Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Plant Sci., 31 May 2023
Sec. Plant Abiotic Stress
This article is part of the Research Topic Abiotic and Biotic Stress in Horticultural Crops: Insight into Recent Advances in the Underlying Tolerance Mechanism View all 46 articles

Editorial: Abiotic and biotic stress in horticultural crops: insight into recent advances in the underlying tolerance mechanism

  • 1ICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • 2School of Horticulture, Hainan University, Haikou, China
  • 3ICAR-Division of Crop Physiology and Biochemistry, National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha, India

Introduction

The changing global climate and human activities have immensely impacted the production and productivity of horticultural crops (Varshney et al., 2018). The abiotic stress condition has led to various environmental restrictions such as salinity, sodic alkaline, drought, temperature fluctuations, and heavy metal exposure (Tiwari et al., 2021; Devi et al., 2022; Lal et al., 2022; Chen et al.; Zheng et al.). These factors can significantly affect plant growth, yield, and quality. Similarly, biotic stresses, such as viruses, fungi, bacteria, insects, vectors, and nematodes, can severely damage the vigour and productivity of horticultural crops (Kumar et al., 2021; Lal et al., 2021; El-Sappah et al.; Sun et al.; Yadav et al.; Samal et al.). Abiotic and biotic stress in horticultural crops impacts seed germination, growth, reproduction (including seed formation, flowering, and fruiting), and eventual decline (El-Sappah et al.; Sun et al. Samal et al.). Hence, it is imperative to investigate horticultural crops’ physiological, biochemical, and molecular reactions to ascertain the impact of abiotic stresses and recognize potential resistance mechanisms and ameliorating approaches.

Various interventions have been implemented in horticultural crops to mitigate the negative effects of abiotic and biotic stresses on crop plant (Williamson et al., 2002; Sonmez et al., 2009). These include biostimulant chemicals, hormones, novel chemicals, and microorganisms, which have been shown to enhance crop plant tolerance and ultimately lead to increased yield in horticultural crops (Chen et al.; Jaiswal et al.). Recent studies have indicated that the presence of phytochemicals, secondary metabolites, and antimicrobial peptides can alleviate the negative impacts of both abiotic and biotic stresses through the augmentation of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants, phytohormonal interactions, activation of defense genes, and systemic resistance (Xia et al., 2020; Altaf et al., 2021; Altaf et al., 2022; Moosa et al.; Tiwari et al., 2022; Najeeb and Li; Rahman et al.). Understanding the effects of abiotic and biotic stresses on horticultural crops and the mechanisms involved in mitigating these stresses can significantly improve crop productivity and quality. In this Research Topic, researchers around the world provided various mitigation strategies and used various novel biostimulant chemicals, hormones, novel chemicals, and microorganisms, as well as phytochemicals, secondary metabolites, and antimicrobial peptides, can help develop new strategies to enhance the resilience of horticultural crops to environmental stresses.

The regulation of stress response involves a significant mechanism known as phytohormonal cross-talk. Researchers have utilized epigenomics, genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics methodologies to comprehend the reaction of horticultural crops toward abiotic stress (Hoekenga, 2014; Zargar et al., 2017; Mishra et al., 2022; Yadav et al.; Zheng et al.). Osmotic adjustments and reactive species signalling are two key mechanisms involved in the response of horticultural crops to abiotic and biotic stress. Transcriptional and translational regulation is essential in stress response in these crops (Zheng et al.). Researchers are also exploring the application of novel phytoprotectants to mitigate stress in horticultural crops (Khan et al., 2014; Arnao and Hernández-Ruiz, 2020; Devireddy et al., 2021). Additionally, there is increasing interest in understanding the mechanistic insights of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) in regulating stress conditions in horticultural crops. PGPR-mediated regulation has been shown to improve the tolerance of crops to abiotic and biotic stresses (Vaishnav et al., 2016; Abbas et al., 2019; Bharti and Barnawal, 2019). By exploring various avenues such as physiological and biochemical responses, signalling mechanisms and pathways, phytohormonal cross-talk, epigenomics, genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics approaches, osmotic adjustments, reactive species signalling, transcriptional and translational regulation, novel phytoprotectants, and PGPR-mediated regulation, a more comprehensive comprehension of horticultural crops’ reaction to abiotic and biotic stress can be attained (Vance, 2010; Qin et al., 2020). The discoveries above have the potential to facilitate the formulation of novel approaches aimed at augmenting crop durability and output.

Studies addressing factors affecting abiotic stress responses in horticultural crops

The world is currently experiencing changes in the global climate, and with the world population increasing rapidly, there is an urgent need to increase agricultural productivity (Rosegrant and Cline, 2003; Devaux et al., 2020; Kumar et al., 2023). According to projections, a 70 percent increase in agricultural output will be necessary by mid-century to satisfy the needs of the expanding population (Ortiz-Bobea et al., 2021). Enhancing agricultural productivity is paramount in tackling the world’s population-escalating food requirements (Knoppers et al., 2008). Given the impacts of climate change, such as elevated temperatures and severe weather phenomena, it is crucial to identify sustainable and effective methods for augmenting agricultural productivity (Zheng et al.). Achieving the horticultural productivity goal necessitates a multifaceted strategy encompassing cutting-edge technologies, embracing sustainable agricultural methodologies, and advancingovel horticultural cultivars (Devaux et al., 2020; Onoja and Adione, 2020). Furthermore, governments and organizations must allocate resources towards research and development initiatives to tackle the horticultural industry’s various obstacles(Yadav et al.; Zulfiqar et al.; Samal et al.).

The role of phytohormone and growth regulator in enhancing horticultural crops can lead to sustainable agricultural growth, which might enhance tolerance against abiotic stress tolerance (Zheng et al.). For example, the use of nano-nutrient solution (NNS) was used to alleviate the detrimental effect of drought on tomato crops. The application of about 1% NNS showed improved shoot length, fresh and dry weight, number of leaves and flowers. It increased the content of leaf chlorophylls, carotenoids, total phenolics, total soluble sugars, and flavonoids of tomato crop. The concentration of 3% NNS was found to minimize electrolyte leakage, while 5% NNS application exhibited higher total free amino acids and minimum lipid peroxidation rate in leaves. The growth regulator NNS could be a promising environmentally safe agricultural technique for mitigating the negative effects of drought stress on crop growth and yield (Mubashir et al.). Similarly, another study by Ahmed et al. showed that using zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) can effectively enhance plant growth and production of Coriandrum sativum L plant during drought. The foliar application of 100 ppm ZnO NPs in Coriandrum sativum L can improve net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate, as well as increase chlorophyll content and reduce abscisic acid levels in drought-susceptible plants. The efficacy of ZnO NPs in inducing drought tolerance was revealed through principal component analysis. The findings suggest that ZnO NPs can be a promising strategy to mitigate the negative impact of drought stress on Coriandrum sativum L (Ahmed et al.). Cold stress is also reported to affect the Hami melon and its keeping quality. However, components such as chitosan treatment can reduce fruit softening and chilling injury in cold-stored Hami melon. The study by Zhang et al. revealed that chitosan treatment maintained high levels of starch and sucrose contents, regulated enzyme activities and gene expressions related to starch and sucrose metabolism, and reduced fruit softening and chilling injury (Zhang et al.).

Moreover, the review on the aspect of the role of bio-stimulator such as salicylic acid (SA) in horticultural revealed that the use of SA can lead to enhance productivity and reduce the negative effects of abiotic stress conditions by enhancing signaling molecules, antioxidants, osmolytes, and secondary metabolites, as well as regulate the expression of stress-related genes (Chen et al.). Pre-harvest foliar spraying of salicylic acid (SA) and post-harvest caraway oil coating was tested to reduce chilling injury (CI) during post-harvest storage of sweet pepper. The caraway oil showed antifungal activity against Botrytis cinerea mycelia. The lowest CI was obtained with 3 mM SA and 0.6% caraway oil treatment. The treatment resulted in a delay in weight loss and firmness, as well as changes in pH, TSS (total soluble solids), TA (total acidity), and color. Additionally, the treatment led to an increase in capsaicin content. Incorporating SA (3 mM) and caraway oil (0.6%) might be a practical solution to improve sweet pepper quality during storage (Hanaei et al.). Using carbon-rich materials such as biochar (BC) also showed significant benefits for horticultural systems. BC amendments to soil or growing media improve seedling growth, increase photosynthetic pigments, and enhance photosynthesis, improving crop productivity in Citrus sinensis crop (Zulfiqar et al.).

The abiotic stress in the horticultural crops leads to changes in the biochemical and molecular response, ultimately providing tolerance. The role of certain genes, such as the overexpression of CpCHS1 gene from sweet cherry in tobacco has been shown to improve the germination frequency and fresh weight of transgenic seedlings under drought stress by enhancing the activity of SOD, POD, CAT, and proline under drought stress. These findings suggest that chalcone synthase plays a crucial role in regulating plant growth, development, and abiotic stress tolerance in sweet cherry and other Rosaceae species, which might have potential applications in improving the productivity and stress tolerance of cherry and other fruit trees (Hou et al.). Similarly, the overexpression of HSF20 in ‘Benihoppe’ strawberries made fruits sensitive to temperature, while overexpression of CBF/NF-Y promoted coloring under cold treatment. On the contrary, different temperatures affected hormone metabolism, anthocyanin, reactive oxygen species, and synthesis of terpenoids, amino acids, and phenylpropanoids, leading to changes in fruit quality and this aforementioned study provides a basis for further research on improving post-harvest quality of strawberries (Zheng et al.). The transcriptome analysis in Brassica napus revealed total of 79,061 unigenes, with 3,703 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) under low-temperature stress. The DEGs under low temperature stress revealed that the gene related to sugar metabolism, antioxidant defense system, plant hormone signal transduction, and photosynthesis was expressed (Hussain et al.). Similarly, the cold stress tolerance was enhanced in cucumber when figleaf was grafted on it, which leads to the activation of the WRKY41/WRKY46-miR396b-5p-TPR module by abscisic acid (ABA). The findings suggest that ABA-mediated figleaf gourd grafting-induced cold tolerance in cucumber plants is through activating the WRKY41/WRKY46-miR396b-5p-TPR module (Sun et al.). Another study by Hussain et al. in soybean highlights the importance of miRNA for low-temperature stress. It also sheds light on the role of miRNAs, such as miR319, miR394, miR397, and miR398, in regulating gene expression cold stress tolerance (Hussain et al.). Another study was conducted on 151 cucumber accessions to identify genetic loci associated with low-temperature germination (LTG). Eight candidate genes associated with abiotic stress were identified, and the function of one gene, CsPPR, was confirmed to regulate cucumber cold tolerance at the germination stage negatively. Moreover, it provides insights into cucumber LT-tolerance mechanisms and can aid in cucumber breeding development (Li et al.). Transcription factors such as MebHLH18 regulate low temperature-induced leaf abscission in cassava. MebHLH18 overexpression decreased the abscission rate, while interference expression increased it. The expression of MebHLH18 was related to POD levels and ROS scavenger levels. A single nucleotide polymorphism variation in the promoter region of MebHLH18 caused changes in its expression, leading to increased POD activity and decreased ROS accumulation, resulting in a slower leaf abscission rate at low temperatures (Liao et al.).

On the contrary, the high-temperature stress negatively affects cucumber anther, reducing pollen fertility and abnormal anther structures. The metabolites in plant hormone signal transduction and amino acid and sugar metabolism pathway were found to be associated with decreased pollen fertility. These findings provide insights into the metabolic changes in cucumber anther under HT (Chen et al.). The role of temperature is very crucial for potato storage. Higher cold conditions during potato storage can lead to the browning of chips and the development of potential carcinogens such as acrylamide during the processing of potato tubers. However, using RNAi-mediated silencing technology, there are four transgenic lines developed with reduced RS content (up to 57.5%) and acceptable chip color upon processing were obtained. The study demonstrated the efficacy of UGPase silencing in controlling CIS in potato, with potential applications for the development of CIS-tolerant potato varieties (Jaiswal et al.).

The translocation of mineral nutrients under abiotic conditions is a major factor affecting plant growth and development. A study in Chinese fir under low P conditions showed that inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) would promote P utilization efficiency. Low P stress conditions promoted AMF colonization and enhanced root cortex tissue dissolution, root biomass accumulation, and P use efficiency (Tian et al.). A similar kind of report was suggested by Zou et al., (2023) that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) affect walnut tree growth and phosphorus acquisition. They also observed that AMF directly helped with phosphorus uptake at low phosphorus levels and increased expression of certain genes involved in phosphorus transport at moderate phosphorus levels (Zou et al.). A recent report by Ihtisham et al. suggested that nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilization improved turfgrass tolerance to cold stress by enhancing antioxidant defense systems and increasing chlorophyll and carotenoid. Efficient nutrient management is important for turfgrass management in transitional climates (Ihtisham et al., 2023). The transcriptomics study in Schima superba in response to Mn metal stress showed 6558 DEGs. The study also identified 20 variably expressed ABC transporters in S. superba under Mn treatment, providing insight into the molecular mechanisms of heavy metal tolerance and detoxification in plants (Liaquat et al.). The deficiency of another essential element, such as B, can lead to affect the photosynthetic performance of sugarbeet cultivars. Song et al. indicated that B deficiency significantly impacted the growth of sugar beet leaves and the net photosynthetic rate. The study suggests that the photosynthetic rate and extent of phot-oxidative damage can be used to develop the varietal selection of sugar beet cultivars (Song et al.). Heavy metal disrupts the metabolic processes of the plant. Heavy metal such as cadmium (Cd) toxicity was reported to affect the wheat selenium-binding protein-A (TaSBP-A). TaSBP-A plays a significant role in Cd detoxification and can be used to develop Cd-tolerant plants (Luo et al.). Moreover, the role of the mineral elements such as calcium in mitigating abiotic stress was comprehensively reviewed by Feng et al.. Exogenous calcium has been shown to enhance plant resistance and tolerance to stresses through various mechanisms, including stabilizing cell walls and membranes, regulating ion ratios, maintaining photosynthesis, and inducing gene expressions and protein transcriptions (Feng et al.).

Among abiotic stress, salinity stress is a major emerging stress which affects horticultural crops. Recent reports showed that the overexpression of gene LpNAC17 from Lilium pumilum in transgenic tobacco resulted in increased net photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll contents and decreased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and intercellular CO2 concentration under salt stress (Wang et al.). Another study in Lilium pumilum showed that key genes such as NF-YB3, metallothionein type 2 protein, vicilin-like seed storage protein, and bidirectional sugar transporter SWEET14 associated with salt stress tolerance (So et al.). Similarly, another study revealed that 143 NPF genes were reported in tobacco and classified into eight subfamilies. These findings suggest that NtNPF6.13 may play a role in chloride uptake in tobacco. Additionally, several other NtNPF genes were identified as potential players in chloride metabolism, but further study is needed to confirm their roles (Zhang et al.).

Drought is detrimental to plant growth and development. Horticultural crops such as grapevine and Cynodon dactylon were reported to be affected by drought stress. The drought-responsive gene ANNEXIN (VvANN1) in grapevine showed to be induced by osmotic stress and enhances osmotic and drought tolerance by modulating the level of MDA, H2O2, and O2·- at the seedling stage, indicating that VvANN1 might be involved in the process of ROS homeostasis under drought or osmotic stress conditions. The control of VvANN1 might be due regulation of VvbZIP45 by controlling the expression of VvANN1 by binding in the promoter region of VvANN1 in response to drought stress (Niu et al.). On the other hand, Cynodon dactylon provides tolerance to drought stress by root modification and sclerification. Anatomical modifications that are specific to each ecotype of Cynodon dactylon to cope with environmental stress conditions (Tufail et al.). Another study of drought stress in C3 and C4 plant, SPEECHLESS genes may play a role in these differences, with C4 crops having evolved multiple homologs, a potential model for abiotic stress response in C3 and C4 crops (Song et al.).

The pH of soil modulates the growth and development of horticultural crops. The study on high soil pH in 15 blueberry cultivars showed variations in phenotypic and physiological. The cultivars were classified into four categories based on their tolerance level, with ‘Briteblue’ being the most tolerant and ‘Anna’ being the most sensitive. Plant height, soluble sugar, transpiration rate, leaf length, intercellular CO2 concentration, SOD, and SPAD were useful predictors of high soil pH tolerance (Yang et al.).

Studies addressing factors affecting biotic stress responses in horticultural crops

Numerous studies have investigated the factors affecting biotic stress responses in horticultural crops (Khan et al.; Yadav et al.). Some of the key factors include plant genetics, environmental conditions, and cultivation practices. Plant genetics play a critical role in biotic stress responses, as the level of resistance to pests and diseases is largely determined by the plant’s genetic makeup. Breeding programs that focus on developing disease-resistant and pest-resistant cultivars have successfully enhanced the resilience of horticultural crops to biotic stress. Studies on watermelon suggest that the resistant line had higher levels of defense-related phytochromes and showed significant differences in gene expression compared to the susceptible line against powdery mildew. Most differentially expressed genes were linked to plant hormone and transduction pathways, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, and defense responses. The study identified several potential genes, including PR1 and PRX, for further research on resistance breeding (Yadav et al.). On the contrary, Yellow Leaf Disease (YLD) affects betel palms in China region due to the velarivirus 1 (APV1). YLD symptoms worsen in winter, and severity is linked to the APV1 viral titre. Temperature also plays a role, with severe symptoms at low temperatures and moderate symptoms at high temperatures. APV1 titer is highest at low temperatures. These findings have implications for YLD epidemiology (Khan et al.). Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) is a harmful disease affecting tomato growth. Six genes (Ty-1 to Ty-6) have been transferred to commercial cultivars to provide protection, but only Ty-1, Ty-2, and Ty-3 are effective in some strains. This study aims to provide information on obstruction genes, sources, and indicators to help breeders develop TYLCV-resistant varieties (El-Sappah et al.).

Bacterial infection in horticultural crops might be devastating and affect the production and productivity of the crops. A recent study by Chandel et al. screened 157 onion genotypes for resistance to Stemphylium leaf blight (SLB) at two stages of growth. A more robust resistance breeding program can be achieved by screening at both stages and selecting genotypes with high dry matter and biochemical activity. This approach can help identify and prioritize genotypes that exhibit desirable traits related to resistance, which can ultimately lead totronger and more effective breeding strategies (Chandel et al.). The impact of galaxolide (HHCB) on the growth, physiology, and biochemistry of wheat and faba bean plants was studied by Madnay et al.. Diazotrophic plant growth-promoting Rhodospirillum sp. JY3 mitigated HHCB-induced stress by modulating oxidative burst, improving plant biomass and photosynthetic efficiency, augmenting antioxidants, and enhancing detoxification metabolism. Inoculation with JY3 also increased the tolerance level of both crops against HHCB contamination (Madnay et al.). Similarly, the role of the CmWRKY15-1 gene was suggested to provide resistance to White Rust disease in chrysanthemums. Silencing CmWRKY15-1 reduced the activities of antioxidant and defense enzymes and increased susceptibility to the pathogen. The gene likely increases resistance by enhancing the protective enzyme system, which could aid in breeding new resistant varieties (Chen et al.; Rahman et al.). Crop loss due to Phytophthora sojae in soybean results in approximately 2 billion US $ crop loss annually. Adigun et al. studied tolerant and susceptible cultivars to assess the role of phyto-oxylipin anabolism during infection. Unique oxylipin biomarkers were generated from intact oxidized lipid precursors in tolerant cultivars, while microbial-origin oxylipins were upregulated in susceptible cultivars. This study provides evidence for phyto-oxylipin metabolism in soybean cultivars during pathogen infection and its potential application in developing soybean tolerance to Phytophthora sojae (Adigun et al.).

Using biological agents is a sustainable approach to control the biotic stress in horticultural crops. The beneficial effect of endophytic bacterial strains in French marigold suggest that three endophytic bacterial strains improved growth, vase life, biochemical attributes, and antioxidant and nematocidal activities. The bacterial strains also improved the plant’s ability to scavenge radicals, resist plant-parasitic nematodes, and increase the activity of several antioxidant enzymes (Naveed et al.). Endophytic entomo-pathogenic fungi (EEPF) can be used as a potential tool for biological control. EEPF can boost plant growth, nutrition, and defense mechanisms against insect pests through changes in physio-chemical properties and the production of enzymes. IPM requires understanding the physiological mechanisms of EEPF colonization and the abiotic and biotic elements that influence plant-EEPF interaction (Samal et al.). Similarly, in another study, the combined effect of Providencia vermicola and iron oxide nanoparticles was observed on plant growth in Ajwain (Trachyspermum ammi) seedlings under different levels of arsenic contamination. However, the application of P. vermicola and FeO-NPs improved plant growth by decreasing arsenic content and capturing reactive oxygen species. FeO-NPs showed better results compared to P. vermicola. The study suggests that combining P. vermicola and FeO-NPs can improve plant growth and composition under metal stress (Sun et al.). Rhizobium is a key nitrogen-fixing microorganism that improves soil fertility and crop productivity. Using soil test-based fertilizers and adding native strains significantly increased pod yield in farmers’ fields. Both strains are recommended for the bio-inoculation of French beans(Athul et al.). The excessive use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides in agriculture causes soil problems and restricts sustainable development. Streptomyces aureoverticillatus HN6 is a biocontrol microorganism that improves soil fertility and controls diseases. Streptomyces HN6 has the potential as a biofertilizer for improving plant productivity and controlling plant pathogenic fungi (Wang et al.). A recent study suggested that Parthenium hysterophorus, a locally available herbaceous plant, manages the bacterial wilt of tomatoes. The P. hysterophorus leaf extract significantly reduced the pathogen population in soil and wilt severity on tomato plants, resulting in increased growth and yield (Najeeb and Li). In another study, Trichoderma spp. Isolates were obtained from the rhizospheric microflora of solanaceous horticultural crops and screened for biocontrol activity against fungal and bacterial pathogens. Molecular identification revealed that seven isolates were T. harzianum and one was T. asperellum. In vitro assays showed significant biocontrol activity for all eight isolates. It was concluded that T. harzianum MC2 and T. harzianum NBG show promise for use in agricultural biopesticide formulations (Rahman et al.). The suppressive effect of salicylic acid and Cinnamomum verum on green and blue mold in sweet oranges. The combination of SA and CV showed the lowest disease incidence and severity without affecting fruit quality. Transcriptional profiling and biochemical quantification revealed upregulation of defense enzymes associated with reduced incidence of molds. SA+CV can be a safer alternative to chemicals for post-harvest mold management (Moosa et al.).

Conclusions and perspectives

In conclusion, the impact of abiotic and biotic stresses on horticultural crops is a significant challenge facing global food security and economies. However, recent research has shown promising strategies to enhance crop tolerance and productivity through biostimulant chemicals, microorganisms, phytochemicals, secondary metabolites, and antimicrobial peptides. Furthermore, researchers are utilizing cutting-edge technologies such as epigenomics, genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics to understand better the mechanisms involved in plant stress response and develop novel approaches to improve crop durability and output. Continuing research in this area is essential to develop sustainable and resilient horticultural crop production systems that adapt to the changing global climate and human activities. By screening for genotypes with high dry matter and biochemical activity, selecting desirable traits related to resistance, and utilizing the latest technologies and strategies, researchers can help develop more robust and effective breeding programs. Ultimately, these efforts have the potential to significantly enhance crop plant tolerance to stress and contribute to the production of high-quality, nutritious, and sustainable food for the growing global population.

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Abbas, R., Rasul, S., Aslam, K., Baber, M., Shahid, M., Mubeen, F., et al. (2019). Halotolerant PGPR: a hope for cultivation of saline soils. J. King Saud Univ Sci. 31, 1195–1201. doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2019.02.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Altaf, M. A., Shahid, R., Ren, M. X., Altaf, M. M., Khan, L. U., Shahid, S., et al. (2021). Melatonin alleviates salt damage in tomato seedling: a root architecture system, photosynthetic capacity, ion homeostasis, and antioxidant enzymes analysis. Sci. Hortic. 285, 110145. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110145

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Altaf, M. A., Shahid, R., Ren, M.-X., Naz, S., Altaf, M. M., Khan, L. U., et al. (2022). Melatonin mitigates cadmium toxicity by promoting root architecture and mineral homeostasis of tomato genotypes. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 22 (1), 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s42729-021-00720-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arnao, M. B., Hernández-Ruiz, J. (2020). Is phytomelatonin a new plant hormone? Agronomy 10 (1), 95. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10010095

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bharti, N., Barnawal, D. (2019). “Amelioration of salinity stress by PGPR,” in PGPR amelioration in sustainable agriculture (Elsevier), 85–106. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-815879-1.00005-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Devaux, A., Goffart, J. P., Petsakos, A., Kromann, P., Gatto, M., Okello, J., et al. (2020). Global food security, contributions from sustainable potato agri-food systems. Potato Crop: Its Agricultural Nutr. Soc. Contribution to Humankind, 3–35. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-28683-5_1/FIGURES/8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Devi, R., Behera, B., Raza, M. B., Mangal, V., Altaf, M. A., Kumar, R., et al. (2022). An insight into microbes mediated heavy metal detoxification in plants: a review. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 22, 914–936. doi: 10.1007/s42729-021-00702-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Devireddy, A. R., Zandalinas, S. I., Fichman, Y., Mittler, R. (2021). Integration of reactive oxygen species and hormone signaling during abiotic stress. Plant J. 105, 459–476. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoekenga, O. A. (2014). "Genomics of mineral nutrient biofortification: calcium, iron and zinc", in Genomics of Plant Genetic Resources: Volume 2. Crop productivity, food security and nutritional quality. (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands), pp. 431–454.

Google Scholar

Khan, Z., Roman, D., Kintz, T., delas Alas, M., Yap, R., Doty, S. (2014). Degradation, phytoprotection and phytoremediation of phenanthrene by endophyte pseudomonas putida, PD1. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 12221–12228. doi: 10.1021/es503880t

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Knoppers, B. M., Fortier, I., Legault, D., Burton, P. (2008). Population genomics: the public population project in genomics (P3G): a proof of concept? Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 16, 664–665. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.55

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, N., Chaudhary, A., Ahlawat, O. P., Naorem, A., Upadhyay, G., Chhokar, R. S., et al. (2023). Crop residue management challenges, opportunities and way forward for sustainable food-energy security in India: a review. Soil Tillage Res. 228, 105641. doi: 10.1016/J.STILL.2023.105641

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, R., Tiwari, R. K., Jeevalatha, A., Siddappa, S., Shah, M. A., Sharma, S., et al. (2021). Potato apical leaf curl disease: current status and perspectives on a disease caused by tomato leaf curl new Delhi virus. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 128, 897–911. doi: 10.1007/S41348-021-00463-W/METRICS

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lal, M. K., Tiwari, R. K., Gahlaut, V., Mangal, V., Kumar, A., Singh, M. P., et al. (2022). Physiological and molecular insights on wheat responses to heat stress. Plant Cell Rep. 41, 501–518. doi: 10.1007/s00299-021-02784-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lal, M. K., Tiwari, R. K., Kumar, R., Naga, K. C., Kumar, A., Singh, B., et al. (2021). Effect of potato apical leaf curl disease on glycemic index and resistant starch of potato (Solanum tuberosum l.) tubers. Food Chem. 359, 129939. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129939

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mishra, U. N., Jena, D., Sahu, C., Devi, R., Kumar, R., Jena, R., et al. (2022). Nutrigenomics: an inimitable interaction amid genomics, nutrition and health. Innovative Food Sci. Emerging Technol. 82, 103196. doi: 10.1016/J.IFSET.2022.103196

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Onoja, A. O., Adione, A. A. (2020). Hidden hunger burden and policy responses in Nigeria: implications for attainment of the sustainable development goal 2. Nigerian Agric. Policy Res. J. (NAPReJ) 7, 8–20. doi: 10.22004/AG.ECON.314135

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ortiz-Bobea, A., Ault, T. R., Carrillo, C. M., Chambers, R. G., Lobell, D. B. (2021). Anthropogenic climate change has slowed global agricultural productivity growth. Nat. Clim Chang 11, 306–312. doi: 10.1038/s41558-021-01000-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qin, Z., Hou, F., Li, A., Dong, S., Wang, Q., Zhang, L. (2020). Transcriptome-wide identification of WRKY transcription factor and their expression profiles under salt stress in sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas l.). Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 14, 599–611. doi: 10.1007/s11816-020-00635-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosegrant, M. W., Cline, S. A. (2003). Global food security: challenges and policies. Sci. (1979) 302, 1917–1919. doi: 10.1126/science.1092958

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sonmez, O., Aydemir, S., Kaya, C. (2009). Mitigation effects of mycorrhiza on boron toxicity in wheat (Triticum durum) plants. N Z J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 37, 99–104. doi: 10.1080/01140670909510254

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tiwari, R. K., Lal, M. K., Kumar, R., Chourasia, K. N., Naga, K. C., Kumar, D., et al. (2021). Mechanistic insights on melatonin-mediated drought stress mitigation in plants. Physiol. Plant 172, 1212–1226. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13307

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tiwari, R. K., Lal, M. K., Kumar, R., Mangal, V., Altaf, M. A., Sharma, S., et al. (2022). Insight into melatonin-mediated response and signaling in the regulation of plant defense under biotic stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 109, 385–399. doi: 10.1007/s11103-021-01202-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vaishnav, A., Kumari, S., Jain, S., Varma, A., Tuteja, N., Choudhary, D. K. (2016). PGPR-mediated expression of salt tolerance gene in soybean through volatiles under sodium nitroprusside. J. Basic Microbiol. 56, 1274–1288. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201600188

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vance, C. P. (2010). Quantitative trait loci, epigenetics, sugars, and microRNAs: quaternaries in phosphate acquisition and use. Plant Physiol. 154, 582–588. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.161067

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Varshney, R. K., Singh, V. K., Kumar, A., Powell, W., Sorrells, M. E. (2018). Can genomics deliver climate-change ready crops? Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 45, 205–211. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2018.03.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Williamson, J. D., Jennings, D. B., Guo, W. W., Pharr, D. M., Ehrenshaft, M. (2002). Sugar alcohols, salt stress, and fungal resistance: polyols - multifunctional plant protection? J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 127, 467–473. doi: 10.21273/jashs.127.4.467

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xia, H., Ni, Z., Hu, R., Lin, L., Deng, H., Wang, J., et al. (2020). Melatonin alleviates drought stress by a non- enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidative system in kiwifruit seedlings. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (3), 852. doi: 10.3390/ijms21030852

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zargar, S. M., Mahajan, R., Nazir, M., Nagar, P., Kim, S. T., Rai, V., et al. (2017). Common bean proteomics: present status and future strategies. J. Proteomics 169, 239–248. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2017.03.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: horticultural crops, abiotic stress responses, biotic stress tolerance, pathogen, insect and nematodes, systemic resistance

Citation: Lal MK, Tiwari RK, Altaf MA, Kumar A and Kumar R (2023) Editorial: Abiotic and biotic stress in horticultural crops: insight into recent advances in the underlying tolerance mechanism. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1212982. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1212982

Received: 27 April 2023; Accepted: 19 May 2023;
Published: 31 May 2023.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Oscar Vicente, Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain

Copyright © 2023 Lal, Tiwari, Altaf, Kumar and Kumar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ravinder Kumar, chauhanravinder97@gmail.com; Rahul Kumar Tiwari, rahultiwari226@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.