Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 07 November 2022
Sec. Plant Physiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Signaling and Crosstalk of Melatonin, Nitric Oxide and Hydrogen Sulfide in Plants View all 6 articles

Key role of reactive oxygen species-scavenging system in nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide crosstalk-evoked thermotolerance in maize seedlings

Yu-Ying Sun,,Yu-Ying Sun1,2,3Jia-Qi Wang,,Jia-Qi Wang1,2,3Ru-Hua Xiang,,Ru-Hua Xiang1,2,3Zhong-Guang Li,,*Zhong-Guang Li1,2,3*
  • 1School of Life Sciences, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, China
  • 2Engineering Research Center of Sustainable Development and Utilization of Biomass Energy, Ministry of Education, Kunming, China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Biomass Energy and Environmental Biotechnology, Yunnan Province, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, China

Nitric oxide (NO) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) are novel signaling molecules, which participate in plant growth, development, and response to stress. In this study root-irrigation with 0.15 mM sodium nitroprusside (SNP, NO donor) up-regulated gene expression of L-CYSTEINE DESULFHYDRASE1 (LCD1), activities of L-cysteine desulfhydrase (LCD) and D-cysteine desulfhydrase (DCD), as well as an endogenous H2S level, compared to control seedlings. The SNP-up-regulated effects were enhanced by 0.5 mM sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS, H2S donor), but weakened by NO scavenger 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (cPTIO) and H2S scavenger hypotaurine (HT) alone. NaHS had no significant effect on gene expression and activity of nitrate reductase (NR, a NO candidate producing enzyme). These data indicate that NO could trigger the LCD/H2S signaling pathway in maize seedlings. To further investigate the effect of NO and H2S crosstalk on thermotolerance in maize seedlings, thermotolerance parameters and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-scavenging system were estimated. The results show that SNP increased survival rate and tissue viability, decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) accumulation, and electrolyte leakage in maize seedlings under heat stress (HS), implying NO could improve thermotolerance in maize seedlings. The NO-improved thermotolerance was impaired by H2S inhibitor DL-propargylglycine (PAG) and scavenger HT alone. Similarly, SNP up-regulated the gene expression of DEHYDROASCORBATE REDUCTASE (DHAR) and GLUTATHIONE REDUCTASE1 (GR1); activities of ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, and catalase; as well as levels of ascorbic acid, glutathione, flavonoids, carotenoids, and total phenols. SNP also reduced hydrogen peroxide and superoxide radical accumulation in maize seedlings under HS compared to the control. The effects of SNP on ROS and their scavenger system were weakened by PAG and HT alone. These data hint that NO could evoke thermotolerance in maize seedlings by triggering the LCD/H2S signaling pathway, and the ROS-scavenging system played a key role in the NO and H2S crosstalk-evoked thermotolerance.

Introduction

Nitric oxide (NO) is an important signaling molecule in plants, it can be produced by nitrate reductase (NR) using nitrite as a substrate (Bruand and Meilhoc, 2019; Kolbert et al., 2019; Gupta et al., 2022; Singh et al., 2022). Mounting evidence shows that NO plays a key role in seed germination, seedling emergence, plant blooming, fruit fresh-keeping, and plant response to abiotic stresses (such as heat, salt, drought, heavy metal, and flooding stresses) by interacting with signaling molecule hydrogen sulfide (H2S) (Liu et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012; Shi et al., 2014; Peng et al., 2016; Muñoz-Vargas et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2018; Xie et al., 2018; Mukherjee, 2019). In rice seedlings, NO application could enhance thermotolerance by modulating antioxidant defense, carbohydrate metabolism, and photosynthesis via the interplay with ethylene, H2S, and sulfur (Gautam et al., 2022a; Gautam et al., 2022b; Sehar et al., 2022). Similarly, in wheat seedlings, foliar application of NO alone or in combination was able to improve photosynthesis under heat stress by reducing H2O2-induced oxidative stress and excess glucose-mediated photosynthetic suppression (Iqbal et al., 2021). Our previous study also found that NO-H2S interaction triggered thermotolerance in maize seedlings (Li et al., 2013), but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear.

H2S is one of the gaseous signaling molecules (such as NO, carbon monoxide, ethylene, ammonia, and hydrogen), and plays a critical role in many physiological processes in plants under optimal and stress conditions (Li et al., 2016; Ahmed et al., 2021). H2S homeostasis in plant cells can be modulated by LCD/DCD, O-acetylserine (thio) lyase (OAS-TL), and sulfite reductase (SiR) (Liu et al., 2021; Mishra et al., 2021; Singh et al., 2021). These enzymes and H2S have a leading role in numerous physiological processes from seed germination to plant senescence. As mentioned above, H2S can not only exert its physiological functions alone (Li et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2021) but also regulates the acquirement of stress tolerance including thermotolerance in plants by interacting with NO (Li et al., 2013; Xie et al., 2018; Huang et al., 2021; Li et al., 2021; Gautam et al., 2022a; Mishra et al., 2022; Sehar et al., 2022). However, the exact interaction mechanism between H2S and NO in plants is not completely clear.

In general, plant cells inevitably produce ROS (mainly superoxide radical, O2.-; hydrogen peroxide, H2O2) by enzymatic and non-enzymatic pathways. This production is enhanced under stress conditions including heat stress (HS) (Yadav et al., 2018; Wani and Kumar, 2020). With the development of global warming, HS has become a principal abiotic stress factor determining plant productivity, accompanying the whole life cycle of plants (Saidi et al., 2011; Hasanuzzaman et al., 2013). HS commonly leads to oxidative damage due to the over-accumulation of ROS. To maintain ROS homeostasis in plant cells, the level of ROS is strictly controlled by the ROS-scavenging system, which is composed of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants (Szymanska et al., 2017). The enzymatic antioxidants mainly incorporate ascorbate peroxidase (APX), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), glutathione reductase (GR), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD). The non-enzymatic antioxidants chiefly refer to ascorbic acid (AsA), glutathione (GSH), flavonoids (FLA), carotenoids (CAR), and polyphenols (Ashraf, 2021; Haider et al., 2021). Under both physiological and stress conditions, the ROS-scavenging system has a leading role in many physiological processes in plants to maintain ROS homeostasis or trigger ROS signaling (Wahid et al., 2007; Zhao et al., 2020). Therefore, the enhancement of the ROS-scavenging system is a positive correlation with plant stress tolerance including thermotolerance.

Maize is the third cereal crop and new model plant, the seedling stage is the critical period to determine yield and field harvest due to its sensitivity to HS (Strable and Scanlon, 2009; Tiwari and Yadav, 2019). Therefore, how to improve the thermotolerance of maize seedlings and resolve its underlying mechanisms is an urgent issue. In this paper, the NO and H2S crosstalk-evoked thermotolerance and the underlying mechanisms in maize seedlings were dissected. It was designed to illustrate the key role of the ROS-scavenging system in the NO and H2S crosstalk-evoked thermotolerance.

Materials and methods

Seed germination and seedling culture

Maize (Zea mays L., cv. Diwo No. 2) seeds were purchased from Shiling Seed Company, China. The healthy and uniform size seeds were sterilized in 0.1% HgCl2 solution for 10 min and then rinsed seven times with distilled water to wash off the residual HgCl2. The rinsed seeds were immersed in distilled water for 12h to imbibe. The watered seeds were sown on the wetted filter papers in plates with covers (about 200 seeds per plate) and germinated in the dark for 60 h in a climate chamber with 26°C and relative humidity (RH) of 65% ± 5%. The 2-cm high seedlings (i.e. 60-h-old seedlings) were irrigated with the following chemicals and HS.

Chemical root-irrigation and HS treatments

The 2-cm high seedlings were divided into 14 groups and irrigated with different chemicals for 4 h (appropriate time was derived from preliminary experiments, the equivalent effect could be gained from 4 to 8 h of irrigation). (1) Distilled water (CK), (2) 0.5 mM NaHS, (3) 0.15 mM SNP, (4) 0.3 mM HT, (5) 0.15 mM cPTIO, (6) 0.5 mM NaHS + 0.15 mM SNP, (7) 0.15 mM cPTIO + 0.5 mM NaHS, (8) 0.15 mM methylene blue (MB) + 0.5 mM NaHS, (9) 0.15 mM N-ω-nitro-L-arginine (NNA) + 0.5 mM NaHS, (10) 0.15 mM sodium tungstate (ST) + 0.5 mM NaHS, (11) 0.3 mM PAG + 0.15 mM SNP, (12) 0.3 mM hydroxylamine (HA) + 0.15 mM SNP, (13) 0.3 mM sodium pyruvate (SP) + 0.15 mM SNP, (14) 0.3 mM HT + 0.15 mM SNP. Among these chemicals, NaHS and HT are H2S donors and scavengers, respectively, while PAG, HA, and SP are H2S inhibitors (Li et al., 2013; Singh et al., 2021). Similarly, SNP, cPTIO, and MB are NO donors and scavengers, respectively, while NNA and ST are NO inhibitors (Singh et al., 2022). The suitable concentrations of these chemicals were rooted in preliminary experiments and our precious studies (Li et al., 2013; Zhou et al., 2018; Ye et al., 2020). To acquire a better effect, in the scavenger and inhibitor experiments, the 58-h-old seedlings were pre-irrigated with scavengers or inhibitors for 2 h and then irrigated with the second chemical for 4 h (e.g. 0.15 mM cPTIO + 0.5 mM NaHS). In the other combined experiments, to avoid chemical reaction in vitro, the 56-h-old seedlings were pre-irrigated with the first chemical for 4 h and then irrigated with the second chemical for 4 (e.g. 0.5 mM NaHS + 0.15 mM SNP). The non-irrigated (CK) and chemical-irrigated seedlings were subjected to HS at 46°C for 16 h in the dark in a climate chamber (this temperature was a half-lethal strength, and the survival rate of the control seedlings irrigated with distilled water was approximately 50%) with an RH of 65% ± 5%. After chemical and HS irrigations, the buds of maize seedlings were sampled to estimate the following physiological and molecular parameters due to their sensitivity to HS among seedling organs (Li et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2019).

Quantification of NO, H2S, and their metabolic enzyme activity and gene expression

After chemical and HS irrigations, the contents of H2S and NO in the buds (aboveground parts) of maize seedlings were determined using the methods reported (Li et al., 2015; Shahi and Srivastava, 2018; Ye et al., 2020). Correspondingly, the contents of soluble proteins in buds of maize seedlings were measured using the Bradford method (Bradford, 1976) using bovine serum albumin as a standard sample. Their activities were expressed in nmol min-1 mg-1 protein, while H2S and NO contents were expressed as a nmol g-1 fresh weight (FW). In addition, the expression of LCD1, OAS-TL, and NR was detected by qRT-PCR (using Zea mays beta-5 tubulin (ZmTUB) as a reference gene) (Qiu et al., 2022), and the primer information of these genes is listed in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Genes and primer information was used in this study.

HS and estimation of thermotolerance parameters

After HS, the heated seedlings were cultured at 26°C in a climate chamber with 200 µmol·m-2·s-1, 14 h/10 h (day/night) photoperiod, and RH of 65% ± 5% for seven days and applied fertilizer with 1/2 Hoagland solution to recover growth. After recovery, the survival rate (SR) was estimated as the formula: SR (%) = the number of the survived seedlings/number of the total seedlings × 100%. Meanwhile, after HS, tissue viability (A485, i.e. triphenyl tetrazolium chloride reduction), MDA content, and electrolyte leakage (EL) were estimated as per the methods described by Wang et al. (2019). The tissue viability, MDA content, and EL were expressed in A485, μmol·g-1 FW, and %.

Enzymatic antioxidant activity and gene expression assay

After chemical and HS irrigations, the enzymatic antioxidants (i.e. APX, DHAR, MDHAR, GR, CAT, and SOD) in buds of maize seedlings were extracted and estimated in the light of the previous procedures (Li, 2019; Wang et al., 2019). The soluble protein contents were assayed as per the abovementioned method (Bradford, 1976). Their activities were calculated using the extinction coefficients of 2.8 (for AsA to calculate APX), 14.0 (for AsA to calculate DHAR and MDHAR), 6.2 (for NADPH to calculate GR), and 40 (for H2O2 to calculate CAT) mM-1 cm-1 except SOD using activity unit (i.e. a unit activity refers to the amount of enzyme which inhibits 50% photochemical reduction of nitroblue tetrazolium) and expressed in nmol min-1 mg-1 protein or U mg-1 protein for SOD. The expression of APX1, DHAR, MDHAR, GR1, CAT1, and SOD4 was detected by qRT-PCR (using Zea mays beta-5 tubulin (ZmTUB) as reference gene) (Qiu et al., 2022), the primer information of these genes was listed in Table 1.

Non-enzymatic antioxidant evaluation

After chemical and HS irrigations, the contents of GSH, oxidized GSH (GSSG), AsA, oxidized AsA (DHA), FLA, CAR, and total phenols (TP) in buds of maize seedlings were extracted and evaluated as per the procedure reported by Wang et al. (2019). The contents of AsA, DHA, GSH, GSSG, and FLA were expressed in μmol g-1 FW, while CAR and TP were expressed as μg g-1 FW and nmol g-1 FW, respectively.

O2.- and H2O2 measurement

After chemical and HS irrigations, the O2.- production rate and H2O2 content were measured using Na,3′-[1-[(phenylamino)-carbonyl]-3,4-tetrazolium] (4-metho- xy-6-nitro) benzene sulfonic acid hydrate (XTT) method and titanous sulfate method, respectively (Li, 2019). The O2.production rate and H2O2 content were counted as the extinction coefficient of 21.6 and 0.28 μM-1 cm-1 and expressed as nmol min-1 g-1 FW and μmol g-1 FW, respectively.

Statistical analysis

The experiments involved a completely random design and the data had at least three biological replicates using Duncan's multiple-range test at a 0.05 significant level. In the figures, the data denote means ± standard error (SE), the bars with the different letters represent significant differences, while the same letters represent no significant difference.

Results

NO triggers H2S signaling in maize seedlings

To explore NO and H2S crosstalk, the activities of enzymes (LCD, DCD, and OAS-TL), expression of genes (LCD1 and OAS-TL), and contents of NO and H2S in maize seedlings irrigated with distilled water (CK), NaHS, HT, SNP, and cPTIO were estimated. The results show that HT, SNP, and cPTIO alone significantly increased LCD (except for cPTIO) and DCD activities in maize seedlings, while OAS-TL merely increased by NaHS, compared to the CK (Figures 1A, C, D). Correspondingly, the gene expression of LCD1 was remarkably up-regulated by SNP and down-regulated by NaHS and cPTIO alone. HT had no significant effect on LCD1 expression in maize seedlings (Figure 1B). WE did not observe that NaHS, HT, SNP, and cPTIO alone significantly affected OAS-TL expression compared with the CK (Figure 1E). As expected, the H2S content in maize seedlings was markedly elevated by NaHS and SNP alone, but it was observably weakened by HT and cPTIO (Figure 1F). These data imply that exogenous NO could increase endogenous H2S content in maize seedlings.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Effect of sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), hypotaurine (HT), sodium nitroprusside (SNP), and 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1- oxyl-3-oxide (cPTIO) on L-cysteine desulfhydrase (LCD) (A), D-cysteine desulfhydrase (DCD) (C), O-acetylserine (thio) lyase (OAS-TL) (D) activities and corresponding gene expression (B, E) as well as hydrogen sulfide (H2S) content (F) in maize seedlings under non-HS conditions. The data had at least three biological replicates and were tested using Duncan's multiple-range test at 0.05 significant level, which denote means ± standard error (SE). The bars with the different letters represent significant differences, while the same letters represent no significant difference.

Similarly, in comparison to the CK, the activity of NR was significantly increased by HT and cPTIO alone, while NaHS and SNP alone had no significant effect on NR (Figure 2A). Correspondingly, NR expression was observably up-regulated by HT and cPTIO alone, and down-regulated by SNP. NaHS had no significant effect on NR expression in maize seedlings compared with the CK (Figure 2B). As might be expected, the endogenous NO content in maize seedlings was significantly increased by SNP. NaHS, HT, and cPTIO on NO did not significantly affect maize seedlings (Figure 2C). These data indicate that exogenous H2S had no significant effect on endogenous NO content in maize seedlings.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Effect of sodium nitroprusside (SNP), 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5- tetrameth- ylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (cPTIO), sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), and hypotaurine (HT) on nitrate reductase (NR) (A) activity, corresponding gene expression (B), and nitric oxide (NO) content (C) in maize seedlings under non-HS conditions. The data had at least three biological replicates and were tested using Duncan,s multiple-range test at 0.05 significant level, which denote means ± standard error (SE). The bars with the different letters represent significant differences, while the same letters represent no significant difference.

NO and H2S crosstalk evokes thermotolerance in maize seedlings

To further investigate the effect of NO and H2S crosstalk on thermotolerance in maize seedlings, the seedlings were irrigated with NaHS and SNP alone or in combination; NaHS alone or combined with cPTIO, MB, NNA, or ST; as well as SNP alone or combined with PAG, HA, SP, or HT prior to HS. As shown in Figure 3, compared with the CK, the SR of maize seedlings was improved by NaHS and SNP alone or in combination after HS. The significant effect of cPTIO, MB, NNA, and ST on the NaHS-improved SR was not observed (Figure 3B). PAG and HT significantly impaired the SNP-improved SR, but HA and SP had no significant effect on this improvement (Figure 3C).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Effect of sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS) alone, or in combination with sodium nitroprusside (SNP), nitric oxide (NO) scavengers and inhibitors as well as SNP alone or in combination with hydrogen sulfide (H2S) inhibitors and scavengers on survival rate (SR) (A–C), tissue viability (D), malondiadehyde (MDA) (E), and electrolyte leakage (EL) (F) in maize seedlings under non-HS and HS conditions. The data had at least three biological replicates and were tested using Duncan's multiple-range test at 0.05 significant level, which denote means ± standard error (SE). The bars with the different letters represent significant differences, while the same letters represent no significant difference.

Interestingly, in comparison with the CK under non-HS conditions, NaHS and SNP alone or in combination improved the tissue viability except for in the case of NaHS alone (A485, Figure 3D) and had no significant effect on MDA accumulation (except for NaHS alone) (Figure 3E) and EL (Figure 3F). Under HS conditions, in comparison to the control, NaHS alone significantly increased A485, while SNP alone or in combination with NaHS was no significant effect (Figure 3D). Similarly, NaHS alone or in combination with SNP obviously reduced MDA accumulation, but SNP had no significance (Figure 3E). The HS-induced increase in EL was observably alleviated by NaHS and SNP alone or in combination compared with the CK (Figure 3F). These data show that H2S acted as signaling role in the downstream of NO in the development of the plant thermotolerance.

NO and H2S crosstalk up-regulates the activity and gene expression of enzymatic antioxidants

As mentioned above, NO and H2S crosstalk could evoke thermotolerance in maize seedlings (Figure 3), to further illustrate the role of enzymatic antioxidants in the formation of thermotolerance, the activities of APX, DHAR, MDHAR, GR, CAT, and SOD, as well as corresponding gene expression, were detected. The results indicate that SNP alone significantly increased APX and DHAR activities, and markedly decreased SOD, but had no significant effect on MDHAR, GR, and CAT in maize seedlings under non-HS conditions compared with the CK (Figures 4, 5). In addition, under non-HS conditions, the SNP-induced APX and DHAR activities were reduced by PAG, HA (except for APX), SP, and HT (except for APX) (Figure 4A, C). PAG, HA, SP, and HT observably enhanced MDHAR (Figure 4E), and markedly lowered CAT and SOD (except for PAG, SP on CAT, and SP on SOD) (Figures 5A, C), but there was no significant difference in GR compared with SNP alone (Figure 4G). Similarly, under non-HS conditions, SNP alone significantly up-regulated GR1 expression (Figure 4H), but had no significant effect on APX1, DHAR, MDHAR1, CAT1, and SOD4, compared with the CK (Figures 4B, D, F, 5B, D). In comparison with SNP alone, PAG, HA, SP, and HT significantly down-regulated APX1 (except for PAG), CAT1 (except for HT), and SOD4 (except for PAG and SP) (Figures 4B, 5B, D), but had no significant effect on DHAR, MDHAR1, and GR1 (Figures 4D, F, H).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Effect of SNP alone or in combination with hydrogen sulfide (H2S) inhibitors and scavengers on ascorbate peroxidase (APX) (A), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) (C), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR) (E), and glutathione reductase (GR) (G) activities and corresponding gene expression (B, D, F, H) in maize seedlings under non-HS and HS conditions. The data had at least three biological replicates and were tested using Duncan's multiple-range test at 0.05 significant level, which denote means ± standard error (SE). The bars with the different letters represent significant differences, while the same letters represent no significant difference.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5 Effect of SNP alone or in combination with hydrogen sulfide (H2S) inhibitors and scavengers on catalase (CAT) (A) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) (C) activities and corresponding gene expression (B, D) in maize seedlings under non-HS and HS conditions. The data had at least three biological replicates and were tested using Duncan's multiple-range test at 0.05 significant level, which denote means ± standard error (SE). The bars with the different letters represent significant differences, while the same letters represent no significant difference.

Under HS conditions, SNP alone significantly increased the activities of APX, GR, and CAT and decreased DHAR, but had no significant effect on MDHAR and SOD in maize seedlings, compared with CK (Figures 4, 5). Additionally, in comparison to SNP alone, PAG, HA, SP, and HT markedly decreased APX (except for HA), GR, CAT, and SOD activities (Figures 4A, G, 5B, D); observably increased DHAR and MDHAR in maize seedlings (Figures 4C, E). For gene expression, SNP alone notably up-regulated the expression of DHAR and GR1 (Figures 4D, H), while there was no significant effect on APX1, MDHAR1, CAT1, and SOD4 in maize seedlings, compared with CK (Figures 4B, F, 5B, D). In comparison to SNP alone, PAG, HA, SP, and HT prominently decreased the expression of APX1 and DHAR (Figure 4B, D), whereas a significant effect on MDHAR1, GR1 (except for SP), CAT1 (except for PAG), and SOD4 was not observed in maize seedlings (Figures 4F, H, 5B, D). This section’s results indicate that NO and H2S crosstalk could activate the enzymatic antioxidant activity in maize seedlings under both non-HS and HS conditions.

NO and H2S crosstalk increases non-enzymatic antioxidants

Besides enzymatic antioxidants, the non-enzymatic antioxidants (AsA, DHA, GSH, GSSG, FLA, CAR, and TP) contents were determined in maize seedlings irrigated with SNP alone or in combination with PAG, HA, SP, or HT. Under non-HS conditions, the results exhibit that SNP alone significantly increased CAR content, and decreased FLA, but had no significant effect on AsA, DHA, GSH, GSSG, and TP in maize seedlings, compared with the CK (Figures 6, 7). In addition, in comparison with SNP alone, PAG, HA, SP, or HT prominently decreased CAR and TP (except for PAG and SP) (Figures 7B, C), while the significant effect on AsA, DHA, GSH, GSSG, and FLA was not recorded in maize seedlings (Figures 6A–D, 7A).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6 Effect of SNP alone or in combination with hydrogen sulfide (H2S) inhibitors and scavengers on ascorbic acid (AsA) (A), dehydroascorbate (DHA) (B), reduced glutathione (GSH) (C), and oxidized GSH (GSSH) (D) contents in maize seedlings under non-HS and HS conditions. The data had at least three biological replicates and were tested using Duncan's multiple-range test at 0.05 significant level, which denote means ± standard error (SE). The bars with the different letters represent significant differences, while the same letters represent no significant difference.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7 Effect of SNP alone or in combination with hydrogen sulfide (H2S) inhibitors and scavengers on flavonoids (FLA) (A), carotenoids (CAR) (B), and total phenols (TP) (C) contents in maize seedlings under non-HS and HS conditions. The data had at least three biological replicates and were tested using Duncan's multiple-range test at 0.05 significant level, which denote means ± standard error (SE). The bars with the different letters represent significant differences, while the same letters represent no significant difference.

Under HS conditions, in comparison with the CK, SNP alone significantly improved AsA, GSH, FLA, CAR, and TP contents, and markedly declined DHA and GSSG in maize seedlings (Figures 6, 7). Compared to SNP alone, PAG, HA, SP, or HT weakened AsA, GSH, and TP contents (Figures 6A, C, 7C), and prominently elevated DHA and GSSG (Figures 6B, D), but had no significant effect on FLA (except for a decrease in HA) and CAR (except for a decrease in PAG) in maize seedlings (Figures 7A, B). This section’s results indicate that NO and H2S crosstalk could increase the non-enzymatic antioxidant level in maize seedlings under both non-HS and HS conditions.

NO and H2S crosstalk weakens H2O2 and O2.-

As described above, the NO and H2S crosstalk could enhance the ROS-scavenging system in maize seedlings under both non-HS and HS conditions (Figures 47). To further probe the effect of NO and H2S crosstalk on O2.- and H2O2, the levels of ROS in maize seedlings irrigated with SNP alone or in combination with PAG, HA, SP, or HT were detected. As shown in Figure 8, under non-HS conditions, SNP alone had no significant effect on the production rate of O2.- and the content of H2O2 compared with CK. Additionally, in comparison with SNP alone, the significant effect of PAG, HA, SP, and HT on ROS levels was not noted in maize seedlings (Figure 8). Under HS conditions, compared to the CK, SNP alone significantly decreased O2.- (Figure 8A) and H2O2 (Figure 8B), compared with SNP alone, PAG, HA, SP, or HT reversed NaHS-decreased O2.- (Figure 8A) and H2O2 (Figure 8B). These data suggest that NO and H2S crosstalk could weaken O2.- production rate and H2O2 levels in maize seedlings under HS conditions.

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8 Effect of SNP alone or in combination with hydrogen sulfide (H2S) inhibitors and scavengers on superoxide radical (O2.-) production rate (A) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (B) contents in maize seedlings under non-HS and HS conditions. The data had at least three biological replicates and were tested using Duncan's multiple-range test at 0.05 significant level, which denote means ± standard error (SE). The bars with the different letters represent significant differences, while the same letters represent no significant difference.

Discussion

HS, as a prime abiotic stress factor, adversely affects the whole life cycle of plants from seed germination to organ senescence (Wahid et al., 2007; Hasanuzzaman et al., 2013). The acquirement of plant thermotolerance is an intricate biological process, involving HS sense, signal transduction, gene expression, and physio-biochemical changes (Saidi et al., 2011; Hasanuzzaman et al., 2013; Asthir, 2015; Wani and Kumar, 2020). Signal transduction commonly forms a sophisticated signal network by the crosstalk among signaling molecules, such as Ca2+, ROS, NO, H2S, and plant hormones (Parankusam et al., 2017; Haider et al., 2021). In this study, under non-HS conditions, SNP alone up-regulated the expression of LCD1 (Figure 1B) and activities of LCD and DCD (Figures 1A, C), which in turn increased the endogenous level of H2S in maize seedlings (Figure 1F). These effects were impaired by cPTIO in maize seedlings, but it was not completely abolished (Figures 1B, F), suggesting that other signaling pathways might be in existence. NaHS alone had no significant effect on the gene expression and activity of NR (Figures 2A, B). These data hint that the NO could trigger the LCD/H2S signaling pathway in maize seedlings under non-HS conditions.

Similarly, SNP increased the SR and tissue viability, and reduced MDA and EL in maize seedlings under HS conditions (Figure 3), indicating that SNP could evoke the thermotolerance of maize seedlings. SNP-evoked thermotolerance was weakened by PAG and HT alone but was not eliminated (Figure 3), similar to the changes in H2S triggered by NO (Figure 1), suggesting that SNP could evoke thermotolerance in maize seedlings by triggering, at least part of the LCD/H2S signaling pathway (Figure 9), further supporting the fact that NO cross-talks with H2S in maize seedlings under non-HS conditions. In addition, the NO and H2S crosstalk-evoked thermotolerance in maize seedlings was supported by a previous study (Li et al., 2013). In maize seedlings, the endogenous level of NO was increased by H2O2 but abolished by cPTIO (Li et al., 2015). Similarly, H2O2 alone activated LCD activity, which in turn accumulated endogenous H2S, which was diminished by cPTIO (Li et al., 2015). Meanwhile, H2O2-induced thermotolerance was enhanced by SNP and NaHS alone, but weakened by cPTIO, PAG, and HT, respectively (Li et al., 2015). Analogously, Gautam et al. (2022a) reported that foliar spraying with ethylene could enhance thermotolerance in rice seedlings by cross-talking with H2S and NO. In Chinese cabbage, Xie et al. (2018) found that crosstalk between H2S and NO existed in the formation of heat tolerance induced by H2S and NO alone or in combination. Similar crosstalk between NO and H2S could also be seen in Poplar (Populus trichocarpa) plants (Cheng et al., 2018). These studies further support our hypothesis that NO and H2S crosstalk evoked thermotolerance in plants.

FIGURE 9
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 9 Mechanisms underlying nitric oxide (NO) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) crosstalk evoked thermotolerance in maize seedlings. Nitric oxide (NO) donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) could trigger hydrogen sulfide (H2S) signaling by up-regulated LCD1 expression and L-cysteine desulfhydrase (LCD) and D-cysteine desulfhydrase (DCD) activities. Then, the activity of the ROS-scavenging system, including enzymatic (ascorbate peroxidase, APX; dehydroascorbate reductase, DHAR; monodehydroascorbate reductase, MDHAR;glutathione reductase, GR; catalase, CAT; and superoxide dismutase, SOD) and non-enzymatic (ascorbic acid, AsA; glutathione, GSH; flavonoids, FLA; carotenoids, CAR; and total phenols, TP) antioxidants, was enhance by SNP, which in turn increased survival rate (SR) and tissue viability, decreased electrolyte leakage (EL), malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide radical (O2.-), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) levels, thus evoking thermotolerance of maize seedlings. Also, the SNP-evoked thermotolerance could be weakened by 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5- tetrameth- ylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (cPTIO), DL-propargylglycine (PGA), and hypotaurine (HT) alone, indicating that ROS-scavenging system plays a key role in the SNP-evoked thermotolerance in maize seedlings. The arrows (↑), (↓), and (⊥) denote increase, decrease, and inhibition, respectively.

HS usually triggers oxidative stress, biomembrane damage, protein denaturation, osmotic stress, methylglyoxal stress, and so forth (Wahid et al., 2007; Li, 2022). As well as causing damage, oxidative stress is the main cause of HS injury (Asthir, 2015). Therefore, the alleviation of oxidative stress is bound up with the acquisition of plant thermotolerance by enhancing the activity of the ROS-scavenging system. The ROS-scavenging system mainly incorporates enzymatic (e.g. APX, DHAR, MDHAR, GR, CAT, and SOD) and non-enzymatic (e.g. AsA, GSH, FLA, CAR, and TP) antioxidants. APX, DHAR, MDHAR, and GR principally drive the AsA-GSH cycle, which in turn modulates the redox balance in plant cells; while SOD and CAT directly scavenge O2.-and H2O2, respectively (Gupta et al., 2018; Hasanuzzaman et al., 2020). Likewise, lipid-soluble non-enzymatic antioxidants (e.g. CAR) quench ROS produced by biomembrane via single electron transfer in thylakoids, whereas water-soluble enzymatic antioxidants (e.g. AsA, GSH, FLA, and TP) can eliminate ROS in the cytosol (Bobrovskikh et al., 2020; Sabagh et al., 2021), thus maintaining redox balance in both biomembrane and cytosol to avoid the oxidative damage of plant cells under HS conditions. In this study, under non-HS conditions, SNP alone up-regulated the expression of GR1 (Figure 4H), activities of APX and DHAR (Figures 4A, C), and content of CAR (Figure 7B), indicating that the SNP-irrigated maize seedlings had a higher activity of ROS-scavenging system. In addition, the expression of genes (APX1, CAT1, and SOD4) (Figures 4B, 5B, D), activities of enzymes (APX, DHAR, CAT, and SOD) (Figures 4A, C, 5A, C), and content of antioxidants (CAR and TP) (Figures 7B, C) were down-regulated by PAG, HA, SP, or HT, further supporting the hypothesis that NO and H2S crosstalk maintained a higher activity of ROS-scavenging system in maize seedlings under non-HS conditions. Similarly, NO and H2S cooperate to enhance thermotolerance in wheat seedlings by reducing glucose sensitivity and oxidative stress via the AsA-GSH cycle (Iqbal et al., 2021). Therefore, the enhanced activity of the ROS-scavenging system by NO and H2S crosstalk laid the foundation for the acquisition of subsequent thermotolerance in maize seedlings.

In the same way, under HS conditions, the SNP-irrigated maize seedlings maintained higher gene expression of the DHAR and GR1 (Figure 4D, H) activities of enzymes (APX, GR, and CAT) (Figures 4A, G, 5A), contents of non-enzymatic antioxidants (AsA, GSH, FLA, CAR, and TP) (Figures 6, 7), and a lower level of O2.- and H2O2 (Figures 8A, B), thus improving the thermotolerance in maize seedlings (Figures 3, 4). Adversely, APX1 and DHAR expression (Figures 4B, D), enzyme (APX, GR, CAT, and SOD) activities (Figures 4A, G, 5B, D), and non-enzymatic antioxidants (AsA, GSH, and TP) contents (Figures 6A, C, 7C) were weakened by PAG, HA, SP, and HT, followed by maintaining a lower activity of ROS-scavenging system and a higher level of O2.- and H2O2 (Figures 8A, B), thus reducing the thermotolerance in maize seedlings (Figures 3, 4). Similarly, in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Irena) seedlings, NO stimulated LCD and DCD activities, which in turn increased the endogenous level of H2S, followed by enhancing the activities of GR, POD, SOD, and CAT, thus reducing H2O2 and O2.- levels under osmotic stress (Khan et al., 2017). NO-treated bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon (L). Pers.) had higher H2S accumulation, enzymes (SOD, CAT, POD, and GR) activities, and GSH level, compared with the control, therefore maintaining a lower level of ROS (i.e. H2O2 and O2.-) (Shi et al., 2014). In addition, the foliar spraying of ethylene enhanced the thermotolerance in rice seedlings by regulating antioxidant enzyme activity, osmolytes, and photosynthetic metabolism via crosstalk with NO and H2S (Gautam et al., 2022a). These investigations further support the fact that NO and H2S crosstalk enhanced the activity of the ROS-scavenging system in plants, suggesting that the ROS-scavenging system played a key role in the NO and H2S crosstalk-evoked thermotolerance in maize seedlings. The mechanism underlying NO and H2S crosstalk-evoked thermotolerance in maize seedlings is presented in Figure 9.

Conclusions

In summary, NO increased H2S level by activating the gene expression of LCD1 and activities of LCD and DCD, while H2S had no significant effect on the gene expression and activity of NR, indicating NO could trigger the LCD/H2S signaling pathway in maize seedlings under non-HS conditions. NO evoked thermotolerance in maize seedlings and this evocation was weakened by H2S inhibitors and scavengers, further supporting the NO and H2S crosstalk in the acquirement of thermotolerance in maize seedlings. Moreover, the vitality of the ROS-scavenging system was enhanced by NO under both non-HS and HS conditions, but it was reduced by H2S inhibitors and scavengers, implying the key role of the ROS-scavenging system in the NO and H2S crosstalk-evoked thermotolerance in maize seedlings.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary files, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author contributions

Z-GL conceived and designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. Y-YS performed the experiments. J-QW analyzed the data. R-HX drew the figures. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was funded by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32160065).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Ahmed, M., Fahad, S., Ali, M. A., Hussain, S., Tariq, M., Ilyas, F., et al. (2021). Hydrogen sulfide: A novel gaseous molecule for plant adaptation to stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 40, 2485–2501. doi: 10.1007/s00344-020-10284-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ashraf, M. (2021). Thermotolerance in plants: Potential physio-biochemical and molecular markers for crop improvement. Environ. Ex.p Bot. 186, 104454. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104454

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Asthir, B. (2015). Mechanisms of heat tolerance in crop plants. Biol. Plant 59, 620–628. doi: 10.1007/s10535-015-0539-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bobrovskikh, A., Zubairova, U., Kolodkin, A., Doroshkov, A. (2020). Subcellular compartmentalization of the plant antioxidant system: an integrated overview. PeerJ 8, e9451. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9451

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bradford, M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye-binding. Anal. Biochem. 59, 248–254.

Google Scholar

Bruand, C., Meilhoc, E. (2019). Nitric oxide in plants: pro- or anti-senescence. J. Exp. Bot. 70, 4419–4427. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz117

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, T., Shi, J., Dong, Y., Ma, Y., Peng, Y., Hu, X., et al. (2018). Hydrogen sulfide enhances poplar tolerance to high-temperature stress by increasingS-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR) activity and reducing reactive oxygen/nitrogen damage. Plant Growth Regul. 84, 11–23. doi: 10.1007/s10725-017-0316-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gautam, H., Fatma, M., Sehar, Z., Mir, I. R., Khan, N. A. (2022a). Hydrogen sulfide, ethylene, and nitric oxide regulate redox homeostasis and protect photosynthetic metabolism under high temperature stress in rice plants. Antioxidants 11, 1478. doi: 10.3390/antiox11081478

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gautam, H., Fatma, M., Sehar, Z., Iqbal, N., Albaqami, M., Khan, N. A. (2022b). Exogenously-sourced ethylene positively modulates photosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, and antioxidant defense to enhance heat tolerance in rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 1031. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gupta, K. J., Kaladhar, V. C., Fitzpatrick, T. B., Fernie, A. R., Møller, I. M., Loake, G. J. (2022). Nitric oxide regulation of plant metabolism. Mol. Plant 15, 228–242. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2021.12.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gupta, D. K., Palma, J. M., Corpas, F. J. (2018). Antioxidants and antioxidant enzymes in higher plants (Cham: Springer).

Google Scholar

Haider, S., Iqbal, J., Naseer, S., Yaseen, T., Shaukat, M., Bibi, H., et al. (2021). Molecular mechanisms of plant tolerance to heat stress: current landscape and future perspectives. Plant Cell Rep. 40, 2247–2271. doi: 10.1007/s00299-021-02696-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hasanuzzaman, M., Bhuyan, M. H. M. B., Parvin, K., Bhuiyan, T. F., Anee, T. I., Nahar, K., et al. (2020). Regulation of ROS metabolism in plants under environmental stress: a review of recent experimental evidence. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21, 8695. doi: 10.3390/ijms21228695

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hasanuzzaman, M., Nahar, K., Alam, M. M., Roychowdhury, R., Fujita, M. (2013). Physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of heat stress tolerance in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 9643–9684. doi: 10.3390/ijms14059643

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, D., Huo, J., Liao, W. (2021). Hydrogen sulfide: Roles in plant abiotic stress response and crosstalk with other signals. Plant Sci. 302, 11073. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110733

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Iqbal, N., Umar, S., Khan, N. A., Corpas, F. J. (2021). Nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide coordinately reduce glucose sensitivity and decrease oxidative stress via ascorbate-glutathione cycle in heat-stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum l.) plants. Antioxidants (Basel) 10 (1), 108. doi: 10.3390/antiox10010108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khan, M. N., Mobin, M., Abbas, Z. K., Siddiqui, M. H. (2017). Nitric oxide-induced synthesis of hydrogen sulfide alleviates osmotic stress in wheat seedlings through sustaining antioxidant enzymes, osmolyte accumulation and cysteine homeostasis. Nitric. Oxide 68, 91–102. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2017.01.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kolbert, Z., Barroso, J. B., Brouquisse, R., Corpas, F. J., Gupta, K. J., Lindermayr, C., et al. (2019). A forty year journey: the generation and roles of NO in plants. Nitric. Oxide 93, 53–70. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2019.09.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z. G. (2019). “Measurement of signaling molecules calcium ion, reactive sulfur species, reactive carbonyl species, reactive nitrogen species, and reactive oxygen species in plants,” in Plant signaling molecules: role and regulation under stressful environments. Eds. Khan, M. R., Reddy, P. S., Ferrante, A., Khan, N. A. (Cambridge: Elsevier), 83–103.

Google Scholar

Li, Z. G. (2022). Role of methylglyoxal and its detoxification system in plant thermotolerance. Acta Physiol. Plant 44, 69. doi: 10.1007/s11738-022-03407-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z. G., Luo, L. J., Sun, Y. F. (2015). Signal crosstalk between nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide may be involved in hydrogen peroxide-induced thermotolerance in maize seedlings. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 62, 507–514. doi: 10.1134/S1021443715030127

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z. G., Min, X., Zhou, Z. H. (2016). Hydrogen sulfide: A signal molecule in plant cross-adaptation. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1621. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01621

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, J., Hou, Z., Liu, G., Hou, L., Liu, X. (2012). Hydrogen sulfide may function downstream of nitric oxide in ethylene-induced stomatal closure inVicia fabaL. J. Integr. Agr. 11, 1644–1653. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(12)60167-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, H., Wang, J., Liu, J., Liu, T., Xue, S. (2021). Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) signaling in plant development and stress responses. aBIOTECH 2, 32–63. doi: 10.1007/s42994-021-00035-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z. G., Xiang, R. H., Wang, J. Q. (2021). Hydrogen sulfide-phytohormone interaction in plants under physiological and stress conditions. J. Plant Growth Regul. 40, 2476–2484. doi: 10.1007/s00344-021-10350-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z. G., Yang, S. Z., Long, W. B., Yang, G. X., Shen, Z. Z. (2013). Hydrogen sulfide may be a novel downstream signal molecule in nitric oxide-induced heat tolerance of maize (Zea mays l.) seedlings. Plant Cell Environ. 36, 1564–1572. doi: 10.1111/pce.12092

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mishra, S., Chowdhary, A. A., Bhau, B. S., Srivastava, V. (2022). Hydrogen sulphide-mediated alleviation and its interplay with other signalling molecules during temperature stress. Plant Biol. (Stuttg) 24, 569–575. doi: 10.1111/plb.13406

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mishra, V., Singh, P., Tripathi, D. K., Corpas, F. J., Singh, V. P. (2021). Nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide: an indispensable combination for plant functioning. Trends Plant Sci. 26, 1270–1285. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.07.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mukherjee, S. (2019). Recent advancements in the mechanism of nitric oxide signaling associated with hydrogen sulfide and melatonin crosstalk during ethylene-induced fruit ripening in plants. Nitric. Oxide 82, 25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2018.11.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Muñoz-Vargas, M. A., González-Gordo, S., Cañas, A., López-Jaramillo, J., Palma, J. M., Corpas, F. J. (2018). Endogenous hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is up-regulated during sweet pepper (Capsicum annuumL.) fruit ripeningIn vitroAnalysis shows that NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase (ICDH) activity is inhibited by H2S and NO. Nitric. Oxide 81, 36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2018.10.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Parankusam, S., Adimulam, S. S., Bhatnagar-Mathur, P., Sharma, K. K. (2017). Nitric oxide (NO) in plant heat stress tolerance: current knowledge and perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1582. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01582

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peng, R., Bian, Z., Zhou, L., Cheng, W., Hai, N., Yang, C., et al. (2016). Hydrogen sulfide enhances nitric oxide-induced tolerance of hypoxia in maize (Zea maysL.). Plant Cell Rep. 35, 2325–2340. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-2037-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qiu, X. M., Sun, Y. Y., Li, Z. G. (2022). Signaling molecule glutamic acid initiates the expression of genes related to methylglyoxal scavenging and osmoregulation systems in maize seedlings. Plant Signal. Behav. 17, e1994257. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2021.1994257

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sabagh, A. E. L., Hossain, A., Iqbal, M. A., Barutçular, C., Islam, M. S., Çig, F., et al. (2021). “Maize adaptability to heat stress under changing climate,” in Plant stress physiology. Ed. Hossain, A. (London: IntechOpen), pp 1–pp24.

Google Scholar

Saidi, Y., Finka, A., Goloubinoff, P. (2011). Heat perception and signalling in plants: a tortuous path to thermotolerance. New Phytol. 190, 556–565. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03571.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sehar, Z., Gautam, H., Iqba, N., Alvi, A. F., Jahan, B., Fatma, M., et al. (2022). The functional interplay between ethylene, hydrogen sulfide, and sulfur in plant heat stress tolerance. Biomolecules 12, 678. doi: 10.3390/biom12050678

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shahi, S., Srivastava, M. (2018). Influence of foliar application of manganese on growth, pigment content, and nitrate reductase activity of Vigna radiata (L.) r. wilczek under salinity. J. Plant Nutr. 41, 1397–1404. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2018.1454470

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, H., Ye, T., Chan, Z. (2014). Nitric oxide-activated hydrogen sulfide is essential for cadmium stress response in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon(L). pers.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 74, 99–107. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.11.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, S., Singh, V. P., Tripathi, D. K., Prasad, S. M., Chauhan, D. K., Dubey, N. K. (2021). Hydrogen sulfide in plant biology: past and present (London: Elsevier).

Google Scholar

Singh, V. P., Singh, S., Tripathi, D. K., Romero-Puertas, M. C., Sandalio, L. M. (2022). Nitric oxide in plant physiology: An ancient molecule with emerging roles (London: Elsevier).

Google Scholar

Strable, J., Scanlon, M. J. (2009). Maize (Zea mays): a model organism for basic and applied research in plant biology. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2009 (10), pdb.emo132. doi: 10.1101/pdb.emo132

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, K. K., Zhu, D. B., Yao, G. F., Hu, K. D., Zhang, H. (2018). Sulfur dioxide acts as an antioxidant and delays programmed cell death in wheat aleurone layers upstream of H2S and NO signaling pathways. Biol. Plant 62, 809–816. doi: 10.1007/s10535-018-0796-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Szymanska, R., Slesak, I., Orzechowska, A., Kruk, J. (2017). Physiological and biochemical responses to high light and temperature stress in plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 139, 165–177. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.05.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tiwari, Y. K., Yadav, S. K. (2019). High temperature stress tolerance in maize (Zea mays l.): physiological and molecular mechanisms. J. Plant Biol. 62, 93–102. doi: 10.1007/s12374-018-0350-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wahid, A., Gelani, S., Ashraf, M., Foolad, M. R. (2007). Heat tolerance in plants: An overview. Environ. Exp. Bot. 61, 199–223. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Li, L., Cui, W., Xu, S., Shen, W., Wang, R. (2012). Hydrogen sulfide enhances alfalfa (Medicago sativa) tolerance against salinity during seed germination by nitric oxide pathway. Plant Soil 351, 107–119. doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-0936-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Ye, X. Y., Qiu, X. M., Li, G. (2019). Methylglyoxal triggers the heat tolerance in maize seedlings by driving AsA-GSH cycle and reactive oxygen species-/methylglyoxal-scavenging system. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 138, 91–99. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.02.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wani, S. H., Kumar, V. (2020). Heat stress tolerance in plants: physiological, molecular and genetic perspectives (Chichester: Wiley).

Google Scholar

Xie, M. J., He, F., Zhang, L. P., Jin, Z. P., Liu, D. M., Pei, Y. X. (2018). Effects of H2S and NO on resistance to high temperature stress in Chinese cabbage. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 37, 1079–1085.

Google Scholar

Yadav, S. K., Tiwari, Y. K., Singh, V., Patil, A. A., Shanker, A. K., Lakshmi, N. J., et al. (2018). Physiological and biochemical basis of extended and sudden heat stress tolerance in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India. Sect. B Biol. Sci. 88, 249–263.

Google Scholar

Ye, X. Y., Qiu, X. M., Sun, Y. Y., Li, Z. G. (2020). Interplay between hydrogen sulfide and methylglyoxal initiates thermotolerance inmaize seedlings bymodulating reactive oxidative species and osmolyte metabolism. Protoplasma 257, 1415–1432. doi: 10.1007/s00709-020-01516-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, J., Lu, Z., Wang, L., Jin, B. (2020). Plant responses to heat stress: physiology, transcription, noncoding RNAs, and epigenetics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 117. doi: 10.3390/ijms22010117

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, Z. H., Wang, Y., Ye, X. Y., Li, Z. G. (2018). Signaling molecule hydrogen sulfide improves seed germination and seedling growth of maize (Zea mays l.) under high temperature by inducing antioxidant system and osmolyte biosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1288.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Keywords: nitric oxide, hydrogen sulfide, reactive oxygen species, reactive oxygen species-scavenging system, maize seedlings

Citation: Sun Y-Y, Wang J-Q, Xiang R-H and Li Z-G (2022) Key role of reactive oxygen species-scavenging system in nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide crosstalk-evoked thermotolerance in maize seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 13:967968. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.967968

Received: 13 June 2022; Accepted: 29 September 2022;
Published: 07 November 2022.

Edited by:

Francisco J. Corpas, Department of Biochemistry (CSIC), Spain

Reviewed by:

Nafees A. Khan, Aligarh Muslim University, India
Nasir M. Khan, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia

Copyright © 2022 Sun, Wang, Xiang and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zhong-Guang Li, zhongguang_li@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.