Shihong Zhang
Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Arch, Beijing, China
Zhihua Wang
Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Arch, Beijing, China
Siva Rama Satyam B.
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, India
Manaswini Behera
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, India
Makarand M. Ghangrekar
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, India
Pai-chun Tao
Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland
Hlynur Stefansson
Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland
William Harvey
Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland
Gudrun Sævarsdottir
Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland
S. Kucukali
Cankaya University, Department of Civil Engineering, Ankara, Turkey
Chuan Wang
Centre for process integration in steelmaking, Swerea MEFOS AB, Luleå, Sweden
Jonny Karlsson
SSAB EMEA, Luleå, Sweden
Lawrence Hooey
Centre for process integration in steelmaking, Swerea MEFOS AB, Luleå, Sweden \ University of Oulu, Finland
Axel Boden
Centre for process integration in steelmaking, Swerea MEFOS AB, Luleå, Sweden
N. Soares
Civil Engineering Department of the University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
A. Samagaio
Environment and Planning Department of the University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
R. Vicente
Civil Engineering Department of the University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
J. Costa
ADAI – Mechanical Engineering Department of the University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Rafael Ferreira
COPPE/ Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Segen Estefen
COPPE/ Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Aviel Verbruggen
University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Neslihan Manav Demir
Yildiz Technical University, Environmental Engineering Department, Istanbul, Turkey
Tamer Coşkun
Yildiz Technical University, Environmental Engineering Department, Istanbul, Turkey
Eyüp Debik
Yildiz Technical University, Environmental Engineering Department, Istanbul, Turkey
Bishnu Chandra Poudel
Ecotechnology, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden
Roger Sathre
Ecotechnology, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden
Leif Gustavsson
Ecotechnology, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden \ Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden
Johan Bergh
Ecotechnology, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden \ Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden
Oscar D. Corbella
PROURB/ FAU, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Gisele Silva Barbosa
PROURB/ FAU, UFRJ, Faculdade Salesiana Maria Auxiliadora, Brasil
Patricia R. C. Drach
PROURB/ FAU, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Agisilaos Economou
National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Paul P. C. Verbunt
Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Michael G. Debije
Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Duraid F. Maki
Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Technology and Engineering, The M. S.University of Baroda, India
P. Prabhakaran
Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Technology and Engineering, The M. S.University of Baroda, India
Marco Milanese
Department of Engineering for Innovation – University of Salento, Lecce, Italy
Arturo de Risi
Department of Engineering for Innovation – University of Salento, Lecce, Italy
Domenico Laforgia
Department of Engineering for Innovation – University of Salento, Lecce, Italy
Download article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp11057803Published in: World Renewable Energy Congress - Sweden; 8-13 May; 2011; Linköping; Sweden
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 57:8, p. 803-809
In this paper; exhaust gas emissions were compared between conventional gas-phase combustion in both forced exhaust gas concentration of hot-water burner & premixed natural gas/air burner with heater and the catalytic combustion in catalytic honeycomb monolith burner. Test proved that the pollutant emissions of gasphase combustion were higher than that of catalytic combustion. It is shown that the conversion of conventional gas-phase combustion was lower than that of catalytic combustion by measured experimental data. It indicated the advantages of energy-saving and environmental protection for the catalytic combustion.
Catalytic combustion; exhaust gas analysis; near zero pollutant emissions; energy-saving
[1] E.Tzimpilis; N.Moschoudis; M.Stoukides; P.Bekiaroglou; Ageing and SO2 resistance of Pd containing perovskite-type oxides; Appl.Catal.B84; 2008; pp. 607–615.
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.05.016.
[2] T.V. Choudhary; S. Banerjee; V.R. Choudhary; Catalysts for combusion of methane and lower alkanes; Appl. Catal. A 234; 2002; pp. 1–23.
doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00231-4.
[3] Q. Liu; A.Q. Wang; X.H. Wang; P. Gao; X.D. Wang; T. Zhang; Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.111 ;2008; pp. 323–333.
doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.08.007.
[4] O.R. Inderwildi; S.J. Jenkins; D.A. King; Dynamic interplay between diffusion and reaction: Nitrogen recombination on Rh-211} in car exhaust catalysis; Angew. Chem.Int.Ed.47; 2008; pp. 5253–5255.
doi: 10.1002/anie.200800685.
[5] J.G. McCarty; Perovskite catalysts for methane combustion; Nature 403; 2000; pp. 35–36.
doi: 10.1038/47388.
[6] V. Dupont; S.H. Zhang; R. Bentley; A. Williams; Experimental and modeling studies of the catalytic combustion of meth-ane; Fuel 81; 2002; pp. 799–810.
doi: 10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00138-7.
[7] L.D. Pfefferle; and W. C. Pfefferle; Catalysis in combustion; Catal. Rev—Sci.Eng.29; 1987; pp. 219–267.
doi: 10.1080/01614948708078071.
[8] R. Dalla Betta; Catalytic combustion gas turbine sys-tems: The preferred technology for low emissions elec-tric power production and co-generation; A. Catal. Today 35; 1997; pp. 129–135.
doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(96)00139-3.
[9] D. B. Fant; G. S. Jackson; H. Karim; D. M. Newburry; P. Dutta; K. O. Smith; and R. W. Dibble; Gas Turbines Power122; J.Eng; 2000; pp. 293–300.
