Ibrahim A. Motawa
School of the Built Environment, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK
Phil F. Banfill
School of the Built Environment, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK
R. Hosseini
Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran PolyTechnic), Tehran, Iran
N. Hosseini
University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran
H. Khorasanizadeh
University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran
Abdulsalam Ebrahimpour
Departament of Mechanical Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Iran
Benoit Boutaud
European Institute for Energy Research, Karlsruhe, Germany
Andreas Koch
European Institute for Energy Research, Karlsruhe, Germany
Pascal Girault
European Institute for Energy Research, Karlsruhe, Germany
Masaya Okumiya
Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
Takuya Shinoda
Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
Makiko Ukai
Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
Hideki Tanaka
Chubu University, Kasugai, Japan
Mika Yoshinaga
Meijyo University, Nagoya, Japan
Kazuyuki Kato
Tohogas Co. Ltd., Nagoya, Japan
Toshiharu Shimizu
Tohogas Co. Ltd., Nagoya, Japan
Guilherme P. M. Fracaro
UNIOESTE (Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná), Cascavel, Brazil
S. N. M Souza
UNIOESTE (Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná), Cascavel, Brazil
M. Medeiros
UNIOESTE (Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná), Cascavel, Brazil
D. F. Formentini
UNIOESTE (Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná), Cascavel, Brazil
C. A Marques
UNIOESTE (Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná), Cascavel, Brazil
Ricardo L. T. Carvalho
Danish Building Research Institute, Aalborg University, Hørsholm, Denmark
Ole M. Jensen
Danish Building Research Institute, Aalborg University, Hørsholm, Denmark
Luís A. C. Tarelho
Department of Environment and Planning, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
Alireza Afshari
Danish Building Research Institute, Aalborg University, Hørsholm, Denmark
Niels C. Bergsøe
Danish Building Research Institute, Aalborg University, Hørsholm, Denmark
Jes S. Andersen
Centre for Renewable Energy and Transportation, Technological Institute, Aarhus, Denmark
Download articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp110572586Published in: World Renewable Energy Congress - Sweden; 8-13 May; 2011; Linköping; Sweden
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 57:40, p. 2586-2593
Published: 2011-11-03
ISBN: 978-91-7393-070-3
ISSN: 1650-3686 (print), 1650-3740 (online)
The UK target to significantly reduce CO2 emissions from housing has been challenged by the fact that 80% of the UK housing stock existing in 2030 has already been built. Energy-efficiency technologies for existing housing are developed in attempt to meet this target; e.g. fabric upgrades; ventilation systems; etc; but the interrelationship between the technical and social aspects of using these technologies is not fully understood. From the household perspective; a clear financial case in addition to other intangible benefits should exist to create high demand for these technologies. On the other hand; many technological interventions are still in the development stage and according to the technology diffusion theory there will be a delay in adopting these technologies on the expected scale. This study will use system dynamics modelling to investigate the relationship between the supply and demand of energy-efficiency technologies for existing housing. A dynamic hypothesis will be set to analyse the interrelationships among the controlling variables of technologies development over a period of time. This paper introduces the main structure of the study and discusses the technique adopted to model the identified dynamic hypothesis.
[1] DEFRA; e-Digest of Environmental Statistics; online available from (http:// www.defra.gov.uk/environment/statistics /index.htm); 2009.
[2] Z. Zavody; Pathway to zero-carbon homes. In; European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (eceee) 2007 Summer Study; Côte d?Azur; France; 4-9 June 2007.
[3] Sustainable Construction Task Force; Making the most of our built environment; DTI; 2004.
[4] T. Oreszczyn and R. Lowe; Challenges for energy and buildings research: objectives; methods and funding mechanisms; Journal of Building Research & Information; Volume 38 (1); 2010; pages 107 – 122
doi: 10.1080/09613210903265432.
[5] A. Peacock; P. Banfill; M. Newborough; D. Kane; S. Turan; D. Jenkins; M. Ahadzi; G. Bowles; P. Eames; H. Singh; T. Jackson; and A. Berry; Reducing CO2 emissions through refurbishment of UK housing. In; European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (eceee) 2007 Summer Study; Côte d?Azur; France 4-9 June 2007.
[6] G. Pellegrini-Masini; G. Bowles; A. Peacock; M. Ahadzi; P. Banfil; Whole life costing of domestic energy demand reduction technologies: householder perspectives. Construction Management and Economics; Vol 28 (3); 2010; pages 217 – 229
doi: 10.1080/01446190903480027.
[7] I. Motawa; A. Price; and W. Sher; A Fuzzy approach for evaluating the iterated implementation of innovations in construction; International Journal of IT in Architecture; Engineering and Construction; Vol. 1(2); 2003; pp 105-118.
[8] I. Motawa; A. Price; and W. Sher; Modelling the implementation of technological innovations in construction; International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology: Special Issue on Interoperability for SME-based environments; Vol. 20 (3); 2004; pp 78-89.
[9] G. Pellegrini-Masini; The carbon-saving behaviour of residential households. In: Futures of Cities 51st IFHP World Congress; Copenhagen; 2007.
[10] J. Sterman; Business dynamics: systems thinking and modelling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill; 2000.
[11] E. Rogers; Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press ISBN 0029266505; 1995.
[12] Y. Veneris; Modelling the transition from the Industrial to the Informational Revolution; Environment and Planning; 22 (3); 1990; pp. 399-416.
doi: 10.1068/a220399.