The disaster-causing factors of the flash floods for the July 20th extreme rainstorm in Henan, China

Global warming has accelerated the frequency and intensity of extreme rainfall events in mountainous areas. Coupled with their vulnerable environment and the impact of intensive human activities, along with the complex and variable causes of flash floods, this exacerbates casualties and property losses. Therefore, this article investigates the triggering mechanisms and potential disaster-causing factors of the extreme “720”flood in the WZD-HGZ basin of Henan. The research results indicate that the flash floods in the WZD-HGZ basin were primarily caused by prolonged heavy rainfall, combined with the complex terrain, obstructive backwater, and human activities. The amplification of the flood mainly occurred in three stages: concentrated runoff from multiple channels, water obstruction caused by the successive collapse of roadbeds and bridges, and the generation of backwater. Besides, due to the lack of basic flood prevention awareness, unclear warnings, and inadequate guidance, the transition chain from issuing warnings to taking action was disrupted. The aforementioned research findings provide references for current flash flood disaster prevention efforts.


Introduction
Flash flood is usually defined as a rapid rise of water level along a stream gully or in a small catchment associated with short-duration but high-intensity rainstorms (Burrell and Eve, 2002;Martin et al., 2013).As such, it is characterized by sudden occurrence, short response time, high flow velocity and sometimes carrying debris and rocks, which has become one of the most devastating disasters all over the world (Mehdi et al., 2018).World Meteorological Organization (WMO) reported more than 5,000 deaths worldwide annually due to flash floods, which exceeds any other flood-related events.Paprotny et al. (2018) studied flood losses from 1,564 flood events in Europe during the last 150 years, of which more than half are flash floods.There are 1,075 fatalities due to flash flood recorded from 1996 to 2014 across the United States, with approximately 100 casualties each year (Ashley and Ashley, 2008;Terti et al., 2017).In China, the total number of casualties caused by flood-related events is around 0.28 million since 1950, and nearly 80% of losses during 2010-2016 were due to flash floods (He et al., 2018;Liu et al., 2022a).
To achieve a better understanding of flash floods, many researches have focused on studying its mechanism (Meral, 2016;Mónica et al., 2017;Yang et al., 2023;Qiu et al., 2024) and identifying meteorological and hydrological factors that have the potential to trigger the disasters, e.g., complex topography with terrain gradients, land use and soil type, land cover, antecedent heavy rainfall, human activities, etc.These factors can determine the hydrological response of watersheds to the rainfall which most flash floods are associated with (Liu et al., 2024).For example, Zhang et al. (2021) and Zhang et al. (2019) investigated the changes in future flash floods due to climate change.They found that extreme rainfall would lead to an increase in inundation depth, thereby increasing the risk of flash floods.However, in the decades, climate change has dramatically altered the extreme weather patterns by which flash floods are generated more likely, the formation mechanisms of flash floods induced by frequent extreme rainfall under climate change have not been thoroughly studied.Meantime, with the rapid social and economic development, the frequent and unpredictable impacts of human activities have increased the risk of flash floods (Billi et al., 2015;Gan et al., 2018;Papagiannaki et al., 2017;Liu et al., 2020;Ye et al., 2024).Especially in China, although the data monitoring network has been developed and implemented at the national level, monitoring facilities in mountain areas need further improvement.Direct measurement equipment is particularly prone to damage under extreme conditions.Therefore, it is essential to develop a decent post-disaster review strategy based on limited data, which can provide a reasonable detection to the hidden factors that induce disasters.One of the greatest challenges is that regions prone to flash floods often lack the limited historical records during such extreme events.
This article focuses on the record-breaking rainfall that occurred in Henan Province, China, on 20 July 2021 (so-called "720 rainstorm"), which reached up to 624 mm/day (Wang and Xuan, 2022;Xu et al., 2022); the motivation is to propose a post-disaster assessment strategy, that leverages limited data to uncover the factors inducing flash floods.This strategy involves comprehensive data collection, including victim accounts and postdisaster surveys, field investigations, and the use of drones for disaster identification.Scenario assumptions and modeling are then employed to rapidly simulate and explore contributing factors to the disaster."720 rainstorm" triggered devastating flash floods in many cities in Henan Province, particularly in the provincial capital, Zhengzhou, causing casualties and significant economic losses.The severe flooding disaster occurred in two villages in the southwestern mountainous area of Zhengzhou, named Wangzongdian (WZD) and Haigouzai (HGZ).The watershed controlled by the two villages experienced the highest number of deaths due to flash floods in 2021.However, due to limited data and the complexity of the situation, it has been challenging to quickly determine the causes that triggered the disaster.Additionally, given the small scale of the WZD-HGZ watershed, it is difficult to explain why the number of casualties in this area was significantly higher than in other flood-affected regions, and what the main factors triggering the flash floods in this watershed?Furthermore, despite issuing a public warning 14 h in advance, why the evacuation process did not proceed effectively remains a question?
To address the aforementioned issues, the study proposes a post-disaster review strategy.Firstly, data collection is emphasized.Given the susceptibility of actual measurement instruments to damage and the difficulty in collecting data, information from various sources such as victim descriptions and post-disaster survey data is considered.Disaster identification primarily relies on field investigations and the use of drones to assist.Subsequently, through scenario assumptions and modeling, the aim is to rapidly simulate and explore the potential factors contributing to the losses.Building upon this foundation, the strategy is applied and validated through practical case studies, specifically considering the characteristics of the flash floods in the WZD-HGZ watershed.The aim is to provide valuable insights for mountain flood disaster defense strategies.The article is organized as follows: Section 2 describes the details of the study area, data collection and process, geographic analysis to extract topographic features and the simulation model; Section 3 shows the simulation results including the rainfall characteristics, flood simulation in the upstream and downstream watersheds and the mechanism and factors driven the disaster; the impact of human behavior is then discussed in Section 4 and the conclusion is given in Section 5.

Study area
The study area, i.e., WZD-HGZ watershed, presented in Figure 1, with the size of 42 km 2 is a sub-catchment controlled by the Suohe River which is a tributary of the Jialu River in the Huai river basin situated in northern China between the Yellow river and the Yangtze river (the two longest rivers in China).According to the on-site survey, the land of the WZD-HGZ watershed is mainly covered by woodland and agricultural crops together with several quarries where the soil mainly composes of sandy clay.According to the historical record, the annual average rainfall of the WZD-HGZ watershed is 608.8 mm with an uneven temporal distribution throughout the year.The rainfall recorded in the period of June-September accounts for 66% of the annual amount.Village WZD controlling the upstream watershed is surrounded by mountains with a total mountain area of 5.3 km 2 on all sides.The watershed can be subdivided into two small watersheds that are bounded by WZD Group, the most north part of village WZD, where the boundary is presented as a yellow dash line and marked as "Upstream (WZD)" in Figure 1B.The upstream watershed is located in the south of WZD Community (marked as red circle), partly under the jurisdiction of Xinmi City, with the size of around 22 km 2 and the length of the main ditch in the area is about 13.9 km which three ditches (west, middle, east) concentrate into.The downstream watershed is located in the north between Village WZD and HGZ (marked as "Downstream (HGZ)" in Figure 1B) where another three tributaries converge to the main ditch and a Railway "Mami Line" (marked as red dash line) passes through.The outlet of the WZD-HGZ watershed is a reservoir called "Zhidingdian" that is designed for preventing a one-in-100-year return level with the check flood level of a one-in-2000-year return period.The reservoir has a total storage capacity of 60.65 million m 3 .As the reservoir had just been reinforced and kept empty storage, it undertook the main flood during the occurrence of the "7.20" rainstorm event.There are 12 local communities including WZD Group, Nantou Group, etc., 442 households and 1,472 residents living in Village WZD while 24 communities including Village Cuimiao, Haixi Group, Hainan Group, Haidong Group and Chenhe Group, 1938 households and 7,047 people in HGZ.
The rainstorm occurring on 20 July 2021 in Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China, has been recognized as one of the rarest and most extraordinary events since 1951, which causes hundreds of casualties and serious financial losses, especially in the watershed located in two mountainous villages named "Wangzongdian" (WZD) and "Haigouzhai" (HGZ).During the event, many direct measurement facilities were destroyed, which leads to great difficulties in supporting flood simulation and disaster analysis (Chen et al., 2022;Liu et al., 2022b).The flash flood accompanied by various topographical disasters such as landslides and debris flow destroyed more than 40,000 houses and caused 251 deaths in total in the four most-affected cities.The worst hit identified according to the casualties and property losses is located in a watershed controlled by the villages of Wang Zong Dian (WZD, upstream) and Hai Gou Zhai (HGZ, downstream) with 49 casualties which are the maximum fatalities due to flash flood disasters and landslides in 2021 (China, 2021).Figure 2 demonstrates one of the most damaged places.Thus, this area is selected to demonstrate the strategy and analyze the flood risk and the underlying reasons leading to the huge lost.

Data collection
The onsite investigation was carried out after the "720" rainstorm event.The unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) was employed to depict the topographic features and identify the post-disaster situation and finally selected two representative cross-sections at both upstream and downstream watersheds.The spatial distribution of nine gauges is presented in Figure 3 and marked as red circles.The basic attribute information of the watersheds and Extracted features used in this study is shown in Table 1.
The rainfall data were collected from automatic rain gauges where some were uploaded directly to the local flash flood early warning and response platforms, Then the inverse distance weighting method (Han and Bray, 2006) was employed to convert the observed point rainfall to hourly areal average.Based on the National flash flood disaster investigation and assessment database and onsite investigation, the basic attribute information of the watersheds was extracted, i.e., land use (Table 1 a), soil type (Table 1 b), river network and elevation (Table 1 c), casualty locations (Table 1 d), and generated the precious digital elevation model (DEM) with the resolution of 30 m and a series of orthophoto maps.These maps were processed in ArcGIS to convert into GIS-compatible format and the details of upstream and downstream watersheds and river networks including nodes were then extracted for generating the model environment.
In addition, the local official departments also provided some investigation data.One is located at the WZD community shown in Figure 2, which is based on the flood trace survey and onsite measurements carried out by Henan Provincial Bureau of hydrology and water resources.They found the values of water surface slope (0.006), the cross-sectional area (200 m 2 ), the hydraulic radius (3.9 m) and riverbed roughness (0.05).Then the peak flow can be roughly calculated by using the Manning formula (Yen, 1992) as 768 m 3 /s.However, it should be noted that during such event, the flow conditions are highly turbulent and supercritical and the application of the calculation can only be a reference value with on-site investigation because many gauges for measuring water levels were destroyed.Henan Provincial Bureau of hydrology and The comparison of the situation before and after 720 rainstorm in one of the most damaged areas, i.e., WZD community.The surrounding rain gauges for calculating areal rainfall.
water resources also carried out a survey in HGZ where the crosssection is located at the entrance of Chenhe Group about 1 km far away from Haidong Group.The ditch cross is almost straight where the riverbed is covered by a hard clay layer while both sides are very steep and made of soil, and the investigated discharge is 905 m 3 /s.

Methods
In this article, the model simulation was implemented by following a two-phase model strategy proposed by Hao et al. (2023) The main parameters involved in this paper include flow production, variables in millimeters (precipitation, evaporation, upper soil moisture content, lower soil moisture content), calculation time step in seconds, evaporation coefficient (interception capacity in millimeters, average water storage in depressions in millimeters), infiltration coefficient, and soil water dynamic equilibrium parameters (such as soil leakage to the groundwater system m/d, linear coefficient of preferential outflow, etc.).This paper applies the FFMS model to the analysis of the spatiotemporal characteristics of floods.The spatiotemporal variable-source hybrid flow model judges the area changes of super-permeable and full-storage flow within the target unit based on the calculated values of water content and cumulative infiltration of different hydrological response units.It also discerns the relationship between the intensity of rainfall in the basin and the infiltration and storage capacity of the underlying surface, achieving the spatiotemporal transformation of superpermeable/full-storage flow in each geomorphological hydrological response unit.
In second stage, an open-source HEC-RAS model (Rangari et al., 2019;Kumar et al., 2020;Ongdas et al., 2020) was then largely built using the parameters proposed by the first stage hydrological model (Hao et al., 2023) and the flood survey of the local official bureau, i.e., Henan Provincial Bureau of Hydrology and Water Resources.The general process is as follows: According to Frontiers in Earth Science 06 frontiersin.orgthe characteristics of the small watershed area, the flow production adopts the initial loss stable infiltration rate method, with required parameters being calibrated or calculated based on empirical values or reference values.The flow concentration method uses the Snyder unit hydrograph method in the parametric unit line method, determining the suitable unit line for the basin by calculating the characteristic values of the unit line through the Bernoulli equation.
The base flow impact is not considered during the calculation process, and the river flow concentration calculation uses the kinematic wave method.Combined the disaster locations based on onsite investigation, several scenarios were proposed and setup for detecting the possible factors that can lead to the deaths.More details are described in Section 3.2 and 3.3 with the discussion of the results.
3 Results and discussion 3.1 Spatiotemporal change at WZD community

Rainfall and water level
The results of transforming the rainfall at observation points in the WZD watershed (upper) during the "720 storm" event to hourly averages are shown in Figure 5A.It can be observed that the rainfall system during the period of 19 July 08:00 to 21 July 08:00 contributed the majority amount of rainfall where several peaks can be easily recognized.The maximum peak is observed to occur at 14:00 on 20 July, which exceeds 60 mm.And the 24-h accumulated maximum rainfall breaks local historical records and is around 500 mm. Figure 5B presents the hourly areal rainfall in HGZ (downstream).The rainfall system is similar to that in the upstream while the 24-h maximum is around 30 mm higher but the maxima of 6-h, 3-h and 1-h are slightly less than the upstream watershed.
Beside the rainfall, two measurement stations survived and are able to provide the record of water level during the event.One is located at the WZD community and it can be observed that the first peak occurred at 8:30, 20 July and just inundated the road surface in front of the building of the community (see Figure 5C), and the second peak reached a very high level of 263.3 m rapidly (only took about 1 h) and maintained the high for around 1 h.The other locates near the Haidong group in the HGZ watershed (see Figure 5D).Different from the situation in the upstream, the downstream flood only has one peak but with the same rapidly increasing rate as the second peak presented upstream.The flood began to increase at noon of 20 July with a very steep gradient and it took only two and half hours for the water level to rise from the bottom of the main ditch (184.3 m) to the peak (195.5 m) inundating Mami Line and the local bureau of land resources near Haidong group but locate relatively high in the area.The flood receded also fast in the first one and half hours and then gradually decreased to 186 m when the second rainfall event ceased.

Rainstorm characteristics
The "720" rainstorm in Henan Province, China is observed to start from 8:00 on July 17 to 8:00 on 23 August 2021.The average rainfall in Zhengzhou city, the capital of Henan Province, is 534 mm with a total volume of around four billion m 3 , which is the highest observation since the local historical precipitation record was available.The average rainfall from 8 a.m. on July 17 to 8 a.m. on July 22 in Xingyang city is 574 mm, where the WZD-HGZ watershed suffered the most intensive rainfall.In order to reveal the rainfall characteristics, we extracted the 6-h accumulated rainfall before the first disaster event has been observed and presents in Figure 6.It can be seen that the highest accumulation is in the upstream watershed with the average of 190 mm while the downstream is relatively low, which is 165 mm in average.
Table 2 presents the comparison results of rainfall in the WZD watershed with historical records.In the upstream watershed controlled by WZD, the maximum rainfall intensities for 1 h, 6 h, and 24 h are 70.5 m, 240.5 m, and 493.3 m, respectively.In the 6-h accumulative rainfall observed in the western mountainous area of Zhengzhou City (8:00-14:00 on July 20) where the studying area, i.e., the WZD-HGZ watershed, is marked within the red boundary.downstream watershed controlled by HGZ, the maximum average rainfall intensities for 1 h, 6 h, and 24 h are 62.3 m, 229.3 m, and 526 m, respectively.Meanwhile, the measured maximum rainfall intensity for 1 h corresponds to a return period of approximately 20 years, while the 6-h maximum rainfall intensity corresponds to a return period of approximately 1,000 years.In the downstream area, the maximum 1-h rainfall intensity approaches a return period of approximately 10 years, while the 6-h rainfall intensity corresponds to a return period of approximately 500 years (Bureau, 2021).Therefore, Combined the results with the onsite investigation (see Table 1; Figure 4), the rainfall characteristics in the WZD-HGZ watershed are as follows: Firstly, there is a large cumulative amount throughout the event, with a total rainfall of 764.5 mm, which is 4.9 times the annual average rainfall (156.5 mm).Secondly, the rainfall duration was long, spanning four to 5 days.Additionally, the rainfall intensity was high, with the maximum rainfall in a 6-h period on July 20 exceeding a 500-year return period event.

Flood simulation in the WZD-HGZ watershed 3.2.1 WZD watershed flood process analysis
Based on the records from the water level station located near the WZD community (which was destroyed at 13:00 on July 20), and combined with relevant information from victim interviews, a hydrograph of the upstream WZD watershed was generated.This hydrograph is depicted in Figure 3C.The water levels before 13:00 are measured by the station while after 13:00 are estimated by the on-site survey.From 13:15 to 13:30, the flood depth at the cross-section increased by 7.15 m, with a maximum flow velocity of 2.4 m/15 m.At around 13:00, the flood inundated Road G234 with a maximum depth of 263.3 m.To identify the factors leading to the sudden increase in flood depth, combined with on-site investigations, it was found that in the WZD watershed, there are three concentrated drainage channels, with two casualty locations.One is located near Tangnao Onsite investigation: water block due to landslide, roadbed and bridge damage (A); discharge simulated at the cross-section of WZD community (upstream watershed) under three scenarios (B); water level corresponding to the peak discharge of three scenarios at the cross-section of WZD community (C).
Bridge, where the embankment of the bridge suffered severe damage during the event.The other is near Nantou Cluster, where a landslide damaged the drainage channel (see Figure 7A).Therefore, to identify triggering factors, three different flood simulation scenarios were generated using the HEC-RAS model, as shown in Figure 7B: The first scenario only considers the natural flow process of the three drainage channels, with a peak flow of 420 m 3 /s (as shown by the blue curve in Figure 7B), which matches well with the measured flow at the same cross-section.The second scenario accounts for water resistance caused by embankments, bridges, and landslides, assuming that only the West Channel triggers floods while the other two channels remain dry; with a peak flow of 600 m 3 /s (marked as the dark blue curve in Figure 7B).The third scenario considers both water resistance and concentration in the three drainage channels, with a peak flow of 770 m 3 /s (marked as the green curve in Figure 7B).
Comparing the simulation results of the three scenarios with the measured peak flow, it was found that the third scenario exhibited excellent consistency.Approximately 60% of the flow can be attributed to the higher peak flow caused by the convergence of the three drainage channels, while the remaining 40% can be Frontiers in Earth Science 10 frontiersin.orgHe et al. 10.3389/feart.2024.1438421attributed to the accumulation of debris blockages resulting from multiple damaged embankments, bridges, and landslides.Clearly, there is a noticeable spike in the peak flow rate once these drainage areas are cleared, as illustrated in Figure 7C.In contrast to the flood events typically triggered by intense precipitation, the water level at the WZD section saw an elevation of 1.8 m.Considering historical records and isohyet maps of heavy rainfall in Henan Province, the simulated peak flow corresponds to a return period of 200-300 years.

HGZ watershed flood process analysis
The results for the downstream watershed are as shown in Table 1c, Figure 8.The water level at Haidong Group rose by 11.2 m, with a maximum rising velocity of 2.1 m/3 m (from 13:57 to 14:00 on July 20).The highest water level reached 195.5 m, which is 2.1 m above the road surface of the Mami Line.The investigation revealed that, in addition to the substantial rainfall, the collapse of a nearby packaging plant also obstructed the river's drainage.This blockage notably reduced the flow capacity of the two culverts located beneath the Mami Line, leading to a worsening of the disaster through the creation of a backflow effect.In the HGZ watershed, two scenarios are considered: one where the obstruction of the Mami Line causes backflow and one where it does not.Using the hydrological model, water levels were simulated for both scenarios with and without backflow at Haidong Group and the local packaging factory.It can be observed that the water levels at the two cross-sections increased by 4.2 m and 3.9 m, respectively.However, based on the measured value of 908 m 3 /s, the impact of backflow is limited.Meanwhile, at Chenhe Group, approximately 1 km away from Haidong Group, flooding is minimally or not affected by backflow due to the damage to the Mami Line.Furthermore, the first scenario captured the measured values: at Chenhe Group, a flow similar to that of a broad-crested weir was obtained, with a headwater level of 2.83 m, an average river width of 113.83 m, and a weir width of 70 m.

Mechanism analysis for leading to disaster
Based on on-site investigations, interviews with victims, and model simulations, the following explores the factors leading to the massive casualties in the WZD-HGZ watershed, summarized primarily into four aspects, as shown in Figure 9.

Special topography and river regime
Village WZD is located close to the confluence of the three ditches (East, Middle and West presented in Figure 1), with a short distance to the headwaters of these ditches.The special topography results in the simultaneous flooding in the single ditch and the soil slopes on both sides of the ditches.Besides, The flood flow velocity at the confluence is extremely high, reaching 6 m/s.Such landforms and fluvial dynamics complicate the precise functioning of flood surveillance, alert systems, and emergency responses, presenting considerable difficulties for evacuation initiatives in the area.In particular, the Nantou Group community in WZD village, located on the convex bank of the channel, was severely affected by the high-flow, high-speed flood, resulting in the destruction of many houses, with casualties accounting for over half of the villagers.

Continuous disruption of infrastructure
In WZD village, there are 31 embankments and silt dams of various sizes, among which only two have flood discharge capabilities, while eight silt dams and small reservoirs with a capacity of less than 100,000 m 3 are unable to control floods.These infrastructures were damaged, severely blocking the upstream water sources.Due to heavy rainfall, 27 embankments, small reservoirs, and silt dams were continuously washed away, especially the embankment of the Tangnao Road, which is only 1.3 km away from the WZD group.Although the embankment height is 16 m, which is 50 m lower in elevation than the WZD group, the blocked water volume is 103,200 m 3 , resulting in a nearly 2-m increase in downstream flood depth and maintaining a high-water level on the road surface for about 3 h, greatly exacerbating the disaster in WZD village.To quantify the impact of damaged infrastructure, based on the on-site investigation on 5 September 2021, the simulation of the flood process in WZD, as shown in Figure 7, was conducted.It confirmed that the collapse of the Tangnao Road caused blockage, which is the main factor exacerbating the flood disaster in WZD village.
In the WZD community, the water level increase due to the damage to these infrastructures is 1.8 m compared to the normal rainfall runoff process, reaching a maximum of 7.5 m.Taking into account the natural convergence time of the three channels, the flood is expected to overflow the embankment of the Tangnao Road around 11 a.m., with the road collapsing completely by 1 p.m.The flood level begins to rise between 12:30 and 1 p.m., while the maximum rainfall intensity (58.5 mm/h) occurs between 2 p.m. and 3 p.m.In other words, the flood peak caused by the embankment damage occurs earlier than the flood peak caused by the rainfallrunoff response.Therefore, the sustained high-water level is not caused by intense rainfall.

Damaged buildings accelerated backflow
Another factor is that buildings, roads, and bridges constructed along the channel were destroyed, leading to debris accumulation, which exacerbated the disaster by causing backflow.The buildings located in WZD Group were damaged seriously, which narrows the ditch by 21%.Several local factories are situated in the alluvial area of the ditch, which narrows the cross-section of the overflow by 71%.Besides, WZD village has three bridges, with small openings that severely limit the flow.These bridge openings are blocked by a large amount of sediment and floating debris carried by the water flow, such as branches, vehicles, and debris from buildings.Therefore, When a large amount of water is retained, if a blocked bridge collapses, the speed and depth of the released floodwaters rapidly increase, leading to downstream disasters.
According to the investigation, the railway line, Mami Line, crosses the Su River, standing 9.1 m above the downstream watershed channel.Below the railway surface, there are two culverts with the size of 4 × 4 m, which are designed for releasing water.However, during the rainstorm event, one culvert was blocked, which totally reduces the cross-section for passing flow by more than 90% and the discharge capacity is only 80 m 3 /s.Therefore, the peak flow rate (i.e., 908 m 3 /s) is trapped at the Mami Line, causing Underlying reasons identified in WZD watershed (A) and HGZ watershed (B).
the water level to rise by approximately 4 m upstream, resulting in 4 deaths in the Haidong Group and 13 deaths in the factory.To quantify the impact of backflow, the cross-section with the highest number of casualties was chosen, and water levels were simulated considering both the blocked and unblocked scenarios of the Mami Line.Compared to the response of runoff to rainfall and flow rates, the flooding levels in the Haidong Group increased by 4.2 m due to backflow, while the flooding levels in the local materials factory increased by 3.9 m.

Low-effective evacuation for flash floods
This disaster causing such serious consequences can be also attributed to the lack of public awareness of flash flood risk prevention.The local government did not realize that during heavy rainfall, infrastructure damage could block floodwaters, causing a sharp increase in flow and raising potential flood risk.Besides, the local management of flash flood risks was improperly implemented.During the revision of the management plan in 2021, several areas that could be affected by river flooding were even removed, increasing the number of residents facing risk.The flood risk management officials did not take timely action upon receiving the "immediate evacuation" warning, mainly evidenced by: (1) no warning was issued to the public near ditches and rivers in WZD Village; (2) residents in low-lying areas of Cuimiao Village were not forcibly evacuated, and local factories were only instructed to temporarily shut down without evacuating their employees.Therefore, the lack of disaster awareness, coupled with the slow response to warning information, should a congested bridge succumb to the pressure of the retained water volume, the consequent release results in a swift upsurge in both the velocity and depth of the floodwaters, exacerbated the scale of the disaster.

Recommendations of early warning information
One automatic rain gauge recorded a 24-h rainfall of over 120 m in Xingyang City, reaching the "immediate evacuation" warning level, while the rainfall recorded by two other rain gauges did not reach the warning level.Thus, the Xingyang City Water Resources Bureau issued a warning to the public at 22:28 on 19 July 2021.
Although the Bureau issued a peer-to-peer warning of "immediate evacuation" 14 h in advance, the information did not convert into effective action, which leads to great casualties and economic loss.It is important not only to identify triggering factors as outlined in Section 3.3 but also to analyze the public's attitude upon receiving the warning.In recent decades, many studies have explored the underlying reasons why the flood early warning system runs less effectively.For example, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) released the "Flood Forecasting and Warning Manual" in 2014, which found that the local perspective and attitudes of people have a greater influence on outcomes than the technical aspects of flood forecasting and response systems.Ling and He (2020) applied social psychology theories, particularly persuasion psychology, to find that flood defense knowledge dissemination typically follows persuasive theories in conveying information to the public.
Flash flood warnings are an "end-to-end" operation, demanding high timeliness, which means a successful warning relies on the public's awareness of defense measures.In the progress from issuing a warning to taking action, there are five psychological barriers needing to be removed, i.e., noticing the warning, understanding the warning, believing in the warning, remembering the warning and taking precautions or evacuation (see Figure 10).During The chain of the transition from issuing a warning to taking precautionary or evacuation actions.
on-site investigations, it was found that after the warning was issued, local officials and residents generally harbored doubts, primarily attributing this to the absence of severe floods in recent years.People lack basic knowledge about flash floods and how to prevent them, including preventative measures, with a particular shortfall in recognizing imminent local hazards and their specific locales.Besides, although many departments issued warnings, local personnel found it difficult to understand professional terms such as "implementing level three response" and "issuing level two warning, " increasing the difficulty of filtering the most valuable warning information.The aforementioned issues could potentially interrupt the chain illustrated in Figure 10, resulting in evacuation failure.
In addition, since the WZD-HGZ watershed locates in part of regions of Xingyang City and Xinmi City, where three locations (i.e., Village Wenzhuang of Xinmi City, Village WZD and Cuimiao of Xingyang City) along ditches observed serious casualties, it reveals that defending flood should be implemented in the unit of watershed rather than administrative region.To be detailed, firstly, the actual rainfall measurements in Xinmi City serve as real-time indicators for issuing alerts to neighboring cities, but the Xingyang City flood warning system struggles to capture this data.Additionally, the system can provide effective rainfall monitoring information from rain gauges in Xinmi City, which could enhance the rainfall data in the WZD-HGZ watershed.Secondly, there is no communication between administrative districts along the same river.In such a case, the flood propagation time in the WZD-HGZ watershed is approximately 40 min; evidently, information needs to be effectively transmitted between upstream and downstream areas.

Conclusion
The article focuses on the extraordinary heavy rainfall that occurred in Henan Province in 2021.Through on-site investigations, interviews with victims, remote sensing image analysis, hydrological model simulations, etc., it analyzes the characteristics of extreme rainfall and corresponding floods in the severely affected WZD-HGZ watershed.The study aims to explore the fundamental reasons for the severe casualties, and the specific conclusions are as follows.
1) The "720 ″ heavy rainfall and flash flood in Henan were primarily caused by prolonged intense rainfall, which was exacerbated by the complex terrain, steep slopes, and human activities.The flood magnified in three main stages: runoff In conclusion, for ungauged basins, establishing an appropriate data monitoring network and developing a data quality assessment plan are crucial for enhancing flash flood risk management.Moreover, warnings must be conveyed in a manner that is both explicit and directive, enabling the public to respond effectively.Different departments should strengthen communication to ensure the continuity of the chain from issuing warnings to taking preventive measures or evacuation actions.Additionally, data quality should be further examined to improve simulation accuracy.

FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3 FIGURE 4Research framework of post-disaster review strategy.

FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5The rainfall during the event in WZD watershed (A) and HGZ watershed (B) and Temporal change of water level recorded at WZD community (C) and Haidong group (D).

FIGURE 8
FIGURE 8Onsite investigation: water block due to damage of factory and Mami Line (A); water level corresponding to the peak discharge at the cross-section of Haidong group (downstream watershed, (B) and local packaging factory (C) under two scenarios.

FIGURE 10
FIGURE 10 generation and concentration-induced flooding, continuous damage to the roadbed, and backwater effects caused by blockages of roads and bridges.2)The reasons for the severe casualties and the difficulty in effective evacuation can be attributed to the confluence of floodwaters from three ditches, the rupture of the Tangnao Road roadbed in the west ditch, and water blockage caused by the Mami Line downstream in HGZ.The water blockage occurred before the peak rainfall arrived, causing the water level to remain high for an extended period.The rupture of Tangnao Road elevated the water level to around 2 m, and the rupture of the Mami Line raised the water level at local factories and the Haidong Group to about 4 m. 3) Considering both social psychology and watershed flood control, the article analyzes the evacuation and warning issuance mechanisms.It finds that the main reasons for the disruption in the chain from issuing a warning to taking preventive or evacuation actions are a lack of basic knowledge about flash flood risk prevention, unclear warnings, and insufficient guidance.

TABLE 2
Areal average rainfall analysis of the WZD-HGZ watershed.