluster originated from the Ligurian Sea. This differentiation seems to be result of significant IBD. Still, instead of a continuous cline of genetic differentiation, our data revealed a discontinuity in the form of patches, indicating the presence of barriers to gene flow or pattern potentially biased with not unformal sampling distribution across the study region (Meirmans, 2012). Nevertheless, we argue that in the case of the Ligurian population, IBD is a less important driver of the contemporary population structure. Limited gene flow toward the central Mediterranean can be partially explained by the well-defined Siculo-Tunisian Strait, an ocean front identified as a barrier for gene flow in some marine species (i.e., Mejri et al., 2009). In addition, recent study based on 79 SNPs analysis suggested that the hatchery stocking program conducted in Corsica during the 1970s, using lobsters originated from the Atlantic coast of France, left the footprint of Atlantic ancestry in the contemporary population and impacted the genetic structure of the Corsican natural population (Jenkins et al., 2020). Such a restocking impact by European lobster of Atlantic origin may additionally explain the observed discontinuity of genetic differentiation within the Mediterranean. Similar intraspecific hybridization pattern between escaped farmed fish of Atlantic origin and wild conspecifics has already been documented in the Adriatic where highly admixed populations had decreased genetic diversity (Šegvić-Bubić et al., 2017; Žužul et al., 2019).

The study results suggest that observed reductions in population size due to overfishing, habitat loss and other anthropogenic activities have not significantly impacted the neutral genetic diversity. The results of the heterozygote excess test under the TPM model showed no genetic erosion signal in all tested populations of H. gammarus, while M ratios were above 0.68 (average 0.77) as the cut off value for selecting demographically stable natural populations (Garza and Williamson, 2001). Genetic diversity indices for both juveniles and adults were comparable to values reported for European lobster populations from northern European waters (Ellis et al., 2017) where the same microsatellites markers were employed. Additionally, the results corroborate with those observed in a population from Lundy Island, a marine protected area in the Bristol Channel (United Kingdom) established in 2003 (Watson et al., 2016), suggesting stability of genetic variability despite intense fishing effort within the regions. Still, there is the potential limitation of the present data set to detect bottleneck events due to the relatively short time since the significant decrease in the census size of European lobster in the Adriatic Sea. Namely, the last significant decrease in landings was recorded in the 1990s, from 119 t y–1 to 10 t y–1 afterward (Lotze et al., 2011). Taking into account species longevity (42–72 years, Sheehy et al., 1999) and the relatively long generation time (9.81–12.88 years, present study), it could be argued that too few generations have passed to observe any loss of generation diversity by drift.

Contemporary and historical gene flow estimations demonstrated limited exchange of genetic material between basins, but not within the Adriatic Sea. Namely, both Migrate and BayesAss results showed that the north eastern coast of the Adriatic Sea acts as the main source of gene flow in the Adriatic Sea, with an asymmetrical migration pattern from the north toward the southern regions, which was additionally supported by the lack of IBD within the basin. Even though the model diagnostics for these analyses and model convergence performed well, the BayesAss method has reduced sensitivity when FST values between populations are less than 0.05, or in cases of high migration rates (Faubet et al., 2007). Since global and pairwise FST values among sampled populations were below the method-supported threshold, caution is required in interpreting these results as precise migration values. Galparsoro et al. (2009) produced the modeled habitat suitability map for the Bay of Biscay and pointed out that the most favorable habitat for European lobster are locations at the boundary between sedimentary and rocky-bottoms at water depths of 35–40 m. The eastern coast of the northern Adriatic meets these conditions. The Adriatic Sea is classified into three sub-regions, where depth increases from north to south (Trincardi et al., 1994). The northern region is the most extensive continental shelf of the Mediterranean Sea with an average bottom depth of about 35 m (Trincardi et al., 1994). The eastern coast of the north region, where the source populations (AD_UM, AD_PU) were sampled, is steep, with minimal recent sedimentation and strong karst relief that influences sediment distribution patterns (Fütterer and Paul, 1976). In contrast to the middle and south regions, which are characterized by average depths of 150 m and broad depressions 1218–1225 m deep, the heterogeneous bottom and relatively shallow depths makes the eastern coast of the north region the most suitable habitat, as the rocky substrate provides shelter from predators while soft sediment increases food availability for the European lobster. Since adult lobsters show high site fidelity in multiple locations (Øresland and Ulmestrand, 2013; Wiig et al., 2013; Skerritt et al., 2015), it would appear that gene flow within the Adriatic relies on dispersal potential of planktonic larvae with the support of local oceanographic features.

The circulation in the Adriatic is mostly counter-clockwise or cyclonic, with currents that northerly inflows along the eastern coast and returns in a southerly direction along the western coast, with up to pronounced circulation cells in the southern, middle and northern region (Orlić et al., 2012). Over a general pattern of panmixia, such circulation system greatly affects seascape connectivity in the Adriatic (Melià et al., 2016) and may be responsible for slight gene break observed between Vis Island population (AD_VI) from the middle region and the Lošinj Island population (AD_LO) from the north region. Although self-recruitment at a small spatial scale has been reported elsewhere (Øresland and Ulmestrand, 2013; Watson et al., 2016), we postulate that the Western Adriatic Current supports larval dispersal from the northern Adriatic, enabling genetically homogenized populations in the core of their range. Taking the duration of pelagic larval duration into account, i.e., 2 to 4 weeks (Schmalenbach and Franke, 2010) and an average current velocity of 25 cm/s (Poulain, 2001), the transfer of genetic material could potentially occur at a relatively large spatial scale, up to distances of 300 to 600 km. Due to the temporal fluctuation of population connectivity, replicated sampling is needed, including populations at the southern-most limits of basin to be able to estimate genetic identity of all possible source populations within the Adriatic Sea.

The mean contemporary Ne estimated for European lobster populations varied from 1,560 to 2,094, depending on the method employed, with overlapping CI of these values with historical estimations per population. To cope with the bias introduced by overlapping generations on estimates by the LD method (NeEstimator; Do et al., 2014), another option, i.e., estimator by parentage assignments (AgeStructure; Wang et al., 2010), specifically developed for populations with overlapping generations was used to estimate Ne by engaging only individuals of known age and sex. These two different approaches gave congruent estimations of Ne for the Adriatic basin, thereby increasing confidence in the estimates. Interestingly, the AgeStructure analysis revealed a decreased Ne per age class for males up to 20% in contrast to the Ne of females. Due to behavioral differences between the sexes, males are less residential and use more space than females (Skerritt et al., 2015), and as such are more vulnerable to fishing than females. This can affect census size and consequently Ne of males. A similar overall Ne estimate was observed in European lobsters from northern European waters (Ellis et al., 2017). Additionally, these Ne values fall within the range of the critical population size (Ne≃1000–5000) necessary for the maintenance of sufficient genetic variance for adaptive response in quantitative traits (Bürger and Lynch, 1997). It seems that the European lobster maintains adequate power to respond to environmental challenges, as already seen in some other overfished marine species (Riccioni et al., 2010; Valenzuela-Quiñonez et al., 2014).

Average haplotype diversity (0.456) across investigated populations was consistent with data for other marine crustaceans in the Mediterranean (Deli et al., 2015; Marra et al., 2015) but lower than those reported from European lobster populations examined using RFLP analysis of a 3-kb mtDNA fragment (Triantafyllidis et al., 2005). The same authors observed reduced genetic diversities in populations from the Adriatic and Aegean Seas in comparison with other Mediterranean regions, stressing that a possible cause is the synergistic effect of genetic bottleneck, absence of immigration that would increase genetic variation and high exploitation. Still, diversity indices from the present data are not comparable with these studies, given the use of different markers and/or sequence length and the lack of data robustness. Nevertheless, the hypothesis of sudden population expansion was not rejected for the present COI dataset and the expansion time estimates supports the hypothesis of a Pleistocene event, i.e., the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM ∼ 18 ka BP) for the Adriatic Sea, where expansion and contraction of European lobster populations were impacted by sea-level (Svitoch et al., 2000). The northern and central regions of the Adriatic were then dry and the sea level was around 130 m lower than today (Malvić and Velić, 2011; Sikora et al., 2014). Subsequently, the south-north orientation of the basin contributed to the postglacial recolonization of the Adriatic from southern refugia in the northward direction (Bianchi et al., 2012). Serial founder events along the recolonization axis may have led to a reduced genetic diversity at the edges of expansion range due to genetic drift. The impact of such a recolonization dynamic on genetic diversity was suggested for the violescent sea-whip Paramuricea clavata in the Eastern Adriatic (Ledoux et al., 2018). In this study, the different haplotype diversity levels observed between the north (0.44) and middle Adriatic (0.62) could be explained by the same factors.

Management Implications

Knowledge about stock structure and population connectivity is important for effective fisheries management. For the first time, this study provides detailed genetic structure of the European lobster in the Adriatic Sea and information on population connectivity between the Adriatic and Mediterranean basins. The European lobster shows signs of overexploitation in the Croatian fishery (Lotze et al., 2011). Despite the implementation of minimum legal size-limit and restricted fishing periods as regulatory measures for lobster fisheries, no additional strategic or long-term management actions have been proposed to improve the species abundance. The improvement of productivity and sustainability of European lobster fisheries in Europe has been practiced through two approaches: lobster stocking (Ellis et al., 2015b) and establishment of marine protected areas (MPAs) (Nillos Kleiven et al., 2019). While impact assessment and potential for lobster stocking remains limited, partially due to unfavorable juvenile tagging methods and limited information on species ecology, MPAs have demonstrated potential in lobster sustainable management. Namely, after 4 years of MPA establishment in southern Norway, CPUE values from experimental fishing had increased by a magnitude of 2.6 compared to pre-protection values (Nillos Kleiven et al., 2019). Thus, we propose establishment of new interconnected MPAs, targeting primarily the eastern part of north Adriatic, an area recognized as the main source of gene flow in the present study. Aside from the already active MPAs, such as the Brijuni archipelago in the north region, a large proportion of lobster habitat remains vulnerable to anthropogenic disturbance and the current level of protection of 3% for the north Adriatic Sea seems insufficient (Bastari et al., 2016). To achieve successful biodiversity protection, marine reserves should be primarily connected to other MPAs via adults or larval dispersal. Thus, species biological traits knowledge such as the pelagic duration and the spawning pattern, along with Lagrangian particle transport modeling within the local current system to study larval transport and population connectivity should be considered for adequate spatial conservation planning (Bray et al., 2017; Legrand et al., 2019).

While sign of neutral genetic diversity loss was not observed for European lobster populations in the present study, fishery and other impacts may have caused changes in the frequency of selectively important traits that cannot be easily measured with present genetic markers. Additionally, an important limitation of assignment methods used here is their power to detect migrants in cases of low levels of population differentiation, although it can be counterbalanced by larger sample sizes and additional gene loci, resulting in suitable power to detect migrants (Paetkau et al., 2004; Manel et al., 2005). In most cases, marine species function as discrete populations in the adult phase, connected with a dispersive pelagic larval stage and sea currents where high gene flow and associated lack of population structure can be expected when using neutral microsatellite markers. The priority for fisheries and conservation management to recognize source-sink attributes of fish populations, has invoke increase of population genomics studies and use of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers. Many marine species showed substantial levels of differentiation at putative candidate loci under selection (Cure et al., 2017), providing new insights into source population and recruitment event connection.

Recently developed SNP markers using RAD sequencing have proven to be powerful in population genetic structure detection (Jenkins et al., 2019). Still, the findings of this study provide novel insights into the genetic diversity and structure of the European lobster in the Adriatic Sea and will serve for fisheries management and the spatial planning of marine reserve networks. Additional efforts will be oriented toward use of SNP markers and researching the genetic architecture of quantitative traits to examine the consequences of fisheries-induced selection on recent European lobster populations.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: NCBI (GenBank acc. no. MT983889 – MT983894).

Ethics Statement

Ethical review and approval was not required for the animal study because lobster tissue samples were obtained exclusively from commercial fisheries.

Author Contributions

TŠ-B, SM-S, and MP conceived the study. MP, AT, FG, ED, and IC conducted the sampling. MP, IŽ, and TŠ-B conducted the molecular and data analysis. TŠ-B and MP wrote and revised the manuscript. SM-S obtained funding for the work. All authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was partially funded by the Croatian Science Foundation (HRZZ) under the projects NurseFish (IP-2016-06-9884) and AquaPop (IP-2014-09-9050).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all fishers and colleagues including Dario Vrdoljak, Pierluigi Carbonara, and Gianluca Coidessa for their help in sample collection. Majority of the samples were collected within the DCF Program.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2020.576023/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

  1. ^ http://popart.otago.ac.nz

References

André, C., and Knutsen, H. (2010). Development of twelve novel microsatellite loci in the European lobster (Homarus gammarus). Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2, 233–236. doi: 10.1007/s12686-009-9151-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Avise, J. C. (2000). Phylogeography: the History and Formation of Species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Google Scholar

Bastari, A., Micheli, F., Ferretti, F., Pusceddu, A., and Cerrano, C. (2016). Large marine protected areas (LMPAs) in the Mediterranean Sea: the opportunity of the Adriatic Sea. Mar. Policy 68, 165–177. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.03.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Beerli, P. (2006). Comparison of Bayesian and maximum-likelihood inference of population genetic parameters. Bioinformatics 22, 341–345. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti803

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Beerli, P. (2008). MIGRATE – Population Genetics Inference Using the Coalescent. Available online at: https://peterbeerli.com/migrate-html5/index.html (accessed January 13, 2020).

Google Scholar

Beerli, P., and Felsenstein, J. (2001). Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 4563–4568. doi: 10.1073/pnas.081068098

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bianchi, C. N., Morri, C., Chiantore, M., Montefalcone, M., Parravicini, V., and Rovere, A. (2012). “Mediterranean sea biodiversity between the legacy from the past and a future of change,” in Life in the Mediterranean Sea: A Look at Habitat Changes, ed. N. Stambler (New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc), 55.

Google Scholar

Bray, L., Kassis, D., and Hall-Spencer, J. M. (2017). Assessing larval connectivity for marine spatial planning in the Adriatic. Mar. Environ. Res. 125, 73–81. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2017.01.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Browne, R., Pérez Benavente, G., Uglem, I., and Carlos Mariño Balsa, J. (2009). An Illustrated Hatchery Guide for the Production of Clawed Lobsters. (Using a Green Water Technique). Dún Laoghaire: Bord Iascaigh Mhara.

Google Scholar

Bürger, R., and Lynch, M. (1997). “Adaptation and extinction in changing environments,” in EXS, eds R. Bijlsma and V. Loeschke (Basel: Birkhäuser), 209–239. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8882-0_12

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cadrin, S. X., Kerr, L. A., and Mariani, S. (2014). Stock Identification Methods: Applications in Fishery Science, 2nd Edn. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.

Google Scholar

Chapuis, M. P., and Estoup, A. (2007). Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 621–631. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl191

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chapuis, M. P., Plantamp, C., Streiff, R., Blondin, L., and Piou, C. (2015). Microsatellite evolutionary rate and pattern in Schistocerca gregaria inferred from direct observation of germline mutations. Mol. Ecol. 24, 6107–6119. doi: 10.1111/mec.13465

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coll, M., Piroddi, C., Albouy, C., Ben Rais Lasram, F., Cheung, W. W. L., Christensen, V., et al. (2012). The Mediterranean Sea under siege: spatial overlap between marine biodiversity, cumulative threats and marine reserves. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 21, 465–480. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00697.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Colloca, F., Cardinale, M., Maynou, F., Giannoulaki, M., Scarcella, G., Jenko, K., et al. (2013). Rebuilding Mediterranean fisheries: a new paradigm for ecological sustainability. Fish Fish. 14, 89–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00453.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cordero, D., Peña, J. B., and Saavedra, C. (2014). Phylogeographic analysis of introns and mitochondrial DNA in the clam Ruditapes decussatus uncovers the effects of Pleistocene glaciations and endogenous barriers to gene flow. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 71, 274–287. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.11.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Corrales, X., Coll, M., Ofir, E., Heymans, J. J., Steenbeek, J., Goren, M., et al. (2018). Future scenarios of marine resources and ecosystem conditions in the Eastern Mediterranean under the impacts of fishing, alien species and sea warming. Sci. Rep. 8:14284. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32666-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coulon, A. (2010). genhet: an easy-to-use R function to estimate individual heterozygosity. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10, 167–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02731.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cowen, R., Gawarkiewicz, G., Pineda, J., Thorrold, S., and Werner, F. (2007). Population connectivity in marine systems: an overview. Oceanography 20, 14–21. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2007.26

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cowen, R. K., Paris, C. B., and Srinivasan, A. (2006). Scaling of connectivity in marine populations. Science 311, 522–527. doi: 10.1126/science.1122039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cure, K., Thomas, L., Hobbs, J. P. A., Fairclough, D. V., and Kennington, W. J. (2017). Genomic signatures of local adaptation reveal source-sink dynamics in a high gene flow fish species. Sci. Rep. 7:8618. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09224-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deli, T., Bahles, H., Said, K., and Chatti, N. (2015). Patterns of genetic and morphometric diversity in the marbled crab (Pachygrapsus marmoratus, Brachyura, Grapsidae) populations across the Tunisian coast. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 34, 49–58. doi: 10.1007/s13131-015-0687-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Do, C., Waples, R. S., Peel, D., Macbeth, G. M., Tillett, B. J., and Ovenden, J. R. (2014). NeEstimator v2: re-implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size (Ne) from genetic data. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 14, 209–214. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12157

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Earl, D. A., and von Holdt, B. M. (2012). STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 4, 359–361. doi: 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ellis, C. D., Hodgson, D. J., André, C., Sørdalen, T. K., Knutsen, H., and Griffiths, A. G. F. (2015a). Genotype reconstruction of paternity in European lobsters (Homarus gammarus). PLoS One 10:e0139585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139585

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ellis, C. D., Hodgson, D. J., Daniels, C. L., Boothroyd, D. P., Bannister, R. C. A., and Griffiths, A. G. F. (2015b). European lobster stocking requires comprehensive impact assessment to determine fishery benefits. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 72, i35–i48. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsu196

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ellis, C. D., Hodgson, D. J., Daniels, C. L., Collins, M., and Griffiths, A. G. F. (2017). Population genetic structure in European lobsters: implications for connectivity, diversity and hatchery stocking. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 563, 123–137. doi: 10.3354/meps11957

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Excoffier, L., and Lischer, H. E. L. (2010). Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10, 564–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

FAO (2018). THE STATE OF MEDITERRANEAN AND BLACK SEA FISHERIES. General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean. Rome: FAO.

Google Scholar

FAO (2020). Fisheries & Aquaculture - Species Fact Sheets - Homarus Gammarus (Linnaeus, 1758). Available online at: http://www.fao.org/fishery/species/2648/en (accessed February 26, 2020).

Google Scholar

Faubet, P., Waples, R. S., and Gaggiotti, O. E. (2007). Evaluating the performance of a multilocus Bayesian method for the estimation of migration rates. Mol. Ecol. 16, 1149–1166. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03218.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fogarty, M., and Botsford, L. (2007). Population connectivity and spatial management of marine fisheries. Oceanography 20, 112–123. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2007.34

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R., and Vrijenhoek, R. (1994). DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 3, 294–299. doi: 10.1071/ZO9660275

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fu, Y.-X. (1997). Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics 147, 915–925.

Google Scholar

Fütterer, D., and Paul, J. (1976). Recent and Pleistocene sediments off the Istrian coast (Northern Adriatic). Senckenb. Maritima 8, 1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.03.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Galparsoro, I., Borja, Á., Bald, J., Liria, P., and Chust, G. (2009). Predicting suitable habitat for the European lobster (Homarus gammarus), on the Basque continental shelf (Bay of Biscay), using ecological-niche factor analysis. Ecol. Modell. 220, 556–567. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.11.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Garza, J. C., and Williamson, E. G. (2001). Detection of reduction in population size using data from microsatellite loci. Mol. Ecol. 10, 305–318. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01190.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goudet, J. (2002). FSTAT, A Program to Estimate and Test Gene Diversities and Fixation Indices (Version 2.9.3.2). Available online at: https://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm (accessed July 1, 2019).

Google Scholar

Hoban, S. M., Mezzavilla, M., Gaggiotti, O. E., Benazzo, A., van Oosterhout, C., and Bertorelle, G. (2013). High variance in reproductive success generates a false signature of a genetic bottleneck in populations of constant size: a simulation study. BMC Bioinformatics 14:309. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-309

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Holthuis, L. B. (1991). FAO species catalogue: marine lobsters of the world. FAO Fish. Synopsis 13:151.

Google Scholar

Huserbråten, M. B. O., Moland, E., Knutsen, H., Olsen, E. M., André, C., and Stenseth, N. C. (2013). Conservation, spillover and gene flow within a network of Northern European marine protected areas. PLoS One 8:e73388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073388

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jakobsson, M., and Rosenberg, N. A. (2007). CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23, 1801–1806. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm233

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jenkins, T. L., Ellis, C. D., Durieux, E. D. H., Filippi, J., Bracconi, J., and Stevens, J. R. (2020). Historical translocations and stocking alter the genetic structure of a Mediterranean lobster fishery. Ecol. Evol. 10, 5631–5636. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6304

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jenkins, T. L., Ellis, C. D., Triantafyllidis, A., and Stevens, J. R. (2019). Single nucleotide polymorphisms reveal a genetic cline across the north-east Atlantic and enable powerful population assignment in the European lobster. Evol. Appl. 12, 1881–1899. doi: 10.1111/eva.12849

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jombart, T. (2008). adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24, 1403–1405. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jørstad, K. E., Farestveit, E., Kelly, E., and Triantaphyllidis, C. (2005). Allozyme variation in European lobster (Homarus gammarus) throughout its distribution range. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 39, 515–526. doi: 10.1080/00288330.2005.9517330

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jost, L. (2008). G ST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol. Ecol. 17, 4015–4026. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03887.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Tamura, K., and Dudley, J. (2016). MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Laikre, L., Allendorf, F. W., Aroner, L. C., Baker, C. S., Gregovich, D. P., Hansen, M. M., et al. (2010). Neglect of genetic diversity in implementation of the convention on biological diversity. Conserv. Biol. 24, 86–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01425.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ledoux, J.-B., Frleta-Valić, M., Kipson, S., Antunes, A., Cebrian, E., Linares, C., et al. (2018). Postglacial range expansion shaped the spatial genetic structure in a marine habitat-forming species: implications for conservation plans in the Eastern Adriatic Sea. J. Biogeogr. 45, 2645–2657. doi: 10.1111/jbi.13461

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Legrand, T., Di Franco, A., Ser-Giacomi, E., Caló, A., and Rossi, V. (2019). A multidisciplinary analytical framework to delineate spawning areas and quantify larval dispersal in coastal fish. Mar. Environ. Res. 151:104761. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2019.104761

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Librado, P., and Rozas, J. (2009). DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25, 1451–1452. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lloret, J., and Riera, V. (2008). Evolution of a Mediterranean coastal zone: human impacts on the marine environment of Cape Creus. Environ. Manage. 42, 977–988. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9196-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lotze, H. K., Coll, M., and Dunne, J. A. (2011). Historical changes in marine resources, food-web structure and ecosystem functioning in the Adriatic Sea, Mediterranean. Ecosystems 14, 198–222. doi: 10.1007/s10021-010-9404-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maltagliati, F., Di Giuseppe, G., Barbieri, M., Castelli, A., and Dini, F. (2010). Phylogeography and genetic structure of the edible sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) inferred from the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 100, 910–923. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01482.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malvić, T., and Velić, J. (2011). “Neogene tectonics in croatian part of the pannonian basin and reflectance in hydrocarbon accumulations,” in New Frontiers in Tectonic Research - at the Midst of Plate Convergence, ed. U. Schattner (Rijeka: InTech). doi: 10.5772/21270

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Manel, S., Gaggiotti, O. E., and Waples, R. S. (2005). Assignment methods: matching biological questions with appropriate techniques. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 136–142. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.12.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marra, A., Mona, S., Sà, R. M., D’Onghia, G., and Maiorano, P. (2015). Population genetic history of Aristeus antennatus (Crustacea: Decapoda) in the Western and Central Mediterranean Sea. PLoS One 10:e0117272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117272

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marty, L., Dieckmann, U., and Ernande, B. (2015). Fisheries-induced neutral and adaptive evolution in exploited fish populations and consequences for their adaptive potential. Evol. Appl. 8, 47–63. doi: 10.1111/eva.12220

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Matić-Skoko, S., Šegvić-Bubić, T., Mandić, I., Izquierdo-Gomez, D., Arneri, E., Carbonara, P., et al. (2018). Evidence of subtle genetic structure in the sympatric species Mullus barbatus and Mullus surmuletus (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Mediterranean Sea. Sci. Rep. 8:676.

Google Scholar

Meirmans, P. G. (2012). The trouble with isolation by distance. Mol. Ecol. 21, 2839–2846. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05578.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meirmans, P. G., and Van Tienderen, P. H. (2004). GENOTYPE and GENODIVE: two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4, 792–794. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00770.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mejri, R., Lo Brutto, S., Ben Hassine, O. K., and Arculeo, M. (2009). A study on Pomatoschistus tortonesei Miller 1968 (Perciformes, Gobiidae) reveals the Siculo-Tunisian Strait (STS) as a breakpoint to gene flow in the Mediterranean basin. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 53, 596–601. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.04.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Melià, P., Schiavina, M., Rossetto, M., Gatto, M., Fraschetti, S., and Casagrandi, R. (2016). Looking for hotspots of marine metacommunity connectivity: a methodological framework. Sci. Rep. 6:23705. doi: 10.1038/srep23705

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nillos Kleiven, P. J., Espeland, S. H., Olsen, E. M., Abesamis, R. A., Moland, E., and Kleiven, A. R. (2019). Fishing pressure impacts the abundance gradient of European lobsters across the borders of a newly established marine protected area. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 286:20182455. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2455

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Øresland, V., and Ulmestrand, M. (2013). European lobster subpopulations from limited adult movements and larval retention. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 70, 532–539. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fst019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Orlić, M., Gačić, M., and LaViolette, P. E. (2012). The currents and circulation of the Adriatic Sea. Oceanol. Acta 15, 109–124.

Google Scholar

Osio, G. C., Orio, A., and Millar, C. P. (2015). Assessing the vulnerability of Mediterranean demersal stocks and predicting exploitation status of un-assessed stocks. Fish. Res. 171, 110–121. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2015.02.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ovenden, J. R., Berry, O., Welch, D. J., Buckworth, R. C., and Dichmont, C. M. (2015). Ocean’s eleven: a critical evaluation of the role of population, evolutionary and molecular genetics in the management of wild fisheries. Fish Fish. 16, 125–159. doi: 10.1111/faf.12052

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paetkau, D., Slade, R., Burden, M., and Estoup, A. (2004). Genetic assignment methods for the direct, real-time estimation of migration rate: a simulation-based exploration of accuracy and power. Mol. Ecol. 13, 55–65. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2004.02008.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pavičić, M., Dragičević, B., Žužul, I., Vrdoljak, D., Matić-Skoko, S., and Šegvić-Bubić, T. (2020). First record of American lobster, Homarus americanus (H. Milne Edwards, 1837), in the Mediterranean Sea. Bioinvasions Rec. 9, 83–88. doi: 10.3391/bir.2020.9.1.11

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peery, M. Z., Kirby, R., Reid, B. N., Stoelting, R., Doucet-Bëer, E., Robinson, S., et al. (2012). Reliability of genetic bottleneck tests for detecting recent population declines. Mol. Ecol. 21, 3403–3418. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05635.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pere, A., Marengo, M., Lejeune, P., and Durieux, E. D. H. (2019). Evaluation of Homarus gammarus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Nephropidae) catches and potential in a mediterranean small-scale fishery. Sci. Mar. 83, 69–77. doi: 10.3989/scimar.04862.22B

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pérez-Losada, M., Nolte, M. J., Crandall, K. A., and Shaw, P. W. (2007). Testing hypotheses of population structuring in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea using the common cuttlefish Sepia officinalis. Mol. Ecol. 16, 2667–2679. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03333.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Phillips, B. F. (2013). Lobsters: Biology, Management, Aquaculture and Fisheries, ed. B. F. Phillips (Oxford: John Wiley & Sons). doi: 10.1002/9781118517444

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Piry, S., Luikart, G., and Cornuet, J.-M. (1999). Computer note. BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective size using allele frequency data. J. Hered. 90, 502–503. doi: 10.1093/jhered/90.4.502

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Poulain, P. M. (2001). Adriatic Sea surface circulation as derived from drifter data between 1990 and 1999. J. Mar. Syst. 29, 3–32. doi: 10.1016/s0924-7963(01)00007-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., and Donnelly, P. (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945–959.

Google Scholar

Prodöhl, P. A., Jørstad, K. E., Triantafyllidis, A., Katsares, V., and Triantaphyllidis, C. (2007). “European lobster-Homarus gammarus,” in Genimpact—Evaluation of Genetic Impact of Aqua-Culture Activities on Native Populations. A European Network (EU contract n. RICA-CT-2005-022802). Final scientific report, eds T. Svåsand, D. Crosetti, E. García-Vázquez, and E. Verspoor, 91–98.

Google Scholar

R Core Team (2017). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Google Scholar

Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J., Xie, D., Baele, G., and Suchard, M. A. (2018). Posterior summarization in bayesian phylogenetics using tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 67, 901–904. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syy032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Raymond, M., and Rousset, F. (1995). An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49, 1280–1283. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb04456.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Riccioni, G., Landi, M., Ferrara, G., Milano, I., Cariani, A., Zane, L., et al. (2010). Spatio-temporal population structuring and genetic diversity retention in depleted Atlantic Bluefin tuna of the Mediterranean Sea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 2102–2107. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908281107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rice, W. R. (1989). Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43, 223–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04220.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rogers, A. R., and Harpending, H. (1992). Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9, 552–569. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040727

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosenberg, N. A. (2004). DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4, 137–138. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00566.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rossi, V., Ser-Giacomi, E., López, C., and Hernández-García, E. (2014). Hydrodynamic provinces and oceanic connectivity from a transport network help designing marine reserves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 2883–2891. doi: 10.1002/2014GL059540

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rousset, F. (2008). GENEPOP’007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for windows and Linux. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 8, 103–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sabatini, L., Bullo, M., Cariani, A., Celić, I., Ferrari, A., Guarniero, I., et al. (2018). Good practices for common sole assessment in the Adriatic Sea: genetic and morphological differentiation of Solea solea (Linnaeus, 1758) from S. aegyptiaca (Chabanaud, 1927) and stock identification. J. Sea Res. 137, 57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2018.04.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmalenbach, I., and Franke, H. D. (2010). Potential impact of climate warming on the recruitment of an economically and ecologically important species, the European lobster (Homarus gammarus) at Helgoland, North Sea. Mar. Biol. 157, 1127–1135. doi: 10.1007/s00227-010-1394-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schubart, C. D., Diesel, R., and Hedges, S. B. (1998). Rapid evolution to terrestrial life in Jamaican crabs. Nature 393, 363–365. doi: 10.1038/30724

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Šegvić-Bubić, T., Grubišić, L., Trumbić, Ž., Stanić, R., Ljubković, J., Maršić-Lučić, J., et al. (2017). Genetic characterization of wild and farmed European seabass in the Adriatic sea: assessment of farmed escapees using a Bayesian approach. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 74, 369–378. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsw155

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Selkoe, K. A., Henzler, C. M., and Gaines, S. D. (2008). Seascape genetics and the spatial ecology of marine populations. Fish Fish. 9, 363–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00300.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shanks, A. L., Grantham, B. A., and Carr, M. H. (2003). Propagule dispersal distance and the size and spacing of marine reserves. Ecol. Appl. 13, 159–169. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0159:pddats]2.0.co;2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sheehy, M. R. J., Bannister, R. C. A., Wickins, J. F., and Shelton, P. M. J. (1999). New perspectives on the growth and longevity of the European lobster (Homarus gammarus). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56, 1904–1915. doi: 10.1139/f99-116

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sikora, M., Mihanović, H., and Vilibić, I. (2014). Paleo-coastline of the Central Eastern Adriatic Sea, and paleo-channels of the Cetina and Neretva rivers during the last glacial maximum. Acta Adriat. 55, 3–18. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2007.03.021

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Skerritt, D. J., Robertson, P. A., Mill, A. C., Polunin, N. V. C., and Fitzsimmons, C. (2015). Fine-scale movement, activity patterns and home-ranges of European lobster Homarus gammarus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 536, 203–219. doi: 10.3354/meps11374

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., and van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 64, 583–639. doi: 10.1111/1467-9868.00353

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Svitoch, A. A., Selivanov, A. O., and Yanina, T. A. (2000). The pont-caspian and Mediterranean basins in the Pleistocene (paleogeography and correlation). Oceanology 40, 868–881.

Google Scholar

Tajima, F. (1989). Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123, 585–595.

Google Scholar

Triantafyllidis, A., Apostolidis, A. P., Katsares, V., Kelly, E., Mercer, J., Hughes, M., et al. (2005). Mitochondrial DNA variation in the European lobster (Homarus gammarus) throughout the range. Mar. Biol. 146, 223–235. doi: 10.1007/s00227-004-1435-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trincardi, F., Correggiari, A., and Roveri, M. (1994). Late quaternary transgressive erosion and deposition in a modern epicontinental shelf: the Adriatic semienclosed basin. Geomarine Lett. 14, 41–51. doi: 10.1007/BF01204470

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tsikliras, A. C., Dinouli, A., Tsiros, V.-Z., and Tsalkou, E. (2015). The Mediterranean and Black Sea fisheries at risk from overexploitation. PLoS One 10:e0121188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121188

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Uglem, I., Belchier, M., and Svasand, T. (2005). Age determination of European lobsters (Homarus gammarus L.) by histological quantification of lipofuscin. J. Crustac. Biol. 25, 95–99. doi: 10.1651/c-2448

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ulrich, I., Müller, J., Schütt, C., and Buchholz, F. (2001). A study of population genetics in the European lobster, Homarus gammarus (Decapoda, Nephropidae). Crustaceana 74, 825–837. doi: 10.2307/20105320

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Valenzuela-Quiñonez, F., Garza, J. C., De-Anda-Montañez, J. A., and García-de-León, F. J. (2014). Inferring past demographic changes in a critically endangered marine fish after fishery collapse. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 71, 1619–1628. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsu058

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Van Oosterhout, C., Hutchinson, W. F., Wills, D. P. M., and Shipley, P. (2004). MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4, 535–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vasilakopoulos, P., Maravelias, C. D., and Tserpes, G. (2014). The alarming decline of mediterranean fish stocks. Curr. Biol. 24, 1643–1648. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.070

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Venables, W. N., and Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern Applied Statistics with S Fourth Edition, 4th Edn. New York, NY: Springer.

Google Scholar

Villamor, A., Costantini, F., and Abbiati, M. (2014). Genetic structuring across marine biogeographic boundaries in rocky shore invertebrates. PLoS One 9:e101135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101135

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, J., Brekke, P., Huchard, E., Knapp, L. A., and Cowlishaw, G. (2010). Estimation of parameters of inbreeding and genetic drift in populations with overlapping generations. Evolution 64, 1704–1718. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00953.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Waples, R. (1998). Separating the wheat from the chaff: patterns of genetic differentiation in high gene flow species. J. Hered. 89, 438–450. doi: 10.1093/jhered/89.5.438

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Watson, H. V., McKeown, N. J., Coscia, I., Wootton, E., and Ironside, J. E. (2016). Population genetic structure of the European lobster (Homarus gammarus) in the Irish Sea and implications for the effectiveness of the first British marine protected area. Fish. Res. 183, 287–293. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2016.06.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wiig, J. R., Moland, E., Haugen, T. O., and Olsen, E. M. (2013). Spatially structured interactions between lobsters and lobster fishers in a coastal habitat: fine-scale behaviour and survival estimated from acoustic telemetry. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 70, 1468–1476. doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2013-0209

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wilson, G. A., and Rannala, B. (2003). Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163, 1177–1191.

Google Scholar

Yeh, F. C. Y. C., Yang, R., and Boyle, T. R. (1999). POPGENE Version 1.32 Microsoft Windows-Based Freeware for Populations Genetic Analysis. Edmonton: University of Alberta.

Google Scholar

Žužul, I., Šegvić-Bubić, T., Talijančić, I., Džoić, T., Lepen Pleić, I., Beg Paklar, G., et al. (2019). Spatial connectivity pattern of expanding gilthead seabream populations and its interactions with aquaculture sites: a combined population genetic and physical modelling approach. Sci. Rep. 9:14718. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51256-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: gene flow, genetic diversity, population structure, fisheries, microsatellites, mtDNA

Citation: Pavičić M, Žužul I, Matić-Skoko S, Triantafyllidis A, Grati F, Durieux EDH, Celić I and Šegvić-Bubić T (2020) Population Genetic Structure and Connectivity of the European Lobster Homarus gammarus in the Adriatic and Mediterranean Seas. Front. Genet. 11:576023. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.576023

Received: 11 July 2020; Accepted: 11 November 2020;
Published: 07 December 2020.

Edited by:

Mehrdad Hajibabaei, University of Guelph, Canada

Reviewed by:

Yessica Rico, Instituto de Ecología (INECOL), Mexico
Gonzalo Gajardo, University of Los Lagos, Chile

Copyright © 2020 Pavičić, Žužul, Matić-Skoko, Triantafyllidis, Grati, Durieux, Celić and Šegvić-Bubić. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Tanja Šegvić-Bubić, tanja.segvic@izor.hr; tsegvic@izor.hr

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.