Issues in the 3rd year of the COVID-19 pandemic, including computer-based testing, study design, ChatGPT, journal metrics, and appreciation to reviewers

In 2022, computer-based testing (CBT) was introduced for the Korean Medical Licensing Examination (KMLE). CBT has also been expanded to the Korean Dental Licensing Examination, Korean Oriental Doctor Medical Licensing Examination, and Korean Care Worker Licensing Examination in 2023. Subsequently, 26 licensing examinations will be administered through CBT in 2025 [1]. For a more convenient and stable testing environment, the Korea Health Personnel Licensing Institute prepared 9 permanent test centers for CBT, which collectively have 1,500 seats (Fig. 1). If the number of examinees on a particular date surpasses 1,500, other sites will be leased. No technical problems occurred during the implementation of CBT for the KMLE. All medical schools in Korea adopted CBT, and no examinee complained of any difficulties in taking CBT. However, further improvements should be made after the transition to CBT. First, the standard setting of CBT still has not been adopted, although there were some studies on the cut score in the 2022 volume of the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions (JEEHP). Kim et al. [2] suggested that acceptable cut scores for Issues in the 3rd year of the COVID-19 pandemic, including computer-based testing, study design, ChatGPT, journal metrics, and appreciation to reviewers Sun Huh


More active adoption of computer-based testing in health professional licensing examination in Korea
In 2022, computer-based testing (CBT) was introduced for the Korean Medical Licensing Examination (KMLE). CBT has also been expanded to the Korean Dental Licensing Examination, Korean Oriental Doctor Medical Licensing Examination, and Korean Care Worker Licensing Examination in 2023. Subsequently, 26 licensing examinations will be administered through CBT in 2025 [1]. For a more convenient and stable testing environment, the Korea Health Personnel Licensing Institute prepared 9 permanent test centers for CBT, which collectively have 1,500 seats ( Fig. 1). If the number of examinees on a particular date surpasses 1,500, other sites will be leased.
No technical problems occurred during the implementation of CBT for the KMLE. All medical schools in Korea adopted CBT, and no examinee complained of any difficulties in taking CBT. However, further improvements should be made after the transition to CBT.
First, the standard setting of CBT still has not been adopted, although there were some studies on the cut score in the 2022 volume of the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions (JEEHP). Kim et al. [2] suggested that acceptable cut scores for verify the sources generated by ChatGPT for citation in the main text. Authors should meticulously check whether ChatGPT-generated content is accurate and suitable, because answers generated by ChatGPT are not perfect in response to questions about specific fields, such as parasitology [5] or digital standards of journal publishing [6].
Country name, study design, and corresponding reporting guidelines to improve the scientific quality I have asked the authors of manuscripts submitted to JEEHP to specify the name of the country of the study population in the title since 2015. This information is included to stimulate readers' interest in JEEHP articles. Marking country names has been frequently required in clinical studies. Knipe and Jewkes [7] also recommended that authors include the country name in which human studies were conducted in the report title. They said, "All research is a product of the social and cultural system within which it is created, and therefore, it should be labeled. " I agree with them. Although there is still no evidence that the country name has attracted much attention, I believe this information can elicit interest among researchers in the corresponding country.
Kim [8] reviewed the study design and corresponding reporting guidelines and stated that out of 44 articles published in JEE-HP from January 2021 to September 2022, 19 (43.2%) needed a more suitable study design, particularly pointing out this issue for before-and-after studies, diagnostic research, and non-randomized trials. The editorial office will be more cautious in suggesting an appropriate study design to the authors. Furthermore, we will continue emphasizing reporting guidelines for the manuscript description. This reporting style may help readers easily identify interesting parts of an article.

Journal metrics and statistics
The 2nd Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) value announced in June 2022, 0.58, showed an improvement from 0.51 in 2021. This JCI ranking in the scientific education category was 10th out of 38 Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) journals (73.7%) and 46th out of 82 Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) and ESCI journals (43.9%). This journal's performance in terms of citations was similar to that in 2021 [9].
The authors' countries in the 2022 issue are shown in Fig. 2. The total cites in Crossref metadata, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection in 2022 were estimated as 825, 845, and 666 times, respectively, on January 23, 2023, reflecting a substantial increase from the values of 525, 555, and 461, respectively, in 2021 [9]. CiteScoreTracker 2022, provided by Elsevier B. V., is 4.3 (650 citations to date/151 documents to date) on January 23, 2023   (https://www.scopus.com/sourceid/21100467423). The 2022 Journal Impact Factor (JIF), which will be officially announced in June 2023, is estimated as 4.286 (300 cites in 2022 for articles in 2020-2021/70 citable articles in 2020-2021). The JIF ranking is estimated as the 7th out of 82 in the "scientific discipline education" category. In the previous editorial, the 2021 JIF was estimated as 1.846, but the final manually calculated value was 2.103 [9]. Journal statistics in 2022 are presented in Table 1.
The editorial office tried not to reject peer-reviewed manuscripts to save the reviewers' time. Unfortunately, out of 56 reviewed manuscripts, 10 were rejected and 4 were withdrawn by the authors. With the exclusion of 5 manuscripts in revision, the acceptance rate of peer-reviewed unsolicited manuscripts was 70.8% (34/48), which is almost the same as the rate in 2021 (70.3%, 26/37). In 2023 and beyond, the editorial office will do its best to increase the acceptance rate of unsolicited manuscripts to at least 80% if they enter the peer review process. On October 20, 2022, eLife announced that it would no longer act as a gatekeeper and would publish all peer-reviewed manuscripts along with the reviewers' feedback. This change means that readers can evaluate the worth of each article by reading both the manuscript and the comments from the reviewers [10]. JEEHP still has not accepted this open peer-review policy, but the goal is the same as that of eLife-not to waste reviewers' valuable comments and to let readers determine the value of the manuscripts. We will try to accept any manuscripts meet the aims and scope and fit the style and format of the journal. Of course, budgetary limitations remain, and it is challenging to publish more than 40 articles a year.
The editorial office will also try its best to shorten the median time until the first decision to 14 days at most.

Reviewers and volunteers' devotion to journal publishing
In 2022, many reviewers voluntarily participated in peer review. I appreciate that they shared their time to enhance the quality of articles published in the journal. The following list presents the reviewers and their affiliations in 18 countries:

New year's plan for the journal publishing
We are ready to introduce graphic abstracts for manuscripts submitted in 2023. A professional designer will complete the graphic abstract when authors draw the article content as a figure. This graphic abstract will attract more attention from readers and be able to be used for conference presentations and for education in the classroom.
The reference style for the internet website will be changed from 2023. The present style is as follows: In 2022, there were 3 articles on licensing examinations. JEE-HP's primary scope encompasses health professions licensing examinations. Therefore, the editorial office will try to receive or invite those manuscripts more actively. It is essential to collaborate with other countries' institutes that have dealt with national licensing examinations for health professions. I welcome suggestions from those international institutions for collaboration for publishing their works.
It is the 19th year that I have served as the editor-in-chief of JEEHP. I would not have expected in 2005 that I would voluntarily devote myself to JEEHP for such a long time. It has genuinely been my pleasure to edit these manuscripts for authors and readers, and I am happy to continue doing this work during my editorship.