pISSN 0513-5796   eISSN 1976-2437
Open Access, Peer-reviewed, Monthly
    Yonsei Med J. 2022 Feb;63(2):114-123. English.
    Published online Jan 20, 2022.
    https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2022.63.2.114
    © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2022
    Review

    Fabrication Techniques of Nerve Guidance Conduits for Nerve Regeneration

    Nae-Un Kang,1 Seung-Jae Lee,2 and So-Jung Gwak3
      • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Korea.
      • 2Department of Mechanical Design Engineering, College of Engineering, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Korea.
      • 3Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Korea.
    • Co-corresponding author: So-Jung Gwak, PhD, Department of Chemical Engineering, Wonkwang University College of Engineering, 460 Iksan-daero, Iksan 54538, Korea. Tel: 82-63-850-7279, Fax: 82-63-850-7276, Email: plus38317@wku.ac.kr
      Co-corresponding author: Seung-Jae Lee, PhD, Department of Mechanical Design Engineering, Wonkwang University College of Engineering, 460 Iksan-daero, Iksan 54538, Korea. Tel: 82-63-850-6696, Fax: 82-63-850-7315, Email: sjlee411@wku.ac.kr
    Received October 28, 2021; Accepted November 26, 2021.

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Abstract

    Neuronal loss and axonal degeneration after spinal cord injury or peripheral injury result in the loss of sensory and motor functions. Nerve regeneration is a complicated and medical challenge that requires suitable guides to bridge nerve injury gaps and restore nerve function. Due to the hostility of the microenvironment in the lesion, multiple conditions should be fulfilled to achieve improved functional recovery. Many nerve conduits have been fabricated using various natural and synthetic polymers. The design and material of the nerve guide conduits were carefully reviewed. A detailed review was conducted on the fabrication method of the nerve guide conduit for nerve regeneration. The typical fabrication methods used to fabricate nerve conduits are dip coating, solvent casting, micropatterning, electrospinning, and additive manufacturing. The advantages and disadvantages of the fabrication methods were reported, and research to overcome these limitations was reviewed. Extensive reviews have focused on the biological functions and in vivo performance of polymeric nerve conduits. In this paper, we emphasize the fabrication method of nerve conduits by polymers and their properties. By learning from the existing candidates, we can advance the strategies for designing novel polymeric systems with better properties for nerve regeneration.

    Keywords
    Nerve regeneration; nerve guidance conduits; fabrication; spinal cord; peripheral nerve

    INTRODUCTION

    Nerve injury damages the brain, spinal cord, or peripheral nervous system and induces serious health problems.1, 2, 3 A complete injury of the nerve causes the total loss of motor or sensory functions pertaining to the injury site, while an incomplete injury causes the retention of some functions. The loss of neurons and degeneration of axons result in the loss of function. Nerve injury is a debilitating and irreversible injury that leads to complete or incomplete loss of sensory and motor function beneath the injury area, depending on the extent of the injury. Such injuries not only cause disabilities for individuals and their families, but also burden health systems and economies with the loss of productivity and high healthcare costs. The average lifetime costs reach a staggering $1.1–4.6 million per spinal cord injury (SCI) patient, with over 1 million people affected in North America alone.4 To understand the complicated interaction of nerve components in tissue-engineered conduits, we need to understand the molecular interactions of normal nerve injury.

    SCI is commonly divided into primary and secondary injuries. Primary injury refers to direct mechanical injury to the spinal cord. However, in most clinical situations, secondary injury following the primary injury is more important, and a therapeutic treatment is need to prevent the propagation of injury.5 Primary injuries, such as cell necrosis, axon disruption, and vascular loss, result from a direct impact on the spine and trigger pathophysiological secondary injuries.6, 7 In addition, secondary injury induces disturbances in ionic homeostasis, hemorrhage, ischemia, glutamate release, cell death, immune response, and oxidative damage.8, 9, 10, 11 Disruption of spinal cord blood vessels induces hemorrhage and ischemia at the SCI site.12, 13, 14 In addition, excessive activated chemicals, such as the excitatory neurotransmitters glutamate or aspartate, cause damage to neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes. As a result, damage to oligodendrocytes leads to axonal demyelination, which impairs nervous system plasticity. Glial scars composed of myelin, cellular debris, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and microglia hinder the regeneration of axons toward their synaptic targets.15, 16, 17 For SCI therapy, high doses of methylprednisolone have been used in clinical treatment. However, several studies reported that treatment with methylprednisolone showed weak neurological improvement after SCI.18

    SCI and peripheral nervous injury differ in regenerative capacity after injury. Neurons in the peripheral nervous system are capable of regeneration after injury; however, neurons in the spinal cord are generally not.19 Schwann cells in the peripheral nervous system, such as degeneration, remyelination, and axonal growth, play a pivotal role in several aspects of nerve repair. Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) represents a clinical and public health problem.20 These cases can potentially lead to lifelong disabilities, although peripheral nerves exhibit the capacity of self-regeneration for less severe injury. Currently, the treatment for PNI is advanced microsurgical end-to-end repair with tensionless epineurial sutures or autologous nerve grafting with end-to-end anastomosis.21, 22

    A tissue engineering construct and contact-mediated guidance for aligned axon growth across the site of injury to the distal host tissue could potentially allow functional recovery. Various bioengineered nerve grafts have been developed using materials and fabrication methods for nerve regeneration. In tissue engineering, the tubular structure fabricated from natural or synthetic biopolymers for nerve regeneration is called nerve guidance conduits (NGC).22 NGCs were designed considering the mechanical and biochemical factors that can promote nerve regeneration. The role of NGCs is connected to injured nerve endings and provides structural and biochemical support.23 It promotes nerve regeneration along the conduit and prevents the invasion of the surrounding tissues. An ideal NGC should have a biomimetic architecture, structural features to align the axon of the regenerating nerve, sufficient mechanical properties, and permeability for nutrient delivery, conductivity, flexibility, and biodegradability.24 However, to develop an ideal NGC, a number of studies have been reported on various fronts, including the design, materials, and fabrication methods. In this review, we discuss the fabrication method of nerve guide conduits by tissue engineering for nerve regeneration.

    DESIGN AND MATERIALS FOR NGCS

    Several types of research on NGC design have been reported. The signs of NGCs can be divided into five categories: 1) hollow, nonporous design, 2) porous design, 3) grooved design, 4) multichannel design, and 5) NGCs with fillers. Hollow or nonporous designs are the simplest hollow conduit designs made of natural or synthetic polymers. Although this design is simple to fabricate, the permeability of oxygen and nutrients is low, so there is a limit to nerve regeneration. The porous design is a conduit design with a porous wall to overcome the disadvantages of the hollow design. This design has a high permeability, which is advantageous for supplying nutrients. However, owing to their high permeability, the surrounding tissues can infiltrate into the inner conduit.

    The grooved design is grooved on the inner surface of the conduit. The groove of the inner surfaces is expected to align better with the regeneration of the axons. The multichannel design is a conduit design with intraluminal channels. This design can be loaded with various nerve regeneration factors. NGCs with filler designs are filled with nanofibers or hydrogels in the lumen. This design filled the inside of the conduit with nanofibers and hydrogels to mimic nerve fascicles.

    The choice of materials for the fabrication of NGCs for nerve regeneration is a particularly important consideration. The basic requirements for NGC fabrication materials are biocompatibility, biodegradability, and suitable mechanical properties. In addition, nerve guide materials are highly permeable and sufficiently flexible with suitable degradation rates and products to provide guidance for regenerative axons and to minimize swelling and inflammatory responses. Natural and synthetic polymers are the most commonly used materials. The most widely used natural polymers are collagen, gelatin, cellulose, and chitosan. Natural polymers provide a biomimetic and cell-friendly environment, but have low mechanical properties. The most widely used synthetic polymers are polycaprolactone (PCL), polylactic acid (PLA), polyglycolic acid, and poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA). Synthetic polymers provide good mechanical properties, but are not biomimetic. A blend of natural and synthetic polymers is often used to overcome these limitations.

    FABRICATION METHODS OF NGCS

    Several fabrication methods have been employed for the development of NGCs (Tables 1 and 2). The most common NGC fabrication methods are dip coating, solvent casting, freeze-drying, micropatterning, electrospinning, and additive manufacturing (AM) (Fig. 1).

    Fig. 1
    Common techniques used for nerve guide conduit fabrication. A: Dip-coating. B: Solvent casting. C: Freeze drying. D: Electrospinning. E: Micro-patterning. NGC, nerve guidance conduits.

    Table 1
    Fabrication Techniques of NGC and Other Effective Factors for Nerve Regeneration

    Table 2
    Fabrication Method of NGC and Other Effective Factors for Nerve Regeneration

    Dip coating

    The dip-coating method is a widely used technology for NGC fabrication, as it is the easiest method. The fabrication process of the dip-coating method is as follows. The first step is to prepare the polymer emulsion. This is prepared by dissolving the polymers in solvents. The second step is to dip the round mold in the prepared polymer emulsion. The dipped round mold is coated with a polymer emulsion. The third step is to remove the round mold from the polymer emulsion and the hardening of the polymer emulsion via evaporation or polymerization. Finally, a conduit structure can be produced by removing the round mold.

    Ko, et al.25 fabricated a gelatin conduit using a dip-coating method for peripheral nerve regeneration. The reported NGCs were fabricated using gelatin and bisvinyl sulfonemethyl (BVSM). It has a shape similar to that of a silicone conduit used in clinical practice. The dip-coating procedure was conducted nine times to produce a conduit coated with 400-µm thick gelatin. The NGCs were assessed for neuronal electrophysiology, animal behavior, neuronal connectivity, macrophage infiltration, calcitonin gene-related peptide localization, and expression, as well as the expression levels of nerve regeneration-related proteins. In addition, the number of fluorogold-labeled cells and histological analysis of the gelatin-BVSM nerve conduits was similar to that observed with the clinical use of silicone rubber conduits after 8 weeks of repair.

    Lin, et al.26 fabricated a PLGA multilayer conduit using a dip-coating method for nerve regeneration. A PLGA multilayer nerve conduit with an associated biodegradable drug reservoir was designed, fabricated, and evaluated. Moreover, to demonstrate the potential of this device for nerve repair, a series of experiments were performed using the nerve growth factor (NGF). As a result, bioactivity assays of the released NGF showed that the drug released from the device between the 15th and 20th day could still promote axon growth (76.6–95.7 µm) in chick dorsal root ganglion cells, which is in the range of maximum growth. As mentioned earlier, NGCs fabricated by dip coating can promote nerve regeneration. The advantage of the dip-coating method is its simpler procedure and easy control of the thickness. However, this method cannot create pores for nutrient transport on the wall of the conduit.

    Solvent casting

    Solvent casting is the cheapest and easiest method to fabricate porous NGC. The fabrication process of the solvent casting method is as follows. The first step is to dissolve the polymer in the solvent. The second step is to fill the mold. Finally, the evaporation of the solvent results in a porous structure. Guo, et al.27 fabricated hollow chitosan conduits using a solvent casting method for peripheral nerve regeneration. A solvent casting procedure was conducted to produce a thickness of 400 µm. The chitosan conduit was then filled with 0, 0.5 or 1.0 mg of simvastatin in Pluronic F-127 hydrogel. Sciatic functional index, electrophysiological assessments, and histological and immunohistochemical assessments were conducted, and it was confirmed that the F-127 hydrogel promoted nerve regeneration. As a result, the chitosan conduit filled with the simvastatin/Pluronic F-127 hydrogel promoted nerve regeneration.

    Fregnan, et al.28 fabricated a chitosan membrane using a solvent casting method for peripheral nerve regeneration. The chitosan membrane was crosslinked with dibasic sodium phosphate (DSP) or γ-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane. The chitosan membrane was rolled and glued with cyanoacrylate glue to obtain a conduit. In addition, evaluation of chitosan/DSP conduits promoted nerve fiber regeneration and functional recovery, leading to an outcome comparable to that of the median nerve repaired by autograft.

    The PLGA multilayer conduit was fabricated a solvent casting method for peripheral nerve regeneration.29 The PLGA-based multilayer nerve conduit has a reservoir for local delivery of NGF. This nerve guide can release NGF for extended periods of time and enhance axon growth in vitro and in vivo, and has the potential to improve nerve regeneration following PNI. Therefore, the advantage of the solvent casting method is that it is a relatively simple procedure, and the porosity and pore size can be controlled. However, the disadvantage of this method is the use of highly toxic solvents, poor pore interconnectivity, and irregularly shaped pores. To overcome the limitations of the solvent casting technique, other techniques that do not use solvents, such as salt leaching, freeze-drying, and gas foaming, are being researched.

    Freeze-drying

    The freeze-drying method is used to fabricate the polymeric porous conduits. The fabrication process consists of two steps. The first step is the freezing step, which cools the polymer solution to a certain temperature. During freezing, interstitial spaces are formed as the solvent forms ice crystals, and polymer molecules aggregate into the interstitial spaces. Then, the solvent removes the phase, in which a low pressure is applied, which is lower than the equilibrium vapor pressure of the frozen solvent. The solvent is completely sublimated to fabricate a dry interconnected porous polymer structure.

    Yao, et al.30 and Cui, et al.31 fabricated collagen nerve conduits using the freeze-drying method. The collagen nerve conduit was created by rolling the collagen membrane. The diameter of the cylindrical conduit was approximately 5 mm, and the tube wall thickness was 60 µm. Long-term follow-up evaluation demonstrated that NGC allowed functional and morphological nerve regeneration. Conclusion: functional assessment of the conduit confirmed that when NGF was loaded onto a longitudinally oriented collagen conduit, it promoted a better recovery of regenerated axons compared to longitudinally oriented collagen conduit alone. Consequently, the advantage of the freeze-drying method is that it can achieve a highly porous structure. Therefore, the permeability of the conduit is high, and the transport of nutrients and oxygen is good, which promotes nerve regeneration. However, in this method, the size and shape of the pores were relatively irregular compared to those of solvent casting.

    Electrospinning

    Electrospinning is the most widely used and reported technique among NGC fabrication methods. Electrospinning is a method of extracting nanofibers by applying an electric field (high voltage) to a polymer solution. The first step of electrospinning is the extrusion of the polymer solution through a nozzle tip with a high applied voltage. The extrusion solution is not dropped by gravity, and is clumped at the nozzle tip by surface tension. At this time, charges are collected on the surface of the solution by a high voltage. In addition, a repulsive force is generated between the charges, the polymer solution overcoming the surface tension, and ejecting. The ejected solution moves to the collector according to the gradient of the electric field. While the ejected solution is supplied by an electric field, the solvents in the ejected solution evaporate, thereby forming nanofibers through secondary fission.

    To describe the reported studies, Xue, et al.32 fabricated electrospinning silk fibroin (SF)-based nerve conduits. A simple electrospinning SF-conduit was collected on a rotating stainless-steel rod (diameter, 5 mm) at a rotating speed of 500 rpm. In this study, functional, histological, and morphometric analyses were conducted, and it was confirmed that SF-based conduits achieved satisfactory regenerative outcomes. Wang, et al.33 fabricated an electrospinning SF/poly (l-lactide-co-caprolactone) [SF/P (LLA-CL)]-based nanofiber membranes. A nerve conduit was fabricated by reeling the membrane onto a stainless-steel bar with a diameter of 1.4 mm. The results revealed that the SF/P (LLA-CL) nerve conduit enhanced peripheral nerve regeneration by improving angiogenesis within the conduit. Therefore, the electrospinning method can be used to fabricate nanofiber architectures, and can also be used widely in materials. In addition, nanofiber architecture is similar to the extracellular matrix, and can positively affect cell attachment and migration compared to micro-architecture. The drawback of electrospinning is its low scalability and low reproducibility, as nanofibers are stacked randomly.

    Micropatterning

    The micropatterning technique is used to fabricate NGCs with various inner designs for axonal alignment. The first process of the micropatterning technique is the fabrication of a micropattern membrane. After fabrication of the micropattern membrane, the micropattern membrane was rolled to fabricate the conduit. To describe the reported studies, Rutkowski, et al.34 fabricated a multilayer NGC using novel transfer techniques and the salt-leaching method. The mold for the micropattern was fabricated using silicon and quartz dies and the reactive ion etching method. The micropattern consisted of a width of 10 µm, depth of 4.3 µm, spacing of 10 µm, and length of 4 cm, and was fabricated using poly (D, L-lactic acid) (PDLLA). The porous layer was fabricated using the salt-leaching method and PDLLA. Based on qualitative observations as well as quantitative measurements using the walking track analysis, micropatterned conduits were significantly enhanced, which was confirmed.

    Ni, et al.35 fabricated a microporous/micropatterned NGC using molding and phase separation methods. The micropattern consisted of a width of 20 µm, depth of 3 µm, and spacing of 20 µm, and was fabricated using PLA. Axon regeneration and functional recovery of the PLA conduit were evaluated by histology, walking track analysis, and electrophysiology. In addition, PLA conduits grafted with chitosan–nano Au and FGF1 after plasma activation had the greatest regeneration capacity and functional recovery in the experimental animals. Consequently, the advantage of micropatterning is that it can align axons by morphological factors inside the NGC. However, the micropatterning technique should be used to fabricate master molds and multistep processes.

    Additive manufacturing

    AM is a three-dimensions (3D) printing processing method that manufactures 3D structures using layer-by-layer deposition materials. AM has various manufacturing methods, such as stereolithography (SLA), selective laser sintering, fused deposition modeling (FDM), inkjet printing, and 3D plotting (Fig. 2). The advantage of AM is that the degree of freedom of the shape is high, so the morphological characteristics of the structure can be controlled and the reproducibility is high. However, depending on the AM method, the materials that can be used are limited, the shape resolution is low, and a supporter is required to fabricate a complex structure.

    Fig. 2
    Additive manufacturing techniques used for nerve guide conduit fabrication. A: Extrusion-based printing. B: Stereolithography. C: Inkjet three-dimensions printing.

    Extrusion-based printing

    Extrusion-based printing is a method of manufacturing 3D structures by extruding and depositing materials using pneumatics, pistons, screws, and nozzles. Extrusion-based printing is divided into FDM, precision extrusion deposition, and 3D plotting, depending on the extrusion method. The advantage of extrusion-based printing is that it can achieve one-step printing of NGCs containing various composite materials that are difficult to obtain by traditional manufacturing methods.36 However, the limitations of extrusion-based printing are that the efficiency and accuracy of printing are low due to using a nozzle, which is prone to blockage.37 To describe the reported studies, Cui, et al.38 fabricated multilayer polyurethane (PU)/collagen NGC using a modified FDM method. The multilayer NGC was composed of a PU outer layer containing a microporous structure and a collagen inner layer.

    The indirect biological-printing method of extrusion-based printing has also been used to produce NGCs. Hu, et al.39 fabricated cryoGelMA NGCs using an indirect biological-printing method. The mold structures were fabricated using a 3D printing technique. Assisted by the 3D printed mold, cryoGelMA NGCs with intricate architectures can be obtained. In this study, the assessment of attachment, proliferation, and upregulation of the expression of their neurotrophic factor mRNA of the cryoGelMA NGCs was conducted. Moreover, the cryoGelMa NGCs to be close to those of the autografts in terms of functional and histological assessment were confirmed.

    Stereolithography and digital light processing

    SLA is a 3D printing technique that uses a laser light source and a photocurable polymer to fabricate a 3D structure. The first step of the SLA process is to add a photosensitive resin to the vat and flatten it. Subsequently, ultraviolet light (UV)-wavelength laser irradiation of photosensitive resin causes polymerization of the resin, and a single cured layer is obtained. The work platform is then filled with a new photosensitive resin layer to continue the curing reaction of the next layer. This process is repeated layer-by-layer to obtain a 3D structure.

    The advantages of SLA techniques are higher accuracy and reproducibility than those of extrusion-based printing techniques. However, this method can only be used with photosensitive resin, and photo initiators should be added to confirm the cytotoxicity of the material. To describe the reported studies, Singh, et al.40 fabricated biodegradable poly (glycerol sebacate methacrylate) (PGSm) NGCs using the SLA technique. PGSm was synthesized, and its degradation rate and mechanical properties were assessed. The fabricated NGC inner diameter was 1 mm, and the wall thickness was 0.35 mm. In vivo results in a mouse common fibular nerve injury model confirmed that repair levels of spinal cord glial activation were equivalent to those seen after graft repair. Singh, et al.41 fabricated a multichannel NGC using the SLA technique and PCL. NGC was filled with NGFs for peripheral nerve regeneration. This demonstrated the application of the NGF-filled NGCs in enhanced and successful regeneration of a critically injured rat sciatic nerve in comparison to random cryogel-filled NGCs, multichannel and clinically preferred hollow conduits, and gold standard autografts.

    Digital light processing (DLP) is a 3D printing technique similar to SLA. DLP is also used as a UV light source for the polymerization of photopolymers. The greatest advantage of DLP is that it cures a single layer simultaneously, thus fabricating a 3D structure much faster. To describe the reported studies, Zhu, et al.42 fabricated various conduits (hollow conduit, multiple microchannel conduit, branched conduit) for human facial nerve repair. The hollow NGC was designed with a wall thickness of 200 µm and a length of 4 mm. The multiple microchannel conduit was incorporated into four microchannels (400 µm in diameter and 4 mm in length) to guide longitudinal nerve regeneration. The branched conduit was designed to integrate two hollow tubular sleeves continuously. Additionally, the materials were synthesized using polyethylene glycol diacrylate, gelatin-methacryloyl (GelMA), and LAP. Tao, et al.43 fabricated functional nanoparticle-enhanced conduits for effective nerve repair. The conduit consisted of GelMA hydrogels with drug-loaded poly (ethylene glycol)-poly (3-caprolactone) nanoparticles. However, similar to the SLA method, this method can only use photosensitive resin, and photo initiators must be added; it is necessary to confirm the cytotoxicity of the material.

    Inkjet 3D printing

    Inkjet 3D printing is a 3D printing technique that uses photocurable binders and powder materials. The first step of the inkjet 3D printing process is to planarize the powder materials. Subsequently, the photocurable binder is sprayed and cured to form one layer. The work platform is then filled with new powder materials. This process is repeated layer-by-layer to obtain a 3D structure. The inkjet 3D printing method is composed of continuous inkjet printing and drop-on-demand inkjet printing according to inkjet techniques.

    Drop-on-demand inkjet printing is widely applied in bioprinting owing to its unique advantages and suitability for the delivery of biomaterials.44 The drop-on-demand inkjet 3D printing method is divided according to the droplet production method. The thermal inkjet 3D printing technique produces droplets according to the local heat of the ink chamber using a heat actuator. The local heat of the ink chamber generates a heat bubble, and the droplets are ejected by the expansion of the heat bubble. The advantage of the thermal inkjet 3D printing method is its fast-printing speed and low equipment cost. However, droplet ejection maintenance is difficult because the droplets are ejected by heat bubbles.

    The piezoelectric inkjet 3D printing technique produces droplets according to the piezoelectric actuator. The piezoelectric actuator changes the chamber wall and volume according to the voltage pulse, and hence ejects a droplet. The electrostatic inkjet 3D printing technique produces droplets according to the pressure plate and electrode plate under the action of static electricity. The volume of the ink chamber is reduced by a pressure plate, and the ink is squeezed out as droplets. The electrohydrodynamic jet 3D printing technique produces droplets through an electric field.

    The advantages of electrohydrodynamic jet printing are its high resolution and printing capability. To describe the reported studies, Qian, et al.45 fabricated multilayered porous NGC using inkjet 3D printing and the layer-by-layer casting method. The NGC consisted of single-layered graphene, multilayered graphene, and PCL.

    Qian, et al.46 fabricated multilayered porous NGC using inkjet 3D printing and a layer-by-layer casting method. The NGC consisted of collagen, nanoceria, and PCL. This NGC successfully improved Schwann cell proliferation, adhesion, and neural expression.

    MULTIPLICATIVE NGCs

    As mentioned above, various fabrication techniques have been developed and applied to fabricate an ideal NGC. These fabrication techniques can determine the morphological factors of NGC and have various effects on nerve regeneration. However, there is a limit to nerve regeneration with NGC alone. To overcome this limitation, multiplicative NGCs have been developed using various other factors for nerve regeneration. Other factors used in tissue engineering for nerve regeneration include growth factors and nutrients. Some growth factors that have been used in nerve regeneration include NGF, glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), neurotrophin 3, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and insulin-like growth factor 1. To describe the reported studies, Oh, et al.47 fabricated NGC with an NGF gradient along the longitudinal direction by rolling a porous PCL membrane with an NGF concentration gradient. They reported that NGF promoted nerve regeneration, and that the concentration gradient of NGF could be a promising strategy for nerve regeneration.

    Liu, et al.48 designed and fabricated multilayered aligned fiber scaffolds by combining emulsion electrospinning, sequential electrospinning, and high-speed electrospinning to modulate the release behavior of GDNF and NGF. Su, et al.49 fabricated a composite NGC containing slow-released BDNF and evaluated its therapeutic effects on peripheral nerve defects. The BDNF-loaded composite conduit was fabricated using the solvent casting method. Xia, et al.50 fabricated a VEGF and NGF-loaded nanofibrous NGC using the emulsion electrospinning method.

    Another factor in tissue engineering is the addition of nanoparticles, which can enhance nerve regeneration. Many studies have reported that gold nanoparticles, silver nanoparticles, and iron oxide nanoparticles have shown immense potential for nerve regeneration.

    Jahromi, et al.51 developed a novel strategy for nerve regeneration using gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and BDNF-encapsulated chitosan in laminin-coated nanofibers of PLGA conduit. Gold nanoparticles and BDNF-encapsulated nanofiber NGC were fabricated by electrospinning. Dolkhani, et al.52 fabricated a chitosan-selenium biodegradable nanocomposite conduit.

    CONCLUSIONS

    In this review, we briefly describe nerve regeneration in tissue engineering. In addition, we present the ideal requirements for NGC, which is essential for nerve regeneration. The materials and designs used in NGC fabrication for nerve regeneration are briefly described; in particular, the NGC fabrication processes are described in detail, and the advantages and disadvantages of each fabrication method are introduced. The reviewed NGC fabrication methods were dip coating, solvent casting, freeze-drying, electrospinning, micropatterning, and additive manufacturing, and representative research cases are described. Moreover, multiplicative NGC fabrication, which is being researched to overcome the limitations of each fabrication method, is also described. However, the reported NGCs do not completely regenerate nerves and have difficulties in clinical application. Therefore, further research on the fabrication of an ideal NGC for complete nerve regeneration should be conducted.

    Notes

    The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

    AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS:

    • Conceptualization: all authors.

    • Data curation: all authors.

    • Formal analysis: all authors.

    • Funding acquisition: all authors.

    • Investigation: all authors.

    • Methodology: all authors.

    • Project administration: all authors.

    • Resources: all authors.

    • Software: all authors.

    • Supervision: all authors.

    • Validation: all authors.

    • Visualization: all authors.

    • Writing—original draft: all authors.

    • Writing—review & editing: all authors.

    • Approval of final manuscript: all authors.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    This paper was supported by Wonkwang University in 2021.

    References

      1. Ahuja CS, Nori S, Tetreault L, Wilson J, Kwon B, Harrop J, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury-repair and regeneration. Neurosurgery 2017;80:S9–S22.
      1. Shrestha B, Coykendall K, Li Y, Moon A, Priyadarshani P, Yao L. Repair of injured spinal cord using biomaterial scaffolds and stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther 2014;5:91
      1. Ko CC, Tu TH, Wu JC, Huang WC, Cheng H. Acidic fibroblast growth factor in spinal cord injury. Neurospine 2019;16:728–738.
      1. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. Facts and figures at a glance. Birmingham: University of Alabama at Birmingham; 2016.
      1. Rowland JW, Hawryluk GW, Kwon B, Fehlings MG. Current status of acute spinal cord injury pathophysiology and emerging therapies: promise on the horizon. Neurosurg Focus 2008;25:E2
      1. Blight AR. Delayed demyelination and macrophage invasion: a candidate for secondary cell damage in spinal cord injury. Cent Nerv Syst Trauma 1985;2:299–315.
      1. Bunge RP, Puckett WR, Becerra JL, Marcillo A, Quencer RM. Observations on the pathology of human spinal cord injury. A review and classification of 22 new cases with details from a case of chronic cord compression with extensive focal demyelination. Adv Neurol 1993;59:75–89.
      1. Alizadeh A, Dyck SM, Karimi-Abdolrezaee S. Traumatic spinal cord injury: an overview of pathophysiology, models and acute injury mechanisms. Front Neurol 2019;10:282
      1. Dyck S, Kataria H, Akbari-Kelachayeh K, Silver J, Karimi-Abdolrezaee S. LAR and PTPσ receptors are negative regulators of oligodendrogenesis and oligodendrocyte integrity in spinal cord injury. Glia 2019;67:125–145.
      1. Sekhon LH, Fehlings MG. Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:S2–S12.
      1. McDonald JW, Sadowsky C. Spinal-cord injury. Lancet 2002;359:417–425.
      1. Mautes AE, Weinzierl MR, Donovan F, Noble LJ. Vascular events after spinal cord injury: contribution to secondary pathogenesis. Phys Ther 2000;80:673–687.
      1. Fleming JC, Norenberg MD, Ramsay DA, Dekaban GA, Marcillo AE, Saenz AD, et al. The cellular inflammatory response in human spinal cords after injury. Brain 2006;129:3249–3269.
      1. Fiani B, Kondilis A, Soula M, Tao A, Alvi MA. Novel methods of necroptosis inhibition for spinal cord injury using translational research to limit secondary injury and enhance endogenous repair and regeneration. Neurospine 2021;18:261–270.
      1. Ramón-Cueto A, Plant GW, Avila J, Bunge MB. Long-distance axonal regeneration in the transected adult rat spinal cord is promoted by olfactory ensheathing glia transplants. J Neurosci 1998;18:3803–3815.
      1. Tian DS, Dong Q, Pan DJ, He Y, Yu ZY, Xie MJ, et al. Attenuation of astrogliosis by suppressing of microglial proliferation with the cell cycle inhibitor olomoucine in rat spinal cord injury model. Brain Res 2007;1154:206–214.
      1. Buss A, Brook GA, Kakulas B, Martin D, Franzen R, Schoenen J, et al. Gradual loss of myelin and formation of an astrocytic scar during Wallerian degeneration in the human spinal cord. Brain 2004;127:34–44.
      1. Takami T, Shimokawa N, Parthiban J, Zileli M, Ali S. Pharmacologic and regenerative cell therapy for spinal cord injury: WFNS spine committee recommendations. Neurospine 2020;17:785–796.
      1. Scheib J, Höke A. Advances in peripheral nerve regeneration. Nat Rev Neurol 2013;9:668–676.
      1. Taylor CA, Braza D, Rice JB, Dillingham T. The incidence of peripheral nerve injury in extremity trauma. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008;87:381–385.
      1. Isaacs J, Browne T. Overcoming short gaps in peripheral nerve repair: conduits and human acellular nerve allograft. Hand (N Y) 2014;9:131–137.
      1. Muheremu A, Ao Q. Past, present, and future of nerve conduits in the treatment of peripheral nerve injury. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:237507
      1. Vijayavenkataraman S. Nerve guide conduits for peripheral nerve injury repair: a review on design, materials and fabrication methods. Acta Biomater 2020;106:54–69.
      1. Li R, Liu Z, Pan Y, Chen L, Zhang Z, Lu L. Peripheral nerve injuries treatment: a systematic review. Cell Biochem Biophys 2014;68:449–454.
      1. Ko CH, Shie MY, Lin JH, Chen YW, Yao CH, Chen YS. Biodegradable bisvinyl sulfonemethyl-crosslinked gelatin conduit promotes regeneration after peripheral nerve injury in adult rats. Sci Rep 2017;7:17489
      1. Lin KM, Shea J, Gale BK, Sant H, Larrabee P, Agarwal J. Nerve growth factor released from a novel PLGA nerve conduit can improve axon growth. J Micromech Microeng 2016;26:045016
      1. Guo Q, Liu C, Hai B, Ma T, Zhang W, Tan J, et al. Chitosan conduits filled with simvastatin/Pluronic F-127 hydrogel promote peripheral nerve regeneration in rats. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2018;106:787–799.
      1. Fregnan F, Ciglieri E, Tos P, Crosio A, Ciardelli G, Ruini F, et al. Chitosan crosslinked flat scaffolds for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomed Mater 2016;11:045010
      1. Labroo P, Shea J, Edwards K, Ho S, Davis B, Sant H, et al. Novel drug delivering conduit for peripheral nerve regeneration. J Neural Eng 2017;14:066011
      1. Yao Y, Cui Y, Zhao Y, Xiao Z, Li X, Han S, et al. Effect of longitudinally oriented collagen conduit combined with nerve growth factor on nerve regeneration after dog sciatic nerve injury. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2018;106:2131–2139.
      1. Cui Y, Yao Y, Zhao Y, Xiao Z, Cao Z, Han S, et al. Functional collagen conduits combined with human mesenchymal stem cells promote regeneration after sciatic nerve transection in dogs. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2018;12:1285–1296.
      1. Xue C, Zhu H, Tan D, Ren H, Gu X, Zhao Y, et al. Electrospun silk fibroin-based neural scaffold for bridging a long sciatic nerve gap in dogs. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2018;12:e1143–e1153.
      1. Wang C, Jia Y, Yang W, Zhang C, Zhang K, Chai Y. Silk fibroin enhances peripheral nerve regeneration by improving vascularization within nerve conduits. J Biomed Mater Res A 2018;106:2070–2077.
      1. Rutkowski GE, Miller CA, Jeftinija S, Mallapragada SK. Synergistic effects of micropatterned biodegradable conduits and Schwann cells on sciatic nerve regeneration. J Neural Eng 2004;1:151–157.
      1. Ni HC, Tseng TC, Chen JR, Hsu SH, Chiu IM. Fabrication of bioactive conduits containing the fibroblast growth factor 1 and neural stem cells for peripheral nerve regeneration across a 15 mm critical gap. Biofabrication 2013;5:035010
      1. Song S, Wang X, Wang T, Yu Q, Hou Z, Zhu Z, et al. Additive manufacturing of nerve guidance conduits for regeneration of injured peripheral nerves. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020;8:590596
      1. Zhu W, Ma X, Gou M, Mei D, Zhang K, Chen S. 3D printing of functional biomaterials for tissue engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2016;40:103–112.
      1. Cui T, Yan Y, Zhang R, Liu L, Xu W, Wang X. Rapid prototyping of a double-layer polyurethane-collagen conduit for peripheral nerve regeneration. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2009;15:1–9.
      1. Hu Y, Wu Y, Gou Z, Tao J, Zhang J, Liu Q, et al. 3D-engineering of cellularized conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration. Sci Rep 2016;6:32184
      1. Singh D, Harding AJ, Albadawi E, Boissonade FM, Haycock JW, Claeyssens F. Additive manufactured biodegradable poly (glycerol sebacate methacrylate) nerve guidance conduits. Acta Biomater 2018;78:48–63.
      1. Singh A, Asikainen S, Teotia AK, Shiekh PA, Huotilainen E, Qayoom I, et al. Biomimetic photocurable three-dimensional printed nerve guidance channels with aligned cryomatrix lumen for peripheral nerve regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2018;10:43327–43342.
      1. Zhu W, Tringale KR, Woller SA, You S, Johnson S, Shen H, et al. Rapid continuous 3D printing of customizable peripheral nerve guidance conduits. Mater Today (Kidlington) 2018;21:951–959.
      1. Tao J, Zhang J, Du T, Xu X, Deng X, Chen S, et al. Rapid 3D printing of functional nanoparticle-enhanced conduits for effective nerve repair. Acta Biomater 2019;90:49–59.
      1. Li X, Liu B, Pei B, Chen J, Zhou D, Peng J, et al. Inkjet bioprinting of biomaterials. Chem Rev 2020;120:10793–10833.
      1. Qian Y, Zhao X, Han Q, Chen W, Li H, Yuan W. An integrated multi-layer 3D-fabrication of PDA/RGD coated graphene loaded PCL nanoscaffold for peripheral nerve restoration. Nat Commun 2018;9:323
      1. Qian Y, Han Q, Zhao X, Li H, Yuan WE, Fan C. Asymmetrical 3D nanoceria channel for severe neurological defect regeneration. iScience 2019;12:216–231.
      1. Oh SH, Kang JG, Kim TH, Namgung U, Song KS, Jeon BH, et al. Enhanced peripheral nerve regeneration through asymmetrically porous nerve guide conduit with nerve growth factor gradient. J Biomed Mater Res A 2018;106:52–64.
      1. Liu C, Li X, Xu F, Cong H, Li Z, Song Y, et al. Spatio-temporal release of NGF and GDNF from multi-layered nanofibrous bicomponent electrospun scaffolds. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2018;29:102
      1. Su H, Xu F, Sun H, Fu X, Zhao Y. Preparation and evaluation of BDNF composite conduits for regeneration of sciatic nerve defect in rats. J Pharm Sci 2020;109:2189–2195.
      1. Xia B, Lv Y. Dual-delivery of VEGF and NGF by emulsion electrospun nanofibrous scaffold for peripheral nerve regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2018;82:253–264.
      1. Jahromi M, Razavi S, Seyedebrahimi R, Reisi P, Kazemi M. Regeneration of rat sciatic nerve using PLGA conduit containing rat ADSCs with controlled release of BDNF and gold nanoparticles. J Mol Neurosci 2021;71:746–760.
      1. Dolkhani S, Najafpour A, Mohammadi R. Fabrication and transplantation of chitosan-selenium biodegradable nanocomposite conduit on transected sciatic nerve: a novel study in rat model. Neurol Res 2020;42:439–450.
      1. Ezra M, Bushman J, Shreiber D, Schachner M, Kohn J. Porous and nonporous nerve conduits: the effects of a hydrogel luminal filler with and without a neurite-promoting moiety. Tissue Eng Part A 2016;22:818–826.
      1. Monfared A, Ghaee A, Ebrahimi-Barough S. Fabrication of tannic acid/poly (N-vinylpyrrolidone) layer-by-layer coating on Mg-based metallic glass for nerve tissue regeneration application. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2018;170:617–626.
      1. Bahremandi Tolou N, Salimijazi H, Kharaziha M, Faggio G, Chierchia R, Lisi N. A three-dimensional nerve guide conduit based on graphene foam/polycaprolactone. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2021;126:112110
      1. Lizarraga-Valderrama LR, Ronchi G, Nigmatullin R, Fregnan F, Basnett P, Paxinou A, et al. Preclinical study of peripheral nerve regeneration using nerve guidance conduits based on polyhydroxyalkanaotes. Bioeng Transl Med 2021;6:e10223
      1. Scaccini L, Mezzena R, De Masi A, Gagliardi M, Gambarotta G, Cecchini M, et al. Chitosan micro-grooved membranes with increased asymmetry for the improvement of the Schwann cell response in nerve regeneration. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:7901
      1. Ferreira CL, Valente CA, Zanini ML, Sgarioni B, Ferreira Tondo PH, Chagastelles PC, et al. Biocompatible PCL/PLGA/polypyrrole composites for regenerating nerves. Macromol Symp 2019;383:1800028
      1. Ghafaralahi S, Ebrahimian-Hosseinabadi M, Zargar Kharazi A. Poly (glycerol-sebacate)/poly (caprolactone)/graphene nanocomposites for nerve tissue engineering. J Bioact Compat Polym 2018;33:529–542.
      1. Lowe CJ, Reucroft IM, Grota MC, Shreiber DI. Production of highly aligned collagen scaffolds by freeze-drying of self-assembled, fibrillar collagen gels. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2016;2:643–651.
      1. Ryan AJ, Lackington WA, Hibbitts AJ, Matheson A, Alekseeva T, Stejskalova A, et al. A physicochemically optimized and neuroconductive biphasic nerve guidance conduit for peripheral nerve repair. Adv Healthc Mater 2017;6:1700954
      1. Zhang W, Zhang L, Liu J, Zhang L, Zhang J, Tang P. Repairing sciatic nerve injury with an EPO-loaded nerve conduit and sandwiched-in strategy of transplanting mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 2017;142:90–100.
      1. Chen F, Wu M, Wu P, Xiao A, Ke M, Huselstein C, et al. Natural flammulina velutipes-based nerve guidance conduit as a potential biomaterial for peripheral nerve regeneration: in vitro and in vivo studies. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2021;7:3821–3834.
      1. Yu L, Zhang W, Jiang Y, Guo C. Gradient degradable nerve guidance conduit with multilayer structure prepared by electrospinning. Mater Lett 2020;276:128238
      1. Chen X, Ge X, Qian Y, Tang H, Song J, Qu X, et al. Electrospinning multilayered scaffolds loaded with melatonin and Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles for peripheral nerve regeneration. Adv Funct Mater 2020;30:2004537
      1. Askarzadeh N, Nazarpak MH, Mansoori K, Farokhi M, Gholami M, Mohammadi J, et al. Bilayer cylindrical conduit consisting of electrospun polycaprolactone nanofibers and DSC cross-linked sodium alginate hydrogel to bridge peripheral nerve gaps. Macromol Biosci 2020;20:e2000149
      1. Lin F, Wang X, Wang Y, Yang Y, Li Y. Preparation and biocompatibility of electrospinning PDLLA/β-TCP/collagen for peripheral nerve regeneration. RSC Adv 2017;7:41593–41602.
      1. Kang Y, Chen P, Shi X, Zhang G, Wang C. Multilevel structural stereocomplex polylactic acid/collagen membranes by pattern electrospinning for tissue engineering. Polymer 2018;156:250–260.
      1. Attalla R, Puersten E, Jain N, Selvaganapathy PR. 3D bioprinting of heterogeneous bi- and tri-layered hollow channels within gel scaffolds using scalable multi-axial microfluidic extrusion nozzle. Biofabrication 2018;11:015012
      1. Uz M, Donta M, Mededovic M, Sakaguchi DS, Mallapragada SK. Development of gelatin and graphene-based nerve regeneration conduits using three-dimensional (3D) printing strategies for electrical transdifferentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Ind Eng Chem Res 2019;58:7421–7427.
      1. Nawrotek K, Mąkiewicz M, Zawadzki D. Fabrication and characterization of polycaprolactone/chitosan-hydroxyapatite hybrid implants for peripheral nerve regeneration. Polymers (Basel) 2021;13:775
      1. Ye W, Li H, Yu K, Xie C, Wang P, Zheng Y, et al. 3D printing of gelatin methacrylate-based nerve guidance conduits with multiple channels. Mater Des 2020;192:108757
      1. Tao J, Liu H, Wu W, Zhang J, Liu S, Zhang J, et al. 3D-printed nerve conduits with live platelets for effective peripheral nerve repair. Adv Funct Mater 2020;30:2004272
      1. Zhang J, Chen Y, Huang Y, Wu W, Deng X, Liu H, et al. A 3D-printed self-adhesive bandage with drug release for peripheral nerve repair. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2020;7:2002601
    Cited by
    Crossref 21
    Google Scholar 
    PubMed Central 15
    Scopus 24
    MeSH Terms
    Axons
    Biological Products
    Hostility
    Learning
    Nerve Regeneration*
    Neurons
    Peripheral Nerves
    Polymers
    Solvents
    Spinal Cord
    Spinal Cord Injuries
    Metrics
    Share
    Links to
    Figures
    slide
    slide

    1 / 2

    Tables
    slide
    slide

    1 / 2

    ORCID IDs
    Funding Information
    PERMALINK