Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol., 07 October 2021
Sec. Systems Endocrinology

Association Between 25(OH)Vitamin D, HbA1c and Albuminuria in Diabetes Mellitus: Data From a Population-Based Study (VIDAMAZON)

  • Endocrinology Division, University Hospital João de Barros Barreto, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil

Background: The effect of glycemic control on diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is well known. Recent evidence has suggested that Vitamin D (VD) may have a nephroprotective effect in diabetes, but the relationship between VD, glycemic control, and albuminuria has yet to be clarified.

Objective: Evaluate the relationship between 25-hydroxy-vitamin D [25(OH)D], HbA1c, and albuminuria in Diabetes Mellitus (DM).

Patients and Methods: Cross-sectional study with 1576 individuals with DM who had 25(OH)D, HbA1c, and albuminuria levels measured. Patients with abnormal creatinine levels were excluded, in order to avoid interference on VD levels by impaired kidney function.

Results: Patients with HbA1c ≥7% had lower 25(OH)D when compared to patients with HbA1c <7% (29.7 ± 10.2 vs 28.1 ± 9.9 ng/ml, p = 0.003) and 25(OH)D levels seems to predict 1.5% of HbA1c behavior. The 25(OH)D concentrations in patients with normoalbuminuria were higher than the levels observed in those with micro or macroalbuminuria (29.8 ± 9.0 vs 26.8 ± 8.6 and 25.1 ± 7.6, respectively, p = 0.001), patients who had 25(OH)D <20 ng/ml and 25(OH)D <30 ng/ml were at a higher risk of presenting albuminuria [OR = 2.8 (95% CI = 1.6 – 4.9), p<0.001, and OR = 2.1 (95% CI = 1.3 - 4.6), p<0.001, respectively]. In our regression model, albuminuria was influenced by HbA1c (r² = 0.076, p<0.00001) and 25(OH)D (r² = 0.018, p = 0.002) independently.

Conclusion: Our study found an association between vitamin D levels, HbA1c and DKD. Additionally, our data suggest that the association between urinary albumin excretion and vitamin D levels is independent of glycemic control in patients with diabetes. Even though our patients presented normal creatinine levels, it is necessary further prospective studies to confirm if this association precedes or not the loss of renal function.

Background

The effect of glycemic control on diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is well known. Large clinical trials, such as DCCT in type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and UKPDS in type 2 DM (13), clearly demonstrated the benefits of improving glycemic control on primary and secondary prevention of DKD. Recent evidence has suggested that Vitamin D (VD) may have a nephroprotective effect in DM (4, 5), and other studies have associated 25-hydroxy-vitamin D [25(OH)VD] levels with albuminuria (6, 7), but it is not a consensus (8).

Several mechanisms are suggested to explain the action of VD in reducing urinary albumin excretion in diabetic patients, including the suppression of renin transcription, proliferative and fibrotic effects, or a combination of these (9, 10). However, there are few evidence showing that VD deficiency or insufficiency in diabetic patients could be associated with microalbuminuria (11) and macroalbuminuria (3) and none of them was a population-based study.

The relationship between 25(OH)D levels and glycemic control also remains unclear. While cross-sectional studies have suggested a possible association (12, 13), others have not (14, 15). In addition, the attempts to supplement VD to improve glycemic control have also shown conflicting results (16, 17). Furthermore, a recently published meta-analysis found that VD supplementation may prevent type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), showing the importance of this subject (18). Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the relationship between serum 25(OH)D levels, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and albuminuria in a based-population study with diabetic patients.

Methods

Study Design and Data Collection

A cross-sectional study was performed, on a populational basis, to evaluate the association between the serum levels of 25(OH)D, HbA1c, and albuminuria in individuals with Diabetes Mellitus. This study was approved by University Hospital João de Barros Barreto ethics committee, CAEE number 66977717.8.0000.0017, conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and the standards of the National Health Council.

The present study used the large VIDAMAZON database, which includes data from over 30,000 individuals and has already provided evidence on other VD aspects (19). We included 1,576 diabetic patients who had their diagnosis confirmed by laboratory data and medical history, but we had no access to their medical records and our laboratory data did not contain antibodies related to type 1 DM and C-peptide. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association criteria (20). Patients with abnormal serum creatinine levels were excluded. Those with a previous history of acute or chronic kidney failure and chronic liver disease were excluded, as well as pregnant women and patients who supplemented vitamin D.

We included 1,576 subjects with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus of both sexes and from different age groups. They had 25(OH)D serum levels, glycated hemoglobin, serum creatinine, fast glycemia, and albuminuria measured at a local laboratory service from August of 2017 to July of 2018. Albuminuria samples were available only in 496 patients. Information regarding BMI and living zone were also collected.

Assay

Serum 25(OH)D was measured quantitatively by the following kit: DiaSorin LIAISON 25(OH)Vitamin D TOTAL chemiluminescence immunoassay (DiaSorin, Stillwater, MN, USA) (21). DiaSorin LIAISON is one of the methods to evaluate 25(OH)D tested by DEQAS (Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme), the largest specialist external quality assessment (proficiency testing) scheme for the vitamin D metabolites 25(OH)D and a 1.25(OH)2D (22).

In data analysis, Vitamin D normal values were stated according to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and Endocrine Society (ES) criteria. IOM established Vitamin D healthy serum values as ≥ 20 ng/dl (23, 24) and ES defines values ≥ 30ng/mL as sufficient, values between 20 and 30 ng/mL as insufficiency and values < 20 ng/mL as deficiency (25). Albuminuria was determined by turbidimetric immunoassay. The creatinine was determined through Jaffé technique (26, 27). Normoalbuminuria was defined as < 30mg/g creatinine, microalbuminuria ≥ 30 mg/g creatinine and < 300 mg/g creatinine, and macroalbuminuria as ≥ 300 mg/g creatinine. HbA1C was measured by ionic exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (28). The calculation of Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) was done by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) (29).

Statistical Analysis

Variables with normal distribution were arranged in the form of a mean and standard deviation, while variables with non-normal distribution were arranged in the form of median and interquartile range. For the comparison of means, the Student’s-T test was used for variables with normal distribution and the Mann-Whitney test for variables with non-normal distribution. Simple linear regression and stepwise multiple regression analysis were also performed to evaluate the influence of 25(OH)VD levels in variables such as HbA1c and albuminuria. Simple linear regressions analysis was carried out to assess the influence of 25(OH)VD levels on HbA1c and albuminuria, using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to define variables normality. Additionally, a stepwise multiple regression model was developed, using 25(OH)VD and HbA1c as covariates to determine if these variables were independently associated with albuminuria. The ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare the variables between three subgroups according to normality. Albuminuria data ​​were presented in the form of a base logarithm 10.

The SPSS Statistics 22® (IBM Corp.) and SigmaPlot 12.0 (Systat Software, Chicago, IL) programs were used for statistical analysis. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Clinical and laboratory characteristics of all patients are presented in Table 1. According to Hb1Ac levels, 432 (27%) of patients presented HbAc1 levels < 7%, while 846 (54%) had their serum levels between 7 and 10% and 298 (19%) presented HbA1c > 10%.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Patients’ clinical and laboratory characteristics.

We observed that patients with lower HbA1c levels presented higher Vitamin D values. In our analysis, those patients who presented HbA1c >7% had significantly lower 25(OH)VD concentration when compared to patients who had HbA1c <7% (28 ± 10 vs 29.5 ± 10 ng/ml, p = 0.003) (Figure 1). Furthermore, using different cut-off points to normal VD levels, our data demonstrate that glycemic control assessed by HbA1c was better in patients with higher 25(OH)VD levels (Figure 2).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Comparison of vitamin D levels according to patient’s HbA1c range. Statistical test used: Mann–Whitney U test.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Comparison of HbA1c levels, according to Vitamin D status. (A) = defined by the 97.5 percentile, indicated by the Institute of Medicine. Statistical test used: Mann–Whitney U test. (B) = according to Endocrine Society criteria. Statistical test used: Kruskal-Wallis test. Deficiency = 25(OH)VD<20 ng/ml; Insufficiency = 25(OH)VD between 20 and 30 ng/ml; Sufficiency = 25(OH)VD ≥ 30 ng/ml. *p < 0.05 between all groups.

Our simple linear regression model using 25(OH)VD and HbA1c showed that an increase of 10 ng/dL in 25(OH)VD concentration was associated with a decrease of 0.25% in HbA1c. Besides that, 25(OH)VD levels seemed to be able to predict 1.5% of HbA1c behavior (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Correlation and linear regression between Vitamin D levels and HbA1c.

We have found a relationship between albuminuria and VD levels. The 25(OH)VD concentration in patients with normoalbuminuria was higher than the levels observed in those with micro or macroalbuminuria (29.8 ± 9 vs 26.8 ± 8.6 and 25.1 ± 7.6, respectively) (Figure 4) and patients who had 25(OH)VD <20 ng/ml and 25(OH)VD <30 ng/ml were at a higher risk of presenting albuminuria [OR = 2.8 (95% CI = 1.6 – 4.9), p<0.001, and OR = 2.1 (95% CI = 1.3 - 4.6), p<0.001, respectively]. In addition, our simple linear regression model using albuminuria and VD demonstrated that 3% of albuminuria behavior could be explained by 25(OH)VD (Figure 5).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Comparison between vitamin D levels according to albuminuric stages. *p < 0.05 between normoalbuminuria vs microalbuminuria and vs macroalbuminuria. Statistical test used: Kruskal-Wallis test.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5 Linear regression between vitamin D levels and albuminuria.

In a stepwise multiple regression model, albuminuria was found to be influenced by HbA1c (B = 0.253, r² = 0.076, p<0.00001) and 25(OH)VD (B = -0.137, r² = 0.018, p = 0.002) independently.

Discussion

Our data demonstrated that patients who had good glycemic control had higher VD levels, with an increase of 10 ng/dL in VD concentration being associated with a decrease of 0.25% in HbA1c. Moreover, our data showed that 25(OH)D concentration ranges established by the Endocrine Society were able to predict better glycemic control evaluated by HbA1c, suggesting that levels > 30ng/dL could be associated with a VD maximum effect on glycemic control.

Cross-sectional studies conducted by Luo et al. (14) and Al-Showmer et al. (15) found no significant relationship between 25(OH)D levels and HbA1c. However, both studies were conducted with small samples (109 and 129 patients, respectively). In contrast, Salih et al. (13), studying 310 patients with T2DM, showed a high prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in those patients when compared to controls. In addition, Darraj et al. (12), in an analytical cross-sectional study with 309 T2DM patients in Saudi Arabia, has found that VD deficiency was an independent predictor for poor glycemic control after adjustment for hypertension, diabetes duration, and diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy. They have not evaluated DKD. The present study used the large VIDAMAZON database (19), being, as we are aware, the first population-based study to establish the association of higher VD levels with better glycemic control.

Our study demonstrated a clear association between higher VD levels and better glycemic control, showing the importance of studying this issue in detail. Nevertheless, it is still difficult to recommend VD supplementation to all prediabetics and diabetics patients. In fact, there is no consensus regarding the relationship between glycemic control and vitamin D supplementation, with studies pointing to opposite directions (16, 17, 30, 31). Alaidarous et al. (32), studying patients with T2DM have found that VD levels were affected by diabetes duration. A recently published meta-analysis found that VD supplementation may prevent T2DM (18), bringing VD reposition closer to our clinical practice.

One hypothesis that could explain our results is that VD could act in insulin resistance, and consequently decreasing glycemic values. The action of VD on insulin resistance has been documented in several studies (3335). In a study with 126 healthy patients, the authors demonstrated a positive correlation of VD with insulin sensitivity and a negative effect with VD deficiency on beta-cell function (36). Vitamin D also acts directly on beta-cells facilitating insulin secretion from the binding of 1.25(OH)2D3 to its nuclear VD receptor and indirectly by regulating the flow of calcium in those cells (37, 38). Changes in the concentrations of this mineral can lead to peripheral resistance to insulin action, by reduction of signal transduction in glucose transport activity.

In our study, VD concentration in patients with normoalbuminuria was higher than in those with micro and macroalbuminuria. We also found that diabetic patients who had VD insufficiency and deficiency were at a higher risk of developing DKD.

In a cross-sectional analysis, Xie et al. (39) in 2019 studied a group of 351 T2DM patients with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) > 60 mL/min and found that low VD levels were independently associated with DKD. In a previous study, we also found a direct relationship between VD and albuminuria in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients with normal GFR, in which those with low VD levels had higher levels of albuminuria, and VD became lower as DKD stages worsened (6). The current study corroborates these findings in a population base. Although vitamin D supplementation might be useful as adjuvant therapy for albuminuria, this relationship is still uncertain, highlighting the need for further studies and with a larger sample size (40).

Our results agree with De Boer et al. (7), who found an association between patients with low 25(OH)D levels (< 20ng/mL) and higher risk of microalbuminuria. In addition, Verrotti et al. (41) studied VD levels in 22 patients with microalbuminuria, 24 patients with normoalbuminuria, and 24 healthy controls, in which the first group showed lower levels of 25(OH)D. In contrast, Joergensen et al. (8) analyzed 220 T1DM patients diagnosed from 1979 to 1984 and did not find an association between albuminuria and VD deficiency, but their results could have been affected by long duration storage of VD samples.

Vitamin D has an important role in DKD. It is well known that diabetic patients with DKD have urinary excretion of VD and VD binding protein, suggesting an impairment reuptake in proximal tubule cells (42). It has been recently described in the literature that VD seems to have a nephroprotective effect (4, 5, 43). One possible mechanism is an action as a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (44). In addition, VD may act lowering oxidative stress by improving renal antioxidant capacity, preventing damage to podocytes by inhibiting hyperglycemia-induced apoptosis, promoting anti-inflammatory action, and improving endothelial function (9, 10, 4547). Those findings are corroborated by our regression model, in which both HbA1c and VD were selected as independent variables influencing albuminuria.

Some studies with large samples evaluated the association between VD levels and DKD (4850). Hong et al. (48), studying retrospectively 1392 patients with T2DM found an association between VD levels, albuminuria, and DKD. In parallel, Wang et al. (50), in an observational study evaluating 4033 patients, described those patients with low VD levels showed a stronger association between lead levels and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio. Both studies included patients with impaired renal function. In our study, we described the association between VD levels, HbA1c, and albuminuria in patients with normal creatinine levels, suggesting that VD is linked to albuminuria before kidney function declines. Our data must be evaluated with caution because we were not capable to exclude subclinical forms of renal insufficiency.

The strengths of our work include a great number of patients in a populational study, excluding patients with evident impaired kidney function (high serum creatinine levels), in order to avoid its interference on VD metabolism. Our main limitation was the difficulty to access information about other factors that could interfere with VD levels (sun exposure, dietary information, and diabetes duration). The 1,576 patients with diabetes included in this work had their diagnosis confirmed by laboratory data and medical history, but we had no access to their medical records and our laboratory data did not contain antibodies related to T1DM and C-peptide. Therefore, our work did not differentiate diabetes types. In addition, we had a small number of patients with macroalbuminuria.

Conclusion

Our study found an association between vitamin D levels, HbA1c and DKD. Additionally, our data suggest that the association between urinary albumin excretion and vitamin D levels is independent of glycemic control in patients with diabetes. Even though our patients presented normal creatinine levels and in consideration of the limited sensitivity and specificity of urinary albumin excretion to correctly identify incipient DKD, it is necessary further prospective studies to confirm if this association precedes or not the loss of renal function.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by University Hospital João de Barros Barreto ethics committee. Written informed consent from the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin was not required to participate in this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author Contributions

All persons who meet authorship criteria are listed as authors, and all authors certify that they have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for the content, including participation in the concept, design, analysis, writing, or revision of the manuscript. KF, JF, HB, and NQ took part in conception and design of study. AA, GN, PC, MR, VL, IL, DG, and AC were responsible for acquisition of data, while WS, ÍA, NMS, PF, NJS, and JA have done the analysis and interpretation of data. ML, JF, FS, LM, VA, FS, LS, FM, and MO have drafted the manuscript together. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We thank Amaral Costa Laboratory and Programa de Pós Graduação em Oncologia e Ciências Médicas of HUJBB for their contribution to the research.

Abbreviations

25(OH)D, 25-hydroxy-vitamin D; DKD, Diabetic Kidney Disease; DM, Diabetes Mellitus; GFR, Glomerular Filtration Rate; HbA1c, Glycated Hemoglobin; T1DM, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus; T2DM, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; VD, Vitamin D.

References

1. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HAW, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, et al. Association of Glycaemia With Macrovascular and Microvascular Complications of Type 2 Diabetes (UKPDS 35): Prospective Observational Study. BMJ (2000) 321:405–12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Nathan DM. For the DCCT/EDIC Research Group. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study at 30 Years: Overview. Diabetes Care (2014) 37:9–16. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Engelen L, Schalkwijk CG, Eussen SJPM, Scheijen JLJM, Soedamah-Muthu SS, Chaturvedi N, et al. Low 25-Hydroxyvitamin D2 and 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Levels Are Independently Associated With Macroalbuminuria, But Not With Retinopathy and Macrovascular Disease in Type 1 Diabetes: The EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study. Cardiovasc Diabetol (2015) 14:67. doi: 10.1186/s12933-015-0231-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. de Zeeuw D, Agarwal R, Amdahl M, Audhya P, Coyne D, Garimella T, et al. Selective Vitamin D Receptor Activation With Paricalcitol for Reduction of Albuminuria in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (VITAL Study): A Randomised Controlled Trial. Lancet (2010) 376:1543–51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61032-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Felício JS, de Oliveira AF, Peixoto AS, de Souza ACCB, Abrahão Neto JF, de Melo FTC, et al. Albuminuria Reduction After High Dose of Vitamin D in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pilot Study. Front Endocrinol (2017) 8:199. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00199

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Felício JS, Luz RM, de Melo FTC, de Souza Resende F, de Oliveira AF, Peixoto AS, et al. Vitamin D on Early Stages of Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Front Endocrinol (2016) 7:149. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2016.00149

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. de Boer IH, Sachs MC, Cleary PA, Hoofnagle AN, Lachin JM, Molitch ME, et al. Circulating Vitamin D Metabolites and Kidney Disease in Type 1 Diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2012) 97:4780–8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2852

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Joergensen C, Hovind P, Schmedes A, Parving H-H, Rossing P. Vitamin D Levels, Microvascular Complications, and Mortality in Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care (2011) 34:1081–5. doi: 10.2337/dc10-2459

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Deng X, Cheng J, Shen M. Vitamin D Improves Diabetic Nephropathy in Rats by Inhibiting Renin and Relieving Oxidative Stress. J Endocrinol Investig (2016) 39:657–66. doi: 10.1007/s40618-015-0414-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Franca Gois P, Wolley M, Ranganathan D, Seguro A. Vitamin D Deficiency in Chronic Kidney Disease: Recent Evidence and Controversies. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2018) 15:1773. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081773

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Ucak S, Sevim E, Ersoy D, Sivritepe R, Basat O, Atay S. Evaluation of the Relationship Between Microalbuminuria and 25-(OH) Vitamin D Levels in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Aging Male (2019) 22:116–20. doi: 10.1080/13685538.2018.1479385

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Darraj H, Badedi M, Poore K, Hummadi A, Khawaji A, Solan Y, et al. Vitamin D Deficiency and Glycemic Control Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Jazan City, Saudi Arabia. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes: Targets Ther (2019) 12:853–62. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S203700

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Salih YA, Rasool MT, Ahmed IH, Mohammed AA. Impact of Vitamin D Level on Glycemic Control in Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 in Duhok. Ann Med Surg (2021) 64:102208. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102208

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Luo C, Wong J, Brown M, Hooper M, Molyneaux L, Yue DK. Hypovitaminosis D in Chinese Type 2 Diabetes: Lack of Impact on Clinical Metabolic Status and Biomarkers of Cellular Inflammation. Diabetes Vasc Dis Res (2009) 6:194–9. doi: 10.1177/1479164109337974

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Al-Shoumer KAAS, Al-Asoosi AA, Ali AH, Nair VS. Does Insulin Resistance in Type 2 Diabetes Alter Vitamin D Status? Prim Care Diabetes (2013) 7:283–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2013.04.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. de Melo FTC, Felício KM, de Queiroz NNM, de Rider Brito HA, Neto JFA, Janaú LC, et al. High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation on Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: Is There an Improvement in Glycemic Control? Curr Diabetes Rev (2021) 17:1–8. doi: 10.2174/1573399817666210106102643

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Aljabri KS, Bokhari SA, Khan MJ. Glycemic Changes After Vitamin D Supplementation in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Vitamin D Deficiency. Ann Saudi Med (2010) 30:454–8. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.72265

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Barbarawi M, Zayed Y, Barbarawi O, Bala A, Alabdouh A, Gakhal I, et al. Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on the Incidence of Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2020) 105:2857–68. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa335

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Neves Marques de Queiroz N, Trindade Cunha de Melo F, de Souza Resende F, Corrêa Janaú L, Jorge Kzan de Souza Neto N, Nascimento de Lemos M, et al. Vitamin D and PTH: Data From a Cross-Sectional Study in an Equatorial Population. Endocr Connect (2020) 9:667–75. doi: 10.1530/EC-20-0206

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021. Diabetes Care (2021) 44:S15–33. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. DiaSorin. LIAISON 25 OH Vitamin D TOTAL Assay [Brochure]. Stillwater, MN, USA: DiaSorin (2019). Available at: https://www.diasorin.com/en/node/8476.

Google Scholar

22. DEQAS. Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme. DEQAS Review 2016/2017. London, UK: DEQAS (2017). Available at: http://www.deqas.org/downloads/DEQAS%20Review%20October%202017.pdf.

Google Scholar

23. American Academy of Pediatrics. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Pediatrics (2012) 130:e1424–4. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2590

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Ross AC, Manson JE, Abrams SA, Aloia JF, Brannon PM, Clinton SK, et al. The 2011 Report on Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D From the Institute of Medicine: What Clinicians Need to Know. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2011) 96:53–8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2704

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, et al. Evaluation, Treatment, and Prevention of Vitamin D Deficiency: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2011) 96:1911–30. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0385

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Slot C. Plasma Creatinine Determination A New and Specific Jaffe Reaction Method. Scand J Clin Lab Investig (1965) 17:381–7. doi: 10.3109/00365516509077065

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Küme T, Sağlam B, Ergon C, Sisman AR. Evaluation and Comparison of Abbott Jaffe and Enzymatic Creatinine Methods: Could the Old Method Meet the New Requirements? J Clin Lab Anal (2018) 32:e22168. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22168

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Goodall I. HbA1c Standardisation Destination - Global IFCC Standardisation How, Why, Where and When. Clin Biochem Rev (2005) 26:5–19.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

29. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF, Feldman HI, et al. A New Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate. Ann Intern Med (2009) 150:604–12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Felício KM, de Souza ACCB, Neto JFA, de Melo FTC, Carvalho CT, Arbage TP, et al. Glycemic Variability and Insulin Needs in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Supplemented With Vitamin D: A Pilot Study Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring System. Curr Diabetes Rev (2018) 14:395–403. doi: 10.2174/1573399813666170616075013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Gulseth HL, Wium C, Angel K, Eriksen EF, Birkeland KI. Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation on Insulin Sensitivity and Insulin Secretion in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes and Vitamin D Deficiency: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care (2017) 40:872–8. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2302

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Alaidarous TA, Alkahtani NM, Aljuraiban GS, Abulmeaty MMA. Impact of the Glycemic Control and Duration of Type 2 Diabetes on Vitamin D Level and Cardiovascular Disease Risk. J Diabetes Res (2020) 2020:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2020/8431976

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Bikle D. Nonclassic Actions of Vitamin D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2009) 94:26–34. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1454

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Chakhtoura M, Azar ST. The Role of Vitamin D Deficiency in the Incidence, Progression, and Complications of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Int J Endocrinol (2013) 2013:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2013/148673

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Lin Z, Li W. The Roles of Vitamin D and Its Analogs in Inflammatory Diseases. Curr Top Med Chem (2016) 16:1242–61. doi: 10.2174/1568026615666150915111557

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Chiu KC, Chu A, Go VLW, Saad MF. Hypovitaminosis D Is Associated With Insulin Resistance and β Cell Dysfunction. Am J Clin Nutr (2004) 79:820–5. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/79.5.820

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Zemel MB, Sun X. Calcitriol and Energy Metabolism. Nutr Rev (2008) 66:S139–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00099.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Sergeev IN, Rhoten WB. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 Evokes Oscillations of Intracellular Calcium in a Pancreatic Beta-Cell Line. Endocrinology (1995) 136:2852–61. doi: 10.1210/en.136.7.2852

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Xie S, Huang L, Cao W, Hu Y, Sun H, Cao L, et al. Association Between Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Diabetic Kidney Disease in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. PLoS One (2019) 14:e0214728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214728

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Gupta S, Goyal P, Feinn RS, Mattana J. Role of Vitamin D and Its Analogues in Diabetic Nephropathy: A Meta-Analysis. Am J Med Sci (2019) 357:223–9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2018.12.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Verrotti A, Basciani F, Carle F, Morgese G, Chiarelli F. Calcium Metabolism in Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Without and With Persistent Microalbuminuria. J Endocrinol Invest (1999) 22:198–202. doi: 10.1007/BF03343541

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Galuška D, Pácal L, Kaňková K. Pathophysiological Implication of Vitamin D in Diabetic Kidney Disease. Kidney Blood Press Res (2021) 46:152–61. doi: 10.1159/000514286

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Tiryaki Ö, Usalan C, Sayiner ZA. Vitamin D Receptor Activation With Calcitriol for Reducing Urinary Angiotensinogen in Patients With Type 2 Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease. Ren Fail (2016) 38:222–7. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2015.1128250

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Li YC, Qiao G, Uskokovic M, Xiang W, Zheng W, Kong J. Vitamin D: A Negative Endocrine Regulator of the Renin–Angiotensin System and Blood Pressure. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol (2004) 89–90:387–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2004.03.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Lei M, Liu Z, Guo J. The Emerging Role of Vitamin D and Vitamin D Receptor in Diabetic Nephropathy. BioMed Res Int (2020) 2020:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2020/4137268

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Li YC. Podocytes as Target of Vitamin D. Curr Diabetes Rev (2010) 7:35–40. doi: 10.2174/157339911794273964

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Doorenbos CRC, van den Born J, Navis G, de Borst MH. Possible Renoprotection by Vitamin D in Chronic Renal Disease: Beyond Mineral Metabolism. Nat Rev Nephrol (2009) 5:691–700. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2009.185

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Hong S, Kim YB, Choi HS, Jeong T-D, Kim JT, Sung YA. Association of Vitamin D Deficiency With Diabetic Nephropathy. Endocrinol Metab (2021) 36:106–13. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2020.826

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Kim SH, Brodsky IG, Chatterjee R, Kashyap SR, Knowler WC, Liao E, et al. Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Kidney Function in Adults With Prediabetes: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol (2021) 16:1201–9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00420121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Wang B, Wan H, Cheng J, Chen Y, Wang Y, Chen Y, et al. Blood Lead, Vitamin D Status, and Albuminuria in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Environ Pollut (2021) 276:116653. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116653

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: epidemiology, endocrinology, diabetes, vitamin D, HbA1c, albuminuria

Citation: Felício JS, de Rider Britto HA, Cortez PC, de Souza Resende F, de Lemos MN, de Moraes LV, de Aquino VT, de Souza Parente F, de Queiroz NNM, Abrahão Neto JF, de Alcântara AL, da Silva WM, de Souza Neto NJK, Freire Piani PP, de Souza ÍJA, Silva LdSD’A, de Oliveira MCNI, Said NM, Nascimento de Lemos G, de Melo FTC, Gomes DL, Contente Braga de Souza AC, de Sá Oliveira dos Reis M, Leal VSG, Lobato IJC and Felício KM (2021) Association Between 25(OH)Vitamin D, HbA1c and Albuminuria in Diabetes Mellitus: Data From a Population-Based Study (VIDAMAZON). Front. Endocrinol. 12:723502. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.723502

Received: 19 July 2021; Accepted: 16 September 2021;
Published: 07 October 2021.

Edited by:

Marcus M. Seldin, University of California, Irvine, United States

Reviewed by:

Daniela Patrizia Foti, University of Catanzaro, Italy
Eusebio Chiefari, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Italy

Copyright © 2021 Felício, de Rider Britto, Cortez, de Souza Resende, de Lemos, de Moraes, de Aquino, de Souza Parente, de Queiroz, Abrahão Neto, de Alcântara, da Silva, de Souza Neto, Freire Piani, de Souza, Silva, de Oliveira, Said, Nascimento de Lemos, de Melo, Gomes, Contente Braga de Souza, de Sá Oliveira dos Reis, Leal, Lobato and Felício. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: João Soares Felício, felicio.bel@terra.com.br

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.